User talk:FatalSubjectivities#top

|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid lightgrey; background-color:Seashell; vertical-align:top"|

|}

|}

Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC

Hello, I noticed this draft that was declined. If independent sources that have significant coverage of the topic cannot be found, a suggestion would be improving the main author's article (Richard Kearney) to add some details about his work. Articles about subtopics that don't independently meet notability requirements (WP:GNG) are usually merged into the most relevant article, this would have the same result. But articles in the draft space also don't immediately vanish unless there's a good reason, they become eligible for WP:G13 after about six months of inactivity. —PaleoNeonate – 16:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Theodicy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agency. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, Anti-Plantinga. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anatheism, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Information icon4.svg

Hello, Anti-Plantinga. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anatheism".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:33, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

{{unblock-un reviewed | user=FatalSubjectivities | reason=Old username was not intended to be harmful, defamatory or identity-thieving to any individual. Nonetheless, I will not use old username since it may be inadvertently seen as harmful or libelous. I will instead use a new username. Post-script: I would prefer if my Contributions page is not wiped clean in my unblocking, if it is possible.Anti-Plantinga (talk) 15:39, 12 December 2021 (UTC) | accept=Allowing username change to requested username. Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. Daniel Case (talk) 07:30, 19 December 2021 (UTC)}}

As the blocking administrator, no objections from me. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 14:43, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Padgriffin. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Elizabeth%20Stuart%20%28theologian%29&diff=1088655887 this edit] to :Elizabeth Stuart (theologian)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 11:11, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Image:Information.svg Hello, I'm Sea Cow. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, :David Bentley Hart, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sea Cow (talk) 03:11, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Removed my edits. Thanks for reminding me FatalSubjectivities (talk) 14:57, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{tlx|Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

}} Doug Weller talk 15:03, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Postchristianity, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Revival. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Information orange.svg Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to :Sunny Side Up. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. {{#ifeq:{{lc:}}|yes|An edit has converted these links, into links to the not-currently-existing page (redlinks) where the draft will be placed if it is eventually accepted. Thus the links will automatically become valid links aimed at the correct target when and if the draft is accepted.|These links have been removed.}} Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:53, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

I noticed that you recently tried to {{tl|prod}} the redirect {{no redirect|Deconstructionism}}. Redirects are very cheap, and although there are sometimes good reasons to delete one, what is your reasoning here? There are currently [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere/Deconstructionism&limit=500 dozens of articles] that link to this redirect, such as Immanuel_Kant#Influence_and_legacy for example. If you are successful in removing the redirect, 65 pages will have links that go from blue to red. Are you prepared to resolve the redlink problem by editing all those articles and adding a pipe to the red link, to make them blue again? In general, it's best to do a bit of research first to see how the redirect is being used, before considering it for deletion. Hope this helps, Mathglot (talk) 23:15, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

:Cyril O'Regan

::added a link pointing to David Walsh

:Jainism and non-creationism

::added a link pointing to Transmigration

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Social constructionism is a standard theory in Sociology, whether one accepts it or not, and should not be tagged with {{tl|buzzword}}, unless you can achieve consensus for it at Talk. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 09:53, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

:That's precisely my point. I wholeheartedly agree that sociologists can be able to use the standard definition. But the term social construct in many cases is a mere eye-catching MOS:JARGON when WP:PLAINENGLISH could have been used. FatalSubjectivities (talk) 06:10, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

{{help me-helped}}

Please help me with with merging Template:Exceptionalism and Template:Ethnocentrism FatalSubjectivities (talk) 17:10, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

: While the two topics overlap in a few respects, they are different enough to merit separate templates. What is your reasoning for wanting to merge them? — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:17, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

::As in, the topics page links that are listed inside them. FatalSubjectivities (talk) 06:16, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

::I think their overlap is very substantial. FatalSubjectivities (talk) 3 December 2022 (UTC)

{{help me-helped}}

Below is what I see and I cannot do it:

_____________________________________________________

← Nietzschean affirmation

[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:MovePage&action=submit#mw-head Jump to navigation][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:MovePage&action=submit#searchInput Jump to search]

The page "[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nietzschean_affirmation&redirect=no Nietzschean affirmation]" (links | [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nietzschean_affirmation&action=edit edit]) has been moved to "Bejahung" ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bejahung&action=edit edit] | [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bejahung&action=history history] | links | [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Movepage&wpOldTitle=Bejahung&wpNewTitle=Nietzschean+affirmation&wpReason=revert&wpMovetalk=1 revert] | [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Bejahung log]) (move log)

A redirect has been created.

Your move should now be reflected in the Wikidata item language link.

• The page [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Nietzschean_affirmation&redirect=no Talk:Nietzschean affirmation] has been moved to Talk:Bejahung.

FatalSubjectivities (talk) 17:19, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

FatalSubjectivities (talk) 17:24, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

:On a related note, Is my IP address revealed? WP:IRCHD says yes, if one uses it. Did I use it? FatalSubjectivities (talk) 17:29, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

:[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Nietzschean_affirmation Pages that link to "Nietzschean affirmation" - Wikipedia] FatalSubjectivities (talk) 17:31, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

:: A bot should take care of any dangling redirects to the old name. Check again in a few days to see if anything was missed. Other than that, it doesn't look like anything still remains to be done after the move, but you might want to post your move justification on the talk page in addition to the edit summary. You'll be able to explain more fully that way. I'd have thought a page that has been hanging around since 2007 would have merited a requested moves discussion, but now I guess we'll see if anyone even notices.

:: I did not see you mention your on-wiki username on IRC; that would be how someone might connect your username and the IP address you were using at the time. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:09, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

:::Thank you FatalSubjectivities (talk) 05:49, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cyril O'Regan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Walsh.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

{{help me-helped}}

I think this could be deleted : [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Absolute_(philosophy&redirect=no Absolute (philosophy - Wikipedia]

There is already [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Absolute_(philosophy)&redirect=no Absolute (philosophy) - Wikipedia]

______

This could too be deleted [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=DeconstructionIsm&redirect=no DeconstructionIsm - Wikipedia]

There is already

[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Deconstructionism&redirect=no Deconstructionism - Wikipedia]

I clicked "(See § When should we delete a redirect? for more information.)" on WP:RfD but it brings me to the same place. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion#When_should_we_delete_a_redirect? Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion - Wikipedia]

And I was not allowed to put WP:PROD on redirects to delete them. Hence this-which-I-am-writing-now.

Thanks.

FatalSubjectivities (talk) 16:02, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

:WP:RFDHOWTO describes how to nominate a page for deletion. Twinkle can also be used to assist in the process. If you want more help, change the {{t|help me-helped}} back into a {{t|help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 16:31, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

:: Also remember to state your reasons for deleting the redirect. Most redirects exist because someone thought there was a justification for them, such as the missing close paren. I think that reasoning is possibly faulty, but it's incumbent on you to address the original reasoning, not just stand on the mere reasonableness of removing the redirect. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:45, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

I find some of your Edit summaries over-long, epecially those with references. Perhaps keep the ES's short and refer to evidence you put on the Talk pages. David notMD (talk) 15:42, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

:Noted

:Tks for informing FatalSubjectivities (talk) 15:02, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

:Actually, why ought they be short? i want to be able to more easily track my edit histories. FatalSubjectivities (talk) 16:05, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

:Is it because they are taking up wp:weight FatalSubjectivities (talk) 09:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jean Baudrillard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transfinite.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from :John Searle into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from page name; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{tl|copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 11:47, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

:Will give a go. FatalSubjectivities (talk) 17:08, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

:Many users were involved. [http://wikipedia.ramselehof.de/wikiblame.php?user_lang=en&lang=en&project=wikipedia&tld=org&article=John+Searle&needle=Derrida&skipversions=0&ignorefirst=0&limit=500&offmon=2&offtag=10&offjahr=2023&searchmethod=int&order=desc&user= WikiBlame (ramselehof.de)]

:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Searle&diff=prev&oldid=106217729

:

Thank you for your continued input with the Meta-historical_fall article, and please note the two most recent comments on the article talk page in relation to your additions:

• Christopher West quote
• Keeping "Related concepts" concisely categorized

I'd like to review most additions together on the talk page as the length and sprawling nature of this article has been a serious concern in the past, and I do not want it to grow to be a concern again. --Jjhake (talk) 13:29, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page :Male and Female He Created Them, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sandbox&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F0%7CWP:Sandbox%5D%5D Ask for help])

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Qwerfjkl_(bot)§ion=new report it to my operator].

Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:13, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Just wanted to let you know that I have removed the PROD tag you placed on the redirect Applied postmodernism - that tag is not applicable to redirects. I also notice that your reason provided was a notability concern, please note that notability is not an issue with redirects, which are only designed to guide readers to a more suitable location anyway (often, non-notable articles are converted to redirects, as well). If you're still looking for the page to be deleted, please list a new discussion at WP:RFD. Thanks! Tollens (talk) 09:13, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hi FatalSubjectivities! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at :The Onion that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. — Garrett W. {☎ ✍} 06:01, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning pn.svg

The page :Category:Christian continental philosophers and theologians has been deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:

• The category had been empty for seven days or more and it was not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories. (See section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Category%3AChristian+continental+philosophers+and+theologians|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:18, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page :Reification (Marxism), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reification_(Marxism)&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1167227343%7CReification%20(Marxism)%5D%5D Ask for help])

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/sandbox/43&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20FatalSubjectivities§ion=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Reification (Marxism)}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1167227343 report it to my operator].

Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:01, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, FatalSubjectivities. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Milbank–Žižek debates, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Information icon4.svg

Hello, FatalSubjectivities. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Milbank–Žižek debates".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/G13?withJS=MediaWiki:G13-restore-wizard.js&page=Draft%3AMilbank%E2%80%93%C5%BDi%C5%BEek+debates request its undeletion]. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:19, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

you shouldn't be using this [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Uranian_(sexuality)&oldid=1137586684 template]. 204.209.132.57 (talk) 19:16, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Information icon4.svg

Hello, FatalSubjectivities. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Manualism in moral theology".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/G13?withJS=MediaWiki:G13-restore-wizard.js&page=Draft%3AManualism+in+moral+theology request its undeletion]. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 01:23, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Information icon4.svg There is currently a discussion at Talk:Pope Francis and LGBT topics regarding a reorganisation of the article. The thread is Article reorganisation proposal. Thank you.

I am seeking consensus for a significant reorganisation of the article. I would be grateful for your comments, as an experienced editor who has contributed to this article before. IgnatiusofLondon (talk) 14:23, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=This_Is_How_You_Lose_the_Time_War&diff=1219401949&oldid=1218728532 I genuinely do not see a pun]. DS (talk) 02:52, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

I note that with [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Katechon&diff=prev&oldid=1211056289 this edit], adding a merge proposal, you missed a few steps that would be really helpful for those considering merge proposals:

• The reason should go on the discussion page of a target, not in the template (even though this is technically feasible)
• You have not indicated a direction in the template, but this should be included wherever possible
• You have not tagged the other page

Adding these steps ensure that the relevant readerships see the proposal and understand exactly what is expected, while provign a forum for discussion.

See WP:MERGEPROP for more details or rationale. Klbrain (talk) 10:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

hello, user:FatalSubjectivities: You made an edit to Bayard Rustin that properly noted a drafting error, but the change you made still leaves that sentence and the following sentence grammatically confused (verb tense, inter alia). More important, it is unclear whether those sentences are intended to be supported by the next footnote, attached to a direct quotation which is another separate sentence. Can you check that source and clarify? In particular, was it intended to say he became "an advocate for people with AIDS," as you phrased it? Or that he became an advocate for increased funding for AIDS research, perhaps? Or an advocate against discrimination targeting individuals who were HIV-positive? Or something else? The original wording that you changed might have been intended to mean any of those. Please clarify, and cite the source that supports you. And perhaps straighten out those two sentences in general, if you can. PDGPA (talk) 18:49, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

:Thanks for pointing out. The word advocate can mean proponent, or mean [https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/advocate "someone who speaks for, supports, or represents a person or group of people who may need extra help or protection"]. Hence, in my opinion, the grammar of the current revision for that sentence in the Rustin page is acceptable.
(On the contrary, "AIDS" is not a group of people - previously, when the page stated that he "advocated for AIDS", the only comprehensible and grammatically correct meaning - 'support" - is silly. )
I admit that I did not read any original source.
FatalSubjectivities (talk) 07:47, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khaled Abou El Fadl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:56, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi, FatalSubjectivities, and thanks for your contributions. I noticed several edits in which you renamed section headings, which is fine, and I see you tried to comply with the spirit of MOS:SECTIONHEADER by adding an anchor to the heading, so that inlinks, if any, would still work. Unfortunately, the *routine* addition of embedded anchors is neither necessary, nor desirable, as it creates a complex section heading that many editors don't know how to handle. In addition, there usually aren't any inlinks, so the anchor is not needed. Finally, Adding a bare, unsubsted anchor (i.e., in the format {{tlc|anchor|Foo}}{{hairspace}}) also obfuscates the edit summary in the history.

Adding a properly formatted anchor can be useful so that incoming links will still work after a heading name change, but this is best used when "MOS:SECTIONANCHOR". When there are none, an anchor is unnecessary, and when there are just a couple, it's best to adjust the links in other articles to the new section name, rather than embed an anchor in the target article heading. Finally, when there are so many incoming links that it would be too time-consuming to fix them all, then please use the {{tls|anchor}} or <span id=...> style recommended at MOS:SECTIONANCHOR, and not {{tlc|anchor|Foo}} format, which causes the "undesirable behavior" that you can read about at the guideline.

I have removed unneeded embedded anchors from Ek Villain, PDF, Qiyas, General semantics, Iranian reformists, Sufi metaphysics, John Milbank, Salafi movement, Gilles Deleuze, and Friedrich Nietzsche's views on women either because they had no incoming links from other articles, or if they did, after adjusting the inlinks (there was one article with a section link to an anchor at General semantics; it was adjusted to the new section name).

While embedded section anchors have their uses, please don't add them willy-nilly, and most of all, please avoid adding them when there are no incoming links to it at all. There is an explanatory note at MOS:#Section headings that explains how to find out if a given article section has any inlinks or not; you can find the note here, or just execute [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=linksto%3A%22ARTICLE%22+insource%3A%2F%5C%5B%5C%5BARTICLE%5C%23OLDSECTION%2F+&title=Special:Search&profile=all&fulltext=1 this advanced search], and change {{smallcaps|article}} to the name of the article, and {{smallcaps|oldsection}} to the old section title. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 01:01, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

:Noted. Will adopt new practices.
I Now know really how advanced the advanced search is. FatalSubjectivities (talk) 08:19, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

In your [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Orson_Scott_Card&curid=6097209&diff=1266006722&oldid=1266002509 edit] to :Orson Scott Card, you added a clarification needed tag to a direct quote. Could you add |reason=your explanation of why the quote needs clarification to the tag to explain to other editors what you think the problem is? Thanks. Schazjmd (talk) 17:55, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Copyright-problem.svg

{{Quote box|quote=

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on :Great Retreat (1930s Russia) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:01, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Control copyright icon.svg Hello FatalSubjectivities! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see {{section link|Help:Translation|Licensing}}.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 21:32, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

• Note - your article consisted of one big quote. That is well beyond limited quotation. -- Whpq (talk) 21:34, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi - you might be interested in my deletion proposal at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Definist_fallacy, since you're the only person in recentish times to have engaged in any substantive way with that article, even if your edits were fairly minor. (The author is gone and other recent editors have just touched reference formatting and suchlike.) ExplodingCabbage (talk) 16:27, 12 May 2025 (UTC)