Bird conservation#Reintroduction and translocations

Since the Late Pleistocene period, it is estimated that 1,430 (95% credible interval: 1327–1544) bird extinctions have occurred. Human activity has been directly attributed to almost all bird species extinctions, specifically prehistoric and early historical species.{{Cite web |title=Humans may have caused the extinction of 1,430 species of birds {{!}} CREAF |url=https://www.creaf.cat/en/articles/humans-may-have-caused-extinction-1430-species-birds |access-date=2025-05-10 |website=www.creaf.cat |language=en}} During the Upper Paleolithic period, human societies began spreading across the globe, leading to the overhunting of species and the introduction of invasive species to new environments. A particularly significant period of extinction occurred when humans colonized the islands of Melanesia, Polynesia, and Micronesia around 4,000 years ago.{{Cite journal |last=Gochfeld |first=M. |date=2007-06-01 |title=Extinction & Biogeography of Tropical Pacific Birds. David W. Steadman. |url=https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icm013 |journal=Integrative and Comparative Biology |volume=47 |issue=5 |pages=790–793 |doi=10.1093/icb/icm013 |issn=1540-7063}} According to a study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, early Polynesian settlers are often credited with contributing to the extinction of over 1,000 bird species during this time, majority of which were non-passerine land birds.{{Cite web |title=Scientists Gauge Ancient Die-Off of Pacific Birds |url=https://www.science.org/content/article/scientists-gauge-ancient-die-pacific-birds |access-date=2025-05-10 |website=www.science.org |language=en}}

Before the Industrial Revolution (1750-1850), most bird species were not yet heavily impacted by habitat loss or climate change. {{Cite journal |last=Pimm |first=Stuart |last2=Raven |first2=Peter |last3=Peterson |first3=Alan |last4=Şekercioğlu |first4=Çağan H. |last5=Ehrlich |first5=Paul R. |date=2006-07-18 |title=Human impacts on the rates of recent, present, and future bird extinctions |url=https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0604181103 |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |volume=103 |issue=29 |pages=10941–10946 |doi=10.1073/pnas.0604181103 |pmc=1544153 |pmid=16829570}}However, overexploitation through hunting, bird collecting, as well as the introduction of invasive species became significant threats. Industrialization marked a turning point in the relationship between humans and birds. The technological growth, urban expansion, and increased emissions from industrial activity caused widespread habitat destruction and altered ecosystems.{{Cite web |date=2023-12-14 |title=23.3: Threats to Biodiversity |url=https://bio.libretexts.org/Courses/Gettysburg_College/01:_Ecology_for_All/23:_Conservation_Biology/23.03:_Threats_to_Biodiversity |access-date=2025-05-10 |website=Biology LibreTexts |language=en}} In the United Kingdom, species such as the white-tailed eagle and cranes, for example, were recognized as more abundant before industrialization began.{{Cite web |date=2023-07-23 |title=300 Years Before the Industrial Revolution, the UK’s Wildlife Looked Strikingly Different |url=https://www.inverse.com/science/britain-ireland-wildlife-before-industrial-revolution#:~:text=While%20white-tailed%20eagles,%20bustards,order%20to%20help%20preserve%20it |access-date=2025-05-10 |website=Inverse |language=en}} By the 19th century, the advent of industrial-scale hunting and urban sprawl had put pressure on many bird populations.

The Passenger Pigeon, once one of the most populous bird species in North America, was driven to extinction in the early 20th century due to relentless hunting and habitat loss. This extinction served as a stark reminder of the fragility of bird populations in the face of human intervention. The loss of such a previously abundant species helped catalyze the first major bird conservation efforts in the United States.{{Cite web |date=2015-12-22 |title=Billions to none... the extinction of the Passenger Pigeon |url=https://johnjames.audubon.org/conservation/billions-none-extinction-passenger-pigeon#:~:text=By%201914%20the%20last%20remaining,species%20highly%20vulnerable%20to%20hunting |access-date=2025-05-10 |website=John James Audubon Center at Mill Grove |language=en}} Following the assumed extinction of Passenger Pigeons, Theodore Roosevelt claimed to have witnessed a small flock of the birds at his family name’s rural cabin in Virginia some 25 years after their extinction date stated to have been March 24th, 1900. Following this sighting, Theodore recognized the severity of the loss of this once abundant species and initiated strengthened bird advocacy legislation during his presidency in 1907. {{Cite web |title=Theodore Roosevelt Signed Archive Passenger Pigeons {{!}} Raab Collection |url=https://www.raabcollection.com/presidential-autographs/roosevelt-pigeons?srsltid=AfmBOoqmBY-y_4wyyP9cuHhKsWxNibWfUULfo9tMd7FGlfO8L9eqZD6- |access-date=2025-05-10 |website=The Raab Collection |language=en-US}}The establishment of the first Federal Bird Reserve on Pelican Island in Florida can be attributed to this sighting made by President Roosevelt.{{Cite web |title=History of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service {{!}} U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service |url=https://www.fws.gov/history-of-fws |access-date=2025-05-10 |website=www.fws.gov |language=en}}

The early 20th century saw the rise of formal conservation efforts. The National Audubon Society, founded in 1905, played a key role in raising awareness about the rapid decline of bird populations, specifically in response to the exploitation of birds for the feather trade. The organization's efforts were influential in propelling early legal protections for birds.{{Cite web |title=The History of Audubon and Bird Conservation {{!}} Audubon |url=https://www.audubon.org/about/history |access-date=2025-05-10 |website=www.audubon.org |language=en}} A significant achievement in favor of bird protection was the passage of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918. This act provided international protection for migratory bird species between the United States, Canada, Mexico, Japan, and Russia.{{Cite web |date=2020-04-26 |title=Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 {{!}} U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service |url=https://www.fws.gov/law/migratory-bird-treaty-act-1918#:~:text=The%20Migratory%20Bird%20Treaty%20Act,all%20protected%20migratory%20bird%20species |access-date=2025-05-10 |website=www.fws.gov |language=en}}

From the 1920s to 1950s, bird advocacy gained further strength. In 1934, the Duck Stamp Act was passed. It sought to fund the protection of wetlands using hunter fees.{{Cite web |last=Fedkiw |first=John |date=September 1989 |title=The Evolving Use and Management of the Nation's Forests, Grasslands, Croplands, and Related Resources |url=https://www.fs.usda.gov/rm/pubs_series/rm/gtr/rm_gtr175.pdf |url-status=live |access-date=5/10/2025 |website=fs.usda.gov}} Additionally, during the Great Depression, New Deal programs including the Civilian Conservation Corps preserved wildlife refuges, providing birds a thriving environment for bird species.{{Cite web |last=Editors |first=HISTORY com |date=2010-05-11 |title=Civilian Conservation Corps |url=https://www.history.com/articles/civilian-conservation-corps |access-date=2025-05-10 |website=HISTORY |language=en}} Birdwatching gained popularity within this timeframe, too, in large part thanks to Roger Tory Peterson’s groundbreaking field guides.{{Cite web |last=https://tanager.org |first=Tanager Creative |title=Roger Tory Peterson Institute |url=https://rtpi.org/birding/ |access-date=2025-05-10 |website=rtpi.org}} Finally, early works of Rachel Carson began connecting the dots between healthy bird populations and a healthy planet. All of these components of this time frame aided in laying more solid groundwork for the continuation of advocacy for birds.{{Cite web |title=Legacy of Rachel Carsons Silent Spring National Historic Chemical Landmark |url=https://www.acs.org/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/rachel-carson-silent-spring.html |access-date=2025-05-10 |website=American Chemical Society |language=en}}

The 1960s were a particularly pivotal era in favor of bird conservation. The publication of Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring (1962) novel aided in exposing widespread dangers of pesticide use, particularly DDT, on bird populations. Her groundbreaking work demonstrated how DDT led to the thinning of eggshells in species like the Bald Eagle and Peregrine Falcon, resulting in reproductive failures. Carson’s book ignited a broader environmental movement, leading to significant policy changes, and the eventual DDT ban.{{Cite web |title=Legacy of Rachel Carsons Silent Spring National Historic Chemical Landmark |url=https://www.acs.org/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/rachel-carson-silent-spring.html |access-date=2025-05-10 |website=American Chemical Society |language=en}} The Environmental Protection Agency enforced a generalized ban on DDT pesticides in 1972. Bald eagles made a famous comeback during the “dirty sixties” thanks to this ban, along with the Brown Pelican and Peregrine Falcons.{{Cite web |last=Nielsen |first=Clare |date=2017-02-15 |title=Birds Need the EPA to Oversee Pesticides (and So Do We All) |url=https://abcbirds.org/birds-need-environmental-protection-agency/ |access-date=2025-05-10 |website=American Bird Conservancy |language=en}}

By the 1980s, the global conservation movement gained further momentum. Organizations like BirdLife International played an increasingly vital role in establishing international frameworks for bird protection. This included efforts to protect critical habitats, such as wetland areas, and to monitor at-risk species. Additionally, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) developed the Red List of Threatened Species, which continues to serve as an important tool for identifying and tracking species at risk of extinction, including many bird species.{{Cite web |date=2021-03-22 |title=Protecting birds where they live and migrate |url=https://www.birdlife.org/projects/ibas-mapping-most-important-places/ |access-date=2025-05-10 |website=BirdLife International |language=en-GB}}

The most critical threat facing threatened birds is the destruction and fragmentation of habitat.Gill, F. (1995). Ornithology. W.H Freeman and Company, New York. {{ISBN|0-7167-2415-4}}. The loss of forests, plains and other natural systems into agriculture, mines, and urban developments, the draining of swamps and other wetlands, and logging reduce potential habitat for many species. In addition the remaining patches of habitat are often too small or fragmented by the construction of roads or other such barriers that cause populations in these fragmented islands to become vulnerable to localized extinction. In addition many forest species show limited abilities to disperse and occupy new forest fragments (see Island biogeography).Moore, R., Robinson, W., Lovette, I., & Robinson, T. (2008). Experimental evidence for extreme dispersal limitation in tropical forest birds. Ecology Letters, 11(9):960–968. {{doi|10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01196.x}} The loss of tropical rainforest is the most pressing problem, as these forests hold the highest number of species yet are being destroyed quickly. Habitat loss has been implicated in a number of extinctions, including the ivory-billed woodpecker (disputed because of "rediscovery"), Bachman's warbler and the dusky seaside sparrow.

Climate change is a catalyst for the worrying downward trend of bird populations globally. The speed of human-caused climate change is currently unprecedented, leading bird species into continuously unadaptable circumstances. The American Bird Conservancy states there is a clear and direct comparison between bird population decline and climate change, stating that “Warming temperatures are changing where birds live, the timing of their migration patterns and egg laying, and even the sizes and shapes of their bodies.”

Overall, it has been observed that most North American bird species have been recognized over the prior few decades to have shifted their breeding ranges irregularly due to climate change. Migratory birds are more prone to the effects of climate change, leading to shifts in time migratory patterns. It’s predicted in the coming years that mountainous birds will even lose suitable migratory habitats due to rising temperatures at higher elevations. On top of these migratory shifts, global warming has been predicted to be changing size and wing length proportionally in all bird species. It is presumed that with rising temperatures, smaller birds maintain better competitive fitness thanks to their easier heat dispersal compared to their larger counterparts within the same species.

Indirect impacts of climate change on birds include increased drought and fires, rising-sea levels, increased disease, phenological mismatch, and uncommon interactions between species. Increase in drought leads to increased fires, destroying nesting ground and fragmenting specifically sagebrush ecosystems. Rise in sea-levels provides similar altercations for marsh-nesting birds. Nesting sites disappear as sea-levels rise, eliminating habitats for nesting parents and young to continue species. Phenological mismatch occurs due to rising temperatures shifting migratory timeframes but not quickly enough, altering the life cycle events in interacting species at different rates.{{Cite web |last=Kathryn |date=2022-07-20 |title=How Does Climate Change Impact Birds? |url=https://abcbirds.org/blog/climate-change-impact/ |access-date=2025-05-10 |website=American Bird Conservancy |language=en}}

Birds are afflicted by numerous pollutants including marine oil pollution, plastic pollution, light pollution, sound pollution, air pollution, and pesticides to name a major few. Plastic pollution serves a major detriment to birds, mainly marine birds.{{Cite web |last=Ornithology |first=British Trust for |date=2021-02-09 |title=Birds and pollution |url=https://www.bto.org/understanding-birds/articles/birds-and-pollution |access-date=2025-05-10 |website=BTO - British Trust for Ornithology |language=en}} Many marine birds suffer from entanglement, nutritional deprivation, and gut damage due to ingested plastic litter.{{Cite journal |last=Wang |first=Limin |last2=Nabi |first2=Ghulam |last3=Yin |first3=Liyun |last4=Wang |first4=Yanqin |last5=Li |first5=Shuxin |last6=Hao |first6=Zhuang |last7=Li |first7=Dongming |date=2021-11-02 |title=Birds and plastic pollution: recent advances |url=https://avianres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40657-021-00293-2 |journal=Avian Research |volume=12 |issue=1 |pages=59 |doi=10.1186/s40657-021-00293-2 |issn=2053-7166 |pmc=8561682 |pmid=34745642}}

File:Fox with auklet.jpges introduced to the Aleutian Islands devastated populations of auks; here a least auklet has been taken.]]

Historically the threat posed by introduced species has probably caused the most extinctions of birds, particularly on islands. most prehistoric human caused extinctions were insular as well. Many island species evolved in the absence of predators and consequently lost many anti-predator behaviors.Blumstein, D., Daniel, J. (2005). "The loss of anti-predator behaviour following isolation on islands." Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 272: 1663–1668. As humans traveled around the world they brought with them many foreign animals which disturbed these island species. Some of these were unfamiliar predators, like rats, feral cats, and pigs; others were competitors, such as other bird species, or herbivores that degraded breeding habitat. Disease can also play a role; introduced avian malaria is thought to be a primary cause of many extinctions in Hawaii.Atkinson, C., Dusek, R., Woods, K., Iko, W. (2000). "Pathogenicity of avian malaria in experimentally-infected Hawaii Amakihi." Journal of Wildlife Diseases 36(2):197–204. The dodo is the most famous example of a species that was probably driven to extinction by introduced species (although human hunting also played a role), other species that were victims of introduced species were the Lyall's wren, poʻo-uli and the Laysan millerbird. Many species currently threatened with extinction are vulnerable to introduced species, such as the kōkako, black robin, Mariana crow, and the Hawaiian duck.

Humans have exploited birds for a very long time, and sometimes this exploitation has resulted in extinction. Overhunting occurred in some instances with a naive species unfamiliar with humans, such as the moa of New Zealand,Holdaway, R., Jacomb, C. (2000). "Rapid Extinction of the Moas (Aves: Dinornithiformes): Model, Test, and Implications." Science 287(5461): 2250 – 2254. in other cases it was an industrial level of hunting that led to extinction. The passenger pigeon was once the most numerous species of bird alive (possibly ever), overhunting reduced a species that once numbered in the billions to extinction.Eckert, Allan W. (1965). The Silent Sky: The Incredible Extinction of the Passenger Pigeon. Lincoln NE: IUniverse.com. {{ISBN|0-595-08963-1}}. Hunting pressure can be for food, sport, feathers, or even come from scientists collecting museum specimens. Collection of great auks for museums pushed the already rare species to extinction.

The harvesting of parrots for the pet trade has led to many species becoming endangered. Between 1986 and 1988, two million parrots were legally imported into the US alone. Parrots are also illegally smuggled between countries, and rarer species can command high prices.

Organized entrapment of birds takes place today across the globe, specifically in Latin America, Asia, and Africa. The demand for exotic pet birds in the United States drives Bolivian and Mexican conquests for entrapment, with a supposed over 22,000 individuals of 31 parrot species illegally traded under Bolivian law every year and an estimated 65,000–78,500 parrots captured every year in Mexico. These conquests continue due to the profits alone, with rarer species selling for up to $1,000 each when caught illegally.{{Cite web |date=2021-04-02 |title=Tackling the illegal trade and trafficking of birds |url=https://www.birdlife.org/projects/tackling-illegal-trade-inc-songbirds/ |access-date=2025-05-10 |website=BirdLife International |language=en-GB}}

Plume hunting is the hunting of wild birds to harvest their ornamentary feathers. More decorative plumes, which were sold for use as ornamentation particularly in hat-making, were more sought after in the trade. While the Plume Trade is not necessarily an large ongoing threat to birds, it was in its height in the late 19th century into the early 20th century until protective efforts were instated.{{Citation |title=Plume hunting |date=2025-03-26 |work=Wikipedia |url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plume_hunting |access-date=2025-05-10 |language=en}}

Hybridization may also endanger birds, damaging the gene stock. For example, the American black duck has been often reported hybridizing with the mallard, starting a slow decline.

Gamebird hybrids are particularly common and many breeders produce hybrids that may be accidentally or intentionally introduced into the wild.

{{Further|Bird kill|Climate change and birds}}File:Albatross hook.jpg has been hooked on a long-line.]]

Birds face a number of other threats. Pollution has led to serious declines in some species. Increasingly large volumes of plastic waste are being transported by wind and ocean currents throughout the planet, and mistaken ingestion by many species is eventually fatal.{{Cite journal |title=Threat of plastic pollution to seabirds is global, pervasive, and increasing |author=Chris Wilcox, Erik Van Sebille, and Britta Denise Hardesty |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |volume=112 |issue=38 |pages=11899–904 |date=September 22, 2015 |doi=10.1073/pnas.1502108112|pmid=26324886 |pmc=4586823 |bibcode=2015PNAS..11211899W |doi-access=free }} Seabirds are also vulnerable to oil spills, which destroy the plumage's waterproofing, causing the birds to drown or die of hypothermia.Dunnet, G., Crisp, D., Conan, G., Bourne, W. (1982). "Oil Pollution and Seabird Populations [and Discussion]." Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B 297(1087): 413–427. Light pollution can also have a damaging effect on some species, particularly nocturnal seabirds such as petrels.Le Correa, M., Ollivier, A., Ribesc S., Jouventin, P., (2002). "Light-induced mortality of petrels: a 4-year study from Réunion Island (Indian Ocean)." Biological Conservation 105: 93–102 [http://www.cefe.cnrs.fr/ecomp/PDF%20papers/LeCorre%202002.pdf]. The pesticide DDT was responsible for thinning egg shells in nesting birds, particularly seabirds and birds of prey that are high on the food chain.Grier, W., (1982). "Ban of DDT and subsequent recovery of Reproduction in bald eagles." Science 218(4578): 1232–1235. The use of pesticides continues to harm birds, especially insectivores like swallows that have lost a food source from the use of insecticides in agriculture.{{Cite journal |last=Stanton |first=R.L. |last2=Morrissey |first2=C.A. |last3=Clark |first3=R.G. |date=2018-02-15 |title=Analysis of trends and agricultural drivers of farmland bird declines in North America: A review |url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S016788091730525X |journal=Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment |language=en |volume=254 |pages=244–254 |doi=10.1016/j.agee.2017.11.028}} A particularly dangerous class of pesticides is the seed-coating neonicotinoids. Neonicotinoids include a neurotoxin that bioaccumulates in the tissue of birds and is associated with impairment of reproduction.

Seabirds face another threat in the form of bycatch, where birds in the water become tangled in fishing nets or hooked on lines set out by long-line fisheries. As many as 100,000 albatrosses are hooked and drown each year on tuna lines set out by long-line fisheries.Brothers NP. 1991. "Albatross mortality and associated bait loss in the Japanese longline fishery in the southern ocean." Biological Conservation 55: 255–268.

Birds are also threatened by high rise buildings, communications towers, and other human-related activities and structures; estimates vary from about 3.5 to 975 million birds a year in the North America alone.{{cite journal |url=http://www.muhlenberg.edu/main/academics/biology/faculty/klem/ACO/documents/FieldJournal-Mortality1990.pdf |first=Daniel |last=Klem Jr. |author-link=Daniel Klem |year=1990 |title=Collisions between birds and windows: mortality and prevention. |journal=Journal of Field Ornithology |volume=61 |issue=l |pages=120–128 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140714113709/http://www.muhlenberg.edu/main/academics/biology/faculty/klem/ACO/documents/FieldJournal-Mortality1990.pdf |archive-date=2014-07-14 }} The largest source of human-related bird death is due to glass windows, which kill 100–900 million birds a year. The next largest sources of human-caused death are hunting (100+ million), house cats (100 million), cars and trucks (50 to 100 million), electric power lines (174 million), and pesticides (67 million).{{cite web|url=http://www.flap.org/|title=Top 13 Killers|publisher=Fatal Light Awareness Program|access-date=2009-05-06}} Birds are also killed in large quantities by flying into communication tower guidelines, usually after being attracted by tower lights. This phenomenon is called towerkill and is responsible for 5–50 million birds deaths a year. Similarly, natural gas flaring can attract and kill large numbers of birds. Approximately 7,500 migrating songbirds were attracted to and killed by the flare at the liquefied natural gas terminal in Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada on September 13, 2013.[http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/7-500-songbirds-killed-at-canaport-gas-plant-in-saint-john-1.1857615 7,500 songbirds killed at Canaport gas plant in Saint John] (online CBC News, September 17, 2013). Similar incidents have occurred at flares on offshore oil and gas installations.[http://play.psych.mun.ca/~mont/pubs/seabirds.pdf Seabirds at Risk around Offshore Oil Platforms in the North-west Atlantic], Marine Pollution Bulletin, Vol. 42, No. 12, pp. 1,285–1,290, 2001.

File:2017 Human-related causes of bird deaths (US).svg involves repeated claims that "windmills" "kill the birds",{{cite news |last1=Kaufman |first1=Mark |title=Trump won't stop making a deceptive bird claim. Experts debunk it. |url=https://mashable.com/article/trump-wind-energy-turbine-birds-death |work=Mashable |date=17 August 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250211034724/https://mashable.com/article/trump-wind-energy-turbine-birds-death |archive-date=11 February 2025 |url-status=live }} but cats in the U.S. actually kill on the order of 10,000 times as many birds as wind turbines.{{cite web |title=Threats to Birds / Top Threats to Birds (U.S. only. Ordered by Median Estimate of Bird Mortality Annually. As of 2017.) |url=https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/threats-birds |publisher=U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250213033928/https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/threats-birds |archive-date=13 February 2025 |date=2017 |url-status=live}}]]

The recent growth in the renewable energy industry is also increasing the threat to birds farther away from dense human population centers. As of late 2019, the capacity of wind power in the U.S. reached 100 GW (gigawatt).{{Cite web |url=http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/us-cracks-100gw-of-wind-as-post-subsidy-era-looms |author=Karl-Erik Stromsta |publisher=Green Tech Media |title=US Cracks 100GW of Wind as Post-Subsidy Era Looms |date=31 October 2013}} Studies conducted at a variety of farms found fewer than 14, and typically fewer than 4, direct bird deaths per year per installed megawatt; suggesting cumulative mortality is approaching the order of a million individuals annually.{{Cite web |url=https://www1.eere.energy.gov/wind/pdfs/birds_and_bats_fact_sheet.pdf |title=Wind Turbine Interactions with Birds, Bats, and their Habitats:A Summary of Research Results and Priority Questions |publisher=National Wind Coordinating Collaborative |date=31 March 2010}} Migrating songbirds appeared to be the most strongly impacted in some studies. The primary impact of commercial solar farms – the majority utilizing photovoltaic collectors which are mounted near the ground – is from extensive land clearing and increases in long-distance power transmission infrastructure. In 2015, biologists working for the state of California estimated that 3,500 birds died at the Ivanpah concentrated solar power demonstration plant in the span of a year; "many of them burned alive while flying near the tower collector where air temperatures reached up to 1,000 degrees Fahrenheit."{{cite web|url=http://www.wsj.com/articles/high-tech-solar-projects-fail-to-deliver-1434138485|title=High-Tech Solar Projects Fail to Deliver|first=Cassandra|last=Sweet|date=12 June 2015|work=The Wall Street Journal|quote=In April, biologists working for the state estimated that 3,500 birds died at Ivanpah in the span of a year, many of them burned alive while flying through a part of the solar installment where air temperatures can reach 1,000 degrees Fahrenheit.}}

According to a 2018 Nature paper studying trends in global waterbird populations, ineffective governance is a major driver of biodiversity loss in wetlands, highlighting the importance of political and institutional factors in conservation outcomes.{{Cite journal |last=Amano |first=Tatsuya |last2=Székely |first2=Tamás |last3=Sandel |first3=Brody |last4=Nagy |first4=Szabolcs |last5=Mundkur |first5=Taej |last6=Langendoen |first6=Tom |last7=Blanco |first7=Daniel |last8=Soykan |first8=Candan U. |last9=Sutherland |first9=William J. |date=January 2018 |title=Successful conservation of global waterbird populations depends on effective governance |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/nature25139 |journal=Nature |language=en |volume=553 |issue=7687 |pages=199–202 |doi=10.1038/nature25139 |issn=0028-0836}}

Scientists and conservation professionals have developed a number of techniques to protect bird species. These techniques have had varying levels of success.

Captive breeding, or ex-situ conservation, has been used in a number of instances to save species from extinction. The principle is to create a viable population of a species in either zoos or breeding facilities, for later reintroduction back into the wild. As such a captive population can either serve as an insurance against the species going extinct in the wild or as a last-ditch effort in situations where conservation in the wild is impossible. Captive breeding has been used to save several species from extinction, the most famous example being the California condor, a species that declined to less than thirty birds. In order to save the California condor the decision was made to take every individual left in the wild into captivity. From these 22 individuals a breeding program began that brought the numbers up to 273 by 2005. An even more impressive recovery was that of the Mauritius kestrel, which by 1974 had dropped to only four individuals, yet by 2006 the population was 800.Jones, C.G.; Heck, W.; Lewis, R.E.; Mungroo, Y.; Slade, G.; Cade, T. (1995). " The restoration of the Mauritius kestrel Falco punctatus population." Ibis 137(Suppl.1): 173–180.

Reintroductions of captive bred populations can occur to replenish wild populations of an endangered species, to create new populations or to restore a species after it has become extinct in the wild. Reintroductions helped bring the wild populations of Hawaiian geese (nene) from 30 birds to over 500. The Mauritius kestrel was successfully reintroduced into the wild after its captive breeding programme. Reintroductions can be very difficult and often fail if insufficient preparations are made, as species born in captivity may lack the skills and knowledge needed for life in the wild after living in captivity. Reintroductions can also fail if the causes of a birds decline have not been adequately addressed. Attempts to reintroduce the Bali starling into the wild failed due to continued poaching of reintroduced birds.Putra, M. & Prins, H. (2000). "Status and distribution of the endemic Bali starling Leucopsar rothschildi." Oryx 34(3): 188–197.

The introduction of captives of unknown pedigree can pose a threat to native populations. Domestic fowl have threatened endemic species such as Gallus g. bankiva while pheasants such as the ring-necked pheasant and captive cheer pheasants of uncertain origin have escaped into the wild or have been intentionally introduced. Green peafowl of similar mixed origins confiscated from local bird dealers have been released into areas with native wild birds.{{cite book|pages=7|title=Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan 1995–1999: Pheasants | author=Philip J. K. McGowan, Peter J. Garson| publisher=Pheasant Specialist Group, IUCN |year= 1995|isbn=2-8317-0299-2}}

File:Green-Lakes-BCA-sign.jpg, Green Lakes State Park, Manlius, New York]]

Translocations involve moving populations of threatened species into areas of suitable habitat currently unused by the species. There are several reasons for doing this; the creation of secondary populations that act as an insurance against disaster, or in many cases threats faced by the original population in its current location. One famous translocation was of the kākāpō of New Zealand. These large flightless parrots were unable to cope with introduced predators in their remaining habitat on Stewart Island, so were moved to smaller offshore islands that had been cleared of predators. From there a recovery programme has managed to maintain and eventually increase their numbers.

As the loss and destruction of habitat is the most serious threat facing many bird species, conservation organizations and government agencies tasked with protecting birds work to protect areas of natural habitat. This can be achieved through purchasing land of conservation importance, setting aside land or gazetting it as a national park or other protected area, and passing legislation preventing landowners from undertaking damaging land use practices, or paying them not to undertake those activities. The goals of habitat protection for birds and other threatened animals and plants often conflicts with other stakeholders, such as landowners and businesses, who can face economically damaging restrictions on their activities. Plans to protect crucial habitat for the spotted owl of North America required the protection of large areas of old growth forest in the western United States; this was opposed by logging companies who claimed it would cause job losses and reduced profits.Simberloff, D. (1987). "The Spotted Owl Fracas: Mixing Academic, Applied, and Political Ecology" Ecology 68(4): 766–772.

{{div col|colwidth=22em}}

• Avicide
• Berne Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats
• Bird Protection Quebec
• BirdLife International
• Bird-skyscraper collisions
• Climate change and birds
• Fundación ProAves
• Hawaiian honeycreeper conservation
• International Convention on the Protection of Birds
• Migratory Bird Treaty
• The Institute for Bird Populations
• Raptor conservation
• Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union
• SOS/BirdLife Slovakia

{{div col end}}

{{Reflist}}

• [http://www.theworldsrarestbirds.com/ The Worlds Rarest Birds] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210822083429/http://www.theworldsrarestbirds.com/ |date=2021-08-22 }}
• [http://www.travelwires.com/conserving-the-environment-through-volunteerism-2592/ Birding Weekends] – a Kruger National Park (KNP) Birding Conservation Project
• [http://www.pakshimitra.org/ Maharashtra Pakshimitra]
• [http://www.paf.net.pk/ Pakistan Avicultural Foundation]

{{Birds|state=collapsed}}

{{conservation of species}}

{{threatened species}}

{{Birds in culture}}

{{Authority control}}