Wikipedia:Picture of the day/Unused

This is a page of featured pictures that have been skipped from appearing as picture of the day for various reasons. Some of these are mainly blocked by their articles or usage (for example, a very short article, or insufficient context), whereas others have more fundamental problems and will probably never appear on the main page. This is not a policy page or archive of discussions; with the exception of the first category, things may be removed from here without any further discussion. Note that some headings may be empty at any particular time. This is fine, it's better to have a framework for new images to be added to than to lack that framework.

Pictures added to this page should also be manually added to :Category:Picture of the day/Unused.

For pictures that have not appeared yet, see :Category:Featured pictures that have not appeared on the Main Page.

=Least likely to appear=

Major problems or cases where we simply did not act in a timely enough manner, and Wikipedia has moved on from the images too much. Largely a mixture of "We can't put that on the main page!" and "...Should this still be a featured picture?"

==Could cause harm==

THESE MUST NOT APPEAR WITHOUT FURTHER DISCUSSION

class="wikitable"

!Image!!Article!!Reason

File:Image Hidden.svgLynchingVoted against appearing in a discussion May 2022. Undocumented image with photographic decisions that lessen the victim's humanity, e.g. the hat put over the face. We don't know who or where this is, making this of very low value to historians. Also, it's on MediaWiki:Bad image list, which means we should be extra careful as we know that this image (or ones like it) have been used disruptively.
File:Image Hidden.svgHermaphrodite (Nadar)Voted against appearing in a discussion May 2022. Risk of harm to intersex people due to it being too clinical, too potentially exploitative, too likely to cause people to object to the nudity then jump straight to attacking intersex people if not properly contextualised. Nominator and restorer of the image requests it not appear.
File:Image Hidden.svgSeptember MornVoted against appearing per discussion at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/September Morn. A mixture of issues with article's creator and issues with the painting's model being under eighteen.

==Licensing issues==

Non-free material must not appear on the main page. As such, anything with unclear status cannot appear.

class="wikitable"

!Image!!Article!!Reason

180pxMe at the ZooSee Talk:Me at the zoo, including the DYK nomination. From the discussions there, there's significant doubt that this is legitimately released under a Creative Commons licence. It was briefly designated as such on YouTube in around 2013, but we believe that the copyright holder is Yakov Lapitsky (who filmed the video) rather than its subject, Jawed Karim, who released it on YouTube. Absent some indication from Lapitsky that he released the rights to Karim, we cannot be certain that he authorised its publication.

As with the Churchill image this has not (yet) been deleted from Commons, but under the precautionary principle we should not feature it on Wikipedia's main page.

=Ones primarily blocked by articles=

There's nothing inherently wrong with these images, but their articles are either too short or too problematic to put on the main page. If someone was willing to put in the work, most of these are potentially main page worthy.

class="wikitable"

!Image!!Article!!Reason

180pxArt and engraving on United States banknotesKind of hard to make anything out of a single entry in a list. Could maybe run it alongside :File:US-Fractional (5th Issue)-$0.10-Fr.1265.jpg?
180pxVienna DiptychArticle way too short.
180pxHippasaArticle consists of one sentence and a list, and the image is one species in the genus.
180px
180px
Half union (in theory)Not used.
180pxFuscous honeyeaterArticle way too short, and the most relevant text is uncited.
180pxWonga pigeonArticle basically uncited.
180pxNanpu BridgeArticle is an uncited stub
180pxPython brongersmaiMight be okay to run this, but article stops being cited half-way through.
180pxMarburger Schlossarticle a stub
180pxYellow-billed cardinalarticle is a stub
180pxYellow-billed cardinal
Paroaria
both articles are stubs
180pxLe Boulevard de Montmartre, Matinée de Printempsarticle is a stub
180pxPeucetiaarticle is a stub
180pxChâteau de Luynesarticle is a stub
180pxHortus Harenboth this and the other article, moon gate, are stubs
180pxDichroic prismarticle is entirely uncited, and also not entirely clear what the picture is, per Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2023 January 30
180pxFerrocarril de Antofagasta a Boliviano usable cited material in the article
180pxPortrait of Adeline Ravouxno usable cited material really pertaining to the painting
180pxHemimorphiteno inline cites
180pxAeshna affinisno inline cites
180pxLavender waxbillStub, and not well referenced
180pxNot currently in any article, and doubt about which turtle it is
180pxNassau grouperNot enough usable cited material in the article
180pxBlack-fronted dotterelNo inline cites
180pxSt. GilgenArticle largely uncited
180pxDesert rose (crystal)Article largely cited to unreliable sources
180pxNorthern_masked_weaverArticle a short stub and largely uncited
180pxSilver-washed fritillaryArticle largely uncited
180pxBrilliant emeraldArticle is a stub and not enough usable material in it
180pxKentish gloryArticle largely uncited
180pxLibythea celtisArticle stubby, and not certain how much is cited
180pxCucullia lucifugaArticle is a stub without any inline citations
180pxSaturnia pavoniaArticle is a stub without any inline citations
180pxMercury switchArticle doesn't have enough cited usable material
180pxChalarodon madagascariensisBoth Chalarodon madagascariensis and Chalarodon are poorly referenced stubs
180pxRusty-margined flycatcherOther than a detailed taxonomy, article has no other cited content
180pxDavid with the Head of Goliath (Caravaggio, Vienna)not sufficiently referenced to write a blurb
180pxLion of Babylonvery short stub with almost no refs
180pxKungur Ice Cavealmost no refs
180pxLycaena phlaeasno inline refs
180pxWu Yongno inline refs
180pxLandscape with the Good Samaritanno inline refs
180pxSpur-winged lapwingmost sections unreferenced and not enough material to generate meaningful blurb
180pxChesterton Windmillmostly unreferenced
180pxRiver ternno inline refs
180pxSella groupno inline refs
180pxSmall red damselflyno inline refs
180pxSmall red damselflyno inline refs
180pxBatalha Monasteryno inline refs
180pxMelitaea phoebearticle needs a major copyedit, not in a coherent enough state to construct a blurb right now
180pxCommon darterno inline cites
180pxRingletno inline cites
180pxCharleston in the American Civil Warnot really enough cited material to form a sensible blurb
180pxSanta Maria delle Grazie, Bresciano inline cites
180pxRoma (opera)no inline cites
180pxWhite-faced storm petrelonly the disease section has inline cites, and that's not enough to construct a blurb
180pxGraphosoma italicumonly the taxonomy section has inline cites, and that's not enough to construct a blurb
180pxKatabatic windneither the article nor the image caption sufficiently cited to construct a blurb
180pxPorta Nigranot enough cited material to construct a blurb
180pxBlack bitternnot enough cited material to construct a blurb
180pxChâteau de Saint-Ulrichnot enough cited material to construct a blurb
180pxFoden Trucksnot enough cited material to construct a blurb
180pxFamiclonenot enough cited material to construct a blurb
180pxSmall skipperno inline cites
180pxOpaon varicolorArticle is a stub.
180pxParamo ground tyrantArticle is a stub.
180pxJuncus compressusArticle is a stub.
180pxNGC 2014, NGC 2020Both articles are stubs.
180pxYeongjo of Joseonnot enough cited material to construct a blurb (earlier unreferenced blurb can be found at Talk:Yeongjo of Joseon/POTD)
180pxBanz Abbeyno inline citations
180pxAsilidaearticle is largely unsourced
180pxPoint Arena Lightarticle is largerly unsourced
180pxYellow-bellied flyrobinonly taxonomy section is sourced, other sections are not
180pxLarge yellow underwingarticle is largely unsourced
180pxCoenonympha glycerionnot enough usable prose
180pxArgynnis pandoranot enough usable prose
180pxJuma Mosque, Shamakhinot enough cited prose
180pxHermann Castlearticle entirely uncited
180pxKyelangno significant aspects of the topic are cited
180pxVanemuinearticle largely unsourced
180pxHope (whale)article has general list of references but no inline citations
180pxEriogaster arbusculaearticle has no inline citations
180pxNelson's sparrowlittle more than a stub, and not enough cited material
180pxBiological membrane?Unclear which article I should be linking this to. There were many articles listed at the FPC nomination, but none of them seem to cover the contents of the image in its totality. For example, the first article listed on the FPC - Biological membrane - does not mention "micelles" anywhere, despite those being part of this image.
180pxNaria porariaNot enough cited material to form a blurb
180pxMandelbulbHeavily unsourced
180pxPycnoclineWhatever the phenomenon shown in the picture is, involving jellyfish, the article prose doesn't seem to mention it (and also no sourcing in the image caption). The biology section only discusses plankton.
180pxGustave III (Auber) or Pierre-Luc-Charles CicériThe Gustave III article doesn't have enough cited information or even information to construct a blurb. Heavily unsourced in artist article.
180pxGreat Sphinx of TanisNot enough sourced information
180pxAbbey of the DormitionArticle largely unsourced
180pxSynesthesia in art, Giuseppe ArcimboldoOne article uses a deprecated sourcing style and one is largely unsourced. Sources exist and could be made into a separate article.
180pxBasteiArticle lacks inline citations
180pxYıldız Hamidiye MosqueMostly uncited
180pxNorthrop HL-10Article has copyvio issues
180pxAlicudiNot enough cited material to construct a blurb
180pxNational Maps of SwitzerlandArticle largely uncited
180pxPepper No. 30Although the blurb now at Talk:Pepper No. 30/POTD has some material, it also contains a {{tl|citation needed}} tag, not to mention that the first part about illumination is uncited, and the part about the aperture is hazy even in the article. Overall I don't see sufficient cited material for this to run at present
180pxJules Barbierstub article
180pxJorge Amadomost of the article is uncited, and those bits that are cited aren't relevant enough to construct a blurb from
180pxWoodbury Langdonlacking inline citations
180pxHemiolaus cobaltinaarticle is a stub
180pxLeptomyrina phidiasarticle is a stub
180pxCymothoe fumanaarticle is a stub

=Doubts as to whether this is the preferred version=

Images that may or may not have some usage, but have another version of some prominence that should probably be talked about before we put this on the main page.

class="wikitable"

!Image!!Article!!Reason

180pxTheoretically Wheatfield with CrowsReplaced in Wheatfield with Crows by :File:Vincent Van Gogh - Wheatfield with Crows.jpg
180pxTheoretically Gibson's albatrossDoesn't appear in Gibson's albatross and doesn't exactly look like the birds pictured there. It is in Great albatross but not certain what exactly it is

Holding areas

These images may be about to leave POTD/Unused, by one means or another. Things are unlikely to stay in these categories all that long, so they might be empty at any one time, but should be kept around to encourage proper classification.

=Under discussion=

These images are temporarily being delayed to allow a discussion or delist vote to take place.

class="wikitable"

!Image!!Article!!Reason

=Potentially ready for Main Page?=

Images held back at one point, but which might be fine now. If they are obviously fine, just remove :Category:Picture of the day/Unused from the image, and it should be scheduled shortly (possibly by you).

class="wikitable"

!Image!!Article!!Reason

{{Main Page topics|state=collapsed}}

Category:Wikipedia Picture of the day

Category:Picture of the day/Unused