Open Government Partnership
{{Short description|2011 multilateral initiative}}
{{Infobox organization
| name = Open Government Partnership
| logo = OGP logo - print layers.png
| abbreviation = OGP
| formation = {{start date and age|2011|09|20}}
| founder = {{flag|Brazil}}
{{flag|Indonesia}}
{{flag|Mexico}}
{{flag|Norway}}
{{flag|Philippines}}
{{flag|South Africa}}
{{flag|United Kingdom}}
{{flag|United States}}
| founding_location = New York, United States
| headquarters = Washington, D.C., United States
| location = Worldwide
| membership = 75 (National)
150 (Local)
| leader_title = CEO
| leader_name = Aidan Eyakuze
| staff = 55
| staff_year = 2020
| website = {{URL|opengovpartnership.org}}
}}
The Open Government Partnership (OGP) is a multilateral initiative aimed at securing commitments from national and sub-national governments to promote open government, combat corruption, and improve governance.{{Cite web |url=https://uia.org/s/or/en/1122280118 |url-access= |title=Open Government Partnership (OGP) |author1=Staff writer |year=2024 |department=UIA Global Civil Society Database |website=uia.org |publisher=Union of International Associations |agency=Yearbook of International Organizations Online |location=Brussels, Belgium |format= |arxiv= |asin= |bibcode= |doi= |doi-broken-date= |isbn= |issn= |jfm= |jstor= |lccn= |mr= |oclc= |ol= |osti= |pmc= |pmid= |rfc= |ssrn= |zbl= |id= |access-date=10 January 2025 |url-status= |archive-url= |archive-date= |via= |quote= |trans-quote= |ref= }} The OGP is managed by a steering committee that includes representatives from governments and from civil society organizations.
History
The Open Government Partnership was formally launched on September 20, 2011, on the sidelines of a UN General Assembly meeting during which heads of state from eight founding governments (Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Norway, the Philippines, South Africa, the United Kingdom, and the United States) endorsed the [https://www.opengovpartnership.org/open-government-declaration Open Government Declaration] and announced their [http://www.opengovpartnership.org/countries country action plans] along with an equal number of civil society leaders.{{Cite web |url=https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/open/partnership |work=whitehouse.gov |title=Open Government Partnership|via=National Archives|access-date=2016-04-27}} The eight founding members also welcomed the commitment of 38 governments to join the OGP.{{Cite web|url=https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/ogp |title=The Open Government Partnership |website=www.state.gov |access-date=2016-04-27}} India{{Cite web |title=India in Open Government and Open Government in India (SSIR) |url=https://ssir.org/articles/entry/india_in_open_government_and_open_government_in_india |access-date=2021-02-09|website=ssir.org|language=en-us}} and Russia{{Cite web|date=2013-05-17|title=Russia Retracts Commitment to Transparency, Leaves Open Government Partnership [Update].|url=https://www.globalintegrity.org/2013/05/17/russia-withdraws-ogp/|access-date=2021-02-09|website=Global Integrity|language=en-US}} had initially expressed intentions to join the partnership, but neither followed through with the process.
Six months after its start, OGP had grown from eight action plans and 46 participating countries to 50 action plans and 54 participating countries.{{Cite news|title=The Open Government Partnership – from eight to 54 countries|last=Harge|first=Jorge|date=April 10, 2012|work=The Guardian}} The meeting in Brasília brought together countries and organizations united in their belief in the power of transparency, with participation from anti-censorship campaigners in Yemen to reformers using data on primary schools to improve education in India.{{Cite news|title=Open Government Partnership: What We're Going to Learn in Brasilia|last=Dudman|first=Jane|date=April 16, 2012|work=The Guardian}}
A total of 46 members had already published action plans containing over 300 open government commitments.{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/public-leaders-network/2012/sep/26/francis-maude-open-government-partnership|title=Francis Maude: transparency brings tangible benefits|last=Maude|first=Francis|date=2012-09-26|newspaper=The Guardian|access-date=2016-04-27|language=en-GB|issn=0261-3077}} According to the then Minister of the United Kingdom's Cabinet Office responsible for public transparency and open data, Francis Maude, Britain sought to "further secure the foundations of OGP as a globally recognized and respected international initiative…. [and to] strengthen the role of civil society organizations, encouraging greater collaboration with governments to forge more innovative and open ways of working."
In 2013, OGP's thematic goals centered around citizen action and responsive government. In an era of hyperconnectivity, openness and transparency, as well as citizen participation and collaboration, are increasingly viewed as essential components of good governance.{{cite web|author=Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono|title=Opening remarks at the Open Government Partnership High-Level Side Event at the 69th United Nations General Assembly|date=September 24, 2014|url=http://www.opengovpartnership.org/sites/default/files/attachments/2014%20OGP%20HLE%20-%20Full%20Transcript%20FINAL.pdf|access-date=April 24, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160513031341/http://www.opengovpartnership.org/sites/default/files/attachments/2014%20OGP%20HLE%20-%20Full%20Transcript%20FINAL.pdf|archive-date=May 13, 2016|url-status=dead}}
With the adoption and implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development by world leaders at a historic United Nations Summit, including Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) 16 for the "promotion of peaceful and inclusive societies," 2015 marked a milestone for the future of development outcomes and open government."[https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/ Sustainable Development Goals]," Department of Public Information, United Nations. In October 2015, the Government of Mexico hosted the third OGP Global Summit in Mexico City, emphasizing the theme "Openness for All: Using the Open Government Principles as Key Mechanisms to Implement the Post-2015 Development Agenda."
In early 2016, OGP launched a new pilot program designed to involve sub-national governments more proactively in the initiative.{{cite web |url=http://www.opengovpartnership.org/how-it-works/subnational-government-pilot-program |title=Subnational Government Pilot Program {{!}} Open Government Partnership |website=www.opengovpartnership.org |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151219122403/http://www.opengovpartnership.org/how-it-works/subnational-government-pilot-program |archive-date=2015-12-19}} Later in December 2016, the Government of France, in partnership with the World Resources Institute (WRI), hosted the fourth OGP Global Summit in the nation's capital, Paris, gathering 3000 representatives from 70 countries.{{cite web|url=https://en.ogpsummit.org/osem/conference/ogp-summit|website=Open Government Partnership|title=OGP Global Summit|access-date=2016-12-09|archive-date=2017-09-18|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170918054146/https://en.ogpsummit.org/osem/conference/ogp-summit|url-status=dead}}
In the first 10 years, OGP members created over 4,500 commitments in more than 300 action plans.{{Cite web |title=OGP Vital Signs - 10 Years of Data in Review |url=https://www.opengovpartnership.org/ogp-vital-signs-10-years-of-data-in-review/ |access-date=2022-04-01 |website=Open Government Partnership |language=en}}
Objectives
OGP serves as a platform for reformers within and outside governments worldwide to develop initiatives that enhance transparency, empower citizens, combat corruption, and utilize new technologies to improve governance. OGP seeks to secure concrete commitments from national and sub-national governments to promote open government reform and innovation, advancing transparency, accountability, and citizen engagement.{{Cite web|url=http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/faqs|title=FAQs|website=Open Government Partnership|access-date=2016-04-27|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160419061120/http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/faqs|archive-date=2016-04-19|url-status=dead}} It is a voluntary partnership that countries choose to join, allowing civil society organizations to collaborate with governments on initiatives aligned with their reform agendas.
= Open Government Declaration =
The principles of OGP are best explained by the [https://www.opengovpartnership.org/process/joining-ogp/open-government-declaration/ Open Government Declaration]. As outlined in the declaration, participating countries are expected to adhere to the following principles:
- Acknowledge that people all around the world are demanding more openness in government. They are calling for greater civic participation in public affairs and seeking ways to make their governments more transparent, responsive, accountable, and effective.
- Recognize that countries are at different stages in their efforts to promote openness in government and that each of us pursues an approach consistent with our national priorities and circumstances and the aspirations of our citizens.
- Accept responsibility for seizing this moment to strengthen our commitments to promote transparency, fight corruption, empower citizens, and harness the power of new technologies to make government more effective and accountable.
- Uphold the value of openness in our engagement with citizens to improve services, manage public resources, promote innovation, and create safer communities. We embrace principles of transparency and open government with a view toward achieving greater prosperity, well-being, and human dignity in our own countries and in an increasingly interconnected world.
OGP participants declare their commitment to increase the availability of information about governmental activities, support civic participation, implement the highest standards of professional integrity, and increase access to new technologies for openness and accountability.
= Community of reformers =
Rather than establish a worldwide transparency ranking of countries, OGP provides support and encouragement to countries around the world as they champion ambitious new reforms and deliver on their promises "under the watchful eyes of citizens." The community of reformers is meant to "offer support to those in government that are willing and to create a hook whereby the conversations among government and civil society can occur."{{Cite news|date=2012-04-20|title=Samantha Power: what I learnt at the OGP|language=en-GB|newspaper=The Guardian|url=https://www.theguardian.com/public-leaders-network/2012/apr/20/samantha-power-open-government|access-date=2016-04-27|issn=0261-3077}} This relationship between government and civil society is the cornerstone of OGP. Governments are expected to actively collaborate with civil society when drafting and implementing country commitments, as well as when reporting on and monitoring efforts. The OGP process requires the government to consult with civil society and citizens, and the Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM) assesses the quality of this consultation.
Funding
The Open Government Partnership is funded through three primary sources: country contributions, bilateral agencies, and private foundations.{{Cite web |title=Transparency & Financial Information |url=https://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/transparency-financial-information/ |access-date=2025-06-01 |website=Open Government Partnership |language=en}} Country contributions are core, unrestricted funds that support the OGP Support Unit's services to all members. Funding from bilateral and private donors complements this by supporting specific initiatives and strategic priorities.
= Country contributions =
In May 2014, it was agreed that all participating governments were expected to contribute to OGP's budget. Contributions are based on each participating country's income level (according to World Bank data) with additional consideration introduced for GDP size.{{Cite web |title=Government Contributions |url=https://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/transparency-financial-information/government-contributions/ |access-date=2025-06-01 |website=Open Government Partnership |language=en}} The OGP Steering Committee sets both minimum and recommended contribution levels.
class="wikitable" | |
Income level | Minimum member contribution
!Recommended member contribution |
---|---|
Low income | $13,500
|$33,750 |
Lower middle income | $33,750
|$67,500 |
Upper middle income | $67,500
|$135,000 |
High income (<$100bn GDP) | $67,500
|$135,000 |
High income ($100bn to $2500bn GDP) | $135,000
|$270,000 |
High income (>$2500bn GDP) | $200,000
|$400,000 |
Structure
As a multi-stakeholder initiative, civil society participation is enshrined in OGP's foundational principles and management structures. Governments and civil society play an equally important role in managing the OGP through participation in the steering committee, the OGP's executive management body, as well as at the national level.
= Co-chairs =
class="wikitable sortable" |
Year
!Government Co-chair !Civil Society Co-chair |
---|
2012–2013
|Government of the United Kingdom |Warren Krafchik, Senior Vice President, International Budget Partnership (IBP) |
2013–2014
|Rakesh Rajani, Head, Twaweza |
2014–2015
|Alexandro Gonzales, Executive Director, GESOC A.C. |
2015–2016
|Suneeta Kaimal, Chief Operating Officer, Natural Resource Governance Institute (NRGI) |
2016–2017
|Manish Bapna, Executive Vice President & Managing Director, World Resources Institute (WRI) |
2017–2018
|Mukelani Dimba, Executive Director, Open Democracy Advice Centre (ODAC) |
2018–2019
|Nathaniel Heller, Executive Vice President, Results for Development (R4D) |
2019–2020
|Robin Hodess, Director of Governance & Transparency, The B Team |
2020–2021
|María Baron, Global Executive Director, [https://directoriolegislativo.org/ Directorio Legislativo] |
2021–2022
|Aidan Eyakuze, Executive Director, [https://twaweza.org/ Twaweza] |
2022–2023
|Anabel Cruz, Founder Director, [https://lasociedadcivil.org/ Institute for Communication and Development] |
2023–2024
|Blair Glencorse, Co-CEO, [https://accountabilitylab.org/ Accountability Lab] |
2024–2025
|Cielo Magno, [https://www.bantaykita.ph/ Bantay Kita - PWYP Philippines] |
= Steering Committee =
The OGP Steering Committee provides guidance and direction at the international level in order to maintain the highest standards for the initiative and ensure its long-term sustainability. It is composed of equal numbers of representatives of governments and civil society organizations. OGP's leadership regularly rotates by appointing a new government co-chair and a new civil society co-chair every year. Incoming government and civil society members of the steering committee are selected by their peers.{{Cite web |title=Steering Committee |url=https://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/who-we-are/steering-committee/ |access-date=2022-07-04 |website=Open Government Partnership |date=October 2019 |language=en}}
== Subcommittees ==
Members of the OGP Steering Committee delegate work to the OGP sub-committees. There are three sub-committees: 1) Governance and Leadership; 2) Criteria and Standards; and 3) Thematic Leadership.{{cite web | url=https://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/who-we-are/steering-committee/sc-composition/ | title=Steering Committee Composition }} The principle of parity is preserved in the sub-committees, as an equal number of government and civil society representatives serve in each one.
= OGP Support Unit =
The OGP Support Unit is a small, permanent secretariat that works closely with the steering committee to advance the goals of the OGP. It is designed to maintain institutional memory, manage OGP's external communications, ensure the continuity of organizational relationships with OGP's partners, and support the broader membership. It also serves as a neutral third party between governments and civil society organizations, ensuring that OGP maintains a productive balance between the two constituencies.{{Cite web |title=Staff |url=https://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/who-we-are/staff/ |access-date=2022-07-04 |website=Open Government Partnership |language=en}}
= Independent Reporting Mechanism =
The Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM) is the key means by which all stakeholders can track OGP progress in participating countries. The IRM produces biannual independent progress reports for each country participating in the OGP. Progress reports assess governments on the development and implementation of their OGP action plans as well as their progress in upholding open government principles. The reports also provide technical recommendations for improvements. These reports are intended to stimulate dialogue and promote accountability between member governments and citizens.{{Cite web |title=Independent Reporting Mechanism - Overview |url=https://www.opengovpartnership.org/irm-guidance-overview/ |access-date=2022-07-04 |website=Open Government Partnership |language=en}}
= International Experts Panel =
The International Experts Panel (IEP) oversees the IRM by helping to ensure the quality of the reviews, assess procedures, and promote findings.{{Cite web |title=International Experts Panel |url=https://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/who-we-are/international-experts-panel/ |access-date=2022-07-04 |website=Open Government Partnership |language=en}}
Membership
= National members =
{{mw-datatable}}{{sticky header}}{{sort under}}{{static row numbers}}
class="wikitable sortable mw-datatable sticky-header sort-under static-row-numbers" | ||
Country | Joined in | Geographic location
!Notes |
---|---|---|
{{flag|Albania}}
|2011 |Europe | | ||
{{flag|Argentina}}
|2012 |Americas | | ||
{{flag|Armenia}}
|2011 |Europe | | ||
{{flag|Australia}} | 2015 | Asia-Pacific
| |
{{flag|Benin}} | 2025 | Africa and Middle East
| |
{{flag|Bosnia and Herzegovina}} | 2014 | Europe
| |
{{flag|Brazil}} | 2011 | Americas
|Founder |
{{flag|Bulgaria}}
|2011 |Europe | | ||
{{flag|Burkina Faso}}
|2016 |Africa and Middle East | | ||
{{flag|Canada}} | 2011 | Americas
| |
{{flag|Cape Verde}}
|2015 |Africa and Middle East | | ||
{{flag|Chile}} | 2011 | Americas
| |
{{flag|Colombia}} | 2011 | Americas
| |
{{flag|Costa Rica}} | 2012 | Americas
| |
{{flag|Croatia}}
|2011 |Europe | | ||
{{flag|Czech Republic}} | 2011 | Europe
| |
{{flag|Dominican Republic}}
|2011 |Americas | | ||
{{flag|Ecuador}}
|2018 |Americas | | ||
{{flag|Estonia}} | 2011 | Europe
| |
{{flag|Finland}} | 2012 | Europe
| |
{{flag|France}} | 2014 | Europe
| |
{{flag|Georgia}}
|2011 |Europe | | ||
{{flag|Germany}} | 2016 | Europe
| |
{{flag|Ghana}}
|2011 |Africa and Middle East | | ||
{{flag|Greece}} | 2011 | Europe
| |
{{flag|Guatemala}}
|2011 |Americas | | ||
{{flag|Honduras}}
|2011 |Americas | | ||
{{flag|Indonesia}} | 2011 | Asia-Pacific
|Founder |
{{flag|Ireland}} | 2013 | Europe
| |
{{flag|Israel}} | 2011 | Europe
| |
{{flag|Italy}} | 2011 | Europe
| |
{{flag|Ivory Coast}}
|2015 |Africa and Middle East | | ||
{{flag|Jamaica}}
|2016 |Americas | | ||
{{flag|Jordan}} | 2011 | Africa and Middle East
| |
{{flag|Kenya}}
|2011 |Africa and Middle East | | ||
{{flag|Kosovo}}
|2023 |Europe |Non-voting member | ||
{{flag|Latvia}} | 2011 | Europe
| |
{{flag|Liberia}}
|2011 |Africa and Middle East | | ||
{{flag|Lithuania}} | 2011 | Europe
| |
{{flag|Malawi}} | 2013 | Africa and Middle East
| |
{{flag|Maldives}}
|2024 |Asia-Pacific | | ||
{{flag|Malta}}
|2011 |Europe | | ||
{{flag|Mexico}} | 2011 | Americas
|Founder |
{{flag|Moldova}}
|2011 |Europe | | ||
{{flag|Mongolia}}
|2013 |Asia-Pacific | | ||
{{flag|Montenegro}}
|2011 |Europe | | ||
{{flag|Morocco}}
|2018 |Africa and Middle East | | ||
{{flag|Netherlands}} | 2011 | Europe
| |
{{flag|New Zealand}} | 2013 | Asia-Pacific
| |
{{flag|Nigeria}}
|2016 |Africa and Middle East | | ||
{{flag|North Macedonia}}
|2011 |Europe | | ||
{{flag|Norway}} | 2011 | Europe
|Founder |
{{flag|Panama}}
|2012 |Americas | | ||
{{flag|Papua New Guinea}}
|2015 |Asia-Pacific | | ||
{{flag|Paraguay}} | 2011 | Americas
| |
{{flag|Peru}}
|2011 |Americas | | ||
{{flag|Philippines}}
|2011 |Asia-Pacific |Founder | ||
{{flag|Portugal}} | 2017 | Europe
| |
{{flag|Romania}}
|2011 |Europe | | ||
{{flag|Senegal}}
|2018 |Africa and Middle East | | ||
{{flag|Serbia}}
|2012 |Europe | | ||
{{flag|Seychelles}}
|2018 |Africa and Middle East | | ||
{{flag|Sierra Leone}}
|2013 |Africa and Middle East | | ||
{{flag|Slovakia}} | 2011 | Europe
| |
{{flag|South Africa}} | 2011 | Africa and Middle East
|Founder |
{{flag|South Korea}} | 2011 | Asia-Pacific
| |
{{flag|Spain}} | 2011 | Europe
| |
{{flag|Sweden}} | 2011 | Europe
| |
{{flag|Timor-Leste}} | 2023 | Asia-Pacific
| |
{{flag|Tunisia}}
|2014 |Africa and Middle East | | ||
{{flag|Ukraine}} | 2011 | Europe
| |
{{flag|United Kingdom}} | 2011 | Europe
|Founder |
{{flag|United States}} | 2011 | Americas
|Founder |
{{flag|Uruguay}}
|2011 |Americas | | ||
{{flag|Zambia}}
|2024 |Africa and Middle East | |
= Local members {{mw-datatable}}{{sticky header}}{{sort under}}{{static row numbers}} =
class="wikitable sortable mw-datatable sticky-header sort-under static-row-numbers" | ||
Name of local jurisdiction
!Type of local jurisdiction ! Country | Joined in | Geographic location |
---|---|---|
Abuja
|City | {{flag|Nigeria}} |2020 |Africa and Middle East | ||
Agadir
|City | {{flag|Morocco}} |2024 |Africa and Middle East | ||
Akhaltsikhe
|City | {{flag|Georgia}} |2020 |Europe | ||
Anambra East
|Municipality | {{flag|Nigeria}} | 2024 | Africa and Middle East |
Anloga District
|District | {{flag|Nigeria}} | 2022 | Africa and Middle East |
Antigua Guatemala
|City | {{flag|Guatemala}} | 2024 | Americas |
Aragón
|Autonomous community | {{flag|Spain}} |2020 |Europe | ||
Armavir
|Municipality | {{flag|Armenia}} |2022 |Europe | ||
Asturias
|Autonomous community | {{flag|Spain}} |2022 |Europe | ||
Athens
|City | {{flag|Greece}} | 2024 | Europe |
Austin, Texas
|City | {{flag|United States}} | 2016 | Americas |
Baguio
|City | {{flag|Philippines}} | 2024 | Asia-Pacific |
Banggai
|Regency | {{flag|Indonesia}} | 2020 | Asia-Pacific |
Banská Bystrica
|City |{{flag|Slovakia}} |2020 |Europe | ||
Bar
|Municipality | {{flag|Montenegro}} |2024 |Europe | ||
Basque Country
|Autonomous community | {{flag|Spain}} |2018 |Europe | ||
Béni Mellal-Khénifra
|Region | {{flag|Morocco}} | 2022 | Africa and Middle East |
Bishkek
|Municipality | {{flag|Kyrgyzstan}} | 2020 | Asia-Pacific |
Bogotá
|City | {{flag|Colombia}} |2020 |Americas | ||
Brebes
|Regency | {{flag|Indonesia}} |2020 |Asia-Pacific | ||
Buenos Aires
|City | {{flag|Argentina}} | 2016 | Americas |
Cajamarca Region
|Region | {{flag|Chile}} | 2024 | Americas |
Cartagena de Indias
|City | {{flag|Colombia}} | 2022 | Americas |
Carthage
|Municipality | {{flag|Tunisia}} |2022 |Africa and Middle East | ||
Catalonia
|Autonomous community | {{flag|Spain}} | 2020 | Europe |
Cǎușeni
|City |{{flag|Moldova}} |2024 |Europe | ||
Chepo
|District | {{flag|Panama}} |2022 |Americas | ||
Chihuahua City
|City | {{flag|Mexico}} | 2022 | Americas |
Contagem
|Municipality | {{flag|Brazil}} |2022 |Americas | ||
Córdoba - Córdoba Province
|City - Province | {{flag|Argentina}} |2020 |Americas | ||
Corrientes
|City | {{flag|Argentina}} | 2022 | Americas |
Curridabat
|District | {{flag|Costa Rica}} | 2020 | Americas |
Dakar
|CIty |{{flag|Senegal}} |2024 |Africa and Middle East | ||
Dar Chaabane El Fehri
|Municipality |{{flag|Tunisia}} |2024 |Africa and Middle East | ||
Detmold
|City | {{flag|Germany}} | 2022 | Europe |
El Kef
|Municipality | {{flag|Tunisia}} |2020 |Africa and Middle East | ||
Elbasan
|City | {{flag|Albania}} | 2020 | Europe |
Elgeyo-Marakwet County
|County | {{flag|Kenya}} |2016 |Africa and Middle East | ||
Fuvamulah
|City |{{Flag|Maldives}} |2024 |Asia-Pacific | ||
Gjakova
|City |{{Flag|Kosovo}} |2024 |Europe | ||
Glasgow
|Municipality | {{flag|United Kingdom}} |2020 |Europe | ||
Goiás State
|State |{{flag|Brazil}} |2024 |Americas | ||
Greater Karak
|Governorate | {{flag|Jordan}} |2020 |Africa and Middle East | ||
Greater Salt
|Municipality | {{flag|Jordan}} | 2020 | Africa and Middle East |
Gwangju
|Municipality | {{flag|South Korea}} |2020 |Asia-Pacific | ||
Gyumri - Vanadzor
|Municipality - Municipality |{{flag|Armenia}} |2020 |Europe | ||
Hamburg
|Municipality | {{flag|Germany}} | 2022 | Europe |
Jalisco
|State | {{flag|Mexico}} | 2016 | Americas |
Kaduna State
|State | {{flag|Nigeria}} |2018 |Africa and Middle East | ||
Kakamega
|City |{{flag|Kenya}} |2024 |Africa and Middle East | ||
Ketu South Municipal District
|Municipal district | {{flag|Ghana}} | 2022 | Africa and Middle East |
Khmelnytskyi
|Municipality | {{flag|Ukraine}} |2020 |Europe | ||
Khoni
|Municipality | {{flag|Georgia}} |2020 |Europe | ||
Kildare County Council
|County | {{flag|Ireland}} |2022 |Europe | ||
Kisela Voda
|Municipality |{{Flag|North Macedonia}} |2024 |Europe | ||
Kutaisi
|Municipality | {{flag|Georgia}} |2022 |Europe | ||
Kyiv
|City |{{flag|Ukraine}} |2024 |Europe | ||
La Libertad Region
|Region | {{flag|Peru}} | 2016 | Americas |
La Paz
|City |{{Flag|Bolivia}} |2024 |Americas | ||
Larena
|Municipality |{{flag|Philippines}} |2024 |Asia-Pacific | ||
Leova
|City |{{flag|Moldova}} |2024 |Europe | ||
Lima
|City | {{flag|Peru}} | 2020 | Americas |
Lisbon
|City |{{flag|Portugal}} |2024 |Europe | ||
Los Angeles
|City |{{flag|United States}} |2020 |Americas | ||
Machakos
|Municipality |{{flag|Kenya}} |2024 |Africa and Middle East | ||
Madiun
|City |{{flag|Indonesia}} |2024 |Asia-Pacific | ||
Madrid
|City | {{flag|Spain}} |2016 |Europe | ||
Maipú
|Municipality | {{flag|Chile}} | 2022 | Americas |
Makhanda
|City | {{flag|South Africa}} |2020 |Africa and Middle East | ||
Makueni
|County | {{flag|Kenya}} |2020 |Africa and Middle East | ||
Manizales
|Municipality | {{flag|Colombia}} | 2022 | Americas |
Mar del Plata
|City |{{flag|Argentina}} |2024 |Americas | ||
Medellín
|City |{{flag|Colombia}} |2024 |Americas | ||
Mendoza
|City | {{flag|Argentina}} |2020 |Americas | ||
Merida - Yucatán
|City - State | {{flag|Mexico}} |2020 |Americas | ||
Metsamor
|Municipality |{{Flag|Armenia}} |2024 |Europe | ||
Mexico State - Tlalnepantla de Baz
|State - Municipality | {{flag|Mexico}} | 2020 | Americas |
Modriča
|Municipality |{{Flag|Bosnia and Herzegovina}} |2024 |Europe | ||
Montevideo
|City | {{flag|Uruguay}} |2022 |Americas | ||
Nairobi
|City | {{flag|Kenya}} |2020 |Africa and Middle East | ||
Nandi County
|County | {{flag|Kenya}} |2020 |Africa and Middle East | ||
Navarre
|Autonomous community |{{flag|Spain}} |2024 |Europe | ||
New York City
|City |{{flag|United States}} |2024 |Americas | ||
Northern Ireland
| | {{flag|United Kingdom}} |2020 |Europe | ||
Novi Pazar
|City | {{flag|Serbia}} |2022 |Europe | ||
Nuevo León - Monterrey Municipality - San Pedro Garza García
|State - Municipality - Municipality | {{flag|Mexico}} | 2022 | Americas |
Ontario
|Province | {{flag|Canada}} | 2016 | Americas |
Orzhytsia - Zviahel
|City - City |{{flag|Ukraine}} |2024 |Europe | ||
Osasco
|Municipality | {{flag|Brazil}} | 2020 | Americas |
Osh
|City |{{flag|Kyrgyzstan}} |2024 |Asia-Pacific | ||
Ouellé
|Municipality |{{flag|Côte d'Ivoire}} |2024 |Africa and Middle East | ||
Ozurgeti
|City | {{flag|Georgia}} | 2020 | Europe |
Paris
|City | {{flag|France}} |2016 |Europe | ||
Pastaza
|Province |{{Flag|Ecuador}} |2024 |Americas | ||
Peñalolén
|Municipality | {{flag|Chile}} | 2020 | Americas |
Pichincha
|Province |{{Flag|Ecuador}} |2024 |Americas | ||
Plateau State
|State | {{flag|Nigeria}} | 2020 | Africa and Middle East |
Plav
|Municipality |{{Flag|Montenegro}} |2024 |Europe | ||
Pristina
|City |{{Flag|Kosovo}} |2024 |Europe | ||
Québec
|Province | {{flag|Canada}} |2020 |Americas | ||
Quezon City
|City |{{flag|Philippines}} |2024 |Asia-Pacific | ||
Quintana Roo
|State | {{flag|Mexico}} | 2020 | Americas |
Quito
|City | {flag|{{Flag|Ecuador}} | 2020 | Americas |
Regueb
|Municipality | {{flag|Tunisia}} | 2020 | Africa and Middle East |
Río Branco
|City |{{Flag|Uruguay}} |2024 |Americas | ||
Rosario
|City | {{flag|Argentina}} |2020 |Americas | ||
Rustavi
|City |{{flag|Georgia}} |2022 |Europe | ||
Salcedo
|City |{{flag|Dominican Republic}} |2022 |Americas | ||
San Jerónimo
|Municipality |{{Flag|Guatemala}} |2024 |Americas | ||
San Joaquín
|City |{{Flag|Chile}} |2024 |Americas | ||
Santa Catarina
|State |{{flag|Brazil}} |2020 |Americas | ||
Santiago - Renca
|City - City |{{Flag|Chile}} |2024 |Americas | ||
Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas
|Province |{{flag|Ecuador}} |2020 |Americas | ||
São Paulo
|City |{{flag|Brazil}} |2016 |Americas | ||
Sarchí
|Canton |{{flag|Costa Rica}} |2022 |Americas | ||
Scotland
| |{{flag|United Kingdom}} |2016 |Europe | ||
Sekondi-Takoradi
|City |{{flag|Ghana}} |2016 |Africa and Middle East | ||
Semarang
|City |{{flag|Indonesia}} |2020 |Asia-Pacific | ||
Seoul
|Municipality |{{flag|South Korea}} |2018 |Asia-Pacific | ||
Shama
|City |{{flag|Ghana}} |2020 |Africa and Middle East | ||
Souss-Massa - Oriental - Drâa-Tafilalet - Laâyoune-Sakia El Hamra
|Region - Region - Region - Region |{{flag|Morocco}} |2024 |Africa and the Middle East | ||
South Cotabato
|Province |{{flag|Philippines}} |2018 |Asia-Pacific | ||
Tagbilaran
|City |{{flag|Philippines}} |2024 |Asia-Pacific | ||
Tamale
|City |{{flag|Ghana}} |2024 |Africa and Middle East | ||
Tangier – Tetouan – Al Hoceima
|Region |{{flag|Morocco}} |2020 |Africa and Middle East | ||
Tarkwa-Nsuaem
|Municipal district |{{flag|Ghana}} |2022 |Africa and Middle East | ||
Tbilisi
|Municipality |{{flag|Georgia}} |2016 |Europe | ||
Ternopil
|Municipality |{{flag|Ukraine}} |2020 |Europe | ||
Tétouan
|Municipality |{{flag|Tunisia}} |2022 |Africa and Middle East | ||
Timișoara
|City |{{flag|Romania}} |2020 |Europe | ||
Tirana
|City |{{flag|Albania}} |2020 |Europe | ||
Tlajomulco de Zúñiga
|Municipality |{{flag|Mexico}} |2022 |Americas | ||
Topoľčany
|Municipality |{{flag|Slovakia}} |2024 |Europe | ||
Travnik
|Municipality |{{Flag|Bosnia and Herzegovina}} |2024 |Europe | ||
Valencian Community
|Autonomous community |{{flag|Spain}} |2022 |Europe | ||
Valongo
|Municipality |{{flag|Portugal}} |2024 |Europe | ||
Villanueva
|Municipality |{{flag|Honduras}} |2024 |Americas | ||
Vinnytsia
|City |{{flag|Ukraine}} |2020 |Europe | ||
Vitória da Conquista
|Municipality |{{flag|Brazil}} |2024 |Americas | ||
Wassa Amenfi East
|Municipal district |{{flag|Ghana}} |2022 |Africa and Middle East | ||
West Java
|Province |{{flag|Indonesia}} |2024 |Asia-Pacific | ||
West Nusa Tenggara
|Province |{{flag|Indonesia}} |2020 |Asia-Pacific | ||
West Sumbawa
|Regency |{{flag|Indonesia}} |2020 |Asia-Pacific | ||
Yerevan
|City |{{flag|Armenia}} |2022 |Europe | ||
Yoff
|Municipality |{{flag|Senegal}} |2024 |Africa and Middle East | ||
Yogyakarta
|City |{{flag|Indonesia}} |2024 |Asia-Pacific | ||
Žabljak
|Municipality |{{flag|Montenegro}} |2024 |Europe | ||
Zaghouan
|Municipality |{{flag|Tunisia}} |2024 |Africa and Middle East | ||
Zagreb
|City |{{flag|Croatia}} |2024 |Europe | ||
Žilina Region
|Region |{{flag|Slovakia}} |2022 |Europe |
= Eligibility Criteria =
In order to participate in OGP, governments must exhibit a demonstrated commitment to open government in four key areas, as measured by objective indicators and validated by independent experts.{{Cite web|title=Eligibility Criteria|url=http://www.opengovpartnership.org/how-it-works/eligibility-criteria|access-date=2016-04-27|website=Open Government Partnership}} The four critical areas of open government are: fiscal transparency, access to information, asset disclosure, and citizen engagement. Countries can earn a total of 16 points for their performance in these four metrics, or 12 points if they are not measured in one of the metrics. Countries that earn 75% of the applicable points (either 12 out of 16 or 9 out of 12) or more are eligible to join. For an eligible country to join, all that is required is a letter from a ministerial representative indicating agreement with the Open Government Declaration and intent to participate in the OGP, as well as the leading agency and an individual point of contact for future work.
The following countries are eligible, but have yet to express interest to join the partnership as of July 2024.{{Cite web|title=Eligibility Criteria & OGP Values Check Assessment|url=https://www.opengovpartnership.org/process/joining-ogp/eligibility-criteria/|access-date=2024-07-12|website=Open Government Partnership|language=en}}
class="wikitable sortable"
|+ !Eligible country !Geographic location |
{{flag|Angola}}
|Africa and the Middle East |
{{flag|Austria}}
|Europe |
{{flag|Belgium}}
|Europe |
{{flag|Bhutan}}
|Asia-Pacific |
{{flag|Guyana}}
|Americas |
{{flag|Iceland}}
|Europe |
{{flag|Japan}}
|Asia-Pacific |
{{flag|Luxembourg}}
|Europe |
{{flag|Mozambique}}
|Africa and the Middle East |
{{flag|Namibia}}
|Africa and the Middle East |
{{flag|Nepal}}
|Asia-Pacific |
{{flag|Niger}}
|Africa and the Middle East |
{{flag|Pakistan}}
|Asia-Pacific |
{{flag|Poland}}
|Europe |
{{flag|Slovenia}}
|Europe |
{{flag|Switzerland}}
|Europe |
{{flag|Tanzania}}
|Africa and the Middle East |
{{flag|Togo}}
|Africa and the Middle East |
{{flag|Trinidad and Tobago}}
|Americas |
= Former member countries =
Mechanism
= Co-creation =
OGP participating countries co-create a National Action Plan (NAP) with civil society. The action plans are "the driving device" for OGP, as they are the instrument through which government and civil society develop their agreed reforms, or commitments, every two years. The set of commitments aims to advance transparency, accountability, participation, and/or technological innovation. Countries, with the active involvement of civil society, are encouraged to tackle new and ambitious commitments as well as build upon past successes. An effective public consultation process during the development of action plans can help build broad support for commitments with a wider set of actors to rely on for successful implementation.{{Cite web|title=Develop a National Action Plan|url=http://www.opengovpartnership.org/how-it-works/develop-a-national-action-plan|access-date=2016-04-27|website=Open Government Partnership}} OGP participating countries operate on a two-year action plan calendar cycle, whereby countries are continuously implementing their programs. The government must regularly report on its progress and work with civil society to monitor and achieve the agreed-upon reforms. Progress is evaluated at regular intervals by an independent researcher appointed by the OGP's [https://web.archive.org/web/20170420192100/https://www.opengovpartnership.org/irm/irm-reports Independent Reporting Mechanism].
= Civil society engagement =
The [http://www.opengovpartnership.org/how-it-works/civil-society-engagement Civil Society Engagement] (CSE) Team works to broaden, strengthen, and engage a strong civil society network to participate in OGP, particularly at the national level. The team supports national civil society actors to help them make better use of the OGP process, including the design, implementation, and monitoring of OGP action plans, for achieving their own advocacy objectives.{{Cite web|title=Civil Society Engagement|url=http://www.opengovpartnership.org/how-it-works/civil-society-engagement|access-date=2016-04-27|website=Open Government Partnership}}
= OGP Local =
Launched in 2016 as the sub-national pilot program, OGP Local seeks to extend the principles of OGP to the local level. A total of 15 sub-national governments were selected to participate in the pilot program and, with the support of the OGP Support Unit and steering committee, have developed national action plans in collaboration with civil society. They will actively contribute to peer learning and networking activities with other sub-national governments and, like OGP's member countries, will be assessed by the IRM."Subnational Government Pilot Program," The Open Government Partnership. http://www.opengovpartnership.org/how-it-works/subnational-government-pilot-program {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151219122403/http://www.opengovpartnership.org/how-it-works/subnational-government-pilot-program |date=2015-12-19 }} The cohort later expanded to 20 before further expansion in October 2020, with 56 new local jurisdictions added to the program.{{Cite web|title=56 Local Jurisdictions Join Global Partnership to Promote Open Government|url=https://www.opengovpartnership.org/news/56-local-jurisdictions-join-global-partnership-to-promote-open-government/|access-date=2020-11-13|website=Open Government Partnership|date=20 October 2020 |language=en}} In 2022, 30 new more local jurisdictions joined OGP Local.{{Cite web |title=Open Government Partnership Welcomes 30 New Local Governments |url=https://www.opengovpartnership.org/news/open-government-partnership-welcomes-30-new-local-governments/ |access-date=2022-06-16 |website=Open Government Partnership |date=17 May 2022 |language=en}} In 2024, additional 55 local jurisdictions joined the OGP Local program. {{Cite web |date=2024-04-16 |title=55 Local Governments Join International Partnership on Open Government |url=https://www.opengovpartnership.org/news/55-local-governments-join-international-partnership-on-open-government/ |access-date=2024-04-16 |website=Open Government Partnership |language=en}}
= Open Parliament =
As OGP continued to expand, engagement with legislative institutions also became more prevalent. In some OGP-participating countries, open parliament has become a particularly significant part of the push for more open government, although commitments related to parliamentary transparency, public participation, and accountability are not always co-created in the same process as the country's OGP action plan. The open parliament initiative also benefits from strategic collaborations with the Open Parliament e-Network (OPeN), a global consortium of organizations focused on parliamentary engagement. As of 2020, its members are the [https://directoriolegislativo.org/ Directorio Legislativo], the Westminster Foundation for Democracy (WFD), the National Democratic Institute (NDI), [http://www.parlamericas.org/en.aspx ParlAmericas], [https://www.transparencialegislativa.org/ Red Latinoamericana por la Transparencia Legislativa (RedLTL)], and the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights.{{Cite web|title=OPeN – Open Parliament e-Network|url=https://openparliamentenetwork.org/|access-date=2020-11-13|language=en-GB}}
OGP Global Summits
OGP participants gather regularly at regional and global events to share their findings in person and to strengthen international cooperation.{{Cite web|title=Events|url=http://www.opengovpartnership.org/events|access-date=2016-05-09|website=Open Government Partnership}} The most significant of these events has been the Global Summit, held annually since 2012. At the 2013 Global Summit, the steering committee voted to skip the 2014 Summit and reconvene in 2015.{{Cite web|title=Summit Planned 2014 Indonesia|url=http://www.freedominfo.org/2013/12/ogp-summit-planned-2014-indonesia/|access-date=2016-05-09|website=www.freedominfo.org}} In addition to providing spaces where participating countries and civil society groups could share information in person, OGP wanted to find a way to showcase the standout efforts of global transparency leaders.
class="wikitable sortable" |
Year
!Event !Host !Dates |
---|
2012
|The 1st OGP Annual Meeting |Brasília, {{flag|Brazil}} |April 17–18, 2012{{Citation|last=Partnership|first=Open Government|title=OGP|date=2011-12-06|url=https://www.flickr.com/photos/opengovpart/6850370967/|access-date=2018-12-09}} |
2013
|The 2nd OGP Annual Meeting |London, {{flag|United Kingdom}} |October 31–November 1, 2013{{Cite web|title=London Summit {{!}} Open Government Partnership|url=https://www.opengovpartnership.org/tag/london-summit|access-date=2018-12-09|website=www.opengovpartnership.org}} |
2015
|The 3rd OGP Global Summit |Mexico City, {{flag|Mexico}} |
2016
|The 4th OGP Global Summit |Paris, {{flag|France}} |
2018
|The 5th OGP Global Summit |Tbilisi, {{flag|Georgia}} |
2019
|The 6th OGP Global Summit |Ottawa, {{flag|Canada}} |
2021
|The 7th OGP Global Summit |Seoul, {{flag|South Korea}} |
2023
|The 8th OGP Global Summit |Tallinn, {{flag|Estonia}} |September 6–7, 2023{{Cite web |title=OGP Global Summit 2023 Tallinn |url=https://avpeesti2023.ee/en |access-date=2023-02-02 |website=avpeesti2023.ee |language=en}} |
2025
|The 9th OGP Global Summit |Vitoria-Gasteiz, {{flag|Spain}} |
= Open Government Awards =
class="wikitable unsortable" |
Year
!Theme !Category !Winner |
---|
rowspan="3" |2014{{Cite web|title=Open Government Awards|url=https://www.opengovawards.org/|access-date=2018-12-17|website=www.opengovawards.org|language=en}}
| rowspan="3" |Citizen Engagement |Gold Awards |1. Denmark for "Statutory Elected Senior Citizens’ Council" |
Silver Awards
|4. Italy for "OpenCoesione-Monithon" |
Bronze Awards
|7. Mexico for "Centro de Itegracion Ciudadana" |
rowspan="3" |2015{{Cite web|title=OGP Booklet 2015|url=https://www.opengovawards.org/data/OGPBooklet2015.pdf|website=Open Government Partnership|access-date=2018-12-17|archive-date=2021-09-05|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210905054157/https://www.opengovawards.org/data/OGPBooklet2015.pdf|url-status=dead}}
| rowspan="3" |Improving Public Services |Overall Awards |1. Uruguay for "ATuServicio.uy" |
Regional Awards
|Tunisia for "Tunisia Online e-Procurement System" |
Special Recognition
|Indonesia for "The Guiding Lights of the Archipelago" for how the initiative benefits vulnerable populations |
rowspan="3" |2016{{Cite web|title=Making Transparency Count: The Open Government Awards|url=https://www.opengovpartnership.org/stories/making-transparency-count-the-open-government-awards/|access-date=2021-02-09|website=Open Government Partnership|date=7 December 2016 |language=en}}
| rowspan="3" |Making Transparency Count |Overall Awards |1. Ukraine for "ProZorro: Bringing Government Procurement to the People" |
Regional Awards
|Malawi for "Construction Sector Transparency Initiative Malawi: Development through Transparency" |
Special Recognition
|Ukraine for "ProZorro: Bringing Government Procurement to the People" for the involvement of youth in the project |
See also
References
External links
- {{Official website|http://www.opengovpartnership.org/}}
- [https://www.opengovpartnership.org/strategy-2023-2028/ OGP Strategy 2023-2028]
__FORCETOC__
Category:Intergovernmental organizations
Category:International non-profit organizations
Category:Non-profit organizations based in the United States
Category:Global policy organizations