. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 21:27, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- {{no redirect|1 = EISP }} → :Orgasm (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=EISP&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2020-02-15&end=2020-03-15&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=EISP stats]) [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:EISP|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#EISP closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:EISP|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#EISP closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:EISP|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#EISP closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ]
Ambiguous redirect, as pointed out on the Miscellaneous Village Pump. (I'm a new user - am I doing this right?) Catgirllover4ever (talk) 06:29, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
:* The English International School of Padua
:* English International School Prague
:* English for Integrated Studies Project
:* Exercise-Induced Sexual Pleasure[https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-pleasures-sex/201203/exercise-induced-orgasms-you-asked-im-answering], but neither orgasm#Exercise-induced nor sexual stimulation mention the term.
: Paradoctor (talk) 07:33, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
KeepDisambiguate as per Paradoctor (see below) Perhaps I can add a bit of clarity here. EISP is an ambiguous term needing a redirect to the schools which use those initials. The term 'Exercise-induced sexual pleasure' got attention from scholars and the media around the first half of the 2010s as you can see [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22exercise-induced+sexual+pleasure%22&rlz=1CAPPDO_enUS716BM717&oq=%22exercise-induced+sexual+pleasure%22&aqs=chrome..69i57.11619j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 here] by referring to what was in popular parlance a 'coregasm'. The wiki-article on Coregasm which I wrote got merged into the wiki-article on Orgasm, but the section got whittled down; evidently many of the contributors to the Orgasm article did not think that it was a valid term, that it was pop culture nonsense; nevertheless there is still discussion in the Orgasm article (hard to find because the Table of Contents is set to only the top levels). Bottom line: the term should point to this section of the Orgasm article [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orgasm#Exercise-induced Orgasm#Females#Exercise-induced here] which is under the second section Females, subsection Achieving Orgasm, subsection entitled 'Exercise-induced'. So I hope that fellow Wikipedians find this exercise of possibly redirecting the redirect to be thoroughly stimulating.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 09:11, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
:: a) The section does not mention / define the term, so redirecting there is pointless.
:: b) Even if it did mention the term, it is not clear that it is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for the term. See [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&range=latest-20&pages=English_for_Integrated_Studies%7CEnglish_International_School_Prague%7CThe_English_International_School_of_Padua%7CEISP Pageviews].
:: Paradoctor (talk) 09:27, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
:::Comment. I added the full term Exercise-induced sexual pleasure to the Exercise-induced section of the Orgasm article. While I agree it's not the most common usage, it does crop up in academic research such as [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14681994.2011.647902 here], which is better than if there was a redirect for WISP (Wikipedia-induced...)--Tomwsulcer (talk) 12:05, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
:::: Good. Got anything countering b) the pageviews data? Paradoctor (talk) 12:24, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
:::::No. Frankly I am not that committed to either inclusion or deletion of the redirect -- in the broader scheme of things, we're in deckchairs territory, shuffling them about.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 13:36, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
:::::: Umm, you realize these are not the only options? Cf. my vote. Paradoctor (talk) 14:15, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
:::::::Update changing to Disambiguate as per Paradoctor (I favor keeping link from Exercise-induced sexual pleasure to the appropriate section of the Orgasm page but frankly I have no strong opinion either way on this.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 15:25, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
:: Are you asking whether this is possible, or do you want someone to do it? If the latter: I'm just waiting for this discussion to be closed. Paradoctor (talk) 12:40, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
::: Adding a ping to Soumyabrata, who may be unaware of the Paradoctor's question above. --CiaPan (talk) 13:18, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
::::Drafted below the redirect and RFD notices. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:46, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Disambiguate I was going to retarget it myself, but the Paradoctor's proposal is much better, so I support it now. --CiaPan (talk) 11:28, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Disambiguate and Close as moot; Ivanvector (kudos unto them) has already added the disambiguation page text; it is no longer a Redirect for discussion, so I think we're done here. TJRC (talk) 19:54, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.