Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 191#Weird user page revision

{{Wikipedia:Village pump/Archive header}}

<s>Minerva</s> Mobile mode doesn't render small tags

Is that deliberate? — 𝐆𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐩𝐢𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐚  08:09, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

:{{works for me}} {{re|Guarapiranga}} see [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Xaosflux/sandbox106?useskin=minerva this sample page]. Notably however, big and default are rendering the same for me in minerva. I tried with Chrome and with Firefox current builds. — xaosflux Talk 14:27, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

::I stand corrected! It actually doesn't render in mobile mode (I assumed everything mobile was simply Minerva, without testing it in desktop mode). And indeed, vector in mobile doesn't render and either. — 𝐆𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐩𝐢𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐚  14:38, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

:::{{re|Guarapiranga}} thanks for update (I added extra link on that page for demo). I think this is disabled by design - good chance that {{ping|Jdlrobson}} can point us to any documentation about support for font-size tags with the MobileFrontend extension... — xaosflux Talk 14:51, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

::::What Izno says. These are deprecated HTML tag that browsers may not necessarily support now or in future. Minerva intentionally does not support them for this reason, and we should be working towards moving away from these tags. There are much better alternatives that are more future proof available Jdlrobson (talk) 20:41, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

:::::{{ping|Jdlrobson}} <small> is no longer deprecated. Probably worth a Phab task (wherein a technical group can decide whether it should have a smaller font-size now/remove the reset). Izno (talk) 01:32, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

::::::The small tag was repurposed in the HTML 5 spec. Where it's used to decrease font size that may or may not be an appropriate usage . Given the small tag can only ever be used by template editors introducing raw HTML I think that is a concern of the template that uses it (using template styles) not a concern of the software itself.

::::::Note we only add styles in core for HTML produced by core code. Jdlrobson (talk) 14:43, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

:::::::{{U|Jdlrobson}}: {{tq|the small tag can only ever be used by template editors}} This is not true. There are currently [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=insource%3Asmall+insource%3A%2F%5C%3C+%2Asmall%2F&title=Special:Search&profile=advanced&fulltext=1&ns0=1 some 400k uses] (times out). Where did you get the idea it was only available in templates? Izno (talk) 18:07, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

::::::::{{smalldiv|1=Was going to say, that was news to me... SamStrongTalks (talk) 18:43, 6 July 2021 (UTC)}}

::::::::Templates are user generated content. Not the PHP or JS code that powers the MediaWiki software. Jdlrobson (talk) 03:13, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

:::::::::{{U|Jdlrobson}}, why do you think I was confused about the various and sundry notions of template external to the template namespace?... That doesn't answer the question that I asked either. (Sorry to grill you, but I'm really confused about why you're really confused....) Izno (talk) 04:10, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

::::::::::Sorry for the confusion. I'm still not 100% sure where I've confused you 🤪 but the point I wanted to get across is as a developer of the MediaWiki software I do not recommend using deprecated HTML tags under any circumstances. The small tag does have meaning in HTML5 but I am working on the assumption that most wikitext that uses these tags uses them with the HTML4 definition since wikipedia predates HTML5 and there are probably better elements that could be used in their place.

::::::::::From a mediawiki software POV it doesn't make sense to provide styling defaults for small (since the definition has changed during the lifetime of Wikipedia), nor does it make sense to provide defaults for big (since it's deprecated).

::::::::::With parsoid we are moving towards HTML5 semantic elements. If styling for small or big is needed they must live in templates or inside MediaWiki:Common.css IMO as wikitext is the only way these elements can end up in the HTML of the page. They are no longer used in the generation of special page HTML for example.

::::::::::Does that make sense of have I made things more confusing? Jdlrobson (talk) 20:37, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

:Big is an obsolete HTML element and should not be used. Replace it where you find it with any other template or HTML suitable (perhaps {{tl|big}}, perhaps removal entirely). So far as I know, it is reset in the CSS for MobileFrontend to 100% and never made bigger than that, which I understand to be deliberate as it was obsolete.

:Small on the other hand is somewhat conflicting for me. It was made obsolete for a brief period in HTML 5 but is no longer and is used to mark up some things you would expect to be "small" text, such as disclaimers in television advertisements. It does not mean "small text" however, even though it remains commonly used for that purpose on Wikipedia in a callback to its deprecated use in HTML 4. ("People use tags in the way they are spelled and not necessarily what they mean semantically.")

:Like big, small is also reset in the same styles for similar reason. Whether it should be 100% font size today is a question mark; that it is named small does not imply that it must make text small, only that it mark up text in the way that HTML 5 expects. Izno (talk) 17:19, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

::I now see that has been set to {{mono|font-size:85%}} in MW's common.css for the last 5 years. Why doesn't mobile mode pick that up then? Just curious. — 𝐆𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐩𝐢𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐚  22:39, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

:::{{U|Guarapiranga}}, mobile loads from MediaWiki:Mobile.css, not Common.css. The reason small is in Common.css at all is because it is not consistently rendered by browsers at a certain size, and it is valuable anyway to set it to the minimum onwiki % established (a long time ago when font sizes were smaller -- Monobook's particularly). Izno (talk) 01:39, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

:This worked for me a while ago (I added it to Special:MyPage/Minerva.js):

big {font-size:124% !important;}

small {font-size:76% !important;}

Qwerfjkltalk 18:37, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

::Wrong page – that's CSS, not JS, so you have to put in Special:MyPage/minerva.css. – Rummskartoffel 21:08, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

:::@Rummskartoffel Oops, I meant .css. Thanks for correcting me! ―Qwerfjkltalk 21:34, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

:Pinging @GuarapirangaQwerfjkltalk 18:40, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

::Thanks, {{u|Qwerfjkl}}, but my concern is with what readers see, not what I see when logged in. Interestingly, as {{u|Xaosflux}} demonstrated above, works in Minerva when in desktop mode even without your hack, as it is set to {{mono|font-size:85%}} in MW's common.css (why mobile mode doesn't pick that up is what I'm asking about). Now, out of curiosity, how did you choose 76 and 124%; did you eyeball it, or copy another standard? Cheers. — 𝐆𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐩𝐢𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐚  22:39, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

:::@Guarapiranga I originally got got it from here, then doubled the difference to make it stand out more. ―Qwerfjkltalk 06:11, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

::::The {{tag|small}} element dates back to 1997, with the HTML 3.2 specification (although it was included in the never-adopted HTML 3.0 spec of 1995). Until HTML 4.01, the various specifications merely showed that it rendered text in a small font. Beginning with HTML5 (2014), it has been repurposed to have a semantic meaning, and is used to represent side comments such as small print: small print typically features disclaimers, caveats, legal restrictions, or copyrights; it is also sometimes used for attribution, or for satisfying licensing requirements (see [//www.w3.org/TR/html52/textlevel-semantics.html#the-small-element HTML 5.2 spec]). So it does not necessarily have to use a font size that is physically smaller than the normal font for that passage of text, although most browsers will do that. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:33, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

:::::Right. Thanks, {{u|Redrose64}}. I'll use {{t|small}} instead from now on. Perhaps this should be documented somewhere (where?), and the tag possibly replaced everywhere by the template (IOW, perhaps WP should deprecate the tag to avoid the confusion). — Guarapiranga  10:43, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Why do I keep getting signed out?

I clicked on the box to stay signed in each time. This seems to happen whenever I use another computer at a library and I sign in to Wikipedia to see if anyone responded to me or one of my edits.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:21, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

:Just guessing, but perhaps Wikimedia has instituted some account security safeguards against the current ransomware hijacks. — Maile (talk) 23:15, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

::Or maybe the library has disabled cookies in the browser. PrimeHunter (talk) 23:31, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

:{{re|Vchimpanzee}} Is this your sequence of events:

:# Logon at trusted computer, set "stay signed in" option during logon

:# Logon at untrusted computer

:# Logoff from untrusted computer

:# Expect that trusted computer is still logged in, but it is not

:? If so, that is expected behavior, logging out from anywhere logs you out from everywhere. — xaosflux Talk 23:34, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

::Yes, that is what happens. "trusted computer" is the one in my house.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:17, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

:::{{re|Vchimpanzee}} currently logging you out anywhere, logs you out of everywhere. Sometimes this message may not display to let you know that is what happened (c.f. phab:T226736). Being able to log out of only one session is not currently available, see phab:T37220 for the development request for that feature. It is a good idea to be able to log out from everywhere, but I agree it can be annoying (especially with 2FA) and I'd prefer that there were separate functions for logging off a specific session/device and logging off of everywhere. — xaosflux Talk 18:11, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

::::To prevent this from occurring again, {{u|Vchimpanzee}}, you could create a public account for use in libraries/work/school/on mobile so that when you leave that public area, you can log out without logging out on your "main" account. Sdrqaz (talk) 18:44, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

:::::Or clear cookies or use incognito mode. Nardog (talk) 20:23, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

:::::I did that but then I never remembered to sign in with that account, so now I use it to test how things are for new users or with the standard preferences. Incidentally, I forgot to sign out at the library and I'm still signed in at home.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:01, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

::@Xaosflux it is only "expected behavior" from the point of view of the people who built the system. I don't think it's "expected behavior" from the point of view of most users. I'm not aware of any other auth system anywhere which has that behavior. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:16, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

:::{{re|RoySmith}} I meant that it is not a malfunction, but yes it could be seen as a UX design issue. phab:T37220 is opened to change to log-out-of-just-this-session, feel free to add additional insights there. — xaosflux Talk 18:26, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

::::Yes, I know what you meant :-) I've already commented there (May 1, 2019). -- RoySmith (talk) 18:38, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Server timing out?

Hello, Village pumpers,

In my work, I do searches on some bots' contributions and I frequently get the message "Server timed out" before any results can be displayed. I don't get this message every time but it's definitely most of the time. I also work on a laptop, not my phone. So, I'm wondering is there anything I can do on my end to extend the amount of time given to a search so I don't get a "timed out" message? Or is this a pretty uniform result that every editor would get if they did the same search?

Thanks for any help you can offer. Liz Read! Talk! 00:33, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

:@Liz can you be a bit more specific on what requests are timing out/what data you're trying to look up? Examples would be helpful. Legoktm (talk) 07:51, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

::Okay, Legoktm, what I'm doing is looking at contributions in a particular name space and "Only show edits that are latest revisions" box checked and that is no problem. All the results are displayed. But when I try to view "Oldest" edits, that's when the system times out. As an alternative, I've tried to go backwards in time with these selected results, clicking "Older 200" repeatedly but it always sticks at the last group of oldest edits in this selection. I've tried it with several different bots and it's usually the same results...timed out when trying to view the oldest edits in this selection of contributions. Oh, and this selection of edits isn't old edits, they have all occurred in the past 12 months. Liz Read! Talk! 21:43, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

:::You guys are brilliant here and this can't be an unique problem. Is there anything I can do to lengthen the amount of time an action can take before the server times out? Liz Read! Talk! 05:19, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

::::The namespace filter is just slow (I found some historical discussion from 2011 when our then-volunteer database admin disabled the feature for a while), and if that account hasn't made any edits in that namespace recently, it'll probably time out. There's no way to bypass the 60 second timeout, it's global across all requests.

::::However, you can use Quarry and other tools to run slower queries to get the same data. If there's a common pattern/theme to your requests, it shouldn't be too difficult to build a slow tool that gets you the data you're looking for. Legoktm (talk) 08:35, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

:::::Okay, thank you, Legoktm, you answered my question about whether I could do anything to extend the amount of time for the server to do its sorting. I don't know much about Quarry except that usually when I ask a technical question, someone gives me a link to it. I guess my last question is where should I go next to learn about using it or ask for assistance? And remember, a little knowledge can be a dangerous thing. ;-} Liz Read! Talk! 02:26, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

::::::Wikipedia:Request a query is a dedicated page for this kind of thing, m:Research:Quarry has some more detail. However asking on this page is totally fine too :) Legoktm (talk) 07:43, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Search script

Is there any way to see talk pages when you are searching? For example, if I search for "Nepal" it would display like this {{pagelinks|Nepal}}. If there is please let me know. Thanks. Bada Kaji (talk • श्रीमान् गम्भीर) 12:47, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

:{{ping|Bada Kaji}} If you enable Navigation popups at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets then you get these options and more when you hover over a link and then "action". PrimeHunter (talk) 20:46, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Moved a page, talk page didn't go with it

I just moved King Arthur's Hall, Tintagel to King Arthur's Great Halls, but for some reason the talk page Talk:King Arthur's Hall, Tintagel didn't get moved with it. I'm sure that whenever I've moved a page before the talk page has gone along for the ride. I've now moved the talk page, but is this some kind of site improvement, a momentary glitch, or something else? Thanks, DuncanHill (talk) 09:21, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

:"Move associated talk page" is a checkbox on the move form, e.g. at Special:MovePage/Example. It's enabled by default, at least for me. PrimeHunter (talk) 20:40, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

::And it's enabled by default for me. So why didn't it work? DuncanHill (talk) 21:09, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Bug fixing is needed!

Try going to the page of Dong_Jingwei (a man), then switch to its counterpart in the Standard Chinese language (中文). The unrelated page of [https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%B5%AE%E6%B8%B8%E7%94%9F%E7%89%A9 浮游生物] (plankton) turns up. The problem is one way, i.e. the language-switching links on the latter's page function normally. Who can get rid of this error?--165.228.11.59 (talk) 09:32, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

:It was introduced [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dong_Jingwei&diff=prev&oldid=1030311539 here] by {{ping||Abovfold}}, apparently in error. I have removed it, and the article now links correctly to the Chinese page. DuncanHill (talk) 09:48, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

::Thanks for teaching us. I shall be able to fix similar problems on my own next time. The trick in short: Someone probably played a joke by adding 'zh:浮游生物' to the article.--165.228.11.59 (talk) 11:00, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Odd google image search link to article

(per User talk:Bogger#An odd photo when you look up my Edwin J. McEnelly page on Google.)

A google image search of "Edwin J. McEnelly" shows a link to the article but with an unrelated image (two men posing for a photo). Any ideas? Bogger (talk) 09:58, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

:The images are taken from Google's own search index and not from Wikipedia. Your best bet is to use the {{Button|Feedback}} button. Kleinpecan (talk) 19:14, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

::We get many such posts. See Template:HD/GKG for a stock reply. PrimeHunter (talk) 20:36, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

:::{{u|PrimeHunter}}, does this file possibly exist on Wikipedia or at Commons? Reverse image searches find no sign of where the file came from, other than here. Could it have been inadvertently transcluded onto the article? Home Lander (talk) 01:26, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

:::This is a completely different case. Google Images specifically shows the unrelated image as their cached thumbnail of https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9d/Edwin.jpg. My guess is that the hash of our image somehow collided with that of the other image in their database. Nardog (talk) 03:26, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

::::Images at :commons:File:Edwin.jpg were deleted 14 October 2017 and 30 December 2020.[https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=File%3AEdwin.jpg] I don't have access to see them. PrimeHunter (talk) 10:23, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

:::::Ah, that must be it. The only living contribution of the uploader of the 2020 image, on the Spanish Wikipedia, contains a mention of an artist named Edwin, who resembles the guy on the left in the picture in question. It's still weird considering the old image was deleted six months ago and the new one has been up for two months. Nardog (talk) 11:00, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

{{od}}

Additional discussion started at :Commons:Commons:Village_pump/Technical#Bad_Google_cache_of_File:Edwin.jpg. Home Lander (talk) 01:03, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Weird user page revision

What on earth was going on with [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Catcallofcthulhu&oldid=1030145063 this revision] of User:Catcallofcthulhu? It caused my main screen reader JAWS to freeze for a couple of seconds, along with causing Chrome to crash when I tried to edit it, because of its extreme line length. Is this what passes for ASCII/Unicode art these days? I'm asking here because, apart from one other edit that brought them to my attention, their edits seem generally good, and I figured that people here would have the best explanations. I've written a message on the user's talk page but they use the mobile app so they may or may not see it. Graham87 16:25, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

:Yeah, Unicode has all sorts of weird sideways-reading fonts that seem to be mostly good for this sort of stuff. I was going to suggest that a user's freedom to express themselves on their user page reaches its limit when it breaks other people's browsers, but I see you've fixed that already. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:29, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

: {{ec}} It seems to be Zalgo text that decodes to "This user is fdşag". No, I have no idea what that means either. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:31, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

::A google search for fdsag reveals that, um, well, I guess what it reveals is that I'm enough older than the current generation of kool kids that I've lost all hope of understanding WTF they're talking about. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:36, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

:::Thanks, wow you learn something every day! Graham87 16:52, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

:::The g is fdsag is not supposed to be there, it is defined here: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=fdsa . Spelling is not really important to these youngings.--Snævar (talk) 07:19, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

::::I see what you did there😉 Catcallofcthulhu (talk) 07:08, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

:::That's literally just me hitting random keys. Catcallofcthulhu (talk) 07:07, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

List of all usernames?

{{tracked|T51132}}

Is a list of all usernames on enwiki available somewhere as a file? I would have thought it would be in [https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Data_dumps/What%27s_available_for_download the XML dumps], as a dump of the user table, but I'm not seeing it there. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:20, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

:Special:ListUsers. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:50, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

:Depending on what you want to do with it, what you are looking for may be available [https://dumps.wikimedia.org/enwiki/latest/enwiki-latest-user_groups.sql.gz here]. — xaosflux Talk 23:47, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

::Yeah, I found enwiki-20210701-user_groups.sql, but that's just the users that are admins and groups like that. I'm looking for a list of all the usernames as a file, so I can slice it and dice it with regular unix command-line tools. I may end up writing something trivial that walks the user table and dumps it into a file, but it just seems weird that such a thing doesn't already exist in the dumps. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:36, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

:::This sounds like phab:T51132. Depending on what fields you want, it should be fairly trivial for a sysadmin to run an export of this if you ask (especially if it is a one-time). Now you mentioned, "enwiki" so do you really only want an account if it is attached here, or would the SUL list work? — xaosflux Talk 01:02, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

::::I assume the SUL list is a superset of the enwiki list? Either would be fine for my purpose. If somebody could do a one-off export for me, that would be excellent. How does one normally request something like that? Open a phab ticket? -- RoySmith (talk) 02:24, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

:Have you tried generating such a list on toolforge with a sql query? -FASTILY 06:51, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

::I'll try that (query 56702 is running) but expect it to time out. — xaosflux Talk 11:43, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

:::Nope, too big. — xaosflux Talk 10:56, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

::::@Xaosflux just out of curiosity, what were you expecting to do next if it didn't time out? The query would have returned 41M rows. How would you have gotten them out of quarry into a file?

::::In any case, thanks for trying. I've opened {{phab|T286488}} -- RoySmith (talk) 15:46, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

::Just split the query. Chunks of a million at a time take about 5 seconds each to query and another 5 to compress.for i in $(seq 0 42); do echo $i; echo "SELECT user_name FROM user WHERE user_id BETWEEN ${i}000000 AND ${i}999999;" | sql enwiki_p | tail -n+2 | gzip -c > usernames-$i.gz; doneCryptic 16:21, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

:::Cool, thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 17:29, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Is there any way to sort Lua functions?

Is there any information, like id or hash, that can be extracted from Lua functions (without calling them) to at least partially sort them, in an array? Alexiscoutinho (talk) 13:47, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

:{{re|Alexiscoutinho}} would you elaborate on what you are trying to do? For a specific script, there can be wide use of both builtin and script defined functions. A hash of something is unlikely to result something useful for a sortkey for anything other than looking for duplicates. — xaosflux Talk 13:54, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

::{{re|Xaosflux}} I was referring to Lua functions in modules. It could be used to quickly compare the equality of two initially unordered tables/arrays. Alexiscoutinho (talk) 14:03, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

::What I actually wanted to do was to hash a set (represented by a table) containing immutable data types, but then I noticed sorting functions would not help as they would still have to be converted to a string ("function") before calculating the hash. Only the number of functions in the set would be meaningful thus there would be more collisions... But I just thought the original question remained relevant. My suggestion above could be used to increase collision handling speed. Alexiscoutinho (talk) 14:15, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

:No. The best you can do is muck around such as in Module:Dump, search for "onames[var]". Johnuniq (talk) 00:05, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Invoking scripts from the url

I vaguely remember seeing this done somewhere, perhaps on a script demo, but my search yielded no results. Is this possible? What I mean is running a script by adding an argument to the url, e.g.:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page?script=example.js
— Guarapiranga (talkcontribs) 13:24, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

:The correct URL parameter is withJS and the script must be in the MediaWiki namespace. So the correct url pattern would be {{code|https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page?withJS{{=}}MediaWiki:[script].js}}. BrandonXLF (talk) 14:39, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

::You're a legend, {{u|BrandonXLF}}! Cheers.

::Wait, does that then mean no can do with user scripts (i.e. scripts in the User space)? — Guarapiranga  21:59, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

:::Yes, only MediaWiki namespace is allowed for security reasons. We don't want normal users to be able to get others to load arbitrary JavaScript by clicking a Wikipedia link. JavaScript in the MediaWiki namespace can only be edited by interface administrators. PrimeHunter (talk) 23:10, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

::::Of course! {{(y)|Thanks}}, {{u|PrimeHunter}}. — Guarapiranga  04:18, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Should edit notices be shown by the reply tool?

{{tracked|T269033}}

I left some feedback for the Reply Tool developers noting that it doesn't show page notices. Apparently this is a deliberate design decision, which I disagree with. Folks might want to comment on https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:Wcrovxjwvulr9n2g. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:37, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

How to create my own wiki

{{atop}}

Hello, how should I create my own wiki using MediaWiki software (outside of WMF?) I don't know how, and I want to know the steps and how much time it takes. 54nd60x (talk) 05:05, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

:You can read mw:Manual:Installation guide. Ruslik_Zero 07:32, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

::{{ping|Ruslik0}} I used Xowa, but I can't seem to find my wiki website. Can you give me instructions for this please? Thanks. 54nd60x (talk) 08:32, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

:::If you're having problems with Xowa, might I suggest https://www.reddit.com/r/xowa/ as a better place to get support. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:09, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

::::{{ping|RoySmith}} It's not that I'm having problems with Xowa, but that I need more detailed instructions. I don't know what is most appropriate for this, but I want to create my own wiki using MediaWiki software (outside of WMF.) It won't be an encyclopedia, but it will just be used by myself to test some of the features of the software by myself so I can install skins etc. What is the most appropriate tool I could use for this? 54nd60x (talk) 03:18, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

:::::{{u|54nd60x}} this is the wrong form for such questions. However if you want to set up your own testing wiki, I suggest [https://miraheze.org Miraheze] – BerrelyP • TC 07:55, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

::mw:Project:Support desk is the correct place to ask about setting up MediaWiki. You will need more details of what you have and have not done when you comment there. As Berrely notes, this is not the correct place to ask about MediaWiki support. Izno (talk) 18:42, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

{{abot}}

Tags

Hello, I saw [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Corry_Evans&curid=22238856&diff=1033747445&oldid=1033706904 this edit] which has an edit summary of "Tags: Golygu ar declyn symudol Golygiad gwe symudol" Any idea where this tag information is coming from? Keith D (talk) 21:04, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

:I already started a thread Wikipedia:Village_pump_(miscellaneous)#Tags_in_Welsh. DuncanHill (talk) 21:06, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

= Welsh! =

{{tracked|T286679}}

If your interface language is set to en-gb - British English, some interface messages will be in Welsh, not English. This is because someone contributed translations to the wrong language on translatewiki.net. The translations will be removed from Wikimedia servers soon, but you can fix the problem for yourself by switching to en - English in Special:Preferences. MediaWiki does not normally include translations in en-gb, and many interface customizations on the English Wikipedia are not available in en-gb. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:05, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

:Glad it's not just me then! Jr8825Talk 11:41, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

::It's a consequence of Brexit. Now we're out of Europe, we've started a gradual transition back to the language of the indigenous inhabitants of these parts. Starting, of course, with Wikipedia.--Verbarson (talk) 17:19, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

:Keep in mind that en-gb is strongly discouraged here, if we could remove en-variants completely I'd be quite happy. The reason why is that you will miss out of most all localized messages. — xaosflux Talk 17:31, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

:We're starting to get questions pertaining to this at the Teahouse and the help desk, which we're redirecting here for answers. I'm not sure how much of the userbase is affected by this, but would a temporary banner telling people to not use en-gb be helpful? —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 19:26, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

::A banner? No. The ticket above should take care of this. — xaosflux Talk 20:04, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

regex search timing out

I have several hundred saved searches, which I use to find misspellings, duplicate words etc. These have all worked perfectly well, for several years, until yesterday, when I started getting

:"A warning has occurred while searching: The regex search timed out, so only partial results are available. Try simplifying your regular expression to get complete results"

As I can't "simplify the search", and still get the right results, the only way for me to get the full search results is to keep refreshing the search, often 4 or 5 times. Has the regex "time-out" period changed? Are the servers currently running slower? Or is there another reason I have suddenly started getting problems? and, the inevitable question, what is the way to resolve it? (W10, Edge, Vector) - Many thanks - Arjayay (talk) 12:54, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

:I am getting similar problems, been happening for a couple of days. Also the time for a change to appear in the search results has degraded considerably, yesterday it took over 6 hours for the search results to be updated for a change. Keith D (talk) 13:09, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

::@Arjayay, is this still a problem? Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 20:34, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

::: Whatamidoing (WMF) - no problems with the regex in the last 12 hours - although the time for changes to appear in the search results, as reported by Keith D, is still much slower than usual. - Arjayay (talk) 20:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

::::Thanks. I'm glad that it's working again. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 21:10, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Non clickable button

{{Moved discussion from|Wikipedia:Teahouse#Non clickable button| ―Qwerfjkltalk 20:50, 16 July 2021 (UTC)}}

How do you get {{Button 2|Publish changes|class=mw-ui-progressive}} as non-clickable? ―Qwerfjkltalk 06:51, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

:{{re|Qwerfjkl}} I believe this is not possible using normal wikisyntax, only with JavaScript. This is because in order to disable the button, you would need a HTML element that supports the disabled="" attribute. However, none of the elements that support this attribute are allowed to be contained in Wikitext as they are either derivates of ,