Rust Belt

{{short description|Region in the U.S. affected by industrial decline}}

File:Bethlehem Steel (1).JPG in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, one of the largest steel manufacturers for most of the 20th century until it abruptly discontinued most of its manufacturing in 1982, and later declared bankruptcy and dissolved]]

The Rust Belt, formerly the Steel Belt or Factory Belt, is an area of the United States that underwent substantial industrial decline in the late 20th century. The region is centered in the Great Lakes and Mid Atlantic regions of the United States. Common definitions of the Rust Belt include Ohio, Indiana, Northern Illinois, southeastern Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Upstate New York. Some broader geographic definitions of the region include parts of Central Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, and West Virginia.

Between the late 19th century and late 20th century, the Rust Belt formed the industrial heartland of the country, and its economies were largely based on iron and steel, automobile production, coal mining, and the processing of raw materials. The term "Rust Belt", derived from the substance rust, refers to the socially corrosive effects of economic decline, population loss, and urban decay attributable to deindustrialization. The term gained popularity in the U.S. beginning in the 1980s,Crandall, Robert W. The Continuing Decline of Manufacturing in the Rust Belt. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1993. when it was commonly contrasted with the Sun Belt, whose economy was then thriving.

The Rust Belt experienced industrial decline beginning in the 1950s and 1960s,{{cite web | url=https://www.minneapolisfed.org/article/2014/competition-and-the-decline-of-the-rust-belt#:~:text=The%20Rust%20Belt%20was%20an,Belt%20began%20a%20long%20downturn | title=Competition and the Decline of the Rust Belt | Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis | access-date=October 11, 2022 | archive-date=October 11, 2022 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221011194907/https://www.minneapolisfed.org/article/2014/competition-and-the-decline-of-the-rust-belt#:~:text=The%20Rust%20Belt%20was%20an,Belt%20began%20a%20long%20downturn | url-status=live }} with manufacturing peaking as a percentage of U.S. GDP in 1953 and declining incrementally in subsequent years and especially in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Demand for coal declined as industry turned to oil and natural gas, and U.S. steel was undercut by competition from Germany and Japan. High labor costs in the Rust Belt were also a factor in encouraging the region's heavy manufacturing companies to relocate to the Sun Belt or overseas or to discontinue entirely. The U.S. automotive industry also declined as consumers turned to fuel-efficient foreign-manufactured vehicles after the 1973 oil crisis raised the cost of gasoline and foreign auto manufacturers began opening factories in the U.S., which were largely not strongly unionized like the U.S. auto manufacturers in the Rust Belt. Families moved away from Rust Belt communities, leaving cities with falling tax revenues, declining infrastructure, and abandoned buildings. Major Rust Belt cities include Baltimore, Buffalo, Chicago, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Detroit, Milwaukee, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Rochester, and St. Louis.{{cite web | url=https://www.thoughtco.com/rust-belt-industrial-heartland-of-the-united-states-1435759#:~:text=Bordering%20lands%20include%20parts%20of,Buffalo%2C%20Cleveland%2C%20and%20Detroit. | title=The Rust Belt is the Industrial Heartland of the United States | access-date=July 25, 2024 | archive-date=June 19, 2024 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240619122705/https://www.thoughtco.com/rust-belt-industrial-heartland-of-the-united-states-1435759#:~:text=Bordering%20lands%20include%20parts%20of,Buffalo%2C%20Cleveland%2C%20and%20Detroit. | url-status=live }} New England was also hit hard by industrial decline, but cities closer to the East Coast, including in the metropolitan areas of Boston, New York, and Washington, D.C. were able to adapt by diversifying or transforming their economies, shifting to services, advanced manufacturing, and high-tech industries.David Koistinen, Confronting Decline: The Political Economy of Deindustrialization in Twentieth-Century New England (2013)

Since the 1980s, presidential candidates have devoted much of their time to the economic concerns of the Rust Belt region, which includes several populous swing states, including Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. These states were crucial to Republican Donald Trump's victories in the 2016 and 2024 presidential elections and the losses by Democrats Hillary Clinton in 2016 and Kamala Harris in 2024.{{cite journal|title=The revolt of the Rust Belt: place and politics in the age of anger|journal=The British Journal of Sociology|volume=68|issue=S1|pages=S120–S152|author=Michael McQuarrie|date=November 8, 2017|doi=10.1111/1468-4446.12328|pmid=29114874|s2cid=26010609 |doi-access=free}}

Background

File:Total mfctrg jobs change 54-02.png are from 1958 to 2002):

{{Legend|#00F020|>62% gain|size=60%}}]]

In the 20th century, local economies in these states specialized in large-scale manufacturing of finished medium to heavy industrial and consumer products, and the transportation and processing of the raw materials required for heavy industry.Teaford, Jon C. Cities of the Heartland: The Rise and Fall of the Industrial Midwest. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1993. The area was referred to as the Manufacturing Belt,Meyer, David R. 1989. "Midwestern Industrialization and the American Manufacturing Belt in the Nineteenth Century." Journal of Economic History 49(4):921–937. Factory Belt, or Steel Belt as distinct from the agricultural Midwestern states forming the so-called Corn Belt and Great Plains states that are often called the "breadbasket of America".{{cite web|url=http://www.learner.org/interactives/historymap/fifty3.html|title=Interactives . United States History Map. Fifty States|website=www.learner.org|access-date=June 7, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170404164131/https://www.learner.org/interactives/historymap/fifty3.html|archive-date=April 4, 2017|url-status=dead}}

The flourishing industrial manufacturing in the region was caused in part by the proximity to the Great Lakes waterways, and abundance of paved roads, water canals, and railroads. After the transportation infrastructure linked the iron ore found in the so-called Iron Range of northern Minnesota, Wisconsin and Upper Michigan with the coking coal mined from the Appalachian Basin in Western Pennsylvania and Western Virginia, the Steel Belt was born. Soon it developed into the Factory Belt with its manufacturing cities: Chicago, Buffalo, Detroit, Milwaukee, Cincinnati, Toledo, Cleveland, St. Louis, Youngstown, and Pittsburgh, among others. This region for decades served as a magnet for immigrants from Austria-Hungary, Poland, and Russia, as well as Yugoslavia, Italy, and the Levant in some areas, who provided the industrial facilities with inexpensive labor., McClelland, Ted. Nothin' but Blue Skies: The Heyday, Hard Times, and Hopes of America's Industrial Heartland. New York: Bloomsbury Press, 2013. These migrants drawn by labor were also accompanied by African Americans during the Great Migration who were drawn by jobs and better economic opportunity.

[[File:Per capita personal income change in metropolitan counties, 1980-2002.png|thumb|The change in per capita personal income in metropolitan counties relative to average U.S. metropolitan areas between 1980 and 2002:

{{Legend|Green|income above avg., growth faster than avg.|size=60%}}

{{Legend|Lime|income above avg., growth avg. or below avg.|size=60%}}

{{Legend|Pink|income below avg., growth faster than avg.|size=60%}}

{{Legend|red|income below avg., growth avg. or below avg.|size=60%}}

{{Legend|maroon|income below avg. and further decreasing|size=60%}}]]

Following several "boom" periods from the late-19th to the mid-20th century, cities in this area struggled to adapt to a variety of adverse economic and social conditions. From 1979 to 1982, known as the Volcker shock,{{cite web | last=Wolf | first=Zachary B. | title=This kind of shock to the economy will have consequences | website=CNN | date=July 27, 2022 | url=https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/27/politics/fed-interest-rate-volcker-what-matters/index.html | access-date=October 3, 2023 | archive-date=October 15, 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231015094745/https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/27/politics/fed-interest-rate-volcker-what-matters/index.html | url-status=live }}{{cite web | title=Volcker Shock: key economic indicators 1979-1987 | website=Statista | date=October 10, 2022 | url=https://www.statista.com/statistics/1338105/volcker-shock-interest-rates-unemployment-inflation/ | access-date=October 3, 2023 | archive-date=October 15, 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231015094746/https://www.statista.com/statistics/1338105/volcker-shock-interest-rates-unemployment-inflation/ | url-status=live }} the U.S. Federal Reserve decided to raise the base interest rate in the United States to 19%. High-interest rates attracted wealthy foreign "hot money" into U.S. banks and caused the U.S. dollar to appreciate. This made U.S. products more expensive for foreigners to buy and also made imports much cheaper for Americans to purchase. The misaligned exchange rate was not rectified until 1986, by which time Japanese imports, in particular, had made rapid inroads into U.S. markets.{{Cite magazine |author=Marie Christine Duggan |year=2017 |title=Deindustrialization in the Granite State: What Keene, New Hampshire Can Tell Us About the Roles of Monetary Policy and Financialization in the Loss of US Manufacturing Jobs |url=https://www.academia.edu/35530846 |magazine=Dollars & Sense |issue=November/December 2017 |access-date=March 12, 2018 |archive-date=December 24, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211224173113/https://www.academia.edu/35530846 |url-status=live }}

From 1987 to 1999, the U.S. stock market went into a stratospheric rise, and this continued to pull wealthy foreign money into U.S. banks, which biased the exchange rate against manufactured goods. Related issues include the decline of the iron and steel industry, the movement of manufacturing to the southeastern states with their lower labor costs,{{Cite web |author=Alder |first1=Simeon |last2=Lagakos |first2=David |last3=Ohanian |first3=Lee |year=2012 |title=The Decline of the US Rust Belt: A Macroeconomic Analysis |url=http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/workshops/macro/TheDeclineoftheU.S.RustBelt.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203001109/http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/workshops/macro/TheDeclineoftheU.S.RustBelt.pdf |archive-date=December 3, 2013}} the layoffs due to the rise of automation in industrial processes, the decreased need for labor in making steel products, new organizational methods such as just-in-time manufacturing which allowed factories to maintain production with fewer workers, the internationalization of American business, and the liberalization of foreign trade policies due to globalization.High, Steven C. Industrial Sunset: The Making of North America's Rust Belt, 1969–1984. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2003. Cities struggling with these conditions shared several difficulties, including population loss, lack of education, declining tax revenues, high unemployment and crime, drugs, swelling welfare rolls, deficit spending, and poor municipal credit ratings.Jargowsky, Paul A. Poverty and Place: Ghettos, Barrios, and the American City. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1997.Hagedorn, John M., and Perry Macon. People and Folks: Gangs, Crime and the Underclass in a Rustbelt City. Lake View Press, Chicago, IL, (paperback: {{ISBN|0-941702-21-9}}; clothbound: {{ISBN|0-941702-20-0}}), 1988."Rust Belt Woes: Steel out, drugs in," The Northwest Florida Daily News, January 16, 2008. [http://www.pcnh-d.net/archives/2008/DailyNews/2008_Jan_16/a2.pdf PDF] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160406142300/http://www.pcnh-d.net/archives/2008/DailyNews/2008_Jan_16/a2.pdf |date=April 6, 2016 }}Beeson, Patricia E. "Sources of the decline of manufacturing in large metropolitan areas." Journal of Urban Economics 28, no. 1 (1990): 71–86.Higgins, James Jeffrey. Images of the Rust Belt. Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press, 1999.

Geography

{{See also|Regional economics | Economic history of the United States}}

File:Emerging US megaregions with cities labeled.png shown in {{Background color|#e7931d|orange}}, part of the Rust Belt]]

File:Sectors of US Economy as Percent of GDP 1947-2009.png between 1947 and 2009{{cite web|title=Who Makes It?|url=http://www.63alfred.com/whomakesit/|access-date=November 28, 2011|archive-date=September 20, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190920130607/http://www.63alfred.com/whomakesit/|url-status=live}}]]

Since the term "Rust Belt" is used to refer to a set of economic and social conditions rather than to an overall geographical region of the U.S., the Rust Belt has no precise boundaries. The extent to which a community may have been described as a "Rust Belt city" depends on how great a role industrial manufacturing played in its local economy in the past and how it does now, as well as on perceptions of the economic viability and living standards of the present day.{{citation needed|date=November 2020}}

News media occasionally refer to a patchwork of defunct centers of heavy industry and manufacturing across the Great Lakes and Midwestern United States as the snow belt,{{cite news|title= Sun On The Snow Belt (editorial)|url= https://www.chicagotribune.com/1985/08/25/sun-on-the-snow-belt/|access-date= September 22, 2011|newspaper= Chicago Tribune|date= August 25, 1985|quote= The Northern states, once the foundry of the nation, are known now as the Rust Belt or the Snow Belt, in invidious comparison to the supposedly booming Sun Belt.|archive-date= September 22, 2024|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20240922205015/https://www.chicagotribune.com/1985/08/25/sun-on-the-snow-belt/|url-status= live}} the manufacturing belt, or the factory belt because of their vibrant industrial economies in the past. This includes most of the cities of the Midwest as far west as the Mississippi River, including St. Louis, and many of those in the Great Lakes and Northern New York.{{Cite book |last=Neumann |first=Tracy |title=Remaking the Rust Belt |publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press |year=2016 |isbn=9780812292893 |language=English}} At the center of this expanse lies an area stretching from northern Indiana and southern Michigan in the west to Upstate New York in the east, where local tax revenues {{as of | 2004 | lc = on}} relied more heavily on manufacturing than on any other sector.{{cite web|title= Measuring Rurality: 2004 County Typology Codes|url= http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/Rurality/Typology/maps/Manufacturing.htm|publisher= USDA Economic Research Service|access-date= September 21, 2011|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20110914001620/http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/Rurality/Typology/maps/Manufacturing.htm|archive-date= September 14, 2011|url-status= dead}}Garreau, Joel. The Nine Nations of North America. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1981.

Prior to World War II, cities in the Rust Belt region were among the largest in the U.S. However, by the end of the 20th century, their population had fallen the most in the country.{{cite news

|last= Hansen

|first= Jeff

|title= Which Way Forward?

|url= http://blog.al.com/bn/2007/03/which_way_forward.html

|access-date= September 21, 2011

|newspaper= The Birmingham News

|date= March 10, 2007

|display-authors= etal

|archive-date= March 4, 2012

|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20120304062746/http://blog.al.com/bn/2007/03/which_way_forward.html

|url-status= live

}}

History

File:US Net International Investment Position.png (NIIP) has caused concern among economists over the effects of outsourcing and high U.S. trade deficits over the long-run.]]

File:Cargill S Superior elevator.jpg in Buffalo, New York]]

File:Fisher Body plant 21.jpg plant in Detroit]]

File:The disused Huber coal breaker in Ashley, Pennsylvania.jpg in Ashley, Pennsylvania, one of the largest anthracite coal breakers in North America; opened in the 1930s and closed in the 1970s.]]

The linking of the former Northwest Territory with the once-rapidly industrializing East Coast was effected through several large-scale infrastructural projects, most notably the Erie Canal in 1825, the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad in 1830, the Allegheny Portage Railroad in 1834, and the consolidation of the New York Central Railroad following the end of the American Civil War in 1875. A gate was opened between a variety of burgeoning industries on the interior North American continent and the markets of large East Coast cities and Western Europe.{{cite book|last=Kunstler|first=James Howard|title=Home From Nowhere: Remaking Our Everyday World for the 21st Century|year=1996|publisher=Touchstone/Simon and Schuster|location=New York|isbn=978-0-684-83737-6}}

Coal, iron ore, and other raw materials were shipped in from surrounding regions which emerged as major ports on the Great Lakes and served as transportation hubs for the region with proximity to railroad lines. Coming in the other direction were millions of European immigrants, who populated the cities along the Great Lakes shores with then-unprecedented speed. Chicago was a rural trading post in the 1840s but grew to be as big as Paris by the time of the 1893 Columbian Exposition.

Early signs of the difficulty in the northern states were evident early in the 20th century before the "boom years" were even over. Lowell, Massachusetts, once the center of textile production in the U.S., was described in the magazine Harper's as a "depressed industrial desert" as early as 1931,{{cite news|last=Marion|first=Paul|title=Timeline of Lowell History From the 1600s to 2009|newspaper=Yankee Magazine|date=November 2009|url=http://www.yankeemagazine.com/article/features/lowell-timeline/2|access-date=December 27, 2015|archive-date=March 4, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304113029/http://www.yankeemagazine.com/article/features/lowell-timeline/2|url-status=dead}} as its textile concerns were being uprooted and sent southward, primarily to the Carolinas.

In the first half of the 20th century, the Great Depression followed by American entry into World War II was followed by a rapid return to economic growth, during which much of the industrial North reached its peak population and industrial output.

The northern cities experienced changes that followed the end of World War II, with the onset of the outward migration of residents to newer suburban communities,{{cite web|title=1990 Population and Maximum Decennial Census Population of Urban Places Ever Among the 100 Largest Urban Places, Listed Alphabetically by State: 1790–1990|url=https://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0027/tab23.txt|publisher=United States Bureau of the Census|access-date=September 22, 2011|archive-date=July 18, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180718120116/https://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0027/tab23.txt|url-status=live}} and the declining role of manufacturing in the American economy.

Outsourcing of manufacturing jobs in tradeable goods has been an important issue in the region. One source has been globalization and the expansion of worldwide free trade agreements. Anti-globalization groups argue that trade with developing countries has resulted in stiff competition from countries such as China which pegs its currency to the dollar and has much lower prevailing wages, forcing domestic wages to drift downward. Some economists are concerned that long-run effects of high trade deficits and outsourcing are a cause of economic problems in the U.S.Hira, Ron, and Anil Hira with foreword by Lou Dobbs, (May 2005). Outsourcing America: What's Behind Our National Crisis and How We Can Reclaim American Jobs. (AMACOM) American Management Association. Citing Paul Craig Roberts, Paul Samuelson, and Lou Dobbs, pp. 36–38. with high external debt (amount owed to foreign lenders) and a serious deterioration in the United States net international investment position (NIIP) (−24% of GDP).Bivens, L. Josh (December 14, 2004). [http://www.epinet.org/Issuebriefs/203/ib203.pdf Debt and the dollar] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041217041437/http://www.epinet.org/Issuebriefs/203/ib203.pdf |date=December 17, 2004 }} Economic Policy Institute. Retrieved on June 28, 2009.Cauchon, Dennis, and John Waggoner (October 3, 2004).[https://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2004-10-03-debt-cover_x.htm The Looming National Benefit Crisis] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120929042412/https://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2004-10-03-debt-cover_x.htm |date=September 29, 2012 }}. USA Today.{{cite book |author=Phillips, Kevin |year=2007 |title=Bad Money: Reckless Finance, Failed Politics, and the Global Crisis of American Capitalism|publisher=Penguin |isbn=978-0-14-314328-4}}

Some economists contend that the U.S. is borrowing to fund consumption of imports while accumulating unsustainable amounts of debt. On June 26, 2009, Jeff Immelt, CEO of General Electric, called for the U.S. to increase its manufacturing base employment to 20% of the workforce, commenting that the U.S. has outsourced too much in some areas and can no longer rely on the financial sector and consumer spending to drive demand.Bailey, David and Soyoung Kim (June 26, 2009).[https://www.theguardian.com/business/feedarticle/8578904 GE's Immelt says the U.S. economy needs industrial renewal] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150611181851/http://www.theguardian.com/business/feedarticle/8578904 |date=June 11, 2015 }}.UK Guardian.. Retrieved on June 28, 2009.

Since the 1960s, the expansion of worldwide free trade agreements have been less favorable to U.S. workers. Imported goods such as steel cost much less to produce in Third World countries with cheap foreign labor (see steel crisis). The introduction of pollution regulation in the late 1960's, combined with rapidly increasing U.S. energy costs (see 1970s energy crisis) caused much U.S. heavy industry to begin moving to other countries. Beginning with the recession of 1970–71, a new pattern of deindustrializing economy emerged. Competitive devaluation combined with each successive downturn saw traditional U.S. manufacturing workers experiencing lay-offs. In general, in the Factory Belt employment in the manufacturing sector declined by 32.9% between 1969 and 1996.Kahn, Matthew E. "The silver lining of rust belt manufacturing decline." Journal of Urban Economics 46, no. 3 (1999): 360–376.

Wealth-producing primary and secondary sector jobs such as those in manufacturing and computer software were often replaced by much-lower-paying wealth-consuming jobs such as those in retail and government in the service sector when the economy recovered.David Friedman (Senior Fellow at the New America Foundation). [https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2002-jun-16-op-friedman-story.html No Light at the End of the Tunnel] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230921112800/https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2002-jun-16-op-friedman-story.html |date=September 21, 2023 }}, Los Angeles Times, June 16, 2002.

In 1984, an incremental expansion of the U.S. trade deficit with China began combined with growing trade deficits with Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. As a result, the traditional manufacturing workers in the region have experienced economic upheaval. This effect has devastated government budgets across the U.S. and increased corporate borrowing to fund retiree benefits. Some economists believe that GDP and employment can be dragged down by large long-run trade deficits.

Free trade, deindustrialization and wage deflation

File:U.S. Trade Balance (1895–2015) and Trade Policies.png

File:Real Income Gains in the Global Population.png

In early 2017, Joseph Stiglitz wrote that "the American middle class is indeed the loser of globalization or free trade" (the diminution of international trade regulations as well as tariffs, taxes) and "China, with its large emerging middle class, is among the big beneficiaries of globalization". "Thanks to globalization, in terms of purchasing-power parity, China actually has already become the largest economy in the world in September 2015".{{cite web|url=https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/02/donald-trump-china-economics-trade|title=Trump's Most Chilling Economic Lie|first=Joseph E.|last=Stiglitz|website=Vanity Fair|date=17 February 2017}}

Studies by David Autor, David Dorn and Gordon Hanson show that free trade with China cost Americans around one million manufacturing workers between 1991 and 2007.Competition from Chinese imports has led to manufacturing job losses and declining wages. They also found that offsetting job gains in other industries never materialized. Closed companies no longer order goods and services from local non-manufacturing firms and former industrial workers may be unemployed for years or permanently. Increased import exposure reduces wages in the non-manufacturing sector due to lower demand for non-manufacturing goods and increased labor supply from workers who have lost their manufacturing jobs. Other work by this team of economists, with Daron Acemoglu and Brendan Price, estimates that competition from Chinese imports cost the U.S. as many as 2.4 million jobs in total between 1999 and 2011.{{Cite journal |last1=Autor |first1=David H. |last2=Dorn |first2=David |last3=Hanson |first3=Gordon H. |date=October 2013 |title=The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States |url=https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.103.6.2121 |journal=American Economic Review |language=en |volume=103 |issue=6 |pages=2121–2168 |doi=10.1257/aer.103.6.2121 |issn=0002-8282|hdl=10419/69398 |hdl-access=free }}{{Cite journal |last1=Acemoglu |first1=Daron |last2=Autor |first2=David |last3=Dorn |first3=David |last4=Hanson |first4=Gordon H. |last5=Price |first5=Brendan |date=January 2016 |title=Import Competition and the Great US Employment Sag of the 2000s |url=https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/682384 |url-status=live |journal=Journal of Labor Economics |language=en |volume=34 |issue=S1 |pages=S141–S198 |doi=10.1086/682384 |issn=0734-306X |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210618091001/http://economics.mit.edu/files/9811 |archive-date=2021-06-18|hdl=10419/110869 |hdl-access=free }}

Avraham Ebenstein, Margaret McMillan, Ann Harrison also pointed out in their article “Why are American Workers getting Poorer? China, Trade and Offshoring” these negative effects of trade with China on American workers.{{Cite report |url=http://www.nber.org/papers/w21027.pdf |title=Why are American Workers getting Poorer? China, Trade and Offshoring |last1=Ebenstein |first1=Avraham |last2=Harrison |first2=Ann |last3=McMillan |first3=Margaret |date=March 2015 |publisher=National Bureau of Economic Research |issue=w21027 |doi=10.3386/w21027 |location=Cambridge, MA |language=en}}

The Economic Policy Institute, a left-leaning think tank, has claimed that free trade created a large trade deficit in the United States for decades which lead to the closure of many factories and cost the United States millions of jobs in the manufacturing sector. Trade deficits lead to significant wage losses, not only for workers in the manufacturing sector, but also for all workers throughout the economy who do not have a university degree. For example, in 2011, 100 million full-time, full-year workers without a university degree suffered an average loss of $1,800 (~${{Format price|{{Inflation|index=US|value=1800|start_year=2011}}}} in {{Inflation/year|US}}) on their annual salary.{{Cite web|url=https://www.epi.org/publication/the-china-toll-deepens-growth-in-the-bilateral-trade-deficit-between-2001-and-2017-cost-3-4-million-u-s-jobs-with-losses-in-every-state-and-congressional-district/|title=The China toll deepens: Growth in the bilateral trade deficit between 2001 and 2017 cost 3.4 million U.S. jobs, with losses in every state and congressional district|website=Economic Policy Institute|access-date=April 26, 2020|archive-date=January 15, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200115022951/https://www.epi.org/publication/the-china-toll-deepens-growth-in-the-bilateral-trade-deficit-between-2001-and-2017-cost-3-4-million-u-s-jobs-with-losses-in-every-state-and-congressional-district/|url-status=live}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.epi.org/publication/standard-models-benchmark-costs-globalization/|title=Using standard models to benchmark the costs of globalization for American workers without a college degree|website=Economic Policy Institute|access-date=April 26, 2020|archive-date=May 8, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200508124822/https://www.epi.org/publication/standard-models-benchmark-costs-globalization/|url-status=live}} According to the Economic Policy Institute, the workers who lost their jobs in the manufacturing sector and who have to accept a reduction in their wages to find work in other sectors, are creating competition, that reduces the wages of workers already employed in these other sectors. The threat of offshoring of production facilities leads workers to accept wage cuts to keep their jobs.

According to the Economic Policy Institute, trade agreements have not reduced trade deficits but rather increased them. The growing trade deficit with China comes from China's manipulation of its currency, dumping policies, subsidies, trade barriers that give it a very important advantage in international trade. In addition, industrial jobs lost by imports from China are significantly better paid than jobs created by exports to China. So even if imports were equal to exports, workers would still lose out on their wages.{{cite web |url=https://www.epi.org/publication/trading-manufacturing-advantage-china-trade/ |title=Trading away the manufacturing advantage: China trade drives down U.S. wages and benefits and eliminates good jobs for U.S. workers | Economic Policy Institute |publisher=Epi.org |access-date=2019-10-07 |archive-date=April 18, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200418060958/https://www.epi.org/publication/trading-manufacturing-advantage-china-trade/ |url-status=live }}

According to the Economic Policy Institute, the manufacturing sector is a sector with very high productivity growth, which promotes high wages and good benefits for its workers. Indeed, this sector accounts for more than two thirds of private sector research and development and employs more than twice as many scientists and engineers as the rest of the economy. The manufacturing sector therefore provides a very important stimulus to overall economic growth. Manufacturing is also associated with well-paid service jobs such as accounting, business management, research and development and legal services. Deindustrialisation is therefore also leading to a significant loss of these service jobs. Deindustrialization thus means the disappearance of a very important driver of economic growth.

In 2010, Paul Krugman called for a general tariff rate of 25% on all Chinese products to halt the deindustrialization of the United States and the offshoring of American industries and factories to China. Paul Krugman notes that the trade deficit caused by free trade has been detrimental to the U.S. manufacturing sector: “There is no doubt that increased imports, particularly from China, have reduced manufacturing employment..., the complete elimination of the U.S. manufacturing trade deficit would add about two million manufacturing jobs.{{Cite news |last=Krugman |first=Paul |date=2016-07-04 |title=Opinion {{!}} Trump, Trade and Workers |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/04/opinion/trump-trade-and-workers.html |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20241204094645/https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/04/opinion/trump-trade-and-workers.html |archive-date=2024-12-04 |access-date=2024-12-13 |work=The New York Times |language=en}}{{Cite web |title=Economist's View: Paul Krugman: Trump, Trade and Workers |url=https://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2016/07/paul-krugman-trump-trade-and-workers.html |access-date=2024-12-13 |website=economistsview.typepad.com}} He expected Chinese surpluses to destroy 1.4 million American jobs by 2011. He therefore proposed taxing the products of certain countries to force them to readjust their currencies.{{Cite news |last=Krugman |first=Paul |date=2010-03-15 |title=Opinion {{!}} Taking On China |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/15/opinion/15krugman.html?src=me |url-status=live |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20241209091243/https://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/15/opinion/15krugman.html?src=me |archive-date=2024-12-09 |access-date=2024-12-13 |work=The New York Times |language=en}}{{Cite web |title=Economist's View: Paul Krugman: Taking On China |url=https://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2010/09/paul-krugman-taking-on-china.html |access-date=2024-12-13 |website=economistsview.typepad.com}}{{Cite web |last=Krugman |first=Paul |date=2009-12-31 |title=Macroeconomic effects of Chinese mercantilism |url=https://archive.nytimes.com/krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/31/macroeconomic-effects-of-chinese-mercantilism/ |access-date=2024-12-13 |website=Paul Krugman Blog |language=en}}

=Outcomes=

File:2020 census reapportionment.svg, except California, is part of the Rust Belt.]]

In 1999, Francis Fukuyama wrote that the social and cultural consequences of deindustrialization and manufacturing decline that turned a former thriving Factory Belt into a Rust Belt as a part of a bigger transitional trend that he called the Great Disruption:Fukuyama, Francis. The Great Disruption: Human Nature and the Reconstitution of Social Order. New York: Free Press, 1999. "People associate the information age with the advent of the Internet in the 1990s, but the shift from the industrial era started more than a generation earlier, with the deindustrialization of the Rust Belt in the United States and comparable movements away from manufacturing in other industrialized countries. … The decline is readily measurable in statistics on crime, fatherless children, broken trust, reduced opportunities for and outcomes from education, and the like".{{Cite magazine |last=Fukuyama |first=Francis |date=May 1999 |title=Human Nature and the Reconstruction of Social Order |url=https://spot.colorado.edu/~mcguire/disruption.htm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180715074054/http://www.wesjones.com/fukuyama.htm |archive-date=2018-07-15 |access-date=2024-12-13 |magazine=The Atlantic |pages=55–80 |volume=283 |issue=5}}

Problems associated with the Rust Belt persist even today, particularly around the eastern Great Lakes states, and many once-booming manufacturing metropolises dramatically slowed down.Feyrer, James, Bruce Sacerdote, and Ariel Dora Stern. [https://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0&type=summary&url=/journals/brookings-wharton_papers_on_urban_affairs/v2007/2007.1saiz.pdf Did the Rust Belt Become Shiny? A Study of Cities and Counties That Lost Steel and Auto Jobs in the 1980s] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160305003441/https://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0&type=summary&url=%2Fjournals%2Fbrookings-wharton_papers_on_urban_affairs%2Fv2007%2F2007.1saiz.pdf |date=March 5, 2016 }}. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs (2007): 41–102. From 1970 to 2006, Cleveland, Detroit, Buffalo, and Pittsburgh lost about 45% of their population and median household incomes fell: in Cleveland and Detroit by about 30%, in Buffalo by 20%, and Pittsburgh by 10%.Daniel Hartley. "Urban Decline in Rust-Belt Cities." Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Economic Commentary, Number 2013-06, May 20, 2013. [https://web.archive.org/web/20130730195948/http://www.clevelandfed.org/research/commentary/2013/2013-06.pdf PDF]

During the mid-1990s, several Rust Belt metropolitan areas experienced a suspension in negative growth, indicated by stabilizing unemployment, wages, and populations.Glenn King. Census Brief: "Rust Belt" Rebounds, CENBR/98-7, Issued December 1998. [https://www.census.gov/prod/99pubs/cenbr987.pdf PDF] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180718104854/https://www.census.gov/prod/99pubs/cenbr987.pdf |date=July 18, 2018 }} During the first decade of the 21st century, however, a negative trend still persisted: Detroit, Michigan lost 25.7% of its population; Gary, Indiana, 22%; Youngstown, Ohio, 18.9%; Flint, Michigan, 18.7%; and Cleveland, Ohio, 14.5%.{{Cite web |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323687604578467134234625160 |title=Mark Peters, Jack Nicas. "Rust Belt Reaches for Immigration Tide", The Wall Street Journal, May 13, 2013, A3. |work=Wall Street Journal |date=May 12, 2013 |access-date=August 8, 2017 |archive-date=December 27, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191227004220/https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323687604578467134234625160 |url-status=live |last1=Peters |first1=Mark |last2=Nicas |first2=Jack }}

rowspan="2" \| City ! rowspan="2" \| State ! colspan="4" \| Population
class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible" border="1" style="text-align:right" \|+2000–2020 population change in Rust Belt cities
change	2020{{cite web \|title=City and Town Population Totals: 2020-2021 \|url=https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/popest/2020s-total-cities-and-towns.html \|access-date=March 12, 2023 \|website=United States Census Bureau \|archive-date=July 11, 2022 \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220711040810/https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/popest/2020s-total-cities-and-towns.html \|url-status=live }}	2000 ! Peak
align=left\| Detroit, Michigan	Michigan	-32.81%	639,111	951,270 \|1,849,568 (1950)
align=left\| Gary, Indiana	Indiana	-31.97%	69,903	102,746 \|178,320 (1960)
align=left\| Flint, Michigan	Michigan	-34.97%	81,252	124,943 \|196,940 (1960)
align=left\| Saginaw, Michigan	Michigan	-28.47%	44,202	61,799 \|98,265 (1960)
align=left\| Youngstown, Ohio	Ohio	-26.77%	60,068	82,026 \|170,002 (1930)
align=left\| Cleveland, Ohio	Ohio	-22.11%	372,624	478,403 \|914,808 (1950)
align=left\| Dayton, Ohio	Ohio	-17.17%	137,644	166,179 \|262,332 (1960)
align=left\| Niagara Falls, New York	New York	-12.45%	48,671	55,593 \|102,394 (1960)
align=left\| Baltimore, Maryland	Maryland	-5.7%	585,708	620,961 \|949,708 (1950)
align=left\| St. Louis, Missouri	Missouri	-13.39%	301,578	348,189 \|856,796 (1950)
align=left\| Decatur, Illinois	Illinois	-13.85%	70,522	81,860 \|94,081 (1980)
align=left\| Canton, Ohio	Ohio	-12.29%	70,872	80,806 \|116,912 (1950)
align=left\| Buffalo, New York	New York	-4.89%	278,349	292,648 \|580,132 (1950)
align=left\| Toledo, Ohio	Ohio	-13.63%	270,871	313,619 \|383,818 (1970)
align=left\| Lakewood, Ohio	Ohio	-10.07%	50,942	56,646 \|70,509 (1930)
align=left\| Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	-9.44%	302,971	334,563 \|676,806 (1950)
align=left\| Pontiac, Michigan	Michigan	-7.13%	61,606	66,337 \|85,279 (1970)
align=left\| Springfield, Ohio	Ohio	-10.25%	58,662	65,358 \|82,723 (1960)
align=left\| Akron, Ohio	Ohio	-12.26%	190,469	217,074 \|290,351 (1960)
align=left\| Hammond, Indiana	Indiana	-6.22%	77,879	83,048 \|111,698 (1960)
align=left\| Cincinnati, Ohio	Ohio	-6.63%	309,317	331,285 \|503,998 (1950)
align=left\| Parma, Ohio	Ohio	-5.26%	81,146	85,655 \|100,216 (1970)
align=left\| Lorain, Ohio	Ohio	-6.74%	64,028	68,652 \|78,185 (1970)
align=left\| Chicago, Illinois	Illinois	-5.17%	2,746,388	2,896,016 \|3,620,962 (1950)
align=left\| South Bend, Indiana	Indiana	-4.02%	103,453	107,789 \|132,445 (1960)
align=left\| Charleston, West Virginia	West Virginia	-8.53%	48,864	53,421 \|85,796 (1960)

In the late 2000s, American manufacturing recovered faster from the Great Recession of 2008 than the other sectors of the economy,{{cite news|title=Rustbelt recovery: Against all the odds, American factories are coming back to life. Thank the rest of the world for that|url=https://www.economist.com/node/18332894|access-date=September 21, 2011|newspaper=The Economist|date=March 10, 2011|archive-date=July 24, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170724221826/http://www.economist.com/node/18332894|url-status=live}} [http://www.acmeind.com/wp-content/uploads/Economist_Rustbelt_Recovery_031011.pdf PDF] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170611024302/http://www.acmeind.com/wp-content/uploads/Economist_Rustbelt_Recovery_031011.pdf |date=June 11, 2017 }} and a number of initiatives, both public and private, are encouraging the development of alternative fuel, nano and other technologies.{{cite news|title=Greening the rustbelt: In the shadow of the climate bill, the industrial Midwest begins to get ready|url=https://www.economist.com/node/14214855|access-date=September 21, 2011|newspaper=The Economist|date=August 13, 2009|archive-date=February 16, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180216210318/http://www.economist.com/node/14214855|url-status=live}}

Along with the neighboring Golden Horseshoe of southern Ontario, the Rust Belt composes one of the world's major manufacturing regions.{{cite web|last=Beyers|first=William|title=Major Manufacturing Regions of the World|url=https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:fnpUF-Xs3KYJ:faculty.washington.edu/beyers/Chapter7_Warf.ppt+manufacturing+regions+of+the+world&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESgeUfyEVJ5-UCp5x3EGgctSVlVRoGItKLn-AVIw0gHisfIXJfVXNS0dClkwio0EWrpZ3SoH8Pfw2z0ryZ2eV8thdhyVXBYU3abQthuNuf8L4Dkj1O1DhZ22H7OWQNI_K9VdPqPX&sig=AHIEtbTNoQ3I1K5J25TpcXYenB0tMs3lIg|publisher=Department of Geography, the University of Washington|access-date=September 21, 2011|archive-date=December 24, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211224173113/https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache%3AfnpUF-Xs3KYJ%3Afaculty.washington.edu%2Fbeyers%2FChapter7_Warf.ppt+manufacturing+regions+of+the+world&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESgeUfyEVJ5-UCp5x3EGgctSVlVRoGItKLn-AVIw0gHisfIXJfVXNS0dClkwio0EWrpZ3SoH8Pfw2z0ryZ2eV8thdhyVXBYU3abQthuNuf8L4Dkj1O1DhZ22H7OWQNI_K9VdPqPX&sig=AHIEtbTNoQ3I1K5J25TpcXYenB0tMs3lIg|url-status=live}}[https://web.archive.org/web/20230213085028/http://www.maderacountyedc.com/mcedc_feb2013/mfg213.pdf Rust Belt is still the heart of U.S. manufacturing]

=Transformation=

Delving into the past and musing on the future of Rust Belt states, a 2010 Brookings Institution report suggests that the Great Lakes region has a sizable potential for transformation, citing already existing global trade networks, clean energy/low carbon capacity, developed innovation infrastructure, and higher educational network.{{Cite web |author=Vey |first1=Jennifer S. |last2=Austin |first2=John C. |last3=Bradley |first3=Jennifer |date=September 27, 2010 |title=The Next Economy: Economic Recovery and Transformation in the Great Lakes Region |url=https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-next-economy-economic-recovery-and-transformation-in-the-great-lakes-region/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181116001246/https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-next-economy-economic-recovery-and-transformation-in-the-great-lakes-region/ |archive-date=November 16, 2018 |access-date=May 25, 2020 |publisher=Brookings Institution Paper}}

Different strategies were proposed in order to reverse the fortunes of the former Factory Belt including building casinos and convention centers, retaining the creative class through arts and downtown renewal, encouraging the knowledge economy type of entrepreneurship, and other steps. This includes growing new industrial base with a pool of skilled labor, rebuilding the infrastructure and infrasystems, creating research and development-focused university-business partnerships, and close cooperation between central, state and local government, and business.{{Cite web |author=Kotkin |first1=Joel |last2=Schill |first2=March |last3=Streeter |first3=Ryan |date=February 2012 |title=Clues From The Past: The Midwest As An Aspirational Region |url=http://www.newgeography.com/files/MIDWEST-ASPIRATIONAL-REGION-2012.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200601103914/http://www.newgeography.com/files/MIDWEST-ASPIRATIONAL-REGION-2012.pdf |archive-date=June 1, 2020 |access-date=June 7, 2013 |publisher=Sagamore Institute}}

New types of research and development-intensive nontraditional manufacturing have emerged recently in the Rust Belt, including biotechnology, the polymer industry, infotech, and nanotech. Information technology is seen as representing an opportunity for the Rust Belt's revitalization.{{cite web |date=May 19, 2013 |title=Silicon Rust Belt » Rethink The Rust Belt |url=http://siliconrustbelt.com/rethink-the-rust-belt/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180821111513/http://siliconrustbelt.com/rethink-the-rust-belt/ |archive-date=August 21, 2018 |access-date=May 29, 2013}} Among the successful recent examples is the Detroit Aircraft Corporation, which specializes in unmanned aerial systems integration, testing and aerial cinematography services.{{cite web|url=https://www.iflyasx.com/|title=ASX – Airspace Experience Technologies – Detroit MI – VTOL|website=ASX|access-date=June 23, 2019|archive-date=June 13, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200613210358/https://www.iflyasx.com/|url-status=live}}

In Pittsburgh, robotics research centers and companies such as the National Robotics Engineering Center and Robotics Institute, Aethon Inc., American Robot Corporation, Automatika, Quantapoint, Blue Belt Technologies, and Seegrid are creating state-of-the-art robotic technology applications. Akron, a former "Rubber Capital of the World" that lost 35,000 jobs after major tire and rubber manufacturers Goodrich, Firestone, and General Tire closed their production lines, is now again well known around the world as a center of polymer research with four hundred polymer-related manufacturing and distribution companies operating in the area. The turnaround was accomplished in part by a partnership between Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, which chose to stay, the University of Akron, and the city mayor's office. The Akron Global Business Accelerator that jump-started a score of successful business ventures in Akron resides in the refurbished B.F. Goodrich tire factory.{{cite news |author=Sherry Karabin |url=http://www.akronlegalnews.com/editorial/7004 |title=Mayor says attitude is key to Akron's revitalization |website=The Akron Legal News |date=May 16, 2013 |access-date=June 6, 2013 |archive-date=July 15, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170715070514/http://www.akronlegalnews.com/editorial/7004 |url-status=live }}

Additive manufacturing, or 3D printing, creates another promising avenue for the manufacturing resurgence. Such companies as MakerGear from Beachwood, Ohio, or ExOne Company from North Huntingdon, Pennsylvania, are designing and manufacturing industrial and consumer products using 3-D imaging systems.{{cite news |url=https://www.post-gazette.com/business/businessnews/2013/06/13/Conference-in-Pittsburgh-shows-growing-allure-of-3-D-printing/stories/201306130342 |title=Conference in Pittsburgh shows growing allure of 3-D printing |author=Len Boselovic |publisher=Pittsburgh Post-Gazette |date=June 13, 2013 |access-date=May 25, 2020 |archive-date=December 30, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171230075311/http://www.post-gazette.com/business/businessnews/2013/06/13/Conference-in-Pittsburgh-shows-growing-allure-of-3-D-printing/stories/201306130342 |url-status=live }}

In 2013, The Economist reported a growing trend of reshoring, or inshoring, of manufacturing when a growing number of American companies were moving their production facilities from overseas back home.{{cite news |url=https://www.economist.com/news/special-report/21569570-growing-number-american-companies-are-moving-their-manufacturing-back-united |title=Coming home: A growing number of American companies are moving their manufacturing back to the United States |newspaper=The Economist |date=January 19, 2013 |access-date=June 20, 2013 |archive-date=June 22, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130622030754/http://www.economist.com/news/special-report/21569570-growing-number-american-companies-are-moving-their-manufacturing-back-united |url-status=live }} Rust Belt states can ultimately benefit from this process of international insourcing.

There have also been attempts to reinvent properties in the Rust Belt in order to reverse its economic decline. Buildings with compartmentalization unsuitable for today's uses were acquired and renewed to facilitate new businesses. These business activities suggest that the revival is taking place in the once-stagnant area.{{Cite news|url=https://www.irishtimes.com/business/economy/rust-belt-states-reinvent-their-abandoned-industrial-landscapes-1.3746893|title=Rust Belt states reinvent their abandoned industrial landscapes|last1=Dayton|first1=Stephen Starr in|last2=Ohio|newspaper=The Irish Times|language=en|date=January 5, 2019|access-date=January 26, 2020|archive-date=November 7, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201107234522/https://www.irishtimes.com/business/economy/rust-belt-states-reinvent-their-abandoned-industrial-landscapes-1.3746893|url-status=live}} The CHIPS and Science Act, which became effective in August 2022, was designed to rebuild the manufacturing sector with thousands of jobs and research programs in states like Ohio focusing on making products like semiconductors due to the global chip shortage of the early 2020s.{{cite web | title=Biden touts computer chips bill in battleground Ohio amid tight Senate race | website=NBC News | date=September 9, 2022 | url=https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/biden-tout-computer-chips-bill-battleground-ohio-tight-senate-race-rcna46986 | access-date=October 11, 2022 | archive-date=October 10, 2022 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221010221119/https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/biden-tout-computer-chips-bill-battleground-ohio-tight-senate-race-rcna46986 | url-status=live }}

In popular culture

The Rust Belt is depicted in various films, television shows, and songs. It is the subject of the popular Billy Joel song, "Allentown," originally released on The Nylon Curtain album in 1982. The song uses Allentown as a metaphor for the resilience of working class Americans in distressed industrial cities during the recession of the early 1980s.

The Rust Belt is the setting for Philipp Meyer's 2009 novel American Rust and its 2021 television adaptation. A core plot device of both is the economic, social, and population decline{{Cite web |title=Philipp Meyer |url=http://www.full-stop.net/2011/02/14/interviews/alex/philipp-meyer/ |access-date=August 8, 2022 |language=en |archive-date=August 8, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220808115206/http://www.full-stop.net/2011/02/14/interviews/alex/philipp-meyer/ |url-status=live }} facing the fictional Western Pennsylvanian town of Buell, itself brought about by thorough de-industrialization typical of the region.{{Cite web |title=American Rust (Official Series Site) Watch on Showtime |url=https://www.sho.com/american-rust |access-date=August 8, 2022 |website=SHO.com |language=en-US |archive-date=August 21, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220821184452/https://www.sho.com/american-rust |url-status=live }}

The 21st century evolution of this region of the U.S. is also depicted through the fictional town of New Canaan, Ohio, in Stephen Markley's 2018 bestseller novel, Ohio. The town is described through both the teenage glamour of high school lens in the early 2000s and the harsh reality lens of what the town became 10 years later.

References

External links

[http://www.coalcampusa.com/rustbelt/rustbelt.htm Industrial Heartland map and photographs]
[https://web.archive.org/web/20121110031800/http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/Picture%201.png Rust Belt map]
[http://libx.bsu.edu/cdm/landingpage/collection/ChngGrsDoc Changing Gears Documentary Film Collection] Digital Media Repository, Ball State University Libraries
[https://exchange.umma.umich.edu/resources/23852 Collection: "Rust Belt" at the University of Michigan Museum of Art]

Category:1980 establishments in the United States

Category:1980s neologisms

Category:Belt regions of the United States

Category:Deindustrialization

Category:Economy of the Midwestern United States

Category:Economy of the Northeastern United States

Category:Great Lakes region (U.S.)

Category:Urban decay in the United States