COINTELPRO

The FBI initiated COINTELPRO, an abbreviation for Counterintelligence Program, in 1956 with the aim of undermining the operations of the Communist Party of the United States. In the 1960s, the scope of the organization was broadened to encompass various additional domestic factions, including the Ku Klux Klan, the Socialist Workers Party, and the Black Panther Party. The cessation of all COINTELPRO operations occurred in 1971. Despite its relatively small scale (constituting approximately 0.2% of the FBI's overall workload during a 15-year timeframe), COINTELPRO was subsequently subject to criticism from both Congress and the American public for infringing upon first amendment rights and other grounds.{{Cite web|url=https://vault.fbi.gov/cointel-pro|title=FBI Records: The Vault — COINTELPRO|accessdate=19 February 2024}}

Tactics included anonymous phone calls, Internal Revenue Service (IRS) audits, and the creation of documents that would divide the American communist organization internally. An October 1956 memo from Hoover reclassified the FBI's ongoing surveillance of black leaders, including it within COINTELPRO, with the justification that the movement was infiltrated by communists.{{harvnb|Weiner|2012|p=198|ps=: "On October 2, 1956, Hoover stepped up the FBI's long-standing surveillance of black civil rights activists. He sent a COINTELPRO memo to the field, warning that the Communist Party was seeking to infiltrate the movement." }} In 1956, Hoover sent an open letter denouncing Dr. T. R. M. Howard, a civil rights leader, surgeon, and wealthy entrepreneur in Mississippi who had criticized FBI inaction in solving recent murders of George W. Lee, Emmett Till, and other African Americans in the South.{{Cite book |title=Black Maverick: T. R. M. Howard's Fight for Civil Rights and Economic Power |last1=Beito |first1=David T. |last2=Beito |first2=Linda Royster |date=2009 |publisher=University of Illinois Press |isbn=978-0-252-03420-6 |location=Urbana |pages=148, 154–159 |oclc=690465801}} When the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC), an African-American civil rights organization, was founded in 1957, the FBI began to monitor and target the group almost immediately, focusing particularly on Bayard Rustin, Stanley Levison, and eventually Martin Luther King Jr.{{harvnb|Weiner|2012|p=200}}.

File:Mlk-uncovered-letter.png"{{Cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/16/magazine/what-an-uncensored-letter-to-mlk-reveals.html |title=What an Uncensored Letter to M. L. K. Reveals |last=Gage |first=Beverly |date=2014-11-11 |work=The New York Times |access-date=2015-01-09 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150107190622/http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/16/magazine/what-an-uncensored-letter-to-mlk-reveals.html |archive-date=2015-01-07}} that the FBI mailed anonymously to Martin Luther King Jr.. King interpreted the letter as an effort to persuade him to commit suicide. More portions of the letter would be released in 2014.]]

After the 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, Hoover singled out King as a major target for COINTELPRO. Under pressure from Hoover to focus on King, Sullivan wrote:{{harvnb|Weiner|2012|p=235}}.

{{Blockquote|In the light of King's powerful demagogic speech ... We must mark him now if we have not done so before, as the most dangerous Negro of the future in this nation from the standpoint of communism, the Negro, and national security.}}

Soon after, the FBI was systematically bugging King's home and his hotel rooms, as they were now aware that King was growing in stature daily as the most prominent leader of the civil rights movement.{{harvnb|Weiner|2012|p=236|ps=: "The bugs got quick results. When King traveled, as he did constantly in the ensuing weeks, to Washington, Milwaukee, Los Angeles, and Honolulu, the Bureau planted hidden microphones in his hotel rooms. The FBI placed a total of eight wiretaps and sixteen bugs on King." }}.

In the mid-1960s, King began to publicly criticize the Bureau for giving insufficient attention to the use of terrorism by white supremacists. Hoover responded by publicly calling King the most "notorious liar" in the United States.{{Cite book |url={{google books|CUI6tY9RJUYC|plainurl=yes}} |title=Pillar of Fire: America in the King Years 1963–1965 |last=Branch |first=Taylor |date=1999 |publisher=Simon & Schuster |isbn=978-1-4165-5870-5 |pages=524–529 |oclc=933467815 |author-link=Taylor Branch |via=Google Books}} In his 1991 memoir, Washington Post journalist Carl Rowan asserted that the FBI had sent at least one anonymous letter to King encouraging him to commit suicide.{{Cite book |url=https://archive.org/details/breakingbarriers00rowa/page/260 |title=Breaking Barriers: A Memoir |last=Rowan |first=Carl T. |date=1991 |publisher=Little, Brown |isbn=978-0-316-75977-9 |edition=1st |location=Boston |page=[https://archive.org/details/breakingbarriers00rowa/page/260 260] |oclc=22110131 |author-link=Carl Rowan }} Historian Taylor Branch documents an anonymous "suicide package" sent by the FBI on November 21, 1964, that contained audio recordings obtained through tapping King's phone and placing bugs throughout various hotel rooms over the previous two years,{{Cite book |title=The COINTELPRO Papers: Documents from the FBI's Secret Wars Against Dissent in the United States |title-link=The COINTELPRO Papers |last1=Churchill |first1=Ward |last2=Vander Wall |first2=Jim |date=2002 |publisher=South End Press |isbn=978-0-89608-648-7 |author-link=Ward Churchill |orig-year=1990}} and that was created two days after the announcement of King's impending Nobel Peace Prize. The tape, which was prepared by FBI audio technician John Matter, documented a series of sexual indiscretions by King combined with a letter telling him: "There is only one way out for you. You better take it before your filthy, abnormal, fraudulent self is bared to the nation".{{harvnb|Branch|1999|pp=527–529}}. King believed that he was subsequently informed that the audio would be released to the media if he did not acquiesce and commit suicide prior to accepting his Nobel Peace Prize. When King refused to satisfy their coercion tactics, FBI Associate Director, Cartha D. DeLoach, commenced a media campaign offering the surveillance transcript to various news organizations, including Newsweek and Newsday. Even by 1969, as has been noted elsewhere, "[FBI] efforts to 'expose' Martin Luther King Jr. had not slackened even though King had been dead for a year. [The Bureau] furnished ammunition to opponents that enabled attacks on King's memory, and ... tried to block efforts to honor the slain leader." However, more portions of the FBI letter to King were made public in 2014 which suggested that the FBI's intent was to push King out of leadership and have "older leaders" like Roy Wilkins lead the civil right movement. The claim that the FBI's intent was to remove King from SCLC leadership was also previously backed in 1976 by the findings of the Church Committee.{{citation|last=Church|first= Frank|author-link= Frank Church|title= Church Committee Book III| work =Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Case Study| publisher= Church Committee| date=April 23, 1976}}

During the same period the program also targeted Malcolm X. While an FBI spokesman has denied that the FBI was "directly" involved in Malcolm's murder in 1965, it is documented that the Bureau worked to "widen the rift" between Malcolm and Elijah Muhammad through infiltration and the "sparking of acrimonious debates within the organization", rumor-mongering, and other tactics designed to foster internal disputes, which ultimately led to Malcolm's assassination.{{harvnb|Branch|1999|p=243}}.{{Cite news |url=https://www.baltimoresun.com/2000/05/14/fbi-should-acknowledge-complicity-in-the-assassination-of-malcolm-x/ |title=FBI should acknowledge complicity in the assassination of Malcolm X |last=Kane |first=Gregory |date=14 May 2000 |work=Baltimore Sun |access-date=26 May 2015 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150524001225/http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2000-05-14/news/0005140182_1_malcolm-x-kill-malcolm-muhammad |archive-date=24 May 2015 |df=dmy-all}} The FBI heavily infiltrated Malcolm's Organization of Afro-American Unity in the final months of his life. The Pulitzer Prize-winning biography of Malcolm X by Manning Marable asserts that most of the men who plotted Malcolm's assassination were never apprehended and that the full extent of the FBI's involvement in his death cannot be known.{{Cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/19/books/review/book-review-malcolm-x-by-manning-marable.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 |title=Malcolm X: Criminal, Minister, Humanist, Martyr |last=Touré |date=17 June 2011 |work=The New York Times |access-date=26 February 2017 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170829123552/http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/19/books/review/book-review-malcolm-x-by-manning-marable.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 |archive-date=29 August 2017 |department=Sunday Book Review |page=BR18 |df=dmy-all}}{{Cite conference |last=Douglass |first=James W. |date=29 March 2006 |title=The Converging Martyrdom of Malcolm and Martin |url=http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/Unspeakable/ConvMartyrdom.html#fn3 |conference=Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Lecture |location=Princeton Theological Seminary |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150125055454/http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/Unspeakable/ConvMartyrdom.html#fn3 |archive-date=25 January 2015 |access-date=17 October 2014 |url-status=live |df=dmy-all}}

Amidst the urban unrest of July–August 1967, the FBI began "COINTELPRO–BLACK HATE", which focused on King and the SCLC, as well as the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), the Revolutionary Action Movement (RAM), the Deacons for Defense and Justice, Congress of Racial Equality (CORE), and the Nation of Islam.{{Cite web |url=http://cisupa.proquest.com/ksc_assets/catalog/101095_FBIBlackExtrOrgsPt1COINTELPRO.pdf |title=Guide to the Microfilm Edition of FBI Surveillance Files: Black Extremist Organizations, Part 1 |website=Lexis-Nexis |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130603094342/http://cisupa.proquest.com/ksc_assets/catalog/101095_FBIBlackExtrOrgsPt1COINTELPRO.pdf |archive-date=2013-06-03 |access-date=2014-10-07}} BLACK HATE established the Ghetto Informant Program and instructed 23 FBI offices to "disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize the activities of black nationalist hate type organizations".{{harvnb|Weiner|2012|p=271}}.

A March 1968 memo stated the program's goal was to "prevent the coalition of militant black nationalist groups"; to "Prevent the RISE OF A 'MESSIAH' who could unify ... the militant black nationalist movement"; "to pinpoint potential troublemakers and neutralize them before they exercise their potential for violence [against authorities]"; to "Prevent militant black nationalist groups and leaders from gaining RESPECTABILITY, by discrediting them to ... both the responsible community and to liberals who have vestiges of sympathy"; and to "prevent the long-range GROWTH of militant black organizations, especially among youth". Dr. King was said to have potential to be the "messiah" figure, should he abandon nonviolence and integrationism,{{Cite web |url=http://herb.ashp.cuny.edu/items/show/814 |title=The FBI Sets Goals for COINTELPRO |last=Hoover |first=J. Edgar |website=HERB: Resources for Teachers |publisher=City University of New York |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141012143108/http://herb.ashp.cuny.edu/items/show/814 |archive-date=2014-10-12 |access-date=2014-10-07}} and Stokely Carmichael was noted to have "the necessary charisma to be a real threat in this way" as he was portrayed as someone who espoused a much more militant vision of "black power".{{Cite news |url=http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weisberg%20Subject%20Index%20Files/F%20Disk/FBI/FBI%20Hampton%20Case%20ONeil%20William%20Jr/Item%2005.pdf |title=Hoover Rated Carmichael As 'Black Messiah' |last=Warden |first=Rob |date=February 10, 1976 |work=Chicago Daily News |access-date=October 8, 2014 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304043005/http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weisberg%20Subject%20Index%20Files/F%20Disk/FBI/FBI%20Hampton%20Case%20ONeil%20William%20Jr/Item%2005.pdf |archive-date=March 4, 2016 |via=Harold Weisberg Archive, Hood College |df=mdy-all}} While the FBI was particularly concerned with leaders and organizers, they did not limit their scope of target to the heads of organizations. Individuals, e.g. writers, were also listed among the targets of operations.{{Cite book |title=The COINTELPRO Papers: Documents from the FBI's Secret Wars Against Domestic Dissent |last1=Churchill |first1=Ward |last2=Vander Wall |first2=Jim |date=1990 |publisher=South End Press |isbn=978-0896083608 |location=Boston |oclc=21908953 |author-link=Ward Churchill}}

This program coincided with a broader federal effort to prepare military responses for urban riots and began increased collaboration between the FBI, Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency, and the Department of Defense. The CIA launched its own domestic espionage project in 1967 called Operation CHAOS.{{harvnb|Weiner|2012|p=272|ps=: "Some 1,500 army intelligence officers in civilian clothing undertook the surveillance of some 100,000 American citizens. Army intelligence shared all their reports over the next three years. The CIA tracked antiwar leaders and black militants who traveled overseas, and it reported back to the FBI. The FBI, in turn, shared thousands of selected files on Americans with army intelligence and the CIA. All three intelligence services sent the names of Americans to the National Security Agency for inclusion on a global watch list; the NSA relayed back to the FBI hundreds of transcripts of intercepted telephone calls to and from suspect Americans."}} A particular target was the Poor People's Campaign, a national effort organized by King and the SCLC to occupy Washington, DC. The FBI monitored and disrupted the campaign on a national level, while using targeted smear tactics locally to undermine support for the march.{{harvnb|McKnight|1998|pp=26–28|ps=: "By March the Hoover Bureau's campaign against King was virtually on a total war footing. In a March 21 'urgent' teletype, Hoover urged all field offices involved in the POCAM project to exploit every tactic in the bureau's arsenal of covert political warfare to bring down King and the SCLC."}} The Black Panther Party was another targeted organization, wherein the FBI collaborated to destroy the party from the inside out.

Overall, COINTELPRO encompassed disruption and sabotage of the Socialist Workers Party (1961), the Ku Klux Klan (1964), the Nation of Islam, the Black Panther Party (1967), and the entire New Left social/political movement, which included antiwar, community, and religious groups (1968). A later investigation by the Senate's Church Committee (see below) stated that "COINTELPRO began in 1956, in part because of frustration with Supreme Court rulings limiting the Government's power to proceed overtly against dissident groups."{{Cite web |url=https://www.muckrock.com/news/archives/2017/dec/08/fbi-kkk/ |title=FBI leadership claimed Bureau was 'almost powerless' against KKK, despite making up one-fifth of its membership |date=December 8, 2017 |publisher=Muckrock |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190124203613/https://www.muckrock.com/news/archives/2017/dec/08/fbi-kkk/ |archive-date=2019-01-24 |access-date=2018-12-08}} Official congressional committees and several court casesSee, for example, [http://www.leagle.com/decision/1984738737F2d1_1738/HOBSON%20v.%20WILSON Hobson v. Wilson], {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170410213857/http://www.leagle.com/decision/1984738737F2d1_1738/HOBSON%20v.%20WILSON |date=2017-04-10 }}, 737 F.2d 1 (1984); [https://www.leagle.com/decision/2001791257F3d534_1744/RUGIERO%20v.%20U.S.%20DEPT.%20OF%20JUSTICE Rugiero v. U.S. Department of Justice], {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170410213803/https://www.leagle.com/decision/2001791257F3d534_1744/RUGIERO%20v.%20U.S.%20DEPT.%20OF%20JUSTICE |date=2017-04-10 }}, 257 F.3d 534, 546 (2001). have concluded that COINTELPRO operations against communist and socialist groups exceeded statutory limits on FBI activity and violated constitutional guarantees of freedom of speech and association.

{{main|Citizens' Commission to Investigate the FBI|Church Committee}}

File:One Vets Sq Media Delco PA.JPG]]

The program was secret until March 8, 1971, when the Citizens' Commission to Investigate the FBI burgled an FBI field office in Media, Pennsylvania, took several dossiers, and exposed the program by passing this material to news agencies.{{Cite web |url=https://www.pbs.org/independentlens/1971/ |title=1971: Citizens Who Exposed COINTELPRO |last=Hamilton |first=Johanna |date=18 May 2015 |website=PBS: Independent Lens |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924131425/http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/1971/ |archive-date=24 September 2015 |access-date=25 August 2017 |df=dmy-all}} The boxing match known as the Fight of the Century between Muhammad Ali and Joe Frazier in March 1971 provided cover for the activist group to successfully pull off the burglary. Muhammad Ali was a COINTELPRO target because he had joined the Nation of Islam and the anti-war movement.{{Cite web |url=https://theintercept.com/2016/06/06/in-1971-muhammad-ali-helped-undermine-the-fbis-illegal-spying-on-americans/ |title=In 1971, Muhammad Ali Helped Undermine the FBI's Illegal Spying on Americans |last=Medsger |first=Betty|author-link= Betty Medsger|date=June 6, 2016 |website=The Intercept |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170427235216/https://theintercept.com/2016/06/06/in-1971-muhammad-ali-helped-undermine-the-fbis-illegal-spying-on-americans/ |archive-date=April 27, 2017 |access-date=April 17, 2017 |df=mdy-all}}

Many news organizations initially refused to immediately publish the information, with the notable exception of The Washington Post. After affirming the reliability of the documents, it published them on the front page (in defiance of the Attorney General's request), prompting other organizations to follow suit. Within the year, Director J. Edgar Hoover declared that the centralized COINTELPRO was over, and that all future counterintelligence operations would be handled case by case.{{Cite web |url=http://www.albionmonitor.net/9905a/jbcointelpro.html |title=A Short History of FBI COINTELPRO |last1=Cassidy |first1=Mike |last2=Miller |first2=Will |date=May 26, 1999 |website=Albion Monitor |publisher=Wayward Press |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070928104133/http://www.albionmonitor.net/9905a/jbcointelpro.html |archive-date=September 28, 2007 |access-date=July 13, 2007}}{{harvnb|Weiner|2012|p=293}}.

Additional documents were revealed in the course of separate lawsuits filed against the FBI by NBC correspondent Carl Stern, the Socialist Workers Party, and a number of other groups. In 1976 the Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities of the United States Senate, commonly referred to as the "Church Committee" after its chairman, Senator Frank Church (D-Idaho), launched a major investigation of the FBI and COINTELPRO. Many released documents have been partly or entirely redacted.

The Final Report of the Select Committee castigated the conduct of the intelligence community in its domestic operations (including COINTELPRO) in no uncertain terms:

{{blockquote|The Committee finds that the domestic activities of the intelligence community at times violated specific statutory prohibitions and infringed the constitutional rights of American citizens. The legal questions involved in intelligence programs were often not considered. On other occasions, they were intentionally disregarded in the belief that because the programs served the "national security" the law did not apply. While intelligence officers on occasion failed to disclose to their superiors programs which were illegal or of questionable legality, the Committee finds that the most serious breaches of duty were those of senior officials, who were responsible for controlling intelligence activities and generally failed to assure compliance with the law.

Many of the techniques used would be intolerable in a democratic society even if all of the targets had been involved in violent activity, but COINTELPRO went far beyond that ... the Bureau conducted a sophisticated vigilante operation aimed squarely at preventing the exercise of First Amendment rights of speech and association, on the theory that preventing the growth of dangerous groups and the propagation of dangerous ideas would protect the national security and deter violence.}}

The Church Committee documented a history of the FBI (initially called BOI until 1936) exercising political repression as far back as World War I, and through the 1920s, when agents were charged with rounding up "anarchists, communists, socialists, reformists and revolutionaries" for deportation. From 1936 through 1976, the domestic operations were increased against political and anti-war groups.

The FBI claimed that the purpose behind COINTELPRO was to "expose, disrupt, misdirect, or otherwise neutralize" groups that the FBI officials believed were "subversive"{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zBgDPupR_lMC&pg=PA182 |title=Surveillance and governance: crime control and beyond |last=Deflam|first=Mathieu |publisher=Emerald Publishing Group |year=2008 |isbn=978-0-7623-1416-4 |page=182 |access-date=2017-12-29 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190405144752/https://books.google.com/books?id=zBgDPupR_lMC&pg=PA182 |archive-date=2019-04-05 |url-status=live}} by instructing FBI field operatives to:{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zBgDPupR_lMC&pg=PA184 |title=Surveillance and governance: crime control and beyond |last=Deflam|first=Mathieu |publisher=Emerald Publishing Group |year=2008 |isbn=978-0-7623-1416-4 |pages=184–185 |access-date=2017-12-29 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190405164813/https://books.google.com/books?id=zBgDPupR_lMC&pg=PA184 |archive-date=2019-04-05 |url-status=live}}

1. Create a negative public image for target groups (for example through surveilling activists and then releasing negative personal information to the public)
2. Break down internal organization by creating conflicts (for example, by having agents exacerbate racial tensions, or send anonymous letters to try to create conflicts)
3. Create dissension between groups (for example, by spreading rumors that other groups were stealing money)
4. Restrict access to public resources (for example, by pressuring non-profit organizations to cut off funding or material support)
5. Restrict the ability to organize protest (for example, through agents promoting violence against police during planning and at protests)
6. Restrict the ability of individuals to participate in group activities (for example, by character assassinations, false arrests, surveillance)

At its inception, the program's main target was the Communist Party.

In an interview with the BBC's Andrew Marr in February 1996, Noam Chomsky—a political activist and MIT professor of linguistics—spoke about the purpose and the targets of COINTELPRO, saying:{{Cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oG24vg8js4o|title=Noam Chomsky v Andrew Marr: 'The Big Idea' Part 2|date=August 27, 2006 |accessdate=19 February 2024|via=www.youtube.com}}

{{quote|COINTELPRO was a program of subversion carried out not by a couple of petty crooks but by the national political police, the FBI, under four administrations ... by the time it got through, I won't run through the whole story, it was aimed at the entire new left, at the women's movement, at the whole black movement, it was extremely broad. Its actions went as far as political assassination.}}

According to the Church Committee:{{Cite book |url=https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/94755_II.pdf |title=Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities (Book II, Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans) |year=1976 |page=213}}

{{quote|

While the declared purposes of these programs were to protect the "national security" or prevent violence, Bureau witnesses admit that many of the targets were nonviolent and most had no connections with a foreign power. Indeed, nonviolent organizations and individuals were targeted because the Bureau believed they represented a "potential" for violence—and nonviolent citizens who were against the war in Vietnam were targeted because they gave "aid and comfort" to violent demonstrators by lending respectability to their cause.

The imprecision of the targeting is demonstrated by the inability of the Bureau to define the subjects of the programs. The Black Nationalist program, according to its supervisor, included "a great number of organizations that you might not today characterize as black nationalist but which were in fact primarily black". Thus, the nonviolent Southern Christian Leadership Conference was labeled as a Black Nationalist "Hate Group".

Furthermore, the actual targets were chosen from a far broader group than the titles of the programs would imply. The CPUSA program targeted not only Communist Party members but also sponsors of the National Committee to Abolish the House Un-American Activities Committee and civil rights leaders allegedly under Communist influence or deemed to be not sufficiently "anti-Communist". The Socialist Workers Party program included non-SWP sponsors of anti-war demonstrations which were cosponsored by the SWP or the Young Socialist Alliance, its youth group. The Black Nationalist program targeted a range of organizations from the Panthers to SNCC to the peaceful Southern Christian Leadership Conference, and included every Black Student Union and many other black student groups. New Left targets ranged from the SDS to the InterUniversity Committee for Debate on Foreign Policy, from Antioch College ("vanguard of the New Left") to the New Mexico Free University and other "alternate" schools, and from underground newspapers to students' protesting university censorship of a student publication by carrying signs with four-letter words on them.}}

Examples of surveillance, spanning all presidents from FDR to Nixon, both legal and illegal, contained in the Church Committee report:{{Cite book |url=https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/94755_II.pdf |title=Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities (Book II, Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans) |year=1976 |page=9}}

• President Roosevelt (1933–1945) asked the FBI to put in its files the names of citizens sending telegrams to the White House opposing his "national defense" policy and supporting Col. Charles Lindbergh.
• President Truman (1945–1953) received inside information on a former Roosevelt aide's efforts to influence his appointments, labor union negotiating plans, and the publishing plans of journalists.
• President Eisenhower (1953–1961) received reports on purely political and social contacts with foreign officials by Bernard Baruch, Eleanor Roosevelt, and Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas.
• The Kennedy administration (1961–1963) had the FBI wiretap a congressional staff member, three executive officials, a lobbyist, and a Washington law firm. US Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy received the fruits of an FBI wiretap on Martin Luther King Jr. and an electronic listening device targeting a congressman, both of which yielded information of a political nature.
• President Johnson (1963–1969) asked the FBI to conduct "name checks" of his critics and members of the staff of his 1964 opponent, Senator Barry Goldwater. He also requested purely political intelligence on his critics in the Senate and received extensive intelligence reports on political activity at the 1964 Democratic Convention from FBI electronic surveillance.
• President Nixon (1969–1974) authorized a program of wiretaps, which produced for the White House purely political or personal information unrelated to national security, including information about a Supreme Court Justice.

Groups that were known to be targets of COINTELPRO operations include:Various Church Committee reports reproduced online at ICDC: [http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/churchfinalreportIIa.htm Final Report, 2A] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061019170937/http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/churchfinalreportIIa.htm |date=2006-10-19 }}; [http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/churchfinalreportIIcb.htm Final Report, 2Cb] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050407085238/http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/churchfinalreportIIcb.htm |date=2005-04-07 }}; [http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/churchfinalreportIIIa.htm Final Report, 3A] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111113092955/http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/churchfinalreportIIIa.htm |date=2011-11-13 }}; [http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/churchfinalreportIIIg.htm Final Report, 3G] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050407051001/http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/churchfinalreportIIIg.htm |date=2005-04-07 }}. Various COINTELPRO documents reproduced online at ICDC: [http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/cpusa.htm CPUSA] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080211104916/http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/cpusa.htm |date=2008-02-11 }}; [http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/swp.htm SWP] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061210110450/http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/swp.htm |date=2006-12-10 }}; [http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/blacknationalist.htm Black Nationalist] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080422174359/http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/blacknationalist.htm |date=2008-04-22 }}; [http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/whitehate.htm White Hate] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080228011953/http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/whitehate.htm |date=2008-02-28 }}; [http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/newleft.htm New Left] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080214121914/http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/newleft.htm |date=2008-02-14 }}; [http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/pr.htm Puerto Rico] .

• Communist and socialist organizations.
• Organizations and individuals associated with the civil rights movement, including Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and others associated with the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, the Congress of Racial Equality, and other civil rights organizations.
• Black nationalist groups.
• The Young Lords.
• The American Indian Movement.
• White supremacist groups, including the Ku Klux Klan.
• The National States' Rights Party.
• A broad range of organizations labeled "New Left", Students for a Democratic Society the Weathermen, and environmental activists.
• Almost all groups protesting the Vietnam War, as well as individual student demonstrators with no group affiliation.
• The National Lawyers Guild.
• Organizations and individuals associated with the women's rights movement.
• Nationalist groups, such as those seeking independence for Puerto Rico, reunification of Ireland, and Cuban exile movements including Orlando Bosch's Cuban Power and the Cuban Nationalist Movement.
• Additional notable American individuals.

The COINTELPRO operators targeted multiple groups at once and encouraged splintering of these groups from within. In letter-writing campaigns (wherein false letters were sent on behalf of members of parties), the FBI ensured that groups would not unite in their causes. For instance, they launched a campaign specifically to alienate the Black Panther Party from the Mau Maus, Young Lords, Young Patriots and SDS. These racially diverse groups had been building alliances, in part due to charismatic leaders, such as Fred Hampton and his attempts to create a "Rainbow Coalition". The FBI was concerned with ensuring that groups could not gain traction through unity, specifically across racial lines. One of the main ways of targeting these groups was to arouse suspicion between the different parties and causes. In this way the bureau took on a divide-and-conquer offensive.

The COINTELPRO documents show numerous cases of the FBI's intentions to prevent and disrupt protests against the Vietnam War. Many techniques were used to accomplish this task. "These included promoting splits among antiwar forces, encouraging red-baiting of socialists, and pushing violent confrontations as an alternative to massive, peaceful demonstrations." One 1966 COINTELPRO operation tried to redirect the Socialist Workers Party from their pledge of support for the antiwar movement.{{Cite book |title=COINTELPRO: The FBI's Secret War on Political Freedom |last=Blackstock |first=Nelson |publisher=Pathfinder |year=1975 |isbn=0-87348-877-6 |location=New York |pages=111 |oclc=46439435}}

The FBI has said that it no longer undertakes COINTELPRO or COINTELPRO-like operations. However, critics have claimed that agency programs in the spirit of COINTELPRO targeted groups such as the Committee in Solidarity with the People of El Salvador,Gelbspan, Ross. (1991) Break-Ins, Death Threats, and the FBI: The Covert War Against the Central America Movement, Boston: South End Press. the American Indian Movement,Churchill, Ward; and James Vander Wall. Agents of Repression: The FBI's Secret Wars against the Black Panther Party and the American Indian Movement, 1988, Boston, South End Press. Earth First!,Pickett, Karen. [http://www.earthfirstjournal.org/article.php?id=132 "Earth First! Takes the FBI to Court: Judi Bari and Darryl Cherney's Case Heard after 12 Years], {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091115151451/http://www.earthfirstjournal.org/article.php?id=132 |date=2009-11-15 }}, Earth First Journal, no date. and the anti-globalization movement.{{Cite news |url=http://inthesetimes.com/article/1628/to_the_extreme1 |title=To the Extreme |last=Hoffman |first=Hank |date=2001-10-01 |work=In These Times |access-date=2018-12-11 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181215173118/http://inthesetimes.com/article/1628/to_the_extreme1 |archive-date=2018-12-15 |language=en-US |issn=0160-5992}}

File:Fred Hampton dead body.jpg, national spokesman for the Black Panther Party, who was assassinated{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ayGMaGUXpKQC&pg=PA10 |title=From the Bullet to the Ballot: The Illinois Chapter of the Black Panther Party and Racial Coalition Politics in Chicago |last=Williams |first=Jakobi |date=2013 |publisher=UNC Press Books |isbn=978-1469608167 |page=10 |language=en}}Michael Newton. [https://books.google.com/books?id=F4-dAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA205 Famous Assassinations in World History: An Encyclopedia] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170113035339/https://books.google.com/books?id=F4-dAwAAQBAJ&lpg=PA206&pg=PA205 |date=2017-01-13 }}. ABC-CLIO, p. 205. {{ISBN|1610692853}}{{Cite web |url=http://chicagocrimescenes.blogspot.com/2009/11/shoot-it-out-death-of-fred-hampton.html |title=Shoot It Out? The Death of Fred Hampton |last=Kendall |date=3 November 2009 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160315082445/http://chicagocrimescenes.blogspot.com/2009/11/shoot-it-out-death-of-fred-hampton.html |archive-date=15 March 2016 |access-date=18 April 2016 |df=dmy-all}} by members of the Chicago Police Department, with the raid itself being a COINTELPRO operation, although there is not proof the assassination itself was.]]

According to attorney Brian Glick in his book War at Home, the FBI used five main methods during COINTELPRO:

1. Infiltration: Agents and informers did not merely spy on political activists. Their main purpose was to discredit, disrupt and negatively redirect action. Their very presence served to undermine trust and scare off potential supporters. The FBI and police exploited this fear to smear genuine activists as agents.
2. Psychological warfare: The FBI and police used a myriad of "dirty tricks" to undermine movements. They planted false media stories and published bogus leaflets and other publications in the name of targeted groups. They forged correspondence, sent anonymous letters, and made anonymous telephone calls. They spread misinformation about meetings and events, set up pseudo movement groups run by government agents, and manipulated or strong-armed parents, employers, landlords, school officials, and others to cause trouble for activists. They used bad-jacketing to create suspicion about targeted activists, sometimes with lethal consequences.{{Citation |last=Ward Churchill |title=Agents of Repression |date=2002 |edition=Agents of Repression: The FBI's Secret Wars Against the Black Panther Party and the American Indian Movement |publisher=South End Press |isbn=978-0896086463 |oclc=50985124 |ol=25433596M |id=0896086461}}
3. Harassment via the legal system: The FBI and police abused the legal system to harass dissidents and make them appear to be criminals. Officers of the law gave perjured testimony and presented fabricated evidence as a pretext for false arrests and wrongful imprisonment. They discriminatorily enforced tax laws and other government regulations and used conspicuous surveillance, "investigative" interviews, and grand jury subpoenas in an effort to intimidate activists and silence their supporters.{{Cite web |url=http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/churchfinalreportIIIc.htm |title=The FBI'S Covert Action Program to Destroy the Black Panther Party |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130113102047/http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/churchfinalreportIIIc.htm |archive-date=2013-01-13 |access-date=2005-04-20}}{{Cite web |url=http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/church/reports/book3/html/ChurchB3_0001a.htm |title=Assassination Archive and Research Center |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140918004714/http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/church/reports/book3/html/ChurchB3_0001a.htm |archive-date=2014-09-18 |access-date=2015-05-05}}
4. Illegal force: The FBI conspired with local police departments to threaten dissidents; to conduct illegal break-ins in order to search dissident homes; and to commit vandalism, assaults, beatings and assassinations. The objective was to frighten or eliminate dissidents and disrupt their movements.
5. Undermine public opinion: One of the primary ways the FBI targeted organizations was by challenging their reputations in the community and denying them a platform to gain legitimacy. Hoover specifically designed programs to block leaders from "spreading their philosophy publicly or through the communications media". Furthermore, the organization created and controlled negative media meant to undermine black power organizations. For instance, they oversaw the creation of "documentaries" skillfully edited to paint the Black Panther Party as aggressive, and false newspapers that spread misinformation about party members. The ability of the FBI to create distrust within and between revolutionary organizations tainted their public image and weakened chances at unity and public support.

The FBI specifically developed tactics intended to heighten tension and hostility between various factions in the black power movement, for example between the Black Panthers and the US Organization. For instance, the FBI sent a fake letter to the US Organization exposing a supposed Black Panther plot to murder the head of the US Organization, Ron Karenga. They then intensified this by spreading falsely attributed cartoons in the black communities pitting the Black Panther Party against the US Organization. This resulted in numerous deaths, among which were San Diego Black Panther Party members John Huggins, Bunchy Carter and Sylvester Bell. Another example of the FBI's anonymous letter writing campaign is how they turned the Blackstone Rangers head, Jeff Fort, against former ally Fred Hampton, by stating that Hampton had a hit on Fort. They also were instrumental in developing the rift between Black Panther Party leaders Eldridge Cleaver and Huey Newton, as executed through false letters inciting the two leaders of the Black Panther Party.

Dhoruba Bin Wahad, a former Black Panther, reflects on how these tactics made him feel, saying he had a combat mentality and felt like he was at war with the government. When asked about why he thinks the Black Panthers were targeted he said, "In the United States, the equivalent of the military was the local police. During the early sixties, at the height of the civil rights movement, and the human rights movement, the police in the United States became increasingly militaristic. They began to train out of military bases in the United States. The Law Enforcement Assistance Act supplied local police with military technology, everything from assault rifles to army personnel carriers. In his opinion, the Counterintelligence Program went hand-in-hand with the militarization of the police in the Black community, with the militarization of police in America."{{Cite book |title=Still Black, Still Strong |last1=Bin Wahad |first1=Dhoruba |last2=Abu-Jamal |first2=Mumia |last3=Shakur |first3=Assata |date=1993 |publisher=Semiotext(e) |isbn=978-0936756745 |pages=18–19 |author-link=Dhoruba al-Mujahid bin Wahad |author-link2=Mumia Abu-Jamal |author-link3=Assata Shakur}}

The FBI also conspired with the police departments of many U.S. cities (San Diego, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Oakland, Philadelphia, Chicago) to encourage repeated raids on Black Panther homes—often with little or no evidence of violations of federal, state, or local laws—which resulted in the police killing many members of the Black Panther Party, most notably Chicago Black Panther Party Chairman Fred Hampton on December 4, 1969. Whether or not the FBI sanctioned his killing remains unproven.{{Cite book |title=A Taste of Power: A Black Woman's Story |last=Brown |first=Elaine |date=1992 |publisher=New York: Doubleday |isbn=978-0385471077 |pages=204–206}} Before the death of Hampton, long-term infiltrator, William O'Neal, shared floor plans of his apartment with the COINTELPRO team. He then gave Hampton a dose of secobarbital that rendered Hampton unconscious during the raid on his home.

In order to eliminate black militant leaders whom they considered dangerous, the FBI is believed to have worked with local police departments to target specific individuals,[http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/doc156.gif Paul Wolf, "COINTELPRO"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090927132811/http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/doc156.gif |date=2009-09-27 }}, ICDC accuse them of crimes they did not commit, suppress exculpatory evidence and falsely incarcerate them. Elmer "Geronimo" Pratt, a Black Panther Party leader, was incarcerated for 27 years before a California Superior Court vacated his murder conviction, ultimately freeing him. Appearing before the court, an FBI agent testified that he believed Pratt had been framed, because both the FBI and the Los Angeles Police Department knew he had not been in the area at the time the murder occurred.{{Cite news |url=http://www.cnn.com/US/9706/10/pratt.release/ |title=Former Black Panther freed after 27 years in jail |access-date=April 30, 2010 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090415190050/http://www.cnn.com/US/9706/10/pratt.release/ |archive-date=2009-04-15 |publisher=CNN}}{{Cite web|url=http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/law/inrepratt82CalRptr2d260.htm|title=In re Pratt, 82 Cal|accessdate=19 February 2024}}

Some sources claim that the FBI conducted more than 200 "black bag jobs",{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=s5qIj_h_PtkC |title=Whiteout: The CIA, Drugs and the Press |first1=Alexander |last1=Cockburn |first2=Jeffrey |last2=St. Clair |publisher=Verso |year=1998 |isbn=978-1-85984-139-6 |page=69 |author-link2=Jeffrey St. Clair |access-date=2015-12-12 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151228175904/https://books.google.com/books?id=s5qIj_h_PtkC&printsec=frontcover |archive-date=2015-12-28 |url-status=live|author1-link=Alexander Cockburn }}FBI document, 19 July 1966, DeLoach to Sullivan re: "Black Bag" Jobs. which were warrantless surreptitious entries, against the targeted groups and their members.{{Cite report |url=http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/churchfinalreportIIIf.htm |title=Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans, Book III: Warrantless Surreptitious Entries: FBI "Black Bag" Break-Ins and Microphone Installations |publisher=Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities United States Senate |date=23 April 1976 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050212101653/http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/churchfinalreportIIIf.htm |archive-date=12 February 2005 |url-status=dead}}

In 1969 the FBI special agent in San Francisco wrote Hoover that his investigation of the Black Panther Party had concluded that in his city, at least, the Panthers were primarily engaged in feeding breakfast to children. Hoover fired back a memo implying the agent's career goals would be directly affected by his supplying evidence to support Hoover's view that the Black Panther Party was "a violence-prone organization seeking to overthrow the Government by revolutionary means".FBI document, 27 May 1969, "Director FBI to SAC San Francisco", available at the FBI reading room.

Hoover supported using false claims to attack his political enemies. In one memo he wrote: "Purpose of counterintelligence action is to disrupt the Black Panther Party and it is immaterial whether facts exist to substantiate the charge."FBI document, 16 September 1970, Director FBI to SAC's in Baltimore, Detroit, Los Angeles, New Haven, San Francisco, and Washington Field Office. Available at the FBI reading room.

{{quote box|width=23em|Viola's family endured Hoover's claiming that cuts on her arm from the car's shattered window indicated "recent drug use" and that her proximity to Moton resembled "a necking party," despite an autopsy revealing no traces of drugs in her system and indicating she hadn't had sex recently before her death.|salign=right|source=—On the FBI's targeting of Viola Liuzzo{{cite web|last1=Britt|first1=Donna|title=A white mother went to Alabama to fight for civil rights. The Klan killed her for it.|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/retropolis/wp/2017/12/15/a-white-mother-went-to-alabama-to-fight-for-civil-rights-the-klan-killed-her-for-it//|website=washingtonpost.com|access-date=16 June 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200616153237/https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/retropolis/wp/2017/12/15/a-white-mother-went-to-alabama-to-fight-for-civil-rights-the-klan-killed-her-for-it//|url-status=dead|df=mdy-all|archive-date=June 16, 2020}}}}

In one particularly controversial 1965 incident, white civil rights worker Viola Liuzzo was murdered by Ku Klux Klansmen, who gave chase and fired shots into her car after noticing that her passenger was a young black man; one of the Klansmen was Gary Thomas Rowe, an acknowledged FBI informant.{{Cite book |title=The Informant: The FBI, the Ku Klux Klan, and the Murder of Viola Liuzzo |last=May |first=Gary |date=2005 |publisher=Yale University Press |isbn=978-0-300-18413-6 |location=New Haven |oclc=57549917}}{{Cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/30/AR2005063001422_pf.html |title=Jonathan Yardley |newspaper=The Washington Post |access-date=April 30, 2010 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110504041637/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/30/AR2005063001422_pf.html |archive-date=2011-05-04}} The FBI spread rumors that Liuzzo was a member of the Communist Party and had abandoned her children to have sexual relationships with African Americans involved in the civil rights movement.{{Cite web |url=http://www25-temp.uua.org/uuhs/duub/articles/violaliuzzo.html |title=Viola Liuzzo |first=Joanne |last=Giannino |website=Dictionary of Unitarian & Universalist Biography |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081227131648/http://www25-temp.uua.org/uuhs/duub/articles/violaliuzzo.html |archive-date=2008-12-27 |access-date=2008-09-29}}{{Cite web |url=http://www.detroitnews.com/history/viola/viola.htm |title=The Detroit housewife who moved a nation toward racial justice |first=Kay |last=Houston |website=The Detroit News, Rearview Mirror |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/19990427180231/http://www.detroitnews.com/history/viola/viola.htm |archive-date=1999-04-27}} FBI records show that J. Edgar Hoover personally communicated these insinuations to President Johnson.{{Cite web |url=http://www.plantingseedsmedia.com/violaliuzzo.html |title=Uncommon Courage: The Viola Liuzzo Story |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060223045502/http://www.plantingseedsmedia.com/violaliuzzo.html |archive-date=2006-02-23}}{{Cite book |title=From Selma to Sorrow: The Life and Death of Viola Liuzzo |first=Mary |last=Stanton |publisher=University of Georgia Press |year=2000 |page=190}} Despite this, three Klansmen would be convicted in a federal trial for Liuzzo's murder in December 1965.{{cite news|url=https://michiganadvance.com/briefs/on-this-day-in-1965-kkk-members-are-convicted-of-killing-civil-rights-activist/|title=On this day in 1965: KKK members are convicted of killing civil rights activist|first=Ken|last=Coleman|publisher=Michigan Advance|date=December 3, 2021|accessdate=July 24, 2024}}

FBI informant Rowe has also been implicated in some of the most violent crimes of the 1960s civil rights era, including attacks on the Freedom Riders and the 1963 Birmingham, Alabama 16th Street Baptist Church bombing.

The ACLU has claimed the FBI supported an extreme right-wing group of former Minutemen, transforming it into a group called the Secret Army Organization that targeted groups, activists, and leaders involved in the Anti-War Movement, using both intimidation and violent acts.{{cite journal |last1=Holles |first1=Everett R. |date=27 June 1975 |title=A.C.L.U. Says FBI Funded 'Army' to Terrorize Antiwar Protesters |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1975/06/27/archives/aclu-says-fbi-funded-army-to-terrorize-young-war-dissidents.html |url-status=live |journal=The New York Times |type=Newspaper |language=en |location=New York |pages=4 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20190727220038/https://www.nytimes.com/1975/06/27/archives/aclu-says-fbi-funded-army-to-terrorize-young-war-dissidents.html |archive-date=27 July 2019 |access-date=28 July 2019 |via=The New York Times Archives}} from the original on 28 July 2019. [https://archive.org/download/a.-c.-l.-u.-says-fbi-funded-army-to-terrorize-antiwar-protesters-everett-r.-holl/A.C.L.U.%20Says%20FBI%20Funded%20%27Army%27%20to%20Terrorize%20Antiwar%20Protesters%2C%20Everett%20R.%20Holles%20%28The%20New%20York%20Times%2C%20June%2027%2C%201975%29%20p.%204.pdf Original scan available.]{{Cite web |url=http://crca.ucsd.edu/~esisco/friendlyfire/A1972.html |title=1972 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070514043305/http://crca.ucsd.edu/~esisco/friendlyfire/A1972.html |archive-date=2007-05-14 |access-date=2009-01-26}}{{Cite book |title=International Handbook of Violence Research |last=Kowalewski |first=David |publisher=Springer Netherlands |year=2003 |isbn=9780306480393 |location=Dordrecht |pages=339–349 |chapter=Vigilantism |doi=10.1007/978-0-306-48039-3_18}}{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rofFPZc0nooC |title=Privacy, a Vanishing Value? |last=Andrews |first=Bruce |date=1980 |publisher=Fordham Univ Press |isbn=9780823210442 |editor-last=Bier |editor-first=William Christian |chapter=Privacy and the protection of national security |via=Google Books}}

Hoover ordered preemptive action "to pinpoint potential troublemakers and neutralize them before they exercise their potential for violence."

The final report of the Church Committee concluded:

Too many people have been spied upon by too many Government agencies and too much information has been illegally collected. The Government has often undertaken the secret surveillance of citizens on the basis of their political beliefs, even when those beliefs posed no threat of violence or illegal acts on behalf of a hostile foreign power. The Government, operating primarily through secret and biased informants, but also using other intrusive techniques, such as wiretaps, microphone "bugs", surreptitious mail opening, and break-ins, has swept in vast amounts of information about the personal lives, views, and associations of American citizens. Investigations of groups deemed potentially dangerous—and even of groups suspected of associating with potentially dangerous organizations—have continued for decades, despite the fact that those groups did not engage in unlawful activity.

Groups and individuals have been assaulted, repressed, harassed and disrupted because of their political views, social beliefs and their lifestyles. Investigations have been based upon vague standards whose breadth made excessive collection inevitable. Unsavory, harmful and vicious tactics have been employed—including anonymous attempts to break up marriages, disrupt meetings, ostracize persons from their professions, and provoke target groups into rivalries that might result in deaths. Intelligence agencies have served the political and personal objectives of presidents and other high officials. While the agencies often committed excesses in response to pressure from high officials in the Executive branch and Congress, they also occasionally initiated improper activities and then concealed them from officials whom they had a duty to inform.

Governmental officials—including those whose principal duty is to enforce the law—have violated or ignored the law over long periods of time and have advocated and defended their right to break the law.

The Constitutional system of checks and balances has not adequately controlled intelligence activities. Until recently the Executive branch has neither delineated the scope of permissible activities nor established procedures for supervising intelligence agencies. Congress has failed to exercise sufficient oversight, seldom questioning the use to which its appropriations were being put. Most domestic intelligence issues have not reached the courts, and in those cases when they have reached the courts, the judiciary has been reluctant to grapple with them.{{Cite book |url=https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/94755_II.pdf |title=Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities (Book II, Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans) |year=1976 |page=5}}{{Cite web |url=http://www.slate.com/id/2135325/ |title=Tapped Out Why Congress won't get through to the NSA. |first=Patrick |last=Radden Keefe |date=February 2, 2006 |website=Slate |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060209041309/http://www.slate.com/id/2135325/ |archive-date=February 9, 2006 |access-date=May 11, 2006 |df=mdy-all}}

While COINTELPRO was officially terminated in April 1971, domestic espionage continued.{{Cite book |title=The Price of Dissent: Testimonies to Political Repression in America |last=Schultz |first=Bud |date=2001 |publisher=University of California Press |isbn=0-520-22402-7 |location=Berkeley |oclc=45248227 |quote=Although the FBI officially discontinued COINTELPRO immediately after the Pennsylvania disclosures 'for security reasons,' when pressed by the Senate committee, the bureau acknowledged two new instances of 'Cointelpro-type' operations. The committee was left to discover a third, apparently illegal operation on its own.}}{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=74beCQAAQBAJ&q=judi+bari,+assassination,+cointelpro&pg=PA144 |title=The FBI Encyclopedia |last=Newton |first=Michael |date=2012 |publisher=McFarland |isbn=978-1476604176 |pages=143–146 |language=en}}{{Cite book |url=https://archive.org/details/fbicomprehensive0000theo |title=The FBI: A Comprehensive Reference Guide |last=Theoharis |first=Athan G. |date=1999 |publisher=Oryx Press |isbn=0-585-09871-9 |location=Phoenix, Ariz. |oclc=42330983 |quote=More recent controversies have focused on the adequacy of recent restrictions on the Bureau's domestic intelligence operations. Disclosures of the 1970s that FBI agents continued to conduct break-ins, and of the 1980s that the FBI targeted CISPES, again brought forth accusations of FBI abuses of power—and raised questions of whether reforms of the 1970s had successfully exorcised the ghost of FBI Director Hoover. |url-access=registration }} Between 1972 and 1974, it is documented that the Bureau planted over 500 bugs without a warrant and opened over 2,000 pieces of personal mail. More recent targets of covert action include the American Indian Movement (AIM), Earth First!, and Committees in Solidarity with the People of El Salvador.{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=91FyAJDjAvQC&q=glenn+fine.+cointelpro.+patriot+act.+letters |title=Spies, Wiretaps, and Secret Operations: An Encyclopedia of American Espionage |last=Hastedt |first=Glenn P. |date=2011 |publisher=ABC-CLIO |isbn=978-1851098071 |page=180 |language=en}} Documents released under the FOIA show that the FBI tracked the late David Halberstam—a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and author—for more than two decades.Associated Press, {{Cite news |url=https://www.thestar.com/News/World/article/533203 |title=FBI tracked journalist for over 20 years |date=November 7, 2008 |work=Toronto Star |access-date=November 23, 2008 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081211135610/http://www.thestar.com/News/World/article/533203 |archive-date=December 11, 2008 |df=mdy-all}} "Counterterrorism" guidelines implemented during the Reagan administration have been described as allowing a return to COINTELPRO tactics.{{Cite book |title=The Price of Dissent: Testimonies to Political Repression in America |last=Schultz |first=Bud |date=2001 |publisher=University of California Press |isbn=0-520-22402-7 |location=Berkeley |pages=399 |oclc=45248227 |quote=The problem persists after Hoover...."The record before this court," Federal Magistrate Joan Lefkow stated in 1991, "shows that despite regulations, orders and consent decrees prohibiting such activities, the FBI had continued to collect information concerning only the exercise of free speech.}} Some radical groups accuse factional opponents of being FBI informants or assume the FBI is infiltrating the movement.{{Cite magazine |last=Mosedale |first=Mike |date=2000-02-16 |title=Bury My Heart |magazine=City Pages |volume=21 |issue=1002}} COINTELPRO survivor Filiberto Ojeda Rios was killed by the FBI's hostage rescue team in 2005,{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QrWSTeJbPXAC&q=ojeda+rios.+assassination.+cointelpro.&pg=PA440 |title=Enemies: A History of the FBI |last=Weiner |first=Tim |date=2013 |publisher=Random House Publishing Group |isbn=978-0812979237 |pages=439–441 |language=en}} his death described by a United Nations special committee as an assassination.{{Cite news |url=https://news.un.org/en/story/2006/06/182362-un-general-assembly-committee-urges-self-determination-puerto-rico |title=UN General Assembly Committee urges self-determination for Puerto Rico |date=2006-06-13 |work=UN News |access-date=2018-06-07 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180612135911/https://news.un.org/en/story/2006/06/182362-un-general-assembly-committee-urges-self-determination-puerto-rico |archive-date=2018-06-12 |language=en}}

Environmentalist Eric McDavid, convicted on arson charges, was released after documents emerged demonstrating that the FBI informant in his Earth Liberation Front group provided crucial leadership, information, and material without which the crime could not have been committed,{{Cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jan/13/fbi-informant-anna-eric-mcdavid-eco-terrorism |title=Role of FBI informant in eco-terrorism case probed after documents hint at entrapment |work=The Guardian |access-date=2019-01-24 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190123223826/https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jan/13/fbi-informant-anna-eric-mcdavid-eco-terrorism |archive-date=2019-01-23}} repeating the same pattern of behavior of COINTELPRO.{{Cite book |title=The Burglary: The Discovery of J. Edgar Hoover's Secret FBI |last=Medsger |first=Betty |date=2014 |publisher=Vintage |isbn=978-0804173667 |author-link=Betty Medsger}} It has been claimed these sorts of practices have become widespread in FBI "counter-terrorism" cases targeting Muslims in the 2009 Bronx terrorism plot and others.{{Cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/nov/16/fbi-entrapment-fake-terror-plots |title=Fake terror plots, paid informants: the tactics of FBI 'entrapment' questioned |work=The Guardian |access-date=2019-01-24 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190123223024/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/nov/16/fbi-entrapment-fake-terror-plots |archive-date=2019-01-23}}{{Cite web |url=https://edition.cnn.com/2017/11/29/politics/aby-rayyan-fbi-terror-sting-pizza-man/index.html |title=How a suicidal pizza man found himself ensnared in an FBI terror sting |date=November 29, 2017 |publisher=CNN |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190123223353/https://edition.cnn.com/2017/11/29/politics/aby-rayyan-fbi-terror-sting-pizza-man/index.html |archive-date=2019-01-23 |access-date=2019-01-24}}{{Cite news |url=https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/detroit-city/2017/02/01/attorney-fbi-entrapped-terror-suspect/97336280/ |title=Attorney: FBI entrapped terror suspect |work=The Detroit News |access-date=2019-01-24 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190123232003/https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/detroit-city/2017/02/01/attorney-fbi-entrapped-terror-suspect/97336280/ |archive-date=2019-01-23}}{{Cite magazine |title=The Would-Be Terrorist vs. the FBI |url=https://www.gq.com/story/matthew-llaneza-alleged-terrorist-fbi-snare |magazine=GQ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190123224042/https://www.gq.com/story/matthew-llaneza-alleged-terrorist-fbi-snare |archive-date=2019-01-23 |access-date=2019-01-24 |url-status=live}}

Authors, such as Ward Churchill, Rex Weyler, and Peter Matthiessen allege that the federal government intended to acquire uranium deposits on the Lakota tribe's reservation land, and that this motivated a larger government conspiracy against AIM activists on the Pine Ridge reservation.{{harvnb|Churchill|Vander Wall|1990|pp=xii, 303}}{{Cite book |title=Blood of the Land: The Government and Corporate War Against First Nations |last=Weyler |first=Rex |date=1982 |publisher=Vintage Books |isbn=0-394-71732-5 |location=New York |oclc=9371425}}{{Cite book |url=https://archive.org/details/inspiritofcrazyh00matt_0 |title=In the Spirit of Crazy Horse |last=Matthiessen |first=Peter |publisher=Penguin Books |year=1983 |isbn=0-14-014456-0 |location=New York |oclc=25313752 |author-link=Peter Matthiessen |url-access=registration }}{{Cite journal |last=Woidat |first=Caroline M. |date=2006 |title=The Truth Is on the Reservation: American Indians and Conspiracy Culture |journal=The Journal of American Culture |volume=29 |issue=4 |pages=454–467|doi=10.1111/j.1542-734X.2006.00422.x }} Others believe COINTELPRO continues and similar actions are being taken against activist groups.{{Cite journal |last=McQuinn |first=Jason |author-link=Jason McQuinn |date=Winter 1996 |title=Conspiracy Theory vs Alternative Journalism |journal=Alternative Press Review |volume=2 |issue=3}}Horowitz, David. "Johnnie's Other O.J.", Front Page Magazine.com, September 1, 1997. Caroline Woidat says that, with respect to Native Americans, COINTELPRO should be understood within a historical context in which "Native Americans have been viewed and have viewed the world themselves through the lens of conspiracy theory." Other authors argue that while some conspiracy theories related to COINTELPRO are unfounded, the issue of ongoing government surveillance and repression is real.{{Cite web |url=http://www.publiceye.org/conspire/x-files.html |title=The X-Files Movie: Facilitating Fanciful Fun, or Fueling Fear and Fascism? |last=Berlet |first=Chip |date=1998 |website=PublicEye.org |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070611085933/http://www.publiceye.org/conspire/x-files.html |archive-date=2007-06-11 |access-date=2020-01-19}}{{Cite web |url=http://www.publiceye.org/liberty/RepressionTOC.html |title=One key to litigating against government prosecution of dissidents: Understanding the underlying assumptions |last1=Berlet |first1=Chip |last2=Lyons |first2=Matthew N. |date=1998 |website=PublicEye.org |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080206194644/http://www.publiceye.org/liberty/RepressionTOC.html |archive-date=2008-02-06 |access-date=2020-01-19}}

FBI Agent Richard G. Held is known to have increased FBI support for the Guardians of the Oglala Nation (GOON) squads, who were a private paramilitary group established in 1972 by the elected tribal chairman, Dick Wilson, under authority of the Oglala Sioux. AIM accused GOONs of involvement in 300 assaults and 64 homicides of political opponents. Despite this, The Bureau rarely investigated them and instead used its resources overwhelmingly to prosecute AIM.{{Cite book |last=Newton |first=Michael |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=74beCQAAQBAJ&q=judi+bari,+assassination,+cointelpro&pg=PA144 |title=The FBI Encyclopedia |date=2012 |publisher=McFarland |isbn=978-1476604176 |pages=143–145 |language=en |access-date=2018-06-13 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190405124652/https://books.google.com/books?id=74beCQAAQBAJ&pg=PA144&dq=judi+bari,+assassination,+cointelpro#v=onepage&q=judi%20bari,%20assassination,%20cointelpro&f=false |archive-date=2019-04-05 |url-status=live}} In 2000, the FBI released a report regarding these alleged unsolved violent deaths on Pine Ridge reservation and accounted for most of the deaths and disputed the claims of unsolved murders. The report stated that only four deaths were unsolved and that some deaths were not murders.{{cite web|url=http://www.indiancountry.com/content.cfm?id=747 |title=Unsolved deaths debunked by FBI Case by case examination puts some rumors to rest |last=Melmer |first=David |work=Indian Country Today |date=2000-07-19 |access-date=2007-10-29 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060506041458/http://www.indiancountry.com/content.cfm?id=747 |archive-date=May 6, 2006 }}{{cite web|url=http://minneapolis.fbi.gov/report.htm|title=Accounting For Native American Deaths, Pine Ridge Indian Reservation, South Dakota|author=staff|work=Federal Bureau of Investigation Minneapolis Division|date=May 2000|access-date=2007-10-29 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070625072708/http://minneapolis.fbi.gov/report.htm |archive-date = 2007-06-25}}

A lawsuit filed by Dhoruba bin-Wahad, a former member of the Black Panther Party, revealed the existence of multiple programs similar to COINTELPRO including "Newkill" (New York Police Killings), Chesrob (a program focused on Panther Assata Shakur), and PRISACTS (The Prison Activists Surveillance Program), a program that focused on "neutralizing" political activists who were already in prison, many of whom (like bin-Wahad) had been targeted by COINTELPRO.{{Cite book |last1=Bin Wahad |first1=Dhoruba |title=Still Black, still strong: survivors of the U.S. war against Black revolutionaries |last2=Abu-Jamal |first2=Mumia |last3=Shakur |first3=Assata |date=1993 |publisher=Semiotexte |isbn=978-0-936756-74-5 |editor-last=Fletcher |editor-first=Jim |series=Semiotexte active agents series |location=New York |editor-last2=Jones |editor-first2=Tanaquil |editor-last3=Lotringer |editor-first3=Sylvère}}{{Cite book |last=Burton |first=Orisanmi |title=Tip of the spear: black radicalism, prison repression, and the long attica revolt |date=2023 |publisher=University of California Press |isbn=978-0-520-39633-3 |location=Oakland, California}}

In April 2018, the Atlanta Black Star characterized the FBI as still engaging in COINTELPRO behavior by surveilling the Black Lives Matter movement. Internal documents dated as late as 2017 showed that the FBI had surveilled the movement.{{Cite web |url=http://atlantablackstar.com/2018/03/27/cointelpro-continues-documents-reveal-fbi-surveillance-black-lives-matter/ |title=COINTELPRO Continues As Documents Reveal FBI Surveillance of Black Lives Matter |website=Atlanta Black Star |date=March 27, 2018 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180531185256/http://atlantablackstar.com/2018/03/27/cointelpro-continues-documents-reveal-fbi-surveillance-black-lives-matter/ |archive-date=2018-05-31 |access-date=2018-05-26}} In 2014, the FBI tracked a Black Lives Matter activist using surveillance tactics which The Intercept found "reminiscent of a rich American history of targeting black Americans," including COINTELPRO.{{Cite web |url=https://theintercept.com/2018/03/19/black-lives-matter-fbi-surveillance/ |title=FBI Tracked an Activist Involved With Black Lives Matter as They Travelled Across the U.S., Documents Show |last1=Joseph |first1=George |last2=Hussain |first2=Murtaza |date=2018-03-19 |website=The Intercept |language=en-US |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180320222529/https://theintercept.com/2018/03/19/black-lives-matter-fbi-surveillance/ |archive-date=2018-03-20 |access-date=2020-01-19}} This practice, along with the imprisonment of black activists for their views, has been associated with the new FBI designation of "Black Identity Extremists".{{Cite web |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/05/judge-orders-release-black-identity-extremist-180504115412408.html |title=US judge orders release of 'first Black Identity Extremist' |publisher=Al Jazeera |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180610075237/https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/05/judge-orders-release-black-identity-extremist-180504115412408.html |archive-date=2018-06-10 |access-date=2018-06-10}}{{Cite web |url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/10/06/the-fbi-has-identified-a-new-domestic-terrorist-threat-and-its-black-identity-extremists/ |title=The FBI's New U.S. Terrorist Threat: 'Black Identity Extremists' |website=Foreign Policy |language=en |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180609215625/http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/10/06/the-fbi-has-identified-a-new-domestic-terrorist-threat-and-its-black-identity-extremists/ |archive-date=2018-06-09 |access-date=2018-06-10}}

Defending Rights & Dissent, a civil liberties group, cataloged known instances of First Amendment abuses and political surveillance by the FBI since 2010. The organization found that the FBI devoted disproportionate resources to spy on peaceful left-leaning civil society groups, including Occupy Wall Street, economic justice advocates, racial justice movements, environmentalists, Abolish ICE, and various anti-war movements.{{Cite web |url=https://rightsanddissent.org/fbi-spying/ |title=Still Spying on Dissent |first=Chip |last=Gibbons |website=Defending Rights & Dissent |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191105084533/https://rightsanddissent.org/fbi-spying/ |archive-date=2019-11-05 |access-date=2019-11-05}}{{Cite news |url=https://theintercept.com/2019/10/22/terrorism-fbi-political-dissent/ |title=The FBI Has a Long History of Treating Political Dissent as Terrorism |last=Speri |first=Alice |date=22 October 2019 |work=The Intercept |access-date=5 November 2019 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191105151641/https://theintercept.com/2019/10/22/terrorism-fbi-political-dissent/ |archive-date=5 November 2019}}

In December 2012, the FBI released redacted documents in response to a Freedom of Information Act request from the Partnership for Civil Justice Fund (PCJF). Mara Verheyden-Hilliard, the executive director of PCJF, said the documents showed that FBI counterterrorism agents had monitored the Occupy movement from its inception in August 2011 and that the FBI acted improperly by collecting "information on people's free-speech actions" and entering it into "unregulated databases, a vast storehouse of information widely disseminated to a range of law-enforcement and, apparently, private entities" (see Domestic Security Alliance Council).Michael S. Schmidt & Colin Moynihan, [https://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/25/nyregion/occupy-movement-was-investigated-by-fbi-counterterrorism-agents-records-show.html F.B.I. Counterterrorism Agents Monitored Occupy Movement, Records Show], New York Times (December 24, 2012). The FBI also communicated with the New York Stock Exchange, banks, private businesses and state and local police forces about the movement.{{cite web |title=The FBI vs. Occupy: Secret Docs Reveal "Counterterrorism" Monitoring of OWS from Its Earliest Days |url=https://www.democracynow.org/2012/12/27/the_fbi_vs_occupy_secret_docs |website=Democracy Now! |access-date=30 April 2021 |language=en |date=27 December 2012}} In 2014, the PCJF obtained an additional 4,000 pages of unclassified documents through a Freedom of Information Act request, showing "details of the scrutiny of the Occupy protests in 2011 and 2012 by law enforcement officers, federal officials, security contractors and others."[https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/05/23/us/23occupy-docs.html Government Surveillance of the Occupy Protests], New York Times (May 22, 2014).

In October 2020, Katie Reiter, chief of staff to Michigan state Senator Rosemary Bayer, had an FBI task force come to her house and aggressively question her about a draft bill she had recently discussed which would have limited the use of tear gas against protesters. Reiter had discussed the proposed ban on tear gas on a private 90-minute Zoom call with Bayer and a handful of other staffers. Reiter says the two officers refused to answer any questions about how they became aware of her private meeting. The Intercept reported about the incident: "Reiter said that the FBI's visit left her confused and fearful. 'It has impacted my sleep, it has caused me quite a bit of anxiety,' she said. 'And it has certainly impacted how we talk. I try not to let it, I'll just be like, 'No, we're going to talk about this.' But it's in my mind all the time.'" A spokesperson for the FBI declined to comment on the record, as did a spokesperson for Zoom.{{Cite web|last1=Speri|first1=Alice|last2=Biddle|first2=Sam|title=FBI Questioned a Michigan Senate Staffer After Zoom Call About Banning Tear Gas|url=https://theintercept.com/2021/01/04/michigan-fbi-zoom-tear-gas/|access-date=2021-05-28|website=The Intercept|date=January 4, 2021|language=en}}

{{Main|:Category:COINTELPRO targets}}

• Ralph Abernathy
• Mumia Abu-Jamal
• Muhammad Ali
• James Baldwin{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dpGSBAAAQBAJ&q=john,+aim,+cointelpro |title=F.B. Eyes: How J. Edgar Hoover's Ghostreaders Framed African American Literature |last=Maxwell |first=William J. |date=2015 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-1400852062 |language=en}}
• Judi Bari
• Dhoruba bin-Wahad
• H. Rap Brown{{Cite web |url=https://www.aaihs.org/rethinking-h-rap-brown-and-black-power/ |title=Rethinking H. Rap Brown and Black Power – AAIHS |date=September 29, 2018 |language=en-US |access-date=2019-11-18}}
• Bunchy Carter
• Eldridge Cleaver
• Marshall Conway
• Jeff Fort
• Howard Bruce Franklin
• Fred Hampton
• Tom Hayden
• Ernest Hemingway
• Abbie Hoffman
• Ericka Huggins
• Jose Cha Cha Jimenez
• Muhammad Kenyatta
• Clark Kerr
• Martin Luther King Jr.
• Stanley Levison
• Viola Liuzzo
• Malcolm X{{Cite web |url=https://www.noi.org/malcolm-x-files/ |title=Malcolm X Assassination & FBI COINTELPRO |date=2013-09-11 |website=NOI.org Official Website |language=en-US |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191103001544/https://www.noi.org/malcolm-x-files/ |archive-date=2019-11-03 |access-date=2019-11-18}}
• Jessica Mitford
• Huey P. Newton
• Geronimo Pratt
• Filiberto Ojeda Ríos
• Mario Savio
• Jean Seberg
• Assata Shakur
• Morris Starsky
• John Trudell
• Kwame Ture

{{Div col|colwidth=30em}}

• 1971, 2014 documentary film on the break-in that first exposed COINTELPRO
• Active measures
• Agent provocateur
• All Power to the People, film documentary by Lee Lew-Lee 1996
• {{section link|Christopher Pyle#Government Service}}, Pyle revealed a similar program by the U.S. Army
• Cold War
• Denial and deception
• Mark Felt, also known as Deep Throat served as chief inspector of COINTELPRO field operations
• FBI National Security Branch
• Joint Terrorism Task Force
• Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group
• Laird v. Tatum
• Mass surveillance in the United States
• MAINWAY, a database of telephone metadata used by the NSA
• NSA warrantless surveillance (2001–2007)
• Operation Gladio
• Operation Mockingbird
• Patriot Act
• PROFUNC, a similar classified Canadian program which focused primarily on communists and crypto-communists
• Red Squad, police intelligence/anti-dissident units which were later operated under COINTELPRO
• Security
• State terrorism
• Surveillance abuse
• Thermcon
• Zersetzung

{{Div col end}}

{{Reflist}}

{{refbegin}}

• {{Cite book |url=https://archive.org/details/bobbyjedgarhisto00hers |title=Bobby and J. Edgar: The Historic Face-Off Between the Kennedys and J. Edgar Hoover That Transformed America |last=Hersh |first=Burton |date=2007 |publisher=Basic Books |isbn=978-0-7867-1982-2 |oclc=493616276 }}
• {{Cite book |url=https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780813333847 |title=The Last Crusade: Martin Luther King, Jr., the FBI, and the Poor People's Campaign |last=McKnight |first=Gerald |date=1998 |publisher=Westview Press |isbn=978-0-8133-3384-7 |location=Boulder, CO |oclc=925217314 }}
• {{Cite book |title=Enemies: A History of the FBI |last=Weiner |first=Tim |date=2012 |publisher=Random House |isbn=978-1-4000-6748-0 |edition=1st |location=New York |oclc=1001918388 }}

{{refend}}

{{refbegin|30em}}

• {{Cite book |title=Cointelpro: The FBI's Secret War on Political Freedom |last=Blackstock |first=Nelson |publisher=Pathfinder Press |year=1988 |isbn=978-0-87348-877-8}}
• {{Cite book |title=Malcolm X: The FBI File |publisher=Carroll & Graf Publishers |year=1991 |isbn=978-0-88184-758-1 |editor-last=Carson |editor-first= Clayborne |editor-last2=Gallen |editor-first2=David}}
• {{Cite book |title=Agents of Repression: The FBI's Secret Wars Against The Black Panther Party and The American Indian Movement |title-link=Agents of Repression |last1=Churchill |first1=Ward |last2=Vander Wall |first2=Jim |publisher=South End Press |year=2002 |isbn=978-0-89608-646-3 |author-link=Ward Churchill |orig-year=1988}}
• {{Cite book |title=The COINTELPRO Papers: Documents from the FBI's Secret Wars Against Dissent in the United States |title-link=The COINTELPRO Papers |last1=Churchill |first1=Ward |last2=Vander Wall |first2=Jim |publisher=South End Press |year=2002 |isbn=978-0-89608-648-7 |orig-year=1990}}
• {{Cite book |title=There's Something Happening Here: The New Left, The Klan, and FBI Counterintelligence |last=Cunningham |first=David |publisher=University of California Press |year=2004 |isbn=978-0-520-23997-5}}
• {{Cite book |url=https://archive.org/details/assaultonleftfbi00davi |title=Assault on the Left |last=Davis |first=James Kirkpatrick |publisher=Praeger Trade |year=1997 |isbn=978-0-275-95455-0}}
• {{Cite book |title=The FBI and Martin Luther King, Jr. (Revised ed.) |last=Garrow |first=David |publisher=Yale University Press |year=2006 |isbn=978-0-300-08731-4}}
• {{Cite book |title=War at Home: Covert Action Against U.S. Activists and What We Can Do About It |last=Glick |first=Brian |publisher=South End Press |year=1989 |isbn=978-0-89608-349-3}}
• {{Cite book |title=The Burglary: The Discovery of J. Edgar Hoover's Secret FBI |last=Medsger |first=Betty |date=2014 |publisher=Vintage |isbn=978-0804173667 |author-link=Betty Medsger}}
• {{Cite book |title=The Lawless State: The Crimes Of The U.S. Intelligence Agencies |last1=Halperin |first1=Morton |last2=Berman |first2=Jerry |last3=Borosage |first3=Robert |last4=Marwick |first4=Christine |year=1976 |isbn=978-0-14-004386-0 |author-link=Morton Halperin}}
• {{Cite book |url=https://archive.org/details/lastmanstandingt00olse_0 |title=Last Man Standing: The Tragedy and Triumph of Geronimo Pratt |last=Olsen |first=Jack |publisher=Doubleday |year=2000 |isbn=978-0-385-49367-3 |author-link=Jack Olsen}}
• {{Cite book |title=Cointelpro |last=Perkus |first=Cathy |publisher=Vintage |year=1976}}
• Theoharis, Athan, Spying on Americans: Political Surveillance from Hoover to the Huston Plan (Temple University Press, 1978).

{{refend}}

{{refbegin|30em}}

• {{cite journal |last=Drabble |first=John |title=The FBI, COINTELPRO-WHITE HATE and the Decline of Ku Klux Klan Organizations in Mississippi, 1964–1971 |journal=Journal of Mississippi History |volume=66 |issue=4 |date=Winter 2004}}
• {{cite journal |last=Drabble |first=John |title=The FBI, COINTELPRO-WHITE HATE and the Decline Ku Klux Klan Organizations in Alabama, 1964–1971 |journal=Alabama Review |volume=61 |issue=1 |date=January 2008 |pages=3–47|doi=10.1353/ala.2008.0016 |s2cid=159498779 }}
• {{cite journal |last=Drabble |first=John |title='To Preserve the Domestic Tranquility': The FBI, COINTELPRO-WHITE HATE, and Political Discourse, 1964–1971 |journal=Journal of American Studies |volume=38 |issue=3 |date=August 2004 |pages=297–328 |doi=10.1017/S002187580400845X |jstor=27557518|s2cid=145405009 }}
• {{cite journal |last=Drabble |first=John |title=From White Supremacy to White Power: The FBI's COINTELPRO-WHITE HATE Operation and the 'Nazification' of the Ku Klux Klan in the 1970s |journal=American Studies |volume=48 |issue=3 |date=Fall 2007 |pages=49–74 |doi=10.1353/ams.0.0007 |jstor=40644149|s2cid=145352378 |url=http://journals.ku.edu/amerstud/article/view/3133 }}
• {{cite journal |last=Drabble |first=John |title=Fighting Black Power-New Left coalitions: Covert FBI media campaigns and American cultural discourse, 1967–1971 |journal=European Journal of American Culture |volume=27 |issue=2 |date=2008 |pages=65–91|doi=10.1386/ejac.27.2.65_1 }}
• {{cite journal |last=Wolfe-Rocca |first=Ursula |url=https://www.zinnedproject.org/if-we-knew-our-history/fbi-war-civil-rights-movement/ |title=Why We Should Teach About the FBI's War on the Civil Rights Movement |journal=Zinn Education Project |date=2016}}

{{refend}}

• Wolfe-Rocca, Ursula. "[https://www.zinnedproject.org/materials/cointelpro-teaching-fbis-war-black-freedom-movement/ COINTELPRO: Teaching the FBI's War on the Black Freedom Movement]", Zinn Education Project.

• [http://vault.fbi.gov/cointel-pro Files on FBI's website]
• FBI COINTELPRO files on Espionage Program
• FBI COINTELPRO file on Hoodwink
• FBI COINTELPRO files on Puerto Rican Groups
• FBI COINTELPRO files on Cuban Matters
• FBI COINTELPRO files on the New Left
• FBI COINTELPRO files on the Socialist Workers Party
• FBI COINTELPRO files on Black Extremist Groups
• FBI COINTELPRO files on White Hate Groups
• FBI COINTELPRO files Las Vegas
• FBI COINTELPRO files Miami
• FBI COINTELPRO files Baltimore
• FBI COINTELPRO files Alexandria
• FBI COINTELPRO files Charlotte
• FBI COINTELPRO files Indianapolis

{{refbegin|30em}}

• U.S. Congress. House. Committee on Internal Security. Hearings on Domestic Intelligence Operations for Internal Security Purposes. 93rd Cong., 2d sess, 1974.
• U.S. Congress. House. Select Committee on Intelligence. Hearings on Domestic Intelligence Programs. 94th Cong., 1st sess, 1975.
• U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Government Operations. Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. Hearings on Riots, Civil and Criminal Disorders. 90th Cong., 1st sess. – 91st Cong., 2d sess, 1967–1970.
• U.S. Congress. Senate. Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities. Hearings – The National Security Agency and Fourth Amendment Rights. Vol. 6. 94th Cong., 1st sess, 1975.
• U.S. Congress. Senate. Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities. Hearings – Federal Bureau of Investigation. Vol. 6. 94th Cong., 1st sess, 1975.
• U.S. Congress. Senate. Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities. Final Report – Book II, Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans. 94th Cong., 2d sess, 1976.
• U.S. Congress. Senate. Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities. Final Report – Book III, Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans. 94th Cong., 2d sess, 1976.
• Final Report of the Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities. United States Senate, 94th Congress, 2nd Session, April 26 (legislative day, April 14), 1976. [AKA "Church Committee Report"]. Archived at [https://archive.org/details/finalreportofsel06unit Archive.org] by the Boston Public Library
• Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities: [http://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/94755_II.pdf Intelligence Reports and the Rights of Americans: Book II]. April 24, 1976.

{{refend}}

{{FBI}}

{{Espionage}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Cointelpro}}

Category:History of civil rights in the United States

Category:History of law enforcement in the United States

Category:History of racism in the United States

Category:Propaganda in the United States

Category:Political repression in the United States

Category:Psychological warfare

Category:Surveillance scandals

Category:Political controversies in the United States

Category:Political imprisonment in the United States

Category:Race-related controversies in the United States

Category:African-American-related controversies

Category:Covert operations

Category:American secret government programs

Category:Federal Bureau of Investigation operations

*

Category:Counterintelligence

Category:Code names

Category:Federal Bureau of Investigation controversies

Category:Human rights abuses in the United States

Category:Federal Bureau of Investigation misconduct

Category:Anti-communism in the United States