All the President's Men (film)#"All the President's Men" Revisited

On June 17, 1972, a security guard at the Watergate complex finds a door's bolt taped over to prevent it from locking. He calls the police, who find and arrest five burglars in the Democratic National Committee headquarters within the complex. The next morning, The Washington Post assigns new reporter Bob Woodward to the local courthouse to cover the story, which is considered of minor importance.

Woodward learns that the five men—James W. McCord Jr. and four Cuban-Americans from Miami—possessed electronic bugging equipment, and are represented by a high-priced "country club" attorney. At the arraignment, McCord identifies himself in court as having recently left the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and the others are also revealed to have CIA ties. Woodward connects the burglars to E. Howard Hunt, an employee of President Richard Nixon's White House counsel Charles Colson, and formerly of the CIA.

Carl Bernstein, another Post reporter, is assigned to cover the Watergate story with Woodward. The two young men are reluctant partners but work well together. Executive editor Benjamin Bradlee believes that their work lacks reliable sources and is not worthy of the Post's front page, but he encourages further investigation.

Woodward contacts a senior government official, an anonymous source he has used before and refers to as "Deep Throat". Communicating secretly, using a flag placed in a balcony flowerpot to signal meetings, they meet at night in an underground parking garage. Deep Throat speaks vaguely and with metaphors, avoiding substantial facts about the Watergate break-in, but promises to keep Woodward on the right path to the truth, advising Woodward to "follow the money".

Woodward and Bernstein connect the five burglars to corrupt activities involving campaign contributions to Nixon's Committee to Re-elect the President (CRP or CREEP). This includes a check for $25,000 paid by Kenneth H. Dahlberg, who Miami authorities identified when investigating the Miami-based burglars. However, Bradlee and others at the Post still doubt the investigation and its dependence on sources such as Deep Throat, wondering why the Nixon administration should break the law when the president is almost certain to defeat his opponent, Democratic nominee George McGovern.

Through former CREEP treasurer Hugh W. Sloan Jr., Woodward and Bernstein connect a slush fund of hundreds of thousands of dollars to White House chief of staff H. R. Haldeman—"the second most important man in this country"—and to former attorney general John N. Mitchell, now head of CREEP. They learn that CREEP was financing a "ratfucking" campaign to sabotage Democratic presidential candidates a year before the Watergate burglary, when Nixon was lagging behind Edmund Muskie in the polls.

While Bradlee's demand for thoroughness compels the reporters to obtain other sources to confirm the Haldeman connection, the White House issues a non-denial denial of the Post's above-the-fold story. Bradlee continues to encourage investigation.

Woodward again meets secretly with Deep Throat and demands he be less evasive. Very reluctantly, Deep Throat reveals that Haldeman masterminded the Watergate break-in and cover-up. He also states the cover-up was not only intended to camouflage the CREEP involvement, but also to hide "covert operations" involving "the entire U.S. intelligence community", including the CIA and FBI. He warns Woodward and Bernstein that their lives, and those of others, are in danger. When the two relay this information to Bradlee and tell him of the depth of the conspiracy, Bradlee realizes that a constitutional crisis is coming, but tells them to move forward with the story.

During second inauguration of Richard Nixon on January 20, 1973, Bernstein and Woodward type the full story, while a television in the newsroom shows Nixon taking the oath of office for his second term as president. A montage of Watergate-related teletype headlines from the following years is shown, ending with the report of Nixon's resignation and the inauguration of Gerald Ford on August 9, 1974.

{{Cast listing|

• Dustin Hoffman as Carl Bernstein
• Robert Redford as Bob Woodward
• Jack Warden as Harry M. Rosenfeld
• Martin Balsam as Howard Simons
• Hal Holbrook as Deep Throat
• Jason Robards as Ben Bradlee
• Jane Alexander as The Bookkeeper
• Stephen Collins as Hugh W. Sloan Jr.
• Ned Beatty as Martin Dardis
• Meredith Baxter as Deborah Murray Sloan
• Penny Fuller as Sally Aiken (based on Marilyn Berger){{cite web|url=http://reelingback.com/articles/newsroom_reality_a_gift |title=Newsroom reality a gift |date=May 21, 1976|website=Reeling Back |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200130215923/http://reelingback.com/articles/newsroom_reality_a_gift |archive-date=January 30, 2020 |access-date=August 2, 2015}}
• Penny Peyser as Sharon Lyons
• Lindsay Crouse as Kay Eddy
• Robert Walden as Donald Segretti
• F. Murray Abraham as Sergeant Paul Leeper
• David Arkin as Eugene Bachinski
• Richard Herd as James W. McCord, Jr. (Watergate Burglar)
• Henry Calvert as Bernard Barker (Watergate Burglar)
• Dominic Chianese as Eugenio Martínez (Watergate Burglar)
• Ron Hale as Frank Sturgis (Watergate Burglar)
• Nate Esformes as Virgilio R. Gonzales (Watergate Burglar)
• Nicolas Coster as Markham (based on Douglas Caddy)
• Joshua Shelley as Al Lewis
• Ralph Williams as Ray Steuben
• Gene Lindsey as Alfred D. Baldwin (Watergate "spotter")
• Polly Holliday as Dardis' secretary
• Carol Trost as Ben Bradlee's secretary
• James Karen as Hugh Sloan's attorney
• Basil Hoffman as Assistant Metro Editor
• Stanley Bennett Clay as Assistant Metro Editor
• John McMartin as Foreign Editor
• John Devlin as Metro Editor
• Paul Lambert as National Editor
• Richard Venture as Assistant Metro Editor
• John Furlong as News Desk Editor
• Valerie Curtin as Miss Milland
• Jess Osuna as Joe (FBI agent)
• Allyn Ann McLerie as Carolyn Abbott
• Christopher Murray as Photo Aide
• Frank Wills as himself (the actual security guard at the Watergate complex)
• Cara Duff-MacCormick as Tammy Ulrich (uncredited)
• John Randolph as John Mitchell (voice) (uncredited)

}}

Unlike the book, the film covers only the first seven months of the Watergate scandal, from the time of the break-in to Nixon's second inauguration on January 20, 1973.{{Cite web|url=http://thatwasnotinthebook.com/diff/all-the-president%27s-men|title=Differences between All the President's Men Book vs Movie|website=thatwasnotinthebook.com|access-date=2018-12-25|archive-date=2018-12-25|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181225080901/http://thatwasnotinthebook.com/diff/all-the-president%27s-men|url-status=live}} The film introduced the catchphrase "follow the money" in relation to the case, which did not appear in the book or in any Watergate documentation.{{Cite web|url=http://freakonomics.com/2011/09/23/follow-the-money/|title=Follow the Money|last=Shapiro|first=Fred|date=2011-09-23|website=Freakonomics|language=en|access-date=2018-12-25|archive-date=2018-12-25|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181225125942/http://freakonomics.com/2011/09/23/follow-the-money/|url-status=live}}

{{Watergate}}

Redford began asking about the Watergate break-in while promoting The Candidate, then read Woodward and Bernstein's Watergate stories in The Washington Post, while waiting to start filming The Way We Were. Redford first spoke with Woodward in November 1972, after the reporters' well-publicized mistake about Hugh Sloan implicating Haldeman in his testimony to the Watergate grand jury.[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVrGZSxpBEA The Legacy of "All the President's Men" with Robert Redford, Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein (April 21, 2011)] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190812032051/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVrGZSxpBEA |date=2019-08-12 }} LBJ Presidential Library on YouTube

Redford bought the rights to Woodward and Bernstein's book in 1974 for $450,000, with the idea to adapt it into a film with a budget of $5 million.{{cite news | last1 = Shales | first1 = Tom | first2 = Tom | last2 = Zito | first3 = Jeannette | last3 = Smyth | title = When Worlds Collide: Lights! Camera! Egos! | newspaper = The Washington Post | date = April 11, 1975 | url = https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/movies/features/dcmovies/postinfilm.htm | access-date = 2008-11-12| archive-date = 2008-07-24| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080724134651/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/movies/features/dcmovies/postinfilm.htm | url-status = live }} Ben Bradlee, executive editor of The Washington Post, realized that the film was going to be produced regardless of his approval, and believed it made "more sense to try to influence it factually". He hoped the film would show that newspapers "strive very hard for responsibility".

Redford hired William Goldman to write the script in 1974. Goldman has said that Woodward was extremely helpful to him but that Bernstein was not. Goldman wrote that his crucial decision regarding the screenplay's structure was to discard the second half of the book.{{sfn|Goldman|1989|p=235}} After he delivered his first draft in August 1974, Warner Bros. agreed to finance the film.

Redford was not happy with Goldman's first draft. Woodward and Bernstein read it and also did not like it. Redford asked for their suggestions, but Bernstein and his girlfriend, writer Nora Ephron, wrote their own draft. Redford showed this draft to Goldman, suggesting that it might contain some material he could integrate, but Goldman later called Redford's acceptance of the Bernstein-Ephron draft a "gutless betrayal".{{sfn|Goldman|1989|p=240}} Redford later expressed dissatisfaction with the Bernstein-Ephron draft, saying, "A lot of it was sophomoric and way off the beat." According to Goldman, "In what they wrote, Bernstein was sure catnip to the ladies."{{sfn|Goldman|1989|p=240}} He also said that one of Bernstein and Ephron's scenes was included in the final film; a bit in which Bernstein deceives a secretary in an attempt to see someone, which was not factually true.

Alan J. Pakula was hired to direct and requested rewrites from Goldman. In a 2011 biography, Redford claimed that he and Pakula held all-day sessions working on the script.{{Citation needed|date=August 2024}} Pakula spent hours interviewing editors and reporters, taking notes of their comments.

In 2011, Richard Stayton wrote an article for Written By magazine{{cite web|title=Written By|url=http://bluetoad.com/publication/?i=67460|work=magazine publication of|publisher=WGAw|access-date=2011-11-06|archive-date=2011-09-06|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110906010215/http://bluetoad.com/publication/?i=67460|url-status=live}} following his comparison of several drafts of the script, including the final production draft. He concluded that Redford's and Pakula's contributions were not significant, that Goldman was properly credited as the writer, and that the final draft had "William Goldman's distinct signature on each page".{{cite web|last=Stayton|first=Richard|title=Fade In – From the Vault, an archival reprint Feb/March 2018|url=https://www.mydigitalpublication.com/publication/?m=&l=1&i=473620&p=56|publisher=Written By magazine (– original publish date, April/May 2011)|access-date=2021-04-11|archive-date=2021-04-11|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210411094114/https://www.mydigitalpublication.com/publication/?m=&l=1&i=473620&p=56|url-status=live}}

Redford first selected Al Pacino to play Bernstein, but later decided that Dustin Hoffman was a better fit for the role.

Jason Robards was always Redford's choice to play Ben Bradlee. However, Bradlee had recommended George C. Scott for the role, and he was somewhat unimpressed when Robards visited the Post offices to develop a feel for the newsroom. In advance of the shoot, Bradlee told Robards, "Just don't make me look like an asshole." At first, Pakula was worried that Robards could not carry Bradlee's easy elegance and command authority. Karl Malden, Hal Holbrook (who would ultimately play Deep Throat), John Forsythe, Leslie Nielsen, Henry Fonda, Richard Widmark, Christopher Plummer, Anthony Quinn, Gene Hackman, Burt Lancaster, Robert Stack, Robert Mitchum and Telly Savalas were also considered for the role.{{cite book | first =Jeff| last = Himmelman | title =Yours in Truth: A Personal Portrait of Ben Bradlee, Legendary Editor of The Washington Post | publisher = Random House Publishing Group | year= 2012 | url = https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0812980565/ | isbn=978-0-679-60364-1 }}

Character actor Martin Balsam played managing editor Howard Simons. According to Bradlee, Simons felt that his involvement with the real story was greatly diminished in the script.

Bradlee teased Post publisher Katharine Graham about who would play her in the film. "Names like Katharine Hepburn, Lauren Bacall and Patricia Neal were tossed out — by us — to make her feel good," Bradlee said. "And names like Edna May Oliver or Marie Dressler, if it felt like teasing time. And then her role was dropped from the final script, half to her relief."{{cite web|url=http://liveswelivedanhagen.blogspot.com/2014/10/ben-bradlee-iconic-editor.html|title=Ben Bradlee: Iconic Editor|access-date=2018-09-12|archive-date=2018-09-09|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180909215255/http://liveswelivedanhagen.blogspot.com/2014/10/ben-bradlee-iconic-editor.html|url-status=live}}

Redford and Hoffman divided top billing, with Redford billed above Hoffman in the posters and trailers, and Hoffman billed above Redford in the film itself (in precisely the same manner in which James Stewart and John Wayne had divided top billing for John Ford's The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance in 1962).

Hoffman and Redford visited The Washington Post{{'s}} offices for months, attending news conferences and conducting research for their roles. Because the Post denied the production permission to shoot in its newsroom, set designers took measurements of the newspaper's offices and took many photographs. Boxes of trash were gathered and transported to sets recreating the newsroom on two soundstages in Hollywood's Burbank Studios at a cost of $200,000. The filmmakers went to great lengths for accuracy and authenticity, including making replicas of outdated phone books. Nearly 200 desks were purchased for $500 each from the same firm that had sold desks to the Post in 1971. The desks were painted the same color as those of the newsroom. The production was supplied with a brick from the main lobby of the Post so that it could be duplicated in fiberglass for the set. Principal photography began May 12, 1975, in Washington, D.C.

All the President's Men was initially assigned an R rating by the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) due to multiple uses of the word "fuck" and its derivatives.{{Cite book |last=Vaughn |first=Stephen |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=B7MkaxKGTGAC&pg=PA48 |title=Freedom and Entertainment: Rating the Movies in an Age of New Media |date=2006 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-85258-6 |pages=47–51 |language=en |access-date=2023-10-26}} Warner Bros. and Robert Redford appealed the decision, arguing that the film's subject matter and historical importance warranted a lower rating.{{cite news |date=1976-03-26 |title='President's Men' Wins Rating Appeal |newspaper=The Tampa Tribune |page=42}} The MPAA Appeals Board, requiring a two-thirds majority to overturn a rating, agreed and reclassified the film as PG (the PG-13 rating did not exist at the time, as it was created in 1984).{{cite news |date=1976-03-21 |title=Film Ratings: Out Of The Closet |newspaper=Arizona Daily Star |page=63}} MPAA president Jack Valenti later stated that the film would have received a G rating if not for the profanity. According to MPAA official Richard Heffner, the Appeals Board considered the language to be contextually appropriate given the film's journalistic and educational significance. The decision exemplified the MPAA's ability to exercise discretion in its ratings process, particularly for films regarded as culturally or historically important.

All the President's Men grossed $7,016,001 from 604 theaters in its first week, placing it atop the U.S. box office.{{cite magazine|magazine=Variety|title=First Week In Only 604 Theatres (advertisement)|date=April 21, 1976|page=8}}{{cite magazine|magazine=Variety|title=50 Top-Grossing Films|date=April 21, 1976|page=11}} It eventually grossed $70.6 million at the box office.

The film has received near-universal acclaim from many film critics, both on its release and in the years immediately following it. On review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes, the film has a 94% rating based on 64 reviews, with an average rating of 9.10/10. The website's consensus reads: "A taut, solidly acted paean to the benefits of a free press and the dangers of unchecked power, made all the more effective by its origins in real-life events."{{rotten-tomatoes|all_the_presidents_men|All the President's Men}} On Metacritic, which gives a weighted average score, the film has a score of 84 out of 100, based on reviews from 13 critics, indicating "universal acclaim".{{Metacritic film|title=All the President's Men}}

At the time of the film's release, Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times awarded the film 3½ stars out of 4, writing: "It provides the most observant study of working journalists we're ever likely to see in a feature film. And it succeeds brilliantly in suggesting the mixture of exhilaration, paranoia, self-doubt, and courage that permeated The Washington Post as its two young reporters went after a presidency."{{cite web | url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/all-the-presidents-men-1976 | title=All the President's Men | first=Roger | last=Ebert | author-link=Roger Ebert | website=RogerEbert.com | date=January 1, 1976 | access-date=January 15, 2019 | archive-date=November 6, 2018 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181106005005/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/all-the-presidents-men-1976 | url-status=live }} Variety praised the "ingenious direction [...] and scripting" that overcame the difficult lack of drama that a story about reporters running down a story might otherwise have.{{cite magazine | url=https://variety.com/1975/film/reviews/all-the-president-s-men-1200423767/ | title=All the President's Men | magazine=Variety | date=December 31, 1975 | access-date=January 15, 2019 | archive-date=November 6, 2018 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181106005003/https://variety.com/1975/film/reviews/all-the-president-s-men-1200423767/ | url-status=live }} Gene Siskel gave the film four stars. In his Chicago Tribune review, he wrote, "Director Alan J. Pakula duplicates the surprise and suspense of his Klute while avoiding the overstatement and pandering paranoia of his more recent political thriller, The Parallax View. Pakula's greatest achievement is the way he unobtrusively weaves outside events into narrative of the reporters' story."{{cite web | url=https://chicagotribune.newspapers.com/article/chicago-tribune-gene-siskel-movie-review/53071992/ | title='All the President's Men: Excitement from pillar to Post | first=Gene | last=Siskel | author-link=Gene Siskel | work=Chicago Tribune | date=April 9, 1976 | access-date=2023-11-15}} Siskel also named it the best film of 1976 on his year-end list.

Vincent Canby of The New York Times wrote, "Newspapers and newspapermen have long been favorite subjects for movie makers—a surprising number of whom are former newspapermen, yet not until All The President's Men, the riveting screen adaptation of the Watergate book by Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward, has any film come remotely close to being an accurate picture of American journalism at its best."{{cite web |url=https://archive.org/details/TheNewYorkTimes1976USAEnglish/Apr%2008%201976%2C%20The%20New%20York%20Times%2C%20%2343174%2C%20USA%20%28en%29/page/n41/mode/2up |first=Vincent |last=Canby |author-link=Vincent Canby |title=All Hail to 'All the President's Men' |work=The New York Times |date=April 8, 1976 |access-date=2023-11-15}} Rex Reed wrote, "Just to think about Watergate (and there are those, I'm told, who prefer not to) is to chatter the brain with a million details, telephone conversations, notebook jottings, investigations and technical problems that could be very dull indeed on film. Awesomely, and with tremendous intelligence, Alan Pakula, the director, has assembled each element with the panache of a mystery novelist. The result is a movie that literally keeps the audience glued to the edge of the seat with nail-biting tension and excitement."{{cite web | url=https://nydailynews.newspapers.com/article/daily-news/135273063/ | first=Rex | last=Reed | author-link=Rex Reed |title=How the big fish was caught | work=New York Daily News | date=April 4, 1976 | access-date=2023-11-15}} Kathleen Carroll of the New York Daily News gave the film a full four-star rating and wrote that it "offers a rousing argument for the preservation of freedom of the press that precious right that allows reporters like Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein to ferret out the truth."{{cite web |url=https://nydailynews.newspapers.com/article/daily-news/135270191/ |first=Kathleen |last=Carroll |title=The toppling of a President | work=New York Daily News | date=April 8, 1976 | access-date=2023-11-15}} Charles Champlin of the Los Angeles Times called it "quite beyond anything else, an engrossing mystery movie, with atmosphere, suspense, surprise, conflict, danger, secret messages, clandestine meetings, heroes, villains and a cast of leading and supporting characters that might have emerged from an unlikely collaboration of, let us say, Gore Vidal and Raymond Chandler."{{cite news | title=History Re-Created as High Drama | first=Charles | last=Champlin | author-link=Charles Champlin | work=Los Angeles Times | date=April 4, 1976 }}

Desmond Ryan of The Philadelphia Inquirer called it "not only a stunningly accurate account of the way big-city newspapers operate, down to the last paper clip and derisive curse, but it is also a superlative movie by any standard. The acting from Redford and Dustin Hoffman as Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein is immaculate and understated, and it is matched right down to the last bit part. It is equalled by Alan Pakula's high-tension direction and William Goldman's tautly accurate screenplay."{{cite news

| last = Ryan

| first = Desmond

| date = April 12, 1976

| title = A true story truly told

| url = https://philly.newspapers.com/article/the-philadelphia-inquirer/135270788/

| work = The Philadelphia Inquirer

| location =

| access-date =November 15, 2023

}} Stanley Eichelbaum of the San Francisco Examiner wrote, "People should enjoy it, since it has the knockout force of an American Z, without the heavy doses of manipulative melodrama. It's eminently entertaining, providing much the same fascination and wry humor as The Front Page, a romantic treatment of the same aspects of competitive, relentlessly aggressive journalism. The film's brilliance largely emanates from the lean, astringent, compellingly realistic, quasi-documentary style brought to it by director Alan J. Pakula (Klute, The Parallax View, etc.) and screenwriter William Goldman. Like the book, the film has the hypnotic impact of a detective thriller in its sharp, subtle retelling of the involved story of the Watergate break-in and Woodward and Bernstein's role in unraveling the cover-up."{{cite news

| last = Eichelbaum

| first = Stanley

| date = April 9, 1976

| title = Smashing, spellbinding film on Watergate

| url = https://sfexaminer.newspapers.com/article/the-san-francisco-examiner/118589489/

| work = San Francisco Examiner

| location =

| access-date =November 15, 2023

}}

Susan Stark of the Detroit Free Press wrote, "The circuitous, sometimes perilous, nearly always frustrating adventure of the two newsmen who broke the conspiracy of silence about the Watergate scandals makes one terrific chunk of material for a movie, Wisely, Robert Redford, who acquired screen right to the book even before it was published, stuck to his gum, leaning hard on the dramatic, as opposed to the political elements in the material. The hard dramatic approach of the film, envisioned by Redford and executed with consummate skill by Alan J. Pakula, works wondrously well, from just about any point of view. In aesthetic terms, it works because the film carries no unnecessary expository baggage. No one is preaching here; no one is pushing a message, except by implication."{{cite news

| last = Stark

| first = Susan

| date = April 9, 1976

| title = Drama Rises Above Politics in 'The President's Men'

| url = https://freep.newspapers.com/article/detroit-free-press/135271136/

| work = Detroit Free Press

| location =

| access-date =November 15, 2023

}} Joe Pollack of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch wrote, "Making a movie hero out of an investigative newspaper reporter is an extremely difficult task. Investigative reporting simply isn't very exciting, nor very dramatic. It involves a lengthy search for sources and tedious checking and cross-checking of facts, combined with an amount of telephone-calling and door-knocking that can become very dull. All the President's Men has turned these potential minuses into gigantic pluses, and comes through as a wonderful motion picture, one that explores the abuses of power and the work of the free press with a mighty magnifying glass. It glorifies the work of the reporter without making it glamorous."{{cite news

| last = Pollack

| first = Joe

| date = April 9, 1976

| title = Glorifying Reporters Without Glamour

| url = https://stltoday.newspapers.com/article/st-louis-post-dispatch/135271294/

| work = St. Louis Post-Dispatch

| location =

| access-date =November 15, 2023

}} Sally Smith of The Atlanta Constitution said, "A 'reporter' movie in the tradition of the '30s and '40s it is not. There are no fast-talking, cigar-chewing editors, no screaming telephones and no thundering presses. 'Scoop' is never mentioned. Instead, the film is close to a dramatized documentary. For those in the audience expecting an emotional catharsis it may be slightly disappointing, but this low-key realism as opposed to being a shrill polemic against Nixon is why the movie works."{{cite news

| last = Smith

| first = Sally

| date = April 9, 1976

| title = 'Al1 the President's Men' Weaves Suspense Story

| url = https://ajc.newspapers.com/article/the-atlanta-constitution/135271493/

| work = The Atlanta Constitution

| location =

| access-date =November 15, 2023

}}

Clyde Gilmour of the Toronto Star called it a "fascinating movie from Warner Bros. [that] vividly but scrupulously dramatizes the almost mythological exploits of the men who uncovered the Big Cover-Up. And it does this while portraying the often-distorted world of a big-city newspaper with an honesty and fidelity seldom, if ever, approached in previous films about the press."{{cite news

| last = Gilmour

| first = Clyde

| date = April 10, 1976

| title = President's Men honestly depicts work of Nixon's nemeses

| url = https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-toronto-star/135270062/

| work = Toronto Star

| location =

| access-date =November 15, 2023

}} Martin Malina of the Montreal Star called it "the biggest and the best portrait of newspaper reporting that Hollywood has yet achieved."{{cite news

| last = Malina

| first = Martin

| date = April 10, 1976

| title = All the President's Men

| url = https://newspapers.com/article/the-montreal-star/135271655/

| work = Montreal Star

| location =

| access-date =November 15, 2023

}} Dave Lanken of the Montreal Gazette called it "a good picture and one that will undoubtedly do very well. It will both satisfy and create continuing interest in the comeuppance of the world's highest elected crime overlord."{{cite news

| last = Lanken

| first = Dave

| date = April 9, 1976

| title = Despite knowing the story's end, 'President's Men' a strong movie

| url = https://montrealgazette.newspapers.com/article/the-gazette/135271627/

| work = The Gazette

| location = Montreal, Quebec, Canada

| access-date =November 15, 2023

}} Michael Walsh of The Province wrote, "Watergate challenged the free press and produced one of journalism's finest hours. All the President's Men insures that its lessons will be understood and remembered."{{cite news

| last = Walsh

| first = Michael

| date = April 9, 1976

| title = 'All the President's Men' nothing short of great

| url = https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-province/135271765/

| work = The Province

| location = Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

| access-date =November 15, 2023

}}

Internationally, Patrick Gibbs of The Daily Telegraph wrote, "Mr Pakula planes implicit confidence in this story, tightly scripted by William Goldman, with only an occasional fictional touch and in his experienced actors led by Robert Redford and Dustin Hoffman as the two reporters, though no great feats are called for in the way of interpretation."{{cite news

| last = Gibbs

| first = Patrick

| date = April 30, 1976

| title = Front Page Splash

| url = https://newspapers.com/article/the-daily-telegraph/135272180/

| work = The Daily Telegraph

| location = London, England, United Kingdom

| access-date =November 15, 2023

}} Colin Bennett of The Age wrote, "Documentary is the best way to tackle a story that's so incredibly close, if it is to be made into entertainment at all. So it's a handicap that two film stars, rather than unknown faces, were deemed necessary to mime Woodstein's astonishment as each new fragment of thread in the pattern is revealed. Characterisation is totally unimportant, however; and the two actors play it straight, sans heroics, concentrating on the stunning business in hand, the only business that really matters."{{cite news

| last = Bennett

| first = Colin

| date = June 11, 1976

| title = Woodstein on the Watergate scent

| url = https://fairfaxmedia.newspapers.com/article/the-age/135272449/

| work = The Age

| location = Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

| access-date =November 15, 2023

}} Romola Costantino of The Sun-Herald remarked, "This movie is sure to be a great success, but it won't necessarily be because of its brilliant reconstruction of the Watergate story. Most people have forgotten about that by now. As for the impressive skill of direction, the realistic, clear dialogue, or the fact that it relives, with mounting suspense, one of the most incredible scandals of this century not even these could have ensured this film's success away from America. There's no sex, no violence, and most of it is telephone calls or takes place behind office desks. But it can't miss, because it also offers two hours in the company of those charismatic stars, Dustin Hoffmann and Robert Redford, as the dedicated newspaper reporters, Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward, from the Washington Post, who were responsible for the whole shake-up."{{cite news

| last = Costantino

| first = Romola

| date = June 13, 1976

| title = Films of the Week

| url = https://fairfaxmedia.newspapers.com/article/the-sydney-morning-herald-taxi-driver/132918275/

| work = The Sun-Herald

| location = Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

| access-date =November 15, 2023

}}

The film continued to receive acclaim long after its release. Chris Nashawaty of Entertainment Weekly, reviewing Blu-ray releases of both this film and Network in 2011, called it "a victory lap for American journalism — the triumphant flip side to Network's self-loathing take on the media. It also anticipated our current WikiLeaks era, with Robert Redford (Woodward) and Dustin Hoffman (Bernstein) milking anonymous sources and burning shoe leather to speak truth to power. These films are timeless and essential, raising thorny questions we're still struggling to answer 35 years later. That must have been heavy stuff to be hit with at the multiplex in 1976. Maybe that's why Rocky walked away with Best Picture."{{cite magazine

| last = Nashawaty

| first = Chris

| date = February 15, 2011

| title = MOVIE ON DVD REVIEW: All the President's Men

| url = https://ew.com/ew/article/0,,20466698,00.html

| magazine = Entertainment Weekly

| location = New York City, New York

| publisher = Time, Inc.

| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110220021529/https://ew.com/ew/article/0,,20466698,00.html

| archive-date =February 20, 2011

| access-date =November 15, 2023

}} In a rare dissenting review published in 1985, Dave Kehr of the Chicago Reader was critical of the writing, calling the film "pedestrian" and "a study in missed opportunities".{{cite web | url=https://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/all-the-presidents-men/Film?oid=1068810 | title=All the President's Men | first=Dave | last=Kehr | author-link=Dave Kehr | work=Chicago Reader | date=26 October 1985 | access-date=2019-01-15| archive-date=2018-11-06| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181106005033/https://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/all-the-presidents-men/Film?oid=1068810 | url-status=live }}

• In 2015, The Hollywood Reporter polled hundreds of Academy members, asking them to revote on past controversial decisions. Academy members indicated that, given a second chance, they would award the 1977 Oscar for Best Picture to All the President's Men instead of to Rocky.{{Cite web|url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/recount-oscar-voters-today-would-773522|title=Recount! Oscar Voters Today Would Make 'Brokeback Mountain' Best Picture Over 'Crash'|website=The Hollywood Reporter|date=18 February 2015|language=en|access-date=2020-01-03|archive-date=2019-01-22|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190122094645/https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/recount-oscar-voters-today-would-773522|url-status=live}}
• It became one of the seven films to win Best Picture from three out of four major U.S. film critics' groups (LA, NBR, NY, NSFC), along with Nashville, Terms of Endearment, Goodfellas, Pulp Fiction, The Hurt Locker and Drive My Car.
• In 2007, Entertainment Weekly ranked All the President's Men as one of its 25 Powerful Political Thrillers.{{cite magazine | title = Democracy 'n' Action: 25 Powerful Political Thrillers | magazine = Entertainment Weekly | url = https://www.ew.com/ew/gallery/0,,20209601_7,00.html | access-date = 2009-09-02| archive-date = 2009-09-04| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20090904195139/http://www.ew.com/ew/gallery/0,,20209601_7,00.html | url-status = dead }}

• AFI's 100 Years... 100 Thrills – #57{{Cite web |title=AFI's 100 Years…100 Thrills |url=https://www.afi.com/afis-100-years-100-thrills/ |access-date=April 9, 2023 |website=American Film Institute |language=en}}
• AFI's 100 Years... 100 Heroes and Villains:
• Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein – #27 Heroes{{Cite web |title=AFI's 100 Years…100 Heroes & Villains |url=https://www.afi.com/afis-100-years-100-heroes-villians/ |access-date=April 9, 2023 |website=American Film Institute |language=en}}
• AFI's 100 Years...100 Cheers – #34{{Cite web |title=AFI's 100 Years…100 Cheers |url=https://www.afi.com/afis-100-years-100-cheers/ |access-date=April 9, 2023 |website=American Film Institute |language=en}}
• AFI's 100 Years...100 Movies: 10th Anniversary Edition – #77{{Cite web |title=AFI'S 100 Years…100 Movies — 10th Anniversary Edition |url=https://www.afi.com/afis-100-years-100-movies-10th-anniversary-edition/ |access-date=April 9, 2023 |website=American Film Institute |language=en}}

Sundance Productions, which Redford owns, produced a two-hour documentary titled "All the President's Men" Revisited.{{Cite news |last=Stelter |first=Brian |author-link=Brian Stelter |date=April 2, 2012 |title=Watergate Reporting, the Second Draft |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/03/arts/television/robert-redford-to-produce-a-documentary-about-watergate.html |access-date=April 9, 2023 |issn=0362-4331}} Broadcast on Discovery Channel Worldwide April 21, 2013, the documentary focuses on the Watergate case and the subsequent film adaptation. It simultaneously recounts how The Washington Post broke Watergate and how the scandal unfolded, going behind the scenes of the film. It explores how the Watergate scandal would be covered in the present day, whether such a scandal could happen again and who Richard Nixon was as a man. W. Mark Felt, deputy director of the FBI during the early 1970s, revealed his identity as Deep Throat in 2005, and this is also covered in the documentary.

Footage from the film is included, as are interviews with Redford and Hoffman, as well as with real-life central characters, including Woodward, Bernstein, Bradlee, John Dean, Alexander Butterfield and Fred Thompson, who served as minority counsel to the Senate Watergate Committee, in his first major public appearance. Contemporary media figures, such as Tom Brokaw (who was NBC News' White House correspondent during the scandal), Jill Abramson, Rachel Maddow and Jon Stewart are also featured in the documentary, which earned a 2013 Emmy nomination for Outstanding Documentary or Nonfiction Special.{{cite web|last=Bauder|first=David|title='All the President's Men Revisited' Documentary To Air On Discovery|url=https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/20/all-the-presidents-men-revisited-documentary-discovery_n_3122655.html|work=The Huffington Post|publisher=AOL|access-date=October 17, 2013|date=March 20, 2013|archive-date=October 26, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131026113500/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/20/all-the-presidents-men-revisited-documentary-discovery_n_3122655.html|url-status=live}}[http://www.emmys.com/shows/all-presidents-men-revisited The Primetime Emmys – All The President's Men Revisted] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140529235128/http://www.emmys.com/shows/all-presidents-men-revisited |date=2014-05-29 }} The Emmys

• The Final Days (1989 film)
• The Post (film)
• All the Prime Minister's Men, 2021 documentary

{{Reflist}}

• {{cite book|last=Goldman |first=William |author-link=William Goldman |date=1989 |edition=Reissue |title=Adventures in the Screen Trade |publisher=Grand Central Publishing |isbn=978-0446391177}}
• [https://www.loc.gov/static/programs/national-film-preservation-board/documents/AllThePresidentsMen.pdf All The President's Men] essay by Mike Canning at National Film Registry
• {{cite news | url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/movies/features/dcmovies/allthepresidentsmen.htm | title='All the President's Men' | first=Matt | last=Slovick | newspaper=The Washington Post | date=1996}}
• {{cite magazine | url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,918170,00.html | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080922075110/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,918170,00.html | url-status=dead | archive-date=September 22, 2008 | title=Cinema: Watergate on Film | date=March 29, 1976 | magazine=Time | url-access=subscription}}
• {{cite news | url=https://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/16/movies/watching-movies-with-steven-soderbergh-follow-muse-inspiration-balance-lofty.html | title=WATCHING MOVIES WITH/Steven Soderbergh; Follow the Muse: Inspiration To Balance Lofty and Light | first=Rick | last=Lyman | date=February 16, 2001 | work=The New York Times}}
• {{cite news | url=https://www.austinchronicle.com/screens/2011-04-15/from-the-watergate-break-in-to-a-broken-news-media/ | title=From the Watergate Break-in to a Broken News Media | first=Marc | last=Savlov | date=April 15, 2011 | work=The Austin Chronicle}}
• [https://www.washingtonpost.com/arts-entertainment/2020/01/23/34-best-political-movies-ever-made/ Ann Hornaday, "The 34 best political movies ever made" The Washington Post (Jan. 23, 2020)], ranked No. 2

{{Wikiquote}}

• {{Official website|https://www.warnerbros.com/movies/all-presidents-men}}
• {{IMDb title|0074119|All the President's Men}}
• {{TCMDb title|67091|All the President's Men}}
• {{mojo title|allthepresidentsmen|All the President's Men}}
• {{rotten-tomatoes|all_the_presidents_men|All the President's Men}}

{{Richard Nixon}}

{{William Goldman}}

{{Alan J. Pakula}}

{{Navboxes

|title = Awards for All the President's Men

|list=

{{National Board of Review Award for Best Film}}

{{National Society of Film Critics Award for Best Film}}

{{New York Film Critics Circle Award for Best Film}}

}}

{{Authority control}}

Category:1976 drama films

Category:1976 films

Category:1970s American films

Category:1970s buddy drama films

Category:1970s English-language films

Category:1970s political drama films

Category:1970s political thriller films

Category:American buddy drama films

Category:American neo-noir films

Category:American political drama films

Category:American political thriller films

Category:Biographical films about journalists

Category:English-language buddy drama films

Category:English-language political drama films

Category:English-language political thriller films

Category:Films about elections

Category:Films about freedom of expression

Category:Films about journalism

Category:Films about presidents of the United States

Category:Films about Richard Nixon

Category:Films about security and surveillance

Category:Films about The Washington Post

Category:Films based on non-fiction books

Category:Films directed by Alan J. Pakula

Category:Films featuring a Best Supporting Actor Academy Award–winning performance

Category:Films scored by David Shire

Category:Films set in libraries

Category:Films set in Miami

Category:Films set in offices

Category:Films set in Washington, D.C.

Category:Films set in the 1970s

Category:Films set in 1972

Category:Films set in 1973

Category:Films set in 1974

Category:Films set in 1975

Category:Films shot in Washington, D.C.

Category:Films that won the Best Sound Mixing Academy Award

Category:Films whose art director won the Best Art Direction Academy Award

Category:Films whose writer won the Best Adapted Screenplay Academy Award

Category:Films with screenplays by William Goldman

Category:National Society of Film Critics Award for Best Film winners

Category:Political drama films based on actual events

Category:Political thriller films based on actual events

Category:Procedural films

Category:United States National Film Registry films

Category:Warner Bros. films

Category:Watergate scandal in film