User talk:JarrahTree/Archive 60

{{nobots}}

{{noindex}}

Tree of Life Newsletter

File:Tree of life by Haeckel.jpg

{{shortcut|WP:TOLN}}

;{{big|July 2019—Issue 004}}

;{{huge|Tree of Life}}

;Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!

{{clear}}

class="wikitable" style="display: inline-table; width: 54%;"

|+Newly recognized content

{{icon|FL}} List of felids by {{noping|PresN}}

{{icon|FA}} Masked booby by {{noping|Casliber}}

{{icon|GA}} Letter-winged kite by {{noping|Casliber}}, reviewed by {{noping|Jens Lallensack}}

{{icon|GA}} Plains zebra by {{noping|LittleJerry}}, reviewed by {{noping|starsandwhales}}

{{icon|GA}} Ornithogalum umbellatum by {{noping|Michael Goodyear}}, reviewed by {{noping|Jens Lallensack}}

{{icon|GA}}


class="wikitable" style="display: inline-table; width: 44%;"

|+Newly nominated content

{{icon|FAC}} Letter-winged kite by {{noping|Casliber}}

{{icon|FAC}} Megabat by {{noping|Enwebb}}

{{icon|FAC}} Onychopterella by {{noping|Super Dromaeosaurus}}

{{icon|GAN}} Dvulikiaspis by {{noping|Super Dromaeosaurus}}

{{icon|GAN}} Kosmoceratops by {{noping|FunkMonk}}

{{icon|GAN}} Clussexx Three D Grinchy Glee by {{noping|Hunter Kahn}}

{{icon|GAN}} Giant golden-crowned flying fox by {{noping|Enwebb}}

{{icon|GAN}} Myxomatosis by {{noping|Rabbit Vet}}

role="presentation" class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="width:100%; background:#b6ecd0;"

|

Two Tree of Life editors in WikiCup round of 16
The WikiCup, an annual editing competition, is now in its fourth round. Casliber, consistent participant since 2010 and winner in 2016, is currently dominating Group A with 601 points. Largely responsible is the successful Featured Article nomination of Masked booby. The other remaining Tree of Life participant, Enwebb, is participating in her first ever WikiCup. In this round, she has a grand total of...5 points. But with the recent Featured Article nomination of Megabat, she stands to gain 600 points if successful. As it stands, though, it appears that at least one ToL editor is headed to the fifth and final round of 8 contestants, which begins September 1.

Thus far, all participants in the WikiCup have generated 17 Featured Articles, 116 Good Articles, 16 Featured Lists, and 57 Featured Pictures. The Good Article Nominations backlog has been reduced as well, with 286 Good Article Reviews.

role="presentation" class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="width:100%; background:#b6ecd0;"

|

Editor spotlight: Photographing the tree of life
For this month's editor spotlight we're joined by {{noping|Charlesjsharp}}, a longtime contributor to Wikimedia Commons with a plethora of featured pictures on English Wikipedia.

1) Starsandwhales: How long have you been editing Wikipedia, and how did you get interested? How did you begin your journey of photographing wildlife?

  • Charlesjsharp: I uploaded my first pictures to Wikipedia twelve years ago for fun, to show my kids how it works. The pictures of my daughter (static trapeze), my son (Revell), my dog (Border Terrier) and my parents’ home (Tealing) are all still in the articles! I then started to upload wildlife images.

:I’d got my first camera aged eight and went on my first safari in the Kruger Park, South Africa in 1970. I was hooked. I switched to digital in 2004, but didn’t buy any high-end lenses till 2014. Such a shame that hundreds of great photos I took before then look so dreadful by today’s quality standards. My 100-400mm lens transformed mammal and bird photography opportunities and when I got my 100mm macro lens in 2016, the whole new world of insects was open for business.

File:Pied kingfisher (Ceryle rudis rudis) female eating chick.jpg

2) S&W: Over the years, you've taken photos of many different organisms from birds to insects to big cats; you have an [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Charlesjsharp/favourites extensive list of favorite images]. Which animals have been the most exciting for you to photograph?

  • Charlesjsharp: The trophy animals the hunters used to shoot are the ones I like to shoot too: it was lion, elephant and baboon in 1970. More recently, hunting for tiger by jeep in Kanha National Park in India was exciting and so was searching for jaguar by boat in the rivers of the Pantanal in Brazil. Our encounters with the mountain gorillas in Rwanda and Uganda was amazing, but the actual photography was no challenge.

:But photographing animal behaviour is the most exciting and challenging. There’s usually movement and it all happens so fast, like when [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Giant_kingfisher_(Megaceryle_maxima)_female_composite.jpg a bird captures its prey]. Every now and then you snap something really unusual – like the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pied_kingfisher#/media/File:Pied_kingfisher_(Ceryle_rudis_rudis)_female_eating_chick.jpg cannibal kingfisher]

3) S&W: Many articles under ToL have requests for people to add images that can go unanswered. What can the community do to improve the coverage of different organisms on Wikipedia, especially when it comes to images?

  • Charlesjsharp: It’s a very time consuming process because the Wikipedia code is cumbersome (*see below). It take an age to upload to Commons: to describe, categorize, geocode. Many of the categories don’t exist so have to be created. If the image is of a subspecies, then all the images have to be checked before you can nominate an image for VI. It’s also takes ages to nominate images for VI and QI on Commons. May be some users use sophisticated tools to lighten the load, but I don’t know if they exist. In other words, Wikipedia is OK, but Commons is a nightmare. Hundreds of really poor quality photos clog up the system and some users are too lazy to filter and edit their nominations.

:Recently, some thoughtless editor added a ‘caption’ box to Commons. A waste of time. The image title should act as the caption.

:I applied for a grant to attend Wikimania, but was unsuccessful. Not much can happen without some funding to kickstart and then drive improvements forward.
Here was my response to the question: "How can we increase the quality and diversity of images being uploaded and, in particular, improve the Featured Picture, Quality Image and Valued Image projects?"

File:Panther chameleon (Furcifer pardalis) male Nosy Be.jpg

::1. Work together on pre-defined projects to develop a team spirit that will help us develop a set of shared values

::2. Through brainstorming, Identify what we need to do to improve the quality and diversity of images being uploaded and, in particular, identify what we need to do to improve the credibility of the Featured Picture, Quality Image and Valued Image projects

::3. By sharing our photographic skills, find ways to share skills with the community. Knowledge transfer is time-consuming and we need to set limited objectives and realistic time frames. This will require compromise as individuals have to listen and find ways to agree. This is going to be much easier through face-to-face meetings

::3. Identify what we need to do to improve the quality and diversity of images being uploaded (diversity of contributor and diversity in subject) and, in particular, identify what we need to do to improve the credibility of the Featured Picture, Quality Image and Valued Image projects

::4. Spend more time talking about values and knowledge transfer than sharing photography tips amongst delegates, then getting all delegates to agree to DO SOMETHING WHEN THEY GET HOME to take things forward.

4) S&W: What advice would you give to people new to photographing wildlife?

  • Charlesjsharp: An impossible question unless you know what someone’s objective is. So you’re on your first safari? Borrow or rent a decent camera and a quality 300mm lens. Then read a few of the dozens of free advice pages on the internet. Then when you’re out and about, take the lens cap off and set the camera to fully automatic sports mode. Be ready. If you’ve time, get in the right place (sunlight/background). Watch the animal’s behaviour. Point and shoot. Glance at the screen. If OK, repeat. Only then start playing with the settings to optimise shutter speed, F number and ISO.

5) S&W: What would the Tree of Life community be surprised to learn about your life off-wiki?


  • Charlesjsharp: I used to be a high-end stamp collector (early USA). My photography is a sort of collecting. And I’m a keen bridge player.

* An example of cumbersome code: getting the layout of my responses to your questions. So dated, and no online spellchecker.

role="presentation" class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="width:100%; background:#b6ecd0"

|

July DYKs
* ... that the wildlife of Senegal includes a critically endangered subspecies of the giant eland and the common Senegal one-striped grass mouse? (July 1)

{{main page image|image=Cycloseris distorta.jpeg|caption=Cycloseris distorta|width=160}}

{{main page image|image=Rat-Catching at the Blue Anchor Tavern (cropped).jpg|caption=Tiny the Wonder, killing rats
at the Blue Anchor Tavern|width=x141}}

{{main page image|image=Episcia cupreata (9631125202).jpg|caption=Episcia cupreata flower|width=140}}

{{icon|Project}} Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

Sent by ZLEA via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:59, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #376

Weather or not to delete the WPC article

One butterfly may flap its wings to create a tornado, but [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Western_Power_Corporation&diff=910175997&oldid=910175721 one editor] does not a WP:SNOWstorm make. Mitch Ames (talk) 06:41, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

''This Month in GLAM'': July 2019

style="width:100%;"

| valign="top" align="center" style="border:1px gray solid; padding:1em;" |

{| align="center"

style="text-align: center;" | File:This Month in GLAM logo 2018.png




style="text-align: center;"

| Headlines

style="font-size:10pt; font-family:Times New Roman; text-align:center;"

|

style="font-family:Times New Roman; text-align:center; font-size:85%;" | Read this edition in fullSingle-page
valign="top" colspan="2" style="padding:0.5em; font-family:Times New Roman;text-align:center; font-size:85%;" |

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

|}

About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 08:20, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Re: Bingo

What a weird article ... and a weird topic for an article ... but it is probably notable enough. Per Google Maps it's in Siesta Park, which is yet another of the localities around here that doesn't have an article ... I've tried to fix the estate article up a bit. Graham87 09:05, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

:How's that? Gotta run now ... Graham87 10:01, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Re: Bendu case

Hi - my mistake, thought I had pressed publish on that page already - is done now! Ta for bringing up Jay4283 (talk) 10:36, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #377

Wandering threads

Consistent indentation [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AWikiProject_Western_Australia&type=revision&diff=911087800&oldid=911082691 here] would make the wandering less exhausting, and the discussion easier to follow... Please pay some heed to WP:THREAD. Mitch Ames (talk) 12:33, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #378

MfD nomination of [[:Portal:Death]]

30px :Portal:Death, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Death and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of :Portal:Death during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 02:13, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

:(Notification: nomination of Sesquicentenary Celebrations Series at articles for deletion. (TW))

Nomination of [[:Sesquicentenary Celebrations Series]] for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Sesquicentenary Celebrations Series is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sesquicentenary Celebrations Series until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Willbb234Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 15:36, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #379

PetScan for spiders not tagged for Australian biota

If you want to find spiders not yet tagged for Australia, try [https://petscan.wmflabs.org/?edits%5Bflagged%5D=both&edits%5Banons%5D=both&templates_no=WikiProject%20Australia&interface_language=en&ns%5B0%5D=1&edits%5Bbots%5D=both&categories=Spiders%20of%20Australia&active_tab=tab_templates_n_links&templates_use_talk_no=on&search_max_results=500&language=en&project=wikipedia&wikidata_label_language=&doit= this search]. It may take some time to run, so be patient. Plantdrew (talk) 17:42, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019 Tree of Life Newsletter

File:Tree of life by Haeckel.jpg

{{shortcut|WP:TOLN}}

;{{big|August 2019—Issue 005}}

;{{huge|Tree of Life}}

;Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!

{{clear}}

class="wikitable" style="display: inline-table; width: 54%;"

|+Newly recognized content

{{icon|FA}} Letter-winged kite by {{noping|Casliber}}

{{icon|FA}} Megabat by {{noping|Enwebb}}

{{icon|FA}} Rock parrot by {{noping|Casliber}}

{{icon|GT}} Adelophthalmidae by {{noping|Super Dromaeosaurus}}

{{icon|GA}} Giant golden-crowned flying fox by {{noping|Enwebb}}, reviewed by {{noping|Starsandwhales}}

{{icon|GA}} Myxomatosis by {{noping|Rabbit Vet}}, reviewed by {{noping|Chiswick Chap}}

{{icon|GA}} Tylopterella by {{noping|Super Dromaeosaurus}}, reviewed by {{noping|Starsandwhales}} and {{noping|Enwebb}}

{{icon|GA}} Kosmoceratops by {{noping|FunkMonk}}, reviewed by {{noping|Jens Lallensack}}

{{icon|GA}} Slender glass lizard by {{noping|SL93}}, reviewed by {{noping|Casliber}}

{{icon|GA}} Guano by {{noping|Enwebb}}, reviewed by {{noping|Chiswick Chap}}

{{icon|GA}} Dvulikiaspis by {{noping|Super Dromaeosaurus}}, reviewed by {{noping|Casliber}}

{{icon|GA}} Rock parrot by {{noping|Casliber}}, reviewed by {{noping|The Rambling Man}}

{{icon|GA}} Leptospirosis by {{noping|Cerevisae}}, reviewed by {{noping|Ajpolino}}

{{icon|GA}} Hepatitis E by {{noping|Ozzie10aaaa}}, reviewed by {{noping|Casliber}}

{{icon|GA}} Cardabiodon by {{noping|Macrophyseter}}, reviewed by {{noping|FunkMonk}}

{{icon|GA}} Clostridium tetani by {{noping|Ajpolino}}, reviewed by {{noping|Chiswick Chap}}

class="wikitable" style="display: inline-table; width: 44%;"

|+Newly nominated content

{{icon|FAC}} Kosmoceratops by {{noping|FunkMonk}}

{{icon|GAN}} Western yellow robin by {{noping|Casliber}}

{{icon|GAN}} Pekarangan by {{noping|Dhio270599}}

{{icon|GAN}} Hibbertopterus by {{noping|Ichthyovenator}}












role="presentation" class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="width:100%; background:#b6ecd0;"

|

What's the relevance of WikiJournals to WP:TOL?
File:WikiJournal of Science logo.svg

File:WikiJournal of Science publishing pipeline (wiki first).svg

Guest column by Thomas Shafee ({{noping|Evolution and evolvability}}), Editor in Chief of WikiJournal of Science''

The Tree of Life WikiProject and its sprawling phylogeny of daughter projects is one of the largest and most active communities in Wikipedia. It encompasses approximately 570 Featured Articles and well over a thousand Good Articles (second only to military history). The WikiJournal of Science (one of three current journals in the user group) has a few aims that may closely align with the interests of the ToL community.

;Review of existing articles

Firstly, WikiJSci can be a complementary system for FA review (getting external review, input, and validity). When an Wikipedia article is nominated (via WP:JAN), journal editors go out to non-Wikipedian academics and researchers who have published on the subject on the last five years and invite them to give feedback comments (e.g. Peripatric speciation and Baryonyx). The resulting changes can then be integrated back into the Wikipedia article.

;Attracting new articles and contributors

Getting more editors involved in Wikipedia is always a high priority. WikiJSci can also be a way to encourage new people to contribute articles (especially on missing/stub/start topics). An example of an article that was written from scratch by a group of non-Wikipedians is Teladorsagia circumcincta. This not only resulted in a new Wikipedia page on an underdeveloped topic, but introduced the idea of Wikimedia contribution to a group of people who had previously never considered it.

;Images, videos, sound and galleries

The journal can be a way to get multimedia content reviewed or encourage contribution. The same approach could be easily adapted to sounds (e.g. frog mating calls) or videos (e.g. starfish feet motion). It also allows for tracking of those images in new articles via Altmetric ([https://dimensions.altmetric.com/details/3455098/news this example] has >200, which is bananas). There aren't any biology examples in WikiJSci yet, but the sister medical journal has published a few summary diagrams, photography, and image galleries. Examples include this gallery by Blausen Medical or the diagram of cell disassembly during apoptosis.

;Other projects

For those interested in other Wikimedia sister projects, there's also broad scope for interactions with the WikiJournals. Perhaps peer reviewed teaching resources could be useful to sit alongside sets of Wikipedia articles and be integrated into Wikiversity courses (like this or this)? Can sections of Wikidata & Wikispecies be peer reviewed? What are the potential avenues for integration with WikiCite, WikiFactMine, Scholia, etc.? Currently, WikiJSci is aiming to be very flexible and try out different formats so long as they can be externally peer reviewed.

For more info, see the 2019-06-30 Signpost article and the current sister project proposal.

role="presentation" class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="width:100%; background:#b6ecd0;"

|

Editor spotlight: Cwmhiraeth
1) Enwebb: You're very prolific with DYKs, with over 2,000 nominations credited (in fact, I'll highlight which DYK nominations this month were yours below). What made you become so involved in this part of Wikipedia? Why should Tree of Life editors nominate articles for DYK?

:Cwmhiraeth: I became aware of the WikiCup in 2012 and entered the contest. The scoring structure seemed to me to favour DYKs, and I went to considerable trouble to identify short stubs that could be expanded into qualifying start class articles with multiple bonus points. Casliber introduced me to preparing articles for FAC and Sasata helped me with my first solo FA. I won the WikiCup that year, and repeated that success the following year, after which the Cup got a bit more competitive. By that time, nominating articles for DYK was an ingrained habit, and I have continued doing so ever since, but at a rather slower rate. I do more work behind the scenes at DYK now, reviewing other people's nominations in excess of my QPQ requirement, and building prep sets ready to go on the main page, and I retired from competing in the WikiCup and became a judge instead. I would encourage ToL editors to nominate suitable articles for DYK because it gives great satisfaction to know that hundreds or even thousands of people have appreciated your work, and it provides a foil for the biographies and historical articles that predominate there.

2) Enwebb: I noticed that your DYK nominations reflect a diverse array of flora and fauna, from trees, marine invertebrates, birds, fishes, and mammals. How do you decide what to work on?

:Cwmhiraeth: As I look around different articles I keep a note of things I might work on, red links, stub articles that need expanding or places in articles where I would like to add a wikilink but no suitable target page exists. So I have this list, but more often than not I choose a new article to work on based on a Google book that I have been using in a previous article. I like Google books; some of them are really useful for species articles, the main annoyance being when certain pages are permanently unavailable, although I am quite good at tricking the books into revealing pages that they were trying to prevent me from viewing. Eventually I get bored with African rodents, or whatever my present topic is, and move on. I am particularly interested in organisms living in extreme habitats, endangered species, invasive species, pest species, parasites or creatures with interesting behavioural traits.

3) Enwebb: Which of your Wikipedia accomplishments are you most proud of?

:Cwmhiraeth: Well, Sea really. Again that was inspired by the WikiCup, and working in collaboration with Chiswick Chap, we took it from virtually nothing, little more than a list of seas, through DYK and GA, culminating in a really tough FA. That was very satisfying (as were the 1000 odd points it gained me at the WikiCup). In complete contrast was the article Tree. I completely rewrote it in a sandbox as an entry for the "Core contest". The previous version had been quite short with a section on "Record breaking trees" which I hived off into a separate article. My new version was immediately challenged and an edit war would have erupted had I not decided to retire from the fray. My version had some serious flaws, I had never studied botany and I had used a book source which misled me. However, after corrections, my version largely remained in place and I later joined Chiswick Chap in bringing the article to GA status.

4) Enwebb: What motivates you to keep contributing? What's your 10,000 ft view (pardon the non-SI) of the community and Tree of Life?

:Cwmhiraeth: I think Wikipedia is a really great project. The idea of Wikipedia as a pool of knowledge contributed to by thousands of individuals in hundreds of countries is inspiring. It would be nice if we had no vandalism and everyone co-operated with everyone else in an amicable spirit, but as we are all human, it does not quite work out like that. I like to think of my efforts as a legacy that will continue in existence after I am gone.

6) Enwebb: How did you first become interested in natural history?

:Cwmhiraeth: When I was young I had an elderly aunt who used to come to stay and who would take me for walks in the countryside, during which we would watch birds and identify wild flowers. She would take me out at weekends from my girls-only boarding school and we would search for orchids on the Wiltshire Downs. My school was not geared up for science, we just did general science for O-levels, and when it came to A-levels, I was the only pupil in my year to do zoology and chemistry, and one of only two to do physics, for which we had to cycle off to the grammar school on the other side of town. I wanted to be a vet, but was discouraged by my father, obtained a BSc in biochemistry and ended up in an unrelated job. If I were to live my life again, things might work out differently, but then I dare say we could all say that!

role="presentation" class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="width:100%; background:#b6ecd0"

|

August DYKs

{{main page image|image=Weebill (Smicrornis brevirostris) - cropped.jpg|caption=Weebill|width=150}}

{{main page image|image=The freshwater crabs of Macau (10.3897-zookeys.810.30726) Figure 2, Nanhaipotamon macau.jpg|caption=Nanhaipotamon macau|width=180}}

{{main page image|image=Paracoccidioides lutzii.png|caption=P. lutzii (yeast phase)|width=150}}

{{main page image|image=Xylocarpus granatum.jpg|caption=Cannonball mangrove|width=133x150}}

{{main page image|image=Ruspolia nitidula male (3788698376).jpg|caption=Ruspolia nitidula male|width=180}}

{{main page image|image=Ugandan kobs (Kobus kob thomasi) female and calf (square crop).jpg|caption=Female kob and calf|width=150}}

{{icon|Project}} Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

Sent by ZLEA via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 15:43, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #380

[[:Category:Fishing companies]] has been nominated for discussion

:Category:Fishing companies, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 18:46, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #381

''This Month in GLAM'': August 2019

style="width:100%;"

| valign="top" align="center" style="border:1px gray solid; padding:1em;" |

{| align="center"

style="text-align: center;" | File:This Month in GLAM logo 2018.png




style="text-align: center;"

| Headlines

style="font-size:10pt; font-family:Times New Roman; text-align:center;"

|

style="font-family:Times New Roman; text-align:center; font-size:85%;" | Read this edition in fullSingle-page
valign="top" colspan="2" style="padding:0.5em; font-family:Times New Roman;text-align:center; font-size:85%;" |

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

|}

About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 07:20, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter September-October 2019

File:Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg

Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}},

;Backlog

Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

;Coordinator

A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.

;This month's refresher course

Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired {{U|Ballonman}}, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.

;Deletion tags

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.

;Paid editing

Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

;Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion

  • Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
  • Blank-and-Redirect is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed.

;Not English

  • A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it.

;Tools

Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs.

Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.

Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.

{{noping|DannyS712 bot III}} is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?type=patrol&user=DannyS712+bot+III&page=&wpdate=&tagfilter=&subtype= patrol log].

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

New article [[Wawasan Nusantara]]

Hi JarrahTree! I just happened to see the new article Wawasan Nusantara. Does WP really need this article? Poor sources, doubtful notabilty. Even most Indonesians would scratch their head seeing this. Bring it to AfD? – Austronesier (talk) 09:27, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Stub maker 2000

Rather than filling up Justlettersandnumbers' talk page, I left the following for you there:

::::::Hi. (Apologies in advance - I don't know how to do diffs). I'm basing the assertion on edit histories like Roman Catholic Diocese of Bayeux, where the history shows a series of edits between 18 and 24 Nov 2018 by D A R C 12345 which includes [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Roman_Catholic_Diocese_of_Bayeux&oldid=870316716| one on 23 Nov] by the IP address, surely by the same editor. Also, the combination of subjects - Australian local government, mediaeval French church subjects and ancient titular sees - is very distinctive. Also, the editing errors in the historical articles across the three identities are identical - to name just one, linking dates and centuries. I haven't yet got an explicit overlap between Stub maker and the IP address but is one needed? Is that enough for your purposes? All best, Ingratis (talk) 13:35, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

I've now found another article - :Teutsind - where the IP address and Stub maker 2000 appear together (series of edits on 2 September), which would be quite a coincidence if they were not the same editor when compared to :Roman Catholic Diocese of Bayeux as above, but I leave it to you to take forward more formally if you wish - I don't involve myself in this sort of thing. Ingratis (talk) 23:06, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #382

[[:Category:Fishing companies in Australia]] has been nominated for discussion

:Category:Fishing companies in Australia, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:31, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

''Cumberland'' (1827 ship)

Hi JarrahTree, My apologies. I got so involved in further correcting the article after I saw your corrections I forgot to thank you. My key original error was to put W in the coords, not E, moving the locus into the Pacific Ocean, rather than just off WA. Once I got that sorted out everything else was clear. Cheers, Acad Ronin (talk) 12:02, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #383

Books & Bytes – Issue 35, July – August 2019

File:Wikipedia Library owl.svg The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes

Issue 35, July – August 2019

  • Wikimania
  • We're building something great, but..
  • Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
  • A Wikibrarian's story
  • Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 15

File:WikiProject X icon.svg

Newsletter • September 2019

A final update, for now:

The third grant-funded round of WikiProject X has been completed. Unfortunately, while this round has not resulted in a deployed product, I am not planning to resume working on the project for the foreseeable future. Please see the final report for more information.

Regards,

-— Isarra 19:24, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:Category:Boats designed by Bruce Farr]]

File:Ambox warning pn.svg

A tag has been placed on :Category:Boats designed by Bruce Farr requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 02:55, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #384

September 2019 Tree of Life Newsletter

File:Tree of life by Haeckel.jpg

{{shortcut|WP:TOLN}}

;{{big|September 2019—Issue 006}}

;{{huge|Tree of Life}}

;Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!

{{clear}}

class="wikitable" style="display: inline-table; width: 54%;"

|+Newly recognized content

{{icon|FA}} Kosmoceratops by {{noping|FunkMonk}}

{{icon|FA}} Onychopterella by {{noping|Super Dromaeosaurus}}

{{icon|FA}} Western yellow robin by {{noping|Casliber}}

{{icon|GA}} Western yellow robin by {{noping|Casliber}}, reviewed by {{noping|Josh Milburn}}

{{icon|GA}} Apororhynchus by {{noping|Mattximus}}, reviewed by {{noping|Chiswick Chap}}

{{icon|GA}} Pekarangan by {{noping|Dhio-270599}}, reviewed by {{noping|Cerebellum}}

{{icon|GA}} Fritillaria by {{noping|Michael Goodyear}}, reviewed by {{noping|Chiswick Chap}}

{{icon|GA}} Embioptera by {{noping|Chiswick Chap}} and {{noping|Cwmhiraeth}}, reviewed by {{noping|Vanamonde93}}

{{icon|GA}} Durio graveolens by {{noping|NessieVL}}, reviewed by {{noping|Dunkleosteus77}}

{{icon|GA}} Big brown bat by {{noping|Enwebb}} and {{noping|Gen. Quon}}, reviewed by {{noping|Dunkleosteus77}}

{{icon|GA}} King brown snake by {{noping|Casliber}}, reviewed by {{noping|Dunkleosteus77}}

{{icon|GA}} Staffordshire Bull Terrier by {{noping|Atsme}}, reviewed by {{noping|FunkMonk}}

{{icon|GA}} Ambush predator by {{noping|Chiswick Chap}}, reviewed by {{noping|Enwebb}}

{{icon|GA}} Belemnitida by {{noping|Dunkleosteus77}}, reviewed by {{noping|Chiswick Chap}}

class="wikitable" style="display: inline-table; width: 44%;"

|+Newly nominated content

{{icon|FAC}} Apororhynchus by {{noping|Mattximus}}

{{icon|FAC}} Meinhard Michael Moser by {{noping|J Milburn}}

{{icon|FAC}} St. Croix macaw by {{noping|FunkMonk}}

{{icon|GAN}} Paleocene by {{noping|Dunkleosteus77}}

{{icon|GAN}} Orcinus meyeri by {{noping|Dunkleosteus77}}

{{icon|GAN}} Snakefly by {{noping|Chiswick Chap}} and {{noping|Cwmhiraeth}}

{{icon|GAN}} Tricolored bat by {{noping|Enwebb}}

{{icon|GAN}} Halloween darter by {{noping|Enwebb}}






role="presentation" class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="width:100%; background:#b6ecd0;"

|

News at a Glance
*An end in sight for the WikiCup

:The 2019 WikiCup is in its fifth and final round, with two of the eight remaining contestants from the ToL community. The 2016 winner {{noping|Casliber}} is in first place as of 1 October, and {{noping|Enwebbb}} is in seventh place.

  • Getting spooky for Halloween

:It's the most wonderful time of the year...Halloween, that is. With articles on skeleton frogs, ghost bats, and Satanic nightjars, Wikipedia has more spooky taxa than a graveyard has ghosts. In the new Spooky Species Contest, Tree of Life editors are turning Wikipedia into Spookypedia, working from a crowd-sourced list of taxa. There's still time to sign up! How can you let an article like Draculoides bramstokeri pass you by?

  • The never-ending article title

:September saw the creation of (takes deep inhalation) Cneoridium dumosum (Nuttall) Hooker F. Collected March 26, 1960, at an Elevation of about 1450 Meters on Cerro Quemazón, 15 Miles South of Bahía de Los Angeles, Baja California, México, Apparently for a Southeastward Range Extension of Some 140 Miles. Just two characters shy of Wikipedia's limit on article title length, Cneoridium dumosum...140 Miles now has the longest article title of any on English Wikipedia. In contrast to its verbose title, the journal article that is the subject of the article is only five words long.

role="presentation" class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="width:100%; background:#b6ecd0;"

|

Welcoming WikiProject Diptera and Project Creation Trends
{{image frame

|caption = Tree of Life subprojects and task forces by start year and whether currently considered active or not

|content = {{ #invoke:Chart | bar chart

| height = 300

| width = 500

| stack = 1

| group 1 = 2 : 1 : 6 : 3 : 14 : 2 : 4 : 2 : 2 : 0 : 1 : 0 : 1 : 0 : 1 : 1 : 1 : 1

| group 2 = 0 : 1 : 1 : 0 : 6 : 4 : 3 : 0 : 1 : 3 : 0 : 2 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 0

| colors = green : blue

| group names = Active : Others

| x legends = '02 : :'04 : :'06 : :'08 : :'10 : :'12 : :'14 : :'16 : :'18 :

}}

}}

This month saw a vanishingly rare occurrence for the Tree of Life: a new WikiProject joined the fold. WikiProject Diptera, however, is also unusual in being a [https://dashboard.wikiedu.org/courses/Washington_University_in_St_Louis/Behavioral_Ecology_(Fall_2019) classroom project]. Whether or not this project will stay active once the semester ends remains to be seen. It does not bode well, however, that {{noredirect|WP:WikiProject Vespidae}}—a creation from the same instructor at St. Louis University—faded to obscurity shortly after the fall semester concluded in 2014. WikiProject Vespidae is defunct and now redirects to the Hymenoptera task force of WikiProject Insects.

Since 2014, the Tree of Life has seen a string of years where one or zero projects or task forces were created. The only projects and task forces created since then are WikiProject Animal anatomy (2014), Hymenoptera task force (2016), Bats task force (2017), WikiProject Hypericaceae (2018), and now WikiProject Diptera (2019). The year 2006 saw the greatest creation of WikiProjects and task forces, with fourteen still active and the remaining six as "semiactive", "inactive", or "defunct".

role="presentation" class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="width:100%; background:#b6ecd0"

|

September DYKs

{{main page image|image=Enischnomyia with Vetufebrus 1.jpg|caption=Enischnomyia fossil in {{nowrap|Dominican amber}}|width=120}}

{{main page image|image=Newtonia hildebrandtii00.jpg|caption=Lebombo wattle in the sand forest|width=x120}}

{{main page image|image=Betula leopoldae SRIC SR02-22-19.jpg|caption=Betula leopoldae {{nowrap|leaf fossil}}|width=120}}

{{main page image|image=Pholiota squarrosoides (4501590245).jpg|caption=Pholiota squarrosoides|width=180}}

{{main page image|image=SciurusIsabellaWolf.jpg|caption=Lady Burton's rope squirrel|width=133x150}}

{{main page image|image=Picking chili peppers from home garden, Indonesia (perspective-cropped).jpg|caption=A child picks chili peppers in an Indonesian home garden.|width=160|border=yes}}

{{icon|Project}} Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

Sent by ZLEA via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 22:26, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #385

''This Month in GLAM'': September 2019

style="width:100%;"

| valign="top" align="center" style="border:1px gray solid; padding:1em;" |

{| align="center"

style="text-align: center;" | File:This Month in GLAM logo 2018.png




style="text-align: center;"

| Headlines

style="font-size:10pt; font-family:Times New Roman; text-align:center;"

|

  • Colombia report: The GLAM team from Wikimedia Colombia in OpenConLatAm
  • Finland report: Photographs and events
  • France report: European Heritage Days
  • Indonesia report: Image donation by Indonesian Air Force
  • Italy report: Wikimedia Italia Summer School
  • Sweden report: Open cultural heritage; More libraries in Africa on Wikidata; Global MIL Week 2019 Feature Conference; Kulturhistoria som gymnasiearbete; Wiki Loves Monuments
  • UK report: Oxford, Khalili Collections and Endangered Archives
  • USA report: Hispanic Heritage and Disability Awareness Month
  • Special story: Help the Movement Learn about Content Campaigns & Supporting newcomers in Wikidata training courses!
  • Wikidata report: Tie a knot in your handkerchief
  • WMF GLAM report: GLAM Manager Role Announced!
  • Calendar: October's GLAM events

style="font-family:Times New Roman; text-align:center; font-size:85%;" | Read this edition in fullSingle-page
valign="top" colspan="2" style="padding:0.5em; font-family:Times New Roman;text-align:center; font-size:85%;" |

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

|}

About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 17:31, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #386

No bother at all...

...I did some more of the necessary. Cheers and happy editing. Lectonar (talk) 08:04, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Event coordinator granted

File:Wikipedia Event coordinator.svg

After reviewing your request for the "eventcoordinator" permission, I have{{{{

safesubst:}}}#if:{{{expiry
}}| temporarily}} enabled the flag on your account{{{{
safesubst:}}}#if:{{{expiry
}}| until {{{expiry}}}}}. Keep in mind these things:

  • The event coordinator right removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24-hour period.
  • The event coordinator right allows you to temporarily add the "confirmed" permission to newly created accounts. You should not grant this for more than 10 days.
  • The event coordinator right is not a status symbol. If it remains unused, it is likely to be removed. Abuse of the event coordinator right will result in its removal by an administrator.
  • Please note, if you were previously a member of the "account creator" group, your flag may have been converted to this new group.

If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the event coordinator right. Happy editing! — xaosflux Talk 11:44, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #387

[[Toodyay Post Office]] - is it still a post office or not?

I was just updating {{tl|Australian Post Offices}} which divides the post office articles in each state into current post offices and former post offices. The WA ones were all listed as current but two are definitely former POs and, while the Toodyay Post Office article doesn't say either way, photos show no Australia Post signage and there is a modern building in Toodyay that claims to be the post office so I put it into the "former" list. But I just thought you might know for certain what the status is. Thanks Kerry (talk) 05:09, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

:former post office, now a local arts & craft place, the current PO is on piesse street Gnangarra 11:24, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

::{{ping|Gnangarra}} Thanks, I'll add that it's "former" to the article. Kerry (talk) 01:55, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

::: thanks folks for clarifying that JarrahTree 02:19, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Wirraminna Environmental Education Centre

Hi Jarrah Tree, I just finished fixing up some aspects of the above article (i.e. infobox and categories). I then looked at the Talk Page and discovered that it had been nominated for deletion in 2016, the discussion agreed to deletion and the order to execute the article had not been carried out! Can you arrange for its disposal? Regards Cowdy001 (talk) 09:46, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Re: your hahaha

You mean [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Busselton_Jetty&diff=prev&oldid=922949259 that], right? I just couldn't help myself ... I went along there on the train today. Now I can finally say I've done it ... Graham87 10:34, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

New Wikimedian in Residence table

A new wikimedian in residence table should soon be implemented based on data from outreach:Wikimedian_in_residence ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Evolution_and_evolvability/sandbox&oldid=923237430 draft table]). If there are any WiRs you know that are missing, please add them. In the meantime, [https://w.wiki/AqW see the map]! T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 08:48, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #388 & Wikidata Birthday

October 2019 Tree of Life Newsletter

File:Tree of life by Haeckel.jpg

{{shortcut|WP:TOLN}}

;{{big|October 2019—Issue 007}}

;{{huge|Tree of Life}}

;Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!

{{clear}}

class="wikitable" style="display: inline-table; width: 54%;"

|+Newly recognized content

{{icon|FA}} Meinhard Michael Moser‎ by {{noping|J Milburn}}

{{icon|GA}} Paleocene by {{noping|Dunkleosteus77}}, reviewed by {{noping|Casliber}}

{{icon|GA}} Clussexx Three D Grinchy Glee by {{noping|Hunter Kahn}}, reviewed by {{noping|Valereee}}

{{icon|GA}} Halloween darter by {{noping|Enwebb}} and {{noping|Cwmhiraeth}}, reviewed by {{noping|J Milburn}}

{{icon|GA}} Deathwatch beetle by {{noping|Cwmhiraeth}}, reviewed by {{noping|Enwebb}}



class="wikitable" style="display: inline-table; width: 44%;"

|+Newly nominated content

{{icon|FAC}} King brown snake by {{noping|Casliber}}

{{icon|FAC}} Paleocene by {{noping|Dunkleosteus77}}

{{icon|FAC}} Megarachne by {{noping|Ichthyovenator}}

{{icon|FLC}} List of canids by {{noping|PresN}}

{{icon|GAN}} Devils Hole pupfish by {{noping|Enwebb}}

{{icon|GAN}} Dryomyza anilis by {{noping|AnuBalasubramanian}}

{{icon|GAN}} Plasmodium knowlesi by {{noping|Ajpolino}}

{{icon|GAN}} Black coral by {{noping|Aven13}}

role="presentation" class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="width:100%; background:#b6ecd0;"

|

News at a Glance
*The first Spooky Species Contest wrapped up this week. Two articles were promoted to Good Article as a result (:Halloween darter and :Deathwatch beetle) and three Did You Know hooks on Halloween were related to the contest (Halloween darter, skeleton frog, and :Coffin Cave mold beetle. Two new articles were created, including Longan witches broom-associated virus and Boophis popi, the skeleton frog species that appeared at DYK.

  • The [https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Wishlist_Survey_2020/Wikispecies 2020 Community Wishlist] Survey is live (focusing on non-Wikipedia content projects), with two proposals so far for WikiSpecies. The Wikimedia Foundation will prioritize the top 5 proposals across all sister projects.
  • The 2019 WikiCup has finally concluded, with {{noping|Casliber}} taking home the bronze. The bulk of their points this round came from two Featured Articles: :rock parrot and :western yellow robin.

{| role="presentation" class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="width:100%; background:#b6ecd0;"

|

Alphabet Soup: Explaining DYK, GA, FA, and More

|-

|

By request from another editor, this month I wrote an overview of ways that content is featured on Wikipedia. Below I have outlined some of the processes for getting content featured:

=Did You Know (DYK)=

What is it: A way for articles to appear on the main page of Wikipedia. A short hook in the format of "Did you know...that ___" presents unusual and interesting facts to the reader, hopefully making the reader want to click through to the article

How it works: The DYK process has fairly low barriers for participation. The eligibility criteria are few and relatively easy to meet. Some important guidelines:

  • To be eligible, article is either new (newly created or moved to mainspace), a 5x expansion, or passed a GA review. Its creation, expansion, or promotion to GA must have been in the past 7 days.
  • Article must be long enough, with more than 1,500 characters of prose (this doesn't include embedded lists)
  • I find Shubinator's DYKcheck script useful in determining whether an article is eligible for nomination.

The process for creating the nomination is somewhat tedious. Instructions can be found here (official instructions) and here ("quick and nice" guide to DYK). Experience is the best teacher here, so don't be afraid to try and fail a few times. The last few DYK nominations I've done, however, have been with the help of SD0001's DYK-helper script, which makes the process a bit more streamlined (you create the template from a popup box on the article; created template is automatically transcluded to nominations page and article talk page)

Once your nomination is created and transcluded, it will need to be reviewed. The reviewer will check that the article meets the eligibility criteria, that the hook is short enough, cited, and interesting, and that other requirements are met, such as for images. If you've been credited with more than 5 DYKs, the reviewer will also check that you've reviewed someone else's nomination for each article that you nominate. This is called QPQ (quid pro quo). You can check how many credited DYKs you've had [https://tools.wmflabs.org/betacommand-dev/cgi-bin/dyk.py here] to see if QPQ is required for you to nominate an article for DYK.

=Good Article (GA)=

What it is: A peer review process to determine that an article meets a set of criteria. This adds a {{icon|GA}} symbol to the top of the article. About 1 in 200 articles on Wikipedia is a GA.

How it works: You follow the instructions to nominate an article, placing a template on its talk page. Anyone can nominate an article—you don't have to be a major contributor, though it is considered polite to inform the major contributors that you are nominating the article. The article is added to a queue to await a review. In the ToL, it seems that reviews happen pretty quickly, thanks to our dedicated members. Once the review begins, the reviewer will offer suggestions to help the article meet the 6 GA criteria. Upon addressing all concerns, the reviewer will pass the article, and voilà! Good Article!

Advice to a first-time nominator: Look at other Good Articles in related areas before nominating. If you're unsure about nominating, consider posting to the talk page of your project to see what other editors think. You can also have a more experienced editor co-nominate the article with you.

=Featured Article (FA)=

What it is: An exhaustive peer review to determine that an articles meets the criteria. This adds a {{icon|FA}} to the top of the article. About 1 in 1,000 articles on Wikipedia is a FA.

How it works: You follow the instructions to nominate an article, placing a template on its talk page. Nominated articles are usually GAs already. Uninvolved editors can nominate, though the article's regular editors should be consulted first. Several editors will come by offering feedback, eventually supporting or opposing promotion to FA. A coordinator will determine if there is consensus to promote the article to FA. For an editor's first FA, spot checks to verify that the sources support the text are conducted.

Advice to a first-time nominator: The Featured Article Candidate (FAC) process is a bit intimidating, but several steps can make your first one easier (speaking as someone who has exactly one). If you also did the GA nomination of the article, you can ask the reviewer for "extra" feedback beyond the GA criteria. You can also formally request a peer review and/or a copy edit from the Guild of Copy Editors to check for content and mechanics. First-time nominators are encouraged to seek the help of a mentor for a higher likelihood of passing their first FAC.

=Good and Featured Topics (GT and FT)=

What it is: It took me a while to realize we even had GT and FT on Wikipedia, as they are not very common relative to GA and FA. Both GT and FT are collections of related articles of high quality (all articles at GA or FA, all lists at Featured List). GT/FT have to be at least 3 articles with no obvious gaps in coverage of the topic, along with other criteria. For GT, all articles have to be GA quality and all lists must be FL. For FT, at least half the articles must be FA or FL, with the remaining articles at GA.

How it works: Follow the nomination procedures for creating a new topic or adding an article to an existing topic. Other editors weigh in to support or oppose the proposal. Coordinators determine if there is consensus to promote to GT/FT.

Advice to a first-time nominator: There are very few GT/FT in Tree of Life (5 GT and 11 FT). Most of the legwork appears to be improving a cohesive set of articles to GA/FA.

|}

role="presentation" class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="width:100%; background:#b6ecd0"

|

October DYKs

{{main page image|image=Rhagoletis pomonella.jpg|caption=Female apple maggot|width=180}}

{{icon|Project}} Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 03:34, 3 November 2019 (UTC) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk)

New Page Review newsletter November 2019

style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF;
style="font-size: 86%;"

File:Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg

Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}},

This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon.

;Getting the queue to 0

There are now {{NUMBERINGROUP:patroller}} holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.

Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.

Want to join? Consider adding the NPP Pledge userbox.

Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some really cool awards.

; Coordinator

Admin {{U|Barkeep49}} has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers.

;This month's refresher course

Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources.

;Tools

  • It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list.
  • It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar.

;Reviewer Feedback

Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13.

;Second set of eyes

  • Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the Monitoring the system section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing good work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR.
  • Do be sure to have our talk page on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers.

;Arbitration Committee

The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights.

;Community Wish list

There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion.


To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks mate. Wikipedia still just has too many dickheads for it to be a regular timesink - there really is a point at which if I'm going to deal with the hassle of that I need to get paid for my time - but I've been enjoying fiddling around the edges once in a while when in the mood. The Drover's Wife (talk) 08:47, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

:Thanks for the welcome Jarrah. Those dickheads never get old... last visit I attracted one serious cuckoo who went all out. Kinda important fellow he was (his view) but a real windbag actually who annoyed quite a few up the tree due to his failure to read :D Anyway I had some free time today so I waltzed back for a bit. I'll leave some of the trash for others to clean before I head back to real life later tonight :D -- Longhair\talk 09:09, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #389

Family businesses

Hi JarrahTree, you're listed as the creator of :Category:Family businesses back in 2017, which had been deleted previously in a 2011 CfD. The new category still has the problems that led to the initial deletion, but since there's clearly an interest in the topic, I've opened a discussion at WP:Business as to how to proceed.-- choster (talk) 23:10, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

New Rater

There's a new version of Rater you may want to try, see WT:RATER#New version of Rater! Beta tester wanted! - Evad37 [talk] 08:43, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #390

''This Month in GLAM'': October 2019

style="width:100%;"

| valign="top" align="center" style="border:1px gray solid; padding:1em;" |

{| align="center"

style="text-align: center;" | File:This Month in GLAM logo 2018.png




style="text-align: center;"

| Headlines

style="font-size:10pt; font-family:Times New Roman; text-align:center;"

|

style="font-family:Times New Roman; text-align:center; font-size:85%;" | Read this edition in fullSingle-page
valign="top" colspan="2" style="padding:0.5em; font-family:Times New Roman;text-align:center; font-size:85%;" |

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

|}

About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 09:01, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

You've got mail

{{You've got mail|dashlesssig=Laterthanyouthink (talk) 05:30, 17 November 2019 (UTC)}}

Why is my edit a conflict of interest

The edits to the page I have made are common knowledge and can be confirmed through the Battye Library

Wikidata weekly summary #391

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

40pxHello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 36

File:Wikipedia Library owl.svg The Wikipedia Library

File:Bookshelf.jpg

Books & Bytes

Issue 36, September – October 2019

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:21, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Heritage sites

It's fine to have strong views, but you've got to be able to articulate why if you want other people to heed them. Our coverage of heritage sites in Queensland and New South Wales is objectively vastly better in breadth, depth and quality than on those in states where there hasn't been a CC-BY project, with South Australia, Victoria and Tasmania being particularly bad. WA is a bit of an exception due to the extensive local projects in some areas, which surpass the CC-BY efforts in at least breadth, but the breadth is very much concentrated in those areas, with even metropolitan National Trust museums still lacking articles. Even in places where the breadth of articles is okay, the user-created articles are heavily lacking in depth compared to the articles we've been able to get through CC-BY material. This is why an argument that is just "I don't like CC-BY material" is not something people are going to care very much about, or why calls for an evaluation are going to fall on deaf ears: the CC-BY material just holds up extremely well by any comparison.

Now, if there are things that can be fixed beyond "I don't like CC-BY content", they're things we can talk out and possibly walk through - but that requires that people explain what those issues actually are. The Drover's Wife (talk) 07:02, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

:Why would they be assessed separately to the process for any other article? You're absolutely correct that no one is interested in assessment, and that's always been substantially the case across the entire Australian WikiProject, largely because it's never served a clear purpose to many people beyond appearing in a metric that nobody much pays attention to: the assessment itself will be ticked off once with no real process and then maybe looked at it again in a decade. It's an issue that's got absolutely nothing to do with heritage places or CC-BY content, and the point and purpose of that assessment process needs a thorough evaluation much more than the addition of good content to the project does. The Drover's Wife (talk) 10:43, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #392

Hi JarrahTree - just wanted to thank you for your very kind message! You've explained things really clearly and i will definitely take up your offer of reviewing content before it is published so as not to cause any issues. Thanks for making me feel part of the community. Msquidnunc (talk) 14:14, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:Category:Transport ministries in Australia]]

File:Ambox warning pn.svg

A tag has been placed on :Category:Transport ministries in Australia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:48, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #393

November 2019 Tree of Life Newsletter

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Tree of Life/Newsletter/008}}

Wikidata weekly summary #394

''This Month in GLAM'': November 2019

style="width:100%;"

| valign="top" align="center" style="border:1px gray solid; padding:1em;" |

{| align="center"

style="text-align: center;" | File:This Month in GLAM logo 2018.png




style="text-align: center;"

| Headlines

style="font-size:10pt; font-family:Times New Roman; text-align:center;"

|

style="font-family:Times New Roman; text-align:center; font-size:85%;" | Read this edition in fullSingle-page
valign="top" colspan="2" style="padding:0.5em; font-family:Times New Roman;text-align:center; font-size:85%;" |

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

|}

About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 14:04, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Rename

question...

Hi JarrahTree, as discussed a few weeks ago, I'm trying to have the company that I work for's page edited as it's very out of date. No one responded to my Talk page request so I've followed your advice and done a userspace draft. As I wanted to make edits rather than rewrite the whole article I'm not sure that's the way to go. Is there a better way for me to do this? Also, separate topic, I would like to start editing some non-conflict of interest pages, ideally starting with some simple language tidy-up type activities, any advice on where to start? thanks and happy Monday! Msquidnunc (talk) 15:02, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Weekly Summary #395

New Page Review newsletter December 2019

File:2019 NPP Backlog.png

;Reviewer of the Year

File:New page reviewer of the year cup.svg

This year's Reviewer of the Year is {{noping|Rosguill}}. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.

Special commendation again goes to {{noping|Onel5969}} who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to {{noping| Boleyn}} and {{noping|JTtheOG}} who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.

Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.

Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.

class="wikitable sortable"

|+Top 10 Reviewers over the last 365 days

!Rank

!Username

!Num reviews

!Log

1

|Rosguill (talk)

| data-sort-value="Onel5969" |47,395

|Patrol Page Curation

2

|Onel5969 (talk)

| data-sort-value="Rosguill" |41,883

|Patrol Page Curation

3

|JTtheOG (talk)

| data-sort-value="JTtheOG" |11,493

|Patrol Page Curation

4

|Arthistorian1977 (talk)

| data-sort-value="Arthistorian1977" |5,562

|Patrol Page Curation

5

|DannyS712 (talk)

| data-sort-value="Boleyn" |4,866

|Patrol Page Curation

6

|CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk)

| data-sort-value="DannyS712" |3,995

|Patrol Page Curation

7

|DragonflySixtyseven (talk)

| data-sort-value="Cwmhiraeth" |3,812

|Patrol Page Curation

8

|Boleyn (talk)

| data-sort-value="Ymblanter" |3,655

|Patrol Page Curation

9

|Ymblanter (talk)

| data-sort-value="CAPTAIN" |3,553

|Patrol Page Curation

10

|Cwmhiraeth (talk)

|3,522

|Patrol Page Curation

(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)

;Redirect autopatrol

A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by {{noping|DannyS712 bot III}}.

;Source Guide Discussion

Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.

;This month's refresher course

While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

[[Murders of Margaret and Seana Tapp]]

There's a non-paywalled article out that you could cannibalise to expand the Wikipedia article - https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/why-the-murders-of-mother-and-daughter-margaret-and-seana-tapp-remain-unsolved/news-story/e119219dfada953cc2c60560123ffc53 PAustin4thApril1980 (talk) 12:20, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

new year

2020 already...

message

Not sure what you mean? The Drover's Wife (talk) 05:41, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Best wishes for the festive season for you and your family. Hoping to be more active in the new year. Cheers. -- Longhair\talk 09:05, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Canberra / ACT

: In each country I usually follow the established order, in this case the higher categories follow that type of categorization, Merry Christmas to you too---> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Sports_venues_in_Canberra ----> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Sports_venues_in_the_Australian_Capital_Territory ----> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Sports_venues_in_Australia_by_state_or_territory ----> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Sports_venues_in_Australia

::Caracas is like any big Latin American city with safe sectors and insecure sectors, I live quietly here, the main problem we have now is the economy and the authoritarian government of Maduro, but Venezuela as Australia is a very diverse country in terms of climates and landscapes , Venezuela has incredible places (from the Andes to the Amazon rainforest, spectacular Caribbean beaches and huge deserts) but the economy is poorly managed and the government is very corrupt. We have a relief lately ... because the economy is being dollarized and there are greater economic freedoms on prices, it is a very complex issue. Sorry for my English--Warairarepano&Guaicaipuro (talk) 23:27, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

style="background-color: #FFFFFF; border: 2px solid #008000;"

|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 120px

|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" |Hi JT! All the warmest wishes for this seasonal occasion, whichever you celebrate - or don't, while I swelter at 27℃ (80.6℉), and peace and prosperity for 2020. Seriously hoping that you'll join me for a cool beer in Bangkok in August when it will be even hotter!
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:55, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

PS: Don't get much chance since my expensive E-grand fell apart 2 years ago, but we'll find a pianner somewhere in BKK... Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:58, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy holidays

:File:Appalachian Bewildered Cat.jpg (talk) 16:12, 24 December 2019 (UTC)]]

:{{clear}}

Season's Greetings

style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 4px solid #FFD700;"

|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 2px;" | 211px

|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2px 2px 0 2px; height: 1.5em;" | Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!

style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" |

----

Hello JarrahTree, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020.
Happy editing,

Donner60 (talk) 07:32, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|96%|Spread the love by adding {{tls|Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.}}

Wikidata weekly summary #396

Happy New Year

My best wishes echo to everyone I've had a good relationship with. I don't feel benevolent enough yet to extend the same towards those I dislike. I'm mean spirited, so I reserve the right to wish good health and blissful days to you and yours, JarrahTree... Iryna Harpy (talk) 09:40, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Re: hahah

Gah, I don't wanna know ... the real world is complicated enough as it is! Graham87 14:31, 2 January 2020 (UTC)