Academy Awards#Awards of Merit categories

The first Academy Awards presentation was held on May 16, 1929, at a private dinner function at the Hollywood Roosevelt Hotel, with an audience of about 270 people.{{cite web |date=May 16, 1929 |title=The 1st Academy Awards {{!}} 1929 |url=https://www.oscars.org/oscars/ceremonies/1929 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191001234905/https://www.oscars.org/oscars/ceremonies/1929 |archive-date=October 1, 2019 |access-date=October 29, 2019 |website=Oscars.org {{!}} Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences}}

The post-awards party was held at the Mayfair Hotel. The cost of guest tickets for that night's ceremony was {{USD|5|long=no}} ({{Inflation|US|5|1929|r=0|fmt=eq|cursign=$}}). Fifteen statuettes were awarded, honoring artists, directors, and other participants in the film-making industry of the time, for their works during the 1927–28 period. The ceremony ran for 15{{spaces}}minutes.

For this first ceremony, winners were announced to the media three months earlier.{{cite web |title=First Academy Awards announced |url=https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/first-academy-awards-announced |access-date=May 22, 2024 |website=HISTORY |date=November 13, 2009 |language=en}} For the second ceremony in 1930, and the rest of the first decade, the results were given to newspapers for publication at 11:00{{spaces}}pm on the night of the awards. In 1940, the Los Angeles Times announced the winners before the ceremony began. As a result, in 1941 the Academy started using a sealed envelope to reveal the names of the winners.

The term "Oscar" is a registered trademark of the AMPAS.

The first Best Actor awarded was Emil Jannings, for his performances in The Last Command and The Way of All Flesh. As he had to return to Europe before the ceremony, the Academy agreed to give him the prize early, making him the first Academy Award recipient. For the first Awards, winners were recognized for multiple films during the qualifying period; Jannings received the award for two films in which he starred, and Janet Gaynor won the first Best Actress award for performances in three films. Beginning with the second ceremony, performers received separate nominations for individual films; no performer has received multiple nominations in the same category since the 3rd Academy Awards.

For the first five ceremonies, the eligibility period ran from August 1 to July 31. The 6th Academy Awards' eligibility ran from August 1, 1932, to December 31, 1933, and as of the 7th Academy Awards, subsequent eligibility periods have matched the calendar year (with the exception of the 93rd Academy Awards, which, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, extended the eligibility period to February 28, 2021).{{cite web |title=History of the Academy Awards |url=http://www.oscars.org/awards/academyawards/about/history.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100706040444/http://www.oscars.org/awards/academyawards/about/history.html |archive-date=July 6, 2010 |website=Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences}}

Best Foreign Language Film, now known as Best International Feature Film, was introduced at the 20th Academy Awards as a special award, and became a competitive category at the 29th Academy Awards.{{cite web |title=Academy Awards History |url=https://www.oscars.org/oscars/academy-awards-history |website=Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences |access-date=January 26, 2025}}

The 74th Academy Awards, held in 2002, presented the first Academy Award for Best Animated Feature,{{cite news |date=February 28, 2014 |title=Disney hoping to win first Oscar for Best Animated Feature |work=New York Post |url=https://nypost.com/2014/02/28/disney-hoping-to-win-first-oscar-for-best-animated-feature/ |url-status=live |access-date=January 26, 2025 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180419053447/https://nypost.com/2014/02/28/disney-hoping-to-win-first-oscar-for-best-animated-feature/ |archive-date=April 19, 2018}} won by Shrek.

Since 1973, all Academy Awards ceremonies, except for 2021, have ended with the Academy Award for Best Picture. Traditionally, the previous year's winners for Best Actor and Best Supporting Actor present the awards for Best Actress and Best Supporting Actress, respectively, and vice versa. In 2009, this model was replaced by each acting award being introduced by five previous winners, each of whom introduces one of the nominated performances, referred to as the "Fab 5" presenters format.{{Cite magazine |last=Grein |first=Paul |date=2024-03-07 |title=Why the Oscars Are Bringing Back the 'Fab 5' Presenters Format from the 2009 Telecast |url=https://www.billboard.com/music/awards/oscars-creative-team-press-conference-fab-5-presenters-format-1235625336/ |access-date=2025-01-24 |magazine=Billboard |language=en-US}} The Fab 5 model returned in 2024 after a 15-year hiatus.

On February 9, 2020, Parasite became the first foreign-language film to win Best Picture at the 92nd Academy Awards.{{cite news |last=Farhi |first=Paul |date=February 10, 2020 |title=Parasite Makes Oscars History as the First Foreign-Language Film to Win Best Picture |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/parasite-makes-oscars-history-as-the-first-foreign-language-film-to-win-best-picture/2020/02/10/93b7e5f8-49fa-11ea-9164-d3154ad8a5cd_story.html |url-status=live |access-date=March 15, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201116212321/https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/parasite-makes-oscars-history-as-the-first-foreign-language-film-to-win-best-picture/2020/02/10/93b7e5f8-49fa-11ea-9164-d3154ad8a5cd_story.html |archive-date=November 16, 2020}}

The 93rd Academy Awards ceremony, honoring the best films of 2020 and early 2021, was held on April 25, 2021, after it was postponed from its original February 28, 2021, schedule due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cinema. As with the two previous ceremonies, there was no host. The ceremony was broadcast on ABC. It took place at the Dolby Theatre in Los Angeles, California for the 19th consecutive year, with satellite locations at Union Station also in Los Angeles.{{cite web |date=June 15, 2020 |title=The Academy and ABC Set April 25, 2021 as New Show Date for 93rd Oscars® |url=https://www.oscars.org/news/academy-and-abc-set-april-25-2021-new-show-date-93rd-oscarsr |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210203203950/https://www.oscars.org/news/academy-and-abc-set-april-25-2021-new-show-date-93rd-oscarsr |archive-date=February 3, 2021 |access-date=February 5, 2021 |publisher=Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences}} Because of the virus impact on films and TV industries, Academy president David Rubin and CEO Dawn Hudson announced that for the 2021 Oscar Ceremony, streaming films with a previously planned theatrical release were eligible.{{cite news |last=Madani |first=Doha |date=April 28, 2020 |title=Streaming films will be considered for Oscars for the first time |work=NBC |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture/movies/oscars-allow-eligibility-streaming-only-films-during-coronavirus-pandemic-n1194631 |url-status=live |access-date=April 30, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201116212313/https://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture/movies/oscars-allow-eligibility-streaming-only-films-during-coronavirus-pandemic-n1194631 |archive-date=November 16, 2020}} The theatrical requirement was reinstated starting with the 95th Academy Awards.{{cite web |last=Pete |first=Hammond |title=Academy Issues New Regulations & Rules For 95th Oscars, Films Must Qualify Again Only In Theatres |url=https://deadline.com/2022/05/oscars-rules-movie-theatres-no-digital-1235027194/ |website=Deadline Hollywood |date=May 18, 2022}}

{{redirect|Oscar trophy|the basketball trophy|Oscar Robertson Trophy}}

{{See also|#Categories}}

The Oscar statuette, officially the Academy Award of Merit,{{cite web |date=July 25, 2014 |title=Oscar Statuette |url=http://www.oscars.org/oscars/statuette |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170301182257/https://www.oscars.org/oscars/statuette |archive-date=March 1, 2017 |access-date=February 27, 2017 |publisher=Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences}} is given to winners of each year's awards. Made of gold-plated bronze on a black metal base, it is {{Convert|13.5|in|cm|1|abbr=on}} tall, weighs {{Convert|8.5|lb|kg|abbr=on}} and depicts a knight rendered in Art Deco style holding a sword standing on a reel of film with five spokes. The five spokes represent the original branches of the Academy: Actors, Writers, Directors, Producers, and Technicians.{{cite web |title=Oscar Statuette: Legacy |url=http://www.oscars.org/awards/academyawards/about/awards/oscar.html/?pn=statuette |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131211172055/http://www.oscars.org/awards/academyawards/about/awards/oscar.html/?pn=statuette |archive-date=December 11, 2013 |access-date=April 13, 2007 |publisher=Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences}}

File:DSC 7227 Музей кино.jpg]]

Sculptor George Stanley, who also did the Muse Fountain at the Hollywood Bowl, sculpted Cedric Gibbons' design. The statuettes presented at the initial ceremonies were gold-plated solid bronze. Within a few years, the bronze was abandoned in favor of Britannia metal, a pewter-like alloy that is then plated in copper, nickel silver, and finally, 24-karat gold. Due to a metal shortage during World War II, Oscars were made of painted plaster for three years. Following the war, the Academy invited recipients to redeem the plaster figures for gold-plated metal ones.{{cite web |title=Oscar Statuette: Manufacturing, Shipping and Repairs |url=http://www.oscars.com/legacy/?pn=statuette&page=2 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927134712/http://www.oscars.com/legacy/?pn=statuette&page=2 |archive-date=September 27, 2007 |access-date=April 13, 2007 |publisher=Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences}}

The only addition to the Oscar since it was created is a minor streamlining of the base. The original Oscar mold was cast in 1928 at the C.W. Shumway & Sons Foundry in Batavia, Illinois, which also contributed to casting the molds for the Vince Lombardi Trophy and Emmy Award statuettes. During the 1970s, the Oscar statues were cast in Crystal Lake, Illinois.{{cite web |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1974/04/02/archives/oscar-night-also-big-one-for-a-factory-in-illinois-make-70-oscars.html/ |title=Oscar NiArchivedght Also Big One For a Factory in Illinois |work=New York Times |access-date=2024-12-19 |date=April 2, 1974 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20241219220233/https://www.nytimes.com/1974/04/02/archives/oscar-night-also-big-one-for-a-factory-in-illinois-make-70-oscars.html |archive-date=2024-12-19}} From 1983 to 2015,{{cite news |date=February 20, 2009 |title=Eladio Gonzalez sands and buffs Oscar #3453 |work=The Boston Globe |url=https://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/02/at_work.html#photo14 |url-status=live |access-date=February 21, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090223085458/http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/02/at_work.html |archive-date=February 23, 2009}} approximately 50 Oscars in a tin alloy with gold plating were made each year in Chicago by Illinois manufacturer R.S. Owens & Company.{{cite news|last=Babwin|first=Don|url=http://www.foxnews.com/printer_friendly_wires/2009Jan26/0,4675,OscarGoldplatedJourney,00.html|title=Oscar 3453 is 'born' in Chicago factory|date=January 27, 2009|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140310092910/http://www.foxnews.com/printer_friendly_wires/2009Jan26/0%2C4675%2COscarGoldplatedJourney%2C00.html|archive-date=March 10, 2014|agency=Associated Press}} ({{cite news |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2245&dat=20090127&id=n_UlAAAAIBAJ&sjid=ff0FAAAAIBAJ&pg=6931,2001573 |title=Lodi News-Sentinel |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150912115310/https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2245&dat=20090127&id=n_UlAAAAIBAJ&sjid=ff0FAAAAIBAJ&pg=6931,2001573|archive-date=September 12, 2015 |url-status=live |via=Google News}}) It would take between three and four weeks to manufacture 50 statuettes.{{cite web |last=Alvarez |first=Alex |date=February 22, 2013 |title=Meet the Mexican Model Behind the Oscar Statue |url=https://abcnews.go.com/ABC_Univision/Entertainment/meet-emilio-fernandez-face-oscars/story?id=18550020 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303023939/http://abcnews.go.com/ABC_Univision/Entertainment/meet-emilio-fernandez-face-oscars/story?id=18550020 |archive-date=March 3, 2016 |access-date=February 27, 2016 |website=ABC News}}

File:Academy Award statuette at the Latvian National Museum of Art.png's Academy Award statuette for Flow (2024) on display at the Latvian National Museum of Art in 2025]]

In 2016, the Academy returned to bronze as the core metal of the statuettes, handing manufacturing duties to Walden, New York-based Polich Tallix Fine Art Foundry, now owned and operated by UAP Urban Art Projects.{{cite web |last=Kojen |first=Natalie |date=February 16, 2016 |title=The Academy and Polich Tallix Fine Art Foundry Revive the Art of Oscar Statuettes |url=http://www.oscars.org/news/academy-and-polich-tallix-fine-art-foundry-revive-art-oscarr-statuettes |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160218215850/http://www.oscars.org/news/academy-and-polich-tallix-fine-art-foundry-revive-art-oscarr-statuettes |archive-date=February 18, 2016 |publisher=Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences}}{{cite web |last=Loviza |first=Amanda |title=Foundry seeks tax breaks in move to Walden |url=https://www.recordonline.com/news/20170127/foundry-seeks-tax-breaks-in-move-to-walden |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190105201457/https://www.recordonline.com/news/20170127/foundry-seeks-tax-breaks-in-move-to-walden |archive-date=January 5, 2019 |access-date=January 5, 2019 |website=recordonline.com}} While based on a digital scan of an original 1929 Oscar, the statuettes retain their modern-era dimensions and black pedestal. Cast in liquid bronze from 3D-printed ceramic molds and polished, they are then electroplated in 24-karat gold by Brooklyn, New York-based Epner Technology. The time required to produce 50 such statuettes is roughly three months.{{cite web |last=Kilday |first=Gregg |date=February 16, 2016 |title=Oscar Statuette Gets a Face-Lift – This year's statuettes will be produced by Polich Tallix Fine Art Foundry and will be hand-cast in bronze before receiving their 24-karat gold finish. |url=https://hollywoodreporter.com/news/oscar-statuette-gets-a-face-866321 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160505081009/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/oscar-statuette-gets-a-face-866321 |archive-date=May 5, 2016 |access-date=February 18, 2016 |website=The Hollywood Reporter}} R.S. Owens is expected to continue producing other awards for the Academy, and service existing Oscars that need replating.{{cite web |last=Di Nunzio |first=Miriam |date=February 16, 2016 |title=Oscar statuettes, longtime creation of Chicago-based company, will now be made in New York |url=http://chicago.suntimes.com/entertainment/oscar-statuettes-longtime-creations-of-chicago-based-company-will-now-be-made-in-new-york/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160308120546/http://chicago.suntimes.com/entertainment/oscar-statuettes-longtime-creations-of-chicago-based-company-will-now-be-made-in-new-york/ |archive-date=March 8, 2016 |website=Chicago Sun-Times}}

The origin of the nickname of the trophy has been disputed, as multiple people have taken credit for naming the trophy "Oscar".

Margaret Herrick, librarian and president of the Academy, may have said she named it after her supposed uncle Oscar in 1931.{{Efn|Sources conflict on whether she actually said this. Deadline Hollywood puts doubt on it, saying {{"'}}He reminds me of my Uncle Oscar,' she was reported to have said, while in the hearing of a 'nearby newspaper columnist' who picked up the anecdote and ran with it the next day". Variety and The Hollywood Reporter state with certainty that she made a claim to the Oscar nickname.}} The only corroboration was a 1938 clipping from the Los Angeles Examiner, in which Herrick told a story of her and her husband joking with each other using the phrase, "How's your uncle Oscar".

Bette Davis, in her 1962 autobiography, claimed she named it in 1936 after her first husband, Harmon Oscar Nelson, of whom the statue's rear end reminded her.{{cite web |date=February 18, 2015 |title=Oscars: Who Came Up With the Name "Oscar" and More About the Statuette's History (Video) |url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/oscars-who-came-up-name-774775 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191029231953/https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/oscars-who-came-up-name-774775 |archive-date=October 29, 2019 |access-date=October 29, 2019 |website=The Hollywood Reporter}} But the term had been in use at least two years before. In a 1974 biography written by Whitney Stine with commentary from Davis, Davis wrote "I relinquish once and for all any claim that I was the one—so, Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, the honor is all yours".{{cite book |last1=Stine |first1=Whitney |title=Mother Goddam: The Story of the Career of Bette Davis |last2=Davis |first2=Bette |publisher=Hawthorn Books |year=1974 |isbn=0-8015-5184-6 |location=New York |page=74 |lccn=73-10265 |oclc=1150862598}}

Columnist Sidney Skolsky wrote in his 1970 memoir that he came up with the term in 1934 under pressure for a deadline, mocking Vaudeville comedians who asked "Will you have a cigar, Oscar?" The Academy credits Skolsky with "the first confirmed newspaper reference" to Oscar in his column on March 16, 1934, which was written about that year's 6th Academy Awards.{{cite web |date=August 27, 2014 |title=The 6th Academy Awards Memorable Moments |url=https://www.oscars.org/oscars/ceremonies/1934/memorable-moments |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190226111216/https://www.oscars.org/oscars/ceremonies/1934/memorable-moments |archive-date=February 26, 2019 |access-date=February 25, 2019 |publisher=Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences}} But in the newspaper clipping that Skolsky referred to, he wrote that {{qi|these statues are called 'Oscars'}}, meaning that the name was already in use.

Bruce Davis, a former executive director of the Academy, credited Eleanore Lilleberg, a secretary at the Academy when the award was first introduced, for the nickname. She had overseen the pre-ceremony handling of the awards. Davis credits Lilleberg because he found in an autobiography of Einar Lilleberg, Eleanore's brother, that Einar had referenced a Norwegian army veteran named Oscar whom the two knew in Chicago, whom Einar described as having always "stood straight and tall".{{cite web |last=Cieply |first=Michael |date=June 26, 2022 |title=So, Once And For All (We Hope), Bruce Davis Settles Why They Call It 'Oscar' |url=https://deadline.com/2022/06/once-for-all-bruce-davis-settles-why-they-call-it-oscar-1235052129/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220626154131/https://deadline.com/2022/06/once-for-all-bruce-davis-settles-why-they-call-it-oscar-1235052129/ |archive-date=June 26, 2022 |access-date=June 26, 2022 |website=Deadline Hollywood}} He asserts credit "should almost certainly belong to" Lilleberg.

In 2021, Brazilian researcher Dr. Waldemar Dalenogare Neto found the probable first public mention of the name "Oscar", in journalist Relman Morin's "Cinematters" column in the Los Angeles Evening Record on December 5, 1933. Since the awards didn't take place that year, he said: "What's happened to the annual Academy banquet? As a rule, the banquet and the awarding of "Oscar", the bronze statuette given for best performances, is all over long before this". This information changes the version of Sidney Skolsky as the first to publicly mention the name.{{Cite web |last=Dalenogare |first=Waldemar |date=June 6, 2021 |title=Descoberta: primeira menção ao nome Oscar na imprensa |url=https://dalenogare.com/2021/06/descoberta-primeira-mencao-ao-nome-oscar-na-imprensa/ |access-date=February 20, 2024 |website=Movie Reviews by Dalenogare |language=en-US}}

To prevent information identifying the Oscar winners from leaking ahead of the ceremony, Oscar statuettes presented at the ceremony have blank baseplates. Until 2010, winners returned their statuettes to the Academy and had to wait several weeks to have their names inscribed on their respective Oscars. Since 2010, winners have had the option of having engraved nameplates applied to their statuettes at an inscription-processing station at the Governor's Ball, a party held immediately after the Oscar ceremony. The R.S. Owens company has engraved nameplates made before the ceremony, bearing the name of every potential winner. The nameplates for the non-winning nominees are later recycled.{{cite news |last=Kilday |first=Greg |date=February 9, 2010 |title=Oscar statues to include engraved names |work=The Hollywood Reporter |url=https://hollywoodreporter.com/news/oscar-statues-include-engraved-names-20476 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150412143119/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/oscar-statues-include-engraved-names-20476 |archive-date=April 12, 2015}}{{cite news |last=Daly |first=Steve |date=February 28, 2014 |title=Governors Ball Secrets: Welcome to the 'Engraving Station,' Where Oscar Statuettes Get Personalized |work=Parade Magazine |url=http://parade.com/266251/stevedaly/governors-ball-secrets-welcome-to-the-engraving-station-where-oscar-statuettes-get-personalized/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150227170517/http://parade.com/266251/stevedaly/governors-ball-secrets-welcome-to-the-engraving-station-where-oscar-statuettes-get-personalized/ |archive-date=February 27, 2015}}

Before 1950, Oscar statuettes were, and remain, the property of the recipient.{{cite news |last=Rose |first=Lacey |date=February 28, 2005 |title=Psst! Wanna Buy An Oscar? |work=Forbes |url=https://www.forbes.com/2005/02/28/cx_lr_0228oscarsales.html |access-date=April 13, 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131111214351/http://www.forbes.com/2005/02/28/cx_lr_0228oscarsales.html |archive-date=November 11, 2013}} Since then the statuettes have been legally encumbered by the requirement that the statuette be first offered for sale back to the Academy for {{USD|1|long=no}}. If a winner refuses to agree to this stipulation, then the Academy keeps the statuette. Academy Awards predating this agreement have been sold in public auctions and private deals for six-figure sums.{{cite web |title=How Much Is an Oscar Statue Worth? Here Are 3 Estimates |author-first1=Megan|author-last1=Leonhardt|url=http://money.com/money/5181378/how-much-oscar-statue-worth/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201116212310/https://money.com/how-much-oscar-statue-worth/ |archive-date=November 16, 2020 |access-date=October 29, 2019 |website=Money}}

In 1989, Michael Todd's grandson tried to sell Todd's Best Picture Oscar for his 1956 production of Around the World in 80 Days to a movie prop collector. The Academy earned enforcement of its statuette contract by gaining a permanent injunction against the sale.

In 1992, Harold Russell consigned his 1946 Oscar for Best Supporting Actor for The Best Years of Our Lives to auction to raise money for his wife's medical expenses. Though his decision caused controversy, the first Oscar ever to be sold passed to a private collector on August 6, 1992, for {{USD|60,500|1992|long=no}}. Russell defended his action, saying, "I don't know why anybody would be critical. My wife's health is much more important than sentimental reasons. The movie will be here, even if Oscar isn't".{{cite news |last=Rothman |first=Heathcliff |date=February 12, 2006 |title=I'd Really Like to Thank My Pal at the Auction House |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/12/movies/redcarpet/id-really-like-to-thank-my-pal-at-the-auction-house.html |url-status=live |access-date=September 20, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170921095530/http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/12/movies/redcarpet/id-really-like-to-thank-my-pal-at-the-auction-house.html |archive-date=September 21, 2017 |issn=0362-4331}}

In December 2011, Orson Welles' 1941 Oscar for Citizen Kane (Academy Award for Best Original Screenplay) was put up for auction, after his heirs won a 2004 court decision contending that Welles did not sign any agreement to return the statue to the Academy.{{cite news |last=Duke |first=Alan |date=December 12, 2011 |title=Orson Welles' 'Citizen Kane' Oscar for sale |publisher=CNN |url=http://www.cnn.com/2011/12/12/showbiz/orson-welles-oscar/index.html |access-date=December 12, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131112025602/http://www.cnn.com/2011/12/12/showbiz/orson-welles-oscar/index.html |archive-date=November 12, 2013}} On December 20, 2011, it sold in an online auction for {{USD|861,542|2011|long=no}}.{{cite news |last=Duke |first=Alan |date=December 21, 2011 |title=Orson Welles' 'Citizen Kane' Oscar brings $861,000 |publisher=CNN |url=http://www.cnn.com/2011/12/21/showbiz/orson-welles-oscar/index.html |access-date=April 7, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140116121806/http://www.cnn.com/2011/12/21/showbiz/orson-welles-oscar/index.html |archive-date=January 16, 2014}}

Some buyers have subsequently returned the statuettes to the Academy, which keeps them in its treasury.

{{See also|#Special categories}}

In addition to the Academy Award of Merit (Oscar award), there are nine honorary (non-competitive) awards presented by the Academy from time to time (except for the Academy Honorary Award, the Technical Achievement Award, and the Student Academy Awards, which are presented annually):{{cite web |date=February 27, 2014 |title=7 Special Oscar Categories and Awards |url=http://mentalfloss.com/article/54512/7-special-oscar-categories-and-awards |first1=Rudie |last1=Obias |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201116212308/https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/54512/7-special-oscar-categories-and-awards |archive-date=November 16, 2020 |access-date=October 29, 2019 |website=Mental Floss}}

• Governors Awards:
• The Academy Honorary Award (annual) (which may or may not be in the form of an Oscar statuette);
• The Irving G. Thalberg Memorial Award (since 1938) (in the form of a bust of Thalberg);
• The Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award (since 1957) (in the form of an Oscar statuette);
• The Academy Scientific and Technical Awards:
• Academy Award of Merit (non-competitive) (in the form of an Oscar statuette);
• Scientific and Engineering Award (in the form of a bronze tablet);
• Technical Achievement Award (annual) (in the form of a certificate);
• The John A. Bonner Medal of Commendation (since 1978) (in the form of a medal);
• The Gordon E. Sawyer Award (since 1982); and
• The Academy Student Academy Awards (annual).

The Academy also awards Nicholl Fellowships in Screenwriting.

From 2004 to 2020, the Academy Award nomination results were announced to the public in mid-January. Prior to that, the results were announced in early February. In 2021, the nominees were announced in March. In 2022, the nominees were announced in early February for the first time since 2003.

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS), a professional honorary organization, is composed of 9,905 voting members {{as of|lc=y|2024}}.{{cite news |title=How Many Women Are Actually Voting for the Oscar Winners? |url=https://www.refinery29.com/2018/02/190829/academy-members-women-oscar-voters |website=Refinery29 |first1=Anne |last1=Cohen |date=February 15, 2018 |url-status=live |access-date=April 18, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180417232906/https://www.refinery29.com/2018/02/190829/academy-members-women-oscar-voters |archive-date=April 17, 2018}}{{cite news|url=https://www.thewrap.com/how-many-votes-to-get-an-oscar-nomination-2025/|title=How Many Votes Will It Take to Get an Oscar Nomination in 2025?|last=Pond|first=Steve|date=December 12, 2024|access-date=December 17, 2024|work=TheWrap}}

Academy membership is divided into different branches, with each representing a different discipline in film production. {{As of|2024}}, actors constitute the largest bloc, numbering 1,258 (12.7% of the voting body). Votes have been certified by the auditing firm PricewaterhouseCoopers, and its predecessor Price Waterhouse, since the 7th Academy Awards in 1935.{{cite news |last=Hutchinson |first=Sean |date=January 24, 2017 |title=How Are Oscar Nominees Chosen? |work=Mental Floss |url=http://mentalfloss.com/article/54560/how-are-oscar-nominees-chosen |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180722072631/http://mentalfloss.com/article/54560/how-are-oscar-nominees-chosen |archive-date=July 22, 2018}}{{cite news |last=Finlay |first=Jackie |date=March 3, 2006 |title=The men who are counting on Oscar |work=BBC News |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/4769730.stm |url-status=live |access-date=April 13, 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070319204536/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/4769730.stm |archive-date=March 19, 2007}}{{cite news |title=Meet the only two people in the world who already know all the Oscar winners {{!}} Market Watch |url=http://www.marketwatch.com/story/meet-the-two-people-who-already-know-the-oscar-winners-2017-02-24?mod=mw_share_twitter |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170227150240/http://www.marketwatch.com/story/meet-the-two-people-who-already-know-the-oscar-winners-2017-02-24?mod=mw_share_twitter |archive-date=February 27, 2017}} In May 2011, the Academy sent a letter advising its then-6,000 or so voting members that an online system for Oscar voting would be implemented in 2013, replacing mailed paper ballots.{{cite news |last=Cieply |first=Michael |date=May 23, 2011 |title=Electronic Voting Comes to The Oscars (Finally) |work=The New York Times |url=http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/05/23/electronic-voting-comes-to-the-oscars-finally |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140105075132/http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/05/23/electronic-voting-comes-to-the-oscars-finally/ |archive-date=January 5, 2014}}

All AMPAS members must be invited to join by the Board of Governors, on behalf of Academy Branch Executive Committees. Membership eligibility may be achieved by a competitive nomination, or an existing member may submit a name, based on other significant contributions to the field of motion pictures.

New membership proposals are considered annually. The Academy does not publicly disclose its membership, although as recently as 2007 press releases have announced the names of those who have been invited to join.{{cite web |title=Academy Invites 115 to Become Members |url=http://www.oscars.org/press/pressreleases/2007/07.06.18.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070827031611/http://www.oscars.org/press/pressreleases/2007/07.06.18.html |archive-date=August 27, 2007 |access-date=September 4, 2007 |publisher=Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences}}

In 2012, the results of a study conducted by the Los Angeles Times were published describing the demographic breakdown of approximately 88% of AMPAS' voting membership. Of the 5,100+ active voters confirmed, 94% were Caucasian, 77% were male, and 54% were found to be over the age of 60. 33% of voting members are former nominees (14%) and winners (19%).{{cite news |last=Horn |first=John |date=February 19, 2012 |title=Unmasking the Academy |work=Los Angeles Times |url=https://latimes.com/entertainment/news/movies/academy/la-et-unmasking-oscar-academy-project-html,0,7473284.htmlstory |access-date=October 15, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140307133844/http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/movies/academy/la-et-unmasking-oscar-academy-project-html%2C0%2C7473284.htmlstory |archive-date=March 7, 2014}} In 2016, the Academy launched an initiative to expand its membership and increase diversity. In 2024, voting membership stood at 9,905.

In 2025, a newly announced procedure required Academy members to view all nominated films within a category to be eligible to cast a vote in the final round of that category. The verification process will be done through the Academy's members-only streaming platform and submitting a form for films viewed at in-person events such as at festivals, screenings or private events.{{cite web |last=Davis |first=Clayton |title=Academy Sets New Oscars Rules for 2025: You Need to Watch All Nominated Films to Vote in a Category |url=https://variety.com/2025/film/awards/oscars-2026-key-dates-casting-rules-ai-1236374012/ |website=Variety |access-date=April 22, 2025 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250421183722/https://variety.com/2025/film/awards/oscars-2026-key-dates-casting-rules-ai-1236374012/ |archive-date=April 21, 2025 |date=April 21, 2025 |url-status=live}}

According to Rules 2 and 3 of the official Academy Awards Rules, a film must open in the previous calendar year, from midnight at the start of January 1 to midnight at the end of December 31, in Los Angeles County, California, and play for seven consecutive days, to qualify, except for the Best International Feature Film, Best Documentary Feature, and awards in short film categories. The film must be shown at least three times on each day of its qualifying run, with at least one of the daily showings starting between 6{{spaces}}pm and 10{{spaces}}pm local time.{{cite web |title=Rule Two: Eligibility |url=https://www.oscars.org/sites/oscars/files/92aa_rules.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200114205010/https://www.oscars.org/sites/oscars/files/92aa_rules.pdf |archive-date=January 14, 2020 |access-date=March 20, 2020 |website=92nd Academy Awards of Merit: Rules |publisher=Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences}}{{cite web |title=FAQ |website=Oscars Submission |url=https://submissions.oscars.org/FAQ.aspx |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150401230002/https://submissions.oscars.org/FAQ.aspx |archive-date=April 1, 2015 |access-date=March 16, 2015}}

For example, the 2009 Best Picture winner, The Hurt Locker, was originally first released in 2008, but did not qualify for the 2008 awards, as it did not play its Oscar-qualifying run in Los Angeles until mid-2009, thus qualifying for the 2009 awards. Foreign films must include English subtitles. Each country can submit only one film for consideration in the International Feature Film category per year.{{cite web |title=The Academy and its Oscar Awards – Reminder List of Eligible Releases |url=http://www.youbioit.com/en/article/shared-information/949/academy-and-its-oscar-awards |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131111232741/http://www.youbioit.com/en/article/shared-information/949/academy-and-its-oscar-awards |archive-date=November 11, 2013}}

Rule 2 states that a film must be feature-length, defined as a minimum of 40{{spaces}}minutes, except for short-subject awards. It must exist either on a 35 mm or 70 mm film print, or in 24{{spaces}}frame/s or 48{{spaces}}frame/s progressive scan digital cinema format, with a minimum projector resolution of 2,048 by 1,080 pixels.{{cite web |title=Academy Award Rules |url=http://www.oscars.org/sites/default/files/87aa_rules.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141021054540/http://www.oscars.org/sites/default/files/87aa_rules.pdf |archive-date=October 21, 2014 |access-date=March 17, 2015}} Since the 90th Academy Awards, presented in 2018, multi-part and limited series have been ineligible for the Best Documentary Feature award. This followed the win of O.J.: Made in America, an eight-hour presentation that was screened in a limited release before being broadcast in five parts on ABC and ESPN, in that category in 2017. The Academy's announcement of the new rule made no direct mention of that film.{{cite magazine |last=McNary |first=Dave |date=April 7, 2017 |title=Oscars: New Rules Bar Multi-Part Documentaries Like 'O.J.: Made in America' |url=https://variety.com/2017/film/news/oscars-new-rules-documentary-oj-made-in-america-barred-1202026406/ |url-status=live |magazine=Variety |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170415012418/http://variety.com/2017/film/news/oscars-new-rules-documentary-oj-made-in-america-barred-1202026406/ |archive-date=April 15, 2017 |access-date=May 30, 2017}}

The Best International Feature Film award does not require a U.S. release. It requires the film to be submitted as its country's official selection.

The Best Documentary Feature award requires either week-long releases in both Los Angeles County and any of the five boroughs of New York City during the previous calendar year,{{efn|Starting with the 2017 awards, a qualifying release for the Documentary Feature award can take place anywhere in the five boroughs of New York City. Previously, a New York City qualifying run could only take place in Manhattan. Since then, Brooklyn has also become a popular location.{{cite press release |title=Awards Rules Approved for 89th Oscars® |date=June 30, 2016 |publisher=Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences |url=https://www.oscars.org/news/awards-rules-approved-89th-oscarsr |access-date=April 7, 2020 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201116212337/https://www.oscars.org/news/awards-rules-approved-89th-oscarsr |archive-date=November 16, 2020}}}} or a qualifying award at a competitive film festival from the Documentary Feature Qualifying Festival list, regardless of any public exhibition or distribution, or submission in the International Feature Film category as its country's official selection. The qualifying theatrical runs must meet the same requirements as those for non-documentary films regarding numbers and times of screenings. A film must have been reviewed by a critic from The New York Times, Time Out New York, the Los Angeles Times, or LA Weekly.{{cite web |title=Rule Eleven: Special Rules for the Documentary Awards |url=https://www.oscars.org/sites/oscars/files/92aa_rules.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200114205010/https://www.oscars.org/sites/oscars/files/92aa_rules.pdf |archive-date=January 14, 2020 |access-date=March 20, 2020 |website=92nd Academy Awards of Merit: Rules |publisher=Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences}}

Producers must submit an Official Screen Credits online form before the deadline. If it is not submitted by the defined deadline, the film will be ineligible for Academy Awards in any year. The form includes the production credits for all related categories.

Awards in short film categories (Best Documentary Short Subject, Best Animated Short Film, and Best Live Action Short Film) have different eligibility rules from most other competitive awards. First, the qualifying period for release does not coincide with a calendar year, instead covering one year starting on October 1, and ending on September 30 of the calendar year before the ceremony. Second, there are multiple methods of qualification. The main method is a week-long theatrical release in either New York City or Los Angeles County during the eligibility period. Films also can qualify by winning specified awards at one of several competitive film festivals designated by the Academy, also without regard to prior public distribution.

A film that is selected as a gold, silver, or bronze medal winner in an appropriate category of the immediately previous Student Academy Awards is also eligible (Documentary category for that award, and Animation, Narrative, Alternative, or International for the other awards). The requirements for the qualifying theatrical run are also different from those for other awards. Only one screening per day is required. For the Documentary award, the screening must start between noon and 10{{spaces}}pm local time. For other awards, no specific start time is required, but the film must appear in regular theater listings with dates and screening times.{{cite web |title=Rule Nineteen: Special Rules for the Short Film Awards |url=https://www.oscars.org/sites/oscars/files/92aa_rules.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200114205010/https://www.oscars.org/sites/oscars/files/92aa_rules.pdf |archive-date=January 14, 2020 |access-date=April 7, 2020 |website=92nd Academy Awards of Merit: Rules |publisher=Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences}}

In late December, ballots and lists of eligible films are sent to the membership. For most categories, members from each of the branches vote to determine the nominees only in their respective categories, i.e. only directors vote for directors, writers for writers, actors for actors, etc. In the special case of Best Picture, all voting members are eligible to select the nominees. A number of branches are only eligible to vote in Best Picture during nomination voting; this includes a producers' branch, as Best Picture is awarded to a film's producer(s), and other branches which have no corresponding award. In all major categories, a variant of the single transferable vote is used, with each member casting a ballot with up to five nominees (ten for Best Picture) ranked preferentially.{{cite news |last=Pond |first=Steve |date=January 7, 2006 |title=Eight things every voter (and fan) should know about Oscar's decidedly unique nomination process. |work=Los Angeles Times |url=http://theenvelope.latimes.com/awards/oscars/env-oscarvote7jan07,0,6919642,print.story?coll=env-home-headlines |access-date=January 27, 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061017160343/http://theenvelope.latimes.com/awards/oscars/env-oscarvote7jan07%2C0%2C6919642%2Cprint.story?coll=env-home-headlines |archive-date=October 17, 2006}}{{cite magazine |last=Young |first=John |date=January 27, 2011 |title=Oscars: The wacky way the Academy counts votes, and the results of our 'If You Were an Oscar Voter' poll |url=https://ew.com/article/2011/01/27/oscar-voter-ballot-reader-poll-results |url-status=live |magazine=Entertainment Weekly |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160506042043/http://www.ew.com/article/2011/01/27/oscar-voter-ballot-reader-poll-results |archive-date=May 6, 2016 |access-date=February 29, 2016}} In certain categories, including International Feature Film, Documentary and Animated Feature, nominees are selected by special screening committees made up of members from all branches.

In most categories, the winner is selected from among the nominees by plurality voting of all members. Since 2009, the Best Picture winner has been chosen by instant-runoff voting.{{cite press release |title=Preferential Voting Extended to Best Picture on Final Ballot for 2009 Oscars |date=August 31, 2009 |url=http://www.oscars.org/press/pressreleases/2009/20090831a.html |access-date=February 29, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091010053612/http://www.oscars.org/press/pressreleases/2009/20090831a.html |archive-date=October 10, 2009 |work=Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences}}{{cite web |last=VanDerWerff |first=Emily |date=February 22, 2015 |title=The Oscars' messed-up voting process, explained |url=https://www.vox.com/2015/2/22/8084239/oscars-2015-ballot |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160225211043/http://www.vox.com/2015/2/22/8084239/oscars-2015-ballot |archive-date=February 25, 2016 |access-date=October 6, 2019 |website=Vox}} Since 2013, re-weighted range voting has been used to select the nominees for the Best Visual Effects.{{cite web |year=2016 |title=89TH ANNUAL ACADEMY AWARDS OF MERIT |url=https://www.oscars.org/sites/oscars/files/89aa_rules.pdf#page=32 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170202000636/http://www.oscars.org/sites/oscars/files/89aa_rules.pdf |archive-date=February 2, 2017 |at=RULE TWENTY-TWO SPECIAL RULES FOR THE VISUAL EFFECTS AWARD |quote=Five productions shall be selected using reweighted range voting to become the nominations for final voting for the Visual Effects award.}}

Film companies will spend as much as several million dollars on marketing to awards voters for a film in the running for Best Picture, in attempts to improve chances of receiving Oscars and other film awards conferred in Oscar season. The Academy enforces rules to limit overt campaigning by its members to try to eliminate excesses and prevent the process from becoming undignified. It has an awards czar on staff who advises members on allowed practices and levies penalties on offenders.{{cite book |last=Marich |first=Robert |title=Marketing to Moviegoers: A Handbook of Strategies and Tactics |publisher=Southern Illinois University Press |year=2013 |edition=3rd |pages=235–48}} For example, a producer of the 2009 Best Picture nominee The Hurt Locker was disqualified as a producer in the category when he contacted associates urging them to vote for his film and not another that was seen as the front-runner. The Hurt Locker eventually won.

The Academy Screening Room or Academy Digital Screening Room is a secure streaming platform which allows voting members of the Academy to view all eligible films (except, initially, those in the International category) in one place. It was introduced in 2019, for the 2020 Oscars. DVD screeners and Academy in-person screenings were still provided. For films to be included on the platform, the North American distributor must pay {{USD|12,500|long=no}}, including a watermarking fee, and a digital copy of the film to be prepared for streaming by the Academy. The platform can be accessed via Apple TV and Roku players.{{cite web |last=Thompson |first=Anne |date=October 31, 2019 |title=Academy Opens Online 'Screening Room' for Oscar Contenders |url=https://www.indiewire.com/2019/10/oscars-2020-academy-screening-room-feature-voting-1202186244/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220125013951/https://www.indiewire.com/2019/10/oscars-2020-academy-screening-room-feature-voting-1202186244/ |archive-date=January 25, 2022 |access-date=January 25, 2022 |website=IndieWire}}{{cite web |last=Urban |first=Sasha |date=March 17, 2022 |title=How the Academy's Screening Room Helps Films Find a Global Audience Among Oscar Voters |url=https://variety.com/2022/film/global/academy-screening-room-oscar-voters-1235204906/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220406044133/https://variety.com/2022/film/global/academy-screening-room-oscar-voters-1235204906/ |archive-date=April 6, 2022 |access-date=April 6, 2022 |website=Variety |language=en-US}} The watermarking process involved several video security firms, creating a forensic watermark and restricting the ability to take screenshots or screen recordings.{{cite web |title=Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences: How the Academy Awards Shared Films With Oscar® Voters With Complete Security |url=https://www.brightcove.com/en/customers/academy-motion-picture-arts-and-sciences/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220125013952/https://www.brightcove.com/en/customers/academy-motion-picture-arts-and-sciences/ |archive-date=January 25, 2022 |access-date=January 25, 2022 |website=Brightcove}}

In 2021, for the 2022 Oscars, the Academy banned all physical screeners and in-person screenings, restricting official membership viewing to the Academy Screening Room. Films eligible in the Documentary and International categories were made available in different sections of the platform. Distributors can also pay an extra fee to add video featurettes to promote their films on the platform.{{cite web |last=Hammond |first=Pete |date=August 27, 2021 |title=Oscars: Academy Digital Screening Room Opens With Amazon And Netflix Contenders First To Vie For Voter Attention; DVDs Now Banned |url=https://deadline.com/2021/08/oscars-academy-digital-screening-room-opens-netflix-amazon-1234823367/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220125013952/https://deadline.com/2021/08/oscars-academy-digital-screening-room-opens-netflix-amazon-1234823367/ |archive-date=January 25, 2022 |access-date=January 25, 2022 |website=Deadline Hollywood}} The in-person screenings were said to be cancelled because of the COVID-19 pandemic.{{cite web |last=Welk |first=Brian |date=August 27, 2021 |title=Oscars Academy Postpones All In-Person Events and Screenings Until 2022 |url=https://www.thewrap.com/oscars-academy-postpones-all-in-person-events-and-screenings-until-2022/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220125013953/https://www.thewrap.com/oscars-academy-postpones-all-in-person-events-and-screenings-until-2022/ |archive-date=January 25, 2022 |access-date=January 25, 2022}} Eligible films do not have to be added to the platform, but the Academy advertises them to voting members when they are.

{{See also|List of Academy Awards ceremonies}}

File:31st Acad Awards.jpg, Hollywood Pantages Theatre, 1959]]

File:81st Academy Awards Ceremony.JPG, Dolby Theatre, 2009]]

File:Dolby Theatre Oscars Los Angeles USA Mar23 IMG 8321.jpg, Dolby Theatre, 2023]]

The major awards are presented at a live televised ceremony, commonly in late February or early March following the relevant calendar year, and six weeks after the announcement of the nominees. It is the culmination of the film awards season, which usually begins during November or December of the previous year. This is an elaborate extravaganza, with the invited guests walking up the red carpet in the creations of the most prominent fashion designers of the day. Black tie dress is the most common outfit for men. Fashion may dictate not wearing a bow tie, and musical performers are sometimes not required to adhere to this. The artists who recorded the nominees for Best Original Song quite often perform those songs live at the awards ceremony, and the fact that they are performing is often used to promote the television broadcast.

The Academy Awards is the world's longest-running awards show televised live from the United States to all time zones in North America and worldwide, and gathers billions of viewers elsewhere throughout the world.{{cite web |date=February 19, 2016 |title=What was the longest Oscars telecast ever? |url=https://www.newsday.com/entertainment/movies/oscars-what-were-the-longest-ceremony-telecasts-in-academy-awards-history-1.11488884 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201116212316/https://www.newsday.com/entertainment/movies/oscars-what-were-the-longest-ceremony-telecasts-in-academy-awards-history-1.11488884 |archive-date=November 16, 2020 |access-date=October 29, 2019 |website=Newsday}} The Oscars were first televised in 1953 by NBC, which continued to broadcast the event until 1960, when ABC took over, televising the festivities, including the first color broadcast of the event in 1966, to 1970. NBC regained the rights for five years {{nowrap|(1971–75),}} then ABC resumed broadcast duties in 1976 and its current contract with the Academy runs through 2028.{{cite news |date=August 31, 2016 |title=ABC Signs Expansive New Agreement to Broadcast The Oscars, Hollywood's Biggest Entertainment Ceremony, Through 2028 |publisher=Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences |url=http://www.oscars.org/news/abc-signs-expansive-new-agreement-broadcast-oscarsr-hollywoods-biggest-entertainment-ceremony |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170202130914/https://www.oscars.org/news/abc-signs-expansive-new-agreement-broadcast-oscarsr-hollywoods-biggest-entertainment-ceremony |archive-date=February 2, 2017}}

The Academy has produced condensed versions of the ceremony for broadcast in international markets, especially those outside of the Americas, in more desirable local timeslots. The ceremony was broadcast live internationally for the first time via satellite since 1970, but only two South American countries, Chile and Brazil, purchased the rights to air the broadcast. By that time, the television rights to the Academy Awards had been sold in 50 countries. In 1980, the rights were sold to 60 countries, and by 1984, the television rights to the Academy Awards were licensed in 76 countries.

In 2004, the ceremonies were moved up from late March/early April to late February, to help disrupt and shorten the intense lobbying and ad campaigns associated with Oscar season in the film industry. Another reason was because of the growing television ratings success coinciding with the NCAA division I men's basketball tournament, which would cut into the Academy Awards audience. In 1976 and 1977, ABC's regained Oscars were moved from Tuesday to Monday and went directly opposite the national championship game on NBC. The earlier date is also to the advantage of ABC, as it now usually occurs during the highly profitable and important February sweeps period.{{cite web |last=Fang |first=Marina |date=June 11, 2019 |title=The Oscars Are Experimenting with a Series Of Date Changes |url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/oscars-academy-awards-date-changes_n_5cffe0dee4b02c23d2d2860e |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201116212338/https://www.huffpost.com/entry/oscars-academy-awards-date-changes_n_5cffe0dee4b02c23d2d2860e |archive-date=November 16, 2020 |access-date=October 29, 2019 |website=HuffPost}}

Some years, the ceremony is moved into the first Sunday of March to avoid a clash with the Winter Olympic Games. Another reason for the move to late February and early March is to avoid the awards ceremony occurring so close to the religious holidays of Passover and Easter, which for decades had been a grievance from members and the general public. Advertising is somewhat restricted, as traditionally no film studios or competitors of official Academy Award sponsors may advertise during the telecast. As of 2020, the production of the Academy Awards telecast held the distinction of winning one the highest number of Emmys in history, with 54 wins and 280 nominations overall.{{cite news |last=Sheehan |first=Paul |date=September 5, 2020 |title=Oscars are one of Emmys' biggest winners |work=Gold Derby |url=https://www.goldderby.com/feature/oscars-emmy-wins-academy-awards-ceremonies-1203685818/ |access-date=November 21, 2023}}

After many years of being held on Mondays at 6:00{{spaces}}p.m. Pacific/9:00{{spaces}}pm Eastern, since the 1999 ceremony, it was moved to Sundays at 5:30{{spaces}}pm PT/8:30{{spaces}}pm ET.{{cite news |last=Carter |first=Bill |date=April 8, 1998 |title=TV Notes; Moving Oscar Night |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1998/04/08/movies/tv-notes-moving-oscar-night.html |access-date=March 8, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140304185231/http://www.nytimes.com/1998/04/08/movies/tv-notes-moving-oscar-night.html |archive-date=March 4, 2014}} The reasons given for the move were that more viewers would tune in on Sundays, that Los Angeles rush-hour traffic jams could be avoided, and an earlier start time would allow viewers on the East Coast to go to bed earlier.{{cite news |date=July 1, 1998 |title=Academy Awards will move to Sunday night |work=Reading Eagle |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1955&dat=19980701&id=-CsiAAAAIBAJ&sjid=eqYFAAAAIBAJ&pg=6637,43314 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150713172446/https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1955&dat=19980701&id=-CsiAAAAIBAJ&sjid=eqYFAAAAIBAJ&pg=6637,43314 |archive-date=July 13, 2015 |via=Google News Archive}} For many years the film industry opposed a Sunday broadcast because it would cut into the weekend box office.{{cite news |date=March 19, 1999 |title=Never Say Never: Academy Awards move to Sunday |work=The Item |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1980&dat=19990319&id=sKEiAAAAIBAJ&sjid=laoFAAAAIBAJ&pg=1224,4570799 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150713172447/https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1980&dat=19990319&id=sKEiAAAAIBAJ&sjid=laoFAAAAIBAJ&pg=1224,4570799 |archive-date=July 13, 2015 |via=Google News Archive}}

In 2010, the Academy contemplated moving the ceremony even further back into January, citing television viewers' fatigue with the film industry's long awards season. However, such an accelerated schedule would dramatically decrease the voting period for its members, to the point where some voters would only have time to view the contending films streamed on their computers, as opposed to traditionally receiving the films and ballots in the mail. Additionally, a January ceremony on Sunday would clash with National Football League (NFL) playoff games.{{cite news |last=Horn |first=John |date=October 5, 2010 |title=Academy looks to move 2012 Oscar ceremony up several weeks |work=Los Angeles Times |url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2010-oct-05-la-et-oscars-20101005-story.html |access-date=February 28, 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140308124541/http://articles.latimes.com/2010/oct/05/entertainment/la-et-oscars-20101005 |archive-date=March 8, 2014}} In 2018, the Academy announced that the ceremony would be moved from late February to mid-February beginning with the 92nd Academy Awards in 2020.{{cite web |date=September 5, 2018 |title=Academy Determines New Oscars Category Merits Further Study |url=https://www.oscars.org/news/academy-determines-new-oscars-category-merits-further-study |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190114100723/https://oscars.org/news/academy-determines-new-oscars-category-merits-further-study |archive-date=January 14, 2019 |access-date=January 15, 2019 |publisher=Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences |quote=The Board of Governors also voted to move up the date of the 92nd Oscars telecast to Sunday, February 9, 2020, from the previously announced February 23}} In 2024, the ceremony was moved to an even earlier start time of 4:00{{spaces}}pm PT/7:00{{spaces}}p.m. ET, the apparent impetus being the ability for ABC to air a half-hour of primetime programming as a lead-out program at 7:30{{spaces}}p.m. PT/10:30{{spaces}}p.m. ET.{{cite web |last1=Hammond |first1=Pete |last2=Hipes |first2=Patrick |date=November 30, 2023 |title=Oscars 2024 Ceremony Moves Up Start Time by an Hour; Abbott Elementary to Follow Telecast on ABC |url=https://deadline.com/2023/11/oscars-2024-start-time-moved-abc-1235644551/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231130181158/https://deadline.com/2023/11/oscars-2024-start-time-moved-abc-1235644551/ |archive-date=November 30, 2023 |access-date=November 30, 2023 |work=Deadline Hollywood}}

Originally scheduled for April 8, 1968, the 40th Academy Awards ceremony was postponed for two days, because of the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. On March 30, 1981, the 53rd Academy Awards was postponed for one day, after the attempted assassination of President Ronald Reagan and others in Washington, D.C.{{cite news |last=Lindsey |first=Robert |date=March 31, 1981 |title=Academy Awards Postponed to Tonight |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1981/03/31/arts/academy-awards-postponed-to-tonight.html |url-status=live |access-date=October 29, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201116212356/https://www.nytimes.com/1981/03/31/arts/academy-awards-postponed-to-tonight.html |archive-date=November 16, 2020 |issn=0362-4331}}

In 1993, an In Memoriam segment was introduced,{{cite news |last=Child |first=Ben |date=March 10, 2010 |title=Farrah Fawcett:Oscars director apologises for 'In Memoriam' omission |work=The Guardian |location=London |url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/2010/mar/10/oscars-farrah-fawcett |url-status=live |access-date=March 8, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100414020632/http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2010/mar/10/oscars-farrah-fawcett |archive-date=April 14, 2010}} honoring those who had made a significant contribution to cinema who had died in the preceding 12 months, a selection compiled by a small committee of Academy members.{{cite news |last=Cohen |first=Sandy |date=March 3, 2010 |title=Oscar's 'In Memoriam' segment is touching to watch, painful to make |work=USA Today |agency=Associated Press |url=https://www.usatoday.com/life/movies/movieawards/oscars/2010-03-03-oscar-memorial-segment_N.htm |url-status=live |access-date=March 8, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100306133003/http://www.usatoday.com/life/movies/movieawards/oscars/2010-03-03-oscar-memorial-segment_N.htm |archive-date=March 6, 2010}} This segment has drawn criticism over the years for the omission of some names. Criticism was also levied for many years regarding another aspect, with the segment having a "popularity contest" feel as the audience varied their applause to those who had died by the subject's cultural impact. The applause has since been muted during the telecast, and the audience is discouraged from clapping during the segment and giving silent reflection instead. This segment was later followed by a commercial break.

In terms of broadcast length, the ceremony generally averages three and a half hours. The first Oscars, in 1929, lasted 15{{spaces}}minutes. At the other end of the spectrum, the 2002 ceremony lasted four hours and twenty-three minutes.Ehbar, Ned (February 28, 2014). "Did you know?" Metro. New York City. p. 18.{{cite news |date=March 25, 2002 |title=Halle Berry, Denzel Washington Win Big |publisher=Fox News |url=https://www.foxnews.com/story/halle-berry-denzel-washington-win-big |url-status=live |access-date=March 4, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120514053517/http://www.foxnews.com/story/0%2C2933%2C48650%2C00.html |archive-date=May 14, 2012}} In 2010, the organizers of the Academy Awards announced winners' acceptance speeches must not run past 45{{spaces}}seconds. This, according to organizer Bill Mechanic, was to ensure the elimination of what he termed "the single most hated thing on the show"—overly long and embarrassing displays of emotion.{{cite news |last=Jones |first=Sam |date=February 16, 2010 |title=Cut ... all change at Oscars as winners are given just 45{{spaces}}seconds to say thanks |work=The Guardian |location=London |url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/2010/feb/16/oscar-winners-speeches-cut |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110128143126/http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2010/feb/16/oscar-winners-speeches-cut |archive-date=January 28, 2011}} In 2016, in a further effort to streamline speeches, winners' dedications were displayed on an on-screen ticker.{{cite web |title=Can the 'thank-you scroll' save Oscar speeches? |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/movies/2016/02/25/thank-you-scroll-oscars-telecast/80840490/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160228195632/http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/movies/2016/02/25/thank-you-scroll-oscars-telecast/80840490/ |archive-date=February 28, 2016 |access-date=February 29, 2016 |website=USA Today}}

During the 2018 ceremony, host Jimmy Kimmel acknowledged how long the ceremony had become, by announcing that he would give a brand-new jet ski to whoever gave the shortest speech of the night, a reward won by Mark Bridges when accepting his Best Costume Design award for Phantom Thread.{{cite magazine |title=This Costume Designer Won Jimmy Kimmel's Jet Ski at the Oscars |url=https://time.com/5185611/oscars-jet-ski/ |url-status=live |magazine=Time |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180305125334/http://time.com/5185611/oscars-jet-ski/ |archive-date=March 5, 2018 |access-date=March 5, 2018}} The Wall Street Journal analyzed the average minutes spent across the 2014–2018 telecasts as follows: 14 on song performances; 25 on the hosts' speeches; 38 on prerecorded clips; and 78 on the awards themselves, broken into 24 on the introduction and announcement, 24 on winners walking to the stage, and 30 on their acceptance speeches.{{cite web |last=Bellini |first=Jason |date=February 21, 2019 |title=The Oscars Are Famously Long – Where Does the Time Go? |url=https://www.wsj.com/video/the-oscars-are-famously-long-where-does-the-time-go/B4B0FC92-67CE-459E-B971-0E941877A642.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190222014509/https://www.wsj.com/video/the-oscars-are-famously-long-where-does-the-time-go/B4B0FC92-67CE-459E-B971-0E941877A642.html |archive-date=February 22, 2019 |access-date=February 22, 2019 |website=The Wall Street Journal |format=Video}}

Although still dominant in ratings, the viewership of the Academy Awards has steadily dropped. The 88th Academy Awards were the lowest-rated in the past eight years (although with increases in male and 18–49 viewership), while the show itself also faced mixed reception. Following the show, Variety reported that ABC was, in negotiating an extension to its contract to broadcast the Oscars, seeking to have more creative control over the broadcast itself. Currently and nominally, AMPAS is responsible for most aspects of the telecast, including the choice of production staff and hosting, although ABC is allowed to have some input on their decisions.{{cite web |date=March 2016 |title=ABC's Oscar Contract Renegotiations: Who'll Get Creative Control? |url=https://variety.com/2016/tv/news/abc-academy-oscars-deal-renegotiations-oscars-2016-1201718452/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160302000335/http://variety.com/2016/tv/news/abc-academy-oscars-deal-renegotiations-oscars-2016-1201718452/ |archive-date=March 2, 2016 |access-date=March 2, 2016 |website=Variety}} In August 2016, AMPAS extended its contract with ABC to 2028: the contract neither contains any notable changes nor gives ABC any further creative control over the telecast.{{cite web |date=September 2016 |title=Inside the Oscars Deal: What it Means for ABC and the Academy |url=https://variety.com/2016/tv/news/abc-oscars-deal-status-quo-1201849487/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160901184910/http://variety.com/2016/tv/news/abc-oscars-deal-status-quo-1201849487/ |archive-date=September 1, 2016 |access-date=September 2, 2016 |website=Variety}}

File:Academy Awards Viewership 1974-2023, in millions.png

Historically, the telecast's viewership is higher when box-office hits are favored to win the Best Picture award. More than 57.25{{spaces}}million viewers tuned to the telecast for the 70th Academy Awards in 1998, the year of Titanic, which generated a box office haul during its initial 1997–98 run of {{USD|600.8 million|long=no}} in the US, a box-office record that would remain unsurpassed for years.{{cite news |last=James |first=Meg |date=February 23, 2008 |title=Academy's red carpet big stage for advertisers |work=The Seattle Times |url=http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2004196530_oscarads23.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111117115833/http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2004196530_oscarads23.html |archive-date=November 17, 2011}} The 76th Academy Awards ceremony, in which The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (pre-telecast box office earnings of {{USD|368 million|long=no}}) received 11 Awards, including Best Picture, drew 43.56{{spaces}}million viewers.{{cite news |last=Bowles |first=Scott |date=January 26, 2005 |title=Oscars lack blockbuster to lure TV viewers |work=USA Today |url=https://www.usatoday.com/life/movies/movieawards/oscars/2005-01-26-oscar-telecast_x.htm |url-status=live |access-date=November 8, 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060915033557/http://www.usatoday.com/life/movies/movieawards/oscars/2005-01-26-oscar-telecast_x.htm |archive-date=September 15, 2006}} The most-watched ceremony based on Nielsen ratings to date, was the 42nd Academy Awards (Best Picture Midnight Cowboy), which drew a 43.4% household rating on April 7, 1970.{{cite magazine |last=Oppelaar |first=Justin |date=October 9, 2002 |title=Charts and Data: Top 100 TV Shows of All Time by Variety |url=https://variety.com/index.asp?layout=chart_pass&charttype=chart_topshowsalltime |magazine=Variety |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120118083655/http://www.variety.com/index.asp?layout=chart_pass&charttype=chart_topshowsalltime |archive-date=January 18, 2012 |access-date=February 26, 2014}} Hoping to reinvigorate the pre-show and ratings, the 2023 Oscars organizers hired members of the Met Gala creative team.{{cite news |last=Brooks Barnes |date=March 13, 2023 |title=With Its Future at Stake, the Academy Tries to Fix the Oscars (Again) |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/09/business/media/academy-awards-broadcast.html |access-date=April 29, 2023 |quote=To reinvigorate the red carpet preshow, Oscars organizers hired members of the Met Gala creative team. |archive-date=September 4, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230904073142/https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/09/business/media/academy-awards-broadcast.html |url-status=live}}

By contrast, ceremonies honoring films that have not performed well at the box office tend to show weaker ratings, despite how much critical acclaim those films have received. The 78th Academy Awards, which awarded a low-budget independent film (Crash with a pre-Oscar gross of {{USD|53.4 million|long=no}}) generated an audience of 38.64{{spaces}}million with a household rating of 22.91%.{{cite news |last=Levin |first=Gary |date=March 7, 2006 |title=Low Ratings Crash Party |work=USA Today |url=https://www.usatoday.com/life/television/news/2006-03-07-nielsen-analysis_x.htm |url-status=live |access-date=April 14, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100611173534/http://www.usatoday.com/life/television/news/2006-03-07-nielsen-analysis_x.htm |archive-date=June 11, 2010}} In 2008, the 80th Academy Awards telecast was watched by 31.76{{spaces}}million viewers on average with an 18.66% household rating, the lowest-rated and least-watched ceremony at the time, in spite of celebrating 80 years of the Academy Awards.{{cite news |title=Oscar ratings worst ever |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=http://www.capecodonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080227/LIFE/802270307 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140330005242/http://www.capecodonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20080227%2FLIFE%2F802270307 |archive-date=March 30, 2014}} The Best Picture winner of that particular ceremony was another independent film (this time, the Coen brothers's No Country for Old Men).

Whereas the 92nd Academy Awards drew an average of 23.6{{spaces}}million viewers,{{cite news |last=Golum |first=Rob |date=February 10, 2020 |title=Oscars Draw Record Low Audience With 23.6 Million Viewers |work=Bloomberg Businessweek | url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-02-10/oscars-draw-lowest-audience-on-record-with-23-6-million-viewers |url-status=live |access-date=March 4, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200624030249/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-02-10/oscars-draw-lowest-audience-on-record-with-23-6-million-viewers |archive-date=June 24, 2020}} the 93rd Academy Awards drew an even lower viewership of 10.4{{spaces}}million,{{cite news |last=Patten |first=Dominic |date=April 27, 2021 |title=Oscar Viewership Rises To 10.4M In Final Numbers; Remains Least Watched & Lowest Rated Academy Awards Ever – Update |work=Deadline Hollywood |url=https://deadline.com/2021/04/2021-0scars-tv-ratings-academy-awards-low-abc-disney-1234744135/ |url-status=live |access-date=April 27, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210427000428/https://deadline.com/2021/04/2021-0scars-tv-ratings-academy-awards-low-abc-disney-1234744135/ |archive-date=April 27, 2021}} the lowest viewership recorded by Nielsen since it started recording audience totals in 1974.{{cite news |last=Smith |first=Gerry |date=April 26, 2021 |title=Oscars Audience Collapses in Latest Setback for Awards Shows |language=en |work=Bloomberg.com |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-26/oscars-audience-falls-by-over-half-in-latest-setback-for-awards |url-status=live |access-date=April 27, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210429232051/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-26/oscars-audience-falls-by-over-half-in-latest-setback-for-awards |archive-date=April 29, 2021}} The 94th and 95th editions drew 16.6 and 18.7{{spaces}}million viewers, respectively, still below the audience of the 92nd edition.

The Academy Film Archive holds copies of every Academy Awards ceremony since the 1949 Oscars, as well as material on many prior ceremonies, along with ancillary material related to more recent shows. Copies are held in a variety of film, video and digital formats.{{cite web |date=September 4, 2014 |title=Academy Awards Collection |url=https://www.oscars.org/film-archive/collections/academy-awards-collection |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201116212319/https://www.oscars.org/film-archive/collections/academy-awards-collection |archive-date=November 16, 2020 |access-date=April 14, 2020 |website=Academy Film Archive}}

In 1929, the first Academy Awards were presented at a banquet dinner at the Hollywood Roosevelt Hotel. From 1930 to 1943, the ceremony alternated between two venues: the Ambassador Hotel on Wilshire Boulevard and the Biltmore Hotel in downtown Los Angeles.

Grauman's Chinese Theatre in Hollywood then hosted the awards from 1944 to 1946, followed by the Shrine Auditorium in Los Angeles from 1947 to 1948. The 21st Academy Awards in 1949 were held at the Academy Award Theatre at what had been the Academy's headquarters on Melrose Avenue in Hollywood.{{cite web |title=Oscars Award Venues |url=http://www.oscars.org/aboutacademyawards/venues.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061212063803/http://www.oscars.org/aboutacademyawards/venues.html |archive-date=December 12, 2006 |access-date=April 13, 2007 |publisher=Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences}}

From 1950 to 1960, the awards were presented at Hollywood's Pantages Theatre. With the advent of television, the awards from 1953 to 1957 took place simultaneously in Hollywood and New York, first at the NBC International Theatre (1953) and then at the NBC Century Theatre, after which the ceremony took place solely in Los Angeles. In 1961, the Oscars moved to the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium in Santa Monica, California. In 1969, the Academy moved the ceremonies back to Downtown Los Angeles, to the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion at the Los Angeles County Music Center. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, the ceremony returned to the Shrine Auditorium.

In 2002, Hollywood's Dolby Theatre, previously known as the Kodak Theatre, became the presentation's current venue.{{cite news |title=Oscars' home renamed Dolby Theatre |publisher=CBS News |url=https://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505245_162-57425417/oscars-home-renamed-dolby-theatre/ |url-status=dead |access-date=May 1, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120502081049/http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505245_162-57425417/oscars-home-renamed-dolby-theatre/ |archive-date=May 2, 2012}}

{{clear}}

In the first year of the awards, the Best Directing award was split into two categories, Drama and Comedy. At times, the Best Original Score award has also been split into separate categories, Drama and Comedy/Musical. From the 1930s to the 1960s, the Art Direction (now Production Design), Cinematography, and Costume Design awards were split into two categories (black-and-white films and color films). Prior to 2012, the Production Design award was called Art Direction, while the Makeup and Hairstyling award was called Makeup. Prior to 2020, the International Feature Film award was called Foreign Language Film.

In August 2018, the Academy announced that several categories would not be televised live, but recorded during commercial breaks and aired later in the ceremony.{{cite news |title=Oscars Won't Televise All Awards, Adds Popular Film Category |work=The Hollywood Reporter |url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/race/academy-plans-three-hour-oscars-telecast-adds-popular-film-category-1133138 |url-status=live |access-date=August 8, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161103125108/https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/race/academy-plans-three-hour-oscars-telecast-adds-popular-film-category-1133138 |archive-date=November 3, 2016}}

Following dissent from Academy members, they announced that they would air all 24 categories live. This followed several proposals, among them, the introduction of a Popular Film category, that the Academy had announced but did not implement.{{cite magazine |title=Academy Reverses Decision, Will Air All Awards at the 2019 Oscars |magazine=Time |url=http://time.com/5531252/air-all-awards-oscars-2019/ |url-status=dead |access-date=February 16, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190217185917/http://time.com/5531252/air-all-awards-oscars-2019/ |archive-date=February 17, 2019}}

In February 2024, the Academy announced it would introduce an award for Achievement in Casting from the 98th ceremony in 2026, having rejected the category in 1999.{{cite web |last=Conradt |first=Stacy |date=February 18, 2010 |title=The Quick 10: 10 Bygone (or rejected) Academy Awards Categories |url=http://mentalfloss.com/article/24001/quick-10-10-bygone-or-rejected-academy-awards-categories |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171208174915/http://mentalfloss.com/article/24001/quick-10-10-bygone-or-rejected-academy-awards-categories |archive-date=December 8, 2017 |access-date=July 3, 2017 |website=Mental Floss}} In April 2025, it announced that Best Stunt Design would be introduced from the 100th ceremony in 2028,{{cite web |url=https://variety.com/2025/awards/news/oscars-stunt-category-1236366412/ |title=Oscars Adds best Stunt Design Category Starting in 2027 |last=Stephan |first=Katcy |work=Variety |date=April 10, 2025 }} having rejected the proposal for a Best Stunt Coordination award every year from 1991 to 2012.{{cite news |date=April 1, 2012 |title=It's Time to Create an Oscar For Stunt Coordinators |publisher=Film School Rejects |url=https://filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/its-time-to-create-an-oscar-for-stunt-coordinators-etrav.php |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131104200600/http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/its-time-to-create-an-oscar-for-stunt-coordinators-etrav.php |archive-date=November 4, 2013}}{{cite news |date=April 4, 2012 |title=Jack Gill Interview |publisher=Action Fest |url=http://actionfest.com/stunt-legends-man-of-action-jack-gills-quest-to-gain-academy-award-recognition-for-stunt-professionals-part-2/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130428074119/http://actionfest.com/stunt-legends-man-of-action-jack-gills-quest-to-gain-academy-award-recognition-for-stunt-professionals-part-2/ |archive-date=April 28, 2013}}{{cite news |last=Handel |first=Jonathan |date=June 15, 2011 |title=Academy Votes Against Creating Oscar Category for Stunt Coordinators |work=The Hollywood Reporter |url=https://hollywoodreporter.com/race/academy-votes-creating-oscar-category-202123 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131026022931/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/race/academy-votes-creating-oscar-category-202123 |archive-date=October 26, 2013}}{{cite news |last=Hiltzik |first=Michael |date=August 4, 2005 |title=One stunt they've been unable to pull off |work=Los Angeles Times |url=http://theenvelope.latimes.com/movies/env-fi-stunts4aug04,0,3864314.story?coll=env-movies |access-date=April 13, 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130922144011/http://theenvelope.latimes.com/movies/env-fi-stunts4aug04%2C0%2C3864314.story?coll=env-movies |archive-date=September 22, 2013}}{{cite magazine |last=Mendelson |first=Scott |date=April 7, 2023 |title=Oscars for Stunts? Filmmakers and Insiders Say It's Overdue |url=https://www.thewrap.com/oscars-stunts-john-wick-indiana-jones-fast-x/ |magazine=The Wrap}}

The Board of Governors meets each year and considers new award categories, including:

• Best Popular Film: proposed in 2018 for presentation at the 2019 ceremony; postponed and yet to be implemented{{cite news |last=Kilday |first=Gregg |date=September 6, 2018 |title=Academy Postponing New Popular Oscar Category |work=The Hollywood Reporter |url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/academy-postponing-new-popular-oscar-category-1140423 |url-status=live |access-date=September 9, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161103125108/https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/academy-postponing-new-popular-oscar-category-1140423 |archive-date=November 3, 2016}}
• Best Title Design: rejected in 1999

The Special Academy Awards are voted on by special committees, rather than by the Academy membership as a whole. They are not always presented on an annual basis.

• Academy Honorary Award: since 1929
• Academy Scientific and Technical Award (three different awards): since 1931
• Gordon E. Sawyer Award: since 1981
• Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award: since 1957
• Irving G. Thalberg Memorial Award: since 1938

• Academy Juvenile Award: 1934 to 1960
• Academy Special Achievement Award: from 1972 to 1995, and again for 2017

Due to the positive exposure and prestige of the Academy Awards, many studios spend around 25 million dollars and hire publicists specifically to promote their films during what is typically called the "Oscar season".{{Cite news |date=March 10, 2024 |title=Comment l'équipe d'" Anatomie d'une chute " a mené sa campagne dans le marathon pour les Oscars |url=https://www.lemonde.fr/culture/article/2024/03/10/dans-le-marathon-pour-les-oscars-anatomie-d-une-chute-tente-de-se-frayer-un-couloir_6221137_3246.html |access-date=March 11, 2024 |work=Le Monde.fr |language=fr}} This has generated accusations of the Academy Awards being influenced more by marketing and lobbying than by quality. William Friedkin, an Academy Award-winning film director and former producer of the ceremony, expressed this sentiment at a conference in New York in 2009, describing it as "the greatest promotion scheme that any industry ever devised for itself".{{cite AV media |url=http://fora.tv/2009/02/24/Director_William_Friedkin_at_the_Hudson_Union_Society#William_Friedkin_Says_Oscars_Simply_a_Promotion_Scheme |title=Director William Friedkin at the Hudson Union Society |date=February 24, 2009 |access-date=March 11, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090310081013/http://fora.tv/2009/02/24/Director_William_Friedkin_at_the_Hudson_Union_Society#William_Friedkin_Says_Oscars_Simply_a_Promotion_Scheme |archive-date=March 10, 2009 |url-status=usurped |people=Friedkin, William (Director)}}

Tim Dirks, editor of AMC's Filmsite, has written of the Academy Awards:

{{blockquote|Unfortunately, the critical worth, artistic vision, cultural influence and innovative qualities of many films are not given the same voting weight. Especially since the 1980s, moneymaking "formula-made" blockbusters with glossy production values have often been crowd-pleasing titans (and Best Picture winners), but they haven't necessarily been great films with depth or critical acclaim by any measure.{{cite web |title=Academy Awards – The Oscars |url=http://www.filmsite.org/oscars.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140120093333/http://www.filmsite.org/oscars.html |archive-date=January 20, 2014 |access-date=October 4, 2009}}}}

A recent technique that has been claimed to be used during the Oscar season is the whisper campaign. These campaigns are intended to spread negative perceptions of other films nominated and are believed to be perpetrated by those who were involved in creating the film. Examples of whisper campaigns include the allegations against Zero Dark Thirty suggesting that it justifies torture and the claim that Lincoln distorts history.{{cite web |last=Kilday |first=Gregg |date=December 20, 2012 |title=Oscar's Dirty Tricks: Inside the Whisper Campaign Machine (Analysis) |url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/race/oscars-dirty-tricks-inside-whisper-405693 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190306043347/https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/race/oscars-dirty-tricks-inside-whisper-405693 |archive-date=March 6, 2019 |access-date=March 2, 2019 |website=The Hollywood Reporter}}

{{further|Oscar bait}}

Typical criticism of the Academy Awards for Best Picture is that among the winners and nominees there is an over-representation of romantic historical epics, biographical dramas, romantic dramedies and family melodramas, most of which are released in the U.S. in the last three months of the calendar year. The Oscars have been infamously known for selecting specific genres of films to be awarded. The term "Oscar bait" was coined to describe such films. This has led, at times, to more specific criticisms that the Academy is disconnected from the audience, e.g., by favoring "Oscar bait" over audience favorites or favoring historical melodramas over critically acclaimed films that depict current life issues.{{cite news |last=Smith |first=Kyle |title=Have the Oscars jumped the shark? |work=New York Post |url=http://www.nypost.com/p/entertainment/movies/have_the_oscars_jumped_the_shark_LLhBrvPY35EnSH0iQzrqRJ |access-date=January 24, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120418115808/http://www.nypost.com/p/entertainment/movies/have_the_oscars_jumped_the_shark_LLhBrvPY35EnSH0iQzrqRJ |archive-date=April 18, 2012}}

Despite the success of The Dark Knight, the film did not receive a Best Picture nomination at the 81st Academy Awards. This decision received substantial criticism and was described as a "snub" by many publications.{{Cite news |last=Child |first=Ben |date=January 28, 2009 |title=The week in geek: The Dark Knight's Oscars snub is a disgrace |url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/filmblog/2009/jan/28/oscars-sciencefictionandfantasy |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241204144754/https://www.theguardian.com/film/filmblog/2009/jan/28/oscars-sciencefictionandfantasy |archive-date=December 4, 2024 |access-date=December 1, 2023 |work=The Guardian |language=en-GB |issn=0261-3077}}{{Cite magazine |last=Wallace |first=Lewis |title=Why So Serious? Oscars Snub Dark Knight for Top Awards |language=en-US |magazine=Wired |url=https://www.wired.com/2009/01/why-so-serious/ |access-date=December 1, 2023 |issn=1059-1028}}{{Cite web |last=Sims |first=David |date=July 18, 2018 |title='The Dark Knight' Changed Hollywood Movies Forever |url=https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2018/07/the-dark-knight-legitimized-the-superhero-movie-for-better-and-worse/565448/ |access-date=December 1, 2023 |website=The Atlantic |language=en}} The backlash to the decision was such that, for the 82nd Academy Awards awards in 2010, the Academy increased the limit for Best Picture nominees from five to ten, a change known as "The Dark Knight Rule".{{Cite web |last=Tapley |first=Kristopher |date=July 17, 2018 |title=Christopher Nolan's 'Dark Knight' Changed Movies, and the Oscars, Forever |url=https://variety.com/2018/film/in-contention/dark-knight-changed-movies-christopher-nolan-1202874041/ |access-date=December 1, 2023 |website=Variety |language=en-US}}{{Cite web |last=Lang |first=Brent |date=February 21, 2017 |title=How Much Has Changed Since Oscar Expanded Best Picture Nominations? |url=https://variety.com/2017/film/awards/oscar-best-picture-expansion-analysis-1201992206/ |access-date=December 1, 2023 |website=Variety |language=en-US}}{{Cite news |last1=Cieply |first1=Michael |date=July 17, 2013 |title=Motion Picture Academy Expands the Best-Picture Pool to 10 Nominees |work=The New York Times |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/25/movies/25oscars.html |access-date=December 1, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130717165526/http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/25/movies/25oscars.html |archive-date=July 17, 2013}}

The Academy Awards have long received criticism over its lack of diversity among the nominees.{{cite web |date=June 15, 2016 |title=In Hollywood, diversity tends to ignore the disabled |url=https://latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-et-mn-hollywood-diversity-disabled-20160610-snap-story.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170426062804/http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-et-mn-hollywood-diversity-disabled-20160610-snap-story.html |archive-date=April 26, 2017 |access-date=April 25, 2017 |website=Los Angeles Times}}{{cite web |date=February 24, 2017 |title=Oscars diversity debate must include learning disability |url=https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/feb/24/oscars-diversity-debate-must-include-learning-disability |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201116212317/https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/feb/24/oscars-diversity-debate-must-include-learning-disability |archive-date=November 16, 2020 |access-date=April 25, 2017 |website=The Guardian}}{{cite news |title=Oscars 2016: Lack of Diversity Has Historically Been a Problem |work=ABC News |url=https://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/oscars-2016-lack-diversity-historically-problem/story?id=37062502 |url-status=live |access-date=April 25, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170426150745/http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/oscars-2016-lack-diversity-historically-problem/story?id=37062502 |archive-date=April 26, 2017}} This criticism is based on the statistics from every Academy Awards since 1929, which show that only 6.4% of Academy Award nominees have been non-white and since 1991, 11.2% of nominees have been non-white, with the rate of winners being even more polarizing.{{cite magazine |last=Berman |first=Eliza |title=This Chart Proves the Oscars Have a Serious Diversity Problem |url=https://labs.time.com/story/oscars-diversity/ |url-status=live |magazine=Time |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180430194958/http://labs.time.com/story/oscars-diversity/ |archive-date=April 30, 2018 |access-date=April 25, 2018}} For a variety of reasons, including marketability and historical bans on interracial couples, a number of high-profile Oscars have been given to yellowface portrayals, as well as performances of Asian characters rewritten for white characters.{{cite web |title=Casting White People in Asian Roles Goes Back Centuries |date=August 20, 2018 |url=https://www.history.com/news/yellowface-whitewashing-in-film-america |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190119135943/https://www.history.com/news/yellowface-whitewashing-in-film-america |archive-date=January 19, 2019 |access-date=May 22, 2019}}{{cite web |last=Moreno |first=Carolina |date=February 24, 2017 |title=11 Times The Oscars Honored White Actors For Playing People Of Color |url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/11-times-the-oscars-honored-white-actors-for-playing-people-of-color_n_58aefe72e4b0140601306fe8 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201116212314/https://www.huffpost.com/entry/11-times-the-oscars-honored-white-actors-for-playing-people-of-color_n_58aefe72e4b0140601306fe8 |archive-date=November 16, 2020 |access-date=May 22, 2019 |website=HuffPost}} It took until 2023 for an Asian woman to win an Academy Award for Best Actress, when Michelle Yeoh received the award for her performance in Everything Everywhere All at Once. The 88th awards ceremony became the target of a boycott, popularized on social media with the hashtag #OscarsSoWhite, based on activists' perception that its all-white acting nominee list reflected bias.{{cite journal |last=Vliet |first=Hannah |date=December 1, 2021 |title=White Saviors Get Gold Trophies: Colorblind Racism and Film Award Culture |url=https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/10.1386/fm_00182_1 |url-status=live |journal=Film Matters |language=en |volume=12 |issue=3 |pages=140–151 |doi=10.1386/fm_00182_1 |issn=2042-1869 |s2cid=247260533 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230323154250/https://intellectdiscover.com/content/journals/10.1386/fm_00182_1 |archive-date=March 23, 2023 |access-date=April 9, 2022}} In response, the Academy initiated "historic" changes in membership by 2020.{{cite news |last=Sims |first=David |date=January 19, 2016 |title=Can a Boycott Change the Oscars? |work=The Atlantic |url=https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2016/01/can-a-boycott-change-the-oscars/424593/ |url-status=live |access-date=February 29, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160226162236/http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2016/01/can-a-boycott-change-the-oscars/424593/ |archive-date=February 26, 2016}}{{cite magazine |last=Kreps |first=Daniel |date=January 23, 2016 |title=Academy Promises 'Historic' Changes to Diversify Membership |magazine=Rolling Stone |url=https://www.rollingstone.com/movies/news/academy-promises-historic-changes-to-diversify-membership-20160123 |url-status=live |access-date=February 29, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160226155628/http://www.rollingstone.com/movies/news/academy-promises-historic-changes-to-diversify-membership-20160123 |archive-date=February 26, 2016}} Some media critics claim the Academy's efforts to address its purported racial, gender and national biases are merely distractions.{{cite web |last1=Lacina |first1=Bethany |last2=Hecker |first2=Ryan |date=May 16, 2021 |title=The Academy Awards Will Have New Diversity Rules to Qualify for an Oscar. But There's a Huge Loophole |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/04/23/academy-awards-will-have-new-diversity-rules-qualify-an-oscar-theres-huge-loophole/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220523022558/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/04/23/academy-awards-will-have-new-diversity-rules-qualify-an-oscar-theres-huge-loophole/ |archive-date=May 23, 2022 |access-date=May 23, 2021 |magazine=The Washington Post}}{{cite web |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/09/movies/oscars-best-picture-diversity.html |first=Kyle |last=Buchanan |title=The Oscars' New Diversity Rules Are Sweeping but Safe |magazine=The New York Times |date=May 16, 2021 |access-date=April 23, 2022 |url-status=live |archive-date=September 10, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200910082228/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/09/movies/oscars-best-picture-diversity.html}}{{cite web |url=https://remezcla.com/features/film/alfonso-cuaron-oscar-nomination-diversity/ |first=Jessica |last=Valent |title=Are 'Roma's Oscar Nominations a Win for Diversity or a Different Shade of Whiteness in Hollywood? |magazine=Remezcla |date=February 15, 2019 |access-date=June 23, 2020 |url-status=live |archive-date=September 30, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930100720/https://remezcla.com/features/film/alfonso-cuaron-oscar-nomination-diversity/}}{{cite web |url=https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/envelope/la-et-st-oscars-mcnamara-notebook-white-hollywood-20160115-column.html |first=Mary |last=McNamara |title=Oscars 2016: It's time for Hollywood to stop defining great drama as white men battling adversity |magazine=Los Angeles Times |date=January 15, 2016 |access-date=November 23, 2018 |url-status=live |archive-date=October 5, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181005170402/http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/envelope/la-et-st-oscars-mcnamara-notebook-white-hollywood-20160115-column.html}} By contrast, the Golden Globe Awards already have multiple winners of Asian descent in leading actress categories.{{cite news|url=https://www.goldderby.com/article/2023/michelle-yeoh-everything-everywhere-all-at-once-golden-globes-asian-winners/|title=Michelle Yeoh: Second Asian comedy/musical actress Golden Globe winner|last=Eng|first=Joyce|date=January 10, 2023|work=GoldDerby|access-date=January 11, 2023|archive-date=January 11, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230111050648/https://www.goldderby.com/article/2023/michelle-yeoh-everything-everywhere-all-at-once-golden-globes-asian-winners/|url-status=live}} Some question whether the Academy's definition of "merit" is just or empowering for non-Americans.{{cite web |url=https://ejumpcut.org/currentissue/DaleHudson/index.html |first=Dale |last=Hudson |title=#OscarMustFall: On Refusing to Give Power to Unjust Definitions of "Merit" |magazine=Jump Cut |year=2022 |access-date=September 27, 2022 |url-status=live |archive-date=September 19, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220919195412/https://www.ejumpcut.org/currentissue/DaleHudson/index.html}}

The Academy's Representation and Inclusion Standards have been criticized for excluding Jews as a distinct underrepresented class.{{Cite web |last=Perry |first=Kevin E G |date=January 10, 2024 |title=Jewish entertainers' group criticises Academy over diversity efforts |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/jewish-entertainers-academy-diversity-criticism-b2476041.html |access-date=January 10, 2024 |website=The Independent |language=en}}

{{See also|Carol (film)#Oscar category}}

The Academy has no rules for how to categorize whether a performance is leading or supporting, and it is up to the discretion of the studios whether a given performance is submitted for either Best Actor/Actress or Best Supporting Actor/Actress. This has led to situations where a film has two or more co-leads, and one of these is submitted in a supporting category to avoid the two leads competing against each other, and to increase the film's chances of winning. This practice has been derisively called "category fraud".{{cite web |url=https://www.liveabout.com/difference-between-lead-and-supporting-actor-2428097 |title=How Lead and Supporting Actor Oscars Are Determined |access-date=March 17, 2023 |archive-date=December 9, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221209195446/https://www.liveabout.com/difference-between-lead-and-supporting-actor-2428097 |url-status=live}}{{cite web |url=https://www.polygon.com/22399802/oscars-category-controversy |title=The Oscars need to fix the Supporting Actor category |website=Polygon |date=April 25, 2021 |access-date=March 17, 2023 |archive-date=October 21, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221021002529/https://www.polygon.com/22399802/oscars-category-controversy |url-status=live}}

For example, Rooney Mara was nominated for Best Supporting Actress for Carol (2015), despite her having a comparable amount of screentime to Cate Blanchett, who was nominated for Best Actress. Another example is Once Upon a Time in Hollywood (2019), where Brad Pitt was nominated for and won Best Supporting Actor, even though he played an equally important role to Best Actor nominee Leonardo DiCaprio. In both these cases, critics argued that the studios behind the films had placed someone who was actually a leading actor or actress into the supporting categories to avoid them competing against their co-lead.

Acting prizes in certain years have been criticized for not recognizing superior performances so much as being awarded for personal popularity,{{cite web |url=http://incontention.com/?p=1045 |title=What's the worst Best Actor choice of all time? |access-date=October 4, 2009 |archive-date=January 15, 2010 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20100115115957/http://incontention.com/?p=1045 |url-status=live}} to make up for a "snub" for a work that proved in time to be more popular or renowned than the one awarded (a 'make-up Oscar'),{{cite web |last=Bramesco |first=Charles |date=March 13, 2023 |title=A brief history of the 'legacy Oscar' and its winners |url=https://lwlies.com/articles/legacy-oscar-winners-jamie-lee-curtis/ |access-date=March 8, 2025 |website=Little White Lies |language=en-US}} or as a "career honor" to recognize a distinguished nominee's entire body of work (a "legacy Oscar").{{cite book |last=Levy |first=Emanuel |title=All About Oscar: The History and Politics of the Academy Awards |publisher=Burns & Oates |year=2003 |isbn=978-0-8264-1452-6}}{{cite web |last=Wenzel |first=Zac |date=April 3, 2023 |title=The Problem with Legacy Oscars |url=https://movieweb.com/the-problems-with-legacy-oscars/ |access-date=March 8, 2025 |website=MovieWeb |language=en-US}}

Following the 91st Academy Awards in February 2019 in which the Netflix-broadcast film Roma had been nominated for ten awards including the Best Picture category, Steven Spielberg and other members of the Academy discussed changing the requirements through the Board of Governors for films as to exclude those from Netflix and other media streaming services. Spielberg had been concerned that Netflix as a film production and distribution studio could spend much more than for typical Oscar-winning films and have much wider and earlier distribution than for other Best Picture-nominated films, while still being able to meet the minimal theatrical-run status to qualify for an Oscar.{{cite web |url=https://www.indiewire.com/2019/02/steven-spielberg-vs-netflix-oscar-academy-wars-1202047846/ |title=The Spielberg vs. Netflix Battle Could Mean Collateral Damage for Indies at the Oscars |first=Anna |last=Thompson |date=February 28, 2019 |access-date=April 24, 2019 |work=IndieWire |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190320081430/https://www.indiewire.com/2019/02/steven-spielberg-vs-netflix-oscar-academy-wars-1202047846/ |archive-date=March 20, 2019 |url-status=live}}

The United States Department of Justice, having heard of this potential rule change, wrote a letter to the Academy in March 2019, cautioning them that placing additional restrictions on films that originate from streaming media services without proper justification could raise anti-trust concerns against the Academy.{{cite web |url=https://variety.com/2019/politics/news/doj-oscar-rules-changes-netflix-1203178413/ |title=Justice Department Warns Academy Over Potential Oscar Rule Changes Threatening Netflix |first=Ted |last=Johnson |date=April 2, 2019 |access-date=April 24, 2019 |work=Variety |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190423210652/https://variety.com/2019/politics/news/doj-oscar-rules-changes-netflix-1203178413/ |archive-date=April 23, 2019 |url-status=live}} Following its April 2019 board meeting, the Academy Board of Governors agreed to retain the current rules that allow for streaming media films to be eligible for Oscars as long as they enjoy limited theatrical runs.{{cite web |url=https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/24/entertainment/academy-streaming-oscars/index.html |title=Academy doesn't change streaming eligibility for Oscars |first=Lisa |last=Respers France |date=April 24, 2019 |access-date=April 24, 2019 |publisher=CNN |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190424125530/https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/24/entertainment/academy-streaming-oscars/index.html |archive-date=April 24, 2019 |url-status=live}}

{{Main|Chris Rock–Will Smith slapping incident}}

During the 94th Academy Awards on March 27, 2022, Chris Rock joked about Jada Pinkett Smith's shaved head{{cite web |last=Bellamy |first=Claretta |date=January 7, 2022 |title=How Jada Pinkett Smith is uplifting Black women with alopecia |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/jada-pinkett-smith-uplifting-black-women-alopecia-rcna11273 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220328034022/https://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/jada-pinkett-smith-uplifting-black-women-alopecia-rcna11273 |archive-date=March 28, 2022 |publisher=NBC News |access-date=March 28, 2022}} with a G.I. Jane reference. Will Smith walked onstage and slapped Rock across the face, then returned to his seat and told Rock, twice, to "Keep my wife's name out [of] your fucking mouth!"{{cite AV media |title=Watch the uncensored moment Will Smith smacks Chris Rock on stage at the Oscars, drops F-bomb |date=March 28, 2022 |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=myjEoDypUD8 |type=News |language=en |publisher=The Guardian |access-date=March 28, 2022 |via=YouTube |archive-date=March 29, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220329004149/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=myjEoDypUD8 |url-status=live}}{{cite AV media |title=Will Smith slaps Chris Rock at the Oscars after joke at wife Jada Pinkett Smith's expense |publisher=ABC7 |date=March 28, 2022 |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5d7VvQcWscY |type=News |language=en |access-date=March 28, 2022 |via=YouTube |archive-date=March 29, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220329034929/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5d7VvQcWscY |url-status=live}}{{cite web |last1=Respers |first1=Lisa France |last2=Elam |first2=Stephanie |date=March 27, 2022 |title=Will Smith appeared to strike Chris Rock on Oscars telecast |url=https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/27/entertainment/will-smith-chris-rock/index.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220328064453/https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/27/entertainment/will-smith-chris-rock/index.html |archive-date=March 28, 2022 |access-date=March 28, 2022 |publisher=CNN}} While later accepting the Best Actor award for King Richard, Smith apologized to the Academy and the other nominees, but not to Rock.{{cite web |last=Gajewski |first=Ryan |date=March 28, 2022 |title=Will Smith Tearfully Apologizes to Academy After Chris Rock Oscars Slap |url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/will-smith-oscar-best-actor-apology-slap-king-richard-1235119288/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220328051847/https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/will-smith-oscar-best-actor-apology-slap-king-richard-1235119288/ |archive-date=March 28, 2022 |access-date=March 28, 2022 |work=The Hollywood Reporter}}{{cite web |last=Arkin |first=Daniel |date=March 27, 2022 |title=Will Smith appeared to hit Chris Rock at the Oscars over joke about Jada Pinkett Smith |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture/pop-culture-news/will-smith-appears-hit-chris-rock-joke-wife-rcna21775 |access-date=March 28, 2022 |publisher=NBC News |language=en |archive-date=March 29, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220329075609/https://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture/pop-culture-news/will-smith-appears-hit-chris-rock-joke-wife-rcna21775 |url-status=live}}{{cite news |last=Whelan |first=Robbie |date=March 27, 2022 |title=Will Smith Takes to Oscar Stage, Appears to Strike Chris Rock After Joke About Jada Pinkett Smith |newspaper=The Wall Street Journal |url=https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/oscars-academy-awards-2022/card/will-smith-takes-to-oscar-stage-appears-to-strike-chris-rock-after-joke-about-jada-pinkett-smith-20Zr7QDygQqZ31fHDlCT |access-date=March 28, 2022 |archive-date=March 29, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220329075610/https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/oscars-academy-awards-2022/card/will-smith-takes-to-oscar-stage-appears-to-strike-chris-rock-after-joke-about-jada-pinkett-smith-20Zr7QDygQqZ31fHDlCT |url-status=live}} Rock decided not to press charges against Smith.{{cite web |last=Yeo |first=Amanda |date=March 28, 2022 |title=Chris Rock won't press charges against Will Smith for that Oscars slap |url=https://mashable.com/article/chris-rock-will-smith-oscars-charges |access-date=March 28, 2022 |publisher=Mashable |language=en |archive-date=March 29, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220329075610/https://mashable.com/article/chris-rock-will-smith-oscars-charges |url-status=live}}

On April 8, 2022, the Academy made an announcement via a letter sent by president David Rubin and CEO Dawn Hudson informing the public that Will Smith had received a ten-year ban from attending the Oscars as a result of the incident.{{cite web |last=Davis |first=Clayton |date=April 8, 2022 |title=Academy Bans Will Smith from Oscars for 10 Years |url=https://variety.com/2022/awards/news/oscars-will-smith-consequences-chris-rock-1235228010/ |work=Variety |access-date=April 20, 2022 |archive-date=April 21, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220421212858/https://variety.com/2022/awards/news/oscars-will-smith-consequences-chris-rock-1235228010/ |url-status=live}}

Some winners critical of the Academy Awards have boycotted the ceremonies and refused to accept their Oscars. The first to do so was screenwriter Dudley Nichols (Best Writing in 1935 for The Informer). Nichols boycotted the 8th Academy Awards ceremony because of conflicts between the Academy and the Writers' Guild.{{cite web |url=http://www.biography.com/oscars/oscars_didyouknow.jsp |title=The Oscars Did You Know? |access-date=June 18, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090623000022/http://www.biography.com/oscars/oscars_didyouknow.jsp |archive-date=June 23, 2009 |url-status=live}} Nichols eventually accepted the 1935 award three years later, at the 1938 ceremony. Nichols was nominated for three further Academy Awards during his career.

George C. Scott became the second person to refuse his award (Best Actor in 1970 for Patton) at the 43rd Academy Awards ceremony. Scott described it as a "meat parade", saying, "I don't want any part of it".{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/obituaries/455563.stm |work=BBC News |title=George C Scott: The man who refused an Oscar |date=September 23, 1999 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140311095900/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/obituaries/455563.stm |archive-date=March 11, 2014}}{{cite news |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,904789,00.html |magazine=Time |title=Show Business: Meat Parade |date=March 8, 1971 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081221203341/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0%2C9171%2C904789%2C00.html |archive-date=December 21, 2008}}{{cite web |url=http://www.biography.com/oscars/oscars_didyouknow.jsp |title=Fast Facts – Did You Know? |publisher=Biography.com |date=May 16, 1929 |access-date=February 6, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100210075430/http://www.biography.com/oscars/oscars_didyouknow.jsp |archive-date=February 10, 2010 |url-status=live}}

The third person to refuse the award was Marlon Brando, who refused his award (Best Actor for 1972's The Godfather), citing the film industry's discrimination against and mistreatment of Native Americans. At the 45th Academy Awards ceremony, Brando asked actress and civil rights activist Sacheen Littlefeather to read a 15-page speech in his place, detailing his criticisms, for which there was booing and cheering by the audience.{{cite web |last=Oscars |title=Marlon Brando's Oscar win for " The Godfather" |date=October 2, 2008 |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QUacU0I4yU |access-date=February 25, 2019 |via=YouTube |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110217152537/http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QUacU0I4yU |archive-date=February 17, 2011 |url-status=live}} In 2022, Littlefeather was accused by her sisters of misrepresenting her ancestry as Native American.{{cite magazine |last=Kreps |first=Daniel |date=October 22, 2022 |title=Sacheen Littlefeather Lied About Native American Ancestry, Sisters Claim |url=https://www.rollingstone.com/tv-movies/tv-movie-news/sacheen-littlefeather-native-american-ancestry-1234616464/ |access-date=March 12, 2023 |magazine=Rolling Stone |language=en-US |archive-date=October 23, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221023002533/https://www.rollingstone.com/tv-movies/tv-movie-news/sacheen-littlefeather-native-american-ancestry-1234616464/ |url-status=live}}{{cite news |date=October 22, 2022 |title=Sacheen Littlefeather's sisters say her Native identity was fraudulent |newspaper=San Francisco Chronicle |url=https://www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/openforum/article/Sacheen-Littlefeather-oscar-Native-pretendian-17520648.php |access-date=March 12, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221022111100/https://www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/openforum/article/Sacheen-Littlefeather-oscar-Native-pretendian-17520648.php |archive-date=October 22, 2022 |last1=Keeler |first1=Jacqueline}}{{cite magazine |last1=Travis |first1=Emlyn |date=October 22, 2022 |title=Sacheen Littlefeather, Native American activist who protested the Oscars, was a 'fraud,' sisters say |url=https://ew.com/movies/sacheen-littlefeather-native-american-oscars-protester-fraud-sisters-say/ |access-date=March 12, 2023 |magazine=Entertainment Weekly |language=en |archive-date=January 14, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230114223534/https://ew.com/movies/sacheen-littlefeather-native-american-oscars-protester-fraud-sisters-say/ |url-status=live}}{{cite web |title=Sacheen Littlefather's sisters say she was not Native American. The actress had disputed similar claims before. |url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/sacheen-littlefather-not-native-american-sisters-say-marlon-brando-oscar-speech-actress/ |first1=Caitlin |last1=O'Kane |access-date=March 12, 2023 |website=CBS News |date=October 24, 2022 |language=en-US |archive-date=October 25, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221025195840/https://www.cbsnews.com/news/sacheen-littlefather-not-native-american-sisters-say-marlon-brando-oscar-speech-actress/ |url-status=live}}{{cite web |last=Gilio-Whitaker |first=Dina |date=October 28, 2022 |title=Sacheen Littlefeather and ethnic fraud – why the truth is crucial, even it it[sic] means losing an American Indian hero |url=https://theconversation.com/sacheen-littlefeather-and-ethnic-fraud-why-the-truth-is-crucial-even-it-it-means-losing-an-american-indian-hero-193263 |url-status=live |access-date=March 12, 2023 |website=The Conversation |archive-date=March 12, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230312093928/http://theconversation.com/sacheen-littlefeather-and-ethnic-fraud-why-the-truth-is-crucial-even-it-it-means-losing-an-american-indian-hero-193263}}

Seven films have had nominations revoked before the official award ceremony:{{cite news |url=http://mentalfloss.com/article/73722/8-oscar-nominations-were-revoked |title=9 Oscar Nominations That Were Revoked |last=Obias |first=Rudie |publisher=Mental Floss |date=February 23, 2019 |access-date=October 14, 2019 |archive-date=November 16, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201116212356/https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/73722/8-oscar-nominations-were-revoked |url-status=live}}

• The Circus (1928) – The film was voluntarily removed by the Academy from competitive categories, to award Charlie Chaplin a special award.
• Hondo (1953) – Removed from the Best Story ballot after letters from the producer and nominee questioned its inclusion in the category.
• High Society (1955) – Withdrawn from screenwriting ballot after being mistaken for the 1956 film of the same title.
• The Godfather (1972) – Initially nominated for eleven awards, its nomination for Best Original Score was revoked after it was discovered that its main theme was very similar to music that the score's composer had written for an earlier film. None of its other nominations were revoked, and it received three Oscars, including Best Picture.
• A Place in the World (1992) – Removed from the Best Foreign Language Film ballot after it was discovered that the country which submitted the film exercised insufficient artistic control.
• Alone Yet Not Alone (2014) – The film's title song, "Alone Yet Not Alone", was removed from the Best Original Song ballot after Bruce Broughton was found to have improperly contacted other members of the Academy's musical branch; this was the first time that a film was removed from a ballot for ethical reasons.
• 13 Hours: The Secret Soldiers of Benghazi (2017) – Sound mixer Greg P. Russell's nomination was rescinded one day before the Awards when it was discovered he had improperly contacted voters by telephone. In this case, the nominations for the other three nominated sound mixers, Gary Summers, Jeffrey J. Haboush and Mac Ruth, were allowed to stand.

One film was disqualified after winning the award, and had the winner return the Oscar:

• Young Americans (1969) – Initially won the award for Best Documentary Feature, but was later revoked after it was revealed that it had opened theatrically prior to the eligibility period.

One film had its nomination revoked after the award ceremony when it had not won the Oscar:

• Tuba Atlantic (2011) – Its nomination for Best Live Action Short Film was revoked when it was discovered that the film had aired on television in 2010, before its theatrical release.

At the 94th Academy Awards in 2022, the award for the Best Animated Feature was presented by three actresses who portrayed Disney princess characters in live-action remakes of their respective animated films: Lily James (Cinderella), Naomi Scott (Aladdin), and Halle Bailey (The Little Mermaid{{--)}}. While introducing the category, Bailey stated that animated films are "formative experiences as kids who watch them," as James put it, "So many kids watch these movies over and over, over and over again." Scott added: "I see some parents who know exactly what we're talking about."{{Cite AV media|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Rmiq2PPQDg|title='Encanto' Wins Best Animated Feature Film | 94th Oscars|date=April 28, 2022|publisher=Oscars|type=Award show|via=YouTube |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230509140640/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Rmiq2PPQDg |archive-date=May 9, 2023}} The remarks were heavily criticized by animation enthusiasts and those working in the industry as infantilizing the medium and perpetuating the stigma that animated works are strictly for children, especially since the industry was credited with sustaining the flow of Hollywood content and revenue during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. Phil Lord, co-producer of one of the nominated films, The Mitchells vs. the Machines, tweeted that it was "super cool to position animation as something that kids watch and adults have to endure." The film's official social media accounts responded to the joke with an image reading: "Animation is cinema."{{cite web |last=Fuster |first=Jeremy |date=March 27, 2022 |title=Phil Lord and Hollywood's Animators Slam Oscars for 'Belittling' Animation Categories |url=https://www.thewrap.com/oscars-new-deal-for-animation/ |access-date=March 29, 2022 |work=TheWrap}}{{cite tweet |number=1508481868479361026 |user=MitchellsMovie |title=*taps sign*}} A week later, Lord and his producing partner Christopher Miller wrote a guest column in Variety criticizing the Academy for the joke and how Hollywood has treated animation, writing that "no one set out to diminish animated films, but it's high time we set out to elevate them." They also suggested to the Academy that the category should be presented by a filmmaker who respects the art of animation as cinema.{{cite web |last1=Lord |first1=Phil |last2=Miller |first2=Chris |date=April 6, 2022 |title=Phil Lord and Chris Miller: Hollywood Should Elevate, Not Diminish Animation (Guest Column) |url=https://variety.com/2022/film/news/phil-lord-christopher-miller-animation-oscars-1235225442/ |access-date=April 6, 2022 |work=Variety}}

Adding to the controversy was that the award for Best Animated Short Film (the nominees for which were mostly made up of shorts not aimed at children) was one of the eight categories that were not presented during the live broadcast.{{cite web |last=Amidi |first=Amid |date=March 27, 2022 |title=During the Biggest Oscar Trainwreck in History, 'Encanto' and 'The Windshield Wiper' Won Oscars (Commentary) |url=https://www.cartoonbrew.com/ideas-commentary/during-the-biggest-oscar-trainwreck-in-history-encanto-and-the-windshield-wiper-won-oscars-commentary-214531.html |access-date=March 29, 2022 |publisher=Cartoon Brew}} The winner for the Best Animated Short award was The Windshield Wiper, a multilingual Spanish-American film which is adult animated, while another nominee in three categories: Best Animated Feature, Best Documentary Feature Film, and Best International Feature Film, was Flee, a PG-13 rated animated documentary about an Afghan refugee. Alberto Mielgo, director of The Windshield Wiper, later gave an acceptance speech for the Oscar: "Animation is an art that includes every single art that you can imagine. Animation for adults is a fact. It's happening. Let's call it cinema. I'm very honored because this is just the beginning of what we can do with animation." Some speculations suggested that the speech played a role in the decision not to broadcast the award.{{Cite web |date=March 28, 2022 |title=Wake Up, Oscars: Animation isn't just for kids |url=https://mashable.com/article/animation-oscars-2022-joke-phil-lord |website=Mashable |language=en-US}}

Another factor is that numerous animated films have been made for mature audiences or with ranges of PG-13 or more, with a few of them—The Triplets of Belleville, Persepolis, Chico and Rita, The Wind Rises, Anomalisa, My Life as a Courgette, The Breadwinner, Loving Vincent, Isle of Dogs, I Lost My Body, Flee, and Memoir of a Snail—having been nominated in this category, with The Boy and the Heron being the first adult animated film (in this case, PG-13-rated) to win in the 96th Academy Awards.{{Cite web |last=Edwards |first=Belen |date=March 28, 2022 |title=Wake Up, Oscars: Animation isn't just for kids |url=https://mashable.com/article/animation-oscars-2022-joke-phil-lord |access-date=April 18, 2022 |website=Mashable |language=en}}{{Cite web |last=Amini |first=Amid |date=March 10, 2024 |title='Boy and the Heron' is the First Hand-Drawn Animated Feature to Win Oscar in 21 Years |url=https://www.cartoonbrew.com/awards/boy-and-the-heron-is-the-first-hand-drawn-animated-feature-to-win-oscar-in-21-years-238916.html |access-date=March 11, 2024 |website=Cartoon Brew}}

These comments came as #NewDeal4Animation, a movement of animation workers demanding equal pay, treatment and recognition alongside their contemporaries working in live-action, was picking up momentum during negotiations for a new contract between The Animation Guild, IATSE Local 839/SAG-AFTRA and the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers,{{cite web |last=Robb |first=David |date=March 29, 2022 |title=Contract Talks Coming Down to the Wire for SAG-AFTRA & the Animation Guild |url=https://deadline.com/2022/03/contract-talks-sag-aftra-animation-guild-1234990317/ |access-date=March 30, 2022 |work=Deadline Hollywood}} and the presentation is being used to rally the movement.

During the 96th Academy Awards in 2024, host Jimmy Kimmel said: "Please raise your hand if you let your kid fill out this part of the ballot." These remarks would again prompt backlash, with Christopher Miller, producer of that year's nominated Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse, tweeting out that the joke was "tired and lazy".{{Cite web |date=March 11, 2024 |title=Christopher Miller on Twitter |url=https://twitter.com/chrizmillr/status/1767061360142331933 |publisher=Twitter}} The PG-13-rated The Boy and the Heron would subsequently win the award.

The following events are closely associated with the annual Academy Awards:

• Governors Awards, which includes the presentation of the Academy Honorary Award, the Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award, and the Irving G. Thalberg Memorial Award{{Cite web|url=https://www.oscars.org/governors|title=Governors Awards|website=Oscars.org | Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences}}
• The 25th Independent Spirit Awards (2010), usually held in Santa Monica, California the Saturday before the Oscars, marked the first time it was moved to a Friday and a change of venue to L.A. Live
• The annual "Night Before", traditionally held at the Beverly Hills Hotel, begun in 2002 and generally known as the party of the season, benefits the Motion Picture & Television Fund, which operates a retirement home for SAG actors in the San Fernando Valley
• Elton John AIDS Foundation Academy Award Party airs the awards live at the nearby Pacific Design Center{{Cite web|last=Pener|first=Degen|date=February 23, 2017|title=Elton John's Oscar Party Turns 25: Spielberg, Hanks, and an Oral History of the AIDS Benefit Where Heidi Klum Dances on Tables|url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-features/elton-johns-oscar-party-turns-25-spielberg-hanks-an-oral-history-aids-benefit-heidi-klum-da-977094/|access-date=September 28, 2021|website=The Hollywood Reporter|language=en-US}}
• The Governors Ball is the Academy's official after-party, including dinner (until 2011), and is adjacent to the awards-presentation venue[https://www.msn.com/en-us/movies/other/inside-the-governors-ball-with-oscar-winners-and-nominees/ar-BB1jI6Df Los Angeles Times article, 2024]
• The Vanity Fair after-party, historically at the former Morton's restaurant, has been at the Sunset Tower since 2009Gary Baum (November 13, 2013), "[https://hollywoodreporter.com/news/vanity-fair-oscar-party-exits-655904 Vanity Fair Oscar Party Exits Sunset Tower; Will It Land in Parking Lot? (Exclusive)]", The Hollywood Reporter. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140219133703/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/vanity-fair-oscar-party-exits-655904 |date=February 19, 2014}}.

It has become a tradition to give out gift bags to the presenters and performers at the Oscars. In recent years, these gifts have been extended to award nominees and winners.{{cite web |last=Valenti |first=Catherine |title=No Oscar? How About a Gift Bag? |url=https://abcnews.go.com/Business/story?id=86683 |work=ABC News |access-date=March 11, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140425162335/http://abcnews.go.com/Business/story?id=86683 |archive-date=April 25, 2014}} The value of each of these gift bags can reach into the tens of thousands of dollars. In 2014, the value was reported to be as high as {{USD|80,000|long=no}}.{{cite news |last=Peterson |first=Kim |title=Oscars' gift bag has $80,000 worth of swag |url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/oscars-gift-bag-has-80000-worth-of-swag/ |publisher=CBS News |access-date=March 11, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140305230143/http://www.cbsnews.com/news/oscars-gift-bag-has-80000-worth-of-swag/ |archive-date=March 5, 2014}} The value has risen to the point where the U.S. Internal Revenue Service issued a statement regarding the gifts and their taxable status.{{cite web |last=Staff |title=IRS Statement on Oscar Goodie Bags |url=https://www.irs.gov/uac/IRS-Statement-on-Oscar-Goodie-Bags |publisher=IRS.gov |access-date=March 11, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140311093138/https://www.irs.gov/uac/IRS-Statement-on-Oscar-Goodie-Bags |archive-date=March 11, 2014}}

Oscar gift bags have included vacation packages to Hawaii and Mexico and Japan, a private dinner party for the recipient and friends at a restaurant, videophones, a four-night stay at a hotel, watches, bracelets, spa treatments, bottles of vodka, maple salad dressing, weight-loss gummie candy and up to {{USD|25,000|long=no}} worth of cosmetic treatments and rejuvenation procedures such as lip fillers and chemical peels from New York City facial plastic surgeon Konstantin Vasyukevich.{{cite web |last=Valiente |first=Alexa |title=What Surprising Freebies Are Inside the 2014 Oscar Nominees' Gift Bags |url=https://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/surprising-freebies-inside-2014-oscar-nominees-gift-bags/story?id=22518285 |work=ABC News |access-date=March 11, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140311095026/http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/surprising-freebies-inside-2014-oscar-nominees-gift-bags/story?id=22518285 |archive-date=March 11, 2014}}{{cite magazine |last=Bacardi |first=Francesca |title=Oscar 'Losers' Become Winners with Distinctive Assets Gift Bags |url=https://variety.com/2014/film/news/oscar-losers-become-winners-with-distinctive-assets-gift-bags-1201100762/ |magazine=Variety |access-date=March 11, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140311095625/http://variety.com/2014/film/news/oscar-losers-become-winners-with-distinctive-assets-gift-bags-1201100762/ |archive-date=March 11, 2014}}{{cite magazine |last=Cuccinello |first=Hayley |title=Inside The $225,000 Oscars 2020 Gift Bag: From An Antarctic Cruise To A Gold Vape Pen To A Smart Bra |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/hayleycuccinello/2020/02/01/215000-oscars-2020-gift-bag/#7f6af406be7d/ |magazine=Forbes |access-date=February 1, 2020 |archive-date=November 16, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201116212337/https://www.forbes.com/sites/hayleycuccinello/2020/02/01/215000-oscars-2020-gift-bag/#7f6af406be7d/ |url-status=live}}{{cite magazine |last=Stabile |first=Angelica |title=The $225,000 Oscars 2020 gift bag: Here's what's inside |url=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/225-000-oscars-gift-bag-160122306.html |magazine=Yahoo |access-date=February 9, 2020 |archive-date=November 16, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201116212353/https://finance.yahoo.com/news/225-000-oscars-gift-bag-160122306.html |url-status=live}} Some of the gifts have even had a "risque" element to them; in 2014, the adult products retailer Adam & Eve had a "Secret Room Gifting Suite". Celebrities visiting the gifting suite included Judith Hoag, Carolyn Hennesy, Kate Linder, Chris Mulkey, Jim O'Heir and John Salley.{{cite magazine |last=Staff |title=Adam & Eve Had Secret Room Gifting Suite for Oscars' Celebs |url=http://business.avn.com/articles/novelty/Adam-Eve-Had-Secret-Room-Gifting-Suite-for-Oscars-Celebs-551833.html |magazine=Adult Video News |access-date=March 11, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140311092632/http://business.avn.com/articles/novelty/Adam-Eve-Had-Secret-Room-Gifting-Suite-for-Oscars-Celebs-551833.html |archive-date=March 11, 2014}}

From 2006 onwards, results are Live+SD; all previous years are live viewing.

{{Main|List of Academy Award records}}

{{col-begin}}

{{col-1-of-2}}

The following nominees received at least 10 nominations:

{{col-2-of-2}}

The following winners received at least 5 awards (including non-competitive):

{{col-end}}

{{col-begin}}

{{col-1-of-2}}

The following nominees received at least 5 nominations:

{{col-2-of-2}}

The following winners received at least 2 awards:

{{col-end}}

{{col-begin}}

{{col-1-of-2}}

The following nominees received at least 5 nominations:

{{col-2-of-2}}

The following winners received at least 3 awards (including non-competitive):

{{col-end}}

• List of film awards
• List of Academy Award-nominated films
• List of actors with Academy Award nominations
• List of superlative Academy Award winners and nominees

{{notelist}}

{{Reflist}}

• {{Cite news |last=Brokaw |first=Lauren |date=March 3, 2010 |title=Wanna See an Academy Awards Invite? We Got It Along with All the Major Annual Events Surrounding the Oscars |url=http://thedailytruffle.com/2010/03/oscar-week-parties-the-weekly-juice-oscar-edition/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100307140008/http://thedailytruffle.com/2010/03/oscar-week-parties-the-weekly-juice-oscar-edition/ |archive-date=March 7, 2010 |url-status=dead |department=The Weekly Juice |work=The Daily Truffle |location=Los Angeles |access-date=February 20, 2024}}
• {{Cite book |last=Cotte |first=Oliver |year=2007 |title=Secrets of Oscar-Winning Animation: Behind the Scenes of 13 Classic Short Animations |publisher=Focal Press |isbn=978-0-240-52070-4}}
• {{Cite book |last1=Fischer |first1=Erika J. |date=1988 |title=The Inauguration of "Oscar": Sketches and Documents from the Early Years of the Hollywood Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences and the Academy Awards, 1927–1930 |location=Munich |publisher=K. G. Saur Verlag |isbn=978-3-598-10753-5 |language=English |oclc=925086635}}
• {{Cite journal |last=Jung |first=Uli |date=November 25, 1989 |title=Fischer, Erika J.: The Inauguration of 'Oscar' |url=https://mediarep.org/bitstream/handle/doc/11500/MEDREZ_1989_4_495_Jung_.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y |language=de |journal=Medienwissenschaft: Rezensionen |volume=6 |issue=4 |pages=495–497 |doi=10.17192/ep1989.4.6134 |issn=0176-4241}} German-language book review of the book.
• {{Cite book |last1=Kinn |first1=Gail |last2=Piazza |first2=Jim |year=2002 |title=The Academy Awards: The Complete History of Oscar |publisher=Black Dog & Leventhal Publishers |isbn=978-1-57912-240-9}}
• {{Cite book |last=Levy |first=Emanuel |year=2003 |title=All About Oscar: The History and Politics of the Academy Awards |publisher=Burns & Oates |isbn=978-0-8264-1452-6}}
• {{Cite book |last=Schulman |first=Michael |year=2023 |title=Oscar Wars: A History of Hollywood in Gold, Sweat, and Tears |location=New York |publisher=Harper |isbn=9780062859013 |oclc=1356972435}}
• {{Cite book |last=Wright |first=Jon |year=2007 |title=The Lunacy of Oscar: The Problems with Hollywood's Biggest Night |publisher=Thomas Publishing, Inc. |isbn=}}{{ISBN needed|date=February 2024}}

{{Commons category}}

• {{Official website}}
• {{IMDb event|0000003|Academy Awards}}

{{Academy Awards}}

{{Academy Awards lists}}

{{Cinema of the United States}}

{{National Cinema Awards}}

{{Authority control}}

{{Portal bar|Film|California|Greater Los Angeles}}

Category:1929 establishments in California

Category:1953 American television series debuts

Category:American annual television specials

Category:American film awards

Category:American live television shows

Category:Annual events in Los Angeles County, California

Category:Awards established in 1929

Category:Cinema of Southern California

Category:Culture of Hollywood, Los Angeles

Category:Events in Los Angeles

Category:Performing arts trophies