fipronil

{{Use dmy dates|date=June 2023}}

{{chembox

| Name = Fipronil

| ImageFile1 = Fipronil.svg

| ImageName1 = 2D chemical structure of fipronil

| ImageFile2 = Fipronil-3D-balls.png

| ImageName2 = 3D chemical structure of fipronil

| ImageName = Fipronil

| IUPACName =

| PIN = 5-amino-1-[2,6-dichloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-4-(trifluoromethylsulfinyl)pyrazole-3-carbonitrile{{r|PubChem}}

| OtherNames = Fipronil
Fluocyanobenpyrazole
Taurus
Termidor

| Section1 = {{Chembox Identifiers

| ChemSpiderID_Ref = {{chemspidercite|correct|chemspider}}

| ChemSpiderID = 3235

| UNII_Ref = {{fdacite|correct|FDA}}

| UNII = QGH063955F

| KEGG_Ref = {{keggcite|correct|kegg}}

| KEGG = D01042

| InChI = 1/C12H4Cl2F6N4OS/c13-5-1-4(11(15,16)17)2-6(14)8(5)24-10(22)9(7(3-21)23-24)26(25)12(18,19)20/h1-2H,22H2

| InChIKey = ZOCSXAVNDGMNBV-UHFFFAOYAP

| ChEMBL_Ref = {{ebicite|correct|EBI}}

| ChEMBL = 101326

| StdInChI_Ref = {{stdinchicite|correct|chemspider}}

| StdInChI = 1S/C12H4Cl2F6N4OS/c13-5-1-4(11(15,16)17)2-6(14)8(5)24-10(22)9(7(3-21)23-24)26(25)12(18,19)20/h1-2H,22H2

| StdInChIKey_Ref = {{stdinchicite|correct|chemspider}}

| StdInChIKey = ZOCSXAVNDGMNBV-UHFFFAOYSA-N

| CASNo_Ref = {{cascite|correct|CAS}}

| CASNo = 120068-37-3

| PubChem = 3352

| ChEBI_Ref = {{ebicite|correct|EBI}}

| ChEBI = 5063

| SMILES = FC(F)(F)S(=O)c2c(C#N)nn(c1c(Cl)cc(cc1Cl)C(F)(F)F)c2N

}}

| Section2 = {{Chembox Properties

| C=12|H=4|Cl=2|F=6|N=4|O=1|S=1

| Density = 1.477-1.626 g/cm3

| MeltingPtC = 200.5

}}

| Section6 = {{Chembox Pharmacology

| ATCvet = yes

| ATCCode_prefix = P53

| ATCCode_suffix = AX15

}}

| Section7 = {{Chembox Hazards

| Hazards_ref =

| ExternalSDS = [https://www.carlroth.com/medias/SDB-0925-AU-EN.pdf?context=bWFzdGVyfHNlY3VyaXR5RGF0YXNoZWV0c3wyMjEwMDZ8YXBwbGljYXRpb24vcGRmfHNlY3VyaXR5RGF0YXNoZWV0cy9oY2UvaDU0Lzg5NjkwNTU4NjI4MTQucGRmfDFiZmU0NDkxMjU2NDRhYWYyODcxNWQ4MzFiOGU4NjA3MjBhZDA3NGI0ZGYwNzJjOWUwMDQwZjE4ZTQ1NzJjZTE Fipronil]

| GHSPictograms = {{GHS06}}{{GHS08}}{{GHS09}}

| GHSSignalWord = Danger

| HPhrases =

| PPhrases =

| MainHazards =

| IngestionHazard =

| InhalationHazard =

| EyeHazard =

| SkinHazard =

| NFPA-H = 2

| NFPA-F = 1

| NFPA-I = 0

| NFPA-S = -

| NFPA_ref ={{cite web |url=https://datasheets.scbt.com/sds/aghs/en/sc-201546.pdf |title=Safety Date Sheet |id=SC-201546 - Fipronil |publisher=Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. |date=23 April 2019 |access-date=30 Oct 2023}}

| FlashPt =

| FlashPtC =

| FlashPt_notes =

| FlashPt_ref =

| AutoignitionPt =

| AutoignitionPtC =

| AutoignitionPt_ref=

| AutoignitionPt_notes=

| ExploLimits =

| TLV =

| TLV-TWA =

| TLV-STEL =

| TLV-C =

| LD50 = 97 mg/kg (rat, oral)

| LDLo =

| LC50 = 0.25 mg/L (rainbow trout, aquatic)

| LCLo =

| PEL =

| REL =

| IDLH =

| NIOSH_id =

| NIOSH_ref =

}}

}}

Fipronil is a broad-spectrum insecticide that belongs to the phenylpyrazole insecticide class.{{Cite book |last1=Jeschke |first1=Peter |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9783527699261 |title=Modern Crop Protection Compounds |last2=Witschel |first2=Matthias |last3=Krämer |first3=Wolfgang |last4=Schirmer |first4=Ulrich |date=25 January 2019 |publisher=Wiley-VCH |isbn=9783527699261 |edition=3rd |pages=1449–1478 |chapter=33.5 GABA-gated Chloride Channel Antagonists (Fiproles)|doi=10.1002/9783527699261 }} Fipronil disrupts the insect central nervous system by blocking the ligand-gated ion channel of the GABAA receptor (IRAC group 2B) and glutamate-gated chloride (GluCl) channels. This causes hyperexcitation of contaminated insects' nerves and muscles. Fipronil's specificity towards insects is believed to be due to its greater binding affinity for the GABAA receptors of insects than to those of mammals, and for its action on GluCl channels, which do not exist in mammals.{{Cite journal |last1=Raymond-Delpech |first1=Valérie |last2=Matsuda |first2=Kazuhiko |last3=Sattelle |first3=Benedict M. |last4=Rauh |first4=James J. |last5=Sattelle |first5=David B. |date=2005 |title=Ion channels: molecular targets of neuroactive insecticides |journal=Invertebrate Neuroscience |language=en |volume=5 |issue=3–4 |pages=119–133 |doi=10.1007/s10158-005-0004-9 |pmid=16172884 |s2cid=12654353 |issn=1354-2516}} {{As of|2017}}, there does not appear to be significant resistance among fleas to fipronil.{{cite journal |title=Perception Versus Reality: Insecticide Resistance in Fleas |url=https://www.americanveterinarian.com/journals/amvet/2017/june2017/perception-versus-reality-insecticide-resistance-in-fleas |archive-date=11 Apr 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200411171315/https://www.americanveterinarian.com/journals/amvet/2017/june2017/perception-versus-reality-insecticide-resistance-in-fleas |url-status=unfit |journal=American Veterinarian |date=18 Jun 2017 |last=Todd-Jenkins |first=Karen |volume=2 |issue=3}}

Fipronil is used as the active ingredient in flea control products for pets and home roach baits as well as field pest control for corn, golf courses, and commercial turf. Its widespread use makes its specific effects the subject of considerable attention. Observations on possible harm to humans or ecosystems are ongoing as well as the monitoring of pesticide resistance development.{{Cite book |title=Small Animal Clinical Pharmacology |last1=Maddison |first1=Jill E. |last2=Page |first2=Stephen W. |edition=2nd |year=2008 |page=229 |publisher=Elsevier Health Sciences |isbn=978-0-7020-2858-8}}

Physical properties

Fipronil (IUPAC name 5-amino-1-[2,6-dichloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-4-(trifluoromethylsulfinyl)pyrazole-3-carbonitrile[https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/3303913 "Compound Summary {{!}} 5-Amino-1-(2,6-dichloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-1H-pyrazole-3-carbonitrile"]. PubChem. Bethesda, Md.: National Library of Medicine. n.d.) is a white, solid powder with a moldy odor. It is degraded slightly by sunlight, stable at normal temperatures for one year, and is not stable in presence of metal ions.{{cite web |author= |title=New Pesticide Fact Sheet |url=https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=P1001KCY.txt |publisher=Office of Pesticide Programs; Office of Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic Substances; United States Environmental Protection Agency |access-date=30 October 2023 |date=May 1996 |id=EPA-737-F-96-005 |via=nepis.epa.gov}}

Use

Fipronil has been used against many different pests on different crops. It is used against major lepidopteran (moth, butterfly, etc.) and orthopteran (grasshopper, locust, etc.) pests on a range of field and horticultural crops and against coleopteran (beetle) larvae in soils. It is employed for cockroach and ant control as well as locust control and termite pest control. In the United States of America, fipronil was approved for use against the Rasberry crazy ant until 2022{{Cite letter|last=Keigwin|first=Richard C. Jr.|recipient=Texas Department of Agriculture|subject=Quarantine exemption under the provisions of Section 18 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act|date=6 May 2019|publisher=United States Environmental Protection Agency|url=https://www.texasagriculture.gov/Portals/0/Publications/PEST/Sect18/19TX06_auth_crazy_ants.pdf|access-date=30 Oct 2023|via=Texasagriculture.gov}}{{Update after|2022}} in counties of Texas where positive identification had been made by entomologists from the Texas Department of Agriculture and the Environmental Protection Agency. In New Zealand, fipronil was used in trials to control wasps (Vespula {{Abbr|spp.|species}}), which are a threat to indigenous biodiversity.{{cite magazine |date=Autumn 2011 |title=Wasp Warfare |url=https://www.doc.govt.nz/globalassets/documents/conservation/land-and-freshwater/land/revive-rotoiti/revive-rotoiti-issue24.pdf |magazine=Revive Rotoiti |location=St Arnaud |publisher=Department of Conservation; New Zealand Government |issue=24 |page=2 |access-date=30 Oct 2011}} It is now being used by the Department of Conservation to attempt local eradication of wasps,{{cite news |last1=Neal |first1=Tracy |date=10 February 2016 |title=War on wasps in Abel Tasman |work=RNZ |publisher=Radio New Zealand |url=https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/regional/296226/war-on-wasps-in-abel-tasman |access-date=30 October 2023}}{{cite web |title=Vespex: Making wide-area wasp control a reality - WWF's Conservation Innovation Awards |url=https://wwf-nz.crowdicity.com/post/160207 |website=wwf-nz.crowdicity.com |access-date=5 March 2016 |archive-date=2 August 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170802204256/https://wwf-nz.crowdicity.com/post/160207 |url-status=dead }}{{cite web |date=n.d. |title=Wasp control Using Vespex |url=http://www.doc.govt.nz/waspcontrol |access-date=30 Oct 2023 |publisher=Department of Conservation; New Zealand Government}} and is being recommended for control of the invasive Argentine ant.{{Cite web |date=n.d. |title=Argentine Ants |url=https://www.doc.govt.nz/nature/pests-and-threats/animal-pests/argentine-ants/ |access-date=30 Oct 2023 |publisher=Department of Conservation; New Zealand Government}} Fipronil is also the active ingredient in many commercial tick and flea treatments for pets.{{Cite web |title=Vet Strength Flea & Tick Treatments for Cats & Dogs | FRONTLINE |url=https://uk.frontline.com/products |accessdate=26 June 2023 |website=uk.frontline.com}}

Effects

=Toxicity=

Fipronil is classed as a WHO Class II moderately hazardous pesticide, and has a rat acute oral {{LD50}} of 97 mg/kg.

It has moderate acute toxicity by the oral and inhalation routes in rats. Dermal absorption in rats is less than 1% after 24 hours exposure and toxicity is considered to be low. It has been found to be very toxic to rabbits.{{Cite web |title=Fipronil Toxicity: Keep Flea Products Away from Rabbits |url=https://vetmed.illinois.edu/pet-health-columns/rabbits-fipronil-toxic/ |access-date=2023-11-20 |website=Veterinary Medicine at Illinois |language=en-US}}

The photodegradate MB46513 or desulfinylfipronil, appears to have a higher acute toxicity to mammals than fipronil itself by a factor of about 10.{{Cite journal |title=Fipronil insecticide: Novel photochemical desulfinylation with retention of neurotoxicity |doi=10.1073/pnas.93.23.12764 |pmid=8917493 |volume=93 |issue=23 |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |pages=12764–12767 |pmc=23994 |year=1996 |last1=Hainzl |first1=D. |last2=Casida |first2=J. E. |bibcode=1996PNAS...9312764H |doi-access=free}}

Symptoms of acute toxicity via ingestion includes sweating, nausea, vomiting, headache, abdominal pain, dizziness, agitation, weakness, and tonic-clonic seizures. Clinical signs of exposure to fipronil are generally reversible and resolve spontaneously. As of 2011, no data were available regarding the chronic effects of fipronil on humans. The United States Environmental Protection Agency has classified fipronil as a group C (possible human) carcinogen based on an increase in thyroid follicular cell tumors in both sexes of the rat. However, as of 2011, no human data are available regarding the carcinogenic effects of fipronil.{{cite web |last1=Jackson, D. |last2=Cornell, C. B. |last3=Luukinen, B. |last4=Buhl, K. |last5=Stone, D. |title=Fipronil Technical Fact Sheet |url=http://npic.orst.edu/factsheets/archive/fiptech.html |publisher=National Pesticide Information Center, Oregon State University Extension Services |access-date=30 October 2023 |date=2009}}

Two Frontline TopSpot products were determined by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation to pose no significant exposure risks to workers applying the product. However, concerns were raised about human exposure to Frontline spray treatment in 1996, leading to a denial of registration for the spray product. Commercial pet groomers and veterinary physicians were considered to be at risk from chronic exposure via inhalation and dermal absorption during the application of the spray, assuming they may have to treat up to 20 large dogs per day.{{cite magazine |year=2000 |title=Fipronil |journal=Pesticides News |publisher=Pesticides Trust |publication-place=London |volume=48 |page=20 |issn=0967-6597}}{{better source needed|date=October 2023}} Fipronil is not volatile, so the likelihood of humans being exposed to this compound in the air is low.

In contrast to neonicotinoids such as acetamiprid, clothianidin, imidacloprid, and thiamethoxam, which are absorbed through the skin to some extent, fipronil is not absorbed substantially through the skin.{{cite web |url=https://www.pesticideresearch.com/site/?page_id=4843 |title=Cockroach Control |website=Pesticideresearch.com |access-date=August 10, 2016 |date=2013-03-31 |archive-date=12 August 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170812022459/http://www.pesticideresearch.com/site/?page_id=4843 |url-status=dead }}{{better source needed|date=October 2023}}

=Drinking water contamination=

In 2021, the US EPA put fipronil on the Draft Fifth Contaminant Candidate List (CCL 5) which can lead to future regulation under the Safe Drinking Water Act.{{cite web |title=Contaminant Candidate List 5{{dash}}CCL 5 |date=n.d. |url=https://www.epa.gov/ccl/contaminant-candidate-list-5-ccl-5 |publisher=United States Environmental Protection Agency |access-date=30 Oct 2023}}

=Detection in body fluids=

Fipronil may be quantitated in plasma by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry or liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry to confirm a diagnosis of poisoning in hospitalized patients or to provide evidence in a medicolegal death investigation.{{cite book |last1=Baselt |first1=Randall C. |title=Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemicals in Man |date=2017 |publisher=Biomedical Publications |location=Seal Beach, California |isbn=978-0-692-77499-1 |pages=894–895 |edition=Eleventh}}

=Ecological toxicity=

{{further|Pesticide toxicity to bees}}

Fipronil is highly toxic to crustaceans, insects (including bees and termites) and zooplankton, as well as rabbits, the fringe-toed lizard, and certain groups of gallinaceous birds. It appears to reduce the longevity and fecundity of female braconid parasitoids. It is also highly toxic to many fish, though its toxicity varies with species. Conversely, the substance is relatively innocuous to passerines, wildfowl, and earthworms.

Its half-life in soil is four months to one year, but much less on the soil surface because it is more sensitive to light (photolysis) than water (hydrolysis).{{cite journal |last1=Gunasekara |first1=Amrith S. |last2=Truong |first2=Tresca |last3=Goh |first3=Kean S. |last4=Spurlock |first4=Frank |last5=Tjeerdema |first5=Ronald S. |title=Environmental fate and toxicology of fipronil |journal=Journal of Pesticide Science |url=https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jpestics/32/3/32_3_189/_article |access-date=30 October 2023 |date=2007 |volume=32 |issue=3 |pages=189–199 |doi=10.1584/jpestics.R07-02 |doi-access=free |format=PDF |issn=1349-0923}}

Few studies of effects on wildlife have been conducted, but studies of the nontarget impact from emergency applications of fipronil as barrier sprays for locust control in Madagascar showed adverse impacts of fipronil on termites, which appear to be very severe and long-lived.{{cite news |last1=Kirby |first1=Alex |title=Anti-locust drive 'created havoc' |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/806641.stm |access-date=30 October 2023 |work=BBC News |department=Sci/Tech |date=27 June 2000}} Also, adverse effects were indicated in the short term on several other invertebrate groups, one species of lizard (Trachylepis elegans), and several species of birds (including the Madagascar bee-eater).

Nontarget effects on some insects (predatory and detritivorous beetles, some parasitic wasps and bees) were also found in field trials of fipronil for desert locust control in Mauritania, and very low doses (0.6-2.0 g a.i./ha) used against grasshoppers in Niger caused impacts on nontarget insects comparable to those found with other insecticides used in grasshopper control. The implications of this for other wildlife and the ecology of the habitat remain unknown, but appear unlikely to be severe. This lack of severity was not observed in bee species in South America. Fipronil is also used in Brazil and studies on the stingless bee Scaptotrigona postica have shown adverse reactions to the pesticide, including seizures, paralysis, and death with a lethal dose of .54 ng a.i./bee and a lethal concentration of .24 ng a.i./μl diet. These values are highly toxic in Scaptotrigona postica and bees in general.{{cite journal |last1=Jacob |first1=Cynthia Renata Oliveira |last2=Soares |first2=Hellen Maria |last3=Carvalho |first3=Stephan Malfitano |last4=Nocelli |first4=Roberta Cornélio Ferreira |last5=Malaspina |first5=Osmar |title=Acute Toxicity of Fipronil to the Stingless Bee Scaptotrigona postica Latreille |journal=Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology |date=2013 |volume=90 |issue=1 |pages=69–72 |doi=10.1007/s00128-012-0892-4 |pmid=23179165 |bibcode=2013BuECT..90...69J |s2cid=35297535 |issn=1432-0800}} Toxic baiting with fipronil has been shown to be effective in locally eliminating German wasps. All colonies within foraging range were eliminated within one week.{{cite journal |last1=Sackmann |first1=Paula |last2=Rabinovich |first2=Mauricio |last3=Corley |first3=Juan Carlos |title=Successful Removal of German Yellowjackets (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) by Toxic Baiting |journal=Journal of Economic Entomology |date=2001 |volume=94 |issue=4 |pages=811–816 |doi=10.1603/0022-0493-94.4.811 |pmid=11561837 |issn=1938-291X}}{{cite journal |title=Short and long-term control of Vespula pensylvanica in Hawaii by fipronil baiting |doi=10.1002/ps.3262 |pmid=22392920 |volume=68 |issue=7 |journal=Pest Management Science |pages=1026–1033 |date=2012 |last1=Hanna |first1=Cause |last2=Foote |first2=David |last3=Kremen |first3=Claire}}

In May 2003, the French Directorate-General of Food at the Ministry of Agriculture determined that a case of mass bee mortality observed in southern France was related to acute fipronil toxicity. Toxicity was linked to defective seed treatment, which generated dust. In February 2003, the ministry decided to temporarily suspend the sale of BASF crop protection products containing fipronil in France.{{cite press release |url=http://www.agro.basf.com/agr/AP-Internet/en/content/news_room/news/basf-fipronil-temporary-suspension-in-france-statement |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120719015344/http://www.agro.basf.com/agr/AP-Internet/en/content/news_room/news/basf-fipronil-temporary-suspension-in-france-statement |url-status=dead |archive-date=19 July 2012 |title=BASF statement regarding temporary suspension of sales of crop protection products containing fipronil in France |author1=Kissling, Elise |author2=BASF SE |year=2003}} The seed treatment involved has since been banned.{{Citation needed|date=November 2007}}

Notable results from wildlife studies include:

  • Fipronil is highly toxic to fish and aquatic invertebrates. Its tendency to bind to sediments and its low water solubility may reduce the potential hazard to aquatic wildlife.{{cite web |title=Fipronil |date=n.d. |url=http://www.livingwithbugs.com/PDFiles/fipronil.pdf |publisher=National Pesticide Telecommunications Network; Oregon State University |access-date=30 Oct 2023 |page=3 |via=Livingwithbugs.com}}
  • Fipronil is toxic to bees and should not be applied to vegetation when bees are foraging.
  • Based on ecological effects, fipronil is highly toxic to upland game birds on an acute oral basis and very highly toxic on a subacute dietary basis, but is practically nontoxic to waterfowl on both acute and subacute bases.
  • Chronic (avian reproduction) studies show no effects at the highest levels tested in mallards (NOEC = 1000 ppm) or quail (NOEC = 10 ppm). The metabolite MB 46136 is more toxic than the parent to avian species tested (very highly toxic to upland game birds and moderately toxic to waterfowl on an acute oral basis).
  • Fipronil is highly toxic to bluegill sunfish and highly toxic to rainbow trout on an acute basis.
  • An early-lifestage toxicity study in rainbow trout found that fipronil affects larval growth with a NOEC of 0.0066 ppm and an LOEC of 0.015 ppm. The metabolite MB 46136 is more toxic than the parent to freshwater fish (6.3 times more toxic to rainbow trout and 3.3 times more toxic to bluegill sunfish). Based on an acute daphnia study using fipronil and three supplemental studies using its metabolites, fipronil is characterized as highly toxic to aquatic invertebrates.
  • An invertebrate lifecycle daphnia study showed that fipronil affects length in daphnids at concentrations greater than 9.8 ppb.
  • A lifecycle study in mysids shows fipronil affects reproduction, survival, and growth of mysids at concentrations less than 5 ppt.
  • Acute studies of estuarine animals using oysters, mysids, and sheepshead minnows show that fipronil is highly acutely toxic to oysters and sheepshead minnows, and very highly toxic to mysids. Metabolites MB 46136 and MB 45950 are more toxic than the parent to freshwater invertebrates (MB 46136 is 6.6 times more toxic and MB 45950 is 1.9 times more toxic to freshwater invertebrates).{{r|New Pesticide Fact Sheet}}

=Colony collapse disorder=

{{main|Colony collapse disorder}}

Fipronil is one of the main chemical causes blamed for the spread of colony collapse disorder among bees.{{citation needed|date=July 2021}} It has been found by the Minutes-Association for Technical Coordination Fund in France that even at very low nonlethal doses for bees, the pesticide still impairs their ability to locate their hive, resulting in large numbers of forager bees lost with every pollen-finding expedition.{{cite web |last=Lima |first=Pedro |work=Globo Rural |date=n.d. |title=Abelhas com microchip |language=pt |url=http://revistagloborural.globo.com/GloboRural/0,6993,EEC1707683-5809,00.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100112092243/http://revistagloborural.globo.com/GloboRural/0,6993,EEC1707683-5809,00.html |archive-date=2010-01-12 |url-status=dead}} A synergistic toxic effect of fipronil with the fungal pathogen Nosema ceranae was recently reported.{{cite journal |display-authors=3 |last1=Aufauvre |first1=Julie |last2=Biron |first2=David G. |last3=Vidau |first3=Cyril |last4=Fontbonne |first4=Régis |last5=Roudel |first5=Mathieu |last6=Diogon |first6=Marie |last7=Viguès |first7=Bernard |last8=Belzunces |first8=Luc P. |last9=Delbac |first9=Frédéric |last10=Blot |first10=Nicolas |title=Parasite-insecticide interactions: a case study of Nosema ceranae and fipronil synergy on honeybee |journal=Scientific Reports |date=2012 |volume=2 |page=326 |id=Article number: 326 |doi=10.1038/srep00326 |doi-access=free |pmid=22442753 |pmc=3310228|bibcode=2012NatSR...2..326A }} The functional basis for this toxic effect is now understood: the synergy between fipronil and the pathogenic fungus induces changes in male bee physiology leading to infertility.{{cite journal |display-authors=3 |last1=Kairo |first1=Guillaume |last2=Biron |first2=David G. |last3=Ben Abdelkader |first3=Faten |last4=Bonnet |first4=Marc |last5=Tchamitchian |first5=Sylvie |last6=Cousin |first6=Marianne |last7=Dussaubat |first7=Claudia |last8=Benoit |first8=Boris |last9=Kretzschmar |first9=André |last10=Belzunces |first10=Luc P. |last11=Brunet |first11=Jean-Luc |title=Nosema ceranae, Fipronil and their combination compromise honey bee reproduction via changes in male physiology |journal=Scientific Reports |date=2017 |volume=7 |issue=1 |page=8556 |id=Article number: 8556 |doi=10.1038/s41598-017-08380-5 |doi-access=free |pmid=28819220 |pmc=5561069|bibcode=2017NatSR...7.8556K }}

A 2013 report by the European Food Safety Authority identified fipronil as "a high acute risk to honeybees when used as a seed treatment for maize" and on July 16, 2013, the EU voted to ban the use of fipronil on maize and sunflowers within the EU. The ban took effect at the end of 2013.{{cite press release |author= |publisher=European Food Safety Authority |url=http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/press/news/130527 |title=EFSA assesses risks to bees from fipronil |date=27 May 2013 |access-date=30 Oct 2023}}{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/jul/16/eu-fipronil-ban-bees |title=EU to ban fipronil to protect honeybees |date=16 July 2013 |location=London |work=The Guardian |first=Damian |last=Carrington}}

=Pharmacodynamics=

Fipronil acts by binding to allosteric sites of GABAA receptors and GluCl receptors (of insects) as an antagonist (a form of noncompetitive inhibition). This prevents the opening of chloride ion channels normally encouraged by GABA, reducing the chloride ions' ability to lower a neuron's membrane potential. This results in an overabundance of neurons reaching action potential and likewise CNS toxicity via overstimulation.{{cite journal |last1=Cole |first1=L. M. |last2=Nicholson |first2=R. A. |last3=Casida |first3=J. E. |year=1993 |title=Action of Phenylpyrazole Insecticides at the GABA-Gated Chloride Channel |journal=Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology |volume=46 |issue=1 |pages=47–54 |doi=10.1006/pest.1993.1035|bibcode=1993PBioP..46...47C }}{{cite book |title=Pesticide Residues in Food{{dash}}1997: Report of the Joint Meeting of the FAO Panel of Experts on Pesticide Residues in Food and the Environment and the WHO Core Assessment Group on Pesticide Residues: Lyons, France: 22 September - 1 October 1997, Part 1 |date=1998 |series=FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper 145 |id=M-84 |publisher=Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; World Health Organization |location=Rome |isbn=978-92-5-104116-1 |issn=0259-2517 |chapter-url=https://www.fao.org/3/w8141e/w8141e0s.htm#4.15%20fipronil%20(t)* |chapter=4.15 Fipronil (T)*}}{{cite journal |doi=10.1080/10408444.2016.1223014 |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308342052 |title=Fipronil insecticide toxicology: Oxidative stress and metabolism |date=2016 |last1=Wang |first1=Xu |last2=Martínez |first2=María Aránzazu |last3=Wu |first3=Qinghua |last4=Ares |first4=Irma |last5=Martínez-Larrañaga |first5=María Rosa |last6=Anadón |first6=Arturo |last7=Yuan |first7=Zonghui |journal=Critical Reviews in Toxicology |volume=46 |issue=10 |pages=876–899 |pmid=27643517 }}

:Acute oral {{LD50}} (rat) 97 mg/kg

:Acute dermal LD50 (rat) >2000 mg/kg

In mammals (including humans) fipronil overdose is characterized by vomiting, agitation, and seizures. Intravenous or intramuscular benzodiazepines are a useful antidote.{{cite book |title=Veterinary Toxicology: Basic and Clinical Principles |last=Gupta |first=Ramesh C. |year=2007 |pages=502–503 |publisher= Academic Press |location=New York |isbn=978-0-12-370467-2}}{{cite journal |display-authors=3 |last1=Mohamed |first1=Fahim |last2=Senarathna |first2=Lalith |last3=Percy |first3=Adrian |last4=Abeyewardene |first4=Manel |last5=Eaglesham |first5=Geoffrey |last6=Cheng |first6=Ron |last7=Azher |first7=Shifa |last8=Hittarage |first8=Ariyasena |last9=Dissanayake |first9=Wasantha |last10=Sheriff |first10=M.H. Rezvi |last11=Davies |first11=Willie |last12=Buckley |first12=Nick A. |last13=Eddleston |first13=Michael |title=Acute Human Self-Poisoning with the N -Phenylpyrazole Insecticide Fipronil—a GABA A -Gated Chloride Channel Blocker |journal=Journal of Toxicology: Clinical Toxicology |date=2004 |volume=42 |issue=7 |pages=955–963 |doi=10.1081/clt-200041784 |pmid=15641641 |pmc=1351141}}

History

=Development=

Fipronil was discovered and developed by Rhône-Poulenc between 1985 and 1987, and placed on the market in 1993 under the {{US Patent|5,232,940 B2}}. Between 1987 and 1996, fipronil was evaluated on more than 250 insect pests on 60 crops worldwide, and crop protection accounted for about 39% of total fipronil production in 1997. Since 2003, BASF holds the patent rights for producing and selling fipronil-based products in many countries.

= 2017 fipronil eggs contamination =

{{main article|2017 fipronil eggs contamination}}

The 2017 fipronil eggs contamination is an incident in Europe and South Korea involving the spread of insecticide contaminated eggs and egg products. Chicken eggs were found to contain fipronil and distributed to 15 European Union countries, Switzerland, and Hong Kong.{{Cite news |author= |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-40896899 |title=Eggs containing fipronil found in 15 EU countries and Hong Kong |date=2017-08-11 |work=BBC News |access-date=30 Oct 2023 |language=en-GB}}{{Cite news |author= |url=https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/danes-imported-20-tons-eggs-tainted-scandal-49152254 |title=EU: 17 nations get tainted eggs, products in growing scandal |work=ABC News |agency=Associated Press |language=en |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170811130403/https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/danes-imported-20-tons-eggs-tainted-scandal-49152254 |archive-date=2017-08-11}} Approximately 700,000 eggs are thought to have reached shelves in the UK alone.{{cite web |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/aug/11/tainted-eggs-found-in-hong-kong-switzerland-and-15-eu-countries |title=Egg contamination scandal widens as 15 EU states, Switzerland and Hong Kong affected |last=Boffey |first=Daniel |date=11 August 2017 |work=The Guardian |access-date=11 August 2017}}

Eggs at 44 farms in Taiwan were also found with excessive fipronil levels.{{cite web |url=https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3239808 |title=Eggs at 44 farms in Taiwan found with excessive insecticide levels |date=26 August 2017 |work=Taiwan News |access-date=26 August 2017 |archive-date=26 August 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170826063622/https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3239808 |url-status=dead }}

References

{{Reflist}}

Further reading

  • {{cite journal |doi=10.1007/s11356-014-3470-y |doi-access=free |title=Systemic insecticides (Neonicotinoids and fipronil): Trends, uses, mode of action and metabolites |date=2015 |last1=Simon-Delso |first1=N. |last2=Amaral-Rogers |first2=V. |last3=Belzunces |first3=L. P. |last4=Bonmatin |first4=J. M. |last5=Chagnon |first5=M. |last6=Downs |first6=C. |last7=Furlan |first7=L. |last8=Gibbons |first8=D. W. |last9=Giorio |first9=C. |last10=Girolami |first10=V. |last11=Goulson |first11=D. |last12=Kreutzweiser |first12=D. P. |last13=Krupke |first13=C. H. |last14=Liess |first14=M. |last15=Long |first15=E. |last16=McField |first16=M. |last17=Mineau |first17=P. |last18=Mitchell |first18=E. A. D. |last19=Morrissey |first19=C. A. |last20=Noome |first20=D. A. |last21=Pisa |first21=L. |last22=Settele |first22=J. |last23=Stark |first23=J. D. |last24=Tapparo |first24=A. |last25=Van Dyck |first25=H. |last26=Van Praagh |first26=J. |last27=Van Der Sluijs |first27=J. P. |last28=Whitehorn |first28=P. R. |last29=Wiemers |first29=M. |display-authors=3 |journal=Environmental Science and Pollution Research |volume=22 |issue=1 |pages=5–34 |pmid=25233913 |pmc=4284386 |bibcode=2015ESPR...22....5S }}