Login
Login

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 6#1739470691

{{rfd log header|2025|February 5|2025|February 7}}

=[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 6|February 6]]=

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 6, 2025.

==Iupac nomenclature==

File:Right-pointing white arrow in blue rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was retarget

to IUPAC nomenclature of chemistry. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:49, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Iupac nomenclature is clearly short for IUPAC nomenclature of chemistry and reflects the fact that people don't always type all-caps when searching. {{no redirect|IUPAC nomenclature}} (all-caps) already redirects to IUPAC nomenclature of chemistry and this change would bring the uncapitalized version into alignment with the all-caps version. {{no redirect|Iupac nomenclature}} currently redirects to chemical nomenclature which is a broader topic than the IUPAC standards. While some people may say chemical nomenclature when they specifically mean IUPAC, readers who type in Iupac nomenclature should be directed to the article for which that is shorthand. Please note, there was a brief merge discussion at Talk:International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry#Merge proposal where it was determined that IUPAC nomenclature of chemistry should be kept and improved. --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 22:05, 6 February 2025 (UTC)


Notices posted on talk pages of the redirect's creator (User:Eequor) and most recent editor (User:Pablo Busatto), both of whom appear inactive. Notices also posted at talk pages for International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, Chemical nomenclature, IUPAC nomenclature of chemistry, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemistry. Ping {{ping|Niodium}} and {{ping|DMacks}} who participated in the merge discussion. --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 22:20, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

:*Just edit this to redirect to IUPAC nomenclature of chemistry as the more natural target. This discussion was not needed I think! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:00, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

  • Retarget to IUPAC nomenclature of chemistry, agreed that this discussion is probably not needed. Glad to see there's clear direction for the target article to mature as a broad, parent article. ⇌ Synpath 00:39, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

:* Yes. Retarget. No discussion needed.

:YBG (talk) 05:25, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

:Agree on retarget to IUPAC nomenclature of chemistry. Fishsicles (talk) 13:48, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==2026 Union budget of India==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. ✗plicit 23:49, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Too Soon. No notable coverage in article, or in list of budgets. Blethering Scot 20:14, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

Delete: Definitely WP:TOOSOON. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:20, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Magick==

File:White check mark in dark green rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was keep

. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:49, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Magick }} → :Ceremonial magic  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:Magick|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Magick closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Magick|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Magick closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Magick|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#Magick closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ] 

Should rather redirect to the disambiguation page Magic, as "magick" is foremost an alternative spelling of "magic" and is even covered in that disambiguation page since earlier. Blockhaj (talk) 19:54, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

  • Keep. There's a strong difference between the two; "magic" most commonly refers to the stage performance, whilst "magick" pretty much always means rituals and supernatural. Nyttend (talk) 23:34, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
  • :Do you have a source for this? Even if that is the case, then it should redirect to Magic (supernatural), not Ceremonial magic, which atm is a flawed article, as stated by its banner. Blockhaj (talk) 00:12, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
  • It should redirect to the Magic disambiguation page. Even if you agree the term doesn't apply to stage magic, it could link to either Ceremonial magic or Magic (supernatural) and it could still be someone trying to find the Magic (illusion) article or any of the other articles linked on the disambiguation page. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:37, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

:*Retarget to Magic (supernatural) rather than the disambiguation page. I feel like most folks who are spelling it like that are looking for something different than stage magic, but I agree that Ceremonial magic shouldn't be the redirect due to it being a flawed article. Magic (supernatural) literally cites this spelling in the first line of the article. Lukeh486 (talk) 18:07, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

::I think its better to prioritize the broader image than "most folks", because we have no way of measuring that properly. Blockhaj (talk) 21:25, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

  • Keep per {{u|Nyttend}}. Second choice could be 'Magic (supernatural)' or 'Magick (Book 4)'. Since these options exist the disamb. page would be the fourth or fifth choice. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:56, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Keep per {{u|Nyttend}} and {{u|Randy Kryn}}; the specific magic that Crowley revived with the term is most fully described at the current target; Magic (supernatural) isn't bad per se, but it is much broader that the modern use of the term. Which brings us to Magick (Book 4), the 1929 book that revived and defined the term in modern usage, might possibly be the most "correct". In any case, magick refers to the robe, dagger, pentacle type magic, not the rabbit out of the hat variety. Skyerise (talk) 06:47, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
  • :Crowley was a nut case and for us unfamiliar with his work it is absolutely ludicrus that a simple alternate spelling of magic should be specifically associated with his work. It is an alternative spelling and our search terms should reflect that first and foremost. Blockhaj (talk) 03:28, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

== 3000s ==

File:White i in purple rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was Retarget to the corresponding disambiguation pages

. Jay 💬 20:01, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

These were last discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_August_20#3000s. Most of the 236 redirects were deleted, while 39 of them were retargeted to disambiguation pages or products as {{tl|R from plural}}. These redirects did not reach a consensus for action. In that discussion, one user suggested retargeting to the disambiguation pages 3000, 4000, and 5000 as {{tl|R from plural}}. Another suggested that they kept as plausible search terms for the first few millennia after the 3rd millennium — in particular, 3000s (millennium) redirects to Timeline of the far future as well. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:56, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

  • I would be inclined to retarget all to the disambiguation pages as {{tl|r from plural}}; in particular I see no content about the 5000s CE at timeline of the far future and so the current redirect is fairly unhelpful. There is at least some information about the 3000s CE and one entry related to the 4000s. Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 15:51, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 19:27, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

  • Retarget all per Caecilius. The DABs all include links to the timeline article as well as other plausible targets. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:53, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Brave Books==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 15%23Brave Books

==ALCS==

File:White check mark in dark green rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was keep

. Jay 💬 18:19, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

"ALCS" is a very ambiguous term, and not everyone associates that with what it currently redirects to. Many people also associate that with a Christian school in Madison, Wisconsin, especially after a recent school shooting there. Cyber the tiger🐯 (talk) 17:59, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

:*Keep per WP:RECENTISM and how ALCS is more associated historically with baseball. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 18:31, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

:* If "ALCS" is ambiguous, then this should probably have been a request to move ALCS (disambiguation) to ALCS. ObserveOwl (talk) 18:53, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

  • Keep Web search results are overwhelmingly related to the baseball competition. I don't see enough evidence to overturn longstanding consensus that the current target is the primary topic. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 22:04, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==What is wikipedia about==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 13%23What is wikipedia about

==Paris 2024 (disambiguation)==

File:White check mark in dark green rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was keep

. Jay 💬 18:18, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Paris 2024 used to be a redirect, but I turned it into a dab page. I'm not sure what purpose this title ever had; it claimed to be a dab, but in reality was just a redirect to another redirect (and now a redirect to a dab). I'm tempted to WP:G6 it, but people sometimes get touchy about CSD, so bringing it here out of an abundance of caution. RoySmith (talk) 17:15, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

:PS, what got me here was when DPL bot tagged Paris 2024 as having ("a large number" of :-)) incoming links to a disambiguation page which needed fixing.

  • Keep Perfectly standard {{tl|R to disambiguation page}}. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:24, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Keep - yeah, the page got automatically created when certain housekeeping edits are made.Onel5969 TT me 22:45, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Chancellor of the the University of California, Santa Barbara==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. Jay 💬 16:57, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Delete as ungrammatical ({{tq|of the}} -> {{!tq|of the the}}) Duckmather (talk) 16:17, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

:Nice catch. I have just created Chancellor of the University of California, Santa Barbara instead. Thank you for catching this typo. Cfls (talk) 18:09, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==List of people nominated to the Supreme Court of the United States in the last year of a presidency==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete some

. Since this has already been relisted twice, I'd like to at least close the ones that are obvious. Feel free to relist the first at any time. asilvering (talk) 23:46, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Does not seem that the target page contains such an organized list of people as stated in the titles of these redirects. Readers searching these terms may not be satisfied with the results, given the target page has no such organization. (However, one of the redirects, {{No redirect|List of people nominated to the Supreme Court of the United States in the last year of a presidency}}, is a {{Tl|R from merge}}.) Steel1943 (talk) 06:56, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

:I think the best solution would be to restore [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_people_nominated_to_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States_in_the_last_year_of_a_presidency&oldid=873767969 the article that was purportedly integrated into another one]. Anythingyouwant (talk) 06:49, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

::No, The rationale for redirecting the article was sound{{snd}}see:Talk:List of people nominated to the Supreme Court of the United States in the last year of a presidency. The information was integrated into the target article, but its fit did not stand the test of time when the article underwent subsequent expansion and revisions. Drdpw (talk) 01:15, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 02:26, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:09, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete #2 and #3. Jay 💬 16:59, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Bishop of of Tuam, Limerick and Killaloe==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. ✗plicit 11:51, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Delete. The duplicate "of" makes this very implausible, but as a 2023 creation, it's old enough that it probably shouldn't be R3-deleted. Nyttend (talk) 09:25, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

:Agree, delete as ungrammatical Duckmather (talk) 16:15, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Murder of of John Williams==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. ✗plicit 11:51, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Delete. The duplicate "of" makes this very implausible, but it was created by a pagemove, so it's not R3-eligible. Nyttend (talk) 09:25, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

:Agree, delete as ungrammatical Duckmather (talk) 16:17, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

Comment If this is from a page move then there will be links linking to this redirect, but the only pages that do link here are ones related to RfD

:WhatLinksHere shows only links in current revisions of articles. Imagine that your article linked to this article at this title, and after it was moved, your article was edited to remove the extra "of". Your article won't show up in WhatLinksHere for "of of". Also, see the page history; it's unquestionably the result of a pagemove. Nyttend (talk) 23:25, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Apache shirt==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 4%23Apache shirt

==Sridevi (upcoming film)==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. asilvering (talk) 23:40, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

This is an {{tl|R from move}} but is misleading and ambiguous (with Sreedevi (film)). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:49, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

:Comment: The subject of Sreedevi (film) is not ambiguous with the nominated redirect, considering the subject of Sreedevi (film) was released in 1977 and is in no way "upcoming". Steel1943 (talk) 19:26, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Similar names, sure, but not ambiguous per Steel, and we have the hatnote for that anyway. How is it misleading? Isn't it plausible that readers look for a film that was announced (in 2014, but readers may not recall years) but not yet released? Jay 💬 11:29, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
  • {{re|Jay}} Misleading because it's not "upcoming". Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:41, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 00:58, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

:Delete – no longer upcoming. Cremastra (talk) 14:56, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete per all. Jay 💬 18:03, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Keep. Do we know that it's "no longer upcoming"? It hasn't been released to this point, but that doesn't mean that it won't ever be released. -- Tavix (talk) 16:59, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
  • :I tried searching before voting, could not find a single source after 2014. Jay 💬 07:41, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
  • ::If it has been cancelled, surely there'd be a source stating that. Unless that has been confirmed, it's still technically upcoming because it has the potential to be released at any time. -- Tavix (talk) 14:00, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
  • :::On the contrary, if there were plans of a release, there would have been sources (at least one) in the last 10 years mentioning that. Jay 💬 17:41, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
  • ::::Why would that be a requirement? Given the poster controversy, a surprise release would make sense. -- Tavix (talk) 01:30, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
  • :::::It is common sense, not a requirement. Cannot emphasize the 10-year delay enough. Any speculation of a surprise or an upcoming release is crystal balling. Jay 💬 07:29, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
  • ::::::It seems the disagreement is on what a lack of sourcing represents. My position is that it's upcoming unless sources say it's been cancelled. Your position is that upcoming requires sourcing of a release date. -- Tavix (talk) 14:28, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:37, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Lasalle College, Bogota==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 6%23Lasalle College, Bogota

==SCCTM==

File:White equals sign on grey rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was no consensus

. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:56, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

This abbreviation seems to mostly be used for the South Carolina Council of Teachers of Mathematics. I can't find any usage of it referring to the film. Rusalkii (talk) 00:29, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

:Delete unless there's an article about the teacher's council mentioned above. Ahri Boy (talk) 10:23, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Keep unless there's an article about the council of teachers mentioned above. Here's some usage: [https://eurocultav.com/2024/12/17/santa-claus-conquers-the-martians-other-holiday-hallucinations-agfa-and-something-weird-release-blu-ray-review/] [https://misantropey.com/2014/12/05/plotopsy-podcast-4-santa-claus-conquers-the-martians/] [https://bluray.highdefdigest.com/9169/santa_martians_special_edition.html] [https://livelocalman.com/2017/10/15/msting-links-cinematic-titanic-episode-5-santa-claus-conquers-the-martians/comment-page-1/] [https://www.reddit.com/r/MST3K/comments/3xidmw/which_is_better_santa_claus_or_santa_claus/?rdt=58369] [https://livelocalman.com/2017/10/]. -- Tavix (talk) 14:32, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 03:10, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete. Without a mention, this is confusing, especially if it's ambiguous ("what's this 1964 film got to do with the teachers' organisation I was looking for?"). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:13, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 08:40, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Keep per Tavix. Even without a mention there is no confusion, the target is a title with first letters capitalized. Reconsider when the teachers get a page to target. Jay 💬 18:38, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Final relist. Keep or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:23, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Mars Silvanus==

File:White check mark in dark green rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was keep

. Jay 💬 16:51, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

I created this from an AFC/R request, but there seem to be two good targets and User:Cactusisme seemed to prefer the Silvanus (mythology) target. I personally could be swayed either way, but I lean towards the section in Mars (mythology) that was initially suggested and that I created it pointing to. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 08:11, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

: I would lean towards keeping it pointing to Mars (mythology), though I think either target would be fine enough. From what I can tell, Cato's passage is the only mention of "Mars Silvanus", and (as we note at Mars's article) it is more likely an asyndetic reference to both gods. At least in the current state of both articles, the section at Mars (mythology) seems to provide the most effective coverage. – Michael Aurel (talk) 01:53, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

  • Keep. The current target seems to note that scholarship seems to consider it a likely interpretation mistake as opposed to a well-attested single entity. Current target also links to Silvanus prominently in the section. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:19, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Athena Mapelli Mozzi==

File:White check mark in dark green rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was keep

. (non-admin closure) Utopes (talk / cont) 10:12, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

I'm questioning whether we need a Redirect for an infant daughter who has no notability of their own. Liz Read! Talk! 04:51, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

:* Seems harmless to me. The redirect is justified as a topic covered or listed in another article, and the non-notability is all the more reason to keep it as a redirect, since it is not likely to be expanded into an article. I recommend keep. StainedGlassCavern (talk) 05:24, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

:It's very common to have redirect articles like this, particularly with things like royal children who do not yet - or may never - attain notability in their own right. I also recommend keep. OGBC1992 (talk) 11:19, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

  • Keep There has been enough mention of her name in the press to warrant having a redirect. Is she notable enough to have an article though? Obviously not. Keivan.fTalk 02:21, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Keep per Keivan.f. Best to keep this as a redirect than to have it as a redlink and encourage article creation. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 07:16, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Scott Kobos==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. Complex/Rational 04:02, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Non-notable minor league player. Removed from target page in Special:Diff/1206094656, has not played since per [https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=kobos-000sco# baseball-reference]. Chew(V • T • E) 03:12, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Aramis Ademan==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. Complex/Rational 04:02, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Non-notable retired minor league player. Removed in Special:Diff/1065068449. Has not played since leaving the Cubs organization. Chew(V • T • E) 03:08, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Eddy Julio Maritnez==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. Complex/Rational 04:02, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Non-notable retired minor league player. Removed in Special:Diff/1020077181 and retired shortly after. A similar redirect to the same player was deleted in {{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 3#Eddy Martínez}} Chew(V • T • E) 03:04, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Type hint==

File:Right-pointing white arrow in blue rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was retarget

to Type system#Combining static and dynamic type checking. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:42, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

This isn't a PHP-specific thing, so the redirect should ideally be retargeted somewhere Duckmather (talk) 02:44, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Pyston==

File:Right-pointing white arrow in blue rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was retarget

to Python (programming language)#Other implementations. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 03:23, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Not sure this is a plausible misspelling. I think this is more likely a misspelling of Piston. Duckmather (talk) 02:32, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

:Comment a quick google search reveals that it refers to https://github.com/pyston/pyston, which might not be notable Duckmather (talk) 02:33, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

  • Refine to Python (programming language)#Other implementations This is a {{tl|R from subtopic}}, not {{tl|R from misspelling}}. The relevant subtopic is already mentioned in that subsection. Add a {{tl|redirect}} hatnote at the target section if needed to resolve any confusion with differently-spelled words. 59.149.117.119 (talk) 04:59, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

:* I'm fine with that. (Striking my initial nomination statement because I was silly.) Duckmather (talk) 16:21, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

  • Refine above (creator of 11-year old redir). Duckmather do you think next time before nomming here, you check the article? p.s. it isn't notable either, but that's irrelevant as it's a redirect. Widefox; talk 23:05, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==C/-==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. Complex/Rational 04:02, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = C/- }} → :C (disambiguation)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:C/-|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#C/- closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:C/-|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#C/- closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:C/-|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#C/- closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ] 

I'm not sure what this might refer to Duckmather (talk) 02:27, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete, it would seem to be an Aussie variant of "c/o" as in "care of", as for postal instructions. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 04:47, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Python (snake)==

File:White check mark in dark green rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was keep

. Consensus that the DAB page is the correct target. Of those participants, it was split between a bare redirect and targeting the section. Since the section is at the top, there's no practical difference, so I am keeping the status quo. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 03:31, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Python (snake) }} → :Python  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:Python (snake)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Python (snake) closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Python (snake)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Python (snake) closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Python (snake)|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#Python (snake) closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ] 
  • {{no redirect|1 = Python snake }} → :Python  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:Python snake|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Python snake closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Python snake|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Python snake closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Python snake|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#Python snake closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ] 
  • {{no redirect|1 = Python (zoology) }} → :Python  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:Python (zoology)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Python (zoology) closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Python (zoology)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Python (zoology) closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Python (zoology)|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#Python (zoology) closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ] 

Maybe retarget to Pythonidae? I think the "snake" disambiguator makes it pretty unambiguous, unless you want to also argue that Python (mythology) and Python (programming language) also count as "snakes". Duckmather (talk) 02:23, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

  • Retarget as per Duck jengod (talk) 02:28, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Keep The ambiguity is of course not coming from the programming language, but the two real-life snake classifications listed. Pythonidae is the family and Python (genus) is within it, but the genus' common name is "true pythons". Seems to me like either could be argued for as the better target, so best to keep. -- Fyrael (talk) 02:36, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

* Retarget per nom. Unambiguous and makes it easier on readers to find desired subject instead of navigating through a DAB page. — 🪫Volatile 📲T | ⌨️C 02:31, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

:* Retarget to Python#Snakes as {{tl|R from incomplete disambiguation}}. StainedGlassCavern (talk) 16:33, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

  • Keep. Per Fyrael. There is ambiguity between Pythonidae and Python (genus). Plantdrew (talk) 17:12, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==कल्की केकलां==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:44, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

{{Oldrfdlist|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 6#कल्की केकलां|keep}}

Alt lang tagged as an R without mention. Without a mention, this does not seem to be a helpful redirect.

This name was removed from the page 8 years ago following an RfD. Tagging as an "R without mention" is not a permanent solution for such RLANGs, as they are generally for pages where such a title is used and at the very least referred to somewhere, to verify the accuracy of the name & search term. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:31, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: The redirect is apparently the Hindi spelling of the name of the subject, who stars in Hindi-language films, correct?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (Goodbye!) 01:32, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

::Mellohi!, Yes. — Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 09:14, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

::Keep The Hindi name seems relevant to the subject as it is a Hindi language film actress. — Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 09:17, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

  • That's not a neutral relisting statement, Mellohi. It has been made clear that the person is an actress. The act of starring in an alt-lang film does not automatically necessitate name-translation redirects though. We don't translate the name of a person every time they speak another language. The name was removed from the page 8 years ago as apparently invalid. Echoing what AngusWOOF said at the previous discussion, "You have to keep that in there so that the redirect makes sense. Otherwise there is no value in retaining this when it is not an identifying name for her primary career.", is still true. If it's not an identifying name, then this otherwise does not have enough affinity to stay. Add the name to the infobox if it's actually what she's called, or delete it if it's not; can't have both. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:47, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete Given the 2012 RfC about article leads (prior to the last RFD) and the 2017 RfC about infoboxes (after the last RFD, which is why this got removed from the infobox), the relevant editor community have basically said quite strongly that they don't think Indic scripts are useful on English Wikipedia, and they don't want to maintain such content. A {{tl|R without mention}} feels to me like an end-run around the spirit of those RfCs. 59.149.117.119 (talk) 22:55, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete – Non-English redirects such as this are not useful on English Wikipedia. Drdpw (talk) 01:07, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==5.1 Music Disc==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 13%235.1 Music Disc

==Shoo in==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 3%23Shoo in

==Khmer ultranationalism==

File:White check mark in dark green rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was keep

. asilvering (talk) 23:37, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

No mention of "ultra" at the target, nor "ultranationalism". Utopes (talk / cont) 06:50, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

: Keep It is a plausible search term. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 13:54, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

:I’m specifically referring to the Khmer Rouge. They were some of the most extreme ultranationalists in history because they banned anything that was not Cambodian and killed everyone who did not follow these rules. For example they would kill anyone who were glasses because glasses were not a Cambodian invention. Otis the Texan (talk) 20:04, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

::{{tqq|.. they would kill anyone who were glasses because glasses were not a Cambodian invention.}}{{cn|date=January 2025}} Also see Anti-intellectualism#Democratic Kampuchea. Jay 💬 18:27, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 05:03, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Comment: The phrase "Khmer ultranationalism" is discussed on New Naratif [https://newnaratif.com/the-anti-vietnamese-legacy-of-kem-ley/] and the Alternative History forum [https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/why-were-the-khmer-rouge-so-violent.543698/], as well as quickly mentioned in a master's thesis [https://dspace.cuni.cz/bitstream/handle/20.500.11956/176919/120428589.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y] and on Rational Wiki [https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Totalitarianism]. I'm not saying these are reliable sources by any means but thought it was worth mentioning where the term is being used. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:19, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Given the newly presented context.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (Goodbye!) 01:16, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

  • Keep. They're obviously related concepts; Khmer ultranationalism is a subset of Khmer nationalism. We routinely expect a redirect to be discussed in the target, but that's because of requirements like relevance (is X related to Y?), which is obvious here because of the titles alone, or because we need to prove that one title is an alternate term for, or related to, the term used for the article title (is "Kampuchea" really related to "Cambodia"?), and again, the terms are obviously related here. Nyttend (talk) 09:29, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Keep per Nyttend. This seems to be used a a descriptor/subset, so the current target is fine and helpful to readers. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 07:13, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==WLBJ (defunct)==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 1%23WLBJ (defunct)