Abjad

The name abjad is based on the Arabic alphabet's first (in its original order) four {{nowrap|letters{{hsp}}{{mdash}}{{hsp}}}}corresponding to a, b, j, and {{nowrap|d{{hsp}}{{mdash}}{{hsp}}}}to replace the more common terms "consonantary" and "consonantal alphabet" in describing the family of scripts classified as "West Semitic". It is similar to other Semitic languages such as Phoenician, Hebrew and Semitic proto-alphabets: specifically, aleph, bet, gimel, dalet.

According to the formulations of Peter T. Daniels,{{sfn|Daniels|Bright|1996}} abjads differ from alphabets in that only consonants, not vowels, are represented among the basic graphemes. Abjads differ from abugidas, another category defined by Daniels, in that in abjads, the vowel sound is implied by phonology, and where vowel marks exist for the system, such as nikkud for Hebrew and ḥarakāt for Arabic, their use is optional and not the dominant (or literate) form. Abugidas mark all vowels (other than the "inherent" vowel) with a diacritic, a minor attachment to the letter, a standalone glyph, or (in Canadian Aboriginal syllabics) by rotation of the letter. Some abugidas use a special symbol to suppress the inherent vowel so that the consonant alone can be properly represented. In a syllabary, a grapheme denotes a complete syllable, that is, either a lone vowel sound or a combination of a vowel sound with one or more consonant sounds.

The contrast of abjad versus alphabet has been rejected by other scholars because abjad is also used as a term for the Arabic numeral system. Also, it may be taken as suggesting that consonantal alphabets, in contrast to e.g. the Greek alphabet, were not yet true alphabets.{{sfn|Lehmann|2011}} Florian Coulmas, a critic of Daniels and of the abjad terminology, argues that this terminology can confuse alphabets with "transcription systems", and that there is no reason to relegate the Hebrew, Aramaic or Phoenician alphabets to second-class status as an "incomplete alphabet".{{cite book|last=Coulmas|first=Florian|title=Writing Systems|year=2004|publisher=Cambridge University Press|page=113|isbn=978-0-521-78737-6}}

However, Daniels's terminology has found acceptance in the linguistic community.

[http://omniglot.com/writing/alphabetic.htm "Abjads / Consonant alphabets"],

Omniglot.com, 2009, quote: "Abjads, or consonant alphabets, represent consonants only, or consonants plus some vowels. Full vowel indication (vocalisation) can be added, usually by means of diacritics, but this is not usually done." Accessed 22 May 2009.

Rogers, Henry (2005): Writing systems: a linguistic approach. Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 0-631-23464-0, ISBN 978-0-631-23464-7. See esp. [https://books.google.com/books?id=vu3lRLVUta8C&dq=abjad&pg=PA115 Chap. 7, pp. 115ff].

[http://www.isca-speech.org/archive/interspeech_2006/i06_1412.html Schone, Patrick (2006)]: "Low-resource autodiacritization of abjads for speech keyword search", In INTERSPEECH-2006, paper 1412-Mon3FoP.13.

Image:Ba`alat.jpg script containing a phrase which may mean 'to Baalat'. The line running from the upper left to lower right reads mt l b^clt.]]

{{See also|History of the alphabet#Descendants of the Aramaic abjad}}

The first abjad to gain widespread usage was the Phoenician abjad. Unlike other contemporary scripts, such as cuneiform and Egyptian hieroglyphs, the Phoenician script consisted of only a few dozen symbols. This made the script easy to learn, and seafaring Phoenician merchants took the script throughout the then-known world.

The Phoenician abjad was a radical simplification of phonetic writing, since hieroglyphics required the writer to pick a hieroglyph starting with the same sound that the writer wanted to write in order to write phonetically, much as man'yōgana (kanji used solely for phonetic use) was used to represent Japanese phonetically before the invention of kana.

Phoenician gave rise to a number of new writing systems, including the widely used Aramaic abjad and the Greek alphabet. The Greek alphabet evolved into the modern western alphabets, such as Latin and Cyrillic, while Aramaic became the ancestor of many modern abjads and abugidas of Asia.

Other sister scripts to Phoenician, that branched from Proto-Sinaitic script are the South Semitic scripts with its two main branches; the Ancient North Arabian scripts that were used in north and central Arabia, until it was displaced by the Arabic alphabet.Ibn Durayd, Ta‘līq min amāli ibn durayd, ed. al-Sanūsī, Muṣṭafā, Kuwait 1984, p. 227 (Arabic). The author purports that a poet from the Kinda tribe in Yemen who settled in Dūmat al-Ǧandal during the advent of Islam told of how another member of the Yemenite Kinda tribe who lived in that town taught the Arabic script to the Banū Qurayš in Mecca and that their use of the Arabic script for writing eventually took the place of musnad, or what was then the Sabaean script of the kingdom of Ḥimyar: "You have exchanged the musnad of the sons of Ḥimyar / which the kings of Ḥimyar were wont to write down in books." and Ancient South Arabian, which evolved later into the Geʽez script, still being used in Eritrea and Ethiopia.

File:Arabic_Language.svg

Impure abjads have characters for some vowels, optional vowel diacritics, or both. The term pure abjad refers to scripts entirely lacking in vowel indicators.{{sfn|Daniels|2013}} However, most modern abjads, such as Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic, and Pahlavi, are "impure" abjads{{snd}}that is, they also contain symbols for some of the vowel phonemes, although the said non-diacritic vowel letters are also used to write certain consonants, particularly approximants that sound similar to long vowels. A "pure" abjad is exemplified (perhaps) by very early forms of ancient Phoenician, though at some point (at least by the 9th century BC) it and most of the contemporary Semitic abjads had begun to overload a few of the consonant symbols with a secondary function as vowel markers, called matres lectionis.{{sfn|Lipiński|1994}} This practice was at first rare and limited in scope but became increasingly common and more developed in later times.

{{Main|Greek alphabet}}

In the 9th century BC the Greeks adapted the Phoenician script for use in their own language. The phonetic structure of the Greek language created too many ambiguities when vowels went unrepresented, so the script was modified. They did not need letters for the guttural sounds represented by aleph, he, heth or ayin, so these symbols were assigned vocalic values. The letters waw and yod were also adapted into vowel signs; along with he, these were already used as matres lectionis in Phoenician. The major innovation of Greek was to dedicate these symbols exclusively and unambiguously to vowel sounds that could be combined arbitrarily with consonants (as opposed to syllabaries such as Linear B which usually have vowel symbols but cannot combine them with consonants to form arbitrary syllables).

Abugidas developed along a slightly different route. The basic consonantal symbol was considered to have an inherent "a" vowel sound. Hooks or short lines attached to various parts of the basic letter modify the vowel. In this way, the South Arabian abjad evolved into the Geʽez script of Ethiopia between the 5th century BC and the 5th century AD. Similarly, the Brāhmī abugida of the Indian subcontinent developed around the 3rd century BC (from the Aramaic abjad, it has been hypothesized).

{{unreferenced section|date=March 2024}}

The abjad form of writing is well-adapted to the morphological structure of the Semitic languages it was developed to write. This is because words in Semitic languages are formed from a root consisting of (usually) three consonants, the vowels being used to indicate inflectional or derived forms. For instance, according to Classical Arabic and Modern Standard Arabic, from the Arabic root {{lang|ar|ك‌ت‌ب}} K-T-B (to write) can be derived the forms {{lang|ar|كَتَبَ}} {{Transliteration|ar|kataba}} (he wrote), {{lang|ar|كَتَبْتَ}} {{Transliteration|ar|katabta}} (you (masculine singular) wrote), {{lang|ar|يَكْتُبُ⁩}} {{Transliteration|ar|yaktubu}} (he writes), and {{lang|ar|مَكْتَبَة⁩}} {{Transliteration|ar|maktabah}} (library). In most cases, the absence of full glyphs for vowels makes the common root clearer, allowing readers to guess the meaning of unfamiliar words from familiar roots (especially in conjunction with context clues) and improving word recognition{{citation needed|date=August 2011}}{{dubious|date=August 2011}} while reading for practiced readers.

The Arabic abjad have been adapted to perform as true alphabets when used to write several languages, including Kurdish, Swahili, Malay, and Uyghur and historically Bosnian, Mozarabic, Aragonese, Portuguese, Spanish and Afrikaans, with some letters or letter combinations being repurposed to represent vowels. The Hebrew abjad has also been adapted to write Jewish languages like Ladino and Yiddish.

• Abjad numerals (Arabic alphanumeric code)
• Abugida
• Disemvoweling
• Gematria (Hebrew & English system of alphanumeric code)
• Numerology
• Shorthand (constructed writing systems that are structurally abjads)

{{Reflist|40em}}

{{refbegin|40em}}

• {{cite encyclopedia

| title = Abjads / Consonant alphabets

| encyclopedia = Omniglot

| url = http://www.omniglot.com/writing/alphabetic.htm

| first1 = Simon

| last1 = Ager

| date = 2015

}}

• {{cite book|last1=Daniels|first1=Peter T.|editor1-last=Owens|editor1-first=Jonathan|title=The Oxford Handbook of Arabic Linguistics|date=2013|publisher=Oxford University Press|page=415|chapter=The Arabic Writing system}}
• {{cite encyclopedia |editor1-first = Peter T.

|editor1-last = Daniels

|editor-link1 = Peter T. Daniels

|editor2-first = William

|editor2-last = Bright

|title = The World's Writing Systems

|publisher = OUP

|date = 1996

|page = [https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780195079937/page/4 4]

|isbn = 978-0195079937

|name-list-style = amp

|url-access = registration

|url = https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780195079937/page/4

}}

• {{Cite book| isbn = 9781588394347| last = Ekhtiar| first = Maryam| title = Masterpieces from the Department of Islamic Art in the Metropolitan Museum of Art|publisher=Metropolitan Museum of Art|location=New York |page=21 |date = 2011 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vO761l9dgZwC&pg=PA21 }}
• {{cite encyclopedia

| first1 = Reinhard G.

| last1 = Lehmann

| title = Ch 2 27-30-22-26. How Many Letters Needs an Alphabet? The Case of Semitic

| encyclopedia = The idea of writing: Writing across borders

| editor1-first = Alex

| editor1-last = de Voogt

| editor2-first = Joachim Friedrich

| editor2-last = Quack

| location = Leiden

| publisher = Brill

| date = 2011

| pages = 11–52

| isbn = 978-9004215450

| name-list-style = amp

}}

• {{cite book|last1=Lipiński|first1=Edward|title=Studies in Aramaic Inscriptions and Onomastics II|date=1994|publisher=Peeters Publishers|location=Leuven, Belgium|isbn=9068316109|pages=29–30}}
• {{cite web

|title = Berber

|url = http://www.ancientscripts.com/berber.html

|first1 = Lawrence

|last1 = Lo

|date = 2012

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170826045645/http://www.ancientscripts.com/berber.html

|archive-date = 26 August 2017

|url-status = dead

|df = dmy-all

}}

• {{Cite book

| last1 = Wright

| first1 = W.

| title = A Grammar of the Arabic Language

| trans-title = transl. from the German of Caspari

| edition = 3rd

| publisher = CUP

| year = 1967

| isbn = 978-0521094559

| volume = 1

| page = 28

}}

{{refend}}

• [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4wKD0uN0NQ The Science of Arabic Letters, Abjad and Geometry, by Jorge Lupin is dead]

{{Writing systems |expanded=Abjads}}

{{list of writing systems}}

Category:Arabic orthography

Category:1990s neologisms