Foothill Transit#498

{{OSM Location map

|coord={{Coord|34.070|-117.909}}

|float=right

|zoom=10

|width=400 |height=200

|scalemark=20

|shape1=n-square

|shape-color1=#0c3383

|shape-outline1=#fff

|mark-size1=20

|mark-coord1 ={{Coord|34.070052|-117.926528}}

|mark-title1 =Headquarters (100 S Vincent)

|mark-coord2 ={{Coord|34.058608|-117.722928}} |shape-color2=#18b4e8 |shape-outline2=#000

|mark-title2 =Pomona Yard (200 S East End)

|mark-coord3 ={{Coord|34.104032|-118.006690}} |shape-color3=#18b4e8 |shape-outline3=#000

|mark-title3 =Irwindale/Arcadia Yard (5640 Peck)

|fullscreen-option=1

|caption=Foothill Transit Key Locations

|auto-caption=1

}}

Foothill Transit operates out of two yards: one in Pomona (opened in 1997), and the other in Arcadia (opened in 2002); the administrative offices moved to West Covina in 2007. The Foothill Transit joint powers authority membership consists of elected representatives from 22 member cities in the San Gabriel Valley and Pomona Valley and three members appointed from the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors. These representatives are divided into five geographical clusters, which each elect a representative annually to serve on a five-member executive board.{{cite web |url=https://caltransit.org/about/50-years/member-profiles/foothill-transit/ |title=Member Profile: Foothill Transit |publisher=California Transit Association |access-date=July 18, 2018}}

Foothill Transit is mainly funded by local sales tax revenue, with 75% coming from Los Angeles County Propositions A and C, California State Transportation Development Act, and the State Transit Assistance Fund. The remaining 25% comes from farebox revenue.

Los Angeles County Supervisor Pete Schabarum is credited with the formation of the transit agency. Schabarum, annoyed by what he saw as disproportionate cutbacks of bus service by the Southern California Rapid Transit District (SCRTD) in the San Gabriel Valley, wanted to secede from the larger agency and form a separate transit agency as early as 1986.{{cite news |url=http://articles.latimes.com/1988-11-06/news/ga-532_1_foothill-transit-zone |title=Foothill Transit Again Seeks Zone as RTD Wrestles with Money Ills |author=Quintana, Craig |date=November 6, 1988 |newspaper=Los Angeles Times |access-date=July 18, 2018}} Compared to routes serving more densely-populated areas, routes in the San Gabriel and Pomona Valleys required greater subsidies to serve fewer riders on longer freeway alignments in eastern Los Angeles County.{{cite news |url=http://articles.latimes.com/1992-07-25/local/me-3909_1_foothill-transit-zone |title=Bus Double Take : Embattled RTD, Foothill Transit Lines Offer Duplicate Service |author=Stein, Mark A. |date=July 25, 1992 |newspaper=Los Angeles Times |access-date=July 19, 2018}}

Foothill was initially founded by 20 member cities; Pasadena voted to join in 1998.{{cite news |url=http://articles.latimes.com/1998/nov/04/local/me-39273 |title=Council Seeks to Join Foothill Transit Service |date=November 4, 1998 |newspaper=Los Angeles Times |access-date=July 20, 2018}} In 1987, the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission (LACTC) approved Foothill to take over fourteen routes which serviced the San Gabriel Valley that were currently operated by SCRTD. Although service was planned to start on July 1, 1988,{{cite news |url=http://articles.latimes.com/1988-07-31/news/hl-10645_1_foothill-transit-zone |title=Fledgling Foothill Transit Zone Forced Into Waiting Game by Two Court Losses |author=Quintana, Craig |date=July 31, 1988 |newspaper=Los Angeles Times |access-date=July 20, 2018}} the Foothill Transit Zone had been prevented from starting service in July by an injunction arising from a lawsuit filed by the drivers and mechanics unions (United Transportation and Amalgamated Transit Unions) of SCRTD against LACTC. Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Eli Chernow ruled that LACTC could not unilaterally transfer the lines without the consent of the SCRTD board of directors. The injunction was upheld on appeal.{{cite news |url=http://articles.latimes.com/1988-07-28/news/ga-9846_1_foothill-transit-zone |title=Foothill Transit 'in Limbo' After 2 Legal Setbacks |author=Quintana, Craig |date=July 28, 1988 |newspaper=Los Angeles Times |access-date=July 20, 2018}}

LACTC had begun withholding $9 million per month from SCRTD in April 1988 on the basis that SCRTD had not followed salary guidelines set by LACTC; SCRTD replied that LACTC, under the leadership of its chairman (Schabarum), was holding the funds hostage to pressure SCRTD to release the lines to Foothill Transit. SCRTD consented to Foothill Transit taking over the bus lines in December 1988 in return for the restoration of funding. Those first two lines operated by Foothill Transit were 495 and 498.{{cite report |url=http://foothilltransit.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/FY-2013-Business-Plan-ADOPTED_opt.pdf |title=Foothill Transit Fiscal Year 2013 Business Plan – Adopted |date=May 9, 2012 |publisher=Foothill Transit |access-date=July 18, 2018 |page=9}}

The trial for the lawsuit against Foothill Transit started in May 1989,{{cite news |url=http://articles.latimes.com/1989-05-18/news/ga-327_1_strident-rtd-critic-embree-bus-lines-foothill-transit |title=Foothill Transit Trial Begins: 2 RTD Unions Argue for Breakup of Local Bus Agency Zone |author=Quintana, Craig |date=May 18, 1989 |newspaper=Los Angeles Times |access-date=July 20, 2018}} was resolved in Foothill's favor by July,{{cite news |url=http://articles.latimes.com/1989-07-20/news/ga-5206_1_foothill-transit-zone |title=Judge Rules for Foothill Transit in RTD Lawsuit |author=Quintana, Craig |date=July 20, 1989 |newspaper=Los Angeles Times |access-date=July 18, 2018}} and the other twelve lines previously operated by SCRTD were transitioned to Foothill Transit between 1989 and 1992.{{cite news |url=http://articles.latimes.com/1992-06-23/local/me-843_1_foothill-transit |title=San Gabriel Valley: Foothill Transit Takes Over 2 RTD Bus Lines |date=June 23, 1992 |newspaper=Los Angeles Times |access-date=July 19, 2018 |quote=Foothill Transit began servicing the [486 and 488] lines Sunday, completing a 1988 Los Angeles Transportation Commission plan for them to take over 14 RTD lines.}} For a short period in 1992, the last two routes to transition (486 and 488) were operated by both Foothill Transit and SCRTD during continued legal disputes. The drivers and mechanics unions disputed the transfer of 486 and 488 since SCRTD had made the decision without negotiating with the union; an arbitrator held up the unions' argument, which led to duplicated service on those lines, as "Foothill Transit [had] the legal right to operate buses on the contested routes, but the [SCRTD had] the legal obligation to do so", and the union planned to use that precedent to roll back service to SCRTD on all fourteen lines. However, Foothill Transit again prevailed in a February 1993 court ruling.{{cite news |url=http://articles.latimes.com/1993-02-03/local/me-920_1_foothill-transit-zone |title=Los Angeles County: Ruling Favoring Foothill Transit Ends Bus Dispute |date=February 3, 1993 |newspaper=Los Angeles Times |access-date=July 19, 2018}}

Schabarum, who hated the influence of trade unions, chose to use contractors to operate the service.{{cite news |url=http://articles.latimes.com/1994-08-02/news/mn-22742_1_foothill-transit |title=News Analysis: Privately Run Foothill Transit a Strike Winner |author1=Rutten, Tim |author2=Muir, Frederick M. |date=August 2, 1994 |newspaper=Los Angeles Times |access-date=July 19, 2018}} All of the operations and maintenance work for Foothill Transit are contracted out. {{as of|2017}}, bus service is operated by Keolis at Pomona and Transdev at Arcadia/Irwindale.

Embree Bus Lines was the initial contractor that operated the first two lines for Foothill starting in December 1988. The hourly operating cost under Foothill Transit was reduced by up to half compared to service under SCRTD, and ridership grew, but the contract operator drivers generally earned less in both wages and fringe benefits, and had less influence over working conditions. In addition, Foothill Transit was not required to provide typical rider services such as schedules, bus stops, transit police, or telephone information. During the 1992 Los Angeles riots, Foothill Transit terminated service at El Monte rather than continue on to downtown Los Angeles. Over the first five years, Foothill Transit consistently saved money compared to SCRTD's historical costs. In 1994, Foothill reported their hourly cost of operations was $55, compared to $93 for the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), with a farebox recovery ratio of 48% (compared to 32% for Metro) at a lower fare of $0.85 (compared to $1.10 for Metro, which was scheduled to increase to $1.35 later that year). In addition, Foothill reported an accident rate of 0.3 per {{convert|100000|mi|abbr=on}} traveled, compared to Metro's rate of 3.3 per {{convert|100000|mi|abbr=on}}, although Metro's accident rate was skewed by older buses and more dense traffic in its operating area.

Foothill executives made the service essentially strike-proof by insisting that two different companies operate the two bus yards, even if it would cost more in the short term. By 1998, Foothill's contractors were Laidlaw and Ryder/ATE.{{cite news |url=http://articles.latimes.com/1998/apr/12/local/me-38544/2 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130701231851/http://articles.latimes.com/1998/apr/12/local/me-38544/2 |url-status=dead |archive-date=July 1, 2013 |title=Privatization: a Route to Better Bus Service? |author=Leeds, Jeff |date=April 12, 1998 |newspaper=Los Angeles Times |access-date=July 20, 2018}} However, due to bus industry consolidation, First Transit operated both yards from 2001 to mid-2007. Currently, both Foothill Transit yards are represented by unions (Arcadia by the Amalgamated Transit Union and Pomona by the Teamsters Union), but past strikes at the agency have been less than successful due to the ability of one yard to operate the other yard's service. In addition, wages are less at Foothill than at other transit operators in the region.

The contract operator drivers at Foothill were also represented by the Teamsters, but a 1994 Los Angeles Times article reported they earned an average of $11 per hour, compared to the average $18.45 per hour earned by Metro drivers. A representative of the union representing Metro's drivers, the United Transportation Union, accused Foothill of not paying its drivers a living wage; the president of the company that was then contracted to manage Foothill, William P. Forsythe, stated the {{USD|20000|1994|round=-3}} typical annual pay of a Foothill driver "isn't bad for a service industry job" and admitted it wasn't fair "compared to MTA, but they've been overpaying for years." In January 1995, the Los Angeles Times reported the majority of the 150 drivers for Laidlaw made $8.50 per hour; those drivers, represented by the Teamsters, rejected a proposed contract that offered no wage increases.{{cite news |url=http://articles.latimes.com/1995-01-26/news/ga-24481_1_foothill-buses |title=Strike May Idle Foothill Transit Buses |author=Jacobs, Chip |date=January 26, 1995 |newspaper=Los Angeles Times |access-date=July 20, 2018}}

Laidlaw, which was responsible for approximately half of Foothill's fleet, operated out of the Upland Yard. The first strike against Foothill Transit started when Laidlaw drivers walked off in February 1996, asking for an immediate $1/hour raise and full medical coverage. Teamsters Local 848 officials stated that drivers could not afford private health insurance, and had to rely on county services instead. Foothill's other contractor was not affected and continued normal operations during the strike.{{cite news |url=http://articles.latimes.com/1996-02-23/local/me-39127_1_foothill-transit |title=Dozens of Foothill Transit Buses Idled by Drivers Strike |author=Simon, Richard |date=February 23, 1996 |newspaper=Los Angeles Times |access-date=July 20, 2018}} The strike ended after thirteen days, when drivers accepted a 3% pay raise with no health coverage on a one-year contract under the threat they would be fired and replaced if they did not return to work.{{cite news |url=http://articles.latimes.com/1996-03-06/local/me-43712_1_bus-drivers-vote |title=Threatened With Job Loss, Bus Drivers Vote to End Strike |author=Winton, Richard |date=March 6, 1996 |newspaper=Los Angeles Times |access-date=July 20, 2018}} Shortly after the expiration of the contract, Laidlaw drivers went on strike again in June 1997, but that strike was settled within hours, as most drivers were no longer represented by the union.{{cite news |url=http://articles.latimes.com/1997-06-05/local/me-390_1_drivers-transit-bus |title=Strike by Foothill Transit Bus Drivers Settled Within Hours |date=June 5, 1997 |newspaper=Los Angeles Times |access-date=July 20, 2018}} The reported average wages in 1998 was $9.30 per hour for Ryder/ATE drivers (represented by the Teamsters), and $9.06 per hour for Laidlaw drivers (who had previously voted to become an open shop).

Effective July 1, 2013, due to expiration of the existing management services contract and continuing conflicts of interest between the executive director, staff, and board, Foothill Transit transitioned to in house management. Executive Director Doran Barnes became the first full-time Foothill employee, and planning, procurement, and other administrative functions became Foothill functions as well.{{cite report |url=http://foothilltransit.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Foothill-Transit-FY-14-15-Business-Plan-and-Budget-Proposed-SMALL_opt.pdf |title=Foothill Transit Fiscal Year 2014–2015 Business Plan & Budget – Proposed |date=May 21, 2014 |publisher=Foothill Transit |access-date=July 18, 2018 |pages=15–16}} Transdev (formerly Veolia) staff continues to operate the transit stores and maintain bus shelters.{{cite news |url=https://www.sgvtribune.com/2013/05/25/foothill-transit-sheds-management-contract-with-outside-firm/ |title=Foothill Transit shed management contract with outside firm |author=Scauzillo, Steve |date=May 25, 2013 |newspaper=San Gabriel Valley Tribune |access-date=July 18, 2018}}

The last two lines operated by Metro (SCRTD's successor) in the eastern San Gabriel Valley were turned over to Foothill in 2016.{{cite news |url=http://morethanredcars.com/?p=369 |title=Metro's Last SGV Holdouts go Blue and White – Foothill Transit Takes Lines #190 and #194 |author=Hobbs, Charles P. |date=July 7, 2016 |work=More than Red Cars |access-date=July 20, 2018}}

In 2017, Foothill Transit hired two new contractors, Keolis and Transdev, both of which are French transportation companies, to manage both of their bus storage yards. Keolis took over First Transit's role in managing the Pomona Yard{{cite press release |url=http://www.keolisnorthamerica.com/news/keolis-transit-services-awarded-eight-year-contract-to-provide-operations-and-maintenance-for-foothill-transit-pomona |title=Keolis Transit Services awarded eight-year contract to provide operations and maintenance for Foothill Transit-Pomona |date=April 26, 2017 |publisher=Keolis Transit Services |access-date=July 18, 2018}} and Transdev took over First Transit's, and previously MV Transportation's, role in managing the Irwindale Yard.{{cite press release |url=https://www.transdevna.com/news/2016/07/08/transdev-awarded-contract-renewal-for-foothill-transit |title=Transdev Awarded Contract Renewal for Foothill Transit |date=July 8, 2016 |publisher=Transdev |access-date=July 18, 2018}}

In 2002, Foothill Transit began purchasing Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) powered buses. In 2010, Foothill Transit was the first transit system to operate an all-electric battery-powered bus from Proterra. By 2013, when the last diesel-powered 2000–2001 Gillig Advantage buses were retired, Foothill Transit became around a 90 percent CNG fleet. 10 percent of the fleet is electric.

Foothill Transit's main goal is to be fully electric by 2030.{{cite press release |url=http://foothilltransit.org/foothill-transit-announces-all-electric-bus-fleet-by-2030/ |title=Foothill Transit announces all electric bus fleet by 2030 |date=May 24, 2016 |publisher=Foothill Transit |access-date=July 20, 2018}} On January 25, 2021, Foothill Transit received its first two all-electric double-decker buses, which were made by Alexander Dennis in the United Kingdom.{{Cite web|date=2021-01-25|title=Foothill Transit Electric Double Decker Bus Arrives in SGV After Atlantic and Cross-Country Travel|url=https://la.streetsblog.org/2021/01/25/foothill-transit-electric-double-decker-bus-arrives-in-sgv-after-atlantic-and-cross-country-travel/|access-date=2021-01-27|website=Streetsblog Los Angeles|language=en-US}}

During its transition to an all Electric Fleet, Foothill Transit suffered a thirty-four percent electric fleet failure rate. The transit system blamed its fleet vendor for the lack of spare parts. Other units stalled while in revenue service.{{cite web |title=With 34% of its electric buses inoperable, Foothill Transit searches for fixes |url=https://www.dailybulletin.com/2021/07/22/with-50-of-its-buses-inoperable-foothill-transit-searches-for-a-way-to-fix-its-fleet/ |website=Daily Bulletin |access-date=10 August 2023 |date=22 July 2021}}

In the Fiscal year 2020, sixty-seven percent of its electric fleet failed to properly operate. Most of the buses had to wait three hundred days for replacement parts.{{cite web |title=Mechanical problems with early electric buses plague multiple transit agencies |url=https://www.dailybulletin.com/2021/09/08/mechanical-problems-with-early-electric-buses-plague-multiple-transit-agencies/ |website=Daily Bulletin |access-date=10 August 2023 |date=9 September 2021}}

In 2021, Foothill transit voted in returning its fleet of Electric Buses to the FTA. Foothill Transit took a 5 million dollar charge, due to its reduced life cycle.{{cite web |title=What to do with 13 inoperable electric buses? Foothill Transit mulls its options |url=https://www.dailybulletin.com/2021/07/23/what-to-do-with-13-inoperable-electric-buses-foothill-transit-mulls-its-options/ |website=Daily Bulletin |access-date=10 August 2023 |date=23 July 2021}}{{cite web |last1=Gordon |first1=Aaron |title=11 Years Ago, Foothill Transit Got 3 Electric Buses. Are They Ready for More? |url=https://www.vice.com/en/article/jg8kp7/electric-bus-foothill-transit-proterra-infrastructure |website=Vice |access-date=10 August 2023 |language=en |date=2 August 2021}}

In 2021, Foothill transit ordered 13 Fuel Cell buses from New flyer to replace its Electric buses{{cite press release |last1=Inc |first1=NFI Group |title=California's Foothill Transit adds 13 hydrogen fuel cell-electric buses from NFI subsidiary New Flyer; follow on marks largest fuel cell fleet in North America |url=https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2021/11/08/2329675/0/en/California-s-Foothill-Transit-adds-13-hydrogen-fuel-cell-electric-buses-from-NFI-subsidiary-New-Flyer-follow-on-marks-largest-fuel-cell-fleet-in-North-America.html |website=GlobeNewswire News Room |access-date=10 August 2023 |language=en |date=8 November 2021}}{{cite web |last1=Max |first1=John |title=13 Hydrogen fuel cell buses ordered for the Foothill Transit fleet |url=https://www.hydrogenfuelnews.com/hydrogen-fuel-cell-buses-foothill/8549459/#:~:text=Foothill%20Transit%20in%20California%20has%20ordered%20thirteen%20zero-emission,supported%20by%20the%20Federal%20Transit%20Administration%20%28FTA%29%20funds. |website=www.hydrogenfuelnews.com |access-date=10 August 2023 |language=en-us |date=16 November 2021}} The Fuel Cell Buses began revenue service in December 2022{{cite web |title=Foothill Transit's new hydrogen buses hit the road next week - Streetsblog Los Angeles |url=https://la.streetsblog.org/2022/12/01/foothill-transits-new-hydrogen-buses-hit-the-road-next-week |website=la.streetsblog.org |access-date=10 August 2023 |language=en |date=1 December 2022}}

Express services operate weekdays only in the peak direction, excluding the Silver Streak.

Services operate weekdays only.

Foothill Transit provides shuttle service for UCLA Football home games, the annual Rose Bowl Game, and other special events at the Rose Bowl from the Parsons Corporation parking lot.

Free 2-Hour Foothill Transit to Foothill Transit local transfers. (Lines 490, 493, 495, 498, 499, and 699), you’ll have to pay the full fare.

As of 2024, the Foothill Transit fleet consists of a mixed fleet of NABI, New Flyer, ENC, Proterra and Alexander Dennis buses. These include the Xcelsior, NABI BRT, Enviro500, ElDorado National Axess, and Proterra Catalyst buses. Foothill Transit uses various propulsion systems to power their buses, which are CNG, Hydrogen,{{Cite web|date=2023-08-22 |title=Greening Big

|url=https://www.foothilltransit.org/greeningbig}}{{Cite web|date=2022-01-12 |title=Foothill Transit’s new hydrogen buses hit the road next week

|url=https://la.streetsblog.org/2022/12/01/foothill-transits-new-hydrogen-buses-hit-the-road-next-week}} and Electric.{{Cite web |date=2010-09-03|title=Foothill Transit unveils its new Ecoliner bus

|url=https://laist.com/news/kpcc-archive/ecoliner}} Foothill Transit uses articulated New Flyer XN60 buses as well as two Double Decker Alexander Dennis Enviro500EVs for use on the Silver Streak (bus) line.{{Cite web |date=2024-09-13 |title=FY25 Adopted Business Plan and Budget |url=https://www.foothilltransit.org/sites/default/files/2024-06/FY25%20Adopted%20Business%20Plan%20and%20Budget.pdf}} The transit agency has an additional twelve Alexander Dennis Enviro500EVs on order.{{Cite web|date=2024-02-21 |title=Foothill Transit orders 12 double deck, zero emission buses from Alexander Dennis

|url=https://www.masstransitmag.com/bus/vehicles/hybrid-hydrogen-electric-vehicles/press-release/53097126/nfi-group-foothill-transit-orders-12-double-deck-zero-emission-buses-from-alexander-dennis}}

{{reflist}}

{{Commons category|Foothill Transit}}

• {{Official website|http://www.foothilltransit.org/}}
• [http://www.foothilltransit.org/EAlertControls/Data/May2006.pdf May 2006 Footnotes detailing Silver Streak service]
• [http://insideevs.com/proterra-announces-largest-ever-u-s-order-for-electric-buses/ Electric bus order 2013 September]

{{clear}}

{{Southern California Transit}}

{{Greater Los Angeles Area Public Transit}}

{{Transdev}}

Category:Public transportation in the San Gabriel Valley

Category:Transportation in Pasadena, California

Category:Bus transportation in California

Category:Transit agencies in California

Category:San Gabriel Valley

Category:Pomona Valley

Category:Transdev

Category:Keolis