User:K6ka/Requests for adminship/Epicgenius

{{Humor}}

{{RfA/autohold|00:01, 8 April 2025 (UTC)|text={{rfah|autohold=yes}}}}

[{{fullurl:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Epicgenius|action=edit§ion=4}} Voice your opinion on this candidate] (talk page)

Final (12/9/3/9); ended with promoting Epicdingus to 🗿 by force. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 00:09, 2 April 2025 (UTC) '''

Monitors: The moyai gods (talk) 00:25, 1 April 2025 (UTC), AlphaBeta...Who? (redirect) 00:42, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

{{user|Epicgenius}} – Per consensus at ANI, the community has concluded that Epicmoyai's refusal to run for RFA has become a net negative for the project. So I bring him before the jury—kicking and screaming—to determine whether he should be mopped by force. {{April fools}} —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 00:01, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

:Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

:1. Why are you interested in becoming an administrator?

::A:

:2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

::A:

:3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

::A: I can confirm that I have caused Epicgenius a lot of stress. They have not dealt with it, and they will never deal with it. The Airship haunts their past, present, and future. Watch this space. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk)

----

You may ask optional questions below. There is a limit of two questions per editor. Multi-part questions are disallowed, but you are allowed to ask follow-up questions related to previous questions.

Optional question from Panini!

:1. What is the best Epic Rap Battles of History?

::A:

• Links for Epicgenius: {{usercheck-short|Epicgenius}}
• Edit summary usage for Epicgenius can be found [https://xtools.wmflabs.org/editsummary/en.wikipedia.org/Epicgenius here].

----

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.

Numerated (#) "votes" in the "Support", "Oppose", and "Neutral" sections may only be placed by editors with an extended confirmed account. All other comments are welcome in the "general comments" section.

{{RfA toolbox|Epicgenius}}

1. I'm first alphabetically, so as usual I'm going to commandeer the first position in the list. 3df (talk) 00:16, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
2. And I'm second, so I go here, which is my rightful place. Down with k6ka! charlotte ^👸♥ 00:05, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
3. Support per nom. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 00:09, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
4. Glad to see we've moved on from last year. -- Jimbo Wales (talk) 00:06, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
5. lowest-possible support --JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 00:35, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
6. Opposen't - A true WikiPatriot! - _Ɔ\^ꓕ ⱯƎꓶZ 01:20, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
7. Keep per AGF, IAR, CABAL. Nobody (talk) 06:51, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
8. Option A: Bro is, after all, an epic genius. guninvalid (talk) 06:59, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
9. Support funny admins could have nicer and greater things.--2600:1700:78EA:450:60D1:C49:6E4E:86C9 (talk) 08:16, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
10. Support - Certainly. --S G 5 5 3 6 B (talk) 14:01, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
11. Support mopping by force, these stone statues haven't been cleaned in hundreds of years! Toadspike [Talk] 18:09, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
12. Support, as more qualified than anyone in the US government. Make Wikipedia Epic Again! --Tryptofish (talk) 20:50, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

1. Oppose per nom. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 00:09, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
2. Strong oppose. We can't let a prolific content contributor be bogged down by admin tasks! SounderBruce 00:11, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
3. Indef. Ban can be appealed after 12 months and every 12 months thereafter. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 00:28, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
4. Oppose Everything!!! Passed RfAs? In April Fools????{{humor inline}} AlphaBeta...Who? (redirect) 00:29, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
5. Indef All this user does is waste his time writing about useless and irrelevant places like New York City, which will likely be destroyed within the next seven billion years! None of what he writes about passes the 100-trillion year test! If this user was admin, he would probably target only active vandals instead of time traveling to fight off the alien vandals like a REAL admin would do! Do we really want that out of an admin? Or even an editor? We need REAL editors that only edit about REAL relevant topics and not random RECENTISM non-sense. Get out of here! λ NegativeMP1 00:36, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
6. 🗿🗿🗿 Oh yeah did I mention 🗿🗿 and 🗿🗿🗿🗿? 🗿🗿🗿 (talk) 00:39, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
7. for having the NERVE to say that someone ELSE was {{tqq|Another example of a candidate who should have run much earlier}}. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:48, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
8. Supportn't - A true WikiDictator! - _Ɔ\^ꓕ ⱯƎꓶZ 01:20, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
9. Oppose. Firstly, the editor was described as {{tq|kicking and screaming}}, which is unbecoming of the conduct expected of an administrator. Secondly, the editor has earned less than 1e+301 four awards and made less than ¹⁰10 edits, raising concerns about hat collecting. Finally, the editor did not make the edit with ID 1, meaning he could not possibly know anything about Wikipedia (obviously). Q.E.D. Victoria (OutsideNormality) / talk 03:53, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

1. Neutral. Maybe we could send him to BRFA next time. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 00:09, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
2. Strongest possible neutral because of reasons. –FlyingAce^✈hello 01:01, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
3. Voten't - A true, uh...! - _Ɔ\^ꓕ ⱯƎꓶZ 01:20, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

1. I'll tell y'all what this one is if it gets consensus. teehee theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:30, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
2. Instructions unclear, voting a fourth time. It's {{Random item|Support|Oppose|Neutral}}. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 00:36, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
3. highest possible {{big|{{red|Error: 4th option not defined}}}} --JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 00:39, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
4. arf. not sure what this epicgenius thing is. another shadow to hunt down? padgriffin ^woof. 01:21, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

1. What?n't - I'm truly confused! - _Ɔ\^ꓕ ⱯƎꓶZ 01:20, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
2. weak unsure about neutrality of ANI. All the Best -- Chuck ^Talk 01:47, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
3. Let's open the mystery box. Elli (talk | contribs) 06:34, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
4. I evaded the FBI for just long enough to place my vote. I hope it was worth it! QuicoleJR (talk) 12:38, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
5. Delete per nom.

1. General comment. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:37, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
2. General Kenobiment - _Ɔ\^ꓕ ⱯƎꓶZ 01:20, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
3. admiral comment Elias 🦗🐜 ^{[Chat, they chattin', they chat]} 02:03, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
4. 🗿 comment —and in that light, Fz20181223 find deliverance.— 14:34, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

• {{RfA/autohold|00:01, 8 April 2025 (UTC)|text=

  :The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.