Login
Login

Wikipedia:Requested moves/Current discussions#May 6, 2016

{{shortcut|WP:RMC|WP:RM/C|WP:RMCD}}{{shortcut|WP:RM#C}}

:This pagesection lists all requests filed or identified as potentially controversial which are currently under discussion.

{{ombox|text=Do not attempt to edit this list manually; a bot will automatically update the page soon after the {{tls|Requested move}} template is added to the discussion on the relevant talk page. The entry is removed automatically soon after the discussion is closed.
To make a change to an entry, make the change on the linked talk page.}}

This list is also available in a page-link-first format and in table format. 132 discussions have been relisted.

=May 22, 2025=

  • (Discuss) – :Islamic terrorism → {{no redirect|Islamist terrorism}} – Islamist terrorism is more neutral as it names the ideology Islamism not the religion. It is what most governments, NGOs, and mainstream outlets have converged on. Even the article itself says - Islamic terrorism is highly politicized and a misnomer. See https://www.cair.com/blog/good-news-associated-press-takes-positive-step-on-use-of-islamist/ (Associated Press recommended use of the term “Islamist” by media professionals. ) Many articles like September 11 attacks also use Islamist instead of Islamic. I'd argue Islamist terrorism is WP:COMMONNAME . Cinaroot (talk) 21:02, 4 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Garsh (talk) 00:30, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Kurmanji → {{no redirect|Northern Kurdish}} – The current title Kurmanji does not reflect the standard naming conventions used for Kurdish language varieties on wikipedia or in linguistic references. If we have Central Kurdish and Southern Kurdish, where is the Northern? Even the short description of the article says "a Northern Kurdish dialect", so is this article about the Northern Kurdish language group or only about the Kurmanji dialect? I'm confused, If it's about the dialect, then why do Kurmanji and Northern Kurdish redirect to each other? Either we separate them properly, or we call it what it is, Northern Kurdish. Academically and linguistically, the standard name is Northern Kurdish; even the [https://iso639-3.sil.org/code/kmr ISO 639-3] code for kmr officially lists the language as Northern Kurdish, not Kurmanji. Famous Kurdish linguist Jamal Nebez also [https://books.vejin.net/ck/text/12931?h=%DA%A9%D9%88%D8%B1%D8%AF%DB%8C%20%D8%A8%D8%A7%DA%A9%D9%88%D9%88%D8%B1%DB%8C used Northern Kurdish] instead of Kurmanji. This is Jamal Nebez's opinion about Kurmanji: {{tqq|Kirmanc/Kirmanj/Kurmanc. It is another word for the name "Kurd", which is why the Kurdish language is called Kurmanji language. Kurmanji is sometimes mistakenly used for Northern Kurdish by others}}.Jamal Nebez (2008). [https://ia802803.us.archive.org/3/items/20200114_20200114_2024/%D9%88%D8%B4%D9%87%E2%80%8C%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%87%E2%80%8C%20-%20%D8%AC%DB%95%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%84%20%D9%86%DB%95%D8%A8%DB%95%D8%B2.pdf Wişenamekî Êtîmolojiyay Zimanî Kurdî]. p. 193. The term Kurmanji is often culturally synonymous with the name Kurd; Vladimir Minorsky stated that the word "Kurmanj" is composed of two elements: kurd + mannaea (Kurdomani > Kurdomanj > Kurdmanj).Michael L. Chyet (2003). [https://dn790001.ca.archive.org/0/items/20200115_20200115_1816/Kurdish-English%20Dictionary%20-%20%5BMichael%20L.%20Chyet%5D.pdf Kurdish–English Dictionary]. even in Wiktionary, only Northern Kurdish is used. Authoritative linguistic sources use Northern Kurdish as the standard: [https://glottolog.org/resource/languoid/id/nort2641 Glottolog], [https://www.ethnologue.com/language/kmr/ Ethnologue], Linguasphere Register.

{{reflist-talk}}

:  Zemen  (talk) 18:55, 7 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 22:55, 14 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Garsh (talk) 00:00, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

=May 21, 2025=

  • (Discuss) – :Ashtar Command → {{no redirect|Ashtar Command (band)}} – The primary topic for Ashtar Command is of course the thing this band is named after, the UFO group. The band is barely notable while the group is one of the most well known UFO religions with many scholarly sources. Should redirect to Ashtar (extraterrestrial being), which itself should be titled Ashtar Command, but that's another battle. PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:18, 14 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Garsh (talk) 23:59, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Swedish Institute of Dramatic Art → {{no redirect|Dramatiska Institutet}} – Based on a Google books search, I think Dramatiska Institutet is probably the Wikipedia:Common name in English. There are numerous hits for "Dramatiska Institutet" in Google books in English, with some false positives, and only 5 for "Swedish Institute of Dramatic Art". The article was moved [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Swedish_Institute_of_Dramatic_Art&diff=prev&oldid=1048122898 in 2021] based on a dictionary entry, http://runeberg.org/svenfack/1361.html, not evidence of the institute's common name. TSventon (talk) 20:50, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :2021 Tri-State tornado → {{no redirect|Tri-state tornado of 2021}} – Similar to Tri-state tornado of 1925, recently moved after long discussions. It's clear that neither "Tri-State" nor "2021 Tri-State" is a proper name here, so the current title doesn't make much sense. The alternative 2021 tri-state tornado would be OK, but the other order was preferred by more editors on the 1925 one. Dicklyon (talk) 20:04, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :War in Abkhazia (1992–1993) → Abkhazian War of Independence – Rather than being just a war, this was the war that led to the de-facto independence of Abkhazia. Therefore, I say we should change the title to "Abkhazian War of Independence" or "Abkhazia Liberation War", similar to how "Bangladesh Liberation War" is stated as such, on here. Vasily1926 (talk) 19:26, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Pegasos → Genesi Pegasos – or {{-r|Pegasos (computer)}} or {{-r|Pegasos (brand)}} or {{-r|Pegasos (computer brand)}} or {{-r|Pegasos (computer system)}}. "Pegasos" is an alternative romanization of the Latin or Greek name for Pegasus. It is also the short name for the Pegasos Swiss Association, an assisted suicide association. It is also the name of [https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c86p6pe2290o a clinic] that used a Sarco pod for an assisted suicide. According to [https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/europe/us-woman-ends-life-using-suicide-pod-what-is-it-how-does-it-work/articleshow/113676232.cms The Times of India], it is also an alternative name for the Sarco pod itself (although I just deleted that claim from the Wikipedia article on the subject because it was not otherwise confirmed and I suspect it may be based on Wikipedia citogenesis). It is not primarily a brand of computer systems produced about two decades ago by a company I've never heard of before. Readership interest is higher for the Swiss association than for the computer brand, according to [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&start=2023-05&end=2025-04&pages=Pegasos_Swiss_Association&7CPegasos pageviews]. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 19:14, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Marble Arch (Libya) → Arch of the Philaeni – See section Talk:Marble Arch (Libya)#Article name above. "Marble Arch" is only used in the British or Allied WW2 context;{{cite book | last=Quinn | first=Josephine Crawley | author-link=Jo Quinn | editor-last1=Quinn | editor-first1=Josephine Crawley | editor-last2=Vella | editor-first2=Nicholas C. | title=The Punic Mediterranean: Identities and Identification from Phoenician Settlement to Roman Rule | chapter=A Carthaginian perspective on the Altars of the Philaeni | publisher=Cambridge University Press |publication-place=Cambridge, UK | date=2014 | isbn=978-1-107-29519-3 | doi=10.1017/cbo9781107295193.012 | page=169 }} modern English-language sources discussing the arch itself tend to use Arch of the Philaeni,{{cite book | last=Agbamu | first=Samuel | title=Restorations of Empire in Africa: Ancient Rome and Modern Italy's African Colonies | publisher=Oxford University Press | publication-place=Oxford, UK | date=2024 | isbn=978-0-19-194380-5 | doi=10.1093/9780191943805.001.0001 | pages=206–237}}{{cite journal | last=Anderson | first=Sean | title=The Light and the Line: Florestano Di Fausto and the Politics of 'Mediterraneità' | journal=California Italian Studies | volume=1 | issue=1 | date=2010 | issn=2155-7926 | doi=10.5070/C311008864 | doi-access=free | url=https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9hm1p6m5 }}{{cite journal | last=Hom | first=Stephanie Malia | title=Empires of tourism: travel and rhetoric in Italian colonial Libya and Albania, 1911–1943 | journal=Journal of Tourism History | volume=4 | issue=3 | date=2012 | issn=1755-182X | doi=10.1080/1755182X.2012.711374 | pages=281–300 | url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1755182X.2012.711374}}{{cite journal | last=Parfitt | first=Rose | title=Fascism, Imperialism and International Law: An Arch Met a Motorway and the Rest is History... | journal=Leiden Journal of International Law | volume=31 | issue=3 | date=2018 | issn=0922-1565 | doi=10.1017/S0922156518000304 | pages=509–538 | url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/leiden-journal-of-international-law/article/abs/fascism-imperialism-and-international-law-an-arch-met-a-motorway-and-the-rest-is-history/8177D06A11B2F1EBF76EC8E093A47921 }}{{cite book | last=Segrè | first=Claudio G. | title=Italo Balbo: A Fascist Life | publisher=University of California Press | publication-place=Berkeley, US; London, UK | date=1990 | isbn=978-0-520-07199-5 |page=309}} which also makes the parenthetical disambiguator unnecessary (preferred per WP:TITLEDAB). Meluiel (talk) 18:44, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Marchantiophyta → {{no redirect|Liverwort}} – Per Wikipedia:COMMONNAME. The two other divisions of bryophytes use their common names as the article title, as well as most other plant divisions. There is a genus of flowering plants with the same common name, but it is not nearly as well known and is only one of its common names. Also, the article frequently uses "liverwort" and "liverworts" in place of "Marchantiophyta". ZKevinTheCat (talk) 15:06, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Chris Pappas → {{no redirect|Chris Pappas (disambiguation)}} – WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Consistently gets [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&start=2024-05&end=2025-04&pages=Chris_Pappas_(American_politician)%7CChris_Pappas_(Neighbours)%7CChris_Pappas_(South_African_politician)%7CChris_Pappas_(EastEnders)%7CChris_D._Pappas thousands more views] than others since August 2024, [https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=Chris_Pappas#Overview majority of traffic] going towards the American politician, and [https://news.google.com/search?q=chris%20pappas&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen dominates the news]. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 22:53, 14 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 14:39, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Chris Pappas (American politician) → Chris Pappas
  • (Discuss) – :List of rampage killers → List of rampage killings – The lists are focused on the events, not their perpetrators. In around sixty of the listed cases, the perpetrator doesn't even seem to be known by name or couldn't be identified as either a single individual or group. It would then be more appropriate to move the dates, locations, casualties, and weapon before the perpetrator in the table template. The titles of the sublistings should be changed accordingly, with the exception of the article List of rampage killers (workplace killings), which can be renamed to List of workplace killings. Then there is also the "other incidents" list, which makes up half of the page and lists a multitude of wildly varying attacks. There is a lot of overlap with the religious, political and ethnic attack lists, such as the 1999 London nail bombings or the 1980 Paris synagogue bombing, and the listings by continents, such as the Daegu subway fire and the Happy Land fire, which would regularly be listed at the top of the Asia and Americas list going by casualties, but are randomly excluded, despite other arson articles being in these lists as well (for example the Saint John City Hall fire or the Bohumín arson attack). A few of these even have "(accused)" attached to the names of the perpetrators, which probably breaches WP:SUSPECT in the more recent cases. The "other incidents" list would be more appropriately listed into dedicated pages for bombings, arson, poisonings and vehicle attacks (with another subsorting into land vehicles and planes). Rubintyrann (talk) 17:10, 13 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 14:37, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Bias (statistics) → {{no redirect|Statistical bias}} – WP:NATURAL, as avoids seemingly unneeded parenthetical disambiguation. If the term is considered particular and technical enough within the field such that treating it lexically as a subset of the broader concept of bias is inappropriate, then that's fine, I just figure it's worth proposing. Remsense ‥ 论 12:16, 14 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 14:36, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Frey (disambiguation) → {{no redirect|Frey}} – Frey is a redirect to Frey (disambiguation). Yes, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Frey&diff=1289858908&oldid=30369452 I did change] the redirect to Freyr, but it was moved 20 (twenty) years ago and now it's clear that the situation is different and there's no primay topic. MrKeefeJohn (talk) 07:46, 14 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 14:36, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – La Dispute → La Dispute (play) – Band page shows clear notability while the play only has three sources (only one of which I know is notable, though the second I wouldn't assume isn't). [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&start=2015-07&end=2025-04&pages=La_Dispute_(band)%7CLa_Dispute Band page has consistently received several times as many page views as the play for the past decade.] Aside from the play coming first/being the namesake for the band, I don't see what would make it PTOPIC. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 16:46, 13 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 02:33, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
  • La Dispute (band) → La Dispute
  • (Discuss) – :The Holocaust → {{no redirect|Holocaust}} – This has been discussed before, but it was a long time ago (13 years!) and consensus can change. There are several reasons why this article should be moved to Holocaust. * Holocaust already redirects here as it is the primary topic. * "The Holocaust" is not capitalized in running text (see MOS:THE) * Many people say that the Holocaust was a unique event in history, but most events do not use "The" in the article title * 99% of the time, "Holocaust" specifically means this event and not any other. Mast303 (talk) 00:57, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :North American Charging System → {{no redirect|North American Charging Standard}} – Despite "North American Charging System" being SAE's official name, it appears that "North American Charging Standard" remains the common name. The North American Charging Standard name is used in recent articles in reliable sources knowledgeable about the auto industry including [https://www.motortrend.com/features/tesla-nacs-charging-port-automaker-compatibility MotorTrend] and [https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a44388939/tesla-nacs-charging-network-compatibility/ Car and Driver], along with press releases from other automakers including [https://www.fromtheroad.ford.com/us/en/articles/2025/nacs-fast-charger-routing-ford-customers-apple-maps-carplay Ford] and [https://pressroom.toyota.com/toyota-bz-all-electric-suv-adds-range-charging-and-exterior-updates-for-2026/ Toyota]. -- RickyCourtney (talk) 23:08, 13 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 00:46, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :White trash (disambiguation) → {{no redirect|White Trash}} – The ambiguous term is the capitalized one, not the lower case common noun. White trash is the primary topic for the lowercase (indeed, the only topic) but the proper noun does not have a primary topic. Mdewman6 (talk) 00:04, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

=May 20, 2025=

  • (Discuss) – :Museum of the Chinese Communist Party → {{no redirect|Museum of the Communist Party of China}} – This page was previously moved to the current name citing WP:COMMONNAME, as per prior discussion at Talk:Chinese Communist Party. I'm not going to delve into that debate, because that debate is largely irrelevant to this article, as that is about the common name of the CCP/CPC, not this museum, and it appears that most online sources use the museum's official name "Museum of the Communist Party of China", which should be considered its common name instead. WP:CONSISTENT shouldn't be applied here as that largely pertains to formatting consistency except for WP:CONSUB, which I believe shouldn't apply either as this museum isn't strictly a subtopic of the Chinese Communist Party article (as opposed to articles like "Discography of {artist name}" or "Economy of {country name}"). Liu1126 (talk) 22:54, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Newton → {{no redirect|Newton (disambiguation)}} – Isaac Newton is the primary topic. TheLatinNerd (talk) 22:20, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Cicero → {{no redirect|Marcus Tullius Cicero}} – On Wikipedia, articles about people are nearly always located at the full name, even if the person is usually known just by their last name (Beethoven). TheLatinNerd (talk) 22:15, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Iroquois passport → {{no redirect|Haudenosaunee passport}} – Haudenosaunee passport is the common name for this subject. The redirect is already in place and should be swapped, with Iroquois passport redirecting to the new title. Haudenosaunee passport is also [https://www.haudenosauneeconfederacy.com/departments/haudenosaunee-documentation-committee/ the official name] of the document. Of the 19 sources referenced in the article: 6 use Haudenosaunee passport, 4 use Iroquois passport, 1 ([https://web.archive.org/web/20101123193835/http://rocnow.com/article/sports/20107150346 Ref 7]) uses passports issued by the Iroquois Confederacy, 1 ([https://web.archive.org/web/20110714184119/http://www.ottawacitizen.com/life/Iroquois+passport+seized+border/5081298/story.html Ref 5]) uses Iroquois passport in the headline only and then uses Haudenosaunee passport consistently throughout, 1 ([https://web.archive.org/web/20090720042243/http://www.gov.im/infocentre/archived_releases/PR_fsc_01/Passport.html Ref 13]) refers to passports issued by both the Iroquois Nation and the Haudenosaunee, 1 ([http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/freetravel/rights/fsj_freetravel_rights_en.htm Ref 14]) refers only to passports issued by the Iroquois Federation, 1 ([https://web.archive.org/web/20100716235040/http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iI149z8c0uBRphmB54w06NhPQlNwD9GTOHL80 Ref 17]) uses Iroquois passport and Haudenosaunee-issued passport once each, 1 ([https://web.archive.org/web/20110719062649/http://www.cnycentral.com/news/story.aspx?id=484701 Ref 18]) does not use either phrase but uses the name Iroquois throughout, 1 discusses a related issue with Cree passports and does not use either phrase, and 2 are dead links. These passports are often discussed in reference to travel issues facing the Haudenosaunee Nationals lacrosse team, which changed their name from Iroquois Nationals in 2022. The sources in the article are mostly older. Notably, several reliable sources referred to the passports as Haudenosaunee even when the team bore the name Iroquois: [https://www.cbc.ca/news/indigenous/iroquois-nationals-face-travel-delays-to-world-lacrosse-championship-over-passport-issues-1.4740828 CBC (2018)], [https://web.archive.org/web/20240129190000/https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/the-iroquois-nationals-and-the-2010-world-lacrosse-championships-feature The Canadian Encyclopedia (2013)], and [https://web.archive.org/web/20101012073536/http://www.indiancountrytoday.com/home/content/Iroquois-Nationals-forfeits-first-game-98603364.html Indian Country Today (2010)]. More importantly, a broader assessment of reliable sources and recent usage shows a preference for Haudenosaunee passport(s). [https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Iroquois+passport%2CIroquois+passports%2CHaudenosaunee+passport%2CHaudenosaunee+passports&year_start=1800&year_end=2022&corpus=en&smoothing=3 Google Ngram] shows zero results for singular Iroquois passport and substantially lower use of Iroquois passports than either the plural or singular with Haudenosaunee. Google Scholar returns 205 hits for Haudenosaunee passports, 116 hits for Haudenosaunee passport, 46 hits for Iroquois passports, and 32 hits for Iroquois passports. Two of the five references that use Iroquois passport(s) in the article are from New York Times articles published in 1990 and 2010, respectively. NYT Magazine used Haudenosaunee passport(s) in [https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/13/magazine/lacrosse-olympics-indigenous-haudenosaunee.html this May 13, 2025 article] and NYT articles from [https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/27/sports/indigenous-athletes-lacrosse.html 2022] and [https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/19/sports/olympics/lacrosse-2028-olympics-haudenosaunee.html 2023] do no use the exact phrase but discuss the passport issues and refer to the people as Haudenosaunee. Other sources that use Haudenosaunee passport(s) include [https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20240710-the-indigenous-roots-of-a-revived-olympic-sport BBC (2024)], [https://www.jpost.com/international/exclusive-you-think-playing-in-the-lacrosse-world-championship-is-tough-562387 Jerusalem Post (2018)], [https://www1.villanova.edu/villanova/law/academics/sportslaw/commentary/mslj_blog/2024/ChallengesAheadRecognitonandSovereigntyIssuesFacebytheHaudenosauneeNationalsLacrosseTeamonTheirPathTothe2028Olympics.html Villanova University (2024)], [https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/iroquois-quest-to-compete-olympic-lacrosse-more-than-game-to-us National Geographic (2020)], [https://indigenousgov.hks.harvard.edu/publications/iroquois-nationals-lacrosse-cayuga-nation-oneida-nation-new-york-onondaga-indian Harvard University], and the book [https://read.dukeupress.edu/books/book/3292/chapter-abstract/8535690/Haudenosaunee-Passports-and-Decolonizing-Borders?redirectedFrom=fulltext Indigenous Peoples and Borders (2024)] --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 19:46, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Iqbal → {{no redirect|Iqbal (disambiguation)}} – Iqbal is definitely WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for Muhammad Iqbal and should redirect there. I'm surprised on how Iqbal remains a disambiguation for such a long period. Previous move requests were effortless so I will try to put a far more stronger case for this one. The current Iqbal disambiguation contains places in Pakistan which are all named after Muhammad Iqbal e.g. Iqbal Manzil, Iqbal Park, Iqbal Stadium, Allama Iqbal International Airport etc. And for anyone saying Iqbal is a common name, well there is already a separate page for Iqbal (name) and nearly all of the article there are nothing in front of Muhammad Iqbal. Muhammad Iqbal is among the top Wikipedia articles by popularity, with [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&range=last-year&pages=Muhammad_Iqbal 520k pageviews last year]. None of the people cited in above discussions like Ahsan Iqbal ([https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&range=last-year&pages=Ahsan_Iqbal 30k pageviews last year]) and Rao Sikandar Iqbal ([https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&range=last-year&pages=Rao_Sikandar_Iqbal 5k pageviews last year]) and Iqbal Masih ([https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&range=last-year&pages=Iqbal_Masih 85k pageviews last year]) As a matter of fact, even adding the pageviews of all these figures is not equal to Muhammad Iqbal alone! A simple Google search for 'Iqbal' would show Muhammad Iqbal everywhere, he's the national poet of the world's fifth-most populous country, a highly well-known renowned figure in India and Iran, known as "Poet of the East" in the West and simply one of the leading figures of the 20th-century. Anyways, this is not meant to boast him but just to state the important of Muhammad Iqbal over other people named "Iqbal". Saying that "Iqbal" is a common name and not primary topic for him is like the same as saying Einstein is a common name and not primary topic for Albert Einstein. IqbalianThought (talk) 18:55, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Clermont Foot → {{no redirect|Clermont Foot 63}} – The official name of the club, similar to FC Versailles 78. [https://ligue1.fr/fr/articles/l1_article_2573-barrages-de-ligue-2-bkt-les-arbitres-de-boulogne-clermont], [https://www.clermontfoot.com/] Hauskasic (talk) 12:16, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :SWAT → SWAT (United States) – This article has been about SWAT units in the United States. Recent edits have added content on SWAT units in China to the article. There is a need to distinguish SWAT in the United States from SWAT in China, which can be accomplished by spitting (WP:CONTENTSPLIT) this article and creating a separate SWAT (China) article. A 2023 journal article titled "Demystifying China’s police tactical units" in the International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice was according to the authors the first study in English language on SWAT in China.{{cite journal |last1=Liu |first1=Lu |last2=Chen |first2=Li |title=Demystifying China’s police tactical units |journal=International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice |date=June 2023 |volume=73 |pages=100595 |doi=10.1016/j.ijlcj.2023.100595 |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1756061623000216 |access-date=6 May 2025}} According to the authors, the first SWAT team was formed in China in 2005 and by 2010 there "more than 900 teams with more than 48,000 enlisted officers". The role of SWAT in China and the entry into SWAT is different to SWAT in the United States. The large number of teams and officers in China is notable to include in Wikipedia.

{{Reflist-talk}}

: Melbguy05 (talk) 11:31, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

  • (Discuss) – :Coalition (Australia) → {{no redirect|Liberal–National Coalition}} – Reopening this proposal due to both recent events (the Liberal–National Coalition splitting) and length of time since the prior discussion. As mentioned prior, the current name of this article is incredibly WP:IMPRECISE, and does not accurately reflect the topic. Many highly reputable sources refer to a 'coalition' in the generic sense in relation to Australian politics, highlighting that a 'Coalition (Australia)' is a generic thing, not a thing that only refers to the Liberal–National Coalition (for example: the [https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/House_of_Representatives/Powers_practice_and_procedure/Practice7/HTML/Chapter2/Government%20and%20Parliament House of Representatives Practice (7th ed)] which is used in Parliament by the Speaker of the House to refer to the rules of the house; the Australian Government's Parliamentary Education Office [https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/your-questions-on-notice/questions/why-do-the-nationals-and-liberals-work-together-while-the-other-parties-labor-greens-etc-are-by-themselves] [https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/parliament-and-its-people/government/government]; the Parliament House itself [https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/House_of_Representatives/Powers_practice_and_procedure/00_-_Infosheets/Infosheet_22_-_Political_parties]; the Australia Institute [https://australiainstitute.org.au/post/how-parliaments-share-power-fact-sheet/]; the Museum of Australian Democracy [https://moadoph.gov.au/explore/stories/democracy/coalition-governments-what-are-they-and-how-do-they-work]). These sources highlight that what is typically referred to as an 'alliance' internationally is instead called a 'coalition' in Australian politics, meaning that 'Coalition (Australia)' absolutely should refer to that term. As also mentioned prior, there are other parties who have formed a coalition. Previous users have argued that these were not true coalitions, but 'minority governments' which is absolutely false according to these reputable sources. According to the rules presented by all of my prior sources: a 'coalition' in Australian politics is any formal arrangement between two or more parties to share power; a 'minority government' in Australian politics is one where a party is allowed to form government (by having its supply Bills passed) despite not having a majority of seats, and therefore has nothing to do with the concept of 'coalition'. The definitive Parliamentary rule and precedence guide also specifically refers to the Liberal–National Coalition as: [https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/House_of_Representatives/Powers_practice_and_procedure/Practice7/HTML/Chapter2/The%20Ministry] "Liberal–National Party ... coalition Governments", and refers to the "Free Trade–Protectionist coalition" between 1904 and 1905 and the "Protectionist–Free Trade–Tariff Reform coalition". This emphasises that "coalition" in these phrases is a description. It is not a part of the proper noun, much less a proper noun in its own right. This also emphasises that "Coalition (Australia)" is incredibly WP:IMPRECISE. Further reasons that "Coalition (Australia)" is incredibly WP:IMPRECISE is that the following are all examples of Australian coalitions as defined by (and often explicitly referenced) in those definitive sources: * the Alliance (Liberal–Residents Rally–Independents Group coalition; 1989-1991; fulfills criteria as per [https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/120864704]); * a Nationalist–Country coalition (precursor to the Liberal–National coalition; 1922–1929; formal agreement present); * two United Australia–Country coalitions (LN coalition precursor; 1934–1939, 1940–1943); * several Liberal–National coalitions (initially a Liberal–Country coalition between 1946–1972 and 1974–1975; 1946–1972, 1974–1987, 1987–2025; formal agreement always present); * arguably a coalition of several small communist parties forming the Communist Alliance coalition (2009–2011); * the Emergency Committee of South Australia (a United Australia–Country–Liberal coalition; 1931–1932); * the Fair Elections Coalition (where the word 'coalition' was part of the party's registered name; Independent–Australian Democrats–Rainbow Alliance coalition; 1989–1991); * the Labor–Green Accord in Tasmania (a Labor–Greens Independents coalition; 1989–1990; formal agreement present); * a Labor–Greens coalition in the ACT (2012–2024; formal agreement present; preceded by a Labor minority government supported by the Greens); * the Minor Party Alliance (complex one which changed parties a lot; an Animal Justice–Australian Sports–Australian Voice–Daylight Savings–Family First–Fishing and Lifestyle–Justice–Liberal Democratic–Motoring Enthusiast–New Democrats–Sex–Transport Matters–WikiLeaks–Uniting Australia party coalition; various membership between 2013–current). * the Victorian Socialists (a Socialist Alternative–Socialist Alliance coalition, later party; 2018–2020). * the Reid ministry (a Free Trade–Protectionist coalition; [https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/House_of_Representatives/Powers_practice_and_procedure/Practice7/HTML/Chapter2/The%20Ministry]; 1904–1905); These are all, officially, coalitions. Many were also referred to as "The Coalition" in their time, indicating that "The Coalition (Australia)" or "Coalition (Australia)" could refer to any of them, depending on the time frame one is researching. Arguably the rename should be to "Liberal–National coalition" not "Liberal–National Coalition" because the phrase is not a proper noun and 'coalition' is not a part of a proper noun but a description. "The Coalition" is a grammatical error, the same as "the Opposition", because it refers to a generic role or descriptor. However I concede to "Liberal–National Coalition" as it has been adopted by many news sources. Whilst "The Coalition" most often refers to the Liberal–National coalition in recent history, that is a matter of bias: there is much more easily accessible media in the time that the Liberal–National coalition has been prevalent, and it is clear from historical sources which refer to the aforementioned coalitions that, at the time there was another coalition prominent, that coalition was also referred to as "the coalition". All style guides, grammatical conventions, and wikipedia guides would indicate that this article should be called "Liberal–National Coalition", particularly considering that there is no longer an Australian "Coalition". "Coalition (Australia)" is ambiguous and could refer to any of the above coalitions, or the concept of a coalition which is the Australian version of an alliance of political parties. Geordannik (talk) 08:06, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Reliable sources/Perennial sources → Perennial sources list – While the current article title "Reliable sources/Perennial sources" is used by some sources to refer to the article subject, it is not concise and it also has the disadvantage of looking like the actual project space page (Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources) if the reader does not read the title carefully or understand how Wikipedia namespaces work.{{pb}}"Perennial sources list" would be a more concise name that is just as precise as "Reliable sources/Perennial sources". "Perennial sources list" has been used as a shorter way to refer to the list by reliable sources, including a [https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3543507.3583218 2023 ACM conference paper], a [https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3711107 2025 ACM journal article], a [https://books.google.com/books?id=CN8MEQAAQBAJ&pg=PA69 2024 book published by Rowman & Littlefield], [https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2024/02/wikipedia-downgrades-cnets-reliability-rating-after-ai-generated-articles/ Ars Technica] {{rspe|Ars Technica}}, the [https://jewishjournal.com/news/united-states/372532/wikipedia-editors-label-adl-only-reliable-for-antisemitism-when-israel-and-zionism-are-not-concerned/ Jewish Journal], and [https://www.windowscentral.com/software-apps/ai-generated-articles-have-no-place-on-the-web-complacent-publications-are-considered-generally-unreliable-by-wikipedia-and-google-in-seismic-shift Windows Central]. — Newslinger talk 04:25, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Ahoy → {{no redirect|Ahoy (disambiguation)}} – Ahoy, mateys! Methinks this is the prim-arry topic by both pageviews and longterm significance! Unlike the other disambiguation entries, it's been used for hundreds of yarrs... er, years. So, there is no credible competing primary topic that could merit this page being disambiguated. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 02:00, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Ahoy (greeting) → Ahoy

=May 19, 2025=

  • (Discuss) – :Ochamchira District → {{no redirect|Ochamchire District}} – I am requesting a page move for this to go to "Ochamchire District," in accordance to the WP:COMMONNAME policy. Ochamchire has 30,000 more results in search than Ochamchira. Vasily1926 (talk) 15:53, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Let Her Cry (song) → Let Her Cry – Compared to the Sri Lankan film, this appears to be by far the more common work called "Let Her Cry". It constantly hits triple-digit views per day, whereas the film has fewer than 10 views a day. Inbound links also suggest this is by far the more notable work by that name and should be the primary topic of Let Her Cry. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 15:06, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Let Her Cry → {{no redirect|Let Her Cry (disambiguation)}} over redirect without leaving a redirect (implied), then WP:G14 delete if unnecessary
  • (Discuss) – :Fukuda Chiyo-ni → {{no redirect|Kaga no Chiyo}} – No strong evidence Fukuda Chiyo-ni is the more well known name. Even the dubious link provided by {{ping|Maculosae tegmine lyncis}} shows Kaga no Chiyo. Not clear which one's preferred in English publications on Google Books. Fukuda isn't mentioned once in the entirety of the corresponding Japanese Wikipedia article. Only Kaga no Chiyo is listed in [https://kotobank.jp/word/%E5%8A%A0%E8%B3%80%E5%8D%83%E4%BB%A3-459365 various major dictionaries (Kokugo Daijiten, Kojien, Daijisen, Daijirin)]. Mazamadao (talk) 14:03, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Cellophane noodles → Glass Noodles – Worldwide for the past seven days on Google Trends, "glass noodles" has significantly higher and more consistent interest than "cellophane noodles" (note that the site isn't currently fully working, and I couldn't see a thirty-day period, but I doubt it would be any different). I think the article's name should reflect what is most commonly called. Anecdotally, as an American I've never heard anyone call them cellophane noodles. Nyonyatwelve (talk) 12:13, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Minister of Agriculture, Bangladesh → {{no redirect|Minister of Agriculture (Bangladesh)}} – "Minister of Agriculture (Bangladesh)" is currently just a redirect with no substantial history. The actual article (currently at "Minister of Agriculture, Bangladesh") has full content and should be at the more appropriate and intuitive title. Requesting a move over the redirect. Saadi095 (talk) 04:40, 12 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 03:46, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Axiom of projective determinacy → {{no redirect|Projective determinacy}} – PD is a proposition about set theory. It could be taken as an axiom; it could be proved from other axioms; it could be treated as an open question; in some contexts (say in L) it could even be mentioned as a false assertion. There is no obvious reason to emphasize the axiomatic status, particularly given that it has been proved from large cardinals. Trovatore (talk) 20:44, 11 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 00:35, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

=May 18, 2025=

  • (Discuss) – :2024 Moldovan European Union membership referendum → 2024 Moldovan European Union membership constitutional referendum – The referendum wasn't actually about Moldova's accession to the EU but about changing the constitution to include accession as a goal to the constitution. This is an important detail. Had the referendum failed, the ruling pro-European government would have most likely justified continuing the accession process based on the referendum not having actually been about joining the EU. Of course that most Moldovans treated it like such, but considering the clear majority support both before and after the referendum for EU accession according to polls, as well as the fact that it was widely seen by much of the population as a strategy by Maia Sandu to increase support for her re-election on the same day, it is likely that in this tight vote there were people who were not opposed to EU accession but disliked the framing of the referendum by the ruling government. This detail carries much relevance in my opinion. By the way, I am the one who decided the current title [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2024_Moldovan_European_Union_membership_referendum&oldid=1215831470] (now I disagree somewhat with this edit summary). I think this deserves discussion and I'd like to hear the opinion of other editors, because the current title misses a bit the article's topic. I'd like that the title bring more attention to the constitution. Super Ψ Dro 23:56, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Swiss Women's Super League → Women's Super League (Switzerland) – None of the linked sources even refer to it as the Swiss Women's Super League. Online I can find articles referring to it as the Axa Women's Super League (because of the sponsor), but not the Swiss Women's Super League. [https://herfootballhub.com/swiss-womens-top-tier-to-be-renamed-axa-womens-super-league/], [https://www.football.ch/desktopdefault.aspx/tabid-3813/11153_read-274452/], [https://www.awsl.ch/axa-womens-super-league/meisterschaft.aspx] Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 23:56, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Subaru Alcyone SVX → {{no redirect|Subaru SVX}} – "Alcyone" was only applied in the domestic Japanese market. All English-speaking markets (all export markets period) called this car the Subaru SVX. Compare Subaru XT, which was also sold as the Alcyone in Japan but nowhere else.  Mr.choppers | ✎  18:16, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Decimal system → {{no redirect|Decimal system (disambiguation)}} – Decimal system should redirect to the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC: Decimal. Of 69 readers clicking a link on this page in the last month, every single one went to Decimal (see [https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=Decimal_system WikiNav]). Joe vom Titan (talk) 08:23, 11 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 17:01, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Korv stroganoff → {{no redirect|Sausage stroganoff}} – Relisting since only two people took part in the discussion above. English language for English Wikipedia. Blockhaj (talk) 13:45, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Dreadlocks → {{no redirect|Locs}} – I am not able to amend the page correctly, but I believe it is worth asserting that many individuals, diasporas, and people groups advocate against the term “dreadlocks.” I understand it’s necessary to include this term on the page for reference and historicity. I just believe it should be renamed and lowered in priority as the term of first reference. Thanks. 209.76.207.20 (talk) 08:47, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Cuauhtémoc Brooklyn Bridge collision → {{no redirect|Cuauhtémoc collision with the Brooklyn Bridge}} – I feel that the current title is grammatically contorted, missing an mdash or some other grammatical elements. It would be better worded with the active agent colliding with the passive object -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 04:43, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

=May 17, 2025=

  • (Discuss) – Kluane → {{no redirect|Kluane (electoral district)}} – Per WP:DPT, let's examine if there's a primary topic here. By usage, the topic of most interest by readers is absolutely not the electoral district: [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/massviews/?platform=all-access&agent=user&source=wikilinks&range=all-time&sort=views&direction=1&view=list&target=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kluane%20(disambiguation) All-time mass views for all items], [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&start=2015-07&end=2025-04&pages=Kluane%7CKluane_National_Park_and_Reserve%7CKluane_Lake%7CKluane_First_Nation All-time monthly page views for the most popular topics] A number of topics attract significantly more reader interest. Likewise, the meta:Research:Wikipedia clickstream archive for the last year shows zero clickstreams for Kluane, meaning the electoral district article is a dead end for navigation. I don't see the long-term significance argument in favor of an electoral district founded in 1974 when it's actually 2 years younger than the national park, and only has 1k electors. With regard to the arguments in Talk:Kluane (disambiguation)#Requested move 25 September 2020, I disagree with Lithopsian's claim that if a national park is called X National Park, that we have to prove that people are referring to the park as X. This is just common sense, and counter examples include Yellowstone, Banff, Yosemite, Yoho, Kootenay, etc. The only odd example that I could quickly find in this regard is Jasper, but there's a wholly different primary topic there (not related to places) and the NP is listed on Jasper (disambiguation) and indeed it appears in [https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=Jasper_%28disambiguation%29 WikiNav from there]. This suffix would match 5 other articles in :Category:Yukon territorial electoral districts. Joy (talk) 20:30, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Kluane (disambiguation) → {{no redirect|Kluane}}
  • (Discuss) – :Dev (Bengali actor) → {{no redirect|Dev (actor)}} – The disambiguation in the current title is unnecessary. The Tamil actor is known as Dev Ramnath, and the title of his article reflects this. The Bengali actor, born Deepak Adhikari, is professionally known and widely credited as simply "Dev." He is a well-known figure in West Bengal, having appeared in numerous successful films and served as a Member of Parliament. He is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC of the name "Dev" in the context of acting. This article should be renamed Dev (actor) M1rrorCr0ss 13:57, 10 May 2025 (UTC). — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 17:20, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Florian Nüßle → {{no redirect|Florian Nuessle}} – Another user has requested this move on my talk page. I messaged the creator of the page who has recommended this process. Snooker's governing bodies WST [https://www.wst.tv/news/2025/march/13/nuessle--hallworth-and-highfield-secure-world-snooker-tour-cards/] WPBSA [https://wpbsa.com/tag/florian-nuessle/] BBC [https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0kx7wy4] and TNT Sports [https://www.tntsports.co.uk/snooker/european-masters/2020-2021/european-masters-florian-nuessle-plays-on-after-allen-century-just-to-get-time-at-the-table_vid1356037/video.shtml?welcome=eurosport] all use the anglicized spelling of his name without the Eszett. Canary757 (talk) 14:24, 9 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. ASUKITE 16:30, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Portuguese–Safavid wars → ? – Portugal did not formally declare war on the Safavids multiple times during this period. These should be described as "conflicts" rather than wars. Kolno (talk) 13:45, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Satanic film → List of films featuring Satan – This has been tagged for years for its brief description of the apparent genre. On trying to research it, there seems to be no discussion of it. But there is discussion of Satan's appearance in films (see [https://www.google.ca/books/edition/Giving_the_Devil_His_Due/cLk-EAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=SATANIC+FILM+GENRE&printsec=frontcover Giving the Devil His Due:Satan and Cinema] (2021) and [https://www.google.ca/books/edition/The_Satanic_Screen/10QCEQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0 The Satanic Screen: An Illustrated Guide to the Devil in Cinema]'' (2020). The list of films in the article appears to be the real "meat and potatoes" of the article and already predominantly just feature film (not just horror films as the lead suggests) featuring Satan prominently in the plot. I recommend redirecting this to a list, as there is no serious discussion about it as a genre. Open to other suggestions on other titles that would be appropriate. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:39, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Sanjay Gandhi Jaivik Udyan → {{no redirect|Sanjay Gandhi Biological Park}} – Name of this article should be in English language Jaivik Udyan is in Hindi language. Sanjay Gandhi Biological Park is a redirect to this article Wikiwizardinho (talk) 11:51, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Aberdeen Group → {{no redirect|Aberdeen (company)}} – Following abrdn's announcement of their name change earlier in March 2025, two proposals were made for how to title this page - "Aberdeen Group" and "Aberdeen (company)" (NB: It is not possible for pages on the English-language Wikipedia to have a title with a lower-case initial letter, notwithstanding the fact that the company uses one in its trading name, aberdeen.) This topic was being discussed on the Talk page, but then, when someone realised that the company had updated their name at the UK's Companies House to Aberdeen Group plc, they decided it was imperative to update the title to Aberdeen Group right away, despite there being no evidence - more or less by definition - that this was the name that is most commonly used for the company (per WP:COMMONNAME). Other than in connection with the name change itself, there has been little to no media coverage referring to the company as "Aberdeen Group", while there has been media coverage which uses the name "Aberdeen" - eg, https://greenstreetnews.com/article/aberdeen-to-offload-e60m-frankfurt-assets/ https://www.fnlondon.com/articles/schroders-and-aberdeen-are-sticking-by-their-investment-management-arms-for-now-9d17e5c5 https://www.investorschronicle.co.uk/content/cc3aff2d-a3ed-5467-be34-1ec2e32fcb2a Kennethmac2000 (talk) 10:53, 24 March 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 14:44, 31 March 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 00:22, 8 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 18:00, 15 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 08:48, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :San Isidro, Davao del Norte → {{no redirect|Sawata, Davao del Norte}} – "Move" was the new municipal's name in accordance to R.A. 11814 of the Philippines, and we should revert to that. Limjran (talk) 08:48, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Pteraspidomorphi → {{no redirect|Pteraspidomorpha}} – Recently the Pteraspidomorpha class was in the monotypic superclass Pteraspidomorphi. This usage was not accepted universally so I deleted that superclass. Now we have to move the page to Pteraspidomorpha. Jako96 (talk) 19:55, 12 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 08:37, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Robert B. Anderson (Texas politician) → {{no redirect|Robert B. Anderson}} – WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&start=2024-05&end=2025-04&pages=Robert_B._Anderson_(Texas_politician)%7CRobert_B._Anderson_(South_Carolina_politician) Negligible views] from the South Carolinian compared the Texan, and being part of a president's cabinet is way more notable than only serving in a State House. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 06:16, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Ptyas mucosa → {{no redirect|Oriental rat snake}} – common and widespread species, well-known by this common name across its range. See - Indian cobra , Common krait, Russell's viper etc. *Indian vs. Oriental - "Oriental" seems to be more common in scientific and taxonomic references. ReptileDB and iNaturalist use this name. OTOH, field guides by Whitaker & Captain and Indraneil Das use the common name 'Indian rat snake'; however, this name seems to be less common in modern use. Vulpes-bengalensis (talk) 04:58, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – 23 skidoo → {{no redirect|23 skidoo (disambiguation)}} – Seems pretty silly to hide the article for the phrase behind a disambiguator, given it is the original usage of the phrase that all other article titles are inspired by, and is clearly the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC by long-term page views: [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=all-agents&redirects=0&start=2020-04&end=2025-04&pages=23_skidoo_(phrase)%7C23_Skidoo_(band)%7C23_Skidoo_(film) Pageview history for the last 5 years] RachelTensions (talk) 04:50, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
  • 23 skidoo (phrase) → 23 skidoo
  • (Discuss) – :2016 Jiangsu tornado → 2016 Funing tornado – More sources call this source the Funing tornado than the Jiangsu tornado - this is akin to calling, say, the Greenfield tornado, the 2024 Iowa tornado. I am not the best at Chinese geography but per COMMONNAME Funing tornado is the clear choice in my eyes. Departure– (talk) 15:46, 2 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 01:59, 10 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 04:13, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Siege of Constantinople (674–678) → Siege of Constantinople (668) – Following Jankowiak's article on the topic, there seems to be an increasing academic consensus that the siege took place in and around the year 668, rather than 674-8. Beyond the [https://www.academia.edu/7091574/The_First_Arab_Siege_of_Constantinople original article], [https://academic.oup.com/book/46840/chapter-abstract/413512634?redirectedFrom=fulltext various], [https://www.jstor.org/stable/48596792 recent] [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-16684-7_11 works] by [https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429437915-14/arab-byzantine-warfare-john-haldon experts] in the [https://www.vr-elibrary.de/doi/abs/10.7788/hian.2021.29.1.51 field] agree with dating the siege to 668, and the campaign to 667-669. There is also Pringent arguing that the siege took place in 670 instead, though I've seen far less support for this. To reflect the now commonly accepted view that the siege did not take place between 674-78, I propose that this page should be moved. Boverisuchus (talk) 19:38, 8 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:24, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Capture of Gagra (October 1992) → {{no redirect|Battle of Gagra (October 1992)}} – It was clearly a two-side engagement, so "battle" is more fitting and "capture" is more misleading. "Battle of Gagra" is also more widespread among RS. Nivzaq (talk) 02:21, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :W.M.M. v. Trump → {{no redirect|A.A.R.P. v. Trump}} – Per WP:COMMONNAME. Additionally, both of the Supreme Court rulings are styled A.A.R.P. v. Trump, notwithstanding that the district court decided to rename the case W.M.M. v. Trump. Even if the official name is important, we now have two of them, and per WP:SURPRISE, we should use the one that [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/redirectviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&start=2025-04-19&end=2025-05-15&sort=views&direction=1&view=list&page=W.M.M.%20v.%20Trump most readers] are looking for. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:13, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

=May 16, 2025=

  • (Discuss) – :Clemenceau → {{no redirect|Clemenceau (disambiguation)}} – Georges Clemenceau is the main topic for this name. [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/massviews/?platform=all-access&agent=user&source=wikilinks&range=latest-20&sort=views&direction=1&view=list&target=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clemenceau All of the listed pages have less page views than his article does.]] Furthermore, [https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=Clemenceau the WikiNav data] shows that functionally all people who go to this article are looking for the former French prime minister. Finally, [https://www.google.com/search?q=Clemenceau Google], [https://www.bing.com/search?q=Clemenceau Bing] and [https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Clemenceau DuckDuckGo] all seem to think that their searchers are looking for him as well. Overall, the French politician is the main topic for this name. ―Susmuffin Talk 23:43, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Habermas → Habermas (surname) – Jürgen Habermas is the main topic for this surname. According to [https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=Habermas the WikiNav data], the philosopher is the only target that people who go to this page click on. Furthermore, [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/massviews/?platform=all-access&agent=user&source=wikilinks&range=latest-20&sort=views&direction=1&view=list&target=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habermas of the three listed people, he has the highest number of page views for his article]. [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Habermas A Google Scholar search] also exclusively returns search results for the proposed target article's subject. In terms of search engines, [https://www.google.com/search?q=Habermas Google], [https://www.bing.com/search?q=Habermas Bing] and [https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Habermas DuckDuckGo] all return search results that relate to Jürgen Habermas. Overall, I agree with the commenter above. ―Susmuffin Talk 23:43, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Swiss Challenge League → Challenge League (Switzerland) – The reason for a previous move is confusion on my part. Sources generally refer to this as the Challenge League. This is seen on the [https://sfl.ch/clubs-dieci-challenge-league official site], which only refers to it as Challenge League, with the sponsor as well. News sources also refer to it as such: [https://telegrafi.com/en/spectacle-and-seven-goals-in-the-challenge-league-derby-in-Switzerland%2C-10-Albanian-footballers-on-the-field-and-two-others-on-the-bench/], [https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/the-sounds-of-_switzerland-a-nation-of-football/45075910], [https://www.tagblatt.ch/sport/ab-sofort-nur-noch-schweizer-ld.679788] Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 22:12, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Swiss Promotion League → Promotion League (Switzerland) – The reason for a previous move is confusion on my part. Sources generally refer to this as the Promotion League, [https://matchcenter.el-pl.ch/default.aspx?lng=1 the official site] refers to it as such (with the title sponsor), and other news sources refer to it as such as well. The official league name change in 2013 describes it as being changed to the Promotion League. [https://www.srf.ch/sport/fussball/super-league/schweizer-fussball-news-xamax-haelt-sich-in-der-challenge-league-nuzzolo-sagt-adieu], [https://www.nau.ch/sport/fussball/promotion-league-fc-koniz-und-fc-breitenrain-mit-geldsorgen-65700655] Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 22:07, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Swiss 1. Liga (football) → {{no redirect|1. Liga Classic}} – The reason this is re-nominated is confusion on my part. Per [https://matchcenter.el-pl.ch/default.aspx?lng=1&ln=12010 Official standings site], this seems to have 1. Liga Classic as the official name, so the page should be moved. Some database sites refer to it as Swiss 1. Liga Classic, but I can find various sources from actual outlets referring to it as 1. Liga Classic. [https://www.bern-ost.ch/Fussball-1-Liga-Classic-Muensingen-feiert-ersten-Heimerfolg--21-Derbysieg-gegen-Prishtina-Bern-692146], [https://kreuzlingen24.ch/articles/313658-1-liga-classic-gruppe-3-kreuzlingen-siegt-fc-st-gallen-u-21-remis-uzwil-vor-abstieg] Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 22:02, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Disney+ Hotstar → {{no redirect|Hotstar}} – Per WP:COMMONNAME, even if it is not longer official. Because in India (base of operations) it is JioHotstar, a title which is not yet permitted, while elsewhere it has different names including Disney+ Hotstar. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:45, 29 March 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Valorrr (lets chat) 01:03, 29 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Trailblazer101 (talk) 20:56, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Jay Powell → {{no redirect|Jay Powell (disambiguation)}} – per WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT, "Jay Powell" should redirect to Jerome Powell. The [https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=Jay_Powell vast majority] of people going to "Jay Powell" are looking for Jerome Powell. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 20:46, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Ahsoka (TV series) → {{no redirect|Star Wars: Ahsoka}} – According to official press releases from Disney, the full, official titles for these two shows are [https://dam.gettyimages.com/thewaltdisneystudios/starwarsahsoka/#!asset/vxsxqmctfmg5cqssb8jxp3 Star Wars: Ahsoka] and [https://dam.gettyimages.com/thewaltdisneystudios/starwarstheacolyte/#!asset/pbnz7htf2cxnvzh4f3jhpbjh Star Wars: The Acolyte], respectively. WP:NATURAL states: {{tqq|Using an alternative name that the subject is also commonly called in English reliable sources, albeit not as commonly as the preferred-but-ambiguous title, is sometimes preferred}}. WP:SUBTITLE supports this by noting: {{tqq|When the most commonly used name is ambiguous, the full title and subtitle might be suitable to be used as a form of natural disambiguation}}. Finally, WP:NCDAB writes: {{tqq|Natural disambiguation that is unambiguous, commonly used, and clear is generally preferable to parenthetical disambiguation}}. For example, the official title of Rogue One is Rogue One: A Star Wars Story, but we omit the franchise-denoting subtitle per WP:CONCISE and WP:COMMONNAME; on the other hand, although a more ideal title for Solo: A Star Wars Story would be simply Solo, it requires parenthetical disambiguation in the form of Solo (2018 American film), so per NCDAB, we opt for the full title even though it is less common and concise. Likewise, although Ahsoka and The Acolyte are indeed most preferable, their full titles provide natural disambiguation. This is consistent with other Star Wars spin-offs such as Star Wars: The Bad Batch and Star Wars: Skeleton Crew, whose shortened titles would similarly require parenthetical disambiguation. It is also prevalent beyond Star Wars, for example Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery, Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga, and Guillermo del Toro's Pinocchio — but Hobbs & Shaw and Wake Up Dead Man because no disambiguation is necessary. To satisfy the "also commonly called ... albeit not [the most] common" stipulation of NATURAL, reliable sources that use Star Wars: Ahsoka include: [https://time.com/6306900/ahsoka-star-wars-what-to-know/] [https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/tv/story/2023-08-23/ahsoka-star-wars-rebels-sabine-wren-hera-syndulla] [https://www.the-independent.com/arts-entertainment/tv/reviews/ahsoka-star-wars-review-cast-disney-plus-b2397750.html] [https://www.npr.org/2023/08/23/1195288664/review-star-wars-ahsoka] [https://variety.com/2023/tv/news/star-wars-ahsoka-premiere-date-disney-plus-1235635951/] [https://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/tv/a45014586/star-wars-ahsoka-release-schedule/] [https://www.cbc.ca/arts/commotion/does-star-wars-ahsoka-do-right-by-the-beloved-character-1.6946307] [https://www.radiotimes.com/tv/sci-fi/ahsoka-season-2-hayden-christensen-return-newsupdate/] [https://datebook.sfchronicle.com/movies-tv/ahsoka-star-wars-review-18303426] [https://mashable.com/video/star-wars-ahsoka-trailer-release-date] [https://www.ign.com/articles/ahsoka-ending-explained-finale-filoni-movie-season-2] [https://decider.com/2023/08/22/star-wars-ahsoka-on-disney-plus-review/] [https://www.cbr.com/star-wars-ahsoka-first-emmy/] [https://screencrush.com/sabine-is-star-of-ahsoka/]; reliable sources that use Star Wars: The Acolyte include: [https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/04/entertainment/star-wars-the-acolyte-review] [https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-news/star-wars-the-acolyte-manny-jacinto-canadian-screen-award-1236153512/] [https://ew.com/star-wars-the-acolyte-trailer-leslye-headland-8610791] [https://deadline.com/2024/10/star-wars-the-acolyte-jodie-turner-smith-calls-out-disney-denouncing-racism-1236110683/] [https://arstechnica.com/culture/2024/03/darkness-rises-in-an-age-of-light-in-first-trailer-for-star-wars-the-acolyte/] [https://www.slashfilm.com/1744229/star-wars-the-acolyte-cancellation-disney-explained/] [https://collider.com/star-wars-the-acolyte-trailer/] [https://parade.com/tv/star-wars-the-acolyte] [https://comicbook.com/starwars/news/star-wars-acolyte-story-cast-characters-timeline-release-date-explained-how-watch/] [https://www.inverse.com/entertainment/the-acolyte-jedi-recruitment-rules] [https://screenrant.com/star-wars-the-acolyte-horror-villains/] [https://www.themarysue.com/no-the-acolye-isnt-ruining-star-wars-whether-you-like-it-or-not/] [https://www.denofgeek.com/tv/star-wars-the-acolyte-jedi-more-interesting/] [https://www.salon.com/2024/06/12/the-acolyte-jedi-witches/]. Rotten Tomatoes uses the full titles as well: [https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/star_wars_ahsoka] [https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/star_wars_the_acolyte]. Disney+ demonstrably does not always use the official title, for example [https://www.disneyplus.com/browse/entity-54b8b4ab-2a2b-444e-8269-18e0c73ed375] [https://www.disneyplus.com/browse/entity-8eed72cc-3c4a-41cf-8e98-44a6b7f8f8d3] [https://www.disneyplus.com/browse/entity-0f5c5223-f4f6-46ef-ba8a-69cb0e17d8d3] [https://www.disneyplus.com/browse/entity-63516dff-91f8-4deb-b110-d22552f329cb] [https://www.disneyplus.com/browse/entity-87d249a9-f236-40cc-bfd5-fbf9cbc44dff] [https://www.disneyplus.com/browse/entity-4aa190d7-6010-410d-b567-b8be3296b521], so it should not be regarded as the most authoritative source for the official title. To address potential concerns with ambiguity, as {{-r|Star Wars: Ahsoka}} currently points to Ahsoka (disambiguation) for some reason, it is highly unlikely for someone to refer to the character (Ahsoka Tano) as "Star Wars: Ahsoka", while the only other primary-topic contender (Ahsoka (novel)) is clearly far less notable; as for {{-r|Star Wars: The Acolyte}}, it already redirects to the TV series since no other Star Wars–related article contains "Acolyte" in its title. InfiniteNexus (talk) 19:25, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
  • The Acolyte (TV series) → {{no redirect|Star Wars: The Acolyte}}
  • (Discuss) – Transnistria War → {{no redirect|War in Transnistria}} – I thought the use of the proper noun Transnistria but not its adjective form was a bit peculiar, so I did a cursory search on Google to see if it is the common name. [https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Transnistria+War%2CWar+in+Transnistria%2CTransnistrian+War%2CWar+of+Transnistria&year_start=1800&year_end=2022&corpus=en&smoothing=3 Google Ngrams returns no results] for Transnistria War and plausible variants with the use of "war", including War in Transnistria, Transnistrian War, and War of Transnistria. [https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Transnistria+conflict%2CTransnistrian+conflict%2CConflict+in+Transnistria%2CConflict+of+Transnistria&year_start=1800&year_end=2022&corpus=en&smoothing=3 Transnistrian conflict and Transnistria conflict] return some results (conflict in / of Transnistria returning none), with the former adjective form seeing much more usage. However, Transnistria conflict is a separate article from Transnistria War with a wider scope, time-wise. "War in Transnistria" and "Transnistrian conflict" are the most used names by a significant margin in Google Search, Google Books, and Google Scholar. I'd rather not waste time copying-and-pasting all the links, but anyone can make the searches themselves and correct me if I'm mistaken. For consistency's sake, it may be preferential to move Transnistria War to Transnistrian war in conjunction with a move to Transnistrian conflict. A final note is that the Romanian and Russian translations provided in the lead also translate literally to "War in Transnistria". Yue🌙 16:21, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Transnistria conflict → {{no redirect|Transnistrian conflict}}
  • (Discuss) – :Kohlberg Kravis Roberts → {{no redirect|KKR & Co.}} – Official corporate name per [https://ir.kkr.com/media/document/d57ed064-3939-4af8-b8b2-b48cd07e2ed8/assets/KKR_-_2024.12.31_10-K.pdf?disposition=inline 10-K] – unabbreviated name is no longer used. Previous RMs have not found consensus for the company to be the primary topic for "KKR" alone. Conifer (talk) 00:34, 28 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 01:36, 5 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 16:16, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Anti-Federalism → {{no redirect|Antifederalism}} – or {{-r|Anti-federalism}}. The word "federalism" is an ordinary word describing a system or philosophy of governance, and "federal" and "federalism" are generally lowercased as far as I know, so I see no obvious reason to capitalize the F in "anti-federalism" (or to capitalize the A in "anti-federalism" in running prose). Per MOS:MOVEMENT, we're supposed to use lowercase for terms describing philosophies and movements. We don't capitalize fascism or republicanism or libertarianism or conservatism or democracy, for example. See also the capitalization in the titles of the Dual federalism and Cooperative federalism articles. This is not the name of a specific organization such as a political party. Clearly, some of the cited sources do not include a hyphen in the term (see [https://web.archive.org/web/20161008065110/http://www.ushistory.org/us/16b.asp this cited US History site] and [https://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-resources/teacher-resources/infographic-differences-between-federalists-and-antifederalists this Gilder Lehrman Institute] article and [https://books.google.com/books?id=n0tf43-IUWcC&q=The+Anti+Federalists this book] and [https://csac.history.wisc.edu/document-collections/constitutional-debates/judiciary/ this University of Wisconsin publication] and [https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/studies-in-american-political-development/article/abs/it-is-natural-to-care-for-the-crazy-machine-the-antifederalists-postratification-acquiescence/E1437314E9F044091C0061C453276735 this Cambridge University Press article], all of which are cited in the article). Also note that the name of the Albany Antifederal Committee does not include a hyphen. Even some of them that hyphenate it do not capitalize the F, such as [https://edsitement.neh.gov/lesson-plans/lesson-1-anti-federalist-arguments-against-complete-consolidation this] cited NEH source. MOS:HYPHENCAPS says to avoid capital letters after hyphens. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 05:39, 7 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. ASUKITE 15:58, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Wikipedia:User access levels → {{no redirect|Wikipedia:User groups}} – The English Wikipedia term "user access level" seems to be a synonym of the MediaWiki term "user group". It is always good to use standard terminology rather than make up our own. See mw:Help:User rights and groups, Special:UserGroupRights, and mw:Manual:User rights for examples of MediaWiki using the term "user group". Quick recap: in MediaWiki (the software that powers Wikipedia), we have "user rights" such as block, and these user rights are assigned to "user groups" such as sysop. Each user group can be masked with a more readable name in the local language, and that more readable name is set at pages such as MediaWiki:Group-sysop. In this case, the mask of sysop is "Administrators". –Novem Linguae (talk) 15:39, 7 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. ASUKITE 15:37, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :The Base (hate group) → The Base (organization) – I'm open to other options but "Hate group" is a terrible disamb in any context, whether true or not. For the same reason we have moved all articles using the (Terrorist) disamb lately, it is just sloppy. Sources largely describe them as neo-Nazi, militant, etc, which are clearer. This article also does not mention that they were designated a hate group by any of the organizations that do that? It probably was but given that it is not included here and they are not called a hate group in the article already makes me think that is not a very good disamb. I am open to other options but this seems the most basic. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:31, 7 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. ASUKITE 15:32, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Masami Tsuchiya → Masami Tsuchiya (singer) – This situation is similar to that for the recently closed RM at Talk:Sajid Mir (politician)#Requested move 28 April 2025. The pageview ratio is inverted, with [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&start=2021-05&end=2025-04&pages=Masami_Tsuchiya%7CMasami_Tsuchiya_(terrorist) 50% more people] interested in reading the article about the Aum Shinrikyo chemist-terrorist than about the singer-songwriter. Also, per MOS:TERRORIST, Wikipedia avoids using the label "terrorist" in article titles – the word is vague, tabloidish and inflamatory. There are only three articles on the entire English Wikipedia that use {{no break|"(terrorist)"}} as a disambiguator. See also the recent RM discussion at Talk:Óscar Ramírez Durand#Requested move 6 March 2025. If it is determined that neither is primary, then I suggest moving the "terrorist" article to {{-r|Masami Tsuchiya (Aum Shinrikyo)}} or {{-r|Masami Tsuchiya (chemist)}} (the title it originally had for a couple of years until 4 September 2020). —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 11:13, 9 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 14:23, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Masami Tsuchiya (terrorist) → {{no redirect|Masami Tsuchiya}}
  • (Discuss) – :Fred Rogers → {{no redirect|Mister Rogers}} – Mister Rogers is the name more commonly referred to by reliable sources and the general public. The Ngrams favor that title: https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Fred+Rogers%2C+Mister+Rogers&year_start=1800&year_end=2022&corpus=en&smoothing=3 Interstellarity (talk) 12:36, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Seicho-no-Ie → {{no redirect|Seicho-No-Ie}} – Academics like to use Seichō-no-Ie with macrons and lowercase no since they're using academic transliteration systems, but the organization itself consistently refers to itself as Seicho-No-Ie, and that's what it's commonly known as. Per WP:COMMONNAME, this article should be renamed Seicho-No-Ie. Please consult various news articles and the organization's official websites for this usage. Yenistardom (talk) 08:46, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Bren Z. Guiao Sports Complex and Convention Center → {{no redirect|Bren Z. Guiao Convention Center}} – Although the convention center is part of a greater sports complex, most of the content and sources only mention the convention center, making it the primary topic. After searching through, most articles just refer to it as "Bren Z. Guiao Convention Center" instead of the full "Bren Z. Guiao Sports Complex and Convention Center". MarcusAbacus (talk) 03:06, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Chao Ratchabut Wongtawan Na Chiang Mai → {{no redirect|Chao Ratchabut (Wongtawan Na Chiang Mai)}} – "Chao Ratchabut" is an honorific title, and Wongtawan Na Chiang Mai is the individual's name. The use of parentheses helps clarify this distinction, aligning with naming conventions used for other historical figures in similar contexts. Inner789 (talk) 08:54, 14 May 2025 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). Lion7410 (talk) 01:56, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

=May 15, 2025=

  • (Discuss) – Tudela → {{no redirect|Tudela (disambiguation)}} – The city in Navarre gets more than three fifths of the views[https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&start=2025-02-13&end=2025-05-14&pages=Tudela%7CTudela,_Misamis_Occidental%7CTudela,_Navarre%7CTudela,_Cebu%7CJo%C3%A3o_Maria_Tudela%7CJosh_Tudela] of all the things on the dab page that could reasonably be called 'Tudela'. Exclude persons surnamed Tudela and it goes above two thirds. It is the primary topic. Srnec (talk) 23:16, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Tudela, Navarre → {{no redirect|Tudela}}
  • (Discuss) – Spider-Man: One More Day → {{no redirect|One More Day (comics)}} – Both the comics of "One More Day" and "Brand New Day" do not have the "Spider-Man" name in either of their titles, and per WP:NCCDAB, the titles as proposed follow the correct naming conventions. While WP:NATURAL disambiguation is preferred, doing so with the presently unofficial titles should not be preferred over the official titles and naming conventions. Concerns were raised in this previous move request at the Brand New Day article, where some consensus formed for moving that and this article to the "{{Tq|(comics)}}" DAB. Trailblazer101 (talk) 16:56, 11 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Trailblazer101 (talk) 20:42, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Spider-Man: Brand New Day → {{no redirect|Brand New Day (comics)}}
  • (Discuss) – :Google Knowledge Graph → {{no redirect|Knowledge Graph}} – The feature is called "Knowledge Graph", not "Google Knowledge Graph". See [https://support.google.com/knowledgepanel/answer/9787176?hl=en] [https://blog.google/products/search/introducing-knowledge-graph-things-not/] [https://blog.google/products/search/about-knowledge-graph-and-knowledge-panels/]. Not only is "Google Knowledge Graph" an incorrect name, but it is also less WP:CONCISE than "Knowledge Graph". Per WP:DIFFCAPS, the difference in capitalization from the general concept of a knowledge graph is sufficient to distinguish between the two articles, so potential confusion is not grounds for arbitrarily adding an incorrect qualifier to a proper name. WP:NATURAL clearly states: {{tqq|Do not use obscure or made-up names.}} Besides, Knowledge Graph (capitalized) already redirects here, with a hatnote pointing to the other page, so if there were truly a risk of confusion, that redirect shouldn't be pointing here in the first place. InfiniteNexus (talk) 19:22, 3 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 03:01, 12 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Steel1943 (talk) 19:31, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Healthcare and the LGBTQ community → {{no redirect|LGBTQ health}} – The content of the article is about healthcare of LGBTQ people. The current title suggests a narrower scope (i.e., how LGBTQ individuals considered as a unified, collective community relate to health care). The language throughout the article primarily discusses LGBTQ people rather than the LGBTQ community as a whole. Trystan (talk) 18:40, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Heinkel He 57 → {{no redirect|Heinkel HE 57}} – The "He 57" designation is incorrect. The RLM never allocated 8-57 to Heinkel, so the company designation "HE 57" should be used, not the incorrect RLM designation. I have been told that the lowercase "He" designation is more common, but this particular model never received that designation. Meltdown627 (talk) 17:00, 8 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 18:28, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Kanye West → {{no redirect|Ye (rapper)}} – all the new reliable sources called him Ye [https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/07/arts/music/ye-takes-back-apology.html The New York Times] and his new songs on apple music is under the name Ye [https://music.apple.com/us/artist/ye/1714710847 Ye on Apple Music] and on X where Ye uploaded his music video his Display Name is Ye [https://twitter.com.com/Kanyewest Ye on X] and his name on Scribe where he released his song Heil Hitler Is released under Ye. Kanye West is an dead name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Momentoftrue (talk • contribs) 15:13, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Alberta Investment Management Corporation → {{no redirect|AIMCo}} – Per WP:NCCORP, is how company refers to itself as on its [https://www.aimco.ca/ website]. Is also how main stream media sources universally refer to it, e.g. [https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2024-11-15/mass-firings-at-aimco-are-a-warning-shot-for-the-maple-eight-bay-street-edition Bloomberg], [https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/aimco-job-cuts-raise-questions-about-commitment-to-inclusion-critics-say-1.7444224 CBC], [https://edmontonjournal.com/news/politics/alberta-fires-aimco-board-finance-minister-takes-over Edmonton Journal], [https://financialpost.com/fp-finance/aimco-performance-before-last-week-shocking-purge Financial Post] and [https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-aimco-closes-new-offices-in-new-york-and-singapore-to-save-costs/ Globe & Mail] Honeuarra (talk) 03:13, 8 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 14:39, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Amrock → Rocket Close – The company has changed its name, as seen on the company website [https://www.rocketcompanies.com/our-companies/] and in the following articles: [https://www.fastcompany.com/91259658/rockets-new-logo-wants-to-tap-into-the-emotional-side-of-buying-a-home] [https://www.marketingdive.com/news/rocket-companies-rebrand-super-bowl/737120/] [https://brand-innovators.com/rocket-unveils-new-brand-identity-ahead-of-super-bowl/][https://www.detroitnews.com/story/business/2025/01/14/rocket-companies-reveals-new-logo-as-part-of-rebranding-plans-super-bowl-ad/77701727007/]. Annie13478 (talk) 11:56, 8 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 14:39, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Tzachas → {{no redirect|Chaka Bey}} – As stated on the footnote in the article, the name "Tzachas" does not appear in any historical document about this person - multiple sources refer to him as "Chaka Bey". [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349281876_The_First_Turkish_Navy_Admiral_Chaka_Bey (PDF) The First Turkish Navy Admiral: Chaka Bey] [https://kutuphane.ttk.gov.tr/details?id=589305 The First Turkish Admiral Chaka Bey] Dismas Reinald Apostolis (2011), Chaka Bey, {{ISBN|6136910756}} It makes no sense to have a Hellenic label on a Turkish person whom ruled an Anatolian beylik, and thus I request the move of this article. AscendencyXXIV (talk) 11:23, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :KK Bosna Visit Sarajevo → {{no redirect|KK Bosna Royal}} – The club's official name is KK Bosna Royal, while KK Bosna Visit Sarajevo is a sponsored name. No articles lead to the team using this sponsored name; all articles consistently use the official name Zdremon (talk) 09:23, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Skyline Queenstown → Skyline Enterprises – I think it would provide a better encyclopedic experience to move this article to be named for the organisation that runs skyline and have Skyline Queenstown as a heading inside of it. Nixleovel (talk) 08:24, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :3D modeling → {{no redirect|3D model}} – What do we think about redirecting this page to just "3D model", instead of what it is now, "3D modeling"? One positive for "3D model" is that is relates to a specific human-output thing, whereas "3D modeling" refers to the process of making 3D models. JustMakeTheAccount (talk) 04:15, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Sleepyhead → {{no redirect|Sleepyhead (disambiguation)}} – Primary topic per pageviews. The only article of this name that gets [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&range=this-year&pages=Sleepyhead|Sleepyhead_(song)|Sleepyhead_(album)|Sleepyhead_(band)|Sleepyhead_(Thorne)|Sleepy_Head_(Adventures_of_Pow_Wow) any kind of traffic]. 162 etc. (talk) 21:07, 6 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 03:45, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Sleepyhead (song) → Sleepyhead
  • (Discuss) – Philippe Ouédraogo → {{no redirect|Philippe Ouédraogo (disambiguation)}} – A mere cursory glance at the article and Google search suggests the cardinal is the primary topic. The cardinal's article has more information and sources and he's a cardinal elector this year with a somewhat dubious qualification for it. The politician once held a minor ministerial role and has largely faded from prominence. Killuminator (talk) 21:16, 6 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 03:44, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Philippe Ouédraogo (cardinal) → Philippe Ouédraogo

=Elapsed listings=

{{shortcut|WP:RME}}

{{hatnote|The 7-day listing period has elapsed. Items below may be closed if there's a consensus, or if discussion has run its course and consensus could not be achieved.}}

  • (Discuss) – :Russia investigation origins counter-narrative → {{no redirect|Russia investigation origins conspiracy theory}} – The article is about a conspiracy theory, and that is how RS describe it. "Counter-narrative" is an unusual euphemism to use, and we are warned about using euphemisms. I know of [https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2017/04/susan-rice-becomes-face-of-trump-counter-narrative-on-russia.html only one RS] using that term for this topic, while many RS use "conspiracy theory". Thus, the current title fails WP:COMMONNAME. It's time to improve the title. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 23:42, 7 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 01:56, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :F1 (film) → F1 The Movie – As per the official poster and the two trailers on the U.S. Warner Bros. YouTube, (1) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yh9BPUBbbQ in this main trailer] and (2) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CT2_P2DZBR0 in this official trailer], the full title is F1 The Movie, sans colon. The most recent [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQWkae5VdgM behind-the-scenes video] from one hour ago also uses this title. In addition, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ia2Ph61bYzc this music video] for the soundtrack also notates this expanded title. Several third-parties such as [https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/f1_the_movie Rotten Tomatoes] have adopted this title too. SunriseAndSunset1 (talk) 21:36, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Person with Headscarf emoji → {{no redirect|Hijab emoji}} – I feel like the tital is unnecessary a bit long. Emojipedia also named it as "Hijab emoji". 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 14:18, 7 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. ASUKITE 20:33, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Yahwism → {{no redirect|Ancient Israelite religion}} – The current name is sadly misleading. Yahwism is not the religion of the ancient Israelites, it is an aspect of it. It may be an important aspect in the religion, it may be the only thing separating it from the Canaanite religion, but it is not the religion itself. As Glennznl wrote here: "I find the term "Yahwism" a bit unfortunate though as it suggests that the religion had already changed into a monotheistic one. "Ancient Israelite religion" would be less misleading and clearer."
    I wrote an article in Hebrew Wikipedia about the Ancient Israelite religion, and explained there the non-Yahwistic characteristics of this religion in more details, based on high-quality recent sourcer. I intend to translate this content to English; it might have been wiser to suggest this move only after the translation, but unfortunately I won't have the time for the translation in the near future. I will be able to translate a summary, if you want more details on the subject. פעמי-עליון (pʿmy-ʿlywn) - talk 18:52, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Darkstalkers 3 → {{no redirect|Vampire Savior}} – Vampire Savior was the title of the game used for all regional versions of the game and is even used on the Capcom Fighting Collection compilation in all regions and it ought to be given more priority than the Darkstalkers 3rebranding that was exclusive to a single console conversion of the game. I was disappointed that I was not notified of the prior discussion, given I was somewhat involved in editing this article before. Jonny2x4 (talk) 18:07, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Paul Marshall Johnson Jr. → Killing of Paul Johnson – This is something I've seen with other articles regarding beheading victims of Islamist groups. Most of their articles are better suited for "Killing of" articles with the only exceptions given that nearly all of them solely focus on their deaths, lacking notabilty either before or after (such as Kayla Mueller). Similar has already been done with Nick Berg, Kenneth Bigley, and Margaret Hassan. Others would include: *David Haines (aid worker) → Killing of David Haines The aforementioned three articles differ in having the phrasings "Killing of", "Kidnapping and murder of" or "Kidnapping and killing of". I generally lean towards the former for simplicity, but wouldn't mind either of the other two. The ones killed in Iraq and Afghanistan are already listed in the "Foreign hostages in x" articles and can probably be deleted if they're not considered noteworthy enough for their own articles in hindsight. As for the shortening of Johnson's name, it was the [https://www.voanews.com/a/a-13-a-2004-06-18-1-1-66888002/261567.html common name] [https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/american-hostage-in-saudi-arabia-beheaded-by-captors used in] [https://www.npr.org/2004/06/18/1964439/u-s-hostage-beheaded-in-saudi-arabia reporting about] [https://www.upi.com/Top_News/2004/06/18/US-reacts-to-Paul-Johnson-beheading/16951087599973/ his kidnapping and beheading], [https://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/rmo/hglt/33722.htm including the U.S. Department of State] and [https://news.un.org/en/story/2004/06/107012 the UN]. He was called "Paul Marshall Johnson Jr." signifcantly less often than just "Paul Johnson" or "Paul Johnson Jr.". The new article title alone would be distinctive enough, with a redirect of "Paul Johnson (murder victim)" and an about notice linking to the disambiguation page. The only articles that should be left standalone with their killing in the death section are journalists i.e. Daniel Pearl, James Foley, Kenji Goto, given how they seem to fulfill general notability. Rubintyrann (talk) 14:20, 7 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Bensci54 (talk) 17:48, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Pentagón Jr. → {{no redirect|Penta (wrestler)}} – He hasn't used the name Pentagón Jr. since 2017. He works for WWE, the largest promotion in the World as Penta, working at Royal Rumble and WrestleMania. While he has several names (Penta, Penta El 0M, Penta El Cero Miedo, Penta El Zero, Penta El Zero M, Penta El Zero Miedo, Penta Oscuro), all of them includes the word Penta, so at this point, it's WP:COMMONNAME. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 11:08, 6 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. ASUKITE 16:04, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

=Backlog=

{{shortcut|WP:RMB}}

{{hatnote|Elapsed listings fall into the backlog after 24 hours. Consider relisting 8-day-old discussions with minimal participation.}}

  • (Discuss) – :Federal states of Austria → {{no redirect|States of Austria}} – I know this is a previously discussed issue, which is why I'd like to gather a few arguments for the potential terms in the following statement so the WP community can decide on it and ideally resolve the debate: In terms of WP:COMMONNAME, both "states" and "provinces" are [https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=states+of+Austria%2Cprovinces+of+Austria%2Cfederal+states+of+Austria%2Cfederal+provinces+of+Austria&year_start=2000&year_end=2022&corpus=en&smoothing=3&case_insensitive=false fairly common]. However, I believe we should avoid the term "federal" in the title, as it is both uncommon and wordy without adding significant contextual value. This leaves us to choose between "states" and "provinces" based on considerations other than COMMONNAME. "State" is a well-established and common term on WP for administrative subdivisions of countries, applicable for Austria as well as other federations like Nigeria, Venezuela, or the neighboring Germany. It is required by WP:ACON is used by [https://european-union.europa.eu/principles-countries-history/eu-countries/austria_en official EU sites] as a translation and is more WP:CONCISE than "province". On the other hand, [https://www.parlament.gv.at/en/explore/political-system/the-federal-state-of-austria/index.html Austrian government websites] and [https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/Erv/ERV_1930_1/ERV_1930_1.html the translation] of the Federal Constitutional Law appear to use "provinces" instead. In my personal understanding, "state" is a more direct translation of Land / Bundesland than "province" and conveys [https://dictionary.cambridge.org/de/worterbuch/englisch/state the concept] of a more autonomous region compared to [https://dictionary.cambridge.org/de/worterbuch/englisch/province province], as every Austrian state is governed by a separate Landtag. "Province" is likely used by Austrian authorities to avoid confusion with the federal state of Austria itself, but to me, this phonetic similarity doesn’t make "state" unsuitable or "province" preferrable. Additionally, considering the concision, usage by the EU, alignment with WP:ACON and the similarity to Germany, there are more arguments favoring "state" than "province", which is why I lean toward "state". Perhaps we could start a poll beneath this message for either "state(s)" (a) or "province(s)" (b). If I've missed any points, please feel free to comment below. –Tobias (talk) 15:27, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :U.S. Agent → {{no redirect|U.S.Agent}} – The correct spelling per Marvel's usage, as seen [https://www.marvel.com/characters/us-agent-john-walker on the company's character profile] and across the publication history dating back decades. The name is a play on "U.S.A.", which is also conventionally written with no spaces, even when the dots are present. The move could be done unilaterally, but I wanted to make sure there was no objections. oknazevad (talk) 02:21, 5 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. cyberdog958Talk 05:21, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Life of Samuel Johnson → ? – There appears to be various titles of this book, depending on the source. The current article is inconsistent: title says "Life of Samuel Johnson" but lead sentence says "The Life of Samuel Johnson, LL.D." Here are the titles and their potential cases: * The Life of Samuel Johnson, LL.D. Looking at this [https://www.peterharrington.co.uk/the-life-of-samuel-johnson-163220.html first edition], the original title appears to be "The Life of Samuel Johnson, LL.D." This is the same title used by [https://www.britannica.com/topic/The-Life-of-Samuel-Johnson-LLD Britannica]. * Life of Samuel Johnson This is the current title of the Wikipedia article, and according to [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?start=0&q=%22Life+of+Samuel+Johnson%22&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5 Google Scholar], it is a name sometimes used for the book. * Life of Samuel Johnson, LL.D This is the name that appears on the infobox image, it also appears on some results in Scholar. * The Life of Samuel Johnson The name used by [https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780192806871.001.0001/acref-9780192806871-e-4047 The Oxford Companion to English Literature]. Also appears on Scholar. I have no idea which of these is the common name. ―Howard • 🌽33 20:16, 5 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 04:04, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Decolonization of the Americas → {{no redirect|European withdrawal from the Americas}} – "Decolonization" is an extremely loaded and controversial word to employ when talking about the article content. The decolonization article itself says "The meanings and applications of the term are disputed." This particularly holds in the Americas, where there are zero independent indigenous countries. Is that actually decolonization? Some might argue yes, others might argue no. My point is not that it isn't decolonization, but that the question of whether it was decolonization creates problems. Therefore, I propose the page title be changed to this descriptive title that avoids controversy. Evaporation123 (talk) 23:09, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Sodor (fictional island) → {{no redirect|Island of Sodor}} – Widely known by this name,[https://ttte.fandom.com/wiki/The_Island_of_Sodor:_Its_People,_History_and_Railways] and this title works better as there doesn't have to be brackets explaining what it is. I know Island of Sodor is a redirect to this page, however, Island of Sodor works better as the page's name. Thomasfan1000 (talk) 22:36, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus → {{no redirect|Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Terminus}} –
    * https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/cag-report-on-railways-flags-issues-with-ecor-workshop-construction-works-at-cst-station-in-mumbai/article69408858.ece * https://www.newsband.in/article_detail/cst-tea-vendor-caught-in-vip-ticket-scam-earned-rs-15-lakh-monthly-through-the-fake-enterprise * https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/tea-vendor-held-for-vip-ticket-scam-at-csmt/articleshow/119991231.cms * https://www.lokmattimes.com/mumbai/central-railway-generates-over-rs-40-lakh-revenue-from-film-shoots-during-financial-year-2024-25-a512/ It seems even though the short form CST is used some times while referring to stations entire name they always write Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaja Terminus. U may still find some articles which don't use Maharaja but coincidently those were the articles which news sites repost every year. Like this article about New Year celebration at the station. https://www.knocksense.com/mumbai/mumbai-news-roundup-cst-welcomes-ny-with-train-honks-18-new-monorail-trains-by-aug-2025-more Mumbai Airport article has already changed name from CSIA to CSMIA so why station is kept the same? Many would argue that both CST and CSMT are common names in that case official name which is also common should be used as this will follow wikipedia as well as sentiments of users. UNESCO and Britanica cant be prooves for common names as they are neither Indian or Maharashtrian agencies. Pleas oppose only if you have a common mans perspective who travels through the station everyday. That common mans opinion should be considered common name and not some foreign agencies seven oceans away from the site. Advay Phadke (talk) 10:39, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Willie Gallacher (politician) → {{no redirect|Willie Gallacher}} – {{Ping|GiantSnowman}} moved the page nine years which I disagree with based on [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&start=2015-07-01&end=2025-05-02&pages=Willie_Gallacher_(politician)%7CWillie_Gallacher_(footballer)%7CWilliam_Gallacher_(footballer)%7CWilliam_Gallagher pageviews] and long term significance. Sahaib (talk) 08:04, 3 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 22:52, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Kalotermitidae → {{no redirect|Drywood termite}} – Per WP:COMMONNAME. Disclosure: I'm initiating this on behalf of my bug-enthusiast friend User:Bardusquus at their request as they're less familiar with the RM process. If both of us participate in this RM, please do not count us separately when closing for the purpose of determining consensus. In their view, "Drywood termite" and "Subterranean termite" are more recognizable and commonly used names than Kalotermitidae and Heterotermitidae. While I am personally too ignorant of this subject matter to have informed opinions on these proposals, Google Trends data demonstrates that the proposed names are more commonly used: [https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=Kalotermitidae,Drywood%20termite&hl=en-US Kalotermitidae vs Drywood termite], [https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=Heterotermitidae,Subterranean%20termite&hl=en-US Heterotermitidae vs Subterrranean termite]. For the Heterotermitidae -> Subterranean Termite move in particular, User:Bardusquus provided the following source: {{tq|"The Heterotermitidae now encompass the three genera often referred to as “subterranean termites”, a term historically associated with “Rhinotermitidae” with an extensive pest status in the literature"}} [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-51028-y]  Vanilla  Wizard 💙 02:01, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Heterotermitidae → {{no redirect|Subterranean termite}}
  • (Discuss) – :Mosley → {{no redirect|Mosley (disambiguation)}} – Mosley almost universally means Oswald Mosley, and should be a redirect there as are Hitler and Mussolini. The page views for every page on this disambiguation can be seen [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&start=2025-04-17&end=2025-05-07&pages=Oswald_Mosley%7CMosley_(film)%7CMosley_(TV_serial)%7CMosley_(surname)%7CMosley_Mayne%7CMosley_Street here] - generally, at its lowest the fascist had more than 2,000x more views than the highest other. 🔮🛷 Vote Kane 🛷🔮 (talk) 16:28, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

{{cbot}}

: – I had moved these in accordance with what seems to be the practice for titles for soundtracks/scores of single movies, but my moves were quickly reverted. “Music of” is normally used for franchises! See special:search/intitle:soundtrack, special:search/intitle:"music of"_film. ~ IvanScrooge98 (talk) 12:50, 30 March 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Valorrr (lets chat) 16:28, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

  • (Discuss) – :Zapatista territories → {{no redirect|Rebel Zapatista Autonomous Municipalities}} – After the Rebel Zapatista Autonomous Municipalities (MAREZ) were dissolved in 2023 and reorganised into the Local Autonomous Governments (GAL), there was quite a bit of debate over the scope of this article in its talk page. Discussions were had about possibly expanding the scope of this article and moving it to a different title, with various different titles thrown out, but no formalised discussion was had on that. My opinion at the time was that the scope of the article itself would need to substantially change and expand before any article move was carried out, although I proposed a broader article on "Zapatista autonomy" might be worth creating. On 19 March 2025, {{User|LaborHorizontal}} carried out a unilateral move of the article to "Zapatista territories" ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zapatista_territories&diff=1281328649&oldid=1280911151 diff]). Despite the move being carried out ostensibly to expand the scope of the article, most of the article is still specifically about the MAREZ, so all that really changed was the title (creating confusion as to what this article is about). The term "Zapatista territories" also set off alarm bells in my head, due to previous issues with the use of "territory" in other article titles; I searched the term up on Google Scholar, and the term is indeed in use, but it is a largely informal term used to refer to the area controlled by the EZLN (or by Zapata's ELS), rather than any specific governance structures established there (which is what this article is about). As the scope of the article has not meaningfully changed enough to justify a move, in my mind at least, I'm proposing this be moved back to "Rebel Zapatista Autonomous Municipalities". I'd also separately propose that anything taking a broader view of the territory controlled by the EZLN be its own article, rather than subsuming this one. Grnrchst (talk) 10:32, 28 March 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 12:08, 4 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Valorrr (lets chat) 16:28, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Negative responsiveness → {{no redirect|Mono-raise criterion}} – Last year these three pages were moved from their earlier names of "Monotonicity criterion", "Consistency criterion", and "Reversal symmetry" (as was "Participation criterion"). Two of the stated justifications for these moves were that the terms "monotonicity" and "consistency" are vague and can mean multiple things and that the pages should be named consistently. But these changes created an inconsistency between these pages and the other pages on voting system criteria (which are named after the criteria themselves and not the paradoxes that occur when they are violated). And the vagueness of the terms "monotonicity" and "consistency" could be addressed by simply making the titles more specific. "Monotonicity criterion" could have been renamed "Mono-raise criterion" or "Monotonicity criterion (electoral systems)" and "Consistency criterion" could have been renamed "Join-consistency criterion" or "Consistency criterion (electoral systems)". As shown in the pages' histories, I tried to fix this. I moved "Best-is-worst paradox" back to "Reversal symmetry". I requested that "No-show paradox" be moved back to "Participation criterion", which later happened. I moved "Negative responsiveness" to "Mono-raise criterion" (which required editing to restore the page's earlier language). And I moved "Multiple districts paradox" to "Join-consistency criterion". However, the user who made the initial changes (Closed Limelike Curves) reversed most of what I did. They moved three of the pages back (but couldn't move back "Participation criterion") and reverted the aforementioned edits to the one page. I apologize if my actions have come across as aggressive, but in my opinion the pages "Participation criterion" and "Reversal symmetry" were fine under those names and the other two pages should have names that, while precise, are consistent with those of the other pages on voting system criteria. Discussion is welcome. But I do want to note that as it stands the page "Negative responsiveness" has the same paragraph (about monotonicity violations in proportional representation systems) appear twice in different sections. One of my reverted edits fixed this by removing one of the duplicates, and it would need to be fixed again in a future edit. I would do it myself, but I might as well let people first discuss which location is more appropriate for the paragraph. Thank you for your input. Man of Steel 85 (talk) 03:25, 16 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting.  — Amakuru (talk) 05:36, 27 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 12:51, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Multiple districts paradox → {{no redirect|Join-consistency criterion}}
  • Best-is-worst paradox → {{no redirect|Reversal symmetry}}
  • (Discuss) – :Mersa Matruh → {{no redirect|Marsa Matrouh}} – Marsa Matruh" appears to be the more widely adopted transliteration in English-language usage, returning approximately 2,540,000 Google search results compared to 1,150,000 for "Mersa Matruh." This variant not only reflects broader contemporary usage but also aligns more closely with the native pronunciation. Previously contested in 2012 so I will list the request in the talk page. Turnopoems 𓋹 ✎ 11:29, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Brighter Days Ahead (album) → {{no redirect|Eternal Sunshine Deluxe: Brighter Days Ahead}} – "Eternal Sunshine Deluxe: Brighter Days Ahead" is the full name of the reissue, no need to shorten it and then add an "(album)" disambiguation. This reissue has also been referred to as simply "Eternal Sunshine Deluxe". TenthAvenueFreezeOut (talk) 16:59, 28 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 22:51, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Liberation Day tariffs → {{no redirect|"Liberation Day" tariffs}} – "Liberation Day" is Trump's own term for the day, and is a partisan name not used by his opoponents. Using the name uncritically in the article title endorses that point of view, in Wikipedia's voice, and breaks WP:NPOV. Putting the term in quotes distances this, and makes it clear this is a quote. — The Anome (talk) 11:19, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :2002 Gujarat riots → {{no redirect|2002 Gujarat violence}} – A vast majority of scholarly sources describe this incident as an attack on the Muslim minority with the support of the state. It makes more sense to replace the word "riots" in the title with "violence". Koshuri (グ) 16:23, 25 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Toadspike [Talk] 13:17, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Tales of the Jedi (TV series) → Tales (Star Wars TV anthology) – From the above discussion, [https://www.starwars.com/news/tales-of-the-underworld-announce Lucasfilm stated in its announcement for Underworld]: {{tq|Today, Lucasfilm and Disney+ announced Star Wars: Tales of the Underworld, the third installment in the Tales anthology series following Tales of the Jedi and Tales of the Empire.}} (bolding once again mine). This clearly indicates that Jedi, Empire, and Underworld (be them three seasons or three wholly unique series) all exist as one singular "Tales" anthology series. Given Tales (TV series) already exists and is also an anthology series, and per the research {{u|Adamstom.97}} did in which there are other Star Wars media in comics, books, and video games, that also use the "Tales" title in some form, I am putting forth the requested title of Tales (Star Wars TV anthology) which provides full disambiguation from these other media. Note that this change is meant to cover the anthology information as its "main"/"franchise" page akin to American Horror Story. This move is not a prevention or opposition to any splitting of these three series to their own titled article; that is a separate discussion. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 14:56, 11 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Valorrr (lets chat) 01:48, 22 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Valorrr (lets chat) 02:45, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Trialeti culture → {{no redirect|Trialeti-Vanadzor culture}} – The overwhelming majority of contemporary academic/scholastic sources use the name "Trialeti-Vanadzor culture" for this culture, not "Trialeti culture." This is reflected in most of the sources used on this page (see: Joan Aruz, Kim Benzel, Jean M. Evans, Beyond Babylon: Art, Trade, and Diplomacy in the Second Millennium B.C. Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York) [https://books.google.com/books?id=gr5BgOwEJicC&dq=trialeti+vanadzor+indo+european&pg=PA92] (2008) p. 92 Daniel T. Potts [https://books.google.com/books?id=7lK6l7oF_ccC&pg=PA681 A Companion to the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East.] Volume 94 of Blackwell Companions to the Ancient World. John Wiley & Sons, 2012 {{ISBN|1405189886}} p.681Aynur ÖZFIRAT (2008), [http://www.mku.edu.tr/files/1113_dosya_1355509802.pdf THE HIGHLAND PLATEAU OF EASTERN ANATOLİA IN THE SECOND MILLENNIUM BCE: MIDDLE/LATE BRONZE AGES]{{cite journal|last=Edens|first=Christoper|title=Transcaucasia at the End of the Early Bronze Age|journal=Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research|date=Aug–Nov 1995|volume=299/300|issue=The Archaeology of Empire in Ancient Anatolia|pages=60, 53–64|jstor=1357345|publisher=The American Schools of Oriental Research|doi=10.2307/1357345|s2cid=163585471 }}). There is a precedence for numerous other cultures on Wikipedia (such as Shulaveri-Shomu culture, Kura-Araxes culture, Lchashen-Metsamor culture, etc.) using these cultures’ full academic names in their page titles, regardless of Google results, geographic locations of the sites named in the cultures, etc. The argument that there are more Google search results for "Trialeti culture" is irrelevant. This is akin to arguing "Francis" gets more Google search results than "Pope Francis" so Pope Francis should be moved to Francis.

{{reflist-talk}}

: Skeptical1800 (talk) 17:51, 26 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Valorrr (lets chat) 02:45, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

  • (Discuss) – :International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association → {{no redirect|ILGA World}} – ILGA World is no longer called ‘International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association’ and no longer uses this name themselves. According to the Swiss [https://www.zefix.ch/en/search/entity/list/firm/1227774 Central Business Name Index] and the [https://app2.ge.ch/ecohrcinternet/extract?lang=EN&companyOfsUid=CHE-455.926.653 Geneva Commercial Register] (Headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland) the organisation changed its name to ‘ILGA World’ with effect as of November 2021 and is now registered as such, which means that this is also its official and legally valid name. Since the old name is no longer valid and no longer used by themselves, I suggest moving to the official self-used and also legally valid name ‘ILGA World’, which already exists as a redirect to this page. -- WikiHelper232 (talk) 14:15, 26 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. cyberdog958Talk 14:42, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Hindu terrorism → {{no redirect|Hindutva terrorism}} – All of the cited sources only blame Hindutva groups for the incidents. None of them target Hindu religion. Using the term "Hindu" will require a fair number of scholarly sources but they are not available. Anatoliatheo (talk) 13:03, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :MAVTV 500 → American open-wheel races at Auto Club Speedway – Per the NASCAR pages precedent. In this case, race both frequently changed sponsors and was sanctioned by both CART and today's IndyCar during its entire life. Additionally, the demolition of the track (along with the track being planned, if it ever happens, remade for NASCAR short tracks) meant AOWR is unlikely to return here. FMecha (to talk|to see log) 15:38, 25 April 2025 (UTC)— Relisting. >>> Extorc.talk 07:28, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Boxing Gloves (film) → {{no redirect|Boxing Gloves}} – Sole Wikipedia entry that bears this exact main title header, thus obviating need for the parenthetical qualifier "(film)". A hatnote stating: "For protective gear worn by fighters, see Boxing glove." should suffice. As for the Boxing gloves redirect with the lowercase "g", it can continue flowing to Boxing glove. — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 22:07, 25 April 2025 (UTC)— Relisting. >>> Extorc.talk 07:27, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – St-Laurent station → St-Laurent station (Ottawa) – I’m not quite as sure with these suggestions as I am with Montréal station → Montréal station (Ottawa), but I did want to file another RM request just to see what others' thoughts on these page names. The first entry pair have very similar names, albeit utilizing each slightly different spellings based on the respective streets they are named after (those road articles could also maybe disambiguated). So maybe the current titles and hatnotes for the first two are fine? However, I do feel a bit more confident with the third entry. The current article title might imply it belongs in Lyon, France, and the hatnote does link to a section on the Lyon article which lists the railway stations there, none of which are simply named "Lyon" verbatim, but each has "Lyon" in their names. It’s similar to the Montreal station case in that perhaps having a dedicated disambiguation page for all the similarly named stations is preferable; i.e. Lyon station → Lyon station (Ottawa) and Lyon station becomes the disambiguation page. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 06:44, 25 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Valorrr (lets chat) 05:52, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Saint-Laurent station → {{no redirect|Saint-Laurent station (Montreal Metro)}}
  • Lyon station → Lyon station (Ottawa)
  • (Discuss) – :Kissufim massacre → {{no redirect|Kissufim attack}} – WP:NCENPOV states that massacre should be used in titles if it is the "generally accepted word" used to refer to an event in scholarly sources, or if it's part of the WP:COMMONNAME. This is due to the POV connotations. It doesn't appear as that standard is satisfied right now nor was it satisfied at the last requested move. Specifically, since the last requested move, WP:ARBPIA5 happened and inconsistencies in article titles relating to the word "massacre" were a major part of that case. Chess (talk) (please mention me on reply) 00:35, 24 April 2025 (UTC)— Relisting. >>> Extorc.talk 10:25, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Weak n-category → {{no redirect|n-category}} – This is a proposal to rename the article to "n-cateogry" as well as to move the materials on a strict n-category from higher category theory to here. The reason: while there is a genuine difference, a strict n-cateogry and a strict n-weak category are both an attempt to articulate the concept of an n-cateogry. And, in general, the conceptual side should triumph against the strict mathematical definition side. That attitude is actually common in Wikipeida; when there are some variants in definitions, we don't create separate articles depending on variations. Also, discussing strict and weak versions at the same place should make it easier to discuss stuff like coherent theorems. Taku (talk) 06:38, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Sidus Ludoviciana → {{no redirect|Sidus Ludovicianum}} – As proposed above. There was an attempted cut-and-paste move; I've redirected the duplicate article to here. The correct process to rename an article is with a requested move (or a manual move if assumed uncontroversial, but that's no longer an option with the other page in the way). Both names are used in sources, but the argument that "Sidus Ludoviciana" is an error is reasonable. Alternatively, the form listed in SIMBAD is Stella Ludoviciana, or the naming issue could be avoided by using the HD designation, HD 116798. SevenSpheres (talk) 18:56, 23 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 22:18, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Quadrature (geometry) → {{no redirect|Quadrature (mathematics)}} – This would revert a move done without discussion by {{u|Fgnievinski}} on 25 September 2023. After the move, they removed the part of the article devoted to the use of the term in integral calculus, probably because they consider unrelated the two uses of term (area conputation and integral computation). I edited recently the article, and the new version shows that the two meanings are deeply related and deserve to be explained in the same article. So, the present vesion of the article is no more restricted to geometry, and this makes the article title confusing. Also, AFAIK, the article covers presently all uses of "quadrature" in mathematics, and the proposed title is thus the most correct one. D.Lazard (talk) 16:40, 22 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Bensci54 (talk) 16:36, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Gaza → {{no redirect|Gaza (disambiguation)}} – The Gaza Strip is the WP:MAINTOPIC for the word "Gaza". See [https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Gaza+Strip%2CGaza+city%2CGaza+Governorate&year_start=1800&year_end=2022&case_insensitive=true&corpus=en&smoothing=3 the ngrams] 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 11:17, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Gaza Strip → Gaza
  • (Discuss) – :October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel → {{no redirect|October 7 attacks}} – No need for additional disambiguation (Hamas-led, Israel) in the title, it just makes it longer without adding enough benefit. Going off Google hits, "October 7 attacks" is five times more common than "October 7 Hamas attack" and almost 50 times more common than the full title. "October 7 attack" is even more common, but as there was clearly more than one attack, so the plural form is the correct title. As it has been established that this is the primary topic for October 7 attacks, this is a pretty routine request, but as there have been prior RMs, this is here and not at RMTR. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 20:52, 11 March 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Valorrr (lets chat) 01:05, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Jonathan Carter (politician) → {{no redirect|Jonathan Carter (activist)}} – The subject of this biography's only foray into politics was twice running for Governor of Maine. Having run as a nominee of a minor party, his candidacies were not serious, and the results show that he wasn't really a viable candidate. That means he is a "wannabe politician" "perennial candidate", not a politician. Of course, we cannot use "wannabe politician" "perennial candidate" for the disambiguation term, as that is derogatory. I had [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jonathan_Carter_(politician)&diff=prev&oldid=1285610516 moved the article] to have activist as the disambiguation term (thinking such a move would not be controversial), but [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jonathan_Carter_(politician)&diff=next&oldid=1285610516 got reverted] with the edit summary that the move requires a discussion. Green Montanan (talk) 20:02, 21 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Valorrr (lets chat) 23:01, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Romulus, Remus, and Khaleesi → Colossal Biosciences Dire Wolf Project – The current title is useless for new readers, as it is just a collection of names with no hint of the article subject. I propose we move the article to "Colossal Biosciences' Dire Wolf Project" as per the companys PR videos. There will ultimately be more pups and this article shouldn't be about the first three in the longrun, as that is not the focus of interest. Blockhaj (talk) 04:56, 11 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 03:58, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Second Battle of Tarain → {{no redirect|Second battle of Tarain}} – Per WP:NCCAPS. Far from always capped in sources. See google scholar [https://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?start=20&q=%22Second+Battle+of+Tarain%22&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5] and ngram result [https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Second+Battle+of+Tarain+in&year_start=1950&year_end=2022&case_insensitive=true&corpus=en&smoothing=3 here]. Cinderella157 (talk) 03:21, 13 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 04:12, 20 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 05:07, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :N,N-Dimethyltryptamine → {{no redirect|Dimethyltryptamine}} – "N,N-Dimethyltryptamine" is a full valid chemical name while "dimethyltryptamine" is a widely used trivial name. Use of the term "dimethyltryptamine" is significantly greater than "N,N-dimethyltryptamine" in the literature and in general per Google ([https://www.google.com/search?q=%22dimethyltryptamine%22] vs. [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22N%2CN-dimethyltryptamine%22]; 861k vs. 313k results), Google Scholar ([https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22dimethyltryptamine%22] vs. [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22N%2CN-dimethyltryptamine%22]; 17.6k vs. 12.2k results), and PubMed ([https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=%22dimethyltryptamine%22] vs. [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=%22N%2CN-dimethyltryptamine%22]; 1,305 results vs. 1,187 results). Moreover, the drug recently received an International Nonproprietary Name (INN) of "dimethyltryptamine" last year ([https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/379650/9789240103702-eng.pdf#page=112]). Hence, per Wikipedia policies including WP:COMMONNAME, WP:OCHEMNAME, WP:PHARMMOS, and WP:MEDTITLE, which state that the most commonly used trivial name in the scholarly literature and/or INN should be used for drug/compound article names, "dimethyltryptamine" should be the title of this page instead of "N,N-dimethyltryptamine" and I propose that we move the page. Thanks. – AlyInWikiWonderland (talk, contribs) 02:30, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Doctor Who series 15 → {{no redirect|Doctor Who Season 2 (2025)}} – This new Season is now airing. It's been demonstrated through discussion that there is no longer a clear wp:COMMONAME as both Season 2 and Series 15 are being used. There is however a consistently used wp:officialname as shown in the following. [https://www.bbc.com/mediacentre/articles/doctor-who-season-2-everything-you-need-to-know BBC Media Centre], [https://press.disneyplus.com/disney-plus/doctor-who/season-2-gallery-images Disney Press], and the [https://www.doctorwho.tv/news-and-features/everything-we-know-about-doctor-who-season-2 Doctor Who commercial website], It’s time to change these titles accordingly as the number reboot appears to be here to stay. We should also update [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Doctor_Who_episodes_(2005%E2%80%93present) List of Doctor Who Episodes (2005-present)] to use the new numbering. Twood36 (talk) 11:47, 17 March 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. BD2412 T 01:15, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Tour of Flanders for Women → {{no redirect|Tour of Flanders (women's race)}} – In February, an RM discussion took place at Talk:Tour of Flanders (men's race), arguing that the men's and women's versions of the Tour of Flanders have had the same branding since 2021 and that Wikipedia should reflect that equity. That RM also proposed moving the Brabantse Pijl and Amstel Gold Race articles, as those races were in the same situation (where the men's and women's races have the same name, but Wikipedia treats the men's race as the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC). The discussion at Tour of Flanders was closed with consensus to add the "(men's race)" disambiguator there, but although the moves proposed in this RM were also discussed in the February RM, they were not adjudicated at that time.{{pb}}In the aftermath of the RM close, a Move Review took place that has only now been closed. I regarded the consensus of the move review as holding that the Tour of Flanders article was correctly moved, but that the close erred in not considering the other races under discussion. Accordingly, I'm starting a new RM now to determine whether consensus exists to move these remaining race articles. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 14:44, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Brabantse Pijl → Brabantse Pijl (men's race)
  • Amstel Gold Race → {{no redirect|Amstel Gold Race (men's race)}}
  • (Discuss) – :Universal Music Group Nashville → ? – On April 24, 2025, Universal Music Group Nashville has officially rebranded as MCA, which interestingly, is a return of "Music Corporation of America" name (see secondary sources like [https://www.billboard.com/pro/universal-music-group-nashville-rebrands-mca/ Billboard], [https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/music-news/umg-nashville-rebrands-to-music-corporation-of-america-1236199803/ The Hollywood Reporter], [https://variety.com/2025/music/news/universal-music-nashville-rebrands-mca-1236377134/ Variety], and [https://www.tennessean.com/story/entertainment/people/2025/04/24/umg-nashville-rebrand-music-corporation-america/83250526007/ Tennessean], as well as the [https://www.mca.com/ company itself]). However, there's also exist an article name MCA Inc., with Music Corporation of America exist as a redirect for MCA Inc. What should we do for moving this article name in regard of rebranding? Should we move "old" MCA Inc. to MCA (original) with the "new" MCA (rebranded from UMG Nashville) in place, or another option. 120.188.5.101 (talk) 05:33, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances → {{no redirect|PFAS}} – Did this a few years ago, discussion resulted in a no consensus. I still believe this should be moved per WP:COMMONNAME, and MOS:ACROTITLE. The latter says: "Acronyms should be used in a page name if the subject is known primarily by its abbreviation and that abbreviation is primarily associated with the subject". PhotographyEdits (talk) 09:47, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Future Days → Future Days (album) – I think it's unlikely that there will be a primary topic any more with the TV episode also named this. Trying to move the episode to primary would definitely be recentism, but I don't think making a DAB page would be controversial. (I am still nominating this for RM since it's a decently major album with obvious notability.) ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:03, 15 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Valorrr (lets chat) 04:37, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :2025 CONCACAF Women's U-17 Championship qualification → 2025 CONCACAF U-17 Women's World Cup qualification – Round one – According to the Official regulations document there is not a Championship in 2025. The correct title must be: 2025 CONCACAF U-17 Women's World Cup qualification – Round one. Reference 1: Since 2024 CONCACAF introduced a new format: Concacaf U-17 Women’s Qualifiers (but never the word Championship), the 2025 tournament is the 1st edition without a Championship. Click here: https://www.concacaf.com/news/concacaf-to-introduce-new-formats-for-region-s-u-17-men-s-and-women-s-qualifiers/
    Reference 2: The official match schedule for Round one marks the competition as Concacaf Women’s U-17 Qualifiers (never as a championship). Click here: https://stconcacafwp001.blob.core.windows.net/media/odnbvjza/2025-wu17q-r1-match-schedule.pdf
    Reference 3: The official Regulations for the tournament, always says Concacaf Women’s U-17 Qualifiers (never as a championship). Click: https://www.concacaf.com/en/under-17s-women/regulations/ Rey1996ss (talk) 20:53, 14 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 01:24, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :2025 Gaza Strip anti-Hamas protests → {{no redirect|2025 Gaza protests}} – Many sources indicate that these protests against Hamas are part of wider protests against the Gaza war and Gaza genocide: "Videos verified by The New York Times showed groups of Gazans in the half-ruined streets in the northern town of Beit Lahiya. Some carried more neutral signs that opposed the continuation of the war, while others chanted slogans calling for Hamas to get out. Gazans, at least publicly, tend to blame Israel for much of the death, destruction and hunger the war has brought. But at least some hold Hamas responsible, as well, for starting the conflict by leading the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel, abducting 251 people to Gaza and continuing to fight rather than giving up its power in exchange for a cease-fire." – [https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/25/world/middleeast/gaza-protests-hamas.html The New York Times] "Videos circulated on social media this week of frustrated Palestinians protesting for an end to the war in Gaza, while others chanted anti-Hamas slogans." – [https://www.newarab.com/news/gaza-hundreds-palestinians-protest-against-deadly-war-hamas The New Arab] "Thousands of Palestinians marched between the wreckage of a heavily destroyed town in northern Gaza on Wednesday in the second day of anti-war protests, with many chanting against Hamas in a rare display of public anger against the militant group. The protests, which centered mainly on Gaza’s north, appeared to be aimed generally against the war, with protesters calling for an end to 17 months of deadly fighting with Israel that has made life in Gaza insufferable." – [https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-hamas-war-news-ceasefire-hostages-03-26-2025-ac541bac478575ca63e9a6da5d3133fc The Associated Press] "In conclusion, it's difficult to state with certainty that the protests in Gaza this week were exclusively aimed against Hamas, nor can they be said to represent a general uprising against the group. Rather they reflect a broad range of opinions held among Palestinians in Gaza, including some explicitly anti-Hamas voices, but most of all, a feeling of desperation and war weariness after over a year of an Israeli military campaign directed against the enclave and yet another breakdown in a ceasefire." – [https://www.dw.com/en/fact-check-were-protests-in-gaza-anti-hamas/a-72067223 Deutsche Welle] "For the third consecutive day, Hassan Saad, 38, and hundreds of others took to the streets in Beit Lahiya, demanding an end to their suffering and a halt to the war on Gaza...[t]he demand for Hamas to relinquish power was not an official goal, Saad clarified, rather, the call came spontaneously from protesters." - [https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/3/28/voices-from-gaza-protests-demand-an-end-to-war-and-suffering Al-Jazeera] Thus, I propose the article name be moved to "2025 Gaza protests" as it seems like these protests are not exclusively about opposition to Hamas. Rather, it seems like opposition to Hamas is part of wider protests with a broad spectrum of opinions in opposition to the Gaza war and Gaza genocide. Also, "Gaza" instead of "Gaza Strip" should be used in the title, in line with 2018–2019 Gaza border protests, 2019 Gaza economic protests, and 2023 Gaza economic protests. Geo (talk) 01:00, 29 March 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Valorrr (lets chat) 16:30, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Racine (disambiguation) → {{no redirect|Racine}} – The primary topic was redirected here due to this RfD (which changed the target of Racine from Jean Racine to this disambiguation page), but the disambiguation page is now malplaced. Opening this as a formal RM due to disagreement at the RfD, and the prior RM. Natg 19 (talk) 19:11, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Vejce ambush → ? – A recent move made me wonder whether the current title is appropriate. I was also wondering whether a descriptive title like "Ambush near Vejce" would be more appropriate. Thus it would be great to receive input. I will list some sources that use both names as proper names. Vejce ambush: {{bulleted list|[https://www.academia.edu/98283878/Remembering_the_2001_Armed_Conflict_in_Macedonia_Modes_of_Commemoration_and_Memorialization_Belgrade_HLC_2022 1] (p. 26)|[https://mia.mk/en/story/anniversary-of-vejce-ambush-observed 2]|[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367635521_Drivers_of_radicalisation_and_violent_extremism_in_the_light_of_community_dynamics_in_MENA_and_the_Balkans_-_North_Macedonia 3] (p. 8)}} Vejce massacre: *[https://balkaninsight.com/2023/10/03/north-macedonia-vows-to-finally-build-memorials-to-troops-killed-in-2001/ 1] *[https://books.google.com/books?id=o7YnSqzV7ucC&redir_esc=y 2] (p. 54) *[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367635521_Drivers_of_radicalisation_and_violent_extremism_in_the_light_of_community_dynamics_in_MENA_and_the_Balkans_-_North_Macedonia 3] (p. 8) StephenMacky1 (talk) 09:10, 10 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Bensci54 (talk) 16:32, 17 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 16:38, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :NFL Kickoff Game → {{no redirect|NFL Kickoff game}} – Even [https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Anfl.com+%22kickoff+game%22 the NFL does not capitalize game] on this one. It was [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Football_League_Kickoff_game&action=history capped without discussion in 2017] and should be fixed. Dicklyon (talk) 12:39, 21 February 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 12:53, 1 March 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Steel1943 (talk) 17:09, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Galactic Center → {{no redirect|Galactic center}} – The previous thinly participated discussion didn't come to a consensus on this, so let's try again. Sources appear to be majority lowercase by a good margin (see [https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=*+galactic+centre%2C*+Galactic+Centre%2C*+galactic+center%2C*+Galactic+Center&year_start=1920&year_end=2022&corpus=en&smoothing=3 n-grams]), and looking through them I don't find "galactic center" referring to centers of galaxies other than our Milky Way. It's clearly a term describing exactly what the words mean, not a proper name, even if it's understood to be the center of our particular galaxy. Also, the previous closer seems to be expressing a supervote, saying "Not Moved per MOS:CELESTIALBODIES", citing a guideline that doesn't clearly apply, instead of noting the arguments made in the RM discussion. Dicklyon (talk) 02:16, 21 March 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 14:44, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Formula One racing → Formula One Grand Prix – “Formula One racing” is too broad and does not accurately reflect the article’s focus on the structure of a Formula One Grand Prix, including practice, qualifying, and the race itself. “Formula One Grand Prix” more precisely describes the subject, aligning WP:COMMONNAME. If ambiguity remains a concern, “Formula One Grand Prix weekend” is a suitable alternative. Pksois23 (talk) 20:08, 19 February 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 09:57, 27 February 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 00:53, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Formula One Grand Prix → {{no redirect|Formula One Grand Prix (disambiguation)}} over redirect without leaving a redirect (implied), then WP:G14 delete if unnecessary
  • (Discuss) – :Technical University of Braunschweig → {{no redirect|Technische Universität Braunschweig}} – Almost identical case to TU Berlin. *1.- The university has never officially used the name Technical University of Braunschweig. It officially states that the name in English is Technische Universität Braunschweig [https://www.tu-braunschweig.de/en/press/corporate-design-of-tu-braunschweig see here]. *2.- Technical university is a misnomer/mistranslation of Technische Universität as it refers to a different type type of higher educational institution in the German system (TUs opposite to technical universities can confer all types of doctoral degrees including humanities, social sciences, law, medicine, etc). *3.- Many years ago, the university used officially the (more appropriate) translation "Braunschweig University of Technology". In 2018 the page was boldly (sic) moved from that to the current one based on a discussion in which no sufficient references were provided. *4.- Last but not least (actually, the most important point): "Technische Universität Braunschweig" is currently the [https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=technical+university+of+braunschweig%2Ctechnische+universit%C3%A4t+braunschweig&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&case_insensitive=true&corpus=en-2019&smoothing=3 most commonly used name in English language references], so this is actually the name that satisfies WP:USEENGLISH. SFBB (talk) 00:40, 8 March 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 23:13, 4 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 10:12, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Yellowstone (American TV series) → {{no redirect|Yellowstone (TV series)}} – Now that the series has concluded, it's a good time to revisit the case for partial disambiguation here. Users opposing this at the previous RM did not argue the article did not qualify for partial disambiguation, but instead were opposed to partial disambiguation in general; a RM discussion is not the venue for litigating that. That the American TV series meets the criteria for partial disambiguation is beyond doubt: over the last 5 years Yellowstone (American TV series) has [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&start=2020-04-03&end=2025-04-03&pages=Yellowstone_(American_TV_series) 32,375,718] views, for a daily average of 17,721; Yellowstone (British TV series) has [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&start=2020-04-03&end=2025-04-03&pages=Yellowstone_(British_TV_series) 33,963] views for a daily average of 19, thus the page view ratio is 953:1 over that span. The practical reason for this proposal, and for this aspect of the WP:INCDAB guideline, is that 99.9% of users searching Yellowstone (TV series) are seeking the American series and should be brought directly to that article rather than reach the disambiguation page, and a hatnote is the appropriate form of disambiguation for the 0.1% of users seeking the British series. For those users who disagree and are against any case of partial disambiguation having a primary topic, please initiate an RfC at an appropriate talk page rather than opposing an individual requested move on those grounds. Mdewman6 (talk) 00:32, 5 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 05:42, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Puelche language → {{no redirect|Gününa Küne language}} – "Gününa Küne" is used far more often in modern literature. I have not encountered one modern work which refers to Gününa Küne as "Puelche", excepting Glottolog. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 23:37, 31 March 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 09:49, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – :Fraternities and sororities → ? – I recently came to the same conclusion regarding the title of this article as it was mentioned in Talk:Fraternities and sororities#Title of article about 9 months ago: The current title can be seen as confusing, given that Fraternity is its own article and is not a redirect that targets this article as a {{Tl|R to plural}}. I'm not sure how exactly this article's name should be changed; the only real hint I have is that compared to the subject at Fraternity, the subject of this article seems to currently be specific to colleges and universities in North America. (Also, it's with noting that {{No redirect|Sorority}} currently targets this article, establishing a de facto WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT association.) Steel1943 (talk) 07:26, 18 March 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 08:55, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

=Possibly incomplete requests=

{{hatnote|See "Request all associated moves explicitly"}}

=References=

{{hatnote|References generally should not appear here. Use {{tlx|reflist-talk}} in the talk page section with the requested move to show references there.}}

{{notelist}}