Clear-channel station#List of all clear-channel stations

Sixty medium wave frequencies were set aside in 1941 under the North American Regional Broadcasting Agreement (NARBA) for use by usually only one, although in some cases two or three, AM stations, covering a wide nighttime area via skywave propagation. These frequencies were known as the "clear channels", and the stations on them are thus clear-channel stations. NARBA set aside 37 Class I-A frequencies and 27 Class I-B frequencies. The Class I-N stations in Alaska shared those same frequencies. Where only one station was assigned to a clear channel, the treaty provides that it must operate with a nominal power of 50 kilowatts or more. These were for the most part Class I-A. Stations on the other clear channels, with two or more stations, must use between 10 kW and 50 kW, and most often use a directional antenna so as not to interfere with each other. In addition to the frequencies, the treaty also specified the specific locations where stations on Class I-B channels could be built.

Some of the original NARBA signatories, including the United States, Canada and Mexico, have implemented bilateral agreements that supersede NARBA's terms, eliminating among other things the distinction between the two kinds of clear channel: the original "I-A" and "I-B" classes, and the newer, U.S.-only "I-N" class, which are now all included in class A. Classes "I-A" and "I-B" still mandate a minimum efficiency of 362.10 mV/m/kW at 1 km, whereas Class "I-N" is permitted to use the lower Class B minimum efficiency of 281.63 mV/m/kW at 1 km. There exist exceptions, where a former Class B station was elevated to Class A, yet it maintained its previous antenna system, or made only minor changes thereto.

Clear-channel stations, unlike other AM stations in North America, have protection from interference to their nighttime skywave secondary service area. Other stations are entitled, at most, to protection from nighttime interference in their primary service area—that which is covered by their groundwave signal.

Many stations beyond those listed in the treaty have been assigned to operate on a clear channel (and some had been long before NARBA came into effect in 1941). In most cases, those stations operate during the daytime only, so as not to interfere with the primary stations on those channels. Since the early 1980s, many such stations have been permitted to operate at night with such low power as to be deemed not to interfere; these stations are still considered "daytimers" and are not entitled to any protection from interference with their nighttime signals. Another group of stations, formerly known as class II stations, were licensed to operate on the former "I-B" clear channels with significant power at night, provided that they use directional antenna systems to minimize radiation towards the primary stations.{{Citation needed|date=April 2011}}

Daytimers (also known as daytime-only stations) are AM radio stations that are limited to broadcasting during the daytime only, as their signals would interfere with clear-channel and other radio stations at night, when solar radiation is reduced, and medium-frequency radio signals can propagate much farther. Such stations are allowed three manners of operation after sunset; to sign off the air completely until sunrise, reduce power (sometimes dramatically, to only a few watts), or switch to a nighttime-only frequency (such as the Detroit area's WNZK, which broadcasts on 690 during the day, and on 680 at night). Their broadcast class is Class D. A great number of these stations use FM translators to continue their broadcasts overnight, and some also broadcast on the internet and have separate streams that air when the station's over-the-air signal has signed off.

Daytime-only stations first originated in the late 1920s shortly after General Order 40 was imposed. One of the first to do so was WKEN in Kenmore, New York (now WUFO). WKEN proposed the concept to avoid the then-common practice of having to share one frequency between multiple stations; under General Order 40, WKEN would have had to share its frequency with WKBW, and the daytime-only proposal allowed both stations their own frequency.{{cite news|url=https://www.fybush.com/sites/2010/site-100226.html|title=Remembering Buffalo's BBC|first=Scott|last=Fybush|date=February 26, 2010|work=Tower Site of the Week|access-date=March 13, 2018}} WUFO remains a daytime-only station to the present day, albeit with a 24/7 FM translator introduced in mid-2017.

As of 2013, daytimers exist only in the United States and Mexico. The last Canadian daytime station, CKOT, signed off on February 17 of that year after converting to the FM band. There were 61 daytimers in Mexico in 2015.{{mexico-inf|AM|accessdate=2015-12-15}}

The following two tables show all of the class-A stations in North America.

First is the Canada, Mexico, and contiguous United States table, for the former class I-A and class I-B stations. General Order 40 allocations are in bold.

Second is the Alaska table, for the former class I-N stations.

Under the most recent treaty, Mexican Class A stations that previously operated with 50 kW or less (but a minimum of 10 kW nights) may increase power to 100 kW days while retaining their 10 kW night operation. This created some anomalies where stations licensed for 10 kW during all hours could increase power to 100 kW days and 10 kW nights, unless a directional antenna system was installed for nights, in which case the maximum night power was 50 kW. Additionally, one Class B station that had been operating non-directionally with 100 kW days and 50 kW nights was required to reduce power to 50 kW during all hours.

{{reflist|group=lower-alpha}}

{{See also|Medium wave#Use in North America}}

In the early days of radio, regulators had difficulty reducing interference between stations. There were two major limitations: a lack of good frequency control during the 1920s, resulting in heterodyne tones that were encountered far beyond the range of understandable audio, and no directional antennas or skywave-suppressing vertical antennas until the early 1930s. The problem was much more severe at night, when skywave signals expanded station signal coverage to hundreds of kilometers. However, with most stations located at urban locations, quality skywave service was considered to be important for providing nighttime reception to the extensive rural regions.

For the U.S., a form of clear channels first appeared in 1923 when the Commerce Department started moving stations which had previously shared three[https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=umn.319510008420257&view=1up&seq=462 "Amendments to Regulations: Regulation 57"], Radio Service Bulletin, September 1, 1922, pages 10-11. (initially two)[https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=osu.32435066705633&view=1up&seq=200 "Amendments to Regulations"], Radio Service Bulletin, January 3, 1922, page 10. frequencies (two for entertainment stations, one for "weather and crop reports") onto a band of frequencies from 550 to 1350 kHz,[https://archive.org/details/radioage12unse/page/n362/mode/1up/ "Radio Conference Recommendations: New Wave Lengths"], Radio Age, May 1923, page 11. which was later extended to 1500 kHz, with 550 to 1070 kHz reserved for higher powered "Class B" stations. Many of the Class B frequencies were assigned to a single station, although a few were used on both the East and West coasts, which were considered far enough apart to limit interference.[https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uiug.30112106763060&view=1up&seq=60 "Broadcasting stations of the United States by wave lengths"], Radio Service Bulletin, March 2, 1925, pages 12-13. Class B stations with transmitters located in population centers were limited to 1,000 watts,[https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83045462/1924-10-20/ed-1/seq-18/ "U.S. Radio Power Scale Announced"], Washington Star, October 29, 1924, page 18. although stations that operated transmitters at remote sites were permitted to use up to 5,000 watts.

Problems intensified in the summer of 1926, when a successful challenge was made to the government's authority, under the Radio Act of 1912, to assign station transmitting frequencies and powers.[https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015051148388&view=1up&seq=182 "Federal Regulation of Radio Broadcasting"] (July 8, 1926) by Acting Attorney General William J. Donovan, Official Opinions of the Attorneys General of the United States, Volume 35, 1929, pages 126-132. This led to unrestricted expansion of the number of stations to 732, and increased the number of stations operating on same frequency. Moreover, previously stations had been assigned to transmitting frequencies of multiples of 10 kHz, which largely eliminated heterodynes from adjacent frequencies. However, during the lapse in regulation, some stations relocated to non-standard "split frequencies", increasing heterodyne interference.[https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uiug.30112106763060&view=1up&seq=451 "Broadcasting stations, alphabetically by call signals"], Radio Service Bulletin, December 31, 1926, pages 9-21.

The Federal Radio Commission (FRC) was formed in March 1927, and one of its key tasks was to reorganize the chaotic broadcast band. A May 1927 reallocation began the process, in part by eliminating "split frequency" operations.[https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uiug.30112106763078&view=1up&seq=60 "List of broadcasting stations issued temporary permits"], Radio Service Bulletin, April 30, 1927, pages 6-14. A December 1, 1927 report on the FRC's ongoing work reviewed operations on 600 to 1000 kHz, which divided these frequencies into ones that were considered "clear" and "unclear".[https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015018399975&view=1up&seq=16 "Broadcasting stations by frequency, showing clear channels (600 to 1,000 kilocycles band), effective December 1, 1927, and subsequently" and "Broadcasting stations, by frequencies, showing uncleared channels (600 to 1,000 kilocycles), effective December 1 and subsequently"], Jurisdiction of Radio Commission: Statement of Hon. Eugene O. Sykes, Acting Chairman Federal Radio Commission, pages 10-17. Its 1928 implementation of General Order 32 was only partially successful in reducing the number of stations. On November 11, 1928, the FRC implemented General Order 40, which classified AM band frequencies as Local, Regional or Clear. Under restrictions imposed by the Davis Amendment, eight clear channels were assigned to each of five U.S. regions. This classification also reserved a small number of frequencies for use by Canada. The maximum power for clear channel stations was gradually increased to 50,000 watts: additionally there were some short-lived experiments with 250–500 kilowatt "super-power" operations, most prominently by WLW in Cincinnati, Ohio

The Federal Radio Commission was replaced by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in 1934. There was debate in Washington, D.C., and in the U.S. broadcasting industry, over whether continuation of the clear-channel system was justifiable. The licensees of clear-channel stations argued that, without their special status, many rural areas would receive no radio service at all. Rural broadcasters pointed out that most of the clear-channel stations were licensed to serve large cities on the two coasts, which made little sense for a service that was meant to provide radio to the vast rural areas in the middle of the country. On June 13, 1938, the U.S. Senate adopted resolution 294, sponsored by Burton K. Wheeler (D-Montana), which stated that it was the "sense of the Senate... that the Federal Communications Commission should not adopt or promulgate rules to permit or otherwise allow any station operating on a frequency in the standard broadcast band (550 to 1600 kilocycles) to operate on a regular or other basis with power in excess of 50 kilowatts".[https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015087659424&view=1up&seq=511 "Limitation of Power of Radio Broadcast Stations"] (Senate Resolution 294), Journal of the Senate of the United States of America (Seventy-Fifth Congress, Third Session), June 9, 1938, page 507. However, the clear-channel licensees argued that a 50,000 watt limit in the U.S. should be lifted. They pointed to successful experiments made by WLW in Cincinnati before World War II, and in later years successful implementation by state broadcasters in Europe and the Middle East, as evidence that this would work and improve the service received by most Americans. Other broadcasters, particularly in the western states, argued to the contrary; that if the special status of the clear-channel stations was eliminated, they would be able to build facilities to provide local service to those rural "dark areas".

The clear channel standards were continued by the March 1941 adoption of the North American Regional Broadcasting Agreement, during which most stations shifted frequencies, in order to increase the number of Canadian clear channel assignments, as well as provide clear channels to Mexico and the Bahamas. Because FM and TV stations did not yet exist, the FCC's main intent for the clear-channel assignments was to provide reliable radio service to the thousands of Americans who lived in the vast rural areas of the United States.Rural Radio Magazine, Vol. 1 No. 1, Clear Channel Group (November 1938), p. 2 As a result, these stations usually reached large portions of North America at night. Radio fans (and staff at those stations) often affectionately call such stations "flamethrowers" or "blowtorches" because of their high power, and boast about their reach by a combined state and provincial count of their coverage area. One of the most outspoken of the small-town broadcasters, Ed Craney of KGIR in Butte, Montana, went so far as to apply to move his station, then on the 1370 kHz regional channel, to a class I-A signal on 660 kHz, asking the FCC to downgrade the NBC New York flagship, WEAF, to make way for the Butte station.{{cite journal | title = KGIR, Butte, Requests 50 kw. On WEAF Clear Channel | date = September 1, 1941 | journal = Broadcasting and Broadcast Advertising | location = Washington, D.C. | publisher = Broadcasting Publications, Inc. | volume = 21 | issue = 9 | page = 16}} The FCC denied Craney's petition.

After 1941, several clear-channel stations applied for power increases to between 500 and 750 kW;{{cite journal | journal = Broadcasting and Broadcast Advertising | title = WHAS Superpower | date = October 27, 1941 | page = 52 | volume = 21 | issue = 17 | publisher = Broadcasting Publications, Inc. | location = Washington, D.C. | quote = A half-dozen other applications ranging from 500,000 to 750,000 watts now are pending}}{{cite journal | journal = Broadcasting and Broadcast Advertising | title = WSB Revives Its 500-kw. Application, Seventh Stations Seeking Superpower | date = November 3, 1941 | page = 57 | volume = 21 | issue = 18 | quote = Already pending before the Commission were the applications of WLW, Cincinnati, for 650,000 watts, WOAI, San Antonio, seeking 750,000 watts, KSL, Salt Lake City, for 500,000 watts, and WSM, Nashville asking 500,000-watt operation. Similarly the application of WHO, Des Moines, for an increase to 500,000 watts is reported to be about ready for filing.}} with dissemination of national defense information cited as one reason this would be in the public interest. In October 1941 the FCC's engineering department presented a report on a complete reorganization of the clear-channel service; the report considered the possibility of "some 25 superpower stations of 500,000 watts or more, strategically located to provide maximum service" (as Broadcasting described it), and suggested that stations would have to be relocated away from the east and west coasts in such a scenario, as coastal stations waste energy over the oceans. One complication the FCC considered was the 1938 Wheeler resolution suggestion that stations be limited to 50 kW.{{cite journal | journal = Broadcasting and Broadcast Advertising | title = Superpower, Clear Channels Slated for Early FCC Probe | date = October 20, 1941 | volume = 21 | issue = 16 | page = 12}}

One station, KOB in Albuquerque, New Mexico, fought a long legal battle against the FCC and New York's WABC for the right to move from a regional channel to a clear channel, 770 kHz, arguing that the New York signal was so weak in the mountain west that it served no one there. KOB eventually won the argument in the late 1960s; it and several other western stations were allowed to move to eastern clear channels. (Western clear channels, such as 680 in San Francisco, had been "duplicated" in the eastern states for many years.)

These new Class II-A assignments began what would later be called "the breakdown of the clear channels".

The class I-A station owners' proposal to increase power fifteen-fold was not immediately quashed, but the new II-A stations would make it effectively impossible for stations on the duplicated channels to do so, and the owners eventually lost interest. That proposal was finally taken off the FCC's docket in the late 1970s.{{Citation needed|date=April 2011}}

On May 29, 1980, the FCC voted to limit the protection for all clear-channel stations to a 750-mile (1,207 km) radius around the transmitter. Stations on those frequencies outside the area of protection were no longer required to sign off or power down after sundown.Facts on File 1980 Yearbook, p. 519

In 1987 the FCC changed its rules to prohibit applications for new "class-D" stations. (Class-D stations have night power between zero and 250 watts, and frequently operate on clear channels.) However, any existing station could voluntarily relinquish nighttime authority, thereby becoming a class-D, and several have done so since the rule change.

• Regulation of radio broadcast in the United States
• Clear Channel Communications
• MW DX

{{Reflist}}

{{GeoGroup}}

• [https://www.fcc.gov/media/radio/am-clear-regional-local-channels#block-menu-block-4 AM Station Classes - Clear, Regional, and Local Channels] (FCC Website)
• [http://www.ac6v.com/clearam.htm Big USA, Mexico, and Canadian AM radio stations]

{{Federal Communications Commission}}

{{Clear-channel AM}}

{{Telecommunications}}

Category:United States communications regulation

Category:Mass media regulation in Canada