User talk:Mukerjee
Hey please check out my edits on Nitin Gadkari page and let me know about them — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashish2470 (talk • contribs) 06:19, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
==Writing Help Pointers for self==
Image:Archilochus-alexandri-002.jpg|128px|thumb|left|Female
]]
- {{mprotected}}
{{fairusein|Al-Kateb v Godwin}} - {{Coor title dms|22|31|17|N|72|14|58|E|region:IN-GJ_type:landmark}} {{coor title dm|29|27|N|75|40|E|type:city}}
possibly these forms are being superceded by {{coord }}
- {{reflist| 2}}
References
{{reflist}}
- meta:Help:Table tables
align="center"
|width="100pt"| vrikShat |width="80pt"| parNam |width="100pt"| bhUmau | patati | |||
from the tree | a leaf | to the ground | falls |
colspan=4 | "a leaf falls from the tree to the ground" |
- meta:Help:Formula math formulae
- Wikipedia:Utilities
Eskimo words for snow
Could you please add some comments on the recent discussion at: talk:Eskimo_words_for_snow. Regards, Fedor 08:40, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
The Humungous Image Tagging Project
Hi. You've helped with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Wiki Syntax, so I thought it worth alerting you to the latest and greatest of Wikipedia fixing project, User:Yann/Untagged Images, which is seeking to put copyright tags on all of the untagged images. There are probably, oh, thirty thousand or so to do (he said, reaching into the air for a large figure). But hey: they're images ... you'll get to see lots of random pretty pictures. That must be better than looking for at at and the the, non? You know you'll love it. best wishes --Tagishsimon (talk)
Bengali article
Hello Mukerjee!
First of all, thanks for your input in the Bangla article. It's good to see someone actively editing different sections. I wanted to just add as a comment, however, that the romanization we've been using in the article has been made fairly systematic and consistent owing to the combined efforts of many Wikipedians to accurately describe the phonemic (not phonetic, not orthographic) system of Bengali. I noticed you reverted my edits, where I changed some of your renderings of Bengali words to reflect this romanization. I wanted to let you know that I will probably be changing these back, so as to fit with the rest of the article, and with all the other articles describing any Bengali words in English. Just thought I'd let you know - and of course if you have questions or would like to contribute to our transliteration/transcription debates, please feel free to comment on my user page. Thanks! --SameerKhan 12:45, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
:Right, I am aware of the difference between transliteration and transcription (I don't have my degree in phonetics/phonology for nothing!). If I have been sloppy about the words I've used, please feel free to edit. I believe that when a few of us were trying to devise a standard Romanization scheme for Bengali on Wikipedia, we were thinking of a phonemic representation (which is technically not transcription either, as a side note) as opposed to a letter-by-letter transliteration, which would be totally unhelpful for non-Bengalis. The idea was to represent the pronunciation of Bengali without getting into the phonetic details of IPA transcription. Anyhow, I'm sure you're aware of this and all... but one thing - please make sure that when you comment on my page, that you comment on my discussion page and not my homepage! Thanks :) --SameerKhan 08:27, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Bangla wikipedia
Hi, you were fairly active in the Bangla wikipedia in the past. Now that we are promoting it greatly, it has grown a lot ... right now up to 1672 articles. If you have time, please check it out (http://bn.wikipedia.org ). Thanks. --Ragib 03:31, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
what you have to do
i doesn't understand why you people interfere with about which you have not much knowledge.Yousaf465
==please don't mess up Gutenberg==
Reverts and multiple major edits of the sort I found there today do not help. I've posted the identical note on another page as well.DGG 06:22, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
and don't mess up printing press, either
We discussed this one once already, and once is enough. You and I and our friends took the East Asian material, formerly mentioned in small sections scattered over various pages, and gave it what was merited by its importance and stature, the page History of Typography in East Asia, a title worked out through consultation. References have been made to this page from all appropriate places we could think of, and if you can find some more places for a see also:, please add them. The title is sufficiently distinctive to make the meaning of the cross reference very clear: one page is discussing one tradition, the other page is discussing another. This is not a POV split--the POV is identical: there are two important traditions, and those who would learn about typography, should learn about both.
The subject you steadfastly and rightly wanted to talk about did not lose by this--it gained.
Consolidate the gains, and write some more about it on its page, instead of repeating the same few paragraphs on many pages. I will gladly read what you edit, so I can learn more. My opinion, for what it's worth, is that the EA article should be considerably longer, have more quotes from EA sources in translation, have a more detailed history, discuss the technology in greater detail, discuss the organization of the trade, discuss more of the major printed works, discuss the spread of the printed works into neighboring countries if there is documentation, have associated short biographical sketches of all the major participants, and a longer list of suggested English-language readings.
I've set out quite an agenda, but I have gathered from various comments and contributions that there are others here who can help. I cannot, but only benefit from what the more knowledgeable will write! DGG 03:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
or movable type
seriously, my fellow editor, perhaps a new page might deal with these aspectsDGG 06:06, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Semantics
right Thanks for that great [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Semantics&curid=29107&diff=88427675&oldid=87285642 expansion] of Semantics. I've been thinking it needed an overhaul like this for a while, but never got around to it because of the scope of the enterprise. I think you've done an admirable job of compressing a lot of info in a few concise and clearly worded paragraphs. It may be a little bit skewed towards Peregrin's view on things*, but I think it is a great base to build further on. Thanks again!
Keep up the great work, — mark ✎ 19:38, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
* I'm missing the embodiment angle for example, with works like Lakoff & Johnson 1980, Lakoff 1987; and non-cognitivist Wittgenstein-inspired views on semantics like those of Sperber & Wilson and Keller (1994, 1996). But hey, I admit that that's rather whiny to say after such a great expansion. So thanks again — your work is highly appreciated!
By the way, are you aware of Countering Systemic Bias? It seems to relate to the discussion started here. You might be specifically interested in its linguistics subsection. Regards, — mark ✎ 20:22, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Art & craft development v.s technical development
:reposted from Talk:History of western typography:
History of western typography is focussed almost exclusively on typographic style and practice as an art and craft, with almost no info on technical developments. That's what Typography, for the most part, is—an art & craft, involving type style and design. Perfect.
Movable type and typefounding are dearly written-about as a separate subject in Movable type (thanks for your additions guys!) It covers the pre-history of typefounding and technical developments in the East, but has little on developments in typographic style as an art and craft—as you would expect. Perfect.
History of typography in East Asia is much the same scope as Movable type but with far less content. It's purely technical and has next-to-nothing on developments in typographic style as an art and craft, use, page effect etc, no names of typefaces or designers. Not so perfect. There is a whole new project for editors interested in filling in this gap in History of typography in East Asia. Thanks!
Remember that it doesn't have to be perfect, and you're encouraged to ignore all rules and use common sense if it results in a better encyclopedia :)
woodblock printing
You will see you have messed up the footnotes here - please sort ou. Thanks
Johnbod 19:02, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Your edit to [[:Johannes Gutenberg]]
Your recent edit to :Johannes Gutenberg ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Johannes_Gutenberg&diff=90039714&oldid=89983875 diff]) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 16:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
:: Why is movable typ in Korea mentioned in the entry, buy not earlier Chinese movable type? And in a entry like that, which concentrates on the history of movable type (as opposed to its workings), it is certainly worth pointing out, that ALL movable type today traces back to Gutenberg, who already employed the same lead, tin and antimony alloy as today (see EB, 2006, entry 'printing') My propostion is to leave only a single line in the entry (Movable type is the system of printing and typography using movable pieces of metal type, made by casting from matrices struck by letterpunches)Gun Powder Ma 13:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Woodcut
Once again you have messed up the page with the edit - please look at the finished article when you do an edit, to check the result. Please correct.
I agree the article is Eurocentric. When I expanded it it from the purely technical stub I looked for stuff on Wikipedia to add but there was only the ukiyo-e article, which deals with a particular rather late genre of Japanese print. There needs to be an article on Asian prints in general (a parallel to old master print) - were there old Chinese ones? I don't even know. I would rather someone with more knowledge did this.
I don't agree about any renaming. This is a technique article, one of a number feeding from printmaking; the history section here should be brief.
I will copy the last 2 paras about the article to the talk page,
Johnbod 18:33, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Nazrul-stamp-bangladesh.gif)
Thanks for uploading :Image:Nazrul-stamp-bangladesh.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 19:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Asiancentric article
If you want to see one of these, try Graphic arts. I'm not a tagger myself, but you might want to tag that
Johnbod 19:11, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Metal type casting in China
:reposted from User talk:James Arboghast:
There is this paragraph at the bottom of the section (just above metal
movable type in Korea):
:This system was later enhanced by pressing wooden blocks into sand and casting metal types from the depression in copper, bronze, iron or tin. The set of wafer-like metal stamp types could be assembled to form pages, inked, and page impressions taken from rubbings on cloth or paper.
This belies the whole point of this section - it simply cannot be that
bronze or copper were also being cast.
Around 1300, tin was being cast in China - the type may have been wafer-thin - it surely failed with the inks they were using then. This sentence is too vague and sweeping... Anyone to throw some light on this? mukerjee (talk) 00:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
:Hi Mukejee. Sorry for the delay replying to this question. I've been flat-out buried under a pile of work in real life.
:The info on casting in China came from John Man's The Gutenberg Revolution, chapter 4 "Something in the air", quote, "The same principal was extended to make metal letters: the wood-block was pressed into sand, and the impression used as a mould for bronze, copper, tin, iron or lead. The result was a collection of thin stamps..."
:What's so vague and sweeping about that? It's a specific regarding the materials. It may sound sweeping in being all-inclusive (of the metals), if you read it that way. I rewrote the info to avoid copyvio, but otherwise technically the meaning of the passage is equivalent to that in Man's book.
:How is it that, "...it simply cannot be that bronze or copper were also being cast." ? John Man may have got the details on casting materials incorrect, or he may have got it right. If other sources contradict his account let's have them.
Sir you posted this on my user page pl use talk page.thanks
I just copyedited the Akbar Bugti page - it was a crying shame...
Faiz says, in "Mujh-se Pahli-si Mohabbat, Mere Mehboob, Na Maang":
Tera gham hai to gham-e-dahr ka jhagra kya hai?
It's a love poem of course, and I can't resist the next two lines:
Teri surat se hai aalam mein baharon ko sabat,
Teri aankhon ke siwa duniya mein rakha kya hai?
Mukerjee 05:22, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Comment
Would you mind weighing in on this debate? --evrik (talk) 15:24, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Your edit to [[:Lonchura]]
Your recent edit to :Lonchura ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lonchura&diff=120436184&oldid=114514797 diff]) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 08:00, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
:I've deleted Munia, recreated Lonchura prior to your edits, then moved it to Munia, so all should be well. jimfbleak 09:58, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
::Sorry, I missed the changes that you had made other than the article title. jimfbleak 12:24, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Barred buttonquail
Whilst alternative English names are fair enough, it's not the intention for Wikipedia to be a multilingual dictionary, so I've removed the list. If you think about it, a species like Barn Owl would have a list of names in the languages of the countries in which it occurs longer than the article itself. jimfbleak 10:06, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
:I still think it's against wiki policy, but I don't want to be bloody-minded, so I accept what you have done. I think that the previous layout, with half the intro taken up with a list of foreign names was very off-putting, but I'll let it rest now. jimfbleak 12:40, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
::on a separate point, several of the alternative names you mention (eg fan-tailed snipe) I have never heard in the UK or elsewhere in 20 years of birding. Perhaps you could clarify when you add them whether they are former obsolete names, or, if they are still current, where they are used? jimfbleak 12:44, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- I have Grimmett, Inskipp and Inskipp, Birds of India {{ISBN|0-691-04910-6}}, which is more recent. All I'm suggesting is that you consider adding something like "Common Snipe also called Fan-tailed Snipe in India", just as, for example, Rough-legged Buzzard is called Rough-legged Hawk in North America.
- I'm pretty sure that the Podiceps Little Grebe is an old classification, but can't source it at present.
- Bank Myna is red-linked under Acridotheres. It is listed in Grimmett et al and Freare and Craig, Starlings and Mynas {{ISBN|0-7136-3961-X}}. Do you want me to knock up a stub for it?
jimfbleak 15:24, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
I've fixed Latham, will respond to rest later, I have to go out very soon for rest of the day. jimfbleak 04:38, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Birds
DYK nomination
Hi, I've nominated an article you worked on, Brown Rock Chat, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the "hook" for the article at Template talk:Did you know#Articles created on April 25 where you can improve it if you see fit. MeegsC 21:43, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
:I found the DYK page early in my wanderings (I've only been here a little over a week) and try to visit regularly to look for interesting articles -- especially those with a bird or biological theme. Wikipedia generates a daily list of all new articles that haven't submitted a DYK piece, and I found your article there. I hope it makes the front page! ;-) You can nominate your own new articles too; just pick out some "Huh, I didn't know that!" bit of information (from an article written in the last five days) and write a DYK under 200 characters long. MeegsC 08:13, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
::Thanks for the suggestion! It took me an age to figure out how to do it, but I got there in the end! MeegsC | Talk 12:45, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Brown Rock Chat
class="messagebox {{#ifeq:{{{small |
|-
|On 30 April, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Brown Rock Chat, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.
Nice Work
I just wanted to drop by and thank you for your work at Yogi Adityanath, Gorakhnath Math and Hindu Yuva Vahini. I think they are splendid contributions. I had wished that the articles move in the direction that you have taken them. Appreciated... -Vritti 21:12, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
DYK
I just noticed that your DYK entry for 9 April has a red link. Please link it properly to the article, otherwise the article will miss out technically by default. Regards. -- P.K.Niyogi 07:33, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Sain Zahoor
class="messagebox {{#ifeq:{{{small |
|-
|On 13 May, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sain Zahoor, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
|} --howcheng {chat} 22:33, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Congratulations - P.K.Niyogi 04:14, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
DYK nom
Hi. Can you find a source for every statement in the article? Because we can;t have comments about murders etc there without a source, per WP:BLP. Blnguyen (cranky admin anniversary) 07:39, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
:Thankyou for your hard work Mukerjee, the article is certainly very interesting and now that every thing is in order, it is enjoying its rightful moment in the sun. Thanks for your persistence. Blnguyen (cranky admin anniversary) 02:04, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
An article which you started, or significantly expanded, ''[[Pappu Kalani]]'', was selected for [[WP:DYK|DYK]]!
class="messagebox {{#ifeq:{{{small |
|-
|On May 29, 2007, Did you know? was updated with {{#if:{{{4|}}}|facts|a fact}} from the article{{#if:{{{4|}}}|s|}} [[Pappu Kalani]]{{#if:{{{4|}}}|{{#if:{{{5|}}}|, |, and}} {{{4}}}
}}{{#if:{{{5|}}}|{{#if:{{{6|}}}|, |, and}} {{{5}}}
}}{{#if:{{{6|}}}|, and {{{6}}}}}, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
|}
Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 (talk) 20:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Little context in [[:Mid-Day (newspaper)]]
leftHello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on :Mid-Day (newspaper), by {{#ifeq:1|1|Lenin and McCarthy (talk · contribs),}} another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because :Mid-Day (newspaper) is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting :Mid-Day (newspaper), please affix the template
DYK
class="messagebox {{#ifeq:{{{small |
|-
|On 20 July, 2007, Did you know? was updated with {{#if:{{{4|}}}|facts|a fact}} from the article{{#if:{{{4|}}}|s|}} Re-bracketing{{#if:{{{4|}}}|{{#if:{{{5|}}}|, |, and}} {{{4}}}
}}{{#if:{{{5|}}}|{{#if:{{{6|}}}|, |, and}} {{{5}}}
}}{{#if:{{{6|}}}|, and {{{6}}}}}, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Takbir
Good catch on Saudi flag! I must have read that passage several times, and just sort of zipped past it... AnonMoos 07:05, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Food fortification
Hi, I have renamed one of your links, Micronutrient fortification to Food fortification. I'm going to start work on that article in my "copious free time". --Slashme 06:42, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
:Glad you liked the changes. I doubt I'll have time to hack at the page much in the near future, but I'll keep an eye on it. --Slashme 05:34, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Maps
Speedy deletion of [[:Sham Chourasi Gharana]]
Image:Nuvola apps important.svg A tag has been placed on :Sham Chourasi Gharana, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a1.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{tl|hangon}}
on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{tl|hangon}}
on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Bmg916Speak 13:48, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
DYK
class="messagebox {{#ifeq:{{{small |
|-
|On 22 September, 2007, Did you know? was updated with {{#if:{{{4|}}}|facts|a fact}} from the article{{#if:{{{4|}}}|s|}} Hans Raj Khanna{{#if:{{{4|}}}|{{#if:{{{5|}}}|, |, and}} {{{4}}}
}}{{#if:{{{5|}}}|{{#if:{{{6|}}}|, |, and}} {{{5}}}
}}{{#if:{{{6|}}}|, and {{{6}}}}}, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
|} --Daniel Case 02:45, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
DYK
Hi, Can you please copyedit Mahendra Nath Mulla and help take it to DYK.Thanks .--Shyamsunder 13:21, 06 October 2007 (UTC)
Did you know
class="messagebox {{#ifeq:{{{small |
|-
|On 8 October, 2007, Did you know? was updated with {{#if:{{{4|}}}|facts|a fact}} from the article{{#if:{{{4|}}}|s|}} Tansen {{#if:{{{4|}}}|{{#if:{{{5|}}}|, |, and}} {{{4}}}
}}{{#if:{{{5|}}}|{{#if:{{{6|}}}|, |, and}} {{{5}}}
}}{{#if:{{{6|}}}|, and {{{6}}}}}, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
DYK Medal
style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};"
|rowspan="2" valign="top" | 80px |rowspan="2" | |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | The DYK Medal |
style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For a great collection of DYKs!! -- P.K.Niyogi 11:16, 8 October 2007 (UTC) |
Gopal Chandra Bhattacharya
class="messagebox {{#ifeq:{{{small |
|-
|On 16 October, 2007, Did you know? was updated with {{#if:{{{4|}}}|facts|a fact}} from the article{{#if:{{{4|}}}|s|}} Gopal Chandra Bhattacharya{{#if:{{{4|}}}|{{#if:{{{5|}}}|, |, and}} {{{4}}}
}}{{#if:{{{5|}}}|{{#if:{{{6|}}}|, |, and}} {{{5}}}
}}{{#if:{{{6|}}}|, and {{{6}}}}}, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
|} --Elkman (Elkspeak) 17:04, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Gopal Chandra Bhattacharya
Gopal Chandra Bhattacharyawas nominated for DYK by {{User|PFHLai}}. Once it is properly developed the Puja article will be informative and good reference material. Regards - P.K.Niyogi 08:31, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
শুভ দূর্গা পুজা
cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" style="background: #ffffd5; border: #FADA60 solid 2px; padding: 5px; font-size: 90%;"
| 300px | {| cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" |
style="text-align: center; border: #FADA60; background: #FADA60;"
|শুভ দূর্গা পুজা !!! |
style="background: #FADA60; border: #FADA60;" |
style="background: #EE88A;" colspan="2" |প্রিয় {{BASEPAGENAME}}, শীতল হাওয়ায় শিউলির সুবাস পুজো মানে নদীর ধারে সাদা কাশ। পুজো মানে পথ চাওয়া কোনো আপন কে ফিরে পাওয়া ভোরের বেলায় শিশির ছোঁয়া। পুজো মানে উতলা মন পুজা মন্ডপে কাওকে দেওয়া মন পুজা মানে নতুন নতুন কাপড়ের কড়কড়ানি আর মন্ডপে মাকে বরণ। পুজো মানে হাসির ছটা কল-কল কথা আর সাজা-গোজা মায়ের কাছে আবদার আর গরম পুজার বাজার। পুজো মানে আকাশের গায়ে পেজা তুলোর মতো ভাসা নতুন বছরের জন্য প্রাণ ভরে নেওয়া আশা ধুনোর গন্ধে ধাকের বাদ্য আর অষ্টমীর অঞ্জলি প্রার্থনা আর পাড়ায় পাড়ায় আগমণির সুর। পুজো মানে, বন্ধু আমার, বাঙালীর প্রান, পুজো মানে আমাদের জীবনের সম্মিলিত গান। আশা করি দুর্গা পুজা আপনার ভাল কাটুক আর দূর্গা মা আপনাকে আর আপনার পরিবারকে ভাল রাখবে। আপনাকে আর আপনার পরিবারকে আমার শুভ বিজয়ার শুভেচ্ছা। Amartyabag TALK2ME 11:22, 17 October 2007 (UTC) |
|}
DYK
class="messagebox {{#ifeq:{{{small |
|-
|On D. R. Kaprekar, {{{2}}}, Did you know? was updated with {{#if:{{{4|}}}|facts|a fact}} from the article{{#if:{{{4|}}}|s|}} {{{3}}}{{#if:{{{4|}}}|{{#if:{{{5|}}}|, |, and}} {{{4}}}
}}{{#if:{{{5|}}}|{{#if:{{{6|}}}|, |, and}} {{{5}}}
}}{{#if:{{{6|}}}|, and {{{6}}}}}, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
|} Adam Cuerden talk 05:47, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
DYK
class="messagebox {{#ifeq:{{{small |
|-
|On 29 December, 2007, Did you know? was updated with {{#if:{{{4|}}}|facts|a fact}} from the article{{#if:{{{4|}}}|s|}} Haridas Mundhra{{#if:{{{4|}}}|{{#if:{{{5|}}}|, |, and}} {{{4}}}
}}{{#if:{{{5|}}}|{{#if:{{{6|}}}|, |, and}} {{{5}}}
}}{{#if:{{{6|}}}|, and {{{6}}}}}, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
|} --Wizardman 18:43, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:India-today-cover-quattrochi.jpg
Thanks for uploading :Image:India-today-cover-quattrochi.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:57, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
[[J. Paul Getty Award for Conservation Leadership]]
Hi, I just saw your new article. It seems like a great award to have an article about. Just wanted to point out that the main source on the WWF website says that the award was established in 2006: http://worldwildlife.org/about/gettyaward/ Now that can't be the case because they also have a list of recipients from long before 2006. Just wondering if you knew of another source that could support the 1974 date. Thanks, Darkspots (talk) 17:29, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
:The new information makes it completely clear. Nice article start. Darkspots (talk) 11:43, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Ehsan Jafri
class="messagebox {{#ifeq:|yes|small|standard}}-talk" |
Image:Updated DYK query.svg
|On 2 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with {{#if:|facts|a fact}} from the article{{#if:|s |
}}{{#if:|{{#if:|, |, and}} {{{5}}}
}}{{#if:|, and {{{6}}}}}, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
[[Lakhbir Singh Brar Rode]]
Hi Mukerjee. I listed your article about Lakhbir Singh Brar Rode for deletion. I send you this message in case you may wish to change the article or debate the topic. Regards, Lester 05:19, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
:Got your message. I hate to list an article for deletion, as I know it takes a lot of work to get an article up there. It's just that it seems a fairly weak link that he had anything to do with blowing up a plane, and the major news organizations don't appear to be following that possibility. If you think the article should stay, you may wish to post a comment >>Here<< at the discussion page for its deletion. If you haven't posted on one of those pages before, check the formatting of other articles listed for deletion. Usually people start with either Keep or Delete in bold type, followed by their reasons for keeping or deleting. It won't be up to me to decide. Other people will leave comments there. Regards, Lester 06:44, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject India Newsletter Volume III, Issue no. 001 - June 2008
style="border-spacing:8px;margin:0px -8px" width="100%"
|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid #cef2e0; background-color:#f5fffa; vertical-align:top;color:#000"| {| width="100%" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#f5fffa" ! Project News | |||||
style="color:#000"|
:*Five new articles were promoted to featured article status in 2008: Western Chalukya architecture, 2007 Samjhauta Express bombings, Akhtar Hameed Khan, Preity Zinta, Kannada literature in the Vijayanagara Empire. :*Two new lists were given featured list status in 2008: List of international cricket centuries by Sachin Tendulkar, List of Victoria Cross recipients by nationality. :*There is currently one Indian article as a featured article nominee. Two more articles, (Bengali language, Kazi Nazrul Islam) are undergoing featured article reviews. You could help save these two articles by leaving your comments or assisting the involved editors. :*Three articles are undergoing good article nominations: Anekantavada, A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada and Santosh Subramaniam.
| |||||
Article statistics and to-do lists | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
style="border: 0px #000000 solid; padding: 1em; width: 60%; vertical-align: top;" |
Article Statistics
Make visible or invisible by clicking Show or Hide, respectively.
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;" | |||||
colspan="2" rowspan="2" | India articles | colspan="6" | Importance | ||||
{{Top-Class|category=Category:Top-importance India articles|Top}} | {{High-Class|category=Category:High-importance India articles|High}} | {{Mid-Class|category=Category:Mid-importance India articles|Mid}} | {{Low-Class|category=Category:Low-importance India articles|Low}} | {{No-Class|category=Category:Unknown-importance India articles|No}} | Total |
rowspan="12" | Quality | |||||
{{FA-Class|category=Category:FA-Class India articles|FA}}
| 19 || 20 || 16 || 10 || 8 || 73 | |||||
{{FL-Class|category=Category:FL-Class India articles|FL}}
| 1 || 4 || 2 || 1 || 1 || 9 | |||||
{{A-Class|category=Category:A-Class India articles|A}}
| || 2 || 3 || 3 || || 8 | |||||
{{GA-Class|category=Category:GA-Class India articles|GA}}
| 4 || 5 || 7 || 12 || 16 || 44 | |||||
{{B-Class|category=Category:B-Class India articles|B}}
| 87 || 128 || 194 || 153 || 263 || 825 | |||||
{{Start-Class|category=Category:Start-Class India articles|Start}}
| 74 || 208 || 530 || 946 || 2730 || 4488 | |||||
{{Stub-Class|category=Category:Stub-Class India articles|Stub}}
| 36 || 159 || 428 || 2540 || 18644 || 21807 | |||||
{{List-Class|category=Category:List-Class India articles|List}}
| || || || || 360 || 360 | |||||
{{Assessed-Class}}
| 221 || 526 || 1180 || 3665 || 22022 || 27614 | |||||
{{Unassessed-Class|category=Category:Unassessed-Class India articles|Unassessed}}
| 1 || 7 || 46 || 92 || 12815 || 12961 | |||||
Total
| 222 || 533 || 1226 || 3757 || 34837 || 40575 |