Itanium#Itanium 9700 (Kittson): 2017

In 1989, HP started to research an architecture that would exceed the expected limits of the reduced instruction set computer (RISC) architectures caused by the great increase in complexity needed for executing multiple instructions per cycle due to the need for dynamic dependency checking and precise exception handling.{{Efn|The size of the needed dependency-checking circuitry increases quadratically with the issue width.}} HP hired Bob Rau of Cydrome and Josh Fisher of Multiflow, the pioneers of very long instruction word (VLIW) computing. One VLIW instruction word can contain several independent instructions, which can be executed in parallel without having to evaluate them for independence. A compiler must attempt to find valid combinations of instructions that can be executed at the same time, effectively performing the instruction scheduling that conventional superscalar processors must do in hardware at runtime.

HP researchers modified the classic VLIW into a new type of architecture, later named Explicitly Parallel Instruction Computing (EPIC), which differs by: having template bits which show which instructions are independent inside and between the bundles of three instructions, which enables the explicitly parallel execution of multiple bundles and increasing the processors' issue width without the need to recompile; by predication of instructions to reduce the need for branches; and by full interlocking to eliminate the delay slots. In EPIC the assignment of execution units to instructions and the timing of their issuing can be decided by hardware, unlike in the classic VLIW. HP intended to use these features in PA-WideWord, the planned successor to their PA-RISC ISA. EPIC was intended to provide the best balance between the efficient use of silicon area and electricity, and general-purpose flexibility.{{cite web |last1=Smotherman |first1=Mark |title=Understanding EPIC Architectures and Implementations |url=https://people.computing.clemson.edu/~mark/464/acmse_epic.pdf |publisher=Clemson University |access-date=5 June 2022}}{{cite web

| url=https://www.hpl.hp.com/news/2001/apr-jun/itanium.html

| title=Inventing Itanium: How HP Labs Helped Create the Next-Generation Chip Architecture

| access-date=March 23, 2007

| date=June 2001

| work=HP Labs

}} In 1993 HP held an internal competition to design the best (simulated) microarchitectures of a RISC and an EPIC type, led by Jerry Huck and Rajiv Gupta respectively. The EPIC team won, with over double the simulated performance of the RISC competitor.{{cite web |last1=Markoff |first1=John |title=Inside Intel, The Future is Riding on the Merced Chip |url=https://archive.org/details/TheJerusalemPost1998IsraelEnglish/Apr%2006%201998%2C%20The%20Jerusalem%20Post%2C%20%2319898%2C%20Israel%20%28en%29/page/n12/mode/1up |publisher=The New York Times, republised by The Jerusalem Post |date=5 April 1998}}

At the same time Intel was also looking for ways to make better ISAs. In 1989 Intel had launched the i860, which it marketed for workstations, servers, and iPSC and Paragon supercomputers. It differed from other RISCs by being able to switch between the normal single instruction per cycle mode, and a mode where pairs of instructions are explicitly defined as parallel so as to execute them in the same cycle without having to do dependency checking. Another distinguishing feature were the instructions for an exposed floating-point pipeline, that enabled the tripling of throughput compared to the conventional floating-point instructions. Both of these features were left largely unused because compilers didn't support them, a problem that later challenged Itanium too. Without them, i860's parallelism (and thus performance) was no better than other RISCs, so it failed in the market. Itanium would adopt a more flexible form of explicit parallelism than i860 had.{{cite web |last1=DeMone |first1=Paul |title=Intel's History Lesson |url=https://www.realworldtech.com/intel-history-lesson/ |website=Real World Tech |date=25 January 2000}}

In November 1993 HP approached Intel, seeking collaboration on an innovative future architecture.{{cite web |last1=DeMone |first1=Paul |title=Countdown to IA-64 |url=https://www.realworldtech.com/countdown-to-ia64/ |website=Real World Tech |date=14 March 2001}}{{refn|{{cite web |last1=Alpert |first1=Donald |title=Intel Itanium Processor (Merced) |url=https://camelback-comparch.com/about/technical-highlights/#merced |date=July 2003}} Alpert was the chief architect of the original P7 and the top engineering manager of Merced{{cite web |last1=Smotherman |first1=Mark |title=Who are the Computer Architects? |url=https://people.computing.clemson.edu/~mark/architects.html |publisher=Clemson University }} See the sections "Independence architecture" and "Wintel".}} At the time Intel was looking to extend x86 to 64 bits in a processor codenamed P7, which they found challenging.{{cite web |last1=DeMone |first1=Paul |title=What's Up With Willamette? (Part 1) |url=https://www.realworldtech.com/willamette-basics/ |website=Real World Tech |date=3 March 2000}} Later Intel claimed that four different design teams had explored 64-bit extensions, but each of them concluded that it was not economically feasible.{{cite web |last1=Kanellos |first1=Michael |title=Intel takes slow road to 64-bit PC chips |url=https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/intel-takes-slow-road-to-64-bit-pc-chips/ |website=CNET |date=21 February 2003}} At the meeting with HP, Intel's engineers were impressed when Jerry Huck and Rajiv Gupta presented the PA-WideWord architecture they had designed to replace PA-RISC. "When we saw WideWord, we saw a lot of things we had only been looking at doing, already in their full glory", said Intel's John Crawford, who in 1994 became the chief architect of Merced, and who had earlier argued against extending the x86 with P7. HP's Gupta recalled: "I looked Albert Yu [Intel's general manager for microprocessors] in the eyes and showed him we could run circles around PowerPC, that we could kill PowerPC, that we could kill the x86." Soon Intel and HP started conducting in-depth technical discussions at an HP office, where each side had six{{Refn|{{cite web |last1=Britt |first1=Russ |title=The birth of a new processor |url=https://www.edn.com/the-birth-of-a-new-processor/ |website=EDN |date=1 January 2000}} (The {{Define|ACM|architecture, compilers, microarchitecture}} committee with 5 people from each side{{cite web |last1=Smotherman |first1=Mark |title=Historical background for EPIC instruction set architectures |url=https://people.computing.clemson.edu/~mark/epic.html |publisher=Clemson University |access-date=3 June 2022}} was probably a different entity.)}} engineers who exchanged and discussed both companies' confidential architectural research. They then decided to use not only PA-WideWord, but also the more experimental HP Labs PlayDoh as the source of their joint future architecture.{{cite web |last1=DeMone |first1=Paul |title=HP's Struggle For Simplicity Ends at Intel |url=https://www.realworldtech.com/hp-intel-itanium/ |website=Real World Tech |date=27 October 1999}}{{cite web |last1=Kathail |first1=Vinod |last2=Schlansker |first2=Michael S. |last3=Rau |first3=B. Ramakrishna |title=HPL-PD Architecture Specification: Version 1.1 |url=https://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/93/HPL-93-80R1.pdf |publisher=HP Laboratories |access-date=2023-07-05 |archive-date=2024-02-04 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240204063521/https://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/93/HPL-93-80R1.pdf |url-status=dead }} Convinced of the superiority of the new project, in 1994 Intel canceled their existing plans for P7.

In June 1994 Intel and HP announced their joint effort to make a new ISA that would adopt ideas of Wide Word and VLIW. Yu declared: "If I were competitors, I'd be really worried. If you think you have a future, you don't."{{cite web |last1=Hamilton |first1=David |title=Intel gambles with Itanium |url=https://www.zdnet.com/article/intel-gambles-with-itanium/ |website=ZDNet |date=28 May 2001}} On P7's future, Intel said the alliance would impact it, but "it is not clear" whether it would "fully encompass the new architecture".{{cite web |last1=Hecht |first1=Jeff |title=Technology: Intel opts for simpler, speedier chips |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg14219303-300-technology-intel-opts-for-simpler-speedier-chips/ |website=New Scientist |date=18 June 1994}}{{cite web |last1=Bozman |first1=Jean S. |title=Chip alliance shakes ground |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QZtKFFB8weQC&pg=PA12 |website=Computerworld |date=13 June 1994}} David House had approved the project, but later severely criticized it.

Later the same month, Intel said that some of the first features of the new architecture would start appearing on Intel chips as early as the P7, but the full version would appear sometime later.{{cite web |last1=Babcock |first1=Charles |title=Silicon marriage: HP/Intel venture |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QtpyKsPTNwkC&pg=PA6 |website=Computerworld |date=25 July 1994}}

In August 1994 EE Times reported that Intel told investors that P7 was being re-evaluated and possibly canceled in favor of the HP processor. Intel immediately issued a clarification, saying that P7 is still being defined, and that HP may contribute to its architecture. Later it was confirmed that the P7 codename had indeed passed to the HP-Intel processor. By early 1996 Intel revealed its new codename, Merced.{{cite web |last1=DeMone |first1=Paul |title=Countdown to IA-64 |url=https://www.realworldtech.com/countdown-to-ia64/ |website=Real World Tech |date=14 March 2001}} Has a typo (P5) in the graphic.{{cite web |last1=Crothers |first1=Brooke |title=Intel aims to bring multimedia to the masses |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zD4EAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA8 |website=InfoWorld |date=29 January 1996}}

HP believed that it was no longer cost-effective for individual enterprise systems companies such as itself to develop proprietary microprocessors, so it partnered with Intel in 1994 to develop the IA-64 architecture, derived from EPIC. Intel was willing to undertake the very large development effort on IA-64 in the expectation that the resulting microprocessor would be used by the majority of enterprise systems manufacturers. HP and Intel initiated a large joint development effort with a goal of delivering the first product, Merced, in 1998.

Merced was designed by a team of 500, which Intel later admitted was too inexperienced, with many recent college graduates. Crawford (Intel) was the chief architect, while Huck (HP) held the second position. Early in the development HP and Intel had a disagreement where Intel wanted more dedicated hardware for more floating-point instructions. HP prevailed upon the discovery of a floating-point hardware bug in Intel's Pentium. When Merced was floorplanned for the first time in mid-1996, it turned out to be far too large, "this was a lot worse than anything I'd seen before", said Crawford. The designers had to reduce the complexity (and thus performance) of subsystems, including the x86 unit and cutting the L2 cache to 96 KB.{{Efn|For comparison the 180nm Pentium III Xeon MP had a 2 MB on-die L2 cache.}} Eventually it was agreed that the size target could only be reached by using the 180 nm process instead of the intended 250 nm. Later problems emerged with attempts to speed up the critical paths without disturbing the other circuits' speed. Merced was taped out on 4 July 1999, and in August Intel produced the first complete test chip.

The expectations for Merced waned over time as delays and performance deficiencies emerged, shifting the focus and onus for success onto the HP-led second Itanium design, codenamed McKinley. In July 1997 the switch to the 180 nm process delayed Merced into the second half of 1999.{{cite web |title=Merced "Will Be Out Late 1999," Says Hewlett-Packard |url=https://techmonitor.ai/technology/merced_will_be_out_late_1999_says_hewlett_packard_1 |agency=Computer Business Review |website=Tech Monitor |date=18 July 1997 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20240213040233/https://techmonitor.ai/technology/merced_will_be_out_late_1999_says_hewlett_packard_1 |archive-date= 13 February 2024 }} Shortly before the reveal of EPIC at the Microprocessor Forum in October 1997, an analyst of the Microprocessor Report said that Itanium would "not show the competitive performance until 2001. It will take the second version of the chip for the performance to get shown".{{cite web |last1=Kanellos |first1=Michael |title=Intel late to 64-bit computing |url=https://www.cnet.com/news/intel-late-to-64-bit-computing/ |website=CNET |date=6 October 1997 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220627172827/https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/intel-late-to-64-bit-computing/ |archive-date= Jun 27, 2022 }} At the Forum, Intel's Fred Pollack originated the "wait for McKinley" mantra when he said that it would double the Merced's performance and would "knock your socks off",{{cite web |last1=Kanellos |first1=Michael |title=Intel, HP unveil EPIC technology |url=https://www.cnet.com/news/intel-hp-unveil-epic-technology/ |website=CNET |date=14 October 1997 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220818183735/https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/intel-hp-unveil-epic-technology/ |archive-date= Aug 18, 2022 }}{{cite web |last1=DeMone |first1=Paul |title=HP's Struggle For Simplicity Ends at Intel |url=https://www.realworldtech.com/hp-intel-itanium/3/ |website=Real World Tech |page=3 |date=27 October 1999 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231031163355/https://www.realworldtech.com/hp-intel-itanium/3/ |archive-date= Oct 31, 2023 }} while using the same 180 nm process as Merced.{{cite news |last1=Gwennap |first1=Linley |title=Intel, HP Make EPIC Disclosure |url=https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~skadron/cs854_uproc_survey/spring_2001/cs854/111401.pdf |work=Microprocessor Report |volume=11 |issue=14 |date=27 October 1997 |url-status=live |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20231031163335/https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~skadron/cs854_uproc_survey/spring_2001/cs854/111401.pdf |archive-date= Oct 31, 2023 }} Pollack also said that Merced's x86 performance would be lower than the fastest x86 processors, and that x86 would "continue to grow at its historical rates". Intel said that IA-64 won't have much presence in the consumer market for 5 to 10 years.{{cite news |last1=Corcoran |first1=Elizabeth |title=Chipmakers unveil works in progress |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/business/1997/10/15/chipmakers-unveil-works-in-progress/b4ecf2c5-7c6b-419e-a0d1-9c35d515b5e0/ |url-access=subscription |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=15 October 1997 |url-status=live |archive-url= https://archive.today/20240213044222/https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/business/1997/10/15/chipmakers-unveil-works-in-progress/b4ecf2c5-7c6b-419e-a0d1-9c35d515b5e0/|archive-date= 13 February 2024 }}

Later it was reported that HP's motivation when starting to design McKinley in 1996 was to have more control over the project so as to avoid the issues affecting Merced's performance and schedule.{{cite web |last1=Robertson |first1=Chiyo |title=Merced: Worth the wait? What of McKinley? |url=https://www.zdnet.com/article/merced-worth-the-wait-what-of-mckinley/ |website=ZDNet |date=17 March 1999}}{{cite web |last1=Matsumoto |first1=Craig |title=Intel outlines road to McKinley processor |url=https://www.eetimes.com/intel-outlines-road-to-mckinley-processor/ |website=EE Times |date=8 October 1998}} The design team finalized McKinley's project goals in 1997.{{cite CiteSeerX |title=Inside the Intel Itanium 2 Processor: a Hewlett Packard Technical White Paper |date=17 July 2002 | citeseerx=10.1.1.96.8209 }} In late May 1998 Merced was delayed to mid-2000, and by August 1998 analysts were questioning its commercial viability, given that McKinley would arrive shortly after with double the performance, as delays were causing Merced to turn into simply a development vehicle for the Itanium ecosystem. The "wait for McKinley" narrative was becoming prevalent.{{cite web |last1=Kanellos |first1=Michael |title=Is Merced doomed? |url=https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/is-merced-doomed/ |website=CNET |date=6 August 1998}} The same day it was reported that due to the delays, HP would extend its line of PA-RISC PA-8000 series processors from PA-8500 to as far as PA-8900.{{cite news |title=INTEL'S MERCED COULD BE ECLIPSED BY MCKINLEY FOLLOW-ON |url=https://techmonitor.ai/technology/intels_merced_could_be_eclipsed_by_mckinley_follow_on |newspaper=Tech Monitor |date=6 August 1998}} In October 1998 HP announced its plans for four more generations of PA-RISC processors, with PA-8900 set to reach 1.2 GHz in 2003.{{cite web |last1=Shankland |first1=Stephen |last2=Kanellos |first2=Michael |title=HP has two-pronged chip plan |url=http://cnet.com/news/0-1004-200-334214.html |website=CNET |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20001203183700/http://cnet.com/news/0-1004-200-334214.html |archive-date=2000-12-03 |date=13 October 1998}}

By March 1999 some analysts expected Merced to ship in volume only in 2001, but the volume was widely expected to be low as most customers would wait for McKinley. In May 1999, two months before Merced's tape-out, an analyst said that failure to tape-out before July would result in another delay.{{cite web |last1=Gary |first1=Gregory |title=IA 64 Update: Part 1 of 2 |url=https://www.edn.com/ia-64-update-part-1-of-2/ |website=EDN |date=3 May 1999}} In July 1999, upon reports that the first silicon would be made in late August, analysts predicted a delay to late 2000, and came into agreement that Merced would be used chiefly for debugging and testing the IA-64 software. Linley Gwennap of MPR said of Merced that "at this point, everyone is expecting it's going to be late and slow, and the real advance is going to come from McKinley. What this does is puts a lot more pressure on McKinley and for that team to deliver".{{cite web |last1=Shankland |first1=Stephen |title=Intel's Merced chip may slip further |url=http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-344601.html |website=CNET |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20000605083119/http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-344601.html |archive-date=2000-06-05 |date=8 July 1999}} By then, Intel had revealed that Merced would be initially priced at $5000.{{cite web |last1=Hamblen |first1=Matt |title=Intel: No Forced March to Merced |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=51iIcvzoX-AC&pg=PA61 |website=Computerworld |date=12 July 1999}} In August 1999 HP advised some of their customers to skip Merced and wait for McKinley.{{cite web |last1=Shankland |first1=Stephen |title=HP upgrade path bypasses Merced chip |url=http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-346220.html |website=CNET |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20000819022147/http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-346220.html |archive-date=2000-08-19 |date=19 August 1999}} By July 2000 HP told the press that the first Itanium systems would be for niche uses, and that "You're not going to put this stuff near your data center for several years."; HP expected its Itanium systems to outsell the PA-RISC systems only in 2005.{{cite web |last1=Shankland |first1=Stephen |title=HP moves slowly into world of Intel 64-bit processors |url=http://www.news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-2241414.html |website=CNET |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010210011931/http://www.news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-2241414.html |archive-date=2001-02-10 |date=11 July 2000}} The same July Intel told of another delay, due to a stepping change to fix bugs. Now only "pilot systems" would ship that year, while the general availability was pushed to the "first half of 2001". Server makers had largely forgone spending on the R&D for the Merced-based systems, instead using motherboards or whole servers of Intel's design. To foster a wide ecosystem, by mid-2000 Intel had provided 15,000 Itaniums in 5,000 systems to software developers and hardware designers.{{cite web |last1=Shankland |first1=Stephen |last2=Kanellos |first2=Michael |title=Intel pushes back schedule for Itanium chip |url=http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-2284759.html |website=CNET |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010413122744/http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-2284759.html |archive-date=2001-04-13 |date=July 18, 2000}} In March 2001 Intel said Itanium systems would begin shipping to customers in the second quarter, followed by a broader deployment in the second half of the year. By then even Intel publicly acknowledged that many customers would wait for McKinley.{{cite web |last1=Shankland |first1=Stephen |title=Intel draws out Itanium arrival |url=http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-4996738.html |website=CNET |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010413151817/http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-4996738.html |archive-date=2001-04-13 |date=1 March 2001}}

[[Image:Itanium Sales Forecasts edit.png|thumb|right|400px|Itanium Server Sales forecast history{{cite web

| url=http://www.zdnet.com/pictures/charts-mining-itanium/

| title=Mining Itanium

| access-date=March 19, 2007

| date=December 7, 2005

| work=CNet News

| archive-date=June 11, 2018

| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180611040452/https://www.zdnet.com/pictures/charts-mining-itanium/

| url-status=dead

}}{{cite news

| url=https://www.cnet.com/news/analyst-firm-offers-rosy-view-of-itanium/

| title=Analyst firm offers rosy view of Itanium

| access-date=March 20, 2007

| last=Shankland

| first=Stephen

| date=February 14, 2006

| publisher=CNET News

| archive-date=June 24, 2016

| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160624090721/http://www.cnet.com/news/analyst-firm-offers-rosy-view-of-itanium/

| url-status=live

}}]]

During development, Intel, HP, and industry analysts predicted that IA-64 would dominate first in 64-bit servers and workstations, then expand to the lower-end servers, supplanting Xeon, and finally penetrate into the personal computers, eventually to supplant RISC and complex instruction set computing (CISC) architectures for all general-purpose applications, though not replacing x86 "for the foreseeable future" according to Intel.{{cite web |last1=Halfhill |first1=Tom R. |title=Beyond Pentium II |url=http://www.byte.com/art/9712/sec5/art1.htm |website=Byte |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20000302143120/http://www.byte.com/art/9712/sec5/art1.htm |archive-date=2000-03-02 |url-status=dead |date=December 1997}}{{cite web |last1=Connor |first1=Deni |title=Intel's Merced will coexist with 32-bit chips |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=AxwEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA61 |website=Network World |date=1 March 1999}}{{cite web |last1=Knorr |first1=Eric |title=Upgrading your server: A look at the Itanium |url=https://www.zdnet.com/article/upgrading-your-server-a-look-at-the-itanium/ |website=ZDNet |date=10 September 2001}}{{cite web

| url=http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2598

| title=Itanium–Is there light at the end of the tunnel?

| access-date=March 23, 2007

| last=De Gelas

| first=Johan

| date=November 9, 2005

| work=AnandTech

| archive-date=May 3, 2012

| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120503094946/http://www.anandtech.com/show/1854

| url-status=live

}}{{cite web

| url=https://venturebeat.com/2009/05/08/exit-interview-retiring-intel-chairman-craig-barrett-on-the-industrys-unfinished-business/

| title=Exit interview: Retiring Intel chairman Craig Barrett on the industry's unfinished business

| access-date=May 17, 2009

| last=Takahashi

| first=Dean

| date=May 8, 2009

| work=VentureBeat

| archive-date=April 21, 2018

| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180421095016/https://venturebeat.com/2009/05/08/exit-interview-retiring-intel-chairman-craig-barrett-on-the-industrys-unfinished-business/

| url-status=live

}} In 1997-1998, Intel CEO Andy Grove predicted that Itanium would not come to the desktop computers for four of five years after launch, and said "I don't see Merced appearing on a mainstream desktop inside of a decade".{{cite web |last1=Nash |first1=Kim S. |title=Behind the Merced Mystique |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=03nTlQZ61IgC&pg=PT14 |website=Computerworld |date=6 July 1998}} In contrast, Itanium was expected to capture 70% of the 64-bit server market in 2002.{{cite web |last1=Yu |first1=Elleen |title=IA-64 to overtake RISC |url=https://www.arnnet.com.au/article/110877/ia-64_overtake_risc/ |website=ARN |date=25 November 1998 |access-date=16 August 2022 |archive-date=29 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230129171855/https://www.arnnet.com.au/article/110877/ia-64_overtake_risc/ |url-status=dead }} Already in 1998 Itanium's focus on the high end of the computer market was criticized for making it vulnerable to challengers expanding from the lower-end market segments, but many people in the computer industry feared voicing doubts about Itanium in the fear of Intel's retaliation.

Compaq and Silicon Graphics decided to abandon further development of the Alpha and MIPS architectures respectively in favor of migrating to IA-64.{{cite web

| url=https://www.zdnet.com/article/itanium-a-cautionary-tale/

| title=Itanium: A cautionary tale

| access-date=January 1, 2019

| date=December 7, 2005

| work=Tech News on ZDNet

| archive-date=August 2, 2020

| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200802000433/https://www.zdnet.com/article/itanium-a-cautionary-tale/

| url-status=live

}}

Several groups ported operating systems for the architecture, including Microsoft Windows, OpenVMS, Linux, HP-UX, Solaris,{{cite web

| url=http://www.computerworld.com/home/news.nsf/all/9909013sunsol

| title=Solaris for IA-64 coming this fall

| last=Vijayan

| first=Jaikumar

| date=September 1, 1999

| website=Computerworld

| archive-date=January 15, 2000

| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20000115084746/http://www.computerworld.com/home/news.nsf/all/9909013sunsol

| url-status=dead

}}{{cite news |url=https://www.eetimes.com/core-logic-efforts-under-way-for-merced/ |title=Core-logic efforts under way for Merced |last=Wolfe |first=Alexander |access-date=December 17, 2019 |date=September 2, 1999 |magazine=EE Times |archive-date=December 17, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191217201650/https://www.eetimes.com/core-logic-efforts-under-way-for-merced/ |url-status=live }}{{cite web

| url=http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Sun+Introduces+Solaris+Developer+Kit+for+Intel+to+Speed+Development...-a020369933

| title=Sun Introduces Solaris Developer Kit for Intel to Speed Development of Applications On Solaris; Award-winning Sun Tools Help ISVs Easily Develop for Solaris on Intel Today

| access-date=June 6, 2016

| date=March 10, 1998

| work=Business Wire

| quote=...developers can quickly develop applications today that will be compatible with and can easily be tuned for Solaris on Merced.

| archive-date=August 5, 2016

| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160805145446/http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Sun+Introduces+Solaris+Developer+Kit+for+Intel+to+Speed+Development...-a020369933

| url-status=dead

}}

Tru64 UNIX, and Monterey/64.{{cite news

| url=https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/next-generation-chip-passes-key-milestone/

| title=Next-generation chip passes key milestone

| last=Shankland

| first=Stephen

| date=September 17, 1999

| publisher=CNET News

}}

The latter three were canceled before reaching the market. By 1997, it was apparent that the IA-64 architecture and the compiler were much more difficult to implement than originally thought, and the delivery timeframe of Merced began slipping.

Intel announced the official name of the processor, Itanium, on October 4, 1999.{{cite web

| url=https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/intel-names-merced-chip-itanium/

| title=Intel names Merced chip Itanium

| access-date=April 30, 2007

| last=Kanellos

| first=Michael

| date=October 4, 1999

| website=CNET

}}

Within hours, the name Itanic had been coined on a Usenet newsgroup, a reference to the RMS Titanic, the "unsinkable" ocean liner that sank on her maiden voyage in 1912.{{cite newsgroup

| url=https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/UiOOaXF3-lI/f3nje9CHPx0J

| title=Re:Itanium

| access-date=May 20, 2020

| last=Finstad

| first=Kraig

| date=October 4, 1999

| newsgroup=comp.sys.mac.advocacy

}} "Itanic" was then used often by The Register,{{cite news

| first=Pete

| last=Sherriff

| title=AMD vs Intel – our readers write

| url=https://www.theregister.com/1999/10/28/amd_vs_intel_our_readers/

| work=The Register

| date=October 28, 1999

| access-date=November 25, 2022

}} and others,{{cite web

|url = https://www.zdnet.com/article/interpreting-mcnealys-lexicon/

|title = Interpreting McNealy's lexicon

|access-date = March 19, 2007

|last = Berlind

|first = David

|date = November 30, 2001

|work = ZDNet Tech Update

|archive-date = September 4, 2019

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190904215102/https://www.zdnet.com/article/interpreting-mcnealys-lexicon/

|url-status = live

}}{{cite web

|url=http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1004260/itanic-shell-game-continues

|url-status=unfit

|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160305085136/http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1004260/itanic-shell-game-continues

|archive-date=March 5, 2016

|title=Itanic shell game continues

|access-date=February 27, 2016

|last=Demerjian

|first=Charlie

|date=July 18, 2006

|website=The Inquirer

}}{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/19/business/market-watch-fawning-analysts-betray-investors.html|title=Fawning Analysts Betray Investors|last=Morgenson|first=Gretchen|date=October 19, 2003|work=The New York Times|access-date=January 1, 2019|archive-date=October 11, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121011211448/http://www.zdnet.com/news/interpreting-mcnealys-lexicon/296322|url-status=live}} to imply that the multibillion-dollar investment in Itanium—and the early hype associated with it—would be followed by its relatively quick demise.

{{Infobox CPU

| name=Itanium (Merced)

| image=KL Intel Itanium ES.jpg

| image_size=300px

| caption=Itanium processor

| produced-start=29 May–June 2001

| produced-end=10 April 2003{{cite web |title=Product Change Notification |url=http://developer.intel.com/design/pcn/Processors/D0102840.pdf |publisher=Intel |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040719063719/http://developer.intel.com/design/pcn/Processors/D0102840.pdf |archive-date=2004-07-19}}

| slowest=733

| slow-unit=

| fastest=800

| fast-unit=MHz

| fsb-slowest=266

| fsb-slow-unit=MT/s

| manuf1=Intel

| core1=

| size-from=

| size-to=

| arch=

| sock1=PAC418

| numcores=1

| l2cache=96 KB

| l3cache=2 or 4 MB

}}

After having sampled 40,000 chips to the partners, Intel launched Itanium on May 29, 2001, with first OEM systems from HP, IBM and Dell shipping to customers in June.{{cite web |last1=Niccolai |first1=James (IDG News Service) |title=Intel officially launches 64-bit Itanium chip |url=https://www.computerworld.com/article/2582076/intel-officially-launches-64-bit-itanium-chip.html |website=Computerworld |date=29 May 2001 |access-date=30 March 2022}}{{cite web |title=Server makers tout Itanium models |url=https://www.zdnet.com/article/server-makers-tout-itanium-models-5000117490/ |website=ZDNet |access-date=30 March 2022}} By then Itanium's performance was not superior to competing RISC and CISC processors.{{cite magazine

| author=Linley Gwennap

| title=Itanium era dawns

| url=https://www.eetimes.com/itanium-era-dawns/

| magazine=EE Times

| date=June 4, 2001

| access-date=December 17, 2019

| archive-date=December 17, 2019

| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191217201629/https://www.eetimes.com/itanium-era-dawns/

| url-status=live

}}

Itanium competed at the low-end (primarily four-CPU and smaller systems) with servers based on x86 processors, and at the high-end with IBM POWER and Sun Microsystems SPARC processors. Intel repositioned Itanium to focus on the high-end business and HPC computing markets, attempting to duplicate the x86's successful "horizontal" market (i.e., single architecture, multiple systems vendors). The success of this initial processor version was limited to replacing the PA-RISC in HP systems, Alpha in Compaq systems and MIPS in SGI systems, though IBM also delivered a supercomputer based on this processor.{{cite web

| url=http://www.top500.org/system/ranking/5597

| title=Titan Cluster Itanium 800 MHz

| access-date=May 16, 2007

| work=TOP500 web site

| archive-date=September 25, 2006

| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060925041933/http://www.top500.org/system/ranking/5597

| url-status=dead

}}

POWER and SPARC remained strong, while the 32-bit x86 architecture continued to grow into the enterprise space, building on the economies of scale fueled by its enormous installed base.

Only a few thousand systems using the original Merced Itanium processor were sold, due to relatively poor performance, high cost and limited software availability.{{cite news

| author=Michael Kanellos

| title=Itanium sales off to a slow start

| url=https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/itanium-sales-off-to-a-slow-start/

| work=CNET News

| date=December 11, 2001

| access-date=July 4, 2023

}} Recognizing that the lack of software could be a serious problem for the future, Intel made thousands of these early systems available to independent software vendors (ISVs) to stimulate development. HP and Intel brought the next-generation Itanium 2 processor to the market a year later. Few of the microarchitectural features of Merced would be carried over to all the subsequent Itanium designs, including the 16+16 KB L1 cache size and the 6-wide (two-bundle) instruction decoding.

{{Infobox CPU

| name=Itanium 2 (McKinley and Madison)

| image=KL Intel Itanium2.jpg

| image_size=300px

| caption=Itanium 2 processor

| produced-start=8 July 2002

| produced-end=16 November 2007{{refn|McKinley: 16 April 2004{{cite web |title=Product Change Notification |url=http://developer.intel.com/design/pcn/Processors/D0103649.pdf |publisher=Intel |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040719080318/http://developer.intel.com/design/pcn/Processors/D0103649.pdf |archive-date=2004-07-19 |url-status=dead}}
Madison 6M: 28 July 2006{{cite web |title=Product Change Notification |url=http://developer.intel.com/design/pcn/Processors/D0105835.pdf |publisher=Intel |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060313054448/http://developer.intel.com/design/pcn/Processors/D0105835.pdf |archive-date=2006-03-13 |url-status=dead}}
Madison 9M: 16 November 2007{{cite web |title=Product Change Notification |url=https://qdms.intel.com/dm/i.aspx/53B15559-69D6-4DD5-8379-0ABE33DCE8D4/PCN107564-00.pdf |publisher=Intel.
Warning: forced download |access-date=28 April 2022}}}}

| slowest=900

| fastest=1667

| slow-unit=

| fast-unit=MHz

| fsb-slowest=400

| fsb-fastest=667

| fsb-slow-unit=

| fsb-fast-unit=MT/s

| hypertransport-slowest=

| hypertransport-fastest=

| hypertransport-slow-unit=

| hypertransport-fast-unit=

| size-from=180 nm

| size-to=130 nm

| soldby=

| designfirm=HP and Intel

| manuf1=

| core1=

| sock1=PAC611

| pack1=

| brand1=

| arch=

| microarch=

| cpuid=

| code=McKinley, Madison, Deerfield, Madison 9M, Fanwood

| numcores=1

| l1cache=

| l2cache=256 KB

| l3cache=1.5–9 MB

| application=

}}

The Itanium 2 processor was released in July 2002, and was marketed for enterprise servers rather than for the whole gamut of high-end computing. The first Itanium 2, code-named McKinley, was jointly developed by HP and Intel, led by the HP team at Fort Collins, Colorado, taping out in December 2000. It relieved many of the performance problems of the original Itanium processor, which were mostly caused by an inefficient memory subsystem by approximately halving the latency and doubling the fill bandwidth of each of the three levels of cache, while expanding the L2 cache from 96 to 256 KB. Floating-point data is excluded from the L1 cache, because the L2 cache's higher bandwidth is more beneficial to typical floating-point applications than low latency. The L3 cache is now integrated on-chip rather than on a separate die, tripling in associativity and doubling in bus width. McKinley also greatly increases the number of possible instruction combinations in a VLIW-bundle and reaches 25% higher frequency, despite having only eight pipeline stages versus Merced's ten.{{cite web |last1=Hammond |first1=Gary |last2=Naffziger |first2=Sam |title=Next Generation Itanium™ Processor Overview |url=http://intel.com/design/itanium2/download/McK-IDF-2001.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030706123550/http://intel.com/design/itanium2/download/McK-IDF-2001.pdf |archive-date=6 July 2003 |url-status=dead}}

McKinley contains 221 million transistors (of which 25 million are for logic and 181 million for L3 cache), measured 19.5 mm by 21.6 mm (421 mm²) and was fabricated in a 180 nm, bulk CMOS process with six layers of aluminium metallization.{{cite journal |last1=Naffzinger |first1=Samuel D. |first2=Glenn T. |last2=Colon-Bonet |first3=Timothy |last3=Fischer |first4=Reid |last4=Riedlinger |first5=Thomas J. |last5=Sullivan |first6=Tom |last6=Grutkowski |date=November 2002 |title=The implementation of the Itanium 2 microprocessor |journal=IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits |volume=37 |issue=11 |pages=1448–1460 |doi=10.1109/JSSC.2002.803943 |bibcode=2002IJSSC..37.1448N |url=http://cpus.hp.com/technical_references/jssc_naffziger.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030322045555/http://cpus.hp.com/technical_references/jssc_naffziger.pdf |archive-date=2003-03-22 |url-status=dead}}{{cite web |last1=Soltis |first1=Don |last2=Gibson |first2=Mark |title=Itanium® 2 Processor Microarchitecture Overview |url=http://www.hotchips.org/archives/hc14/2_Mon/03_soltis.pdf |website=Hot Chips |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050531030015/http://www.hotchips.org/archives/hc14/2_Mon/03_soltis.pdf |archive-date=31 May 2005 |url-status=dead}}{{cite web |last1=Naffziger |first1=Samuel |last2=Hammond |first2=Gary |title=The Implementation of the Next-Generation 64b Itanium Microprocessor |url=http://www.imec.be/elela/HD03/examens/2003/D20_6.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041029174655/http://www.imec.be/elela/HD03/examens/2003/D20_6.pdf |archive-date=29 October 2004 |url-status=dead}} In May 2003 it was disclosed that some McKinley processors can suffer from a critical-path erratum leading to a system's crashing. It can be avoided by lowering the processor frequency to 800 MHz.{{cite web |last1=Krazit |first1=Tom |title=Intel details Itanium 2 bug |url=https://www.computerworld.com/article/2570015/intel-details-itanium-2-bug.html |website=Computerworld |date=12 May 2003 |access-date=30 March 2022}}

In 2003, AMD released the Opteron CPU, which implements its own 64-bit architecture called AMD64. The Opteron gained rapid acceptance in the enterprise server space because it provided an easy upgrade from x86. Under the influence of Microsoft, Intel responded by implementing AMD's x86-64 instruction set architecture instead of IA-64 in its Xeon microprocessors in 2004, resulting in a new industry-wide de facto standard.

In 2003, Intel released a new Itanium 2 family member, codenamed Madison, initially with up to 1.5 GHz frequency and 6 MB of L3 cache. The Madison 9M chip released in November 2004 had 9 MB of L3 cache and frequency up to 1.6 GHz, reaching 1.67 GHz in July 2005. Both chips used a 130 nm process and were the basis of all new Itanium processors until Montecito was released in July 2006, specifically Deerfield being a low wattage Madison, and Fanwood being a version of Madison 9M for lower-end servers with one or two CPU sockets.

In November 2005, the major Itanium server manufacturers joined with Intel and a number of software vendors to form the Itanium Solutions Alliance to promote the architecture and accelerate the software porting effort.{{cite web

|url = http://www.itaniumsolutionsalliance.org

|title = Itanium Solutions Alliance

|access-date = May 16, 2007

|work = ISA web site

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080908015727/http://www.itaniumsolutionsalliance.org/

|archive-date = September 8, 2008

|url-status = usurped

|df = mdy-all

}}

The Alliance announced that its members would invest $10 billion in the Itanium Solutions Alliance by the end of the decade.{{cite web

|url = http://www.ednasia.com/article-12139-computingleadersannouncestrategyforneweraofmissioncriticalcomputing-Asia.html

|title = Computing Leaders Announce Strategy for New Era of Mission Critical Computing

|access-date = October 16, 2008

|last = Scott

|first = Bilepo

|date = January 26, 2006

|work = Itanium Solutions Alliance Press Release

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120111011444/http://www.ednasia.com/article-12139-computingleadersannouncestrategyforneweraofmissioncriticalcomputing-Asia.html

|archive-date = January 11, 2012

|url-status = dead

|df = mdy-all

}}

{{Infobox CPU

| name=9000 and 9100 series

| image=Intel Itanium 2 9000 with cap removed.jpg

| image_size=300px

| caption=Intel Itanium 2 9000 (heat spreader removed)

| produced-start=18 July 2006

| produced-end=26 August 2011{{cite web |title=Intel server processors to be discontinued in 2012 |url=https://www.cpu-world.com/news_2011/2011021601_Intel_server_processors_to_be_discontinued_in_2012.html |website=CPU-World |access-date=28 April 2022}}

| slowest=1.4

| fastest=1.67

| fast-unit=GHz

| fsb-slowest=400

| fsb-fastest=667

| fsb-slow-unit=

| fsb-fast-unit=MT/s

| hypertransport-slowest=

| hypertransport-fastest=

| hypertransport-slow-unit=

| hypertransport-fast-unit=

| size-from=90 nm

| size-to=

| soldby=

| designfirm=

| manuf1=

| core1=

| sock1=PAC611

| pack1=

| brand1=

| arch=

| microarch=

| cpuid=

| code=Montecito, Montvale

| numcores=1 or 2

| l1cache=

| l2cache=256 KB (D) + 1 MB (I)

| l3cache=6–24 MB

| application=

}}

{{Main|Montecito (processor)}}

In early 2003, due to the success of IBM's dual-core POWER4, Intel announced that the first 90 nm Itanium processor, codenamed Montecito, would be delayed to 2005 so as to change it into a dual-core, thus merging it with the Chivano project.{{cite web |last1=Kanellos |first1=Michael |title=Intel accelerates Itanium schedule |url=https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/intel-accelerates-itanium-schedule/ |website=CNET |access-date=3 April 2022}}{{cite news |last1=Shankland |first1=Stephen |last2=Kanellos |first2=Michael |title=Intel's summer of servers |url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/technology/intels-summer-of-servers/article1163609/ |website=The Globe and Mail |date=9 July 2003 |access-date=27 April 2022}} In September 2004 Intel demonstrated a working Montecito system, and claimed that the inclusion of hyper-threading increases Montecito's performance by 10-20% and that its frequency could reach 2 GHz.{{cite web |last1=Kanellos |first1=Michael |title=Intel fills in more details on Itanium family |url=https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/intel-fills-in-more-details-on-itanium-family/ |website=CNET |access-date=3 April 2022}}{{cite web |last1=Wilson |first1=Derek |title=Intel Developer Forum Fall 2004: Day 1 Keynote |url=https://www.anandtech.com/show/1465/3 |website=AnandTech |access-date=28 April 2022}} After a delay to "mid-2006" and reduction of the frequency to 1.6 GHz,{{cite news |last1=Shankland |first1=Stephen |title=Intel pushes back Itanium chips, revamps Xeon |url=https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/intel-pushes-back-itanium-chips-revamps-xeon/ |website=CNET |access-date=3 April 2022}} on July 18 Intel delivered Montecito (marketed as the Itanium 2 9000 series), a dual-core processor with a switch-on-event multithreading and split 256 KB + 1 MB L2 caches that roughly doubled the performance and decreased the energy consumption by about 20 percent.{{cite web

|url = https://www.computerworld.com/article/2536018/-tukwila--itanium-servers-due-early-next-year--intel-says.html

|title = 'Tukwila' Itanium servers due early next year, Intel says

|access-date = September 26, 2022

|last = Niccolai

|first = James

|date = May 20, 2008

|work = Computerworld

}} At 596 mm² die size and 1.72 billion transistors it was the largest microprocessor at the time. It was supposed to feature Foxton Technology, a very sophisticated frequency regulator, which failed to pass validation and was thus not enabled for customers.

Intel released the Itanium 9100 series, codenamed Montvale, in November 2007, retiring the "Itanium 2" brand.{{cite web

| url=http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=202800983

| title=Intel Unveils Seven Itanium Processors

| access-date=November 6, 2007

| last=Gonsalves

| first=Antone

| date=November 1, 2007

| work=InformationWeek

| archive-date=March 10, 2012

| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120310003352/http://www.informationweek.com/

| url-status=dead

}} Originally intended to use the 65 nm process,{{cite web |title=Intel Shares Findings, Platform Plans To Better Guide Businesses Through 'Transformation' |url=https://www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/releases/2004/20040907corp_a.htm |publisher=Intel}} it was changed into a fix of Montecito, enabling the demand-based switching (like EIST) and up to 667 MT/s front-side bus, which were intended for Montecito, plus a core-level lockstep. Montecito and Montvale were the last Itanium processors in which design Hewlett-Packard's engineering team at Fort Collins had a key role, as the team was subsequently transferred to Intel's ownership.{{cite web |title=Intel Strengthens Investment In Intel® Itanium® Architecture With Hiring Of HP Design Team |url=https://www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/releases/2004/20041216comp.htm}}

{{Infobox CPU

| name=9300 series

| produced-start=8 February 2010

| produced-end=2nd quarter of 2014

| slowest=1.33

| fastest=1.73

| slow-unit=

| fast-unit=GHz

| fsb-slowest=

| fsb-fastest=

| fsb-slow-unit=

| fsb-fast-unit=

| hypertransport-slowest=

| hypertransport-fastest=

| hypertransport-slow-unit=

| hypertransport-fast-unit=

| size-from=65 nm

| size-to=

| soldby=

| designfirm=

| manuf1=

| sock1=FC-LGA6 (LGA1248)

| pack1=

| brand1=

| arch=

| microarch=

| cpuid=

| code=

| numcores=2 or 4

| l1cache=

| l2cache=256 KB (D) + 512 KB (I)

| l3cache=10–24 MB

| application=

}}

{{Infobox CPU

| name=9500 and 9700 series

| produced-start=8 November 2012

| produced-end=30 January 2020{{cite web |last1=Shilov |first1=Anton |title=Intel to Discontinue Itanium 9700 'Kittson' Processor, the Last of the Itaniums |url=https://www.anandtech.com/show/13924/intel-to-discontinue-itanium-9700-kittson-processor-the-last-itaniums |website=AnandTech |access-date=28 April 2022}}

| slowest=1.73

| fastest=2.67

| slow-unit=

| fast-unit=GHz

| fsb-slowest=

| fsb-fastest=

| fsb-slow-unit=

| fsb-fast-unit=

| hypertransport-slowest=

| hypertransport-fastest=

| hypertransport-slow-unit=

| hypertransport-fast-unit=

| size-from=32 nm

| size-to=

| soldby=

| designfirm=

| manuf1=

| sock1=FC-LGA6 (LGA1248)

| pack1=

| brand1=

| arch=

| microarch=

| cpuid=

| code=Poulson, Kittson

| numcores=4 or 8

| l1cache=

| l2cache=256 KB (D) + 512 KB (I)

| l3cache=20–32 MB

| application=

}}

File:Intel Itanium 9300 CPU Top with cap.png

File:Intel Itanium 9300 CPU bottom.png

File:Intel Itanium 9300 Socket Intel LGA 1248.JPG

File:Intel Itanium 9300 with cap removed.jpg

{{Main|Tukwila (processor)|}}

The original code name for the first Itanium with more than two cores was Tanglewood, but it was changed to Tukwila in late 2003 due to trademark issues.{{cite web |last1=Kanellos |first1=Michael |title=Intel changes code name of future Itanium |url=https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/intel-changes-code-name-of-future-itanium/ |website=CNET |access-date=4 July 2023}}{{cite web |last1=McMillan |first1=Robert |title=Trademark flap prompts Intel to rename Tanglewood |url=https://www.infoworld.com/article/2678103/trademark-flap-prompts-intel-to-rename-tanglewood.html |website=InfoWorld |date=18 December 2003 |access-date=31 March 2022}} Intel discussed a "middle-of-the-decade Itanium" to succeed Montecito, achieving ten times the performance of Madison.{{cite news |last1=Vance |first1=Ashlee |author-link=Ashlee Vance |title=Tanglewood to run 10x faster than Madison |url=https://www.theregister.com/2003/05/01/tanglewood_to_run_10x_faster1/ |work=The Register |access-date=27 April 2022}} It was being designed by the famed DEC Alpha team and was expected have eight new multithreading-focused cores. Intel claimed "a lot more than two" cores and more than seven times the performance of Madison.{{cite web |last1=McMillan |first1=Robert |title=FALL IDF: Intel readies 8-core, 16-core Itanium 2 |url=https://www.infoworld.com/article/2676169/fall-idf--intel-readies-8-core--16-core-itanium-2.html |website=InfoWorld |date=17 September 2003 |access-date=31 March 2022}}{{cite web |last1=Shankland |first1=Stephen |title='Tanglewood' to top Intel chip show |url=https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/tanglewood-to-top-intel-chip-show/ |website=CNET |access-date=31 March 2022}}{{cite web |last1=McMillan |first1=Robert |title=Itanium 2 Montecito to be multithreaded |url=https://www.computerweekly.com/news/2240053525/Itanium-2-Montecito-to-be-multithreaded |website=Computer Weekly |access-date=31 March 2022}} In early 2004 Intel told of "plans to achieve up to double the performance over the Intel Xeon processor family at platform cost parity by 2007".{{cite web |title=Intel Outlines Platform Innovations For More Manageable, Balanced And Secure Enterprise Computing |url=https://www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/releases/2004/20040218corp.htm |publisher=Intel}} By early 2005 Tukwila was redefined, now having fewer cores but focusing on single-threaded performance and multiprocessor scalability.{{cite web |last1=Shankland |first1=Stephen |title=Intel to spotlight new Itanium: 'Poulson' |url=https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/intel-to-spotlight-new-itanium-poulson/ |website=CNET |access-date=31 March 2022}}

In March 2005, Intel disclosed some details of Tukwila, the next Itanium processor after Montvale, to be released in 2007. Tukwila would have four processor cores and would replace the Itanium bus with a new Common System Interface, which would also be used by a new Xeon processor.{{cite magazine

|url = https://www.eetimes.com/intel-preps-hypertransport-competitor-for-xeon-itanium-cpus/

|title = Intel preps HyperTransport competitor for Xeon, Itanium CPUs

|access-date = December 17, 2019

|last = Merritt

|first = Rick

|date = March 2, 2005

|magazine = EE Times

|archive-date = December 17, 2019

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20191217201715/https://www.eetimes.com/intel-preps-hypertransport-competitor-for-xeon-itanium-cpus/

|url-status = live

}} Tukwila was to have a "common platform architecture" with a Xeon codenamed Whitefield, which was canceled in October 2005,{{cite news |last1=Vance |first1=Ashlee |author-link=Ashlee Vance |title=Intel's Xeon chip kill is result of chaos in India |url=https://www.theregister.com/2005/10/28/intel_whitefield_india/ |work=The Register |access-date=28 April 2022}} when Intel revised Tukwila's delivery date to late 2008.{{cite web

| url=https://www.zdnet.com/article/intel-pushes-back-itanium-chips-revamps-xeon/

| title=Intel pushes back Itanium chips, revamps Xeon

| access-date=January 1, 2019

| last=Shankland

| first=Stephen

| date=October 24, 2005

| work=ZDNet News

| archive-date=August 2, 2020

| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200802000438/https://www.zdnet.com/article/intel-pushes-back-itanium-chips-revamps-xeon/

| url-status=live

}} In May 2009, the schedule for Tukwila, was revised again, with the release to OEMs planned for the first quarter of 2010.{{cite web

| url=http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1137434/tukwila-delayed-2010

| title=Tukwila delayed until 2010

| access-date=May 21, 2009

| last=Demerjian

| first=Charlie

| date=May 21, 2009

| website=The Inquirer

| url-status=unfit

| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090523101543/http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1137434/tukwila-delayed-2010

| archive-date=May 23, 2009

}}

The Itanium 9300 series processor, codenamed Tukwila, was released on February 8, 2010, with greater performance and memory capacity.{{cite web|url=https://www.eweek.com/networking/new-intel-itanium-offers-greater-performance-memory-capacity/|title=New Intel Itanium Offers Greater Performance, Memory Capacity|first=Jeff|last=Burt|date=February 8, 2010|website=eWeek}}

The device uses a 65 nm process, includes two to four cores, up to 24 MB on-die caches, Hyper-Threading technology and integrated memory controllers. It implements double-device data correction, which helps to fix memory errors. Tukwila also implements Intel QuickPath Interconnect (QPI) to replace the Itanium bus-based architecture. It has a peak interprocessor bandwidth of 96 GB/s and a peak memory bandwidth of 34 GB/s. With QuickPath, the processor has integrated memory controllers and interfaces the memory directly, using QPI interfaces to directly connect to other processors and I/O hubs. QuickPath is also used on Intel x86-64 processors using the Nehalem microarchitecture, which possibly enabled Tukwila and Nehalem to use the same chipsets.{{cite web

| url=https://www.zdnet.com/article/intel-updates-itanium-line-with-kittson/

| title=Intel updates Itanium line with 'Kittson'

| access-date=June 15, 2007

| last=Tan

| first=Aaron

| date=June 15, 2007

| work=ZDNet

}}

Tukwila incorporates two memory controllers, each of which has two links to Scalable Memory Buffers, which in turn support multiple DDR3 DIMMs,{{cite web

| url=https://arstechnica.com/business/news/2009/02/intel-delays-quad-itanium-to-boost-platform-memory-capacity.ars

| title=Intel delays quad Itanium to boost platform memory capacity

| access-date=February 5, 2009

| last=Stokes

| first=Jon

| date=February 5, 2009

| work=ars technica

| archive-date=January 22, 2012

| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120122093011/http://arstechnica.com/business/news/2009/02/intel-delays-quad-itanium-to-boost-platform-memory-capacity.ars

| url-status=live

}}

much like the Nehalem-based Xeon processor code-named Beckton.{{cite news

|url = http://www.dailytech.com/Intel+Aims+for+Efficiency+With+New+Server+Roadmap/article14224.htm

|first = Jansen

|last = Ng

|title = Intel Aims for Efficiency With New Server Roadmap

|date = February 10, 2009

|work = DailyTech

|access-date = February 10, 2009

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20090213150005/http://www.dailytech.com/intel+aims+for+efficiency+with+new+server+roadmap/article14224.htm

|archive-date = February 13, 2009

|url-status = dead

|df = mdy-all

}}

During the 2012 Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Oracle Corp. support lawsuit, court documents unsealed by a Santa Clara County Court judge revealed that in 2008, Hewlett-Packard had paid Intel around $440 million to keep producing and updating Itanium microprocessors from 2009 to 2014. In 2010, the two companies signed another $250 million deal, which obliged Intel to continue making Itanium CPUs for HP's machines until 2017. Under the terms of the agreements, HP had to pay for chips it gets from Intel, while Intel launches Tukwila, Poulson, Kittson, and Kittson+ chips in a bid to gradually boost performance of the platform.{{cite web|url=http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/display/20120201201109_HP_Paid_Intel_690_Million_to_Keep_Itanium_Alive_Court_Findings.html|title=HP Paid Intel $690 Million to Keep Itanium Alive - Court Findings.|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304054256/http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/display/20120201201109_HP_Paid_Intel_690_Million_to_Keep_Itanium_Alive_Court_Findings.html|archive-date=March 4, 2016|url-status=dead}}{{cite magazine|url=https://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2012/02/hp-itanium/|title=HP Paid Intel $690 Million To Keep Itanium On Life Support|author=Robert McMillan|date=February 1, 2012|magazine=Wired|access-date=March 7, 2017|archive-date=March 6, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140306014953/http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2012/02/hp-itanium/|url-status=live}}

Intel first mentioned Poulson on March 1, 2005, at the Spring IDF.{{cite web |title=Intel Platforms, Technologies To Drive Enterprise Advances |url=https://www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/releases/2005/20050301corp_a.htm |publisher=Intel |access-date=31 March 2022}} In June 2007 Intel said that Poulson would use a 32 nm process technology, skipping the 45 nm process. This was necessary for catching up after Itanium's delays left it at 90 nm competing against 65 nm and 45 nm processors.

At ISSCC 2011, Intel presented a paper called "A 32nm 3.1 Billion Transistor 12-Wide-Issue Itanium Processor for Mission Critical Servers."{{cite web

|url = http://isscc.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2017/05/ISSCC2011_AdvanceProgram.pdf

|title = ISSCC 2011

|access-date = November 17, 2017

|archive-date = December 1, 2017

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20171201034615/http://isscc.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2017/05/ISSCC2011_AdvanceProgram.pdf

|url-status = dead

}}

Analyst David Kanter speculated that Poulson would use a new microarchitecture, with a more advanced form of multithreading that uses up to two threads, to improve performance for single threaded and multithreaded workloads.{{cite web

| url=https://www.realworldtech.com/poulson-preview/

| title=New Itanium Microarchitecture at ISSCC 2011

| access-date=July 4, 2023

| last=Kanter

| first=David

| date=November 17, 2010

| work=Real World Tech

}}

Some information was also released at the Hot Chips conference.{{cite web

|url = https://itpeernetwork.intel.com/itanium-poulson-update-greater-parallelism-new-instruction-replay-more-catch-the-details-from-hotchips/

|title = Itanium Poulson Update — Greater Parallelism, New Instruction Replay & More: Catch the details from Hotchips!

|date = August 19, 2011

|access-date = November 17, 2017

|archive-date = June 27, 2018

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180627144340/https://itpeernetwork.intel.com/itanium-poulson-update-greater-parallelism-new-instruction-replay-more-catch-the-details-from-hotchips/

|url-status = live

}}{{cite web

| url=http://www.slideshare.net/PaulineNist/intel-itanium-poulson-update-at-hotchips

| title=Intel Itanium Hotchips 2011 Overview

| date=18 August 2011

| access-date=January 23, 2012

| archive-date=14 February 2012

| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120214131459/http://www.slideshare.net/PaulineNist/intel-itanium-poulson-update-at-hotchips

| url-status=live

}}

Information presented improvements in multithreading, resiliency improvements (Intel Instruction Replay RAS) and few new instructions (thread priority, integer instruction, cache prefetching, and data access hints).

Poulson was released on November 8, 2012, as the Itanium 9500 series processor. It is the follow-on processor to Tukwila. It features eight cores and has a 12-wide issue architecture, multithreading enhancements, and new instructions to take advantage of parallelism, especially in virtualization.{{cite web

| url=https://www.realworldtech.com/poulson/

| last=Kanter

| first=David

| title=Poulson: The Future of Itanium Servers

| publisher=Real World Tech

| date=May 18, 2011

| access-date=November 9, 2012

| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121102093620/http://www.realworldtech.com/poulson/

| archive-date=November 2, 2012

| url-status=live

}}{{cite web

|url = http://newsroom.intel.com/servlet/JiveServlet/download/38-5835/Hot%20Chips%20%20Poulson%20disclosure%20Factsheet.pdf

|title = Hot Chips Poulson Disclosure Factsheet

|access-date = August 19, 2011

|date = August 19, 2011

|work = Intel press release

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120324101540/http://newsroom.intel.com/servlet/JiveServlet/download/38-5835/Hot%20Chips%20%20Poulson%20disclosure%20Factsheet.pdf

|archive-date = March 24, 2012

|url-status = dead

|df = mdy-all

}}

The Poulson L3 cache size is 32 MB and common for all cores, not divided like previously. L2 cache size is 6 MB, 512 I KB, 256 D KB per core.{{cite conference

| chapter=A 32nm 3.1 billion transistor 12-wide-issue Itanium® processor for mission-critical servers

| date=February 24, 2011

|doi = 10.1109/ISSCC.2011.5746230|conference = 2011 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference|pages = 84–86|last1 = Riedlinger|first1 = Reid J.|last2 = Bhatia|first2 = Rohit|last3 = Biro|first3 = Larry|last4 = Bowhill|first4 = Bill|last5 = Fetzer|first5 = Eric|last6 = Gronowski|first6 = Paul|last7 = Grutkowski|first7 = Tom| title=2011 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference

|isbn = 978-1-61284-303-2}} Die size is 544 mm², less than its predecessor Tukwila (698.75 mm²).{{cite magazine

| url=https://www.eetimes.com/researchers-carve-cpu-into-plastic-foil/

| title=Researchers carve CPU into plastic foil

| first=Rick

| last=Merrit

| date=November 23, 2010

| magazine=EE Times

| access-date=December 17, 2019

| archive-date=December 17, 2019

| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191217201623/https://www.eetimes.com/researchers-carve-cpu-into-plastic-foil/

| url-status=live

}}{{cite web

| url=https://www.engadget.com/2011/08/22/intel-talks-up-next-gen-itanium-32nm-8-core-poulson/

| title=Intel talks up next-gen Itanium: 32nm, 8-core Poulson

| first=Terrence

| last=O'Brien

| publisher=Engadget

| date=August 22, 2011

| access-date=April 30, 2012

| archive-date=April 21, 2018

| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180421163456/https://www.engadget.com/2011/08/22/intel-talks-up-next-gen-itanium-32nm-8-core-poulson/

| url-status=live

}}

Intel's Product Change Notification (PCN) 111456-01 lists four models of Itanium 9500 series CPU, which was later removed in a revised document.{{cite web| url = http://www.cpu-world.com/news_2012/2012061301_Unreleased_Intel_Itanium_9500-series_CPUs_spotted.html| title = Unreleased Intel Itanium 9500-series CPUs spotted| access-date = 2012-08-02| archive-date = 2017-11-22| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20171122032035/http://www.cpu-world.com/news_2012/2012061301_Unreleased_Intel_Itanium_9500-series_CPUs_spotted.html| url-status = live}} The parts were later listed in Intel's Material Declaration Data Sheets (MDDS) database.{{cite web| url = http://www.cpu-world.com/news_2012/2012062601_Spotted_9500-series_CPUs_confirmed_to_be_Poulson_Itaniums.html| title = Spotted 9500-series CPUs confirmed to be "Poulson" Itaniums| access-date = 2012-08-02| archive-date = 2017-10-06| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20171006152039/http://www.cpu-world.com/news_2012/2012062601_Spotted_9500-series_CPUs_confirmed_to_be_Poulson_Itaniums.html| url-status = live}} Intel later posted Itanium 9500 reference manual.{{cite web| url = http://www.cpu-world.com/news_2012/2012071101_Intel_publishes_Itanium_9500_reference_manual.html| title = Intel publishes Itanium 9500 reference manual| access-date = 2012-08-02| archive-date = 2017-10-08| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20171008075849/http://www.cpu-world.com/news_2012/2012071101_Intel_publishes_Itanium_9500_reference_manual.html| url-status = live}}

The models are the following:{{cite web|title=Products formerly Poulson|url=http://ark.intel.com/products/codename/26643/Poulson|website=Intel® ARK (Product Specs)|access-date=May 31, 2017|archive-date=May 18, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170518065154/http://ark.intel.com/products/codename/26643/Poulson|url-status=live}}

:

Intel had committed to at least one more generation after Poulson, first mentioning Kittson on 14 June 2007.{{cite web |last1=Boslet |first1=Mark |title=Intel to employ advanced technology on server chips |url=https://www.mercurynews.com/2007/06/14/intel-to-employ-advanced-technology-on-server-chips/ |website=The Mercury News |date=15 June 2007 |access-date=26 February 2022}} Kittson was supposed to be on a 22 nm process and use the same LGA2011 socket and platform as Xeons.{{cite web |last1=Wheeler |first1=Bob |title=Tocking Itanium |url=https://www.linleygroup.com/newsletters/newsletter_detail.php?num=4912 |publisher=The Linley Group |access-date=26 February 2022}}{{cite web |last1=Skaugen |first1=Kirk |title=IDF2011 Intel Developer Forum |url=https://download.intel.com/newsroom/kits/idf/2011_fall/pdfs/Kirk_Skaugen_DCSG_MegaBriefing.pdf |publisher=slide 21. Intel |access-date=26 February 2022}}{{cite web |last1=Nist |first1=Pauline |title=More than just another Itanium chip |url=https://itpeernetwork.intel.com/more-than-just-another-itanium-chip/#gs.r3sxvd |publisher=Intel |access-date=26 February 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200808053527/https://itpeernetwork.intel.com/more-than-just-another-itanium-chip/#gs.r3sxvd |archive-date=8 August 2020 |url-status=dead}} On 31 January 2013 Intel issued an update to their plans for Kittson: it would have the same LGA1248 socket and 32 nm process as Poulson, thus effectively halting any further development of Itanium processors.{{cite web |title=Intel® Itanium® Processors Update |url=http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/itanium/itanium-kittson-update.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161109135111/http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/itanium/itanium-kittson-update.html |archive-date=9 November 2016 |url-status=dead}}

In April 2015, Intel, although it had not yet confirmed formal specifications, did confirm that it continued to work on the project.{{cite web |url=https://www.kitguru.net/components/cpu/anton-shilov/intel-still-committed-to-make-new-itanium-processors/ |title=Intel still committed to make new Itanium processors |quote=KitGuru Says: Even though it is highly likely that "Kittson" chips will be released, it does not seem that Intel and HP actually want to invest R&D money in boosting performance of IA-64 chips. As a result, it looks like the best thing "Kittson" will offer will be a 20 per cent performance improvement over current gen offerings. |last1=Shilov |first1=Anton |date=April 17, 2015 |website=kitguru.net |access-date=July 4, 2023}} Meanwhile, the aggressively multicore Xeon E7 platform displaced Itanium-based solutions in the Intel roadmap.{{cite web |url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/2099260/intels-new-xeon-server-chip-pushes-itanium-closer-to-end.html |title=Intel's new Xeon server chip pushes Itanium closer to death's door |last1=Shah |first1=Agam |date=February 19, 2014 |website=pcworld.com |publisher=PC World |access-date=January 13, 2016 |archive-date=January 26, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160126165249/http://www.pcworld.com/article/2099260/intels-new-xeon-server-chip-pushes-itanium-closer-to-end.html |url-status=live }} Even Hewlett-Packard, the main proponent and customer for Itanium, began selling x86-based Superdome and NonStop servers, and started to treat the Itanium-based versions as legacy products.{{cite web |last1=Shilov |first1=Anton |title=HP: mission-critical servers business improves as Itanium fades away |url=https://www.kitguru.net/professional/server/anton-shilov/hp-mission-critical-servers-business-improves-as-itanium-fades-away/ |website=Kitguru |access-date=30 March 2022}}{{cite web |last1=Shah |first1=Agam |title=HP sees HP-UX sticking around for 10 years |url=https://www.computerworld.com/article/2853998/hp-sees-hp-ux-sticking-around-for-10-years.html |website=Computerworld |date=2 December 2014 |access-date=30 March 2022}}

Intel officially launched the Itanium 9700 series processor family on May 11, 2017.{{cite web|title=Intel® Itanium® Processor|url=https://www-ssl.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/processors/itanium.html|website=Intel|access-date=May 15, 2017}} Kittson has no microarchitecture improvements over Poulson; despite nominally having a different stepping, it is functionally identical with the 9500 series, even having exactly the same bugs, the only difference being the 133 MHz higher frequency of 9760 and 9750 over 9560 and 9550 respectively.{{cite web |title=Intel® Itanium® Processor 9300, 9500 and 9700 Series Specification Update |url=https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/specification-updates/9300-9500-9700-series-spec-update.pdf |publisher=Intel |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201111234308/https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/specification-updates/9300-9500-9700-series-spec-update.pdf |archive-date=11 November 2020 |url-status=live}}{{cite news|last1=Cutress|first1=Ian|title=Intel's Itanium Takes One Last Breath: Itanium 9700 Series CPUs Released|url=http://www.anandtech.com/show/11372/intels-itanium-takes-one-last-breath-9700-series-released|access-date=May 11, 2017|publisher=Anandtech|date=May 11, 2017|archive-date=May 11, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170511152533/http://www.anandtech.com/show/11372/intels-itanium-takes-one-last-breath-9700-series-released|url-status=live}}

Intel announced that the 9700 series would be the last Itanium chips produced.

The models are:{{cite web|title=Products formerly Kittson|url=https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/codename/32203/kittson.html|website=Intel® ARK (Product Specs)|access-date=May 15, 2017|archive-date=August 4, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190804134312/https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/codename/32203/kittson.html|url-status=live}}

:

Compared to its Xeon family of server processors, Itanium was never a high-volume product for Intel. Intel does not release production numbers, but one industry analyst estimated that the production rate was 200,000 processors per year in 2007.{{cite web

| url=http://www.internetnews.com/ent-news/article.php/3705016

| title=Intel Plows Forward With Itanium

| access-date=October 18, 2007

| last=Patrizio

| first=Andy

| date=October 12, 2007

| work=InternetNews.com

| archive-date=April 22, 2018

| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180422062117/http://www.internetnews.com/ent-news/article.php/3705016

| url-status=dead

}}

According to Gartner Inc., the total number of Itanium servers (not processors) sold by all vendors in 2007, was about 55,000 (It is unclear whether clustered servers counted as a single server or not.). This compares with 417,000 RISC servers (spread across all RISC vendors) and 8.4 million x86 servers. IDC reports that a total of 184,000 Itanium-based systems were sold from 2001 through 2007. For the combined POWER/SPARC/Itanium systems market, IDC reports that POWER captured 42% of revenue and SPARC captured 32%, while Itanium-based system revenue reached 26% in the second quarter of 2008.IDC World Wide Server Tracker, Q2'08

According to an IDC analyst, in 2007, HP accounted for perhaps 80% of Itanium systems revenue.

According to Gartner, in 2008, HP accounted for 95% of Itanium sales. HP's Itanium system sales were at an annual rate of $4.4Bn at the end of 2008, and declined to $3.5Bn by the end of 2009,{{cite news

| url=https://www.theregister.com/2010/02/24/gartner_q4_2009_servers/

| title=Gartner report card gives high marks to x64, blades

| access-date=November 25, 2022

| last=Morgan

| first=Timothy Prickett

| date=February 24, 2010

| work=The Register

}}

compared to a 35% decline in UNIX system revenue for Sun and an 11% drop for IBM, with an x86-64 server revenue increase of 14% during this period.

In December 2012, IDC released a research report stating that Itanium server shipments would remain flat through 2016, with annual shipment of 26,000 systems (a decline of over 50% compared to shipments in 2008).{{cite web| url = http://www.pcworld.com/article/2028587/intel-shifts-gears-on-itanium-raising-questions-about-the-server-chips-future.html| title = Intel shifts gears on Itanium, raising questions about the server chip's future| access-date = 2013-08-04| archive-date = 2013-06-15| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130615180648/http://www.pcworld.com/article/2028587/intel-shifts-gears-on-itanium-raising-questions-about-the-server-chips-future.html| url-status = live}}

By 2006, HP manufactured at least 80% of all Itanium systems, and sold 7,200 in the first quarter of 2006.{{cite web

| url=https://www.theregister.com/2006/06/01/itanic_q1_gartner/

| title=HP grabs 90% of 'industry standard' Itanic market

| access-date=November 25, 2022

| last=Vance

| first=Ashlee

| author-link=Ashlee Vance

| date=June 1, 2006

| work=The Register

}}

The bulk of systems sold were enterprise servers and machines for large-scale technical computing, with an average selling price per system in excess of US$200,000. A typical system used eight or more Itanium processors.

By 2012, only a few manufacturers offered Itanium systems, including HP, Bull, NEC, Inspur and Huawei. In addition, Intel offered a chassis that could be used by system integrators to build Itanium systems.{{cite web

| url=http://support.intel.com/support/motherboards/server/SR9000MK4U/sb/CS-023638.htm

| title=Intel Server System SR9000MK4U Technical Product Specification

| access-date=April 14, 2007

| date=January 2007

| work=Intel web site

| archive-date=February 8, 2009

| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090208174924/http://support.intel.com/support/motherboards/server/SR9000MK4U/sb/CS-023638.htm

| url-status=live

}}

By 2015, only HP supplied Itanium-based systems. When HP split in late 2015, Itanium systems (branded as Integrity){{Cite web |last=Aleksandar |first=Kostovic |date=2021-07-31 |title=Itanium Waves Goodbye As Intel Delivers Last Shipments of Now Forgotten Processor Family |url=https://www.tomshardware.com/news/last-itanium-shipment |access-date=2022-11-29 |website=Tom's Hardware |language=en}} were handled by Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), with a major update in 2017 (Integrity i6, and HP-UX 11i v3 Update 16). HPE also supports a few other operating systems, including Windows up to Server 2008 R2, Linux, OpenVMS and NonStop. Itanium is not affected by Spectre or Meltdown.{{Cite news|url=https://secure64.com/not-vulnerable-intel-itanium-secure64-sourcet/|title=Not Vulnerable - Intel Itanium/Secure64 SourceT - Secure 64|date=January 9, 2018|work=Secure 64|access-date=October 4, 2018|language=en-US|archive-date=October 4, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181004103818/https://secure64.com/not-vulnerable-intel-itanium-secure64-sourcet/|url-status=live}}

Prior to the 9300-series (Tukwila), chipsets were needed to connect to the main memory and I/O devices, as the front-side bus to the chipset was the sole operational connection to the processor.{{efn| the processor supported TAP (JTAG) and SMBus for debugging and system configuration}} Two generations of buses existed: the original Itanium processor system bus (a.k.a. Merced bus) had a 64 bit data width and 133 MHz clock with DDR (266 MT/s), being soon superseded by the 128-bit 200 MHz DDR (400 MT/s) Itanium 2 processor system bus (a.k.a. McKinley bus), which later reached 533 and 667 MT/s. Up to four CPUs per single bus could be used, but prior to the 9000-series the bus speeds of over 400 MT/s were limited to up to two processors per bus.{{cite web |title=Intel® Itanium® 2 Processor Datasheet |url=http://download.intel.com/design/Itanium2/datashts/25094505.pdf |page=9 |publisher=Intel |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060621013059/http://download.intel.com/design/Itanium2/datashts/25094505.pdf |archive-date=21 June 2006 |url-status=dead}}{{cite web |title=Dual-Core Intel® Itanium® 2 Processor 9000 Series Datasheet |url=http://download.intel.com/design/Itanium2/datashts/31405401.pdf |page=9 |publisher=Intel |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110607124058/http://download.intel.com/design/Itanium2/datashts/31405401.pdf |archive-date=7 June 2011 |url-status=dead}} As no Itanium chipset could connect to more than four sockets, high-end servers needed multiple interconnected chipsets.

The "Tukwila" Itanium processor model had been designed to share a common chipset with the Intel Xeon processor EX (Intel's Xeon processor designed for four processor and larger servers). The goal was to streamline system development and reduce costs for server OEMs, many of which develop both Itanium- and Xeon-based servers. However, in 2013, this goal was pushed back to be "evaluated for future implementation opportunities".{{cite news| url = https://www.theregister.com/2013/02/08/intel_kills_itanium_xeon_convergence_and_kittson/| title = Remember that Xeon E7-Itanium convergence? FUHGEDDABOUDIT| first = Timothy Prickett| last = Morgan| work = The Register| access-date = November 25, 2022}}

In the times before on-chip memory controllers and QPI, enterprise server manufacturers differentiated their systems by designing and developing chipsets that interface the processor to memory, interconnections, and peripheral controllers. "Enterprise server" referred to the then-lucrative market segment of high-end servers with high reliability, availability and serviceability and typically 16+ processor sockets, justifying their pricing by having a custom system-level architecture with their own chipsets at its heart, with capabilities far beyond what two-socket "commodity servers" could offer. Development of a chipset costs tens of millions of dollars and so represented a major commitment to the use of Itanium.

Neither Intel nor IBM would develop Itanium 2 chipsets to support newer technologies such as DDR2 or PCI Express.{{cite news

| url=https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/sources-ibm-ditching-itanium-altogether/

| title=Sources: IBM ditching Itanium altogether

| access-date=July 4, 2023

| last=Shankland

| first=Stephen

| date=February 25, 2005

| publisher=CNET News

}}

Before "Tukwila" moved away from the FSB, chipsets supporting such technologies were manufactured by all Itanium server vendors, such as HP, Fujitsu, SGI, NEC, and Hitachi.

The first generation of Itanium received no vendor-specific chipsets, only Intel's 460GX consisting of ten distinct chips. It supported up to four CPUs and 64 GB of memory at 4.2 GB/s, which is twice the system bus's bandwidth. Addresses and data were handled by two different chips. 460GX had an AGP X4 graphics bus, two 64-bit 66 MHz PCI buses and configurable 33 MHz dual 32-bit or single 64-bit PCI bus(es).{{cite web |title=Intel 460GX Chipset Datasheet |url=http://developer.intel.com/design/itanium/downloads/24870301.pdf |publisher=Intel |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040723073549/http://developer.intel.com/design/itanium/downloads/24870301.pdf |archive-date=23 July 2004 |url-status=dead}}

There were many custom chipset designs for Itanium 2, but many smaller vendors chose to use Intel's E8870 chipset. It supports 128 GB of DDR SDRAM at 6.4 GB/s. It was originally designed for Rambus RDRAM serial memory, but when RDRAM failed, Intel added four DDR SDRAM-to-RDRAM converter chips to the chipset.{{cite book |last1=Mueller |first1=Scott |last2=Soper |first2=Mark Edward |last3=Sosinsky |first3=Barrie |title=Upgrading and Repairing Servers |date=2006 |publisher=Pearson Education |isbn=0-13-279698-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9cLFf_1PBnkC&pg=PT301 |access-date=6 April 2022}} When Intel had previously made such a converter for Pentium III chipsets 820 and 840, it drastically cut performance.{{cite web |last1=Shimpi |first1=Anand Lal |title=Intel's 820 Chipset - Performance using SDRAM |url=https://www.anandtech.com/show/465 |website=AnandTech |access-date=6 April 2022}}{{cite web |last1=Shimpi |first1=Anand Lal |title=Rambus DRAM Part 2: Performance |url=https://www.anandtech.com/show/551 |website=AnandTech |access-date=6 April 2022}} E8870 provides eight 133 MHz PCI-X buses (4.2 GB/s total because of bottlenecks) and a ICH4 hub with six USB 2.0 ports.

Two E8870 can be linked together by two E8870SP Scalability Port Switches, each containing a 1MB (~200,000 cache lines) snoop filter, to create an 8-socket system with double the memory and PCI-X capacity, but still only one ICH4. Further expansion to 16 sockets was planned.{{cite journal |display-authors=etal |last=Briggs |first=Fayé |title=Intel 870: a building block for cost-effective, scalable servers |journal=IEEE Micro |date=7 August 2002 |volume=22 |issue=2 (March–April) |pages=36–47 |doi=10.1109/MM.2002.997878 |citeseerx=10.1.1.140.2915 |s2cid=3201355 }}{{cite web |title=Intel® E8870 Scalable Node Controller (SNC) Datasheet |url=http://www.intel.com/design/chipsets/datashts/25111203.pdf |publisher=Intel |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040701014149/http://www.intel.com/design/chipsets/datashts/25111203.pdf |archive-date=1 July 2004 |url-status=dead}}{{cite web |title=Intel® E8870IO Server I/O Hub (SIOH) Datasheet |url=http://intel.com/design/chipsets/datashts/25111103.pdf |publisher=Intel |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030706004227/http://intel.com/design/chipsets/datashts/25111103.pdf |archive-date=6 July 2003 |url-status=dead}} In 2004 Intel revealed plans for its next Itanium chipset, codenamed Bayshore, to support PCI-e and DDR2 memory, but canceled it the same year.{{cite web |title=Intel Outlines Platform Innovations For More Manageable, Balanced And Secure Enterprise Computing |url=https://www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/releases/2004/20040218corp.htm |publisher=Intel |access-date=7 April 2022}}

HP has designed four different chipsets for Itanium 2: zx1, sx1000, zx2 and sx2000. All support 4 sockets per chipset, but sx1000 and sx2000 support interconnection of up to 16 chipsets to create up to a 64 socket system. As it was developed in collaboration with Itanium 2's development, booting the first Itanium 2 in February 2001,{{cite web |title=Overview of the new Itanium® 2-based HP servers rx2600 and rx5670: how HP is putting Intel® Itanium 2 processors to work |url=http://www.hp.com/products1/itanium/infolibrary/whitepapers/5981_2240EN.pdf |page=17 |publisher=Hewlett-Packard |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030319214329/http://www.hp.com/products1/itanium/infolibrary/whitepapers/5981_2240EN.pdf |archive-date=19 March 2003 |url-status=dead}} zx1 became the first Itanium 2 chipset available and later in 2004 also the first to support 533 MT/s FSB. In its basic two-chip version it directly provides four channels of DDR-266 memory, giving 8.5 GB/s of bandwidth and 32 GB of capacity (though 12 DIMM slots).{{cite web |title=HP Integrity rx2620 Server |url=http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/12141_div/12141_div.PDF |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061029145359/http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/12141_div/12141_div.PDF |archive-date=29 October 2006 |url-status=dead}} In versions with memory expander boards memory bandwidth reaches 12.8 GB/s, while the maximum capacity for the initial two-board 48 DIMM expanders was 96 GB, and the later single-board 32 DIMM expander up to 128 GB. The memory latency increases by 25 nanoseconds from 80 ns due to the expanders. Eight independent links went to the PCI-X and other peripheral devices (e.g. AGP in workstations), totaling 4 GB/s.{{cite web |title=HP Integrity rx4640-8 Server |url=http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/11847_div/11847_div.PDF |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060314004913/http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/11847_div/11847_div.PDF |archive-date=14 March 2006 |url-status=dead}}{{cite web |title=HP Integrity rx5670 Server summary |url=http://www.hp.com/products1/servers/integrity/entry_level/rx5670/index.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041209002029/http://www.hp.com/products1/servers/integrity/entry_level/rx5670/index.html |archive-date=9 December 2004 |url-status=dead}}

HP's first high-end Itanium chipset was sx1000, launched in mid-2003 with the Integrity Superdome flagship server.

It has two independent front-side buses, each bus supporting two sockets, giving 12.8 GB/s of combined bandwidth from the processors to the chipset. It has four links to data-only memory buffers and supports 64 GB of HP-designed 125 MHz memory at 16 GB/s. The above components form a system board called a cell. Two cells can be directly connected together to create an 8-socket glueless system. To connect four cells together, a pair of 8-ported crossbar switches is needed (adding 64 ns to inter-cell memory accesses), while four such pairs of crossbar switches are needed for the top-end system of 16 cells (64 sockets), giving 32 GB/s of bisection bandwidth. Cells maintain cache coherence through in-memory directories, which causes the minimum memory latency to be 241 ns. The latency to the most remote (NUMA) memory is 463 ns. The per-cell bandwidth to the I/O subsystems is 2 GB/s, despite the presence of 8 GB/s worth of PCI-X buses in each I/O subsystem.{{cite web |last1=Turner |first1=Vernon |last2=Rau |first2=Shane |title=HP's sx1000 Chipset: Innovation Atop Standardization |url=http://h71028.www7.hp.com/ERC/downloads/sx1000_White_Paper_.pdf |publisher=IDC (sponsored by HP) |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050601104604/http://h71028.www7.hp.com/ERC/downloads/sx1000_White_Paper_.pdf |archive-date=1 June 2005 |url-status=dead}}{{cite web |title=Meet the HP Integrity Superdome: A white paper from HP |url=http://www.hp.com/products1/servers/integrity/superdome_high_end/infolibrary/Superdome_wp.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040731205815/http://www.hp.com/products1/servers/integrity/superdome_high_end/infolibrary/Superdome_wp.pdf |archive-date=31 July 2004 |url-status=dead}}{{cite web |title=Itanium®–based midrange servers from HP— the HP Integrity rx7620-16 and rx8620-32 Servers |url=http://h21007.www2.hp.com/dspp/files/unprotected/integritymidrangejan05.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050509234702/http://h21007.www2.hp.com/dspp/files/unprotected/integritymidrangejan05.pdf |archive-date=9 May 2005 |url-status=dead}}

HP launched sx2000 in March 2006 to succeed sx1000. Its two FSBs operate at 533 MT/s. It supports up to 128 GB of memory at 17 GB/s. The memory is of HP's custom design, using the DDR2 protocol, but twice as tall as the standard modules and with redundant address and control signal contacts. For the inter-chipset communication, 25.5 GB/s is available on each sx2000 through its three serial links that can connect to a set of three independent crossbars, which connect to other cells or up to 3 other sets of 3 crossbars. The multi-cell configurations are the same as with sx1000, except the parallelism of the sets of crossbars has been increased from 2 to 3. The maximum configuration of 64 sockets has 72 GB/s of sustainable bisection bandwidth. The chipset's connection to its I/O module is now serial with an 8.5 GB/s peak and 5.5 GB/s sustained bandwidth, the I/O module having either 12 PCI-X buses at up to 266 MHz, or 6 PCI-X buses and 6 PCIe 1.1 ×8 slots. It is the last chipset to support HP's PA-RISC processors (PA-8900).{{Cite web|url=http://archive.org/details/manualzilla-id-7031299|title=User Service Guide HP Integrity Superdome/sx2000 and HP 9000 Superdome/sx2000 Servers|publisher=Hewlett-Packard|date=September 2009|via=Internet Archive}}

HP launched the first zx2-based servers in September 2006. zx2 can operate the FSB at 667 MT/s with two CPUs or 533 MT/s with four CPUs. It connects to the DDR2 memory either directly, supporting 32 GB at up to 14.2 GB/s, or through expander boards, supporting up to 384 GB at 17 GB/s. The minimum open-page latency is 60 to 78 ns. 9.8 GB/s are available through eight independent links to the I/O adapters, which can include PCIe ×8 or 266 MHz PCI-X.{{cite web |title=Overview of the HP Integrity rx2660, rx3600, and rx6600 Servers |url=https://shoredata.us.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/rx6600.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170306041015/https://shoredata.us.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/rx6600.pdf |archive-date=2017-03-06 |url-status=live}}{{cite web |title=HP Integrity systems Family guide |url=https://www.hp.com/ch-de/pdf/harness_family_brosch_re_4aa3-4519enw_tcm_179_1247486.pdf |access-date=24 May 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220708214847/https://www.hp.com/ch-de/pdf/harness_family_brosch_re_4aa3-4519enw_tcm_179_1247486.pdf|archive-date=8 July 2022|url-status=dead}}

In May 2003, IBM launched the XA-64 chipset for Itanium 2. It used many of the same technologies as the first two generations of XA-32 chipsets for Xeon, but by the time of the third gen XA-32 IBM had decided to discontinue its Itanium products. XA-64 supported 56 GB of DDR SDRAM in 28 slots at 6.4 GB/s, though due to bottlenecks only 3.2 GB/s could go to the CPU and other 2 GB/s to devices for a 5.2 GB/s total. The CPU's memory bottleneck was mitigated by an off-chip 64 MB DRAM L4 cache, which also worked as a snoop filter in multi-chipset systems. The combined bandwidth of the four PCI-X buses and other I/O is bottlenecked to 2 GB/s per chipset. Two or four chipsets can be connected to make an 8 or 16 socket system.{{cite web |title=IBM Eserver xSeries 455 Planning and Installation Guide |url=https://lenovopress.com/sg247056.pdf |publisher=IBM/Lenovo |access-date=6 April 2022}}

SGI's Altix supercomputers and servers used the SHUB (Super-Hub) chipset, which supports two Itanium 2 sockets. The initial version used DDR memory through four buses for up to 12.8 GB/s bandwidth, and up to 32 GB of capacity across 16 slots. A 2.4 GB/s XIO channel connected to a module with up to six 64-bit 133 MHz PCI-X buses. SHUBs can be interconnected by the dual 6.4 GB/s NUMAlink4 link planes to create a 512-socket cache-coherent single-image system. A cache for the in-memory coherence directory saves memory bandwidth and reduces latency. The latency to the local memory is 132 ns, and each crossing of a NUMAlink4 router adds 50 ns. I/O modules with four 133 MHz PCI-X buses can connect directly to the NUMAlink4 network.{{cite web |last1=Woodacre |first1=Michael |last2=Robb |first2=Derek |last3=Roe |first3=Dean |last4=Feind |first4=Karl |title=The SGI® Altix 3000 Global Shared-Memory Architecture |url=http://www.sgi.com/pdfs/3474.pdf |website=sgi.com |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060314142114/http://www.sgi.com/pdfs/3474.pdf |archive-date=2006-03-14 |url-status=dead}}{{cite web |last1=Vogelsang |first1=Reiner |title=SGI® Altix™ Hardware Architecture |url=https://moodle.risc.jku.at/file.php/50/altix_hardware.pdf |access-date=25 April 2022 }}{{cite web |title=SGI® Altix™ 350 System User's Guide |url=http://techpubs.sgi.com/library/manuals/4000/007-4660-002/pdf/007-4660-002.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160121032040/http://techpubs.sgi.com/library/manuals/4000/007-4660-002/pdf/007-4660-002.pdf |archive-date=2016-01-21 |url-status=dead}}{{cite web |title=SGI® Altix® 3000 Servers and Superclusters |url=http://www.sgi.com/pdfs/3392.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060314165928/http://www.sgi.com/pdfs/3392.pdf |archive-date=2006-03-14 |url-status=dead}} SGI's second-generation SHUB 2.0 chipset supported up to 48 GB of DDR2 memory, 667 MT/s FSB, and could connect to I/O modules providing PCI Express.{{cite web |title=SGI® Altix® 4700 Servers and Supercomputers |url=http://www.sgi.com/pdfs/3867.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051124042540/http://www.sgi.com/pdfs/3867.pdf |archive-date=2005-11-24 |url-status=dead}}{{cite web |last1=Vogelsang |first1=Reiner |title=SGI® Altix™ Hardware Architecture |url=https://wwwuser.gwdg.de/~parallel/parallelrechner/altix_documentation/Altix_Hardware_revised_4.pdf |access-date=4 July 2023}} It supports only four local threads, so when having two dual-core CPUs per chipset, Hyper-Threading must be disabled.{{cite web |title=SGI® L1 and L2 Controller Software User's Guide |url=http://techpubs.sgi.com/library/manuals/3000/007-3938-006/pdf/007-3938-006.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151203105150/http://techpubs.sgi.com/library/manuals/3000/007-3938-006/pdf/007-3938-006.pdf |archive-date=2015-12-03 |url-status=dead}}

• HP-UX 11 (supported until 2025)

• NetBSD (a tier II port{{Cite web|title=Platforms Supported by NetBSD|url=https://www.netbsd.org/ports/|access-date=2021-03-02|website=www.netbsd.org|archive-date=2021-02-27|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210227091416/http://www.netbsd.org/ports/|url-status=live}} that "is a work-in-progress effort to port NetBSD to the Itanium family of processors. Currently no formal release is available."{{Cite web|title=NetBSD/ia64|url=http://wiki.netbsd.org/ports/ia64/|access-date=2021-03-02|website=wiki.netbsd.org|archive-date=2018-04-27|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180427122809/http://wiki.netbsd.org/ports/ia64/|url-status=live}})
• FreeBSD (unsupported since 31 October 2018)

The Trillian Project was an effort by an industry consortium to port the Linux kernel to the Itanium processor. The project started in May 1999 with the goal of releasing the distribution in time for the initial release of Itanium, then scheduled for early 2000.{{cite web|last=Sabbagh|first=Dan|date=3 Feb 2000|title=Trillian releases Linux code for Itanium|url=http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2111194/trillian-releases-linux-code-itanium|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070930200218/http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2111194/trillian-releases-linux-code-itanium|archive-date=30 September 2007|url-status=dead|access-date=2007-03-20|work=vnunet.com}} By the end of 1999, the project included Caldera Systems, CERN, Cygnus Solutions, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Intel, Red Hat, SGI, SuSE, TurboLinux and VA Linux Systems.{{cite press release|date=December 20, 1999|title=Leading Linux Distributors Join the Trillian Project|url=https://www.redhat.com/en/about/press-releases/press-trillian|access-date=2007-03-20|website=Red Hat}} The project released the resulting code in February 2000. The code then became part of the mainline Linux kernel more than a year before the release of the first Itanium processor. The Trillian project was able to do this for two reasons:

• the free and open source GCC compiler had already been enhanced to support the Itanium architecture.
• a free and open source simulator had been developed to simulate an Itanium processor on an existing computer.{{cite web| url = http://www.irisa.fr/caps/projects/ArchiCompil/iato/| title = IATO simulation environment}}

After the successful completion of Project Trillian, the resulting Linux kernel was used by all of the manufacturers of Itanium systems (HP, IBM, Dell, SGI, Fujitsu, Unisys, Hitachi, and Groupe Bull). With the notable exception of HP, Linux is either the primary OS or the only OS the manufacturer supports for Itanium. Ongoing free and open source software support for Linux on Itanium subsequently coalesced at Gelato.

In 2005, Fedora Linux started adding support for Itanium{{Cite web|last=Shankland|first=Stephen|title=Fedora for Itanium taking baby steps|url=https://www.cnet.com/culture/fedora-for-itanium-taking-baby-steps/|access-date=2023-07-04|website=CNET|date=22 March 2005 |language=en}} and Novell added support for SUSE Linux.{{Cite web|last=Connor|first=Deni|date=2005-01-06|title=Novell releases SuSE Linux for HP Itanium servers|url=https://www.networkworld.com/article/2328219/novell-releases-suse-linux-for-hp-itanium-servers.html|access-date=2021-10-14|website=Network World|language=en|archive-date=2021-10-29|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211029172431/https://www.networkworld.com/article/2328219/novell-releases-suse-linux-for-hp-itanium-servers.html|url-status=live}} In 2007, CentOS added support for Itanium in a new release.{{Cite web|title=CentOS 5 Linux released|url=https://www.itpro.co.uk/110119/centos-5-linux-released|access-date=2021-10-14|website=IT PRO|date=14 April 2007 |language=en|archive-date=2021-10-29|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211029170900/https://www.itpro.co.uk/110119/centos-5-linux-released|url-status=live}}

• Debian (official support was dropped in Debian 8; unofficial support available through Debian Ports until June 2024{{cite web|title=Debian Ports|url=https://www.ports.debian.org|access-date=2024-10-27}})
• EPIC Slack - an unofficial port of Slackware - specifically supports IA-64 (and hence Itanium) since its release in May 2024.{{cite web|title=Slackware for IA-64 is here! Get E P I C !|url=http://epic-slack.org/#!index.md#2024-05-15|date=2024-05-15|access-date=2025-01-26}}
• Gentoo Linux{{cite web|title=Project:IA-64|url=https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:IA-64|quote=The Gentoo/IA-64 Project works to keep Gentoo the most up to date and fastest IA-64 distribution available. |access-date=2015-07-12|archive-date=2018-09-16|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180916235508/https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:IA-64|url-status=live}} (releases before August 2024){{cite web|title=Summary of Gentoo Council meeting 2024-07-21|url=https://projects.gentoo.org/council/meeting-logs/20240721-summary.txt|quote=The Council members agreed on deprecated ia64 arch|access-date=2024-08-15}}
• Red Hat Enterprise Linux (unsupported since RHEL 6, had support in RHEL 5 until 2017, which supported other platforms until November 30, 2020)
• SUSE Linux 11 (supported until 2019, for other platforms SUSE 11 was supported until 2022).
• T2 SDE supports Itanium in its IA-64 port.{{cite web|title=T2 24.12 "Sky's the Limit!"|url=https://t2sde.org/#news-2024-12-19|quote=Support and stability was improved for SPARC64, Intel Itanium IA-64, Sony PS3, [...]|date=2024-12-19|access-date=2025-01-26}}

In 2009, Red Hat dropped Itanium support in Enterprise Linux 6.{{Cite web|last=Ricknäs|first=Mikael|date=2009-12-21|title=Red Hat to drop Itanium support in Enterprise Linux 6|url=https://www.computerworld.com/article/2522241/red-hat-to-drop-itanium-support-in-enterprise-linux-6.html|access-date=2021-10-14|website=Computerworld|language=en|archive-date=2021-10-28|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211028172143/https://www.computerworld.com/article/2522241/red-hat-to-drop-itanium-support-in-enterprise-linux-6.html|url-status=live}} Ubuntu 10.10 dropped support for Itanium.{{Cite web|last=Clark|first=Jack|title=SPARC and Itanium support discontinued in Ubuntu 10.10|url=https://www.zdnet.com/article/sparc-and-itanium-support-discontinued-in-ubuntu-10-10/|access-date=2021-10-14|website=ZDNet|language=en|archive-date=2021-10-29|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211029180056/https://www.zdnet.com/article/sparc-and-itanium-support-discontinued-in-ubuntu-10-10/|url-status=live}} In 2021, Linus Torvalds marked the Itanium code as orphaned. Torvalds said:

"HPE no longer accepts orders for new Itanium hardware, and Intel stopped accepting orders a year ago. While intel is still officially shipping chips until July 29, 2021, it's unlikely that any such orders actually exist. It's dead, Jim."{{Cite news|first=Tim|last=Anderson|title='It's dead, Jim': Torvalds marks Intel Itanium processors as orphaned in Linux kernel|url=https://www.theregister.com/2021/02/01/linux_pulls_itanium_support/|access-date=2021-10-14|work=The Register|language=en|archive-date=2021-10-29|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211029174912/https://www.theregister.com/2021/02/01/linux_pulls_itanium_support/|url-status=live}}{{Cite web|title=kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git - Linux kernel source tree|url=https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=228345bf98cd78f91d007478a51f9a471489e44a|access-date=2021-10-14|website=kernel.org|archive-date=2021-11-03|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211103183816/https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=228345bf98cd78f91d007478a51f9a471489e44a|url-status=live}}

Support for Itanium was removed in Linux 6.7{{Cite web |title=kernel/git/next/linux-next.git - The linux-next integration testing tree |url=https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=cf8e8658100d4eae80ce9b21f7a81cb024dd5057 |access-date=2023-09-18 |website=git.kernel.org}}{{Cite web |title=Linux 6.7 Set To Drop Support For Itanium IA-64 |url=https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-6.7-To-Drop-Itanium-IA-64 |access-date=2023-09-18 |website=www.phoronix.com |language=en}} and is since then maintained out-of-tree.{{cite web |url=https://github.com/linux-ia64/ |title=linux-ia64 |website=GitHub |quote=Maintenance and development of the Linux operating system for Intel Itanium architecture (IA-64) |access-date=October 1, 2024}}{{cite web |url=http://epic-linux.org/ |title=EPIC Linux |access-date=October 1, 2024}}

• Windows XP 64-Bit Edition (unsupported since June 30, 2005)
• Windows Server 2003 (unsupported since July 14, 2015)
• Windows Server 2008 (unsupported since January 14, 2020, paid Extended Security Updates not available on Itanium)
• Windows Server 2008 R2 (unsupported since January 14, 2020, paid Extended Security Updates not available on Itanium; last Windows version to support Itanium processors)

{{main|OpenVMS#Port to Intel Itanium}}

In 2001, Compaq announced that OpenVMS would be ported to the Itanium architecture.{{cite web|url=http://h71000.www7.hp.com/openvmstimes/openvmstimes.pdf|title=Compaq OpenVMS Times|date=January 2002|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060302213751/http://h71000.www7.hp.com/openvmstimes/openvmstimes.pdf|archive-date=March 2, 2006|url-status=dead}} This led to the creation of the V8.x releases of OpenVMS, which support both Itanium-based HPE Integrity Servers and DEC Alpha hardware.{{cite journal|url=http://www.decus.de/events/alphamigration/vortraege/porting_openvms_to_integrity.pdf|title=Porting OpenVMS to HP Integrity Servers|author=Clair Grant|journal=OpenVMS Technical Journal|volume=6|date=June 2005|access-date=2021-11-22|archive-date=2021-11-22|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211122133713/http://www.decus.de/events/alphamigration/vortraege/porting_openvms_to_integrity.pdf|url-status=live}} Since the Itanium porting effort began, ownership of OpenVMS transferred from Compaq to HP in 2001, and then to VMS Software Inc. (VSI) in 2014.{{cite news|newspaper=Computerworld|url=https://www.computerworld.com/article/2490683/operating-systems-hp-gives-openvms-new-life.html|title=HP gives OpenVMS new life|date=July 31, 2014|author=Patrick Thibodeau|access-date=2021-10-21|archive-date=2021-10-30|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211030234001/https://www.computerworld.com/article/2490683/operating-systems-hp-gives-openvms-new-life.html|url-status=live}} Noteworthy releases include:

• V8.0 (2003) - First pre-production release of OpenVMS on Itanium available outside HP.
• V8.2 (2005) - First production-grade release of OpenVMS on Itanium.
• V8.4 (2010) - Final release of OpenVMS supported by HP. Support ended on December 31, 2020.{{cite web|url=https://support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/docDisplay?docId=a00083646en_us|title=OpenVMS Roadmap|date=July 2019|publisher=HPE|access-date=2021-11-22|archive-date=2021-11-22|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211122133712/https://support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/docDisplay?docId=a00083646en_us|url-status=live}}
• V8.4-2L3 (2021) - Final release of OpenVMS on Itanium supported by VSI. Support ends on December 31, 2035.{{cite web|url=https://vmssoftware.com/about/roadmap/|title=OpenVMS – A guide to the strategy and roadmap|website=VSI|access-date=2025-05-13}}

Support for Itanium has been dropped in the V9.x releases of OpenVMS, which run on x86-64 only.

NonStop OS was ported from MIPS-based hardware to Itanium in 2005.{{cite web|url=https://www.hpe.com/psnow/doc/4AA0-6149ENW|title=HPE NonStop OS|date=April 2018|publisher=HPE|access-date=2021-11-22|archive-date=2021-11-22|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211122135935/https://www.hpe.com/psnow/doc/4AA0-6149ENW|url-status=live}} NonStop OS was later ported to x86-64 in 2015. Sales of Itanium-based NonStop hardware ended in 2020, with support ending in 2025.{{cite web|url=https://assets.ext.hpe.com/is/content/hpedam/documents/4aa4-2000-2999/4aa4-2988/4aa4-2988enw.pdf|title=HPE NonStop family of systems|publisher=HPE|date=May 2021|access-date=2021-11-22|archive-date=2022-01-21|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220121201745/https://assets.ext.hpe.com/is/content/hpedam/documents/4aa4-2000-2999/4aa4-2988/4aa4-2988enw.pdf|url-status=live}}{{cite web|url=https://connect2nonstop.com/2371-2/|title=News from HPE's NonStop Enterprise Division|author=Prashanth Kamath U|date=2019-07-30|access-date=2021-11-22|website=The Connection|archive-date=2021-11-22|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211122140545/https://connect2nonstop.com/2371-2/|url-status=live}}

GNU Compiler Collection deprecated support for IA-64 in GCC 10, after Intel announced the planned phase-out of this ISA.{{cite web |title=Intel Itanium IA-64 Support To Be Deprecated By GCC 10, Planned Removal In GCC 11 |url=https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Intel-IA-64-GCC-Deprecation |website=Phoronix |access-date=2020-07-09 |archive-date=2020-07-11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200711001829/https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Intel-IA-64-GCC-Deprecation |url-status=live }} LLVM (Clang) dropped Itanium support in version 2.6.{{Cite web|date=Jul 24, 2009|title=Remove the IA-64 backend. · llvm/llvm-project@1715115 · GitHub|url=https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/17151155ed8f83dcbb5db69bca2839ac2da19e0e|website=GitHub}}

HP sells a virtualization technology for Itanium called Integrity Virtual Machines.

Emulation is a technique that allows a computer to execute binary code that was compiled for a different type of computer. Before IBM's acquisition of QuickTransit in 2009, application binary software for IRIX/MIPS and Solaris/SPARC could run via type of emulation called "dynamic binary translation" on Linux/Itanium. Similarly, HP implemented a method to execute PA-RISC/HP-UX on the Itanium/HP-UX via emulation, to simplify migration of its PA-RISC customers to the radically different Itanium instruction set. Itanium processors can also run the mainframe environment GCOS from Groupe Bull and several x86 operating systems via instruction set simulators.

File:Processor families in TOP500 supercomputers.svg showing the representation of different families of micro-
processors in the TOP500 ranking list of supercomputers (1993–2019)]]

Itanium was aimed at the enterprise server and high-performance computing (HPC) markets. Other enterprise- and HPC-focused processor lines include Oracle's and Fujitsu's SPARC processors and IBM's Power microprocessors. Measured by quantity sold, Itanium's most serious competition came from x86-64 processors including Intel's own Xeon line and AMD's Opteron line. Since 2009, most servers were being shipped with x86-64 processors.

In 2005, Itanium systems accounted for about 14% of HPC systems revenue, but the percentage declined as the industry shifted to x86-64 clusters for this application.{{cite web

| url=http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2008/09/24/idc-performance-computing

| title=Supercomputing now dominated by X86 architecture

| access-date=September 27, 2008

| last=Novakovic

| first=Nebojsa

| date= September 25, 2008

| website=The Inquirer

| url-status=unfit

| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080927080239/http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2008/09/24/idc-performance-computing

| archive-date=September 27, 2008

}}

An October 2008 Gartner report on the Tukwila processor stated that "...the future roadmap for Itanium looks as strong as that of any RISC peer like Power or SPARC."{{cite web

| url=http://www.gartner.com/DisplayDocument?ref=g_rss&id=770312

| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090214114712/http://www.gartner.com/DisplayDocument?ref=g_rss&id=770312

| archive-date=February 14, 2009

| url-status=dead

| title=Preparing for Tukwila: The Next Generation of Intel's Itanium Processor Family

| access-date=October 21, 2008

| last=Butler

| first=Andrew

| date= October 3, 2008

}}

An Itanium-based computer first appeared on the list of the TOP500 supercomputers in November 2001. The best position ever achieved by an Itanium 2 based system in the list was No. 2, achieved in June 2004, when Thunder (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) entered the list with an Rmax of 19.94 Teraflops. In November 2004, Columbia entered the list at No. 2 with 51.8 Teraflops, and there was at least one Itanium-based computer in the top 10 from then until June 2007. The peak number of Itanium-based machines on the list occurred in the November 2004 list, at 84 systems (16.8%); by June 2012, this had dropped to one system (0.2%),{{cite web

|url = https://www.top500.org/statistics/list/

|title = Processor Generation / Itanium 2 Montecito

|access-date = June 6, 2022

|work = TOP500 web site

}} Select "June 2012" and "Processor Generation" and no Itanium system remained on the list in November 2012.

File:Itanium 2 mx2 module top.jpg

File:Itanium 2 mx2 module bottom.jpg

The Itanium processors show a progression in capability. Merced was a proof of concept. McKinley dramatically improved the memory hierarchy and allowed Itanium to become reasonably competitive. Madison, with the shift to a 130 nm process, allowed for enough cache space to overcome the major performance bottlenecks. Montecito, with a 90 nm process, allowed for a dual-core implementation and a major improvement in performance per watt. Montvale added three new features: core-level lockstep, demand-based switching and front-side bus frequency of up to 667 MHz.

File:HP-HP9000-ZX6000-Itanium2-SystemBoard-A7231-66510 42.jpg zx6000 system board with dual Itanium 2 processors]]

Image:Itanium2.png

When first released in 2001, Itanium's performance was disappointing compared to better-established RISC and CISC processors. Emulation to run existing x86 applications and operating systems was particularly poor, with one benchmark in 2001 reporting that it was equivalent at best to a 100 MHz Pentium in this mode (1.1 GHz Pentiums were on the market at that time).{{cite news

| url=https://www.theregister.com/2001/01/23/benchmarks_itanic_32bit_emulation/

| title=Benchmarks – Itanic 32bit emulation is 'unusable'. No kidding — slower than a P100

| first=Andrew

| last=Orlowski

| work=The Register

| date=January 23, 2001

| access-date=November 25, 2022

}}

Itanium failed to make significant inroads against IA-32 or RISC, and suffered further following the arrival of x86-64 systems which offered greater compatibility with older x86 applications.

In a 2009 article on the history of the processor — "How the Itanium Killed the Computer Industry" — journalist John C. Dvorak reported "This continues to be one of the great fiascos of the last 50 years".{{cite web

| url=https://www.pcmag.com/article.aspx/curl/2339629

| title=How the Itanium Killed the Computer Industry

| access-date=April 15, 2012

| last=Dvorak

| first=John C.

| author-link=John C. Dvorak

| date=January 26, 2009

| work=PC Mag

| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120608105627/http://www.pcmag.com/article.aspx/curl/2339629

| archive-date=June 8, 2012

| url-status=dead

}} Tech columnist Ashlee Vance commented that the delays and underperformance "turned the product into a joke in the chip industry".{{Cite news

|url=http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/09/ten-years-after-first-delay-intels-itanium-is-still-late/

|title=Ten Years After First Delay, Intel's Itanium Is Still Late

|work=The New York Times

|date=February 9, 2009

|access-date=April 1, 2010

|last=Vance

|first=Ashlee

|author-link=Ashlee Vance

|archive-date=July 10, 2011

|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110710101259/http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/09/ten-years-after-first-delay-intels-itanium-is-still-late/

|url-status=live

}} In an interview, Donald Knuth said "The Itanium approach...was supposed to be so terrific—until it turned out that the wished-for compilers were basically impossible to write."{{cite web

| last=Knuth

| first=Donald E.

| url=http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1193856

| title=Interview with Donald Knuth

| publisher=InformIT

| date=April 25, 2008

| access-date=April 1, 2010

| archive-date=February 23, 2021

| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210223015337/https://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1193856

| url-status=live

}}

Both Red Hat and Microsoft announced plans to drop Itanium support in their operating systems due to lack of market interest;{{cite web|url=https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/windowsserver/2010/04/02/windows-server-2008-r2-to-phase-out-itanium/|title=Windows Server 2008 R2 to Phase Out Itanium|last=Reger|first=Dan|date=April 2, 2010|work=Windows Server Blog|access-date=July 29, 2018|archive-date=June 13, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180613111922/https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/windowsserver/2010/04/02/windows-server-2008-r2-to-phase-out-itanium/|url-status=live}}{{cite news|url=https://www.theregister.com/2009/12/18/redhat_rhel6_itanium_dead/|title=Red Hat pulls plug on Itanium with RHEL 6|first=Timothy Prickett|last=Morgan|date=December 18, 2009|work=The Register|access-date=November 25, 2022}} however, other Linux distributions such as Gentoo and Debian remain available for Itanium. On March 22, 2011, Oracle Corporation announced that it would no longer develop new products for HP-UX on Itanium, although it would continue to provide support for existing products.{{cite web |last=Nystedt |first=Dan |date=March 22, 2011 |title=Oracle stops developing software for Intel's Itanium Chips |url=https://www.pcworld.com/article/495910/article-2090.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211230101153/https://www.pcworld.com/article/495910/article-2090.html |archive-date=December 30, 2021 |access-date=December 30, 2021 |website=PC World}} Following this announcement, HP sued Oracle for breach of contract, arguing that Oracle had violated conditions imposed during settlement over Oracle's hiring of former HP CEO Mark Hurd as its co-CEO, requiring the vendor to support Itanium on its software "until such time as HP discontinues the sales of its Itanium-based servers",{{cite web|title=HP wins judgment in Itanium suit against Oracle|url=https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2012/08/hp-wins-judgement-in-itanium-suit-against-oracle/|website=Ars Technica|date=August 2012|access-date=July 1, 2016|archive-date=November 12, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112030259/https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2012/08/hp-wins-judgement-in-itanium-suit-against-oracle/|url-status=live}} and that the breach had harmed its business. In 2012, a court ruled in favor of HP, and ordered Oracle to resume its support for Itanium. In June 2016, Hewlett Packard Enterprise (the corporate successor to HP's server business) was awarded $3 billion in damages from the lawsuit.{{cite web|title=HP awarded $3B in damages from Oracle over Itanium database cancelation|url=https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/06/hp-awarded-3b-in-damages-from-oracle-over-itanium-database-cancellation/|website=Ars Technica|date=July 2016|access-date=July 1, 2016|archive-date=November 8, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201108090154/https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/06/hp-awarded-3b-in-damages-from-oracle-over-itanium-database-cancellation/|url-status=live}}{{cite news|title=Oracle Loses $3 Million Verdict For Ditching HP Itanium Chip|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-06-30/oracle-ordered-to-pay-hp-3-billion-by-jury-for-itanium-damages|newspaper=Bloomberg.com|date=30 June 2016|access-date=July 1, 2016|archive-date=2016-07-01|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160701011939/http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-06-30/oracle-ordered-to-pay-hp-3-billion-by-jury-for-itanium-damages|url-status=live}} Oracle unsuccessfully appealed the decision to the California Court of Appeal in 2021.{{cite news|title=Oracle loses bid to upend HP's $3 billion win|url=https://www.reuters.com/legal/transactional/oracle-loses-bid-upend-hps-3-billion-win-2021-06-14/|website=Reuters|date=15 June 2021|access-date=July 7, 2021|last1=Brittain|first1=Blake|archive-date=2021-07-09|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210709191923/https://www.reuters.com/legal/transactional/oracle-loses-bid-upend-hps-3-billion-win-2021-06-14/|url-status=live}}

A former Intel official reported that the Itanium business had become profitable for Intel in late 2009.{{cite news

| url=http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/17/a-decade-later-intels-itanium-chip-makes-a-profit/

| title=A Decade Later, Intel's Itanium Chip Makes a Profit

| access-date=April 7, 2010

| last=Vance

| first=Ashlee

| author-link=Ashlee Vance

| date=May 21, 2009

| newspaper=The New York Times

| archive-date=November 4, 2011

| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111104141808/http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/17/a-decade-later-intels-itanium-chip-makes-a-profit/

| url-status=live

}} By 2009, the chip was almost entirely deployed on servers made by HP, which had over 95% of the Itanium server market share, making the main operating system for Itanium HP-UX. On March 22, 2011, Intel reaffirmed its commitment to Itanium with multiple generations of chips in development and on schedule.{{cite web

| last=Darling

| first=Patrick

| title=Intel Reaffirms Commitment to Itanium

| url=https://newsroom.intel.com/chip-shots/chip-shot-intel-reaffirms-commitment-to-itanium/#gs.6ytayt

| work=Chip Shots

| publisher=Intel

| date=March 23, 2011

| access-date=May 20, 2020

| archive-date=March 27, 2020

| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200327004812/https://newsroom.intel.com/chip-shots/chip-shot-intel-reaffirms-commitment-to-itanium/#gs.6ytayt

| url-status=dead

}}

File:HP-HP9000-ZX6000-Itanium2-Workstation 12.jpg zx6000, an Itanium 2-based Unix workstation ]]

Although Itanium did attain limited success in the niche market of high-end computing, Intel had originally hoped it would find broader acceptance as a replacement for the original x86 architecture.{{cite web

| url=http://features.techworld.com/operating-systems/2690/will-intel-abandon-the-itanium/

| title=Will Intel abandon the Itanium?

| date=July 20, 2006

| author=Manek Dubash

| quote=Once touted by Intel as a replacement for the x86 product line, expectations for Itanium have been throttled well back.

| publisher=Techworld

| access-date=December 19, 2010

| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110219212053/http://features.techworld.com/operating-systems/2690/will-intel-abandon-the-itanium/

| archive-date=February 19, 2011

| url-status=dead

}}

AMD chose a different direction, designing the less radical x86-64, a 64-bit extension to the existing x86 architecture, which Microsoft then supported, forcing Intel to introduce the same extensions in its own x86-based processors.{{cite web

| first = Charlie

| last = Demerjian

| title = Why Intel's Prescott will use AMD64 extensions

| url = http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1029651/why-intels-prescott-will-use-amd64--extensions

| website = The Inquirer

| date = September 26, 2003

| access-date = October 7, 2009

| url-status = unfit

| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20091010181925/http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1029651/why-intels-prescott-will-use-amd64--extensions

| archive-date = October 10, 2009

}} These designs can run existing 32-bit applications at native hardware speed, while offering support for 64-bit memory addressing and other enhancements to new applications. This architecture has now become the predominant 64-bit architecture in the desktop and portable market. Although some Itanium-based workstations were initially introduced by companies such as SGI, they are no longer available.

• List of Intel Itanium processors

{{Notelist}}

{{Reflist|30em}}

{{Commons category}}

• [https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/series/451/intel-itanium-processor.html Intel Itanium Processor Product Specifications]
• [https://www.hpe.com/us/en/servers/hp-ux.html#portfolio HPE Integrity Servers] official web page
• [https://web.archive.org/web/20070223234225/http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/IA64wiki/ItaniumInternals Some undocumented Itanium 2 microarchitectural information]
• {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110706223150/http://sverre.web.cern.ch/sverre/IA64_1.pdf |date=July 6, 2011 |title=IA-64 tutorial, including code examples }}
• [https://archive.today/20130103063317/http://www.hp.com/go/integrity Itanium Docs at HP]
• [https://people.computing.clemson.edu/~mark/epic.html Historical background for EPIC instruction set architectures]

{{Intel processors}}

{{CPU technologies}}

{{Authority control}}

Category:Computer-related introductions in 2001

Category:Intel microprocessors

Category:Very long instruction word computing

Category:64-bit microprocessors

Category:VLIW microprocessors

Category:Products and services discontinued in 2021