Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murat Khasanov

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn by the nominator. (non-admin closure) Mhhossein talk 12:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

=[[:Murat Khasanov]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Murat Khasanov}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Murat_Khasanov Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Murat Khasanov}})

Withdrawn by nominator. Now adequately sourced. Insufficient sources after being online since 2008 and following prod. Once source is WP:PRIMARY and cannot be "counted" towards notability and the other is a passing reference. Essentially an unsourced BLP. TransporterMan (TALK) 19:17, 26 April 2020 (UTC) Withdrawn. TransporterMan (TALK) 19:47, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:36, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:37, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

  • Keep. Clearly passes WP:NPOL per the source that I added yesterday. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:45, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:53, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

  • Keep per {{u|Phil Bridger}}. A parliamentarian always passes WP:NPOL. --Soman (talk) 20:21, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep. Khasanov is a member of the State Duma - the national legislature of Russia. LefcentrerightTalk (plz ping) 21:59, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep, the nominator seems to react because someone added unsourced content to the article. Then that content is the problem, not the article. Geschichte (talk) 11:04, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep. Yes, the article needs some improvement, so by all means flag it for {{tl|BLP refimprove}}, but he has credible and properly verified inherent notability claims under both WP:NATHLETE and WP:NPOL. Bearcat (talk) 16:16, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.