List of films considered the worst#Mac and Me (1988)

{{Main|Maniac (1934 film){{!}}Maniac (1934 film)}}

File:Maniac5.jpg (1934) is one of the many pre-Code exploitation films from the 1930s featuring sex, violence and drugs (especially marijuana).]]

Maniac, also known as Sex Maniac, is a pre-Code exploitation-horror film directed by Dwain Esper. The story is a loose adaptation of the Edgar Allan Poe story "The Black Cat" and follows a vaudeville impersonator who becomes an assistant to a mad scientist. Promoted as a documentary on mental illness, Maniac was criticized for its gratuitous footage of women undressing and for plagiarizing horror sequences from the 1922 silent film Häxan. Danny Peary believes that Maniac is the worst film ever made, and Charlie Jane Anders of Gawker Media{{'}}s io9 described it as "possibly the worst movie in history."{{Cite book|last=Peary|first=Danny|author-link=Danny Peary|title=Cult Midnight Movies: Discover the 37 Best Weird, Sleazy, Sexy, and Crazy Good Cinema Classics|publisher=Workman Publishing Company|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=TTsPBAAAQBAJ&q=Maniac+%281934%29+Dwain+Esper|year=2014|isbn=9780761181699|access-date=October 2, 2020|archive-date=October 25, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231025172439/https://books.google.com/books?id=TTsPBAAAQBAJ&q=Maniac+%281934%29+Dwain+Esper#v=snippet&q=Maniac%20(1934)%20Dwain%20Esper&f=false|url-status=live}}{{cite web |url=https://io9.gizmodo.com/did-the-worst-movie-of-all-time-come-out-75-years-ago-5161275 |title=Did The Worst Movie Of All Time Come Out 75 Years Ago? |publisher=io9 |last=Anders |first=Charlie Jane |date=February 26, 2009 |access-date=February 18, 2019 |archive-date=February 18, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190218201930/https://io9.gizmodo.com/did-the-worst-movie-of-all-time-come-out-75-years-ago-5161275 |url-status=live }} Rotten Tomatoes placed Maniac on its list of movies "So Bad They're Unmissable", Vanity Fair included the film on its list of the 20 worst movies ever and it is featured in John J. B. Wilson's book The Official Razzie Movie Guide: Enjoying the Best of Hollywood's Worst.{{cite news|url=https://www.vanityfair.it/show/cinema/2018/02/25/20-film-piu-brutti-di-sempre|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220108083603/https://www.vanityfair.it/show/cinema/2018/02/25/20-film-piu-brutti-di-sempre |work=Vanity Fair|title=I 20 film più brutti di sempre|last=Pellegrini|first=Francesca|language=it|date=February 25, 2018|access-date=February 18, 2019|archive-date=January 8, 2022}}

{{Main|Reefer Madness{{!}}Reefer Madness}}

File:ReeferMadness_13.jpg film Reefer Madness was called "the grand-daddy of all 'Worst' movies" by Leonard Maltin.]]

Reefer Madness (originally released as Tell Your Children and sometimes titled or subtitled as The Burning Question, Dope Addict, Doped Youth, and Love Madness) is a 1936 American exploitation film and propaganda work revolving around the melodramatic events that ensue when high school students are lured by pushers to smoke cannabis and consequently become addicted and involved in various crimes such as a hit and run accident, manslaughter, murder, attempted rape, and descent into madness, association with organized crime, and suicide.

Pacific Standard wrote that Reefer Madness was "one of the first films ever to be considered transcendentally bad" and Leonard Maltin has called it "the grand-daddy of all 'Worst' movies".{{cite book |last=Maltin |first=Leonard |author-link=Leonard Maltin |title=Leonard Maltin's Movie and Video Guide 2004 |publisher=Signet |year=2003 |isbn=0-451-20940-0 |url=https://archive.org/details/leonardmaltinsmo00leon }} Las Vegas CityLife named it the "worst ever" runner-up to Plan 9 from Outer Space,{{cite news |url=http://archives.lasvegascitylife.com/articles/2009/09/24/ae/stage/iq_31362594.txt |date=September 24, 2009 |last=McKee |first=David |work=Las Vegas CityLife |access-date=November 17, 2013 |title=What's the Worst Movie Ever? |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130903051856/http://archives.lasvegascitylife.com/articles/2009/09/24/ae/stage/iq_31362594.txt |archive-date=September 3, 2013 }} and News.com.au considered it a "disastrous flop turned cult classic" due to its "terrible acting and exaggerated drug-addicted stereotypes".{{cite web|url=https://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-act/when-hollywoods-worst-films-become-cult-classics/news-story/792f3f09aba66809245d65328c73921c|title=When Hollywood's worst films become cult classics|work=News.com.au|first=Troy|last=Lennon|date=December 7, 2017|access-date=January 20, 2019|archive-date=January 21, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190121064145/https://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-act/when-hollywoods-worst-films-become-cult-classics/news-story/792f3f09aba66809245d65328c73921c|url-status=live}} Natalli Amato of The Daily Dot included Reefer Madness on her list of the best worst movies, writing that it "may be one of the worst movies of all time for the fact that it accomplished the exact opposite of its intended goal" by becoming a cult classic among stoners.{{cite web |last=St-Amand |first=Vanessa |title=Ranked: The best worst movies you need to watch |url=https://www.dailydot.com/upstream/best-worst-movies/ |website=The Daily Dot |access-date=July 8, 2022 |date=March 29, 2022 |archive-date=June 19, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220619224037/https://www.dailydot.com/upstream/best-worst-movies/ |url-status=live }} Leafly{{'}}s Danté Jordan also wrote that it may be "the worst movie of all time", criticizing its many inaccuracies regarding marijuana use and calling it "easily one of the most uncreative and tone-deaf pieces of anti-cannabis propaganda".{{cite web |last=Jordan |first=Danté |title=We watched 'Reefer Madness' to confirm it's still complete garbage |url=https://www.leafly.com/news/lifestyle/reasons-why-reefer-madness-is-complete-garbage |website=Leafly |access-date=July 8, 2022 |language=en |date=January 27, 2020 |archive-date=July 8, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220708065233/https://www.leafly.com/news/lifestyle/reasons-why-reefer-madness-is-complete-garbage |url-status=live }}

{{Main|The Terror of Tiny Town{{!}}The Terror of Tiny Town}}

The Terror of Tiny Town, directed by Sam Newfield and produced by Jed Buell, remains the only musical Western with an all-dwarf cast. The film was pulled from obscurity as a camp classic after appearing in college and midnight screenings in the early 1970s.{{Cite web|title=The Terror of Tiny Town (1938)|url=https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/92598/the-terror-of-tiny-town|access-date=December 16, 2020|website=Turner Classic Movies|language=en|archive-date=June 14, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210614012516/https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/92598/the-terror-of-tiny-town|url-status=live}} In 1978, it was included in Michael Medved's book, The Fifty Worst Films of All Time,{{cite web|url=https://filmthreat.com/uncategorized/the-terror-of-tiny-town-dvd/|title=The Terror of Tiny Town (DVD)|work=Film Threat|date=June 17, 2005|access-date=March 23, 2020|archive-date=March 24, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200324034956/https://filmthreat.com/uncategorized/the-terror-of-tiny-town-dvd/|url-status=live}} and has since been listed as one of the worst films ever made, by Flavorwire, Rotten Tomatoes, and The Golden Turkey Awards. Melvin Defleur referred to it as "Perhaps the worst film of all time",{{Cite book|last=Defleur|first=Melvin|author-link=Melvin Defleur|title=Understanding Mass Communication: A Liberal Arts Perspective|publisher=Houghton Mifflin Harcourt|edition=6|year=1998|page=160}} and critic Gabriel Ricard listed it as the worst film ever made; stating, "not only is it pretty terrible, but Tiny Town is also pretty endearing."{{cite web|url=https://culturedvultures.com/best-worst-movies/|title=20 Best Worst Movies Of All Time|work=Cultured Vultures|last=Richard|first=Gabriel|date=June 5, 2019|access-date=March 23, 2020|archive-date=December 9, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191209080410/https://culturedvultures.com/best-worst-movies/|url-status=live}} In 1986, The Terror of Tiny Town was the first film featured on Canned Film Festival, a late night television show featuring the worst movies ever made.{{cite web|url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1986-06-20-8602140300-story.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220507001443/https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1986-06-20-8602140300-story.html|title=A 'Terror' Kicks Off World's Worst Film Festival|work=Chicago Tribune|last=Terry|first=Clifford|date=June 20, 1989|access-date=March 23, 2020|archive-date=May 7, 2022}}

{{Main|The Babe Ruth Story{{!}}The Babe Ruth Story}}

File:William_Bendix_1960.JPG, who played The Great Bambino in The Babe Ruth Story (1948), cited as one of the worst biopics ever made.]]

The Babe Ruth Story is a 1948 baseball film biography of Babe Ruth, starring William Bendix, Claire Trevor and Sam Levene.{{Citation|last1=Del Ruth|first1=Roy|title=The Babe Ruth story|date=2010|publisher=Warner Home Video|language=en|oclc=694103117|last2=Considine|first2=Bob|last3=Callahan|first3=George|last4=Bendix|first4=William|last5=Trevor|first5=Claire|last6=Bickford|first6=Charles|last7=Frawley|first7=William|last8=Levene|first8=Sam|last9=Allied Artists Productions}} The New York Times describes it as "the Plan 9 from Outer Space of baseball biopics".{{cite news |title=The Babe Ruth Story (1948)|url=https://www.nytimes.com/movies/movie/3535/The-Babe-Ruth-Story/overview |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131219200719/http://www.nytimes.com/movies/movie/3535/The-Babe-Ruth-Story/overview |url-status=dead |archive-date=December 19, 2013 |department=Movies & TV Dept.|work=The New York Times|first=Hal|last=Erickson|author-link=Hal Erickson (author)|date=2013|access-date=November 30, 2013}} It was rushed into release while Ruth was still alive. One infamous scene features Ruth promising a dying child that he will hit two home runs. The child is subsequently cured of his ailments after Ruth delivers on the promise.

Baseball Hall of Famer Ted Williams believed it to be the worst movie he had ever seen. The Washington Times stated that it "stands as possibly the worst movie ever made".{{cite news |title=Duke as Williams? A Prince of an Idea |first=Dan |last=Shaughnessy |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=XscSAAAAIBAJ&pg=7230,788739&dq=babe+ruth+story+worst+film |newspaper=Spokane Chronicle |date=April 3, 1986 |access-date=November 30, 2013 |archive-date=August 16, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220816054117/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=XscSAAAAIBAJ&pg=7230,788739&dq=babe+ruth+story+worst+film |url-status=live }}{{cite news |last=Heller |first=Dick |title=Clinic and reception in the works to honor NBA pioneer Lloyd |newspaper=The Washington Times |date=July 23, 2000 |url-access=subscription |url=http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=WT&p_theme=wt&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EB08BFA289BE4FB&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D |access-date=November 30, 2013 |archive-date=November 1, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181101055233/http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=WT&p_theme=wt&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EB08BFA289BE4FB&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D |url-status=live }} The Spokesman-Review included the film on its list of the worst films of all time, while Paul Newberry of the Associated Press wrote that the film's place on "nearly every list of the worst movies ever made" was "with good reason".{{cite web |last=Apple |first=Charles |title=Some of the worst movies of all-time |url=https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2020/sep/22/some-worst-movies-all-time/ |website=The Spokesman-Review |access-date=July 10, 2022 |language=en |date=September 22, 2020 |archive-date=July 10, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220710190457/https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2020/sep/22/some-worst-movies-all-time/ |url-status=live }}{{cite web |last=Newberry |first=Paul |title=Counting down baseball's worst movie locales |url=https://www.providencejournal.com/story/sports/2019/08/10/counting-down-baseballs-worst-movie-locales/4492519007/ |website=The Providence Journal |access-date=July 10, 2022 |date=August 10, 2019 |archive-date=June 25, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220625165504/https://www.providencejournal.com/story/sports/2019/08/10/counting-down-baseballs-worst-movie-locales/4492519007/ |url-status=live }} Newsday{{'}}s Jack Mathews similarly wrote that The Babe Ruth Story was "what many people consider to be the worst sports movie of all time".{{cite journal |last=Dunne |first=Michael |title=Post-War Cultural Construction in "The Babe Ruth Story" |journal=Studies in Popular Culture |date=October 1996 |volume=19 |issue=1 |pages=1–7 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/23413739 |access-date=July 10, 2022 |publisher=Popular Culture Association in the South |jstor=23413739 |archive-date=July 10, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220710190457/https://www.jstor.org/stable/23413739 |url-status=live }} It also was called one of the worst sports films ever each by Newsday and The A.V. Club,{{cite news |last=Isaacs |first=Stan |title=Out ofLeft Field – The 10 Worst Sports Movies Of All Time |newspaper=Newsday |date=February 26, 1989 |url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/278087041 |access-date=November 30, 2013 |archive-date=December 3, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203051629/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/newsday/doc/278087041.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Feb%2026,%201989&author=Stan%20Isaacs&pub=Newsday%20%28Combined%20editions%29&edition=&startpage=&desc=OUT%20OF%20LEFT%20FIELD%20The%2010%20Worst%20Sports%20Movies%20Of%20All%20Time |id={{ProQuest|278087041}} |url-status=live }}{{Cite web|url=https://www.avclub.com/the-home-run-that-cured-cancer-16-amazing-movie-sports-1798214998|title=The home run that cured cancer: 16 Amazing Movie Sports Feats|last1=Mincher|first1=Chris|last2=Bahn|first2=Christopher|date=October 6, 2008|website=The A.V. Club|language=en-US|access-date=April 16, 2019|last3=Modell|first3=Josh|last4=Gillette|first4=Amelie|last5=Tobias|first5=Scott|last6=Murray|first6=Noel|last7=Pierce|first7=Leonard|archive-date=April 16, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190416101215/https://film.avclub.com/the-home-run-that-cured-cancer-16-amazing-movie-sports-1798214998|url-status=live}} and called one of the worst biopics by Moviefone and Spike.{{cite news|url=http://news.moviefone.com/2009/11/05/worst-movie-biopics/|title=Worst Movie Biopics: Real-Life Catastrophes|date=November 5, 2009|access-date=November 30, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203031806/http://news.moviefone.com/2009/11/05/worst-movie-biopics/|archive-date=December 3, 2013|url-status=dead|publisher=Moviefone}}{{Cite web|url=http://www.spike.com/articles/td0rkp/all-access-weekly-blockbuster-hollywood-bios-the-good-the-bad-and-the-jobs|title=Blockbuster Hollywood Bios: The Good, the Bad, and the "Jobs"|last=Marshall|first=Kevin|date=August 16, 2013|website=Spike|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203195640/http://www.spike.com/articles/td0rkp/all-access-weekly-blockbuster-hollywood-bios-the-good-the-bad-and-the-jobs|archive-date=December 3, 2013|url-status=dead|access-date=April 16, 2019}} Entertainment writer Michael Sauter included the film in his book, The Worst Movies of All Time, and Leonard Maltin called it "perfectly dreadful".

{{Main|No Orchids for Miss Blandish (film){{!}}No Orchids for Miss Blandish (film)}}

No Orchids for Miss Blandish, a British gangster film adapted from the 1939 novel by James Hadley Chase, received a very hostile reception from the press. This was mainly due to the film's high (for the time) level of sexual and violent content, but also because its attempt to portray Americans using a largely British cast (including an early role for Sid James){{cite book |first=Cliff |last=Goodwin |title=Sid James: A Biography |publisher=Random House |year=2011 |isbn=978-0-7535-4682-6 |pages=67–68 }} was seen as unconvincing.{{cite book |last=McFarlane |first=Brian |year=1999 |chapter=Outrage: No Orchids for Miss Blandish |title=British Crime Cinema |editor-first=Steve |editor-last=Chibnall |editor-first2=Robert |editor-last2=Murphy |publisher=Routledge |isbn=0-415-16870-8 |pages=37–50 }}

The British film journal Monthly Film Bulletin called it "the most sickening exhibition of brutality, perversion, sex and sadism ever to be shown on a cinema screen". The Sunday Express film reviewer called No Orchids for Miss Blandish "the worst film I have ever seen".{{cite book |title=Halliwell's Film Guide |publisher=HarperPerennial |year=1994 |isbn=978-0-06-273318-4 |page=781 }} The Australian newspaper The Age also gave a harsh review: "No Orchids for Miss Blandish is not only a disgrace to the studio that made it, but it also reflects on the British industry as a whole ... the entire production is unpardonable."{{cite news |title=Question of Propriety for the Censor |url=https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/205685128/19598563 |access-date=2024-12-13 |work=The Age |date=1948-11-27 |location=Melbourne |page=9 |via=Trove}}

Cliff Goodwin, discussing No Orchids for Miss Blandish{{'}}s initial reception, notes it was "unanimously dubbed 'the worst film ever made{{'"}}. Later reviews of the film were equally antipathetic. No Orchids for Miss Blandish was described by British film reviewer Leslie Halliwell as a "hilariously awful gangster film ... one of the worst films ever made". Leonard Maltin's Classic Movie Guide states that No Orchids for Miss Blandish "aspires to be a Hollywood film noir and misses by a mile."{{cite book |last=Maltin |first=Leonard |year=2011 |title=Leonard Maltin's Classic Movie Guide: From The Silent Era Through 1965 |edition=Second |publisher=Penguin |isbn=978-0-452-29577-3 |page=474 }}

{{Main|Glen or Glenda{{!}}Glen or Glenda}}

File:Ed wood glen or glenda.jpg in a scene from Glen or Glenda. He directed Glen or Glenda and Plan 9 from Outer Space and was named the Worst Director of All Time in The Golden Turkey Awards.]]

Glen or Glenda starred Ed Wood as Glen, a transvestite who cross-dresses as Glenda. Wood also directed the film. After a dream sequence, Glen undergoes psychotherapy to help "cure" him of his transvestism.

Leonard Maltin wrote that Glen or Glenda was worse than Wood's later Plan 9 from Outer Space and considered it "possibly the worst movie ever made". Julien Allen of Reverse Shot similarly wrote that it was "widely considered to be an atrocity" and "the most catastrophic failure of [Wood's] singularly bad career".{{cite web |last=Allen |first=Julien |title=Simply the Worst: Edward D. Wood Jr.'s 'Glen or Glenda?' |url=https://www.indiewire.com/2011/09/simply-the-worst-edward-d-wood-jr-s-glen-or-glenda-224683/ |website=IndieWire |access-date=July 8, 2022 |language=en |date=September 7, 2011 |archive-date=July 8, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220708193054/https://www.indiewire.com/2011/09/simply-the-worst-edward-d-wood-jr-s-glen-or-glenda-224683/ |url-status=live }} Richard Barrios described Glen or Glenda as "one of the funniest and worst movies ever made".Richard Barrios, Screened Out: Playing Gay in Hollywood from Edison to Stonewall, Psychology Press, 2003, {{ISBN|0-415-92328-X}}, Page 235.

{{Main|Robot Monster{{!}}Robot Monster}}

Robot Monster is a science-fiction film produced and directed by Phil Tucker and originally shot and exhibited in 3D. Its title character, which is "a man in a gorilla suit wearing what looks like a diving helmet sprouting TV antennae", was given the Most Ridiculous Monster in Screen History award in The Golden Turkey Awards. It is also featured in The Book of Lists{{'}} 10 worst movies list,{{sfn|Book of Lists|page=208}} The Fifty Worst Films of All Time and Michael Sauter's book The Worst Movies of All Time.{{sfn|Sauter|page=326}}{{cite web |last=Cerabona |first=Ron |title=So bad it's good: retro sci-fi's monster appeal |url=https://www.newcastleherald.com.au/story/449342/so-bad-its-good-retro-sci-fis-monster-appeal/ |website=The Newcastle Herald |access-date=July 22, 2022 |language=en-AU |date=October 30, 2012 |archive-date=July 22, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220722140503/https://www.newcastleherald.com.au/story/449342/so-bad-its-good-retro-sci-fis-monster-appeal/ |url-status=live }} Robot Monster was featured in an episode of the movie-mocking TV show Mystery Science Theater 3000, as well as Canned Film Festival. The film is remembered fondly by horror novelist Stephen King, who quotes, and agrees with, a review in Castle of Frankenstein magazine ("certainly among the finest terrible movies ever made", "one of the most laughable poverty row quickies").{{cite book |first=Stephen |last=King |author-link=Stephen King |title=Danse Macabre |year=1981 |publisher=Everest House |location=New York |isbn=978-0-89696-076-3|title-link=Danse Macabre (book) }} Chris Barsanti in The Sci-Fi Movie Guide writes: "[Robot Monster] gives Plan 9 From Outer Space a run as the worst movie of all time."{{cite book |last=Barsanti |first=Chris |title=The Sci-Fi Movie Guide: The Universe of Film from Alien to Zardoz |date=2014 |publisher=Visible Ink Press |isbn=978-1578595334 |pages=312}}

{{Main|The Conqueror (1956 film){{!}}The Conqueror (1956 film)}}

File:The_Conqueror_(1956)_film_poster.jpg The Conqueror featured John Wayne as Asian warlord Genghis Khan, cited as one of the most miscast roles ever.]]

Howard Hughes funded The Conqueror, an epic film featuring John Wayne as Mongolian chieftain Genghis Khan and the redheaded Susan Hayward as a Tatar princess. The movie was filmed near St. George, Utah, downwind from a nuclear testing range in Nevada, and is often blamed for the cancer deaths of many of the cast and crew, including Hayward, Wayne, Agnes Moorehead, Pedro Armendáriz, and director Dick Powell.{{cite web |last=Adams |first=Cecil |title=Did John Wayne die of cancer caused by a radioactive movie set? |publisher=The Straight Dope |date=October 26, 1984 |url=http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a2_016.html |access-date=March 7, 2011 |archive-date=July 3, 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080703225341/http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a2_016.html |url-status=dead }} In addition to filming near the testing range, truckloads of the red sands were transported back to the studios for interior scenes and by 1980, 91 of the 220 (over 41%) cast and crew members had been diagnosed with cancer.{{cite news|last=von Tunzelmann|first=Alex|title=The Conqueror: Hollywood gives Genghis Khan a kicking he won't forget|url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/filmblog/2013/may/03/the-conqueror-hollywood-genghis-khan|newspaper=The Guardian|date=May 3, 2013|location=London|access-date=December 12, 2016|archive-date=June 23, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130623112047/http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/filmblog/2013/may/03/the-conqueror-hollywood-genghis-khan|url-status=live}}

The film made the ten-worst list in The Book of Lists,{{sfn|Book of Lists|page=208}} appears in Michael Sauter's The Worst Movies of All Time,{{sfn|Sauter|page=68–71}} and was among those listed in The Fifty Worst Films of All Time. Additionally, the Aldergrove Star described The Conqueror as the worst ever made and Complex listed it as the worst biopic ever made.{{cite web |last=Grewal |first=Joti |title=Former Aldergrove Star editor releases book, soon-to-be documentary about 'worst movie ever made' |url=https://www.aldergrovestar.com/home/former-aldergrove-star-editor-releases-book-soon-to-be-documentary-about-worst-movie-ever-made/ |website=Aldergrove Star |access-date=July 26, 2022 |date=September 27, 2021 |archive-date=March 7, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230307010926/https://www.aldergrovestar.com/home/former-aldergrove-star-editor-releases-book-soon-to-be-documentary-about-worst-movie-ever-made/ |url-status=dead }}{{cite web |last=Barone |first=Matt |title=The 10 Worst Biopic Movies Of All Time |work=Complex |date=November 12, 2012 |url=http://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2012/11/10-worst-biopic-movies-of-all-time/ |access-date=July 7, 2017 |archive-date=August 13, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170813211848/http://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2012/11/10-worst-biopic-movies-of-all-time/ |url-status=live }} The Guardian called the choice of Wayne for Khan – a role originally written for Marlon Brando – "one of the worst casting decisions of all time". Wayne lamented taking the role, stating, "Don't make an ass of yourself trying to play parts you are not suited for."{{cite web |last=Bell |first=Chris |title=The movie so toxic it killed John Wayne: the tragedy of The Conqueror |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/0/movie-toxic-killed-john-wayne-tragedy-conqueror/ |website=The Daily Telegraph |access-date=July 23, 2022 |date=January 17, 2017 |archive-date=July 8, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220708152313/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/0/movie-toxic-killed-john-wayne-tragedy-conqueror/ |url-status=live }} The Daily Telegraph writes: "by absolutely every conceivable metric – financially, critically, historically, ethnically, and even body count – it would come to be known as one of the biggest disasters in cinematic history." Rolling Stone described the film as the worst decision in movie history.{{cite magazine |last=Greene |first=Andy |title=The 50 Worst Decisions in Movie History |url=https://www.rollingstone.com/tv-movies/tv-movie-lists/the-50-worst-decisions-in-movie-history-1234824872/the-conqueror-casts-john-wayne-as-genghis-khan-films-on-a-nuclear-testing-site-1234827135/ |magazine=Rolling Stone |access-date=October 25, 2023 |date=September 25, 2023 |archive-date=October 1, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231001221023/https://www.rollingstone.com/tv-movies/tv-movie-lists/the-50-worst-decisions-in-movie-history-1234824872/the-conqueror-casts-john-wayne-as-genghis-khan-films-on-a-nuclear-testing-site-1234827135/ |url-status=live }}

Hughes, one of the world's wealthiest people at the time, had previously produced the successful dramatic films Hell's Angels, Scarface, and The Outlaw.{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/april/5/newsid_4739000/4739940.stm |title=BBC On This Day | 5 | 1976: Billionaire Howard Hughes dies |work=BBC News |date=April 7, 1976 |access-date=November 18, 2013 |archive-date=December 16, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171216160139/http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/april/5/newsid_4739000/4739940.stm |url-status=live }} After viewing The Conqueror, Hughes bought every existing print for $12 million and refused to let the film be seen on TV until 1974, reportedly out of guilt over the decision to shoot at such a hazardous location.{{cite book |title=My Year of Flops |last=Rubin |first=Nathan |year=2010 |publisher=Scribner |isbn=978-1-4391-5312-3 |url=https://archive.org/details/myyearofflopsavc0000rabi }} This was the last film Hughes produced.

{{Main|Fire Maidens from Outer Space{{!}}Fire Maidens from Outer Space}}

Fire Maidens from Outer Space, a low-budget British space opera film (known in the US as Fire Maidens of Outer Space), is about a group of astronauts visiting an all-female society on a moon of Jupiter.{{Cite web|url=https://www.dvddrive-in.com/reviews/e-h/firemaidensofouterspaceblu56.htm|title=Fire Maidens of Outer Space|website=dvddrive-in.com|access-date=July 18, 2021|archive-date=June 3, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210603133337/http://dvddrive-in.com/reviews/e-h/firemaidensofouterspaceblu56.htm|url-status=live}} This film developed a negative reputation for its poor special effects (including a scene on the alien planet in which an automobile is visible driving past).{{Cite web |url=https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/61441/fire-maidens-of-outer-space/ |title=Fire Maidens Of Outer Space |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200812024858/https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/61441/fire-maidens-of-outer-space/ |archive-date=August 12, 2020 |work=DVD Talk |date=August 13, 2013 |access-date=January 21, 2014}} Leslie Halliwell described Fire Maidens from Outer Space as "a strong contender for the title of the worst movie ever made, with diaphanously clad English gals striking embarrassed poses against cardboard sets".John Walker (ed.) Halliwell's Film and Video Guide 2000, London and New York; HarperCollins, 1999, {{ISBN|0-06-273645-0}} (p.287). British film historian I.Q. Hunter included it in his list of candidates for "the worst British film ever made".I. Q Hunter, "From Window Cleaner to Potato Man" in British Comedy Cinema, edited by I.Q. Hunter and Laraine Porter. Routledge, 2012. {{ISBN|0-415-66667-8}}. (p.154) The DVD Talk website's review claimed it "may be among the worst-ever professionally produced science fiction films". Paul Welsh of the Borehamwood & Elstree Times wrote that it was "probably the worst [film] ever produced".{{cite web |last=Welsh |first=Paul |title=The worst film ever made? |url=https://www.borehamwoodtimes.co.uk/news/19747083.fire-maidens-outer-space---worst-film-ever-made/ |website=Borehamwood & Elstree Times |access-date=July 10, 2022 |language=en |date=November 28, 2021 |archive-date=July 10, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220710191835/https://www.borehamwoodtimes.co.uk/news/19747083.fire-maidens-outer-space---worst-film-ever-made/ |url-status=live }} In his book Operation Hollywood: How the Pentagon Shapes and Censors the Movies, David L. Robb wrote that the film's director Cy Roth is "widely regarded as one of the worst filmmakers of all time", adding that, out of the three films he made, "the worst was Fire Maidens from Outer Space...which is often cited as one of the ten worst movies ever made".{{cite book |last=Robb |first=David L. |title=Operation Hollywood: How the Pentagon Shapes and Censors the Movies |date=2004 |publisher=Prometheus Books |location=Amherst, NY |isbn=9781591021827 |page=321 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=j1wbAQAAIAAJ |access-date=July 13, 2022 |archive-date=October 25, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231025172902/https://books.google.com/books?id=j1wbAQAAIAAJ |url-status=live }}

{{Main|Plan 9 from Outer Space{{!}}Plan 9 from Outer Space}}

File:PlanNine 09.jpg) attacks Eros (Dudley Manlove) in the 1957 Ed Wood classic Plan 9 from Outer Space.]]

Ed Wood's Plan 9 from Outer Space, a science fiction film about aliens resurrecting the dead, was labeled the "Worst Film Ever" by The Golden Turkey Awards in 1980.{{cite web |last=Rabin |first=Nathan |author-link=Nathan Rabin |title=Control Nathan Rabin 4.0 #126 Plan 9 From Outer Space (1957) |url=https://www.nathanrabin.com/happy-place/2020/9/16/control-nathan-rabin-40-126-plan-9-from-outer-space-1957 |website=Nathan Rabin's Happy Place |access-date=July 10, 2022 |date=September 16, 2020 |archive-date=October 10, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221010212057/https://www.nathanrabin.com/happy-place/2020/9/16/control-nathan-rabin-40-126-plan-9-from-outer-space-1957 |url-status=live }} Wood shot only a small amount of unrelated footage featuring top-billed star Bela Lugosi before his death. Wood incorporated the footage into the film and cast Tom Mason as Lugosi's stand-in; Mason, a personal acquaintance of Wood, bore little resemblance to Lugosi and played his scenes holding the character's cape in front of his face. Although Golden Turkey Awards author Michael Medved credits Lugosi's top billing with its enduring legacy,{{cite web |last=Liebenson |first=Donald |title=Plan 9 from Outer Space Lands in TCM Classic Film Festival |url=https://www.tcm.com/articles/Article/021336/plan-9-from-outer-space-lands-in-tcm-classic-film-festival/ |date=May 7, 2021 |access-date=July 10, 2022 |publisher=Turner Classic Movies |archive-date=July 10, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220710104952/https://www.tcm.com/articles/Article/021336/plan-9-from-outer-space-lands-in-tcm-classic-film-festival/ |url-status=live }} The Independent listed various other shortcomings: "A UFO dangling in the sky has been variously said to be either a car hubcap or a paper plate. Actors read from scripts on their lap; sound microphones wobble in and out of shot. Fake trees and cemetery headstones wobble as the actors brush past them. Characters go into scenes when it's night time and leave five minutes later into daylight. ... the plot itself appears to be the product of insanity."{{cite web |last=Barnett |first=David |title=In defence of the so-called Worst Movie Ever Made |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/features/in-defence-of-the-socalled-worst-movie-ever-made-plan-9-from-outer-space-a7660961.html |website=The Independent |access-date=August 3, 2022 |language=en |date=March 31, 2017 |archive-date=August 3, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220803103027/https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/features/in-defence-of-the-socalled-worst-movie-ever-made-plan-9-from-outer-space-a7660961.html |url-status=live }}

Emanuel Levy notes the film has been dubbed "the epitome of so-bad-it's-good cinema" and has gained a cult following since appearing in The Golden Turkey Awards.{{cite web |last=Levy |first=Emanuel |author-link=Emanuel Levy |title=Plan 9 from Outer Space (1959) |url=https://emanuellevy.com/review/plan-9-from-outer-space-1959-ed-woods-sci-fi-horror/ |website=emanuellevy.com |access-date=July 11, 2022 |date=February 1, 2021 |archive-date=July 11, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220711095637/https://emanuellevy.com/review/plan-9-from-outer-space-1959-ed-woods-sci-fi-horror/ |url-status=live }} My Year of Flops author Nathan Rabin wrote that: "It's hard to overstate the role Plan 9 From Outer Space and its eccentric creator have played in the birth and evolution of bad movie culture... Plan 9 was the original best worst movie." BBC writer Nicholas Barber wrote that "it stands as the epitome of cinematic awfulness. And that's why so many people love it."{{cite web |last=Barber |first=Nicholas |title=Is this the worst film ever made? |url=https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20220107-is-this-the-worst-film-ever-made |publisher=BBC |access-date=July 21, 2022 |date=January 10, 2022 |language=en |archive-date=July 20, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220720114337/https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20220107-is-this-the-worst-film-ever-made |url-status=live }} Glenn Kenny of RogerEbert.com and The Radio Times Guide to Films each described it as the worst movie ever made,Radio Times Guide to Films 2014. Radio Times, London, 2013. {{ISBN|0-9567523-6-5}} (p.947). and IGN wrote: "Plan 9 from Outer Space was the undisputed best worst movie ever made for decades until films like Troll 2 and The Room got notorious, and it's still a legitimate contender".

It holds a 66% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 38 reviews, with the consensus stating that it is "justly celebrated for its staggering ineptitude".{{cite web |title=Plan 9 From Outer Space |url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/plan-9-from-outer-space |website=Rotten Tomatoes |access-date=July 21, 2022 |publisher=Fandango |language=en |archive-date=November 14, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161114165703/https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/plan-9-from-outer-space/ |url-status=live }} Phil Hall of Film Threat contends that the film is "far too entertaining to be considered as the very worst film ever made",{{Cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/plan-9-from-outer-space/reviews/|title=Plan 9 from Outer Space – Movie Reviews|website=Rotten Tomatoes|publisher=Fandango|access-date=April 16, 2019|archive-date=April 16, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190416083129/https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/plan-9-from-outer-space/reviews/|url-status=live}} and Kim Newman states that, "The worst thing you can say about a film is that it's boring, and Plan 9 is a fairly entertaining movie." Although Flavorwire included it on its list of the 50 worst movies ever made (in the 50th spot), writer Jason Bailey described The Golden Turkey Awards{{'}}s assessment of it as "a label that stuck" and opined that he did not think it was even Wood's worst film. Likewise, John Wirt of The Advocate goes as far as to call it "the ultimate cult flick", and Videohound's Complete Guide to Cult Flicks and Trash Pics states, "In fact, the film has become so famous for its own badness that it's now beyond criticism."{{cite book |last=Schwartz |first=Carol |title=Videohound's Complete Guide to Cult Flicks and Trash Pics |publisher=Visible Ink Press |year=1995 |isbn=978-0-7876-0616-9}} Barber credits Plan 9{{'}}s cult following to the film having some "halfway decent" elements, such as the film's title and screen presence of actors Tor Johnson and Maila Nurmi, while film historian Rodney F. Hill considers the film to be a "campy, cult masterpiece" with a "minimalist avant-garde aesthetic".

{{Main|The Creeping Terror{{!}}The Creeping Terror}}

The science-fiction/horror film The Creeping Terror was directed, produced, and edited by Vic Savage (under the pseudonym A.J. Nelson or Arthur Nelson,{{Cite web|url=https://talkfilmsociety.com/columns/schlock-value-the-creeping-terror-1964|title=Schlock Value: The Creeping Terror (1964)|website=Talk Film Society|date=September 11, 2017|access-date=February 1, 2022|archive-date=February 1, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220201235735/https://talkfilmsociety.com/columns/schlock-value-the-creeping-terror-1964|url-status=live}} but kept his name when credited as an actor). The movie is about a large slug-like alien that lands on Earth and terrorizes a small town in California.Medved, Harry and Michael (1986). Son of Golden Turkey Awards. New York: Random House/Villard Books. {{ISBN|0-394-74341-5}}. p. 197. The film is memorable for its use of some bargain-basement effects: stock footage of a rocket launch played in reverse to depict the landing of an alien spacecraft, and the "monster" appears to be composed of a length of shag carpet draped over several actors. Notably, the creature's victims inexplicably stand perfectly still as the slow-moving monster approaches them.

ComingSoon.net declared it "widely considered the worst picture ever made", calling Plan 9 From Outer Space "a bona fide magnum opus" compared to The Creeping Terror.{{cite web |last=Alexander |first=Chris |title=Creep Behind the Camera Blu-ray Review |url=https://www.comingsoon.net/horror/reviews/886917-the-creep-behind-the-camera-blu-ray-review |website=ComingSoon.net |access-date=February 2, 2022 |date=September 12, 2017 |archive-date=February 2, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220202022353/https://www.comingsoon.net/horror/reviews/886917-the-creep-behind-the-camera-blu-ray-review |url-status=live }} Montreal Gazette and Dread Central also report that it has a reputation as being one of the worst films ever made.{{cite web |title=Synapse Films Getting Creepy This September with Dario Argento's Creepers, The Creep Behind the Camera, and The Creeping Terror Blu-rays |url=https://www.dreadcentral.com/news/236216/synapse-films-getting-creepy-september-dario-argentos-creepers-creep-behind-camera-creeping-terror-blu-rays/ |website=Dread Central |access-date=February 2, 2022 |date=June 21, 2017 |archive-date=February 2, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220202000344/https://www.dreadcentral.com/news/236216/synapse-films-getting-creepy-september-dario-argentos-creepers-creep-behind-camera-creeping-terror-blu-rays/ |url-status=live }} The film was featured in The Golden Turkey Awards,{{sfn|Golden Turkey Awards|pages=18}} and its follow-up book, Son of Golden Turkey Awards.{{cite web |title=Fantasia 2014: The Creep Behind the Camera was scarier than the carpet monster from outer space |url=https://montrealgazette.com/entertainment/movies/fantasia-2014-the-creep-behind-the-camera-was-scarier-than-the-carpet-monster-from-outer-space |website=Montreal Gazette |access-date=February 2, 2022 |language=en-CA |archive-date=February 1, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220201235307/https://montrealgazette.com/entertainment/movies/fantasia-2014-the-creep-behind-the-camera-was-scarier-than-the-carpet-monster-from-outer-space |url-status=live }} Mystery Science Theater 3000 featured The Creeping Terror in its sixth season and British film magazine Total Film included it on its list of the 66 worst films ever made.{{cite web |url=https://rottentomatoes.com/m/the-creeping-terror-dangerous-charter-the-crawling-monster/ |title=The Creeping Terror (Dangerous Charter) (The Crawling Monster) |website=Rotten Tomatoes |publisher=Fandango |access-date=November 18, 2013 |archive-date=October 14, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131014100058/http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/the-creeping-terror-dangerous-charter-the-crawling-monster/ |url-status=live }}

A documentary directed by Pete Schuermann about the making of the film, The Creep Behind The Camera, was released in 2014.

{{Main|Santa Claus Conquers the Martians{{!}}Santa Claus Conquers the Martians}}

File:Santa_Claus_Conquers_the_Martians_1.jpg is the only film to be featured on all three of the following shows: Mystery Science Theater 3000, Rifftrax and Cinematic Titanic.{{Cite web|url=https://www.denofgeek.com/movies/rifftrax-a-guide-to-holiday-riffing/|title=RiffTrax: A Guide to Christmas and Holiday Episodes|date=December 18, 2020|website=Den of Geek|access-date=July 18, 2021|archive-date=July 18, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210718210136/https://www.denofgeek.com/movies/rifftrax-a-guide-to-holiday-riffing/|url-status=live}}]]

The sci-fi movie Santa Claus Conquers the Martians was the creation of TV director Nicholas Webster.{{Cite web|url=https://vimeo.com/32952750|title=SANTA CLAUS CONQUERS THE MARTIANS (Nicholas Webster, 1964)|date=December 1, 2011|via=Vimeo|access-date=May 10, 2020|archive-date=May 17, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220517185308/https://vimeo.com/32952750|url-status=live}} Because Martian children only get to see Santa Claus on TV signals beamed from Earth, their parents decide to abduct Santa to make them happy. The film was criticized for its oddity and poor special effects. It is also known for starring a very young Pia Zadora.{{cite web|url=https://filmthreat.com/features/1295/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121130200629/https://filmthreat.com/features/1295/|url-status=dead|archive-date=November 30, 2012|title=Film Threat – The Bootleg Files: "Santa Claus Conquers The Martians"|work=Filmthreat.com|access-date=May 4, 2012}} BBC critic Nick Cramp described it as "possibly the worst film ever made".{{cite web |title=Santa Claus Conquers the Martians (1964) |publisher=BBC |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2000/12/11/santa_claus_conquers_the_martians_1964_review.shtml |last=Cramp |first=Nick |date=December 11, 2020 |access-date=March 25, 2020 |archive-date=June 30, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200630130524/http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2000/12/11/santa_claus_conquers_the_martians_1964_review.shtml |url-status=live }} The film is cited on a 10-worst list in The Book of Lists and in The Fifty Worst Films of All Time.{{sfn|Book of Lists|page=208}} It has been featured in Mystery Science Theater 3000,{{cite web |title=Mystery Science Theater 3000 – Santa Claus Conquers the Martians |work=TV.com |url=http://www.tv.com/mystery-science-theater-3000/santa-claus-conquers-the-martians/episode/46920/summary.html?tag=ep_list;title;47/ |access-date=March 7, 2011 |archive-date=August 22, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090822232331/http://www.tv.com/mystery-science-theater-3000/santa-claus-conquers-the-martians/episode/46920/summary.html?tag=ep_list%3Btitle%3B47%2F |url-status=dead }} Canned Film Festival, Rifftrax and Cinematic Titanic (another spin-off of MST3K that revisited the film in 2008).{{cite web |url=https://cinematictitanic.twinvision.com/products/ |title=Cinematic Titanic | The Store |work=Cinematictitanic.twinvision.com |date=October 11, 2012 |access-date=November 18, 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131015034626/https://cinematictitanic.twinvision.com/products/ |archive-date=October 15, 2013 }}{{Cite web|url=https://shoutfactory.com/|title=Shout! Factory Store|website=Shout! Factory|access-date=October 1, 2023|archive-date=October 1, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231001193317/https://shoutfactory.com/|url-status=live}}

{{main|The Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-Up Zombies{{!}}The Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-Up Zombies}}

The Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-Up Zombies (sometimes shortened to The Incredibly Strange Creatures) is a 1964 American monster movie written and directed by Ray Dennis Steckler. Steckler also starred in the film, billed under the pseudonym "Cash Flagg". In the film, three friends visit a carnival and stumble onto a group of occultists and disfigured monsters. Produced on a $38,000 budget, much of it takes place at The Pike amusement park in Long Beach, California, which resembles Brooklyn's Coney Island. The film was billed as the first "monster musical", beating out The Horror of Party Beach by a mere month in release date. The music critic Lester Bangs wrote an appreciative 1973 essay about Incredibly Strange Creatures in which he tries to explain and justify the movie's value: "This flick doesn't just rebel against, or even disregard, standards of taste and art. In the universe inhabited by The Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-Up Zombies, such things as standards and responsibility have never been heard of. It is this lunar purity which largely imparts to the film its classic stature. Like Beyond the Valley of the Dolls and a very few others, it will remain as an artifact in years to come to which scholars and searchers for truth can turn and say, {{'}}This was trash!{{'"}}{{cite book |last=Bangs |first=Lester |author-link = Lester Bangs |editor-first = Greil |editor-last = Marcus |title = Psychotic Reactions and Carburetor Dung |year = 1987 |publisher = Random House |location = New York |isbn = 0-394-53896-X |chapter = The Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-Up Zombies, or, The Day The Airwaves Erupted |page = 122}} The 2004 DVD The 50 Worst Movies Ever Made listed this film as the worst film of all time.{{Cite book|last=Grobaty|first=Tim|title=Location Filming in Long Beach|publisher=Arcadia Publishing|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jWR_CQAAQBAJ&dq=The+Incredibly+Strange+Creatures+Who+Stopped+Living+and+Became+Mixed-Up+Zombies!!%3F+2004+50+Worst+Movies+Ever+Made%27&pg=PT65|year=2012|isbn=978-1614237754|access-date=March 27, 2023|archive-date=April 7, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230407010802/https://books.google.com/books?id=jWR_CQAAQBAJ&dq=The+Incredibly+Strange+Creatures+Who+Stopped+Living+and+Became+Mixed-Up+Zombies%21%21%3F+2004+50+Worst+Movies+Ever+Made%27&pg=PT65|url-status=live}} Time Out and Flavorwire included it on their respective worst film lists.{{cite web |last1=Singer |first1=Matthew |last2=McGeady |first2=Sean |title=The 40 best bad movies ever made |url=https://www.timeout.com/film/the-best-bad-movies-ever-made |website=Time Out |date=September 7, 2022 |access-date=May 6, 2023 |archive-date=May 23, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230523020505/https://www.timeout.com/film/the-best-bad-movies-ever-made |url-status=live }}

{{Main|Monster a Go-Go!{{!}}Monster a Go-Go!}}

Monster a Go-Go! began as Terror at Halfday by Bill Rebane. The production ran out of money and the film was abandoned. Herschell Gordon Lewis, who reportedly needed a second feature to compose a double bill, purchased and completed it for a minimal amount of money. Several of the film's actors were unable to return, so Lewis simply replaced their parts with new characters who mysteriously appear and fill the roles of the missing characters. One of the actors Lewis managed to rehire had gained weight, gone bald, and grown a goatee, so Lewis recast him as the brother of the original character.{{cite web |date=June 16, 2003 |url=http://www.agonybooth.com/monster_a_go_go/default.asp?Page=5 |title=Recap: Monster A-Go Go (1965) |work=The Agony Booth |access-date=January 21, 2007 |archive-date=October 23, 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061023063604/http://www.agonybooth.com/monster_a_go_go/default.asp?Page=5 |url-status=live }} The picture consists mostly of lengthy dialogue sequences concerning the apparent mutation of an astronaut into a monster portrayed by the 231-cm-tall (7 ft 6¾ in) Henry Hite. Poor audio quality makes much of the dialogue unintelligible, and when the film is overexposed, several characters' faces appear as bright white, glowing circles. During the climax of the movie, as soldiers prepare to confront the mutated astronaut, he abruptly vanishes and the narrator informs the audience, "there was no monster", and that the astronaut has, in fact, been in the Atlantic Ocean the entire time.{{cite web |last=Beldin |first=Fred |title=Monster A Go-Go! |work=Allmovie.com |url=https://allmovie.com/movie/monster-a-go-go%21-v33169/review |access-date=September 12, 2012 |archive-date=August 2, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120802155607/http://www.allmovie.com/movie/monster-a-go-go%21-v33169/review |url-status=live }}

NJ.com notes that many cinemaphiles consider it to be the worst film of all time, including the film's original director Rebane.{{cite web |last1=Voger |first1=Mark |title='Monster A-Go Go': A cult favorite guaranteed to make you cringe |url=https://www.nj.com/entertainment/2010/10/monster_a-go_go_a_cult_favorit.html |website=NJ.com |access-date=December 7, 2024 |language=en |date=October 26, 2010}} Matt Brunson of Film Frenzy agrees with its designation as one of the worst films ever made, stating it belongs in the "exalted pantheon of immortal atrocities like Plan 9 from Outer Space, Robot Monster and Manos: The Hands of Fate."{{cite web |title=Monster A-Go-Go - Movie Reviews {{!}} Rotten Tomatoes |url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/monster_a_gogo/reviews |website=Rotten Tomatoes |access-date=December 7, 2024 |language=en}} Meanwhile, MovieWeb writer B. Alan Orange believes it to be the second-worst movie ever made, after Superbabies: Baby Geniuses 2.{{cite web |last1=Orange |first1=B. Alan |title=Bill Rebane Looks Back at Monster a Go-Go! [Exclusive] |url=https://movieweb.com/exclusive-bill-rebane-looks-back-at-monster-a-go-go/ |website=MovieWeb |access-date=December 2, 2024 |language=en |date=October 25, 2010}} It was also featured on Mystery Science Theater 3000, where writer Paul Chaplin called the dialogue "garbled beyond recognition" and declared it to be the worst movie they ever featured on the program.{{cite web |title=Mystery Science Theater 3000 – Monster A Go-Go |publisher=Castle Forrester |url=http://www.castleforrester.com/media/guide/0421.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081120215055/http://www.castleforrester.com/media/guide/0421.htm |url-status=dead |archive-date=November 20, 2008 |access-date=March 7, 2011}}{{cite web |url=https://www.angelfire.com/ga/hikeeba/mst3kguide.html |title=Hi-keeba!'s MST3K Episode Guide |work=Angelfire.com |date=March 1, 2001 |access-date=January 17, 2011 |archive-date=August 20, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160820170410/http://www.angelfire.com/ga/hikeeba/mst3kguide.html |url-status=live }} Total Film later included it on its list of the worst films ever made.

{{Main|Manos: The Hands of Fate{{!}}Manos: The Hands of Fate}}

File:Manosposter.jpg (1966) went unnoticed until the cult TV series Mystery Science Theater 3000 aired the film in 1993.]]

The low-budget horror film Manos: The Hands of Fate, made by El Paso insurance and fertilizer salesman Hal P. Warren,{{cite book |title=The Joy of Trash: Nathan Rabin's Happy Place's Definitive Guide to the Very Wortst of Everything |date=December 16, 2021 |page=154 |publisher=Independently published |isbn=979-8-7859-1421-6 |url=https://www.amazon.com/Joy-Trash-Nathan-Definitive-Everything/dp/B09NR9NTB4 |access-date=December 29, 2021 |archive-date=December 29, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211229034841/https://www.amazon.com/Joy-Trash-Nathan-Definitive-Everything/dp/B09NR9NTB4 |url-status=live }} concerns a vacationing family kidnapped by a polygamous cult of pagans. The film was conceived after Warren bet Academy Award-winning screenwriter Stirling Silliphant{{Cite web|url=https://www.nathanrabin.com/happy-place/2019/9/16/control-nathan-rabin-40-69-manos-the-hands-of-fate-1966|title=Exploiting our Archives: Control Nathan Rabin 4.0 #69 Manos: The Hands of Fate (1966)|website=Nathan Rabin's Happy Place|date=May 13, 2023|access-date=December 29, 2021|archive-date=December 29, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211229033553/https://www.nathanrabin.com/happy-place/2019/9/16/control-nathan-rabin-40-69-manos-the-hands-of-fate-1966|url-status=live}} that anyone could make a horror movie.{{cite magazine |url=https://ew.com/article/2005/06/06/worst-movie-ever-made/ |title=The Worst Movie Ever Made |page=2 |magazine=Entertainment Weekly |date=June 6, 2005 |access-date=December 3, 2019 |first=Dalton |last=Ross |archive-date=January 4, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220104025540/https://ew.com/article/2005/06/06/worst-movie-ever-made/ |url-status=live }} Warren was convinced by the film's cinematographer and stunt coordinator that most of its glaring mistakes could be fixed in a Dallas post-production studio, when in reality the two wanted to quickly wrap the production because they were not being paid. Several technical gaffes made it into the film, including scenes filmed out of focus, a marking slate being seen in one shot, the scarf on the female lead's head disappearing and reappearing, and an insect bumping the camera lens.{{sfn|Adams|pages=91–2}} The film was shot with a camera that could not record sound and had a 32-second maximum shot length. All dialogue was later dubbed by Warren and four others, including a grown woman who dubbed the voice for a seven-year-old girl.{{sfn|Adams|pages=91–2}}{{cite web |url=http://entertainment.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/08/13/12645253-torgo-lives-mystery-science-alums-revisit-worst-movie-ever-manos-the-hands-of-fate |title=Torgo lives! 'Mystery Science' alums revisit worst movie ever, 'Manos: The Hands of Fate' |last=Fashingbauer Cooper |first=Gael |date=August 13, 2012 |work=NBC News |access-date=March 4, 2013 |archive-date=January 3, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130103195520/http://entertainment.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/08/13/12645253-torgo-lives-mystery-science-alums-revisit-worst-movie-ever-manos-the-hands-of-fate |url-status=dead }}

Manos opens with nine minutes of monotonous driving scenes reportedly intended to be overlaid with opening credits that were never added. The movie includes dialogue spoken while all characters are facing away from the camera, a character complaining about it getting dark while the sun is brightly shining, and the character Torgo, a satyr with overly large thighs, that three women attempt to massage to death.{{cite news |title=Hero Massaged to Death in 'Manos-- The Hands of Fate' |first=Betty |last=Pierce |url=http://www.mst3ktemple.com/images/manos_review-post-x.jpg |newspaper=El Paso Herald-Post |date=November 11, 1966 |access-date=March 1, 2013 |archive-date=December 17, 2005 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051217154836/http://www.mst3ktemple.com/images/manos_review-post-x.jpg |url-status=usurped }} The film gained notoriety and cult popularity by being featured on Mystery Science Theater 3000,{{cite web |title=Mystery Science Theater 3000 – Manos: The Hands of Fate |work=TV.com |url=http://www.tv.com/mystery-science-theater-3000/manos-the-hands-of-fate/episode/46947/summary.html?tag=ep_list;title;74/ |access-date=March 7, 2011 |archive-date=June 28, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110628235129/http://www.tv.com/mystery-science-theater-3000/manos-the-hands-of-fate/episode/46947/summary.html?tag=ep_list%3Btitle%3B74%2F |url-status=dead }} and was the show's most popular episode. The film has a rare 0% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes,{{Rotten Tomatoes|qid=Q691828|title=Manos – the Hands of Fate |access-date=July 2, 2018}} and Entertainment Weekly says the movie is "widely regarded as, quite simply, the worst movie ever made". Even Warren himself would later admit his film was one of the worst ever, suggesting it might make a passable comedy if redubbed.{{cite news |first=Richard |last=Brandt |url=http://www.jophan.org/mimosa/m18/brandt.htm |title=The Hand That Time Forgot |work=Mimosa |date=May 1996 |access-date=August 17, 2006 |pages=35–38 |archive-date=October 6, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181006083628/http://www.jophan.org/mimosa/m18/brandt.htm |url-status=live }} The film was later restored{{Cite web|url=https://www.npr.org/2011/12/12/143573040/manos-the-hands-of-fate-carefully-restoring-the-opposite-of-a-masterpiece|title='Manos: The Hands Of Fate': Carefully Restoring The Opposite Of A Masterpiece|first=Chris|last=Heller|date=December 12, 2011|website=NPR|access-date=March 16, 2020|archive-date=May 29, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200529014421/https://www.npr.org/2011/12/12/143573040/manos-the-hands-of-fate-carefully-restoring-the-opposite-of-a-masterpiece|url-status=live}} and released on Blu-ray in 2015.{{Cite web|url=https://www.avclub.com/read-this-the-battle-over-the-infamous-cult-classic-ma-1798284742|title=Read this: The battle over the infamous cult classic Manos: The Hands of Fate|date=September 25, 2015|website=The A.V. Club|access-date=July 13, 2022|archive-date=August 15, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220815104028/https://www.avclub.com/read-this-the-battle-over-the-infamous-cult-classic-ma-1798284742|url-status=live}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.synapsefilms.com/product/manos-the-hands-of-fate-special-edition-blu-ray/|title=Manos: The Hands of Fate [Special Edition] [Blu-ray] – Synapse Films|date=October 13, 2015|access-date=July 13, 2022|archive-date=July 13, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220713142423/https://www.synapsefilms.com/product/manos-the-hands-of-fate-special-edition-blu-ray/|url-status=live}}

{{Main|A Place for Lovers{{!}}A Place for Lovers}}

A Place for Lovers is a French-Italian romantic film directed by Vittorio De Sica (a filmmaker known for acclaimed neorealist works, such as Umberto D and The Bicycle Thieves), starring Faye Dunaway as a terminally ill American fashion designer in Venice, Italy, and Marcello Mastroianni as a race car driver who has a whirlwind affair with her. Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times called it the "most godawful piece of pseudo-romantic slop I've ever seen!"{{cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |title=A Place for Lovers |newspaper=Chicago Sun-Times |date=December 16, 1969 |url=https://rogerebert.com/reviews/a-place-for-lovers-1969 |access-date=October 19, 2013 |archive-date=October 20, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131020094319/http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/a-place-for-lovers-1969 |url-status=live }} and Charles Champlin of the Los Angeles Times referred to it as "the worst movie I have seen all year and possibly since 1926".{{cite news |title=A Place For Lovers Film 'Worst' One Critic's Seen |last=Champlin |first=Charles |author-link=Charles Champlin |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=FmlkAAAAIBAJ&pg=1127,904508&dq=a+place+for+lovers+dunaway+worst |newspaper=Los Angeles Times |date=December 18, 1969 |access-date=August 19, 2013 |archive-date=July 9, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220709123728/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=FmlkAAAAIBAJ&pg=1127%2C904508&dq=a+place+for+lovers+dunaway+worst |url-status=live }} Leonard Maltin noted Ebert's comments in his review, and offered that the film was "low points for all concerned". A Place for Lovers was included as one of the choices in The Fifty Worst Films of All Time, and Vanity Fair listed it as one of the 20 worst movies ever made.

{{Main|They Saved Hitler's Brain{{!}}They Saved Hitler's Brain}}

They Saved Hitler's Brain is a science fiction film directed by David Bradley.{{cite web |url=https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/92846/they-saved-hitlers-brain |title=They Saved Hitler's Brain (1964) |publisher=Turner Classic Movies |access-date=March 27, 2020 |archive-date=March 27, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200327112754/http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/92846/They-Saved-Hitler-s-Brain/ |url-status=live }} It was adapted for TV from a shorter 1963 theatrical feature film, Madmen of Mandoras, and was lengthened by about 20 minutes with additional footage shot by UCLA students at the request of the distributor. In the film, Adolf Hitler's head was severed from his body at the end of World War II and the head plans to rule over a new Third Reich from South America. It has a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, based on five reviews from critics, with an average rating of 1.3/10.{{cite web |url = http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/they_saved_hitlers_brain/ |title = They Saved Hitler's Brain | work = Rotten Tomatoes |publisher = Fandango |access-date = March 26, 2020 |archive-date = October 21, 2019 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20191021085728/https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/they_saved_hitlers_brain/ |url-status = live }} TV Guide called it "One of the all-time worst", while Danny Peary said it was "A legitimate candidate for Worst Film Ever Made title."{{Cite book|last=Peary|first=Danny|author-link=Danny Peary|title=Guide for the Film Fanatic|publisher=Simon & Schuster|page=430|year=1986|isbn=0671610813}} In 1979, it won the World's Worst Film Festival in Ottawa, Canada, which reportedly delighted Bradley.{{Cite book|last=Slide|first=Anthony|author-link=Anthony Slide|title=Magnificent Obsession: The Outrageous History of Film Buffs, Collectors, Scholars, and Fanatics|publisher=University Press of Mississippi|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ep9GDwAAQBAJ&q=they+saved+hitler%27s+brain+&pg=PT105|year=2018|isbn=978-1496810533|access-date=October 2, 2020|archive-date=October 25, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231025172940/https://books.google.com/books?id=ep9GDwAAQBAJ&q=they+saved+hitler%27s+brain+&pg=PT105#v=snippet&q=they%20saved%20hitler's%20brain&f=false|url-status=live}} It has been featured in The Golden Turkey Awards and Canned Film Festival, and has been spoofed on The Simpsons multiple times.

{{Main|Myra Breckinridge (film){{!}}Myra Breckinridge (film)}}

File:GoreVidalVanVechten1.jpg and Caligula were based on works by author and political commentator Gore Vidal, who disowned both adaptations.]]

The 1970 comedy film Myra Breckinridge, based on the book of the same name by Gore Vidal, directed by Michael Sarne and starring Raquel Welch, Rex Reed, Mae West, John Huston and Farrah Fawcett,{{cite web |title=Myra Breckinridge |url=https://variety.com/1969/film/reviews/myra-breckinridge-1117793381/ |magazine=Variety |access-date=January 18, 2022 |date=January 1, 1970 |archive-date=September 24, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210924071014/https://variety.com/1969/film/reviews/myra-breckinridge-1117793381/ |url-status=live }} provoked controversy due to a scene in which Welch forcibly sodomizes a bound man while clips from various classic films play onscreen. The film was initially rated X before edits and an appeal to the MPAA brought it down to an R. It also used the technique of inserting clips from Golden Age movies in such a way that the dialogue took on sexual undertones. The film was a critical failure, with Time magazine saying, "Myra Breckinridge is about as funny as a child molester."{{cite news |title=Cinema:Some Sort of Nadir |magazine=Time |date=July 6, 1970 |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,878382,00.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080513095014/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,878382,00.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=May 13, 2008 |access-date=March 7, 2011}} Leonard Maltin gave it a BOMB (the lowest score possible) and stated that it was "as bad as any movie ever made". The Miami News critic Herb Kelly nominated Myra Breckinridge as the worst film ever made.{{cite news |title='Breckinridge' Worst Ever |last=Kelly |first=Herb |url=https://www.newspapers.com/clip/40395524/ |newspaper=The Miami News |date=August 29, 1970 |access-date=August 17, 2013 |archive-date=October 25, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231025172959/https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-miami-news-herb-kelly-columnbrecke/40395524/ |url-status=live }} It was also included in The Book of Lists{{'}} worst movies of all time, which claimed that there was something in it to offend absolutely everyone.{{sfn|Book of Lists|page=208}} Likewise, The Fifty Worst Films of All Time and Vanity Fair also listed it as one of the worst movies ever made. Gore Vidal disowned it, calling it "an awful joke",{{cite book |last1=Hoberman |first1=J. |author-link1=J. Hoberman |last2=Rosenbaum |first2=Jonathan |author-link2=Jonathan Rosenbaum |title=Midnight Movies |publisher=Da Capo Press |year=1991 |isbn=0-306-80433-6 |page=268}} and blamed the movie for a decade-long drought in the sale of the original book.{{cite book |last=Conner |first=Floyd |title=Hollywood's Most Wanted: The Top 10 Book of Lucky Breaks, Prima Donnas, Box Office Bombs, and Other Oddities |publisher=Brassey's |year=2002 |isbn=1-57488-480-8 |page=[https://archive.org/details/hollywoodsmostwa0000conn/page/65 65] |url=https://archive.org/details/hollywoodsmostwa0000conn/page/65 }}

{{Main|Zaat{{!}}Zaat}}

Directed by Don Barton,{{Cite web |url=https://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/news/one-and-done-8-filmmakers-who-have-only-directed-a-single-movie/ar-AA108Iqg?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=8a77fc93804d4808bab665cceffcb034 |title=One and Done: 8 Filmmakers Who Have Only Directed a Single Movie – Collider on msn.com |website=MSN |access-date=July 30, 2022 |archive-date=July 30, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220730222838/https://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/news/one-and-done-8-filmmakers-who-have-only-directed-a-single-movie/ar-AA108Iqg?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=8a77fc93804d4808bab665cceffcb034 |url-status=live }} Zaat was also known under various titles including Hydra, Attack of the Swamp Creatures, Legend of the Zaat Monster, and The Blood Waters of Dr. Z (the name under which it was lampooned on Mystery Science Theater 3000). The film follows a Nazi mad scientist who injects himself with a formula that turns him into a mutated catfish. Florida Times-Union critic Matt Soergel quipped that Zaat "could very well be the best film ever made about a mutated catfish".{{cite web|url=http://jacksonville.com/tu-online/stories/061201/enm_zaat.html|title=Locally made sci-fi thriller is all 'Zaat' and then some|date=June 12, 2001|access-date=September 30, 2013|archive-date=August 13, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170813183130/http://jacksonville.com/tu-online/stories/061201/enm_zaat.html|url-status=live}} Critic Jeffrey Kauffman said, "this is the sort of film Ed Wood, Jr. might have made—on a bad day" and added, "Lovers of fantastically bad films rate Zaat one of the worst".{{cite web|url=http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Zaat-Blu-ray/35923/#Review|title=Zaat Blu Ray|date=February 21, 2012|last=Kauffman|first=Jeffrey|access-date=September 30, 2013|archive-date=July 11, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180711203907/http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Zaat-Blu-ray/35923/#Review|url-status=live}} Patrick Naugle of DVD Verdict stated, "The acting in Zaat is below subpar. Actors seem to be whispering their lines and trying hard not to fully comprehend that they're in one of the worst films ever made", while Michael Rubino of DVD Verdict also claimed, "Zaat may be one of the worst films ever created".{{cite web|url=https://dvdverdict.com/printer/zaatbluray.php|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131002180849/https://dvdverdict.com/printer/zaatbluray.php|url-status=dead|archive-date=October 2, 2013|title=DVD Verdict Review – Zaat (Blu Ray)|date=February 12, 2012|last=Naugle|first=Patrick|work=DVD Verdict|access-date=September 30, 2013}}{{cite web|url=https://dvdverdict.com/reviews/mst3kxvii.php |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100225160816/https://dvdverdict.com/reviews/mst3kxvii.php |url-status=dead |archive-date=February 25, 2010 |title=DVD Verdict Review – Mystery Science Theater 3000 |date=February 22, 2010 |last=Rubino |first=Michael |work=DVD Verdict |access-date=September 30, 2013 }} NPR called it a "sci-fi fiasco" when it became "the winner — er, loser —" on IMDb's Bottom 100.{{cite web|url=https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=101056819|title=10 Reasons Why We Love Making Lists|date=February 24, 2009|last=Weeks|first=Linton|work=NPR|access-date=September 30, 2013|archive-date=October 20, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131020082139/http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=101056819|url-status=live}} Zaat appeared on Mystery Science Theater 3000, which gave it significant exposure,{{cite web |author=Sampo |url=http://www.mst3kinfo.com/?p=5866 |title=Season 10 Episode Guide! |publisher=MST3Kinfo |date=May 20, 2010 |access-date=December 19, 2013 |archive-date=December 18, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131218085901/http://www.mst3kinfo.com/?p=5866 |url-status=live }} and was also featured on RedLetterMedia's show Half in the Bag where the hosts called it one of their favorite "so bad it's good" films.{{cite web|url=http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag-zaat/|title=Half in the Bag:Zaat!|date=April 30, 2012|work=RedLetterMedia|access-date=September 30, 2013|archive-date=March 27, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200327104101/http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag-zaat/|url-status=dead}} Total Film included it in their list of the 66 worst films of all time.

{{Main|An American Hippie in Israel{{!}}An American Hippie in Israel}}

The 1972 Israeli film An American Hippie in Israel is about an American hippie traveling to Israel after being involved with the Vietnam War, befriending Israeli flower children, and encountering "menacing" mimes along the way. The film was presumed lost, but after resurfacing 38 years after its production, it became a "midnight sensation" in Tel Aviv and developed a cult following{{Cite web|url=https://vimeo.com/76605726|title=An American Hippie in {{Typo|Isreal}}|author=Cork International Film Festival|date=October 10, 2013|via=Vimeo|access-date=April 25, 2020|archive-date=February 2, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230202035330/https://vimeo.com/76605726|url-status=live}} akin to The Rocky Horror Picture Show. It was then released internationally on home video by Grindhouse Releasing. Gil Shefler of The Jewish Daily Forward described it as "perfectly awful", offering that it "probably is the worst Israeli movie ever made, and a serious candidate for the worst movie of all time".{{cite news |newspaper=The Jewish Daily Forward |url=http://forward.com/articles/134946/finding-new-life-as-a-cult-classic/ |date=January 26, 2011 |last=Shefler |first=Gil |access-date=August 14, 2013 |title=Finding New Life As a Cult Classic |archive-date=October 18, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151018024531/http://forward.com/articles/134946/finding-new-life-as-a-cult-classic/ |url-status=live }} Its description as "a serious candidate for the worst movie of all time" was echoed by Josh Olson in IndieWire.{{cite web |last=Olson |first=Josh |title=Trailers from Hell: Josh Olson on Little Known Comedy 'An American Hippie in Israel' |url=https://www.indiewire.com/2013/12/trailers-from-hell-josh-olson-on-little-known-comedy-an-american-hippie-in-israel-194709/ |website=IndieWire |access-date=July 13, 2022 |language=en |date=December 9, 2013 |archive-date=July 13, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220713060658/https://www.indiewire.com/2013/12/trailers-from-hell-josh-olson-on-little-known-comedy-an-american-hippie-in-israel-194709/ |url-status=live }} Ben Hartman of The Jerusalem Post stated the film was "surely one of the worst films ever made in Israel, or beyond".{{cite news |url=http://www.jpost.com/Arts-and-Culture/Entertainment/Horrendous-Israeli-70s-film-becomes-a-cult-favorite |date=January 9, 2011 |last=Harman |first=Ben |work=The Jerusalem Post |access-date=August 29, 2013 |title='Horrendous' Israeli '70s film becomes a cult favorite |archive-date=August 30, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180830142226/https://www.jpost.com//Arts-and-Culture/Entertainment/Horrendous-Israeli-70s-film-becomes-a-cult-favorite |url-status=live }} Nana 10 said it claims the title of "worst Israeli film and most amusing".{{Cite web|language=he |url=http://news.nana10.co.il/Article/?ArticleID=766710 |title=News article from Nana 10 | work=nana 10 - חדשות |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170808053515/http://news.nana10.co.il/Article/?ArticleID=766710 |archive-date=August 8, 2017 |access-date=August 26, 2013}}

{{Main|Bat Pussy{{!}}Bat Pussy}}

A loose spoof of the 1966 Batman television series cited as one of the earliest examples of a pornographic parody film, the presumably-1970s pornographic film Bat Pussy has been described as the worst pornographic film ever made due to "some incredibly unarousing sex and a general attitude of awfulness".{{cite news |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/the-filter/11395280/The-rise-of-parody-porn-the-Chaucer-of-our-times.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/the-filter/11395280/The-rise-of-parody-porn-the-Chaucer-of-our-times.html |archive-date=2022-01-11 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |title=The rise of parody porn, 'the Chaucer of our times' |newspaper=The Daily Telegraph |author=Merz, Theo |date=February 23, 2015}}{{cbignore}}{{cite web |url=http://io9.gizmodo.com/5914178/the-bizarre-history-of-superhero-porn-nsfw |title=The Bizarre History of Superhero Porn [NSFW] |author=Anders, Charlie Jane |date=May 30, 2012 |publisher=io9 |access-date=March 21, 2016 |archive-date=March 27, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160327103621/http://io9.gizmodo.com/5914178/the-bizarre-history-of-superhero-porn-nsfw |url-status=live }} Possessing no credits or copyright information, there is no known record of Bat Pussy{{'}}s existence prior to the mid-1990s, when it was discovered in the storeroom of an adult movie theater in Memphis, Tennessee, and subsequently released on home video by exploitation film distributor Something Weird Video. Gawker Media{{'}}s io9 proclaimed the film to be "the absolute nadir of pornography, period. Not just Batman-themed pornography. ALL pornography", deriding its "obese redneck" cast as rendering the film "wank-proof".{{cite web |url=http://io9.gizmodo.com/5545416/a-brief-history-of-batman-themed-pornography-nsfw |title=A brief history of Batman-themed pornography (NSFW) |publisher=io9 |author=Lamar, Cyriaque |date=May 22, 2010 |access-date=March 21, 2016 |archive-date=March 7, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160307104420/http://io9.gizmodo.com/5545416/a-brief-history-of-batman-themed-pornography-nsfw |url-status=live }} PornParody.com, a website dedicated to the genre, acknowledged its status as "the worst adult movie of all time", describing Bat Pussy as "renowned for its technical ineptness and anti-eroticism" due to its "physically unappealing" actors.{{cite web |url=http://pornparody.com/2014/10/bat-pussy-the-first-superhero-porn-parody/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141008174205/http://pornparody.com/2014/10/bat-pussy-the-first-superhero-porn-parody/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=October 8, 2014 |title=Bat Pussy – the first superhero porn parody? |date=October 6, 2014 |publisher=PornParody.com}} AV Maniacs contested Bat Pussy{{'}}s categorization as pornography on the grounds of the lead actor's visible erectile dysfunction and instead labeled the film "anti-porn", asking "How else do you categorize an adult film that completely and utterly fails to elicit even the minutest amount of arousal in its viewers?"{{cite web |url=http://avmaniacs.com/features/bat_pussy.html |title=Deep Inside Bat Pussy |author=Allison, Matthew |publisher=AV Maniacs |access-date=March 24, 2016 |archive-date=October 26, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151026200719/http://avmaniacs.com/features/bat_pussy.html |url-status=live }} The book The Many More Lives of Batman by William Uricchio and Will Brooker also labeled Bat Pussy "the worst porn film ever made", criticizing its poor adaptation of the source material.{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lj3-rQEACAAJ&q=%22Bat+Pussy%22&pg=PA115 |title=The Many More Lives of Batman |author1=Pearson, Rebecca |author2=Brooker, Will |author3=Uriccho, William |date=2015 |isbn=978-1844577644 |publisher=British Film Institute |access-date=February 27, 2024 |archive-date=February 27, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240227175609/https://books.google.com/books?id=lj3-rQEACAAJ&q=%22Bat+Pussy%22&pg=PA115 |url-status=live }}

{{Main|At Long Last Love{{!}}At Long Last Love}}

File:Peter Bogdanovich.jpg initially apologized for At Long Last Love, once described as "the worst musical extravaganza in Hollywood history", but an updated cut of the film has met with critical reevaluation.]]

At Long Last Love was renowned director Peter Bogdanovich's musical homage to great 1930s Hollywood musicals. It features songs by Cole Porter and stars Cybill Shepherd and Burt Reynolds. Film Threat wrote that it received "the most withering reviews any film ever received", while The Guardian reported that it was "savaged by critics at the time and viewed as one of the worst films ever".{{cite web |title=The Bootleg Files: At Long Last Love |url=https://filmthreat.com/uncategorized/the-bootleg-files-at-long-last-love/ |work=Film Threat |access-date=July 19, 2022 |date=May 5, 2006 |archive-date=July 19, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220719171530/https://filmthreat.com/uncategorized/the-bootleg-files-at-long-last-love/ |url-status=live }}{{cite web |title=Peter Bogdanovich: a life in pictures |url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/gallery/2022/jan/06/peter-bogdanovich-a-life-in-pictures |website=The Guardian |access-date=July 13, 2022 |date=January 6, 2022 |archive-date=July 13, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220713143336/https://www.theguardian.com/film/gallery/2022/jan/06/peter-bogdanovich-a-life-in-pictures |url-status=live }} Richard Brody of The New Yorker compared it to the later critical failures of Heaven's Gate and Ishtar, writing: "critics of the time heaven's-gated [At Long Last Love], leaving Bogdanovich ishtarred and feathered".{{cite magazine |last=Brody |first=Richard |author-link=Richard Brody |title=How Peter Bogdanovich Shaped the Backstory of Modern Cinema |url=https://www.newyorker.com/culture/postscript/how-peter-bogdanovich-shaped-the-backstory-of-modern-cinema |magazine=The New Yorker |access-date=July 13, 2022 |date=January 7, 2022 |archive-date=May 30, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220530220647/https://www.newyorker.com/culture/postscript/how-peter-bogdanovich-shaped-the-backstory-of-modern-cinema |url-status=live }} Such reviews included Hollis Alpert's, in which he said that "This failure is so dismal that it goes beyond failure",{{cite book |last=Tookey |first=Christopher |title =Named and Shamed: The World's Worst and Wittiest Movie Reviews from Affleck to Zeta-Jones |publisher =Troubador Publishing |year =2010 |page =34 |isbn =978-1-84876-560-3}} and Esquire critic John Simon's, who said that "it may be the worst movie musical of this – or any – decade".{{cite book |last=Yule |first=Andrew |title =Picture shows: the life and films of Peter Bogdanovich |publisher =Hal Leonard Corporation |year =1992 |page =[https://archive.org/details/pictureshowslife00yule/page/90 90] |isbn =0-87910-153-9 |url =https://archive.org/details/pictureshowslife00yule/page/90 }} Meanwhile, Buffalo News film critic Jeff Simon wrote, "About 45 minutes in, it became apparent to one and all that this was one of the worst and most embarrassing major-talent turkeys of all time."{{cite news |title=Wisecrack Addicts Laughing at the Not-So-Bad |url=http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=BN&p_theme=bn&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EAF994638769706&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D |newspaper=The Buffalo News |date=May 24, 1996 |author=Simon, Jeff |access-date=October 11, 2011 |archive-date=November 1, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181101095439/http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=BN&p_theme=bn&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EAF994638769706&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D |url-status=live }} Bogdanovich, who was also the screenwriter, sent press releases to newspapers across the country apologizing for the film.

CNN later noted that it had attained a legacy as being "the worst musical extravaganza in Hollywood history",{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/10/showbiz/movies/big-bombs-revisited|title=Picking up the pieces on Hollywood's biggest bombs|last=Leopold|first=Todd|date=July 11, 2013|access-date=August 23, 2013|publisher=CNN|archive-date=August 18, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130818030235/http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/10/showbiz/movies/big-bombs-revisited|url-status=live}} and Jay Cocks has said the film was "regarded as the great white elephant catastrophe of its time".{{cite book |last=Muir |first=John Kenneth |title =Singing a new tune:the rebirth of the modern film musical, from Evita to De-lovely and beyond |publisher =Hal Leonard Corporation |year =2005 |page =[https://archive.org/details/singingnewtunere0000muir/page/58 58] |isbn =1-55783-610-8 |url =https://archive.org/details/singingnewtunere0000muir/page/58 }} Lester J. Keyser wrote that it was "justly included on most lists of the ten worst films ever made",{{cite book |last=Keyser |first=Lester J. |title=Hollywood in the Seventies |date=1981 |publisher=A.S. Barnes |location=Los Angeles, California |isbn=0498025454 |page=85}} as it was included in Michael Sauter's The Worst Films of All Time, The Golden Turkey Awards and Vanity Fair's worst film list.{{sfn|Medved|1978|p=37}}{{cite book |last=Medved |first=Michael |title =The Golden Turkey Awards |publisher =G. P. Putnam's Sons |year =1980 |page =209 |isbn =0-399-50463-X|title-link =The Golden Turkey Awards }}

Bogdanovich lamented being influenced by studio previews to cut the film before its theatrical release. Unbeknownst to Bogdanovich, a studio editor who preferred the director's first cut constructed his own based on the test screening version that he once had access to. This version subsequently aired on cable TV and streamed on Netflix in place of the theatrical cut. When news of this reached Bogdanovich, he contacted Fox and made a few finishing touches, resulting in a better received director's cut that debuted on home video in 2013.{{cite web|last=McWeeny |first=Drew |url=http://www.hitfix.com/blogs/motion-captured/posts/peter-bogdanovich-screens-new-cut-of-at-long-last-love-and-tells-story-behind-it |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120217194802/http://www.hitfix.com/blogs/motion-captured/posts/peter-bogdanovich-screens-new-cut-of-at-long-last-love-and-tells-story-behind-it |title=Peter Bogdanovich screens new cut of At Long Last Love and tells story behind it |website=Hitfix |date=January 9, 2012 |access-date=March 5, 2014 |archive-date=February 17, 2012}}

{{Main|Exorcist II: The Heretic{{!}}Exorcist II: The Heretic}}

Exorcist II: The Heretic is the sequel to William Friedkin's Oscar-winning 1973 film, this time directed by John Boorman. Friedkin opted not to return to direct the sequel and The Daily Telegraph states that Boorman "hated the original" and intended The Heretic to be an "antidote [...] to wash away the evil of Friedkin's film."{{cite web |last=Fordy |first=Tom |title='The worst film ever made'? Why Exorcist II: The Heretic is truly the sequel from hell |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/0/exorcist-2-the-heretic-linda-blair-richard-burton/ |website=The Daily Telegraph |access-date=October 28, 2023 |date=October 3, 2023 |archive-date=October 28, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231028125349/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/0/exorcist-2-the-heretic-linda-blair-richard-burton/ |url-status=live }} Set four years after the first film, Linda Blair reprised her role as Regan MacNeil, who is revealed to have healing powers, and Richard Burton stars as Father Philip Lamont, who believes that the demon Pazuzu targets those with healing abilities. Blair agreed to return for the sequel as long as she did not have to wear the possession make-up from the first film, leading to the use of an unconvincing stand-in, while Burton read his lines off cue cards. Despite his character dying in the original film, Max von Sydow returned for flashback sequences set in Africa, where Lamont flies to on the back of a locust.

The Daily Telegraph notes that some consider it the worst film ever made. British film critic Mark Kermode called the original film his favorite film of all time but believes the sequel to be the worst film ever made, stating, "This is a film that trashes a work of art. It's like someone deciding to do a Mona Lisa 2, but with a moustache."{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/2004/jul/02/1 |title='If I'd made that, I'd change my name' |access-date=December 1, 2013 |newspaper=The Guardian |archive-date=December 3, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203135052/http://www.theguardian.com/film/2004/jul/02/1 |url-status=live }} The Golden Turkey Awards named it the second-worst film ever made, after Plan 9 from Outer Space, and it also appeared in The Official Razzie Movie Guide. The A.V. Club listed it as the worst sequel of all time and critic Bill Chambers stated it was "Possibly the worst film ever made and surely the worst sequel ever made."{{cite web |url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/exorcist_ii_the_heretic/reviews/ |title=Exorcist II – The Heretic Reviews |website=Rotten Tomatoes |publisher=Fandango |access-date=April 16, 2019 |archive-date=April 28, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190428150130/https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/exorcist_ii_the_heretic/reviews/ |url-status=live}}{{cite web |title=The 25 worst sequels of all time |url=https://www.avclub.com/the-25-worst-sequels-of-all-time-1850799210/slides/26 |website=The A.V. Club |access-date=October 28, 2023 |language=en |date=September 8, 2023 |archive-date=October 28, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231028125412/https://www.avclub.com/the-25-worst-sequels-of-all-time-1850799210/slides/26 |url-status=live}} Friedkin believed the sequel diminished the value of the original film and called it "the worst piece of shit I've ever seen" and "a fucking disgrace."{{Cite news |url=https://www.cinemablend.com/news/2464836/original-exorcist-director-says-the-sequel-was-the-worst-movie-hes-ever-seen |title=Original Exorcist Director Says The Sequel Was The Worst Movie He's Ever Seen |publisher=CinemaBlend |date=January 9, 2019 |access-date=January 20, 2019 |last=Libbey |first=Dirk |archive-date=January 21, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190121064119/https://www.cinemablend.com/news/2464836/original-exorcist-director-says-the-sequel-was-the-worst-movie-hes-ever-seen|url-status=live}}{{Cite news |url=http://www.blastr.com/2013-4-15/exorcist-director-says-sequel-one-worst-films-ive-ever-seen |title=Exorcist director says sequel is 'one of the worst films I've ever seen' |access-date=December 1, 2013 |date=April 15, 2013 |first=Don |last=Kaye |publisher=Blastr |archive-date=August 4, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130804174243/http://www.blastr.com/2013-4-15/exorcist-director-says-sequel-one-worst-films-ive-ever-seen |url-status=dead}} Eventually, the film garnered so much hate that Boorman disowned it. In an interview with Bob McCabe for the book The Exorcist: Out of the Shadows, he confessed, "The sin I committed was not giving the audience what it wanted in terms of horror."{{cite book |last=McCabe |first=Bob |title=The Exorcist: Out of the Shadows |publisher=Omnibus Press |date=1999 |page=164 |isbn=9780711975095}} A third installment in the Exorcist franchise, The Exorcist III: Legion, was released in 1990 and would in later years gain a cult following,{{cite web |url=https://bloody-disgusting.com/editorials/3578046/masterpiece-exorcist-iii-nearly-turns-30-finally-getting-due/ |title=Nearly 30 Years Later, Masterpiece 'The Exorcist III' is Finally Getting Its Due |last=Kurland |first=Daniel |website=Bloody Disgusting |date=August 16, 2019}} with author Nat Segaloff writing that, "The first rule of Exorcist III is: you do not talk about Exorcist II."

{{Main|The Swarm (1978 film){{!}}The Swarm (1978 film)}}

The Swarm is a 1978 horror film about a killer bee invasion of Texas, directed and produced by Irwin Allen. Despite its all-star cast (including Michael Caine, Henry Fonda, Richard Widmark and Olivia de Havilland), it was a box-office failure and was excoriated by reviewers.Halliwell's film and video guide 2002 edited by John Walker. London. HarperCollins Entertainment, 2001. {{ISBN|0-00-712265-9}} (p. 804). On its UK release, The Sunday Times described The Swarm as "simply the worst film ever made".{{Cite web |url=https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2001/apr/26/artsfeatures2 |title=The worst movie ever? |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131111042603/http://www.theguardian.com/culture/2001/apr/26/artsfeatures2 |archive-date=November 11, 2013 |work=The Guardian |date=April 26, 2001 |access-date=March 29, 2014}} Leslie Halliwell described it as a "very obvious disaster movie with risible dialogue". The Guardian article on The Swarm stated, "You could pass it all off as a sick joke, except it cost twelve million dollars, twenty-two million bees, and several years of someone's life." Barry Took, reviewing it for Punch, stated, "the story is of a banality matched only by the woodenness of the acting". Time Out magazine called The Swarm a "risibly inadequate disaster movie".{{Cite web |url=https://www.timeout.com/london/film/the-swarm |title=The Swarm |work=Time Out London |date=September 10, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191115053443/https://www.timeout.com/london/film/the-swarm |archive-date=November 15, 2019 |access-date=March 29, 2014}} The Swarm is included in several "worst movie" books, including the Medved brothers' The Golden Turkey Awards,Mikel J. Koven, Film, Folklore and Urban Legends. Scarecrow Press, 2008 {{ISBN|0-8108-6025-2}} (p. 91) and The Official Razzie Movie Guide.{{cite book|last=Wilson|first=John|title=The Official Razzie Movie Guide: Enjoying the Best of Hollywood's Worst |year=2005|publisher=Grand Central Publishing|isbn=0-446-69334-0}} It soon gained a cult status (enough so that Warner Archive released the extended version on Blu-ray).{{Cite web|url=https://bloody-disgusting.com/home-video/3517106/warner-archive-releasing-extended-version-1978s-swarm-blu-ray/|title=Warner Archive Releasing Extended Version of 1978's 'The Swarm' on Blu-ray|first=John|last=Squires|date=August 22, 2018|access-date=January 11, 2019|archive-date=January 12, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190112044300/https://bloody-disgusting.com/home-video/3517106/warner-archive-releasing-extended-version-1978s-swarm-blu-ray/|url-status=live}}{{Cite web|url=https://addictedtohorrormovies.com/2017/07/14/on-this-day-in-horror-history-the-mind-boggling-the-swarm-hit-theaters/|title=On This Day in Horror History: The Mind Boggling 'The Swarm' Hit Theaters|date=July 14, 2017|access-date=January 11, 2019|archive-date=January 11, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190111232542/https://addictedtohorrormovies.com/2017/07/14/on-this-day-in-horror-history-the-mind-boggling-the-swarm-hit-theaters/|url-status=live}}

{{Main|I Spit on Your Grave{{!}}I Spit on Your Grave}}

I Spit on Your Grave became controversial for its graphic violence and lengthy depictions of gang rape.{{cite web |last=Floorwalker |first=Mike |title=Roger Ebert's Most Brutal Movie Takedowns Of All Time |url=https://www.grunge.com/125308/roger-eberts-most-brutal-movie-reviews-ever/ |website=Grunge.com |access-date=January 17, 2022 |date=June 7, 2018 |archive-date=January 28, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220128122409/https://www.grunge.com/125308/roger-eberts-most-brutal-movie-reviews-ever/ |url-status=live }} It was initially unable to find a distributor until 1980 when it received a wider release. Luke Y. Thompson of the New Times stated, "Defenders of the film have argued that it's actually pro-woman, due to the fact that the female lead wins in the end, which is sort of like saying that cockfights are pro-rooster because there's always one left standing".{{cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/i_spit_on_your_grave|title=I Spit on Your Grave (Day of the Woman)|website=Rotten Tomatoes|publisher=Fandango|access-date=April 16, 2019|archive-date=April 14, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190414200846/https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/i_spit_on_your_grave|url-status=live}} Critic David Keyes named I Spit on Your Grave the worst film of the 1980s and James Livingston wrote in The World Turned Inside Out that it was "a terrifically bad movie".{{cite book |url=http://hnn.us/articles/121079.html#:~:text=The%20excerpt%20that%20follows%20is%20drawn%20from%20Chapters,Intellectual%20History%20Conference%20at%20CUNY%20on%20November%2012th |first=James |last=Livingston |title=The World Turned Inside Out: American Thought and Culture at the End of the 20th Century |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield |year=2011 |isbn=978-0742535428 |page=189 |access-date=August 10, 2020 |archive-date=September 24, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210924182041/http://hnn.us/articles/121079.html#:~:text=The%20excerpt%20that%20follows%20is%20drawn%20from%20Chapters,Intellectual%20History%20Conference%20at%20CUNY%20on%20November%2012th |url-status=live }} Scott Tobias of The A.V. Club called it "one of the era's most abhorrent pieces of exploitation trash"{{cite news |url=https://avclub.com/article/emi-spit-on-your-graveem-2010-53367 |title=I Spit On Your Grave (2010) |first=Scott |last=Tobias |date=March 21, 2011 |newspaper=The A.V. Club |access-date=November 12, 2019 |archive-date=October 25, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231025172917/https://www.avclub.com/i-spit-on-your-grave-2010-1798224700 |url-status=live }} and Patrick Naugle of DVD Verdict stated, "It's one of the most soulless, vile, and morally reprehensible things I've ever had to sit through."{{Cite news|url=https://dvdverdict.com/reviews/dontmesssister.php |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040426083712/https://dvdverdict.com/reviews/dontmesssister.php |url-status=dead |archive-date=April 26, 2004 |title=Don't Mess With My Sister |first=Patrick |last=Naugle |date=February 15, 2002 |publisher=DVD Verdict }} Roger Ebert gave the film no stars, referring to it as "A vile bag of garbage ... without a shred of artistic distinction," adding, "Attending it was one of the most depressing experiences of my life"{{cite news |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/i-spit-on-your-grave-1980 |title=Review of I Spit on Your Grave |access-date=October 11, 2020 |first=Roger |last=Ebert |author-link=Roger Ebert |date=July 16, 1980 |newspaper=Chicago Sun-Times |archive-date=October 24, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211024112255/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/i-spit-on-your-grave-1980 |url-status=live }} and considered it the worst movie ever made.{{cite news|url=http://beaconnews.suntimes.com/news/2247859-418/ebert-movie-chaz-roger-writer.html |title=Movie, journalism fans queue up to see Ebert |access-date=March 20, 2007 |first=Steve |last=Lord |date=November 7, 2010 |newspaper=Chicago Sun-Times |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101111153312/http://beaconnews.suntimes.com/news/2247859-418/ebert-movie-chaz-roger-writer.html |archive-date=November 11, 2010 |url-status=dead }}{{cite news |title=Video Q&A |last=Ebert |first=Roger |author-link=Roger Ebert |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=0U9IAAAAIBAJ&pg=2655,5621128&dq=roger+ebert+i+spit+on+your+grave+worst+ever |newspaper=The Ledger |date=May 28, 1998 |access-date=November 3, 2013 |archive-date=February 13, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220213185938/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=0U9IAAAAIBAJ&pg=2655%2C5621128&dq=roger+ebert+i+spit+on+your+grave+worst+ever |url-status=live }} Gene Siskel also considered it one of the worst films ever made.{{cite news |url=https://chicagotribune.newspapers.com/clip/80954901/gene-siskel-movie-reviewsthe-man-who/ |title='Man Who Wasn't There' would best be left unseen |access-date=January 3, 2023 |first=Gene |last=Siskel |author-link=Gene Siskel |date=August 17, 1983 |newspaper=Chicago Tribune |archive-date=January 3, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230103203334/https://chicagotribune.newspapers.com/clip/80954901/gene-siskel-movie-reviewsthe-man-who/ |url-status=live }} Film Racket featured it as their first entry in to their "Worst Movie Ever?" series,{{Cite news |url=http://filmracket.com/worst-movie-ever-i-spit-on-your-grave/ |title=Worst Movie Ever? I Spit On Your Grave |first=Pete |last=Croatto |date=May 1, 2013 |work=Film Racket |access-date=July 31, 2015 |archive-date=September 11, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150911070207/http://filmracket.com/worst-movie-ever-i-spit-on-your-grave/ |url-status=usurped }} while Vanity Fair and Flavorwire included it in their worst film lists.{{cite web|url=http://flavorwire.com/477608/the-50-worst-movies-ever-made/view-all |title=The 50 Worst Movies Ever Made|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190330132846/https://www.flavorwire.com/477608/the-50-worst-movies-ever-made/view-all |first=Jason |last=Bailey |date= September 17, 2014 |archive-date=March 30, 2019 |work=Flavorwire}} Despite the intense negative reception from some critics, the film has a 53% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, with IGN critic R.L. Shaffer arguing that whether the film is repulsive and exploitative or ingenious depends on what the viewer wants from the movie: "Admittedly, I Spit on Your Grave is a gruesome, deplorable little exploitation picture that, on the surface, seems to enjoy its rape sequences just as much, if not more, than the vengeance-filled finale. But on a more subtle level, the film is a surprisingly well-executed revenge story that plays like a brutally raw nerve – a terrifyingly stark view of the real horror of rape, painted by bizarre, skewed cinematography, gory violence, and a keen sense of creeping atmosphere and dread."{{cite web |last=Shaffer |first=R. L. |title=I Spit on Your Grave (1978) Blu-Ray Review |url=https://www.ign.com/articles/2011/02/04/i-spit-on-your-grave-1978-blu-ray-review |website=IGN |access-date=February 1, 2022 |date=February 4, 2011 |archive-date=February 1, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220201230500/https://www.ign.com/articles/2011/02/04/i-spit-on-your-grave-1978-blu-ray-review |url-status=live }}

{{Main|Caligula (film){{!}}Caligula (film)}}

The 1979 erotic historical drama Caligula, directed by Tinto Brass about the infamous Roman Emperor Caligula, was in part financed by Penthouse founder Bob Guccione. The film, featuring a prestigious cast (Malcolm McDowell, Helen Mirren, Peter O'Toole, and John Gielgud) is notorious for explicit scenes of sex and violence, including six minutes of hardcore porn footage filmed by Guccione and another editor without Brass' approval. Caligula earned some pre-release controversy after Gore Vidal, who had written the script, distanced himself from the film,{{Cite web|url=https://siskelebert.org/?p=6694|title=The Worst Movies of 1980 – Siskel and Ebert Movie Reviews|website=siskelebert.org|access-date=April 14, 2021|archive-date=April 14, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210414233852/https://siskelebert.org/?p=6694|url-status=live}} and actress Maria Schneider, who objected to the nude scenes, walked off the set and was replaced with then-unknown Teresa Ann Savoy.{{cite magazine |title=Show Business: Will the Real Caligula Stand Up? |url=https://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,947822-1,00.html |magazine=Time |access-date=January 18, 2022 |date=January 3, 1977 |archive-date=January 18, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220118183135/http://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,947822-1,00.html |url-status=live }} Upon its release, Vidal stated that it was "easily one of the worst films ever made".

Caligula also received strongly hostile reviews from critics, who denounced its extreme scenes of sex and violence and lack of narrative coherence.{{cite news |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/caligula-1980 |title=Caligula movie review & film summary (1980) |newspaper=Chicago Sun-Times |first=Roger |last=Ebert |author-link=Roger Ebert |date=September 22, 1980 |access-date=October 11, 2020 |archive-date=October 7, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201007010030/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/caligula-1980 |url-status=live }} Roger Ebert gave Caligula a zero-star rating, dubbing it "sickening, utterly worthless, shameful trash", accusing it of being artistically vulgar in its depiction of sex and violence, and of having technically incompetent direction and structure. It was one of the few films Ebert ever walked out on (two hours into its 170-minute running time), after describing himself as feeling "disgusted and unspeakably depressed".{{cite news|url=http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2008/10/dont_read_me_first.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081018181430/http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2008/10/dont_read_me_first.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=October 18, 2008 |title=Don't read me first! |first=Roger |last=Ebert |author-link=Roger Ebert |date=October 16, 2008 |work=Chicago Sun-Times |access-date=June 9, 2012}} Ebert also placed it on his "Most Hated" list and Michael Sauter selected it for The Worst Movies of All Time.{{sfn|Sauter|page=266}} Australian newspaper The Age stated that Caligula was being "billed by critics everywhere as one of the worst films ever made".{{cite news |title=News Diary |journal=The Age |date=June 8, 1981 |page=2}} The Hamilton Spectator later referred to Caligula as "possibly the worst movie ever made".{{cite news |title=Lowest: 100 Really Bad Moments in 20th Century Entertainment |journal=The Hamilton Spectator |date=July 24, 1999 |page=W17}} Joe Holleman, in an article in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch discussing historical films set in Ancient Rome, argued, "two of the worst movies made in the 20th century were ancient Rome pieces ... Cleopatra and Caligula".{{cite news |first=Joe |last=Holleman |title=Roman Warriors roam the big screen again |journal=St. Louis Post-Dispatch |date=May 5, 2000 |page=E1}} Christopher Armstead, reviewing Caligula for the website Film Critics United, stated, "Dollar for dollar, this could very well be the worst movie ever made."{{cite web |url=http://filmcriticsunited.com/caligula.html |title=Caligula |first=Christopher |last=Armstead |work=Film Critics United |access-date=January 10, 2014 |archive-date=January 10, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140110125709/http://filmcriticsunited.com/caligula.html |url-status=live }} In 2011, Sean Bell of PopMatters wrote of its enduring legacy: "in the same way much of our attention-deficit civilisation may go through life vaguely aware that Citizen Kane is a masterpiece without ever seeing it, ... we know that Caligula is awful, usually without ever finding out for ourselves."{{cite web |last=Bell |first=Sean |title='Caligula's Ghost: Why Cinema Needs Epic Failure More than Mediocre Success, PopMatters |url=https://www.popmatters.com/151468-caligulas-ghost-why-cinema-needs-epic-failure-more-than-mediocre-suc-2495917054.html |website=PopMatters |access-date=January 18, 2022 |date=December 1, 2011 |archive-date=January 18, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220118182706/https://www.popmatters.com/151468-caligulas-ghost-why-cinema-needs-epic-failure-more-than-mediocre-suc-2495917054.html |url-status=live }}

Although widely criticized, the film's "over-the-top combination of outré aesthetics [and] exploitation-film tropes" has gained it cult status over time, and in 2024, Thomas Negovan released an extensive re-edit, Caligula: The Ultimate Cut, incorporating alternate takes and unused footage from the Penthouse archives to enhance narrative coherence while shortening the film's overall length. In a review in The New York Times, Elisabeth Vincentelli said that it is a "rare re-edited version of a movie that features less graphic sex and violence than the original."{{cite news |last=Vincentelli |first=Elisabeth |title='Caligula: The Ultimate Cut' Review: The Emperor's New Clothes |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/15/movies/caligula-the-ultimate-cut-review.html |url-access=limited |date=August 15, 2024 |access-date=August 15, 2024 |work=The New York Times |location=New York City |quote=Even more crucial is the belief that a masterpiece lurks within the mangled original release. Now attempting to prove that theory is "Caligula: The Ultimate Cut," the latest iteration of a film that has gone through an unfathomable number of edits over the decades. This is the rare re-edited version of a movie that features less graphic sex and violence than the original. What kind of world are we living in?}} In an interview with The Guardian, McDowell praised the removal of sexually explicit material added by Guccione, and said The Ultimate Cut is "very much the movie I thought I was making"."{{cite news |last=Pelley |first=Rich |title=Malcolm McDowell: 'Kubrick had stewed pears and sour chicken for lunch because Napoleon did' |url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/article/2024/aug/01/malcolm-mcdowell-kubrick-had-stewed-pears-and-chicken-for-lunch-because-napoleon-did |work=the Guardian |location=London |date=August 1, 2024 |access-date=August 15, 2024}} The Ultimate Cut holds an 65% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 40 reviews;{{cite web |title=Caligula: The Ultimate Cut |url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/caligula_the_ultimate_cut |website=Rotten Tomatoes |access-date=March 24, 2025 |publisher=Fandango |language=en }} however, Brass has publicly disowned it.

{{Main|Heaven's Gate (film){{!}}Heaven's Gate (film)}}

File:MichaelCimino2003.jpg destroyed the reputation of director Michael Cimino and bankrupted film distributor United Artists, though re-edits of the film have been met with critical reevaluation.]]

The Western epic Heaven's Gate, loosely based on the Johnson County War in 1890s Wyoming, was plagued by massive cost and time overruns, largely due to director Michael Cimino's extreme attention to detail. He demanded 50 takes of at least one scene and refused to start shooting for another until a cloud he liked rolled across the sky. It cost over $44 million, but brought in only $3.5 million at the box office.{{cite news |last=Bukszpan |first=Daniel |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2012/03/20/The-15-Biggest-Box-Office-Bombs.html?slide=9 |title=The 15 Biggest Box Office Bombs -> 8. Heaven's Gate (1980) |publisher=CNBC |date=March 20, 2012 |access-date=October 11, 2020 |archive-date=June 10, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110610231738/http://www.cnbc.com/id/38815985?slide=9 |url-status=live }} The original version ran at nearly four hours, but was pulled from release after only one week due to scathing reviews. It later resurfaced in a 149-minute version, but by then the damage was done. The film effectively ended not only the existence of United Artists as an independent Hollywood studio (its parent firm sold the company to Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, where it operated until 2019), but also, largely, Cimino's career; initially considered a director on the rise after directing The Deer Hunter (which won five Oscars, including Best Picture and Best Director), his reputation never recovered after Heaven's Gate. The production is also notorious for the cruelty to animals that occurred both on screen and on site, including deliberately killing a horse with explosives.{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1986/03/24/movies/cruel-camera-about-animal-abuse.html |date=March 24, 1986 |last=Corry |first=John |title='Cruel, Camera,' About Animal Abuse |work=The New York Times |access-date=October 11, 2020 |archive-date=February 17, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210217004121/https://www.nytimes.com/1986/03/24/movies/cruel-camera-about-animal-abuse.html |url-status=live }} The controversies surrounding Heaven's Gate{{'}}s failure are credited for having a role in ending the "auteur period" of the 1970s, with studios subsequently taking control back from directors.

Vincent Canby called it "an unqualified disaster", among other things. Roger Ebert called it "the most scandalous cinematic waste I've ever seen".{{cite news |author-link=Roger Ebert |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=January 1, 1981 |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/heavens-gate-1981 |title=Heaven's Gate movie review & film summary (1981) |work=Chicago Sun-Times |access-date=October 11, 2020 |archive-date=October 17, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191017192105/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/heavens-gate-1981 |url-status=live }} After word of his grandiose spending and defiant nature toward studio United Artists got out (detailed in Final Cut by Steven Bach, a studio executive involved with the film from the beginning),{{cite book |url=https://archive.org/details/finalcutartmoney00bach |url-access=registration |page=[https://archive.org/details/finalcutartmoney00bach/page/6 6] |quote=heaven's gate april 16 1979. |isbn=9781557043740 |title=Final Cut: Art, Money, and Ego in the Making of Heaven's Gate, the Film that Sank United Artists |year=1999 |publisher=Newmarket Press |last=Bach |first=Steven |author-link=Steven Bach}} Cimino was awarded the 1980 Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Director, and the film was nominated for four more Razzies, including Worst Picture.{{cite web |url=http://razzies.com/asp/content/XcNewsPlus.asp?cmd=view&articleid=21 |title=Summary of 1981 Razzies |work=Razzies.com |access-date=December 19, 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140116032635/http://razzies.com/asp/content/XcNewsPlus.asp?cmd=view&articleid=21 |archive-date=January 16, 2014}} In 1999, Time placed the film on a list of the 100 worst ideas of the 20th century, and Rolling Stone ranked it as one of the worst decisions in movie history. In 2008, Joe Queenan of The Guardian called it the worst film ever made, saying that it "defies belief". Readers of film magazine Empire later voted Heaven's Gate the sixth-worst film of all time, and Vanity Fair included it in its list of the worst films ever made.

Despite the vicious reviews, the film's reputation improved over time.{{cite magazine |url=https://www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/movie-of-the-week-heavens-gate |last=Brody |first=Richard |author-link=Richard Brody |title=Movie of the Week: "Heaven's Gate" |magazine=The New Yorker |date=November 25, 2015 |access-date=October 11, 2020 |archive-date=September 26, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200926084352/https://www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/movie-of-the-week-heavens-gate |url-status=live }}{{cite web |last=Holmes |first=Linda |title='My Year Of Flops': A Very Good Book About Some Very Bad Movies |url=https://www.npr.org/2010/10/19/130669942/my-year-of-flops-a-very-good-book-about-some-very-bad-movies |publisher=NPR |access-date=January 22, 2022 |language=en |date=October 19, 2010 |archive-date=February 2, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230202035326/https://www.npr.org/2010/10/19/130669942/my-year-of-flops-a-very-good-book-about-some-very-bad-movies |url-status=live }}{{Cite web |date=Feb 14, 2024 |title=The Criterion Channel's March 2024 Lineup |url=https://www.criterion.com/current/posts/8388-the-criterion-channels-march-2024-lineup |website=The Criterion Channel |access-date=March 1, 2024 |archive-date=March 1, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240301234818/https://www.criterion.com/current/posts/8388-the-criterion-channels-march-2024-lineup |url-status=live }} In fall of 2012, the New York Film Festival, the venue for its infamous opening, premiered the restored director's cut. In stark contrast, The Times called the restored version "a modern masterpiece" and its 1980 cut "one of the greatest injustices of cinematic history".{{cite news |url=https://www.thetimes.com/world/us-world/article/heavens-gate-box-office-turkey-that-sank-a-studio-is-a-modern-masterpiece-vb8fdjn5mkm |title=Heaven's Gate: box office turkey that sank a studio is a modern masterpiece |last=Hoyle |first=Ben |newspaper=The Times |date=October 1, 2012 |access-date=November 18, 2013 |archive-date=August 26, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160826001131/http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/arts/film/article3554129.ece |url-status=live }} The film has also been released on Blu-ray and DVD by the Criterion Collection.{{Cite web|url=https://www.criterion.com/films/28036-heaven-s-gate|title=Heaven's Gate|website=The Criterion Collection|access-date=November 15, 2018|archive-date=November 16, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181116000911/https://www.criterion.com/films/28036-heaven-s-gate|url-status=live}} Manohla Dargis of The New York Times said that the film "has been called a disaster and a disgrace, yet also anointed a masterpiece."{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/17/movies/michael-ciminos-heavens-gate-returns-to-film-forum.html |title=The Second Coming of 'Heaven's Gate' |last=Dargis |first=Manohla |author-link=Manohla Dargis |date=March 15, 2013 |access-date=June 13, 2013 |work=The New York Times |archive-date=March 25, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130325031349/http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/17/movies/michael-ciminos-heavens-gate-returns-to-film-forum.html |url-status=live }} In 2023, the French magazine Télérama ranked it 17th in its list of the 100 greatest films in the history of cinema, describing the work as "a post-classical, lyrical, and disenchanted Western".{{cite magazine |url=https://www.telerama.fr/cinema/les-100-meilleurs-films-de-l-histoire-selon-telerama-0116-9283.php | title=Les 100 meilleurs films de l'histoire selon "Télérama" |magazine=Télérama |date=August 16, 2023 |access-date=November 12, 2023}}

{{Main|The Apple (1980 film){{!}}The Apple (1980 film)}}

The Apple (also called Star Rock) is a 1980 science fiction musical comedy film written and directed by Menahem Golan.{{Cite web|url=https://www.insidehook.com/article/movies/movies-disco-1980-the-apple-xanadu|title=Revisiting 1980, The Year the Movies Killed Disco|website=InsideHook|access-date=October 10, 2022|archive-date=October 10, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221010135429/https://www.insidehook.com/article/movies/movies-disco-1980-the-apple-xanadu|url-status=live}} It stars Catherine Mary Stewart as a young singer named Bibi, who, in a futuristic 1994, signs to an evil label named Boogalow International Music. It deals with themes of conformity versus rebellion, and makes use of Biblical allegory, including that of Adam and Eve and the rapture.{{cite web |last=Bailey |first=Jason |title=Bad Movie Night: The Distinctive Disco Cheese of 'The Apple' |url=http://flavorwire.com/607226/bad-movie-night-the-distinctive-disco-cheese-of-the-apple |date=July 10, 2017 |access-date=December 9, 2017 |website=Flavorwire |language=en |archive-date=December 10, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171210015918/http://flavorwire.com/607226/bad-movie-night-the-distinctive-disco-cheese-of-the-apple |url-status=live }}

Common criticism from both reviews that appeared in trade publications and major news outlets and the audience were a lack of originality, a weak script,{{cite web|url=http://www.afi.com/members/catalog/DetailView.aspx?s=&Movie=56362|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170710142839/http://www.afi.com/members/catalog/DetailView.aspx?s=&Movie=56362|publisher=American Film Institute|title=The Apple|access-date=January 31, 2016|archive-date=July 10, 2017}} uninspired music, poor execution, and Golan's inexperienced take on the 1960s hippie movement. During the 1980 Montreal World Film Festival, some members of the audience threw vinyl records of music from the film at the screen.{{cite web |last=Harris |first=Blake |title=The Apple Oral History: How Did This Get Made |url=https://www.slashfilm.com/542502/the-apple-oral-history/ |website=/Film |access-date=January 12, 2022 |date=February 5, 2016 |archive-date=January 12, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220112025341/https://www.slashfilm.com/542502/the-apple-oral-history/ |url-status=live }} At the 1980 Stinkers Bad Movie Awards, the film received seven nominations (including Worst Picture) and won two awards: Worst Director (Golan) and Least "Special" Special Effects.{{Cite web|url=http://theenvelope.latimes.com/extras/lostmind/year/1980/1980st.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070815004414/http://theenvelope.latimes.com/extras/lostmind/year/1980/1980st.htm|url-status=dead|archive-date=August 15, 2007|title=Past Winners Database|work=Los Angeles Times |date=August 15, 2007}} Stinkers co-founder Mike Lancaster later selected The Apple as the worst film he had ever seen.{{cite web |title=Q & A with the Stinkers |url=http://thestinkers.com/qanda.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010413025218/http://thestinkers.com/qanda.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=April 13, 2001 |website=Stinkers Bad Movie Awards |access-date=July 9, 2022}} The Saturday Evening Post listed it as the worst movie musical ever,{{cite web |title=The Worst Movie Musicals Ever |url=https://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2020/08/the-worst-movie-musicals-ever/ |work=The Saturday Evening Post |last=Brownfield |first=Troy |access-date=January 11, 2022 |date=August 7, 2020 |archive-date=January 11, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220111170729/https://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2020/08/the-worst-movie-musicals-ever/ |url-status=live }} and critic Tim Brayton described it as "A completely unadulterated bundle of the worst of cinema all spun up into one ball of madness. It cannot be described, and it can barely be experienced."{{cite web |url=http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1001131-apple/ |title=The Apple (1980) |work=Rotten Tomatoes |publisher=Fandango Media |access-date=July 7, 2019 |archive-date=August 5, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200805172044/https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1001131-apple |url-status=live }} Sean Burns in Philadelphia Weekly wrote: "The Apple isn't just the worst disco musical ever made; it could very well be the worst movie ever made, period."{{cite news |title=Summer Camp |first=Sean |last=Burns |newspaper=Philadelphia Weekly |date=July 12, 2006}} The Apple was included in Paste{{'}}s Bad Movie Diaries column, where critic Kenneth Lowe described it as "without a doubt the most cringe-inducing, the most mortifying, the absolutely most embarrassing feature we've ever watched."{{cite web |last1=Lowe |first1=Kenneth |last2=Vorel |first2=Jim |title=Bad Movie Diaries: The Apple (1980) |url=https://www.pastemagazine.com/movies/bad-movie-diaries/bad-movie-diaries-the-apple-1980/ |website=Paste |access-date=January 11, 2022 |language=en |date=February 19, 2020 |archive-date=January 11, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220111133434/https://www.pastemagazine.com/movies/bad-movie-diaries/bad-movie-diaries-the-apple-1980/ |url-status=live }} It has also been covered by the How Did This Get Made? podcast and Flavorwire{{'}}s Bad Movie Night column and Mental Floss listed it as one of the "Ten Really Bad Movies that Define 'Bad Movies'".

=== Inchon (1981) ===

{{Main|Inchon (film){{!}}Inchon (film)}}

The war film Inchon, directed by Terence Young and starring Laurence Olivier as General Douglas MacArthur,{{Cite web|url=https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/3139/inchon|title=Inchon|website=Turner Classic Movies|access-date=July 13, 2022|archive-date=July 13, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220713185127/https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/3139/inchon|url-status=live}} was meant to depict the Battle of Inchon during the Korean War. Producer Mitsuharu Ishii was a senior member of the Japanese branch of the Unification Church, whose leader, Sun Myung Moon,{{Cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiWctDyWhDI|title=Slate's Bad Movies: Oscar Slumming|date=March 3, 2008 |via=YouTube|access-date=November 12, 2019|archive-date=March 12, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200312071510/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiWctDyWhDI&gl=US&hl=en|url-status=live}} claimed he had the film made to show MacArthur's spirituality and connection to God and the Japanese people.s:U.S. v. Sun Myung Moon 532 F.Supp. 1360 (1982) Its eventual production cost of $46 million resulted in a $5 million box-office gross, and The New York Times review written by Vincent Canby calls the movie "the most expensive B-movie ever".{{cite news |title=Inchon (1981) – 'Inchon,' At Last |first=Vincent |last=Canby |url=https://movies.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9A03E0D8123BF934A2575AC0A964948260 |work=The New York Times |date=September 17, 1982 |access-date=February 10, 2017 |archive-date=February 15, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120215194638/http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9A03E0D8123BF934A2575AC0A964948260 |url-status=live }} The Washington Post described Inchon as "one of the biggest commercial disasters in film history".{{cite news |title =Terence Young dies – Directed Bond movies | newspaper =The Washington Post |page =B6 |date =September 9, 1994}} Every conceivable kind of problem plagued production, including labor issues, the U.S. military withdrawing support due to the film's Unification Church connection, weather and natural disasters, customs difficulties, expensive directorial blunders, and the original director (Andrew McLaglen) quitting before the start of production. Olivier's performance was criticized, and he was awarded the 1982 Golden Raspberry award for Worst Actor.{{cite web |url=http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=332&PN=3 |title=1982 Razzie Nominees & "Winners" – The Official Razzie Forum |work=Razzies.com |access-date=January 17, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160820075540/http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=332&PN=3 |archive-date=August 20, 2016 |url-status=dead }} The film itself took the 1982 Razzies for Worst Picture and Worst Screenplay, and Young's direction earned him a tie for Worst Director of 1982. A number of reviewers at various media outlets described Inchon as the worst film ever made, including The Washington Post,{{cite news |last=Mayo |first=Mike |title =Hollywood's untapped resources – worthwhile movies don't always make it to video | newspaper =The Washington Post |date =April 13, 1997 |page=G7}} Newsweek,{{cite news |last=Boedeker |first=Hal |title =The Magic of Olivier his film legacy sets standard for all actors | work =The Miami Herald |page =36G |date =July 21, 1989 |quote=The worst of his choices was probably taking on the role of Gen. Douglas MacArthur in 1982's Inchon. Newsweek called Inchon 'the worst movie ever made, a turkey the size of Godzilla.'}} TV Guide,{{cite magazine |url=http://movies.tvguide.com/inchon/review/102041 |title=Inchon Review |magazine=TV Guide |date=November 28, 2012 |access-date=November 18, 2013 |archive-date=October 4, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111004195720/http://movies.tvguide.com/inchon/review/102041 |url-status=live }} and the Canadian Press.{{cite news |last=McKay |first=John (Canadian Press) |title =Welch fleshes out worst in film | work =The Record (Kitchener, Ontario, Canada) |page =E4 |date =March 23, 2004}} Inchon was later profiled in multiple books on worst in film, including The Hollywood Hall of Shame by Harry and Michael Medved,{{cite book |last1=Medved |first1=Harry |first2=Michael |last2=Medved |author2-link=Michael Medved |title=The Hollywood Hall of Shame: The Most Expensive Flops in Movie History |publisher=Perigee Books |location=New York, NY |year=1984 |pages=[https://archive.org/details/hollywoodhallofs00medv/page/189 189–197] |isbn=0-399-51060-5 |title-link=The Hollywood Hall of Shame }} and The Worst Movies of All Time by Michael Sauter.{{sfn|Sauter|page=197}} To date, Inchon has never been released on home video in the United States although it was aired on the church's Good Life TV Network.

{{Main|Tarzan, the Ape Man (1981 film){{!}}Tarzan, the Ape Man (1981 film)}}

The adventure film Tarzan, the Ape Man, loosely based on the novel Tarzan of the Apes by Edgar Rice Burroughs, stars Miles O'Keeffe (who would later star in the 1982 Conan the Barbarian knock-off Ator the Invincible, which alongside its sequel featured in two episodes of the TV series Mystery Science Theater 3000) in the title role and Bo Derek as his partner Jane Parker, and is told from Jane's point of view. Despite being a box-office success, critics poorly received it upon its release due to its poor screenplay, bad acting, and unintentional humor. Leonard Maltin, writing for his Movie Guide, stated that the film "lacks action, humor and charm", and considered it so bad that it "nearly forced editors of this book to devise a rating lower than BOMB". Leslie Halliwell was equally harsh; he described Tarzan, the Ape Man as "certainly the worst of the Tarzan movies and possibly the banalest film so far made; even the animals give poor performances".Leslie Halliwell, John Walker, Halliwell's Film Guide. HarperPerennial, 1996 (p. 1119). Writer Thomas S. Hischak described it thus: "Produced and directed without a shred of talent by John Derek, Tarzan, the Ape Man often ranks high in the lists of the worst movies ever made."Thomas S. Hischak, American Literature on Stage and Screen: 525 Works and Their Adaptations McFarland, 2012. {{ISBN|0-7864-9279-1}} (p. 237) Film critic John Nesbit considered it "my pick for worst film ever",{{cite web|url=http://oldschoolreviews.com/rev_80/tarzan.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140304212347/http://oldschoolreviews.com/rev_80/tarzan.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=March 4, 2014 |title=John Derek, Tarzan the Ape Man |publisher=Old School Reviews |access-date=March 5, 2014}} while Matt Brunson of Creative Loafing wrote, "this cinematic atrocity truly is one of the all-time worsts".{{cite web |last=Brunson |first=Matt |url=http://clclt.com/charlotte/view-from-the-couch/Content?oid=2354590 |title=View From The Couch | View from the Couch | Creative Loafing Charlotte |work=Clclt.com |date=June 16, 2004 |access-date=March 5, 2014 |archive-date=March 4, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304051036/http://clclt.com/charlotte/view-from-the-couch/Content?oid=2354590 |url-status=live }} Tarzan, the Ape Man was nominated for six awards at the 2nd Golden Raspberry Awards, winning one for Worst Actress (Bo Derek). It holds a 10% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 20 reviews.{{cite web|url=https://rottentomatoes.com/m/1020897-tarzan_the_ape_man|title=Tarzan, the Ape Man (1981)|website=Rotten Tomatoes|publisher=Fandango|access-date=January 30, 2021|archive-date=March 7, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210307075545/https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1020897-tarzan_the_ape_man|url-status=live}}

{{Main|Mommie Dearest (film){{!}}Mommie Dearest (film)}}

File:Faye Dunaway on the set of A Place for Lovers, 1968.jpg (pictured in A Place for Lovers, also on this list) regretted her Razzie-winning portrayal of actress Joan Crawford in the camp classic Mommie Dearest,{{Cite web|url=https://www.washingtonblade.com/2021/10/14/camp-classic-mommie-dearest-turns-40/|title=Camp classic 'Mommie Dearest' turns 40|first=Gregg|last=Shapiro|date=October 14, 2021|access-date=October 22, 2021|archive-date=October 22, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211022143742/https://www.washingtonblade.com/2021/10/14/camp-classic-mommie-dearest-turns-40/|url-status=live}} yet it earned a spot at number 41 on AFI's 100 Years... 100 Heroes and Villains.]]

Mommie Dearest, directed by Frank Perry,{{Cite web |url=https://collider.com/mommie-dearest-oscars-cult-classic/ |title=How 'Mommie Dearest' Went From Oscar Bait to Cult Classic{{!}}Collider |website=Collider |date=March 10, 2023 |access-date=December 10, 2023 |archive-date=July 22, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230722215022/https://collider.com/mommie-dearest-oscars-cult-classic/ |url-status=live }} was based on the memoir of the same name by Christina Crawford, about her upbringing by Joan Crawford.{{Cite web|url=https://mubi.com/de/films/mommie-dearest|title=Meine liebe Rabenmutter|via=mubi.com|access-date=January 28, 2019|archive-date=January 29, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190129005847/https://mubi.com/de/films/mommie-dearest|url-status=live}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-2006-06-06-0606060260-story.html|title='Mommie Dearest' meets John Waters|website=Chicago Tribune|date=June 6, 2006|access-date=June 5, 2021|archive-date=July 31, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210731191016/https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-2006-06-06-0606060260-story.html|url-status=live}}{{Cite web|url=https://catalog.afi.com/Catalog/moviedetails/68145|title=AFI|Catalog|website=catalog.afi.com|access-date=June 5, 2021|archive-date=June 5, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210605163811/https://catalog.afi.com/Catalog/moviedetails/68145|url-status=live}} It was the first film to sweep the Golden Raspberry Awards nominations, winning a total of five Razzies out of the nine nominations, including "Worst Picture" and Worst Actress (Faye Dunaway, shared with Bo Derek).{{sfn|Adams|page=188}} The same organization also named it "Worst Picture of the Decade" in 1989/90, and was nominated for "Worst Drama of Our First 25 Years" in 2004/05.{{cite news|url=http://www.razzies.com/asp/content/XcNewsPlus.asp?cmd=view&articleid=12|title=Decade's Worst -The 80's|last=Wilson |first=John |author-link=John J. B. Wilson |publisher=Golden Raspberry Awards|date=March 15, 1990|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130511065558/http://www.razzies.com/asp/content/XcNewsPlus.asp?cmd=view&articleid=12|archive-date=May 11, 2013}} The film is part of the "100 most awful" in The Official Razzie Movie Guide and Michael Sauter's The Worst Movies of All Time.{{cite news|url=https://www.usatoday.com/life/movies/movieawards/2005-02-24-razzies_x.htm|title=Razzies still knocking Hollywood down a peg after 25 years|publisher=Associated Press / USA Today|date=February 24, 2005|access-date=October 11, 2020|archive-date=February 5, 2013|archive-url=https://archive.today/20130205085925/http://www.usatoday.com/life/movies/movieawards/2005-02-24-razzies_x.htm|url-status=live}}{{cite book |last=Wilson |first=John |title =The official Razzie movie guide: enjoying the best of Hollywood's worst |publisher =Hachette |year =2005 |isbn =0-446-69334-0}}{{sfn|Sauter|page=189}} It earned, as film critic and TV host Richard Crouse put it, "some of the nastiest reviews ever".{{cite book |last=Crouse |first=Richard |author-link=Richard Crouse |title =Reel Winners: Movie Award Trivia |publisher =Dundurn Group |year =2005 |page =[https://archive.org/details/reelwinnersmovie0000crou/page/123 123] |isbn =1-55002-574-0 |url =https://archive.org/details/reelwinnersmovie0000crou/page/123 }} Eric Henderson of CBS Minneapolis named it at the top of his "Best 'Worst Movies Ever{{'"}} list.{{cite news|url=http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2010/07/21/movie-blog-best-worst-movies-ever/|title=Movie Blog: Best 'Worst Movies Ever'|last=Henderson|first=Eric|publisher=CBS Minneapolis|date=June 21, 2010|access-date=June 13, 2013|archive-date=October 4, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151004063910/http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2010/07/21/movie-blog-best-worst-movies-ever/|url-status=live}} Roger Ebert wrote of this film, "I can't imagine who would want to subject themselves to this movie. 'Mommie Dearest' is a painful experience that drones on endlessly, as Joan Crawford's relationship with her daughter, Christina, disintegrates from cruelty through jealousy into pathos."{{cite news |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/mommie-dearest-1981 |title=Mommie Dearest movie review & film summary (1981) |first=Roger |last=Ebert |author-link=Roger Ebert |work=Chicago Sun-Times |date=January 1, 1981 |access-date=October 11, 2020 |archive-date=November 11, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171111205638/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/mommie-dearest-1981 |url-status=live }} Of the performance of Faye Dunaway, Variety said "Dunaway does not chew scenery. Dunaway starts neatly at each corner of the set in every scene and swallows it whole, co-stars and all."{{Cite web |url=https://variety.com/1980/film/reviews/mommie-dearest-1200424940/ |title=Mommie Dearest Review – Read Variety's Analysis Of The Movie Mommie Dearest |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140715082555/http://variety.com/1980/film/reviews/mommie-dearest-1200424940/|archive-date=2014-07-15 |work=Variety |date=January 1, 1981}} Vanity Fair and Rotten Tomatoes subsequently included Mommie Dearest on their worst film lists.

Despite the reviews at the time,{{cite magazine |url=https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/06/05/joan-crawfords-explosive-offscreen-life |title=Joan Crawford's Explosive Offscreen Life |last=Brody |first=Richard |author-link=Richard Brody |magazine=The New Yorker |date=May 26, 2017 |access-date=October 11, 2020 |archive-date=January 16, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210116100845/https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/06/05/joan-crawfords-explosive-offscreen-life |url-status=live }} the film was a box-office success, grossing $39 million worldwide on a $5 million budget. It has a 50% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 46 reviews. The site's consensus reads, "Mommie Dearest certainly doesn't lack for conviction, and neither does Faye Dunaway's legendary performance as a wire-wielding monster; unfortunately, the movie is too campy and undisciplined to transcend guilty pleasure".{{Cite web |url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/mommie_dearest/ |title=Mommie Dearest (1981) |website=Rotten Tomatoes |publisher=Fandango |access-date=January 30, 2021 |archive-date=April 16, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190416101214/https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/mommie_dearest/ |url-status=live }}

{{Main|Dünyayı Kurtaran Adam{{!}}Dünyayı Kurtaran Adam}}

The Turkish science-fiction adventure Dünyayı Kurtaran Adam (also commonly known as Turkish Star Wars) was directed by Çetin İnanç and starred Cüneyt Arkın. It is notorious for illegally using footage from well-known science fiction films and shows, most notably Star Wars, along with stealing the music score from films such as Moonraker and Raiders of the Lost Ark. The film is also criticized for its nonsensical plot, badly written dialogue, and crude special effects.{{cite web |url=http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Issue/story?oid=oid%3A197912 |title=There Is No Try...: Foleyvision does the Turkish 'Star Wars' Austin Screens |publisher=AustinChronicle.com |date=February 20, 2004 |access-date=January 17, 2011 |archive-date=September 18, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090918185247/http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Issue/story?oid=oid:197912 |url-status=live }}{{cite web|url=https://filmthreat.com/reviews/2341/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100312030851/https://filmthreat.com/reviews/2341/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=March 12, 2010 |title=The Turkish Star Wars |publisher=Film Threat |date=May 18, 2005 |access-date=January 17, 2011 }} It is also a fantasy martial arts film, heavily influenced by 1970s Hong Kong martial arts films from Golden Harvest.{{cite book |last=Goldweber |first=David Elroy |title=Claws & Saucers: Science Fiction, Horror, and Fantasy Film 1902-1982: A Complete Guide |date=2015 |publisher=Lulu Press, Inc |isbn=978-1-312-28803-4 |page=1773 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hgJJzgEACAAJ&pg=PT1773 |access-date=February 27, 2024 |archive-date=February 27, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240227175610/https://books.google.com/books?id=hgJJzgEACAAJ&pg=PT1773 |url-status=live }}

Jos Kirps of ArticlesBase called it "The Worst Movie Ever", and stated, "There are many bad sci-fi movies, and for many years movie addicts even considered Ed Wood's Plan 9 From Outer Space the worst movie of all times. But Plan 9 is still a pretty good movie when compared to Dünyayi Kurtaran Adam."{{cite web|url=http://www.contour2002.org/article/the-worst-movie-ever-a-turkish-star-wars-clone|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140810150129/http://www.contour2002.org/article/the-worst-movie-ever-a-turkish-star-wars-clone|url-status=dead|archive-date=August 10, 2014|title=Contour2002.org|access-date=October 1, 2014}} Sabah called it the "world's worst film".{{Cite web |language=tr |url=http://www.sabah.com.tr/Gunaydin/Magazin/2012/04/15/turkun-uzayla-imtihani-nereye-kadar-surecek |title=News article from Sabah newspaper |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160530010134/http://www.sabah.com.tr/gunaydin/magazin/2012/04/15/turkun-uzayla-imtihani-nereye-kadar-surecek |archive-date=May 30, 2016 |access-date=August 29, 2013}} Hürriyet described the film as "sitting on the throne of the king" when compared to other "so bad it's good" cult films.{{Cite web |language=tr |url=http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/yazarlar/20291864.asp |title=News article from Hürriyet |date=April 7, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160302134628/http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/yazarlar/20291864.asp |archive-date=March 2, 2016 |access-date=August 29, 2013}} Toronto Standard called it a "dollar-store Star Wars" and compared it to the works of Ed Wood.{{cite news|title= Dollar-store Star Wars|publisher= Toronto Standard|date= May 4, 2012|url= http://torontostandard.com/culture/dollar-store-star-wars|access-date= August 24, 2013|archive-date= September 26, 2018|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20180926123159/http://www.torontostandard.com/culture/dollar-store-star-wars/|url-status= live}} When it became apparent that the film had inspired an enthusiastic international cult, a sequel, The Son of the Man Who Saved the World (Dünyayı Kurtaran Adam'ın Oğlu), was shot in 2006 and featured many returning members of the original cast and crew.{{cite web|language=tr |url=http://www.sabah.com.tr/2006/04/13/gny/gny119-20060413-200.html |title=News article from Sabah newspaper |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090808044254/http://www.sabah.com.tr/2006/04/13/gny/gny119-20060413-200.html |archive-date=August 8, 2009 |access-date=July 29, 2006}} The film was included on Time Out{{'}}s 40 Best Bad Movies Ever Made list.

{{Main|Howard the Duck (film){{!}}Howard the Duck (film)}}

Directed by Willard Huyck, written by Huyck and Gloria Katz, and produced by George Lucas, it is based on the Marvel Comics character of the same name. Howard the Duck received overwhelmingly negative reviews from film critics. Orange Coast Magazine writer Marc Weinberg and Leonard Maltin criticized the decision to shoot the film in live action.{{cite magazine |last= Weinberg |first= Marc |date = 1986 |title = Out-Foxed | magazine= Orange Coast Magazine | volume = 12 | issue = 9 |pages = 143–144 }}{{cite book |last= Maltin |first= Leonard |title = Leonard Maltin's 2009 Movie Guide |year = 2008 |publisher = Penguin Group |isbn = 978-0-452-28978-9 |page = [https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780452289789/page/641 641] |chapter = H |url = https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780452289789/page/641 }} The appearance of Howard was criticized as being unconvincing due to his poorly functioning mouth and expressionless face. Reviewers also criticized the acting and humor and found the film boring.{{cite book |last= Stanley |first= John |title = Creature Features: The Science Fiction, Fantasy, and Horror Movie Guide |year = 2000 |publisher = Berkley Boulevard Books |page = 253 |isbn = 0-425-17517-0 | quote = For one, the duck costume and makeup are phony — Howard looks like a midget in a Halloween costume. }}{{cite book |last= Hunter |first= Lew |title = Lew Hunter's Screenwriting 434: The Industry's Premier Teacher Reveals the Secrets of the Successful Screenplay |year = 2004 |publisher = Perigee |isbn = 0-399-52986-1 |page = 21 |chapter = Nothing in the Mind, Please | quote = Because we all know what a duck looks like, Lucas could not get an audience to suspend their belief that Howard was a little person in a duck suit. }} Dave Kehr of the Chicago Tribune said the movie's "crude, often embarrassing, sex jokes" seemed "out of place" with the more innocent aspects of the film.{{cite news|last=Kehr|first=Dave|date= August 1, 1986|title= UNLOVABLE DUCK MAKES 'HOWARD' AN UNLOVABLE FILM|work= Chicago Tribune|url= https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1986-08-01-8602250309-story.html|access-date= May 13, 2021|archive-date= October 24, 2020|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20201024095717/https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1986-08-01-8602250309-story.html|url-status= live}} Jay Carr of The Boston Globe claimed that "They Don't Get Much Worse Than Howard{{-"}},{{cite news|url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/294411402|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151018024531/https://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/boston/doc/294411402.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Aug%201,%201986&author=Jay%20Carr,%20Globe%20Staff&pub=Boston%20Globe%20%28pre-1997%20Fulltext%29&edition=&startpage=&desc=THEY%20DON%27T%20GET%20MUCH%20WORSE%20THAN%20%27HOWARD%27|title=They Don't Get Much Worse Than 'Howard'|work=The Boston Globe|url-access=subscription|access-date=September 30, 2013|first=Jay|last=Carr|date=August 1, 1986|url-status=live|archive-date=October 18, 2015| id={{ProQuest|294411402}} }} Glenn Heath Jr. of Slant Magazine wrote that it "has a rightful place in the canon of worst films ever",{{cite web|url=https://www.slantmagazine.com/house/2011/07/summer-of-86-tarred-and-feathered-howard-the-duck/|title=Summer of '86: Tarred and Feathered: Howard the Duck|work=Slant Magazine|date=July 28, 2011|access-date=March 14, 2014|archive-date=March 16, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140316105914/http://www.slantmagazine.com/house/2011/07/summer-of-86-tarred-and-feathered-howard-the-duck/|url-status=live}} and TV Guide states it is "one of the worst big-budget movies ever made".{{cite web|url=http://movies.tvguide.com/howard-the-duck/review/101469|title=Howard the Duck|work=TV Guide|access-date=March 14, 2014|archive-date=September 30, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130930202246/http://movies.tvguide.com/howard-the-duck/review/101469|url-status=dead}} It was featured in Empire{{'}}s poll of the 50 worst films ever made, and Screen Rant and Vanity Fair have included it on their worst film lists.

Rotten Tomatoes gives the film a score of 13% based on 86 reviews, making it the lowest-rated Lucasfilm production of those reviewed on the site. The site's consensus states: "While it has its moments, Howard the Duck suffers from an uneven tone and mediocre performances."{{cite web |url = https://rottentomatoes.com/m/howard_the_duck/ |title = Howard the Duck (1986) | website = Rotten Tomatoes |publisher = Fandango |access-date = January 15, 2025 |archive-date = August 3, 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140803155451/https://rottentomatoes.com/m/howard_the_duck/ |url-status = live }} It received seven Golden Raspberry Award nominations in 1987 including Worst Supporting Actor (Tim Robbins), Worst Director (Willard Huyck) and Worst Original Song ("Howard the Duck"). It won four trophies for Worst Screenplay, Worst New Star ("the six guys and gals in the duck suit"), Worst Visual Effects, and Worst Picture, tied with Under the Cherry Moon.{{cite web |last= Wilson |first= John |title = 1986 Archive |url = http://www.razzies.com/asp/content/XcNewsPlus.asp?cmd=view&articleid=25 |publisher = Golden Raspberry Award |access-date = October 11, 2009 |url-status = dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130602153152/http://www.razzies.com/asp/content/XcNewsPlus.asp?cmd=view&articleid=25 |archive-date = June 2, 2013 }} The movie also won a Stinkers Bad Movie Awards for Worst Picture.{{cite news|url=http://theenvelope.latimes.com/extras/lostmind/year/1986/1986st.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061017172107/http://theenvelope.latimes.com/extras/lostmind/year/1986/1986st.htm|archive-date=October 17, 2006|title=1986 9th Hastings Bad Cinema Society Stinkers Awards|access-date=April 2, 2013|work=Stinkers Bad Movie Awards|publisher=Los Angeles Times}} The negative reaction to the film took its toll on the cast, who found themselves unable to work on other projects as a result.{{cite video |people=Thompson, Lea; Jones, Jeffrey; Gale, Ed |date=2009 |title=Releasing the Duck |medium=DVD |publisher=Universal Home Video |id=UPC 025195052306}}

Over time, the film has remained a source of fascination and developed "a small, but loyal fanbase."{{cite web |last= Chipman |first= Bob |title = Duck Fails Hollywood Bets It All on Duck Boners |url = https://www.primerand.co/5/howard | work = Primer&Co. |access-date = May 9, 2021 |archive-date = September 27, 2021 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20210927081429/https://www.primerand.co/5/howard |url-status = dead }}{{cite web |last= Alter |first= Ethan |title = Role Recall: Tim Robbins on being in the first Marvel movie, where his 'Bull Durham' character is now and the one thing he still has from 'The Shawshank Redemption' |url = https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/tim-robbins-role-recall-shawshank-redemption-bull-durham-howard-the-duck-mystic-river-the-player-hudsucker-proxy-jacobs-ladder-181140444.html | work = Yahoo |date = October 11, 2019 |access-date = May 10, 2021 |archive-date = May 11, 2021 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20210511044758/https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/tim-robbins-role-recall-shawshank-redemption-bull-durham-howard-the-duck-mystic-river-the-player-hudsucker-proxy-jacobs-ladder-181140444.html |url-status = live }}{{Cite web|url=https://www.cinemablend.com/news/2434140/lea-thompson-is-pitching-a-howard-the-duck-movie-to-marvel|title=Lea Thompson Is Pitching A Howard The Duck Movie To Marvel|first1=Dirk|last1=Libbey|date=June 12, 2018|website=CINEMABLEND|access-date=January 11, 2019|archive-date=January 11, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190111232640/https://www.cinemablend.com/news/2434140/lea-thompson-is-pitching-a-howard-the-duck-movie-to-marvel|url-status=live}} Howard the Duck has appeared in several Marvel Cinematic Universe movies and series beginning in 2014's Guardians of the Galaxy, in which he was voiced by Seth Green.{{Cite web|url=https://www.cinemablend.com/new/Guardians-Galaxy-End-Credits-Sequence-Explained-66562.html|title=Guardians Of The Galaxy End Credits Sequence Explained|last=Eisenberg|first=Eric|date=August 1, 2014|website=CinemaBlend|access-date=April 16, 2019|archive-date=April 15, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190415082055/https://www.cinemablend.com/new/Guardians-Galaxy-End-Credits-Sequence-Explained-66562.html|url-status=live}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.syfy.com/syfy-wire/seth-green-howard-the-duck-mcu-james-gunn|title=Seth Green would voice Howard the Duck in the MCU again 'anytime they asked'|date=July 20, 2020|website=SYFY Official Site|access-date=July 13, 2022|archive-date=October 25, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231025173448/https://www.syfy.com/syfy-wire/seth-green-howard-the-duck-mcu-james-gunn|url-status=live}}

{{Main|Ishtar (film){{!}}Ishtar (film)}}

File:Elaine May - publicity1.jpg director Elaine May defended her 1987 box office flop, stating, "If all of the people who hate Ishtar had seen it, I would be a rich woman today."{{Cite web|url=https://forward.com/culture/434193/elaine-may-mounting-a-comeback-at-87-is-directing-a-new-film/|title=Elaine May, Mounting A Comeback At 87, Is Directing A New Film|last=Grisar|first=PJ|work=The Forward|access-date=April 28, 2020|date=November 4, 2019|archive-date=November 5, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191105155049/https://forward.com/culture/434193/elaine-may-mounting-a-comeback-at-87-is-directing-a-new-film/|url-status=live}}]]

Ishtar was written and directed by Elaine May{{Cite web|url=https://mubi.com/notebook/posts/the-not-so-savage-messiahs|title=The Not-So-Savage Messiahs|date=August 5, 2013|website=MUBI|access-date=August 2, 2022|archive-date=August 17, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220817111104/https://mubi.com/notebook/posts/the-not-so-savage-messiahs|url-status=live}} and starred Oscar-winning duo Warren Beatty and Dustin Hoffman as an ode to the Road to... film series featuring Bing Crosby and Bob Hope. Beatty and Hoffman star as Rogers and Clarke, two untalented lounge singers who travel to Morocco in hopes of finding a gig.{{Cite magazine|url=https://www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/movie-of-the-week-ishtar|title=Movie of the Week: "Ishtar"|last=Brody|first=Richard|author-link=Richard Brody|magazine=The New Yorker|access-date=February 11, 2019|date=August 6, 2015|archive-date=January 9, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190109004100/https://www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/movie-of-the-week-ishtar|url-status=live}} Due to unanticipated problems with filming in the desert—which resulted in numerous reshoots—the film ran over budget by $30 million. While its final budget cost was $55 million, Ishtar earned only $14,375,181 at the North American box office, leading Ishtar to become synonymous with "box-office flop". It was also subject to harsh reviews from critics. The film was nominated for Worst Picture and Worst Screenplay in the 8th Golden Raspberry Awards, winning one for Worst Director. The San Jose Mercury News claimed that "Time has not improved this film's reputation as being one of the worst ever made."{{cite news |url=http://www.mercurynews.com/movies-dvd/ci_17017300 |title=Review: 'Dinner for Schmucks' a savory comedy |newspaper=San Jose Mercury News |date=May 1, 2011 |access-date=September 20, 2013 |archive-date=September 21, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921061311/http://www.mercurynews.com/movies-dvd/ci_17017300 |url-status=live }} Time Out suggested it was "so bad it could have been deliberate", and called it "one of the worst films ever made",{{cite magazine |url=https://www.timeout.com/london/film/ishtar |title=Ishtar |magazine=Time Out |access-date=February 20, 2020 |archive-date=November 15, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181115225621/https://www.timeout.com/london/film/ishtar |url-status=live }} while Ed Morrissey referred to it as "The Citizen Kane of big-budget, A-list vehicular homicides."{{cite web |url=http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/22/what-were-the-worst-movies-of-all-time/ |title=What were the worst movies of all time? |first=Ed |last=Morrissey |work=Hot Air |author-link=Ed Morrissey |date=February 22, 2009 |publisher=Hot Air |access-date=September 20, 2013 |archive-date=September 21, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921060444/http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/22/what-were-the-worst-movies-of-all-time/ |url-status=live }} It was included in Michael Sauter's The Worst Movies of All Time book, Rotten Tomatoes placed it amongst "25 Moves So Bad They're Unmissable" and Richard Roeper included it on his list of the 40 worst films he had seen.{{sfn|Sauter|page=213–216}}Richard Roeper, 10 Sure Signs a Movie Character is Doomed and Other Surprising Movie Lists, New York: Hyperion Books, 2003, pp. 66–67 In 1999, Time placed the film on a list of the 100 worst ideas of the 20th century.{{cite magazine |url=http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,991230,00.html |title=The 100 Worst Ideas Of The Century |date=June 14, 1999 |access-date=April 8, 2018 |url-access=subscription |magazine=Time |first1=Melissa |last1=August |first2=Harriet |last2=Barovick |first3=Michelle |last3=Derrow |first4=Tam |last4=Gray |first5=Daniel S. |last5=Levy |first6=Lina |last6=Lofaro |first7=David |last7=Spitz |first8=Joel |last8=Stein |first9=Chris |last9=Taylor |archive-date=October 21, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181021051659/http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,991230,00.html |url-status=live }}

The film has since become a cult classic.{{Cite web|url=https://www.filminquiry.com/10-movies-low-ratings-actually-good/|title=10 Movies With Low Ratings That Are Actually Good|first=Alistair|last=Ryder|date=August 6, 2015|website=Film Inquiry|access-date=January 11, 2019|archive-date=January 12, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190112044239/https://www.filminquiry.com/10-movies-low-ratings-actually-good/|url-status=live}} Ishtar has seen a minor critical re-evaluation from some critics like Richard Brody, and directors Quentin Tarantino, Edgar Wright, and Martin Scorsese have praised it in interviews.{{Cite web|url=https://www.indiewire.com/2020/05/ishtar-box-office-flop-game-changer-setback-female-directors-1202231739/|title='Ishtar': How Hollywood Decided That One Box-Office Flop Spoke for All Female Directors|last=Brueggemann|first=Tom|date=May 17, 2020|website=IndieWire|language=en|access-date=December 9, 2022|archive-date=July 5, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220705130534/https://www.indiewire.com/2020/05/ishtar-box-office-flop-game-changer-setback-female-directors-1202231739/|url-status=live}} Gary Larson, who initially lampooned the movie in The Far Side, said he regrets writing that cartoon because he based it solely on Ishtar{{'}}s reputation, and that he enjoyed the film when he later watched it. As of December 2022, it is the only cartoon he has publicly admitted to regretting.{{cite web|last=McGuire|first=Liam|title=Gary Larson Names the One Far Side Comic He Wants to Apologize For|website=Screen Rant|date=December 1, 2022|access-date=December 9, 2022|url=https://screenrant.com/far-side-gary-larson-apologize-ishtar-mistake/|archive-date=December 9, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221209004631/https://screenrant.com/far-side-gary-larson-apologize-ishtar-mistake/|url-status=live}} Defenders argue that the studio did not back May, resulting in a public relations disaster before it was released in theaters. Joe Queenan compared the film to another comedy film considered the worst, Gigli, and wrote that although it was considered one of the worst films ever made at the time of its release, it "has several comic moments" and does not get worse on subsequent viewings, unlike Gigli.

{{Main|Leonard Part 6{{!}}Leonard Part 6}}

File:Bill cosby 1969.JPG became the first person to accept a Golden Raspberry Award for Leonard Part 6, which he admitted was the worst movie ever made.{{Cite web|url=https://siskelebert.org/?p=2512|title=Worst of 1987 – Siskel and Ebert Movie Reviews|website=siskelebert.org|access-date=January 9, 2022|archive-date=January 9, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220109145300/https://siskelebert.org/?p=2512|url-status=live}}]]

Leonard Part 6, starring (as well as written and produced by) Bill Cosby, was intended as a parody of spy movies. Leonard Parker, a former CIA spy, is brought out of retirement to save the world from an evil vegetarian who brainwashes animals to kill people. Rita Kempley at The Washington Post noted the large number of Coca-Cola product placements and said "The only good thing about Bill Cosby's Leonard Part 6 is that we didn't have to see Parts 1 through 5."{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/movies/videos/leonardpart6pgkempley_a0ca2f.htm|title=Leonard Part 6 (PG)|last=Kempley|first=Rita|date=December 19, 1987|newspaper=The Washington Post|access-date=June 27, 2012|archive-date=September 21, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921220949/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/movies/videos/leonardpart6pgkempley_a0ca2f.htm|url-status=live}} Scott Weinberg at DVD Talk noted the film as "truly one of the worst movies you'll ever see ... movies this bad should be handled with Teflon gloves and a pair of tongs".{{cite web|url=https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/15632/leonard-part-6/|title=Leonard Part 6|last=Weinberg|first=Scott|date=April 26, 2005|work=DVD Talk|access-date=June 27, 2012|archive-date=November 6, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121106000452/http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/15632/leonard-part-6/|url-status=live}} By 1990, Dennis King of the Tulsa World wrote that the film had "become synonymous with 'bomb.'"{{cite news|last=King|first=Dennis|title=Ghost Dad|date=July 6, 1990|newspaper=Tulsa World|url=http://www.tulsaworld.com/archives/ghost-dad/article_5b0372e5-e91b-5570-b2c7-c9edabbfae0a.html|access-date=January 27, 2019|archive-date=May 7, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190507042016/https://www.tulsaworld.com/archives/ghost-dad/article_5b0372e5-e91b-5570-b2c7-c9edabbfae0a.html|url-status=live}} Total Film and Vanity Fair subsequently included Leonard Part 6 on their respective worst film lists. Cosby himself disowned the film, and when it was released to theaters he publicly advised people not to see it. It earned Golden Raspberrys for Worst Actor (Cosby), Worst Picture, and Worst Screenplay. It was also nominated for two more Razzie Awards, for Worst Supporting Actress and Worst Director.{{cite news|title=Leonard RIP?|newspaper=Los Angeles Times|date=December 20, 1987|url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1987-12-20-ca-29856-story.html|access-date=December 26, 2010|first=Pat H.|last=Broeske|archive-date=January 19, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120119151239/http://articles.latimes.com/1987-12-20/entertainment/ca-29856_1_leonard-part|url-status=live}} Cosby became the first person to accept a Golden Raspberry Award,{{Cite news |last= Feran |first= Tim |title = Section: Features – Accent & Arts – Intermission | newspaper = Columbus Dispatch |location = Columbus, Ohio |page = 01F |date = April 26, 1992}} and said "It was the worst movie I ever made – the worst movie anyone ever made".{{cite news |title=Stars take critics with a grain of salt |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=waFEAAAAIBAJ&pg=1013,2816922&dq=leonard+part+6+worst+ever&hl=en |newspaper=The Daily Union |date=May 12, 1991 |access-date=April 1, 2020 |archive-date=August 16, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220816054117/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=waFEAAAAIBAJ&pg=1013,2816922&dq=leonard+part+6+worst+ever&hl=en |url-status=live }}

{{Main|Nukie{{!}}Nukie}}

Nukie is a 1987 South African film directed by Sias Odendaal (credited as Sias Odendal) and Michael Pakleppa, and starring Steve Railsback, Ronald France, and Glynis Johns. The plot concerns an alien, Nukie, who crash lands on Earth and seeks help from two children to reunite with his brother, Miko, who has been captured by the United States government. The film is considered to be a knock-off of Steven Spielberg's 1982 film E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial. Witney Seibold of /Film writes that "Nukie is only remarkable for how undeniably terrible it is", noting that it appears on lists of the worst films ever made.{{cite web |last=Seibold |first=Witney |title=The Nukie Controversy Explained: Destroying Crappy Movies For Charity |url=https://www.slashfilm.com/1167319/the-nukie-controversy-explained-destroying-crappy-movies-for-charity/ |website=/Film |access-date=January 16, 2023 |date=January 13, 2023 |archive-date=January 14, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230114222128/https://www.slashfilm.com/1167319/the-nukie-controversy-explained-destroying-crappy-movies-for-charity/ |url-status=live }} Comic Book Resources note that it is "regarded as one of the worst movies ever made",{{cite web |last=Trinos |first=Angelo Delos |title=10 Copycat Films That Are Worse Than What They're Ripping Off |url=https://www.cbr.com/copycat-films-worse-than-original/ |website=Comic Book Resources |date=15 August 2022 |access-date=11 January 2023 |archive-date=January 11, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230111233339/https://www.cbr.com/copycat-films-worse-than-original/ |url-status=live }} with critic Brad Jones selecting Nukie as the worst film he has ever seen,{{cite web |last=Phalin |first=Mike |title=Schlock and the Snob: An Interview With Brad Jones |url=https://www.dreadcentral.com/news/185215/schlock-snob-interview-brad-jones/ |website=Dread Central |access-date=11 January 2023 |date=26 August 2016 |archive-date=January 1, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230101080206/https://www.dreadcentral.com/news/185215/schlock-snob-interview-brad-jones/ |url-status=live }} and Red Letter Media calling it "Possibly one of the worst films ever made."{{cite web |last=Newgent |first=Sean |title=VHS copy of forgotten 'E.T.' knock-off 'Nukie' sells for $80,600 |url=https://www.kgun9.com/entertainment/vhs-copy-of-forgotten-e-t-knock-off-nukie-sells-for-80-600 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230111230814/https://www.kgun9.com/entertainment/vhs-copy-of-forgotten-e-t-knock-off-nukie-sells-for-80-600 |publisher=KGUN-TV |access-date=11 January 2023 |language=en |date=10 January 2023 |archive-date=11 January 2023}} Total Film write that it is considered by some to be the "most painful movie ever made"; they listed Nukie the worst kids movie ever made and one of the worst science-fiction films ever made.{{cite web|url=https://www.gamesradar.com/25-worst-science-fiction-films/|title=25 Worst Science-Fiction Films|last=Winning|first=Joshua|work=Total Film|publisher=GamesRadar|date=June 30, 2014|access-date=July 8, 2017|archive-date=July 14, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170714012719/http://www.gamesradar.com/25-worst-science-fiction-films/|url-status=live}} The film's co-director, Michael Pakleppa, referred to Nukie as "the most wrong-gone thing [he had] ever done in [his] life" and feared that the final product was "the worst film on Earth."{{cite web |last=Balmont |first=James |title=Nukie: the strange story behind the forgotten ET knock-off |url=https://www.dazeddigital.com/film-tv/article/58061/1/nukie-the-et-knock-off-film-awful-alien-vhs-interview |website=Dazed |access-date=January 30, 2023 |language=en |date=January 30, 2023 |archive-date=January 30, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230130102008/https://www.dazeddigital.com/film-tv/article/58061/1/nukie-the-et-knock-off-film-awful-alien-vhs-interview |url-status=live }}

{{Main|The Garbage Pail Kids Movie{{!}}The Garbage Pail Kids Movie}}

The Garbage Pail Kids Movie is a 1987 live-action adaptation of the then-popular trading card series of the same name, itself a gross-out parody of the then-popular Cabbage Patch Kids dolls co-created by Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist Art Spiegelman. The film is often criticized for its gross-out humor, nonsensical plot, poor explanations, bad acting, and the unsettling appearance of the Garbage Pail Kids (the title characters are depicted by dwarf actors in low-budget costumes, with poorly functioning mouths and expressionless faces). It has a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.{{Rotten Tomatoes|qid=Q7735810|title=The Garbage Pail Kids Movie}} On Metacritic, the film holds a score of 1, making it tied for the lowest scoring film on the site. Caryn James of The New York Times said the movie is "too repulsive for children or adults of any age" and is "enough to make you believe in strict and faraway boarding schools".{{cite news |first=Caryn |last=James |url=https://movies.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9B0DE1D81030F931A1575BC0A961948260 |title=Movie Review – The Garbage Pail Kids Movie |newspaper=The New York Times |access-date=June 6, 2010 |date=August 28, 1987 |archive-date=February 10, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120210083257/http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9B0DE1D81030F931A1575BC0A961948260 |url-status=live }} Carlos Coto of the Sun-Sentinel called it "one of the worst ever made".{{cite news |url=http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/1987-09-05/features/8703110946_1_garbage-pail-kids-cabbage-patch-kids-kids-show |title=Trashy 'Garbage Pail Kids' Has No Value |newspaper=Sun-Sentinel |access-date=September 29, 2010 |date=September 5, 1987 |archive-date=January 13, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120113001340/http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/1987-09-05/features/8703110946_1_garbage-pail-kids-cabbage-patch-kids-kids-show |url-status=dead }} Internet critic Doug Walker, best known for the series Nostalgia Critic, stated that it was not only the worst film he had ever reviewed as the Nostalgia Critic, but the worst movie he had ever seen overall, deeming that the film served to undermine its own moral.{{Cite web |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?si=4-mps8wKdhD8nWDu&v=_8Ik0xbSjSY |title=Doug Walker on The Garbage Pail Kids Movie |via=YouTube |date=December 16, 2012 |access-date=May 17, 2024 |archive-date=May 17, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240517170607/https://www.youtube.com/watch?si=4-mps8wKdhD8nWDu&v=_8Ik0xbSjSY |url-status=live }}

Much of the film's content is said to be inappropriate for children, its intended audience. Throughout the movie, the Garbage Pail Kids steal, get in fights, bite people's toes off, flatulate in people's faces, threaten others with switchblades, urinate upon themselves, and run over cars. In addition to scatological behavior, the movie has several scenes that feature sexual images, violence, and drinking. Offended parents launched a nationwide protest of the movie that successfully resulted in the movie being withdrawn from circulation.{{cite web |url=https://allmovie.com/work/the-garbage-pail-kids-movie-19217 |title=The Garbage Pail Kids Movie > Overview |publisher=AllMovie |access-date=June 6, 2010 |archive-date=June 1, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200601082028/https://www.allmovie.com/movie/the-garbage-pail-kids-movie-v19217 |url-status=live }} The shortened release contributed to the movie's poor gross of only $1,576,615.{{cite web |url=https://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=garbagepailkids.htm |title=The Garbage Pail Kids Movie (1987) – Box Office Mojo |work=Box Office Mojo |access-date=March 7, 2011 |archive-date=March 23, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110323072054/http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=garbagepailkids.htm |url-status=live }} It was nominated for three Razzies at the 8th Golden Raspberry Awards: Worst Visual Effects, Worst New Star for the Garbage Pail Kids collectively, and Worst Original Song.

{{Main|Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2{{!}}Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2}}

Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2 is the sequel to the 1984 Christmas-themed slasher film Silent Night, Deadly Night, which faced protests from parent groups and sharp criticism from At the Movies hosts Roger Ebert and Gene Siskel due to its promotional campaign featuring an ax-wielding Santa Claus.{{cite web |last1=Bailey |first1=Jason |title=So Bad It's Good: It's Christmas Time (and Garbage Day) in 'Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2' |url=https://www.flavorwire.com/493459/so-bad-its-good-its-christmas-time-and-garbage-day-in-silent-night-deadly-night-part-2 |website=Flavorwire |access-date=December 14, 2024 |language=en |date=December 12, 2014}} The film was a financial success despite the controversy, leading producers to enlist Lee Harry to repurpose its footage for a new project; however, $100,000 was eventually allocated to shoot additional original material.{{cite web |last1=Kennedy |first1=Michael |title=Why Silent Night, Deadly Night 2 Was So Legendarily Bad |url=https://screenrant.com/silent-deadly-night-2-problems-production-bad/ |website=Screen Rant |access-date=December 14, 2024 |language=en |date=3 August 2022}} Nearly half of the Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2{{'}}s runtime consists of flashbacks to the first film, narrated by Ricky Caldwell (Eric Freeman), the brother of the original film's protagonist, as he recounts events before embarking on his own murderous rampage.

Much of the film's reception and legacy centers on Freeman's performance, which Flavorwire states "may very well be the single worst performance ever committed to celluloid," and Nathan Rabin states: "I'm not sure whether Freeman gives the worst performance of all time or the best here but it is one of the most unique starring turns in the history of film."{{cite web |last1=Rabin |first1=Nathan |authorlink=Nathan Rabin |title=Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2 Is One of the Craziest, Sleaziest and Most Deranged Pieces of Shit I've Ever Seen. That's Why It's Great and Everyone Should See It |url=https://nathanrabin.substack.com/p/silent-night-deadly-night-part-2 |website=Nathan Rabin's Bad Ideas |access-date=December 14, 2024 |date=30 November 2023}} A scene in which Ricky shouts "garbage day!" before shooting and killing a bystander taking out his trash became an Internet meme after being uploaded to YouTube in its early years. Screen Rant has since deemed the film to be "a masterpiece of the so bad it's good variety," and "one of the worst movies ever made."{{cite web |last1=Gunning |first1=Cathal |title=Every Killer Santa Horror Movie Ranked |url=https://screenrant.com/killer-santa-horror-movies-ranked-worst-best/ |website=Screen Rant |access-date=December 14, 2024 |language=en |date=25 December 2022}} Meanwhile, Rabin stated it was "the sleaziest, craziest, worst and most ridiculous movie ever made. That’s why it’s great and every one should see it."{{cite tweet|author=Nathan Rabin|user=nathanrabin|author-link=Nathan Rabin|number=1728430127728738339|title=Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2 is the sleaziest, craziest, worst and most ridiculous movie ever made. That's why it's great and every one should see it.|date=November 25, 2023|access-date=December 15, 2024}} Emmett O'Regan of Comic Book Resources also selected it as the worst movie ever made,{{cite web |last1=O'Regan |first1=Emmett |title=Why Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2 Is the Worst Movie of All Time |url=https://www.cbr.com/silent-night-deadly-night-worst-movie-all-time/ |website=Comic Book Resources |access-date=December 14, 2024 |language=en |date= December 11, 2022}} and an article in Paste asserted that: "in terms of filmmaking quality—it’s hard to believe that in terms of pure, unadulterated crap, anything could ever surpass it." Additionally, Flavorwire, /Film, and Paste have all listed it as the worst Christmas film ever made.{{cite web |last1=Donato |first1=Matt |title='Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2' Is The Best Worst Christmas Horror Movie And You Must Watch It |url=https://www.slashfilm.com/555210/silent-night-deadly-night-part-2/ |website=/Film |access-date=December 15, 2024 |date=December 22, 2017}}{{cite web |last1=Vorel |first1=Jim |title=The 20 Worst Christmas Movies of All Time |url=https://www.pastemagazine.com/movies/christmas/the-20-worst-christmas-movies-of-all-time |website=Paste |access-date=December 14, 2024}} Time Out and Flavorwire later included it on their respective lists of the worst films ever made.

{{Main|Hobgoblins (film){{!}}Hobgoblins (film)}}

Hobgoblins, by Rick Sloane, is widely considered a low-budget knock-off that capitalizes on the popularity of the 1984 film Gremlins. It gained popularity in 1998 after being featured on an episode of Mystery Science Theater 3000. MST3K writer Paul Chaplin later commented on Hobgoblins, saying, "Oh, man. You have no idea the torture it was to watch this movie several times in the space of a week. It shoots right to the top of the list of the worst movies we've ever done." Specific points of the film that were lampooned were the extreme misogyny and atrocious treatment of women; the film's technical incompetence and repetitive scenes; its asinine, poorly conceived plot; its dreadful acting; and its ugly look and gratuitous vulgarity, particularly in regards to its characters and subject matter.{{cite web|url=http://www.castleforrester.com/media/guide/0907.htm |title=Episode Guide|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081013042500/http://www.castleforrester.com/media/guide/0907.htm |archive-date=October 13, 2008 }} David Cornelius of DVD Talk stated, "There's not one aspect of this movie that isn't the Worst Thing Ever."{{cite web |url=https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/38236/mad-monster-rally/ |title=Mad Monster Rally : DVD Talk Review of the DVD Video |publisher=DVD Talk|access-date=March 5, 2014|last=Cornelius |first=David|date=August 18, 2009 |archive-date=February 24, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140224044732/http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/38236/mad-monster-rally/ |url-status=live }} The Standard{{'}}s Bad Horror Club noted its status as one of the worst films of all time, commenting: "it’s so preposterously badly made, terribly acted and ineptly constructed that it makes for some of the most fun you can ever have watching a movie."{{cite web |last1=Embley |first1=Jochan |last2=Fletcher |first2=Harry |title=Remembering 80s disaster Hobgoblins in all its chaotic glory |url=https://www.standard.co.uk/culture/film/bad-horror-club-hobgoblins-80s-disaster-a4422426.html |website=The Standard |access-date=December 8, 2024 |language=en |date=April 23, 2020}}

Sloane has embraced Hobgoblins{{'}} status as one of the worst films of all time, stating that he fears that it will be forgotten if it is removed from IMDb's user-generated bottom 100 list.{{Cite web|url=https://www.dreadcentral.com/news/12169/rick-sloane-talks-hobgoblins/|title=Rick Sloane Talks Hobgoblins|author=Foywonder|date=June 23, 2009|website=Dread Central|language=en|access-date=December 8, 2024}} After seeing the MST3K episode himself, Sloane was inspired to direct a sequel, which was released in 2009.{{Cite web|url=https://mubi.com/films/hobgoblins-2|title=Hobgoblins 2|via=mubi.com|access-date=May 10, 2020|archive-date=September 27, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210927043012/https://mubi.com/films/hobgoblins-2|url-status=live}} In addition to IMDb, it has been featured on lists from Flavorwire and Total Film.

{{Main|Mac and Me{{!}}Mac and Me}}

Mac and Me is about a young boy in a wheelchair who meets and befriends an alien who has crash-landed on Earth. A box-office failure,{{cite news|title=Advertising is so much a part of life that it's understandable to find familiar products in films. But sometimes it goes too far.|work=Los Angeles Times|date=August 29, 1999|url=https://articles.latimes.com/1999/aug/29/entertainment/ca-4591/3|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131204041237/http://articles.latimes.com/1999/aug/29/entertainment/ca-4591/3|url-status=dead|archive-date=December 4, 2013|access-date=May 17, 2012}} the film grossed $6,424,112 in the United States{{mojo title|macandme|Mac and Me}} on a $13 million budget.{{cite web|url=https://catalog.afi.com/Catalog/MovieDetails/58827|title=Mac and Me|website=AFI Catalog of Feature Films|access-date=April 27, 2018|archive-date=April 28, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180428093913/https://catalog.afi.com/Catalog/MovieDetails/58827|url-status=live}} It used to have a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, whose critical consensus notes that it is "duly infamous" as both an imitation of E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (1982), and a marketing vehicle for McDonald's and Coca-Cola{{Rotten Tomatoes|qid=Q1761515|title=Mac and Me}} (the filmmakers had admitted a profit-sharing arrangement with the former).{{cite news|title= Movie Review Mac and Me Takes a Big McBite Out of E.T.|newspaper= Los Angeles Times|url= https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1988-08-15-ca-300-story.html|access-date= December 5, 2010|archive-date= March 7, 2011|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20110307085307/http://articles.latimes.com/1988-08-15/entertainment/ca-300_1_big-mac|url-status= live}} Leonard Maltin described the film as being "more like a TV commercial than a movie", and Marjorie Baumgarten of the Austin Chronicle called it a "shameless E.T. knockoff". Mac and Me is widely regarded as one of the worst films ever made,{{cite web|url=https://screenrant.com/movies-with-bizarre-weird-source-material/|title=15 Movies With Bizarre Source Material|last=McGranaghan|first=Mike|date=March 21, 2017|website=Screen Rant|access-date=June 23, 2018|archive-date=June 24, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180624035654/https://screenrant.com/movies-with-bizarre-weird-source-material/|url-status=live}}{{cite news|url=https://movieweb.com/mac-and-me-movie-alternate-ending-video/|title=Alternate Mac and Me Ending Unearthed and It's Insane|last=Millican|first=Josh|date=August 8, 2018|work=MovieWeb|access-date=December 15, 2018|archive-date=September 11, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180911081746/https://movieweb.com/mac-and-me-movie-alternate-ending-video/|url-status=live}} with The Telegraph reporting that it is "frequently pulled out in 'worst film of all time' arguments".{{cite web|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/2016/07/18/top-aliens-in-the-movies/mac-and-me/ |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/2016/07/18/top-aliens-in-the-movies/mac-and-me/ |archive-date=January 11, 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|title=Top 20 aliens in the movies|date=December 19, 2017|website=The Telegraph|access-date=April 27, 2018}}{{cbignore}} Filmmaker Morgan Spurlock (responsible for the 2004 Oscar-nominated Super Size Me) declared it the "worst thing you'll ever see in your entire life", as well as the most egregious example of product placement in cinema history.{{cite news|url=https://movies.yahoo.com/blogs/movie-talk/morgan-spurlock-dubs-mac-worst-movie-ever-sold-060910653.html|date=April 22, 2011|last=Crow|first=Jonathan|work=Yahoo! Movies|access-date=August 29, 2013|title=Morgan Spurlock Dubs 'Mac and Me' the Worst Film Ever Sold|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120405070102/http://movies.yahoo.com/blogs/movie-talk/morgan-spurlock-dubs-mac-worst-movie-ever-sold-060910653.html|archive-date=April 5, 2012}} The film was also named the worst ever in the San Francisco Chronicle,{{cite news|date=January 22, 2017|title=Mac and Me|newspaper=San Francisco Chronicle|quote=McDonald's created an 'E.T.' rip-off called 'Mac and Me' in 1988... It's the worst movie ever made.}} as well as by broadcaster Simon Mayo{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p03slrls|title=Paul Rudd and Chris Evans interviewed by Simon Mayo|date=April 29, 2016|publisher=BBC Radio 5 Live|access-date=April 27, 2018|time=10 minutes|quote=Mac and Me... we're talking about the worst film ever made.|archive-date=May 10, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180510202715/https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p03slrls|url-status=live}} and writer/producer Damon Lindelof.{{cite web|url=https://www.gq.com/story/damon-lindelof-paul-alien-comedy|title=Damon Lindelof's Open Letter to Paul the Alien|last=Lindelof|first=Damon|author-link=Damon Lindelof|date=March 14, 2011|website=GQ|access-date=April 27, 2018|archive-date=April 28, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180428093747/https://www.gq.com/story/damon-lindelof-paul-alien-comedy|url-status=live}} Michael Hayden of GQ India referred to it as "hands down the worst family movie in Hollywood history".{{cite web|url=https://www.gqindia.com/content/6-best-bad-films/#s-cust0|title=The 6 best bad films|last=Hayden|first=Michael|date=November 10, 2011|website=GQ India|access-date=May 11, 2018|archive-date=May 12, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180512044317/https://www.gqindia.com/content/6-best-bad-films/#s-cust0|url-status=live}} The film was nominated for four Razzie Awards including Worst Picture and Worst Screenplay, and won two trophies: Worst Director for Stewart Raffill (tied with Blake Edwards for Sunset) and Worst New Star for Ronald McDonald in a cameo. Mac and Me has however gained a cult following and was featured on the second season of the Mystery Science Theater 3000 revival (the only Razzie-winning film ever to be riffed in the history of the show).{{cite news|url=https://www.thrillist.com/entertainment/nation/mcdonalds-mac-and-me-paul-rudd-movie-et-spinoff|title=How McDonald's Bizarre 'E.T.' Knockoff Got Made|last=Patches|first=Matt|date=April 3, 2017|publisher=Thrillist|access-date=December 11, 2017|archive-date=December 11, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171211213637/https://www.thrillist.com/entertainment/nation/mcdonalds-mac-and-me-paul-rudd-movie-et-spinoff|url-status=live}}{{cite web|url=https://nerdist.com/mac-and-me-bottleneck-gallery-figure-pins/|title=Mac and Me Finally (?) Gets Figure and Pin Collection|last=McNally|first=Victoria|date=April 24, 2017|publisher=Nerdist|access-date=May 11, 2018|archive-date=May 12, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180512044315/https://nerdist.com/mac-and-me-bottleneck-gallery-figure-pins/|url-status=live}}{{Cite web|url=https://uproxx.com/tv/mystery-science-theater-3000-mac-and-me-season-2/|title='Mystery Science Theater 3000' Will Tackle 'Mac And Me' In Season 2|date=November 12, 2018|access-date=January 3, 2020|archive-date=January 3, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200103134816/https://uproxx.com/tv/mystery-science-theater-3000-mac-and-me-season-2/|url-status=live}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.cbr.com/mst3k-movies-good-without-the-riffing/|title=10 MST3K Movies You Should Watch Without The Riffing|first=Derek|last=Faraci|date=June 12, 2022|website=CBR|access-date=February 12, 2023|archive-date=February 12, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230212014327/https://www.cbr.com/mst3k-movies-good-without-the-riffing/|url-status=live}}

{{Main|Things (film){{!}}Things (film)}}

Things, a 1989 Canadian low budget, independent, horror exploitation film, was written and produced by Andrew Jordan & Barry J. Gillis. It cost approximately $35,000 in total to make{{cite web|url=http://www.canuxploitation.com/review/things.html|title=Things review|publisher=Canuxploitation|access-date=December 28, 2013|archive-date=September 29, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130929234728/http://www.canuxploitation.com/review/things.html|url-status=live}} and marked the mainstream film debut of porn star Amber Lynn. It was ostensibly made as homage to horror icons and films, such as George A. Romero and his Night of the Living Dead franchise.{{cite web|url=http://www.critcononline.com/films_on_the_fringe.htm|title=Films on the Fringe: Things (1989)|publisher=Critic Online|access-date=June 7, 2009|archive-date=April 15, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090415201758/http://www.critcononline.com/films_on_the_fringe.htm|url-status=live}} Adam Symchuk of Screen Rant writes: "While films like The Room and Birdemic seem to be constant contenders for the best 'so bad it's good' movie, [Things] is the true unheralded champion among many cinephiles."{{cite web |title=It Came From The North: 10 Great Monster Movies From Canada |url=https://screenrant.com/great-monster-movies-from-canada/ |website=Screen Rant |last=Symchuk |first=Adam |access-date=July 26, 2022 |date=September 30, 2020 |archive-date=July 26, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220726091201/https://screenrant.com/great-monster-movies-from-canada/ |url-status=live }} Likewise, Jeff Kirschner of Dread Central nominated it as the worst movie ever made and Will Pfeifer opined that "It's so terrible I can't think of another movie that even comes close."{{cite web|url=http://www.dreadcentral.com/news/142337/things-worst-movie-ever-made/|title=Things: The Worst Movie Ever Made|date=December 10, 2015|publisher=Dread Central|last=Kirschner|first=Jeff|access-date=July 26, 2022|archive-date=December 4, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221204173115/https://www.dreadcentral.com/news/142337/things-worst-movie-ever-made/|url-status=live}}{{cite web |last=Pfeifer |first=Will |author-link=Will Pfeifer |title=Will Pfeifer: Monsters, mullets meet for snoozefest |url=https://www.jacksonnewspapers.com/x1348677046/Will-Pfeifer-Monsters-mullets-meet-for-snoozefest |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210902063835/https://www.jacksonnewspapers.com/x1348677046/Will-Pfeifer-Monsters-mullets-meet-for-snoozefest |newspaper=Jackson Newspapers |access-date=July 26, 2022 |date=October 17, 2008 |archive-date=September 2, 2021 |language=en}} In 2022, RiffTrax concluded that Things was the worst movie that they had ever spoofed.{{cite web |last1=Nelson |first1=Mike J. |author-link1=Michael J. Nelson |last2=Murphy |first2=Kevin |author-link2=Kevin Murphy (actor) |last3=Corbett |first3=Bill |author-link3=Bill Corbett |title=Things |url=https://www.rifftrax.com/things |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220305141159/https://www.rifftrax.com/things |publisher=Rifftrax |archive-date=March 5, 2022 |access-date=July 26, 2022 |language=en |date=March 4, 2022}}

{{Main|Troll 2{{!}}Troll 2}}

Despite its title, Troll 2 does not feature any trolls (the antagonists are actually goblins) and has no relation to the original 1986 film. Troll 2 was produced under the title "Goblins", but the title was changed by American distributors. In the film, an American family vacations to the town of Nilbog (goblin spelled backwards), where vegetarian goblins attempt to turn the family into edible plants. It was shot in Utah and the cast was composed of local amateur actors. A language barrier developed between the cast and the Italian crew, led by director Claudio Fragasso, who had translated the script to English.{{cite web |last1=Griggs |first1=Brandon |title=Troll 2: As camp as it gets |url=https://archive.sltrib.com/story.php?ref=/arts/ci_5457861 |website=The Salt Lake Tribune |date=March 17, 2007 |access-date=December 30, 2024}} The bad acting and dialogue have become notorious for their camp value, with individual scenes having become Internet memes.{{cite web |last1=Berchtold |first1=Trent |title=The 10 Most Rewatchable Bad Horror Movies, Ranked |url=https://collider.com/bad-horror-movies-rewatchable-ranked/ |website=Collider |access-date=December 30, 2024 |language=en |date=September 29, 2024}} In 2009, Michael Stephenson, the child star of Troll 2, released Best Worst Movie, a documentary exploring the film's tumultuous production and its unexpected cult following.

NPR reports that it is "known as the worst movie of all time"{{cite web |url=https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=105420828 |title=The Beauty Of The 'Best Worst Movie' |work=NPR |publisher=NPR |access-date=June 15, 2009 |archive-date=June 20, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090620200356/http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=105420828 |url-status=live }} while The A.V. Club calls it "a popular candidate for the worst film ever made".{{cite web |url=https://avclub.com/article/ibest-worst-movie-iuncovers-the-heartbreaking-psyc-95807 |title=Best Worst Movie uncovers the heartbreaking psychodrama in a memorably insane B-movie |work=The A.V. Club |last=Rabin |first=Nathan |author-link=Nathan Rabin |date=March 29, 2013 |access-date=March 29, 2013 |archive-date=May 16, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140516063721/http://www.avclub.com/article/ibest-worst-movie-iuncovers-the-heartbreaking-psyc-95807 |url-status=live }} Likewise, TV Guide proclaimed that "Troll 2 is really as bad as they come,"{{cite web|url=https://www.tvguide.com/movies/troll-2/review/129231 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170426044557/http://www.tvguide.com/movies/troll-2/review/129231/ |title=Troll 2 Review |work=TV Guide |archive-date=April 26, 2017 |access-date=March 5, 2014}} and Ken Hanke of Mountain Xpress stated in his review that: "There are movies that are bad. There are movies that are so-bad-they're-good. And then there's Troll 2—a movie that's so bad that it defies comprehension."{{cite web |url=http://www.mountainx.com/movies/review/troll_2 |title=Movie Review: Troll 2 |work=Mountain Xpress |last=Hanke |first=Ken |date=July 23, 2008 |access-date=March 5, 2014 |archive-date=October 19, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131019171306/http://www.mountainx.com/movies/review/troll_2 |url-status=live }} Troll 2 regularly appears on lists of films considered the worst, including: Flavorwire, Fotogramas, IGN, Rotten Tomatoes, Screen Rant, and Time Out. Furthermore, Collider named it the most rewatchable bad movie of all time.

{{Main|Highlander II: The Quickening{{!}}Highlander II: The Quickening}}

The French-British film Highlander II: The Quickening is a sequel to the 1986 cult film Highlander, which transitions the fantasy of the original film into science fiction, and retcons the mystical warriors of the first film into aliens. It received a harsh reception from both critics and audiences, as it has a 0% score on Rotten Tomatoes and appears on its 100 Worst Movies of All Time. Common criticisms included the lack of motivation for the characters, blatant disregard for backstory from the first film (such as the new and seemingly incongruent origin for the Immortals and the unexplained resurrection of Ramírez), glaring plot holes, a messy and nonsensical story structure, the filmmaker's inability to balance unrelated plots and subplots, and obvious contradictions in the film's internal logic.{{Cite web|url=https://www.ign.com/articles/2000/06/16/highlander-2-renegade-version|title=Highlander 2: Renegade Version|author=I. G. N. Staff|date=June 16, 2000|website=IGN}} In selecting it as the worst movie sequel of all time, Comic Book Resources also wrote that "it is typically considered one of the worst films of all time."{{cite web |last=Williams |first=Isaac |title=The 10 Worst Movie Sequels Ever, Ranked |url=https://www.cbr.com/worst-movie-sequels-ever/ |publisher=Comic Book Resources |access-date=January 11, 2022 |date=January 5, 2022}} Roger Ebert named it the worst film of 1991, stating: "If there is a planet somewhere whose civilization is based on the worst movies of all time, Highlander 2: The Quickening deserves a sacred place among their most treasured artifacts."{{cite news |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/highlander-2-the-quickening-1991 |title=Highlander 2: The Quickening movie review (1991) |first=Roger |last=Ebert |author-link=Roger Ebert |journal=Chicago Sun-Times |date=November 1, 1991 |access-date=October 10, 2020}} An IGN review said: "How bad is this movie? Well, imagine if Ed Wood were alive today, and someone gave him a multi-million dollar budget. See his imagination running rampant, bringing in aliens from outer space with immensely powerful firearms, immortals who bring each other back to life by calling out their names, epic duels on flying skateboards, and a blatant disregard for anything logical or previously established—now you are starting to get closer to the vision of Highlander II."{{Cite web |url=https://www.ign.com/articles/2000/06/16/highlander-2-renegade-version |title=Highlander 2: Renegade Version Review |work=IGN |date=June 16, 2000}} Screen Rant has since included it on its list of the 25 worst films of all time.

In 1995, the film's director Russell Mulcahy made a director's cut version known as Highlander 2: Renegade Version and then later released another version simply known as Highlander 2: The Special Edition for its 2004 DVD release. The film was reconstructed on both occasions largely from existing material, with certain scenes removed and others added back in, and the entire sequence of events changed. The reconstructed film's reception was far better than the original's; it was elevated to a mixed reception.{{cite web|url = https://joblo.com/horror-movies/news/highlander-ii-there-can-be-only-four-cuts---part-2|title = Highlander II: There can be only four cuts!| work = JoBlo Movie Network|date = November 24, 2010|access-date = March 16, 2013}}

{{main|Super Mario Bros. (film){{!}}Super Mario Bros. (film)}}

File:Bob hoskins filming ruby blue cropped (cropped).jpg (pictured in 2006) described Super Mario Bros. as "the worst thing I ever did" later in his life.]]

The first feature-length live-action film based on a video game, Super Mario Bros. was directed by the husband-and-wife team of Rocky Morton and Annabel Jankel (known for their work on Max Headroom). It follows the brothers Mario (Bob Hoskins) and Luigi (John Leguizamo), plumbers who venture into a parallel universe to rescue Princess Daisy (Samantha Mathis) from the villainous King Koopa (Dennis Hopper). The Super Mario series' publisher, Nintendo, believed the Mario franchise was strong enough for experimentation and gave the filmmakers free creative license.{{cite magazine |last=Russell |first=Jamie |title=Why the Super Mario Movie Sucked |url=https://www.wired.com/2012/04/generation-xbox-super-mario-movie/ |magazine=Wired |access-date=July 9, 2022 |date=April 23, 2012}} The finished film bears little resemblance to the games,{{cite web |last=Bibbiani |first=William |title=The Best Worst Movies Ever Made: The Room, Super Mario Bros. and More |url=https://sea.ign.com/breakin-2-electric-boogaloo/180321/feature/the-best-worst-movies-ever-made-the-room-super-mario-bros-and-more |website=IGN |access-date=July 9, 2022 |date=December 27, 2021}} trading their colorful Mushroom Kingdom for a dystopic world populated by humanoid dinosaurs. SyFy Wire wrote: "Some movies are so bad that they're secretly good. Super Mario Bros. is so bad it crushes your spirit. It's unfathomably terrible."{{cite web |last=Grierson |first=Tim |title=This week in genre history: Super Mario Bros. the movie gets an instant 'game over' |url=https://www.syfy.com/syfy-wire/super-mario-bros-movie-genre-history |website=SyFy Wire |access-date=July 9, 2022 |date=May 26, 2020}} The film was criticized for its inconsistent tone, complex narrative, and lack of faithfulness to the source material.{{Cite AV media |last1=Siskel |first1=Gene |last2=Ebert |first2=Roger |date=August 18, 2008 |title=Siskel & Ebert Review "Super Mario Bros." |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbEH66qiwrY |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160810150516/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbEH66qiwrY |archive-date=August 10, 2016 |access-date=November 28, 2016 |via=YouTube}}{{cite web |last=Walsh |first=Michael |title=8 Things Fans Want To See In The Super Mario Movie |url=https://collider.com/things-fans-want-super-mario-movie/ |website=Collider |access-date=July 9, 2022 |date=June 22, 2022}} According to Variety, Super Mario Bros. is a mainstay on lists compiling the worst films of all time.{{cite web |last1=Shanfield |first1=Ethan |title=Mario Powers Up: How Nintendo Visionary Shigeru Miyamoto and Illumination's Chris Meledandri Plan to Super Smash Hollywood |url=https://variety.com/2023/film/features/super-mario-bros-movie-shigeru-miyamoto-interview-1235572488/ |website=Variety |access-date=March 21, 2024 |date=April 4, 2023}} It was voted the sixth worst film of all time by RiffTrax in 2012,{{cite web |title=Worst Movies of All Time Top 10 |url=https://www.rifftrax.com/worst-movies-of-all-time-top-10 |publisher=RiffTrax |access-date=July 9, 2022 |date=2012}} and IGN ranked it among the "best worst movies ever made" in 2021. Author David Bodanis, in his 2020 book The Art of Fairness, called Super Mario Bros. "the worst movie ever made".{{cite book |last=Bodanis |first=David |title=The Art of Fairness: The Power of Decency in a World Turned Mean |date=November 2020 |publisher=Abrams Books |isbn=9781647003869 |chapter=Directors |quote=The result was 1941, and while it's not the worst movie ever made—not when Super Mario Bros. is still available—it's definitely a contender.}}

In addition to scathing reviews, Super Mario Bros. was a box-office bomb, and Morton and Jankel were "blacklisted" as directors in Hollywood. In a 2007 interview, Hoskins said: "The worst thing I ever did? Super Mario Bros. It was a fuckin' nightmare. The whole experience was a nightmare. It had a husband-and-wife team directing, whose arrogance had been mistaken for talent. After so many weeks their own agent told them to get off the set! Fuckin' nightmare. Fuckin' idiots."{{Cite web |last=Hattenstone |first=Simon |date=August 3, 2007 |title=The Method? Living it out? Cobblers! |url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/2007/aug/03/2 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161216193111/https://www.theguardian.com/film/2007/aug/03/2 |archive-date=December 16, 2016 |access-date=December 13, 2016 |website=The Guardian}} In a 2011 interview, he was asked, "What is the worst job you've done?", "What has been your biggest disappointment?", and "If you could edit your past, what would you change?" His answer to all three was Super Mario Bros.{{Cite web |last=Greenstreet |first=Rosanna |date=June 17, 2011 |title=Q&A: Bob Hoskins |url=https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2011/jun/18/bob-hoskins-interview-neverland |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131110021801/http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2011/jun/18/bob-hoskins-interview-neverland |archive-date=November 10, 2013 |access-date=December 13, 2016 |website=The Guardian}} The film made Nintendo wary of licensing its works to film studios,{{cite news|last=Vary|first=Adam|title=Sony Pictures Lands "Mario Bros." Movie Rights From Nintendo, Leaked Emails Show|url=https://www.buzzfeed.com/adambvary/sony-nintendo-mario-bros-movie#.duwkpjZgV|access-date=December 11, 2014|website=BuzzFeed News|date=December 11, 2014|archive-date=December 12, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141212093710/http://www.buzzfeed.com/adambvary/sony-nintendo-mario-bros-movie#.duwkpjZgV|url-status=live}} and it did not license Mario again until it collaborated with Illumination for The Super Mario Bros. Movie (2023) three decades later. Seth Rogen, who voiced Donkey Kong in the 2023 film, called Super Mario Bros. one of the worst films ever made and what "made me realize that movies, like, could be bad. That never occurred to me until that moment."{{cite web |last=Malkin |first=Marc |title='Super Mario Bros. Movie' Star Seth Rogen Calls Original 1993 Adaptation 'One of the Worst Films Ever Made' |url=https://variety.com/2023/film/columns/super-mario-bros-seth-rogen-slams-original-movie-1235574029/ |website=Variety |access-date=March 21, 2024 |date=April 5, 2023}}

{{Main|North (1994 film){{!}}North (1994 film)}}

File:Rob_Reiner_LBJ_Library_2016_-_DIG13955_105.jpg made the family film North (1994), which was panned by critics to the point that Roger Ebert famously declared he "hated, hated, hated this movie" on the film review show Siskel and Ebert at the Movies.]]

The Rob Reiner film North is an adaptation of the novel North: The Tale of a 9-Year-Old Boy Who Becomes a Free Agent and Travels the World in Search of the Perfect Parents by Alan Zweibel, who also wrote the screenplay and has a minor role in the film. North, which stars Elijah Wood in the title role and also marked Scarlett Johansson's film debut, was a critical and commercial failure, earning only $7,138,449 worldwide despite its budget of over $40 million. It was widely criticized for its plot, its all-star cast of insensitive characters, lack of humor and portrayal of numerous ethnic stereotypes (especially Alaskan Inuit). It has a 14% approval rating at Rotten Tomatoes.{{cite web |title=North Movie Reviews, Pictures – Rotten Tomatoes |work=Rotten Tomatoes |url=https://rottentomatoes.com/m/north/ |access-date=March 7, 2011}} Roger Ebert gave it zero stars and, in his review, infamously wrote, "I hated this movie. Hated hated hated hated hated this movie. Hated it. Hated every simpering stupid vacant audience-insulting moment of it. Hated the sensibility that thought anyone would like it. Hated the implied insult to the audience by its belief that anyone would be entertained by it."{{Cite web|url=https://siskelebert.org/?p=493|title=Worst of 1994 – Siskel and Ebert Movie Reviews|website=siskelebert.org}}{{Cite web|url=https://siskelebert.org/?p=5388|title=The Client, Lassie, It Could Happen to You, North, Barcelona, 1994 – Siskel and Ebert Movie Reviews|website=siskelebert.org}} He continued saying "North is a bad film – one of the worst movies ever made", and it is also on his list of most hated films. Both Ebert and Gene Siskel named North as the worst film of 1994.{{cite web |title=The Official Site of Gene Siskel |work=Cmgww.com |url=http://www.cmgww.com/stars/siskel/screening_room/thumbs_down.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090226070236/http://www.cmgww.com/stars/siskel/screening_room/thumbs_down.htm |url-status=dead |archive-date=February 26, 2009 |access-date=March 7, 2011}} Mick LaSalle of the San Francisco Chronicle said in his review that "North is director Rob Reiner's first flat-out failure, a sincerely wrought, energetically made picture that all the same crashes on takeoff. It's strange and oddly distasteful, at its best managing to be bad in some original and unexpected ways."{{cite news |url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/1995/01/06/dd59113.dtl |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20031113141403/http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=%2Fc%2Fa%2F1995%2F01%2F06%2Fdd59113.dtl |url-status=dead |archive-date=November 13, 2003 |work=The San Francisco Chronicle |title=Rob Reiner's 'North' Is Distastefully Bad |last=LaSalle |first=Mick |author-link=Mick LaSalle |date=January 8, 2011}} Richard Roeper named North as one of the 40 worst movies he has ever seen, saying that, "Of all the films on this list, North may be the most difficult to watch from start to finish." The film was nominated for the following awards at the 15th Golden Raspberry Awards: Worst Picture, Worst Actor (Bruce Willis, also for Color of Night), Worst Supporting Actress (Kathy Bates), Worst Supporting Actor (Dan Aykroyd, also for Exit to Eden), Worst Director, and Worst Screenplay (Andrew Scheinman and Alan Zweibel).

{{Main|A Story About Love{{!}}A Story About Love}}

The Norwegian romantic film Dis – en historie om kjærlighet was directed by Aune Sand. The film follows different couples and their love stories around the world, in Cairo, Normandy, Oslo and New York City. Dis received universally poor reviews by critics, and has been called the most poorly reviewed Norwegian film in history.{{cite magazine|last=Kristoffersen|first=Marius Vartdal|title=Hva Var I Veien Med Dis?|url=http://znett.com/2011/05/hva-var-i-veien-med-dis/|date=May 3, 2011|access-date=July 14, 2014|magazine=Z Filmtidsskrift|language=no}} Critic Harald Kolstad of Dagsavisen gave it a score of zero, refused to acknowledge Dis as a film, and claimed to have never seen anything worse.{{cite news|last=Pedersen |first=Brent Erik |title=Hedrer Dagsavisens kritiker |url=http://www.dagsavisen.no/kultur/hedrer-dagsavisens-kritiker/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140617125554/http://www.dagsavisen.no/kultur/hedrer-dagsavisens-kritiker/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=June 17, 2014 |access-date=July 14, 2014 |newspaper=Dagsavisen|language=no }} Aftenposten referred to the film as "the largest turkey" and "the most reviled film",{{cite news|title=Norges største kalkun flyr igjen|url=http://www.osloby.no/article199599_2.ece|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120814005215/http://www.osloby.no/article199599_2.ece|url-status=dead|archive-date=August 14, 2012|date=June 28, 2012|access-date=July 14, 2014|newspaper=Aftenposten|language=no}} and Total Film included it on its list of the 66 worst films ever made. Despite being a critical disaster it became a commercial success, gaining cult film status with a following akin to The Rocky Horror Picture Show, with fans embracing its "so bad it's good" qualities. Director Aune Sand insists that Dis is a masterpiece.{{cite news|title= Slakter norsk film|url=http://www.dagbladet.no/kultur/2005/07/20/437937.html|access-date=July 14, 2014|newspaper=Dagbladet|language=no}}

{{Main|Showgirls{{!}}Showgirls}}

File:Paul Verhoeven.jpg, whose Showgirls earned a record 13 Golden Raspberry Award nominations, was the first person to attend the ceremony and accept the awards in person.{{Cite news |last= Persall |first= Steve |title = 'Showgirls' gets razzed | newspaper = St. Petersburg Times |page = 2B |date = March 25, 1996}}]]

Hype for Paul Verhoeven's erotic drama Showgirls focused on the sex and nudity in this NC-17 French-American film with a $45 million budget, but the final result was critically derided. Much hype revolved around the film's star, Elizabeth Berkley, who only two years before had starred in the lighthearted and chaste teen sitcom Saved by the Bell. The film won seven Razzie Awards, a record at that time, and received 13 nominations, a record that still stands. It received an additional award at the 20th Golden Raspberry Awards, where it was awarded Worst Picture of the Decade. Kenneth Turan of the Los Angeles Times called it, "a film of thunderous oafishness that gives adult subject matter the kind of bad name it does not need or deserve".{{cite web|url=https://rottentomatoes.com/m/showgirls/reviews/#page=2&sort=source |title=Showgirls – Movie Reviews |website=Rotten Tomatoes |access-date=March 5, 2014}} Michael Dequina of TheMovieReport.com also criticized the film, claiming that it was "the best bad filmmaking Hollywood has to offer".{{cite web|url=http://themoviereport.com/movierpt1.html#showgirls |title=The Movie Report Archive, Volume 1 |work=TheMovieReport.com |access-date=November 18, 2013}} Adam White wrote in The Independent that it was "the worst movie ever made" but also a masterpiece.{{cite web|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/features/showgirls-elizabeth-berkley-paul-verhoeven-you-dont-nomi-documentary-a9407086.html |title=Showgirls: The remarkable resurrection of the worst movie ever made |work=The Independent|last=White|first=Adam|date=March 18, 2020|access-date=April 17, 2020}} Stephen Lynch of the Knight Ridder/Tribune similarly named it the worst movie ever made, calling it "so bad it may be brilliant".{{cite news |title=Critic picks worst movies of all time |first=Stephen|last=Lynch|url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=398&dat=20011003&id=oGhOAAAAIBAJ&pg=6912,5443994|newspaper=Bartow Press |date=October 3, 2001 |access-date=June 12, 2014}} Various sources have since included Showgirls in their respective lists of the worst films ever made, including: Rotten Tomatoes, Empire, Screen Rant, Vanity Fair, and Flavorwire. Showgirls was also featured in Michael Sauter's The Worst Movies of All Time as well as The Official Razzie Movie Guide. Despite being a critical failure and failing at the box office initially, Showgirls found success as a camp cult film, particularly among the LGBT community, but whether the film was intended to be satirical remains subject to debate. On the home video market, the film was MGM's most profitable release for years.

{{Main|The Scarlet Letter (1995 film){{!}}The Scarlet Letter (1995 film)}}

A "freely adapted" version of the 1850 romantic novel by Nathaniel Hawthorne, directed by Roland Joffé and starring Demi Moore and Gary Oldman.{{cite web|url=http://www.orlandosentinel.com/os-xpm-1995-10-13-9510110375-story.html|title='Scarlet Letter' is Untrue to the Hawthorne Tale|last=Boyar|first=Jay|date=October 13, 1995|website=Orlando Sentinel|access-date=November 1, 2020}} The film met with universally negative reviews{{cite web|url=https://www.deseretnews.com/top/705/7/The-Scarlet-Letter-20-best-selling-books-that-werent-as-acclaimed-as-film-adaptations.html|title=20 best-selling books that weren't as acclaimed as film adaptations|last=Purdy|first=Alicia|date=May 26, 2012|website=Deseret News|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131213092221/https://www.deseretnews.com/top/705/7/The-Scarlet-Letter-20-best-selling-books-that-werent-as-acclaimed-as-film-adaptations.html|access-date=September 26, 2018|archive-date=December 13, 2013}} and was a box-office bomb, grossing $10.4 million against a production budget of $46 million.{{cite web|title=The Scarlet Letter (1995)|url=https://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=scarletletter.htm|website=Box Office Mojo|access-date=November 12, 2020}} Multiple critics named the film the worst of 1995.{{cite web|url=https://www.deseret.com/1995/12/22/19211366/best-worst-movies-of-1995|title=Best & Worst Movies of 1995|last=Hicks|first=Chris|date=December 22, 1995|website=Deseret News|access-date=November 1, 2020}}{{cite web|url=https://www.sfgate.com/entertainment/article/So-Bad-You-Can-t-Hate-Them-Demi-Moore-s-3017177.php|title=So Bad You Can't Hate Them|last=LaSalle|first=Mick|author-link=Mick LaSalle|date=December 30, 1995|website=San Francisco Chronicle|access-date=November 6, 2020}}{{cite news|url=https://www.thecoast.ca/halifax/worst-film/BestOf?oid=10515293|title=Worst Film 1995|website=The Coast|access-date=November 6, 2020}}

Chris Hicks of the Deseret News argued that its deviation from the source material represents "Hollywood's arrogance in its purest form". The Washington Post{{'}}s Amy E. Schwartz reported that the "nutty" film was described by numerous reviewers as the worst they had ever seen.{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1995/10/24/even-hawthorne-would-have-laughed/765e3169-7ffb-4b1f-934d-5b2c3c1468f5/|title=Even Hawthorne Would Have Laughed|last=Schwartz|first=Amy E|date=October 24, 1995|newspaper=The Washington Post|access-date=November 1, 2020}} Kevin Williamson of National Review observed a "combination of awfulness and inexplicability", and claimed that "any objective and authoritative analysis will reveal that the worst film ever made is Demi Moore's version of The Scarlet Letter".{{cite web|url=https://www.nationalreview.com/media-blog/i-hate-disagree-my-betters-kevin-d-williamson/|title=I Hate to Disagree with My Betters...|last=Williamson|first=Kevin|date=February 19, 2009|website=National Review|access-date=November 1, 2020}} Sadie Trombetta of Bustle wrote that it "has earned an almost permanent spot on every 'Worst Movie of All Time' list",{{cite web|url=https://www.bustle.com/articles/121305-9-books-that-should-never-have-been-made-into-movies|title=9 Books That Should Never Have Been Movies|last=Trombetta|first=Sadie|date=November 5, 2015|website=Bustle|access-date=November 1, 2020}} while author Libby Fischer Hellmann noted that it is "widely cited as the worst film adaptation ever made".{{cite web|url=https://www.libbyhellmann.com/5-great-books-movie-stinkers/|title=5 Great Books That Were Movie Stinkers|last=Hellmann|first=Libby Fischer|author-link=Libby Fischer Hellmann|date=August 7, 2016|website=LibbyHellmann.com|access-date=November 6, 2020}} The film was nominated for seven Golden Raspberry Awards, winning "Worst Remake or Sequel". Furthermore, Roger Ebert placed the film on his "most hated" list.

{{Main|Bio-Dome{{!}}Bio-Dome}}

The 1996 comedy film Bio-Dome focuses on two moronic stoner best friends, played by Pauly Shore and Stephen Baldwin, who accidentally get trapped inside of the Bio-Dome owned by Henry Gibson, a hermetically sealed ecological system, after mistaking it for a mall while looking for a bathroom.

For MTV News, Eric Snider wrote in 2008 that "nothing can account for...the movie Bio-Dome, which is–and I do not make this assertion lightly–the worst crime ever perpetrated against humanity throughout all of recorded history". Snider went on to call it "quite bad" and "certainly one of the worst comedies" he had ever seen, criticizing Pauly Shore's performance as unfunny and the film's writing as stupid.{{cite web |last=Snider |first=Eric |title=Eric's Bad Movies: Bio-Dome (1996) |url=http://www.mtv.com/news/2759537/erics-bad-movies-bio-dome-1996/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220710185442/http://www.mtv.com/news/2759537/erics-bad-movies-bio-dome-1996/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=July 10, 2022 |website=MTV News |access-date=July 10, 2022 |language=en |date=June 19, 2008}} Syfy Wire{{'}}s Cassidy Ward described Bio-Dome as "one of the best-worst movies of all time", stating that its plot "strains credulity", while Jon O'Brien of Inverse called it "one of the worst movies ever made" and wrote that it "has nothing to offer but unconvincing pratfalls...tumbleweed one-liners...and some unashamed sexism, too".{{cite web |last=Ward |first=Cassidy |title=Bio-Dome was a stoner movie flop, but Biosphere 2 was a real experiment |url=https://www.syfy.com/syfy-wire/bio-dome-biosphere-2-real-science-movie |website=Syfy Wire |access-date=July 10, 2022 |date=January 13, 2021}}{{cite web |last=O'Brien |first=Jon |title=How a '90s sci-fi comedy became one of the worst movies ever made |url=https://www.inverse.com/entertainment/bio-dome-movie-science-fiction-anniversary |website=Inverse |access-date=July 10, 2022 |language=en |date=January 17, 2021}} It was described as "almost unwatchably awful" and "a baffling piece of work" by Charles Bramesco of Uproxx, who wrote that it was a "perennial contender in the battle for the title of Worst Movie Ever".{{cite web |last=Bramesco |first=Charles |title=20 Years Later, The Pure Stupidity Of 'Bio-Dome' Remains Unmatched |url=https://uproxx.com/movies/bio-dome-20th-anniversary/ |website=Uproxx |access-date=July 10, 2022 |date=January 12, 2016}} The A.V. Club{{'}}s Nathan Rabin wrote, "Critics and audiences alike found the Bio-Dome to be an abomination unto the Lord, an affront to the gods of cinema, and also a very bad movie, bad enough to be considered the gold standard of crapitude in Shore's oeuvre," noting that it had the lowest Metacritic score of any movie, with 1 out of 100.{{cite web |author1=Rabin, Nathan|author1-link=Nathan Rabin |title=I Watched This On Purpose: Bio-Dome |url=https://www.avclub.com/i-watched-this-on-purpose-bio-dome-1798214668 |website=The A.V. Club |access-date=July 10, 2022 |language=en-us |date=August 27, 2008}} Bio-Dome was named one of the worst movies of the 1990s in a poll conducted by RiffTrax.{{cite web |last=Smith |first=Jodi |title=Rifftrax Compiles The 20 Worst Movies Of The 90s: Disagree With Them, Won't You? |url=https://www.pajiba.com/seriously_random_lists/rifftrax-compiles-the-20-worst-movies-of-the-90s.php |website=Pajiba |access-date=July 10, 2022 |date=January 21, 2015}}

Kylie Minogue, who starred in the film as oceanographer Petra von Kant, called appearing in the film the worst decision of her career. For his performance in the movie, Shore won the Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actor at the 17th Golden Raspberry Awards, tying with Tom Arnold for his performance in Big Bully.{{cite web |title=In film, these were worst of 1996 |url=https://www.tampabay.com/archive/1997/03/25/in-film-these-were-worst-of-1996/ |website=Tampa Bay Times |access-date=July 10, 2022 |language=en |date=March 25, 1997}}

{{Main|Batman & Robin (film){{!}}Batman & Robin (film)}}

File:Btrjpg.jpg superhero sequel Batman & Robin (1997) was named the worst movie ever made by Empire.]]

Batman & Robin is a superhero film based on the DC character Batman and is the fourth and final installment of the Burton/Schumacher Batman film series. It is directed by Joel Schumacher and stars George Clooney as Batman/Bruce Wayne, Arnold Schwarzenegger as Mr. Freeze, Uma Thurman as Poison Ivy, Chris O'Donnell as Robin/Dick Grayson, Alicia Silverstone as Batgirl/Barbara Wilson and Michael Gough as Alfred Pennyworth. This film was largely criticized for its toyetic and camp approach, and Mr. Freeze's approach and one-line jokes.

{{as of|2017|June}}, review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes reports that 11% of critics have given the film a positive review based on 89 reviews, certifying it "Rotten" with an average rating of 3.7/10, and the critics' consensus: "Joel Schumacher's tongue-in-cheek attitude hits an unbearable limit in Batman & Robin, resulting in a frantic and mindless movie that's too jokey to care much for."{{cite web |url = https://rottentomatoes.com/m/1077027-batman_and_robin/ |title = Batman & Robin | website=Rotten Tomatoes |publisher=Fandango |access-date = July 6, 2019}} By comparison Metacritic collected an average score of 28/100, based on 21 reviews.{{cite web |url = https://metacritic.com/movie/batman-robin |title = Batman & Robin (1997): Reviews | work=Metacritic |publisher=CBS Interactive |access-date=April 17, 2010}} Michael J. Nelson, of Mystery Science Theater 3000 fame, wrote of the movie in his book, Movie Megacheese, "Batman & Robin is not the worst movie ever. No, indeed. It's the worst thing ever. Yes, it's the single worst thing that we as human beings have ever produced in recorded history."{{Cite book |url = https://archive.org/details/mikenelsonsmovie00nels |url-access = registration |page = [https://archive.org/details/mikenelsonsmovie00nels/page/79 79] |title = Mike Nelson's Movie Megacheese |publisher = Harper Collins |isbn = 978-0-380-81467-1 |last1 = Nelson |first1 = Michael J |date = June 20, 2000}} Batman & Robin also came in first in an Empire poll of the 50 worst films ever. Joel Schumacher apologized to disappointed fans on the 2005 DVD release of Batman & Robin.{{cite AV media |people = Joel Schmacher |title = "Making of" Introduction | medium = DVD |publisher = Warner Bros. |year = 2005 }} In 2021, Clooney stated that he refused to let his wife watch the film, saying, "There are certain films I just go, 'I want my wife to have some respect for me'".{{Cite web |last=Sharf |first=Zack |date=2021-10-05 |title=George Clooney Refuses to Show 'Batman & Robin' to His Wife: 'I Want Her to Have Respect for Me' |url=https://www.indiewire.com/features/general/george-clooney-refuses-show-wife-batman-robin-1234669477/ |access-date=2023-07-13 |website=IndieWire |language=en-US}} Clooney however would reprise his role as Bruce Wayne from the film in 2023's The Flash.[https://variety.com/2023/film/news/george-clooney-refuses-batman-movies-the-flash-cameo-1235844045/ George Clooney Says There’s ‘Not Enough Drugs in the World’ to Get Him to Play Batman Again, Even After ‘The Flash’ Cameo - Variety]

{{Main|Day and Night (1997 film){{!}}Day and Night (1997 film)}}

The French romance film Le Jour et la Nuit was directed by philosopher Bernard-Henri Lévy. It follows a French author who fled to Mexico for a quiet life and an actress who is willing to seduce him to get a part in a film adapted from one of his books. Before its release, Le Jour et la Nuit was heavily promoted in many French newspapers and magazines.Jade Lindgaard and Xavier De La Porte, The Imposter: BHL in Wonderland (Translated by John Howe) London; Verso, 2012. {{ISBN|978-1-84467-748-1}} (p. 48-9). When the film premiered at the Berlin International Film Festival in 1997, hundreds of journalists walked out of the screening and those that stayed ridiculed it.{{cite news |last=Dahlburg |first=John-Thor |title=The Film That Plato Didn't Make |newspaper=Los Angeles Times |date=March 28, 1997 |url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1997-03-28-ca-42798-story.html |access-date=October 14, 2013}} Following its release, Le Jour et la Nuit was harshly criticized by the French media, with overwhelmingly negative reviews appearing in publications such as Libération, Le Monde and Le Nouvel Observateur. The film also did poorly commercially, with only 73,147 seats for Le Jour et la Nuit having been sold two months after its release. L'Humanité called it an "Absolute debacle" and Michel Houellebecq referred to it as the "most preposterous film in history".{{cite web |last=Adams |first=Tim |title=Public Enemies by Michel Houellebecq and Bernard-Henri Lévy – review |url=https://www.theguardian.com/books/2011/dec/08/public-enemies-houellebecq-levy-review |website=The Guardian |access-date=May 10, 2023 |date=December 8, 2011}}{{cite news |title=The volcano a molehill |newspaper=L'Humanité |date=February 19, 1997 |url=https://www.humanite.fr/node/154931 |access-date=October 14, 2013}} Le Jour et la Nuit was considered the worst French film since 1945 by film magazine Cahiers du cinéma, and its status as the "worst film in history" was discussed by the French version of Slate.{{cite web|url=http://www.slate.fr/story/27925/pire-film-du-monde-bhl-concurrence |title="Le Jour et la Nuit", pire film de l'histoire ... Vraiment? |date=October 3, 2010 |work=Slate|access-date=December 19, 2013}} Likewise, English-language film site /Film described its status as "one of the worst foreign language movies ever made", and filmmaker Claude Chabrol selected it as one of the worst movies ever made.{{cite web |last=Thiellement |first=Pacome |title=Le film que BHL n'a pas compris (pourtant c'est son préféré !) |url=https://www.blast-info.fr/emissions/2023/le-film-que-bhl-na-pas-compris-pourtant-cest-son-prefere-6fAP-oVYSFuCqF6zPuXNlA |website=Blast le souffle de l’info |access-date=May 10, 2023 |language=fr}}{{cite web |last=Pearson |first=Ben |title=BBC Polls Critics, Releases 100 Greatest Foreign Films List |url=https://www.slashfilm.com/562029/bbc-polls-critics-releases-100-greatest-foreign-films-list/ |website=/Film |access-date=May 10, 2023 |date=October 30, 2018}} An original documentary, Anatomy of a Massacre, was released with the Le Jour et la Nuit DVD, and focused on its intense negative reception and failure.{{cite news |title=BHL et la critique ciné, c'était le jour et la nuit |newspaper=20 Minutes |date=October 11, 2010 |url=http://www.20minutes.fr/medias/607145-media-bhl-critique-cine-jour-nuit |access-date=October 14, 2013}}

{{Main|The Avengers (1998 film){{!}}The Avengers (1998 film)}}

An adaptation of the popular 1960s British TV series of the same name, The Avengers starred Ralph Fiennes as John Steed and Uma Thurman as Emma Peel, with Sean Connery as their antagonist, Sir August de Wynter. It was directed by Jeremiah S. Chechik. The Avengers began to receive negative publicity after Warner Bros., the film's distributor, refused to allow any early press-screenings for movie reviewers.{{cite news |author-link=Godfrey Cheshire |first=Godfrey |last=Cheshire |url=https://variety.com/1998/film/reviews/the-avengers-sputtering-spies-steed-and-peel-lack-appeal-1200454676/ |title=The Avengers – Sputtering Spies: Steed and Peel Lack Appeal |work=Variety |date=August 17, 1998 |access-date=June 27, 2022}} After early test screenings, The Avengers was heavily edited by the studio.{{cite news |first=Janet |last=Maslin |author-link=Janet Maslin |url=https://www.nytimes.com/library/film/081598avengers-film-review.html |title='The Avengers': Shh! They're Trying Not to Be Noticed |newspaper=The New York Times |date=August 15, 1998 |access-date=January 27, 2015 }} On its release, The Avengers was savaged by film critics, with the Birmingham Post stating "The Avengers is being slated by critics as the worst film ever made" and adding that one reviewer had joked the film was such a "turkey" that the makers should have handed distribution to the poultry chain Bernard Matthews.{{cite news |title=Film-The Avengers |newspaper=The Birmingham Post |date=August 19, 1998 }} Several reviewers disparaged The Avengers for lacking the wit and excitement of its source material.{{cite magazine |url=http://www.radiotimes.com/film/cjykx/the-avengers |title=Review: The Avengers |first=Alan |last=Jones |magazine=Radio Times |access-date=January 27, 2015 }}{{cite news |url=http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/entertainment/not-so-excellent-avengers-insults-old-series-awful-film-debases-tv-inspiration-article-1.807212 |title=Not So Excellent Avengers |first=David |last=Bianculli |newspaper=New York Daily News |date=August 18, 1998 |access-date=January 27, 2015 }} Janet Maslin strongly criticized The Avengers: "With pseudo-suave repartee that would make Austin Powers blush and with so many shades of Howard the Duck that one scene depicts man-size pastel teddy bears sitting around a conference table, it's a film to gall fans of the old TV series and perplex anyone else. I can't remember another Friday morning show where I heard actual cries of "Ugh!" on the way out the door" and finished her review with, "At a pared-down, barely rational 100 minutes, The Avengers is short but not short enough."

David Bianculli said, "This Avengers film is so horrendously, painfully and thoroughly awful, it gives other cinematic clunkers like Ishtar and Howard the Duck a good name." Alan Jones in The Radio Times stated "The cult 1960s TV series gets royally shafted by Hollywood in this stunningly designed blockbuster that's stunningly awful in every other department ... Terrible special effects and zero chemistry between Fiennes and Thurman make this notorious disaster a total waste of everyone's time and energy." The Avengers also shared a Razzie Award for "Worst Remake or Sequel" with the 1998 adaptations of Psycho and Godzilla at the 19th Golden Raspberry Awards. Total Film magazine later voted Fiennes and Thurman in The Avengers as "The Worst Movie Double Act Of All Time".{{cite news |title=Double disasters make it to top of the flops |newspaper=The Western Mail |location=Cardiff |date=December 1, 2003 }} The film also appeared on Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films.

{{Main|Fatal Deviation{{!}}Fatal Deviation}}

Fatal Deviation is often credited as being the first martial arts film to be filmed in Ireland. It stars martial artist James Bennett and Michael Graham, who is best known for being a member of the boy band Boyzone. The Irish Post and Den of Geek write that it is a mainstay of worst film lists.{{cite web|url=https://www.denofgeek.com/movies/fatal-deviation/looking-back-at-fatal-deviation-irelands-only-martial-arts-film|title=Meet Fatal Deviation, Ireland's only martial arts film|last=Lines|first=Craig|date=November 4, 2015|access-date=June 7, 2019|work=Den of Geek|archive-date=June 7, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190607211617/https://www.denofgeek.com/movies/fatal-deviation/looking-back-at-fatal-deviation-irelands-only-martial-arts-film|url-status=dead}} Luke McKinney of Cracked.com called it the worst film ever made, writing: "There are so many things about making a movie that Jimmy doesn't know, that you could replace film school with this movie alone--just screening it once for students and asking them to list all the things it did wrong. Anyone who doesn't write 'everything' instantly fails."{{cite web |url= http://www.cracked.com/article_18632_irelands-only-kung-fu-movie-is-worst-film-ever-made.html|title=Ireland's Only Kung Fu Movie (Is The Worst Film Ever Made)|last=McKinney|first=Luke|date=July 3, 2010|access-date=March 9, 2019|work=Cracked.com}} The Irish Post named it the worst Irish film of all time,{{cite web |url= https://www.irishpost.com/entertainment/definitive-ranking-7-worst-irish-films-time-158594|title= A definitive ranking of the 7 worst Irish films of all-time|first=Aidan|last=Lonergan|date= August 16, 2018|access-date= March 9, 2019|work= The Irish Post}} the Irish Independent wrote that it is "regarded as one of the worst films ever made" and Comic Book Resources called it "one of the worst commercial movies ever made".{{cite web |url= https://www.independent.ie/lifestyle/westlife-what-next-26785226.html|title=Westlife: what next?|date= October 22, 2011|access-date=March 9, 2019|work=Irish Independent}}{{cite web |last=Boehm |first=Simon |title=Ireland's First Martial Arts Movie Is Gloriously Bad |url=https://www.cbr.com/fatal-deviation-ireland-martial-arts-movie-cult-classic/ |website=Comic Book Resources |access-date=July 13, 2022 |date=March 15, 2021}} Entertainment.ie placed it on its list of "10 So Bad They're Good Movies You Need To See Before You Die" and it was covered in Paste{{'}}s Bad Movie Diaries column.{{cite web |url= https://entertainment.ie/cinema/movie-news/10-so-bad-theyre-good-movies-you-need-to-see-before-you-die-227463/|title=10 So Bad They're Good Movies You Need To See Before You Die|last=Lloyd|first=Bryan|access-date=March 9, 2019|work=entertainment.ie|date=March 12, 2018}}{{cite web |url= https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2018/07/bad-movie-diaries-fatal-deviation-1998.html |title=Bad Movie Diaries: Fatal Deviation (1998)|last1=Vorel|first1=Jim|last2=Lowe|first2=Kenneth|access-date=June 7, 2019|work=Paste|date=July 31, 2018}}

{{Main|Parting Shots{{!}}Parting Shots}}

The British black comedy Parting Shots was the last film directed by Michael Winner. It starred rock musician Chris Rea as a man who, after being told he has only six months to live, begins murdering people who have wronged him. Andrew Collins took a very negative view of the film: "Parting Shots ... is going to set the course of British film-making back 20 years. It is not only the worst British film produced in this country since Carry On Emmannuelle (quite a feat in itself), it is a thoroughbred contender for the crown of Worst Film Ever Made."Andrew Collins, "How to Shoot a Real Turkey" The Observer, March 28, 1999. Observer Screen, p.6. In an interview about the film, Charlotte O'Sullivan, the Independent's film editor, claimed Parting Shots was "the worst film I've ever seen". O'Sullivan also criticized it for glorifying vigilantism: "It's Michael Winner and you know, he doesn't have any sense of irony. He seems to be saying it is okay to go and kill people.""Winner's Turkey has a bad aftertaste". The Sunday Herald, May 2, 1999 (p.7) The journalist Miles Kington later claimed "Parting Shots ... was directed by Michael Winner and despite the glittering cast, was possibly the worst film ever made."Miles Kingston, "One or two plots to occupy my declining years". The Independent, May 3, 2005, (p.30). I. Q. Hunter listed Parting Shots as one of the candidates for "the Worst British film ever made". Parting Shots was also featured in a poll of Empire magazine readers' "50 Worst Movies Ever" poll.

{{Main|The Underground Comedy Movie{{!}}The Underground Comedy Movie}}

The Underground Comedy Movie is based on a cable access show from 1988. Director and lead actor Vince Offer constructed the film out of a series of tasteless, lowbrow skits (including Gena Lee Nolin loudly using the restroom and a superhero named Dickman who dresses in a giant penis costume and defeats his enemies by squirting them with semen). In 1999, Offer filed a suit against 20th Century Fox and the co-directors of There's Something About Mary (1998), Bobby and Peter Farrelly, claiming that 14 scenes in Mary were stolen from his film.{{cite magazine|url=https://ew.com/article/1999/06/11/underground-comedy-movie-2/|title=Movie Review Underground Comedy Movie |date=June 11, 1999|access-date=December 3, 2019|magazine=Entertainment Weekly|last=Gleiberman|first=Owen}} The Farrellys released this statement: "We've never heard of him, we've never heard of his movie, and it's all a bunch of baloney."{{cite magazine|url=https://ew.com/article/1998/10/16/monitor-269/|title=Monitor: Celebrity news for October 16, 1998|last1=Karger|first1=Dave|first2=Suna|last2=Chang|date=October 16, 1998|magazine=Entertainment Weekly|access-date=December 3, 2019}} Lawrence Van Gelder of The New York Times referred to it as a "wretched film" and stated that "The Underground Comedy Movie stands as a monument to ineptitude and self-delusion."{{cite news|url=https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/library/film/052899comedy-film-review.html|title=Lawrence Van Gelder's review of The Underground Comedy Movie |last=Van Gelder |first=Lawrence |author-link=Lawrence Van Gelder |work=The New York Times|date=May 28, 1999 |access-date=December 19, 2013}} Rod Dreher of the New York Post said it "may be the least amusing comedy ever made".{{cite news|last=Dreher|first=Rod|author-link=Rod Dreher|title='Comedy' is Really Buried by Its Trash|work=New York Post|date=May 28, 1999}} Dave Shulman of L.A. Weekly described it as a "serious contender for the single worst movie ever made",{{cite web |title=Critic's Corner S-Z |url=http://thestinkers.com/critics3.html#Underground%20Comedy%20Movie |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010412233933/http://thestinkers.com/critics3.html#Underground%20Comedy%20Movie |url-status=dead |archive-date=April 12, 2001 |website=Stinkers Bad Movie Awards |access-date=July 9, 2022}} while Stinkers Bad Movie Awards co-founder Mike Lancaster said that it was the worst film that he had ever paid to see. Nathan Rabin covered the film in his column detailing terrible films and stated that: "nothing I've covered for this column was quite as soul-crushingly, brain-meltingly terrible as ... The Underground Comedy Movie."{{cite web|url=https://www.nathanrabin.com/happy-place/2018/9/4/this-looks-terrible-the-underground-comedy-movie-1999|title=This Looks Terrible! The Underground Comedy Movie (1999)|last=Rabin|first=Nathan|author-link=Nathan Rabin|work=nathanrabin.com|date=September 4, 2018|access-date=February 23, 2019}} Thom Bennett at Film Journal International, wrote "Anyone offended by unbearably bad films, jokes that are not funny and wasting 90 minutes of their lives is, as promised, guaranteed to be offended. In fact, to even call this mess a comedy is giving it far too much credit", and "The Underground Comedy Movie may well be the worst film I have ever seen."{{cite web|url=http://www.filmjournal.com/filmjournal/esearch/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000697847|title=Underground Comedy Movie, The|last=Bennett|first=Thom|work=Film Journal International|access-date=March 7, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131105184223/http://www.filmjournal.com/filmjournal/esearch/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000697847|archive-date=November 5, 2013|url-status=dead}} Writing in Central Western Daily, Peter Young said, "I am pretty sure that I can declare this The Worst Film I Have Ever Seen."{{cite web|url=http://www.centralwesterndaily.com.au/story/1386763/comedy-film-best-kept-underground/|title=Comedy film best kept underground|last=Young|first=Peter|work=Central Western Daily|date=March 26, 2013|access-date=March 6, 2018}}

{{Main|Battlefield Earth (film){{!}}Battlefield Earth (film)}}

File:John Travolta Battlefield Earth signing.jpg during Battlefield Earth{{'s}} promotional tour]]

Battlefield Earth is based on the first half of L. Ron Hubbard's 1982 novel of the same name, and stars John Travolta, Barry Pepper and Forest Whitaker. Although a sequel covering the second half of the book was planned, the panning from critics, poor box-office performance, and financial ruin of Franchise Pictures killed off such plans. It was criticized for a poor script, hammy acting, overuse of Dutch angles, repetitive dialogue, and several inconsistencies and plot holes. The movie's producer, Franchise Pictures, was later forced out of business after it emerged that it had fraudulently overstated the film's budget by $31 million. It has a 3% rating at Rotten Tomatoes,{{Rotten Tomatoes|qid=Q811023|title=Battlefield Earth}} where it is included in the top 100 worst-reviewed movies of all time.{{cite web |url=https://rottentomatoes.com/guides/worst_of_the_worst/ |title=The worst of the worst pictures |website=Rotten Tomatoes |date=September 21, 2009 |access-date=January 17, 2011 |archive-date=November 23, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101123212257/http://www.rottentomatoes.com/guides/worst_of_the_worst/ |url-status=dead }} Roger Ebert predicted that the film, "for decades to come will be the punch line of jokes about bad movies".{{cite news |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/battlefield-earth-2000 |work=Chicago Sun-Times |title=Battlefield Earth movie review (2000) |date=May 12, 2000 |access-date=October 11, 2020 |last=Ebert |first=Roger |author-link=Roger Ebert}} Ebert also wrote, "The director, Roger Christian, has learned from better films that directors sometimes tilt their cameras, but he has not learned why". It is also on his "most hated" list.{{cite news|url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/eberts-most-hated |title=Ebert's Most Hated |work=RogerEbert.com |date=August 11, 2005 |last=Ebert |first=Roger |author-link=Roger Ebert |access-date=January 17, 2011}} Nathan Rabin covered the film as part of his My World of Flops column for The A.V. Club, calling it "a fiasco that occupies a distinguished place high atop the pantheon of widely reviled crap" and said, "A legendary disaster well before it finished completion, Battlefield Earth hit theaters with a "Kick Me" sign on it so massive it could be detected from outer space."{{cite web |url=https://www.avclub.com/my-year-of-flops-case-file-66-battlefield-earth-1798212540 |title=My Year OF Flops Case File #66: Battlefield Earth |last=Rabin |first=Nathan |author-link=Nathan Rabin |website=The A.V. Club |date=September 11, 2007 |language=en-US |access-date=January 27, 2019}}

It won seven Golden Raspberry Awards, including Worst Picture and Worst Screen Couple (John Travolta and "anyone on the screen with him"). In 2005, an eighth Razzie (for Worst "Drama" of Our First 25 Years) was awarded to the film,{{cite web |title=Awards for Battlefield Earth |work=IMDb |url=https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0185183/awards |access-date=June 27, 2008}}{{better source needed|date=March 2023}} and in 2010 it won a ninth Razzie at the 30th Golden Raspberry Awards for Worst Picture of the Decade.{{cite web |title=Razzie Noms for Worst Picture of the Decade |work=Razzies.com |url=http://www.razzies.com/history/09NomPOD.asp |access-date=February 2, 2010}} Listing the film as one of the worst decisions in movie history, Rolling Stone quipped that, "If Earth sticks around long enough for the Golden Raspberry Awards to hand out a "worst movie of the century" at their 2100 ceremony, it'll probably win that, too." It won more Razzies than any film in the history of the awards at the time,{{cite web |url=http://www.razzies.com/history/07release.asp |title=Golden Raspberry Award Foundation |work=Razzies.com |access-date=November 18, 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130321103846/http://www.razzies.com/history/07release.asp |archive-date=March 21, 2013}} until Jack and Jill surpassed its record with 10 wins in 2012.

The movie appeared on Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films,{{cite web |url=https://www.metacritic.com/browse/movies/score/metascore/all?sort=asc |title=Best Movies of All Time |work=Metacritic |publisher=CBS Interactive |access-date=April 17, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230215194915/https://www.metacritic.com/browse/movies/score/metascore/all?sort=asc |archive-date=February 15, 2023 |url-status=dead}} and is on the Movie Review Query Engine's (MRQE) 50 Worst Movies list,{{cite web |url=https://www.mrqe.com/lists/50_worst_movies |title=50 Worst Movies |work=Movie Review Query Engine |access-date=April 17, 2019}} as well as worst film lists from Screen Rant, Vanity Fair, Flavorwire, Digital Trends and the New York Daily News. Empire named it the second worst movie ever made after Batman & Robin and The Register listed it as the worst movie ever made.{{cite web |title=Battlefield Earth ruled worst film Ever |work=The Register|last=Haines |first=Lester |url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/04/20/worst_movie/ |access-date=April 5, 2018 |date=April 20, 2012}} Pepper and Whitaker both expressed regret for their involvement in Battlefield Earth, while film screenwriter J. David Shapiro later apologized for making "the suckiest movie ever".{{cite web |last=Dembrow |first=Dylan |title=15 Things You Didn't Know About The Disastrous Battlefield Earth |url=https://screenrant.com/battlefield-earth-movie-worst-trivia-facts-secrets/ |website=Screen Rant |date=January 28, 2018 |access-date=December 5, 2020}}

{{main|Titanic: The Legend Goes On{{!}}Titanic: The Legend Goes On}}

Titanic: The Legend Goes On (also known as Titanic, mille e una storia, Titanic: La leggenda continua and Titanic: The Animated Movie) is an Italian animated mockbuster about the sinking of the {{RMS|Titanic}}. It features a similar romantic storyline to James Cameron's 1997 Titanic film, but also has a number of talking animals (most notably, a rapping dog). Reviews condemned the quality of the animation and criticized the plot for being insensitive to the memory of the victims of the Titanic.

Total Film named Titanic: The Legend Goes On as "officially the worst film ever made", after it topped a list of the 66 worst films ever. An article from Collider also described it as one of the worst films ever made, but notes that it "[lacks] the cult following that other bad films often acquire," stating: "Titanic: The Legend Goes On is too heinous for such fond pleasures."{{cite web |last=Mattson |first=Kelcie |title=I Watched the Animated Titanic Musical So You Don't Have To |url=https://collider.com/titanic-animated-movie/ |website=Collider |access-date=May 3, 2024 |language=en |date=September 11, 2023}} Critic Tim Brayton said that "It is one of the most surreally bad films I have ever encountered", adding: "For sheer mesmerising grotesqueness, there's almost nothing I can name that beats it, and no fan of bad movies can say that their life is complete till they've been exposed to it."{{cite web |title=Titanic: The Animated Movie |url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/titanic_the_animated_movie |website=Rotten Tomatoes |access-date=January 28, 2022 |language=en}}{{cite web |last=Brayton |first=Tim |title=Titanic: The Legend Goes On... (2000) – Movie Review |url=https://www.alternateending.com/2020/05/titanic-the-legend-goes-on-2000.html |website=Alternate Ending |access-date=January 28, 2022 |date=May 20, 2020}} Total Film also included the film on a list of the worst kids' movies, describing it as being "widely considered one of the worst animated films ever made",{{cite web|url=https://www.gamesradar.com/50-worst-kids-movies/|title=50 Worst Kids Movies|last=Winning|first=Joshua|work=Total Film|publisher=GamesRadar|date=November 8, 2011|access-date=July 8, 2017 }} while Spanish film magazine Fotogramas selected it as one of the 20 worst films ever made.{{cite web |last=Rosado |first=Ricardo |title=Las 20 peores películas de la historia del cine: un homenaje |url=https://www.fotogramas.es/noticias-cine/g19447838/20-peores-peliculas-historia/?slide=19 |website=Fotogramas |access-date=January 26, 2022 |language=es-ES |date=October 1, 2020}} Screen Rant included it on a list of the 12 worst animated films of all time, and it topped a Showbiz Cheat Sheet list of the top 10 worst animated films ever, with author Will Roberts commenting that "[any] list of the worst animated films of all time begins with ... Titanic: The Legend Goes On".{{cite web|url=https://www.cheatsheet.com/entertainment/worst-animated-movies.html/|title=10 Worst Animated Movies of All Time|work=Showbiz Cheat Sheet|last=Roberts|first=Will|date=January 15, 2017|access-date=January 28, 2022|archive-date=January 22, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220122103918/https://www.cheatsheet.com/entertainment/worst-animated-movies.html/|url-status=dead}} In 2012, Titanic: The Legend Goes On became the lowest-rated film on IMDb's Bottom 100 list.{{cite web |last=Renzetti |first=Jackie |title=Not Your Cameron's "Titanic" |url=https://mndaily.com/223181/arts-entertainment/not-your-camerons-titanic/ |newspaper=The Minnesota Daily |date= April 16, 2014|access-date=January 26, 2022}}

{{Main|Freddy Got Fingered{{!}}Freddy Got Fingered}}

The comedy film Freddy Got Fingered stars Tom Green, who also wrote and directed it, featuring largely gross-out and shock humor similar to that featured in The Tom Green Show. In the film, Green stars as a 28-year-old slacker and cartoonist who falsely accuses his father of child molestation when he questions his son's life goals. Freddy Got Fingered received overwhelmingly negative reviews, with CNN critic Paul Clinton declaring it "quite simply the worst movie ever released by a major studio in Hollywood history."{{cite news |last=Clinton |first=Paul |author-link=Paul Clinton |title='Freddy Got Fingered' is a bad, bad film |work=CNN|date=April 19, 2001 |url=http://archives.cnn.com/2001/SHOWBIZ/Movies/04/19/Freddy.Fingered/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061230080518/http://archives.cnn.com/2001/SHOWBIZ/Movies/04/19/Freddy.Fingered/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=December 30, 2006 |access-date=October 11, 2020}} Warren Epstein of The Gazette described Freddy Got Fingered as "the worst movie ever made".{{cite news |url=https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-5965104.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180319151405/https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-5965104.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=March 19, 2018 |title=Task of fingering worst movies of all time a real handful|first=Warren |last=Epstein |newspaper=The Gazette |location=Colorado Springs, CO|date=April 26, 2001}} A review in The Washington Post said: "If ever a movie testified to the utter creative bankruptcy of the Hollywood film industry, it is the abomination known as Freddy Got Fingered."{{cite news |last=Hughes |first=Scott |title=The worst movie ever? |work=The Guardian |date=April 26, 2001 |url=https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2001/apr/26/artsfeatures2 |access-date=February 9, 2011 |location=London}} Roger Ebert included the film on his "most hated" list, gave it zero out of four stars and wrote: "This movie doesn't scrape the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn't the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn't below the bottom of the barrel. This movie doesn't deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence with barrels."{{cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |author-link=Roger Ebert |title=Freddy Got Fingered movie review (2001) |work=Chicago Sun-Times |date=April 20, 2001 |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/freddy-got-fingered-2001 |access-date=October 11, 2020}}

Freddy Got Fingered was nominated for eight awards at the 2001 Razzies, and won for Worst Picture, Worst Actor, Worst Director, Worst Screenplay, and Worst On-Screen Couple.{{cite news |title=Freddy heads Razzies nominations |work=BBC News |date=February 11, 2002 |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/1814018.stm |access-date=February 9, 2011}}{{cite news |last=Waters |first=Darren |title=Green gets fingered for Razzies |work=BBC News |date=March 23, 2002 |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/entertainment/2002/oscars_2002/1889555.stm |access-date=February 9, 2011}} Razzies founder John J. B. Wilson called it "offensive, stupid and obnoxious" and said it had "no redeeming value". Green accepted his awards in person, traveling to the ceremony in a white Cadillac, wearing a tuxedo and rolling out his own red carpet to the presentation. The movie has an 11% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.{{cite web|url=https://rottentomatoes.com/m/freddy_got_fingered/ |title=Freddy Got Fingered |website=Rotten Tomatoes |access-date=November 18, 2013}} In 2010, the film was nominated at the 30th Golden Raspberry Awards for Worst Picture of the Decade, though it lost to Battlefield Earth.{{cite news |last=Masters |first=Tim |title=Sandra Bullock wins worst actress award at Razzies |work=BBC News |date=March 7, 2010 |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8554035.stm |access-date=February 9, 2011}} Freddy Got Fingered also appeared on Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films, was featured in Empire{{'s}} list of the 50 Worst Movies Ever poll,{{cite web |url = https://www.empireonline.com/movies/features/50-worst-movies-ever-2/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200201223813/https://www.empireonline.com/movies/features/50-worst-movies-ever-2/ |title = The 50 Worst Movies Ever | work=Empire |date=February 4, 2010 |archive-date=February 1, 2020 |access-date = March 17, 2014}} and is on the MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list.

{{Main|Glitter (film){{!}}Glitter (film)}}

File:Mariah Carey 2005.jpg for the film in 2001; she was consequently bought out of her $100 million recording contract with Virgin Records for approximately $28 million.{{cite web|url=http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=CSTB&p_theme=cstb&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0F115C6D597A4809&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM|title=Mariah Carries On With Record Deal, Recovery|last=Zwecker|first=Bill|work=Chicago Sun-Times |date=January 22, 2002|access-date=June 16, 2011}}{{Cite web|url=http://www.razzies.com/forum/2001-razzie-nominees-winners_topic351.html|date=December 4, 2005|access-date=June 30, 2012|work=Golden Raspberry Awards|title=2001 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners"|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303171013/http://www.razzies.com/forum/2001-razzie-nominees-winners_topic351.html|archive-date=March 3, 2016|url-status=dead}}]]

Starring Mariah Carey{{Cite web|url=https://screenrant.com/worst-movies-rated-negative-10-reddit/|title=10 Movies That Are A Negative 10 Out Of 10, According To Reddit|first=Lukas|last=Shayo|date=November 12, 2022|website=ScreenRant}} in the lead role as an aspiring singer in 1980s New York City, the romantic musical drama Glitter was intended to be her breakthrough role but was a critical failure and a box-office bomb. Hindustan Times claimed that Glitter "was slammed by almost all critics for being the worst film ever".{{cite news |title=Mariah Carey's flop movie 'Glitter' almost killed her |newspaper= Hindustan Times |date=November 4, 2009 |quote=Carey, 39, had to be hospitalised due to an emotional breakdown after Glitter was slammed by almost all critics for being the worst film ever.}} Fade In stated that "Glitter isn't just one of the worst music-themed films ever — it's one of the worst films ever made, period."{{cite web|title=The 30 worst Vanity Projects of all time|url=http://fadeinonline.com/the-30-worst-vanity-projects-of-all-time.html|website=Fadeinonline.com|date=June 2, 2013|publisher=Fade In|access-date=August 23, 2015|archive-date=September 8, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150908144455/http://fadeinonline.com/the-30-worst-vanity-projects-of-all-time.html|url-status=dead}} Author Bob McCann wrote in Encyclopedia of African American Actresses in Film and Television that it's "rightfully in the running as one of the worst films ever made".{{cite book |first=McCann |last=Bob |title=Encyclopedia of African American Actresses in Film and Television |location=New York |publisher=Performing Arts |year=2009 |isbn=9780786458042 |page=70 }} News.com.au,{{cite news|url=https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/movies/absolute-stinkers-the-15-worst-movies-of-all-time/news-story/0023085ea96fa3f2c581778a070f1308|title=Absolute stinkers: The 15 worst movies of all time|last=Stephenson|first=Alison|date=November 13, 2013|access-date=April 17, 2019|website=News.com.au}} Hi,{{cite web|title=Worst Films Ever: Glitter|url=http://www.hihimag.com/hi/ents/film/2013/07/worst-films-ever-glitter/|website=Hi|access-date=August 23, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924030115/http://www.hihimag.com/hi/ents/film/2013/07/worst-films-ever-glitter/|archive-date=September 24, 2015|url-status=dead}} Flavorwire, Screen Rant, Vanity Fair, Metacritic, and Empire are amongst those who have listed it as one of the worst films ever made.

Glitter received six Razzie nominations, and Carey won for Worst Actress.{{cite news|title=Tom Green, Estella Warren are Razzie winners |url=https://www.ew.com/article/2002/03/25/tom-green-estella-warren-are-razzie-winners |newspaper=Entertainment Weekly |access-date=August 23, 2015 |first=Brian |last=Hiatt |date=March 25, 2002}} It was also featured in The Official Razzie Movie Guide, and in 2005, it was nominated for "Worst Musical of Our First 25 Years", but lost to From Justin to Kelly. In an interview in 2010, Carey stated that she believed that the film's failure at the box office was largely due to the soundtrack being released the same day as the September 11 attacks.{{cite web|title=Carey Blames 9/11 For 'Glitter' Flop|work=Digital Spy|publisher=Hachette Filipacchi Médias|url=http://www.digitalspy.com/movies/news/a199302/carey-blames-911-for-glitter-flop.html|last=Reynolds|first=Simon|date=January 26, 2010|access-date=August 23, 2015}} It has a 6% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 87 reviews.{{cite web|title=Glitter (2001)|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/glitter|website=Rotten Tomatoes|access-date=June 3, 2017}}

{{Main|Swept Away (2002 film){{!}}Swept Away (2002 film)}}

File:Madonna by David Shankbone cropped.jpg received a Golden Raspberry Award for her performance in the 2002 remake of Lina Wertmüller's Oscar-nominated Swept Away, making her the most awarded actress in the institution's history.{{Cite web|date=February 21, 2012|title=All-Time Razzie Cham-Peens LIST – The Official Razzie® Forum|url=http://www.razzies.com/forum/alltime-razzie-champeens-list_topic5372.html|access-date=September 3, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120221214230/http://www.razzies.com/forum/alltime-razzie-champeens-list_topic5372.html|archive-date=February 21, 2012|publisher=Golden Raspberry Awards}}]]

A remake of a 1974 Italian film of the same name, the romantic comedy film Swept Away was directed by Guy Ritchie and starred his then-wife Madonna and Adriano Giannini. It received overwhelmingly negative reviews, with most of the criticism going towards Madonna's bad acting, the original film being considered superior and the remake being considered just a star vehicle for Madonna.{{Cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/1410000/Madonna-and-Guy-swept-away-on-tide-of-criticism.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/1410000/Madonna-and-Guy-swept-away-on-tide-of-criticism.html |archive-date=January 11, 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|title=Madonna and Guy swept away on tide of criticism|last=Poole|first=Oliver|work=The Daily Telegraph|date=October 11, 2002|access-date=December 28, 2018|language=en-GB|issn=0307-1235}}{{cbignore}} Rex Reed of The New York Observer said: "If there is one thing worse than a Guy Ritchie movie, it's a Guy Ritchie movie with Madonna in it."{{Cite web|url=https://observer.com/2002/10/not-swept-away-by-madonna/|title=Not Swept Away By Madonna|date=October 21, 2002|work=The New York Observer|language=en|access-date=December 28, 2018}} Newsday critic John Anderson said, "New ways of describing badness need to be invented to describe exactly how bad it is."{{Cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1116774-swept_away/reviews/?page=2&sort=|title=Swept Away – Movie Reviews |website=Rotten Tomatoes|publisher=Fandango|access-date=December 28, 2018}} Joe Queenan of The Guardian discussed the movie in an article on what makes a movie the worst of all time and said, "[...] Showgirls has a certain campy allure that grows a bit each time I see it. Madonna's Swept Away doesn't; it seems more amateurish on each viewing, like a morass that starts out as a quagmire, then morphs into a cesspool and finally turns into a slime pit on the road to its ultimate destination in the bowels of Hell."{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/2008/mar/21/1|title=Joe Queenan on the worst movie of all time|last=Queenan|first=Joe|author-link=Joe Queenan (author)|date=March 21, 2008|work=The Guardian|access-date=December 28, 2018|language=en-GB|issn=0261-3077}} Julie Burchill, also from The Guardian, selected it as her pick for the worst film ever made.

Swept Away was also a box-office bomb; against a $10 million budget, it grossed $598,645 in the United States and around $437,875 from foreign territories for a worldwide total gross of $1,036,520.{{Cite web|url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=sweptaway.htm|title=Swept Away (2002)|website=Box Office Mojo|access-date=December 28, 2018}} It received five awards at the 23rd Golden Raspberry Awards and became the first film to win both Worst Picture and Worst Remake or Sequel. At the 25th Golden Raspberry Awards, it was nominated for Worst "Drama" of Our First 25 Years, and at the 30th Golden Raspberry Awards, it was nominated for Worst Picture of the Decade, but 'lost' to Battlefield Earth at both ceremonies. Empire ranked it #20 in its list of "The 50 Worst Movies Ever", and After Ellen ranked it #7 in its list of "The worst movies ever to grace the screen".{{Cite web|url=https://www.afterellen.com/movies/58522-the-worst-movies-ever-to-grace-the-screen|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190422135335/https://afterellen.com/movies/58522-the-worst-movies-ever-to-grace-the-screen|title=The worst movies ever to grace the screen|date=September 8, 2009|website=After Ellen.com|access-date=January 30, 2019|archive-date=April 22, 2019}}

{{Main|The Master of Disguise{{!}}The Master of Disguise}}

The comedy film The Master of Disguise was produced in part by Adam Sandler and stars Dana Carvey as Pistachio Disguisey, an undercover Italian waiter who must save his father Fabbrizio (James Brolin) from the evil Devlin Bowman (Brent Spiner) by using his inherent skills in disguise. Although the film was a box office success, it received scathing reviews from critics upon its release, many of which pointed out its sophomoric plot, unfunny humor (in particular, its flatulence gags) and disguises that would clearly not be recognized by children (such as Tony Montana from Scarface). Many critics also pointed out the short running time, consisting of 72 minutes of the film itself and over ten minutes of end credits juxtaposed with outtakes, including two post credit scenes. Roger Ebert gave it one star out of four, claiming, "The movie is a desperate miscalculation. It gives poor Dana Carvey nothing to do that is really funny, and then expects us to laugh because he acts so goofy all the time."{{cite web|last=Fragoso |first=Sam |url=https://rogerebert.com/reviews/the-master-of-disguise-2002 |title=The Master Of Disguise Movie Review (2002) |work=Chicago Sun-Times |date=August 2, 2002 |access-date=March 5, 2014}} Alan Morrison, writing for Empire, proclaimed that The Master of Disguise was "the worst film ever made: a film about idiots, made by idiots, for idiots", while Matthew Turner of ViewLondon remarked, "This is a serious contender for the title of The Worst Film Ever Made."{{cite web|url=http://www.viewlondon.co.uk/films/the-master-of-disguise-film-review-3673.html |title=The Master of Disguise Film Review – The Master of Disguise Film Pictures, The Master of Disguise Film Trailer |work=Viewlondon.co.uk |date=October 16, 2006 |access-date=March 5, 2014}} The film holds a 1% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 104 reviews,{{cite web|url=https://rottentomatoes.com/m/master_of_disguise/ |title=The Master of Disguise |website=Rotten Tomatoes |access-date=July 24, 2014}} and is featured on the site's list of the top 100 worst-reviewed films of all time. It also appears on Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films, and is on the MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list. A cameo appearance by Bo Derek landed her a nomination for Worst Supporting Actress at the 23rd Golden Raspberry Awards, but she lost to Madonna for Die Another Day.

{{Main|Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever{{!}}Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever}}

The action film Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever stars Antonio Banderas and Lucy Liu as opposing secret agents. Critics panned it, generally regarding it as having no redeeming features, not even the unintentional comedic value normally associated with bad films. They variously described the film as "A picture for idiots", "Boring to an amazing degree", "A fine achievement in stupidity and dullness", "Dreadful", "[Giving] new meaning to the word incoherent", and "bad on just about every level". One critic suggested an alternative title as "Simplistic: Bullets Vs. Humans".{{cite web |title=David Hunter Movie Reviews |url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/critics/david-hunter/movies |website=Rotten Tomatoes |access-date=June 21, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211217224538/https://www.rottentomatoes.com/critics/david-hunter/movies |archive-date=December 17, 2021 |url-status=live}}

Stephen Hunter of The Washington Post wrote, "You could run this film backward, soundtrack included, and it would make no less sense."{{cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A42115-2002Sep19 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110628231426/http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A42115-2002Sep19 |url-status=dead |archive-date=June 28, 2011 |last=Hunter |first=Stephen |author-link=Stephen Hunter |title=Goosey Lucy: 'Ballistic,' a Lot of Noisy Dumdum |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=September 20, 2002 |access-date=January 17, 2011}} Roger Ebert called the movie "a chaotic mess, overloaded with special effects and explosions, light on continuity, sanity and coherence."{{cite news |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/ballistic-ecks-vs-sever-2002 |first=Roger |last=Ebert |title=Ballistic: Ecks Vs. Sever movie review (2002) |date=September 20, 2020 |access-date=October 11, 2020}} In addition to being lambasted by critics, it was a disaster financially, recouping just over $19.9 million of its $70 million budget. In March 2007, Rotten Tomatoes ranked it #1 among "The Worst of the Worst" movie list, with 108 "rotten" reviews and no "fresh" ones.{{cite web |url=https://rottentomatoes.com/features/special/2007/wotw/?r=1&mid=1116131 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090303154232/https://rottentomatoes.com/features/special/2007/wotw/?r=1&mid=1116131 |title=ROTTEN TOMATOES: The Worst of the Worst Pictures |work=Rotten Tomatoes |archive-date=March 3, 2009 |access-date=October 11, 2020}} Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever remains the worst reviewed film on Rotten Tomatoes, as it is at the top of their 100 Worst Films of All time list. Mental Floss has also nominated it as the worst movie ever made and Ebert included it in his "most hated" list.

{{Main|Ben and Arthur{{!}}Ben and Arthur}}

A low-budget 2002 American romantic drama film about the titular gay couple who come into conflict with Arthur's religious brother, Ben and Arthur was written, directed, produced, edited, and scored by Sam Mraovich, who also played the character Arthur. Ben and Arthur received strong criticism (especially from the LGBT community) for its low budget and poor plotting. BuzzFeed described it as the "worst gay movie of all time".{{cite news|url=https://www.buzzfeed.com/louispeitzman/the-man-behind-the-worst-gay-movie-of-all-time-doesnt-care-i |title=The Man Behind The "Worst Gay Movie Of All Time" Doesn't Care If You Hate It |first=Louis |last=Peitzman |publisher=BuzzFeed |date=September 5, 2014 |access-date=March 15, 2018}} The gay popular culture site Queerty described Ben and Arthur as "unintelligible" and ended its review by calling it the "Worst. Movie. Ever."{{cite magazine |url=http://www.queerty.com/ben-arthur-the-worst-gay-movie-of-all-time-20090220 |title=Ben & Arthur: The Worst Gay Movie of All Time |first=Japhy |last=Grant |magazine=Queerty |date=February 20, 2009 |access-date=January 25, 2015 }} The gay movie review site Cinemaqueer likewise stated: "Ben and Arthur is so terrible that it has awoken the dormant Bette Davis in me. It is so painfully bad that it wouldn't even make good fodder on Mystery Science Theater 3000. This just might possibly be the worst movie I have ever seen ... Unless you get a kick out of mocking bad films, avoid this one at all costs."{{cite web |url=http://www.cinemaqueer.com/review%20pages/9deadgayguysben.html |title=9 dead gay guys/ben & arthur |first=Michael D. |last=Klemm |website=Cinemaqueer |date=July 2004 |access-date=January 25, 2015 }} Michael Adams, reviewing the film for his book Showgirls, Teen Wolves, and Astro Zombies, describes it thus: "Ben & Arthur is as over-the-top insane as it is ludicrously executed ... the production values, from biscuits on plates comprising the main course of a candlelit dinner to a church literally having a cardboard cross and a cartoon Jesus on the wall, are as bad as anything I've seen."{{sfn|Adams|page=301}} A Rotten Tomatoes article placed Ben and Arthur on their list of "Films So Bad They're Unmissable", saying "If Tommy Wiseau's The Room is the over-wrought, melodramatic and self-pitying heterosexual camp classic of choice, then Sam Mraovich's Ben & Arthur is its gay equivalent." Rotten Tomatoes also stated "Every scene, every line, every hissy fit is simultaneously hilariously amateur and hysterically fever-pitched."{{cite web |url=https://editorial.rottentomatoes.com/article/25-movies-so-bad-theyre-unmissable/|title=25 Movies So Bad They're Unmissable |last=Adams |first=Michael |website=Rotten Tomatoes |publisher=Fandango |date=January 30, 2010 |access-date=January 25, 2015 }} Total Film ranked Ben and Arthur at No. 58 in their list of the 66 worst films of all time.{{cite web|url=https://www.gamesradar.com/66-worst-movies-of-all-time/|title=66 Worst Movies Of All Time|date=February 15, 2012 |work=Total Film|publisher=GamesRadar|access-date=September 30, 2013 }} Mraovich finds Ben and Arthur{{'}}s placement among the canon of worst films to be a blessing as the film has received more attention than he ever anticipated.

{{Main|From Justin to Kelly{{!}}From Justin to Kelly}}

The romantic-comedy musical From Justin to Kelly stars Kelly Clarkson and Justin Guarini,{{Cite web|url=https://www.nathanrabin.com/happy-place/2021/3/23/adventures-of-pluto-nash-and-13-other-critically-maligned-flops-that-bombed-because-they-fucking-suck|title=Adventures of Pluto Nash and 13 Other Critically Maligned Flops That Bombed Because They Fucking Suck|website=Nathan Rabin's Happy Place|date=March 23, 2021 }} the winner and runner-up, respectively, of the first season of American Idol. The film was a critical and commercial disaster, earning only $4.9 million at the North American box office and achieving a 10% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 63 reviews.{{cite web|url=https://rottentomatoes.com/m/from_justin_to_kelly/ |title=From Justin To Kelly |website=Rotten Tomatoes |access-date=July 24, 2014}} Josh Tyrangiel of Time Magazine described From Justin to Kelly as "a monstrous Idol movie musical that in the most generous light is the worst film so far this century",{{Cite web |url=https://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,1156616,00.html |title=Miss Independent |first=Josh |last=Tyrangiel |work=Time Magazine |date=February 5, 2006}} while The Free Lance–Star referred to it as "the world's worst movie"."Dishing it!" The Free Lance–Star, July 9, 2003, (p.56). Nathan Rabin, reviewing the film for his "My Year of Flops" series, stated, "All films require suspension of disbelief. From Justin To Kelly requires something more like a temporary lobotomy. Nothing about the main characters or their relationships makes sense."{{Cite web |url=https://www.avclub.com/contest-winning-case-file-150-from-justin-to-kelly-1798218477 |title=Contest-Winning Case File #150: From Justin To Kelly |first=Nathan |last=Rabin |work=The A.V. Club |date=November 11, 2009 |access-date=27 February 2024}} It won a special Razzie—"Governor's Award – Distinguished Under-Achievement in Choreography"—at the 24th Golden Raspberry Awards."Gigli Takes Razzie Dishonors as Year's Worst", Reading Eagle, March 1, 2004 (p.20) It was nominated for eight additional Razzies (including a second special award, "Worst Excuse for an Actual Movie"), and a year later it won for Worst "Musical" of Our First 25 Years. Total Film, Screen Rant and Digital Trends included From Justin to Kelly on their worst film lists. In a later interview, Clarkson expressed regret over From Justin to Kelly, stating she only did it because she was contractually obligated to do so: "I knew when I read the script it was going to be real, real bad, but when I won, I signed that piece of paper, and I could not get out of it."

{{Main|The Room{{!}}The Room}}

File:Tommy-Wiseau-1.jpg in a promotional picture for the 2003 cult classic The Room]]

The independently produced The Room, about an amiable banker whose friends betray him one by one, has been called "the Citizen Kane of bad movies" by some critics.{{cite magazine |url=https://ew.com/article/2008/12/12/crazy-cult-room/|title=The Crazy Cult of 'The Room'|date=July 20, 2009 |magazine=Entertainment Weekly |access-date=December 3, 2019|first=Clark |last=Collis}}{{cite news |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/features/the-couch-surfer-it-may-be-sublimely-rubbish-but-the-room-makes-audiences-happy-1752708.html |title=The Couch Surfer: 'It may be sublimely rubbish, but The Room makes audiences happy' |date=July 20, 2009 |work=The Independent |access-date=November 23, 2009 |location=London}}{{cite magazine |url=https://ew.com/article/2008/12/30/the-room-postsc/ |title='The Room': Worst movie ever? Don't tell that to its suddenly in-demand star |last=Collis |first=Clark |date=December 30, 2008 |magazine=Entertainment Weekly |access-date=December 3, 2019}} The Guardian, Vox, The Washington Post, ABC Australia, and Süddeutsche Zeitung called it the worst film ever made.{{Cite news|last=Rose|first=Steve|url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/filmblog/2009/sep/10/cinema-the-room-cult|title=Is this the worst movie ever made?|date=September 9, 2009|work=The Guardian|access-date=March 18, 2020|language=en-GB|issn=0261-3077}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.vox.com/culture/2017/12/2/16720012/the-room-tommy-wiseau-backstory-explained|title=The Room: how the worst movie ever became a Hollywood legend as bizarre as its creator|last=Romano|first=Aja|date=December 2, 2017|website=Vox|language=en|access-date=March 18, 2020}}{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/the-room-is-the-worst-movie-ever-made-but-ive-seen-it-a-hundred-times--without-irony/2017/11/30/6475b096-d3ae-11e7-b62d-d9345ced896d_story.html|title=Perspective {{!}} 'The Room' is the worst movie ever made, but I've seen it a hundred times — without irony|last=Park|first=Gene|date=November 30, 2017|newspaper=Washington Post|language=en|access-date=March 18, 2020}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-05/the-room-tommy-wiseau-worst-film-ever-made-endures/9223516|title=The worst movie ever made, explained|last=Donoughue|first=Paul|date=December 5, 2017|website=ABC News|language=en-AU|access-date=March 18, 2020}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.sueddeutsche.de/kultur/schlechtester-film-aller-zeiten-wie-eine-atombombe-die-jeden-moment-explodiert-1.1680571|title="The Room", schlechtester Film aller Zeiten|last=Graff|first=Bernd|website=Süddeutsche.de|date=May 28, 2013 |language=de|access-date=March 18, 2020}} Ignatiy Vishnevetsky of The A.V. Club called it "the greatest bad movie of our time" and said, "The Room is nearly an anti-film—an inane and unintentionally surreal soap opera, filled with non-sequiturs, confused characters, and gratuitous, anatomically incorrect sex."{{Cite web|url=https://www.avclub.com/the-disaster-artist-is-a-lousy-tribute-to-the-greatest-1820787988|title=The Disaster Artist is a lousy tribute to the greatest bad movie of our time|last=Vishnevetsky|first=Ignatiy|website=The A.V. Club|date=November 30, 2017 |access-date=January 4, 2019}} Though the film's star, writer, producer, and director Tommy Wiseau has claimed it is a black comedy and its numerous flaws are intentional, other actors involved in the production have denied this, saying that Wiseau intended it as a melodramatic romance.{{cite news |title=Cult hit (Even M is a recycled sex scene) The Room is best worst film |url=http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/film/article6067024.ece |newspaper= The Times |first=Christopher |last=Goodwin |date=April 12, 2009 |location=London |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110615143230/http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/film/article6067024.ece |archive-date=2011-06-15}}

The Room has been noted for its bizarre and non-sequiturial dialogue, protracted sex scenes, various subplots that are inadequately resolved or simply disappear altogether (most notably, a character announces that she has been diagnosed with breast cancer, but this is never mentioned again throughout the entire film), and infamous use of green-screen for "outdoor" rooftop scenes. It made its broadcast premiere as an April Fools' Day special in 2009 on Cartoon Network's Adult Swim block, edited down from its original R rating to a TV-14/DSLV rating; it would prove so popular the network continued to air the film on April 1 as a tradition for several years, to the point the 2012 prank for the network consisted of playing the first few minutes before suddenly cutting off for an unannounced one-night revival of their Toonami block, with block host T.O.M first greeting the audience as Wiseau's character does, declaring "Oh, hai, Adult Swim". The day after its appearance, its DVD became the top-selling independent film on Amazon.com. In June 2010, The Room started playing at the American Film Institute Silver Theatre in Silver Spring, Maryland.{{cite news |last=Siblo |first=Matt |url=http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/articles/39009/tommy-wiseau-and-the-room-at-afi-silver-theatre-friday |title=Tommy Wiseau and The Room at AFI Silver Theatre: Friday, June 11 through Sunday, June 13 |newspaper=Washington City Paper |date=June 12, 2010 |access-date=January 17, 2011 |archive-date=June 28, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110628230640/http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/articles/39009/tommy-wiseau-and-the-room-at-afi-silver-theatre-friday |url-status=dead }} Mystery Science Theater 3000 alumni Michael J. Nelson, Kevin Murphy, and Bill Corbett produced an audio commentary track to accompany the movie through their site RiffTrax.com. In 2013, the book The Disaster Artist, written by Greg Sestero and Tom Bissell, was published; the book is Sestero's memoir of his involvement in the production of the movie. The book was adapted into the Oscar-nominated film of the same name,{{Cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNtvTr4hADk|title="Call Me by Your Name" wins Best Adapted Screenplay | 90th Oscars (2018)|date=April 17, 2018 |via=YouTube}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.oscars.org/oscars/ceremonies/2018|title=The 90th Academy Awards | 2018|website=Oscars.org | Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences|date=April 15, 2019 }} directed by and starring James Franco as Wiseau (winning a Best Actor Golden Globe Award for his performance){{Cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_81Peb7Atc4|title=James Franco Wins Best Actor, Musical or Comedy at the 2018 Golden Globes|date=January 7, 2018 |via=YouTube}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.goldenglobes.com/film/disaster-artist|title=Disaster Artist, The|website=goldenglobes.com}} and his brother Dave Franco as Sestero. A remake starring Bob Odenkirk was set to be released in June 2023 to coincide with the 20th anniversary of the film's release, but was delayed.

{{Main|Gigli{{!}}Gigli}}

The Martin Brest movie Gigli features Jennifer Lopez and Ben Affleck, with appearances by Al Pacino and Christopher Walken.{{Cite web|url=https://www.theringer.com/2017/6/19/16039450/the-50-best-good-bad-movies-a9add81b5b7f|title=The 50 Best Good Bad Movies|author=|date=June 19, 2017|website=The Ringer}} Gigli was originally a black comedy with no romantic subplot, but the producers demanded script rewrites throughout filming, hoping to cash in on the Lopez–Affleck romance that was then big news in celebrity-watching publications such as Us and People. This film cost $54 million to make but grossed only $6 million, making it one of the biggest box-office bombs of all time. The Times gave the film a zero, making Gigli the lowest-scored film review in the publication's history at that time. The Wall Street Journal stated that it was "[t]he worst movie—all right, the worst allegedly major movie—of our admittedly young century",{{cite web |url=http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/08/01/a-look-back-at-gigli-the-infamous-bennifer-starring-film-on-its-10th-anniversary.html |title=A Look Back at 'Gigli,' the Infamous Bennifer-Starring Film, on Its 10th Anniversary |website=The Daily Beast |date=August 1, 2013 |access-date=September 20, 2013}} while Roger Friedman of Fox News claimed it was "[t]he worst movie ever made".{{cite news |url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/2003/07/30/gigli-is-up/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921105143/http://www.foxnews.com/story/2003/07/30/gigli-is-up/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=September 21, 2013 |title=The 'Gigli' Is Up |publisher=Fox News|date=July 30, 2003 |access-date=September 20, 2013}} It was also the winner of seven Razzies (including 2005's Worst "Comedy" of Our First 25 Years),{{cite web |url=http://www.razzies.com/asp/directory/25thWinners.htm |title=Halle's Feline Fiasco Catwoman and President's Fahrenheit Blunders Tie for 25th Razzie Dis-Honors |work=Razzies.com |access-date=March 7, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110315210719/http://www.razzies.com/asp/directory/25thWinners.htm |archive-date=March 15, 2011 |url-status=dead }} and in 2010 the film was nominated at the 30th Golden Raspberry Awards for "Worst Picture of the Decade". It is in Rotten Tomatoes' Top 100 worst-reviewed movies of the 2000s, where it has a 6% rating.{{Rotten Tomatoes|qid=Q260533|title=Gigli}} AfterEllen ranked Gigli number 1 in its list of the worst films of all time. Empire, Screen Rant, and Digital Trends also listed it as one of the worst films ever made.

{{Main|Sex Lives of the Potato Men{{!}}Sex Lives of the Potato Men}}

The 2004 British sex comedy Sex Lives of the Potato Men is about the sex lives of a group of potato delivery men in Birmingham. The film received strongly hostile reviews from the British media. Reviews claimed Sex Lives of the Potato Men was unfunny, disgusting, and depressing.{{Cite web |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131012015015/http://news.sky.com/story/248096/critics-pan-worst-film-ever |title=Critics Pan "Worst Film Ever"|work=Sky News|date=February 23, 2004 |archive-date=October 12, 2013 |url=http://news.sky.com/story/248096/critics-pan-worst-film-ever}} Writing in the Daily Mirror, film critic Kevin O'Sullivan called Sex Lives of the Potato Men "one of the worst films ever made".Kevin O'Sullivan, The Daily Mirror, March 5, 2004, (p.14) Novelist Will Self, in his review for The Evening Standard, called Sex Lives of the Potato Men "mirthless, worthless, toothless, useless". The Times reviewer James Christopher dubbed Sex Lives of the Potato Men "one of the two most nauseous films ever made ... a masterclass in film-making ineptitude". The Sunday Express film critic, Henry Fitzherbert, also strongly condemned the film: "Sex Lives is so awful it left me slack-jawed in disbelief ... it must be one of the worst British comedies."Henry Fitzherbert, The Sunday Express, February 22, 2004 (p.67). Catherine Shoard, in a critique in The Sunday Telegraph, stated "It's hard to know what to say to this – it's like finding the right words at a nasty accident ... Sex Lives of the Potato Men is probably the lewdest Brit-com since Confessions of a Window Cleaner, and certainly the worst." Shoard also described the film as "Less a film than an appetite suppressant."Catherine Shoard, The Sunday Telegraph, February 22, 2004. Alan Morrison in the Scottish Daily Record described it as "puerile smut of the very worst kind ... Sex Lives of the Potato Men should never have been made"."Review:Sex Lives of the Potato Men. Daily Record, February 20, 2004. The Irish Times later noted that "Sex Lives of the Potato Men attracted some of the worst reviews in living memory."Donald Clarke, "Out of Office:Interview with Mackenzie Crook". "The Ticket" Magazine, The Irish Times, April 25, 2008, (p.6). The Birmingham Post described Sex Lives of the Potato Men as "quite possibly the worst film ever made",Mike Davies, The Birmingham Post, April 24, 2008 (p. 13). while The Independent on Sunday stated that the film was "a strong contender for the title of worst film of all time".Matthew Bell, Independent on Sunday, February 8, 2009, (p. 42). It was also featured in Empire{{'}}s 50 Worst Movies Ever poll. The film has a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, based on 14 reviews.{{cite web|url=https://rottentomatoes.com/m/the-sex-lives-of-the-potato-men/ |title=Sex Lives Of The Potato Men on Rotten Tomatoes |website=Rotten Tomatoes |access-date=January 12, 2015}}

{{Main|Catwoman (film){{!}}Catwoman (film)}}

File:Halle Berry in Hamburg, 2004.jpg, Germany. Berry would accept the Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actress for her performance in person where she described the film as a "piece of shit, godawful movie".{{Cite AV media |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-7s_yeQuDg |title=Halle Berry accepts Razzie Award {{!}} official Razzie YouTube channel}}]]

Nominally based on the DC Comics character, Catwoman stars Halle Berry as the title character. The film was the result of various rewrites by a total of 28 different screenwriters, though only four were credited after arbitration with the Writers Guild of America. It has a 9% rating at Rotten Tomatoes,{{Rotten Tomatoes|qid=Q115760|title=Catwoman}} and was declared "arguably the worst superhero film ever made" by the Orlando Sentinel. Jean Lowerison of the San Diego Metropolitan said in her review that Catwoman "goes on my 'worst' list for the year, and quite possibly for all time".{{cite web |first=Jean |last=Lowerison |url=http://sandiegometro.archives.whsites.net/reel/index.php?reelID=713 |title='Catwoman' The cat and the Bratt |publisher=San Diego Metropolitan |access-date=January 17, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110724130824/http://sandiegometro.archives.whsites.net/reel/index.php?reelID=713 |archive-date=July 24, 2011 }} Sadaf Ahsan of the National Post went further, calling it the worst movie ever made.{{cite news |url=https://nationalpost.com/entertainment/movies/writer-of-the-worst-movie-of-all-time-agrees-that-it-was-indeed-the-worst-movie-of-all-time |title=Writer of the worst movie of all time agrees that it was, indeed, the worst movie of all time |work=National Post |last=Ahsan |first=Sadaf |date=February 27, 2018 |access-date=March 19, 2018}} The Village Voice summed up reviews of the film under the title "Me-Ouch".{{cite news |first=Janet |last=Kim |url=http://www.villagevoice.com/2004-07-20/film/me-ouch/1 |title=Me-Ouch – Page 1 – Movies – New York |newspaper=Village Voice |date=July 20, 2004 |access-date=January 17, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110629162951/http://www.villagevoice.com/2004-07-20/film/me-ouch/1/ |archive-date=June 29, 2011 }} The movie was the winner of four Razzies for Worst Picture, Worst Actress, Worst Director (Pitof) and Worst Screenplay. Berry arrived at the ceremony to accept her Razzie in person (with her Best Actress Oscar for Monster's Ball in hand), saying: "First of all, I want to thank Warner Bros. Thank you for putting me in a piece of shit, god-awful movie ... It was just what my career needed." Roger Ebert included it in his "most hated" list, being joined by Screen Rant and Flavorwire, who also included it in their worst film lists.

{{Main|Daniel – Der Zauberer{{!}}Daniel – Der Zauberer}}

The German film Daniel – Der Zauberer was directed by Ulli Lommel and stars pop singer and ex-Deutschland sucht den Superstar contestant Daniel Küblböck, who appeared as a fictionalized version of himself. The Daily Dot wrote that it is considered to be the worst German film,{{cite web|url=https://www.dailydot.com/upstream/worst-movies-on-imdb/|title=Diving into the worst-rated movies on IMDb|date=December 11, 2015|work=The Daily Dot|access-date=March 14, 2018}} while n-tv said it was "possibly the worst movie ever made".{{cite web|url=https://www.n-tv.de/leute/Filmemacher-Ulli-Lommel-erliegt-Herzinfarkt-article20165706.html|title=Filmemacher Ulli Lommel erliegt Herzinfarkt|date=December 4, 2017|publisher=n-tv|access-date=March 14, 2018|language=de}} The website filmstarts.de states that Daniel – Der Zauberer was "unbearable for non-fans of Küblböck", adding that "the performances of the actors were some of the worst in the history of German cinema", and alleging that Ulli Lommel and producer Peter Schamoni had "damaged their reputation".{{cite web|url=http://www.filmstarts.de/kritiken/37527-Daniel-Der-Zauberer.html |title=Daniel – Der Zauberer – Film 2004 |work=Filmstarts.de |access-date=November 18, 2013}} Years after its release, Küblböck admitted that, in retrospect, "[Y]ou have to say this is the worst movie of all time really".{{cite web|url=http://www.fr-online.de/wiesbaden/ex-dsds-star-daniel-kueblboeck-ist-jetzt-wiesbadener,1472860,3195326.html|title=Daniel Küblböck ist jetzt Wiesbadener|date=February 15, 2009|work=Frankfurter Rundschau|access-date=September 13, 2013|language=de}}

The film also performed extremely poorly at the box office, having only 13,834 viewers altogether, which led to it being withdrawn from screening at most cinemas within the first week,{{Cite book|last=Astinus|first=A. D.|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lZxpEAAAQBAJ&q=daniel+der+zauberer+13.834&pg=PT9|title=Die neun schlechtesten Filme der Kinogeschichte: Die ganze Welt der schlechtesten Kinofilme – Von Daniel, der Zauberer bis Kartoffelsalat – Nicht fragen!|date=September 30, 2015|publisher=neobooks|isbn=978-3-7380-4159-0|language=de}} with RP Online referring to it as a "super-flop".{{Cite web|url=https://rp-online.de/kultur/musik/kueblboeck-als-super-flop_aid-16831093|title=Kinos setzen "Daniel der Zauberer" ab: Küblböck als Super-Flop|website=RP ONLINE|date=September 17, 2004|language=de|access-date=October 4, 2019}} It is consistently listed at IMDb's Bottom 100 list and became the lowest-rated film at one point.{{cite web|url=http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/worst-movies-made-gallery-1.3678697|title=The worst movies ever made|last=Lisi|first=Brian|work=New York Daily News|date=December 5, 2017 |access-date=March 14, 2018}} Total Film listed it as the third worst film of all time, after Superbabies: Baby Geniuses 2 and the direct-to-video animated mockbuster Titanic: The Legend Goes On, while Fotogramas and New York Daily News included it on their worst film lists. Filmstarts.de ranked it number 4 in its list of the 25 worst movies ever made,{{Cite web|url=http://www.filmstarts.de/nachrichten/18494996.html?page=22|title=Die 25 schlechtesten Filme aller Zeitenstarts|work=Filmstarts.de |date=July 31, 2015 |access-date=March 8, 2019}} and on the German movie rating site Moviepilot.de, it is the lowest-rated film with an average rating of 0.4/10.{{Cite web|url=https://www.moviepilot.de/filme/schlechteste|title=Die schlechtesten Filme {{!}} moviepilot.de|website=moviepilot.de|language=de|access-date=March 8, 2019|archive-date=September 11, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180911002428/https://www.moviepilot.de/filme/schlechteste|url-status=dead}} In 2016, it was showcased on SchleFaZ, a German television show featuring the worst films ever made.{{cite web |title=Schlechteste Filme aller Zeiten - Küblböck-Film läuft im SchleFaZ-Programm |url=https://www.moviepilot.de/news/schlechteste-filme-aller-zeiten-kublbock-film-lauft-im-schlefaz-programm-168856 |website=moviepilot.de |access-date=March 4, 2024 |date=March 23, 2016 |language=de}}

{{Main|Superbabies: Baby Geniuses 2{{!}}Superbabies: Baby Geniuses 2}}

The family-oriented comedy Superbabies: Baby Geniuses 2 was the last film directed by Bob Clark (of A Christmas Story fame) before his death. It is a sequel to the 1999 film Baby Geniuses and like its predecessor, it received negative reviews from film critics. Following the plot of the first film, four babies can communicate with each other using 'baby talk', and have knowledge of many secrets. The "baby geniuses" become involved in a scheme by media mogul Bill Biscane (Jon Voight), a notorious kidnapper of children, who intends to use a satellite system to brainwash the world's population and force them to watch TV for the rest of their lives.

The film was a box-office bomb, only receiving $9 million from its $20 million budget. MovieWeb writer B. Alan Orange considers it the worst movie ever made, Entertainment Weekly writer Joshua Rivera stated that it was the worst movie he had ever sat through,{{cite magazine|url=https://ew.com/article/2015/01/16/popwatch-confessional-worst-kids-movies/|title=PopWatch Confessional: The worst movie a kid has made you sit through|date=January 16, 2015|magazine=Entertainment Weekly|access-date=April 3, 2018}} and Tom Long of The Deseret News said "It is perhaps the most incompetent and least funny comic film ever made."{{cite news|url=http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700003619/SuperBabies-Baby-Geniuses-2.html|title=SuperBabies: Baby Geniuses 2|last=Long|first=Tom|date=November 17, 2004|work=Deseret News|access-date=May 3, 2012|archive-date=June 24, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180624040559/https://www.deseretnews.com/article/700003619/SuperBabies-Baby-Geniuses-2.html|url-status=dead}} It was nominated for four Golden Raspberry Awards including Worst Picture, Worst Director (Bob Clark), Worst Supporting Actor (Jon Voight) and Worst Screenplay (Steven Paul (story) & Gregory Poppen).{{cite news|url=http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_26-1-2005_pg9_6|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131111023112/http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_26-1-2005_pg9_6|url-status=dead|archive-date=November 11, 2013|title='Catwoman' battles President Bush for worst acting prize|date=January 26, 2005|work=Daily Times|access-date=May 3, 2012}} Total Film named it the runner-up to Titanic: The Legend Goes On in its list of the worst films ever made, and Mental Floss selected it as the second worst movie ever made after Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever. It was ranked as the worst sequel of all time by Rotten Tomatoes and, with a score of 0%, it is included in their list of the 100 Worst Movies of All Time.{{cite web |title=50 Worst Sequels of All Time |url=https://editorial.rottentomatoes.com/guide/worst-sequels-of-all-time/ |website=Rotten Tomatoes |publisher=Fandango |access-date=January 8, 2022}}

{{Main|Alone in the Dark (2005 film){{!}}Alone in the Dark (2005 film)}}

File:2009 Razzies Worst Career Achievement.jpg director Uwe Boll receiving a rare Worst Career Achievement award at the 29th Golden Raspberry Awards, where he was described as "Germany's answer to Ed Wood".{{cite web |last1=Brooks |first1=Xan |title=The Love Guru leads Razzie nominations |url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/2009/jan/21/love-guru-leads-razzies-nominations |website=The Guardian |access-date=December 31, 2024 |date=January 21, 2009}}]]

Loosely based on a series of video games by Infogrames and directed by Uwe Boll, the German-Canadian-American film Alone in the Dark was panned by critics for a multitude of reasons, including poor script and production values, quick cuts to optimize the gory content, almost no connection to the game, and bad acting.{{Rotten Tomatoes|qid=Q701977|title=Alone in the Dark}} The movie received a 1% rating at Rotten Tomatoes, was the second worst reviewed movie of the 2000s, and appears in their top 100 worst-reviewed movies list. It appeared on Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films, which they gave a 9/100 to,{{Citation |title=Alone in the Dark |url=https://www.metacritic.com/movie/alone-in-the-dark |access-date=March 24, 2022}} is on the MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list, and is one of the few films to have received an F rating on CinemaScore.{{cite news |last=Lincoln |first=Kevin |title=What the 19 Movies to Ever Receive an 'F' CinemaScore Have in Common |url=https://www.vulture.com/2017/09/here-are-the-only-19-movies-to-ever-receive-an-f-cinemascore.html |work=Vulture |date=September 20, 2017 |access-date=January 17, 2019}}

Roger Moore of The Orlando Sentinel stated: "Alone in the Dark shows just how tenuous Plan 9 from Outer Space{{'}}s hold on that 'worst movie ever' title really is."{{cite news|url=http://www.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment/movies/orl-db-moviereviews-searchresults,0,3279701,results.formprofile?turbine_cdb_lib__cdb_01_txt=Alone%20in%20the%20Dark&Find+it!=Submit+Query |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110629101527/http://www.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment/movies/orl-db-moviereviews-searchresults,0,3279701,results.formprofile?turbine_cdb_lib__cdb_01_txt=Alone%20in%20the%20Dark&Find+it!=Submit+Query |url-status=dead |archive-date=June 29, 2011 |title=Alone in the Dark |newspaper=Orlando Sentinel |date=January 28, 2005 |access-date=June 13, 2014 |first=Roger |last=Moore }} Likewise, Peter Hartlaub, the San Francisco Chronicle{{'s}} pop culture critic, called the film "the best Ed Wood movie ever made ... a film so mind-blowingly horrible that it teeters on the edge of cinematic immortality."{{cite news|url=http://www.sfgate.com/movies/article/FILM-CLIPS-Also-opening-today-2702523.php#alone |title=Film Clips / Also opening today |newspaper=San Francisco Chronicle |date=January 28, 2005 |access-date=November 18, 2013 |first=Ruthe |last=Stein}} In 2009, he named it the worst film of the decade.{{cite news|url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/01/01/MV9A1BAHMM.DTL&type=movies | work=San Francisco Chronicle |title=Decade in review: Hartlaub's movie choices |date=July 30, 2010}} Jeffrey Lyles of The Gazette considered it so bad that "other legendary bad films ... await a film of this magnitude because it gets awfully lonely on the island of misfit movies",{{cite news |url=http://ww2.gazette.net/gazette_archive/2005/200505/entertainment/moviefeat/258216-1.html |title='Dark' is dreary |newspaper=The Gazette (Maryland) |date=February 2, 2005 |access-date=November 18, 2013 |archive-date=November 12, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131112020202/http://ww2.gazette.net/gazette_archive/2005/200505/entertainment/moviefeat/258216-1.html |url-status=dead }} while Scott Nash of Three Movie Buffs dubbed it "one of the worst movies ever made."

Screenwriter Blair Erickson wrote about his experience dealing with Boll and his original script, which was closer to the actual game itself, and Boll's script change demands on the comedy website Something Awful.{{cite news |title = Behind the Scenes: Uwe Boll and Uwe Boll's Alone In the Dark |url = https://somethingawful.com/feature-articles/behind-scenes-uwe/1/ |first= Blair |last= Erickson |date = February 2, 2005 |publisher = Something Awful}} It received two 2005 Golden Raspberry Awards nominations for Worst Director (Uwe Boll) and Worst Actress (Tara Reid), and won three 2005 Stinkers Awards, for Worst Picture, Worst Director, and Worst Special Effects.{{cite web |last=Weinberg |first=Scott |url=https://rottentomatoes.com/news/1646425/2005_stinker_awards_announced |title=2005 Stinker Awards Announced! |website=Rotten Tomatoes |date=March 3, 2006 |access-date=January 17, 2011 |archive-date=December 12, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101212091710/http://www.rottentomatoes.com/news/1646425/2005_stinker_awards_announced/ |url-status=dead }} Empire, Flavorwire, and Screen Rant all later included the film on their respective lists for the worst films ever made.

{{Main|Aag (2007 film){{!}}Aag (2007 film)}}

Aag is a remake of one of the most successful Hindi films, Sholay, directed by Ram Gopal Varma. Rajeev Masand gave it a zero out of five.{{cite web |url=http://ibnlive.in.com/news/review-rgv-ki-aag-is-rgv-ka-daag/47834-8.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090722120747/http://ibnlive.in.com/news/review-rgv-ki-aag-is-rgv-ka-daag/47834-8.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=July 22, 2009|title=Review: RGV Ki Aag is RGV ka daag}} Times of India stated that Aag "destroyed Bollywood's greatest film" and acknowledged that some "consider it the world's worst film".{{cite news |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/bollywood/news-interviews/A-Decade-of-decadence/articleshow/7195010.cms |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131020040304/http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2010-12-31/news-interviews/28236351_1_rakhi-sawant-salman-khan-vivek-oberoi |url-status=live |archive-date=October 20, 2013 |title=A Decade of decadence |date=December 31, 2010 |newspaper=The Times of India |access-date=August 25, 2013}} Hindustan Times awarded it the "Lifetime's Worst Ever Movie Award".{{cite news|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/Entertainment/Reviews/Review-Ram-Gopal-Varma-Ki-Aag/Article1-245543.aspx |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111117015847/http://www.hindustantimes.com/Entertainment/Reviews/Review-Ram-Gopal-Varma-Ki-Aag/Article1-245543.aspx |url-status=dead |archive-date=November 17, 2011 |title=Review: Ram Gopal Varma Ki Aag |newspaper=Hindustan Times |date=August 31, 2007 |access-date=August 25, 2013 }} It came in first in a FHM India list of the 57 worst movies ever made.{{cite web|url=http://www.fhmindia.com/57-worst-films-ever-ii/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120912012157/http://www.fhmindia.com/57-worst-films-ever-ii/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=September 12, 2012 |title=57 Worst Films Ever – II |publisher=FHM (India) |access-date=August 25, 2013 }} Total Film included it in their list of the 66 worst films of all time. Amitabh Bachchan, who appeared in the original film and returned for the remake, later admitted that the film was "a mistake".{{cite web |url=http://www.digitalspy.com/bollywood/news/a329312/amitabh-bachchan-ram-gopal-varma-ki-aag-a-mistake.html |title= Amitabh Bachchan: 'Ram Gopal Varma Ki Aag a mistake' |website=Digital Spy|date= July 11, 2011 |access-date=August 25, 2013}}

{{Main|Epic Movie{{!}}Epic Movie}}

Epic Movie is a parody film by Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer that mainly parodies epic and fantasy movies, most notably The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe and the Harry Potter films, but also contains references to all kinds of other then-popular films. Like most works of Friedberg and Seltzer, it received extremely negative reviews, holding an approval rating of 2% on Rotten Tomatoes, and a Metacritic score of 17/100, indicating "overwhelming dislike".{{Citation|title=Epic Movie|url=https://www.metacritic.com/movie/epic-movie|access-date=February 25, 2019| work=Metacritic |publisher=CBS Interactive}}

Harry Fletcher of The Standard said: "Filmmakers and trash-peddlers Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer have been responsible for some of the most pointless, lazy and unforgivable movies of the past decade and frankly, they need to be stopped. Disaster Movie, 300 spoof Meet the Spartans and awful Hunger Games mickey-take The Starving Games could easily have made this list of the worst movies ever made, but Epic Movie might be the worst of the lot."{{Cite web|url=https://www.standard.co.uk/go/london/film/the-12-worst-films-ever-made-a3838756.html|title=The 12 worst films ever made|website=The Standard|last=Fletcher|first=Harry|language=en|date=June 20, 2018|access-date=February 25, 2019}} Meanwhile, Jamie Russell of the BBC called it "the most excruciating, unfunny film you'll see this year... if not your entire lifetime."{{Cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2007/02/05/epic_movie_2007_review.shtml|title=BBC – Movies – review – Epic Movie|last=Russell|first=Jamie|publisher=BBC|date=February 7, 2007|access-date=February 25, 2019}} Likewise, Nathan Rabin gave it an F score and said, "Epic Movie [...] strays so far from the solid fundamentals of filmmaking that it calls the very foundation of humor into question."{{Cite web|url=https://www.avclub.com/epic-movie-1798202359|title=Epic Movie|last=Rabin|first=Nathan|author-link=Nathan Rabin|website=The A.V. Club|date=January 29, 2007 |language=en-US|access-date=February 25, 2019}}

At the 28th Golden Raspberry Awards, it received three nominations, for Worst Remake or Rip-off, Worst Screenplay and Worst Supporting Actress (Carmen Electra). It is included in Rotten Tomatoes' list of the 100 Worst Movies of All time, Empire{{'}}s and Flavorwire{{'}}s lists of the 50 worst movies ever made, Standard{{'}}s list of the 12 worst films ever made, MRQE's 50 worst movies list and Newsweek{{'}}s list of the 50 worst comedy movies of all time.{{Cite web|url=https://www.newsweek.com/worst-comedy-movies-all-time-ranked-1071735|title=The worst comedy films of all time, from 'Scary Movie 5' to 'The Hottie & the Nottie'|last1=Sim|first1=David|first2=Eve|last2=Watling |date=August 14, 2018|website=Newsweek|language=en|access-date=February 25, 2019}}

{{Main|I Know Who Killed Me{{!}}I Know Who Killed Me}}

I Know Who Killed Me is a psychological thriller film directed by Chris Sivertson and starring Lindsay Lohan as identical twins, one of whom insists her identity is that of another woman after being abducted by a serial killer. At the 28th Golden Raspberry Awards, it set a record for most awards won in a single year by winning eight awards and it received two further nominations at the 30th Golden Raspberry Awards.{{cite web|url=http://edition.cnn.com/2008/SHOWBIZ/Movies/02/23/razzie.awards/|title=Lohan's 'Killed Me' sets worst-film record |publisher=CNN|author=Leopold, Todd|date=February 23, 2008|access-date=February 12, 2019}}

The How Did This Get Made? podcast questioned, "Is this the worst movie Lindsay Lohan has ever been in or flat out the worst movie ever?"{{cite web |url=https://www.earwolf.com/episode/i-know-who-killed-me/ |title= I Know Who Killed Me |publisher=Earwolf|work=How Did This Get Made?|date=October 18, 2011|access-date=February 12, 2019}} Richard Roeper selected the film as the worst of the 2000s.{{cite book |first=Croft |last=Ally |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XOMzAgAAQBAJ&q=I+know+who+killed+me+richard+roeper&pg=PT87|title= The Lindsay Lohan Story |publisher=Orion Publishing Group |year=2012 |isbn=978-1409136378}} Gabe Delahaye of Stereogum reviewed I Know Who Killed Me as part of his search for the worst movie ever made, writing that: "Out of all the possible Worst Movies of All Time so far, none has been as painful to actually watch as I Know Who Killed Me".{{cite web |url=https://www.stereogum.com/1779984/the_hunt_for_the_worst_movie_o_10/vg-loc/videogum/|title=The Hunt For The Worst Movie Of All Time: I Know Who Killed Me|work=Stereogum|last=Delahaye|first=Gabe|date=June 23, 2008|access-date=February 12, 2019}} It was named the 34th worst movie ever made in Empire{{'}}s 50 Worst Movies Ever poll and After Ellen named it the second worst ever made, after Gigli. MRQE includes it on its 50 Worst Movies list, and it has a rare F rating on CinemaScore.

{{Main|Disaster Movie{{!}}Disaster Movie}}

Disaster Movie is a parody film written and directed by Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer, spoofing films in the disaster film genre. The film, like most films by Friedberg and Seltzer, received extremely negative reviews and has a 1% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 73 reviews. The site's consensus states: "Returning to their seemingly bottomless well of flatulence humor, racial stereotypes, and stale pop culture gags, Friedberg and Seltzer have produced what is arguably their worst Movie yet."{{cite web|url=https://rottentomatoes.com/m/disaster_movie/|title=Disaster Movie – Rotten Tomatoes|website=Rotten Tomatoes|access-date=June 3, 2013}} It was ranked by Rotten Tomatoes as one of the worst-reviewed films of all time. Jason Solomons of The Guardian stated that "Nothing can convey the grimness of Disaster Movie, which would be the Worst Movie Ever Made were it actually a movie at all."{{cite news|last=Solomons|first=Jason |author-link=Jason Solomons|title=Disaster Movie|url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/2008/sep/07/comedy|work=The Guardian|access-date=June 3, 2013 |date=September 6, 2008|location=London}} Adam Tobias of Watertown Daily Times claimed that "I just don't see how anyone could not find Disaster Movie one of the worst films of all time." Tobias went on to write that the title was appropriate because the film is "a disaster."{{cite news|last=Tobias|first=Adam|title=Disaster Movie one of the worst films of all time|url=http://www.wdtimes.com/features/screen_scenes/article_a665de71-6454-5ce5-9454-d13b9ad9ee18.html|work=Watertown Daily Times|access-date=June 3, 2013|date=September 5, 2008}} It was featured in Empire{{'}}s 50 Worst Movies Ever poll, Total Film{{'}}s 66 Worst Movies Ever list, Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films, and the MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list (where it holds a score of 17, the lowest score on the site). Disaster Movie also received a rare F rating on CinemaScore. The film is also notable for being the motion picture debut of Kim Kardashian, whose performance garnered a nomination for Worst Supporting Actress at the 29th Golden Raspberry Awards alongside five additional nominations.{{cite news|last=Fleeman|first=Mike|date=January 21, 2009|title=Kim Kardashian: Thanks for the Razzie Nomination!|work=People|url=http://www.peoplestylewatch.com/people/stylewatch/redcarpet/2009/article/0,,20249205_20254091,00.html|url-status=live|access-date=June 3, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130928173450/http://www.peoplestylewatch.com/people/stylewatch/redcarpet/2009/article/0,,20249205_20254091,00.html|archive-date=September 28, 2013}}

{{Main|Meet the Spartans{{!}}Meet the Spartans}}

Another 2008 parody movie by Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer, Meet the Spartans mainly parodied the movie 300, but references to numerous other films as well. Like most Friedberg and Seltzer projects, it received extremely negative reviews, holding an approval rating of 2% on Rotten Tomatoes, with the consensus reading: "A tired, unfunny, offensive waste of time, Meet the Spartans scrapes the bottom of the cinematic barrel.",{{Cite web |title=Meet the Spartans (2008) |url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/meet_the_spartans |access-date=April 17, 2019 |website=Rotten Tomatoes |publisher=Fandango}} and a Metacritic score of 9/100, indicating "overwhelming dislike".{{Cite web |title=Meet the Spartans |url=https://www.metacritic.com/movie/meet-the-spartans |access-date=April 17, 2019 |website=Metacritic |publisher=CBS Interactive}} Josh Levin of Slate called it the worst movie he had ever seen.{{Cite web |last=Levin |first=Josh |date=January 30, 2008 |title=Meet the Spartans: another terrible spoof movie from the nongeniuses who brought you Date Movie and Epic Movie. |url=https://slate.com/culture/2008/01/meet-the-spartans-another-terrible-spoof-movie-from-the-nongeniuses-who-brought-you-date-movie-and-epic-movie.html |access-date=March 4, 2019 |website=Slate Magazine |language=en}} It is included in Empire{{'}}s and Flavorwire{{'}}s lists of the 50 worst movies ever made, News.com.au{{'}}s list of the 15 worst films of all time, Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films, and MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list. At the 29th Golden Raspberry Awards, it received five nominations, including Worst Picture.

{{Main|The Hottie and the Nottie{{!}}The Hottie and the Nottie}}

The romantic comedy The Hottie and the Nottie starring Paris Hilton, Joel Moore, Christine Lakin, and The Greg Wilson opened to poor box-office takings and strongly negative reviews with a 5% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.{{Cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/hottie_and_the_nottie|title=The Hottie and the Nottie (2008)|website=Rotten Tomatoes|publisher=Fandango|access-date=July 12, 2018}} The British newspaper The People, reviewing The Hottie and the Nottie, claimed "Paris Hilton is the world's worst actress and she's starring in the worst movie ever made."{{cite news|title=The Hottie and the Nottie Review|date=March 23, 2008|newspaper=The People|location=London, England|quote=Disaster Of Paris; Bimbo is worst actress ever}} Nathan Lee of The Village Voice called it "crass, shrill, disingenuous, tawdry, mean-spirited, vulgar, idiotic, boring, slapdash, half-assed, and very, very unfunny".{{cite web |first=Nathan |last=Lee |url=http://www.villagevoice.com/2008-01-29/film/the-hottie-and-the-nottie |title=Village Voice Review |publisher=Villagevoice.com |date=January 29, 2008 |access-date=December 6, 2012 |archive-date=October 30, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121030093726/http://www.villagevoice.com/2008-01-29/film/the-hottie-and-the-nottie/ |url-status=dead }} Online film critic James Berardinelli described the film's comedy as "about as funny as the anal rape scene in The War Zone".{{cite web|url=http://www.reelviews.net/movies/h/hottie_nottie.html |title=James Berardinelli review |publisher=Reelviews.net |date=May 13, 2007 |access-date=December 6, 2012}} Richard Roeper called it "excruciatingly, painfully, horribly, terribly awful", and argued that "nobody in this movie really should have a career in movies".{{cite web |url=https://rottentomatoes.com/m/hottie_and_the_nottie/ |website=Rotten Tomatoes |title=The Hottie and The Nottie |access-date=October 25, 2014 }} Connie Ogle in the Miami Herald described The Hottie and the Nottie thus: "Imagine the worst movie you've ever seen. Got it? Now try to think of something worse. That something is this movie – wretched, embarrassing and a waste of the time and energy of everyone involved." The film appears on Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films, and the MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list.

{{main|Álom.net{{!}}Álom.net}}

Álom.net (also known as Dream Well or Dream.net) is a Hungarian film that emulates tropes found in American teen films. 444.hu wrote that it is "the worst movie of all time, and that's why it became a cult film".{{cite web |title=A Rohadt Kritikusok szerint a Pappa Pia túltolta a fostalicskát |url=https://444.hu/2017/08/20/a-rohadt-kritikusok-szerint-a-pappa-pia-tultolta-a-fostalicskat |website=444.hu |access-date=February 1, 2022 |language=hu |date=August 20, 2017}} Furthermore, 24.hu and Index.hu each named it the worst Hungarian film ever made and The Irish Times reported its status as "the worst film of all time" when it became the lowest-rated film on IMDb.{{cite web |title=10 éves az Álom.net, amivel Steiner Kristóf "görbe tükröt akart mutatni az akkori generációnak" |url=https://24.hu/szorakozas/2019/04/16/steiner-kristof-alom-net-labancz-lilla-iszak-eszter/ |website=24.hu |access-date=February 1, 2022 |language=hu |date=April 16, 2019}}{{cite web |last=Dávid |first=Sajó |title=Készül a folytatás minden idők legrosszabb magyar filmjéhez |url=https://index.hu/kultur/cinematrix/2014/11/26/keszul_a_folytatas_minden_idok_legrosszabb_magyar_filmjehez/ |website=Index.hu |access-date=February 1, 2022 |language=hu |date=November 26, 2014}}{{cite news |last=Clarke |first=Donald |title=What's the worst film of all time? |url=https://www.irishtimes.com/blogs/screenwriter/2011/04/19/whats-the-worst-film-of-all-time/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120203074651/https://www.irishtimes.com/blogs/screenwriter/2011/04/19/whats-the-worst-film-of-all-time/ |newspaper=The Irish Times |date=April 19, 2011 |access-date=February 1, 2022 |archive-date=February 3, 2012}} Total Film named it the fourth worst film ever made and FMC.hu included it on their list of the ten worst films ever made.{{cite web |title=Minden idők tíz legrosszabb filmje |url=https://fmc.hu/2019/11/02/minden-idok-tiz-legrosszabb-filmje |website=fmc.hu |access-date=February 1, 2022 |language=hu}}

{{Main|Birdemic: Shock and Terror{{!}}Birdemic: Shock and Terror}}

File:Rifftrax_live_show_birdemic.jpg, Mike Nelson, and Kevin Murphy during the live RiffTrax treatment of Birdemic]]

An independently produced film that is an apparent homage to Alfred Hitchcock's The Birds, Birdemic: Shock and Terror tells the story of a romance between the two leading characters, played by Alan Bagh and Whitney Moore, as their small town is attacked by birds. Written, directed, and produced by James Nguyen, it was intended as a "romantic thriller"{{cite web |url=http://www.viceland.com/blogs/en/2010/02/12/james-nguyens-birdemic-is-the-new-best-worst-movie-ever/ |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120914135451/http://www.viceland.com/blogs/en/2010/02/12/james-nguyens-birdemic-is-the-new-best-worst-movie-ever/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=September 14, 2012 |title=Birdemic Has Romance and Suspense and All That |publisher=Viceland Today |date=February 12, 2010 |access-date=April 16, 2011}} but is notable due to its poor quality, with reviewers calling out its wooden acting, bad dialogue, amateurish sound and editing, nonsensical plot and, in particular, its special effects, consisting primarily of poorly rendered computer generated eagles and vultures that perform physically awkward aerial maneuvers and explode upon impact with the ground.{{Cite web|url=https://www.cbr.com/birdemic-makes-crows-have-eyes-3-masterpiece/|title=Birdemic Makes The Crows Have Eyes 3 Look Like a Hitchcock Masterpiece|first=Ethan|last=Parker|date=October 30, 2020|website=CBR}}

The film, which cost $10,000 to make,{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/8604858.stm |title=Is Birdemic worst film ever made? |work=BBC News |date=April 6, 2010 |access-date=April 16, 2011}} was called by the Huffington Post "truly, one of the worst films ever made"{{cite news |url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/review-embirdemic-shock-a_b_491140|first=Fabio|last=Periera |title=Review: Birdemic: Shock and Terror |work=HuffPost |date=March 9, 2010 |access-date=December 3, 2019}} and by The Village Voice as "one more in the pantheon of beloved trash-terpieces".{{cite news |url=http://www.villagevoice.com/2010-03-30/film/birdemic-shock-and-terror-one-more-for-the-trash-terpiece-heap/ |title=Birdemic: Shock and Terror, One More for the Trash-terpiece Heap |newspaper=The Village Voice |date=March 30, 2010 |access-date=April 16, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110320100812/http://www.villagevoice.com/2010-03-30/film/birdemic-shock-and-terror-one-more-for-the-trash-terpiece-heap/ |archive-date=March 20, 2011 }} Flavorwire ranked it number 1 in its list of the 50 worst films ever made. Slate deemed it among the worst movies ever made,{{cite magazine |url=http://www.slate.com/id/2249870/pagenum/all/#p2 |title=The Worst Movies Ever Made |magazine=Slate |last=Weiner|first=Jonah|date=April 6, 2010 |access-date=April 16, 2011}} while Salon referred to it as "a cult hit among bad-movie fans"{{cite news|url=http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/film_salon/2011/02/25/birdemic_review |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110228043216/http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/film_salon/2011/02/25/birdemic_review |url-status=dead |archive-date=February 28, 2011 |title="Birdemic": The magic of atrocious CGI, confirmed |work=Salon |date=February 25, 2011 |access-date=May 6, 2011 }} and Variety stated that the film displayed "all the revered hallmarks of hilariously bad filmmaking".{{cite magazine |url=https://variety.com/review/VE1117942491?refcatid=31 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110629203625/https://variety.com/review/VE1117942491?refcatid=31 |url-status=dead |archive-date=June 29, 2011 |title=Variety Reviews – Birdemic: Shock and Terror |magazine=Variety |date=March 29, 2010 |access-date=May 6, 2011 |first=Ronnie |last=Scheib}} Following the home media release of Birdemic, Michael J. Nelson, Kevin Murphy, and Bill Corbett of Mystery Science Theater 3000 fame produced an audio commentary track to accompany the movie through Rifftrax. They later riffed upon the film again theatrically.{{cite web|author=eas106 |url=http://www.fandango.com/rifftraxlive:birdemic_157390/movieoverview |title=RiffTrax Live: Birdemic (2012) Movie Tickets, Reviews, and Photos |work=Fandango.com |date=October 25, 2012 |access-date=November 18, 2013}} In response to the cult status of the first film, a sequel—Birdemic 2: The Resurrection—was released in 2013, and included many returning members of the cast and crew.{{Cite web|url=https://variety.com/2013/film/reviews/film-review-birdemic-2-the-resurrection-1200424321/|title=Film Review: 'Birdemic 2: The Resurrection'|first=Dennis|last=Harvey|date=April 29, 2013}} Another sequel was released on several streaming platforms on January 24, 2023 titled Birdemic: Sea Eagle.

{{Main|The Last Airbender (film){{!}}The Last Airbender (film)}}

The Last Airbender is a fantasy adventure film written, produced, and directed by M. Night Shyamalan and is based on the Nickelodeon animated TV series Avatar: The Last Airbender. Upon release, the film was widely panned with critics pointing out the bad acting, numerous plot holes, screenplay, dialogue, poor visual effects (despite its reported $150 million budget), and especially Shyamalan's directing. It was also ridiculed for the poor quality of its post-converted 3-D, and the casting of white and Indian actors to portray characters who were interpreted as East Asian or Inuit in the source material triggered accusations of racism and whitewashing.{{cite news|first=Graeme|last=McMillan|title=Avatar Casting Makes Fans See... White|access-date=December 19, 2008|date=December 17, 2008|url=http://io9.com/5111680/avatar-casting-makes-fans-see-white| work=io9|publisher=Gawker Media}} Further criticism came from fans of the animated series, who said the film differed tremendously from its critically acclaimed source material. David Onda of Comcast wrote that it "has been called one of the worst [films] ever made." Roger Ebert called the film "an agonizing experience in every category I can think of and others still waiting to be invented. The laws of chance suggest that something should have gone right. Not here. It puts a nail in the coffin of low-rent 3D, but it will need a lot more coffins than that."{{cite web|last=Ebert|first=Roger|author-link=Roger Ebert|title=The Last Airbender|url=https://rogerebert.com/reviews/the-last-airbender-2010|work=Chicago Sun-Times|access-date=December 22, 2013}} When asked if Last Airbender had been the worst film he has ever seen, Mike Ryan of Vanity Fair answered, "Yes."{{cite magazine|last=Ryan|first=Mike|title=25 Questions You May Have About The Last Airbender|url=https://www.vanityfair.com/online/oscars/2010/07/25-questions-you-may-have-about-the-last-airbender|magazine=Vanity Fair|date=July 1, 2010|access-date=December 22, 2013}}

It garnered nine nominations at the 31st Golden Raspberry Awards, and won five, including Worst Picture and Worst Director.{{cite web |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-12589752 |publisher=BBC News |date= February 27, 2011 |title=M Night Shyamalan's Last Airbender wins Razzie Awards |access-date=February 27, 2011 }}{{cite web|title=The 31st Annual Razzie Awards|url=http://razzies.com/history/11winners.asp|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130103033553/http://razzies.com/history/11winners.asp|publisher=Golden Raspberry Awards|archive-date=January 3, 2013}} Hi highlighted the film in their "Worst Films Ever" series,{{cite web|last=Wilson|first=Natasha|title=The Worst Films Ever: The Last Airbender|url=http://www.hihimag.com/hi/ents/film/2013/08/the-worst-films-ever-the-last-airbender/|website=Hi|access-date=June 29, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140808051629/http://www.hihimag.com/hi/ents/film/2013/08/the-worst-films-ever-the-last-airbender/|archive-date=August 8, 2014|url-status=dead}} and Rotten Tomatoes, Screen Rant and Digital Trends included it in their worst film lists. Dev Patel would later express regret and dislike for his role and his experience with the film. He described his performance as Prince Zuko as being as though he "saw a stranger on the screen that I couldn't relate to."{{Cite web |url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/dev-patel-regretting-last-airbender-i-saw-a-stranger-screen-951544 |title=Dev Patel on Regretting 'Last Airbender': I "Saw a Stranger on the Screen" |last=Couch |first=Aaron |date=December 1, 2016 |website=The Hollywood Reporter |access-date=December 1, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161202113203/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/dev-patel-regretting-last-airbender-i-saw-a-stranger-screen-951544 |archive-date=December 2, 2016 |url-status=live }}{{Cite web|url=https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YyQGKSzYqBg|archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211028/YyQGKSzYqBg|archive-date=October 28, 2021|title=THR Full Oscar Actor's Roundtable: Andrew Garfield, Casey Affleck, Dev Patel, & More|date=January 23, 2017|via=YouTube|language=en|access-date=January 23, 2017}}{{cbignore}}

{{Main|Bucky Larson: Born to Be a Star{{!}}Bucky Larson: Born to Be a Star}}

Bucky Larson: Born to Be a Star was produced by Adam Sandler's Happy Madison Productions and featured Nick Swardson in the titular role as a small-town manchild who pursues a career in the pornographic film industry after learning that his parents were porn stars in the 1970s. On Rotten Tomatoes, Bucky Larson has a 3% rating, and it appears on the site's list of the 100 Worst Movies of All Time. Linda Cook of the Quad-City Times described the film as "the worst of the worst",{{cite news|url=http://qctimes.com/entertainment/columnists/linda-cook/bucky-is-the-worst-of-the-worst/article_77c4eeea-dd6b-11e0-93fe-001cc4c03286.html|title='Bucky' is the worst of the worst|newspaper=Quad-City Times|last=Cook|first=Linda|date=September 12, 2011|access-date=August 11, 2017}} while ScreenCrush critic Matt Singer picked it as the worst film ever made.{{cite web |last=D'Alessio |first=Jeff |title=Top critics: The worst film I ever reviewed |url=https://www.news-gazette.com/arts-entertainment/top-critics-the-worst-film-i-ever-reviewed/article_9453df47-e504-5609-aeab-ba37a1aba2cf.html |website=The News-Gazette |access-date=June 11, 2023 |language=en |date=April 16, 2023}} Jim Vorel of Paste's Bad Movie Diaries column suggested that Bucky Larson was the worst film covered by the column.{{cite web |title=Bad Movie Diaries: Bucky Larson: Born to Be a Star (2011) |url=https://www.pastemagazine.com/movies/bad-movie-diaries/bad-movie-diaries-bucky-larson-born-to-be-a-star-2/ |language=en |date=August 30, 2018|access-date=July 12, 2022|last1=Lowe |first1=Kenneth |last2=Vorel |first2=Jim |website=Paste }} In listing it as one of the ten worst comedies ever, Michael Musto stated that Bucky Larson was "a badness the world had forgotten was capable of existing".{{cite news|url=https://www.theblot.com/10-worst-film-comedies-ever-made-7720429|title=The 10 worst comedies ever made|last=Musto|first=Michael|author-link=Michael Musto|work=The Blot Magazine|date=June 12, 2014|access-date=August 11, 2017}} Screen Rant included it in its list of the 25 worst movies in film history and Mental Floss named it the fifth worst movie ever.{{cite news|url=https://screenrant.com/worst-movies-list-all-time/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170811144052/https://screenrant.com/worst-movies-list-all-time/|title=25 Worst Movies in Film History|last=Kendrick|first=Ben|work=Screen Rant|date=November 13, 2015|access-date=August 11, 2017|archive-date=August 11, 2017}}{{cite news|url=http://mentalfloss.com/article/503248/15-worst-movies-ever-made|title=The 15 Worst Movies Ever Made|last=Wood|first=Jennifer M|work=Mental Floss|date=August 10, 2017|access-date=August 11, 2017}} Bucky Larson also appears on MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list, and Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films. The film earned six nominations at the 32nd Golden Raspberry Awards, but lost in every category to Jack and Jill, which was also produced by Happy Madison Productions.

{{Main|Jack and Jill (2011 film){{!}}Jack and Jill (2011 film)}}

File:Adam Sandler 2011 (Cropped).jpg starred in Jack and Jill and That's My Boy. He also produced these films, as well as The Master of Disguise and Bucky Larson: Born to Be a Star.]]

Jack and Jill is a comedy film starring Adam Sandler as Jack, a commercial director, who is visited by his "identical" twin sister, Jill (played by Sandler, in drag), during the holidays. Salon stated that Jack and Jill "received some of the worst reviews of any movie ever" upon its release.{{cite news|url=http://www.salon.com/2011/11/14/the_tragedy_of_adam_sandler/|title=The tragedy of Adam Sandler|work= Salon |last=Eggers|first=Toph|date=November 14, 2011|access-date=August 23, 2013}} In the film, Jill is wooed by Al Pacino, whom Jack wants to be in his Dunkin' Donuts commercial. Richard Roeper of the Chicago Sun-Times noted the irony of Pacino's presence, as the actor is best known for playing Michael Corleone in The Godfather, which is widely considered one of the best films ever made, in this film, which he called "one of the worst movies in the history of cinema!"{{cite web|url=http://www.richardroeper.com/reviews/footlooselikecrazyandjackandjill.aspx|title=Footloose, Like Crazy, and Jack and Jill|publisher=Richard Roeper & The Movies|last=Roeper|first=Richard|access-date=April 25, 2013}} Ramin Setoodeh of The Daily Beast and Peter Travers of Rolling Stone reviewed it together in an article entitled "Adam Sandler's 'Jack and Jill' Is the Worst Movie Ever Made".{{cite web|url=http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/11/11/movie-review-adam-sandler-s-jack-and-jill-is-the-worst-movie-ever-made.html|title=Movie Review: Adam Sandler's 'Jack and Jill' Is the Worst Movie Ever Made|website=The Daily Beast|last=Setoodeh|first=Ramin|date=November 11, 2011|access-date=April 25, 2013}} After an hour-long critique, RedLetterMedia claimed that it was "so egregious that it ceased to be a film", and the site also later called it "the worst thing in the world".{{cite web|url=http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag-jack-and-jill/|title=Half in the Bag: Jack and Jill|publisher=RedLetterMedia|author=Mike Stoklasa, Jay Bauman|date=November 20, 2011|access-date=April 25, 2013|archive-date=January 23, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200123031718/http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag-jack-and-jill-1-of-2/|url-status=dead}} Mike McGranaghan wrote, on his website The Aisle Seat: "Howard the Duck, Gigli, Showgirls, From Justin to Kelly. What do they all have in common? They're all widely considered among the worst big studio movies ever made. You know what else they have in common? They're all better than Jack and Jill."{{cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/jack_and_jill_2011|title=Jack and Jill (2011)|website=Rotten Tomatoes|publisher=Fandango|access-date=June 10, 2019}}{{cite web|url=http://aisleseat.com/jackandjill.htm |title=Jack and Jill |publisher=The Aisle Seat |last=McGranaghan|first=Mike|date=November 1, 2011 |access-date=November 18, 2013}} Jack and Jill won a record 10 awards at the 32nd Golden Raspberry Awards, sweeping every category. It broke the record previously held by Battlefield Earth for having the most Razzies earned by a single film and is the only film to win every possible award.{{cite news |title=Adam Sandler movie Jack and Jill sweeps Razzie awards |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-17582458 |work=BBC News |date=April 2, 2012 |access-date=May 17, 2012}} The film holds a 3% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, where it ranks as being one of the 100 Worst Movies of All Time. Vanity Fair and Screen Rant have also included it on their respective worst film lists.

{{Main|That's My Boy (2012 film){{!}}That's My Boy (2012 film)}}

Another comedy film starring Adam Sandler, That's My Boy concerns a middle school student named Donny Berger who has sex with his teacher, gets her pregnant, and in turn, earns a lifestyle of a minor celebrity, something he never intended to happen. Years later, Donny (played by Sandler) crashes his now-adult son's (Andy Samberg) wedding and bachelor party to get money to pay his taxes, therefore avoiding prison. The film has been widely panned due to its comedic portrayal of incest, hebephilia, statutory rape, and gerontophilia,{{cite news|url=https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/comedy-about-middle-school-statutory-rape-does-adam-sandlers-thats-my-boy-go-too-far/|title=Comedy about middle school statutory rape? Does Adam Sandler's That's My Boy go too far?|last=McKay|first=Hollie|date=April 30, 2012|access-date=April 17, 2019|publisher=Fox News}}{{cite web |url=http://live.drjays.com/index.php/2012/05/21/is-adam-sandler-serious-with-thats-my-boy/ |title=Is Adam Sandler Serious With That's My Boy? | DrJays.com Live | Fashion. Music. Lifestyle |work=Live.drjays.com |date=May 21, 2012 |access-date=December 19, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131212060031/http://live.drjays.com/index.php/2012/05/21/is-adam-sandler-serious-with-thats-my-boy/ |archive-date=December 12, 2013 |url-status=dead }}{{cite web|url=http://ncfm.org/2012/05/news/discrimination-against-men-news/adam-sandlers-new-movie-thats-my-boy-exploits-child-victims-of-sexual-assault-please-boycott-the-movie/ |title=Adam Sandler's new movie That's My Boy exploits child victims of sexual assault. Please boycott the movie. | National Coalition For Men |date=May 2, 2012 |publisher=NCFM |access-date=December 19, 2013}} with film critic Andrew O'Hehir of Salon stating, "[Sandler's] new movie about a rape survivor and his estranged son is supposed to be funny, but radiates pain and rage."{{cite news |url=http://www.salon.com/2012/06/16/sympathy_for_adam_sandler/ |title=Adam Sandler hates you |work=Salon.com |date=June 16, 2012 |access-date=December 19, 2013}} Richard Roeper of the Chicago Sun-Times proclaimed, "To say That's My Boy is one of the worst movies of the year is to insult 2012. This is one of the worst movies I've ever seen",{{cite news|url=http://www.suntimes.com/entertainment/movies/13146305-421/pervs-will-be-pervs-in-thats-my-boy.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120617062159/http://www.suntimes.com/entertainment/movies/13146305-421/pervs-will-be-pervs-in-thats-my-boy.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=June 17, 2012 |title=Pervs will be pervs in That's My Boy – Chicago Sun-Times |work=Suntimes.com |access-date=December 19, 2013 }} while Richard Haridly of Quickflix called it "one of the saddest and most exhausting" films he has ever seen.{{cite web|url=http://www.quickflix.com.au/news/reviews/thatsmyboy |title=That's My Boy review by Richard Haridy |publisher=Quickflix |access-date=December 19, 2013}} MaryAnn Johanson of Flick Filosopher outright panned the film for its inability to generate laughs as well as its depraved content, calling it "a disgusting excuse for a comedy" and possibly "the most repulsive movie I've ever seen",{{cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/thats_my_boy/reviews/|title=That's My Boy – Movie Reviews|website=Rotten Tomatoes|publisher=Fandango|access-date=April 17, 2019}}{{cite web|url=http://www.flickfilosopher.com/2013/01/thats-my-boy-review.html |title=That's My Boy (review) |work=FlickFilosopher.com |date=January 23, 2013 |access-date=December 19, 2013}} and Jonathan Lack of We Got This Covered declared, "That's My Boy isn't just the worst film of 2012, it's one of the most morally reprehensible comedies of all time, a disgusting movie you should stay far, far away from."{{cite web|url=https://wegotthiscovered.com/movies/boy-review/|title=That's My Boy Review|last=Lack|first=Jonathan R.|date=June 15, 2012|work=Wegotthiscovered.com|access-date=April 17, 2019}} Furthermore, Ed Whitfield of The Ooh Tray stated, "It may be the worst film, in any genre, ever made".{{cite web|author=The Ooh Tray |url=http://www.theoohtray.com/2012/09/09/film-review-thats-my-boy/ |title=Film Review: That's My Boy |publisher=The Ooh Tray |date=October 2, 2012 |access-date=December 19, 2013}} In addition to the movie's overwhelmingly negative reviews, That's My Boy earned eight nominations at the 33rd Golden Raspberry Awards, such as Worst Picture and Worst Director, and won the awards for Worst Actor (Sandler) and Worst Screenplay.{{cite web |url=http://www.razzies.com/history/13winners.asp |title=Razzie Winners |work=Razzies.com |access-date=December 19, 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130227010807/http://www.razzies.com/history/13winners.asp |archive-date=February 27, 2013 }} It holds a 20% rating on Rotten Tomatoes {{as of|2019|April|17|lc=y|df=US}} based on 115 reviews.{{cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/thats_my_boy_2012|title=That's My Boy|website=Rotten Tomatoes|publisher=Fandango|access-date=April 17, 2019}}

{{main|Foodfight!{{!}}Foodfight!}}

The animated comedy Foodfight!, directed by Larry Kasanoff, features a cast of celebrity voice actors, including Charlie Sheen, Wayne Brady, Hilary Duff, and Eva Longoria.{{Cite web|url=https://www.pastemagazine.com/movies/the-100-best-b-movies-of-all-time/|title=The 100 Best "B Movies" of All Time|date=May 8, 2014|website=pastemagazine.com|access-date=June 29, 2022|archive-date=June 24, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180624040038/https://www.pastemagazine.com/blogs/lists/2014/05/the-100-best-b-movies-of-all-time.html?a=1|url-status=dead}} The film revolves around brand mascots, known as "Ikes", who come to life in a supermarket after closing time, and their struggles against the forces of Brand X. Several actual corporate mascots make cameos in the movie, such as Mrs. Butterworth, Charlie the Tuna, and the California Raisins. Development for the movie began as early as 2000, but troubled production, including an incident where the hard drives had supposedly been stolen, and financial difficulties delayed its release several times. The film eventually received a limited theatrical release in Europe in 2012, and it became a box-office bomb, earning just $74,000 against its reported $65 million budget.{{cite web|last=Sherlock|first=Ben|date=June 30, 2020|title=The 5 Best (& 5 Worst) Animated Movies From The 2010s|url=https://screenrant.com/best-worst-animatedmovies-2010s-pixar-toy-story-coco-emoji/|access-date=January 7, 2020|work=Screen Rant|quote=With a reported budget of $65 million and a box office gross of less than $74,000, Foodfight! was a devastating financial catastrophe, and it's since been branded one of the worst movies ever made.}} Foodfight! was also critically panned for its animation, humor, use of product placement as a central theme (and being aimed towards children), and content inappropriate for its target audience, such as sexual innuendo and references to Nazism.

A New York Times article condemned the film, saying: "The animation appears unfinished ... And the plot ... is impenetrable and even offensive." The article also reported that Foodfight! had been "seized upon by Internet purveyors of bad cinema".{{cite web |last=Rossen |first=Jake |title=Placing Products? Try Casting Them |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/11/movies/the-rise-and-fall-of-the-computer-animated-foodfight.html |work=The New York Times |access-date=January 7, 2022 |date=August 9, 2013}} One such Internet critic was Nathan Rabin of The A.V. Club, who included the film in his My World of Flops column, describing it as "one of those fall-of-civilization moments" and "This is the kind of movie so unbelievably, surreally and exquisitely terrible that you want to share it with the rest of the world. I was put on earth to suffer through abominations like Foodfight! so that society as a whole might benefit from my Christ-like sacrifice."{{Cite web|last=Rabin|first=Nathan|author-link=Nathan Rabin|date=February 27, 2013|title=Supermarket Brands Sponsored Case File #34: Foodfight!|url=https://www.avclub.com/supermarket-brands-sponsored-case-file-34-foodfight-1798236586|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170826092349/https://film.avclub.com/supermarket-brands-sponsored-case-file-34-foodfight-1798236586|archive-date=August 26, 2017|access-date=January 7, 2022|website=The A.V. Club}}{{cite news|last=Rabin|first=Nathan|author-link=Nathan Rabin|date=February 12, 2019|title=This Looks Terrible! Foodfight! (2012)|work=nathanrabin.com|url=https://www.nathanrabin.com/happy-place/2019/2/12/this-looks-terrible-foodfight-2012|access-date=January 7, 2022}} Meanwhile, a review in Esquire described it as "The Room, rendered in horribly sharp polygons" and Hollywood News called it "by far the crappiest piece of crap I have ever had the misfortune to watch".{{cite web|last=Nicholson|first=Tom|date=June 10, 2020|title=The Best Movies To Watch While Very, Very Stoned|url=https://www.esquire.com/uk/culture/film/a21726330/best-stoner-movies/|access-date=January 7, 2022|work=Esquire}}{{cite news|title=Foodfight! Review |url=http://www.thehollywoodnews.com/2012/10/25/foodfight-review/|website=Hollywood News|access-date=January 7, 2022|date=October 25, 2012}} Likewise, critic Tim Brayton described it as "the absolute ugliest animated feature that has ever been released by something resembling an actual animation studio ... one of the very worst movies I have ever seen."{{cite news|title=Foodfight! (2012)|url=http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/foodfight/|website=Rotten Tomatoes|publisher=Fandango|access-date=January 7, 2022}}{{cite web |last=Brayton |first=Tim |title=Foodfight! (2012) – Movie Review |url=https://www.alternateending.com/2015/04/dont-play-with-your-food.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220107083052/https://www.alternateending.com/2015/04/dont-play-with-your-food.html |website=Alternate Ending |access-date=January 7, 2022 |date= April 24, 2015 |archive-date=January 7, 2022}} In 2024, Collider described it as the "absolute worst [movie] of the 21st century, without any real competition."{{cite web |last1=Pacheco |first1=Diego Pineda |title=The 10 Worst Fantasy Movies of the 2010s, Ranked |url=https://collider.com/worst-fantasy-movies-2010s-ranked/ |website=Collider |access-date=December 1, 2024 |language=en |date=November 27, 2024}} Digital Trends, Time Out, Fotogramas, Mental Floss, and MSN have since included Foodfight! in their worst film lists.{{cite web |title=10 Really Bad Movies that Define "Bad Movies" |url=https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/12464/10-really-bad-movies-define-bad-movies |website=Mental Floss |access-date=July 21, 2022 |date=September 6, 2012}}{{cite web|last=Charlebois|first=Mathieu|date=November 29, 2018|title=The worst movies of all time|url=https://www.msn.com/en-ph/entertainment/entertainmentmovies/the-worst-movies-of-all-time/ss-BBQh1D2#image=6|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220106083744/https://www.msn.com/en-ca/entertainment/movies/the-worst-movies-of-all-time/ss-AAQm4Hw#image=6|access-date=January 7, 2022|archive-date=January 6, 2022|publisher=MSN}} Rebecca Hawkes of The Daily Telegraph described Foodfight! as "the worst animated children's film ever made",{{cite web|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/0/forget-emoji-movie-discover-foodfight-worst-childrens-animation/|title=Forget The Emoji Movie: discover Foodfight!, the worst children's animation of all time|last=Hawkes|first=Rebecca|date=August 2, 2017|work=The Daily Telegraph|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180624030309/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/0/forget-emoji-movie-discover-foodfight-worst-childrens-animation/|archive-date=June 24, 2018|url-status=live|access-date=January 7, 2022}} while IndieWire, Comic Book Resources and Screen Rant have each described it as being one of the worst animated films ever made.{{cite news|first=Greg|last=Ehrbar|date=May 8, 2013|title=DVD REVIEW: "FoodFight!"|publisher=Indiewire|url=http://blogs.indiewire.com/animationscoop/dvd-review-foodfight-2003|access-date=January 7, 2022}}{{cite web|date=January 15, 2017|title=12 Worst Animated Movies of All Time|url=http://screenrant.com/worst-animated-movies-all-time/|access-date=January 7, 2022|work=Screen Rant|archive-date=January 8, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220108225848/https://screenrant.com/worst-animated-movies-all-time/|url-status=dead}}{{cite web |last=Venegas |first=Jasmine |title=10 Movies With Less-Than-Subtle Advertisements |url=https://www.cbr.com/movies-with-obvious-advertisements-ads/ |publisher=Comic Book Resources |access-date=January 7, 2022 |date=August 18, 2021}}

{{Main|Run for Your Wife (2012 film){{!}}Run for Your Wife (2012 film)}}

A British comedy film based on the stage farce of the same name, Run for Your Wife starred Danny Dyer as John Smith, a bigamist, and Denise van Outen and Sarah Harding as his wives. Run for Your Wife was directed by the author of the play, Ray Cooney (who also makes an uncredited cameo appearance). Upon release, Run for Your Wife was savaged by film critics, with the South African newspaper Daily News saying "Run for Your Wife could be the worst film in history","Movie may be the biggest Turkey ever", Daily News, South Africa, February 21, 2013. the Studio Briefing website reporting that "Some writers are making the case that the British comedy may be 'the worst film ever{{'"}},{{Cite web |url=http://www.studiobriefing.net/2013/02/the-worst-film-in-history/#sthash.xFKOr9e6.dpuf |title=The Worst Film in History? |work=Studio Briefing |date=February 21, 2013 |access-date=February 13, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130226120418/http://www.studiobriefing.net/2013/02/the-worst-film-in-history/ |archive-date=2013-02-26}} and The Daily Mirror claiming Run for Your Wife "was branded the worst British film ever".{{Cite web |last=Drake |first=Matthew |date=2013-10-06 |title=Danny Dyer's film company went bust with debt to taxpayer of £25,000 |url=http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/danny-dyers-film-company-old-2343670 |access-date=2024-02-27 |website=The Mirror |language=en}} Run for Your Wife met with such overwhelmingly negative reviews upon release that the reviews themselves were widely reported in the UK media.{{Cite web |date=2013-02-16 |title='Run for Your Wife' - Is this the worst movie ever filmed? |url=https://uk.movies.yahoo.com/-run-for-your-wife----is-this-the-worst-movie-ever-filmed--114048296.html |access-date=2024-02-27 |website=uk.movies.yahoo.com |language=en-GB}} The film was variously described as "a catastrophe", "as funny as leprosy" and "30 years past its sell-by-date", with The Guardian reviewer Peter Bradshaw saying that it "makes The Dick Emery Show look edgy and contemporary".{{Cite news |last=Bradshaw |first=Peter |date=2013-02-14 |title=Run for Your Wife – review |url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/2013/feb/14/run-for-your-wife-review |access-date=2024-02-27 |work=The Guardian |language=en-GB |issn=0261-3077}} The Independent's Anthony Quinn wrote, "The stage play ran for nine years – it [the film] will be lucky to run for nine days. Perhaps never in the field of light entertainment have so many actors sacrificed so much dignity in the cause of so few jokes ... From the look of it, Cooney hasn't been in a cinema for about 30 years".{{Cite web |date=2013-02-15 |title=Film review: Run for Your Wife (12A) |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/reviews/film-review-run-for-your-wife-12a-8495806.html |access-date=2024-02-27 |website=The Independent |language=en}}

The cast featured numerous British celebrities in cameo roles, which was commented upon by several reviewers. The Metro commented that "no one emerges unscathed among the cameo-packed cast that reads largely like a roll-call for Brit TV legends you'd previously suspected deceased".{{Cite web |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/features/run-for-your-wife-as-funny-as-leprosy-8496873.html |title=Run for Your Wife – 'As funny as leprosy' |work=The Independent (London) |date=January 30, 2015}} The Daily Record described the film as "an exasperating farce containing not one single, solitary laugh. {{sic|Comprised|hide=y| of}} people losing their trousers and falling over, the film looks like a pilot for a (mercifully) never-commissioned 70s sitcom".{{Cite web |last=Edwards |first=David |date=2013-02-15 |title=Movie Review: Run for your wife (12A) |url=http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/entertainment/movies/movie-dvd-reviews/movie-review-run-your-wife-1711076 |access-date=2024-02-27 |website=Daily Record |language=en}} An article in the Independent described Run for Your Wife (along with the similarly panned Movie 43) as contenders for the title of the "worst film in history".{{Cite web |date=2013-02-15 |title=Run For Your Wife: Is this movie the biggest turkey ever filmed? |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/run-for-your-wife-is-this-movie-the-biggest-turkey-ever-filmed-8497478.html |access-date=2024-02-27 |website=The Independent |language=en}} The Berkhamsted & Tring Gazette reported "critics have been queuing up to batter recent release Run for Your Wife, with general agreement that it ranks among the worst British comedies of all time"."Run for Your Wife", Berkhamsted & Tring Gazette, March 11, 2013. Run for Your Wife was also a box office bomb, earning only £602 in its opening weekend at the British box office to its £900,000 budget.{{Cite web |title=Danny Dyer's Run For Your Wife takes just £602 at the box office |url=https://www.radiotimes.com/tv/comedy/danny-dyers-run-for-your-wife-takes-just-602-at-the-box-office/ |access-date=2024-02-27 |website=Radio Times |language=en-GB}}{{cite web |url=http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/movies/news/a460182/danny-dyers-run-for-your-wife-flops-with-gbp602-at-the-box-office.html |title=Danny Dyer's 'Run For Your Wife' flops with £747 at the box office | website=Digital Spy|date=February 20, 2013 |access-date=January 30, 2015}} Run for Your Wife has a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes {{as of|2015|July|29|lc=y|df=US}} based on 15 reviews.{{Cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/run_for_your_wife_2013/|title=Run For Your Wife (2013)|website=Rotten Tomatoes|publisher=Fandango|access-date=April 17, 2019}}

{{Main|Fateful Findings{{!}}Fateful Findings}}

Fateful Findings is a 2012 independent techno-thriller written, directed and produced by Neil Breen. Breen also starred in the film and took on most of the crew roles, including film editor, sound editor, accountant, caterer, set designer, wardrobe, makeup and casting. The film follows an author-turned-hacker with supernatural powers who uses his abilities to reveal vague "government and corporate secrets", while beset by numerous relationship dramas, and ends with an extended sequence at a press conference where politicians and businesspeople confess to corruption and kill themselves before an applauding crowd.

Writing for Film Threat, reviewer Mike Hodges described it as "the worst movie ever made", comparing it unfavorably to Troll 2 and The Room.{{cite web|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140222032832/https://filmthreat.com/reviews/66453/|url=https://filmthreat.com/reviews/66453/|first=Mike|last=Hodges|website=Film Threat|date=May 27, 2013|archive-date=February 22, 2014|access-date=February 1, 2018|url-status=dead|title=Fateful Findings}} Nathan Rabin, writing for Rotten Tomatoes, said Fateful Findings threatens The Room{{'}}s position as "best worst movie",{{cite web|url=https://editorial.rottentomatoes.com/article/why-fateful-findings-deserves-cult-status/|title=Why Fateful Findings Deserves Cult Status|first=Nathan|last=Rabin|date=December 8, 2015|website=Rotten Tomatoes|access-date=February 1, 2018}} while reviewers of the podcast The Flop House said "Move over The Room, move over Birdemic" and Mystery Science Theater 3000 head writer Elliott Kalan described it as the "good-est bad movie, maybe, I've ever seen".{{Cite AV media|url=https://soundcloud.com/the-flop-house/ep-187-fateful-findings|title=Ep. #187 – Fateful Findings|first=Elliot|last=Kalan|first2=Dan|last2=McCoy|first3=Stuart|last3=Wellington|date=September 19, 2015|publisher=The Flop House|access-date=February 1, 2018|time=50:22 to 50:55}} Paste Magazine said Fateful Findings sits "right next to [The Room] on the Mt. Rushmore of bad movies", and noted that while Tommy Wiseau had eventually embraced and encouraged mockery of The Room, Breen doesn't "pretend to be 'in on it'" and the film maintains a "magic" as sincere outsider art.{{cite web|title=Fateful Findings: The Room for the Next Generation of Bad Movie Lovers|date=1 September 2023|access-date=26 October 2023|website=Paste Magazine|url=https://www.pastemagazine.com/movies/neil-breen/fateful-findings-bad-movies-the-room|first=Jacob|last=Oller}} Screen Rant and the New York Daily News later listed it as one of the worst films of all time.

{{Main|Movie 43{{!}}Movie 43}}

Produced and co-directed by Peter Farrelly, among others, Movie 43 is a gross-out sex comedy film consisting of several vignettes each by a different director and a sizable cast of recognizable actors and actresses including Dennis Quaid, Greg Kinnear, Hugh Jackman, Kate Winslet, Liev Schreiber, Naomi Watts, Anna Faris, Emma Stone, Richard Gere, Uma Thurman, Chloë Grace Moretz, Gerard Butler, Halle Berry, Stephen Merchant, Kristen Bell, Terrence Howard, Elizabeth Banks, Kate Bosworth, Johnny Knoxville, Justin Long, Chris Pratt, Josh Duhamel, and Jason Sudeikis. Holding a score of 5% on Rotten Tomatoes, it is included on the site's 100 Worst Movies of All Time list, and is also on the MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list. Movie 43 won three awards at the 34th Golden Raspberry Awards: Worst Picture, Worst Director, and Worst Screenplay. In the Worst Director category, all 13 directors won the award.{{cite news|url=https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/envelope/moviesnow/la-et-mn-movie-43-named-worst-film-of-2013-razzie-awards-20140228,0,5893779.story |title='Movie 43' is named worst film of 2013 at the 34th Razzie Awards |work=Los Angeles Times |date=March 1, 2014 |access-date=March 1, 2014 |first=Susan |last=King}}

Several critics have called it one of the worst films ever made, including Peter Howell of the Toronto Star, who said, "There's just one use for Movie 43, apart from it being ground into the landfill that it deserves to become sooner rather than later. It provides me with a handy new answer to a question I'm often asked: 'What's the worst film you've ever seen?{{'"}}{{cite news|url=https://www.thestar.com/entertainment/movies/2013/01/25/movie_43_review_the_worst_film_ever_gets_zero_stars.html|title=Movie 43 review: The worst film ever gets zero stars|last=Howell|first=Peter|date=January 25, 2013|work=Toronto Star|access-date=April 17, 2019}} Brady Murphy of Murphy Reviews wrote that the movie "had no heart" and gave it the site's first zero out of ten rating.{{cite web |url=http://www.murphyreviews.com/movie-43.html |title=Movie 43 |publisher=Murphy Reviews |date=January 30, 2013 |access-date=November 18, 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131020021708/http://www.murphyreviews.com/movie-43.html |archive-date=October 20, 2013 }} Meanwhile, Richard Roeper of the Chicago Sun-Times voiced similar hatred, calling it "aggressively tasteless" and "the Citizen Kane of awful."{{cite news|url=http://www.suntimes.com/entertainment/17804431-421/theres-awful-and-then-theres-movie-43.html|title=There's awful and THEN there's Movie 43|date=January 25, 2013|work=Chicago Sun-Times|last=Roeper|first=Richard|author-link=Richard Roeper|access-date=November 18, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130129011636/http://www.suntimes.com/entertainment/17804431-421/theres-awful-and-then-theres-movie-43.html|archive-date=January 29, 2013|url-status=dead}} Lou Lumenick stated, "If you mashed-up the worst parts of the infamous Howard the Duck, Gigli, Ishtar and every other awful movie I've seen since I started reviewing professionally in 1981, it wouldn't begin to approach the sheer soul-sucking badness of the cringe-inducing Movie 43."{{cite web |last=Tobias |first=Scott |title=Weekend Box Office: Race to the bottom |url=https://www.avclub.com/weekend-box-office-race-to-the-bottom-1798235931 |website=The A.V. Club |access-date=March 16, 2024 |language=en |date=January 28, 2013}} Elizabeth Weitzman of the New York Daily News also considered it the worst movie she ever saw.{{cite news|url=http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tv-movies/movie-review-movie-43-article-1.1248520|title=Movie Review: Movie 43|last=Weitzman|first=Elizabeth|date=January 26, 2013|work=New York Daily News|access-date=April 17, 2019|location=New York}}

{{Main|Humshakals{{!}}Humshakals}}

File:Sajid Khan at Arbaaz Khan’s birthday bash at Su Casa.jpg's Humshakals as having succeeded his previous film, Himmatwala, in becoming the worst film in Bollywood history.]]

A Bollywood comedy film directed by Sajid Khan, Humshakals featured Indian actors Saif Ali Khan, Ram Kapoor and Riteish Deshmukh. On Rotten Tomatoes, the film has a 0% rating, based on six reviews, with an average rating of 2/10.{{cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/humshakals/ |title=Humshakals (2014) |website=Rotten Tomatoes |access-date=July 10, 2017}} Mihir Fadnavis wrote in his Firstpost review, "sexual tomfoolery, shrieking and hamming aside, there's much more to hate about this 'family movie'. It's disturbing to see such an atrocious, regressive, misogynistic, sexist, homophobic cinematic product force-fed to paying audiences. I can understand that a comedy need not be 'safe', but what goes on in Humshakals is simply too horrifying to bear."{{cite news|url=http://www.firstpost.com/blogs/humshakals-review-saif-ali-khan-riteish-deshmukh-team-up-to-give-you-brain-damage-1580181.html |title=Humshakals review: How Saif, Riteish teamed up to give your brain damage |work=Firstpost |last=Fadnavis|first=Mihir|date=June 22, 2014 |access-date=July 22, 2014}} Saurabh Dwivedi of India Today stated "I can only say that Humshakals will be listed in one of the worst films of the century."{{cite magazine|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/humshakals-movie-review-sajid-khan-riteish-deshmukh-saif-ali-khan/1/367688.html |title=Movie review: Humshakals is three times trash |last=Dwivedi|first=Saurabh|date=June 20, 2014|magazine=India Today}} Writing in Emirates 24/7, Sneha May Francis said that it succeeded Khan's previous endeavor, Himmatwala, in becoming the worst Bollywood film ever.{{cite web|url=http://www.emirates247.com/entertainment/films-music/saif-ali-khan-s-humshakals-act-could-make-kareena-insecure-2014-06-19-1.553579 |title=Saif Ali Khan's 'Humshakals' act could make Kareena insecure |last=Francis|first=Sneha May|publisher=Emirates 24/7 |date=June 29, 2014 |access-date=October 22, 2014}} Fadnavis went further, writing that it displaced Himmatwala as the "worst possible product any film industry in the world can offer". Itrath Syed of The Georgia Straight stated that Humshakals was "the absolute bottom of the cinematic barrel".{{cite web|url=https://www.straight.com/movies/673511/humshakals-redefines-dreadfulness|title=Humshakals redefines dreadfulness|work=The Georgia Straight|last=Syed|first=Itrath|date=June 25, 2014 |access-date=July 10, 2017}} The film received five Golden Kela Award nominations,{{cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/entertainment/humshakals-lead-nominations-list-at-golden-kela-awards/article6905214.ece |title=Humshakals' leads nominations list at Golden Kela Awards |newspaper=The Hindu |author=PTI|date=February 17, 2015 |access-date=October 22, 2014 |location=Chennai, India}} and won the "award" for Worst Film.{{cite web|url=http://www.thenational.ae/arts-lifestyle/from-holly-to-bolly/sonakshi-and-arjun-grab-top-golden-kela-awards |title=Sonakshi and Arjun grab top Golden Kela awards |newspaper=The National |author=IANS|date=March 15, 2015 |access-date=August 17, 2015}} It also won two Ghanta Awards; the film won Worst Picture and Ram Kapoor, Saif Ali Khan and Riteish Deshmukh shared the Worst Actor award.{{cite web|url=http://www.ibtimes.co.in/ghanta-awards-2015-complete-winners-list-sonakshi-sinha-ajay-devgn-win-worst-actor-awards-farah-625675 |title=Ghanta Awards 2015 Complete Winners List: Sonakshi Sinha, Ajay Devgn Win Worst Actor Awards; Farah Khan Worst Director |work=International Business Times|last=Mehta|first=Ankhita|date=March 9, 2015 |access-date=August 17, 2015}}

Several of the cast members also lamented their involvement in the film. Despite being the film's leading actress, Bipasha Basu did not participate in the film's promotions because she was "extremely disturbed by the end result" and stated that "Humshakals was the worst experience of my life".{{cite news |date=August 8, 2014 |title=Sajid Khan's Humshakals left me disturbed: Bipasha Basu |newspaper=Hindustan Times |url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/entertainment/tabloid/sajid-khan-s-humshakals-left-me-disturbed-bipasha-basu/article1-1249663.aspx |author=IANS|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140809060246/http://www.hindustantimes.com/entertainment/tabloid/sajid-khan-s-humshakals-left-me-disturbed-bipasha-basu/article1-1249663.aspx |url-status=dead |archive-date=August 9, 2014 |location=Mumbai}}{{cite web|url=http://www.rediff.com/movies/slide-show/slide-show-1-bipasha-humshakals-was-the-worst-experience-of-my-life/20140826.htm |title=Bipasha: Humshakals was the worst experience of my life |work=Rediff.com |date=August 26, 2014}} Another cast member, actress Esha Gupta, warned her family to not watch the film.{{cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/Humshakals-I-asked-my-father-not-to-watch-the-film-says-Esha-Gupta/articleshow/37616095.cms |title=Humshakals: I asked my father not to watch the film, says Esha Gupta |newspaper=Times of India |date= July 2, 2014 }} After the release of the film, leading actor Saif Ali Khan lamented that "I've been introspecting a lot and will never repeat a mistake that was Humshakals."{{cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/Saif-Ali-Khan-Humshakals-was-a-mistake/articleshow/38590378.cms |title=Saif Ali Khan: Humshakals was a mistake |newspaper=Times of India |date= July 18, 2014 }}

{{Main|Saving Christmas{{!}}Saving Christmas}}

Saving Christmas is a faith-based Christmas comedy film starring Kirk Cameron, who plays a fictionalized version of himself attempting to convince his brother-in-law (played by the film's director, Darren Doane) that Christmas is still a Christian holiday.{{Cite news|last=Kenigsberg|first=Ben|date=November 13, 2014|title=To Save Us All From Satan's Power|language=en-US|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/14/movies/kirk-camerons-saving-christmas-intervenes.html|access-date=June 8, 2020|issn=0362-4331}} On Rotten Tomatoes, the film has a 0% rating, based on 19 reviews, with an average rating of 2.40/10.{{cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/kirk_camerons_saving_christmas/reviews/|title=Kirk Cameron's Saving Christmas|website=Rotten Tomatoes|access-date=December 17, 2020}} Critic David Keyes described Saving Christmas as "The worst holiday movie ever made", Billings Gazette selected the film as the worst Christmas movie of all time,{{cite web|url=http://billingsgazette.com/entertainment/movies/the-worst-christmas-movies-of-all-time/collection_b50903c8-f2cf-54ce-8fea-90fac279d391.html|title=The 25 Worst Christmas Movies of All Time|work=Billings Gazette|date=December 12, 2016|access-date=July 28, 2017}} and Will Nicol of Digital Trends included it on his list of the ten worst movies ever made.{{cite web|url=https://www.digitaltrends.com/movies/worst-movies-ever-made/|title=10 Worst Movies You Can Watch|work=Digital Trends|last=Nicol|first=Will|date=May 10, 2017|access-date=July 28, 2017}} Christy Lemire picked Saving Christmas as the worst film she has ever reviewed and called it "The Room of Christmas movies" (while adding that she found The Room to be more enjoyable) and gave it a score of zero stars out of four.{{cite web|url=https://indiewire.com/2017/06/critics-worst-movies-ever-reviewed-1201843846/|title=Critics Pick the Worst Movies They've Ever Reviewed|work=IndieWire|last=Kohn|first=Eric|date=June 19, 2017|access-date=July 28, 2017}}{{Cite news|url=http://christylemire.com/kirk-camerons-saving-christmas/|title=Kirk Cameron's Saving Christmas|date=November 21, 2014|last=Lemire|first=Christy|author-link=Christy Lemire|work=Christy Lemire|access-date=September 9, 2018|language=en-US}} Reece Taylor of Comic Book Resources also considers it the worst film ever made.{{cite web |last1=Taylor |first1=Reece |title=Is This Christmas Film the Worst Movie of All Time? |url=https://www.cbr.com/worst-movie-all-time-kirk-cameron-saving-christmas/ |website=Comic Book Resources |access-date=December 26, 2024 |language=en |date=December 24, 2022}} The film's history after release was further marred by widespread vote brigading; Cameron asked fans to give the film positive reviews on Rotten Tomatoes,{{cite news |url= http://www.christianpost.com/news/kirk-cameron-urges-fans-to-improve-saving-christmas-rating-help-me-storm-the-gates-of-rotten-tomatoes-130072/ |title=Kirk Cameron Urges Fans to Improve Saving Christmas Rating, 'Help Me Storm the Gates of Rotten Tomatoes' |author=Koonse, Emma |newspaper=The Christian Post |date=November 21, 2014 |access-date=July 28, 2017}} which resulted in a backlash of Internet users instead travelling to the Rotten Tomatoes page to review bomb the film.{{cite web |url=https://cinemablend.com/new/Kirk-Cameron-Tried-Cheat-Rotten-Tomatoes-It-Did-Go-68399.html |title=Kirk Cameron Tried To Cheat Rotten Tomatoes, It Did Not Go Well |last=Wakeman |first=Gregory | work=CinemaBlend |date=November 25, 2014 |access-date=July 28, 2017}} Three weeks after its release, Saving Christmas became the lowest-rated film on IMDb's bottom 100 list. Cameron blamed the low rating on a Reddit campaign by "haters and atheists" to purposely lower the film's ratings.{{cite news|last=O'Neal|first=Sean|date=December 5, 2014|title=Kirk Cameron Is Crucified at the Hands of IMDb Users, Rises with Jesus Coffee|url=https://avclub.com/article/kirk-cameron-crucified-hands-imdb-users-rises-jesu-212677|newspaper=The A.V. Club|access-date=December 9, 2014}} The film won four awards, including Worst Picture, at the 35th Golden Raspberry Awards.{{cite news|last=King|first=Susan|date=February 21, 2015|title=Kirk Cameron's Saving Christmas Dominates the 35th Razzie Awards|url=https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/moviesnow/la-et-mn-kirk-cameron-35th-razzie-awards-20150220-story.html |newspaper=Los Angeles Times|access-date=July 28, 2017}}

{{Main|United Passions{{!}}United Passions}}

File:Tim Roth cropped.jpg, who starred in United Passions, called it "awful".{{cite web |url= https://metro.co.uk/2015/12/23/tim-roth-calls-his-fifa-movie-united-passions-awful-says-he-only-made-it-to-pay-his-kids-college-fees-5582396/ |website=Metro.co |title= Tim Roth calls his FIFA movie United Passions 'awful', says he only made it to pay his kids' college fees|date=December 23, 2015 }} The movie received the first Barry L. Bumstead Award during the 36th Golden Raspberry Awards,{{Cite web|url=https://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/movies/razzie-awards-hillarys-america-blows-golden-raspberries-at-preoscar-awards-shamefest-20170226-gulepe.html|title=Razzie Awards: Hillary's America blows golden raspberries at pre-Oscar awards shamefest|last=Idato|first=Michael|date=February 26, 2017|website=The Sydney Morning Herald |access-date=January 6, 2020}} and is tied for the lowest scoring film on Metacritic.]]

A 2014 English-language French drama film about the origins of the football world governing body Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), United Passions starred Tim Roth (as FIFA President Sepp Blatter), Gérard Depardieu and Sam Neill and was directed by Frédéric Auburtin. United Passions{{'}} release in the U.S. occurred simultaneously with the 2015 FIFA corruption case, in which several current and former members of FIFA's executive committee were arrested on charges of corruption,{{cite news |last=Scheck |first=Frank |title='United Passions': Film Review |url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/united-passions-film-review-799879 |newspaper=The Hollywood Reporter |access-date=June 4, 2015}} and Blatter himself resigned following repeated accusations of corruption at FIFA under his leadership.{{cite news |last=Parker |first=Graham |date=June 2, 2015 |title=Sepp Blatter: A history of scandal |url=http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2015/6/2/sepp-blatter-a-history-of-scandal.html |publisher=Al Jazeera |access-date=June 4, 2015}} United Passions was accused of ignoring these long-running claims.{{Cite web|url=https://www.goal.com/en/news/1717/editorial/2015/06/09/12556292/is-united-passions-the-worst-movie-of-all-time-fifa%E2%80%93|title=Is United Passions the worst movie of all time? Fifa propaganda film paints Blatter as a bastion of morality|last=Koylu|first=Enis|website=Goal.com|access-date=April 17, 2019}}{{cite news |last=Field |first=Paul |date=June 3, 2015 |title=United Passions review: FIFA's hideous £16 million movie is unintentional comedy gold |url=https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/united-passions-review-fifas-hideous-5817599 |newspaper=Daily Mirror |access-date=June 25, 2015}} London Evening Standard{{'}}s Des Kelly wrote that United Passions was "the worst movie ever made" and "the most extraordinary vanity exercise; a vile, self-aggrandizing, sugar-coated pile of manure".{{Cite web |url=https://www.standard.co.uk/sport/football/des-kelly-sugarcoated-fifa-film-is-spreading-around-europe-like-a-virus-9820165.html |title=Sugar-coated FIFA film is spreading around Europe like a virus |first=Des |last=Kelly |work=London Evening Standard |date=October 27, 2014 |access-date=June 25, 2015}} Sean Mahoney of Inquisitr called it the "worst movie ever".{{cite web |url=https://www.inquisitr.com/news-america-roach-rats-infected-cities/ |title= Worst Movie Ever: 'United Passions' FIFA Film Called 'Unwatchable' And 'Cinematic Excrement' |first= Sean|last= Mahoney| website=Inquisitr|date= June 8, 2015 }} Daniel Gold of The New York Times claimed United Passions is "one of the most unwatchable films in recent memory, a dishonest bit of corporate-suite sanitizing that's no good even for laughs",{{Cite web |first=Daniel M. |last=Gold |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/05/movies/review-in-united-passions-a-fictionalized-fifa-underwritten-by-the-soccer-group.html |title=Review: In 'United Passions', a Fictionalized FIFA, Underwritten by the Soccer Group |work=The New York Times|date=June 4, 2015|access-date=June 25, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150605175501/https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/05/movies/review-in-united-passions-a-fictionalized-fifa-underwritten-by-the-soccer-group.html |archive-date=2015-06-05}} later stating it would make the top three of his list of all time bad films.{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/videos/world/2015/06/14/exp-new-film-about-fifa-opens-in-the-u-s-.cnn|title='United Passions' not getting good reviews|publisher=CNN|date=June 14, 2015|access-date=September 4, 2015}} Several critics noted the irony of the film's depiction of Blatter as an anti-corruption campaigner. Paul Field of the Daily Mirror said that this created "unintentional comedy gold". On Rotten Tomatoes, United Passions has an approval rating of 0% based on 16 reviews,{{Cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/united_passions|title=United Passions (2015)|website=Rotten Tomatoes|publisher=Fandango Media|access-date=September 28, 2019}} while on Metacritic, the film holds a score of 1 out of 100, based on 9 critics, and is tied for the lowest scoring film on the site. Screen Rant subsequently included it on its list of the 25 worst movies of all time.

United Passions was also a box-office bomb, becoming the second-lowest-grossing film ever in American history, with a total take of $918, surpassed only by the 2006 thriller Zyzzyx Road.{{cite web|url=https://avclub.com/article/fifa-vanity-project-united-passions-breaks-box-off-221084|title=FIFA vanity project United Passions breaks box-office record (not the good kind)|last=Rife|first=Katie|date=June 19, 2015|work=The A.V. Club|publisher=The Onion|access-date=April 17, 2019}} The film additionally went directly to DVD in France and was not distributed in a number of other European countries.{{cite news|url=https://www.latimes.com/sports/sportsnow/la-sp-sn-fifa-movie-united-passions-bombs-20150608-story.html|title='United Passions,' which cost FIFA $29 million, has $607 box-office take|first=Austin|last=Knoblauch|work=Los Angeles Times|date=June 25, 2015|access-date=June 8, 2015}}{{cite web|url=http://www.espnfc.com/fifa-world-cup/story/2496658/fifa-film-united-passions-among-worst-in-us-history|title=FIFA film 'United Passions' one of worst in U.S. box office history|author=|work=ESPN FC|publisher=(ESPN)|date=June 25, 2015|access-date=June 21, 2015}} Several of the people involved in United Passions later expressed regret over the film. Director Auburtin called United Passions "a disaster" and added: "Now I'm seen as bad as the guy who brought AIDS to Africa or the guy who caused the financial crisis ... apparently I am a propaganda guy making films for corrupt people."{{cite news|url=https://hollywoodreporter.com/news/fifa-movie-director-breaks-silence-802760|title=FIFA Movie Director Breaks Silence on Bomb: "It's a Disaster; My Name Is All Over [This Mess]"|first1=Scott |last1=Roxborough |first2=Rhonda |last2=Richford |name-list-style=amp|work=The Hollywood Reporter|date=June 17, 2015|access-date=June 25, 2015}} Roth apologized for taking part in the film and admitted that he took the job in United Passions for the money. It also received the first Barry L. Bumstead Award during the 36th Golden Raspberry Awards,{{Cite web|url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/razzie-awards-mock-fifty-shades-870615|title=Razzie Awards Mock 'Fifty Shades of Grey,' Redeem Sylvester Stallone|website=The Hollywood Reporter|date=February 28, 2016 |language=en|access-date=January 6, 2020}} a special category for critical and financial failures that were not given an eligible release.

{{Main|Dirty Grandpa}}

Dirty Grandpa, a 2016 comedy film starring Robert De Niro and Zac Efron as a grandfather and grandson going to Florida during spring break, received negative reviews for its gross-out and shock humor that was also considered as sexist,{{Cite web|url=http://sassymamainla.com/2016/01/how-dirty-grandpa-made-my-feminism-hurt/.html|title=How DIRTY GRANDPA Made My Feminism Hurt: An Exposé|last=Howard|first=Courtney|date=January 22, 2016|website=Sassy Mama in LA|language=en-US|access-date=September 28, 2019|archive-date=December 27, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181227042320/http://sassymamainla.com/2016/01/how-dirty-grandpa-made-my-feminism-hurt/.html|url-status=dead}} homophobic, and racist.{{Cite web|url=https://slate.com/human-interest/2016/02/comedies-like-dirty-grandpa-get-hard-are-horribly-homophobic.html|title=Some of Hollywood's Most Successful Comedies Have a "Hipster Homophobia" Problem|last=Lang|first=Nico|date=February 10, 2016|website=Slate Magazine|language=en|access-date=September 28, 2019}} Mike Ryan of Uproxx said: "Dirty Grandpa is the worst movie I've ever seen in a movie theater. Burn it."{{Cite web|url=https://www.indiewire.com/2016/01/reviews-is-dirty-grandpa-robert-deniros-worst-movie-ever-124909/|title=Reviews: Is 'Dirty Grandpa' Robert DeNiro's Worst Movie Ever?|last=Murthi|first=Vikram|date=January 22, 2016|website=IndieWire|language=en|access-date=December 26, 2018}} He later also picked it as the worst film he had ever both reviewed and seen.{{cite news|last=Ryan|first=Mike|title='Dirty Grandpa': The Most Important Movie Ever Made|url=http://uproxx.com/movies/dirty-grandpa-review/|access-date=January 16, 2018|publisher=Uproxx|date=January 21, 2016}} Pete Hammond of Deadline Hollywood said the film "is not just the worst movie [De Niro] has ever been in, but it may be the worst movie anyone has ever been in."{{Cite web|url=https://deadline.com/2016/01/dirty-grandpa-review-zac-efron-robert-de-niro-worst-ever-1201688276/|title='Dirty Grandpa' Review: The Worst Film Of Robert De Niro's Career (Or Maybe Anybody's)|last=Hammond|first=Pete|date=January 22, 2016|website=Deadline|language=en|access-date=December 26, 2018}} Glenn McDonald of Indy Week said: "The awful, ugly Dirty Grandpa is the comedy equivalent of torture porn ... In fact, in the dizzying moments after being bludgeoned by this miserable specimen, I was convinced it's among the worst movies ever made."{{Cite web|url=https://indyweek.com/culture/archives/movie-review-awful-ugly-dirty-grandpa-comedy-equivalent-torture-porn/|title=Movie review: The awful, ugly Dirty Grandpa is the comedy equivalent of torture porn|last=McDonald|first=Glenn|date=January 22, 2016|website=INDY Week|language=en-us|access-date=December 26, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181227181550/https://indyweek.com/culture/archives/movie-review-awful-ugly-dirty-grandpa-comedy-equivalent-torture-porn/ |archive-date=2018-12-27}} Richard Roeper gave the film zero stars, writing, "If Dirty Grandpa isn't the worst movie of 2016, I have some serious cinematic torture in my near future."{{Cite web|url=https://chicago.suntimes.com/entertainment/dirty-grandpa-robert-de-niro-deserves-better-than-this-dreck/|title='Dirty Grandpa': Robert De Niro deserves better than this dreck|website=Chicago Sun-Times|date=March 6, 2016 |language=en|access-date=December 26, 2018}} On his YouTube channel, Roeper also said: "I'm not ready to say Dirty Grandpa is the worst movie I've ever seen, but I'm also not ready to say it's not the worst movie I've ever seen."{{Citation|title=Richard Roeper Reviews "Dirty Grandpa"|date=January 21, 2016 |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOu2gzJiaCg|archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211028/XOu2gzJiaCg|archive-date=October 28, 2021|language=en|access-date=September 29, 2019}}{{cbignore}} Mark Kermode, on his BBC Radio 5 Live show (Kermode and Mayo's Film Review), said that he found the film "truly, genuinely horrible" and went on to say, "after Dirty Grandpa I did feel genuinely unclean, I wanted to go and have a shower, because it's just so revolting. Somewhere in hell there is a multiplex playing this on a double bill, with Movie 43 and Entourage."{{Citation|last=kermodeandmayo|title=Dirty Grandpa reviewed by Mark Kermode|date=January 29, 2016 |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05GwDHYXlmI|archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211028/05GwDHYXlmI|archive-date=October 28, 2021|access-date=December 27, 2018}}{{cbignore}} He would later go on to brand it his least favorite film of 2016.{{Citation|last=kermodeandmayo|title=The Ten Worst Films of 2016: Part Two|date=December 30, 2016 |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4NwzBUjeMl0|archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211028/4NwzBUjeMl0|archive-date=October 28, 2021|access-date=December 27, 2018}}{{cbignore}}

Glenn Kenny of RogerEbert.com said: "The actor Bela Lugosi appeared in some landmark, perhaps even great, films at the beginning of his Hollywood career in the 1930s. ... Lugosi's final film was 1957's Plan 9 from Outer Space, frequently cited as the worst film ever made. The cinematic landmarks of De Niro's career include films such as Coppola's The Godfather Part II and Scorsese's Raging Bull. He has been featured in a good number of very bad films in the years since. But this? This might just be his own Plan 9."{{Cite web|url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/dirty-grandpa-2016|title=Dirty Grandpa Movie Review & Film Summary (2016)|last=Kenny|first=Glenn|website=RogerEbert.com|language=en|access-date=February 17, 2019}} The film has an approval rating of 10% at Rotten Tomatoes based on 135 reviews, with an average rating of 3.1/10,{{Cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/dirty_grandpa/|title=Dirty Grandpa (2016)|website=Rotten Tomatoes|publisher=Fandango Media|access-date=November 18, 2021}} while on Metacritic it has a score of 21 out of 100 based on 27 critics, indicating "generally unfavorable reviews".{{Cite web|url=https://www.metacritic.com/movie/dirty-grandpa|title=Dirty Grandpa Reviews|website=Metacritic|publisher=CBS Interactive|access-date=September 28, 2019}} At the 37th Golden Raspberry Awards it received five nominations, for Worst Picture, Worst Actor (De Niro), Worst Screenplay, and two nominations for Worst Supporting Actress (Julianne Hough and Aubrey Plaza), but did not win in any category.

{{Main|Guardians (2017 film){{!}}Guardians (2017 film)}}

Guardians is a 2017 Russian superhero film{{Cite web|url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/guardians-movie-trailer-2017-russian-923229/|title=Trailer for Russian Superhero Movie 'Guardians' Is So Weird It Just Might Be Good|first=Aaron|last=Couch|website=The Hollywood Reporter |date=August 26, 2016}}{{Cite web|url=https://mubi.com/films/guardians-2017|title=Guardians|via=mubi.com}} about a team of Soviet superheroes created during the Cold War.{{Cite web|url=https://letterboxd.com/film/guardians-2017/|title=Guardians (2017)|website=Letterboxd|access-date=April 17, 2019}} It was criticized for having a derivative plot, bad acting and direction, cheap CGI, plot holes, and overall low quality. Kg-portal.ru wrote that "Guardians is a film from which Russian cinema should be protected. It's like a sequel to Plan 9 from Outer Space, filmed by Uwe Boll, with the screenplay by Tommy Wiseau and with him in the lead role."{{cite news|url=https://kg-portal.ru/movies/zaschitniki/reviews/5269/|script-title=ru:Дерьмо на экспорт

|language=ru|work=kg-portal.ru|date=October 23, 2017|access-date=February 19, 2019}} Rossiyskaya Gazeta commented that the film was "Worse than you can imagine."{{cite news|url=https://rg.ru/2017/02/24/zashchitniki-sarika-andreasiana-naskolko-eto-ploho.html|script-title=ru:Ослик, суслик, Андреасян

|language=ru|work=Rossiyskaya Gazeta|date=February 24, 2017|access-date=February 23, 2019}} Meduza compared the film's director, Sarik Andreasyan, to Plan 9 from Outer Space{{'}}s director, Ed Wood, and said that Guardians "is a convincing answer to the eternal question of why we can never catch up with Hollywood even in our own box office".{{cite news|url=https://meduza.io/feature/2017/02/23/filmy-na-nedelyu-patrioticheskie-i-uzhasayuschie-zaschitniki-a-takzhe-dzheki-toni-erdmann-i-slishkom-svobodnyy-chelovek|script-title=ru:Фильмы на неделю: патриотические (и ужасающие) "Защитники", а также "Джеки", "Тони Эрдманн" и "Слишком свободный человек"|language=ru|work=Meduza|date=October 23, 2017|access-date=February 19, 2019}} Afisha said that it was the Russian answer to Howard the Duck,{{cite news|url=https://daily.afisha.ru/cinema/4639-zaschitniki-nash-otvet-govardu-utke/|script-title=ru:"Защитники" Сарика Андреасяна: наш ответ Говарду-утке|language=ru|work=Afisha|date=October 23, 2017|access-date=February 19, 2019}} and Ivi, Inc. commented that "a more talentless film is hard to imagine".{{cite news|url=https://www.ivi.tv/watch/143155/reviews/44706|script-title=ru:Защитите нас от "Защитников"|language=ru|work=Ivi, Inc.|date=October 23, 2017|access-date=February 19, 2019|archive-date=February 20, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190220181302/https://www.ivi.tv/watch/143155/reviews/44706|url-status=dead}} RIA Novosti placed it at the top of their worst film list{{cite news|url=https://ria.ru/20171128/1509765632.html?referrer_block=index_daynews3_1|script-title=ru:Самый худший фильм: какие картины последних лет разочаровали зрителей

|language=ru|publisher=RIA Novosti|date= November 28, 2017|access-date=February 19, 2019

|work=РИА Новости

}} and Russian review aggregator Kritikanstvo listed it among the all-time lowest-scoring films.{{cite news|url=http://www.kritikanstvo.ru/top/movies/worst/alltime/|script-title=ru:Худшие фильмы|language=ru|publisher=Kritikanstvo|access-date=February 19, 2019}} Critics outside of Russia generally panned the film but were not as harsh, as it has a 33% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 12 reviews.{{cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/guardians_2017|title=Guardians (Zashchitniki)|work=Rotten Tomatoes|publisher=Fandango|access-date=November 18, 2021}} A sequel was planned,{{cite web |url= https://hollywoodreporter.com/news/russian-superhero-film-china-release-868671|title= Russian Cold War Superhero Film to Get China Release Under Import Quota|first=Vladimir|last=Kozlov|date= February 23, 2016|access-date= February 23, 2019|work= The Hollywood Reporter}} but the film was a box-office bomb, which resulted in the film's production company, Enjoy Movies, subsequently filing for bankruptcy, and the Cinema Foundation of Russia, which provided part of the budget, suing the company and demanding a return of the investment.

{{main|Loqueesha{{!}}Loqueesha}}

The 2019 comedy film Loqueesha stars Jeremy Saville, who also independently wrote, directed, and produced the film, as Joe, who needs money to pay for his son's private school education and, after getting rejected for a job as a radio host, the listing for which encourages women and minorities to apply, gets the job by pretending to be a sassy black woman named Loqueesha who gives out advice on air.{{cite web |last=Rabin |first=Nathan |title=Loqueesha is Somehow Much Worse Than It Looks |url=https://www.nathanrabin.com/happy-place/2019/6/3/birth-of-a-soul-sister-case-file-127my-year-of-flops-ii-24-loqueesha |website=Nathan Rabin's Happy Place |author-link=Nathan Rabin |date=August 1, 2022 |access-date=August 3, 2022}} The film's trailer and poster were panned online as racist and stereotypical upon their release,{{cite web |last=Graham |first=Adam |title=Detroit-set film 'Loqueesha' causes social media stir |url=https://www.detroitnews.com/story/entertainment/movies/2019/05/13/detroit-set-film-loqueesha-causes-social-media-stir/1189396001/ |website=The Detroit News |access-date=July 8, 2022 |date=May 13, 2019}} with Entertainment.ie{{'}}s Brian Lloyd writing that it was "one the [sic] worst fucking things we have ever seen, and we still can't believe it's actually real".{{cite web |last=Richards |first=Brian |title="Loqueesha" Is A Movie That Actually Exists In The Year 2019, And This Trailer Is More Disturbing Than Any Horror Movie |url=https://www.pajiba.com/web_culture/the-trailer-for-loqueesha-is-more-disturbing-than-any-horror-movie.php |website=Pajiba |access-date=July 8, 2022 |date=May 11, 2019}}{{cite web |last=Lloyd |first=Brian |title=Here's the trailer for 'Loqueesha', the worst movie of this decade |url=https://entertainment.ie/movies/movie-news/heres-the-trailer-for-loqueesha-the-worst-movie-of-this-decade-401275/ |website=Entertainment.ie |access-date=July 8, 2022 |language=en |date=May 11, 2019}} Upon seeing the actual film, Nathan Rabin said that the film was "somehow much worse" than the trailer led people to believe.

The film was universally panned by critics, as it garnered a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.{{cite web |title=Loqueesha |url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/loqueesha |access-date=July 9, 2022 |website=Rotten Tomatoes |publisher=Fandango |language=en}} Joel Golby of The Guardian called the plot "one of the more offensive in history", also criticizing its lighting, sound design, and acting, among other aspects of the film, and writing, "The worst film ever made. Worse than The Room, in every way. The one-star rating it currently has on IMDb is actively generous. I cannot believe this film got made."{{cite web |last=Golby |first=Joel |title=Is Loqueesha the worst film ever made? |url=https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2019/jun/08/is-loqueesha-worst-film-ever-made |website=The Guardian |access-date=July 8, 2022 |language=en |date=June 8, 2019}} Dan Kahan of Popdust called it "genuinely the worst movie [he had] ever watched", calling Saville an "unbelievable racist" and deeming the movie "grotesque", "abhorrent", and "criminal".{{cite web |last=Kahan |first=Dan |title=Delete This Film: "Loqueesha" Is Genuinely the Worst Movie I've Ever Watched |url=https://www.popdust.com/loqueesha-is-worst-movie-ever-2638947149.html |website=Popdust |access-date=July 8, 2022 |language=en |date=June 23, 2019}} For Decider, Kay-B wrote that she "wouldn't recommend this film to anyone, living or dead" as it was "painfully hard to watch" while also dubbing it "the year's most reviled movie".{{cite web |author1=Kay-B |title='Loqueesha,' The Year's Most Reviled Movie, Is Now Streaming on Amazon Prime |url=https://decider.com/2019/06/05/loqueesha-review/ |website=Decider |access-date=July 8, 2022 |date=June 5, 2019}}

{{main|Cats (2019 film){{!}}Cats (2019 film)}}

File:Cats Logo.svg, who wrote the 1980s Tony Award-winning original stage version of Cats, called the film "ridiculous". It was widely panned for unusual CGI and poor performances.{{Cite web |url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/andrew-lloyd-webber-cats-movie-ridiculousl_n_5f27f889c5b656e9b09e26be |title=Andrew Lloyd Webber Lashes Out At 'Cats' Movie And Director |work=HuffPost|date=August 3, 2020 }}{{Cite magazine |url=https://ew.com/movies/andrew-lloyd-webber-slams-cats-movie-ridiculous/ |title=Andrew Lloyd Webber slams Cats film adaptation |magazine=Entertainment Weekly}}]]

Cats is a film adaptation of the popular musical penned by Andrew Lloyd Webber{{Cite web |url=https://www.thewrap.com/cats-movie-may-happen-andrew-lloyd-webber-says/ |title='Cats' Movie May Happen, Lord Andrew Lloyd Webber Says |date=December 3, 2013 |website=TheWrap|access-date=February 21, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180720195119/https://www.thewrap.com/cats-movie-may-happen-andrew-lloyd-webber-says/|archive-date=July 20, 2018|url-status=live}}{{cite web|url=https://deadline.com/2020/08/andrew-lloyd-webber-cats-movie-tom-hooper-1203001983/|title=Andrew Lloyd Webber Says Movie Adaptation Of 'Cats' Was "Ridiculous"|first=Dino-Ray|last=Ramos|work=Deadline|date=August 2, 2020|access-date=August 3, 2020}} (based on the works of T. S. Eliot) and directed by Academy Award-winning filmmaker Tom Hooper (The King's Speech).{{Cite web|url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/cats-movie-review-2019|title=Cats movie review & film summary (2019) | Roger Ebert|first=Sheila|last=O'Malley|website=RogerEbert.com}} The film is about a tribe of cats called the Jellicles as they hold their Jellicle Ball, an annual ceremony where the cats compete for the chance to enter the Heaviside Layer, where the chosen Jellicle will be granted a new life.{{Cite web|url=https://letterboxd.com/film/cats-2019/|title=Cats (2019)|via=letterboxd.com}}

Lloyd Webber condemned the film as "ridiculous" stating, "The problem with the film was that Tom Hooper decided that he didn't want anybody involved in it who was involved in the original show."{{cite web|url=https://deadline.com/2020/08/andrew-lloyd-webber-cats-movie-tom-hooper-1203001983/|title=Andrew Lloyd Webber Says Movie Adaptation Of 'Cats' Was "Ridiculous"|first=Dino-Ray|last=Ramos|work=Deadline|date=August 2, 2020|access-date=September 23, 2020}}

It was criticized for CGI "digital fur technology", which depicted the film's actors as bipedal cats. An updated version of the film, with a refined CGI patch, was sent to theaters after its premiere.{{cite news|url=https://www.theverge.com/2019/12/23/21034843/cats-film-updated-digital-fur-technology|title=Cats is being patched with 'improved visual effects'|date=December 23, 2019 |work=The Verge|first1=Thomas |last1=Ricker}} Describing the experimentation with digital fur as one of the worst decisions in movie history, Rolling Stone wrote: "There are many, many other problems with Cats, ... but it was hard for anyone to focus on any of them when it just looked so shitty and disturbing." Other critics also panned the performances of some of the actors, with James Corden and Rebel Wilson (who parodied themselves at the 92nd Academy Awards) receiving the most criticism.{{Cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqAe7U54ry0|title="1917" wins Best Visual Effects|date=March 11, 2020 |via=YouTube}}{{cite web|url=https://www.cinemablend.com/news/2489991/the-oscars-cats-jokes-has-the-academy-in-hot-water-with-the-visual-effects-society|title=The Oscars' Cats Jokes Has The Academy In Hot Water With The Visual Effects Society – CINEMABLEND|date=February 11, 2020 }} {{as of|June 2024}}, Cats sits at a 19% on Rotten Tomatoes.{{cite web|title=Cats (2019)|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/cats_2019|access-date=June 10, 2024|website=Rotten Tomatoes|publisher=Fandango}} The film won six awards out of nine nominations at the 40th Golden Raspberry Awards, including Worst Director for Hooper, Worst Supporting Actress for Wilson, Worst Supporting Actor for Corden, and Worst Picture overall.{{cite magazine|url=https://ew.com/awards/2020-razzie-award-winners-cats/|title= Razzies 2020 winners list: Cats wins Worst Picture at Razzie Awards|magazine=Entertainment Weekly}}

Early reviews for Cats were embargoed.{{Cite news |last=Lodge |first=Guy |date=2019-12-18 |title=Feline confident? Cats' last-minute dash to the cinema |url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/2019/dec/18/cats-musical-awards-trailer-premiere-box-office |access-date=2024-02-27 |work=The Guardian |language=en-GB |issn=0261-3077}}{{Cite news |date=2019-12-17 |title=Star Wars and Cats: First reactions pour in |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-50822692 |access-date=2024-02-27 |work=BBC News |language=en-GB}} Manohla Dargis from The New York Times commented that "[a] doctoral thesis could be written about how this misfire sputtered into existence".{{Cite news |last=Convery |first=Stephanie |date=2019-12-19 |title='A furry orgy in a dumpster': what the reviews say about Cats |url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/2019/dec/19/a-furry-orgy-in-a-dumpster-what-the-reviews-say-about-cats |access-date=2024-02-27 |work=The Guardian |language=en-GB |issn=0261-3077}} British newspaper The Daily Telegraph called the film an "all-time disaster" with reviewer Tim Robey giving the film "zero stars" in his review.{{Cite news |last=Robey |first=Tim |date=2019-12-19 |title=Cats review: a sinister, all-time disaster from which no one emerges unscathed |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/0/cats-review-sinister-all-time-disaster-no-one-emerges-unscathed/ |access-date=2024-02-27 |work=The Telegraph |language=en-GB |issn=0307-1235}}{{Cite news |date=2019-12-19 |title=Cats star Jason Derulo says 'reviews don't matter' after the film is panned by critics |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/12/19/cats-star-jason-derulo-says-reviews-dont-matter-film-panned/ |access-date=2024-02-27 |work=The Telegraph |language=en-GB |issn=0307-1235}}{{Cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/0/cats-review-sinister-all-time-disaster-no-one-emerges-unscathed/|title=Cats review: a sinister, all-time disaster from which no one emerges unscathed|first=Tim|last=Robey|newspaper=The Telegraph |date=December 19, 2019}} Critics from The Washington Post, Rolling Stone and The Detroit News wrote that it was a candidate for the worst film of the 2010s, with The Detroit News reviewer Adam Graham writing: "Cats is the biggest disaster of the decade, and possibly thus far in the millennium. It's Battlefield Earth with whiskers."{{cite news|last=Graham|first=Adam|title=Review: Me-ouch! Film version of 'Cats' a Deuteronomy disaster|url=https://www.detroitnews.com/story/entertainment/movies/2019/12/19/cats-movie-review-disaster/2664918001/|access-date=December 20, 2019|work=The Detroit News|date=December 19, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191219231516/https://www.detroitnews.com/story/entertainment/movies/2019/12/19/cats-movie-review-disaster/2664918001/|archive-date=December 19, 2019|url-status=live}}{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/arts-entertainment/2019/12/20/biggest-disaster-decade-roundup-most-memorable-cats-reviews/|title='Cats': Critics pan Andrew Lloyd Webber musical's movie adaptation |newspaper=The Washington Post}}{{Cite magazine|url=https://www.rollingstone.com/movies/movie-reviews/cats-movie-review-taylor-swift-927486/|title='Cats': A Broadway Musical Adaptation Straight Outta the Litter Box |magazine=Rolling Stone }} Graham later selected Cats as the worst movie he had ever seen. Wade Major of CineGods.com slammed it as "Showgirls with fur", while Battlefield Earth screenwriter J. David Shapiro (who previously won the Razzie for Worst Screenplay) said Cats had usurped his film as the worst ever made.{{Cite web|url=https://cinegods.com/tomato-slam-cats/|title=TOMATO SLAM: CATS|first=Wade|last=Major|date=December 20, 2019}}{{cite web |last=Chilton |first=Louis |title=Writer of Battlefield Earth names Cats as the new worst movie ever |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/battlefield-earth-cats-musical-worst-movie-ever-scientology-travolta-a9515991.html |website=The Independent |access-date=March 16, 2024 |language=en |date= May 15, 2020}} Cats was included on Time Out{{'}}s 40 Best Bad Movies Ever Made list.

{{Main|365 Days (2020 film){{!}}365 Days (2020 film)}}

File:Michele Morrone Blanka Lipińska Anna Maria Sieklucka.jpg, Blanka Lipińska, and Michele Morrone (from left to right) appeared at a promotional event for 365 Days]]

365 Days (Polish: 365 Dni) is a 2020 Polish erotic romantic drama film directed by Barbara Białowąs and Tomasz Mandes.{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/02/movies/365-days-netflix.html|title=How '365 Days' Became One of Netflix's Worst-Reviewed Big Hits|first=Ashley|last=Spencer|newspaper=The New York Times |date=July 2, 2020}} It is based on the first novel of a trilogy by Blanka Lipińska. The plot follows a young woman from Warsaw in a spiritless relationship falling for a dominant Sicilian man, who imprisons and imposes on her a period of 365 days for which to fall in love with him. It stars Michele Morrone as Don Massimo Torricelli and Anna-Maria Sieklucka as Laura Biel. The film was released theatrically in Poland on February 7, 2020, and was later made available on Netflix on June 7, 2020, where, despite extremely negative critical response, it became one of the most-watched films, for a time being the fourth-most-watched media on Netflix UK and the third-most-watched media on Netflix US, and gained global attention.{{Cite web|date=June 23, 2020|title=365 Days: the Netflix softcore porn film that people can't stop watching|url=http://www.theguardian.com/film/2020/jun/23/365-days-netflix-polish-film|access-date=August 7, 2021|website=The Guardian|language=en}} It was also a box-office success at Polish cinemas, grossing an estimated $8,964,000.{{Cite news |last=Day |first=Matt |date=June 23, 2020 |title=Controversial erotic thriller dubbed one of the worst films EVER becomes global smash |url=https://www.thefirstnews.com/article/controversial-erotic-thriller-becomes-global-smash-13560 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200723031959/https://www.thefirstnews.com/article/controversial-erotic-thriller-becomes-global-smash-13560 |archive-date=2020-07-23 |access-date=2024-11-01 |work=The First News}} The film received overwhelmingly negative reviews from critics, who heavily criticized its softcore themes, sexual violence and Mafia glorification. Rotten Tomatoes collected 16 reviews and identified 0% of them as positive, with an average rating of 1.9/10.{{Citation|title=365 Days (2020)|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/365_days_2020|language=en|access-date=August 7, 2021}} Polish English-language news website The First News says that it has been dubbed one of the worst films ever. Taylor Andrews of Cosmopolitan called it the worst thing he had ever seen.{{Cite web|last=Taylor Andrews|date=June 8, 2020|title=Please, I Beg You: Do Not Watch '365 DNI' for Anything but the Sex Scenes|url=https://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love/a32802161/365-dni-netflix-review-sexy-controversy/|access-date=August 7, 2021|website=Cosmopolitan|language=en-US}} Kevin Maher of The Times said "There haven't been line readings this poor since the third act of The Room" and "It makes the bonking puppets in Team America: World Police look like straight-faced documentary".{{Cite news|last=Maher|first=Kevin|title=365 Days review — this Polish soft-porn flick is execrable|newspaper=The Times|language=en|url=https://www.thetimes.com/culture/tv-radio/article/365-days-review-this-polish-soft-porn-flick-is-execrable-htjjv8kd9|access-date=August 7, 2021|issn=0140-0460|date=June 19, 2020}} Maddy Mussen of The Tab called it "the worst thing Netflix has ever produced" and said "If you have watched 365 Days on Netflix, there will not be a doubt in your mind that it's the worst thing you've ever seen."{{Cite web|date=June 16, 2020|title=27 reasons why '365 Days' is the worst thing Netflix has ever produced|url=https://thetab.com/uk/2020/06/16/27-reasons-why-365-days-is-the-worst-thing-netflix-has-ever-produced-161825|access-date=August 7, 2021|website=UK|language=en-GB}} Jessica Kiang of Variety called it "a thoroughly terrible, politically objectionable, occasionally hilarious Polish humpathon".{{Cite web|last=Kiang|first=Jessica|date=June 10, 2020|title='365 Days': Film Review|url=https://variety.com/2020/film/reviews/365-days-review-365-dni-1234629333/|access-date=August 7, 2021|website=Variety|language=en-US}}

In March 2021, the film was nominated for six Golden Raspberry Awards, for Worst Picture, Worst Director, Worst Actor (Michele Morrone), Worst Actress (Anna-Maria Sieklucka), Worst Screenplay and Worst Prequel, Remake, Rip-off or Sequel,{{Cite web|url=https://www.joblo.com/razzie-nominations-dolittle-365-days-worst-of-the-year/|title=Razzie Nominations: Dolittle & 365 Days top nods for worst of the year|first=Gaius|last=Bolling|date=March 12, 2021}} becoming the second foreign-language film to be nominated for Worst Picture after Italy's Pinocchio (2002; albeit the dubbed version),{{Cite web|title=RAZZ NEWZ|url=http://razzies.com/razz-newz.html|access-date=August 7, 2021|website=The Razzies!|language=en}} and won only one in the Screenplay category.{{Cite web|url=https://editorial.rottentomatoes.com/article/razzie-awards-2021-winners/|title=Razzie Awards 2021 Winners: Music, 365 Days Win Big at 41st Golden Raspberry Awards}}

{{Main|Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey{{!}}Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey}}

File:Rhys_Frake-Waterfield_2023.png (directed by Rhys Frake-Waterfield, pictured above) was critically panned{{cite web |url=https://collider.com/winnie-the-pooh-blood-and-honey-review |last=Bonaime |first=Ross |title='Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey' Review: Oh (Don't) Bother |date=February 16, 2023 |website=Collider}} for its cheap quality and poor execution.]]

Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey is a 2023 low-budget British horror film which reimagines the characters of the series of children's books by A.A. Milne as mutant slasher villains, released after Milne's work entered the public domain a year prior.{{cite web |last=Neuenkirchen |first=Andreas |title=Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey Is Building to an Anti-Disney Horror Universe |url=https://www.cbr.com/winnie-the-pooh-blood-and-honey-anti-disney/ |website=Comic Book Resources |access-date=March 10, 2024 |language=en |date=February 10, 2023}}{{cite web |url=https://collider.com/best-winnie-the-pooh-movies |title=The 10 Best Winnie the Pooh Movies Before Seeing 'Blood And Honey' |last=Searle |first=Tyler B. |website=Collider |date=August 5, 2022}} It was widely criticized for its premise, alongside lack of humor, poor acting, low grade special effects, incoherent screenplay, poorly lit scenes and dearth of interesting characters.{{cite web |last=Harvey |first=Dennis |title='Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey' Review: An Un-Bear-Able Horror Cheapie |url=https://variety.com/2023/film/reviews/winnie-the-pooh-blood-and-honey-review-1235524780/ |website=Variety |access-date=17 February 2023 |date=16 February 2023 |archive-date=16 February 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230216095917/https://variety.com/2023/film/reviews/winnie-the-pooh-blood-and-honey-review-1235524780/ |url-status=live}}{{cite web |last=Allen |first=Nick |title=Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/winnie-the-pooh-blood-and-honey-movie-review-2023 |website=RogerEbert.com |access-date=17 February 2023 |date=16 February 2023 |archive-date=16 February 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230216172442/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/winnie-the-pooh-blood-and-honey-movie-review-2023 |url-status=live}} Nathan Rabin stated that the film was "the regrettable product of a loophole in copyright law that allowed these vultures to twist and distort and corrupt A.A. Milne's beloved icons of gentleness and childhood innocence to their own mercenary ends."{{cite web |last=Rabin |first=Nathan |author-link=Nathan Rabin |title=I Hated, Hated, Hated Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey |url=https://nathanrabin.substack.com/p/i-hated-hated-hated-winnie-the-pooh |website=Nathan Rabin's Bad Ideas |access-date=March 11, 2024 |date=20 February 2023}} Rabin issued his first zero star review for the film, in which he referenced Roger Ebert's 1994 review of North{{cite web |last=Ebert |first=Roger |author-link=Roger Ebert|title=North movie review & film summary (1994) |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/north-1994 |website=RogerEbert.com |date=July 22, 1994 |access-date=April 8, 2024 |language=en}} by stating: "I Hated, Hated, Hated Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey." With a score of 3%, it appears on Rotten Tomatoes' 100 Worst Movies of All Time list.{{cite web |title=Bad Movies: The 100 Worst Movies of All Time |url=https://editorial.rottentomatoes.com/guide/worst-movies-of-all-time/ |website=Rotten Tomatoes |publisher=Fandango |access-date=March 10, 2024}} Screen Rant later placed it at the top of their 10 Terrible Movies You Don't Have to See to Know They're Bad list.{{cite web |last=Walters |first=Jack |title=10 Terrible Movies You Don't Have To See To Know They're Bad |url=https://screenrant.com/terrible-movies-not-see-know-bad/ |website=Screen Rant |access-date=March 29, 2024 |language=en |date=26 July 2023}}

Shawn Paul Wood of The Cinema Spot wrote, "As anyone can tell, Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey is one of the worst movies ever made. And, by the looks of its dazzling lack of antipathy for protecting its copyright, Disney knew it."{{cite web |last=Wood |first=Shawn Paul |title=Bearly Watchable 'Winnie the Pooh: Blood And Honey' Dared Disney To Stop It |url=https://www.thecinemaspot.com/2023/11/12/winnie-the-pooh-blood-and-honey-dared-disney-to-stop-it |website=The Cinema Spot |access-date=March 10, 2024 |date=November 12, 2023}} Matt Villei of Collider wrote, "If these reviews are anything to go by, the film might find itself in a spot of bother as it is being called one of the worst horror movies ever, though some predicted that, from its low quality, the film could garner a cult following similar to Tommy Wiseau's disasterpiece, The Room."{{cite web |last=Villei |first=Matt |title=First 'Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey' Reactions Call It "Stifled," "So Bad It's Good," and the Worst Movie Ever |url=https://collider.com/winnie-the-pooh-blood-and-honey-reactions-is-it-good/ |website=Collider |access-date=March 10, 2024 |language=en |date=February 16, 2023}} It received all five Razzies that it was nominated for at the 44th Golden Raspberry Awards, including Worst Picture, Screenplay and Director (Rhys Frake-Waterfield).{{cite web |last=Phillips |first=Zoe G. |title=Razzie Awards: 'Winnie The Pooh: Blood and Honey' Sweeps Its Five Nominated Categories |url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/razzie-awards-winnie-the-pooh-blood-and-honey-sweeps-1235846272/ |website=The Hollywood Reporter |access-date=March 10, 2024 |date=March 9, 2024}}

Jim Cummings, the current voice actor for Disney's Pooh and Tigger, has also openly bashed the movie in an interview, calling it "absolutely disgusting", as well as threatening the filmmakers with legal action if they dared to use or imitate his voice for their version of the title character.{{Cite AV media |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bgba1c4MAoA |title=Jim Cummings Talks Winnie the Pooh Blood and Honey |date=2022-07-16 |last=Kyrill Panasenko |access-date=2025-01-18 |via=YouTube}}

{{main|Madame Web (film)}}

File:Dakota Johnson Madame Web premiere CDMX.jpg, Dakota Johnson and S.J. Clarkson at a promotional event for Madame Web, the fourth film in Sony's Spider-Man Universe. The movie was panned as the "worst comic book movie" yet and a future "camp classic", with Johnson and other cast members also lampooning its poor reception.]]

Madame Web is a 2024 American superhero movie featuring the Marvel Comics character of the same name, and the fourth film in Sony's Spider-Man Universe (SSU), a poorly-received franchise based on characters and properties associated with the character Spider-Man, who is not prominently featured in it. Set in 2003, the movie depicts the origin story of Cassie Webb (Dakota Johnson), a woman who develops clairvoyant abilities and tries to save three young women (Sydney Sweeney, Isabela Merced, Celeste O'Connor) from Ezekiel Sims (Tahar Rahim), who wants to kill them before they become Spider-Women in the future and kill him. Upon its release, it was widely panned as being "meme fodder",{{Cite news |last=Rosenblatt |first=Kalhan |date=February 14, 2024 |title=Marvel's Madame Web is meme fodder but doesn't stick the landing, reviewers say |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture/movies/sonys-madame-web-dakota-johnson-reviews-rcna138823 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240218162714/https://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture/movies/sonys-madame-web-dakota-johnson-reviews-rcna138823 |archive-date=February 18, 2024 |access-date=February 18, 2024 |publisher=NBC News}} with Madame Web being regarded by some commentators as a "future cult classic" and a "camp classic".{{Cite news |last=Dargis |first=Manohla |date=February 14, 2024 |title=Madame Web Review: Dakota Johnson Can't Save This Spidey Spinoff |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/14/movies/madame-web-review-dakota-johnson.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240216111430/https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/14/movies/madame-web-review-dakota-johnson.html |archive-date=February 16, 2024 |access-date=February 16, 2024 |newspaper=The New York Times}}{{Cite news |last=Holtermann |first=Callie |date=February 22, 2024 |title=The Internet Is Obsessed With Madame Web. The Box Office? Well … |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/22/style/madame-web-memes-box-office.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240223051337/https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/22/style/madame-web-memes-box-office.html |archive-date=February 23, 2024 |access-date=February 23, 2024 |newspaper=The New York Times}}{{Cite web |last=Rangel |first=Felipe |date=March 11, 2024 |title=The Madame Web Oscars Jokes Mean It's In Danger Of Becoming A Cult Classic |url=https://screenrant.com/madame-web-oscars-jokes-explained/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240311171349/https://screenrant.com/madame-web-oscars-jokes-explained/ |archive-date=March 11, 2024 |access-date=March 13, 2024 |website=Screen Rant}}

Many described it as being one of the worst comic book movies ever made, including critics from The Daily Beast,{{cite web |title=‘Madame Web’ Is Officially the Worst Superhero Movie Yet |url=https://www.thedailybeast.com/obsessed/madame-web-is-officially-the-worst-superhero-movie-of-all-time/ |website=The Daily Beast |last=Spilde |first=Coleman |access-date=March 15, 2025 |language=en |date=February 20, 2024}} USA Today,{{cite web |last1=Truitt |first1=Brian |title='Madame Web' review: Dakota Johnson headlines the worst superhero movie since 'Morbius' |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/movies/2024/02/13/madame-web-movie-review/72573482007/ |website=USA Today |access-date=March 15, 2025 |date=February 13, 2024}} and the Chicago Sun-Times.{{cite web |url=https://chicago.suntimes.com/movies-and-tv/2024/02/14/madame-web-foretells-a-future-of-disappointed-moviegoers |title= 'Madame Web' foretells a future of disappointed moviegoers |year=14 February 2024 |last=Roeper|first=Richard|author-link=Richard Roeper|website=Chicago Sun-Times}} Others went further; Josh Korngut of Exclaim! called it "One of the worst films in recent memory",{{cite web |last1=Korngut |first1=Josh |title=Even Dakota Johnson Seems to Know 'Madame Web' Sucks │ Exclaim! |url=https://exclaim.ca/film/article/madame-web-film-review-dakota-johnson |website=Exclaim! |date=February 14, 2024 |access-date=March 15, 2025 |language=en}} while Hoai-Tran Bui of Inverse described it as "just about the worst movie you’d find at the bottom of that Walmart dollar bin".{{cite web |title=2024's Worst Superhero Movie Is a New Low For an Already Struggling Genre |url=https://www.inverse.com/entertainment/madame-web-review |website=Inverse | author=Hoai-Tran Bui |access-date=March 15, 2025 |language=en |date=February 13, 2024}} Fred Topel of United Press International defined it as "bad in ways even debacles like Catwoman and Batman & Robin never broached."{{cite news |url=https://www.upi.com/Entertainment_News/Movies/2024/02/13/Madame-Web-movie-review/3881707781283/ |title=Madame Web movie review |last=Topel |first=Fred |date=February 14, 2024 |access-date=March 15, 2024| agency=United Press International}} David Fear of Rolling Stone panned it as "the Cats: The Movie of superhero movies", further calling it a "genuine Chernobyl-level disaster that seems to get exponentially more radioactive as it goes along".{{cite magazine |last1=Fear |first1=David |title='Madame Web' Isn't As Bad As You've Heard. It's So Much Worse |url=https://www.rollingstone.com/tv-movies/tv-movie-reviews/madame-web-review-dakota-johnson-mcu-spider-man-spinoff-1234956689/ |magazine=Rolling Stone |access-date=March 19, 2025 |date=February 13, 2024 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20250213110132/https://www.rollingstone.com/tv-movies/tv-movie-reviews/madame-web-review-dakota-johnson-mcu-spider-man-spinoff-1234956689/ |archivedate=2025-02-13}} Other critics, such as Sam Adams of Slate, embraced its campy aspects, writing that the movie was "a blight on the history of superheroes and cinema itself. I enjoyed the hell out of it."{{cite magazine |last1=Adams |first1=Sam |title=Madame Web Is One of the Worst Superhero Movies in Years—and One of the Most Enjoyable |url=https://slate.com/culture/2024/02/madame-web-movie-review-marvel-sony-spider-man.html |magazine=Slate |access-date=March 15, 2025 |date=February 14, 2024}} Likewise, Harrison Brocklehurst of The Tab stated that Madame Web was "one of the worst films of all time – and yet I loved every stupid second of [it]."{{cite web |last1=Brocklehurst |first1=Harrison |title=Madame Web is one of the worst films ever made - here's why I loved every second of it |url=https://thetab.com/2024/02/19/madame-web-is-one-of-the-worst-films-ever-made-heres-why-i-loved-every-second-of-it |website=The Tab |access-date=March 15, 2025 |date=19 February 2024}}

The movie won three awards at the 45th Golden Raspberry Awards: Worst Picture, Worst Actress (Johnson), and Worst Screenplay.{{cite web |url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/2025-razzie-award-winners-full-list-1236150360/ |title=Razzie Awards: 'Madame Web' Named Worst Picture, Nabs Two Other Trophies |last=Lewis |first=Hilary |work=The Hollywood Reporter |date=February 28, 2025 |access-date=February 28, 2025}} Johnson was not surprised by the film's poor reception,{{Cite magazine |last=Owen |first=Charlotte |date=March 5, 2024 |title=Dakota Johnson Can't Fake It |url=https://www.bustle.com/entertainment/dakota-johnson-teatime-book-club |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240305163301/https://www.bustle.com/entertainment/dakota-johnson-teatime-book-club |archive-date=March 5, 2024 |access-date=March 5, 2024 |magazine=Bustle}} and Sweeney lampooned its performance.{{Cite web |last=Zilko |first=Christian |date=March 3, 2024 |title=Sydney Sweeney Jokes About Madame Web Flopping in SNL Monologue |url=https://www.indiewire.com/news/general-news/sydney-sweeney-snl-monologue-madame-web-jokes-1234959681/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240303202534/https://www.indiewire.com/news/general-news/sydney-sweeney-snl-monologue-madame-web-jokes-1234959681/ |archive-date=March 3, 2024 |access-date=March 13, 2024 |website=IndieWire}} Merced embraced the film's reception with the various memes surrounding it and for her enjoyment of other camp films.{{Cite web |last=Cavanaugh |first=Patrick |date=August 15, 2024 |title=Madame Web{{'s}} Isabela Merced Still 'A Little Bit Proud' of Spider-Man Spinoff |url=https://comicbook.com/movies/news/madame-web-isabela-merced-reaction-proud-campy-spider-man/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240815195135/https://comicbook.com/movies/news/madame-web-isabela-merced-reaction-proud-campy-spider-man/ |archive-date=August 15, 2024 |access-date=August 17, 2024 |website=ComicBook.com}} Lorenzo Di Bonaventura described the film's reception as "an axe in your head" and a "harsher experience", not wanting to experience the "brutalness of failure" again when comparing the film's low box-office performance to its high viewership on Netflix.{{Cite web |last=Aguilar |first=Matthew |date=July 25, 2024 |title=SDCC 2024: Madame Web Producer Reflects on Box Office Flop, 'Like an Ax in Your Head' |url=https://comicbook.com/movies/news/sdcc-2024-madame-web-producer-reflects-on-box-office-flop-like-an-ax-in-your-head/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240726042256/https://comicbook.com/movies/news/sdcc-2024-madame-web-producer-reflects-on-box-office-flop-like-an-ax-in-your-head/ |archive-date=July 26, 2024 |access-date=September 14, 2024 |website=ComicBook.com}} Sony had reportedly planned for Madame Web to be the first film in a potential new franchise before abandoning these plans due to the movie's critical and commercial failure.{{Cite magazine |last1=McClintock |first1=Pamela |last2=Hibberd |first2=James |author-link2=James Hibberd (writer) |date=February 19, 2024 |title=Inside Sony's Madame Web Collapse: Forget About a New Franchise |url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/madame-web-bomb-killed-sony-franchise-1235829471/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240219160237/https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/madame-web-bomb-killed-sony-franchise-1235829471/ |archive-date=February 19, 2024 |access-date=February 19, 2024 |magazine=The Hollywood Reporter |quote=…it has been widely reported that Madame Web cost $80 million, but the actual number is in the low $100 million range, according to several sources.}}

{{portal|Film|Lists}}

• List of biggest box-office bombs
• List of films voted the best
• List of films with a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes
• Low culture
• Z movie

{{Reflist}}

{{refbegin|35em|indent=yes}}

• {{cite book |first=Michael |last=Adams |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2AeL09OCjLEC |title=Showgirls, Teen Wolves, and Astro Zombies: a film critic's year-long quest to find the worst movie ever made |location=New York |publisher=Itbooks |year=2010 |isbn=978-0-06-180629-2 |ref={{SfnRef|Adams}}}}
• {{cite book |last=Maltin |first=Leonard |author-link=Leonard Maltin |title=Leonard Maltin's Movie Guide |publisher=Signet |year=2003 |isbn=0-451-20940-0 }}
• {{cite book |last=Medved |first=Harry |title =The Fifty Worst Films of All Time: (and how they got that way) |publisher =Popular Library |year =1978 |isbn =0-445-04139-0}}
• {{cite book |last=Medved |first=Michael |author-link=Michael Medved |title =The Golden Turkey Awards |publisher =G. P. Putnam's Sons |year =1980 |isbn =0-399-50463-X |ref={{SfnRef|Golden Turkey Awards}}}}
• {{cite book |last=Sauter |first=Michael |title =The Worst Movies of All Time, or, What Were They Thinking? |publisher =Carol Publishing Group |year =1999 |isbn =0-8065-2078-7 |ref={{SfnRef|Sauter}}}}
• {{cite book |last1=Wallechinsky |first1=David |author-link1=David Wallechinsky |last2=Wallace |first2=Irving |author-link2=Irving Wallace |last3=Wallace |first3=Amy |author-link3=Amy Wallace |title=The Book of Lists |year=1977|publisher=William Morrow and Company|isbn=978-0688031831|ref={{SfnRef|Book of Lists}}}}
• {{cite book |last=Wilson |first=John |author-link=John J. B. Wilson |title=The Official Razzie Movie Guide: Enjoying the Best of Hollywood's Worst |year=2005|publisher=Grand Central Publishing|isbn=0-446-69334-0}}

{{refend}}

• [https://editorial.rottentomatoes.com/guide/worst-movies-of-all-time/ Rotten Tomatoes: 100 Worst Movies of All Time]
• [http://www.rogerebert.com/rogers-journal/eberts-most-hated Ebert's Most Hated]
• [https://www.imdb.com/chart/bottom IMDb Bottom 100] (user scores)

{{Worst works}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Films considered the worst}}

Worst

Category:Lists of worsts

Category:Film fandom

Category:Articles containing video clips