Login
Login

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 December 29#1578335057

{{rfd log header|2019|December 28|2019|December 30}}

=[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 December 29|December 29]]=

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 29, 2019.

==Urbanology==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 January 6%23Urbanology

==Robin Thicke and Miley Cyrus twerked in MTV Video Music Awards==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. signed, Rosguill talk 18:24, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

WP:PANDORA –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 23:18, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

  • delete what a stupid and absurd redirect. Praxidicae (talk) 23:27, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep Seems reasonable to me. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 00:29, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete as a redirect that is overly-precise do a point where as a search term it is implausible and unlikely. Steel1943 (talk) 13:04, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • :...FWIW, I'm not a fan of WP:PANDORA existing either or being used as a rationale for deletion and honestly wish it could be removed, but of course, I see an unrelated reason to delete this redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 16:18, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep as harmless. WP:PANDORA is so laughably wrong as a rationale, especially for this redirect. Nobody looks at that redirect and thinks "I'm going to go create several more just like it!" And even if that did happen, so what? If they're bad redirects, there will be a valid rationale for deletion, and if they're good and/or harmless, Wikipedia is improved by those creations. -- Tavix (talk) 15:04, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • :{{re|Tavix|Steel1943}} I fully admit that I phoned in the deletion rationale for this one. I was tagging about 100 redirects as {{tl|R from meme}} and just wanted to put whatever down for a nomination to get it out of the way. The real reason for nomination I would say is because it would never be expected as an article name due to its construction as a full sentence. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 16:39, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete. The full title as it is written is not a likely search term. Utopes (talk) 04:06, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete, redirect has never [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&range=all-time&pages=Robin_Thicke_and_Miley_Cyrus_twerked_in_MTV_Video_Music_Awards gotten any significant views], and it isn't that likely of a search term to begin with. TheAwesomeHwyh 20:30, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak delete per Utopes. I understand the desire to have some access to this content, and we'd need a descriptive phrase in absence of a set name for it. That gives us a lot of leeway, but I just don't see this one. "Twerked in"? Even something like Robin Thicke and Miley Cyrus twerking I could accept. --BDD (talk) 15:57, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==Rapist Search==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete.

--BDD (talk) 15:54, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Rapist Search }} → :Marc Brown (journalist)  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rapist_Search&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2019-11-29&end=2019-12-28&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Rapist_Search stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Rapist Search|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Rapist Search closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Rapist Search|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Rapist Search closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Rapist Search|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Rapist Search closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

No mention in WP:BLP article. Not sure I understand nor do I want to. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 22:51, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

  • Delete Apparently based on a meme that shows the guy presenting a report featuring a suspect sketch that looks like him. Enlightening discussions (in both quality and association) in places like [https://www.dawgshed.com/threads/worst-suspect-sketch-ever-somehow-leads-to-police-arresting-florida-teen.170660/ this]. The kind of flash-in-the-pan crap we ought not to dignify with topical redirects. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 23:04, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete no reliable sources have appeared to have covered this and the meme has been removed from the article for over 4 years without being readded strongly indicating that this was never relevant to being with.--69.157.252.96 (talk) 23:52, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
  • delete per User:Elmidae --Lenticel (talk) 03:46, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==Pokémon with the "poke" and the "mon" and the thing where the guy comes out of the thing==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. Editors make the darndest redirects! --BDD (talk) 15:53, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

unhelpful and unlikely search term. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 22:42, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

  • Comment from [http://www.lardlad.com/assets/quotes/season12/CABF16.shtml this link], it appears to be a quote. – UnnamedUser (talk; contribs) 01:11, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete—useless. buidhe 12:04, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • delete unwieldy and unlikely redirect --Lenticel (talk) 03:49, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==Xbox 1080==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. signed, Rosguill talk 18:24, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Xbox 1080 }} → :Xbox Series X  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Xbox_1080&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2019-11-22&end=2019-12-21&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Xbox_1080 stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Xbox 1080|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Xbox 1080 closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Xbox 1080|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Xbox 1080 closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Xbox 1080|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Xbox 1080 closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Implausible search term. Not called the Xbox 1080 in any capacity and googling it just brings up results relating to Xboxes working on 1080p displays. Anarchyte (talk | work) 12:10, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

  • Delete outside of resolution talk I’ve found a Facebook group, a rumour that the Xbox 1 was going to be called Xbox 1080 (the article did mention it could be an April Fools prank), and an unofficial concept for what an Xbox handheld could look like that was crested in 2009. None of these are viable targets.--69.157.252.96 (talk) 08:07, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep as a plausible {{Tl|R from incorrect name}} for consistency, considering that {{No redirect|Xbox 720}} is a redirect that targets Xbox One. Steel1943 (talk) 19:46, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

::The big difference is that I at least remember people referring to the XB1 as the 720 informally before the official name was announced thought based on my search it doesn’t appear to have happened with this console. I also did a quick Google search (not necessarily the best source granted) which strongly indicates that the 720 name was in far greater use regarding what we now know as the Xbox 1 than 1080 being used for the Series X. In short the 720 redirect isn’t anywhere near as relevant as it first appears.--69.157.252.96 (talk) 02:55, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

::{{ping|Steel1943}} The XB1 has been referred to as the XB720. [https://www.denofgeek.com/games/xbox-720/25704/xbox-one-price-and-specs-revealed] [https://www.extremetech.com/gaming/159402-microsofts-sacrifice-the-xbox-one-is-now-merely-the-xbox-720]. The same cannot be said for the XBSX. Anarchyte (talk | work) 03:52, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

::::Once again agreed, the only source I could find regarding Microsoft naming their console 1080 was an article that mentioned that the Overclockers Club leaked in April 1st 2011 that Microsoft’s next console would be called Xbox 1080 (the Xbox 1 not the Series X) because every game would have a 1080 resolution and that it would be announced at E3 2011.[https://wccftech.com/microsoft-xbox-1080-leaked-specs-unveiled/]. So ironically due to a 7 year old April fools joke the XB1 has more of a claim to this redirect though nowhere near enough to make that a viable target.--69.157.252.96 (talk) 07:09, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 20:27, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. We're a few Xboxes past the 360 now, so it's unlikely that people would extrapolate past the nonexistent Xbox 720. <RetroCraft314 /> 23:57, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep. WP:CHEAP. I can imagine a curious college student who hasn't played video games in a while to search this term. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 16:46, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 March 6#Nintendo 512. Besides, if this naming scheme continued, wouldn't the pattern be *2 rather than +360? -- Tavix (talk) 13:16, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete This is silly, and roughly equally plausible for any post-360 Xbox model. --BDD (talk) 15:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==Return of the==

File:White check mark in dark green rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was keep

. signed, Rosguill talk 18:25, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Return of the }} → :Return of the No. 1 Suspect  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Return_of_the&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2019-11-22&end=2019-12-21&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Return_of_the stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Return of the|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Return of the closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Return of the|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Return of the closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Return of the|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Return of the closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Ambiguous title with no clear target. Delete. - Eureka Lott 17:30, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

  • Comment This one's tricky. Normally the # would go to an article "Return of the" as with "Point #1" going to Point (disambiguation) but there isn't any disambiguation for this, as everything in such a list would only be a partial title match. Would using a {{tlx|technical reasons}} followed by a {{tlx|lookfrom}} be better? I don't see where they can put a lookfrom in a hatnote. I put the example in the redirect. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:14, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
  • delete vague at best --Lenticel (talk) 01:58, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep: Useful redirect for linking and searching since Return of the #1 Suspect leads to it. I don't see anything else that could plausibly be referred to by this (people don't randomly omit words while looking for articles); thus, the current target is the clear one. Glades12 (talk) 13:46, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete as vague. I now want to listen to "Return of the Mack". Steel1943 (talk) 19:43, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
  • ...Now neutral since discovering that Return of the #1 Suspect does indeed look up {{No redirect|Return of the}} due to technical restrictions. In fact, due to this and the fact that many have stated that this redirect is unhelpful due to this title being a WP:PTM for many titles, I wonder if a disambiguation page is an idea? Thinking about it though, the primary issue with such a disambiguation page is that unless there are not titles that match that exact string of technical issues ("Return of the #..."), then the current target would be the only title listed, and the only other possible entries would be the {{Tl|Look from}} and {{Tl|In title}} templates... Steel1943 (talk) 16:12, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep This is a workaround for a technical restriction. This redirect ensures that people who type the correct name of the album actually get to their intended destination. If there are other articles this title could refer to, we can link to them with {{tl|technical reasons}}. Reach Out to the Truth 03:52, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 20:23, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

  • Delete. Return of the No. 1 Suspect is viewed rarely (average 3 times a day), and I have my doubts it would survive an AfD. This says to me very few people would expect Return of the to point to it, especially because outside of the technical error, it's not known by that name at all. Nohomersryan (talk) 20:50, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep. I fully support {{u|AngusWOOF}}'s proposed solution here. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 16:46, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep per Reach Out to the Truth. I think it's fair to say that there's nothing known simply as "Return of the", and thus nothing we need to disambiguate against. Nohomersryan's point about the article's dubious notability is well taken, but AfD is a separate question. If it's deleted and the redirect is subsequently speedied, so be it. --BDD (talk) 15:51, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==Range Rover SVR==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. Rocknrollmancer, I think you should feel free to remove the supporting statement in the target article. Of course, be open to having it added back, or this redirect recreated, if the idea of this model can be supported with reliable sources. --BDD (talk) 15:47, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Range Rover SVR }} → :Jaguar R and SVR models  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Range_Rover_SVR&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2019-11-21&end=2019-12-20&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Range_Rover_SVR stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Range Rover SVR|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Range Rover SVR closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Range Rover SVR|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Range Rover SVR closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Range Rover SVR|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Range Rover SVR closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Delete as a bogus redirect - serves no purpose other than to cause disappointment and frustration - readers need to look elsewhere. The target article contains no information on Range Rover SVR, other than an Original Research statement in the lede: "On 11 August 2014, the Range Rover Sport SVR was announced by Land Rover at Pebble Beach. The model sports a number of aesthetic alterations and performance improvements. This vehicle was introduced for the 2015 model year.". Additionally there is one Range Rover image and a mention as part of a caption to SVR logo. The majority of article content is devoted to Jaguar, with no other Range Rover content. The same editor who created the redirect created all the target article content. Rocknrollmancer (talk) 02:21, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

:*Comment - as a post-script just to confirm there is nothing existing at Range Rover, and no worthwhile content at the target article, so nothing citated to merge/retarget is inappropriate.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 14:15, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 20:22, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==Jacques Désormeaux==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 January 7%23Jacques Désormeaux

==Johhny Brittain==

File:White check mark in dark green rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was keep

. Rough consensus that this typo warrants a redirect because of its history and relatively common occurrence. (non-admin closure) ComplexRational (talk) 16:08, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Johhny Brittain }} → :Johnny Brittain  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Johhny_Brittain&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2019-11-29&end=2019-12-28&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Johhny_Brittain stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Johhny Brittain|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Johhny Brittain closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Johhny Brittain|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Johhny Brittain closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Johhny Brittain|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Johhny Brittain closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Implausible typo. Page was moved to the correct title after being created at this title by mistake. Jalen Folf (talk) 14:50, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

:*Delete. A waste of a redirect. Thanks, Thatoneweirdwikier Say hi 16:54, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

::*Redirects are cheap. This discussion will use rather more resources. We do not normally delete redirects from page moves within article space. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 17:32, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

  • Keep. Over 11 years old, and harmless. 84.236.27.55 (talk) 18:15, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete, considering that Johhny doesn't exist and never has. Steel1943 (talk) 20:00, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep per Nohomersryan. Johhny may not exist, but this nominated redirect existing makes sense for the same reason I created {{No redirect|Lada Gaga}} years ago: It is a commonly-used typo by third-party sources. Steel1943 (talk) 21:53, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep. I get hundreds of results for "Johhny Brittain" on Google, so I don't think this typo is particularly implausible [https://www.motorcyclenews.com/news/new-bikes/royal-enfield-bullet-trials-works-replica/] [https://indianautosblog.com/royal-enfield-bullet-trials-suffer-from-low-demand-report-p318965] [https://www.jwg.co.uk/shop/product/royal-enfield-bullet-500-trials] [https://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/castrol-series-famous-riders-18-cards-275764696]. Nohomersryan (talk) 20:52, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==Windows Janus==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 January 6%23Windows Janus

==Cent Jours Avant Le Lendemain==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. signed, Rosguill talk 19:59, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

This is a redirect related to a non-notable fanwork. Was created by a sockpuppet who is known for adding cruft to franchise pages. ★Trekker (talk) 10:41, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

  • Delete per WP:RFD#D7, broken (section does not exist). 84.236.27.55 (talk) 11:17, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
  • I've combined these nominations. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2019_December_29&oldid=933215547#Cent_Jours_Avant_Le_Lendemain Before I did], each had an identical nomination statement and delete vote. --BDD (talk) 19:06, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==The Exhibitionist==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. signed, Rosguill talk 19:58, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = The Exhibitionist }} → :Ava Max#Discography  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Exhibitionist&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2019-11-29&end=2019-12-28&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=The_Exhibitionist stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:The Exhibitionist|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#The Exhibitionist closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:The Exhibitionist|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#The Exhibitionist closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:The Exhibitionist|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#The Exhibitionist closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

I can't find any reliable sources confirming that this is the title of the subject's upcoming album, it seems to just be a rumour at this point. If this discussion is closed as delete, it would be nice if The Exhibitionist (album) and The Exhibitionist (Ava Max album) were also deleted. Vaporgaze (talk) 10:08, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

  • Delete all 3 - as per nom. Currently not mentioned at target, and no reliable sourcing.Onel5969 TT me 10:52, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==Third hand==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 January 6%23Third hand

==Wikiclinic==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. signed, Rosguill talk 19:58, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Wikiclinic }} → :Wikipedia:Clinic for Wikipediholics  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikiclinic&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2019-11-29&end=2019-12-28&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Wikiclinic stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Wikiclinic|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Wikiclinic closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Wikiclinic|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Wikiclinic closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Wikiclinic|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Wikiclinic closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Inappropriate cross-namespace redirect to a joke page – very unlikely to be useful to readers or editors. I would recommend deletion. ComplexRational (talk) 00:31, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==War journalism==

File:White check mark in dark green rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was keep

. signed, Rosguill talk 19:57, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = War journalism }} → :War correspondent  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=War_journalism&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2019-11-29&end=2019-12-28&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=War_journalism stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:War journalism|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#War journalism closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:War journalism|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#War journalism closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:War journalism|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#War journalism closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

This could also conceivably point to Peace journalism, where war journalism is described in some detail (despite the title). The current target is more geared towards war journalists, but I could see this going either way. ComplexRational (talk) 00:15, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

:After some consideration, Keep. War journalism is a big subject (there are dictionaries and encyclopedias of war journalism out there), and a full article is likely to be forthcoming. Redirect to Peace journalism will be misleading to readers. It's akin redirecting black to white, because white is explained by contrasting itself with black... 凰兰时罗 (talk) 01:12, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==Bath toy==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 January 6%23Bath toy