estramustine phosphate

EMP is indicated, in the United States, for the palliative treatment of metastatic and/or progressive prostate cancer, whereas in the United Kingdom it is indicated for the treatment of unresponsive or relapsing prostate cancer.{{cite web|title=Estracyt Capsules - Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC)|work=electronic Medicines Compendium|publisher=Pfizer Limited|access-date=8 February 2014|date=12 August 2013|url=http://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/medicine/1511/SPC/Estracyt+Capsules/|archive-date=22 February 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140222203824/http://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/medicine/1511/SPC/Estracyt+Capsules/|url-status=dead}} The medication is usually reserved for use in hormone-refractory cases of prostate cancer, although it has been used as a first-line monotherapy as well. Response rates with EMP in prostate cancer are said to be equivalent to conventional high-dose estrogen therapy.{{cite book| vauthors = Lupulescu A |title=Hormones and Vitamins in Cancer Treatment|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VddUa-2cp-YC&pg=PA40|date=24 October 1990|publisher=CRC Press|isbn=978-0-8493-5973-6|pages=40–}}

Due to its relatively severe side effects and toxicity, EMP has rarely been used in the treatment of prostate cancer. This is especially true in Western countries today. As a result, and also due to the scarce side effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone modulators (GnRH modulators) like leuprorelin, EMP was almost abandoned. However, encouraging clinical research findings resulted in renewed interest of EMP for the treatment of prostate cancer.

EMP has been used at doses of 140 to 1,400 mg/day orally in the treatment of prostate cancer.{{cite book| veditors = Stella V, Borchardt R, Hageman M, Oliyai R, Maag H, Tilley J |title=Prodrugs: Challenges and Rewards|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qkjHxX5TgHEC&pg=PA174|date=12 March 2007|publisher=Springer Science & Business Media|isbn=978-0-387-49782-2|pages=174–}} However, oral EMP is most commonly used at a dose of 560 to 640 mg/day (280–320 mg twice daily). The recommended dosage of oral EMP in the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) label for Emcyt is 14 mg per kg of body weight (i.e., one 140 mg oral capsule for each 10 kg or 22 lbs of body weight) given in 3 or 4 divided doses per day. The label states that most patients in studies of oral EMP in the United States have received 10 to 16 mg per kg per day. This would be about 900 to 1,440 mg/day for a 90-kg or 200-lb man. Lower doses of oral EMP, such as 280 mg/day, have been found to have comparable effectiveness as higher doses but with improved tolerability and reduced toxicity. Doses of 140 mg/day have been described as a very low dosage.{{cite journal | vauthors = Kitamura T, Suzuki M, Nishimatsu H, Kurosaki T, Enomoto Y, Fukuhara H, Kume H, Takeuchi T, Miao L, Jiangang H, Xiaoqiang L | display-authors = 6 | title = Final report on low-dose estramustine phosphate (EMP) monotherapy and very low-dose EMP therapy combined with LH-RH agonist for previously untreated advanced prostate cancer | journal = Aktuelle Urologie | volume = 41 | issue = Suppl 1 | pages = S34–S40 | date = January 2010 | pmid = 20094950 | doi = 10.1055/s-0029-1224657 | s2cid = 7710924 }} EMP has been used at doses of 240 to 450 mg/day intravenously.

EMP and other estrogens such as polyestradiol phosphate and ethinylestradiol are far less costly than newer therapies such as GnRH modulators, abiraterone acetate, and enzalutamide.{{cite journal | vauthors = Sayed Y, Taxel P | title = The use of estrogen therapy in men | journal = Current Opinion in Pharmacology | volume = 3 | issue = 6 | pages = 650–654 | date = December 2003 | pmid = 14644018 | doi = 10.1016/j.coph.2003.07.004 }}{{cite journal | vauthors = Hedlund PO, Henriksson P | title = Parenteral estrogen versus total androgen ablation in the treatment of advanced prostate carcinoma: effects on overall survival and cardiovascular mortality. The Scandinavian Prostatic Cancer Group (SPCG)-5 Trial Study | journal = Urology | volume = 55 | issue = 3 | pages = 328–333 | date = March 2000 | pmid = 10699602 | doi = 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00580-4 }} In addition, estrogens may offer significant benefits over other means of androgen deprivation therapy, for instance in terms of bone loss and fractures, hot flashes, cognition, and metabolic status.

EMP has been used to prevent the testosterone flare at the start of GnRH agonist therapy in men with prostate cancer.{{cite journal | vauthors = Shimizu TS, Shibata Y, Jinbo H, Satoh J, Yamanaka H | title = Estramustine phosphate for preventing flare-up in luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue depot therapy | journal = European Urology | volume = 27 | issue = 3 | pages = 192–195 | date = 1995 | pmid = 7541359 | doi = 10.1159/000475159 }}

{{Estrogen dosages for breast and prostate cancer}}

EMP is or has been available in the form of both capsules (140 mg, 280 mg) for oral administration and aqueous solutions (300 mg) for intravenous injection.{{cite book| veditors = Muller NF, Dessing RP |title=European Drug Index: European Drug Registrations | edition = Fourth |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2HBPHmclMWIC&pg=PA245|date=19 June 1998|publisher=CRC Press|isbn=978-3-7692-2114-5|pages=245, 454}}{{cite book| vauthors = Becker KL |title=Principles and Practice of Endocrinology and Metabolism|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FVfzRvaucq8C&pg=PA2153|year=2001|publisher=Lippincott Williams & Wilkins|isbn=978-0-7817-1750-2|pages=2153–}}

EMP is contraindicated when used in children, patients hypersensitive to estrogens or nitrogen mustards, those with peptic ulcer (an ulcer in the digestive tract), those with severely compromised liver function, those with weak heart muscle (also known as myocardial insufficiency) and those with thromboembolic disorders or complications related to fluid retention.

The side effects of EMP overall have been described as relatively severe. The most common side effects of EMP have been reported to be gastrointestinal side effects like nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, with nausea and vomiting occurring in 40% of men. They are usually mild or moderate in severity, and the nausea and vomiting can be managed with prophylactic antiemetic medications. Nonetheless, severe cases of gastrointestinal side effects with EMP may require dose reduction or discontinuation of therapy. Although nausea and vomiting have been reported to be the most common side effects of EMP, gynecomastia (male breast development) has been found to occur in as many as 83% of men treated with EMP, and the incidence of erectile dysfunction is possibly similar to or slightly less than the risk of gynecomastia. As a rule, feminization, a gynoid fat distribution, demasculinization, and impotence are said to occur in virtually or nearly 100% of men treated with high-dose estrogen therapy.{{cite journal | vauthors = Galbraith SM, Duchesne GM | title = Androgens and prostate cancer: biology, pathology and hormonal therapy | journal = European Journal of Cancer | volume = 33 | issue = 4 | pages = 545–554 | date = April 1997 | pmid = 9274433 | doi = 10.1016/S0959-8049(96)00444-3 }}{{cite journal | vauthors = Tammela T | title = Endocrine treatment of prostate cancer | journal = The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology | volume = 92 | issue = 4 | pages = 287–295 | date = November 2004 | pmid = 15663992 | doi = 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2004.10.005 | s2cid = 25425351 }} Decreased sexual activity has also been reported in men treated with EMP. These side effects are due to high estrogen levels and low testosterone levels. Prophylactic irradiation of the breasts can be used to decrease the incidence and severity of gynecomastia with estrogens.

Severe adverse effects of EMP are thromboembolic and cardiovascular complications including pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, stroke, thrombophlebitis, coronary artery disease (ischemic heart disease; e.g., myocardial infarction), thrombophlebitis, and congestive heart failure with fluid retention. EMP produces cardiovascular toxicity similarly to diethylstilbestrol, but to a lesser extent in comparison at low doses (e.g., 280 mg/day oral EMP vs. 1 mg/day oral diethylstilbestrol).{{cite journal | vauthors = Cox RL, Crawford ED | title = Estrogens in the treatment of prostate cancer | journal = The Journal of Urology | volume = 154 | issue = 6 | pages = 1991–1998 | date = December 1995 | pmid = 7500443 | doi = 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66670-9 }} The prostate cancer disease state also increases the risk of thromboembolism, and combination with docetaxel may exacerbate the risk of thromboembolism as well. Meta-analyses of clinical trials have found that the overall risk of thromboembolism with EMP is 4 to 7%, relative to 0.4% for chemotherapy regimens without EMP. Thromboembolism is the major toxicity-related cause of discontinuation of EMP.{{cite journal | vauthors = Fizazi K, Le Maitre A, Hudes G, Berry WR, Kelly WK, Eymard JC, Logothetis CJ, Pignon JP, Michiels S | display-authors = 6 | title = Addition of estramustine to chemotherapy and survival of patients with castration-refractory prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of individual patient data | journal = The Lancet. Oncology | volume = 8 | issue = 11 | pages = 994–1000 | date = November 2007 | pmid = 17942366 | doi = 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70284-X }} Anticoagulant therapy with medications such as aspirin, warfarin, unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparin, and vitamin K antagonists can be useful for decreasing the risk of thromboembolism with EMP and other estrogens like diethylstilbestrol and ethinylestradiol.{{cite journal | vauthors = Petrioli R, Roviello G, Fiaschi AI, Laera L, Bianco V, Ponchietti R, Barbanti G, Francini E | display-authors = 6 | title = Low-Dose Estramustine Phosphate and Concomitant Low-Dose Acetylsalicylic Acid in Heavily Pretreated Patients With Advanced Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer | journal = Clinical Genitourinary Cancer | volume = 13 | issue = 5 | pages = 441–446 | date = October 2015 | pmid = 25920994 | doi = 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.03.004 }}

Adverse liver function tests are commonly seen with EMP, but severe liver dysfunction is rare with the medication. Central nervous system side effects are rarely seen with EMP, although enlarged ventricles and neuronal pigmentation have been reported in monkeys treated with very high doses of EMP (20–140 mg/kg/day) for 3 to 6 months. EMP does not appear to have cytostatic effects in normal brain tissue. In women treated with EMP in clinical studies, a few instances of minor gynecological hemorrhages have been observed. EMP is described as relatively well tolerated among cytostatic antineoplastic and nitrogen-mustard agents, rarely or not at all being associated with significant hematologic toxicity such as myelosuppression (bone marrow suppression), gastrointestinal toxicity, or other more marked toxicity associated with such agents. In contrast to most other cytostatic agents, which often cause myelosuppression, leukopenia (decreased white blood cell count), and neutropenia (decreased neutrophil count), EMP actually produces leukocytosis (increased white blood cell count) as a side effect.

In a small low-dose study using 280 mg/day oral EMP for 150 days, tolerability was significantly improved, with gastrointestinal irritation occurring in only 15% of men, and there was no incidence of severe cardiovascular toxicity or deep vein thrombosis. In addition, no other side effects besides slight transient elevated liver enzymes were observed. These findings suggest that lower doses of oral EMP may be a safer option than higher doses for the treatment of prostate cancer. However, a subsequent 2004 meta-analysis of 23 studies of thromboembolic events with EMP found substantial incidence of thromboembolic events regardless of dosage and no association of EMP dose with risk of these complications.{{cite journal | vauthors = Lubiniecki GM, Berlin JA, Weinstein RB, Vaughn DJ | title = Thromboembolic events with estramustine phosphate-based chemotherapy in patients with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma: results of a meta-analysis | journal = Cancer | volume = 101 | issue = 12 | pages = 2755–2759 | date = December 2004 | pmid = 15536625 | doi = 10.1002/cncr.20673 | s2cid = 21465413 }}

{{Side effects of estramustine phosphate (EMC)}}

{{Side effects of estramustine phosphate (FDA)}}

There has been no clinical experience with overdose of EMP. Overdose of EMP may result in pronounced manifestations of the known adverse effects of the medication. There is no specific antidote for overdose of EMP. In the event of overdose, gastric lavage should be used to evacuate gastric contents as necessary and treatment should be symptom-based and supportive. In the case of dangerously low counts of red blood cells, white blood cells, or platelets, whole blood may be given as needed. Liver function should be monitored with EMP overdose. After an overdose of EMP, hematological and hepatic parameters should continue to be monitored for at least 6 weeks.

EMP has been used at high doses of as much as 1,260 mg/day by the oral route and 240 to 450 mg/day by intravenous injection.

EMP has been reported to increase the efficacy and toxicity of tricyclic antidepressants like amitriptyline and imipramine. When products containing calcium, aluminium, and/or magnesium, such as dairy products like milk, various foods dietary supplements, and antacids, are consumed concomitantly with EMP, an insoluble chelate complex/phosphate salt between EMP and these metals can be formed, and this can markedly impair the absorption and hence oral bioavailability of EMP. There may be an increased risk of angioedema in those concurrently taking ACE inhibitors.

{{See also|Pharmacodynamics of estradiol}}

File:Estramustine.svg, the major active cytostatic form of estramustine phosphate.]]

File:Estradiol.svg, the major active estrogenic form of estramustine phosphate.]]

EMP, also known as estradiol normustine phosphate, is a combined estrogen ester and nitrogen mustard ester. It consists of estradiol, an estrogen, linked with a phosphate ester as well as an ester of normustine, a nitrogen mustard. In terms of its pharmacodynamic effects, EMP is a prodrug of estramustine, estromustine, and estradiol. As a prodrug of estradiol, EMP is an estrogen and hence an agonist of the estrogen receptors.{{cite journal | vauthors = Kuhl H | title = Pharmacology of estrogens and progestogens: influence of different routes of administration | journal = Climacteric | volume = 8 | issue = Suppl 1 | pages = 3–63 | date = August 2005 | pmid = 16112947 | doi = 10.1080/13697130500148875 | s2cid = 24616324 }} EMP itself has only very weak affinity for the estrogen receptors. The medication is of about 91% higher molecular weight than estradiol due to the presence of its C3 normustine and C17β phosphate esters. Because EMP is a prodrug of estradiol, it may be considered to be a natural and bioidentical form of estrogen, although it does have additional cytostatic activity via estramustine and estromustine.

EMP acts by a dual mechanism of action: 1) direct cytostatic activity via a number of actions; and 2) as a form of high-dose estrogen therapy via estrogen receptor-mediated antigonadotropic and functional antiandrogenic effects.{{cite book| vauthors = Oettel M, Schillinger E |title=Estrogens and Antiestrogens II: Pharmacology and Clinical Application of Estrogens and Antiestrogen|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wBvyCAAAQBAJ&pg=PA540|date=6 December 2012|publisher=Springer Science & Business Media|isbn=978-3-642-60107-1|pages=540–}} The antigonadotropic and functional antiandrogenic effects of EMP consist of strong suppression of gonadal androgen production and hence circulating levels of androgens such as testosterone; greatly increased levels of sex hormone-binding globulin and hence a decreased fraction of free androgens in the circulation; and direct antiandrogenic actions in prostate cells.{{cite journal | vauthors = Wang LG, Liu XM, Kreis W, Budman DR | title = Androgen antagonistic effect of estramustine phosphate (EMP) metabolites on wild-type and mutated androgen receptor | journal = Biochemical Pharmacology | volume = 55 | issue = 9 | pages = 1427–1433 | date = May 1998 | pmid = 10076535 | doi = 10.1016/S0006-2952(97)00657-6 | doi-access = free }}{{cite journal | vauthors = Van Poppel H, Werbrouck PW, Baert L | title = Effect of estramustine phosphate on free androgens. A comparative study of the effect of orchiectomy and estramustine phosphate on free androgens in patients with prostatic cancer | journal = Acta Urologica Belgica | volume = 58 | issue = 4 | pages = 89–95 | date = 1990 | pmid = 2093302 }}{{cite journal | vauthors = Karr JP, Wajsman Z, Kirdani RY, Murphy GP, Sandberg AA | title = Effects of diethylstilbestrol and estramustine phosphate on serum sex hormone binding globulin and testosterone levels in prostate cancer patients | journal = The Journal of Urology | volume = 124 | issue = 2 | pages = 232–236 | date = August 1980 | pmid = 7190620 | doi = 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)55383-5 }} The free androgen index with oral EMP has been found to be on average 4.6-fold lower than with orchiectomy. As such, EMP therapy results in considerably stronger androgen deprivation than orchiectomy. Metabolites of EMP, including estramustine, estromustine, estradiol, and estrone, have been found to act as weak antagonists of the androgen receptor ({{abbrlink|EC₅₀|half-maximal effective concentration}} = 0.5–3.1 μM), although the clinical significance of this is unknown.{{cite journal | vauthors = Olson KB, Pienta KJ | title = Recent advances in chemotherapy for advanced prostate cancer | journal = Current Urology Reports | volume = 1 | issue = 1 | pages = 48–56 | date = May 2000 | pmid = 12084341 | doi = 10.1007/s11934-000-0035-z | s2cid = 31084737 }}

Extremely high levels of estradiol and estrone occur during EMP therapy. The estrogenic metabolites of EMP are responsible for its most common adverse effects and its cardiovascular toxicity. EMP has been described as having relatively weak estrogenic effects in some publications. However, it has shown essentially the same rates and degrees of estrogenic effects, such as breast tenderness, gynecomastia, cardiovascular toxicity, changes in liver protein synthesis, and testosterone suppression, as high-dose diethylstilbestrol and ethinylestradiol in clinical studies.{{cite journal | vauthors = Daehlin L, Damber JE, von Schoultz B, Bergman B | title = The oestrogenic effects of ethinyl oestradiol/polyoestradiol phosphate and estramustine phosphate in patients with prostatic carcinoma. A comparative study of oestrogen sensitive liver proteins, gonadotrophins and prolactin | journal = British Journal of Urology | volume = 58 | issue = 4 | pages = 412–416 | date = August 1986 | pmid = 3092893 | doi = 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1986.tb09095.x }} The notion that EMP has relatively weak estrogen activity may have been based on animal research, which found that EMP had 100-fold lower uterotrophic effects than estradiol in rats, and may also not have taken into account the very high doses of EMP used clinically in humans.Fredholm, B., Jensen, G., Lindskog, M., & Muntzing, J. (1974, January). Effects of estramustine phosphate (Estracyt) on growth of DMBA-induced mammary tumors in rats. In Acta Pharmacologica et Toxicologica (Vol. 35, pp. 28-28). 35 Norre Sogade, PO Box 2148, DK-1016 Copenhagen, Denmark: Munksgaard Int Publ Ltd.

The mechanism of action of the cytostatic effects of EMP is complex and only partially understood. EMP is considered to mainly be a mitotic inhibitor, inhibiting mechanisms involved in the mitosis phase of the cell cycle. Specifically, it binds to microtubule-associated proteins and/or to tubulin and produces depolymerization of microtubules (K_d = 10–20 μM for estramustine), resulting in the arrest of cell division in the G₂/M phase (specifically metaphase). EMP was originally thought to mediate its cytostatic effects as a prodrug of normustine, a nitrogen mustard, and hence was thought to be an alkylating antineoplastic agent. However, subsequent research has found that EMP is devoid of alkylating actions, and that the influence of EMP on microtubules is mediated by intact estramustine and estromustine, with normustine or estradiol alone having only minor or negligible effects. As such, the unique properties of the estramustine and estromustine structures, containing a carbamate-ester bond, appear to be responsible for the cytostatic effects of EMP. In addition to its antimitotic actions, EMP has also been found to produce other cytostatic effects, including induction of apoptosis, interference with DNA synthesis, nuclear matrix interaction, cell membrane alterations, induction of reactive oxygen species (free oxygen radicals), and possibly additional mechanisms. EMP has been found to have a radiosensitizing effect in prostate cancer and glioma cells, improving sensitivity to radiation therapy as well.

The cytostatic metabolites of EMP are accumulated in tissues in a selective manner, for instance in prostate cancer cells. This may be due to the presence of a specific estramustine-binding protein (EMBP) (K_d = 10–35 nM for estramustine), also known as prostatin or prostatic secretion protein (PSP), which has been detected in prostate cancer, glioma, melanoma, and breast cancer cells.{{cite journal | vauthors = Tew KD, Stearns ME | title = Estramustine--a nitrogen mustard/steroid with antimicrotubule activity | journal = Pharmacology & Therapeutics | volume = 43 | issue = 3 | pages = 299–319 | date = 1989 | pmid = 2682681 | doi = 10.1016/0163-7258(89)90012-0 }} Because of its tissue selectivity, EMP is said to produce minimal cytostatic effects in healthy tissues, and its tissue selectivity may be responsible for its therapeutic cytostatic efficacy against prostate cancer cells.

EMP was originally developed as a dual ester prodrug of an estrogen and normustine as a nitrogen mustard alkylating antineoplastic agent which, due to the affinity of the estrogen moiety for estrogen receptors, would be selectively accumulated in estrogen target tissues and hence estrogen receptor-positive tumor cells. Consequentially, it was thought that EMP would preferentially deliver the alkylating normustine moiety to these tissues, allowing for reduced cytostatic effects in healthy tissues and hence improved efficacy and tolerability. However, subsequent research found that there is very limited and slow cleavage of the normustine ester and that EMP is devoid of alkylating activity. In addition, it appears that estramustine and estromustine may be preferentially accumulated in estrogen target tissues not due to affinity for the estrogen receptors, but instead due to affinity for the distinct EMBP.

Extremely high, pregnancy-like levels of estradiol may be responsible for the leukocytosis (increased white blood cell count) that is observed in individuals treated with EMP.{{cite journal | vauthors = Alexander NC, Hancock AK, Masood MB, Peet BG, Price JJ, Turner RL, Stone J, Ward AJ | display-authors = 6 | title = Estracyt in advanced carcinoma of the breast: a phase II study | journal = Clinical Radiology | volume = 30 | issue = 2 | pages = 139–147 | date = March 1979 | pmid = 86404 | doi = 10.1016/S0009-9260(79)80133-6 }}{{cite journal | vauthors = Daponte D, Sylvester R, De Pauw M, Fryszman A, Smith RM, Smith PH | title = Change in white cell count during treatment of advanced cancer of the prostate with estramustine phosphate and with stilboestrol | journal = British Journal of Urology | volume = 55 | issue = 4 | pages = 408–412 | date = August 1983 | pmid = 6349745 | doi = 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1983.tb03333.x }} This side effect is in contrast to most other cytotoxic agents, which instead cause myelosuppression (bone marrow suppression), leukopenia (decreased white blood cell count), and neutropenia (decreased neutrophil count).{{Citation needed|date=December 2019|reason=removed citation to predatory publisher content}}

EMP at a dosage 280 mg/day has been found to suppress testosterone levels in men into the castrate range (to 30 ng/dL) within 20 days and to the low castrate range (to 10 ng/dL) within 30 days. Similarly, a dosage of 70 mg/day EMP suppressed testosterone levels into the castrate range within 4 weeks.

{{See also|Pharmacokinetics of estradiol}}

File:Estradiol and testosterone levels with 280 mg per day oral estramustine phosphate in men with prostate cancer.png

Upon oral ingestion, EMP is rapidly and completely dephosphorylated by phosphatases into estramustine during the first pass in the gastrointestinal tract.{{cite book| veditors = Cavalli F, Kaye SB, Hansen HH, Armitage JO, Piccart-Gebhart M |title=Textbook of Medical Oncology | edition = Fourth |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WdDKBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA442|date=12 September 2009|publisher=CRC Press|isbn=978-0-203-09289-7|pages=442–}} Estramustine is also partially but considerably oxidized into estromustine by 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases during the first pass.{{cite journal | vauthors = Gunnarsson O, Andersson SB, Johansson SA | title = The hydrolysis of estramustine phosphate; in vitro studies | journal = European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics | volume = 8 | issue = 4 | pages = 395–402 | date = 1983 | pmid = 6673977 | doi = 10.1007/BF03188772 | s2cid = 22105700 }} As such, EMP reaches the circulation as estramustine and estromustine, and the major metabolite of EMP is estromustine. A limited quantity of approximately 10 to 15% of estramustine and estromustine is further slowly metabolized via hydrolysis of the normustine ester into estradiol and estrone, respectively. This reaction is believed to be catalyzed by carbamidases, although the genes encoding the responsible enzymes have not been characterized. The circulating levels of normustine formed from EMP are insignificant.{{cite journal | vauthors = Hauser AR, Merryman R | title = Estramustine phosphate sodium | journal = Drug Intelligence & Clinical Pharmacy | volume = 18 | issue = 5 | pages = 368–374 | date = May 1984 | pmid = 6373212 | doi = 10.1177/106002808401800502 | s2cid = 25303747 }}{{cite book| vauthors = Gate L, Tew KD |title=Cancer Management in Man: Chemotherapy, Biological Therapy, Hyperthermia and Supporting Measures|chapter=Alkylating Agents|series=Cancer Growth and Progression |year=2011|pages=61–85|publisher=Springer |doi=10.1007/978-90-481-9704-0_4|isbn=978-90-481-9703-3}} Release of nitrogen mustard gas from normustine via cleavage of the carboxylic acid group has not been demonstrated and does not seem to occur.

The oral bioavailability of EMP is low, which is due to profound first-pass metabolism; specifically, dephosphorylation of EMP. The oral bioavailability of EMP specifically as estramustine and estromustine is 44 to 75%, suggesting that absorption may be incomplete. In any case, there is a linear relationship between the oral dose of EMP and circulating levels of estramustine and estromustine. Consumption of calcium, aluminium, or magnesium with oral EMP can markedly impair its bioavailability due to diminished absorption from the intestines, and this may interfere with its therapeutic effectiveness at low doses.

Following a single oral dose of 420 mg EMP in men with prostate cancer, maximal levels of estromustine were 310 to 475 ng/mL (475,000 pg/mL) and occurred after 2 to 3 hours. Estradiol levels with 280 mg/day oral EMP have been found to increase to very high concentrations within one week of therapy. In one study, levels of estradiol were over 20,000 pg/mL after 10 days, were about 30,000 pg/mL after 30 days, and peaked at about 40,000 pg/mL at 50 days. Another study found lower estradiol levels of 4,900 to 9,000 pg/mL during chronic therapy with 560 mg/day oral EMP. An additional study found estradiol levels of about 17,000 pg/mL with 140 mg/day oral EMP and 38,000 pg/mL with 280 mg/day oral EMP.{{Citation needed|date=December 2019|reason=removed citation to predatory publisher content}} The circulating levels of estradiol and estrone during EMP therapy have been reported to exceed normal levels in men by more than 100- and 1,000-fold, respectively. Levels of estramustine and estradiol in the circulation are markedly lower than those of estromustine and estrone, respectively, with a ratio of about 1:10 in both cases. Nonetheless, estradiol levels during EMP therapy appear to be similar to those that occur in mid-to-late pregnancy, which range from 5,000 to 40,000 pg/mL.{{cite web | title = Estradiol | date = November 2009 | url = http://www.ilexmedical.com/files/PDF/Estradiol_ARC.pdf | work = Abbott Laboratories | access-date = 2018-09-20 | archive-date = 2021-11-27 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20211127070253/https://www.ilexmedical.com/files/PDF/Estradiol_ARC.pdf | url-status = dead }} No unchanged EMP is seen in the circulation with oral administration.

The pharmacokinetics of EMP are different with intravenous injection. Following a single intravenous injection of 300 mg EMP, levels of EMP were higher than those of its metabolites for the first 8 hours. This is likely due to the bypassing of first-pass metabolism. However, by 24 hours after the dose, unchanged EMP could no longer be detected in the circulation. The clearance of EMP from blood plasma is 4.85 ± 0.684 L/h. The volumes of distribution of EMP with intravenous injection were small; under a two-compartment model, the volume of distribution for the central compartment was 0.043 L/kg and for the peripheral compartment was 0.11 L/kg. The plasma protein binding of EMP is high. Estramustine is accumulated in tumor tissue, for instance prostate cancer and glioma tissue, with estramustine levels much higher in these tissues than in plasma (e.g., 6.3- and 15.9-fold, respectively). Conversely, levels of estromustine in tumor versus plasma are similar (1.0- and 0.5-fold, respectively). Estramustine and estromustine appear to accumulate in adipose tissue.

The elimination half-life of estromustine with oral EMP was 13.6 hours on average, with a range of 8.8 to 22.7 hours. Conversely, the elimination half-life of estromustine with intravenous injection was 10.3 hours, with a range of 7.36 to 12.3 hours. For comparison, the corresponding elimination half-lives of estrone were 16.5 and 14.7 hours for oral and intravenous administration, respectively. Estramustine and estromustine are mainly excreted in bile and hence in feces. They are not believed to be excreted in urine.

File:Estramustine phosphate metabolism.png of oral estramustine phosphate in humans.{{cite journal | vauthors = Gunnarsson PO, Forshell GP | title = Clinical pharmacokinetics of estramustine phosphate | journal = Urology | volume = 23 | issue = 6 Suppl | pages = 22–27 | date = June 1984 | pmid = 6375076 | doi = 10.1016/S0090-4295(84)80093-X }}{{cite journal | vauthors = Ozeki T, Takeuchi M, Suzuki M, Kitamura T, Takayanagi R, Yokoyama H, Yamada Y | title = Single nucleotide polymorphisms of 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 7 gene: mechanism of estramustine-related adverse reactions? | journal = International Journal of Urology | volume = 16 | issue = 10 | pages = 836–841 | date = October 2009 | pmid = 19735314 | doi = 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2009.02374.x | s2cid = 38350076 }}{{cite journal | vauthors = Suzuki M, Muto S, Hara K, Ozeki T, Yamada Y, Kadowaki T, Tomita K, Kameyama S, Kitamura T | display-authors = 6 | title = Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase genes might predict the risk of side-effects of estramustine phosphate sodium in prostate cancer patients | journal = International Journal of Urology | volume = 12 | issue = 2 | pages = 166–172 | date = February 2005 | pmid = 15733111 | doi = 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01004.x | s2cid = 71166897 | doi-access = }}]]

{{See also|Estrogen ester|List of estrogen esters#Estradiol esters|List of hormonal cytostatic antineoplastic agents}}

EMP, also known as estradiol 3-normustine 17β-phosphate or as estradiol 3-(bis(2-chloroethyl)carbamate) 17β-(dihydrogen phosphate), is a synthetic estrane steroid and a derivative of estradiol. It is an estrogen ester; specifically, EMP is a diester of estradiol with a C3 normustine (nitrogen mustard–carbamate moiety) ester and a C17β phosphate ester. EMP is provided as the sodium or meglumine salt. EMP is similar as a compound to other estradiol esters such as estradiol sulfate and estradiol valerate, but differs in the presence of its nitrogen mustard ester moiety. Antineoplastic agents related to EMP, although none of them were marketed, include alestramustine, atrimustine, cytestrol acetate, estradiol mustard, ICI-85966, and phenestrol.

Due to its hydrophilic phosphate ester moiety, EMP is a readily water-soluble compound.{{cite book| vauthors = Loftsson T |title=Drug Stability for Pharmaceutical Scientists|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dUzyAQAAQBAJ&pg=PA77|date=25 January 2014|publisher=Academic Press|isbn=978-0-12-411562-0|pages=77–}}{{cite book| vauthors = Bernal S |title=Drug Resistance in Oncology|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=x9rL5HiTFTUC&pg=PA287|date=21 August 1997|publisher=CRC Press|isbn=978-1-4200-0209-6|pages=287–}}{{cite book| vauthors = Murff SJ |title=Safety and Health Handbook for Cytotoxic Drugs|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CqIPtcoUiMMC&pg=PA89|date=20 February 2012|publisher=Government Institutes|isbn=978-1-60590-705-5|pages=89–}} This is in contrast to most other estradiol esters, which are fatty acid esters and lipophilic compounds that are not particularly soluble in water. Unlike EMP, estramustine is highly lipophilic, practically insoluble in water, and non-ionizable. The phosphate ester of EMP was incorporated into the molecule in order to increase its water solubility and allow for intravenous administration.

The molecular weight of EMP sodium is 564.3 g/mol, of EMP meglumine is 715.6 g/mol, of EMP is 520.4 g/mol, of estramustine is 440.4 g/mol, and of estradiol is 272.4 g/mol.{{cite web | title = Estramustine phosphate| url = https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/259329 | work = PubChem | publisher = U.S. National Library of Medicine }} As a result of these differences in molecular weights, EMP contains about 52%, EMP sodium about 48%, and EMP meglumine about 38% of the amount of estradiol within their structures as does an equal-mass quantity of estradiol.

{{Structural properties of selected estradiol esters}}

EMP was first synthesized in the mid-1960s and was patented in 1967.{{cite journal | vauthors = Punzi JS, Duax WL, Strong P, Griffin JF, Flocco MM, Zacharias DE, Carrell HL, Tew KD, Glusker JP | display-authors = 6 | title = Molecular conformation of estramustine and two analogues | journal = Molecular Pharmacology | volume = 41 | issue = 3 | pages = 569–576 | date = March 1992 | pmid = 1545778 | url = http://molpharm.aspetjournals.org/content/41/3/569 }} It was initially developed for the treatment of breast cancer. The idea for EMP was inspired by the uptake and accumulation of radiolabeled estrogens into breast cancer tissue. However, initial clinical findings of EMP in women with breast cancer were disappointing. Subsequently, radiolabeled EMP was found to be taken up into and accumulated rat prostate gland, and this finding culminated in the medication being repurposed for the treatment of prostate cancer. EMP was introduced for medical use in the treatment of this condition in the early 1970s, and was approved in the United States for this indication in 1981.{{cite book| vauthors = Figg WD, Chau CH, Small EJ | title = Drug Management of Prostate Cancer|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4KDrjeWA5-UC&pg=PA402|date=14 September 2010|publisher=Springer Science & Business Media|isbn=978-1-60327-829-4|pages=402–}} EMP was originally introduced for use by intravenous injection. Subsequently, an oral formulation was introduced, and the intravenous preparation was almost abandoned in favor of the oral version.

EMP is provided as the sodium salt for oral administration, which has the generic names estramustine phosphate sodium ({{abbrlink|USAN|United States Adopted Name}}) and estramustine sodium phosphate ({{abbrlink|BANM|British Approved Name}}, {{abbrlink|JAN|Japanese Accepted Name}}), and as the meglumine salt for intravenous administration, which has the generic name estramustine phosphate meglumine.{{cite book| vauthors = Elks J |title=The Dictionary of Drugs: Chemical Data: Chemical Data, Structures and Bibliographies|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0vXTBwAAQBAJ&pg=PA502|date=14 November 2014|publisher=Springer|isbn=978-1-4757-2085-3|pages=502–503}}{{cite book|title=Index Nominum 2000: International Drug Directory|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5GpcTQD_L2oC&pg=PA406|date=January 2000|publisher=Taylor & Francis|isbn=978-3-88763-075-1|pages=406–407}}{{cite book| vauthors = Morton IK, Hall JM |title=Concise Dictionary of Pharmacological Agents: Properties and Synonyms|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tsjrCAAAQBAJ&pg=PA114|date=6 December 2012|publisher=Springer Science & Business Media|isbn=978-94-011-4439-1|pages=114–}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.drugs.com/international/estramustine.html|title = Estramustine Uses, Side Effects & Warnings}} The {{abbrlink|INNM|International Nonproprietary Name}} is estramustine phosphate. The name estramustine phosphate is a contraction of estradiol normustine phosphate. EMP is also known by its former developmental code names Leo 299, Ro 21-8837, and Ro 21-8837/001.

EMP is most commonly marketed under the brand names Estracyt and Emcyt, but has also been sold under a number of other brand names, including Amsupros, Biasetyl, Cellmustin, Estramustin HEXAL, Estramustina Filaxis, Estranovag, Multosin, Multosin Injekt, Proesta, Prostamustin, and Suloprost.

{{See also|List of estrogens available in the United States}}

EMP is marketed in the United States,{{cite web | title = Drugs@FDA: FDA Approved Drug Products | publisher = United States Food and Drug Administration | access-date = 29 January 2017 | url = http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/}} Canada, and Mexico under the brand name Emcyt, whereas the medication is marketed under the brand name Estracyt in the United Kingdom and elsewhere throughout Europe as well as in Argentina, Chile, and Hong Kong. It has been discontinued in a number of countries, including Australia, Brazil, Ireland, and Norway.{{cite book|title=Martindale: The Complete Drug Reference|publisher=Pharmaceutical Press|date=12 February 2013|access-date=8 February 2014|url=http://www.medicinescomplete.com/mc/martindale/current/1832-c.htm|chapter=Estramustine Sodium Phosphate|editor=Sweetman, S|place=London, UK}}

EMP has been studied in the treatment of other cancers such as glioma and breast cancer. It has been found to slightly improve quality of life in people with glioma during the first 3 months of therapy.

{{Reflist}}

{{refbegin|30em}}

• {{cite journal | vauthors = Tew KD | title = The mechanism of action of estramustine | journal = Seminars in Oncology | volume = 10 | issue = 3 Suppl 3 | pages = 21–26 | date = September 1983 | pmid = 6364362 }}
• {{cite journal | vauthors = Hoisaeter PA, Bakke A | title = Estramustine phosphate (Estracyt): experimental and clinical studies in Europe | journal = Seminars in Oncology | volume = 10 | issue = 3 Suppl 3 | pages = 27–33 | date = September 1983 | pmid = 6364363 }}
• {{cite journal | vauthors = Sandberg AA | title = Metabolic aspects and actions unique to Estracyt | journal = Seminars in Oncology | volume = 10 | issue = 3 Suppl 3 | pages = 3–15 | date = September 1983 | pmid = 6364364 }}
• {{cite journal | vauthors = Haukaas SA | title = Immunological effects of diethylstilbestrol and estramustine phosphate | journal = Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology. Supplementum | volume = 83 | pages = 1–32 | date = 1984 | pmid = 6387896 }}
• {{cite journal | vauthors = Hauser AR, Merryman R | title = Estramustine phosphate sodium | journal = Drug Intelligence & Clinical Pharmacy | volume = 18 | issue = 5 | pages = 368–374 | date = May 1984 | pmid = 6373212 | doi = 10.1177/106002808401800502 | s2cid = 25303747 }}
• {{cite journal | vauthors = Sandberg AA | title = Metabolic parameters of Estracyt pertinent to its effects in prostatic cancer | journal = Urology | volume = 23 | issue = 6 Suppl | pages = 11–21 | date = June 1984 | pmid = 6375075 | doi = 10.1016/S0090-4295(84)80092-8 }}
• {{cite journal | vauthors = Gunnarsson PO, Forshell GP | title = Clinical pharmacokinetics of estramustine phosphate | journal = Urology | volume = 23 | issue = 6 Suppl | pages = 22–27 | date = June 1984 | pmid = 6375076 | doi = 10.1016/S0090-4295(84)80093-X }}
• {{cite journal | vauthors = Forsgren B, Björk P | title = Specific binding of estramustine to prostatic proteins | journal = Urology | volume = 23 | issue = 6 Suppl | pages = 34–38 | date = June 1984 | pmid = 6375077 | doi = 10.1016/S0090-4295(84)80095-3 }}
• {{cite journal | vauthors = Kalland T, Haukaas SA | title = Immunologic effects of estramustine phosphate | journal = Urology | volume = 23 | issue = 6 Suppl | pages = 39–45 | date = June 1984 | pmid = 6375078 | doi = 10.1016/S0090-4295(84)80096-5 }}
• {{cite journal | vauthors = Høisaeter PA | title = Mode of action of Emcyt | journal = Urology | volume = 23 | issue = 6 Suppl | pages = 46–48 | date = June 1984 | pmid = 6375079 | doi = 10.1016/S0090-4295(84)80097-7 }}
• {{cite journal | vauthors = Müntzing J, Gunnarsson K | title = Preclinical pharmacology and toxicology of estramustine phosphate | journal = Urology | volume = 23 | issue = 6 Suppl | pages = 6–10 | date = June 1984 | pmid = 6375082 | doi = 10.1016/S0090-4295(84)80091-6 }}
• {{cite journal | vauthors = Slack NH, Murphy GP | title = Clinical toxicity and long-term results of Emcyt therapy for prostate cancer | journal = Urology | volume = 23 | issue = 6 Suppl | pages = 73–77 | date = June 1984 | pmid = 6375085 | doi = 10.1016/S0090-4295(84)80103-X }}
• {{cite journal | vauthors = Hedlund PO | title = Mode of action of estramustine phosphate in hormone dependent and hormone non-dependent prostate cancer | journal = Progress in Clinical and Biological Research | volume = 185A | pages = 197–202 | date = 1985 | pmid = 3898129 }}
• {{cite journal | vauthors = Hedlund PO | title = Estracyt--mode of action and clinical experience | journal = Progress in Clinical and Biological Research | volume = 243B | pages = 215–219 | date = 1987 | pmid = 3309981 }}
• {{cite journal | vauthors = Murphy GP | title = A current review of the clinical experience with Estracyt | journal = Progress in Clinical and Biological Research | volume = 243B | pages = 221–225 | date = 1987 | pmid = 3309982 }}
• {{cite journal | vauthors = Forsgren B | title = Estramustine-binding protein in rat and human prostate | journal = Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology. Supplementum | volume = 107 | pages = 56–58 | date = 1988 | pmid = 3287598 }}
• {{cite journal | vauthors = Tew KD, Stearns ME | title = Intracellular effects of estramustine (Estracyt/Emcyt) | journal = Progress in Clinical and Biological Research | volume = 303 | pages = 169–175 | date = 1989 | pmid = 2674983 }}
• {{cite journal | vauthors = Tew KD, Stearns ME | title = Estramustine--a nitrogen mustard/steroid with antimicrotubule activity | journal = Pharmacology & Therapeutics | volume = 43 | issue = 3 | pages = 299–319 | date = 1989 | pmid = 2682681 | doi = 10.1016/0163-7258(89)90012-0 }}
• {{cite journal | vauthors = Könyves I | title = Estramustine phosphate (Estracyt) in the treatment of prostatic carcinoma | journal = International Urology and Nephrology | volume = 21 | issue = 4 | pages = 393–397 | date = 1989 | pmid = 2693392 | doi = 10.1007/BF02559635 | s2cid = 9727646 }}
• {{cite journal | vauthors = Benson R, Hartley-Asp B | title = Mechanisms of action and clinical uses of estramustine | journal = Cancer Investigation | volume = 8 | issue = 3–4 | pages = 375–380 | date = 1990 | pmid = 2207764 | doi = 10.3109/07357909009012056 }}
• {{cite journal | vauthors = Van Poppel H, Baert L | title = The present role of estramustine phosphate in advanced prostate cancer | journal = Progress in Clinical and Biological Research | volume = 370 | pages = 323–341 | date = 1991 | pmid = 1924466 }}
• {{cite journal | vauthors = Janknegt RA | title = Estramustine phosphate and other cytotoxic drugs in the treatment of poor prognostic advanced prostate cancer | journal = The Prostate. Supplement | volume = 4 | pages = 105–110 | date = 1992 | pmid = 1574449 | doi = 10.1002/pros.2990210516 | s2cid = 40562112 }}
• {{cite journal | vauthors = Tew KD, Glusker JP, Hartley-Asp B, Hudes G, Speicher LA | title = Preclinical and clinical perspectives on the use of estramustine as an antimitotic drug | journal = Pharmacology & Therapeutics | volume = 56 | issue = 3 | pages = 323–339 | date = December 1992 | pmid = 1301594 | doi = 10.1016/0163-7258(92)90023-S }}
• {{cite book | vauthors = Kreis W | title = Concepts, Mechanisms, and New Targets for Chemotherapy | chapter = Estramustine revisited | series = Cancer Treatment and Research | volume = 78 | pages = 163–184 | date = 1995 | publisher = Springer | pmid = 8595142 | doi = 10.1007/978-1-4615-2007-8_8 | isbn = 978-1-4613-5829-9 }}
• {{cite journal | vauthors = Perry CM, McTavish D | title = Estramustine phosphate sodium. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy in prostate cancer | journal = Drugs & Aging | volume = 7 | issue = 1 | pages = 49–74 | date = July 1995 | pmid = 7579781 | doi = 10.2165/00002512-199507010-00006 | s2cid = 36725810 }}
• {{cite journal | vauthors = Hudes G | title = Estramustine-based chemotherapy | journal = Seminars in Urologic Oncology | volume = 15 | issue = 1 | pages = 13–19 | date = February 1997 | pmid = 9050135 }}
• {{cite journal | vauthors = Bergenheim AT, Henriksson R | title = Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of estramustine phosphate | journal = Clinical Pharmacokinetics | volume = 34 | issue = 2 | pages = 163–172 | date = February 1998 | pmid = 9515186 | doi = 10.2165/00003088-199834020-00004 | s2cid = 1943973 }}
• {{cite journal | vauthors = Kitamura T | title = Necessity of re-evaluation of estramustine phosphate sodium (EMP) as a treatment option for first-line monotherapy in advanced prostate cancer | journal = International Journal of Urology | volume = 8 | issue = 2 | pages = 33–36 | date = February 2001 | pmid = 11240822 | doi = 10.1046/j.1442-2042.2001.00254.x | s2cid = 43384150 }}
• {{cite journal | vauthors = Ravery V, Fizazi K, Oudard S, Drouet L, Eymard JC, Culine S, Gravis G, Hennequin C, Zerbib M | display-authors = 6 | title = The use of estramustine phosphate in the modern management of advanced prostate cancer | journal = BJU International | volume = 108 | issue = 11 | pages = 1782–1786 | date = December 2011 | pmid = 21756277 | doi = 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10201.x | s2cid = 33456591 | doi-access = }}
• {{cite journal | vauthors = Qin Z, Li X, Zhang J, Tang J, Han P, Xu Z, Yu Y, Yang C, Wang C, Xu T, Xu Z, Zou Q | display-authors = 6 | title = Chemotherapy with or without estramustine for treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis | journal = Medicine | volume = 95 | issue = 39 | pages = e4801 | date = September 2016 | pmid = 27684806 | pmc = 5265899 | doi = 10.1097/MD.0000000000004801 }}

{{refend}}

{{Estradiol}}

{{Chemotherapeutic agents}}

{{Estrogens and antiestrogens}}

{{Androgen receptor modulators}}

{{Estrogen receptor modulators}}

Category:Antiandrogens

Category:Antigonadotropins

Category:Carbamates

Category:Chloroethyl compounds

Category:DNA replication inhibitors

Category:Estradiol esters

Category:Estranes

Category:Estrogens

Category:Hormonal antineoplastic drugs

Category:Mitotic inhibitors

Category:Nitrogen mustards

Category:Phosphate esters

Category:Drugs developed by Pfizer

Category:Prodrugs

Category:Prostate cancer