list of highest-grossing films
{{Short description|None}}
{{featured list}}
{{pp-extended|small=yes}}
{{Use American English|date=December 2023}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=December 2023}}
File:Poster - Gone With the Wind 01.jpg held the record for the highest-grossing film for twenty-five years and, when adjusted for inflation, has earned more than any other film|alt=A screencap of the title card from the trailer of Gone with the Wind.]]
Films generate income from several revenue streams, including theatrical exhibition, home video, television broadcast rights, and merchandising. However, theatrical box-office earnings are the primary metric for trade publications in assessing the success of a film, mostly because of the availability of the data compared to sales figures for home video and broadcast rights, but also because of historical practice. Included on the list are charts of the top box-office earners (ranked by both the nominal and real value of their revenue), a chart of high-grossing films by calendar year, a timeline showing the transition of the highest-grossing film record, and a chart of the highest-grossing film franchises and series. All charts are ranked by international theatrical box-office performance where possible, excluding income derived from home video, broadcasting rights, and merchandise.
Traditionally, war films, musicals, and historical dramas have been the most popular genres, but franchise films have been among the best performers of the 21st century. There is strong interest in the superhero genre, with eleven films in the Marvel Cinematic Universe featuring among the nominal top-earners. The most successful superhero film, Avengers: Endgame, is also the second-highest-grossing film on the nominal earnings chart, and there are four films in total based on the Avengers comic books charting in the top twenty. Other Marvel Comics adaptations have also had success with the Spider-Man and X-Men properties, while films based on Batman and Superman from DC Comics have generally performed well. Star Wars is also represented in the nominal earnings chart with five films, while the Jurassic Park franchise features prominently. Although the nominal earnings chart is dominated by films adapted from pre-existing properties and sequels, it is headed by Avatar, which is an original work. Animated family films have performed consistently well, with Disney films enjoying lucrative re-releases prior to the home-video era. Disney also enjoyed later success with films such as Frozen and its sequel, Zootopia, and The Lion King (along with its computer-animated remake), as well as its Pixar division, of which Inside Out 2, Incredibles 2, and Toy Story 3 and 4 have been the best performers. Beyond Disney and Pixar animation, China's Ne Zha 2 (the highest-grossing animated film), and the Despicable Me and Shrek series have met with the most success.
While inflation has eroded the achievements of most films from the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s, there are franchises originating from that period that are still active. Besides the Star Wars and Superman franchises, James Bond and Godzilla films are still being released periodically; all four are among the highest-grossing franchises. Some of the older films that held the record of highest-grossing film still have respectable grosses by today's standards, but no longer compete numerically against today's top-earners in an era of much higher individual ticket prices. When those prices are adjusted for inflation, however, then Gone with the Wind—which was the highest-grossing film outright for twenty-five years—is still the highest-grossing film of all time. All grosses on the list are expressed in U.S. dollars at their nominal value, except where stated otherwise.
{{TOC limit|2}}
Highest-grossing films
File:James Cameron by Gage Skidmore.jpg.]]
With a worldwide box-office gross of over $2.9 billion, Avatar is proclaimed to be the "highest-grossing" film, but such claims usually refer to theatrical revenues only and do not take into account home video and television income, which can form a significant portion of a film's earnings. Once revenue from home entertainment is factored in, it is not immediately clear which film is the most successful. Titanic earned $1.2 billion from video and DVD sales and rentals,{{Cite magazine |last=Pincus-Roth |first=Zachary |date=January 8, 2006 |title=Movies aren't the only B.O. monsters |url=https://variety.com/2006/legit/news/movies-aren-t-the-only-b-o-monsters-1117935611/ |magazine=Variety |access-date=February 2, 2014 |archive-date=April 20, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210420110457/https://variety.com/2006/legit/news/movies-aren-t-the-only-b-o-monsters-1117935611/ |url-status=live }} in addition to the $2.2 billion it grossed in theaters. While complete sales data are not available for Avatar, it earned $345 million from the sale of sixteen million DVD and Blu-ray units in North America,{{Cite web |title=Avatar – Video Sales |url=https://www.the-numbers.com/movie/Avatar#tab=video-sales |access-date=November 12, 2013 |website=The Numbers |publisher=Nash Information Services |archive-date=November 25, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181125204128/https://www.the-numbers.com/movie/Avatar#tab=video-sales |url-status=live }} and ultimately sold a total of thirty million DVD and Blu-ray units worldwide.{{Cite news |date=March 17, 2011 |title=Unkind unwind |newspaper=The Economist |url=https://www.economist.com/briefing/2011/03/17/unkind-unwind |access-date=April 6, 2022 |archive-date=September 4, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170904063950/http://www.economist.com/node/18386456 |url-status=live }} After home video income is accounted for, both films have earned over $3 billion each. Television broadcast rights also substantially add to a film's earnings and, as of 2010, a film often earned the equivalent of as much as 20–25% of its theatrical box office for two television runs, on top of pay-per-view revenues;{{Cite book |last=Vogel |first=Harold L. |title=Entertainment Industry Economics: A Guide for Financial Analysis |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2010 |isbn=978-1-107-00309-5 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=BfyFFCyRvX0C&pg=PA224 224] |quote=Most pictures would likely receive 20% to 25% of theatrical box office gross for two prime-time network runs.}} Titanic earned a further $55 million from the NBC and HBO broadcast rights, equating to about 9% of its North American gross.
When a film is highly exploitable as a commercial property, its ancillary revenues can dwarf its income from direct film sales.{{Cite news |last=Clark |first=Emma |date=November 12, 2001 |title=How films make money |work=BBC News |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/1646640.stm |access-date=April 12, 2012 |archive-date=September 8, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170908180558/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/1646640.stm |url-status=live }} The Lion King (1994) earned over $2 billion in box-office and home video sales, but this pales in comparison to the $8 billion earned at box offices around the world by the stage adaptation.{{Cite web |last=Seymour |first=Lee |date=December 18, 2017 |title=Over The Last 20 Years, Broadway's 'Lion King' Has Made More Money For Disney Than 'Star Wars' |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/leeseymour/2017/12/18/the-lion-king-is-making-more-money-for-disney-than-star-wars/#268447731ff0 |access-date=July 28, 2019 |website=Forbes |archive-date=June 10, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230610055447/https://www.forbes.com/sites/leeseymour/2017/12/18/the-lion-king-is-making-more-money-for-disney-than-star-wars/#268447731ff0 |url-status=live }} Merchandising can be extremely lucrative too: The Lion King also sold $3 billion of merchandise,{{Cite news |date=February 15, 1998 |title=The Entertainment Glut |work=Bloomberg |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/1998-02-15/the-entertainment-glut |access-date=April 6, 2022 |archive-date=October 12, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171012095740/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/1998-02-15/the-entertainment-glut |url-status=live }} while Pixar's Cars—which earned $462 million in theatrical revenues and was only a modest hit by comparison to other Pixar films{{Cite web |title=Pixar – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=pixar.htm |access-date=April 12, 2012 |website=Box Office Mojo |archive-date=August 29, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190829102520/https://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=pixar.htm |url-status=live }}—generated global merchandise sales of over $8 billion in the five years after its 2006 release.{{Cite news |last=Szalai |first=Georg |date=February 14, 2011 |title=Disney: 'Cars' Has Crossed $8 Billion in Global Retail Sales |work=The Hollywood Reporter |url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/disney-cars-has-crossed-8-99438/ |access-date=April 6, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110319190512/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/disney-cars-has-crossed-8-99438 |archive-date=March 19, 2011}}{{Cite news |last1=Chmielewski |first1=Dawn C. |last2=Keegan |first2=Rebecca |date=June 21, 2011 |title=Merchandise sales drive Pixar's 'Cars' franchise |work=Los Angeles Times |url=https://www.latimes.com/business/la-xpm-2011-jun-21-la-fi-ct-cars2-20110621-story.html |access-date=April 12, 2012 |archive-date=July 9, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130709001110/http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jun/21/business/la-fi-ct-cars2-20110621 |url-status=live }} Pixar had another huge hit with Toy Story 3, which generated almost $10 billion in merchandise retail sales in addition to the $1 billion it earned at the box office.{{Cite news |last1=Palmeri |first1=Christopher |last2=Sakoui |first2=Anousha |date=November 7, 2014 |title=More Disney Fun and Games With 'Toy Story 4' in 2017 |work=Bloomberg News |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-11-07/more-disney-fun-and-games-with-toy-story-4-in-2017 |access-date=June 30, 2015 |archive-date=July 5, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150705203120/http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-11-07/more-disney-fun-and-games-with-toy-story-4-in-2017 |url-status=live }}
On this chart, films are ranked by the revenues from theatrical exhibition at their nominal value, along with the highest positions they attained. Seven films in total have grossed in excess of $2 billion worldwide, with Avatar ranked in the top position. All of the films have had a theatrical run (including re-releases) in the 21st century, and films that have not played during this period do not appear on the chart because of ticket-price inflation, population size and ticket purchasing trends not being considered.
:{{box office table legend|#b6fcb6|icon=†}}
{{sticky header}}{{table alignment}}
{{Refbegin|}}
{{note label|Titanic|T||The totals given for Titanic at Box Office Mojo and The Numbers are both incorrect. Prior to the 2023 re-release, the totals at both trackers were inflated above the true figure. {{bulleted list|As of 2019, Box Office Mojo correctly recorded that Titanic had grossed $1.843 billion on its original release, $344 million from its 3D reissue in 2012, and a further $692,000 from a limited release in 2017 for a lifetime total of $2.187 billion.{{cite web |title=Titanic (1997) |website=Box Office Mojo |via=Wayback Machine |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191027003338/https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0120338/ |access-date=October 27, 2019}}{{cbignore}} Following a limited re-release in 2020, Box Office Mojo incorrectly added $7 million to the original release total.{{cite web |title=Titanic (1997) |website=Box Office Mojo |via=Wayback Machine |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201030074558/https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0120338/ |access-date=October 30, 2020}}{{cbignore}} By the end of 2021, Box Office Mojo had corrected the original release total, but added the $7 million figure to both the 2012 and 2017 reissue totals, incorrectly increasing the lifetime total by $14 million to $2.202 billion.{{cite web |title=Titanic (1997) |website=Box Office Mojo |via=Wayback Machine |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211026222823/https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0120338/ |access-date=October 26, 2021}}{{cbignore}} At the beginning of 2023, Box Office Mojo corrected the total for the 2017 reissue, bringing the lifetime gross down to $2.195 billion, but retained the error in the 2012 reissue.{{cite web |title=Titanic (1997) |website=Box Office Mojo |via=Wayback Machine |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230205001927/https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0120338/ |access-date=February 5, 2023}}{{cbignore}} | The Numbers does not log individual releases, but had the lifetime total recorded as $2.186 billion in September 2014 (roughly equating to $1.843 billion for the original release and $343.6 million for the 3D reissue).{{cite web |title=Titanic |website=The Numbers |via=Wayback Machine |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140902192258/http://www.the-numbers.com/movie/Titanic#http://www.the-numbers.com/movie/#tab=summar&tab=summary |access-date=September 2, 2014}}{{cbignore}} A couple of weeks later, The Numbers increased the lifetime gross to $2.208 billion, without explanation.{{cite web |title=Titanic |website=The Numbers |via=Wayback Machine |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140913203854/http://www.the-numbers.com/movie/Titanic#http://www.the-numbers.com/movie/#tab=summary&tab=summary |access-date=September 13, 2014}}{{cbignore}}}}}}
{{note label|Spider-Man|SM||The worldwide total for Spider-Man: No Way Home at Box Office Mojo is incorrect, by virtue of double-counting the original Spanish gross in its 2024 re-release total. For this reason totals are sourced to an archived version of Box Office Mojo prior to when the error crept in.}}
{{note label|Frozen|F||Box Office Mojo stopped updating its main total for Frozen in August 2014, while it was still in release. The total listed here incorporates subsequent earnings in Japan, Nigeria, Spain, the United Kingdom and Germany up to the end of 2015 but omits earnings in Turkey, Iceland, Brazil, and Australia (2016), which amount to a few hundred thousand dollars. The total is rounded to $1 million to compensate for the numerical inaccuracy. It was re-released in the United Kingdom in December 2017 with the featurette Olaf's Frozen Adventure, earning an additional $2.3 million.}}
{{note label|Fast 8|F8||In the case of The Fate of the Furious the gross is from an archived version of Box Office Mojo, after irregularities were discovered in the current figure. Ongoing weekly drops in the totals for several countries—Argentina being the worst affected—led to a drop in the overall worldwide total.{{cite web |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&country=AR&id=furious8.htm |title=The Fate of the Furious (2017) – International Box Office Results: Argentina |website=Box Office Mojo |access-date=January 11, 2018}} In view of what appears to be an aberration in the source, a previous figure is provided.}}
{{note label|LOTR3|RK||The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King saw its original gross corrected in early 2020. The result of this correction is that Spider-Man: Far From Home, Captain Marvel and Transformers: Dark of the Moon all peaked one place lower than shown in the accompanying source.}}
{{note label|Dark Knight Rises|DKR||The worldwide total for The Dark Knight Rises at Box Office Mojo is incorrect, by virtue of double-counting the original Australian gross in its 2024 re-release total. For this reason totals are sourced to an archived version of Box Office Mojo prior to when the error crept in.}}
{{note label|TS3|TS3||Box Office Mojo revised the grosses for Pixar films in August 2016, resulting in the gross for Toy Story 3 being corrected from $1.063 billion to $1.067 billion.{{cite web |title=Pixar Movies at the Box Office |website=Box Office Mojo |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=pixar.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160816210106/http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=pixar.htm |archive-date=August 16, 2016}}{{cite web |title=Pixar Movies at the Box Office |website=Box Office Mojo |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=pixar.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160820153822/http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=pixar.htm |archive-date=August 20, 2016}} This means that it peaked at number 4 at the end of its run, ahead of Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest, rather than at number 5 as indicated by the source.}}
{{Refend}}
Highest-grossing films adjusted for inflation
{{See also|List of highest-grossing films in the United States and Canada#Adjusted for ticket-price inflation|List of films by box office admissions}}
File:World Inflation rate 2017.svg
Because of the long-term effects of inflation, notably the significant increase of movie theater ticket prices, the list unadjusted for inflation gives far more weight to later films.{{cite news |last=Bialik |first=Carl |url=https://blogs.wsj.com/numbersguy/how-hollywood-box-office-records-are-made-889/ |title=How Hollywood Box-Office Records Are Made |work=The Wall Street Journal |date=January 29, 2010 |access-date=August 9, 2011 |archive-date=November 1, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111101195443/http://blogs.wsj.com/numbersguy/how-hollywood-box-office-records-are-made-889/ |url-status=live }} The unadjusted list, while commonly found in the press, is therefore largely meaningless for comparing films widely separated in time, as many films from earlier eras will never appear on a modern unadjusted list, despite achieving higher commercial success when adjusted for price increases.{{cite news |last=Pincus-Roth |first=Zachary |url=https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2009/07/why-journalists-don-t-account-for-inflation-when-they-report-box-office-records.html |title=Best Weekend Never |work=Slate |date=July 6, 2009 |access-date=April 6, 2022 |archive-date=April 6, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220406213349/https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2009/07/why-journalists-don-t-account-for-inflation-when-they-report-box-office-records.html |url-status=live }} To compensate for the devaluation of the currency, some charts make adjustments for inflation, but not even this practice fully addresses the issue, since ticket prices and inflation do not necessarily parallel one another. For example, in 1970, tickets cost $1.55 or about $6.68 in inflation-adjusted 2004 dollars; by 1980, prices had risen to about $2.69, a drop to $5.50 in inflation-adjusted 2004 dollars.{{cite conference |first1=S. Eric |last1=Anderson |first2=Stewart |last2=Albertson |first3=David |last3=Shavlick |title=How the motion picture industry miscalculates box office receipts |conference=Proceedings of the Midwest Business Economics Association |date=March 2004 |publisher=Loma Linda University |url=http://www.usi.edu/business/abe/2004/movies.doc |conference-url=http://www.usi.edu/business/abe/2004.aspx |format=DOC |access-date=April 8, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131029204604/http://www.usi.edu/business/abe/2004/movies.doc |archive-date=October 29, 2013}} Ticket prices have also risen at different rates of inflation around the world, further complicating the process of adjusting worldwide grosses.
Another complication is release in multiple formats for which different ticket prices are charged. One notable example of this phenomenon is Avatar, which was also released in 3D and IMAX: almost two-thirds of tickets for that film were for 3D showings with an average price of $10, and about one-sixth were for IMAX showings with an average price over $14.50, compared to a 2010 average price of $7.61 for 2D films.{{cite web |first=Brandon |last=Gray |title='Avatar' Claims Highest Gross of All Time |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/article/ed2356806660/ |website=Box Office Mojo |access-date=April 6, 2022 |archive-date=February 7, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100207134301/http://www.boxofficemojo.com/news/?id=2667&p=l.htm |url-status=live }} Social and economic factors such as population change{{cite news |last=Bialik |first=Carl |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704878904575031813961239170 |title=What It Takes for a Movie to Be No. 1 |work=The Wall Street Journal |date=January 30, 2010 |access-date=August 9, 2011 |archive-date=December 18, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181218054255/https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704878904575031813961239170 |url-status=live }} and the growth of international markets{{cite news |last=Kolesnikov-Jessop |first=Sonia |title=Hollywood Presses Its Global Agenda |work=The New York Times |date=May 22, 2011 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/23/business/media/23film-screensingapore.html |access-date=January 4, 2012 |archive-date=December 18, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181218011038/https://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/23/business/media/23film-screensingapore.html |url-status=live }}{{cite news |last=Hoad |first=Phil |title=The rise of the international box office |work=The Guardian |date=August 11, 2011 |url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/filmblog/2011/aug/11/hollywood-international-box-office |access-date=January 4, 2012 |archive-date=June 29, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230629043918/https://www.theguardian.com/film/filmblog/2011/aug/11/hollywood-international-box-office |url-status=live }}{{cite news |last=Frankel |first=Daniel |title=Why the Foreign Box Office Leads: 'Fast Five,' 'Thor' Open Overseas First |work=The Wrap |date=May 1, 2011 |url=https://www.thewrap.com/rise-foreign-box-office-why-fast-five-debuted-down-under-first-26957/ |access-date=April 6, 2022 |archive-date=January 9, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190109012046/https://www.thewrap.com/rise-foreign-box-office-why-fast-five-debuted-down-under-first-26957/ |url-status=live }} also have an effect on the number of people purchasing theater tickets, along with audience demographics where some films sell a much higher proportion of discounted children's tickets, or perform better in big cities where tickets cost more.
The measuring system for gauging a film's success is based on unadjusted grosses, mainly because historically this is the way it has always been done because of the practices of the film industry: the box-office receipts are compiled by theaters and relayed to the distributor, which in turn releases them to the media.{{cite news |last=Bialik |first=Carl |url=https://blogs.wsj.com/numbersguy/box-office-records-are-the-stuff-of-legend-240/ |title=Box-Office Records Are the Stuff of 'Legend' |work=The Wall Street Journal |date=December 17, 2007 |access-date=August 10, 2011 |archive-date=October 29, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131029224731/http://blogs.wsj.com/numbersguy/box-office-records-are-the-stuff-of-legend-240/ |url-status=live }} Converting to a more representative system that counts ticket sales rather than gross is also fraught with problems because the only data available for older films are the sale totals. As the motion picture industry is highly oriented towards marketing currently released films, unadjusted figures are always used in marketing campaigns so that new blockbuster films can much more easily achieve a high sales ranking, and thus be promoted as a "top film of all time",{{cite news |last=Leonhardt |first=David |title=Why 'Avatar' Is Not the Top-Grossing Film |date=March 1, 2010 |work=The New York Times |url=https://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/01/why-avatar-is-not-the-top-grossing-film |access-date=April 7, 2013 |archive-date=October 16, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211016144720/https://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/01/why-avatar-is-not-the-top-grossing-film/ |url-status=live }} so there is little incentive to switch to a more robust analysis from a marketing or even newsworthy point of view.
Despite the inherent difficulties in accounting for inflation, several attempts have been made. Estimates depend on the price index used to adjust the grosses, and the exchange rates used to convert between currencies can also affect the calculations, both of which can have an effect on the ultimate rankings of an inflation adjusted list. Gone with the Wind—first released in 1939—is generally considered to be the most successful film, with Guinness World Records in 2014 estimating its adjusted global gross at $3.4 billion. Estimates for Gone with the Wind{{'}}s adjusted gross have varied substantially: its owner, Turner Entertainment, estimated its adjusted earnings at $3.3 billion in 2007, a few years earlier than the Guinness estimate; other estimates fall either side of this amount, with one putting its gross just under $3 billion in 2010,{{Cite news |first=Tom |last=Shone |author-link=Tom Shone |title=Oscars 2010: How James Cameron took on the world |website=The Daily Telegraph |date=February 3, 2010 |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/oscars/7144424/Oscars-2010-How-James-Cameron-took-on-the-world.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220110/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/oscars/7144424/Oscars-2010-How-James-Cameron-took-on-the-world.html |archive-date=January 10, 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |access-date=March 22, 2012}}{{cbignore}} while another provided an alternative figure of $3.8 billion in 2006.{{Cite news |last=Hill |first=George F. |title=Gone With The Wind, Indeed |date=June 25, 2006 |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/23/AR2006062301502.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181227233419/https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/23/AR2006062301502.html |archive-date=December 27, 2018}} Which film is Gone with the Wind{{'}}s nearest rival depends on the set of figures used: Guinness had Avatar in second place with $3 billion, while other estimates saw Titanic in the runner-up spot with first-run worldwide earnings of almost $2.9 billion at 2010 prices.
class="wikitable plainrowheaders" style="margin:auto; margin:auto;"
|+{{nowrap|Highest-grossing films {{As of|2023|lc=y}} adjusted for inflation{{cite book |title=Guinness World Records |edition=2015 |year=2014 |volume=60 |isbn=978-1-908843-70-8 |pages=160–161 |publisher=Guinness World Records}}}}{{ref label|Inflation|Inf}} ! scope="col" | Rank ! scope="col" | Title ! scope="col" data-sort-type="currency" | {{longitem|Worldwide gross ! scope="col" | Year |
1
! scope="row" | Gone with the Wind | style="text-align:right;" | {{ref |GWTW|GW}}${{formatnum:{{#expr:(3440000000*1.007*1.005*1.015*1.017*1.016*1.015+2176120)*1.005*1.053*1.073*1.031 round -6}}}} | style="text-align:center;" | 1939 |
2
! scope="row" | Avatar | style="text-align:right;" | {{ref |Avatar|A1}}${{formatnum:{{#expr:((3020000000*1.007*1.005*1.015*1.017*1.017*1.015*1.005*1.053+1281204+57995770)*1.073+76012917)*1.031 round -6}}}} | style="text-align:center;" | 2009 |
3
! scope="row" | Titanic | style="text-align:right;" | {{ref |Titanic|T}}${{formatnum:{{#expr:(2516000000+57884114+285666656)*1.007*1.005*1.015*1.017*1.016*1.015*1.005*1.053*1.073*1.031+691642+78741+70157472 round -6}}}}| style="text-align:center;" | 1997 |
4
! scope="row" | Star Wars | style="text-align:right;" | ${{formatnum:{{#expr:2825000000*1.007*1.005*1.015*1.017*1.016*1.015*1.005*1.053*1.073*1.031 round -6}}}} | style="text-align:center;" | 1977 |
5
! scope="row" | Avengers: Endgame | style="text-align:right;" | {{ref |Avengers Endgame|AE}}${{formatnum:{{#expr:2797501328*1.005*1.053*1.073*1.031 round-6}}}} | style="text-align:center;" | 2019 |
6
! scope="row" | The Sound of Music | style="text-align:right;" | ${{formatnum:{{#expr:2366000000*1.007*1.005*1.015*1.017*1.016*1.015*1.005*1.053*1.073*1.031 round -6}}}} | style="text-align:center;" | 1965 |
7
! scope="row" | E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial | style="text-align:right;" | {{ref |ET|ET}}${{formatnum:{{#expr:(2310000000*1.007*1.005*1.015*1.017*1.016*1.015*1.005*1.053*1.073+516969+2834590)*1.031 round -6}}}} | style="text-align:center;" | 1982 |
8
! scope="row" | The Ten Commandments | style="text-align:right;" | ${{formatnum:{{#expr:2187000000*1.007*1.005*1.015*1.017*1.016*1.015*1.005*1.053*1.073*1.031 round -6}}}} | style="text-align:center;" | 1956 |
9
! scope="row" | Doctor Zhivago | style="text-align:right;" | ${{formatnum:{{#expr:2073000000*1.007*1.005*1.015*1.017*1.016*1.015*1.005*1.053*1.073*1.031 round -6}}}} | style="text-align:center;" | 1965 |
10
! scope="row" | Star Wars: The Force Awakens | style="text-align:right;" | {{ref |The Force Awakens|TFA}}${{formatnum:{{#expr:2068223624*1.015*1.017*1.016*1.015*1.005*1.053*1.073*1.031 round -6}}}} | style="text-align:center;" | 2015 |
{{Refbegin}}
{{note label|Inflation|Inf||Inflation adjustment is carried out using the Consumer price index for advanced economies published by the International Monetary Fund.{{cite web |title=World Economic Outlook: Inflation rate, end of period consumer prices |publisher=International Monetary Fund |url=https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/PCPIEPCH@WEO/ADVEC |access-date=June 16, 2024 |archive-date=May 10, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190510074943/https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/PCPIEPCH@WEO/ADVEC |url-status=live }} The index is uniformly applied to the grosses in the chart published by Guinness World Records in 2014, beginning with the 2014 index. The figures in the above chart take into account inflation that has occurred in every year since then, through 2023.}}
{{note label|GWTW|GW||The adjusted gross for Gone with the Wind includes the original release and reissue grosses up to 1998, adjusted from the Guinness base year, and the 2019 gross{{cite web |title=Gone with the Wind (2019 Re-release) |website=Box Office Mojo |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/releasegroup/gr2689159685/ |access-date=June 16, 2024 |quote=Gross: $2,176,120}} adjusted from the 2020 index. There have been several limited re-releases in the 2020s, but the grosses from these reissues are not represented in the adjusted gross.}}
{{note label|Avatar|A1||The adjusted gross for Avatar includes revenue from the original release and all four reissues. The original release and 2010 Special Edition grosses are adjusted from the Guinness base year, whilst the 2020 and 2021 grosses are adjusted from the 2021 index and the 2022 gross from 2022.{{cite web |title=Avatar (2009) |website=Box Office Mojo |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0499549/ |access-date=September 10, 2022 |quote=2020 Re-release: $1,281,204; 2021 Re-release: $57,995,770; 2022 Re-release: $76,012,917 |archive-date=May 3, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210503004225/https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0499549/ |url-status=live }}}}
{{note label|Titanic-b|T||Guinness{{'}} adjusted total for Titanic only increased by $102,000,000 between the 2012 (published in 2011) and 2015 editions, a rise of 4.2% shared by the other adjusted totals in the chart, and omitted the gross from a 3D re-release in 2012.{{cite book|editor-last=Glenday|editor-first=Craig|script-title=ru:Гиннесс. Мировые рекорды|trans-title=Guinness World Records |edition=2012 |year=2011 |publisher=Astrel |location=Moscow |isbn=978-5-271-36423-5 |page=211 |language=ru |translator-last=Andrianov |translator-first=P.I. |translator-last2=Palova |translator-first2=I.V.}} This chart incorporates the gross of $343,550,770 from the reissue and adjusts it from the 2013 index.{{cite web |title=Titanic 3D (2012) – International Box Office results |website=Box Office Mojo |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&id=titanic3d.htm |access-date=November 25, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191027003338/https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0120338/ |archive-date=October 27, 2019|quote=$343,550,770}} Titanic grossed a further ${{formatnum:{{#expr:691642+71352}}}} during limited re-releases in 2017 and 2020, and these have been incorporated into the gross from the 25th anniversary reissue and adjusted from the 2023 index.{{cite web |title=Titanic (1997) |website=Box Office Mojo |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0120338/ |access-date=November 25, 2012 |quote=2017 Re-release: $691,642; 2020 Re-release: $71,352; 25 Year Anniversary: $70,157,472}}}}
{{note label|ET|ET||The adjusted gross for E.T. includes revenue from the original release and all re-releases. The original release along with the 1985 and 2002 reissues are adjusted from the Guinness base year, whilst the 2020 and 2022 grosses{{cite web |title=E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (1982) |website=Box Office Mojo |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0083866/ |access-date=June 16, 2024 |quote=2020 Re-release: $516,969; 2022 Re-release: $2,834,590 }} are adjusted from the 2022 index.}}
{{note label|Avengers Endgame|AE||The gross for Avengers: Endgame is adjusted from the 2020 index.}}
{{note label|The Force Awakens|TFA||The gross for Star Wars: The Force Awakens is adjusted from the 2016 index.}}
{{Refend}}
== High-grossing films by year ==
{{Quote box
| title = {{anchor|distributor rental}}Glossary: Distributor rentals
| quote = Box-office figures are reported in either gross revenue or distributor rentals, the latter being especially true of older films. Commonly mistaken for home video revenue, distributor rentals are the distributor's share of the film's theatrical revenue (i.e. the box office gross less the exhibitor's cut).{{cite book |last=Cones |first=John W. |title=The feature film distribution deal: a critical analysis of the single most important film industry agreement |publisher=Southern Illinois University Press |year=1997 |isbn=978-0-8093-2082-0 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=EoeJ7VmwnDIC&pg=PA41 41] |quote=Distributor rentals: It is also important to know and recognize the difference between the distributor's gross receipts and the gross rentals. The term "rentals" refers to the aggregate amount of the film distributor's share of monies paid at theatre box offices computed on the basis of negotiated agreements between the distributor and the exhibitor. Note that gross receipts refers to amounts actually received and from all markets and media, whereas gross rentals refers to amounts earned from theatrical exhibition only, regardless of whether received by the distributor. Thus, gross receipts is the much broader term and includes distributor rentals. The issue of film rentals (i.e., what percentage of a film's box office gross comes back to the distributor) is of key importance...More current numbers suggest that distributor rentals for the major studio/distributor released films average in the neighborhood of 43% of box office gross. Again, however, such an average is based on widely divergent distributor rental ratios on individual films.}}{{cite book |last=Marich |first=Robert |title=Marketing to moviegoers: a handbook of strategies used by major studios and independents |publisher=Southern Illinois University Press |edition=2 |year=2009 |orig-year=1st. pub. Focal Press:2005 |isbn=978-0-8093-2884-0 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=_6USFaYxyeUC&pg=PA252 252] |quote=Rentals are the distributors' share of the box office gross and typically set by a complex, two-part contract.}} Historically, the rental price averaged at 30–40% when the distributors owned the theater chains, equating to just over a third of the gross being paid to the distributor of the film.{{cite book |last=Balio |first=Tino |title=The American film industry |publisher=University of Wisconsin Press |year=2005 |isbn=978-0-299-09874-2 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=OBpDf_uUp30C&pg=PA296 296] |quote=Film Rentals as Percent of Volume of Business (1939): 36.4}} In the modern marketplace, rental fees can vary greatly—depending on a number of factors—although the films from the major studios average out at 43%.
| align = right
| salign = right
| width = 20em;
| bgcolor = #F0EAD6;
}}
Audience tastes were fairly eclectic during the 20th century, but several trends did emerge. During the silent era, films with war themes were popular with audiences, with The Birth of a Nation (American Civil War), The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, The Big Parade and Wings (all World War I) becoming the most successful films in their respective years of release, with the trend coming to an end with All Quiet on the Western Front in 1930. With the advent of sound in 1927, the musical—the genre best placed to showcase the new technology—took over as the most popular type of film with audiences, with 1928 and 1929 both being topped by musical films. The genre continued to perform strongly in the 1930s, but the outbreak of World War II saw war-themed films dominate again during this period, starting with Gone with the Wind (American Civil War) in 1939, and finishing with The Best Years of Our Lives (World War II) in 1946. Samson and Delilah (1949) saw the beginning of a trend of increasingly expensive historical dramas set during Ancient Rome/biblical times throughout the 1950s as cinema competed with television for audiences,{{cite book |last=Balio |first=Tino |year=1987 |title=United Artists: the Company that Changed the Film Industry |publisher=University of Wisconsin Press |isbn=978-0-299-11440-4 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=9EeK5s3aw44C&pg=PA124 124–125] |quote=To rekindle interest in the movies, Hollywood not only had to compete with television but also with other leisure-time activities...Movies made a comeback by 1955, but audiences had changed. Moviegoing became a special event for most people, creating the phenomenon of the big picture. |url=https://archive.org/details/unitedartistscom00bali/page/124}} with Quo Vadis, The Robe, The Ten Commandments, Ben-Hur and Spartacus all becoming the highest-grossing film of the year during initial release, before the genre started to wane after several high-profile failures.{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA179 179]. "Later epics proved far more disastrous for the backers. Samuel Bronston's The Fall of the Roman Empire, filmed in Spain, cost $17,816,876 and grossed only $1.9 million in America. George Stevens's long-gestating life of Christ, The Greatest Story Ever Told (1965), which had been in planning since 1954 and in production since 1962, earned domestic rentals of $6,962,715 on a $21,481,745 negative cost, the largest amount yet spent on a production made entirely within the United States. The Bible: In the Beginning... (1966) was financed by the Italian producer Dino De Laurentiis from private investors and Swiss banks. He then sold distribution rights outside Italy jointly to Fox and Seven Arts for $15 million (70 percent of which came from Fox), thereby recouping the bulk of his $18 million investment. Although The Bible returned a respectable world rental of $25.3 million, Fox was still left with a net loss of just over $1.5 million. It was the last biblical epic to be released by any major Hollywood studio for nearly twenty years."}} The success of White Christmas and South Pacific in the 1950s foreshadowed the comeback of the musical in the 1960s with West Side Story, Mary Poppins, My Fair Lady, The Sound of Music and Funny Girl all among the top films of the decade. The 1970s saw a shift in audience tastes to high concept films, with six such films made by either George Lucas or Steven Spielberg topping the chart during the 1980s. The 21st century has seen an increasing dependence on franchises and adaptations, with the box-office dominance of films based on pre-existing intellectual property at record levels.{{cite web |first=Trey |last=Williams |title=Ridley Scott's latest 'Alien' announcement drives Hollywood's sequel problem |date=September 25, 2015 |website=MarketWatch |url=http://www.marketwatch.com/story/ridley-scotts-latest-alien-announcement-drives-hollywoods-sequel-problem-2015-09-25 |access-date=May 12, 2016 |archive-date=June 8, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160608132003/http://www.marketwatch.com/story/ridley-scotts-latest-alien-announcement-drives-hollywoods-sequel-problem-2015-09-25 |url-status=live }}
File:Steven Spielberg by Gage Skidmore.jpg
Steven Spielberg (1975, 1981, 1982, 1989 and 1993) and Cecil B. DeMille (1932, 1947, 1949, 1952 and 1956) tie as the most represented directors on the chart with five films apiece occupying the annual top spot. William Wyler (1942, 1946, 1959 and 1968) and James Cameron (1991, 1997, 2009 and 2022) are each represented by four films, whilst D. W. Griffith (1915, 1916 and 1920), George Roy Hill (1966, 1969 and 1973) and the Russo brothers (2016, 2018 and 2019) all feature heavily with three films apiece. George Lucas directed two chart-toppers in 1977 and 1999, but also served in a strong creative capacity as a producer and writer in 1980, 1981, 1983, and 1989 as well. The following directors have also all directed two films on the chart: Frank Lloyd, King Vidor, Frank Capra, Michael Curtiz, Leo McCarey, Alfred Hitchcock, David Lean, Stanley Kubrick, Guy Hamilton, Mike Nichols, William Friedkin, Peter Jackson, Gore Verbinski, and Michael Bay; Mervyn LeRoy, Ken Annakin and Robert Wise are each represented by one solo credit and one shared credit, and John Ford co-directed two films. Disney films are usually co-directed and some directors have served on several winning teams: Wilfred Jackson, Hamilton Luske, Clyde Geronimi, David Hand, Ben Sharpsteen, Wolfgang Reitherman and Bill Roberts have all co-directed at least two films on the list. Only seven directors have topped the chart in consecutive years: McCarey (1944 and 1945), Nichols (1966 and 1967), Spielberg (1981 and 1982), Jackson (2002 and 2003), Verbinski (2006 and 2007) and the Russo brothers (2018 and 2019).
Because of release schedules—especially in the case of films released towards the end of the year—and different release patterns across the world, many films can do business in two or more calendar years; therefore the grosses documented here are not confined to just the year of release. Grosses are not limited to original theatrical runs either, with many older films often being re-released periodically so the figures represent all the business a film has done since its original release; a film's first-run gross is included in brackets after the total if known. Because of incomplete data it cannot be known for sure how much money some films have made and when they made it, but generally the chart chronicles the films from each year that went on to earn the most. In the cases where estimates conflict both films are recorded, and in cases where a film has moved into first place because of being re-released the previous record-holder is also retained.
:{{box office table legend|#b6fcb6|icon=†}}
{{clear}}
class="wikitable plainrowheaders" style="margin:auto; margin:auto;"
|+High-grossing films by year of release{{cite web |title=Yearly Box Office |website=Box Office Mojo |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/yearly/?view2=worldwide&view=releasedate&p=.htm |access-date=January 6, 2012 |archive-date=July 29, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150729050238/http://www.boxofficemojo.com/yearly/?view2=worldwide&view=releasedate&p=.htm |url-status=live }}{{cite web |title=Movie Index By Year |website=The Numbers |publisher=Nash Information Services. LLC |url=https://www.the-numbers.com/movies |access-date=January 6, 2012 |archive-date=December 21, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111221072403/http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/ |url-status=live }}{{cite web |last=Dirks |first=Tim |website=Filmsite.org |publisher=American Movie Classics |title=All-Time Box-Office Hits By Decade and Year |url=http://www.filmsite.org/boxoffice2.html |access-date=January 5, 2012}}{{cbignore}} ! Year ! Title ! Worldwide gross ! Budget ! {{abbr|Ref|References}} |
scope="row" | 1915
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|50000000}}–{{nts|100000000}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|110000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite book |last=Monaco |first=James |title=How to Read a Film:Movies, Media, and Beyond |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2009 |isbn=978-0-19-975579-0 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=bgbOsjnppAcC&pg=PA262 262] |quote=The Birth of a Nation, costing an unprecedented and, many believed, thoroughly foolhardy $110,000, eventually returned $20 million and more. The actual figure is hard to calculate because the film was distributed on a "states' rights" basis in which licenses to show the film were sold outright. The actual cash generated by The Birth of a Nation may have been as much as $50 million to $100 million, an almost inconceivable amount for such an early film.}}{{cite book |last=Wasko |first=Janet |chapter=D.W. Griffiths and the banks: a case study in film financing |editor-last=Kerr |editor-first=Paul |title=The Hollywood Film Industry: A Reader |publisher=Routledge |year=1986 |isbn=978-0-7100-9730-9 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=jMINAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA34 34] |quote=Various accounts have cited $15 to $18 million profits during the first few years of release, while in a letter to a potential investor in the proposed sound version, Aitken noted that a $15 to $18 million box-office gross was a 'conservative estimate'. For years Variety has listed The Birth of a Nation{{'}}s total rental at $50 million. (This reflects the total amount paid to the distributor, not box-office gross.) This 'trade legend' has finally been acknowledged by Variety as a 'whopper myth', and the amount has been revised to $5 million. That figure seems far more feasible, as reports of earnings in the Griffith collection list gross receipts for 1915–1919 at slightly more than $5.2 million (including foreign distribution) and total earnings after deducting general office expenses, but not royalties, at about $2 million.}}{{cite book |editor-last=Lang |editor-first=Robert |title=The Birth of a nation: D.W. Griffith, director |publisher=Rutgers University Press |year=1994 |isbn=978-0-8135-2027-8 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=rKOgVk13vawC&pg=PA30 30] |quote=The film eventually cost $110,000 and was twelve reels long. |url=https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780813520278/page/30}} |
---|
scope="row" | 1916
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1750000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} {{ref |Intolerance|IN}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|385907}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite magazine |title=Griffith's 20 Year Record |magazine=Variety |date=September 5, 1928 |page=12 |access-date=March 21, 2023|url=https://archive.org/details/variety92-1928-09/page/n12/mode/1up}}{{cite book |first=Richard |last=Schickel |year=1996 |title=D. W. Griffith: An American Life |series=Limelight Series |publisher=Hal Leonard Corporation |isbn=978-0-87910-080-3 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=-YFNfV5fRDgC&pg=PA326 326] |quote=...there exists a very precise production accountant's statement, drawn up some time after the picture was finished, previews had been held and release prints struck. This document shows that the negative cost of the picture was precisely $385,906.77...}} |
scope="row" | 1917
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|500000}}{{ref |USgross|*}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|300000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA26 26]}}.
|
scope="row" | 1918
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|8000000}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|250000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite news |last=Coons |first=Robin |work=The Daytona Beach News-Journal |title=Hollywood Chatter |date=June 30, 1939 |page=[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=eHIoAAAAIBAJ&sjid=C8cEAAAAIBAJ&pg=4926%2C5479066 6]}} |
scope="row" | 1919
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|120000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite book |last=Shipman |first=David |title=The great movie stars: the golden years |publisher=Crown Publishing Group |year=1970 |page=[https://archive.org/details/greatmoviestarst00ship 98] |quote=It was a low budgeter—$120,000—but it grossed world-wide over $3 million and made stars of Chaney and his fellow-players, Betty Compson and Thomas Meighan.}} |
scope="row" | 1920
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|5000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} ({{nts|prefix=$|4000000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|800000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite news |title=Biggest Money Pictures |work=Variety |date=June 21, 1932 |page=1|url=https://archive.org/details/variety106-1932-06/page/n120/mode/1up|via=Archive.org}} Cited in {{cite web |title=Biggest Money Pictures |publisher=Cinemaweb |url=http://www.cinemaweb.com/silentfilm/bookshelf/7_v_32_4.htm |access-date=July 14, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110708155503/http://www.cinemaweb.com/silentfilm/bookshelf/7_v_32_4.htm |archive-date=July 8, 2011}} |
scope="row" | 1921
|The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|5000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} ({{nts|prefix=$|4000000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|600000}}–{{nts|800000}} |
scope="row" | 1922
|Douglas Fairbanks in Robin Hood | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2500000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|930042.78}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite book |last=Brownlow |first=Kevin |title=The parade's gone by .. |publisher=University of California Press |year=1968 |isbn=978-0-520-03068-8 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=wCD5EH64Qw8C&pg=PA255 255] |quote=The negative cost was about $986,000, which did not include Fairbanks' own salary. Once the exploitation and release prints were taken into account, Robin Hood cost about $1,400,000—exceeding both Intolerance ($700,000) and the celebrated "million dollar movie" Foolish Wives. But it earned $2,500,000.}}{{cite book |last=Vance |first=Jeffrey |title=Douglas Fairbanks |publisher=University of California Press |year=2008 |isbn=978-0-520-25667-5 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=e3DVBxGQ95YC&pg=PA146 146] |quote=The film had a production cost of $930,042.78—more than the cost of D.W. Griffith's Intolerance and nearly as much as Erich von Stroheim's Foolish Wives (1922).}} |
scope="row" | 1923
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|5000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|800000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite magazine |title=Business: Film Exports |magazine=Time |date=July 6, 1925 |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,728553,00.html |access-date=July 12, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101105030518/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,728553,00.html |archive-date=November 5, 2010 |url-status=dead |url-access=subscription}} |
scope="row" | 1924
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|700000}} |
scope="row" rowspan="2" | 1925
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|18000000}}–{{nts|22000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|382000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{Citation |last=May |first=Richard P. |title=Restoring The Big Parade |journal=The Moving Image |volume=5 |issue=2 |pages=140–146 |issn=1532-3978 |doi=10.1353/mov.2005.0033 |date=Fall 2005 |s2cid=192076406 |quote=...earning somewhere between $18 and $22 million, depending on the figures consulted}}{{cite book |last=Robertson |first=Patrick |title=Guinness Book of Movie Facts and Feats |publisher=Abbeville Publishing Group |year=1991 |edition=4 |isbn=978-1-55859-236-0 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=jdjsQY5qkbEC&q=%22samson+and+delilah%22+worldwide+million+rentals 30] |quote=The top grossing silent film was King Vidor's The Big Parade (US 25), with worldwide rentals of $22 million.}}{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA58 58–59]}}. "Even then, at a time when the budget for a feature averaged at around $300,000, no more than $382,000 was spent on production...According to the Eddie Mannix Ledger at MGM, it grossed $4,990,000 domestically and $1,141,000 abroad." |
Ben-Hur
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|10738000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} ({{nts|prefix=$|9386000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3967000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web |title=Ben-Hur (1925) – Notes |publisher=Turner Classic Movies |url=https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/35/ben-hur#notes |access-date=December 19, 2017 |archive-date=July 24, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190724083359/http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/35/Ben-Hur/notes.html |url-status=live }}{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA163 163]. "MGM's silent Ben-Hur, which opened at the end of 1925, had out-grossed all the other pictures released by the company in 1926 combined. With worldwide rentals of $9,386,000 on first release it was, with the sole possible exception of The Birth of a Nation, the highest-earning film of the entire silent era. (At a negative cost of $3,967,000, it was also the most expensive.)"}} |
scope="row" | 1926
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2600000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} {{ref |For Heaven's Sake|FH}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|150000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web |last=Miller |first=Frank |title=For Heaven's Sake (1926) – Articles |publisher=Turner Classic Movies |url=https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/410794/for-heavens-sake#articles-reviews |access-date=January 15, 2012 |archive-date=July 24, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190724090237/http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/410794/For-Heaven-s-Sake/articles.html |url-status=live }} |
scope="row" | 1927
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3600000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{harvnb|Finler|2003|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=rvVhEJmbfrsC&q=wings+%242+million&pg=PA188 188]}}. "At a cost of $2 million Wings was the studio's most expensive movie of the decade, and though it did well it was not good enough to earn a profit." |
scope="row" | 1928
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|5900000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|388000}} | style="text-align:center;" |The Jazz Singer and The Singing Fool
|
scope="row" rowspan="2" | 1929
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|4400000}}–{{nts|4800000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|379000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{citation |last=Birchard |first=Robert S. |title=The Broadway Melody |year=2010 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA121 121] |quote=It earned $4.4 million in worldwide rentals and was the first movie to spawn sequels (there were several until 1940).}} In: {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010}}.{{Cite book |last=Bradley |first=Edwin M. |title=The First Hollywood Musicals: A Critical Filmography of 171 Features, 1927 Through 1932 |publisher=McFarland & Company |year=2004 |orig-year=1st. pub. 1996 |isbn=978-0-7864-2029-2}}
|
Sunny Side Up
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3500000}}{{ref |USgross|*}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} {{ref |Sunny Side Up|SS}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|600000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA46 46]}}. "Production Cost: $0.6 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)." |
scope="row" | 1930
|All Quiet on the Western Front | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1250000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite book |last=Cormack |first=Mike |title=Ideology and Cinematography in Hollywood, 1930–1939 |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan |year=1993 |isbn=978-0-312-10067-4 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=w0JSFWpr2gAC&pg=PA28 28] |quote=Although costing $1250000—a huge sum for any studio in 1929—the film was a financial success. Karl Thiede gives the domestic box-office at $1500000, and the same figure for the foreign gross.}}Hell's Angels
|
scope="row" rowspan="2" | 1931
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|12000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} ({{nts|prefix=$|1400000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|250000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web |last=Feaster |first=Felicia |title=Frankenstein (1931) |publisher=Turner Classic Movies |url=https://www.tcm.com/this-month/article/18617 |access-date=July 4, 2011 |archive-date=December 21, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141221174009/http://www.tcm.com/this-month/article/373967%7C18617/Frankenstein.html |url-status=live }}{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&q=%22worldwide+rentals%22&pg=PA163 163]}}. "It drew $1.4 million in worldwide rentals in its first run versus $1.2 million for Dracula, which had opened in February 1931." |
City Lights
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|5000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1607351}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite book |last=Vance |first=Jeffrey |title=Chaplin: genius of the cinema |publisher=Abrams Books |year=2003 |page=[https://archive.org/details/chaplingeniusofc00vanc 208] |quote=Chaplin's negative cost for City Lights was $1,607,351. The film eventually earned him a worldwide profit of $5 million ($2 million domestically and $3 million in foreign distribution), an enormous sum of money for the time.}} |
scope="row" | 1932
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2738993}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|694065}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite journal |editor-last=Ramsaye |editor-first=Terry |title=The All-Time Best Sellers – Motion Pictures |journal=International Motion Picture Almanac 1937–38 |year=1937 |pages=[https://archive.org/stream/international193738quig#page/942/mode/2up 942–943] |quote=Kid from Spain: $2,621,000 (data supplied by Eddie Cantor)}}Shanghai Express
|
scope="row" rowspan="4" | 1933
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:1856000+306000+685000+2500000}}}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} ({{nts|prefix=$|1856000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|672,255.75}} | style="text-align:center;" |King Kong
|
I'm No Angel
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:2250000+1000000}}}}+{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|200000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web |title=I'm No Angel (1933) – Notes |publisher=Turner Classic Movies |url=https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/79021/im-no-angel#notes |access-date=January 7, 2012 |quote=According to a modern source, it had a gross earning of $2,250,000 on the North American continent, with over a million more earned internationally. |archive-date=December 17, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191217022041/https://web.archive.org/web/20190724090234/http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/79021/I-m-No-Angel/notes.html |url-status=live }}{{harvnb|Finler|2003|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=rvVhEJmbfrsC&q=angel%20rock-bottom%20cost&pg=PA188 188]}}. "The studio released its most profitable pictures of the decade in 1933, She Done Him Wrong and I'm No Angel, written by and starring Mae West. Produced at a rock-bottom cost of $200,000 each, they undoubtedly helped Paramount through the worst patch in its history..." |
Cavalcade
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3000000}}–{{nts|4000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1116000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite book |last=Solomon |first=Aubrey |title=The Fox Film Corporation, 1915–1935: A History and Filmography |year=2011 |publisher=McFarland & Company |isbn=978-0-7864-6286-5}}
|
She Done Him Wrong
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3000000}}+{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|274076}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{citation |last=Block |first=Alex Ben |title=She Done Him Wrong |year=2010 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA173 173] |quote=The worldwide rentals of over $3 million keep the lights on at Paramount, which did not shy away from selling the movie's sex appeal.}} In: {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010}}.{{cite book |last=Phillips |first=Kendall R. |title=Controversial Cinema: The Films That Outraged America |year=2008 |publisher=ABC-CLIO |isbn=978-1-56720-724-8 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=ViQzDunkm9QC&pg=PA26 26] |quote=The reaction to West's first major film, however, was not exclusively negative. Made for a mere $200,000, the film would rake in a healthy $2 million in the United States and an additional million in overseas markets.}}{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA135 135]}}. "Total production cost: $274,076 (Unadjusted $s)." |
scope="row" rowspan="2" | 1934
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:2608000}}}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1605000}} |
It Happened One Night
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2500000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} {{ref |One Night|ON}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|325000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite magazine |title=Wall St. Researchers' Cheery Tone|magazine=Variety |date=November 7, 1962 |page=7}}{{Cite book |last=Dick |first=Bernard F. |title=Claudette Colbert: She Walked in Beauty |publisher=University Press of Mississippi |year=2008 |isbn=978-1-60473-087-6 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=P3P9efYabOQC&pg=PA79 79] |quote=Although Columbia's president, Harry Cohn, had strong reservations about It Happened One Night, he also knew that it would not bankrupt the studio; the rights were only $5,000, and the budget was set at $325,000, including the performers' salaries.}} |
scope="row" | 1935
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|4460000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1905000}} |
scope="row" | 1936
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:5273000+124000+647000}}}}+{{ref |Rentals|R}} ({{nts|prefix=$|5273000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1300000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite book |last=Turk |first=Edward Baron |title=Hollywood Diva: A Biography of Jeanette MacDonald |publisher=University of California Press |year=2000 |orig-year=1st. pub. 1998 |isbn=978-0-520-22253-3}}
|
scope="row" | 1937
|Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:418000000}}}}+{{ref |Snow White|S7}} ({{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:4200000+4300000}}}}){{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1488423}} | style="text-align:center;" |Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs
::p. [https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&q=When%20the%20budget%20rose%20from%20%24250%2C000%20to%20%241%2C488%2C423&pg=PA207 207] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230404050856/https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&q=When%20the%20budget%20rose%20from%20$250,000%20to%20$1,488,423&pg=PA207 |date=April 4, 2023 }}. "When the budget rose from $250,000 to $1,488,423 he even mortgaged his own home and automobile. Disney had bet more than his company on the success of Snow White." ::p. [https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&q=%22%248%20million%20in%20worldwide%20rentals%22%20george%20lucas%20blockbusting&pg=PA237 237] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230404001733/https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&q=%22$8%20million%20in%20worldwide%20rentals%22%20george%20lucas%20blockbusting&pg=PA237 |date=April 4, 2023 }}. "By the end of 1938, it had grossed more than $8 million in worldwide rentals and was ranked at the time as the second-highest-grossing film after the 1925 epic Ben-Hur". ::p. [https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&q=%22foreign%20rentals%22&pg=PA255 255] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230403234803/https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&q=%22foreign%20rentals%22&pg=PA255 |date=April 3, 2023 }}. "On its initial release Pinocchio brought in only $1.6 million in domestic rentals (compared with Snow White{{'}}s $4.2 million) and $1.9 million in foreign rentals (compared with Snow White{{'}}s $4.3 million)." |
scope="row" | 1938
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|5000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1200000}} | style="text-align:center;" |1938
|
scope="row" | 1939
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|390525192}}–{{nts|402382193}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3900000}}–{{nts|4250000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web |title=Gone with the Wind |website=The Numbers |publisher=Nash Information Services. LLC |url=https://www.the-numbers.com/movies/1939/0GWTW.php |access-date=February 8, 2013 |archive-date=February 1, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130201012023/http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/1939/0GWTW.php |url-status=live }}{{cite web |url=http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/4094/gone-with-the-wind |title=Gone with the Wind |website=Boxoffice |access-date=May 29, 2016 |archive-date=December 25, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181225034141/https://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/4094/gone-with-the-wind |url-status=live }}{{cite web |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0031381/ |title=Gone with the Wind (1939) |website=Box Office Mojo |access-date=October 1, 2024}}{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA283 283]}} ."The final negative cost of Gone with the Wind (GWTW) has been variously reported between $3.9 million and $4.25 million." |
scope="row" rowspan="2" | 1940
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|87000862}}{{ref |USgross|*}} ({{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:1600000+1900000}}}}){{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2600000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web |title=Pinocchio (1940) |website=Boxoffice |url=http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/7922/pinocchio-1940 |access-date=May 29, 2016 |archive-date=May 30, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160530073253/http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/7922/pinocchio-1940 |url-status=live }}{{cite book |last=Barrier |first=Michael |year=2003 |title=Hollywood Cartoons: American Animation in Its Golden Age |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=New York |isbn=978-0-19-983922-3 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=xt5k08yuAXIC&q=pinocchio%20%22negative%20cost%20was%20%242.6%20million%22 266] |quote=The film's negative cost was $2.6 million, more than $1 million higher than Snow White{{'}}s.}} |
Boom Town
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|4600000}}{{ref |USgross|*}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2100000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite book |last=Schatz |first=Thomas |title=Boom and Bust: American Cinema in the 1940s |volume=6 of History of the American Cinema |year=1999 |publisher=University of California Press |orig-year=1st. pub. 1997 |isbn=978-0-520-22130-7 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=dwf5SUcfousC&pg=PA466 466] |quote=Boom Town ($4.6 million).}}{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA258 258]–[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&q=boom%20town%20biggest%20moneymaker&pg=PA259 259]}}. "Production Cost: $2.1 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s) ... Boom Town was the biggest moneymaker of 1940 and one of the top films of the decade." |
scope="row" | 1941
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|7800000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1600000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&q=sergeant%20york%20worldwide&pg=PA267 267]}}. "With worldwide rentals of $7.8 million in its initial release, the movie made a net profit of over $3 million."{{harvnb|Finler|2003|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=rvVhEJmbfrsC&pg=PA301 301]}}. "The studio did particularly well with its war-related pictures, such as Sergeant York (1941), which cost $1.6 million but was the studio's biggest hit of the decade aside from This is the Army (1943), the Irving Berlin musical for which the profits were donated to the Army Emergency Relief fund." |
scope="row" rowspan="2" | 1942
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|267997843}} ({{nts|prefix=$|3449353}}){{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1700000}}–{{nts|2000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web |title=Bambi |website=Boxoffice |url=http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/810/bambi |access-date=May 29, 2016 |archive-date=May 30, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160530073254/http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/810/bambi |url-status=live }}{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&q=%22worldwide+rentals%22&pg=PA281 281]}}. "Worldwide rentals of $3,449,353 barely recouped the film's nearly $2 million production cost."{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA712 712–713]}}.
|
Mrs. Miniver
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|8878000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1344000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite book |last=Glancy |first=Mark |title=When Hollywood Loved Britain: The Hollywood 'British' Film 1939–1945 |year=1999 |publisher=Manchester University Press |isbn=978-0-7190-4853-1 |pages=[https://books.google.com/books?id=T_Yryky_eA4C&pg=PA94 94]–[https://books.google.com/books?id=T_Yryky_eA4C&pg=PA95 95] |quote=Mrs Miniver was a phenomenon. It was the most popular film of the year (from any studio) in both North America and Britain, and its foreign earnings were three times higher than those of any other MGM film released in the 1941–42 season. The production cost ($1,344,000) was one of the highest of the season, indicating the studio never thought of the film as a potential loss-maker. When the film earned a worldwide gross of $8,878,000, MGM had the highest profit ($4,831,000) in its history. Random Harvest nearly matched the success of Mrs Miniver with worldwide earnings of $8,147,000 yielding the second-highest profit in MGM's history ($4,384,000). Random Harvest was also the most popular film of the year in Britain, where it proved to be even more popular than Britain's most acclaimed war film, In Which We Serve.}}{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010}}
|
scope="row" rowspan="2" | 1943
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|11000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2681298}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{citation |last=McAdams |first=Frank |title=For Whom the Bell Tolls |year=2010 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA287 287] |quote=Despite the early furor over the novel being "pro-red and immoral," the film opened to strong and favorable reviews and brought in $11 million in worldwide rentals in its initial release.}} In: {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010}}.{{cite web |title=For Whom the Bell Tolls (1943) – Notes |publisher=Turner Classic Movies |url=https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/75353/for-whom-the-bell-tolls#notes |access-date=June 24, 2012 |archive-date=July 24, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190724090231/http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/75353/For-Whom-the-Bell-Tolls/notes.html |url-status=live }}{{cite web |title=A Guy Named Joe (1944) – Notes |publisher=Turner Classic Movies |url=https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/191/a-guy-named-joe#notes |access-date=August 29, 2012 |quote=According to M-G-M studio records at the AMPAS Library, the film had a negative cost of $2,627,000 and took in $5,363,000 at the box office. When the picture was re-issued for the 1955–56 season, it took in an additional $150,000. |archive-date=December 17, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191217022123/https://web.archive.org/web/20190724090236/http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/191/A-Guy-Named-Joe/notes.html |url-status=live }} |
This Is the Army
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|9555586.44}}{{ref |USgross|*}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1400000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite journal |last=Bergreen |first=Laurence |title=Irving Berlin: This Is the Army |date=Summer 1996 |volume=28 |issue=2 |journal=Prologue |url=https://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/1996/summer/irving-berlin-1.html |access-date=August 22, 2012 |at=[https://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/1996/summer/irving-berlin-3.html Part 3] |archive-date=August 11, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190811114838/https://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/1996/summer/irving-berlin-1.html |url-status=live }}{{cite web |title=This Is the Army (1943) – Notes |publisher=Turner Classic Movies |url=https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/92968/this-is-the-army#notes |access-date=July 9, 2011 |archive-date=July 15, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150715004430/http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/92968/This-Is-the-Army/notes.html |url-status=live }} |
scope="row" | 1944
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|6500000}}{{ref |USgross|*}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&q=%22going%20my%20way%22&pg=PA420 420]}}. "(Unadjusted $s) in Millions of $s – Production Cost: $1.0" |
scope="row" rowspan="2" | 1945
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|80000000}}{{ref |Mom and Dad|MD}}/{{nts|prefix=$|22000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|65000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite book |last=Schaefer |first=Eric |title="Bold! Daring! Shocking! True!": A History of Exploitation Films, 1919–1959 |year=1999 |publisher=Duke University Press |isbn=978-0-8223-2374-7 |pages=[https://books.google.com/books?id=CSBZqe0zPaMC&pg=PA197 197]–199 |quote=Leading the pack of postwar sex hygiene films was Mom and Dad (1944), which would become not only the most successful sex hygiene film in history but the biggest pre-1960 exploitation film of any kind. At the end of 1947, the Los Angeles Times reported that Mom and Dad had grossed $2 million. By 1949 Time had estimated that Mom and Dad had taken in $8 million from twenty million moviegoers. And publicity issuing from Mom and Dad{{'}}s production company indicated that by the end of 1956 it had grossed over $80 million worldwide. Net rentals of around $22 million by 1956 would easily place it in the top ten films of the late 1940s and early 1950s had it appeared on conventional lists. Some estimates have placed its total gross over the years at up to $100 million, and it was still playing drive-in dates into 1975...The film was made for around $65,000 with a crew of Hollywood veterans including director William "One Shot" Beaudine, cinematographer Marcel LePicard, and a cast that sported old stalwarts Hardie Albright, Francis Ford, and John Hamilton.}} |
The Bells of St. Mary's
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|11200000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1600000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010}}
|
scope="row" rowspan="3" | 1946
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|65000000}}{{ref |USgross|*}} ({{nts|prefix=$|3300000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2125000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web |title=Song of the South |website=The Numbers |publisher=Nash Information Services. LLC |url=https://www.the-numbers.com/movies/1946/0SOTS.php |access-date=July 10, 2011 |archive-date=September 3, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110903154448/http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/1946/0SOTS.php |url-status=live }}{{cite book |last=Gabler |first=Neal |title=Walt Disney: the biography |year=2007 |publisher=Aurum Press |pages=[https://books.google.com/books?id=EX0WAQAAIAAJ&q=%22song+of+the+south%22+%22million%22 438] |quote=Still, the film wound up grossing $3.3 million...}}{{cite web |title=Song of the South (1946) – Notes |publisher=Turner Classic Movies |url=https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/90871/song-of-the-south#notes |access-date=July 25, 2012 |archive-date=July 24, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190724090242/http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/90871/Song-of-the-South/notes.html |url-status=live }} |
The Best Years of Our Lives
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|14750000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2100000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010}}
|
Duel in the Sun
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|10000000}}{{ref |USgross|*}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|5255000}} |
scope="row" rowspan="2" | 1947
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|8000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|6375000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite book|title=Twentieth Century-Fox: a corporate and financial history|last=Solomon|first=Aubrey|publisher=Rowman & Littlefield|year=2002|isbn=978-0-8108-4244-1|series=Filmmakers series|volume=20|orig-year=First published 1988}}
::p. [https://books.google.com/books?id=WIZwZOz8LHsC&pg=PA167 167] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231107234333/https://books.google.com/books?id=WIZwZOz8LHsC&pg=PA167#v=onepage&q&f=false |date=November 7, 2023 }}. "The Planet of the Apes motion pictures were all moneymakers and Zanuck's record would have immediately improved had he stayed through the release of The French Connection, which took in rentals of approximately $75 million worldwide." ::p. [https://books.google.com/books?id=w70iAAAAMAAJ&q=%22french+connection%22 256] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231107234334/https://books.google.com/books?id=w70iAAAAMAAJ&q=%22french+connection%22 |date=November 7, 2023 }}. "$3,300,00".{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA285 285] (note 6.56)}}. "The cost of Duel in the Sun has been reported as both $5,255,000 (Haver, David O'Selznick's Hollywood, 361) and $6,480,000 (Thomson, Showman: The Life of David O'Selznick, 472); the latter figure may include distribution expenses. Forever Amber cost $6,375,000 (Solomon, Twentieth Century-Fox: A Corporate and Financial History, 243)." |
Unconquered
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|7500000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} {{ref |Unconquered|UN}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|4200000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite book |last=Chopra-Gant |first=Mike |title=Hollywood Genres and Post-war America: Masculinity, Family and Nation in Popular Movies and Film Noir |year=2006 |publisher=I.B. Tauris |isbn=978-1-85043-815-1 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=RVdCSSVd_KQC&pg=PA18 18] |quote=Forever Amber: $8 million; Unconquered: $7.5 million; Life with Father: $6.25 million}}{{cite web |title=Unconquered (1947) – Notes |publisher=Turner Classic Movies |url=https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/4415/unconquered#notes |access-date=January 10, 2012 |archive-date=July 15, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150715003119/http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/4415/Unconquered/notes.html |url-status=live }} |
scope="row" rowspan="3" | 1948
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:4144000+1774134}}}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2500000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA232 232]}}.
|
The Red Shoes
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|5000000}}{{ref |USgross|*}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{ntsh|2000000}}{{nts|prefix=£|505581}} ({{nts|prefix=~$|2000000}}) | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite book |last=Street |first=Sarah |title=Transatlantic Crossings: British Feature Films in the United States |publisher=Continuum International Publishing Group |year=2002 |isbn=978-0-8264-1395-6 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=Y5cn_OiCJRkC&pg=PA110 110] |quote=Although both films had higher than average budgets (The Red Shoes cost £505,581 and Hamlet cost £572,530, while the average cost of the other thirty films for which Rank supplied information was £233,000), they resulted in high takings at home and abroad.}}{{cite web |first=Lawrence H. |last=Officer |title=Dollar-Pound Exchange Rate From 1791 |publisher=MeasuringWorth |year=2011 |url=http://www.measuringworth.com/datasets/exchangepound/result.php?year_source=1791&year_result=2011 |access-date=November 18, 2012 |quote=1947–1948: $4.03 (per British pound) |archive-date=November 18, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121118093356/http://www.measuringworth.com/datasets/exchangepound/result.php?year_source=1791&year_result=2011 |url-status=live }} |
The Snake Pit
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|4100000}}{{ref |USgross|*}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3800000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web |title=The Snake Pit |website=The Numbers |publisher=Nash Information Services. LLC |url=https://www.the-numbers.com/movies/1948/0SNPI.php |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111228005949/http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/1948/0SNPI.php |archive-date=December 28, 2011}}{{cite news |title='Snake Pit' Seen No Problem After All |date=January 19, 1949 |work=Variety |page=[https://archive.org/stream/variety173-1949-01#page/n348/mode/1up 7]}} |
scope="row" | 1949
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:7976730+6232520}}}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3097563}} |
scope="row" rowspan="2" | 1950
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|263591415}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2200000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web |title=Cinderella (1950) |website=The Numbers |publisher=Nash Information Services |url=https://www.the-numbers.com/movie/Cinderella-(1950) |access-date=January 2, 2017 |archive-date=June 5, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190605170703/https://www.the-numbers.com/movie/Cinderella-(1950) |url-status=live }}{{cite book |first1=Michael D. |last1=Eisner |first2=Tony |last2=Schwartz |title=Work in Progress |publisher=Pennsylvania State University |year=2009 |isbn=978-0-7868-8507-7 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=73_WAAAAMAAJ&q=cinderella+%22Released+in+February+1950,+it+cost+nearly+%243+million+to+make+but+earned+more+than+%2420+million+worldwide%22 178] |quote=Cinderella revived its fortunes. Re-released in February 1950, it cost nearly $3 million to make but earned more than $20 million worldwide. |url=https://archive.org/details/workinprogress00eisn_0/page/178}}{{cite book |last=Barrier |first=Michael |title=Hollywood Cartoons: American Animation in Its Golden Age |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2003 |isbn=978-0-19-516729-0 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=zDJXnzMh7bkC&q=%242.2+million+cinderella+gross+rentals+disney+and+rko+%247.8+million&pg=PA401 401] |quote=It cost around $2.2 million, little more than each of the two package features, Melody Time and The Adventures of Ichabod and Mr. Toad (as Tluo Fabulous Characters had ultimately been named), that just preceded it, but its gross rentals—an amount shared by Disney and RKO—were $7.8 million, almost twice as much as the two package features combined.}} |
King Solomon's Mines
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|10050000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2258000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite book |title=The E. J. Mannix ledger |year=1962 |publisher=Howard Strickling Collection |location=Margaret Herrick Library, Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences}} |
scope="row" | 1951
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|21037000}}–{{nts|26700000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|7623000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA136 136]–139}}
|
scope="row" rowspan="2" | 1952
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|50000000}}{{ref |Cinerama|CI}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite news |last=Mulligan |first=Hugh A. |newspaper=The Register-Guard |location=Eugene, Oregon |title=Cinerama Pushing Ahead As Biggest Money-Maker |date=September 23, 1956 |page=[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=GPRVAAAAIBAJ&sjid=YeIDAAAAIBAJ&pg=6899,3861317 7B]}}{{cite book |last=Zone |first=Ray |title=3-D Revolution: The History of Modern Stereoscopic Cinema |publisher=University Press of Kentucky |year=2012 |isbn=978-0-8131-3611-0 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=k2Ajw-EEOEkC&pg=PA71 71] |quote=Produced at a cost of $1 million, This is Cinerama ran 122 weeks, earning $4.7 million in its initial New York run alone and eventually grossed over $32 million. It was obvious to Hollywood that the public was ready for a new form of motion picture entertainment. The first five Cinerama feature-length travelogues, though they only played in twenty-two theaters, pulled in a combined gross of $82 million.}} |
The Greatest Show on Earth
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|18350000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} {{ref |Greatest Show|GS}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3873946}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{citation |last=Burns |first=Douglas |year=2010 |title=The Greatest Show on Earth |pages=354–[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA355 355] |quote=By May 1953, Variety was reporting that the Best Picture winner had amassed $18.35 million in worldwide rentals.}} In: {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010}}.{{cite web |title=The Greatest Show on Earth (1952) – Notes |publisher=Turner Classic Movies |url=https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/4608/the-greatest-show-on-earth#notes |access-date=January 8, 2012 |archive-date=July 14, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150714222444/http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/4608/The-Greatest-Show-on-Earth/notes.html |url-status=live }}{{Cite book |last=Birchard |first=Robert S. |title=Cecil B. DeMille's Hollywood |year=2009 |publisher=University Press of Kentucky |isbn=978-0-8131-3829-9}}
|
scope="row" rowspan="2" | 1953
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|145000000}} ({{nts|prefix=$|7000000}}){{ref |USgross|*}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3000000}}–{{nts|4000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web |title=Peter Pan (1953) – Notes |publisher=Turner Classic Movies |url=https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/86554/peter-pan#notes |access-date=July 24, 2011 |archive-date=September 3, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150903110329/http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/86554/Peter-Pan/notes.html |url-status=live }}{{cite magazine |url=https://archive.org/stream/variety193-1954-01#page/n301/mode/2up |title=Top Grossers of 1953 |page=10 |magazine=Variety |date=January 13, 1954 |access-date=September 12, 2019}} |
The Robe
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|25000000}}–{{nts|{{#expr:16700000+9400000}}}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|4100000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA147 147]–[https://books.google.com/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA148 148]}}. "To take full advantage of CinemaScope's panoramic possibilities, shooting was delayed for the sets to be redesigned and rebuilt, adding $500,000 to the eventual $4.1 million budget...It ultimately returned domestic rentals of $17.5 million and $25 million worldwide, placing it second only to Gone with the Wind in Variety{{'}}s annually updated chart."{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&q=%22foreign%20rentals%22&pg=PA367 367]}}. "It brought in $16.7 million in domestic rentals, $9.4 million in foreign rentals, and made a net profit of $8.1 million." |
scope="row" rowspan="3" | 1954
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|24500000}}{{ref |USgross|*}} ({{nts|prefix=$|5300000}}){{ref |USgross|*}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web |url=http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/8393/rear-window |title=Rear Window |website=Boxoffice |access-date=May 29, 2016 |archive-date=May 30, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160530073625/http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/8393/rear-window |url-status=live }}{{cite book |last=Lev |first=Peter |title=Transforming the Screen, 1950–1959 |publisher=University of California Press |year=2006 |volume=7 of History of the American Cinema |isbn=978-0-520-24966-0}}
|
White Christmas
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|26000050}}{{ref |USgross|*}} ({{nts|prefix=$|12000000}}){{ref |USgross|*}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3800000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web |title=White Christmas |website=Boxoffice |url=http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/11167/white-christmas |access-date=May 29, 2016 |archive-date=May 30, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160530073627/http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/11167/white-christmas |url-status=live }}{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA420 420]}}. "Domestic Box Office: $19.6 million; Production Cost: $3.8 million."{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA149 149]}}. "VistaVision was first used for the musical White Christmas (1954), which Variety named the top grosser of its year with anticipated domestic rentals of $12 million." |
20,000 Leagues Under the Sea
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|25000134}}{{ref |USgross|*}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|4500000}}–{{nts|9000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web |title=20000 Leagues Under The Sea |website=Boxoffice |url=http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/14246/20000-leagues-under-the-sea |access-date=May 29, 2016 |archive-date=December 25, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181225034753/https://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/14246/20000-leagues-under-the-sea |url-status=live }}{{cite web |last=Miller |first=John M |title=20,000 Leagues Under the Sea (1954) – Articles |publisher=Turner Classic Movies |url=https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/20642/20-000-leagues-under-the-sea#articles-reviews |access-date=January 9, 2012 |archive-date=December 21, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141221175536/http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/20642/20-000-Leagues-Under-the-Sea/articles.html |url-status=live }}{{harvnb|Finler|2003|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=rvVhEJmbfrsC&pg=PA320 320]}}. "It was up and running in time to handle Disney's most elaborate expensive feature, 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, based on the book by Jules Verne, starring James Mason and Kirk Douglas and directed by Richard Fleischer at a cost of $4.5 million." |
scope="row" rowspan="3" | 1955
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|187000000}} ({{nts|prefix=$|6500000}}){{ref |USgross|*}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|4000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite magazine |first=Anthony |last=D'Alessandro |title=Disney Animated Features at the Worldwide Box Office |date=October 27, 2003 |magazine=Variety |url=https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Tooned+in%3A+Disney%27s+ani+classics+set+the+bar+and+lit+the+way+for...-a0110473946 |access-date=July 4, 2022 |via=The Free Library |quote=The Jungle Book $378 million; One Hundred and One Dalmatians $303 million; Lady and the Tramp $187 million |archive-date=November 4, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201104215642/https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Tooned+in%3a+Disney%27s+ani+classics+set+the+bar+and+lit+the+way+for...-a0110473946 |url-status=live }}{{cite web |title=Lady and the Tramp (1955) – Notes |publisher=Turner Classic Movies |url=https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/80607/lady-and-the-tramp#notes |access-date=July 27, 2011 |archive-date=September 28, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150928004123/http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/80607/Lady-and-the-Tramp/notes.html |url-status=live }} |
Cinerama Holiday
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|21000000}}{{ref |Cinerama|CI}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite news |last=Minego |first=Pete |work=Portsmouth Daily Times |location=Portsmouth, Ohio |title=Pete's Pungent Patter |date=May 21, 1956 |page=[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=I7dQAAAAIBAJ&sjid=6M8MAAAAIBAJ&pg=4059,7032150&dq=cinerama-holiday+million 19]}}{{cite web |title=Cinerama Holiday (1955) – Notes |publisher=Turner Classic Movies |url=https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/493857/cinerama-holiday#notes |access-date=July 7, 2012 |archive-date=July 24, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190724090239/http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/493857/Cinerama-Holiday/notes.html |url-status=live }} |
Mister Roberts
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|9900000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2400000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010}}
|
scope="row" | 1956
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|90066230}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|13270000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA327 327]}}. "Production cost: $13.3 million; Domestic Film Rental: $31.3; Foreign Film Rental: $23.9; Worldwide Box office (estimated): $122.7 (Initial Release – Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA159 159]–161}}
|
scope="row" | 1957
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|30600000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2840000}} |
scope="row" | 1958
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|30000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|5610000}} |
scope="row" | 1959
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|90000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|15900000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{Cite book |last=Ross |first=Steven J. |year=2011 |title=Hollywood Left and Right: How Movie Stars Shaped American Politics |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-991143-1 |pages=[https://books.google.com/books?id=pn1CuZUHk9MC&pg=PA278 278–279] |quote=Costing $15 million to produce, the film earned $47 million by the end of 1961 and $90 million worldwide by January 1989.}}{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA324 324]}}. "Worldwide box office: $146.9 million; Worldwide rentals: $66.1 million; Production cost: $15.9 million. (Initial Release – Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)" |
scope="row" rowspan="3" | 1960
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|30000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|4000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite book |last=Reid |first=John Howard |title=America's Best, Britain's Finest: A Survey of Mixed Movies |volume=14 of Hollywood classics |publisher=Lulu |year=2006 |isbn=978-1-4116-7877-4 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=zCm5aNkafSYC&pg=PA243 243]–245 |quote=Negative cost: around $4 million; Worldwide film rentals gross (including 1968 American reissue) to 1970: $30 million.}} |
Spartacus
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|60000000}} ({{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:12462044+9643181}}}}){{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|10284014}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{Cite book |last=Webster |first=Patrick |year=2010 |title=Love and Death in Kubrick: A Critical Study of the Films from Lolita Through Eyes Wide Shut |publisher=McFarland & Company |isbn=978-0-7864-5916-2 |pages=[https://books.google.com/books?id=Bz_x37RSSqIC&pg=PA298 298] (note 2.23) |quote=Spartacus cost $12 million and grossed some $60 million at the box office, figures Kubrick rarely again matched.}}{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA179 179]}}.
|
Psycho
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|50000000}}+ ({{nts|prefix=$|14000000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|800000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web |last=Nixon |first=Rob |title=Psycho (1960) – Articles |publisher=Turner Classic Movies |url=https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/24944/psycho#articles-reviews |access-date=January 9, 2012 |archive-date=September 12, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150912071710/http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/24944/Psycho/articles.html |url-status=live }} |
scope="row" rowspan="2" | 1961
|One Hundred and One Dalmatians | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|303000000}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3600000}}–{{nts|4000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web |title=One Hundred and One Dalmatians |website=Daily Variety |date=January 18, 1961 |url=https://www.variety.com/review/VE1117793715 |author=Tube. |access-date=August 23, 2011 |archive-date=November 9, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121109003703/http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117793715/ |url-status=live }} |
West Side Story
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|105000000}} ({{nts|prefix=$|31800000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|7000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{citation |last=Block |first=Hayley Taylor |title=West Side Story |year=2010 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA449 449] |quote=With its three rereleases, it took in over $105 million in worldwide box office ($720 million in 2005 dollars).}} In: {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010}}. |
scope="row" rowspan="3" | 1962
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:44824852+32500000}}}} ({{nts|prefix=$|69995385}}) | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|13800000}} | style="text-align:center;" |Lawrence of Arabia
|
How the West Was Won
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|35000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|14483000}} |
The Longest Day
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|33200000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|8600000}} |
scope="row" rowspan="2" | 1963
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|40300000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|31115000}} |
From Russia with Love
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|78900000}}/{{nts|prefix=$|29400000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite book |last=Chapman |first=James |title=Licence to thrill: a cultural history of the James Bond films |publisher=I.B. Tauris |year=2007 |isbn=978-1-84511-515-9 }}
|
scope="row" rowspan="3" | 1964
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|55000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|17000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA184 184]}}
|
Goldfinger
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|124900000}} ({{nts|prefix=$|46000000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3000000}} |
Mary Poppins
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|44000000}}–{{nts|prefix=$|50000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|5200000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{citation |last=Burns |first=Douglas |title=Mary Poppins |year=2010 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA469 469] |quote=In its initial run, Poppins garnered an astounding $44 million in worldwide rentals and became the company's first Best Picture Oscar contender.}} In: {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010}}. |
scope="row" | 1965
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|286214076}} ({{nts|prefix=$|114600000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|8000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web |url=http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/9495/the-sound-of-music |title=The Sound of Music |website=Boxoffice |access-date=May 29, 2016 |archive-date=December 25, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181225034614/https://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/9495/the-sound-of-music |url-status=live }}{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA434 434]}}.
|
scope="row" rowspan="3" | 1966
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|25325000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|18000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite book |last=Silverman |first=Stephen M |title=The Fox that got Away: The Last Days of the Zanuck Dynasty at Twentieth Century-Fox |year=1988 |location=Secaucus, N.J. |publisher=L. Stuart |page=[https://archive.org/details/foxthatgotawayt00silv/page/325 325] |isbn=978-0-8184-0485-6}} |
Hawaii
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|34562222}}{{ref |USgross|*}} ({{nts|prefix=$|15600000}}){{ref |USgross|*}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|15000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web |title=Hawaii |website=The Numbers |publisher=Nash Information Services. LLC |url=https://www.the-numbers.com/movies/1966/0HWII.php |access-date=August 18, 2011 |archive-date=March 16, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120316041415/http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/1966/0HWII.php |url-status=live }}{{harvnb|Finler|2003|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=rvVhEJmbfrsC&pg=PA356 356]–363}} |
Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|33736689}}{{ref |USgross|*}} ({{nts|prefix=$|14500000}}){{ref |USgross|*}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|7613000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web |title=Who's Afraid of Virginia Wolf? (1966) |website=The Numbers |publisher=Nash Information Services. LLC |url=https://www.the-numbers.com/movie/Whos-Afraid-of-Virginia-Wolf#tab=summary |access-date=February 3, 2020 |archive-date=November 12, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191112022640/https://www.the-numbers.com/movie/Whos-Afraid-of-Virginia-Wolf#tab=summary |url-status=live }}{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA188 188]}}. "The negative cost of Warners' adaptation of Edward Albee's play Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? (1966)—filmed in widescreen and black-and-white, largely set in domestic interiors and with a cast of only four principal actors—amounted to $7,613,000, in part because stars Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton received up-front fees of $1 million and $750,000 respectively, against 10 percent of the gross apiece. (Their participation was presumably added to the budget)." |
scope="row" rowspan="2" | 1967
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|378000000}} ({{nts|prefix=$|23800000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3900000}}–{{nts|4000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite news |title=Animals Portray Parts in Disney's "Robin Hood" |date=October 18, 1970 |newspaper=Toledo Blade |at=[https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1350&dat=19701018&id=k8hOAAAAIBAJ&sjid=xQEEAAAAIBAJ&pg=2133,463153 Sec. G, p. 7] |quote="The Jungle Book," in {{sic|it|'s|nolink=y|expected=its}} initial world-wide release, has grossed $23.8 million to date...}}{{cite magazine |title=The Jungle Book |magazine=Variety |date=October 4, 1967 |last=Murphy |first=A.D. |page=6 |url=https://variety.com/1966/film/reviews/the-jungle-book-1200421257/ |access-date=March 14, 2018 |quote=It was filmed at a declared cost of $4 million over a 42-month period. |archive-date=March 15, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180315200013/http://variety.com/1966/film/reviews/the-jungle-book-1200421257/ |url-status=live }} |
The Graduate
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|85000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3100000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite book |first1=R. Serge |last1=Denisoff |first2=William D. |last2=Romanowski |title=Risky Business: Rock in Film |year=1991 |publisher=Transaction Publishers |isbn=978-0-88738-843-9}}
|
scope="row" rowspan="2" | 1968
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:138000000+214618+568997+135370+1283820+192457+27510+159068+5046+155841+296525 round -6}}}}–{{nts|{{#expr:190000000+214618+568997+135370+1283820+192457+27510+159068+5046+155841+296525 round -7}}}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|10300000}} | style="text-align:center;" |2001: A Space Odyssey
|
Funny Girl
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|80000000}}–{{nts|100000000}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|8800000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite news |last=Haber |first=Joyces |work=Los Angeles Times |title='Funny Girl' a Box Office Winner |date=March 27, 1969 |url=https://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/672252782.html?dids=672252782:672252782&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:AI |access-date=March 29, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120724135213/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/672252782.html?dids=672252782:672252782&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:AI |archive-date=July 24, 2012 |quote=..."Funny Girl" will gross an estimated $80 to $100 million worldwide.}}{{cite news |last=Welles |first=Chris |title=Behind the Silence at Columbia Pictures—No Moguls, No Minions, Just Profits |work=New York |date=September 7, 1970 |volume=3 |issue=36 |pages=42–[https://books.google.com/books?id=8-ICAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA47 47] |quote=While Columbia, battling Ray Stark over every dollar, did Funny Girl for around $8.8 million, a million or so over budget, Fox spent nearly $24 million on Hello, Dolly!, more than twice the initial budget, and the film will thus have to gross three times as much to break even.}} |
scope="row" | 1969
|Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|152308525}} ({{nts|prefix=$|37100000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|6600000}} | style="text-align:center;" |Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid
|
scope="row" | 1970
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|173400000}} ({{nts|prefix=$|80000000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2260000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite magazine|magazine=Variety|title=Top 50 worldwide grossers|date=July 15, 2002|last=D'Alessandro|first=Anthony|page=52, Paramount at 90 supplement}}{{cite news |title='Love Story' II: Ryan Redux? |magazine=New York |year=1976 |volume=9 |page=389 |quote=Bring those handkerchiefs out of retirement. ... After all, the first movie made around $80 million worldwide.}}{{citation |last=Block |first=Hayley Taylor |title=Love Story |year=2010 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA545 545] |quote=The final cost came in at $2,260,000.}} In: {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010}}. |
scope="row" rowspan="3" | 1971
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|75000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3300000}} |
Fiddler on the Roof
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|49400000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|9000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA549 549]}}. "Fiddler had the highest domestic box office of 1971 (it was second in worldwide box office after Diamonds Are Forever), with more than $100 million in unadjusted worldwide box office on its initial release. The soundtrack album was also a huge seller. The 1979 rerelease was not as successful, with the $3.8 million print and ad costs almost as high as the $4.3 million in worldwide rentals." |
Diamonds Are Forever
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|116000000}} ({{nts|prefix=$|45700000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|7200000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA428 428–429]}}
|
scope="row" | 1972
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:243862778+1267490+121323+818333+29349+21701}}}}–{{nts|{{#expr:285000000+1267490+121323+818333+29349+21701 round -6}}}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|6000000}}–{{nts|7200000}} | style="text-align:center;" |The Godfather
|
scope="row" rowspan="2" | 1973
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|430872776}} ({{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:66300000+46000000}}}}){{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|10000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web|url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0070047/|title=The Exorcist (1973)|website=Box Office Mojo|access-date=September 5, 2024|archive-date=November 1, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231101025010/https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0070047/|url-status=live}}{{cite book |first1=Robert Henry |last1=Stanley |first2=Charles Side |last2=Steinberg |title=The media environment: mass communications in American society |publisher=Hastings House |year=1976 |isbn=978-0-8038-4681-4 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=Z30tAAAAMAAJ&q=%22the+sting%22+million+worldwide+exorcist 76] |quote=...further reflected by the phenomenal successes of The Sting, Chinatown and The Exorcist. The latter film, which cost about $10 million to produce, has grossed over $110 million worldwide.}}{{cite magazine|magazine=Variety|date=January 8, 1975|page=24|title=Big Rental Films of 1974 |quote=U.S-Canada market only $66,300,000|url=https://archive.org/details/sim_variety_1975-01-08_277_9/page/24/mode/1up|access-date=July 4, 2022|via=Archive.org}}{{cite magazine|magazine=Daily Variety|title=WB Adds To Its Record Collection|page=1|last=Pollock|first=Dale|date=May 9, 1979|quote="Towering Inferno" did $56,000,000 overseas in billings while "The Exorcist" totted up $46,000,000}} |
The Sting
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|115000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|5500000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{Citation |title=New York |year=1975 |volume=8 |quote=...Jaws should outstrip another MCA hit, The Sting, which had world-wide revenues of $115 million. |title-link=New York (magazine)}} ([https://books.google.com/books?id=jW8pAQAAIAAJ&q=%22world-wide%20revenues%22 Online copy] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230404001745/https://books.google.com/books?id=jW8pAQAAIAAJ&q=%22world-wide%20revenues%22 |date=April 4, 2023 }} at Google Books){{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA560 560]}}. "Production Cost: $5.5 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)." |
scope="row" | 1974
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|203336412}} ({{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:48838000+56000000}}}}){{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|14300000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite magazine|magazine=Variety|title=It Towers $203,336,412 (advertisement)|date=June 2, 1976|pages=8–9|url=https://varietyultimate.com/archive/issue/WV-06-02-1976-8|url-access=subscription|access-date=October 31, 2020|archive-date=January 8, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230108042413/https://varietyultimate.com/archive/issue/WV-06-02-1976-8|url-status=dead}}{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=Ro0hASPfC68C&pg=PA354 206]–208}}. "The most successful entry in the disaster cycle was the $15 million The Towering Inferno which earned over $48,650,000 in domestic rentals and about $40 million foreign."{{cite news |first=Leonard |last=Klady |title=All-Time Top Film Rentals |date=1998 |work=Variety |url=https://www.variety.com:80/numbers/video.asp |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/19991007042514/http://www.variety.com/numbers/video.asp |archive-date=October 7, 1999 |quote=Domestic rentals: $48,838,000}}{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=568}}. "Production Cost: $14.3 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)." |
scope="row" | 1975
|Jaws | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|477220580}} ({{nts|prefix=$|193700000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|9000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web |title=Jaws (1975) |website=Box Office Mojo |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0073195/ |access-date=January 4, 2024 |archive-date=April 2, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200402223250/https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0073195/ |url-status=live }}{{cite book |first=Steven |last=Priggé |title=Movie Moguls Speak: Interviews With Top Film Producers |year=2004 |publisher=McFarland & Company |isbn=978-0-7864-1929-6 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=40UTI-uUHpwC&pg=PA8 8] |quote=The budget for the first Jaws was $4 million and the picture wound up costing $9 million.}} |
scope="row" | 1976
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|225000000}} ({{nts|prefix=$|77100000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1075000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{Cite The Numbers|id=Rocky|title=Rocky (1976)|access-date=October 2, 2023}}{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA214 214]}}. "Rocky was the "sleeper of the decade". Produced by UA and costing just under $1 million, it went on to earn a box-office gross of $117,235,247 in the United States and $225 million worldwide."{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA527 527]}}.
|
scope="row" | 1977
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|775398007}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|11293151}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web |title=Star Wars (1977) |website=Box Office Mojo |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0076759/ |access-date=October 1, 2023 |archive-date=March 5, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230305182237/https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0076759/ |url-status=live }}{{cite news |last=Wuntch |first=Philip |work=The Dallas Morning News |title=Return of E.T. |date=July 19, 1985 |url=http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=DM&p_text_direct-0=0ED3CD81CFEA1C2E&p_field_direct-0=document_id |url-access=subscription |access-date=March 6, 2012 |quote=Its worldwide box-office gross was $619 million, toppling the record of $530 million set by Star Wars. |archive-date=May 17, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130517022355/http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=DM&p_text_direct-0=0ED3CD81CFEA1C2E&p_field_direct-0=document_id |url-status=live }}{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA218 218]}}. "Eventually costing $11,293,151, Star Wars was previewed at the Northpoint Theatre in San Francisco on May 1, 1977." |
scope="row" | 1978
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|396271103}} ({{nts|prefix=$|341000000}}) | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|6000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web |title=Grease (1978) |website=Box Office Mojo |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0077631/ |access-date=May 14, 2023 |archive-date=May 22, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230522151012/https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0077631/ |url-status=live }}{{cite book |last=Hofler |first=Robert |title=Party Animals: A Hollywood Tale of Sex, Drugs, and Rock 'N' Roll Starring the Fabulous Allan Carr |publisher=ReadHowYouWant.com |year=2010 |isbn=978-1-4596-0007-2 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=iqRezpQzUcAC&pg=PA145 145] |quote=Despite the fact that Grease was well on its way to becoming the highest-grossing movie musical in the world, and eventually grossed over $341 million...}} |
scope="row" rowspan="2" | 1979
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|210308099}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|31000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web|url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0079574/|title=Moonraker (1979)|website=Box Office Mojo|access-date=October 2, 2023|archive-date=January 31, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230131155637/https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0079574/|url-status=live}}Kramer vs. Kramer
|
Rocky II
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|200182160}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|7000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{Cite The Numbers|id=Rocky-2|title=Rocky 2 (1979)|access-date=October 2, 2023}}{{cite magazine |last=Kilday |first=Greg |title=Rules of the Game |date=May 22, 1992 |magazine=Entertainment Weekly |issue=119 |url=https://ew.com/article/1992/05/22/our-guide-successful-sequels/ |access-date=July 4, 2012 |archive-date=December 25, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181225034800/https://ew.com/ew/article/0,,310543,00.html |url-status=live }} |
scope="row" | 1980
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|550016086}} ({{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:538375067-67597694-57214766}}}}){{ref |Star Wars|SW}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|23000000}}–{{nts|32000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |The Empire Strikes Back
|
scope="row" | 1981
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|389925971}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|18000000}}–{{nts|22800000}} | style="text-align:center;" |Raiders of the Lost Ark
|
scope="row" | 1982
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|797307407}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|10500000}}–{{nts|12200000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web |title=E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial (1982) |website=Box Office Mojo |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0083866/ |access-date=September 5, 2024}}{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA609 609]}}. "Steven Spielberg, by far the most successful director of the decade, had the highest-grossing movie with 1982's E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial, which grossed over $664 million in worldwide box office on initial release."{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA652 652]}}. "Production Cost: $12.2 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)." |
scope="row" | 1983
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|482466382}} ({{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:475106177-45470437-43790543}}}}){{ref |Star Wars|SW}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|32500000}}–{{nts|42700000}} | style="text-align:center;" |Return of the Jedi
|
scope="row"| 1984
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:243640120+126000000+161688+60823+101133 round -5}}}} ({{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:229200000+126000000}}}}) | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|25000000}}–{{nts|30000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |Ghostbusters
|
scope="row" | 1985
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:381109762+5641847+567495+1430000+476685}}}} ({{nts|prefix=$|381109762}}) | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|19000000}}–{{nts|22000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |Back to the Future
|
scope="row" | 1986
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|357288178}} ({{nts|prefix=$|345000000}}) | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|14000000}}–{{nts|19000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web|url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0092099/|title=Top Gun (1986)|website=Box Office Mojo|access-date=September 17, 2023}}{{citation |last=McAdams |first=Frank |title=Top Gun |year=2010 |pages=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA678 678–679] |quote=Production Cost: $19.0 (Millions of $s) ... Despite mixed reviews, it played in the top 10 for an extended period and was a huge hit, grossing almost $345 million in worldwide box office.}} In: {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010}}.{{harvnb|Finler|2003|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=rvVhEJmbfrsC&pg=PA190 190–191]}}. |
scope="row" | 1987
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|320145693}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|14000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |Fatal Attraction
|
scope="row" | 1988
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|354825435}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|30000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web|url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0095953/|title=Rain Man (1988)|website=Box Office Mojo|access-date=September 17, 2023}}{{harvnb|Finler|2003|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=rvVhEJmbfrsC&pg=PA244 244]}}. "Rain Man: 30.0 (cost in million $s)" |
scope="row" | 1989
|Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|474171806}}–{{nts|494000000}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|36000000}}–{{nts|55400000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0097576/ |title=Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade (1989) |website=Box Office Mojo |access-date=September 17, 2023}}{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA694 694–695]}}. "Production Cost: $55.4 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s) ... The film went on to haul in over $494 million worldwide." |
scope="row" | 1990
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|505870681}} ($505,702,588) | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|22000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0099653/ |title=Ghost (1990) |website=Box Office Mojo |access-date=July 12, 2020}} |
scope="row" | 1991
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:519843345+(1037809)+(2893302)}}}} (${{formatnum:519843345}}) | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|94000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |Terminator 2
|
scope="row" | 1992
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|504050219}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|28000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web|url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0103639/|title=Aladdin (1992)|website=Box Office Mojo|access-date=September 17, 2023}} |
scope="row" | 1993
| align="right" |${{formatnum:{{#expr:1033928303+270700+3336227}}}} (${{formatnum:912667947}}) | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|63000000}}–{{nts|70000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |Jurassic Park
|
scope="row" | 1994
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:968511805+2195958}}}} ({{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:312855561+450600000}}}}) | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|45000000}}–{{nts|79300000}} | style="text-align:center;" |The Lion King
|
scope="row" rowspan="2" | 1995
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|373554033}} ({{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:373554033-8680257}}}}) | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|30000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |Toy Story
|
Die Hard with a Vengeance
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|366101666}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|70000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web|url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0112864/|title=Die Hard with a Vengeance (1995)|website=Box Office Mojo|access-date=September 17, 2023}}{{harvnb|Finler|2003|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=rvVhEJmbfrsC&pg=PA123 123]}}. |
scope="row" | 1996
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|817400891}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|75000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0116629/ |title=Independence Day (1996) |website=Box Office Mojo |access-date=September 13, 2009}} |
scope="row" | 1997
| align="right" |${{formatnum:{{#expr:1843373318+343550770+691642+71352+70157472}}}} (${{formatnum:1843373318}}) | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|200000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |Titanic
|
scope="row" | 1998
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|553709788}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|140000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0120591/ |title=Armageddon (1998) |website=Box Office Mojo |access-date=January 18, 2023}}{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA509 509]}}. "Production Cost: $140.0 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)." |
scope="row" | 1999
|Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace | align="right" |${{formatnum:1046515409}} (${{formatnum:924317558}}) | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|115000000}}–{{nts|127500000}} | style="text-align:center;" |Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace
|
scope="row" | 2000
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|546388108}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|100000000}}–{{nts|125000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=mi2.htm |title=Mission: Impossible II |website=Box Office Mojo |access-date=September 17, 2023}} |
scope="row" | 2001
|Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone | align="right" |${{formatnum:{{#expr:1023842938-3552958-4410216-4328645-2504289}}}}{{ref |HP1 gross|HP1}} ({{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:974755371}}}}) | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|125000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone
|
scope="row" | 2002
|The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|948945489}} ({{nts|prefix=$|936689735}}) | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|94000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web |title=The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers |website=Box Office Mojo |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0167261/ |access-date=December 20, 2023 |quote=Worldwide: $948,945,489; Original Release: $936,689,735}} |
scope="row" | 2003
|The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King | align="right" |${{formatnum:1147997407}} (${{formatnum:1140682011}}) | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|94000000}} |
scope="row" | 2004
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|932530034}} ({{nts|prefix=$|928965305}}) | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|150000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0298148/ |title=Shrek 2 (2002) |website=Box Office Mojo |access-date=February 4, 2025}} |
scope="row" | 2005
|Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|896346413}} ({{nts|prefix=$|895921036}}) | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|150000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
|
scope="row" | 2006
|Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest | align="right" |${{formatnum:1066179747}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|225000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0383574/ |title=Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest (2006) |website=Box Office Mojo |access-date=January 18, 2023}} |
scope="row" | 2007
|Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|960996492}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|300000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/release/rl4100490753/ |title=Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End (2007) |website=Box Office Mojo |access-date=January 18, 2023}} |
scope="row" | 2008
| align="right" |${{formatnum:1007336937}} (${{formatnum:{{#expr:531039412+466000000}}}}) | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|185000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |The Dark Knight
|
scope="row" | 2009
| align="right" |${{formatnum:2923706026}} (${{formatnum:2743577587}}) | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|237000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web|title=Avatar (2009)|url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0499549/|access-date=March 21, 2023|website=Box Office Mojo|quote=Worldwide: $2,923,706,026; Original Release: $2,743,577,587; 2010 Special Edition: $44,838,548; 2020 Re-release: $1,281,204; 2021 Re-release: $57,995,770; 2022 Re-release: $76,012,917}} |
scope="row" | 2010
| align="right" |${{formatnum:1066970811}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|200000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |{{cite web |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0435761/ |title=Toy Story 3 (2010) |website=Box Office Mojo |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230106231628/https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0435761/?ref_=bo_cso_table_38 |archive-date=January 6, 2023 |access-date=January 18, 2023}} |
scope="row" | 2011
|Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2 | align="right" | ${{formatnum:{{#expr:1356841356-181938-38277-14481414}}}} (${{formatnum:1341511219}}) | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|250000000}}{{ref |HP8 budget|HP8}} | style="text-align:center;" |Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2
|
scope="row" | 2012
| align="right" |${{formatnum:1518815515}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|220000000}} |
scope="row" | 2013
| align="right" |${{formatnum:{{#expr:1274219009-247650477+249036646-21668593+22492845+167333+(40960083-39090985)/0.63866+(41087765-40960083)/0.64136+(41170608-41087765)/0.636+(42840559-41170608)/0.7497+(42976318-42840559)/0.742+42526744-35098170 round -6}}}} (${{formatnum:{{#expr:1274219009-247650477+249036646-21668593+22492845+167333+(40960083-39090985)/0.63866+(41087765-40960083)/0.64136+(41170608-41087765)/0.636+42526744-35098170 round -6}}}}) | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|150000000}} | style="text-align:center;" |Frozen
::Total as of August 3, 2014: $247,650,477 ::Total as of August 31, 2014: $249,036,646
::Total as of August 17, 2014: $167,333
::Total as of July 27, 2014: $21,668,593 ::Total as of November 2, 2014: $22,492,845
::Total as of June 8, 2014: £39,090,985 ::Total as of November 30, 2014: £40,960,083 ($1 = £0.63866) ::Total as of December 7, 2014: £41,087,765 ($1 = £0.64136) ::Total as of December 14, 2014: £41,170,608 ($1 = £0.636) ::Total as of November 26, 2017: £42,840,559 ($1 = £0.7497) ::Total as of December 3, 2017: £42,976,318 ($1 = £0.742)
::Total as of March 30, 2014: €35,098,170 ::Total as of October 18, 2015: €42,526,744 :::nb. the exact euro to dollar conversion rate is unknown for earnings since April 2014, but the euro never fell below parity with the dollar during 2014 and 2015 (as can be verified by comparing the exchange rate on the individual date entries at the provided reference) so an approximate conversion rate of €1: $1 is used here to give a lower-bound. |
scope="row" | 2014
|Transformers: Age of Extinction | align="right" |${{formatnum:1104039076}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|210000000}} |
scope="row" | 2015
| align="right" |${{formatnum:2068223624}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|245000000}} |
scope="row" | 2016
| align="right" |${{formatnum:1153337496}} (${{formatnum:1153296293}}) | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|250000000}} |
scope="row" | 2017
| align="right" |${{formatnum:1332539889}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|200000000}} |
scope="row" | 2018
| align="right" |${{formatnum:2048359754}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|316000000}}–{{nts|400000000}} |style="text-align:center;" | {{cite web |url=https://variety.com/2018/film/box-office/avengers-infinity-war-biggest-box-office-opening-ever-1202791751/ |title='Avengers: Infinity War' Officially Lands Biggest Box Office Opening of All Time |last=Rubin |first=Rebecca |website=Variety |date=April 30, 2018 |access-date=May 14, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180502205129/http://variety.com/2018/film/box-office/avengers-infinity-war-biggest-box-office-opening-ever-1202791751/ |archive-date=May 2, 2018 |url-status=live}} |
scope="row" | 2019
| align="right" |${{formatnum:2797501328}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|356000000}} |
scope="row" | 2020
| align="right" |${{formatnum:507119058}} | align="right" |${{formatnum:15750000}} |style="text-align:center;" | {{Cite The Numbers|id=Kimetsu-no-Yaiba-Mugen-Ressha-Hen-(2020-Japan)|title=Kimetsu no Yaiba: Mugen Ressha-Hen (2020)|access-date=November 13, 2023}} |
scope="row" | 2021
| align="right" |${{formatnum:1922598800}} (${{formatnum:1912233593}}) | align="right" |${{formatnum:200000000}} |style="text-align:center;" | {{Cite web |last=Rubin |first=Rebecca |date=December 14, 2021 |title=Box Office Preview: Spider-Man: No Way Home Eyes Mighty, Massive, Marvelous $150 Million-Plus Debut |url=https://variety.com/2021/film/news/spider-man-no-way-home-opening-weekend-estimate-tom-holland-1235132943/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211214205932/https://variety.com/2021/film/news/spider-man-no-way-home-opening-weekend-estimate-tom-holland-1235132943/ |archive-date=December 14, 2021 |access-date=December 14, 2021 |website=Variety}} |
scope="row" | 2022
| align="right" |${{formatnum:2320250281}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|350000000}}–{{nts|460000000}} |style="text-align:center;" | {{cite web |first=Pamela |last=McClintock |title=Box Office: 'Avatar: The Way of Water' Lands Coveted China Release |date=November 22, 2022 |publisher=The Hollywood Reporter |url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/avatar-the-way-of-water-box-office-china-release-1235268699/ |access-date=January 10, 2023}}{{cite web |url=https://deadline.com/2022/12/avatar-the-way-of-water-box-office-1235200714/|title='Avatar: The Way Of Water' Opens To $134M; Why Pic's Box Office Fate Will Be Determined Through The Holidays – Sunday AM Update|author=Anthony D'Alessandro|work=Deadline|date=December 18, 2022|access-date=January 10, 2023}} |
scope="row" | 2023
| align="right" |${{formatnum:1447038421}} | align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|128000000}}–{{nts|145000000}} |style="text-align:center;" | {{cite news |last=D'Alessandro |first=Anthony |date=July 23, 2023 |title='Barbie' Still Gorgeous With Best YTD $155M Opening; 'Oppenheimer' Ticking To $80M+ In Incredible $300M+ U.S. Box Office Weekend – Sunday AM Update |url=https://deadline.com/2023/07/box-office-barbie-oppenheimer-barbenheimer-1235443828/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230721142533/https://deadline.com/2023/07/box-office-barbie-oppenheimer-barbenheimer-1235443828/ |archive-date=July 21, 2023 |access-date=July 23, 2023 |website=Deadline Hollywood}}{{cite magazine |last=Paskin |first=Willa |title=Greta Gerwig's 'Barbie' Dream Job |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/11/magazine/greta-gerwig-barbie.html |magazine=The New York Times Magazine |access-date=July 11, 2023 |date=July 11, 2023 |url-access=limited |archive-date=July 11, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230711163054/https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/11/magazine/greta-gerwig-barbie.html/ |url-status=live}} |
scope="row" | 2024
| align="right" |${{formatnum:1698863816}} | align="right" |${{formatnum:200000000}} |style="text-align:center;" | {{Cite web |last=Rubin |first=Rebecca |date=June 11, 2024 |title=Box Office: Inside Out 2 Aims to Reverse Pixar's Woes With $85 Million Debut |url=https://variety.com/2024/film/news/box-office-inside-out-2-opening-weekend-projection-pixar-woes-1236032726/ |website=Variety |access-date=June 23, 2024}} |
scope="row" | 2025
! scope="row" style="background:#b6fcb6;" | Ne Zha 2 † | align="right" |${{formatnum:{{#expr:2090940000+20858156+4716410+970308+7327452+1596106+568260}}}} | align="right" |${{formatnum:80000000}} |
{{Refbegin|}}
(...) Since grosses are not limited to original theatrical runs, a film's first-run gross is included in brackets after the total if known.
{{note label|USgross|*||Canada and U.S. gross only.}}
{{note label|Rentals|R||Distributor rental.}}
{{note label||TBA||To be ascertained.}}
{{note label|Intolerance|IN||No contemporary sources provide figures for 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, although The Numbers provides a figure of $8,000,000 for the North American box-office gross.{{cite web |title=20,000 Leagues Under the Sea |website=The Numbers |publisher=Nash Information Services |url=https://www.the-numbers.com/movies/1916/020LU.php |access-date=January 5, 2012}} However, it is possible this figure has been mistaken for the gross of the 1954 remake which also earned $8,000,000 in North American rentals.}}
{{note label|For Heaven's Sake|FH||Some sources such as The Numbers state that Aloma of the South Seas is the highest grossing film of the year, earning $3 million.{{cite book |title=Milwaukee Magazine |volume=32 |issue=1–6 |year=2007 |quote=The year's top–grossing movie, Aloma made $3 million in the first three months and brought Gray back to Milwaukee for its opening at the Wisconsin Theatre.|title-link=Milwaukee Magazine}} However, no contemporary sources provide figures for Aloma of the South Seas, so it is unclear what the $3 million figure relates to. If it were the rental gross then that would have made it not only the highest-grossing film of the year, but one of the highest-grossing films of the silent era, and if that is the case it would be unusual for both International Motion Picture Almanac and Variety to omit it from their lists.}}
{{note label|Sunny Side Up|SS||It is not clear if the figure for Sunny Side Up is for North America or worldwide. Other sources put its earnings at $2 million,{{cite book |last=Parkinson |first=David |title=The Rough Guide to Film Musicals |publisher=Dorling Kindersley |year=2007 |isbn=978-1-84353-650-5 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=Zff4BhUOOnwC&pg=PA28 28] |quote=But they had previously succeeded in showing how musicals could centre on ordinary people with Sunny Side Up (1929), which had grossed $2 million at the box office and demonstrated a new maturity and ingenuity in the staging of story and dance.}} which may suggest the higher figure is the worldwide rental, given the confusion over international figures during this period.}}
{{note label|One Night|ON||The figure for It Happened One Night is not truly representative of its success: it was distributed as a package deal along with more than two dozen other Columbia films, and the total earnings were averaged out; the true gross would have been much higher.{{Cite book |last=McBride |first=Joseph |title=Frank Capra: The Catastrophe of Success |publisher=University Press of Mississippi |year=2011 |isbn=978-1-60473-838-4 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=DMkLpTFBEtUC&pg=PA309 309] |quote=According to the studio's books It Happened One Night brought in $1 million in film rentals during its initial release, but as Joe Walker pointed out, the figure would have been much larger if the film had not been sold to theaters on a block-booking basis in a package with more than two dozen lesser Columbia films, and the total rentals of the package spread among them all, as was customary in that era, since it minimized the risk and allowed the major studios to dominate the marketplace.}}}}
{{note label|Snow White|S7||Snow White{{'}}s $418 million global cume omits earnings outside of North America from 1987 onwards.}}
{{note label|GWTW|GW||It is not absolutely clear how much Gone with the Wind earned from its initial release. Contemporary accounts often list it as earning $32 million in North American rentals and retrospective charts have often duplicated this claim; however, it is likely this was the worldwide rental figure. Trade journals would collate the data by either obtaining it from the distributors themselves, who were keen to promote a successful film, or by surveying theaters and constructing an estimate. Distributors would often report the worldwide rental since the higher figure made the film appear more successful, while estimates were limited to performance in North America; therefore it was not unusual for worldwide and North American rentals to be mixed up. Following the outbreak of World War II, many of the foreign markets were unavailable to Hollywood so it became standard practice to just report on North American box-office performance.{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=Ro0hASPfC68C&pg=PA6 6]–[https://books.google.com/books?id=Ro0hASPfC68C&pg=PA7 7]}}. "For similar reasons of accountability, Variety has typically used figures for domestic (U.S. and Canadian) rather than worldwide revenue. This became its standard policy in 1940, when the advent of war in Europe persuaded the American film industry (temporarily, as it turned out) that it should be wholly reliant on the home market for profitability. Where specific rentals data are reported in Variety before this (which tended to be only sporadically) they were often for worldwide rather domestic performance. This was also the case with other trade sources, such as Quigley{{'}}s annual Motion Picture Almanac, which published its own all-time hits lists from the early 1930s onward. The subsequent confusion of domestic and worldwide figures, and of rental and box-office figures, has plagued many published accounts of Hollywood history (sometimes including those in Variety itself), and we have attempted to be diligant in clarifying the differences between them." In keeping with this new approach, the North American rental for Gone with the Wind was revised to $21 million in 1947 ($11 million lower than the previous figure),{{cite news |last=Shearer |first=Lloyd |title=GWTW: Supercolossal Saga of an Epic |date=October 26, 1947 |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/movies/bestpictures/wind-ar6.html |access-date=July 14, 2012}} and as of 1953—following the 1947 re-release—Variety was reporting earnings of $26 million.{{cite magazine |title=Cinema: The Big Grossers |date=February 2, 1953 |magazine=Time |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,817905,00.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081222115657/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,817905,00.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=December 22, 2008 |access-date=September 15, 2012}} Through 1956, MGM reported cumulative North American earnings of $30,015,000 and foreign earnings of $18,964,000, from three releases.{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&q=%22Gone%20with%20the%20Wind%20includes%20initial%20release%20plus%20four%20rereleases%20(1941%2C1942%2C1947%20and%201954)%20since%20foreign%20rental%20revenues%20were%20available%20only%20cumulative%20through%201956.%22&pg=PA129 129]}}. "Domestic Rentals: $30,015,000 (61%); Foreign Rentals: $18,964,000 (39%)...Gone with the Wind includes initial release plus four rereleases (1941,1942,1947 and 1954) since foreign rental revenues were available only cumulative through 1956." Worldwide rentals of $32 million from the initial release is consistent with the revised figures and later reported worldwide figures: they indicate that the film earned $21 million in North America and $11 million overseas from the initial release, and added a further $9 million in North America and $8 million overseas from subsequent re-releases up to 1956.}}
{{note label|Mom and Dad|MD||Mom and Dad does not generally feature in 'high-gross' lists such as those published by Variety due to its independent distribution. Essentially belonging to the exploitation genre, it was marketed as an educational sex hygiene film in an effort to circumvent censorship laws. Falling foul of the Motion Picture Production Code, Mom and Dad was prevented from obtaining mainstream distribution and restricted to independent and drive-in theaters. It was the biggest hit of its kind, and remained in continual distribution until the 1970s when hardcore pornography eventually took over. At the end of 1947 it had earned $2 million, and by 1949, $8 million; by 1956 it had earned $22 million in rentals, representing a gross of $80 million, and would have easily placed in the top ten films in the late 1940s and early 1950s. Estimates of its total earnings are as high as $100 million.}}
{{note label|Unconquered|UN||Chopra-Gant stipulates that the figure given for Unconquered is for North American box-office, but as was common at the time, the chart confuses worldwide and North American grosses. Other sources state that the takings for Forever Amber ($8 million) and Life with Father ($6.5 million){{citation |last=McDermott |first=Christine |title=Life with Father |year=2010 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA307 307] |quote=No matter what the billing, the movie became a worldwide hit with $6.5 million in worldwide rentals, from Pappa och vi in Sweden to Vita col padre in Italy, although it booked a net loss of $350,000.}} In: {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010}}. were in fact worldwide rental grosses, so it is possible this is also true of Unconquered.}}
{{note label|Cinerama|CI||The Cinerama figures represent gross amounts. Since the Cinerama corporation owned the theaters there were no rental fees for the films, meaning the studio received 100% of the box-office gross, unlike the case with most other films where the distributor typically receives less than half the gross. Since Variety at the time ranked films by their U.S. and Canadian rental, they constructed a hypothetical rental figure for the Cinerama films to provide a basis for comparison to other films in their chart: in the case of This Is Cinerama, the $50 million worldwide gross was reconfigured as a $12.5 million U.S. rental gross; this is exactly 25% of the amount reported by Cinerama, so Variety{{'}}s formula seemingly halved the gross to obtain an estimate for the U.S. share, and halved it again to simulate a rental fee.{{cite news |last=Mulligan |first=Hugh A. |work=The Register-Guard |location=Eugene, Oregon |title=Cinerama Pushing Ahead As Biggest Money-Maker |date=September 23, 1956 |page=[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=GPRVAAAAIBAJ&sjid=YeIDAAAAIBAJ&pg=6899,3861317 7B]}} All five Cinerama features collectively generated $120 million in worldwide box office receipts.{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA145 145]}}. "The commercial success of the five Cinerama travelogues, which earned an aggregate worldwide box-office gross of $120 million by 1962 (including $82 million in the United States and Canada), nevertheless demonstrated to the mainstream industry the market value of special screen formats."}}
{{note label|Greatest Show|GS||Variety put the worldwide rental for The Greatest Show on Earth at around $18.35 million (with $12.8 million coming from the United States{{harvnb|Finler|2003|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=rvVhEJmbfrsC&pg=PA358 358]}}) a year after its release; however, Birchard puts its earnings at just over $15 million up to 1962. It is likely that Birchard's figure is just the North American gross rental, and includes revenue from the 1954 and 1960 reissues.}}
{{note label|Star Wars|SW||The "first run" Star Wars grosses do not include revenue from the 1997 special-edition releases; however, the figure does include revenue from the re-releases prior to the special editions.}}
{{note label|HP1 gross|HP1||The Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone reissue totals recorded by Box Office Mojo for Brazil (2020), Italy (2021), Netherlands (2021) and South Korea (2021) have been deducted from the lifetime gross due to Box Office Mojo double-counting the original release grosses in those countries.}}
{{note label|HP8 budget|HP8||Production costs were shared with Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 1.}}
{{Refend}}
Timeline of highest-grossing films
File:Birth of a Nation theatrical poster.jpg
At least eleven films have held the record of 'highest-grossing film' since The Birth of a Nation assumed the top spot in 1915. Both The Birth of a Nation and Gone with the Wind spent twenty-five consecutive years apiece as the highest-grosser, with films directed by Steven Spielberg and James Cameron holding the record on three occasions each. Spielberg became the first director to break his own record when Jurassic Park overtook E.T., and Cameron emulated the feat when Avatar broke the record set by Titanic. When it took over the top spot in 2019, Avengers: Endgame became the first sequel to hold the record of highest-grossing film, and in doing so interrupted thirty-six years of Spielberg/Cameron dominance before Avatar reclaimed the top spot two years later in 2021 upon a re-release.
Some sources claim that The Big Parade superseded The Birth of a Nation as highest-grossing film, eventually being replaced by Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, which in turn was quickly usurped by Gone with the Wind. Exact figures are not known for The Birth of a Nation, but contemporary records put its worldwide earnings at $5.2 million as of 1919.{{cite book |last=Wasko |first=Janet |contribution=D.W. Griffiths and the banks: a case study in film financing |editor-last=Kerr |editor-first=Paul |title=The Hollywood Film Industry: A Reader |publisher=Routledge |year=1986 |isbn=978-0-7100-9730-9 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=jMINAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA34 34] |quote=Various accounts have cited $15 to $18 million profits during the first few years of release, while in a letter to a potential investor in the proposed sound version, Aitken noted that a $15 to $18 million box-office gross was a 'conservative estimate'. For years Variety has listed The Birth of a Nation{{'}}s total rental at $50 million. (This reflects the total amount paid to the distributor, not box-office gross.) This 'trade legend' has finally been acknowledged by Variety as a 'whopper myth', and the amount has been revised to $5 million. That figure seems far more feasible, as reports of earnings in the Griffith collection list gross receipts for 1915–1919 at slightly more than $5.2 million (including foreign distribution) and total earnings after deducting general office expenses, but not royalties, at about $2 million.}} Its international release was delayed by World War I, and it was not released in many foreign territories until the 1920s; coupled with further re-releases in the United States, its $10 million earnings as reported by Variety in 1932 are consistent with the earlier figure.{{cite magazine |title=Biggest Money Pictures |magazine=Variety |date=June 21, 1932 |page=1|url=https://archive.org/details/variety106-1932-06/page/n120/mode/1up|via=Archive.org}} Cited in {{cite web |title=Biggest Money Pictures |publisher=Cinemaweb |url=http://www.cinemaweb.com/silentfilm/bookshelf/7_v_32_4.htm |access-date=June 25, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111105043830/http://www.cinemaweb.com/silentfilm/bookshelf/7_v_32_4.htm |archive-date=November 5, 2011}} At this time, Variety still had The Birth of a Nation ahead of The Big Parade ($6,400,000) on distributor rentals and—if its estimate is correct—Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs ($8,500,000){{cite news |agency=United Press International |work=Daily Record |location=Ellensburg, Washington |title='Peter Pan' flies again |date=July 21, 1989 |page=[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=r3dUAAAAIBAJ&sjid=WY8DAAAAIBAJ&pg=2540,2188129 16]}} would not have earned enough on its first theatrical run to take the record;{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA237 237]}}. "By the end of 1938, it had grossed more than $8 million in worldwide rentals and was ranked at the time as the second-highest-grossing film after the 1925 epic Ben-Hur". although it would have been the highest-grossing 'talkie',{{harvnb|Finler|2003|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=rvVhEJmbfrsC&pg=PA47 47]}}. "Walt Disney took a big risk when he decided to invest $1.5 million in his first feature-length animated film, Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. It became the biggest hit of the sound era and the largest-grossing movie since The Birth of a Nation – until the release of independent producer David O. Selznick's Gone with the Wind just two years later." displacing The Singing Fool ($5,900,000).{{Cite book |last=Barrios |first=Richard |title=A Song in the Dark: The Birth of the Musical Film |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1995 |isbn=978-0-19-508811-3 |page=[https://archive.org/details/songindarkbirtho00barr/page/49 49] |quote=Since it's rarely seen today, The Singing Fool is frequently confused with The Jazz Singer; although besides Jolson and a pervasively maudlin air the two have little in common. In the earlier film Jolson was inordinately attached to his mother and sang "Mammy"; here the fixation was on his young son, and "Sonny Boy" became an enormous hit. So did the film, which amassed a stunning world-wide gross of $5.9 million...Some sources give it as the highest gross of any film in its initial release prior to Gone with the Wind. This is probably overstating it—MGM's records show that Ben-Hur and The Big Parade grossed more, and no one knows just how much The Birth of a Nation brought in. Still, by the standards of the time it's an amazing amount. |url=https://archive.org/details/songindarkbirtho00barr/page/49}} Although received wisdom holds that it is unlikely The Birth of a Nation was ever overtaken by a silent-era film,{{cite book |last=Everson |first=William K. |year=1998 |orig-year=First published 1978 |title=American silent film |publisher=Da Capo Press |isbn=978-0-306-80876-0 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=pyQaKxBjjzMC&pg=PA374 374] |quote=Putting The Birth of a Nation in fifth place is open to question, since it is generally conceded to be the top-grossing film of all time. However, it has always been difficult to obtain reliable box-office figures for this film, and it may have been even more difficult in the mid-1930s. After listing it until the mid-1970s as the top-grosser, though finding it impossible to quote exact figures, Variety, the trade journal, suddenly repudiated the claim but without giving specific details or reasons. On the basis of the number of paid admissions, and continuous exhibition, its number one position seems justified. |url=https://archive.org/details/americansilentfi00ever_0/page/374}} the record would fall to 1925's Ben-Hur ($9,386,000) if The Birth of a Nation earned significantly less than its estimated gross.{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA163 163]}}. "MGM's silent Ben-Hur, which opened at the end of 1925, had out-grossed all the other pictures released by the company in 1926 combined. With worldwide rentals of $9,386,000 on first release it was, with the sole possible exception of The Birth of a Nation, the highest-earning film of the entire silent era." In addition to its gross rental earnings through public exhibition, The Birth of a Nation played at a large number of private, club and organizational engagements which figures are unavailable for.{{cite news |last=du Brow |first=Rick |work=The Columbus Dispatch |title=Documentary On The Klan Made Quite An Impact On Du Brow |date=September 22, 1965 |page=[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=i9sbAAAAIBAJ&sjid=ClEEAAAAIBAJ&pg=7022,1479191 12]}} It was hugely popular with the Ku Klux Klan who used it to drive recruitment,{{cite news |last=Hodgkinson |first=Will |work=The Daily Telegraph |title=Culture quake: The Birth of a Nation |date=April 12, 2004 |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/donotmigrate/3615281/Culture-quake-The-Birth-of-a-Nation.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220110/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/donotmigrate/3615281/Culture-quake-The-Birth-of-a-Nation.html |archive-date=January 10, 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |access-date=January 31, 2012}}{{cbignore}} and at one point Variety estimated its total earnings to stand at around $50 million.{{cite news |last=Thomas |first=Bob |author-link=Bob Thomas (reporter) |agency=Associated Press |work=Reading Eagle |title='West Side Story' Earned $19 Million Last Year |date=January 18, 1963 |page=[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=YxMrAAAAIBAJ&sjid=gpwFAAAAIBAJ&pg=3048,210679 20]}} Despite later retracting the claim, the sum has been widely reported even though it has never been substantiated. While it is generally accepted that Gone with the Wind took over the record of highest-grossing film on its initial release—which is true in terms of public exhibition—it is likely it did not overtake The Birth of a Nation in total revenue until a much later date, with it still being reported as the highest earner up until the 1960s. Gone with the Wind itself may have been briefly overtaken by The Ten Commandments (1956), which closed at the end of 1960 with worldwide rentals of $58–60 million{{cite book |first1=Louis |last1=Klopsch |first2=George Henry |last2=Sandison |first3=Thomas De Witt |last3=Talmage |title=Christian Herald |year=1965 |volume=88 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=Ou3eAAAAMAAJ&q=%22ten+commandments%22+rentals 68] |quote=Yet "The Ten Commandments" has earned 58 million dollars in film rentals and is expected to bring in 10 to 15 million each year it is reissued.}}{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA160 160–161]}}. "General release began at normal prices in 1959 and continued until the end of the following year, when the film was temporarily withdrawn (the first of several reissues came in 1966). The worldwide rental by this time was around $60 million. In the domestic market it dislodged Gone with the Wind from the number one position on Variety{{'}}s list of All-Time Rentals Champs. GWTW had hitherto maintained its lead through several reissues (and was soon to regain it through another in 1961)." compared to Gone with the Wind{{'}}s $59 million;{{cite news |last=Oviatt |first=Ray |work=Toledo Blade |title=The Memory Isn't Gone With The Wind |date=April 16, 1961 |page=[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=V75OAAAAIBAJ&sjid=EAEEAAAAIBAJ&pg=4564,6940480 67]–68}} if it did claim the top spot its tenure there was short-lived, since Gone with the Wind was re-released the following year and increased its earnings to $67 million. Depending on how accurate the estimates are, the 1959 remake of Ben-Hur may also have captured the record from Gone with the Wind: as of the end of 1961 it had earned $47 million worldwide,{{cite web |title=Ben-Hur (1959) – Notes |publisher=Turner Classic Movies |url=https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/415095/ben-hur#notes |access-date=November 17, 2012}} and by 1963 it was trailing Gone with the Wind by just $2 million with international takings of $65 million,{{cite news |last=Thomas |first=Bob |author-link=Bob Thomas (reporter) |agency=Associated Press |work=The Robesonian |title=Movie Finances Are No Longer Hidden From Scrutiny |date=August 1, 1963 |page=[https://news.google.co.uk/newspapers?id=QsBVAAAAIBAJ&sjid=iUANAAAAIBAJ&pg=7022,1836881 10]}} ultimately earning $66 million from its initial release.{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA324 324]}}. "Worldwide rentals: $66.1 million (initial release)"
Another film purported to have been the highest-grosser is the 1972 pornographic film Deep Throat. In 1984, Linda Lovelace testified to a United States Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on juvenile justice that the film had earned $600 million;{{cite news |author=Washington (AP) |work=The Free Lance–Star |title='Deep Throat' star against pornography |date=September 13, 1984 |page=[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=deJLAAAAIBAJ&sjid=x4sDAAAAIBAJ&pg=5792,1886785 12]}} this figure has been the subject of much speculation, since if it is accurate then the film would have made more money than Star Wars, and finished the 1970s as the highest-grossing film. The main argument against this figure is that it simply did not have a wide enough release to sustain the sort of sums that would be required for it to ultimately gross this amount.{{cite news |last=Hiltzik |first=Michael |work=Los Angeles Times |title='Deep Throat' Numbers Just Don't Add Up |date=February 24, 2005 |url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2005-feb-24-fi-golden24-story.html |access-date=February 2, 2012}} Exact figures are not known, but testimony in a federal trial in 1976—about four years into the film's release—showed the film had grossed over $25 million.{{cite news |author=Memphis (UPI) |work=The Palm Beach Post |title='Deep Throat' Defendant Found Guilty of Conspiring |date=May 1, 1976 |page=[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=5lc0AAAAIBAJ&sjid=YM0FAAAAIBAJ&pg=1025,8602 A2]}} Roger Ebert has reasoned it possibly did earn as much as $600 million on paper, since mobsters owned most of the adult movie theaters during this period and would launder income from drugs and prostitution through them, so probably inflated the box-office receipts for the film.{{cite web |last=Ebert |first=Roger |author-link=Roger Ebert |website=rogerebert.com |publisher=Chicago Sun-Times |title=Inside Deep Throat |date=February 11, 2005 |url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050210/REVIEWS/50128001 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110606050046/http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20050210%2FREVIEWS%2F50128001 |archive-date=June 6, 2011 |url-status=live |access-date=February 2, 2012}}
The Birth of a Nation, Gone with the Wind, The Godfather, Jaws, Star Wars, E.T., and Avatar all increased their record grosses with re-releases. The grosses from their original theatrical runs are included here along with totals from re-releases up to the point that they lost the record; therefore the total for The Birth of a Nation includes income from its reissues up to 1940; the total for Star Wars includes revenue from the late 1970s and early 1980s reissues but not from the 1997 Special Edition; the total for E.T. incorporates its gross from the 1985 reissue but not from 2002. The total for Avatar
{{Refbegin}}
{{note label|Rentals2|R||Distributor rental.}}
{{note label|Reissue|{{‡|alt=Includes re-releases}}||Includes revenue from re-releases. If a film increased its gross through re-releases while holding the record, the year in which it recorded its highest gross is also noted in italics.}}
{{Refend}}
Highest-grossing franchises and film series
{{See also|List of highest-grossing media franchises}}
Prior to 2000, only seven film series had grossed over $1 billion at the box office: James Bond,{{cite web |title=Box Office History for James Bond Movies |website=The Numbers |publisher=Nash Information Services |url=https://www.the-numbers.com/movies/series/JamesBond.php |access-date=January 4, 2012}} Star Wars,{{cite web |title=Box Office History for Star Wars Movies |website=The Numbers |publisher=Nash Information Services |url=https://www.the-numbers.com/movies/series/StarWars.php |access-date=January 4, 2012}} Indiana Jones,{{cite web |title=Indiana Jones – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=indianajones.htm |access-date=January 6, 2012 |website=Box Office Mojo}} Rocky,{{Cite news |last=Anderson |first=Dave |date=November 16, 2003 |title=Bayonne Bleeder Throws a Punch at the Italian Stallion |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/16/sports/othersports/16ANDE.html |access-date=January 4, 2012}}{{Cite news |last=Schneiderman |first=R. M. |date=August 10, 2006 |title=Stallone Settles With The 'Real' Rocky |work=Forbes |url=https://www.forbes.com/2006/08/10/rocky-stallone-settlement-cx_rs_0810autofacescan04.html |access-date=January 4, 2012}}{{cite web |last=Poller |first=Kenneth G. |date=November 12, 2003 |title=Charles Wepner v. Sylvester Stallone |publisher=Mango & Iacoviello |url=http://www.mandilaw.com/files/complaint.pdf |access-date=January 4, 2012 |archive-date=October 29, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131029201713/http://www.mandilaw.com/files/complaint.pdf |url-status=dead }} Batman,{{cite web |title=Batman – Worldwide (Unadjusted) & Batman: Mask of the Phantasm |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=batman.htm |access-date=January 6, 2012 |website=Box Office Mojo}} Jurassic Park,{{cite web |title=Jurassic Park – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=jurassicpark.htm |access-date=January 6, 2012 |website=Box Office Mojo}} and Star Trek.{{cite web |title=Box Office History for Star Trek Movies |website=The Numbers |publisher=Nash Information Services |url=https://www.the-numbers.com/movies/series/StarTrek.php |access-date=January 4, 2012}} Since the turn of the century, that number has increased to over a hundred.{{cite web |title=Movie Franchises |url=https://www.the-numbers.com/movies/franchises/sort/World#franchise_overview=l100:od4 |access-date=December 11, 2024 |website=The Numbers |publisher=Nash Information Services}} This is partly due to inflation and market growth, but it is also due to Hollywood's adoption of the franchise model: films that have built-in brand recognition such as being based on a well-known literary source or an established character. The methodology is based on the concept that films associated with things audiences are already familiar with can be more effectively marketed to them, and as such are known as "pre-sold" films within the industry.{{Cite news |author=The Economist online |date=July 11, 2011 |title=Pottering on, and on |newspaper=The Economist |url=https://www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2011/07/film-franchises |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110711204558/https://www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2011/07/film-franchises |archive-date=July 11, 2011}}
A franchise is typically defined to be at least two works derived from a common intellectual property. Traditionally, the work has a tautological relationship with the property, but this is not a prerequisite. An enduring staple of the franchise model is the concept of the crossover, which can be defined as "a story in which characters or concepts from two or more discrete texts or series of texts meet".{{Cite news |first=Jess |last=Nevins |date=August 23, 2011 |title=A Brief History of the Crossover |work=io9 |url=https://io9.gizmodo.com/5833704/a-brief-history-of-the-crossover |access-date=July 19, 2018}} A consequence of a crossover is that an intellectual property may be utilized by more than one franchise. For example, Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice belongs to not only the Batman and Superman franchises, but also to the DC Extended Universe, which is a shared universe. A shared universe is a particular type of crossover where a number of characters from a wide range of fictional works wind up sharing a fictional world.{{Cite news |first=Jess |last=Nevins |date=September 9, 2011 |title=The First Shared Universes |work=io9 |url=https://io9.gizmodo.com/5838896/the-first-shared-universes |access-date=July 19, 2018}} The most successful shared universe in the medium of film is the Marvel Cinematic Universe, a crossover between multiple superhero properties owned by Marvel Comics. The Marvel Cinematic Universe is also the highest-grossing franchise, amassing over $31 billion at the box office.
The Spider-Man films are the highest-grossing series based on a single property, earning over $11 billion at the box office (although the Eon James Bond films have earned over $19 billion in total when adjusted to current prices).{{efn|Prior to the release of Spectre in 2015, the James Bond series had grossed approximately $17.7 billion at 2015 prices;{{cite news |title=How 'Spectre' May Stack Up With 'Thunderball' as a James Bond Blockbuster |date=November 6, 2015 |newspaper=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/11/05/business/media/james-bond-films-most-popular-box-office.html |access-date=January 7, 2018}} after factoring in earnings of over $1.6 billion from Spectre and No Time to Die, the series has earned at least $19.3 billion adjusted for inflation.}} The Marvel Cinematic Universe has had the most films gross over $1 billion, with eleven. The four Avengers films, the two Frozen films, and the two Avatar films are the only franchises where each installment has grossed over $1 billion, although the Jurassic Park, Black Panther and Inside Out series have averaged over $1 billion per film.
:{{legend|#b6fcb6|Background shading indicates that at least one film in the series is playing in the week commencing {{Days before now|{{#switch: {{CURRENTDAYNAME}} |Saturday=1 |Sunday=2 |Monday=3 |Tuesday=4 |Wednesday=5 |Thursday=6 |0}}}} in theaters around the world.|text=†}}
cellpadding="0" cellspacing="1" style="border:1px solid darkgrey; margin:auto;width:80em;"
|+ Highest-grossing franchises and film series{{ref label|Franchise sources|§|§}} |+ {{small|(The films in each franchise can be viewed by selecting "show".)}} |
colspan="6" |
{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=header|ranklabel=Rank|titlelabel=Series|totallabel=Total worldwide gross|numberlabel=No. of films|averagelabel=Average of films|highestlabel=Highest-grossing film}} |
colspan="6" |
{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=franchise|rank=1|title=Marvel Cinematic Universe{{ref |Shared|S}} †|total={{#expr:22589262908+379751655+432243292+402064899+1922598800+955775804+760928081+859208836+476071180+845555777+206136825+1338073645+414757293}}|number=35|highest=Avengers: Endgame|gross=2797501328|release=y |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=franchise|sub=y|title=The Infinity Saga|total={{#expr:13506562880+5269487547+3813212481}}|number=23|highest=Avengers: Endgame|gross=2797501328 |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Phase Three|number=11|highest=Avengers: Endgame|gross=2797501328 |Avengers: Endgame (2019) |2797501328 |Avengers: Infinity War (2018) |2048359754 |Black Panther (2018) |1347280838 |Captain America: Civil War (2016) |1153337496 |Spider-Man: Far From Home (2019) |1132679685 |Captain Marvel (2019) |1128274794 |Spider-Man: Homecoming (2017) |880918840 |Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 (2017) |863756051 |Thor: Ragnarok (2017) |853983879 |Doctor Strange (2016) |677796076 |Ant-Man and the Wasp (2018) |622674139 }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Phase Two|number=6|highest=Avengers: Age of Ultron|gross=1402809540 |Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015) |1402809540 |Iron Man 3 (2013) |1214811252 |Guardians of the Galaxy (2014) |773350147 |Captain America: The Winter Soldier (2014) |714421503 |Thor: The Dark World (2013) |644783140 |Ant-Man (2015) |519311965 }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Phase One|number=6|highest=The Avengers|gross=1518815515 |The Avengers (2012) |1518815515 |Iron Man 2 (2010) |623933331 |Iron Man (2008) |585796247 |Thor (2011) |449326618 |Captain America: The First Avenger (2011) |370569774 |The Incredible Hulk (2008) |264770996 }} }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=franchise|sub=y|title=The Multiverse Saga †|total={{#expr:379751655+432243292+402064899+1922598800+955775804+760928081+859208836+476071180+845555777+206136825+1338073645+414757293}}|number=12|highest=Spider-Man: No Way Home|gross=1922598800|release=y |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Phase Four|number=7|highest=Spider-Man: No Way Home|gross=1922598800 |Spider-Man: No Way Home (2021) |1922598800 |Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (2022) |955775804 |Black Panther: Wakanda Forever (2022) |859208836 |Thor: Love and Thunder (2022) |760928081 |Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings (2021) |432243292 |Eternals (2021) |402064899 |Black Widow (2021) |379751655 }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Phase Five †|number=5|highest=Deadpool & Wolverine|gross=1338073645|release=04 |Deadpool & Wolverine (2024) |1338073645 |Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 (2023) |845555777 |Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania (2023) |476071180 |Captain America: Brave New World (2025) † |414757293 |The Marvels (2023) |206136825 }} }} }} |
colspan="6" |
{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=franchise|rank=2|title=Spider-Man|total={{#expr:{{#expr:825776725+789728142+895735062}}+{{#expr:758682352+709734012}}+{{#expr:880918840+1132679685+1922598800}}+{{#expr:856085151+506813864+167460961+100498764+478937618+62076533}}+{{#expr:375540831+690824738}}}}|number=16|highest=No Way Home|gross=1922598800 |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Marvel Cinematic Universe|number=3|highest=No Way Home|gross=1922598800 |No Way Home (2021) |1922598800 |Far From Home (2019) |1132679685 |Homecoming (2017) |880918840 }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Raimi series|number=3|highest=Spider-Man 3|gross=895735062 |Spider-Man 3 (2007) |895735062 |Spider-Man (2002) |825776725 |Spider-Man 2 (2004) |789728142 }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Sony's Spider-Man Universe|number=6|highest=Venom|gross=856085151 |Venom (2018) |856085151 |Venom: Let There Be Carnage (2021) |506813864 |Venom: The Last Dance (2024) |478937618 |Morbius (2022) |167460961 |Madame Web (2024) |100498764 |Kraven the Hunter (2024) |62076533 }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Webb series|number=2|highest=The Amazing Spider-Man|gross=758682352 |The Amazing Spider-Man (2012) |758682352 |The Amazing Spider-Man 2 (2014) |709734012 }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Spider-Verse|number=2|highest=Across the Spider-Verse|gross=690824738 |Across the Spider-Verse (2023) |690824738 |Into the Spider-Verse (2018) |375540831 }} }} |
colspan="6" |
{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=franchise|rank=3|title=Star Wars|total={{#expr:{{#expr:775398007+(538375067+9593937)+482366101}}+{{#expr:1046515409+649398328+848754768}}+68282844+{{#expr:2068223624+1332539889+1074144248}}+{{#expr:1057420387+392924807}}}}|number=12|highest=The Force Awakens|gross=2068223624 |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=franchise|sub=y|title=Skywalker Saga|total={{#expr:{{#expr:775398007+(538375067+9593937)+482366101}}+{{#expr:1046515409+649398328+848754768}}+{{#expr:2068223624+1332539889+1074144248}}}}|number=9|highest=The Force Awakens|gross=2068223624 |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Sequel trilogy|number=3|highest=The Force Awakens|gross=2068223624 |VII – The Force Awakens (2015) |2068223624 |VIII – The Last Jedi (2017) |1332539889 |IX – The Rise of Skywalker (2019) |1074144248 }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Prequel trilogy|number=3|highest=The Phantom Menace|gross=1046515409 |I – The Phantom Menace (1999) |1046515409 |III – Revenge of the Sith (2005) |848754768 |II – Attack of the Clones (2002) |649398328 }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Original trilogy|number=3|highest=A New Hope|gross=775398007 |IV – A New Hope (1977) |775398007 |V – The Empire Strikes Back (1980) |{{#expr:538375067+9593937}} |VI – Return of the Jedi (1983) |482366101 }} }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Standalone films|number=2|highest=Rogue One|gross=1057420387 |Rogue One (2016) |1057420387 |Solo (2018) |392924807 }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=film|sub=y|title=The Clone Wars (2008)|total=68282844}} }} |
colspan="6"|
{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=franchise|rank=4|title=Wizarding World|total={{#expr:{{#expr:1009046830+880684614+797568607+896815106+942201710+934483039+977070383+1342139727}}+{{#expr:814038508+654855901+407150844}}}}|number=11|highest=Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2|gross=1342139727 |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Harry Potter series|number=8|highest=Deathly Hallows – Part 2|gross=1342139727 |Deathly Hallows – Part 2 (2011) |1342139727 |Philosopher's Stone (2001) |1009046830 |Deathly Hallows – Part 1 (2010) |977070383 |Order of the Phoenix (2007) |942201710 |Half-Blood Prince (2009) |934483039 |Goblet of Fire (2005) |896815106 |Chamber of Secrets (2002) |880684614 |Prisoner of Azkaban (2004) |797568607 }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Fantastic Beasts series|number=3|highest=Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them|gross=814038508 |Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (2016) |814038508 |The Crimes of Grindelwald (2018) |654855901 |The Secrets of Dumbledore (2022) |407150844 }} }} |
colspan="6" |
{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=franchise|rank=5|title=James Bond|total={{#expr: {{#expr:59500000+78900000+124900000+141200000+101000000+116000000}}+ 64600000+ {{#expr:126400000+98500000+185400000+210300000+194900000+183700000+152400000}}+ {{#expr:191200000+156200000}}+ {{#expr:352194034+333011068+361832400+431971116}}+ {{#expr:616505162+589580482+1108594137+880705312+1119126+774153007}}+ 41744718+160000000}} |number=27|highest=Skyfall|gross=1108594137 |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=franchise|sub=y|title=Eon series|total={{#expr: {{#expr:59500000+78900000+124900000+141200000+101000000+116000000}}+ 64600000+ {{#expr:126400000+98500000+185400000+210300000+194900000+183700000+152400000}}+ {{#expr:191200000+156200000}}+ {{#expr:352194034+333011068+361832400+431971116}}+ {{#expr:616505162+589580482+1108594137+880705312+1119126+774153007}}}} |number=25|highest=Skyfall|gross=1108594137 |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Daniel Craig series|number=5|highest=Skyfall|gross=1108594137 |Skyfall (2012) |1108594137 |Spectre (2015) |880705312 |No Time to Die (2021) |774153007 |Casino Royale (2006) |616505162 |Quantum of Solace (2008) |589580482 }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Pierce Brosnan series|number=4|highest=Die Another Day|gross=431971116 |Die Another Day (2002) |431971116 |The World Is Not Enough (1999) |361832400 |GoldenEye (1995) |352194034 |Tomorrow Never Dies (1997) |333011068 }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Roger Moore series|number=7|highest=Moonraker|gross=210300000 |Moonraker (1979) |210300000 |For Your Eyes Only (1981) |194900000 |The Spy Who Loved Me (1977) |185400000 |Octopussy (1983) |183700000 |A View to a Kill (1985) |152400000 |Live and Let Die (1973) |126400000 |The Man with the Golden Gun (1974) |98500000 }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Sean Connery series|number=6|highest=Thunderball|gross=141200000 |Thunderball (1965) |141200000 |Goldfinger (1964) |124900000 |Diamonds Are Forever (1971) |116000000 |You Only Live Twice (1967) |101000000 |From Russia with Love (1963) |78900000 |Dr. No (1962) |59500000 }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Timothy Dalton series|number=2|highest=The Living Daylights|gross=191200000 |The Living Daylights (1987) |191200000 |Licence to Kill (1989) |156200000 }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=George Lazenby series|number=1|highest=On Her Majesty's Secret Service|gross=64600000 |On Her Majesty's Secret Service (1969) |64600000 }} }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=film|sub=y|title=Never Say Never Again (1983)|total=160000000}} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=film|sub=y|title=Casino Royale (1967)|total=41744718}} }} |
colspan="6" |
{{Highest-grossing films franchise|rank=6|title=Avengers|number=4|highest=Endgame|gross=2797501328 |Endgame (2019) |2797501328 |Infinity War (2018) |2048359754 |The Avengers (2012) |1518815515 |Age of Ultron (2015) |1402809540 }} |
colspan="6" |
{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=franchise|rank=7|title=X-Men|total={{#expr:{{#expr:296339528+407711549+460435291+352616690+746045700+543934105+252442974}}+{{#expr:373062864+414828246+619021436}}+{{#expr:49169594}}+{{#expr:782612155+785896609+1338073645}}}}|number=14|highest=Deadpool & Wolverine|gross=1338073645 |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Main series|number=7|highest=Days of Future Past|gross=746045700 |Days of Future Past (2014) |746045700 |Apocalypse (2016) |543934105 |The Last Stand (2006) |460435291 |X2 (2003) |407711549 |First Class (2011) |352616690 |X-Men (2000) |296339528 |Dark Phoenix (2019) |252442974 }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Deadpool series|number=3|highest=Deadpool & Wolverine|gross=1338073645 |Deadpool & Wolverine (2024) |1338073645 |Deadpool 2 (2018) |785896609 |Deadpool (2016) |782612155 }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Wolverine series|number=3|highest=Logan|gross=619021436 |Logan (2017) |619021436 |The Wolverine (2013) |414828246 |Origins: Wolverine (2009) |373062864 }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=film|sub=y|title=The New Mutants (2020)|total=49169594}} }} |
colspan="6" |
{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=franchise|rank=8|title=Fast & Furious|total={{#expr:{{#expr:207517509+236350661+158964610+360366870+626137675+788680968+1515341399+1238764765+726229501+714375114}}+760732926}}|number=11|highest=Furious 7|gross=1515341399 |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=The Fast Saga|number=10|highest=Furious 7|gross=1515341399 |Furious 7 (2015) |1515341399 |The Fate of the Furious (2017){{ref|Fast 8|F8}} |1238764765 |Fast & Furious 6 (2013) |788680968 |F9 (2021) |726229501 |Fast X (2023) |714375114 |Fast Five (2011) |626137675 |Fast & Furious (2009) |360366870 |2 Fast 2 Furious (2003) |236350661 |The Fast and the Furious (2001) |207517509 |Tokyo Drift (2006) |158964610 }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=film|sub=y|title=Hobbs & Shaw (2019)|total=760732926}} }} |
colspan="6" |
{{Highest-grossing films franchise|rank=9|title=DC Extended Universe{{ref |Shared|S}}|number=15|highest=Aquaman|gross=1148528393 |Aquaman (2018) |1148528393 |Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016) |873637528 |Wonder Woman (2017) |822854286 |Suicide Squad (2016) |746846894 |Man of Steel (2013) |668045518 |Justice League (2017) |657926987 |Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom (2023) |439381226 |Black Adam (2022) |393452111 |Shazam! (2019) |365971656 |The Flash (2023) |271433313 |Birds of Prey (2020) |205358461 |Wonder Woman 1984 (2020) |169601036 |The Suicide Squad (2021) |168717425 |Shazam! Fury of the Gods (2023) |134138006 |Blue Beetle (2023) |130788072 }} |
colspan="6" |
{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=franchise|rank=10|title=Batman|total={{#expr:{{#expr:3900000+57343}}+{{#expr:411508343+266822354+336529144+238207122+{{#expr:48482+10057+38014+373+28597+196}}+82102379}}+5617391+{{#expr:373672993+1007336937+1081169825}}+873637528+{{#expr:4462034+39091}}+311950384+{{#expr:1074458282+207500287}}+772319315}}|number=18|highest=The Dark Knight Rises|gross=1081169825 |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=The Dark Knight trilogy|number=3|highest=The Dark Knight Rises|gross=1081169825 |The Dark Knight Rises (2012) |1081169825 |The Dark Knight (2008) |1007336937 |Batman Begins (2005) |373672993 }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Joker series|number=2|highest=Joker|gross=1074458282 |Joker (2019) |1074458282 |Folie à Deux (2024) |207500287 }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Burton/Schumacher series|number=4|highest=Batman|gross={{#expr:411508343+48482}} |Batman (1989) |{{#expr:411508343+48482}} |Batman Forever (1995) |{{#expr:336529144+38014+373}} |Batman Returns (1992) |{{#expr:266822354+10057}} |Batman & Robin (1997) |{{#expr:238207122+28597+196}} }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=film|sub=y|title=Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)|total=873637528}} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=film|sub=y|title=The Batman (2022)|total=772319315}} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=film|sub=y|title=The Lego Batman Movie (2017)|total=311950384}} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=film|sub=y|title=Catwoman (2004)|total=82102379}} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=film|sub=y|title=Mask of the Phantasm (1993)|total=5617391}} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=DC Universe Animated Original Movies|number=2|highest=The Killing Joke|gross=4462034 |The Killing Joke (2016) |4462034 |Batman and Harley Quinn (2017) |39091 }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=1960s TV series|number=2|highest=Batman: The Movie|gross=3900000 |Batman: The Movie (1966){{ref |USgross3|*}}{{ref |Rentals3|R}} |3900000 |Return of the Caped Crusaders (2016) |57343 }} }} |
colspan="6"|
{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=franchise|rank=11|title=Jurassic Park|total={{#expr:{{#expr:1037535230+618638999+368780809}}+{{#expr:1671537444+1308473425+1004004592}}}}|number=6|highest=Jurassic World|gross=1671537444 |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Jurassic World series|number=3|highest=Jurassic World|gross=1671537444 |Jurassic World (2015) |1671537444 |Fallen Kingdom (2018) |1308473425 |Dominion (2022) |1004004592 }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Jurassic Park trilogy|number=3|highest=Jurassic Park|gross=1037535230 |Jurassic Park (1993) |1037535230 |The Lost World (1997) |618638999 |Jurassic Park III (2001) |368780809 }} }} |
colspan="6" |
{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=franchise|rank=12|title=Middle-earth|total={{#expr:{{#expr:898748756+948945489+1147997407}}+{{#expr:1017030651+959027992+956019788}}+30471420+20658572}}|number=8|highest=The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King|gross=1147997407 |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=franchise|sub=y|title=Jackson series|total={{#expr:{{#expr:898748756+948945489+1147997407}}+{{#expr:1017030651+959027992+956019788}}}}|number=6|highest=The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King|gross=1147997407 |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=The Lord of the Rings|number=3|highest=The Return of the King|gross=1147997407 |The Return of the King (2003) |1147997407 |The Two Towers (2002) |948945489 |The Fellowship of the Ring (2001) |898748756 }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=The Hobbit|number=3|highest=An Unexpected Journey|gross=1017030651 |An Unexpected Journey (2012) |1017030651 |The Desolation of Smaug (2013) |959027992 |The Battle of the Five Armies (2014) |956019788 }} }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=film|sub=y|title=The Lord of the Rings (1978)|total=30471420}} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=film|sub=y|title=The War of the Rohirrim (2024)|total=20658572}} }} |
colspan="6"|
{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=franchise|rank=13|title=Despicable Me|total={{#expr:{{#expr:543283815+970766005+1034800131+971105208}}+{{#expr:1159444662+940482695}}}}|number=6|highest=Minions|gross=1159444662 |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Main series|number=4|highest=Despicable Me 3|gross=1034800131 |Despicable Me 3 (2017) |1034800131 |Despicable Me 4 (2024) |971105208 |Despicable Me 2 (2013) |970766005 |Despicable Me (2010) |543283815 }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Minions series|number=2|highest=Minions|gross=1159444662 |Minions (2015) |1159444662 |The Rise of Gru (2022) |940482695 }} }} |
colspan="6" |
{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=franchise|rank=14|title=Transformers|total={{#expr:{{#expr:709709780+836303693+1123794079+1104054072+605425157+467989645+441656550+129408392}}+5860601}}|number=9|highest=Dark of the Moon|gross=1123794079 |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Main series|number=8|highest=Dark of the Moon|gross=1123794079 |Dark of the Moon (2011) |1123794079 |Age of Extinction (2014) |1104054072 |Revenge of the Fallen (2009) |836303693 |Transformers (2007) |709709780 |The Last Knight (2017) |605425157 |Bumblebee (2018) |467989645 |Rise of the Beasts (2023) |441656550 |One (2024) |129408392 }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=film|sub=y|title=The Transformers: The Movie (1986)|total=5860601}} }} |
colspan="6" |
{{Highest-grossing films franchise|rank=15|title=Avatar|number=2|highest=Avatar|gross=2923706026 |Avatar (2009) |2923706026 |The Way of Water (2022) |2320250281 }} |
colspan="6" |
{{Highest-grossing films franchise|rank=16|title=Pirates of the Caribbean|number=5|highest=Dead Man's Chest|gross=1066179747 |Dead Man's Chest (2006) |1066179747 |On Stranger Tides (2011) |1045713802 |At World's End (2007) |960996492 |Dead Men Tell No Tales (2017) |794861794 |The Curse of the Black Pearl (2003) |654264015 }} |
colspan="6" |
{{Highest-grossing films franchise|rank=17|title=Mission: Impossible|number=7|highest=Fallout|gross=791657398 |Fallout (2018) |791657398 |Ghost Protocol (2011) |694713380 |Rogue Nation (2015) |682716636 |Dead Reckoning (2023) |571125435 |Mission: Impossible 2 (2000) |546388108 |Mission: Impossible (1996) |457696391 |Mission: Impossible III (2006) |398479497 }} |
colspan="6" |
{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=franchise|rank=18|title=Shrek|total={{#expr:{{#expr:484409218+932530034+813367380+752600867}}+{{#expr:554987477+485254377}}}}|number=6|highest=Shrek 2|gross=932530034 |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Main series|number=4|highest=Shrek 2|gross=932530034 |Shrek 2 (2004) |932530034 |Shrek the Third (2007) |813367380 |Shrek Forever After (2010) |752600867 |Shrek (2001) |484409218 }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Puss in Boots series|number=2|highest=Puss in Boots|gross=554987477 |Puss in Boots (2011) |554987477 |The Last Wish (2022) |485254377 }} }} |
colspan="6" |
{{Highest-grossing films franchise|rank=19|title=The Twilight Saga|number=5|highest=Breaking Dawn – Part 2|gross=829746820 |Breaking Dawn – Part 2 (2012) |829746820 |Breaking Dawn – Part 1 (2011) |712205856 |New Moon (2009) |709827462 |Eclipse (2010) |698509825 |Twilight (2008) |407187715 |Twilight / New Moon Combo (2010) |2385237 }} |
colspan="6" |
{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=franchise|rank=20|title=The Lion King †|total={{#expr:970707763+1465+1656943394+722339600}}|number=4|highest=The Lion King (2019)|gross=1656943394|release=y |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=CGI animated series †|number=2|highest=The Lion King (2019)|gross=1656943394|release=02 |The Lion King (2019) |1656943394 |Mufasa (2024) † |722339600 }} |{{Highest-grossing films franchise|type=series|sub=y|title=Traditionally animated series|number=2|highest=The Lion King (1994)|gross=970707763 |The Lion King (1994) |970707763 |The Lion King 1½ (2004) |1465 }} }} |
{{Refbegin}}
{{note label|Shared|S||Shared universes for which some properties also have their own entries.}}
{{note label|USgross3|*||Canada and U.S. gross only.}}
{{note label|Rentals3|R||Distributor rental.}}
{{refend}}
See also
{{Portal|Film}}
Notes
{{notelist}}
References
{{reflist}}
= Box office sources =
{{reflist|group="#"|30em}}
= Franchise and series sources =
{{Refbegin|30em}}
- {{note label|Franchise sources|§|§}}{{cite web |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/ |access-date=April 23, 2015 |title=Franchise Index |website=Box Office Mojo}}
- Avengers
- {{cite web |title=Avengers – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=avengersfranchise.htm |access-date=October 12, 2015 |website=Box Office Mojo}}
- Batman
- {{cite web |title=Batman – Worldwide (Unadjusted) & Batman: Mask of the Phantasm |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=batman.htm |access-date=July 26, 2016 |website=Box Office Mojo}}
- Fathom events
- Batman (UK): {{cite web |title=Batman (1989) 30th Anniversary |website=Box Office Mojo |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&id=batman30.htm |access-date=May 25, 2019 |quote=UK: $48,482}}
- Batman Returns (UK): {{cite web |title=Batman Returns (Event) |website=Box Office Mojo |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&id=batmanreturnsevent.htm |access-date=May 25, 2019 |quote=UK: $10,057}}
- Batman Forever: {{cite web |title=Batman Forever (Fathom Event) |website=Box Office Mojo |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&id=batmanforeverfathomevent.htm |access-date=May 25, 2019 |quote=US: $38,014; UK: $373}}
- Batman and Robin: {{cite web |title=Batman and Robin (Fathom Event) |website=Box Office Mojo |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&id=batmanandrobinfathomevent.htm |access-date=May 25, 2019 |quote=US: $28,597; UK: $196}}
- Batman: The Movie (1966) {{ndash}} {{cite book |last1=Silverman |first1=Stephen M. |chapter=Breakeven for Feature Productions: 1966 Releases |title=The Fox That Got Away: The Last Days of the Zanuck Dynasty at Twentieth Century-Fox |date=1988 |publisher=L. Stuart |page=325 |isbn=978-0-8184-0485-6 |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/foxthatgotawayt00silv/page/325 |chapter-url-access=registration}}
- {{cite web |title=Catwoman (2004) |website=Box Office Mojo |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=catwoman.htm |access-date=July 22, 2012}}
- {{cite web |url=https://www.the-numbers.com/movie/Batman-Return-of-the-Caped-Crusaders#tab=summary |title=Batman: Return of the Caped Crusaders |website=The Numbers |access-date=December 17, 2016}}
- {{cite web |url=https://www.the-numbers.com/movie/Batman-and-Harley-Quinn#tab=summary |title=Batman and Harley Quinn (2017) |website=The Numbers |access-date=August 22, 2017}}
- {{cite web |title=Joker (2019) |website=Box Office Mojo |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt7286456/ |access-date=November 11, 2019}}
- DC Extended Universe
- {{cite web |title=DC Extended Universe – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=dc.htm |access-date=May 8, 2019 |website=Box Office Mojo}}
- Despicable Me
- {{cite web |title=Despicable Me (Unadjusted) |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=despicableme.htm |access-date=November 4, 2015 |website=Box Office Mojo}}
- The Fast and the Furious
- {{cite web |title=The Fast and the Furious – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=fastandthefurious.htm |access-date=October 23, 2019 |website=Box Office Mojo}}
- {{cite web |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=furious8.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170822151827/https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=furious8.htm |title=The Fate of the Furious (2017) |website=Box Office Mojo|archive-date=August 22, 2017}}
- Wizarding World
- {{cite web |title=J.K. Rowling's Wizarding World – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=jkrowling.htm |access-date=November 17, 2016 |website=Box Office Mojo}}
- James Bond
- {{cite web |title=James Bond – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=jamesbond.htm |access-date=April 17, 2016 |website=Box Office Mojo}} (Brosnan and Craig)
- {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA428 428–429]}}. "James Bond Franchise Films: All-Release Worldwide Box Office." (Connery, Lazenby, Moore and Dalton)
- {{cite web |title=Never Say Never Again (1983) |website=The Numbers |publisher=Nash Information Services |url=https://www.the-numbers.com/movies/1983/0NSNA.php |access-date=November 25, 2012}}
- {{cite web |title=Casino Royale (1967) |website=The Numbers |publisher=Nash Information Services |url=https://www.the-numbers.com/movies/1967/0CARO.php |access-date=January 6, 2012}}
- {{cite web |title=Casino Royale (Secret Cinema 2019) |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&country=UK&id=casinoroyale2019.htm |access-date=June 16, 2019 |website=Box Office Mojo}}
- Jurassic Park
- {{cite web |title=Jurassic Park – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=jurassicpark.htm |access-date=November 25, 2018 |website=Box Office Mojo}}
- {{cite web |title=Jurassic Park (2011 re-release) |url=https://boxofficemojo.com/movies/intl/?id=_fJURASSICPARK201&country=UK&wk=2011W38&id=_fJURASSICPARK201 |access-date=January 17, 2015 |website=Box Office Mojo |quote=United Kingdom: $786,021}}
- Marvel Cinematic Universe
- {{cite web |title=Marvel Cinematic Universe – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=avengers.htm |access-date=June 19, 2016 |website=Box Office Mojo}}
- Middle-earth
- {{cite web |title=Middle Earth – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=middleearth.htm |access-date=November 18, 2016 |website=Box Office Mojo}}
- {{cite web |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/intl/?id=_fTHELORDOFTHERING03 |title=The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (2017 re-release) |website=Box Office Mojo |access-date=February 6, 2017}}
- {{cite web |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/intl/?id=_fTHELORDOFTHERING04 |title=The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (2017 re-release) |website=Box Office Mojo |access-date=February 6, 2017}}
- {{cite web |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/intl/?id=_fTHELORDOFTHERING05 |title=The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2017 re-release) |website=Box Office Mojo |access-date=February 6, 2017}}
- {{cite web |title=The Lord of the Rings – Worldwide (Unadjusted) & The Lord of the Rings (1978) |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=lordoftherings.htm |access-date=April 23, 2015 |website=Box Office Mojo}}
- Mission: Impossible
- {{cite web |title=Mission: Impossible – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=missionimpossible.htm |access-date=November 4, 2015 |website=Box Office Mojo}}
- Pirates of the Caribbean
- {{cite web |title=Pirates of the Caribbean – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=piratesofthecaribbean.htm |access-date=January 6, 2012 |website=Box Office Mojo}}
- Shrek
- {{cite web |title=Shrek – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=shrek.htm |access-date=December 14, 2012 |website=Box Office Mojo}}
- Spider-Man
- {{cite web |title=Spider-Man – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=spiderman.htm |access-date=December 15, 2014 |website=Box Office Mojo}}
- {{cite web |title=Spider-Man / Men in Black II |website=Box Office Mojo |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=main&id=spidermeninblack.htm |access-date=May 31, 2018}}
- {{cite web |title=Columbia 100th Anniversary Series |website=Box Office Mojo |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/release/rl4217536513/ |access-date=May 5, 2024}}
- Star Wars
- {{cite web |title=Star Wars (1977) |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=starwars4.htm |access-date=January 6, 2012 |website=Box Office Mojo}}
- {{cite web |title=The Empire Strikes Back |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&country=00&id=starwars5.htm |access-date=October 8, 2015 |website=Box Office Mojo}}
- {{cite web |title=Return of the Jedi |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=starwars6.htm |access-date=January 6, 2012 |website=Box Office Mojo}}
- {{cite web |title=The Phantom Menace |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=starwars.htm |access-date=November 25, 2012 |website=Box Office Mojo}}
- {{cite web |title=Attack of the Clones |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=starwars2.htm |access-date=January 6, 2012 |website=Box Office Mojo}}
- {{cite web |title=Revenge of the Sith |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=starwars3.htm |access-date=January 6, 2012 |website=Box Office Mojo}}
- {{cite web |title=The Clone Wars |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=starwarsclonewars.htm |access-date=January 6, 2012 |website=Box Office Mojo}}
- Disney releases (2015–present): {{cite web |title=Star Wars – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=starwars.htm |access-date=October 9, 2018 |website=Box Office Mojo}}
- Transformers
- {{cite web |title=Transformers – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=transformers.htm |access-date=May 17, 2015 |website=Box Office Mojo}}
- The Twilight Saga
- {{cite web |title=Twilight – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=twilight.htm |access-date=May 1, 2013 |website=Box Office Mojo}}
- {{cite web |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=twilightnewmooncombo.htm |access-date=September 25, 2011 |title=Twilight/New Moon Combo (one-night-only) |website=Box Office Mojo}}
- X-Men
- {{cite web |title=X-Men – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=xmen.htm |access-date=March 12, 2017 |website=Box Office Mojo}}
{{Refend}}
= Bibliography =
{{Refbegin}}
- {{cite book |editor1-last=Block |editor1-first=Alex Ben |editor2-last=Wilson |editor2-first=Lucy Autrey |year=2010 |title=George Lucas's Blockbusting: A Decade-by-Decade Survey of Timeless Movies Including Untold Secrets of Their Financial and Cultural Success |publisher=HarperCollins |isbn=978-0-06-177889-6 |url=https://archive.org/details/georgelucassbloc00alex}}
- {{cite book |last=Finler |first=Joel Waldo |year=2003 |title=The Hollywood Story |publisher=Wallflower Press |isbn=978-1-903364-66-6 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/hollywoodstory0000finl }}
- {{cite book |last1=Hall |first1=Sheldon |last2=Neale |first2=Stephen |year=2010 |title=Epics, Spectacles, and Blockbusters: A Hollywood History |publisher=Wayne State University Press |isbn=978-0-8143-3008-1 }}
{{Refend}}
External links
- [https://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/world/ All-Time Worldwide Box Office Grosses] at Box Office Mojo
- [https://www.the-numbers.com/box-office-records/worldwide/all-movies/cumulative/all-time All-Time Highest-Grossing Movies Worldwide] at The Numbers
- [http://www.filmsite.org/boxoffice.html Box-Office Top 100 Films of All Time] at Filmsite.org
{{Film box office|state=expand}}
{{Media series}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Highest-grossing films}}