User talk:Davey2010/Archive 2018 2

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:25, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Sorry I couldn't intervene sooner... I saw your reports just a bit too late. Like I said, I've left a final warning and I'm keeping an active eye on the article and the user. He's burned up his final warning - if he adds unsourced content like that again, he's toast... ;-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:39, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

:Hi, Okie dokie thank you, Your reply over at RFPP made a lot of sense, Anywya thank you for dealing with it and for your help, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 18:46, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from changing the date format in references, such as at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nissan_Leaf&type=revision&diff=849877906&oldid=849877370 . We have already agreed at Talk:Tesla Model S#RfC about date format in references that yyyy-mm-dd is allowed and that changing away from it without consensus is violating the WP guidelines.  Stepho  talk  00:32, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

:I'm not going to keep a huge log of every article where my changes have been objected because the objection rate is very VERY low (in that there's only one objection a year if that), I apply the whole DMY/MDY to all articles so no I shan't refrain from changing them but you're more than welcome to revert which I say you already have done. –Davey2010^Talk 00:56, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

::What you just said is that you will try to get away with it even though you know it is against the guidelines. Causing more work for me to maintain the guidelines.  Stepho  talk  04:35, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

:::Like I said I use this script per CONSISTENCY - There's a huge divide on it sure but this year you're the only person to have had an issue and last year you were the only person to have had an issue ..... I've been doing this for what 4 years now ? and in that time only 3 people have objected now bearing in mind I have used this script on thousands of articles and like I said only 3 people to my knowledge have objected ..... so like I said I shall carry on using this script, Thanks your message. –Davey2010^Talk 12:18, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the catch on Riley Reid, I only caught the obvious vandalism I reverted, I missed the other issues right before it. JamesG5 (talk) 17:33, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|JamesG5}}, No worries you wasn't meant to know, I apologise for not leaving an edit summary tho - I keep forgetting that when you revert back to a specific version the first editor's pinged so sorry about that, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 17:41, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Sorry for the streak of bad edits. I promise I won’t be doing that anymore and I hope you enjoy the rest of your Saturday -Bigs!

:Hi {{u|Bigs7}}, No worries bud, Thanks you too!, Happy editing :) –Davey2010^Talk 20:49, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi Davey,

I just read an alert on my wiki account and it was from you. You (and me) were 5 years younger in that time, it seems I read really slow. Below this message you will find the text of the alert I got.

I don't have very much to say. But the reason "it did not appear constructive" seems subjetive from my point of view (subjetive too, of course). If I thought the comment was not constructive then I didn't take the time to write it.

I own a truck from SCAMTRUCKS, so I thought I knew something about it. And as the truck name 'SCAM' its not the company name ('SCAM TRUCKS') then I corrected it and so the term is not ambiguous anymore. The other correction was insert the link to the company, link tested (in their time, and today) and active (www.scv.it . scam vehicles).

Now it is as before my contribution, if you think it is better naming the company SCAM as the truck name and then using an ambiguous name, and without a tested link to the company. Then, as I wrote at the very start of this message, I have no more to say. Leave it as it is, but surely you could (not now, in their time) give some arguments when use the sentence 'not constructive'. Contributors will not feel prone to make contributions if these things are usual.

Thank you,

Best Regards,

Pepe

"May 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Davey2010. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Iveco Daily because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! –

→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 16:37, 23 May 2013 (UTC)" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prrs1000 (talk • contribs)

:Hi, I was a newbie at the time of reverting you so I'd take the revert and the warning with a pinch of salt, It was 5 years ago so not worth worrying over, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 12:30, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

I've blocked you for 24 hours per [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Travel_Republic&diff=prev&oldid=851324363 this edit summary]. You've been here long enough to know how unacceptable that sort of behaviour is. Nick (talk) 14:47, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

:{{u|Nick}} - Funnily enough I was just about to scrub that and apologise but your block has now stopped that, Had Crissy bothered to help instead of being unneedlessly awkward I wouldn't of got so worked up?!. –Davey2010^Talk 14:51, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

:: I think, looking at the situation, it's actually you who has been the awkward editor today. You reverted Ansh666's implementation of their AfD closure [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Travel_Republic&diff=851317945&oldid=851282106 here] then edit warred to restore your interpretation of the closure [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Travel_Republic&diff=851323928&oldid=851321334 here] before making a personal attack on Chrissymad [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Travel_Republic&diff=prev&oldid=851324363 here]. The AfD is explicit and clear - the closure, in bold, is 'redirect'. The additional comment is 'Content can be merged from page history' which means if anybody wishes to add content relating to Travel Republic to Dnata, they can look at the history of Travel Republic and take the content from one of the old revisions of Travel Republic to add into Dnata (subject to attributing it correctly, of course). The closure does not explicitly require a merge to take place and you attempting to force this to happen is inappropriate. Nick (talk) 15:02, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

:::Like I said on Chrissys talkpage the closing admin to my knowledge has never closed an AFD as merge (because they disagree with that process) but the consensus on that AFD was clearly for merge, My interpretation of the closure was Ansh was open to anyone merging but didn't want to do this themselves which is why I took it upon myself to go ahead with the merge route myself,

:::I could've gone to their talkpage or at DRV but I felt those options would create unneedless drama so I thought my way would create the least drama but apparently not,

:::As I have a tendency to make a mess of merges I added a template in the hope someone with more competency would carry this out, I wouldn't say I was being awkward at all to be honest but that being said I do accept your view in that it could and maybe does look that way. –Davey2010^Talk 15:42, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

::ummm isn't the block a little hasty {{u|Nick}}? I would have very strongly expected Davey to temper his frustration and apologise. Sometimes it takes a few minutes.. Irondome (talk) 14:56, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

::: No. Nick (talk) 15:02, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

::Why am I being blamed for your block? All I said, in a perfectly civil edit summary was that the redirect was per the closed AFD's consensus. You gave me no time to respond after leaving a rather snippy message on my talk page, followed by you calling me a prick. It was also not an appropriate merge, if the entire contents were appropriate for that article, it wouldn't have been closed as redirect and as it stands now, all the content that you copied over is PR fluff, which is precisely what was discussed. If you had a problem with the AFD or close, it should have been taken to the closing admin or WP:DRV. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:58, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

:::Because with all due respect instead of helping me you decided to be awkward over it, If you didn't agree with my merge template you then should've come to my talkpage, That all being said that's no reason to say what I did and I do aplogise for that, When I state "I'm hopeless with X" I would then expect to be helped with or for those disagreeing to come here .... not revert and IMHO get funny over it, Like I said tho I shouldn't of said what I did and apologise for that. –Davey2010^Talk 15:01, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

• Just an observation but it's a bit odd the only contribution this admin has made all day today is to block me...., Just an observation. –Davey2010^Talk 15:04, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

:*That's because your behaviour today has dragged me away from the article I'm writing. Nick (talk) 15:08, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

::*Well, a civility notice or a "SAY THIS AGAIN AND YOU WILL BE BLOCKED" would've sufficed. –Davey2010^Talk 15:28, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

:::{{tps}} Davey, if you disagree with your block you can request to be unblocked. If you don't know how to, it's {{unblock|your reason here ~~~~}}. Linguist^unEins^uno (Linguist111) 19:13, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

::::Hi {{u|Linguist111}}, Nice to see you again, Hope you're doing well :),

::::Tbh in some ways I feel the block was justified and in others not so much but either way I feel if I were to request unblocking (and then succeed) something tells me someone's going to go to ANI with the whole "Unblocking Dave now confirms personal attacks are fine" or words to that effect so I feel as a whole it's best just to wait this out,

::::Ah well thanks for popping by and yeah hope you're well, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 19:34, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

:::::That's okay. I agree, it is probably preferable to serve block time instead of requesting an unblock, which can cause unnecessary additional drama. I’m pretty sure you’ll have learnt not to insult another again like that. Take care. Linguist^unEins^uno (Linguist111) 19:45, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

::::::Exactly, Meh it's only 24 hours so not too bad, Absolutely I mean I wish I never said it in the first place but there we are, Anyway thanks again for popping by, Take care, –Davey2010^Talk 20:03, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

• Just for this to go on record I've apologised to Chrissymad[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chrissymad&diff=851479156&oldid=851478471#A_bowl_of_strawberries_for_you!], Like I said on their talkpage anger or not those words should never of been said, Anyway yeah just wanted it to go on record that I've apologised, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 16:49, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

:Hi Mona.N, Thanks so much, Take care, –Davey2010^Talk 01:38, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:37, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

I liked your original argument about reflecting a world-wide point of view. You don't have to be "a sheep" just because a lot of UK editors don't want to think beyond their own point of view :) Wikipedia should be a project for the entire world, not just the 0.8% percent in the UK. I realize that all the US vs. UK conflict on English Wikipedia has created a tribal mentality, but the rest of the world gets ignored in the process. Anyway, thanks for listening. Cheers! Kaldari (talk) 10:07, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|Kaldari}}, True but at the time I didn't think it would sway towards Keep and thought instead of being the awkward one if you like I figured yeah I'd just be a sheep lol, I absolutely agree I wish there wasn't this big divide but unfortunately there is and like you say there are other countries out there not just the UK & US, Ah well no worries thanks for your message :),

:Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 14:22, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

::The truth is {{U|Kaldari|Ryan}}, that US editors and readers often don't think en.Wiki exists outside the US! The solution would be to accord the privilege to busy non US resident Wikipedians to attend real life, dedicated meetings for this massive English language Wikipedia. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:28, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi. I'll just point out in case there is any misunderstanding, that AfC doesn't approve anything. AfC itself is not 'approved'. The last say in what gets kept or sent to a deletion process is NPR, our official core process, managed (we hope) by a vetted and accredited user group ;) Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:34, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

:Hi Kudpung, Admittedly that was certainly a play in my !vote, I've never really paid much attention to the AFC process so don't really have knowledge on it as such, Anyway many thanks for your message :), I've since changed my !vote although not because of the AFC thing, Anyway hope all is well, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 14:44, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:History of Crayola crayons. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Only unnecessary, old and unreliable citations which have no relation at present were removed and fresh sources were added to compensate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meenalxoxo (talk • contribs) 14:40, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

:Please don't remove or replace cites as these don't need to be replaced or removed, Thanks. –Davey2010^Talk 14:46, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi. Hm, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Millie_Bobby_Brown&diff=next&oldid=853115142 I do not understand why consensus would be necessary to update the image].

The image you added is from 2017 and the one that I added is 2018. Your "Previous is fine" editing summary does not seem to be a valid argument. What is the inconvenience? Best regards

:Hi, Because the image is only a year old so thus doesn't need changing, You believe the image should be changed and I disagree so consensus should be sought, At present I'm not seeing a valid reason to replace the image other than RECENTISM which obviously isn't a valid reason, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 15:06, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

::I think that image needs to updated because she has physically changed: she is still a kid growing up. Whenever a more current good image is available, it's better :) If there isn't a real problem with updating the image, why are you opposing it? "the image is only a year old so thus doesn't need changing" is a pretty personal opinion. --Miaow 15:30, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

:::Hi {{u|Miaow}}, But she wouldn't of changed that much in a year and personally I don't believe we need to update an image every year, Once every 2 years sure but once a year seems rather excessive, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 15:34, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tham Luang cave rescue. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:39, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Please respond to my talk page, you seem to have ignored it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CarnageKeith (talk • contribs) 19:28, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

:{{Done}}. –Davey2010^Talk 19:29, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:52, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Saudi Arabia. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

:Thanks. –Davey2010^Talk 21:27, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

I accept that a page move may not be appropriate at this time. However please explain your decision to keep reverting edits regarding new logo and name. This logo is currently in use across selected stores and will receive a rollout. I’ll hold off page move for the time being but feel new logo and branding should be reflected. Steven a91 (talk) 15:13, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

:{{tps}}{{ping|Steven a91}} The best thing to do is produce a source that says this is definitely the new official name. However, we work on the principle of using the common name and stick with what most people would know the business by. Everyone will still be saying, "I'm just going to pop into John Lewis while I'm here to see if they've got a decent priced toaster". Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:27, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

::Hi {{ping|Steven a91}}, You're more than welcome to start another RFC which this time I shan't touch but IMHO as per COMMONNAME the name should remain, No one's going to call it "Waitrose and partners" ... It will always be known as Waitrose however in a few years I wouldn't object to the moving as sources will eventually begin to use the new name and lede would be changed to reflect all of that, Cheers, –Davey2010^Talk 15:44, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:19, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

We'll be around when you just can't resist. Wishing you all the best. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 20:23, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

:Thanks mate, I'll no doubt be back before December lol, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 21:03, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:ATS Euromaster 2002 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Hey, I fulfilled your RFPP request before I saw that you [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_page_protection&type=revision&diff=858972263&oldid=858970588 removed it]. Pinging protecting admin {{u|Oshwah}} as courtesy. If the page experiences too much disruption, a short-term semi-protection is also an option. Airplaneman ✈ 21:47, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|Airplaneman}}, Ah my apologies I had no idea you had removed it otherwise I would've left it, As the winner's been announced I don't think it'd vandalised that much but if it is I'll return to RFPP lol, I would've requested a lot sooner had I know it was under PC but obviously not being around I had no idea, Anyway many thanks for removing it although if you feel it'd be better reapplied I'd have no objections to you reinstating it, Many thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 22:09, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi,

re [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Debenhams&diff=next&oldid=859800592&diffmode=source this] edit: I did not actively change filenames. (just fix bad parameter names). However, I did use AWB GernFixes (spelling etc.), so possiby that routine changed the image name. Incorrectly as we now know. All fine now, have a nice edit. -DePiep (talk) 20:36, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|DePiep}}, At the time of reverting back I automatically assumed you were fixing that editors edits (like many other editors do) so without thinking I simply reverted back, When I saw you had edited that page again I realised your edits were unrelated to the other editors which is why I thanked you for both edits, Anyway sorry for the reverts, Thanks –Davey2010^Talk 20:53, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

::All fine, and no need to excuse. The genfixes edit (filename change) was not needed, so yr revert was OK. -DePiep (talk) 23:02, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

:::Cool cool, Cheers, –Davey2010^Talk 02:40, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:Nisa logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:30, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:43, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Communist Party of China. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:27, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

:Thanks Princyd, It's certainly unique that's for sure {{p|grin}}. –Davey2010^Talk 15:53, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

I can see that you are very interested in horror films and I was wondering if you would like to review an article I nominated for GA: Wes Craven's The Hills Have Eyes. Thanks for your consideration!MagicatthemovieS (talk) 17:09, 5 October 2018 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS

:Hi {{u|MagicatthemovieS}}, Personally I would remove the red-wikilinks for the cast and I would also reduce the images a bit - Not everyone uses a huge monitor so for those on mobile or on pre-1800's laptops the images seem excessively big, But ofcourse that's just my opinion which you're more than welcome to ignore :),

:Other than that I would say the article is perfect and that you should be very proud! :), Cheers, –Davey2010^Talk 02:07, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

::Thanks for the feedback! Would you be interested in conducting a formal review of the article?MagicatthemovieS (talk) 02:09, 6 October 2018 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS

:::Hi, Sorry I don't really much knowledge with reviewing articles, Sorry I couldn't be of any more help, Thanks for popping by :). –Davey2010^Talk 15:07, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

-- Dolotta (talk) 03:49, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

:Congrats D. I know a couple of these were removing trolling from my talk page and that is much appreciated. Many many more were helping to improve the 'pedia and for that you deserve 100,000 thanks :-) Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk

::Thanks talk) & MarnetteD, Very much appreicated :), Weird to think 6 years ago I made my first edit and now 6 years on I've made over one hundred thousand edits! Anyway thanks Dolotta & MarnetteD much appreciated :) –Davey2010^Talk 11:46, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

:::Glad to have you around! -- Talk (Dolotta (talk) 14:34, 8 October 2018 (UTC))

:::Diamond Dave, thanks for your contributions to improve the encyclopedia. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:49, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

::::Thanks {{u|Northamerica1000}} that's very kind of you, And it obviously goes without saying thank you for all of contributions to the encyclopedia too :) –Davey2010^Talk 17:56, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

:::::Thanks to you. I thank myself for 99.9999% of my edits, because everybody makes some mistakes! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:07, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

::::::"Diamond Dave" :) Love it! "Diamond Dave Always Has The Best Prices" ;) You East End bookie you ;) Seriously, bloody good work mate and congrats! Here's to the next 100K!!! ——SerialNumber54129 18:13, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

:::::::{{u|Serial Number 54129}} - Hahaha love it!! :), Thanks so much mate!, Haha well by my calculations It'll take me roughly 8 years to reach another 100k and it'll take me 54 years to reach 1 million and once I reach 1 million I'll be 83 years old!! {{p|grin}}{{p|grin}}{{p|grin}}{{p|grin}}, I've spent waaay to long working that out! {{p|grin}}{{p|grin}} –Davey2010^Talk 19:08, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

::::::::And of course, the 100,000th edit was to a bus-related article. Go figure! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:01, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

:::::::::Haha IKR out of all the topics in the world it had to be on a bus-related article! *tak* {{p|grin}}, I couldn't have it any other way lol –Davey2010^Talk 02:08, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Deadhead bus.jpg

::::::::::I dig bus conversions. See e.g. deadhead bus at right. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:00, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

{{od}}

File:Bus conversion (2).jpg

Just a bit more, because you're the only bus enthusiast I've ever come across on wiki: I've seen a few very nice bus conversions, clean and modern, like a new motor home inside; hot water, shower, toilet, water tanks, fridge, solar panels, all electrical, tv, stove and oven, etc. Problem is that nowadays, with the price of fuel combined with low miles per gallon, it's expensive to travel in these. If WW III ever goes down, I'll take off in one of these way out into the woods, next to a stream, with a wood burning stove, and with plenty of provisions, including that to thereafter grow and process my own food, and then hope for the best! No nukes is good nukes. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:21, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

:Hi NA, Seeing 12 notifications inregards to my talkpage quite nearly gave me a heart attack!, I thought I was the subject at ANI and then thought I was blocked lol, Glad to know that wasn't the case lol, The bus conversion & camping sounds beautiful!, If WW III went down I'd immediately buy [https://res.cloudinary.com/simpleview/image/upload/crm/albuquerque/Breaking-Bad-RV-Tours-21-cbb53c305056a36_cbb53d39-5056-a36a-0901a1132764be33.jpg one of these] and start my own meth business {{p|grin}}, Nah I'd buy [https://media.glampinghub.com/accommodations/vintage-vw-campervan-rentals-surrey-uk-1498818115677.png this] and loot supermarkets for anything and everything {{p|grin}}. –Davey2010^Talk 15:59, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

::Diamond Davey: In the US, meth heads are referred to as tweakers. I'd imagine there's tweakers in the greater London area, right? Yuck. Worst thing one could put into their body. Stick with that which is organic, beer and whiskey and such, maybe herb if one's into that, right? Reefer appears to be gaining more acceptance nowadays. Conversely, if WW III goes down, your bathtub "go fast" could make a killing. Yeah, I over-edited my above remark, but I wanted it to be accurate, for posterity reasons. I'm not sorry that you received those notifications, because I'm getting older, which means dumber. Ha! What else now? It is not really looting if the windows are all broken and almost everything is gone from a store; then it's just redecoration for gentrification. Those VW buses are great for camping, but their engines SUCK; always breaking down, overheating, having the timing go out, and more. I think they're great fun, but UGH. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:43, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

:::Yep plenty of those here in the UK but over here they're more commonly referred to as "druggies" and other slang terms, Personally I've never done drugs or smoked not even as a kid, Seeing what smoking and drugs does to you I suppose it's just never appealed to me ....,

:::Haha no no the older you get the wiser you become! :)

:::Haha sounds like a true VW right there!! {{p|grin}}, –Davey2010^Talk 17:45, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

::::Well, your choices are wise. Stay lean, mean and clean. Plus, it's those tweaks that are running around stabbing one-another in London, like a bunch of the dumbest sheeple ever. If WW III goes down, you're invited to my campsite. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:58, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Just a passing thought re:your comment here - should the editor be considered to be "repeatedly coming" to ORCP if they leave 12 months between consecutive polls? Notwithstanding your conclusion that there's been little change since the previous poll, it was in Sep. 2017, making it not all that recent. Airbornemihir (talk) 16:40, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|Airbornemihir}}, Even annually I would still consider this as "repeatedly coming" Had it been over a year then I would consider that as a simple retry (IE not repeatedly coming if that makes sense), Many thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 17:03, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:57, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Revert one more time and u break 3rr rule and will be banned, dont add jokes to wikipedia , we dont need jokes to automobile articles -->Typ932 ^T·C 18:19, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

:Do us both a favour and go read WP:BRD!, You've been told to go to the talkpage twice ... don't make me tell you for a third time. –Davey2010^Talk 18:22, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

:Many thanks {{u|Northamerica1000}}, Bizarrely enough it's actually my birthday today so kinda weird to have different greeting on my birthday lol, Anyway many thanks - I'll mass-spam mine around the 29th! :), Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 16:23, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

::Well, happy birthday too! Have a good day, since it's your day! Cheerrriiioooooooo, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:25, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

:::Thanks so much mate! :), Take care. –Davey2010^Talk 16:48, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Health and appearance of Michael Jackson. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Hello Davey2010,

today you reversed my edit on the article Eurovision Song Contest 2018, where I changed the Russian Kiev (Киев) to the Ukrainian Kyiv (Київ).

Here's three reasons why I would like to see you reverse your reversion:

1) "Kyiv" was used in all official material of the contest

thumb

2) Kyiv is Ukrainian-speaking

thumb

3) Ukrainian is the only official language of Ukraine

List of official languages by country and territory#U

Please restore my version of the article.

EurovisionAndXenomorphs (talk) 18:59, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|EurovisionAndXenomorphs}}, Apologies for not getting back to you sooner (I only recieved one notification which was for the newsletter after this message so had no idea you even left a message until now)

:There seems to be a lot of to and fro as to what the country should go by, As the article goes with Kiev throughout it's only right the name is applied elsewhere, It's also worth noting a recent RM was closed as not moved (being in favour of Kiev instead of Kyiv),

:If you want wikilinks changed you should probably go to Talk:Kiev and get some sort of consensus as opposed to randomly changing articles here and there,

:Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 00:42, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

::Apologies in advance if there's typos etc - Currently have a migraine due to lack of sleep meaning the laptop brightness is turned down low meaning I can't really see sweet f all so if there are errors please accept my apologies. –Davey2010^Talk 00:44, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Why did you roll back my edits to Nicki Minaj? What gives? It's frustrating, I'm putting a lot of work into improving this page. Kim Leung (talk) 20:30, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

:Your image captions are fine but in the same edit you're also removing content, By all means reinsert the image captions but please don't remove content without explaining it (or going to the talkpage), Cheers, –Davey2010^Talk 20:33, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks Atsme and a Happy Halloween to you too :) –Davey2010^Talk 01:58, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

:BYOB! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:41, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

::Sounds like a plan! :), Celebrate like it's Christmas lol –Davey2010^Talk 10:06, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Starr-101102-9466-Cucurbita pepo-Halloween pumpkins smashed by vandals ready for animal forage-Kula Country Farms-Maui (24963134121).jpg.

{{-}}

::Nom nom nom :), Literally making me hungry although I've never actually ate a pumpkin so it might be lovely or it imght be gross lol –Davey2010^Talk 18:44, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

:::It's a squash, and can be cooked. It's not bad when cooked and served with brown sugar and perhaps some pumpkin spice mix. There's also roasted pumpkin seeds too. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:11, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

::::That actually sounds really really nice :), Must try one one day :) –Davey2010^Talk 19:32, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:34, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

::Thanks Iggy and a Happy Halloween to you too :) –Davey2010^Talk 18:34, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Notification re Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Curriculum (England and Wales) (2nd nomination). Algarve1233 (talk) 17:37, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

:Hi {{uu|Algarve1233}}, Sorry you're going to have to refresh my memory :) - Have I commented on something similar ? A first nom doesn't appear to exist ?, Many thanks (and Happy Halloween if you celebrate it). –Davey2010^Talk 18:36, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

::Hi {{u|Davey2010}}, the page was moved after the last discussion so the original AfD which you voted in is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Curriculum (England, Wales and Northern Ireland). Matt14451 (talk) 20:37, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

:::Hi {{u|Matt14451}}, Ah brilliant thank you, I vaguely remember !voting on a curriculum AFD but couldn't say where or when or even if it was an English one, Anyway thanks for your reply it's much apppreciated :). –Davey2010^Talk 20:41, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

::::Note to self - commented om AFD. –Davey2010^Talk 01:25, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Doria Ragland. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello. Would you be interested to say your opinion about the issue raised here — Talk:List of heads of state of Angola#Requested move 2 November 2018? Thanks in advance. --Sundostund (talk) 01:52, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

:Hi Sundostund, Thanks I'll take a look tomorrow as currently heading to bed, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 02:26, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

::{{Done}} - Thanks {{u|Sundostund}} for the invite :) –Davey2010^Talk 01:19, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

I was temporary inactive from editing Wikipedia and I watch the articles to avoid vandalism. But I didn't you warn me month change. But listen, changing the month on every month is wrong. I want to say I am extremely sorry. I know I am not disruptive. I was quiet and slow from editing. Listen Davey, I know it was difficult for me and changing the months is wrong and I am extremely sorry. If you can accept my apology. Also, I am scared about the "current" dissapearing and I don't want to talk about on a daily basis. I am not owning articles but everyone is allowed to edit. I just watch some aricles to avoid IP vandals too. I will still watch and edit some and I will be careful and have to do better than that next time do not warn me again and it will never happen again. I will happy for your reply so it will not happen again. Tell User:Mungo Kitsch I am sincerely apologize and It will never happen again. This is a resolution and I hope you will accept my apology. Thanks. Steam5 (talk) 13:38, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|Steam5}}, No need to apologise it's all cool but as a future note if you keep changing the months in templates as well the accessdates then you run the risk of being blocked, Like I said the months should only be changed if the entire article has had the DMY/MDY tool applied,

:You still haven't explained [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Olivia_Culpo&diff=867341803&oldid=867207119 this] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Olivia_Culpo&diff=next&oldid=867341803 this] tho..... Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 14:00, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

::I still don't want to explain about Olivia Culpo's edit. I think I was scared about the word "current" dissapear. I know I don't own some articles but everyone edits. I think I edit to watch the word "current" on top of the article's history page until it dissapears. Is there an alternate way to watch some articles to avoid vandalism by random IPs and most IPs via mobile devices? Thanks. Steam5 (talk) 14:19, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

::::Hi, Okay well you should stop making edits like that as it's disruptive, Yep click the middle star on the top right of the page, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 14:26, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

:::::I am never disruptive as always. I was temporary inactive and slow from Wikipedia. The good news I click on many of the stars on most articles. I hope this helps. Steam5 (talk) 14:29, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

::::::@{{U|Steam5}}: I have read your statement mentioning me; thanks for your explanation. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 20:34, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Since you said you didn't object to being reverted there, I went ahead and did it. I don't feel like anything was resolved one way or the other. I'm willing to be wrong on this, but I'd like a little clarity on the subject first. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:11, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|SarekOfVulcan}}, Thanks for the heads up, I can't really see any other outcome other than a "reminder" so to speak... I feel that's the best resolution you're going to get but ofcourse I could be completely wrong, Many thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 22:17, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello again. Would you be interested to say your opinion about the issue raised here — Talk:List of German presidents#Requested move 6 November 2018? Thanks in advance. --Sundostund (talk) 22:15, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

{{Done}}, Many thanks {{u|Sundostund}}. –Davey2010^Talk 22:29, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ron Stallworth. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Is there a reason CSS image crop is not okay in infoboxes? Just asking, I don't know. By the way, I can probably extract a slighty better (very minor improvement really) image as I found a slightly better source. - Alexis Jazz 05:45, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|Alexis Jazz}}, Apologies for the delayed response I'd completely forgot about your message (and then saw your name at Commons which reminded me: ) )

:Generally cropped versions are preferred over the template stuff as with cropped images it's not really hard to go wrong .... whereas with the template stuff it would take some reading first,

:Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 17:24, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Can you please review your assessment on the file moves for Alfred Theodore Joseph Bastien. I cna't see how have the words "Creator" in front of the name serves any purpose. I would have thought the request being at uploader request would have been sufficient. Standard naming for such files is artist - work name - accession number. Much appreciated.--Labattblueboy (talk) 14:06, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|Labattblueboy}}, I originally had an issue with the first request but's gone completely out of my head as to what the issue was so I've gone ahead and renamed it (I thought I added a reason when declining but seemingly not so no idea), Anyway apologies for that, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 14:35, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Fred Bauder. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Fred Bauder/Evidence. Please add your evidence by November 27, 2018, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Fred Bauder/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 20:57, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Instead of using them for meaningless threats, you might use one or even several of your neurones to realize that File:Francois Poullain de la Barre.jpg and File:Pierre Bayle.jpg contain the very same portrait. So one of them needs to be renamed or deleted.Sapphorain (talk) 23:05, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

:{{U|Sapphorain}} Your rename request "{{xt|Please rename or suppress; this is NOT de la Barre}}" makes no mention of this other portrait, Simply saying "This is NOT so and so" means nothing ..... –Davey2010^Talk 00:04, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

:: But I did mention this other portrait in the first request, which was also rejected. Moreover I had put a link to this other portrait in the description of the de la Barre file. Sapphorain (talk) 07:36, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello Davey2010, I have recently noticed that you reverted a number of edits in one go, on the Blackpool Transport Wikipedia page back on the 22 August 2018. One of those edits reverted was contributed by myself back on the 18 March 2018, where you reverted to the last revision done just before mine, which was contributed on the 2 January 2018. My edit mainly focused on all the past historic buses that operated in Blackpool since 1921, under the heading "List of bus types". You did leave a reason for reverting all those edits, which was "Restore back to last good version - bus cruft / copyvio imgs". However, I do not understand from that reason why you reverted my edit. There is another Wikipedia page linked to the Blackpool Transport page called Blackpool Tramway, which gives extensive information on all of the Blackpool Tramway tramcar fleet classes from 1885 onwards, so I feel that there should also be a page on Wikipedia that covers all the Blackpool bus fleet classes that have operated in Blackpool since 1921, either on the Blackpool Transport page or on a separate new page linked to the Blackpool Transport page. Could you explain why you therefore reverted my edit please? Thankyou.

PryceV1 (talk) 20:45, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|PryceV1}}, I still stand by that comment I feel the content fails BUSCRUFT - When I say buscruft I mean over-detailed content that would only interest bus enthusiasts, Ofcourse I'm not the be all and end all of Wikipedia so I would kindly suggest you start an RFC on the talkpage, I also don't agree with your changes on the Tramways article but reverting back would be disruptove and in all fairness no one else has reverted you or seemingly had an issue, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 20:57, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Davey2010. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Davey2010. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:PeoplePlus Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:02, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

I suggest dropping the stick regarding Patrick. Find more (recent) bad taggings/nominations by Patrick so you can actually make a solid point, or find a better target.

Don't take this as a command - I have no power to tell you what to do - but a suggestion. If you continue on your current path, I don't see how that could end well. Just trying to look out for you. - Alexis Jazz 20:20, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

:Thanks Alexis Jazz, I've decided to strike and redact all - bizarrely I didn't realise it was all over one image, I thought there were multiple taggings which is why I became so rattled, Thanks for popping by, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 21:01, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

What talk page? I have done this. --Slindsell15 (talk) 16:19, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

:Hi, Then you need to wait and allow people to chime in, This can take days, weeks and even months, I'll take a look now, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 16:24, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Do you have a high authority in wiki? if so I could use your help on the doctor who page. thanks --Slindsell15 (talk) 16:31, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|Slindsell15}}, I like to think I'm God on here occasionaly but apart from that no :), Unfortunately even if I eas an admin I couldn't and wouldn't do anything differently, Everyone needs to go to talkpages when there's disputes it's how this place works, If you odn't like talking to people then unfortunately this place isn't for you, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 16:34, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the apology. May seem like nothing, but it is rare on here for people to step up and say they're sorry, even over something small like a mistimed sarcastic comment. The comment itself wasn't a big deal, but it came at a time when I was already having a rough day. So your willingness to step up and apologize is greatly appreciated. Thanks again. --Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:13, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|Zackmann08}}, Again really sorry for the dickish comment, Unfortunately the less sleep I have the more of a dick I become and it certainly doesn't help when you're sat in a class for 6-7 hours doing mind-numbing rubbish you've done 5 times before!!,

:Had I remembered I would've struck and apologised much much sooner but yeah really really sorry for the comment,

:Many thanks for your message :),

Take care, –Davey2010^Talk 18:32, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Information.svg A file that you uploaded or altered, :File:BBC iPlayer Screenshot.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 02:42, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:18, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello,

I noticed you have access to edit Tanya Burr, and I believe her filmography section needs updating according to her IMDB. If you could update it, that’d be super helpful.

Thanks Joesimnett (talk) 13:56, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

• Hi {{u|Joesimnett}}, You're more than welcome to go to the talkpage and update her section there (and then someone can paste it over), Just remember to add {{Edit extended-protected}} before your message, Cheers, –Davey2010^Talk 15:01, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

We'll never know because Arbcom Rob refuses to acknowledge the multiple requests to name the people against whom he is casting these aspersions. Bad form for an admin, let alone an Arb, and now his fellow Arbs all rushing to his defence. Truly eyewatering. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:57, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|The Rambling Man}}, I completely agree, If he believes there are genuine groupies then he needs to name them or failing that redact the ridiculous comment .... but no he does neither and now we have even more bloody drama, Just what the project needs!. –Davey2010^Talk 17:03, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/User_problems&diff=330828503&oldid=330826710

It's not that I disagree. In fact, I agree that nothing will come from that report. But if memory serves me right, you were warned previously not to close threads on admin noticeboards. It's rather unusual on Commons. So it may not be wise.

Again, I personally agree with the closure itself. But on Commons this is generally left to admins. I'm not going to stop or revert you, just reminding you. - Alexis Jazz 01:05, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|Alexis Jazz}}, Many thanks for your message, My apologies I did actually forget all about it, Being used to doing it here it's rather hard remembering not to do it there, I just did it without thinking,

:Anyway I've obviously undone the closure. many thanks for your message :), –Davey2010^Talk 02:14, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

::It seems like the denizens of commons have some funny ways altogether..Simon Adler (talk) 02:40, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

:::Hi {{u|Simon Adler}}, The way Commons sees it is an Administrator board therefore only admins must close discussions ... if you take a look over there generally closures are a rare thing meaning like the one I closed discussions go from the core issue to something then completely unrelated and or trivial and then discussions turn into a timesink, Alexis was to put it bluntly saving me from the timesink that would end up being another ANU discussion over the closure, –Davey2010^Talk 02:49, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

:Haha thank you {{u|Simon Adler}}, Take care mate, –Davey2010^Talk 03:14, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

::Just call me Si Davey. I used to be Irondome but changed me name to the real one. See you around mate! Simon Adler (talk) 04:01, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

File:BrezelnSalz02 (cropped).JPG

8px Here's some pretzels to go with that brew, Happy Holidays! ^tm North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:04, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

:::Ahhhh I thought you sounded familiar :), See around mate,

:::Thanks {{u|Northamerica1000}} and Happy Holidays to you too :). –Davey2010^Talk 11:25, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

{{clear}}

--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:34, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|Ozzie10aaaa}}, I'm so sorry I had completely forgot to reply!, Thanks so much for the Christmas greeting and I hope you and yours have a great Crimbo & New Year :), I'll get my greeting sent out at some point this year {{p|grin}}, Thanks again, –Davey2010^Talk 11:40, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|Vauxford}}, Thanks so much!, I too have very fond memories of these, Such a shame to see such a great vehicle go from being the most seen bus or van to now barely being seen at all, I even recall for a good 2-3-4 years these were constant on sites like Ebay and the alike ... now there's barely a convoy on there, Guess these beauties can't last forever unfortunately :(,

:Many thanks for the barnstar!, Keep up the great work mate, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 16:54, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

::Indeed, it hard to find one in good condition, the only decent ones I can find are late 2005/2006. The one on the Infobox is missing it wing mirror (I didn't notice this at the time). --Vauxford (talk) 17:17, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

:::Couldn't tell you the years but I know recently as well as in the past I've seen some that are in immaculate condition surprisingly, Haha not gonna lie I did notice it a few months ago but wasn't worth mentioning or even replacing :), –Davey2010^Talk 17:27, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:46, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello! I read your recent comment at the discussion about C. Iblis. I have made a recent return to regular editing, and I have indeed viewed those "IAR" banners here and there. Just to add a mild comment: I think that kind of thing sets a very bad example for other editors who may not understand what the intention is (I do not,) and they may take it as a touchstone to engage in contentious editing/ discussion with impunity. If I were myself accused of such a thing, I would point to the permission of such banners as prima facie. This is not meant to be a complaint or indictment of any kind, only my opinion. Regards, Hamster Sandwich (talk) 19:54, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

:Thanks for your comments, I would rather not get into a debate over it but for me I prefer to follow common sense than every policy by the letter, I've pretty much gone with IAR in the 5-6 years of being here, Anyway thanks again for your comments. –Davey2010^Talk 19:59, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GiantSnowman. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GiantSnowman/Evidence. Please add your evidence by December 31, 2018, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GiantSnowman/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Bradv🍁 21:41, 17 December 2018 (UTC)