People's Action Party#Young PAP and internet presence

File:Mr. Lee Kuan Yew Mayoral reception 1965 (cropped).jpg, the first Prime Minister of Singapore and one of the founders of the People's Action Party]]

Lee Kuan Yew, Toh Chin Chye and Goh Keng Swee were involved in the Malayan Forum, a London-based student activist group that was against colonial rule in Malaya in the 1940s and early 1950s.{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uwohR6juj-MC|title=Goh Keng Swee: A Public Career Remembered|last1=Desker|first1=Barry|last2=Guan|first2=Chong|last3=Kwa|first3=Chong Guan|date=2012|publisher=World Scientific|isbn=9789814291392}}{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gQ-JAAAAQBAJ|title=Lee Kuan Yew: The Crucial Years|last=Josey|first=Alex|date=15 February 2013|publisher=Marshall Cavendish International Asia Pte Ltd|isbn=9789814435499}} Upon returning to Singapore, the group met regularly to discuss approaches to attain independence in Malayan territories and started looking for like-minded individuals to start a political party. Journalist S. Rajaratnam was introduced to Lee by Goh.{{cite book|title=PAP 50 : Five Decades of the People's Action Party|last=Leong|first=Ching|publisher=People's Action Party|year=2004|location=Singapore}} Lee was also introduced to several English-educated left-wing students and Chinese-educated union and student leaders while working on the Fajar sedition trial and the National Service riot case.{{cite book|last1=Lee|first1=Kuan Yew|title=The Singapore Story: Memoirs of Lee Kuan Yew|publisher=Marshall Cavendish International Asia Pte Ltd|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9m5PBAAAQBAJ|isbn=9789814561761|date=15 September 2012}}

The PAP was officially registered as a political party on 21 November 1954. Members of the first Central Executive Committee (CEC) of the party include a group of trade unionists, lawyers and journalists such as Lee Kuan Yew, Abdul Samad Ismail, Toh Chin Chye, Devan Nair, S. Rajaratnam, Chan Chiaw Thor, Fong Swee Suan, Tann Wee Keng and Tann Wee Tiong.{{Cite news|url=http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19541024-1.2.55|title=Nine Form New Political Party in Singapore|date=24 October 1954|work=The Straits Times|access-date=17 August 2017|archive-date=17 August 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170817151523/http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19541024-1.2.55|url-status=live}} The political party was led by Lee Kuan Yew as its secretary-general, with Toh Chin Chye as its founding chairman. Other party officers include Tann Wee Tiong, Lee Gek Seng, Ong Eng Guan and Tann Wee Keng.{{cite news|title=The PAP bosses|url=http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19550712-1.2.133|newspaper=The Straits Times|date=12 July 1955|access-date=18 September 2017|archive-date=18 January 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180118011740/http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19550712-1.2.133|url-status=live}}

The PAP first contested the 1955 general election in which 25 of 32 seats in the legislature were up for election. In this election, the PAP's four candidates gained much support from the trade union members and student groups such as the University Socialist Club, who canvassed for them.{{Cite book|title=Men in White: The Untold Story of Singapore's Ruling Political Party.. ISBN|last1=Yap|first1=Sonny|last2=Richard|first2=Lim|last3=Weng|first3=K. Leong|publisher=Straits Times Press|year=2010|isbn=978-9814266512|location=Singapore|pages=54}} The party won three seats, one by its leader Lee Kuan Yew for the Tanjong Pagar division and one by PAP co-founder Lim Chin Siong for the Bukit Timah division.{{Cite web|url=http://www.nas.gov.sg/archivesonline/photographs/record-details/c8a3566b-5380-11e4-859c-0050568939ad|title=Elected into the Legislative Assembly were (from left) …|date=3 April 1955|website=National Archives of Singapore|access-date=17 August 2017|archive-date=18 August 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170818011532/http://www.nas.gov.sg/archivesonline/photographs/record-details/c8a3566b-5380-11e4-859c-0050568939ad|url-status=live}}{{Cite news|url=http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19550403-1.2.10|title=The Results|date=3 April 1955|work=The Straits Times|access-date=17 August 2017|archive-date=18 August 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170818012358/http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19550403-1.2.10|url-status=live}} Then 22 years old unionist Lim Chin Siong was and remained the youngest Assemblyman ever to be elected to office. The election was won by the Labour Front headed by David Marshall.{{Cite news|url=http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19550403-1.2.2|title=Labour Wins – Marshal Will Be Chief Minister|access-date=17 August 2017|archive-date=18 August 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170818014002/http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19550403-1.2.2|url-status=live}}

In April 1956, Lim and Lee represented the PAP at the London Constitutional Talks along with Chief Minister David Marshall which ended in failure as the British declined to grant Singapore internal self-government. On 7 June 1956, Marshall, disappointed with the constitutional talks, stepped down as Chief Minister as he had pledged to do so earlier if self-governance was not achieved. He was replaced by Lim Yew Hock, another Labour Front member.{{cite web|url=http://infopedia.nl.sg/articles/SIP_1462_2009-02-18.html|title=Lim Chin Siong|author=Wong Hongyi|year=2009|work=Singapore Infopedia|publisher=National Library Board Singapore|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090728022721/http://infopedia.nl.sg/articles/SIP_1462_2009-02-18.html|archive-date=28 July 2009}} Lim pursued a largely anti-communist campaign and managed to convince the British to make a definite plan for self-government. The Constitution of Singapore was revised accordingly in 1958, replacing the Rendel Constitution with one that granted Singapore self-government and the ability for its own population to fully elect its Legislative Assembly.

PAP and left-wing members who were communists were criticised for inciting riots in the mid-1950s.{{Cite news|url=http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19550922-1.2.2|title=Mr. Lim Sits on The Fence|access-date=17 August 2017|archive-date=18 August 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170818013755/http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19550922-1.2.2|url-status=live}}{{Cite news|url=http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19550517-1.2.2|title=The Guilty Men – By Goode|date=17 May 1955|work=The Straits Times|access-date=17 August 2017|archive-date=18 August 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170818012524/http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19550517-1.2.2|url-status=live}} Lim Chin Siong, Fong Swee Suan and Devan Nair as well as several unionists were detained by the police after the Chinese middle schools riots.{{Cite news|url=http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19561028-1.2.5|title=Who's Who – The Top 15 Names|date=28 October 1956|work=The Straits Times|access-date=17 August 2017|archive-date=18 August 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170818013327/http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19561028-1.2.5|url-status=live}} Lim Chin Siong was placed under solitary confinement for close to a year, away from his other PAP colleagues, as they were placed in the Medium Security Prison (MSP) instead.{{Cite journal|author=Ministry of Finance|date=August 2015|title=INCOME GROWTH, INEQUALITY AND MOBILITY TRENDS IN SINGAPORE|url=https://app.mof.gov.sg/Portals/0/Feature%20Articles/Income%20Growth,%20Distribution%20and%20Mobility%20Trends%20in%20Singapore.pdf|journal=Ministry of Finance Occasional Paper|access-date=14 April 2016|archive-date=7 April 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160407020634/https://app.mof.gov.sg/Portals/0/Feature%20Articles/Income%20Growth,%20Distribution%20and%20Mobility%20Trends%20in%20Singapore.pdf|url-status=live}} The number of PAP members imprisoned rose in August 1957, when PAP members from the trade unions (viewed as "communist or pro-communist") won half the seats in the Central Executive Committee (CEC). The "moderate" CEC members, including Lee Kuan Yew, Toh Chin Chye and others, refused to take their appointments in the CEC. Yew Hock's government again made a sweeping round of arrests, imprisoning all the "communist" members, before the "moderates" re-assumed their office.{{Cite web|url=http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/ex-pap-man-recounts-1957-kelong-meeting|title=Ex-PAP man recounts 1957 'kelong meeting'|last=Leong|first=Weng Kam|date=10 June 2016|publisher=The Straits Times|access-date=19 August 2016|archive-date=21 September 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160921184554/http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/ex-pap-man-recounts-1957-kelong-meeting|url-status=live}}

Following this, the PAP decided to re-assert ties with the labour faction of Singapore in the hope of securing the votes of working-class Chinese Singaporeans, many of whom were supporters of the jailed unionists. Lee Kuan Yew convinced the incarcerated union leaders to sign documents to state their support for the party and its policies, promising to release the jailed members of the PAP when the party came to power in the next elections.{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=buuiCgAAQBAJ|title=Leaders of Singapore|last=Chew|first=Melanie|date=29 July 2015|publisher=World Scientific|isbn=9789814719452|pages=80}} Ex-Barisan Sosialis member Tan Jing Quee claims that Lee was secretly in collusion with the British to stop Lim Chin Siong and the labour supporters from attaining power because of their huge popularity. Quee also states that Lim Yew Hock deliberately provoked the students into rioting and then had the labour leaders arrested.{{cite book|title=Comet in our sky: Lim Chin Siong in history|author=Tan Jing Quee|publisher=Insan|year=2001|isbn=983-9602-14-4}} Greg Poulgrain of Griffiths University argued that "Lee Kuan Yew was secretly a party with Lim Yew Hock in urging the Colonial Secretary to impose the subversives ban in making it illegal for former political detainees to stand for election". Lee Kuan Yew eventually accused Lim Chin Siong and his supporters of being communists working for the Communist United Front, but evidence of Lim being a communist cadre was a matter of debate as many documents have yet to be declassified.{{Cite news |last=Seng |first=Kah |date=20 December 2014 |title=British archives, personal accounts, confirm extent of Communist United Front activities here: PM Lee |work=The Straits Times |url=http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/british-archives-personal-accounts-confirm-extent-of-communist-united-front-activities |url-status=live |access-date=31 August 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170831132942/http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/british-archives-personal-accounts-confirm-extent-of-communist-united-front-activities |archive-date=31 August 2017}}{{cite news |last=Kah Seng |first=Loh |date=15 January 2015 |title=An annotated bibliography of Operation Coldstore – New Mandala |language=en-US |work=New Mandala |url=http://www.newmandala.org/the-history-writes-itself-an-annotated-bibliography-of-operation-coldstore/ |url-status=dead |access-date=31 August 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170831140342/http://www.newmandala.org/the-history-writes-itself-an-annotated-bibliography-of-operation-coldstore/ |archive-date=31 August 2017}}

File:ST31May1959.jpg the day after the 1959 election, reporting on the results and the PAP's victory]]

The PAP eventually won the 1959 general election.{{Cite news|url=http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19590531-1.2.2|title=2.45 am-PAP ROMPS HOME WITH LANDSLIDE VICTORY|date=31 May 1959|work=The Straits Times|access-date=17 August 2017|archive-date=18 August 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170818013508/http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19590531-1.2.2|url-status=live}} The election was also the first one to produce a fully elected parliament and a cabinet wielding powers of full internal self-government. The party has remained in power ever since, winning a majority of seats in every successive general election. Lee, who was chosen to be the first Prime Minister after an internal election within the PAP, would eventually helm this post for the next 31 years,{{Cite news|url=http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19590602-1.2.2|title=LEE IS PREMIER|access-date=17 August 2017|archive-date=18 August 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170818013439/http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19590602-1.2.2|url-status=live}} requested the British for the release of the left-wing members of the PAP, including the likes of Lim Chin Siong, Fong Swee Suan, Sandrasegaran Woodhull, James Puthucheary and Devan Nair.{{Cite news|url=http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19590603-1.2.99|title=Unlocking The Gates|date=3 June 1959|work=The Straits Times|access-date=21 August 2017|archive-date=21 August 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170821091338/http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19590603-1.2.99|url-status=live}}

In 1961, the Singapore Trades Union Congress (STUC), which had backed the PAP back in 1959, split into the pro-PAP National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) and the non-affiliated and more leftist Singapore Association of Trade Unions (SATU). The SATU collapsed in 1963, following the now PAP-led government's crackdown and detention of its leaders during Operation Coldstore and its subsequent official deregistration on 13 November 1963. The NTUC remains as the sole trade union centre in the country today and continues to have a close relationship with the PAP.{{cite web |url=http://infopedia.nl.sg/articles/SIP_1237_2008-11-30.html |title=Singapore Association of Trade Unions |access-date=12 September 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090401154609/http://infopedia.nl.sg/articles/SIP_1237_2008-11-30.html |archive-date=1 April 2009}}

{{see also|1961 Singaporean by-elections}}

In 1961, disagreements on the proposed merger plan to form Malaysia and long-standing internal party power struggle led to the split of the left-wing group from the PAP.{{cite news|title=When Lee lost control of PAP for 10 days|newspaper=The Straits Times|date=12 September 2009}}{{Cite news|url=http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19610727-1.2.3|title=PAP 'rebels' to form an opposition party|access-date=17 August 2017|archive-date=18 August 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170818013843/http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19610727-1.2.3|url-status=live}}{{Cite news|url=http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19610710-1.2.4|title=Merger issue: Dr. Toh hits out at six top unionists|access-date=17 August 2017|archive-date=18 August 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170818012549/http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19610710-1.2.4|url-status=live}}

Although the "communist" faction had been frozen out of ever taking over the PAP, other problems had begun to arise internally. Ong Eng Guan, the former Mayor of the City Council after PAP's victory in the 1957 Singapore City Council election, presented a set of "16 Resolutions" to revisit some issues previously explored by Chin Siong's faction of the PAP: abolishing the PPSO, revising the Constitution, and changing the method of selecting cadre members.{{Cite book|title=Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy|url=https://archive.org/details/economicoriginsd00acem|url-access=limited|last1=Acemoglu|first1=Daron|last2=Robinson|first2=James A.|publisher=Cambridge Press|year=2005|pages=[https://archive.org/details/economicoriginsd00acem/page/n24 8]–10|isbn=9780521855266}}{{rp|82}}

Although Ong's 16 Resolutions originated from the left-wing faction led by Lim Chin Siong, that faction had only reluctantly asked the PAP leadership to clarify its position on them,{{Cite journal|last=Thum|first=Ping Tjin|date=Nov 2013|title='The Fundamental Issue is Anti-colonialism, Not Merger': Singapore's "Progressive Left", Operation Coldstore, and the Creation of Malaysia|journal=ARI Working Paper|issue=211}} as they still thought that the party with Lee Kuan Yew at the helm was a better alternative than Ong who was regarded as mercurial and a tyrant. However, Lee took the stance taken by the left-wing PAP members as a lack of confidence in his leadership. This issue caused a rift between the "moderate" PAP members (led by Lee) and the "left-wing" faction (led by Lim).

Ong was then expelled, and he resigned his Assembly seat to challenge the government to a by-election in Hong Lim in April 1961, where he won 73.3% of the vote.{{Cite web|url=https://sg-elections.com/by-election/1961-4/hong-lim.html|title=Singapore Legislative Assembly By-Election April 1961 > Hong Lim|website=singapore-elections.com|access-date=19 August 2016|archive-date=1 June 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160601144636/http://singapore-elections.com/by-election/1961-4/hong-lim.html|url-status=live}} This was despite the fact that Lee Kuan Yew had made a secret alliance with Fong Chong Pik, the leader of the Communist Party of Malaya (CPM), to get the CPM cadres to support the PAP in the by-election.

The breakaway group of members formed the Barisan Sosialis with Lim Chin Siong as secretary-general.{{Cite book|title=The Fajar Generation: The University Socialist Club and the Politics of Postwar Malaya and Singapore|last1=Poh|first1=Soo K|last2=Tan|first2=Jing Quee|last3=Koh|first3=Kay Yew|publisher=SIRD|year=2010|isbn=9789833782864|location=Petaling Jaya|pages=59–60}} Aside from the Chinese union leaders, lawyers Thampoe Thamby Rajah and Tann Wee Tiong,{{cite news|title=Lawyers Rajah, Tann join Barisan Socialis|url=http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19610815-1.2.49|newspaper=The Straits Times|date=15 August 1961|access-date=18 September 2017|archive-date=30 August 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180830151144/http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19610815-1.2.49|url-status=live}} several members from the University Socialist Club such as James Puthucheary (uncle of Janil Puthucheary) and Poh Soo Kai joined the party.{{Cite book|title=The University Socialist Club and the Contest for Malaya: Tangled Strands of Modernity|last=Loh|first=Kah S|publisher=Amsterdam University Press|year=2012|isbn=978-9089644091|location=Amsterdam|pages=24–25}} 35 of 51 branches of the PAP and 19 of 23 branch secretaries defected to Barisan.

{{see also|PAP-UMNO relations}}

After gaining independence from Britain, Singapore joined the federation of Malaysia in 1963. Although the PAP was the ruling party in the state of Singapore, the PAP functioned as an opposition party at the federal level in the larger Malaysian political landscape. At that time and until the 2018 general election, the federal government in Kuala Lumpur was controlled by a coalition led by the United Malays National Organisation (UMNO). However, the prospect that the PAP might rule Malaysia agitated UMNO. The PAP's decision to contest federal parliamentary seats outside Singapore and the UMNO decision to contest seats within Singapore breached an unspoken agreement to respect each other's spheres of influence and aggravated PAP–UMNO relations. The clash of personalities between PAP leader Lee Kuan Yew and Malaysian Prime Minister Tunku Abdul Rahman resulted in a crisis and led to Rahman forcing Singapore to leave Malaysia on 9 August 1965. Upon independence, the nascent People's Action Party of Malaya, which had been registered in Malaysia on 10 March 1964, had its registration cancelled on 9 September 1965, just a month after Singapore's exit. Those with the now non-existent party applied to register People's Action Party, Malaya which was again rejected by the Malaysian government, before settling with the Democratic Action Party (DAP).

File:People's Action Party general election rally, Tampines Stadium, Singapore - 20110505-04.jpg in 2011]]

The PAP has held an overwhelming majority of seats in the Parliament of Singapore since 1966, when the opposition Barisan Sosialis (Socialist Front) resigned from Parliament after winning 13 seats following the 1963 general election, which took place months after a number of their leaders had been arrested in Operation Coldstore based on accusations of being communists affliated with the Communist Party of Malaya (CPM).

It subsequently achieved a monopoly in an expanding parliament (winning every parliamentary seat) for the next four elections (1968, 1972, 1976 and 1980). Opposition parties returned to the legislature at a 1981 by-election. The 1984 general election was the first election in 21 years in which opposition parties won seats. From then until 2006, the PAP faced four opposition MPs at most. Opposition parties did not win more than four parliamentary seats from 1984 until 2011 when the Workers' Party (WP) won six seats and took away a Group Representation Constituency (GRC) for the first time for any opposition party, as well as until 2020 by which an opposition party had won more than one GRC, which was also achieved by the WP.

Even so, the PAP still holds a supermajority in the legislature, to the point that Singapore is effectively a dominant party system similar to Japan's Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) rule of the country.{{cite news |title=How the LDP dominates Japan's politics |url=https://www.economist.com/the-economist-explains/2021/10/28/how-the-ldp-dominates-japans-politics |newspaper=The Economist |access-date=11 September 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211101154455/https://www.economist.com/the-economist-explains/2021/10/28/how-the-ldp-dominates-japans-politics |archive-date=1 November 2021 |date=28 October 2021}} With its supermajority, the PAP has always had the ability to amend the Constitution of Singapore at will, including the introduction of multi-member constituencies under the GRC system (in 1988) or the Nominated Member of Parliament (NMPs) scheme (in 1990), which has helped strengthened the government's dominance and control of Parliament.{{cite journal|last1=Tan|first1=Kenneth Paul|title=The Ideology of Pragmatism: Neo-liberal Globalisation and Political Authoritarianism in Singapore|journal=Journal of Contemporary Asia|date= 2012|volume=42|issue=1|pages=67–92|doi=10.1080/00472336.2012.634644|s2cid=56236985}}

File:Members of the first People's Action Party Central Executive Committee, 1954.png

The longtime governing party of Singapore, spans both past and present, but notably occurred in the mid-1980s where the first generation of PAP leaders in the CEC and the Cabinet of Singapore ceded power to a second generation of leaders.

By 1984, the "old guard" (first generation of party leaders) had been governing Singapore for approximately a quarter of a century. Aging leadership was a key concern, and then-Prime Minister of Singapore Lee Kuan Yew sought to groom younger leaders. In a speech on 29 September 1984, Lee argued that though the first generation of leaders was still "alert and fully in charge", to hang on to power until they had become feeble would allow power to be wrested from them, with no say in who their successors were.{{cite journal|last=Quah|first=Jon|title=Singapore in 1984: Leadership Transition in an Election Year|journal=Asian Survey|year=1985|volume=25|issue=2|page=225|jstor=2644306|doi=10.2307/2644306

}}

On 30 September, at the Ordinary Party Conference, power was transferred to the second generation of leaders, who were elected to the Central Executive Committee in place of all the old CEC members; of the 14-member CEC, Lee Kuan Yew remained the only "old guard" leader.

According to a report to the Library of Congress, the old guard were confident in their "rectitude" and discretion in using their extensive political powers for Singapore's common good, but were not as confident in the next generation in doing so. Various limits on executive power were considered, in order to minimise the chances of corruption. These included a popularly elected President of Singapore with substantial, nonceremonial powers.{{cite web|last=LePoer|first=Barbara|title=Key political issues - Succession|url=http://countrystudies.us/singapore/53.htm|work=Countrystudies|publisher=Library of Congress}} This particular reform was enacted with a constitutional amendment in 1991.

The old guard also sought to eschew the use of PAP as a central political institution, seeking to "depoliticise" and disperse power among society, and sought to include low-level community leaders in government. A policy of cross-fertilisation was enacted: exchange of leaders, "elites" and talent would take place between private and government sectors, civilian and military segments of society, and between the party and the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC).

The next generation of leaders in the late 1980s was split between the factions of then Brigadier General Lee Hsien Loong and the older, more-experienced Goh Chok Tong. Lee Hsien Loong was supported by bureaucrats in the Ministry of Defence and army colleagues in the Singapore Armed Forces; Goh Chok Tong had more influence in the Singapore Civil Service, the Cabinet and government-linked companies.{{cite book|last=Worthington|first=Ross|title=Governance in Singapore|year=2002|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-0-7007-1474-2|url=https://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/070071474X/?keywords=slapped&v=search-inside}}

Lee Kuan Yew himself remained Prime Minister and in the CEC until 1990, when he stepped down in favour of Goh Chok Tong as PM. Lee Hsien Loong became PM in 2004.

On 23 November 2018, two fourth-generation leadership members (then–Minister for Finance Heng Swee Keat and then–Minister for Trade and Industry Chan Chun Sing) were elected as the First and Second Assistant Secretaries-General; these were, respectively, the second- and third-highest positions in the party. They replaced Teo Chee Hean and Tharman Shanmugaratnam. This represented a significant step of the leadership transition from the third generation to the fourth generation.

On 1 May 2019, Heng Swee Keat was appointed the new and sole Deputy Prime Minister, replacing Teo and Tharman. He was then widely seen as the 4th and next Prime Minister and Secretary-General of PAP succeeding incumbent Lee Hsien Loong. However, on 8 April 2021, Heng unexpectedly announced he would step down as the fourth-generation leader and step aside to pave the way for younger and healthier leaders to take over leadership, citing his health and age as reasons. Several Cabinet members were then seen as possible candidates to succeed Heng, including Minister for Finance Lawrence Wong, Minister for Health Ong Ye Kung, and Minister for Education Chan Chun Sing.{{citation needed|date=April 2025}}

On 14 April 2022, Wong was selected as new leader of PAP's fourth-generation (4G) team, succeeding Heng.{{Cite news |url= https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/lawrence-wong-prime-minister-4g-leader-lee-hsien-loong-announcement-2626176 |title= Finance Minister Lawrence Wong endorsed as leader of 4G team: PM Lee |work=ChannelNewsAsia |location= Singapore |date=14 April 2022}} Wong received an "overwhelming majority" of support in the consultation process, surpassing that of other nominees.{{Cite news |url= https://www.bloombergquint.com/politics/singapore-pm-lee-signals-lawrence-wong-becomes-new-successor |title=Singapore PM Lee Signals Lawrence Wong Becomes New Successor |website=www.bloombergquint.com |date=14 April 2022}} His candidacy was unanimously endorsed by the cabinet and subsequently by the PAP MPs at a party caucus on 14 April.{{Cite news |url= https://sg.news.yahoo.com/lawrence-wong-endorsed-as-leader-of-singapores-pap-4-g-team-104721122.html |title=Lawrence Wong selected as leader of Singapore's PAP 4G team: PM Lee |website=sg.news.yahoo.com |date=14 April 2022}} On 4 December 2024, he was elected Secretary-General of People's Action Party, with an endorsement from Lee Hsien Loong.{{Cite news |title= Orderly transitions in political leadership cannot be taken for granted: SM Lee in last speech as PAP chief |url= https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/lee-hsien-loong-pap-secretary-general-leadership-transition-lawrence-wong-handover-4767291 |date=24 November 2024 |work=ChannelNewsAsia |location= Singapore |first=Vanessa |last=Lim}}{{Cite news |title=PAP announces new central executive committee; Lawrence Wong officially elected secretary-general |url= https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/pap-cec-lawrence-wong-secretary-general-four-co-opted-4786521 |date=4 December 2024 |work=ChannelNewsAsia |location= Singapore}}

File:People's Action Party supporters, Greenridge Secondary School, Singapore - 20110427-04.jpg]]

File:People's Action Party headquarters, New Upper Changi Road 310522.jpg

During its initial years, the party had adopted a traditional Leninist form of party organisation, together with a vanguard cadre from its labour-leaning faction. The PAP Executive later expelled the leftist faction in 1961, bringing the ideological basis of the party into the centre and later in the 1960s moving further to the right.

In the beginning, there were about 500 so-called temporary cadres appointed,{{cite book|author=Diane K. Mauzy and R.S. Milne |year=2002 |title=Singapore Politics Under the People's Action Party |url=https://archive.org/details/singaporepolitic00mauz |url-access=limited |publisher=Routledge |isbn=0-415-24653-9 |page=[https://archive.org/details/singaporepolitic00mauz/page/n59 41]}} however the current number of cadres is unknown, with the register of cadres being kept confidential. In 1988, Wong Kan Seng revealed that there were more than 1,000 cadres.

Cadre members have the right to attend party conferences and to vote for and elect and to be elected into the Central Executive Committee (CEC), the pinnacle of party leaders.

To become a party cadre, a party member must be first nominated by the MP in their branch. The candidate will then undergo three sessions of interview, each with four to five ministers or MPs and the appointment is then made by the CEC. About 100 candidates are nominated each year.{{cite news|url=http://www.singapore-window.org/80404st1.htm|title=The PAP cadre system|date=4 April 1998|newspaper=The Straits Times|location=Singapore|author=Koh Buck Song|access-date=10 January 2006|archive-date=8 January 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180108023347/http://www.singapore-window.org/80404st1.htm|url-status=live}}

Alternatively, party cadres are recruited based on recommendations by existing PAP cadres, prospective recruits for general election candidates are then internally shortlisted before

{{See also|1959 PAP prime ministerial election}}

Political power in the party is concentrated in the CEC, led by the secretary-general. The secretary-general of the PAP is the leader of the party. Due to PAP's electoral victories in every general election since 1959, the prime minister of Singapore has been by convention the secretary-general of the PAP since 1959. Key appointments in the CEC are usually Cabinet members.

From 1957 onward, the rules laid down that the outgoing CEC should recommend a list of candidates from which the cadre members can then vote for the next CEC. This has recently changed so that the CEC nominates eight members and the party caucus selects the remaining ten.

Historically, the position of Secretary-General was not considered for the office of Prime Minister, but rather the Central Executive Committee held an election to choose the prime minister. There was a contest between PAP Secretary-General Lee Kuan Yew and PAP Treasurer Ong Eng Guan, prior to 1959. Lee subsequently won the leadership and was inaugurated as the first prime minister of Singapore.{{cite news|title=Lee Kuan Yew elected as Prime Minister of Singapore|url=http://www.asiaone.com/News/AsiaOne%2BNews/Singapore/Story/A1Story20090910-166931.html|newspaper=AsiaOne|access-date=16 December 2012|date=10 September 2009|archive-date=14 February 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110214001920/http://www.asiaone.com/News/AsiaOne+News/Singapore/Story/A1Story20090910-166931.html|url-status=dead}}

The next lower level committee is the HQ Executive Committee (HQ EXCO) which performs the party's administration and oversees 14 sub-committees.{{cite web |url=http://www.pap.org.sg/abt_leadership_hqexe.shtml |title=About the Leadership HQ Executive Committee|publisher=People's Action Party |access-date=10 May 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060506032823/http://www.pap.org.sg/abt_leadership_hqexe.shtml |archive-date=6 May 2006}}

The sub-committees are the following:

1. Branch Appointments and Relations
2. Constituency Relations
3. Information and Feedback
4. New Media
5. Malay Affairs
6. Membership Recruitment and Cadre Selection
7. PAP Awards
8. Political Education
9. Publicity and Publication
10. Social and Recreational
11. Women's Wing (WW)
12. Young PAP (YP)
13. PAP Seniors Group (PAP.SG)
14. PAP Policy Forum (PPF)

The Young PAP is the youth-wing of the party, serving as a youth organisation for young adults and students in Singapore who support the PAP and have an interest in politics.{{Cite book |last=Tan |first=Kenneth Paul |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YNnbx98ixNkC |title=Renaissance Singapore? Economy, Culture, and Politics: Economy, Culture, and Politics |date=1 January 2007 |publisher=NUS Press |isbn=9789971693770 |pages=162, 231–236}} The incumbent chairman of the youth-wing is Janil Puthucheary.{{cite news |date=2 December 2011 |title=People's Action Party Central Executive Committee |newspaper=People's Action Party |url=http://www.pap.org.sg/leadership.php/ |access-date=25 December 2012 |archive-date=7 July 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120707094745/http://www.pap.org.sg/leadership.php |url-status=dead }}{{Cite web |title=Chan Chun Sing is new Young PAP chairman |url=http://www.asiaone.com/print/News/Latest+News/Singapore/Story/A1Story20121214-389561.html |access-date=6 September 2017 |website=www.asiaone.com}}{{Cite news |date=9 December 2000 |title=Young PAP members: Who they are |work=Today |url=http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/today20001209-1.2.4.4 |access-date=6 September 2017}} The YP's predecessor, the PAP Youth Committee, was established in 1986, under Lee Hsien Loong's tenure as Chairman. All PAP members under the age of 35 had then been grouped under the Youth Committee. In 1993, the Youth Committee was renamed the Young PAP. In an effort to attract members, then Chairman George Yeo said that people joining the YP could take positions different from central party leadership. The age limit was raised from 35 to 40.{{cite book |last=Rodan |first=Gary |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=j2QCDIjRS2AC&dq=young+pap+singapore&pg=PA101 |title=Political oppositions in industrialising Asia |publisher=Psychology Press |year=1996 |isbn=978-0-415-14865-8 |pages=101}} Memberships are issued through the PAP branches under each constituency in Singapore.{{Cite web |title=Getting out of apathy zone |url=http://www.asiaone.com/News/AsiaOne+News/Singapore/Story/A1Story20100219-199622.html |access-date=6 September 2017 |website=www.asiaone.com}} By 2005, the committee had grown to more than 6,000 members.{{cite news |date=5 January 2008 |title=Young PAP taps S'poreans abroad |work=The New Paper |location=Singapore |url= |access-date=}} In 2010, then Vice-Chairman Zaqy Mohamad said the YP attracts over 1200 new members that year, an increase on the 1000 new members in 2009.{{Cite news |date=8 November 2010 |title=More joining Young PAP: Zaqy |work=TODAY |url=http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/today20101108-1.2.7.1 |access-date=6 September 2017}}

Since 1995, the youth-wing of the PAP has had an internet presence that aims to "correct 'misinformation' about Singapore politics or culture".{{cite magazine |date=1 July 1995 |title=Mickey Unbound |url=https://www.wired.com/1995/07/updata-41/ |url-status=live |magazine=Wired |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160210032937/https://www.wired.com/1995/07/updata-41/ |archive-date=10 February 2016 |access-date=6 November 2017}} Under the urging of then Minister for Information and the Arts George Yeo, Young PAP took charge of running several online websites to create an online presence for the party.{{Cite news |last=Chen |first=Tommi |date=14 March 1995 |title=Internet world watches as Young PAP enters cyberspace |work=The Straits Times}} After popular forum Sintercom was shut down in 2001, the Young PAP offered their own forum for moderated discussions.{{Cite news |date=24 August 2001 |title=Want to talk politics? |work=TODAY |url=http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/today20010824-1.2.2 |access-date=6 September 2017}} They have since set up various blogs and social media accounts with multimedia content to engage the masses.{{Cite news |last=Chang |first=Rachel |date=18 March 2010 |title=YP to close 2 Facebook pages |work=The Straits Times |url=http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/issue/straitstimes20100318-1 |access-date=7 September 2017}}{{Cite news |date=9 July 2008 |title=See you on Facebook |work=TODAY |url=http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/today20080709-1.2.7 |access-date=6 September 2017}}{{Cite news |last=Au-Yong |first=Rachel |date=14 May 2014 |title=PAP responds to criticisms of viral video by its youth wing |work=The Straits Times |url=http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/pap-responds-to-criticisms-of-viral-video-by-its-youth-wing |access-date=6 September 2017}}

In February 2007, it was reported by The Straits Times that the PAP's new media committee chaired by Minister Ng Eng Hen, had initiated an effort to counter critics anonymously on the Internet "as it was necessary for the PAP to have a voice on cyberspace".{{cite news |author=Li Xueying |date=3 February 2007 |title=PAP moves to counter criticism of party, Govt in cyberspace |newspaper=The Straits Times |location=Singapore}} The initiative was divided by two sub-committees, one of which was in charge of strategising the campaigns and is co-headed by Minister Lui Tuck Yew and MP Zaqy Mohamad. The other sub-committee—new media capabilities group led by MPs Baey Yam Keng and Josephine Teo executed the strategies. The initiative was set up after the 2006 general election and also included around 20 IT-savvy PAP activists.

The PAP has a long-running programme, known as 'Friends of the PAP' by which it enlists individuals and organisations to assist in promoting its political goals. In 2002, secretary-general Goh Chok Tong announced an intention to expand this programme, which at the time was primarily limited to "establishment figures" in the public and private sector. He established a related scheme titled "Young Friends of the PAP" to attract Singaporeans below the age of 40 as well and explained that the intention was to "refresh" the PAP and improve the "quality" of PAP's membership. Membership as a 'Young Friend' was by invitation only, and the group was limited to about 500 people.{{Cite news |date=3 December 2002 |title=PAP scouting for young to refresh its ranks |url=https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes20021203-1.2.27.4.3 |work=The Straits Times |pages=3}}

According to local media reports, the Friends of the PAP programme had "fallen out of the public consciousness" after 2002. However, in June 2024, the PAP revived the Friends of the PAP programme and expanded it, now with a renewed focus on local social media influencers, with the intention to connect with a wider and younger audience. The PAP did not respond to media queries about whether the Friends of the PAP programme remained invite-only or what the rules of engagement for members of the programme were.{{cite news |last=Wong |first=Pei Ting |date=22 June 2024 |title=Influencers, cause champions, businessmen: The new Friends of the PAP |url=https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/influencers-cause-champions-businessmen-the-new-friends-of-the-pap |access-date=30 June 2024 |work=The Straits Times |issn=0585-3923}}

Unlike many political parties in numerous other countries that rely on grassroots mobilisation and overt rewards for party loyalty, the People's Action Party (PAP) in Singapore adopts a highly centralised, top-down and meritocratic approach to candidate recruitment, in order to prevent nepotism, cronyism, branch stacking, entryism or any form of primary elections.{{cite news |last=Mydans |first=Seth |date=2011-04-18 |title=In Singapore, the Party in Power Offers New Faces |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/19/world/asia/19iht-singapore19.html |access-date=2025-04-30 |work=The New York Times |language=en-US |issn=0362-4331}} Rather than progressing through local branches or factional networks, prospective legislators are identified through "talent spotting" (executive search) by senior figures in government and industry.{{citation |last=Tan |first=Netina |title=Institutionalized Succession and Hegemonic Party Cohesion in Singapore |date=2014-12-29 |work=Party System Institutionalization in Asia |pages=49–73 |editor-last=Hicken |editor-first=Allen |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/CBO9781107300385A010/type/book_part |access-date=2025-04-30 |edition=1 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |doi=10.1017/cbo9781107300385.003 |isbn=978-1-107-04157-8 |editor2-last=Kuhonta |editor2-first=Erik Martinez|url-access=subscription }} This screening mechanism is designed to attract individuals with distinguished records in the civil service, the armed forces, academia, managerial executives from the private sector or non-profit sector, or professional sectors such as engineering, law, finance, mass media and health care. This unique preselection invitation system is designed to maintain the technocratic, meritocratic, realpolitik and pragmatic character of the PAP, and to avert any form of personalist dictatorships, populism and political polarization.{{cite web |title=GE2025: Singaporeans must reject populism, polarisation and post-truth politics, says PAP's Murali Pillai |url=https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/ge2025-murali-pillai-populism-jurong-east-bukit-batok-rally-pap-5094831 |access-date=2025-04-30 |website=CNA}}

Prospective candidates first emerge through recommendations by PAP activists, corporate leaders, Members of Parliament and senior civil servants. Each year, roughly one hundred individuals—many of whom have studied or worked abroad—are invited to "tea sessions" with 2–3 serving ministers, during which they engage in in-depth discussions lasting up to two and a half hours (sometimes unbeknownst initially by the interviewee, of the true intent of the tea session(s), which is an euphemism for informal prospecting interviews by the PAP, for candidacy in upcoming Singapore general elections).{{cite news |date=2025-04-18 |title=Ex-AIC chief Dinesh Vasu Dash answered two calls to serve: To fight Covid-19 and to join the PAP |url=https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/politics/ex-aic-chief-dinesh-vasu-dash-answered-two-calls-to-serve-to-fight-covid-19-and-to-join-the-pap |access-date=2025-04-30 |work=The Straits Times |issn=0585-3923}}{{cite web |title=Deep Dive GE2025 Podcast: PAP's Elysa Chen on being 'kicked into politics' and overcoming imposter syndrome |url=https://www.channelnewsasia.com/podcasts/ge2025-elysa-chen-pap-bishan-toa-payoh-deep-dive-podcast-5093841 |access-date=2025-04-30 |website=CNA}}{{cite web |title=OLEH-OLEH TEMASEK: Bila Teh Mencuit Rasa |url=https://berita.mediacorp.sg/komentar/oleh-oleh-temasek-bila-teh-mencuit-rasa-906246 |access-date=2025-04-30 |website=BERITA Mediacorp |language=ms}}{{cite web |title=Wanna be a PAP MP? He is the Minister to drink tea with. |url=https://mothership.sg/2015/12/wanna-be-a-pap-mp-he-is-the-minister-to-drink-tea-with/ |access-date=2025-04-30 |website=mothership.sg}} Those shortlisted then face two formal interviews conducted by a high-level panel at party headquarters; successful interviewees meet again with ministers, though final approval rests with the Central Executive Committee (CEC) before the successful interviewees are "invited to join politics".{{cite web |last=Administrator |date=2025-04-09 |title=Oh, for the good old days? • Michael Barr |url=https://insidestory.org.au/oh-for-the-good-old-days/ |access-date=2025-04-30 |website=Inside Story}} In the lead-up to an election, approved candidates are assigned to shadow incumbent MPs, and they receive training in public speaking and media communications.

Furthermore, a small number of recruits—typically five or six per electoral cycle—are selected for additional psychological assessment based on a Shell-Oil-developed appraisal system. These candidates undergo a day-and-a-half examination of more than 1,000 questions to evaluate their personality and disposition, and are then earmarked as potential ministerial talent. While the PAP presents this elaborate, multi-stage process as a means of upholding "meritocracy" by choosing the "best man or woman for the job", critics argue that the heavy reliance on elite networks and professional pedigrees renders the system fundamentally elitist and prone to groupthink rather than genuinely open to wider society, especially the working class who may share a different socioeconomic environment and resulting worldview.

Although only a fraction of prospective short-listed candidates are selected to represent the party at general elections, not everyone invited to join the PAP's candidate pipeline accepts the offer from the PAP. Many decline for personal or professional reasons—some encounter employer restrictions, others face familial opposition or simply feel that politics is not for them. Likewise, when it comes to retaining serving PAP MPs in Singapore, despite the elevated salaries for ministers and Members of Parliament in Singapore, a small number also choose not to seek re-election or step aside before any given election, citing similar personal, family, lifestyle or career considerations.{{cite web |title=Have you had tea yet? A recent chat with an old friend at Our Tampines… {{!}} Chairul Fahmy H. |url=https://www.linkedin.com/posts/chairulfahmy_have-you-had-tea-yet-a-recent-chat-with-activity-7284061385867632642-iBD-/ |access-date=2025-04-30 |website=www.linkedin.com}}{{cite web |date=2025-04-22 |title=Singapore election 2025: Nee Soon MPs Louis Ng, Carrie Tan and Derrick Goh to step down from politics |url=https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/singapore/ge2025-nee-soon-mps-louis-ng-carrie-tan-and-derrick-goh-step-down-politics |access-date=2025-04-30 |website=The Business Times}}{{cite web |title=GE2025: Five one-term MPs step down as PAP seeks refreshed team, highest number in recent polls |url=https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/ge2025-one-term-mps-pap-refreshed-team-5086026 |access-date=2025-04-30 |website=CNA}}

Professor Hussin Mutalib from the National University of Singapore (NUS) opines that the PAP has often set forth the idea of Asian democracy and values, drawing from a notion of Asian culture and Confucianism to construct ideological bulwarks against Western democracy. He added that for founding prime minister Lee Kuan Yew, "Singapore would be better off without Western-style liberal democracy".{{cite book|author=Hussin Mutalib|year=2004|title=Parties and Politics. A Study of Opposition Parties and the PAP in Singapore|publisher=Marshall Cavendish Adademic|isbn=981-210-408-9|page=20}}

Consequently, the governance of the PAP has occasionally been characterised by some observers, especially in the West, as semi-authoritarian by liberal democratic standards or having turned Singapore into a nanny state.{{cite journal |last1=Tan |first1=Kenneth Paul |date=2007 |title=Singapore's National Day Rally speech: A site of ideological negotiation |journal=Journal of Contemporary Asia |volume=37 |issue=3 |pages=292–308 |doi=10.1080/00472330701408635 |s2cid=145405958}} According to Professor Kenneth Paul Tan from the NUS, the PAP proclaim that many Singaporeans continue to vote for the party as economic considerations, pragmatism and stability triumph over accountability and checks and balances by opposition parties.

{{see also|Government of Singapore Investment Corporation|Temasek Holdings}}

The party economic ideology has always accepted the need for some welfare spending and for pragmatic economic interventionism. However, free-market policies have been popular since the 1980s as part of the wider implementation of a meritocracy in civil society, and Singapore frequently ranks extremely highly on indices of economic freedom published by economically liberal organisations such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. Singapore is also the only Asian country with the top AAA sovereign rating from the "Big Three" credit rating agencies of S&P, Moody's and Fitch.{{citation needed|date=April 2025}}

Lee Kuan Yew said in 1992: "Through Hong Kong watching, I concluded that state welfare and subsidies blunted the individual's drive to succeed. I watched with amazement the ease with which Hong Kong workers adjusted their salaries upwards in boom times and downwards in recessions. I resolved to reverse course on the welfare policies which my party had inherited or copied from British Labour Party policies".{{cite web |url=http://www.nzbr.org.nz/documents/speeches/speeches-99/optimism_for_the_new-millennium.doc.htm |title=Optimism for the New Millennium. |date=9 December 1999 |access-date=10 May 2006 |publisher=Rotary Club of Wellington North |author=Roger Kerr |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060307184005/http://www.nzbr.org.nz/documents/speeches/speeches-99/optimism_for_the_new-millennium.doc.htm |archive-date=7 March 2006}}

Notably, since Singapore's independence in 1965, the party has also supported the creation of state-owned enterprises, known within Singapore as Government-linked Corporations (GLCs), in order to jumpstart industrialisation, spearhead economic development and lead to economic growth (primarily job creation) in various sectors of the Singaporean economy as there was a lack of private sector funds and expertise, particularly in the early years of nationhood. Various GLCs were formed to pursue strategic sectors such as in ship building and repair (Sembcorp Marine, Keppel Corporation), aviation and defence (Singapore Airlines, ST Engineering), telecommunications (Singtel), real estate (CapitaLand) and development finance (DBS Bank) amongst others. In addition, various GLCs were set up as private-public partnerships, notable as joint ventures or strategic alliances with foreign companies or investors with relevant expertise, particularly in the petrochemicals and oil refining industries.{{cite web |last1=Ling |first1=Hui Tan |last2=D. Ramirez |first2=Carlos |title=Singapore, Inc. Versus the Private Sector: Are Government-Linked Companies Different? |url=https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2003/wp03156.pdf |website=imf.org |publisher=International Monetary Fund |access-date=8 January 2024 |date=July 2003}}

Since the early years of the PAP's rule, the idea of survival as a small and vulnerable country with hostile neighbours has been a central theme of Singaporean politics. According to Diane Mauzy and R. S. Milne, most analysts of Singapore have discerned four major ideologies of the PAP, namely pragmatism, meritocracy, multiracialism and Asian values/communitarianism.{{Cite book|author=Christopher Tremewan|year=1996|title=The Political Economy of Social Control in Singapore (St. Anthony's Series)|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan|isbn=978-0-312-15865-1|page=105}} The PAP also advocates nationalism not based on ethnocentrism, encouraging a united Singaporean identity while also recognising the main ethnic groups that make up the country.

In January 1989, then President Wee Kim Wee in his opening address to the 7th Parliament of Singapore stated that Singapore must adopt a set of shared national values. He was of the view that a national ideology was useful to bond Singaporeans together by preserving the cultural heritage of the core communities of Singapore, and upholding certain common values that would capture the essence of being a Singaporean.{{cite web |last=Tin Seng |first=Lim |title=Shared Values |url=https://www.nlb.gov.sg/main/article-detail?cmsuuid=194d7f99-c8b6-408e-86cf-8ebfb8547d28 |website=www.nlb.gov.sg |publisher=National Library Board |access-date=8 January 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240108063620/https://www.nlb.gov.sg/main/article-detail?cmsuuid=194d7f99-c8b6-408e-86cf-8ebfb8547d28 |archive-date=8 January 2024}} In response, the government set up a committee as a follow-up to Wee's proposal, and in January 1991, the PAP formally introduced a white paper on "Shared Values" for the country, which consists of five national values to forge a national identity. These values were: nation before community and society above self; family as the basic unit of society; regard and community support for the individual; consensus instead of contention, and racial and religious harmony. They were also set as a contrast against the "more Westernised, individualistic, and self-centred outlook on life" and to uphold the "traditional Asian ideas of morality, duty and society".

At an Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) dialogue held on 2 July 2015 and chaired by Fareed Zakaria, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong spoke about the need to maintain a Jeffersonian natural aristocracy in the system to instill a culture of respect and to avoid anarchy.{{cite web |title=Transcript of Dialogue with Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong at the SG50+ Conference on 2 July 2015 |url=https://www.pmo.gov.sg/Newsroom/transcript-dialogue-prime-minister-lee-hsien-loong-sg50-conference-2-july-2015 |work=Prime Minister's Office |access-date=8 January 2024 |date=27 December 2018}}{{cite news |url=https://www.economist.com/china/2015/09/03/unnatural-aristocrats|title=Unnatural aristocrats|newspaper=The Economist|access-date=28 July 2018 |archive-date=28 July 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180728201035/https://www.economist.com/china/2015/09/03/unnatural-aristocrats|url-status=live}} In November 2019, Lee stated at a party convention that the PAP must not allow the "disconnect between the masses and the elite seen in other countries to take root in Singapore".{{cite web |last=Tee |first=Zhuo |title=PAP must not allow split between masses and elite to take root, says PM Lee Hsien Loong |url=https://www.straitstimes.com/politics/pap-convention-pap-must-not-allow-split-between-masses-and-elite-to-take-root-says-pm-lee |website=The Straits Times |access-date=8 January 2024 |date=10 November 2019}} During the election campaign in July 2020, Lee's estranged brother over 38 Oxley Road, Lee Hsien Yang, accused the PAP of elitism as one of his explanations of joining the Progress Singapore Party (PSP).{{cite web |author=Faris Mokhtar |title=Singapore election: Lee Hsien Yang says PAP blind to 'real anger' |url=https://www.scmp.com/news/asia/southeast-asia/article/3092211/singapore-election-pms-brother-lee-hsien-yang-says-pap |website=South China Morning Post |publisher=Bloomberg |access-date=8 January 2024 |date=7 July 2020}} In a 2024 interview, Lee Hsien Loong criticised "wokeness", claiming that it "causes life to be burdensome" and saying that "he did not want Singapore to go in that direction".{{cite web |author=Anthony Chia |date=16 May 2024 |title=PM Lee Hsien Loong's Interview with Local Media – Section 3: Social Safety Nets and Social Cohesion (May 2024) |url=https://www.pmo.gov.sg/Newsroom/PM-Lee-Hsien-Loong-English-Interview-Social-Safety-Nets-and-Social-Cohesion-May-2024 |access-date=21 February 2025 |website=Prime Minister's Office Singapore}}

Particularly during the climate of the Cold War, the party was openly hostile to communist or left-wing political ideologies despite a brief joint alliance with the pro-labour co-founders of the PAP during the party's early years, who were eventually accused of being communists and arrested. Nevertheless, Singapore formally joined the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) in 1970 and did not openly align with the Capitalist Bloc. In 1987, as part of Operation Spectrum, the PAP government arrested various individuals under accusations of plotting to overthrow the government and to establish a communist state. Since the 2010s, the party while remaining largely conservative was seen by some observers as to have adopted a more centre-left tack in certain areas in order to remain electorally dominant.{{cite news|last1=Azhar|first1=Saeed|last2=Chalmers|first2=John|title=Singapore's rulers hope a nudge to the left will keep voters loyal|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-singapore-election/singapores-rulers-hope-a-nudge-to-the-left-will-keep-voters-loyal-idUSKCN0R60XS20150906|access-date=21 November 2017|work=Reuters|date=6 September 2015|archive-date=1 December 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171201034259/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-singapore-election/singapores-rulers-hope-a-nudge-to-the-left-will-keep-voters-loyal-idUSKCN0R60XS20150906|url-status=live}}

The socialism practised by the PAP during its first few decades in power was of a pragmatic kind as characterised by the party's rejection of nationalisation. According to Chan Heng Chee, by the late 1970s the intellectual credo of the government rested explicitly upon a philosophy of self-reliance, similar to the rugged individualism of the American brand of capitalism. Despite this, the PAP still claimed to be a socialist party, pointing out its regulation of the private sector, activist intervention in the economy and social policies as evidence of this.Driven by Growth: Political Change in the Asia-Pacific Region edited by James W. Morley In 1976, the PAP formally resigned from the Socialist International (SI) after the Dutch Labour Party had initially proposed to expel the PAP on allegations of indefinite detention of political prisoners, alluding to Chia Thye Poh.{{cite web|title=PAP bows out of Socialist International |url=http://www.wp.org.sg/news/news_articles/pap_socialistint.htm |publisher=Workers' Party of Singapore |date=June 1976 |access-date=4 October 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070917160621/http://www.wp.org.sg/news/news_articles/pap_socialistint.htm |archive-date=17 September 2007}}{{cite news |date=1 June 1976 |title=Main Singapore Party Quits The Socialist International |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1976/06/01/archives/main-singapore-party-quits-the-socialist-international.html |access-date=12 March 2023 |issn=0362-4331}}

The PAP symbol, which is a red flash and blue circle on white, stands for action inside multicultural unity. It also appears on party flags on parades. PAP members at party rallies have customarily worn a uniform of white shirts and white trousers which symbolises incorruptibility and purity of the party's ideologies of the government.{{cite web |title=Our Party |url=https://www.pap.org.sg/our-party/ |website=People's Action Party |access-date=8 November 2021}} Lee Kuan Yew acknowledged that the Flash and Circle was adopted from the British Union of Fascists, but that the colors where changed to better represent the PAP.{{cite news |last=Burton |first=John |date=7 May 2006 |title=Observer from Singapore |url=https://www.ft.com/content/297c2b22-ddee-11da-af29-0000779e2340 |work=Financial Times |location=London |access-date=3 November 2023}}

; Legislative Assembly

; Parliament

{{div col|colwidth=25em}}

• PAP Community Foundation
• Party Whip of the People's Action Party
• Politics of Singapore
• List of political parties in Singapore

{{div col end}}

{{Reflist}}

{{notelist}}

; Books

{{refbegin}}

• Goh, Cheng Teik (1994). Malaysia: Beyond Communal Politics. Pelanduk Publications. {{ISBN|967-978-475-4}}.
• {{cite book |last1=Yap |first1=Sonny |last2=Lim |first2=Richard |last3=Leong |first3=Weng K. |author-link= |year=2010 |title=Men in White: The Untold Story of Singapore's Ruling Political Party |publisher=Straits Times Press |isbn=9789814266512 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Bb2SQQAACAAJ}}
• {{cite book |last=Jayakumar |first=Shashi |year=2021 |title=A History of the People's Action Party, 1985-2021 |publisher=NUS Press |isbn=9789813251281 |url= }}

{{refend}}

; Online sources

{{refbegin}}

• [http://www.country-data.com/cgi-bin/query/r-11798.html "Singapore – People's Action Party"] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051210021209/http://www.country-data.com/cgi-bin/query/r-11798.html |date=10 December 2005}}. Country Studies Series by the Federal Research Division of the Library of Congress. Retrieved 15 July 2020.

{{refend}}

{{Sister project links|display=People's Action Party|d=Q371395|voy=no|m=no|mw=no|species=no|n=People's Action Party|v=no}}

{{scholia}}

{{Library resources box|onlinebooks=no|by=yes}}

• {{URL|https://www.pap.org.sg/}}

{{Portal bar|Conservatism|Politics|Singapore}}

{{Singaporean political parties}}

{{Authority control}}

Category:Political parties in Asia

Category:Political parties established in 1954

Category:Politics of Singapore

Category:1954 establishments in Singapore

Category:Conservative parties in Asia

Category:Conservative parties in Singapore

Category:Conservative parties in Southeast Asia

Category:Socially conservative parties

Category:Anti-communist parties