Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Pennsylvania/Alerts/content

:{{pagelinks|1=Wikipedia:WikiProject Pennsylvania/Alerts/content}} – (View MfD)​

::{{grey|(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.)}} Aasim (talk) 20:27, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

This page has never been used since it was created. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:30, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• As best I can tell, you are neither a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Pennsylvania, nor have you discussed anything at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pennsylvania. Is the page causing trouble outside of the WikiProject? Or, why are you cleaning up others' WikiProjects? WikiProjects should manage themselves, and not have outsiders fiddling things for no good reason. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:51, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
• Keep as rag picking, with an optional caution from the closer to stop wasting the time of MFD. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:13, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

: Keep Agree. Not extensive. Project may start again Wakelamp d[@-@]b (talk) 13:18, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

• Comment the template that uses this subpage has also been nominated for deletion, {{tl|WikiProject Pennsylvania alerts}} is nominated at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_November_29 -- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 17:22, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
• Delete The essay Wikipedia:Ragpicking only applies to {{tq|page[s] in draft space or user space}}, and provides arguments against cleaning out those specific namespaces (both of which I happen to agree with). It does not provide a valid argument against cleaning out unused cruft in project namespace, which this appears to be. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:33, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
• :I agree with that, but do not agree with WikiProjects being given no special respect. Is this "cleaning out", or is it random deletions. Why this page, and not other cruft? Once random outsiders have finished deleting their selection of the meaning of cruft, will the WikiProject members continue to regard the WikiProject as theirs to manage? I think it is more likely that outsider micromanagement deletion of their subpages will do more damage in destabilising the WikiProject membership that it will help the WikiProject. SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:32, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Aasim (talk) 20:27, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

:Delete per nom. Not everything created in a project space and even in a WikiProject subpage is automatically worth keeping, nor does it need to be discussed with the project. It either is used or useful or is not. In this case, it shows that it isn't used. Gonnym (talk) 07:03, 10 December 2021 (UTC)|

:Keep Project is active. They can delete the page if they wish Wakelamp d[@-@]b (talk) 13:20, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

::{{replyto|Wakelamp}} Please don't leave multiple bolded !votes in the same discussion, it's fine to leave additional comments or reply to other editors but you should only leave one bolded !vote. 192.76.8.80 (talk) 11:33, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

:::Thank-you for explaining. I will correct in future, Wakelamp d[@-@]b (talk) 13:51, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

:Keep or Redirect to the primary project alerts page, but in the absence of a clear cut WP:DELREASON no need to waste community time in an WP:MFD, blanking or redirecting almost always suffices in cases where no CSD applies. Regards, 213.193.27.121 (talk) 19:18, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

• Keep, as this does no harm.Jackattack1597 (talk) 19:58, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.