Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States#Consolidating the two above proposals
{{WikiProject banner shell|
{{WikiProject United States}}
}}
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/Tab header}}
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/TOC}}
{{Old MfD |date=19 July 2022 |result=no consensus |page=Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/US related unreferenced BLPs |altpage=Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States/US related unreferenced BLPs}}
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/Navigation}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 16
|algo = old(60d)
|archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|minthreadsleft = 4
|archive = Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn|target=Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States/Archive index|mask=Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States/Archive <#>|leading_zeros=0|indexhere=yes}}
__TOC__
Good article reassessment for [[The Nightmare Before Christmas]]
The Nightmare Before Christmas has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:40, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Featured article review for [[Battle of Corydon]]
I have nominated Battle of Corydon for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm Talk 17:38, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for [[Nancy Pelosi]]
Nancy Pelosi has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:18, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for [[Mobile, Alabama]]
Mobile, Alabama has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 00:42, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for [[Colt McCoy]]
Colt McCoy has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 14:01, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
Requested split at [[Talk:Energy in Texas #Requested split]]
There is a requested split at Talk:Energy in Texas #Requested split that may be to the interest of members of this Project. Servite et contribuere (talk) 15:43, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for [[Wyatt Earp]]
Wyatt Earp has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:00, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for [[Ian Kinsler]]
Ian Kinsler has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:16, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
[[:Donald Trump]] has an [[WP:RFC|RfC]]
[[LaSalle Detention Center]]
Good article reassessment for [[2011 D.C. United season]]
2011 D.C. United season has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 12:54, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
[[Wikipedia:The World Destubathon|The World Destubathon]]
Hello. Project members are invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It will be held from June 16-July 13. There is $3338 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning some vouchers to help you buy books for future content by improving articles for your country or any other, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for your project, sign up if interested!♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:15, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Requested move at [[Talk:List of entertainment affected by the September 11 attacks#Requested move 23 May 2025]]
File:Information.svg There is a requested move discussion at Talk:List of entertainment affected by the September 11 attacks#Requested move 23 May 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPathtalk 12:16, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for [[Disaster Transport]]
Disaster Transport has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:53, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Discussion at [[:Talk:The Chicks#Reorganization for potential GA|Talk:The Chicks § Reorganization for potential GA]]
File:Symbol watching blue lashes high contrast.svg You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:The Chicks § Reorganization for potential GA, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 06:19, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
FAR notice for [[Baltimore Steam Packet Company]]
I have nominated Baltimore Steam Packet Company for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:19, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for [[Gloria Steinem]]
Gloria Steinem has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 14:36, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
List of counties in Maine
I have nominated List of counties in Maine for featured list removal. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:09, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
inproject: keyword for search within WP US and its subprojects
In case you missed it, you can now [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:PageAssessments#Search do searches within wikiprojects].The documentation however isn't currently clear for how to use this within WP United States.
- If you want to search within the entirety of WP US, use the keyword
inproject:"United States"
- If you want to search within a subproject of WP US, use the keyword
inproject:"United States/WikiProject {projectname}"
- Example:
inproject:"United States/WikiProject Louisville"
will do searches within WikiProject Louisville
This was made available in January, but I just discovered it and didn't see it mentioned in this discussion's archives. Enjoy. Stefen 𝕋owers among the rest! Gab • Gruntwerk 00:51, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
WikiProject Nevada
I noticed that {{tl|WikiProject Nevada}} is marked as an inactive project. Any thoughts on at least making it a subproject of this one, like many of the other states that don't have their own project, and do something that will be similar to, say, {{tl|WikiProject Arkansas}}, where it's a wrapper of the US project banner? Nevada ("NV" and "NV-importance") parameters would have to be added to the US project banner, but I don't know everything else that may be involved to accomplish this. Thanks. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 15:08, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
:Support, and I think it should be done with other inactive/defunct projects. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:20, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
:Which way this goes isn't concerning to me, but I'd note there was a message on its talk page last July asking for the NV project to be reactivated. Stefen 𝕋owers among the rest! Gab • Gruntwerk 17:46, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Abner Vance
Hey I am working on this biography about this man named Draft:Abner Vance, I stumbled upon him when researching the Draft:Hatfield family.
Abner Vance might be of interest to y'all because he appears to be the ancestor to JD Vance.
Right now, I haven't found any sources to confirm this connection yet. But I believe JD Vance did claim to be related to Abner Vance and I have stumbled upon many other sources that stated Abner and his descendants are related to other notable people in American history.
Would anyone like to work on this biography? Or work on the genealogy of the current Vice President of the United States. CycoMa2 (talk) 15:41, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
:I know I have commented this before in the past. It’s just I am getting really tired writing all these biographies by myself.
:I literally had to drive to historical societies by myself to get access to many sources for these articles. CycoMa2 (talk) 15:50, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Houses of Representatives
Just in the past 15 minutes, I've come across at least two separate articles about US state legislators, who were filed in {{cl|21st-century members of the United States House of Representatives}}, despite never having served in that body, instead of "21st-century members of [Appropriate State Legislature]".
If I stumbled across two by pure chance without even actively looking for that, then there are undoubtedly others as well, but since I'm a Canadian who couldn't name more than a small handful of US Representatives if I tried, I'm not the guy who could actively take on the job of finding any others. So is there anybody with more expertise on that subject who'd be willing and able to take on a check to make sure that everybody who's in that category actually belongs there? Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 16:37, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Requested move at [[Talk:Elon Musk–Donald Trump feud#Requested move 6 June 2025]]
File:Information.svg There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Elon Musk–Donald Trump feud#Requested move 6 June 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 10:29, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
[[WP:WikiProject Indiana|WikiProject Indiana]]
As far as I can tell, the (currently semi-active) Indiana wikiproject has been included in WP United States since 2011, yet {{tl|WikiProject Indiana}} hasn't been deprecated like other WP US-included state banners. Also, the front page of the wikiproject directs editors to use the {{tl|WikiProject United States}} banner while its Assessments page shows the old banner. I would proceed with correcting these things, but I wanted to post here first to see if I was missing something. Is this project permitted to use either banner for some reason, or was as I suspect, the transition to WP US not ever fully completed? Stefen 𝕋owers among the rest! Gab • Gruntwerk 20:51, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
:I went ahead and updated WP IN's Assessments page yesterday to show the correct banners. I imagine the part that could really ruffle feathers is deprecating the old banner and switching talk page uses to the new one. I will ask on their talk page before proceeding with that part. Any other advice is welcome. Stefen 𝕋owers among the rest! Gab • Gruntwerk 01:42, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
Moe Berg at FAR
I have nominated Moe Berg for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 14:14, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Indigenous people of the Everglades region at FAR
I have nominated Indigenous people of the Everglades region for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 08:37, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for [[36th Engineer Brigade (United States)]]
36th Engineer Brigade (United States) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 18:51, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Working On drafts for candiates
In the 2026 US Iowa Senate race, there's a candidate called Nathan Sage. He doesn't have an article, which normally nobody cares about, but he is considered to be the best candidate to win the nomination. Currently there's a draft of the article on Sage, and if you can help edit on that page, it would be good.
Here is the link --------> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Nathan_Sage_1 Fad8229 (talk) 01:06, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
"[[:Arroz Espanol]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Arroz_Espanol&redirect=no Arroz Espanol] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at {{section link|1=Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 June 13#Arroz Espanol}} until a consensus is reached.
Note: Arroz Español also being discussed. --MYCETEAE 🍄🟫—talk 21:17, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
No Kings protests
Collaboration welcome at No Kings protests. ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:09, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
Discussion at [[Talk:Brian Wilson]]
There's an important discussion regarding how we should handle the Death and tributes section of the Brian Wilson article. The discussion can be found at Talk:Brian Wilson#Death section. Input from project members would be very much appreciated. Thanks, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 13:44, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Requested move at [[Talk:2025 Somerset–London tornado#Requested move 5 June 2025]]
File:Information.svg There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2025 Somerset–London tornado#Requested move 5 June 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. CNC (talk) 18:36, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for [[Toyota Center]]
Toyota Center has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:29, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for [[Jeannie (TV series)]]
Jeannie (TV series) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:45, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
:@AirshipJungleman29 116.206.193.39 (talk) 07:30, 20 June 2025 (UTC)