User talk:Reverosie

:Thank you so much for the welcome! I really appreciate it :) And thank YOU for all of your contributions to Wikipedia! Reverosie (talk) 18:06, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

:Wow! I was absolutely not expecting my draft to be created as an article so quickly!! Thank you so much!!! I'm so happy I could contribute to Wikipedia like this, and I plan on making more contributions in the future! Reverosie (talk) 18:48, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

:Wow! Thank you so much again!! I wasn't expecting this quick of a publish for a stub article. Cheers to many more articles! Reverosie (talk) 22:20, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

:If you wish, you should join Wikiproject History and/or Wikiproject Middle Ages. Wikiprojects are a collaborative group of editors especially interesed in one topic. Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 04:00, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

::How do I join? Reverosie (talk) 04:02, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Looks like WP History has their participants list here while WP Middle Ages has the list on their front page. You can add your name to both. Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 04:05, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

::::Thank you! Reverosie (talk) 04:06, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

:Thank you so much!!!!! I honestly don't know what to say. I'm so glad that I've made a positive impact on Wikipedia, and I plan on continuing with more article creations and edits soon! Reverosie (talk) 04:01, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

:Seconded! Thanks for your positive/friendly attitude + 2 well-written articles and numerous constructive edits within only a week of joining! GoldRomean (talk) 03:09, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

::Thank you so much!!! Reverosie (talk) 03:12, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

:::I'll just echo the other editors. You are off to a great start. Thank you for your contributions. -- Whpq (talk) 17:28, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

::::Thank you so much!!! I'm so happy to help Reverosie (talk) 17:30, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

{{Help me-helped}}

Please help me with...

Hello!

I've been working on improving a Wikipedia article for a bit of time now (I haven't been here long, but I've made a sizeable amount of edits per the article's failed good article assessment), and I was wondering if it could be upgraded from C-Class to B-Class. I was told at the teahouse that anybody could change the assessment as they saw fit, but I'm worried about bias since I'm the one who made these changes and therefore want a second opinion. The article is Baldwin IV of Jerusalem for reference. Please tell me if I'm good to go in terms of increasing the class, and anything I can improve, regardless of class, as well!

Thank you! Reverosie (talk) 17:13, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

:You can make a request at Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia/Assessment#Assessment requests. You might also consider asking the editor who did the GA review at Talk:Baldwin IV of Jerusalem/GA1. -- Whpq (talk) 17:27, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

::Thank you so much! I also noticed that you happen to be my mentor, so thank you again for looking out for me! Reverosie (talk) 17:28, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

The year in the {{sfn}} has to match the year in the citation template. So for {{cite book|last=Runciman|first=Steven|author-link=Steven Runciman|orig-year=1952|year=1989|title=The Kingdom of Jerusalem and the Frankish East, 1100–1187|series=A History of the Crusades|volume=II|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0-521-06163-6}} you need to use 1989 inside the sfn, not 1952. HHope this helps! DuncanHill (talk) 20:05, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

:Thank you so much!! I managed to fix this by copying the working citation from another article :) Reverosie (talk) 20:07, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

::You've fixed the ISBN date problem, but broken the links between the {{sfn}} and the citation template. I'll show you what needs to be done. DuncanHill (talk) 20:11, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Oh! I didn't mean to break it. Your help would be much appreciated since I'm still new to these things Reverosie (talk) 20:11, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

::::That's OK, sfn references can be hard to get right. If you look at [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Harv_and_Sfn_no-target_errors&curid=144682&diff=1292411406&oldid=1292409736 this edit] you'll see that I changed 1952 in the sfn to 1989, to match the year in the citation template. This fixes the no-target errors that the mismatch of years had caused. DuncanHill (talk) 20:15, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

:::::That makes a lot of sense, thank you so much for the help! Reverosie (talk) 20:16, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

{{help me-helped}}

Please help me with...

Hello!

First of all, I'm sorry if this is very similar to my last question; I'm new to Wikipedia and still trying to learn as much as I can!

I already posted this at the teahouse, but it's been nearly 4 hours without a reply, so I'm wondering if I could get an answer this way instead :)

I was curious about the process of promoting articles from B-Class to Good Article status, and have a few questions about it:

1. If an article fails a nomination, how much time do you have to wait before it can be nominated again?

2. How much time do you have to fulfill requests by a reviewer before said reviewer fails you? I'm worried about this because of my own schedule

3. How long does the process of review take in the first place, and how rigorous is it? How many nominated articles usually pass?

4. What's the difference between a good article and an A-Class article in the first place? Which rating is "higher"?

5. Most importantly of all, is the article I've been preparing ready to be nominated? Why or why not? The article is Baldwin IV of Jerusalem as I've said earlier (sorry again!)

Thank you so much in advance, and if this question is too similar to the last one, please let me know! Reverosie (talk) 21:47, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

:Hello Reverosie. It looks like your question at the Teahouse was answered. Would it be okay with you if the {{tl|help me}} template is nullified now? 🌳 Balsam Cottonwood (talk) ✝ 06:08, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

::Yes, thank you! Reverosie (talk) 12:18, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

{{trout}}

You have been trouted for: I just want to see what trouting someone looks like Reverosie (talk) 15:11, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

In Baldwin IV of Jerusalem it says {{tq|but it was captured and destroyed by Saladin after two previous to the sultan.}} Something is missing. I am not qualified to do a full review but I made some minor changes. Polygnotus (talk) 18:24, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:You're absolutely right! The sentence had a missing word. Thank you so much for pointing this out!!! Reverosie (talk) 18:28, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

In Godehilde of Tosny the mother is referred to as Isabel of Conches in the infobox and as Isabel of Montfort in the lead which is a bit confusing.

Also {{tq|Although it is possible that Godehilde could have married both Robert and Baldwin, it is highly possible that William made a mistake}} at the end is missing something. Polygnotus (talk) 18:39, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:Thank you so much!! Both of these things are fixed! Reverosie (talk) 18:42, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Are you sure {{Tq|Isabel of Farabel}} existed? I googled that name and I can't find any evidence of a person existing by that name. I made some edits on SNR 0519-69.0 and Sibylla (wife of Bohemond III) btw. Polygnotus (talk) 18:56, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:About Isabel of Farabel: It's confusing. Bohemond III of Antioch's article has a bit more on that (but not really!). Also, thank you so much for the edits on those pages! I really appreciate the help! Reverosie (talk) 18:58, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

::It is possibly Isabella of Farabel but I am not sure about that. Polygnotus (talk) 19:14, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:::It is Isabella. I'm not sure why it said Isabel! Reverosie (talk) 19:16, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

::::Bohemond of Botron claims that Isabella(?) had a daughter called Isabel. Weird. Check out the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?go=Go&search=insource%3A%22Isabel%20of%20Farabel%22%20&title=Special%3ASearch&ns0=1&searchToken=6buojudlneyf9ab37ej2hj9zo query]. Polygnotus (talk) 19:20, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:::::Bohemond of Botron was married to Isabella of Botron, not Isabella of Farabel. Confusing. Reverosie (talk) 19:25, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

::::::To make things even more confusing, because why not, Bohemond of Botron says:

::::::{{tq|He was the son of Bohemond III of Antioch and his fourth wife Isabel of Farabel.}}

::::::Ok, so Bohemond of Botron is the son of Isabel of Farabel. Got it.

::::::Then it says {{tq|Whilst still a child, Bohemond was betrothed to Isabella}}

::::::Ok, the son of Isabel was bethroted to Isabella. Why not.

::::::Then it says: {{tq|With Isabella he had four children:... Isabel}} Are these people insane? Your mom, wife and child have the same name? Then why not call yourself Isabel as well? Polygnotus (talk) 19:29, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:::::::Yeah, I'm going to fix that now. To make things in this subject worse, Bohemond III of Antioch himself had two sons named Bohemond: Bohemond of Botron and Bohemond IV of Antioch Reverosie (talk) 19:31, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

::::::::I wasn't aware that you own a time machine. I think we should give them all an UUID to make differentiation easier. Polygnotus (talk) 19:32, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::I think they're differentiated on wikidata but still awful Reverosie (talk) 19:34, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

::::::::::So then in the sentence {{Tq|He was the son of Bohemond III of Antioch and his fourth wife Isabel of Farabel.}} it should be Isabella, right? Polygnotus (talk) 19:37, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::::Yes. I'll fix that too. I think that both spellings are used, but we should really stick to using one Reverosie (talk) 19:38, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

::::::::::::fixed Reverosie (talk) 19:38, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:::::::Fixed Reverosie (talk) 19:32, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Was Sibylla (wife of Bohemond III) (fl. 1180) correctly categorized as a {{tq|13th-century women}}? Polygnotus (talk) 19:02, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:I don't think so. I'll re-categorize that now Reverosie (talk) 19:13, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

::Some people dare call me a nitpicker! The audacity! {{smiley}} Thanks! Polygnotus (talk) 19:42, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Thank you for pointing these things out!!! Reverosie (talk) 19:42, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi, saw that you were interested in GA reviewing. I love your enthusiasm - I'm not acquainted with GAR , so I'll leave it to the mentors there to answer your question. However, I did want to recommend WP:DYK reviewing, which could help you get used to the whole "reviewing" thing. The process is similar-ish to GA, but simpler/faster as DYK's for new articles, usually, instead of, well, good articles. No pressure, just recommend a look ;). Cheers! GoldRomean (talk) 23:37, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:Thank you so much!!! I'm definitely going to look into that. It's a bit scary waiting for your first review, so I want to be as prepared as I can :) Reverosie (talk) 23:40, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Reverosie,

I just wanted to ask you if you had edited Wikipedia before with other accounts. It's not against policy to create a new account as long as the previous account(s) were not blocked. It's just incredibly unusual for a brand new account to accumulate more than 400 edits in their first 5 days of editing and you also do not edit like a new editor.

If you are actually a more experienced editor, just list your previous accounts on your User page. It's best to be open and honest on this platform. Thank you and if you have any questions about editing on Wikipedia or its many policies and guidelines, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you and happy editing! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:43, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

:Hello!

:No, I haven't edited Wikipedia before! I really am a new editor :) I've just had a lot of time on my hands and grasped the source editor quickly thanks to a bit of experience with programming.

:I've used the teahouse to my advantage so far and I plan to keep using it as long as I need it. Thanks so much! Reverosie (talk) 12:19, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Your user page is very nice :D 2409:4063:8E1D:DECA:1162:2C5D:C257:7942 (talk) 16:03, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

:Thank you so much!!! Reverosie (talk) 16:04, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

::Yes, good job on the user page. 🌳 Balsam Cottonwood (talk) ✝ 00:21, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Thank you so much!!! You were actually my inspiration to make a decent userpage, so it's really nice hearing that from you! Reverosie (talk) 00:25, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sibylla, Queen of Jerusalem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maria Komnene. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

:Thank you so much DPL bot! It's fixed Reverosie (talk) 12:21, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

:Thank you KiranBOT :) Reverosie (talk) 03:25, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Nothing special, just wanted to test out my new signature 🌷Reverosie🌷 (talk) 23:21, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

:not sure why the talk link won't work 🌷Reverosie🌷 🌸talk🌸 23:25, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

::? 🌷Reverosie🌷 (talk) 23:26, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

:::i think that did it 🌷Reverosie🌷 (talk) 23:27, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

::::no 🌷Reverosie🌷 talk 23:29, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

:::::was it the space 🌷Reverosie🌷talk 23:30, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

::::::it said it worked in the preferences 🌷Reverosie🌷 (talk) 23:31, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

:::::::no big deal 🌷Reverosie🌷 ^★talk★ 23:36, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

::::::::the space is still ugly though 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 23:37, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::The talk link doesn't work here because it's a self link on your own talk page. If you put your signature somewhere else, like in your sandbox, it should work. 🌳 Balsam Cottonwood (talk) ✝ 00:45, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

::::::::::Thank you so much! I should have tested that out somewhere else 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 02:31, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::::The talk is currently invisible to we the light-theme users, btw. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:53, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

::::::::::::Fixed, thank you for pointing that out! 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 15:55, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It will be held from Monday June 16 - Sunday July 13. There is $3338 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to help you buy books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for articles which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:33, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

:I'll take a look, thank you! 🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 13:34, 3 June 2025 (UTC)