Fur clothing#Processing of fur

{{Further|History of hide materials}}

File:Canadian man fur coat 1910.jpeg

Fur is generally thought to have been among the first materials used for clothing. The period when fur was first used as clothing is debated. It is known that several species of hominoids including Homo sapiens and Homo neanderthalensis used fur clothing. Clothing was made from the hides of animals such as bison, muskox, bear, ground sloth, woolly rhinoceros, mammoth or Irish elk.

Fur clothing predates written history and has been recovered from various archaeological sites worldwide.{{Cite web |title=Fur in prehistory |url=https://en.natmus.dk/historical-knowledge/historical-themes/the-fur-trail/fur-in-prehistory/ |access-date=2022-11-22 |website=National Museum of Denmark |language=en}}

Crown proclamations known as "sumptuary legislation" were issued in England{{Cite web |title=Protecting native industry in medieval and early modern England |url=https://exhibits.law.harvard.edu/protecting-native-industry-medieval-and-early-modern-england |access-date=2022-11-22 |website=exhibits.law.harvard.edu |language=en}} limiting the wearing of certain furs to higher social statuses, thereby establishing a cachet based on exclusivity. Furs such as leopard, snow leopard and cheetah (all three of them known as 'panther' at the time), red squirrel, marten, and ermine were reserved for the aristocracy, while fox, hare and beaver clothed the middle, and goat, wolf and sheepskin the lower. Fur was primarily used for visible linings, with species varied by season within social classes. Populations of fur-bearing animals decreased in West Europe and began to be imported from the Middle East and Russia.{{Cite book |last=Skov |first=Lise |url=https://www.bloomsburyfashioncentral.com/encyclopedia-chapter?docid=b-9781847888570&tocid=b-9781847888570-EDch8017 |title=Berg Encyclopedia of World Dress and Fashion |year=2010 |isbn=978-1-8478-8397-1 |volume=8: West Europe |location=Oxford |pages=90–91 |language=en |via=Bloomsbury Fashion Central}}

As new kinds of fur, such as jaguar and chinchilla, entered Europe, other uses were found for fur other than clothing. Beaver was most desired and used to make hats which became popular headpieces, especially during wartime. Swedish soldiers wore broad-brimmed hats made exclusively from beaver felt. Due to the limitations of beaver fur, hat-makers relied heavily on North America for imports as beaver was only available in the Scandinavian peninsula.

Other than the military, fur has been used for accessories such as hats, hoods, scarves, and muffs. Design elements including the visuals of the animal were considered acceptable with heads, tails and paws still being kept on the accessories. During the nineteenth century, Seal and karakul were made into indoor jackets.

File:Nutriajacke.jpg jacket, reversible]]

The twentieth century saw fur being fashionable in West Europe with full fur coats. With lifestyle changes as a result of developments like indoor heating, the international textile trade affected how fur was distributed around the world. Europeans focused on using local resources giving fur association with femininity with the increasing use of mink.

The most popular kinds of fur in the 1960s (known as luxury fur) were blond mink, white rabbit, yellow leopard, jaguar or cheetah, black panther, silver striped fox and red fox. Cheaper alternatives were pelts of wolf, Persian lamb or muskrat. It was common for ladies to wear a matching hat. In the 1950s, a must-have type of fur was the mutation fur (naturally nuanced colours) and fur trimmings on a coat that were beaver, lamb fur, Astrakhan and mink.{{Cite news |last=Smith |first=Ray A. |date=27 January 2020 |title=The Awkward Heirloom: No One Wants Grandma's Fur Coat |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-awkward-heirloom-no-one-wants-grandmas-fur-coat-11580121002 |access-date=10 September 2022 |work=The Wall Street Journal}}

In 1970, Germany was the world's largest fur market. In 1975, the International Fur Trade Federation banned endangered species furs like silk monkey, silky sifaka, ringtailed lemur, golden bamboo lemur, sportive lemur, dwarf lemur, ocelot, margay, cougar, snow leopard, black panther, leopard, jaguar, tiger, cheetah, quoll, numbat, chinchilla, black bear, Sun bear, Moon bear, and polar bear. The use of animal skins was brought to light during the 1980s by animal rights organizations while the demand for fur decreased. Anti-fur organizations raised awareness of animal welfare issues within the fashion industry. Fur farming was banned in Britain in 1999. During the twenty-first century, foxes and mink have been bred in captivity with Denmark, the Netherlands and Finland being leaders in mink production. Fur farming has since been banned in the Netherlands.{{Cite web |date=2003-12-15 |title=Inside the Fur Industry: Factory Farms |url=https://www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-clothing/animals-used-clothing-factsheets/inside-fur-industry-factory-farms/ |access-date=2023-09-22 |website=PETA |language=en-US}}

File:Lagerraum von Lomer & Co (vor 1906).jpg

File:Fur sewing machine.jpg]]

Fur is still worn in cooler climates around the world due to its warmth and durability. From the days of early European settlement, up until the development of modern clothing alternatives, fur clothing was popular in Canada during the cold winters. The invention of inexpensive synthetic textiles for insulating clothing led to fur clothing falling out of fashion.

Fur is still used by indigenous people and industrialized societies, due to its availability and superior insulation properties. The Inuit peoples of the Arctic relied on fur for most of their clothing, and it also forms a part of traditional clothing in Russia, Ukraine, the former Yugoslavia, Scandinavia, and Japan.

A number of consumers and designers—notably British fashion designer and outspoken animal rights activist Stella McCartney—reject fur due to moral beliefs against cruelty to animals.{{Cite web |date=July 31, 2009 |title=Fur-Free Designers and Retailers |url=http://www.hsus.org/furfree/fashion/retailers/furfree_retailers_designers.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091126045059/http://www.hsus.org/furfree/fashion/retailers/furfree_retailers_designers.html |archive-date=2009-11-26 |website=Humane Society of the United States}}

Animal furs used in garments and trim may be dyed bright colors or with patterns, often to mimic exotic animal pelts: alternatively, they may be left their original pattern and color. Fur may be shorn down to imitate the feel of velvet, creating a fabric called shearling.

The introduction of alternatives in the early 20th century brought tension to the clothing industry as the faux fur manufacturers started producing faux fur and capitalising on profits. By the 1950s synthetic fur garments had become popular and affordable. Newspapers were writing articles on major chemical companies trying to outdo each other in the quest to create the most realistic fake fur.{{Cite web |last=Amed |first=Imran |date=6 September 2018 |title=Burberry Stops Destroying Product and Bans Real Fur |url=https://www.businessoffashion.com/articles/news-analysis/burberry-stops-destroying-product-and-bans-real-fur/ |access-date=2022-11-25 |website=The Business of Fashion |language=en}}

The popularity of natural fur has declined in recent years. While Vogue Paris published a homage to fur in August 2017, Gucci later endorsed the idea of not using animal fur. Other high-end brands to follow this lead are Stella McCartney, Givenchy, Calvin Klein, Ralph Lauren, Michael Kors, Philosophy di Lorenzo Serafini. Burberry announced its intentions to stop sending models with fur on runways but did not stop selling it in stores. Some companies have attempted to devise sustainable methods of producing leather and fur. Designer Ingar Helgason is developing Bio fur which would grows synthetic pelts the way that Modern Meadow has been able to produce grown leather and Diamond foundry-created lab-grown diamonds. BOF fur debate hosted by Zilberkweit director of the British Fur Association argued that natural fur was more sustainable. Others said that chemical processes needed to treat animals’ fur in order to be worn are just as detrimental to the environment.{{Cite web |last=Smith |first=PJ |date=11 August 2018 |title=Fashion's Fur-Free Future |url=https://www.businessoffashion.com/opinions/news-analysis/op-ed-fashions-fur-free-future/ |access-date=2022-11-25 |website=The Business of Fashion |language=en |department=Op-Ed}}{{Cite web |last=Maisey |first=Sarah |date=2018-01-06 |title=With more fashion brands declaring themselves fur free, what's next for the fur industry? |url=https://www.thenationalnews.com/lifestyle/with-more-fashion-brands-declaring-themselves-fur-free-what-s-next-for-the-fur-industry-1.693095 |access-date=2022-11-25 |website=The National |language=en}}

Fashion houses such as Hermès, Dior and Fendi still use natural fur. Alex Mcintosh, who leads the Fashion Futures post-graduate program at London College of Fashion, says “change on this level would only be driven on a genuine lack of demand and not just social media outcry”.

{{see also|List of types of fur}}

Common animal sources for fur clothing and fur trimmed accessories include fox, mink, rabbit (specifically the rex rabbit), finnraccoon (industry term for tanuki), lynx, bobcat, polecat (called 'fitch'), muskrat, beaver, stoat (ermine), marten, otter, sable, civet, seals, karakul sheep, muskox, caribou, llama, alpaca, skunk, coyote, wolf, chinchilla, opossum, and common brushtail possum.{{Cite news |last=Brooks |first=David |date=2011-12-28 |title=New Zealand turns a pest into luxury business |url=http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/bizfocus/archives/2008/12/21/2003431724 |access-date=2012-01-04 |work=Taipei Times |page=12 |agency=AFP}} Some of these are more highly prized than others, and there are many grades and colors. In the past animals such as leopards, jaguars, tigers, lemurs, and Colobus monkeys were commonly used but CITES laws and the environmental regulation has made these furs illegal. Additionally, in some regions the furs of domestic dogs and cats are used for warmth.

Different furs have different properties; coyote fur is resilient and works as a great wind barrier but is very rough to touch, while fox fur is silky but delicate.

The import and sale of seal products was banned in the US in 1972 over conservation concerns about Canadian seals. The import and sale is still banned even though the Marine Animal Response Society estimates the harp seal population is thriving at approximately 8 million,{{Cite web |title=Harp Seal |url=http://www.marineanimals.ca/species/harp_eng.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191031212759/http://www.marineanimals.ca/species/harp_eng.html |archive-date=2019-10-31 |website=Marine Animal Response Society}} and the bans harmful impact on Indigenous communities that had relied on seal hunting as a source of international income. The import, export and sales of domesticated cat and dog fur were also banned in the US under the Dog and Cat Protection Act of 2000.{{CodeFedReg |16|301}}

Most of the fur sold by high fashion retailers globally is from farmed animals such as mink, foxes, and rabbits. Some cruel methods of killing have made people more aware as animal rights activists work harder to protect the animals. The 2001 recommendations of the European Commission's Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare (SCAHAW) state correspondingly: ‘In comparison with other farm animals, species farmed for their fur have been subjected to relatively little active selection except with respect to fur characteristics.{{Cite web |title=The environmental costs and health risks of fur |url=https://www.furfreealliance.com/environment-and-health/ |access-date=2022-11-25 |website=Fur Free Alliance |language=en-CA}}{{Cite web |title=Fur bans |url=https://www.furfreealliance.com/fur-bans/ |access-date=2022-11-25 |website=Fur Free Alliance |language=en-CA}}

==Processing of fur==

File:Blaufuchs-Sandalen, Königsallee 2019 (2a).jpg

File:Nutukkaat.JPG fur footwear]]

The manufacturing of fur clothing involves obtaining animal pelts where the hair is left on. Depending on the type of fur and its purpose, some of the chemicals involved in fur processing may include table salts, alum salts, acids, soda ash, sawdust, cornstarch, lanolin, degreasers, and, less commonly, bleaches, dyes and toners (for dyed fur).{{cite book | last=Churchill | first=J.E. | title=The Complete Book of Tanning Skins and Furs | publisher=Stackpole Books | year=1983 | isbn=978-0-8117-1719-9 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-2Hw1Y7JmAAC | access-date=2024-03-27}}{{cite book | last=Kaplan | first=Harry | editor-last1=Ward | editor-first1=A.G. | title=Furskin Processing: The Commonwealth and International Library: Leather Technology | publisher=Elsevier Science | year=2013 | isbn=978-1-4831-3895-4 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PqogBQAAQBAJ | access-date=2024-03-27}}

The first step in the process is the skinning phase. Animals must be frozen in order to make this phase safe, otherwise, the temperature change from the warm body of the animal to the cold environment around it would cause all the hair to fall off the pelt. It's also best for the carcass to be frozen before skinning so that the carcass won't bleed while being skinned. After the carcass is skinned it's then fleshed, dried, salted, pickled, tanned (either by chemical or by natural method), and then softened. The length of time taken to skin, tan, and process the fur is a contributing factor of the high price.

Workers exposed to fur dust created during fur processing have been shown to have reduced pulmonary function in direct proportion to their length of exposure.{{Cite journal |last1=Chen |first1=Jie |last2=Lou |first2=Jiezhi |last3=Liu |first3=Zhenlin |date=January 2003 |title=Pulmonary Function in Fur-Processing Workers: A Dose-Response Relationship |journal=Archives of Environmental Health |volume=58 |issue=1 |pages=37–41 |doi=10.3200/AEOH.58.1.37-41 |pmid=12747517 |s2cid=30463019 |id={{INIST|14777753}}}} The process of fur manufacturing includes waterways-pumping waste and toxic chemicals into the surrounding environment. Dyed furs also do not last as long as natural furs. On the other hand, fur is naturally biodegradable, whereas faux fur is not.{{Cite web |last=Hoskins |first=Tansy |date=2013-10-29 |title=Is the fur trade sustainable? |url=http://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/sustainable-fashion-blog/is-fur-trade-sustainable |access-date=2022-11-25 |website=The Guardian |language=en}} Using natural tanning methods such as bark tanning can eliminate the harmful effects of the modern leather and fur tanning industries. Bark tanning involves boiling leaves or bark of trees to extract the tannins that are then used to preserve the hide.

The use of wool involves shearing the animal's fleece from the living animal so that the wool can be regrown but sheepskin shearling is made by retaining the fleece to the leather and shearing it.Australian Wool Corporation, Australian Wool Classing, Raw Wool Services, 1990.

File:Fitch fur coat back side.JPG

The foremost reason for the exorbitant price of a fur coat is the amount of time it takes to craft the garment. The first step is the pelt matcher who takes the furs available and matches them based on size and color to create one cohesive garment. Next a craftsperson will repair any damage shown on any of the pelts such as bald spots of torn leather.

Next the pelt is worked in a variety of ways to accentuate the markings of the animals, increase the thermal properties of the pelt, save on cost, or to create new patterns or styles. The let-out method is the most popular method used in the past, this involves cutting the pelt into countless thin strips and sewing them back together in a staggered fashion to make the pelt thinner and longer. The skin-to-skin method, now often called 'full pelt' is the easiest method where whole pelts are sewn side-by-side to fit the pattern. This method is incredibly warm, but looks the least like fabric. The airgallon method involves making small slits in the leather side of the fur making it longer and more lightweight for those who need to save on price. SAGA Furs and Kopenhagen Furs have both been investing in new methods such as knitting with fur (first invented by Indigenous people knitting arctic hare fur into blankets), fur lace, and fur intarsia.

Anti-fur campaigns gained popularity in the 1980s and 1990s, with the participation of numerous celebrities and since then fur has been in decline.{{Cite press release |title=FICA sales stats |date=2005-09-15 |publisher=Fur Commission USA |url=http://www.furcommission.com/news/newsF08z.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060318113019/http://www.furcommission.com/news/newsF08z.htm |archive-date=18 March 2006}} Fur clothing has become the focus of boycotts due to the opinion that it is cruel and unnecessary. PETA and other animal rights organizations, celebrities, and animal rights ethicists, have called attention to fur farming.

Animal rights advocates object to the trapping and killing of wildlife, and to the confinement and killing of animals on fur farms due to concerns about the animal' suffering and death. They may also condemn "alternatives" made from synthetic (oil-based) clothing as they promote fur for the sake of fashion. Protests also include objections to the use of leather in clothing, shoes and accessories.

Some animal rights activists have disrupted fur fashion shows with protests,{{Cite web |last=Cartner-Morley |first=Jess |date=16 February 2018 |title=Anti-fur protests set to fly as activists target London fashion week |url=https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2018/feb/16/london-fashion-week-fur-set-fly-animal-rights-activists-protests |access-date=30 December 2021 |website=The Guardian}} while other anti-fur protesters may use fashion shows featuring faux furs or other alternatives to fur clothing as a platform to highlight animal suffering from the use of real leathers and furs.{{Cite magazine |last=Kelly |first=Alyssa |date=2 March 2020 |title=Stella McCartney Stages Anti-Fur Protest with Animal Models at Paris Fashion Week Show |url=https://people.com/style/stella-mccartney-stages-anti-fur-protest-with-animal-models-at-paris-fashion-week-show/ |access-date=30 December 2021 |magazine=People}} These groups sponsor "Compassionate Fashion Day" on the third Saturday of August to promote their anti-fur message. Some American groups participate in "Fur Free Friday", an event held annually on the Friday after Thanksgiving (Black Friday) that uses displays, protests, and other methods to highlight their beliefs regarding furs.{{Cite web |title=2021 Fur-Free Friday Protest |url=https://www.lcanimal.org/index.php/campaigns/fur/fur-free-friday |access-date=30 December 2021 |publisher=Last Chance for Animals}}

In Canada, opposition to the annual seal hunt is viewed as an anti-fur issue, although the Humane Society of the United States claims that its opposition is to "the largest slaughter of marine mammals on Earth."{{Cite web |date=16 June 2010 |title=Seal Hunt |url=http://www.humanesociety.org/issues/seal_hunt/ |url-status=bot: unknown |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100616040111/http://www.humanesociety.org/issues/seal_hunt/ |archive-date=16 June 2010 |website=The Humane Society of the United States}} IFAW, an anti-sealing group, claims that Canada has an "abysmal record of enforcement" of anti-cruelty laws surrounding the hunt.{{Cite web |title=Why commercial sealing is cruel |url=http://www.ifaw.org/united-kingdom/our-work/seals/why-commercial-sealing-cruel |website=IFAW - International Fund for Animal Welfare}} A Canadian government survey{{Cite web |date=12 May 2008 |title=Fisheries and Aquaculture Management - Seals and Sealing in Canada |url=http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/seal-phoque/reports-rapports/study-etude/study-etude_e.htm |url-status=bot: unknown |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080512014542/http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/seal-phoque/reports-rapports/study-etude/study-etude_e.htm |archive-date=12 May 2008}} indicated that two-thirds of Canadians supported the hunting of seals if the regulations under Canadian law.

PETA representative Johanna Fuoss credits social media and email marketing campaigns for helping to mobilize an unprecedented number of animal rights activists. “In the year before Michael Kors stopped using fur, he had received more than 150,000 emails,” Fuoss tells Highsnobiety. “This puts a certain pressure on designers who can see that the zeitgeist is moving away from fur.” New technologies and platforms have made it easier than ever for those advocating change to get results. While in the past, activists had to invade runways with signs and paint, or physically mail privately viewed letters, today's activist can raise a commotion without leaving the house.{{Cite web |last=Balmat |first=N. |date=2018-04-01 |title=From vegan leather to bio fur: Growing materials from cells |url=https://futur404.com/growing-materials-cells/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191031212803/https://futur404.com/growing-materials-cells/ |archive-date=2019-10-31}}{{Cite web |date=2018-09-13 |title=How Social Media Is Pushing Fur Out of Fashion |url=https://www.highsnobiety.com/p/social-media-pushing-fur-out-fashion/ |access-date=2022-11-25 |website=Highsnobiety |language=en}}

The rise of social media has provided the general public with a direct line of communication with companies and a platform for opinions and protests, making it harder for brands to ignore targeted activism. “Brands are under huge pressure to respond to social media and avoid any controversy,” says Mark Oaten, chief executive of the IFF.{{Cite web |last=O'Connor |first=Tamison |date=15 October 2018 |title=Why Fashion's Anti-Fur Movement Is Winning |url=https://www.businessoffashion.com/articles/news-analysis/why-fashions-anti-fur-movement-is-winning/ |access-date=2022-11-25 |website=The Business of Fashion |language=en}} The anti-fur messaging is being amplified by social media and a millennial customer base that is paying closer attention to the values represented by the products they buy.

The feeling of outrage against animal suffering is particularly intense when cats and dogs are involved since these are the most popular pets in Western countries. Therefore, consumers demand to be assured about the production of furs to avoid the risk of inadvertently buying products made with fur from these animals. To counteract the growing concern of consumers, European Union officially banned the import and export from all Member States of dog and cat furs, and all products containing fur from these species, with Regulation 1523/2007,{{cite EU regulation |serial=1523/2007 |date=11 December 2007 |description=banning the placing on the market and the import to, or export from, the Community of cat and dog fur, and products containing such fur |eurlextag=32007R1523}} applying since December 31, 2008. A combined method for species identification in furs, based on a combined morphological and molecular approach, has been proposed to discriminate dog and cat furs from allowed fur-bearing species, as this is a necessary step to comply with the ban.{{Cite journal |last1=Mariacher |first1=Alessia |last2=Garofalo |first2=Luisa |last3=Fanelli |first3=Rita |last4=Lorenzini |first4=Rita |last5=Fico |first5=Rosario |date=2019-11-11 |title=A combined morphological and molecular approach for hair identification to comply with the European ban on dog and cat fur trade |journal=PeerJ |language=en |volume=7 |pages=e7955 |doi=10.7717/peerj.7955 |issn=2167-8359 |pmc=6855206 |pmid=31737444 |doi-access=free}}{{Cite journal |last1=Garofalo |first1=Luisa |last2=Mariacher |first2=Alessia |last3=Fanelli |first3=Rita |last4=Fico |first4=Rosario |last5=Lorenzini |first5=Rita |date=2018-06-05 |title=Hindering the illegal trade in dog and cat furs through a DNA-based protocol for species identification |journal=PeerJ |language=en |volume=6 |pages=e4902 |doi=10.7717/peerj.4902 |issn=2167-8359 |pmc=5993017 |pmid=29888130 |doi-access=free}}

Alternatives to fur have been proposed or invented, including faux biodegradable plant based fur.{{Cite web |last=Miller |first=Sara |date=2024-04-08 |title=Fake Fur, Real Sustainability: Company Fighting Pollution In Fashion |url=https://nocamels.com/2024/04/fake-fur-real-sustainability-company-fighting-pollution-in-fashion/ |access-date=2024-06-29 |website=NoCamels |language=en-US}}

{{main|Fur trade}}

File:Pelz-Verkaufsstand in Tallinn, Estland.jpg, Estonia in 2019]]

The fur trade is the worldwide buying and selling of fur for clothing and other purposes. The fur trade was one of the driving forces of exploration of North America and the Russian Far East.{{Cite encyclopedia |title=The Economic History of the Fur Trade: 1670 to 1870 |encyclopedia=EH.Net Encyclopedia |url=https://eh.net/encyclopedia/the-economic-history-of-the-fur-trade-1670-to-1870/ |access-date=2022-11-22 |date=March 16, 2008 |editor-last=Whaples |editor-first=Robert |last2=Lewis |first2=Frank |last1=Carlos |first1=Ann}}

The fur trade has long-lasting effects, specifically on the Natives in North America and the populations of fur bearing animals worldwide. When fur farming was first developed in North America it was in response to the dwindling numbers of wild furbearing animals caused by unregulated hunting and trapping. {{Cite book |last=Harding |first=A. R. |url=https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/009168701 |title=Fur farming: a book of information about fur bearing animals, enclosures, habits, care, etc. |date=1909 |publisher=A.R. Harding |location=Columbus, OH}}

Currently the most common animals in the global fur trade are farmed animals; mink are the most traded fur worldwide,{{Cite news |last1=Ball |first1=Anneke |last2=Lewis |first2=Noah |last3=Miller |first3=Mark Adam |date=2022-02-23 |title=The rise and fall of the real fur industry in the US |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/rise-and-fall-fur-industry-faux-mink-2022-2 |access-date=2022-11-22 |work=Business Insider |language=en-US}} followed by arctic fox (see Arctic fox fur), red fox, finnraccoon and rabbit. {{Cite web |title=Fur Production and Fur Laws |url=https://www.animallaw.info/intro/fur-production-and-fur-laws |access-date=2022-11-22 |website=Animal Legal & Historical Center}}

Following the public awareness of animal welfare abuses in the fur industry, the European Union initiated the WelFur system.{{Cite web |date=2018-11-15 |title=Welfare Standards for fur farmed animals (WelFur) |url=https://www.eesc.europa.eu/en/policies/policy-areas/enterprise/database-self-and-co-regulation-initiatives/146 |access-date=2022-11-22 |website=European Economic and Social Committee |language=en}} WelFur is the agreed upon certification program in the E.U. that prioritizes animal welfare in European fur farms, these farms are then given a QR code through the Furmark system{{Cite web |title=What is Furmark |url=https://www.furmark.com/what-is-furmark/what-it-means |access-date=2022-11-22 |website=Furmark Individual Certification Programme}} to share with the clothing company which theoretically allows consumers to trace their fur coat back to which farm the animals came from. This system only applies to fur farms in the E.U. that supply fox, mink, and raccoon, and does not apply to farms in China or Russia.

Wild furs are still sold in the fur trade as well such as sable, wild fox, coyote, beaver, lynx, and martens. The Agreement on International Humane Trapping Standards (AIHTS), negotiated between the Russian Federation, the E.U., the U.S. and Canada, is an agreement signed in 1998 to "establish international standards of humane trapping" worldwide.{{Cite journal |author=ECGCGRF (European Community, Government of Canada, and Government of the Russian Federation) |date=1998-02-14 |title=Agreement on International Humane Trapping Standards |url=https://ec.europa.eu/environment/biodiversity/animal_welfare/hts/pdf/Text_of_AIHTS_between_EU_Canada_Russia.pdf |journal=Official Journal of the European Communities |volume=42 |pages=43–57}}

Real fur in fashion is contentious, with Copenhagen (2022){{Cite web |date=2022-08-16 |title=Copenhagen Fashion Week Bans Fur After PETA Protest |url=https://vegconomist.com/fashion-design-and-beauty/copenhagen-fashion-week-bans-fur/ |access-date=2022-11-22 |website=vegconomist |language=en-GB}} and London (2018){{Cite news |date=2018-09-07 |title=London Fashion Week to go fur-free for the first time |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-45446028 |access-date=2022-11-22 |work=BBC News |language=en-GB}} fashion weeks banning real fur in its runway shows following protests and government attention to the issue. Fashion houses such as Gucci and Chanel have banned the use of fur in its garments.{{Cite web |last=Kratofil |first=Colleen |title=Luxury Fashion Brands That Are Anti-Fur |url=https://people.com/style/fur-free-luxury-fashion-brands/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221122182935/https://people.com/style/fur-free-luxury-fashion-brands/ |archive-date=2022-11-22 |access-date=2022-11-22 |website=Peoplemag |language=en}} Versace and Furla also stopped using fur in their collections in early 2018.{{Cite web |last=Assoune |first=Alex |date=2020-03-18 |title=Why We Should Stop Buying And Wearing Fur Clothes |url=https://www.panaprium.com/blogs/i/why-we-should-stop-buying-and-wearing-fur-clothes |access-date=2023-09-22 |website=Panaprium |language=en}} In 2020, the luxury outdoor brand Canada Goose announced it would discontinue the use of new coyote fur on parka trims following protests.{{Cite news |date=2021-06-24 |title=Canada Goose to end the use of all fur on coats |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/business-57592599 |access-date=2022-11-22 |work=BBC News |language=en-GB}} Luxury brands like Dior, Fendi, Louis Vuitton, Max Mara, and Hermès continue to use fur in their designs.{{Cite web |last=Wolfe |first=Isobella |date=2022-08-03 |title=These Luxury Brands Are Still Harming Animals For Profit |url=https://goodonyou.eco/luxury-brands-harming-animals/ |access-date=2022-11-22 |website=Good On You |language=en}}

Governing bodies have issued legislation banning the sale of new real fur garments. In 2021, Israel was the first government to ban the sale of real fur garments, with the exception of those worn as part of a religious faith.{{Cite news |last=Hernandez |first=Joe |date=2021-06-14 |title=Israel Has Become The 1st Country To Ban The Sale Of Most Fur Clothing |url=https://www.npr.org/2021/06/14/1006279660/israel-has-become-the-first-country-to-ban-the-sale-of-fur-clothing |access-date=2022-11-22 |work=NPR |language=en}} In 2019, the state of California banned fur trapping, with a total ban on the sale of all new fur garments except those made of sheep, cow, and rabbit fur going into effect on January 1, 2023.{{Cite web |last=Kaur |first=Harmeet |date=2019-10-13 |title=California becomes the first state to ban fur products |url=https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/13/us/california-bans-fur-products-trnd/index.html |access-date=2022-11-22 |website=CNN |language=en}}{{Cite web |last=Traynor |first=Jeff |date=2019-09-17 |title=California's Trapping Ban: A closer look at the ramifications |url=https://furbearerconservation.com/blog/2019/9/14/californias-trapping-ban-a-closer-look |access-date=2022-11-22 |website=Furbearer Conservation |language=en-US}}

• Fur farming

{{Reflist}}

{{commons category|Fur garments}}

• {{Cite Americana|wstitle=Furs (skins)|display=Furs are articles made from the skins of fur-bearing animals prepared with the hair left on|author=Ernest Ingersoll|author-link=Ernest Ingersoll|short=x}}

{{Clothing materials and parts}}

{{Clothing}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Fur Clothing}}

Category:Fur

Category:Clothing by material

Category:History of clothing

Category:Clothing controversies

Category:Winter fabrics

Category:Clothing and the environment