COVID-19 lockdown in China
{{short description|Chinese quarantine effort in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Hubei}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=March 2020}}
{{Use British English|date=January 2020}}{{Broader|Chinese government response to COVID-19}}{{Update|date=November 2022|reason=Needs more information about lockdowns from 2021 to present}}
{{Infobox civil conflict
|title = COVID-19 lockdown in China
|causes = COVID-19 pandemic
|side3 =
|side2 =
|side1 =
|result = About 13 million quarantined in Wuhan;
over 57 million in fifteen other cities{{Cite news |url=https://www.dw.com/zh/%E6%AD%A6%E6%B1%89%E8%82%BA%E7%82%8E%E7%97%85%E6%AF%92%E6%8C%81%E7%BB%AD%E6%89%A9%E6%95%A3-%E6%B9%96%E5%8C%97%E4%B8%8B%E4%BB%A4%E5%B0%8115%E4%B8%AA%E5%9F%8E%E5%B8%82/a-52132769 |script-title=zh:武汉肺炎病毒持续扩散 湖北下令封15个城市 {{!}} DW {{!}} 24 January 2020 |publisher=Deutsche Welle |language=zh-Hans |access-date=25 January 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200124234427/https://www.dw.com/zh/%E6%AD%A6%E6%B1%89%E8%82%BA%E7%82%8E%E7%97%85%E6%AF%92%E6%8C%81%E7%BB%AD%E6%89%A9%E6%95%A3-%E6%B9%96%E5%8C%97%E4%B8%8B%E4%BB%A4%E5%B0%8115%E4%B8%AA%E5%9F%8E%E5%B8%82/a-52132769 |archive-date=24 January 2020 |url-status=live}}
|status =
|methods = Suspension of all public transport, and control of movement in and out of the city
|leadfigures1 =
|goals = Quarantine the region of the COVID-19 outbreak
|date = 23 January – 8 April 2020 ({{Age in years, months, weeks and days|2020|1|23|2020|4|8}}; most of Hubei ended on 25 March 2020; Wuhan lockdown ended on 8 April 2020)
|image = {{Photo montage
|photo1a = Policemen wearing masks patrolling Wuhan Tianhe Airport during Wuhan coronavirus outbreak.jpg
|photo2a = A nurse measuring the body temperature for outpatients in Hubei TCM Hospital.jpg
|photo2b = Citizens of Wuhan lining up outside of a drug store to buy masks during the Wuhan coronavirus outbreak.jpg
|photo3a = Staff monitoring passengers' body temperature in Wuhan railway station during the Wuhan coronavirus outbreak.jpg
|photo3b = Passengers lining up in Wuhan railway station for their body temperature to be checked during the Wuhan coronavirus outbreak.jpg
|photo4b =
|size = 280
|border = 0
}}
|caption = Top: Montage of various scenes in Wuhan during the outbreak
{{Collapsible list|title=Bottom Map Legend:|titlestyle=font-weight:normal;background:transparent;text-align:left;|{{leftlegend|#76161A|Areas that have been or are being blocked due to the outbreak}}{{leftlegend|#E36654|Areas not yet blocked but with more cases}}
}}
|map_type = China
|map_caption = Wuhan in Hubei province, China
|partof = the COVID-19 pandemic in mainland China
|subtitle =
|leadfigures3=
|injuries =
|notes =
|casualties_label =
|fined =
|coordinates =
|charged =
|detentions =
|arrests =
|fatalities =
|leadfigures2 =
|casualties3 =
|casualties2 =
|casualties1 =
|howmany3 =
|howmany2 =
|howmany1 =
|sidebox =
}}File:Wuhan citizens rush to buy vegetables during Wuhan coronavirus outbreak.jpg
On 23 January 2020, the central government of China imposed a lockdown in Wuhan and other cities in Hubei in an effort to quarantine the center of an outbreak of COVID-19; this action was commonly referred to as the Wuhan lockdown ({{zh|s=武汉封城|p=Wǔhàn fēng chéng}}). The World Health Organization (WHO), although stating that it was beyond its own guidelines, commended the move, calling it "unprecedented in public health history".{{Cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-health-who-idUSKBN1ZM1G9|title=Wuhan lockdown 'unprecedented', shows commitment to contain virus: WHO representative in China|date=23 January 2020|work=Reuters|access-date=23 January 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200124203401/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-health-who-idUSKBN1ZM1G9|archive-date=24 January 2020|url-status=live}}
The lockdown in Wuhan set the precedent for similar measures in other Chinese cities. Within hours of the Wuhan lockdown, travel restrictions were also imposed on the nearby cities of Huanggang and Ezhou, and were eventually imposed on all 15 other cities in Hubei, affecting a total of about 57 million people.{{cite news|url=https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/26/asia/wuhan-coronavirus-update-intl-hnk/index.html|title=Wuhan coronavirus: Thousands of cases confirmed as China goes into emergency mode|author1=James Griffiths|author2=Amy Woodyatt|publisher=CNN|access-date=1 February 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200128120647/https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/26/asia/wuhan-coronavirus-update-intl-hnk/index.html|archive-date=28 January 2020|url-status=live}}{{Cite news|url=https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_5671283|language=zh-cn|script-title=zh:襄阳火车站关闭,湖北省最后一个地级市"封城"|website=thepaper.cn|date=29 January 2020|access-date=4 February 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200202170024/https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_5671283|archive-date=2 February 2020|url-status=live}} On 2 February 2020, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, implemented a seven-day lockdown in which only one person per household was allowed to exit once each two days, and most of the highway exits were closed.{{cite news|url=https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/china-shuts-down-city-of-wenzhou-far-from-virus-epicentre|title=China shuts down city of Wenzhou, far from virus epicentre |author= |date=2 February 2020 |work=The Straits Times|access-date=2 February 2020}} On 13 March 2020, Huangshi{{cite web |script-title=zh:湖北省黄石市:解除市区交通管制,停办通行证|url=https://news.sina.com.cn/c/2020-03-13/doc-iimxyqwa0259279.shtml |work=Sina News |date=13 March 2020 |access-date=14 March 2020}} and Qianjiang{{cite news|url=https://news.sina.cn/2020-03-13/detail-iimxxstf8849211.d.html?vt=4&pos=8&cid=56261|script-title=zh:湖北潜江市民燃放烟花庆祝解封 |work=Sina News |date=13 March 2020}} became the first Hubei cities to remove strict travel restrictions within part or all of their administrative confines. On 8 April 2020, the Wuhan lockdown officially ended.{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/07/world/asia/wuhan-coronavirus.html|title=China Ends Wuhan Lockdown, but Normal Life Is a Distant Dream|first=Raymond|last=Zhong|website=New York Times|date=7 April 2020|access-date=2020-04-07}} The lockdown, combined with other public health measures in early 2020, succeeded in suppressing virus transmission and averted a more widespread outbreak in China.{{Cite journal|last=Lancet|first=The|date=2020|title=COVID-19 and China: lessons and the way forward|journal=Lancet|volume=396|issue=10246|pages=213|doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31637-8|issn=0140-6736|pmc=7377676|pmid=32711779}}{{Cite journal|last1=Lu|first1=Guangyu|last2=Razum|first2=Oliver|last3=Jahn|first3=Albrecht|last4=Zhang|first4=Yuying|last5=Sutton|first5=Brett|last6=Sridhar|first6=Devi|last7=Ariyoshi|first7=Koya|last8=von Seidlein|first8=Lorenz|last9=Müller|first9=Olaf|date=2021-01-01|title=COVID-19 in Germany and China: mitigation versus elimination strategy|url=https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2021.1875601|journal=Global Health Action|volume=14|issue=1|pages=1875601|doi=10.1080/16549716.2021.1875601|issn=1654-9716|pmc=7833051|pmid=33472568}}
Subsequent lockdowns were introduced in other regions of China in response to localised outbreaks during the two years following. The largest of these was Shanghai in early 2022.
Some Western observers, such as Amnesty International, were initially skeptical of the lockdown;{{cite web|url=https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2020/02/explainer-seven-ways-the-coronavirus-affects-human-rights/|title=Here are seven ways the coronavirus affects human rights|date=5 February 2020|publisher=Amnesty International|access-date=24 March 2020}}{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/unprecedented-chinese-quarantine-could-backfire-experts-say/2020/01/24/db073f3c-3ea4-11ea-8872-5df698785a4e_story.html|title=Unprecedented Chinese quarantine could backfire, experts say|last1=Bernstein|first1=Lenny|last2=Craig|first2=Tim|date=24 January 2020|newspaper=The Washington Post|access-date=23 March 2020}} however, as the COVID-19 pandemic spread to other countries and territories, similar measures were enacted around the globe.
A series of protests in mainland China against COVID-19 lockdowns began in November 2022.
On 7 December 2022, China's National Health Commission in a 10-point announcement stipulated that negative COVID-19 tests would no longer be required, apart from vulnerable areas such as nurseries, elderly care facilities and schools.{{Cite news |agency=Associated Press |date=2022-12-07 |title=China announces a rollback of its strict anti-COVID-19 measures |language=en |work=NPR |url=https://www.npr.org/2022/12/07/1141172723/china-announces-a-roll-back-of-its-strict-anti-covid-19-measures |access-date=2022-12-11}}
Background
Wuhan is the capital of Hubei province in China. With a population of over 11 million, it is the largest city in Hubei, the most populous city in Central China, the seventh-most populous Chinese city, and one of the nine National Central Cities of China. Wuhan lies in the eastern Jianghan Plain, on the confluence of the Yangtze River and its largest tributary, the Han River. It is a major transportation hub, with dozens of railways, roads and expressways passing through the city and connecting to other major cities. Because of its key role in domestic transport, Wuhan is known as the "Nine Provinces' Thoroughfare" ({{zh|labels=no|c=九省通衢}}){{cite web |url=http://www.readmeok.com/2012-5/21_11860.html |script-title=zh:九省通衢"盛宴开席" – 读我网 |website=readmeok.com |access-date=23 January 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304113420/http://www.readmeok.com/2012-5/21_11860.html |archive-date=4 March 2016 |url-status=live}} and sometimes referred to as "the Chicago of China".{{cite news |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,848985,00.html |title=Foreign News: On To Chicago |date=13 June 1938 |magazine=Time |access-date=20 November 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20120105114835/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,848985,00.html |archive-date=5 January 2012 }}{{cite news |url= https://www.chicagotribune.com/2012/05/13/chicago-is-all-over-the-place/ |title=Chicago is all over the place |last=Jacob |first=Mark |date=13 May 2012 |newspaper=Chicago Tribune |access-date=22 May 2012 |url-status=live |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20130511215253/http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-05-13/news/ct-talk-nato-chicago-0513-20120513_1_violent-crime-chicago-connection-south-america-s-chicago |archive-date=11 May 2013 }}{{cite book |author={{Nihongo2|水野幸吉}} (Mizuno Kokichi) |publisher=Wuhan Press |year=2014 |isbn=9787543084612 |pages=3 |script-title=zh:中国中部事情:汉口 |trans-title=Central China: Hankou}}
2020 lockdowns
=Hubei=
File:Region of Hubei quarantine.png
In mid-December 2019, the Chinese Government acknowledged an emerging cluster of people, many linked to the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan, were infected with pneumonia with no clear causes. Chinese scientists subsequently linked the pneumonia to a new strain of coronavirus that was given the initial designation 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Some of the first symptoms appeared on 10 December, and 24 cases were later discovered to have connection to the seafood market.{{cite web |title=Shrimp vendor at Wuhan market may be coronavirus 'patient zero' |url=https://nypost.com/2020/03/27/shrimp-vendor-at-wuhan-market-may-be-coronavirus-patient-zero/ |website=New York Post |language=en |date=27 March 2020}}
Within three weeks of the first known cases, the government built sixteen large mobile hospitals in Wuhan and sent 40,000 medical staff to the city.{{Cite book |last=Jin |first=Keyu |title=The New China Playbook: Beyond Socialism and Capitalism |date=2023 |publisher=Viking |isbn=978-1-9848-7828-1 |location=New York |author-link=Keyu Jin}}{{Rp|page=137}}
On 10 January 2020, the first death and 41 clinically confirmed infections caused by the coronavirus were reported.{{Cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/10/world/asia/china-virus-wuhan-death.html |title=China Reports First Death From New Virus |last1=Qin |first1=Amy |date=10 January 2020 |work=The New York Times |access-date=23 January 2020 |last2=Hernández |first2=Javier C. |issn=0362-4331 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200111020017/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/10/world/asia/china-virus-wuhan-death.html |archive-date=11 January 2020 |url-status=live}}
By 22 January, the novel coronavirus had spread to major cities and provinces in China, with 571 confirmed cases and 17 deaths reported. Confirmed cases were also reported in other regions and countries, including Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, Thailand, Japan, South Korea, and the United States.
According to Li Lanjuan, a professor at Zhejiang University's school of medicine and member of the high-level expert team convened by the National Health Commission, she had urged a lockdown on Wuhan on several occasions between 19 January and 22 January 2020 as a last resort to contain the epidemic.{{Cite news |url=https://sg.news.yahoo.com/build-coronavirus-lockdown-inside-china-145139273.html |title=Build-up to coronavirus lockdown: inside China's decision to close Wuhan |date=2 April 2020 |publisher=Yahoo News |access-date=5 April 2020 |archive-date=4 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200404172627/https://sg.news.yahoo.com/build-coronavirus-lockdown-inside-china-145139273.html |url-status=dead }}
At 2{{nbsp}}am on 23 January, authorities issued a notice informing residents of Wuhan that from 10{{nbsp}}am, all public transport, including buses, railways, flights, and ferry services would be suspended. The Wuhan Airport, the Wuhan railway station, and the Wuhan Metro were all closed. The residents of Wuhan were also not allowed to leave the city without permission from the authorities.{{Cite news |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-51217455 |title=Lockdowns rise as China tries to control virus |date=23 January 2020 |publisher=BBC |location=United Kingdom |access-date=23 January 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200123181250/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-51217455 |archive-date=23 January 2020 |url-status=live}} The notice caused an exodus from Wuhan. An estimated 300,000 people were reported to have left Wuhan by train alone before the 10 am lockdown.{{Cite news |url=https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/breakingnews/3048974 |script-title=zh:武漢肺炎》高調「#逃離武漢」 封城前夕至少30萬人逃出 – 國際 – 自由時報電子報 |date=23 January 2020 |work=Liberty Times |location=Taiwan |language=zh-Hant-TW |access-date=23 January 2020}} By the afternoon of 23 January, the authorities began shutting down some of the major highways leaving Wuhan.{{Cite news |url=https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/23/china/wuhan-coronavirus-update-intl-hnk/index.html |title=Wuhan virus spreads as China puts cities on lockdown and scraps New Year celebrations |last1=Regan |first1=Helen |last2=Griffiths |first2=James |last3=Culver |first3=David |last4=Guy |first4=Jack |publisher=CNN |access-date=23 January 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200126075016/https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/23/china/wuhan-coronavirus-update-intl-hnk/index.html |archive-date=26 January 2020 |url-status=live}} The lockdown came two days before the Chinese New Year, the most important festival in the country, and traditionally the peak traveling season, when millions of Chinese travel across the country.
Following the lockdown of Wuhan, public transportation systems in two of Wuhan's neighboring prefecture-level cities, Huanggang and Ezhou, were also placed on lockdown. A total of 12 other county to prefecture-level cities in Hubei, including Huangshi, Jingzhou, Yichang, Xiaogan, Jingmen, Suizhou, Xianning, Qianjiang, Xiantao, Shiyan, Tianmen, and Enshi, were placed on traveling restrictions by the end of 24 January, bringing the number of people affected by the restriction to more than 50 million.
==Lockdown timeline==
- 23 January, transport in Wuhan, Huanggang and Ezhou severely restricted, including closure of public transit, trains, airports, and major highways
- 24 January, travel restrictions enacted in 12 additional prefecture-level cities in Hubei
- 13 February, the Chinese government has issued extension of order to shut down all non-essential companies, including manufacturing plants, in Hubei Province until at least 24:00 on 20 February.
- 20 February, the Chinese government has issued extension of order to shut down all non-essential companies, including manufacturing plants, and all schools in Hubei Province until at least 24:00 on 10 March.{{cite web
|url=http://www.xinhuanet.com/2020-02/20/c_1125603476.htm
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200220141055/http://www.xinhuanet.com/2020-02/20/c_1125603476.htm
|url-status=dead
|archive-date=20 February 2020
|script-title=zh:湖北:除疫情防控必需外各类企业不早于3月10日复工
|date=2020-02-20
|agency=Xinhua News Agency
|publisher=Hubei Provincial New Coronavirus Infectious Pneumonia Prevention and Control Headquarters
|access-date=2020-02-28}}
- 13 March: Huangshi removes controls and permits on road traffic within its urban area; Qianjiang does the same for its entire administrative area.
- 14 March: Hubei Sanitation and Health Committee ({{zh|labels=no|s=卫生健康委员会}}) Vice-chairperson Liu Dongru ({{zh|labels=no|s=柳东如}}) announces that only Wuhan remains a "high-risk area",{{cite web
|url=https://www.backchina.com/news/2020/03/15/677206.html
|date=2020-03-15
|script-title=zh:解禁!湖北封闭式管理松绑 武汉市为高风险地区}} and that the entirety of the rest of the province is considered medium- or "low-risk areas". Any low-risk township-level divisions, in addition to those medium- and high-risk divisions with no confirmed active cases, could lift their blockades and other mobility controls. Per China News Service reporting, by 14 March, besides the aforementioned Huangshi and Qianjiang, Yichang, Huanggang, Suizhou, Xiantao, Jingzhou, Jingmen, Shiyan, Xiangyang, Tianmen, and Shennongjia had announced "measures to lessen controls" and for industries to incrementally resume work and production.
- 17 March: Jingzhou removes its permit requirements for transport, resuming normal transport operations, and also removes entry/exit controls on xiaoqu.{{cite web
|url=https://www.yicai.com/news/100550418.html
|script-title=zh:湖北荆州:17日起小区有序解封
|access-date=2020-03-16
|script-work=zh:荆州发布
|language=zh-cn}}
- 18 March: The Hubei taskforce to control COVID-19 ({{zh|labels=no|s=湖北省新冠肺炎疫情防控指挥部}}) announces that, with the exception of exit/entry into Wuhan and the province as a whole, all anti-COVID-19 traffic checkpoints within the province are to be removed.{{Cite news
|url=https://news.sina.com.cn/c/xl/2020-03-19/doc-iimxxsth0354225.shtml
|script-title=zh:湖北:保供稳价 保障群众生活
|date=2020-03-19
|access-date=2020-03-19
|work=ETToday.net
|language=zh-Hant}}
- 22 March: Wuhan loosens its two-month lockdown.{{cite web
|title=China scrambles to curb rise in imported coronavirus cases, Wuhan eases lockdown
|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/world/story/china-scrambles-to-curb-rise-in-imported-coronavirus-cases-wuhan-eases-lockdown-1658550-2020-03-23
|website=India Today
|date=2020-03-23
|access-date=2020-03-24}}
- 25 March: Hubei lifts the lockdown outside of Wuhan,{{cite news
|title=China to lift travel restrictions in Hubei after months of coronavirus lockdown
|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/24/china-to-lift-travel-restrictions-in-hubei-after-months-of-coronavirus-lockdown
|work=The Guardian
|access-date=2020-03-24
|date=2020-03-24}} although people will still need to confirm their "Green Code" health classification, designated by Alipay's monitoring system, to travel.{{cite news
|url=http://news.china.com.cn/txt/2020-03/24/content_75853787.htm
|script-title=zh:中国发布丨明起湖北除武汉外地区解除离鄂通道管控 武汉4月8日起解除离汉离鄂通道管控
|script-work=zh:中国网
|last1=Guo
|first1=Zehan (郭泽涵)
|date=2020-03-24
|access-date=2020-03-24}}
- 8 April: Wuhan lifts its lockdown, resumes all transportation,{{cite web
|title=China to Lift Lockdown Over Virus Epicenter Wuhan on April 8
|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-03-24/china-to-lift-lockdown-over-virus-epicenter-wuhan-on-april-8
|website=Bloomberg
|date=2020-03-24
|access-date=2020-03-24}} with residents intending to leave the city facing similar "Green Code" requirements as those in the rest of the province.{{cite web
|agency=Associated Press
|title=Green symbol on Chinese smartphone screens allows subway travel, hotel check-in; new 'health code' a tool in getting economy on its feet
|url=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/green-symbol-health-code-on-smartphone-screens-is-part-of-chinas-bid-to-get-economy-moving-again-2020-04-06
|website=MarketWatch
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200409180927/https://www.marketwatch.com/story/green-symbol-health-code-on-smartphone-screens-is-part-of-chinas-bid-to-get-economy-moving-again-2020-04-06
|archive-date=2020-04-09
|date=2020-04-06
|url-status=live}}
{{COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns in mainland China}}
= Elsewhere in China =
== Lockdowns by outdoor restrictions ==
On 1 February in Huanggang, Hubei implemented a measure whereby only one person from each household is permitted to go outside for provisions once every two days, except for medical reasons or to work at shops or pharmacies. Many cities, districts, and counties across mainland China implemented similar measures in the days following, including Wenzhou, Hangzhou, Fuzhou, Harbin, and the whole of Jiangxi.
class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible" style="text-align:right"
|+Chinese administrative divisions with household-based outdoor restrictions !Administrative !Division !Provincial !Start date !End date !Ordinary !Population !Notes !Sources |
Huanggang
|Prefectural |Hubei |2020-02-01 |2020-03-22 |6,162,069 |2010 | |
Wenzhou
|Prefectural |Zhejiang |2020-02-02 |2020-02-08 |9,190,000 |2017 | | |
Wenling
|Prefectural |Zhejiang |2020-02-02 | |1,366,800 |2010 | | |
Fangchenggang
|Prefectural |Guangxi |2020-02-02 |2020-02-08 |860,100 |2010 | | |
Guigang
|Prefectural |Guangxi |2020-02-02 | |1,562,200 |2010 |Urban districts only | |
Yuzhou, Yulin
|District |Guangxi |2020-02-02 |2020-02-09 |900,000 |2010 | | |
Zhouzhi, Xi'an
|County |Shaanxi |2020-02-02 | |562,768 |2010 |One person per household every day | |
Huyi, Xi'an
|District |Shaanxi |2020-02-03 |2020-02-09 |556,377 |2010 |One person per household every day | |
Bengbu
|Prefectural |Anhui |2020-02-03 | |3,164,467 |2010 | | |
Huaibei
|Prefectural |Anhui |2020-02-03 | |2,114,276 |2010 | | |
Bincheng, Binzhou |District |Shandong |2020-02-03 |2020-02-09 |682,717 |2010 | | |
Taizhou
|Prefectural |Zhejiang |2020-02-03 | |5,968,838 |2010 | | |
Hangzhou
|Prefectural |Zhejiang |2020-02-04 | |9,806,000 |2017 | | |
Ezhou
|Prefectural |Hubei |2020-02-04 | |1,048,668 |2010 | | |
Fuzhou
|Prefectural |Fujian |2020-02-04 | |7,660,000 |2017 | | |
Xuzhou
|Prefectural |Jiangsu |2020-02-04 |2020-02-08 |8,577,225 |2010 | | |
Jingdezhen
|Prefectural |Jiangxi |2020-02-04 |2020-03-31 |1,655,000 |2015 | |
Harbin
|Prefectural |Heilongjiang |2020-02-04 | |10,635,971 |2010 | | |
Yicheng, Zhumadian |District |Henan |2020-02-04 | |721,723 |2010 |One person per household every five days | |
Xincheng, Xi'an
|District |Shaanxi |2020-02-04 | |589,739 |2010 | | |
Chang'an, Xi'an
|District |Shaanxi |2020-02-04 | |1,083,285 |2010 | | |
Yanta, Xi'an
|District |Shaanxi |2020-02-05 | |1,178,529 |2010 | | |
Lianhu, Xi'an
|District |Shaanxi |2020-02-05 | |712,300 |2015 | | |
Ningbo
|Prefectural |Zhejiang |2020-02-05 | |8,202,000 |2018 | | |
Hailing, Taizhou
|District |Jiangsu |2020-02-05 | |594,656 |2010 | | |
Hefei
|Prefectural |Anhui |2020-02-05 | |7,965,300 |2017 | | |
Fuyang
|Prefectural |Anhui |2020-02-05 |2020-02-08 |7,599,913 |2010 | | |
Benxi
|Prefectural |Liaoning |2020-02-05 | |1,709,538 |2017 | | |
Ngawa
|Autonomous |Sichuan |2020-02-05 | |930,100 |2015 | | |
Garzê
|Autonomous |Sichuan |2020-02-05 | |1,164,900 |2015 | | |
Liuzhou
|Prefectural |Guangxi |2020-02-05 | |3,758,700 |2010 | | |
Guilin
|Prefectural |Guangxi |2020-02-05 | |4,961,600 |2015 | | |
Jinchengjiang, Hechi |District |Guangxi |2020-02-05 | |330,131 |2010 |One person per household every day | |
Jiangxi
|Province | – |2020-02-06 |2020-03-31 |45,200,000 |2013 | |
Xianyang
|Prefectural |Shaanxi |2020-02-06 | |5,096,001 |2010 | | |
Jinzhou
|Prefectural |Liaoning |2020-02-06 | |3,070,000 |2010 | | |
Kuancheng, Changchun |District |Jilin |2020-02-06 | |680,631 |2010 | | |
Tangshan
|Prefectural |Hebei |2020-02-07 | |7,935,800 |2018 | | |
Baodi, Tianjin
|District |Tianjin |2020-02-09 | |799,057 |2010 | | |
Hubei
|Province | – |2020-02-16 |2020-03-13 |59,020,000 |2018 | | |
Suifenhe
|County |Heilongjiang |2020-04-08 | |69,607 |2018 |One person per household every three days | |
colspan="3" |All
| | |233,511,355 | | colspan="2" |Sum of census data and population estimates above |
{{multiple image
| align = right
| direction = vertical
| width =
| image1 = Exit-Entry_Permit_for_Residents_During_the_Outbreak_of_2019-nCoV.png
| caption1 = Closed management in Jintan District, Changzhou, Jiangsu, where citizens are allowed outside for purchasing once every two days with permit.
| image2 = Road_closure_notice_on_Tianhe_Road,_Yucheng_Street,_Yuhuan_City,_Zhejiang_Province-1.jpg
| caption2 = Some areas took road closure measures to avoid the spread of COVID-19. Pictured is a road closure notice on Tianhe Road, Yucheng Subdistrict, Yuhuan, Zhejiang.
| image3 = Anti-COVID_Slogans_in_Lushunkou_District,_Dalian_City_02.jpg
| caption3 = A slogan for road closure in Lyushunkou District, Dalian, Liaoning.
| image4 = Community that is closed due to 2019–20 coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan on 27 February 2020.jpg
| caption4 = Residents in Wuhan had to buy daily necessities and food across the fence gate due to their community lockdown.
| image5 =
| caption5 =
}}
== Closed management of communities ==
Many areas across China have implemented what is called "closed management" ({{zh|s=封闭式管理 |p=fēngbìshì guǎnlǐ}}) on a community-basis. In most of the areas where this came into effect, villages, communities, and units in most areas would only keep one entrance and exit point open, and each household is allowed limited numbers of entrances and exits. In some places, night-time access is prohibited, effectively a curfew, and in extreme cases, access is prohibited throughout the day.{{Cite news|url=http://www.chinanews.com/sh/2020/02-14/9090650.shtml|script-title=zh:湖北十堰张湾区实施战时管制 全国多小区限制夜间出行}} People entering and leaving are required to wear masks and receive temperature tests. In some areas, vouchers are issued to the public, with vouchers and valid credentials. There are also areas where people are allowed to declare on WeChat mini-programs or public accounts and some apps at the same time.{{cite web|url=https://news.163.com/20/0210/03/F50B779S0001899O.html|script-title=zh:深圳:全部小区、城中村凭码(证)进出|author1=南方都市报|script-website=zh:网易|access-date=9 February 2020}} Courier and food delivery personnel are usually prohibited from entering. Control in communities with confirmed cases is more stringent.
List by the time of official announcement:
Impacts and reactions
The exodus from Wuhan before the lockdown resulted in angry responses on the Chinese microblogging website Sina Weibo from residents in other cities who were concerned that it could result in spreading of the novel coronavirus to their cities. Some in Wuhan were concerned with the availability of provisions and especially medical supplies during the lockdown.{{Cite news |url= https://www.dw.com/en/wuhan-lockdown-china-takes-extreme-measures-to-stop-virus-spread/a-52120126 |title=Wuhan lockdown: China takes extreme measures to stop virus spread {{!}} DW {{!}} 23 January 2020 |publisher=Deutsche Welle |access-date=23 January 2020}}
The World Health Organization called the Wuhan lockdown "unprecedented" and said it showed "how committed the authorities are to contain a viral breakout". However, WHO clarified that the move was not a recommendation that WHO had made and authorities have to wait and see how effective it is. The WHO separately stated that the possibility of locking down an entire city in this way was "new to science".{{Cite news |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-51224504 |title=How is China coping with the coronavirus outbreak? |date=24 January 2020 |publisher=BBC |location=United Kingdom |access-date=25 January 2020}}
The CSI 300 Index, an aggregate measure of the top 300 stocks in the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges, dropped almost 3% on 23 January 2020, the biggest single-day loss in almost 9 months, after the Wuhan lockdown was announced as investors reacting to the drastic measure sought safe haven for their investments.{{Cite news |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/stocks/news/china-stocks-slump-3-on-wuhan-lockdown-over-virus-outbreak/articleshow/73548510.cms |title=China stocks slump 3% on Wuhan lockdown over virus outbreak |date=23 January 2020 |work=The Economic Times |location=India |access-date=24 January 2020 |archive-date=26 January 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200126073829/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/stocks/news/china-stocks-slump-3-on-wuhan-lockdown-over-virus-outbreak/articleshow/73548510.cms |url-status=dead }}
The unprecedented scale of this lockdown generated controversy, and at least one expert criticized this measure as "risky business" that "could very easily backfire" by forcing otherwise healthy people in Wuhan to stay in close conditions with infected people. Drawing a cordon sanitaire around a city of 11 million people raises ethical concerns. It also drew comparisons to the lockdown of the poor West Point neighbourhood in Liberia during the 2014 ebola outbreak, which was lifted after ten days.{{Cite news |url= https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/22/world/asia/coronavirus-quarantines-history.html |title=Scale of China's Wuhan Shutdown Is Believed to Be Without Precedent |last=Levenson |first=Michael |date=22 January 2020 |work=The New York Times |access-date=25 January 2020 |issn=0362-4331}}{{Cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/13/world/africa/liberias-military-tries-to-remedy-tension-over-ebola-quarantine.html |title=Liberia's Military Tries to Remedy Tension Over Ebola Quarantine |last=MacDougall |first=Clair |date=12 May 2015 |work=The New York Times |access-date=25 January 2020 |issn=0362-4331 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170716011317/https://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/13/world/africa/liberias-military-tries-to-remedy-tension-over-ebola-quarantine.html |archive-date=16 July 2017 |url-status=live}}
The lockdown caused panic in the city of Wuhan, and many expressed concern about the city's ability to cope with the outbreak. At the time, some experts questioned whether the large costs of such a vast lockdown, both financially and in terms of personal liberty, would translate to effective infection control. Medical historian Howard Markel argued that the Chinese government "may now be overreacting, imposing an unjustifiable burden on the population," and said that "incremental restrictions, enforced steadily and transparently, tend to work far better than draconian measures."{{Cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/27/opinion/china-wuhan-virus-quarantine.html |title=Opinion {{!}} Will the Largest Quarantine in History Just Make Things Worse? |last=Markel |first=Howard |date=27 January 2020 |work=The New York Times |access-date=27 January 2020 |issn=0362-4331 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200127165714/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/27/opinion/china-wuhan-virus-quarantine.html |archive-date=27 January 2020 |url-status=live}} Others, such as Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, defended the intent behind the lockdowns, saying that they have bought the world a "delay to essentially prepare better." Mathematical epidemiologist Gerardo Chowell of Georgia State University stated that based on mathematical modelling, "containment strategies implemented in China are successfully reducing transmission."{{cite web|url=https://www.statnews.com/2020/02/21/coronavirus-wuhan-quarantine-bought-world-time-to-prepare/|title=Wuhan quarantine bought the world time to prepare for Covid-19|date=21 February 2020|website=STAT|access-date=26 February 2020}}
However, as the global COVID-19 pandemic worsened, similar lockdown measures were enacted around the world. After northern Italy became a new hotspot of the outbreak in late February, the Italian government has enacted what has been called a "Wuhan-style lockdown," by quarantining nearly a dozen towns of 50,000 people in the provinces of Lombardy and Veneto.{{cite web|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/italy-struggles-virus-doesn-respect-borders-200225165436970.html|title=Italy struggles with virus 'that doesn't respect borders'|last=Oddone|first=Elisa|publisher=Al Jazeera|access-date=26 February 2020}}{{Cite news|url=https://www.wired.com/story/could-the-us-contain-a-coronavirus-outbreak/|title=Could the US Contain a Coronavirus Outbreak?|magazine=Wired|access-date=28 February 2020|issn=1059-1028}} Iran, another developing hotspot for the coronavirus as of 25 February, has come under calls to assume similar lockdown procedures as China and Italy. Security experts such as Gal Luft of the Institute for the Analysis of Global Security in Washington, have said that "The best way for Iran to deal with the disease is to do precisely what China has done – quarantine." and that "If Wuhan with its 11 million population can be under quarantine, so can Tehran with its 8 million"{{cite web|url=https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3052152/fears-mount-coronavirus-outbreak-worsens-sanctions-hit-iran|title=Fears mount as coronavirus outbreak worsens in sanctions-hit Iran|date=25 February 2020|website=South China Morning Post|access-date=26 February 2020}}
E-commerce contributed substantially to China's COVID-19 pandemic response by facilitating fast delivery of personal protective equipment, food, and daily use consumer goods during lockdowns.{{Cite book |last=Liu |first=Lizhi |title=From Click to Boom: The Political Economy of E-Commerce in China |publisher=Princeton University Press |year=2024 |isbn=9780691254104 |pages=159 |doi=10.1515/9780691254111 |jstor=jj.14527541}}
By late 2020, public health experts estimated that the Wuhan lockdown prevented between 500,000 and 3 million infections and between 18,000 and 70,000 deaths.{{cite web|url=https://www.scmp.com/comment/opinion/article/3109634/real-reason-china-pushing-better-global-response-covid-19-pandemic|title=The real reason China is pushing for a better global response to the Covid-19 pandemic|date=14 November 2020|website=South China Morning Post|access-date=15 November 2020}} A November 2021 study examining data from the first half of 2020 estimated that over 347,000 deaths may have been prevented in China by COVID-19 prevention measures from 1 January 2020, to 31 July 2020. The estimate does not solely include deaths that would have occurred due to COVID-19. It includes deaths that were inadvertently prevented, such as from traffic collisions or air pollution.{{Cite journal|last1=Qi|first1=Jinlei|last2=Zhang|first2=Dandan|last3=Zhang|first3=Xiang|last4=Takana|first4=Tanakao|last5=Pan|first5=Yuhang|last6=Yin|first6=Peng|last7=Liu|first7=Jiangmei|last8=Liu|first8=Shuocen|last9=Gao|first9=George F.|last10=He|first10=Guojun|last11=Zhou|first11=Maigeng|date=2021-11-29|title=Short- and medium-term impacts of strict anti-contagion policies on non-COVID-19 mortality in China|journal=Nature Human Behaviour|volume=6|issue=1|language=en|pages=55–63|doi=10.1038/s41562-021-01189-3|pmid=34845358|s2cid=244751919|issn=2397-3374|doi-access=free}}
See also
References
{{reflist}}
{{COVID-19 pandemic}}
{{COVID-19 pandemic in mainland China}}
Category:2020 disasters in China
Category:Responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020
Category:Containment efforts related to the COVID-19 pandemic