Login
Login

Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia/Assessment#Assessment requests

{{Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Wikipedia articles by quality statistics}}

{{clear|left}}

{{shortcut|WP:WPWP/ASSESS}}

Welcome to the assessment department of the Wikipedia WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia-related articles (for scope, see the WikiProject page). While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{tlx|WikiProject Wikipedia}} banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of :Category:Wikipedia articles by quality and :Category:Wikipedia articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

{{TOC left|limit=4}}

{{clear}}

Subpages

{{flatlist|

}}

Popular pages: A bot-generated list of pageviews, useful for focused cleanup of frequently viewed articles.

Frequently asked questions

: See also the general assessment FAQ

; 1. What is the purpose of the article ratings? : The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content. Please note, however, that these ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole.

; 2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject? : Just add {{tl|WikiProject Wikipedia}} to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else.

; 3. Someone put a {{tl|WikiProject Wikipedia}} template on an article, but it doesn't seem to be within the project's scope. What should I do? : Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the project talk page (or directly with the person who tagged the article).

; 4. Who can assess articles? : Any member of WikiProject Wikipedia is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural disputes.

; 5. How do I rate an article? : Check the quality scale and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the instructions below to add the rating to the project banner on the article's talk page. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process; this is documented in the detailed assessment scale below.

; 6. Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? : Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.

; 7. What if I don't agree with a rating? : You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process; this is documented in the detailed assessment scale below.

; 8. Aren't the ratings subjective? : Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

; 9. What if I have a question not listed here? : If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department; for any other issues, you can go to the main project discussion page.

Instructions

=Quality assessments=

{{Assessment Class Summary|banner=WikiProject Wikipedia|topic=Wikipedia}}

{{Grading scheme

|Project = Wikipedia

|FA_example =

|A_example = 30 years war

|GA_example = Church of Scientology editing on Wikipedia

|B_example = Wikimedia Foundation

|C_example = Wikitravel

|Start_example = Bellevue School District

|Stub_example = Geographical bias on Wikipedia

|FL_example =

|List_example = List of Wikipedias

|Book_cat = yes

|Book_example = Book:Wikimedia Foundation

|Cat_cat = yes

|Cat_example = :Category:Wikimedia

|Dab_cat = yes

|Dab_example = Wikipedia (disambiguation)

|FM_cat =

|FM_example =

|File_cat = yes

|File_example = :File:Wiki.png

|Portal_cat = yes

|Portal_example = N/A

|Project_cat = yes

|Project_example = Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia

|Redirect_cat = yes

|Redirect_example = Wikipedia:List of media personalities who have vandalised Wikipedia

|Template_cat = yes

|Template_example = Template:Wikipedia

|NA_cat = yes

|NA_example = N/A

}}

=Importance assessment=

{{Assessment Importance Summary

|banner =WikiProject Wikipedia

|topic =Wikipedia

}}

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of Wikipedia.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.

{{Importance scheme

|topic = Wikipedia

|impn =

|Top_text =

|Top_example = Wikipedia

|High_text =

|High_example = Wikimania

|Mid_text =

|Mid_example = Nupedia

|Low_text =

|Low_example = Malayalam Wikipedia

|NA = yes

|NA_text =

|NA_example = :Category:Wikipedia

|Unknown = yes

|Unknown_text =

|Unknown_example= Magnus Manske

}}

Assessment requests

{{notice|For an introduction to assessments, see Assessment information.}}

{{Further|Category:Unassessed articles|label1=Category:Unassessed articles, by topic/subject|Category:All unassessed articles|label2=Category:All unassessed articles, Alphabetical}}

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it:

  • On the article's Talk page, blank the class parameter like WikiProject banner shell|class=|.
    The article is then immediately included at :Category:Unassessed articles and associated WikiProject sub-categories.

:OR

  • List the request below, and SIGN with four ~~~~ and then wait for the article's assessment. Note that due to the article's topic and/or the limited number of volunteers here at this wikiproject, and the backlog of requests, there may be a significant delay answering the request.

=Requests from 2025=

----

==Requests from May 2025==

  • Request reassessment on importance scale of Bertram Fletcher Robinson for both Wikipedia:WikiProject Devon and Wikipedia:WikiProject Journalism following significant expansion followinmg promotion to GA Status. Many thanks.82.38.214.91 (talk) 16:38, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Request reassessment of Walter Tirel. Sushidude21! (talk) 02:28, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

:: {{Done}} reassessed as C class. GoldRomean (talk) 21:41, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

:: {{Done}} assessed as start class. GoldRomean (talk) 21:41, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

----

==Requests from April 2025==

----

{{collapse top|title=Requests from 2025 - January to March}}

==Requests from March 2025==

  • Requesting an assessment of Earthquake (Jisoo song). Slinora (talk) 13:19, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} by @Nkon21, who assessed as C class @Slinora. Ktkvtsh (talk) 02:30, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting a reassessment of Steel guitar. User:Eagledj(talk) 17:46, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{No action}} The article has several issues: 1) Lead section is too extensive 2) Several statements have no references, where do these claims come from? 3) Two whole sections "Console steel guitars" and "Steels and slides" lack detail and any inline citations.
  • :As I said to another user, I encourage you to improve the article and request another reassessment! NeoGaze (talk) 21:00, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting a reassessment of The Books of Jacob. Adelequested (talk) 13:19, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} Reassessed to C-class. The article has multiple issues: 1) The first reference comes from twitter, used in a way that is not acceptable 2) References 26 and 27 are broken 3) Plot and characters sections have no references 4) Parts of the article are written in a persuasive and subjective style, making use of peackock terms. These parts should be rewritten to be more neutral NeoGaze (talk) 20:49, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • ::Thanks for the detailed feedback! Adelequested (talk) 10:15, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting a reassessment of A Place of Greater Safety. Adelequested (talk) 13:19, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} Reassessed to C-class. For improvement the article needs more references, as well as at least two more inline citations; plot section and the supposed Sunday Express Book of the Year award. NeoGaze (talk) 20:35, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting a reassessment of Lolly Willowes. Adelequested (talk) 13:19, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} Reassessed to C-class. More sources should be added if possible, and notes section should be reworked into a more standard list of sources and references. NeoGaze (talk) 20:30, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting an assessment of Module:EUPP seats. Julius Schwarz (talk) 14:39, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Not done}} as this does not need to be assessed. @Julius Schwarz. I have marked it as patrolled. Ktkvtsh (talk) 02:32, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
  • ::Thanks @Ktkvtsh. Can I remove the "Module rating is invalid or not specified" notice, then? It's a bit unsightly and, from what I understand, not applicable. Julius Schwarz (talk) 07:04, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
  • :::I'd say yes, though I really don't know much about Modules. Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:23, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting a reassessment of ThinkPad G series. Dcfbf (talk) 01:11, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} Reassessed as C-class. Lead paragraph could be more detailed. NeoGaze (talk) 20:19, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting an assessment of Jerjuan Newton. TarheelBornBred (talk) 16:59, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} Assessed to C-class. Lead pharagraph could be more detailed, but so far pretty good. NeoGaze (talk) 20:15, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting an assessment of The Diary of a CEO. Thank you! O2Q357Ys 15:25, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} Reassessed to B-class. Comprehensive and well-sourced. Good work! NeoGaze (talk) 20:09, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • ::Thanks O2Q357Ys (talk) 14:03, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting a reassessment of 1958 Rif riots. Mayouhm (talk) maybe C class now 12:54, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} Reassessed to C-class. It could be improved with the addition of pictures (if available and with no copyright issues) and "Aftermath" section could be more detailed. A citation requierement is pending there as well. NeoGaze (talk) 20:04, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting an assessment of Józef Tkaczuk. Wikociewie (talk) 11:57, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} Assessed as Start-class. Article needs to be developed further. NeoGaze (talk) 19:56, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting a reassessment of Education in Egypt, I have tidied it up, structured it, improved the text and added a history section Turnopoems (talk) 11:03, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Comment}} When I looked at it the article was rated a B -- if you want to get it up to an A-class you have to go to a specialized place for that, unfortunately -- here is only for up to B-class. I've actually rated it a C-class as there are large uncited parts, per the requirement that things likely to be challenged are cited for B-class. You can change it back if you disagree, though: to be honest, I'm not really sure how to interpret the "important or controversial material must be cited" criterion. Mrfoogles (talk) 04:10, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :I do think it's a nice history section, though. Mrfoogles (talk) 04:12, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting a reassessment of Egyptian cuisine, I have significantly expanded the article, including a history section Turnopoems (talk) 11:03, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} Reassessed to C-class. There are few issues; lead text is a bit too long, several pharagraphs have no inline citations, a citation is called for in "Medieval Egypt" and "Starters and salads" has a template calling for expansion. Otherwise excellent article! NeoGaze (talk) 19:48, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting assessment of Deep-sea anglerfish; current assessment: Start-class.Anthropophoca (talk) 05:34, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} @Anthropophoca reassessed at C-class, could use some work on references, try looking in deep sea articles and magazines as they may include an n article or report that could be used as a reference. Sheriff U3 18:17, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
  • ::I've found that a lot of those references tend to only mention the very basics of their biology and not much further, which is why i extensively referenced TW Pietsch's work, who is considered the expert on this clade. He's often interviewed when news agencies discuss these animals anyways. Anthropophoca (talk) 02:20, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting a reassessment of Adi Meyerson. Surfinsi (talk) 00:53, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} Reassessed to B-class. Detailed and extensively sourced. Good job! NeoGaze (talk) 19:41, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting an assessment of Berberism. Mayouhm (talk) 13:58, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} Reassessed at C-class Sheriff U3 16:09, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting an assessment of Giorgos Pantelakis. Abudabanas (talk) 10:49, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{done}}: assessed it as start class. Try to expand it. Also add more citations. RAIHAN ⚡ Got something to say? 11:01, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting an assessment of Your Love (Jisoo song). Slinora (talk) 16:57, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} RAIHAN ⚡ Got something to say? 18:25, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting a reassessment of Bondla Wildlife Sanctuary, I have significantly expanded the article, (notify me if there is any irrelevant content to be removed) User:Mitsingh (talk) 10:09, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} I decided to lower it from B-class to C-class, and honestly it could have been demoted to Start-class. The article still needs to be significantly developed, as several parts just have two or three lines worth of text, some of which also don't have any inline citations. More references and sources, if possible, should be added as well. Don't be discouraged! NeoGaze (talk) 09:00, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting a reassessment of Camp Hanuman Temple please, thx ash (talk) 15:18, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} Ashlar I assessed it at Start-class. Needs lots of work. Sheriff U3 16:09, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
  • ::Thanks. (As explanation, the version at the time I submitted the article for reassessment was a lot longer.) ash (talk) 04:43, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting a reassessment of Safe third country VeritasViolet (talk) 20:55, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} Reassessed as Start-class. The article needs be developed and improved in several ways, for example; a more detailed lead section, more references, broader perspective with cases beyond Europe and the Western Sphere, etc. NeoGaze (talk) 07:14, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting reassessment of Korea University Business School. I believe that the article is no longer a stub, as I added more information and provided sources. Please be kind to reassess the article, thank you! Nuritae331 (talk) 01:39, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} Reassessed as C-class. A few isssues I see are 1) lead text is too short, 2) a few paragraphs need more citations, such as "facilities" and the firs paragraph of "Accreditations and Rankings" an 3) a reference is repeated several times without it being named. Otherwise, jood job! NeoGaze (talk) 11:55, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting reassessment of Depauperate ecosystem as it is likely now more than a stub. Hirundinidae (talk) 20:27, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} I reassessed it as C-class. It is good and well-cited, but there is still room for expansion and improvement. Good job! NeoGaze (talk) 07:06, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting a assessment of Eish baladi Turnopoems (talk) 09:51, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} : assessed it as start class. You should try to expand it. Also add more citations. RAIHAN ⚡ Got something to say? 18:29, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting a reassessment of 2025 Bangladesh Premier League ~ RAIHAN ⚡ Got something to say? 09:30, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} Reassessed to B-class, detailed and well-referenced. The marketing section could be considered problematic, as it may be interpreted as advertising, but it seems neutral enough to me. NeoGaze (talk) 19:34, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting a reassessment of Bangladesh national cricket team ~ RAIHAN ⚡ Got something to say? 09:29, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{No action}} The article has several important issues, as the message boxes indicate. NeoGaze (talk) 19:18, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting a reassessment of In Outer Space Davejfudge (talk) 22:44, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} Reassesed to C-class. Article still needs improvement; mainly a more detailed lead paragraph, and more as well as varied references if possible. NeoGaze (talk) 19:11, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting a reassessment of Couldn't Wait to Tell You Krimzonmania7078 (talk) 22:53, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} Krimzonmania7078 I assessed it a Start-class. Sheriff U3 22:59, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting a reassessment of Flag of Hawaii Jp2207 (talk) 21:24, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} I reassessed it as B-class. Extensive coverage and well-cited. NeoGaze (talk) 23:33, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting a reassessment of Egypt Turnopoems (talk) 16:23, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Comment}} The same as in the case below. NeoGaze (talk) 19:04, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • ::Marking as {{No action}} Ktkvtsh (talk) 02:39, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting a reassessment of Economy of Egypt Turnopoems (talk) 16:16, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Comment}} The article is already B-class, if you want to raise its quality class to either A or to GA, you need to nominate the article for review in its talk page. NeoGaze (talk) 19:02, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • ::Marking as {{No action}} Ktkvtsh (talk) 02:38, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting a reassessment of Military industry of Egypt Turnopoems (talk) 16:16, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} assessed as B class Ktkvtsh (talk) 06:43, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting an assessment of Amstone Turnopoems (talk) 16:13, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{done}} RAIHAN ⚡ Got something to say? 18:34, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting an assessment of Robotics Engineering Systems Turnopoems (talk) 16:13, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{done}} I've assessed it as a Start-class. RAIHAN ⚡ Got something to say? 18:33, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting a reassessment of Jizzakh CentralAsianEditor (talk) 14:05, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{No action}} The article needs substantial development. There are empty sections and several paragraphs without inline citations. More sources, if possible, should be added as well. I encourage to keep working on the article and to request a new reassessment once these issues have been solved. NeoGaze (talk) 18:50, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting a assessment of Ilan Uti CentralAsianEditor (talk) 14:05, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} C-class. Could use some more references, and I can't tell whether the citation at the end of the Geography section is intended to apply to all the information in the section, or just the last paragraph. With some more citations and (maybe) a little expansion on why it was strategically important, I think this would be B-class. Mrfoogles (talk) 04:28, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting a reassessment of Tashkent (state) CentralAsianEditor (talk) 13:59, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} @CentralAsianEditor, assessed as B class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 02:38, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting a reassessment of the politician Damien Tudehope, this looks like it should be at least start-class. Qwerty123M (talk) 01:03, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} Reassesed to C-class. The article is fairly complete and (with the exception of a single citation needed) well referenced. You should probably adress that issue as soon as you can. Otherwise, there is still room for improvement, but pretty good work done so far! NeoGaze (talk) 09:10, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting reassessment of Matt King (swimmer) Joeykai (talk) 02:27, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} Reassesed to C-class, seeing it is detailed and correctly referenced. Just a few points for future improvement; Lead paragraph should be more detailed, Some parts of the article would benefit of rewritting with better prose, and a reference lacks correct citation format (the link is just there, vulnerable to link rot). NeoGaze (talk) 18:38, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting reassessment of Michael Bunting Joeykai (talk) 02:27, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} Reassesed to B-class. Detailed, comprehensive and well-sourced. Excellent! NeoGaze (talk) 18:24, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting assessment of Yale Bulldogs women's soccer Joeykai (talk) 02:27, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} Assessed as Start-class as it needs more work. For example, lead paragraph is too short, and history section doesn't cover events beyond 2005, and has significant gaps between 1980-200. More references and sources are needed, and if possible they should be added using citation templates NeoGaze (talk) 10:07, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting reassessment of 2024–25 Nigeria Premier Football League - Article meets requirements for start class. Jõséhola 10:00, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} @Josedimaria I assessed it at Start-class. Sheriff U3 05:17, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting reassessment of Van Zandt, Washington feedmepaperr (talk) 05:40, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} assessed as C class @Feedmepaperr Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:20, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Reassessment of Greg Berlanti. Article has enough info to be considered higher than start-class Theadventurer64 (talk) 19:29, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} assessed as C class @Theadventurer64 Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:19, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting reassessment of Jewish deli after it has been an article for improvement. Yeshivish613 (talk) 00:14, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} -- B; well-cited & good coverage. Mrfoogles (talk) 04:22, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
  • Request reassessment please of Tom Thurber. (Suggest this is more than a stub now.) ash (talk) 10:17, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{done}} - @ash, remove stub; assessed as C-class article. JoeNMLC (talk) 12:04, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

----

==Requests from February 2025==

:*:{{Done}} Assessed at C-class Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 23:24, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

----

==Requests from January 2025==

  • Requesting assessment of Newton, Surrey. Currently a start-class article but I have made a fair amount of updates and added citations where missing. IngeniousPachyderm (talk) 17:34, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} assessed as C class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 18:07, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting assessment of 2012 Bacha Khan International Airport attack. start-class article. substantial updates made so far. Tahir Pro (talk) 09:15, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} assessed as C class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 18:06, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting assessment of St. Joseph School (Hilo, Hawaii) and Waiakea High School. Waiakea High's article has been updated, and SJS's was merged from another article, so it is no longer a stub. Thank you! Theadventurer64 (talk) 21:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} assessed as Start class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 18:04, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting reassessment of Evolutionary economics. The article has witnessed a revamp in recent years, I would be grateful if one could have a look at what it is now and provide some ideas for further development. Econ angoryushev (talk) 18:36, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} assessed as B class. Anything higher will need to be requested elsewhere. Ktkvtsh (talk) 18:03, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting reassessment of Willie McLean (soccer, born 1904) Joeykai (talk) 06:52, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Not done}} @Joeykai leaving at Start class. There is a good bit of this left unsourced. Ktkvtsh (talk) 18:02, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting assessment of Whittier Mansion. It was a stub when I began, and I have made significant updates. I'd like to understand where it stands, and what could help further improve it. Thank you!

:Delectopierre (talk) 20:12, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

  • :{{already done}}, kept at c class. would recommend checking wp:mos to clarify prose. article structure would be better sorted into broader "history", "location", "design/architecture" sections. is there more information about the hauntings that make it lead-worthy? source 2 leads to an error page and i placed a few citation needed tags to improve. nice work so far!--Plifal (talk) 04:49, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting reassessment of St Martin's, Isles of Scilly from start to C-Class following recent updates and improvements. Thankyou for your time and consideration to this request. 82.38.214.91 (talk) 15:03, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} I have reassessed at C-class. Looks good! Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 00:10, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting assessment for Platon Rozhdestvensky. This is the longest article I've written and am simply looking for feedback on it. Thank you in advance!Alexthegod5 (talk) 20:57, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} Alexthegod5 I have assessed as a C-class Article. It is well sourced and has plenty of links to other articles. Good Job! Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 00:13, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting reassessment for Grevillea exul. I have expanded upon this page with numerous scientific papers and online resources, as well as information from a book I have specifically on the genus. I believe the page deserves at the very least a C-class rating, as it is no longer a stub. Thank you. Lord.of.the.Proterozoic (talk) 04:04, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} Lord.of.the.Proterozoic I have reassessed it as a C-class article. It is fairly well written for a plant, as I have noticed those hardly ever make it above Start-class. Good Work! Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 07:00, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
  • ::Thank you! I will keep up what I'm doing with creating and improving articles for Grevillea and Hakea species. Lord.of.the.Proterozoic (talk) 09:39, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting reassessment for 1906 California gubernatorial election and 1902 California gubernatorial election. Articles have been expanded upon alot by myself and others. Thank you! NewishIdeas (talk) 00:42, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} NewishIdeas I have reassessed the article as a C-class article. It looks nice! Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 06:57, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting reassessment for Mardakan. I've been updating and adding information to the article for a very long time. I believe it should not be classified as a Start-class article anymore. Please be kind to reassess it again. Thank you very much! Nuritae331 (talk) 16:47, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} Nuritae331 I have reassessed the article at C-class. One thing I noticed is that in the section titled Etymology there was no reference cited for most of the paragraph. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 20:24, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Request reassessment for 1910 California gubernatorial election. Currently rated stub class, but has been expanded upon alot. Thank you! NewishIdeas (talk) 00:23, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} Assessed at C-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 06:20, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting reassessment for Music of Gunbuster. For Music of Gunbuster, this was because Areaseven siginificantly expanded on it in 2023 and 2024. I do not believe the Stub-Class designation is correct for an article of that length. Z. Patterson (talk) 03:46, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} Assessed at Start-class. I don't think it qualifies for C-class yet, but it is definitely at least Start-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 06:23, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting reassessment for Emily Patricia Gibson. It was a stub article, but I have expanded on it significantly. Thank you! Chefcat29 (talk) 17:10, 19 January 2025
  • :{{Already Done|Assessed}} by Schwede66 they gave it a C-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 06:32, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting reassessment for Third medium contact method. The article now covers all developments of the third medium contact method, including the most recent ones from 2025, a description of the basic approach (without too much technical detail), brief sections on its applications, and it is well-cited. I would appreciate it if other editors could review the article and provide their feedback on this request.AHFrederiksen (talk) 12:43, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} Assessed at C-class. It looks fairly good, it may qualify for a B-class, but a more experienced reviewer should look at it. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 06:36, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting an assessment for the Pete Ondeng article. I have been working on it to ensure compliance with Wikipedia's BLP policy. Feedback is needed on:

:* Reliability of sources used.

:* Neutrality in tone—does it seem promotional?

:* Contentious or poorly sourced material.

: Your assistance in reviewing or improving the article is greatly appreciated! Emily Emiliene k (talk)

  • :{{Done}} Assessed at C-class. It is very good, reference 11. needs to be fixed though. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 06:47, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting reassessment for Sogang University. I've provided generous information as well as sources since it's last assessment, please be kind to reassess it again, thank you! Nuritae331 (talk) 16:53, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
  • :I assessed it at C-class but it maybe a B-class, a more experienced editor will need to look at it. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 06:24, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting assessment for Cope Notes, which did not receive a rating after NPP review. 30Four (talk) 06:21, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} Assessed at start class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 06:19, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting assessment for Bridge Fire. Never re-assessed since start rating. Arcturus95 (talk) 03:04, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
  • :*:{{Done}}: Gave it a B, very well-written article with great sources. Mamani1990 (talk) 16:18, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting for assessment of Bawi system. Recently made and need input on its current status. Thanks :) Mmis325 (talk) 04:37, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Already done|Graded}} by Ipigott. They have given it a B. / RemoveRedSky [talk] 18:04, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting for (re)assessment of Taguig. Made some significant edits, and I would like to know what still needs to be improved so I can work on it. Thank you! PH 0447 (talk) 12:02, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} assessed as B class. Anything higher will need to be requested elsewhere. Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:59, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Requesting reassessment of Louis René Barrera Indiangrass Wildlife Sanctuary. Thank you in advance! LIUCWisshorn24 (talk)
  • :{{Done}} assessed as B class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:56, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Request reassessment of Francis Francis please. (I don't think this is a stub anymore.) Thanks ash (talk) 09:14, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Already done|Upgraded}} to 20px Start Class by Vanderwaalforces. / RemoveRedSky [talk] 18:08, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Request reassessment of Next, Hello! I don't think this is a stub anymore and kindly request reassessment please. Thank you in advance, Mamani1990 (talk) 19:45, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
  • :{{Done}} I assessed it at C-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 06:27, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

----

{{collapse bottom}}

Assessment log

class=toccolours align=right

| Wikipedia articles:
{{WP1|Wikipedia}}

:The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

{{Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Wikipedia articles by quality log}}

Wikipedia

Assessment