Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yes, we créu

=[[Yes, we créu]]=

:{{la|Yes, we créu}} – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{findsources|Yes, we créu}})

Non-notable neologism with no sources. Cheers! Scapler (talk) 09:29, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete - plenty of Ghits but all Twitter and blogs - per WP:NEO we need more solid attestation, and more time, to know if this is really entering the language or just this week's catch-phrase. JohnCD (talk) 10:17, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Want to speedy on general principle, but there's no such rationale. =) Somebody whipped this one up in light of Rio De Janerio's recent successful bid to the 2016 olympics, but that alone doesn't make it notable. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 15:47, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete, neologism. Hairhorn (talk) 19:08, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete Even Barack Obama's famous "Yes, we can" don't even have an article on Wikipedia [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yes_we_can]. Why should this have an article? Also, no references provided. Jolenine (Talk - My Contribs) 21:17, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete: Per above. Joe Chill (talk) 22:12, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete: Non-notable. RmSilva can talk! 22:40, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 22:35, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. If this gains traction, and if sources present themselves, then a mention at 2016 Summer Olympics might be in order - but there isn't enough here for an article. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 15:42, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment: Related AFD: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Créu. This fact belongs somewhere, so I added this to 2016_Summer_Olympics#Bidding: "Rejoicing Brazillians coined the phrase "Yes, we créu" (a play on U.S. President Barack Obama's 2008 campaign slogan) to celebrate the win."{{cite news|url=http://www.estadao.com.br/noticias/esportes,yes-we-creu-o-hit-olimpico-brasileiro-no-twitter,445002,0.htm|title='Yes We Créu': o hit olímpico brasileiro no Twitter|date=October 2, 2009|work=O Estado de S. Paulo|accessdate=2009-10-08}}
  • --Milowent (talk) 17:36, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
  • delete not even a neologism. Just a twitter trend. --Damiens.rf 18:31, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete for sure, not encyclopedic (even though I'm Brazilian...) Capmo (talk) 02:51, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

{{reflist}}