Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 22#Template:TRS Footer

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by {{admin|Izno}} AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Introduction to tables/tabs}}

Seems to have been replaced with Help:Introduction to tables with Wiki Markup/tabs. User:GKFX^talk 21:18, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

:Correct - this can be deleted. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)^talk 23:13, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:22, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|TOSHI Engine games}}

No transclusions. No main article. None of the target articles contain the string "Toshi". – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:17, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete We don't seem to have any content on the TOSHI game engine, just this template. Nigej (talk) 22:03, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:23, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Input link/1}}

Unused subtemplate. User:GKFX^talk 21:16, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:23, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|TRS Footer}}

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. It is marked as historical, which would be fine if there were talk page links from discussions about it, or examples of it on talk or testcases pages, but there do not appear to be any such links. It is unclear what value there is in keeping this template around. It looks like it used to be substed into pages like Wikipedia:WikiProject Conservatism/News/September 2011, but that code can easily be copy/pasted into a project-space page if the project's newsletters are revived. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:09, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:23, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|S-Bahn-Linie}}

Early precursor to {{t1|Bahnlinie}}. It had a single usage in the article space, which I've replaced. Mackensen (talk) 21:08, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:24, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|TP zone}}

No transclusions, incoming links, documentation, or categories. The entire transcluded content of the template is just the value of the first unnamed parameter. Not useful. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:06, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:24, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Subjsec}}

No transclusions. Only edits were creation in 2018. Typing this template is not any easier than typing "[[#Section name]] section". – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:05, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Oppose I think {{u|Jonesey95}} has misunderstood the purpose of this template, which is designed for talk pages referring to sections in their associated pages, for which [[#Section name]] is not a substitute. Daask (talk) 22:16, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
• :{{U|Daask}}: You are correct; I did misunderstand. I see that it can be used on a talk page to link to a section in the article, not on the talk page itself. Please help me understand why this template does not appear to be used on any pages. I still don't think it's any easier to use this template than to copy/paste "[[Article name#Section name]] section" from my browser's address bar. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:55, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
• Delete Unused, not complicated enough to warrant a template. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

:Delete. I also feel that this is not something that is needed, and apparently, over 3 years it hasn't found use. Gonnym (talk) 02:07, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per above. Clearly not too useful since no one has used it. Or perhaps no one knows about it. Either way it should be deleted. Nigej (talk) 06:32, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Storylines of Shortland Street navigation}}

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. The more comprehensive {{tl|Shortland Street}} appears to meet the need served by this template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:02, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete Sort of succession boxes for the "storylines". Not too obvious exactly what it was intended for, but clearly never used. Nigej (talk) 21:53, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Start Edinburgh Trams}}

No transclusions. Has been replaced by {{tl|s-rail}} or {{tl|Adjacent stations}} at relevant articles such as Princes Street#Tram. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:58, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:58, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Start NBABAA SBS}}

No transclusions, incoming links, or documentation. Created in 2006, with only cleanup edits since then. It appears that {{tl|Start NBA SBS}} is sufficient for relevant articles. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:54, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Nigej (talk) 22:00, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:57, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Spoken article requested/Small}}

No transclusions, incoming links, documentation, or categories. Unnecessary when {{Spoken article requested|small=yes}} works just fine. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:44, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:57, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Squads sidebar/Philadelphia Union}}

No transclusions. The more comprehensive {{tl|Philadelphia Union}} appears to be preferred. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:37, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:57, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Squads sidebar/New York Red Bulls}}

No transclusions. The more comprehensive {{tl|New York Red Bulls}} appears to be preferred. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:36, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:56, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Spicks and Specks tracks}}

No transclusions or incoming links. This single-article content exists in a more comprehensive form at Spicks and Specks (album). – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:35, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:53, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Height/cm to ft in}}
• {{tfd links|Height/m to ft in}}

Unused subtemplates of {{tl|height}}. User:GKFX^talk 20:02, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete both per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
• Comment can't all these templates be replaced with {{tl|convert}} (including {{tl|height}} ) ? -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 00:41, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 January 29. Izno (talk) 22:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{tfd links|Disambiguation_needed/editintro}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:44, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Change/outIoffSon}}
• {{tfd links|Change/outIonSon}}
• {{tfd links|Change/row2IoffSoff}}
• {{tfd links|Change/rowIoffSoff}}
• {{tfd links|Change/rowIoffSon}}
• {{tfd links|Change/rowIonSoff}}
• {{tfd links|Change/rowIonSon}}

Subtemplates of {{tl|change}}, now unused after the template was converted to Lua in 2018. User:GKFX^talk 19:27, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete all per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:23, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Current top 5 Women's UCI Rankings - Individuals}}
• {{Tfd links|Current top 5 Women's UCI Rankings - Nations}}
• {{Tfd links|Current top 5 Women's UCI Rankings - Teams}}

I have copied the content of these three templates to UCI Women's Road World Rankings#Current rankings on the basis that this has been done for the men at UCI Men's road racing world ranking#Current world rankings. This approach is generally preferred for single-use content, since article content is more likely to be updated. The 3 templates noted are now unused and can be deleted. Nigej (talk) 17:15, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:39, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:21, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Events at the 2018 Arctic Winter Games}}

Full of red links and unused. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:15, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. All the events were deleted after WP:PRODs so the template is now useless. Nigej (talk) 16:21, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by {{admin|Fastily}} AnomieBOT⚡ 02:05, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|ISO 8859-1|module=Module:}}
• {{Tfd links|Show file signature}}

This module and template have no transclusions. At the time of the 2018 TfD (closed as no consensus), they were used in one page. If it hasn't found a use in over three years, we probably shouldn't keep it around. If there is a use for it in current articles, by all means transclude it and I will be happy to withdraw the nomination. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:26, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

: The template was used in List of file signatures, and was removed in this edit (2021-05-15). It was used to display a graphical representation of the bytes in the file signatures. The module is called what it is because the graphical representation partially agrees with the ISO 8859-1 text encoding, but displays control characters as .. The editor who removed it apparently basically substed it in most cases, except the control characters, which were written as ., are now represented with Control Pictures, like ␀ for 0x00, a definite improvement that the template could also do.

: The template is still useful on that page, because manually typing out the hex and graphical representations of the file signature and making sure they agree is pretty error-prone. But the module should be renamed because it's not implementing the ISO 8859-1 encoding because of how it displays the control characters. — Eru·tuon 06:00, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

::I agree that a module to convert hex strings to the ISO 8859-1-style rendering seems useful and would help to verify that the article in question is consistent. Both the module and its template wrapper should have the same name, and neither of the current names are really quite right. User:GKFX^talk 12:26, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete as the nominator in the 2018 discussion; my position has not changed since. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:22, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:38, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• I tend toward a weak delete here given the single-page use, even though the use is probably one of the few I've seen where template/module is appropriate for a single page. :/ --Izno (talk) 22:36, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:42, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Roadlink}}

Apparently identical to {{tlp|jct|2=noshield=y}}, and used in only one article. User:GKFX^talk 11:57, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:11, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
• : Struck; I'm still unconvinced it's useful to have separate templates that do essentially the same thing except for one being substituted, but this isn't worth getting into an argument over. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
• Keep—this should be substituted, which is why it doesn't have transclusions. It's not quite the same as {{tlp|jct}} because it gets turned into direct wikilinks upon saving/substitution. Imzadi 1979 → 03:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
• That's not really a distinction between them, as {{tlsx|roadlink}} appears to behave exactly the same as {{tlsx|jct|noshield{{=}}y}} even when substituting, see Special:Permalink/1067237498 for an example. User:GKFX^talk 12:54, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
• For various reasons, we should not be encouraging substitution of {{tlsx|jct}}, even with that parameter in place. In short, based on actual usage, this is not redundant and should not be deleted. Imzadi 1979 → 15:27, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:37, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per above. Arguments like "It's not quite the same" and "For various reasons" are not convincing. Nigej (talk)
• This template is supposed to be auto-substituted. The other is never supposed to be substituted. For that reason, they are not the same. Imzadi 1979 → 19:25, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
• I'm not sure anyone's arguing that they're exactly the same. The question is whether we really need it. We've got Jct with 30,886 transclusions and Roadlink with 1 transclusion. It's simply not worth maintaining templates unless they have significant use. Why has it not been used when its been around so long? What can Roadlink do that Jct can't? Why do you believe Roadlink will get vastly more use in the future than it does now? Nigej (talk) 19:38, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
• As noted, roadlink should not have any transclusions, by design, because it is supposed to be substituted. It is an editing tool to produce wikilinks to highway articles. For example, there are 50 states in the US, each with its own naming scheme for state highways. If I'm in the middle of writing an article and need to link to a highway in Wisconsin, I can type out {{tlsx|roadlink|state=WI|WI|32}} and get the link and proper abbreviation I need without looking that up. Once I save that edit, the link gets created and there isn't a transclusion left behind. So yes, this template is used and useful. Imzadi 1979 → 19:47, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
• Ok, but when I enter {{subst:roadlink|state=WI|WI|32}} {{subst:jct|state=WI|WI|32|noshield=y}}, save it and then look at the file, I've got WIS 32 WIS 32 so the two seem exactly the same to me. Nigej (talk) 20:11, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
• Keep as used, useful, and properly labeled as subst-only. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:40, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
• As discussed above, it's still not clear what the useful difference is between this and {{jct|noshield=y}} is, whether substituting or not. User:GKFX^talk 21:20, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
• As discussed above, if roadlink is used and not substituted, it will be substituted by a bot, while jct should not be auto-substituted. That is the difference. Imzadi 1979 → 00:49, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
• keep, the fact that one is auto-substituted by bot and the other is not is enough of a difference for me. Frietjes (talk) 17:38, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:38, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Macedonian Third Football League}}

No transclusions, incoming links, documentation, or categories. This template transcludes two navboxes, each of which are used individually in articles. There is no need for this particular combination when adding two navboxes is straightforward. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:18, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete Useless wrapper for two templates. As noted, editors are adding one or the other or both as they require. Nigej (talk) 14:34, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:38, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Current Top 10 Men's Road Rankings - Individual}}

No transclusions. Out of date by almost two years. This content appears to be maintained locally at UCI Men's road racing world ranking. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:11, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete Superseded by being edited directly at UCI Men's road racing world ranking#Current world rankings. Nigej (talk) 14:16, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:38, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Ratio with precision}}

Unused math template. Gonnym (talk) 14:10, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

:Delete per nom. User:GKFX^talk 22:49, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:39, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Rndnear}}

Unused math template. Gonnym (talk) 14:10, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

:Delete per nom. User:GKFX^talk 22:49, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

:delete, no longer needed. Frietjes (talk) 17:15, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:39, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Inverse-percentage}}

Unused math template. Gonnym (talk) 14:05, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:39, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Gcd}}

Unused math template. Gonnym (talk) 14:04, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete Wrapper for the Module:Math gcd function, which perhaps people are using directly. Nigej (talk) 14:14, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:35, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Greek to arabic numeral}}

Cool template which was created in 2017 but is unused. It seems there just isn't a need for this on en.wiki. Gonnym (talk) 14:02, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
• Comment the underlying module is called "Greek", perhaps this should be renamed -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 00:46, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
• See Module talk:Greek for the move request -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 00:47, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:32, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Table addition 22}}

Unused table template. Gonnym (talk) 13:59, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete Produces a table with an extra row containing a sum. Everything is hardwired which perhaps explains why its not used. Nigej (talk) 14:09, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:31, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Evalint}}

Unused other than in 1 archived talk where it could be subst if required. Gonnym (talk) 13:59, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Subst and delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:27, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|ErrorBar}}

Unused template. Gonnym (talk) 13:57, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:17, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|DYK archive editintro}}
• {{tfd links|DYK archive editintro/tomorrow}}
• {{tfd links|DYK changes}}

Apparently unused parts of the DYK process. User:GKFX^talk 13:17, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• As creator of {{tl|DYK changes}}, which was planned to be part of introducing a backlog review blitz at DYK—the blitz ended up not being needed—I'd like to move it to my user space in case it should be needed in the future. Might this be possible, GKFX? (If not, I'll just copy it.) Regarding DYK archive editintro and its /tomorrow subpage, Support deletion of both. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:37, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
• :@BlueMoonset: Yes, you can move it to your userspace as a valid alternative to deletion. We can delete the resulting redirect as part of this TfD or you can tag it for speedy deletion. User:GKFX^talk 19:14, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
• ::Thanks, GKFX. {{tl|DYK changes}} has been moved to my userspace and the TfD template removed from it; I have tagged the redirect for speedy deletion. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:01, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete. Per CSD G7. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 00:19, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Checkuser/impl}}

Unused subtemplate of Checkuser. User:GKFX^talk 13:12, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Speedy delete - I'm the author of this subtemplate and can clearly see that the checkuser template has been refactored since I made it. No need for this now. As the only substantial author I'll delete this under G7. --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 00:14, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:15, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Avg temp row C/CtoF}}

Unused weather subtemplate. User:GKFX^talk 13:10, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete Paired with {{tl|Avg temp row F/FtoC}} which was TfDed recently: Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 December 28#Template:Average temperature table/FtoC. Nigej (talk) 14:03, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:15, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Age in years months and days}}

Unused age calculation template. I'm also not convinced that calculating a time period in years, months and a precise number of days is meaningful, since months vary in length. User:GKFX^talk 13:08, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete Unused variant of {{tl|Age in years, months and days}} (with a comma) which is quite widely used. If such a variant was required that template should be modified with an extra parameter. Nigej (talk) 13:56, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:15, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Article-cv2}}

Unused template. There seems to have been some doubt at its last TfD as to whether it was in use or going to be used, but ten years on [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=insource%3A%2F%5BAa%5Drticle-cv2%2F&title=Special:Search&profile=advanced&fulltext=1&ns0=1&ns1=1&ns2=1&ns3=1&ns4=1&ns5=1&ns6=1&ns7=1&ns8=1&ns9=1&ns10=1&ns11=1&ns12=1&ns13=1&ns14=1&ns15=1&ns100=1&ns101=1&ns118=1&ns119=1&ns710=1&ns711=1&ns828=1&ns829=1&ns2300=1&ns2301=1&ns2302=1&ns2303=1 it isn't]. User:GKFX^talk 13:03, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:37, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|TI line S10 navbox}}
• {{Tfd links|TI line S20 navbox}}
• {{Tfd links|TI line S30 navbox}}
• {{Tfd links|TI line S40 navbox}}
• {{Tfd links|TI line S50 navbox}}

Unused; replaced by {{t1|Treni Regionali Ticino Lombardia}}. Mackensen (talk) 12:36, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete all per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:35, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|FooBarHumMigNav|module=Module:}}
• {{Tfd links|FooBarHumMigNav}}

Unused and unclear if even ready for usage as there is no documentation. Move to user's sandbox if wanted, otherwise delete. Gonnym (talk) 12:31, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete or move both per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:35, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|CountryAdjectiveDemonym/test|module=Module:}}

Unused test page which if required, should have been added to Module:CountryAdjectiveDemonym/testcases. Gonnym (talk) 12:29, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Nigej (talk) 14:56, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:34, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Polyhedra snub DB}}
• {{Tfd links|Even star polygon db}}
• {{Tfd links|Star figure db}}

Unused templates. Gonnym (talk) 12:23, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete all per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
• Delete all I'm original author, hacky template created in a time before Lua. Even if we needed it there are better ways to do this now. --Salix alba (talk): 03:54, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
• :@Salix alba is your User:Pfafrich/test page still needed? It's using some templates (like Template:Polyhedra DB) which are only used there. If you don't need it you can blank or request for it to be deleted. Gonnym (talk) 12:14, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
• ::@Gonnym now deleted. --Salix alba (talk): 18:50, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:34, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|FDP chairs}}

Used but duplicates a section of Template:Free Democratic Party (Germany) and both are used on the same pages. Gonnym (talk) 12:09, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete Clearly no need for both and the other seems preferable. List at Free Democratic Party (Germany)#Leader of the FDP. Nigej (talk) 14:28, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:31, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|CDUHeads}}

Unused and Template:Christian Democratic Union of Germany has a section with this data. Gonnym (talk) 12:04, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete Clearly no need for both and the other seems preferable. List at Christian Democratic Union of Germany#Leader of the CDU, 1946–present. Nigej (talk) 14:40, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:31, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Book list/doc/example}}

Unused and Template:Book list/doc uses an example so no reason to subst it there either. Gonnym (talk) 12:02, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:31, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Boomtown (festival)}}

Unused and none of the charity articles even mention "Boomtown", so can't see how this would even be valid usage. Gonnym (talk) 11:59, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

:Delete per nom. This template is a hangover from this and this AfD discussion for pages connected with the Boomtown events (all of which were either deleted or made into redirects): now that there is only one page for the organisation, there seems no reason for this template to exist. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 12:57, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:30, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Batman Beyond}}

Used but Template:DC Animated Universe also has the links and is used on the same set of articles. No need for duplications. Gonnym (talk) 11:52, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete There are no many templates in this area that they must be bewildering for readers. In this case it's best to focus on {{tl|DC Animated Universe}} which covers the important topics. Nigej (talk) 14:52, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:23, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Superman: The Animated Series}}
• {{Tfd links|Batman: The Animated Series}}

Unused and its links already use Template:DC Animated Universe so won't be used. Gonnym (talk) 11:50, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete both There are no many templates in this area that they must be bewildering for readers. In this case it's best to focus on {{tl|DC Animated Universe}} which covers the important topics. Nigej (talk) 14:52, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:22, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Top ten African female squash players}}
• {{Tfd links|Top ten African male squash players}}
• {{Tfd links|Top ten American female squash players}}
• {{Tfd links|Top ten American male squash players}}
• {{Tfd links|Top ten Asian female squash players}}
• {{Tfd links|Top ten Asian male squash players}}
• {{Tfd links|Top ten Australian female squash players}}
• {{Tfd links|Top ten Australian male squash players}}
• {{Tfd links|Top ten Canadian female squash players}}
• {{Tfd links|Top ten Canadian male squash players}}
• {{Tfd links|Top ten Egyptian female squash players}}
• {{Tfd links|Top ten English female squash players}}
• {{Tfd links|Top ten English male squash players}}
• {{Tfd links|Top ten European female squash players}}
• {{Tfd links|Top ten European male squash players}}
• {{Tfd links|Top ten female squash players from the Americas}}
• {{Tfd links|Top ten French female squash players}}
• {{Tfd links|Top ten French male squash players}}
• {{Tfd links|Top ten German male squash players}}
• {{Tfd links|Top ten Hong Kong female squash players}}
• {{Tfd links|Top ten Hong Kong male squash players}}
• {{Tfd links|Top ten Indian female squash players}}
• {{Tfd links|Top ten Indian male squash players}}
• {{Tfd links|Top ten Malaysian female squash players}}
• {{Tfd links|Top ten Malaysian male squash players}}
• {{Tfd links|Top ten male squash players from the Americas}}
• {{Tfd links|Top ten Mexican male squash players}}
• {{Tfd links|Top ten New Zealand female squash players}}
• {{Tfd links|Top ten New Zealand male squash players}}
• {{Tfd links|Top ten Oceanian female squash players}}
• {{Tfd links|Top ten Oceanian male squash players}}
• {{Tfd links|Top ten Pakistani male squash players}}
• {{Tfd links|Top ten Spanish male squash players}}

This is a follow-up to: Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 21#Template:Top ten Egyptian male squash players and includes all the other templates at :Category:Squash ranking navigational boxes with the exception of the global {{tl|Top ten squash players}}. All but two of these have not been updated since 2019 and those two, only a couple of times. Clearly there's not sufficient interest to keep them maintained and, in my view, an out of date navbox is worse than no navbox at all. However, even if they were maintained they should be deleted, since they fail much of what makes a useful WP:NAVBOX. The players in each "top 10" are almost always unconnected except for being in the top 10 on that date. The articles generally do not refer to each other. There are no parent articles like African female squash players. Nigej (talk) 09:16, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete Really falls under fancruft more than anything. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:03, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Not useful for navigation. -- Ab207 (talk) 09:10, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:49, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Taxobox/Status sandbox}}

Old sandboxing page; no longer needed. I would have {{tlx|db-author}}'ed this one, but others touched it.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  10:00, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

:Delete per nom. Might be even G6 as standard housekeeping. Gonnym (talk) 11:20, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:50, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Cr-BPL22}}

Unnecessary linking template that was introducing WP:NFCC violations — JJMC89 (T·C) 09:36, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:04, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).