Login
Login

Wikipedia:WikiProject Academic Journals/Journals cited by Wikipedia/Questionable1

{{JCW-Main|letter=Questionable}}

{{JCW-CRAP-top}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=1|target=MDPI|citations=22906|articles=16360|source=BLPU|note=MDPI is very much hit-and-miss. MDPI on Beall's original list in 2014, but was removed in 2015. The updated list says "Some of their journals have a very poor peer-review; some are fine." Social Sciences could be multiple other journals. Evaluate on a case by case basis (see Q8 in the FAQ).|doi1=10.1989|doi2=10.20944|doi3=10.32545|doi4=10.3390|doi5=10.35995|l-count=393|e-count=386|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=2|target=Frontiers Media|citations=15645|articles=11006|source=BLP|note=Very much hit-and-miss. See note on Beall's list. Will accept almost anything (80-90% of submissions), and has [https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/05/open-access-publisher-sacks-31-editors-amid-fierce-row-over-independence sacked editors] for being too selective. Many journals have impact factors and are listed on DOAJ, and Frontiers Media remains part of COPE and OASPA. Evaluate on a case by case basis (see Q8 in the FAQ).|doi1=10.3389|doi2=10.4175|l-count=259|e-count=256|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=3|target=Hijacked journal|citations=6581|articles=5347|source=BLH, BLHU, BLJ, Bohannon|note=|doi1=|l-count=249|e-count=217|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=4|target=Hindawi (publisher)|citations=6280|articles=5410|source=BLP*|note=Listed on Beall's list in 2010, but later removed as a 'borderline case'. In 2023, Hindawi retracted several thousands of articles from paper mills. Wiley estimates that 10-13% of all Hindawi papers are affected, though this may vary from journal to journal. Evaluate on a case by case basis (see Q8 in the FAQ).|doi1=10.1100|doi2=10.1155|doi3=10.3814|doi4=10.4061|doi5=10.5402|doi6=10.6064|doi7=10.7167|doi8=10.7217|l-count=589|e-count=581|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=5|target=Medknow Publications|citations=5895|articles=4445|source=BLP*, BLJU|note=Listed on Beall's list in 2011, but removed in 2012. Several of its journal are listed on the updated list, however.|doi1=10.4103|doi2=10.6219|l-count=521|e-count=515|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=6|target=Bentham Science Publishers|citations=3853|articles=3054|source=BLP|note=Bentham Open is listed, although Bentham Science Publishers is not.|doi1=10.2174|l-count=300|e-count=297|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=7|target=Dove Medical Press|citations=2435|articles=2002|source=BLJU|note=Formerly on Beall's original list as 'Dove Press', but several journals are listed on the updated list.|doi1=10.2147|l-count=153|e-count=151|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=8|target=Alternative medicine|citations=2329|articles=1594|source=URF|note=|doi1=|l-count=324|e-count=219|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=9|target=Case report|citations=1864|articles=1526|source=URF|note=Case reports may be perfectly fine citations, however they will usually fail WP:MEDRS as individual cases are considered anecdotal evidence.|doi1=|l-count=272|e-count=256|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=10|target=Baishideng Publishing Group|citations=1352|articles=1015|source=BLP|note=|doi1=10.11569|doi2=10.12998|doi3=10.13105|doi4=10.35711|doi5=10.35712|doi6=10.35713|doi7=10.37126|doi8=10.3748|doi9=10.4239|doi10=10.4240|doi11=10.4251|doi12=10.4252|doi13=10.4253|doi14=10.4254|doi15=10.4291|doi16=10.4292|doi17=10.4329|doi18=10.4330|doi19=10.4331|doi20=10.5306|doi21=10.5312|doi22=10.5313|doi23=10.5314|doi24=10.5315|doi25=10.5316|doi26=10.5317|doi27=10.5318|doi28=10.5319|doi29=10.5320|doi30=10.5321|doi31=10.5409|doi32=10.5410|doi33=10.5411|doi34=10.5412|doi35=10.5492|doi36=10.5493|doi37=10.5494|doi38=10.5495|doi39=10.5496|doi40=10.5497|doi41=10.5498|doi42=10.5499|doi43=10.5500|doi44=10.5501|doi45=10.5527|doi46=10.5528|doi47=10.5662|l-count=53|e-count=51|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=11|target=Parapsychology|citations=1317|articles=880|source=URF|note=Several skeptical publications setting out to debunk rather than promote nonsensical claims may be included here.|doi1=|l-count=47|e-count=35|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=12|target=Pseudo-scholarship|citations=1122|articles=948|source=URF|note=|doi1=|l-count=197|e-count=123|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=13|target=Current Science|citations=1096|articles=919|source=BLJU|note=|doi1=|l-count=3|e-count=3|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=14|target=Tabloid journalism|citations=1069|articles=564|source=URF|note=|doi1=|l-count=33|e-count=32|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=15|target=Conspiracy theory|citations=919|articles=806|source=URF|note=|doi1=|l-count=86|e-count=61|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=16|target=AME Publishing Company|citations=683|articles=567|source=BLP|note=|doi1=10.21037|l-count=64|e-count=62|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=17|target=Cureus|citations=676|articles=604|source=|note=Uses crowd-sourced "post-publication peer-review".|doi1=10.7759|l-count=3|e-count=3|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=18|target=ResearchGate|citations=656|articles=598|source=RSPGU|note=See WP:RSP#ResearchGate.|doi1=10.13140|l-count=189|e-count=188|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=19|target=Impact Journals (New York State, USA)|citations=623|articles=506|source=BLP|note=|doi1=10.18632|l-count=7|e-count=6|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=20|target=Propaganda|citations=543|articles=454|source=URF|note=|doi1=|l-count=190|e-count=145|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=21|target=Forbes|citations=509|articles=452|source=RSPGU|note=See WP:RSP#Forbes.com contributors, staff is reliable, contributors are not.|doi1=|l-count=9|e-count=9|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=22|target=F1000 (publisher)|citations=498|articles=429|source=See [https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2013/01/15/pubmed-and-f1000-research-unclear-standards-applied-unevenly/]|note=|doi1=10.12688|doi2=10.12703|doi3=10.3410|doi4=10.4089|doi5=10.7490|l-count=27|e-count=23|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=23|target=Oncotarget|citations=429|articles=372|source=BLJ|note=|doi1=|l-count=1|e-count=1|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=24|target=Rolling Stone|citations=427|articles=392|source=RSPGU|note=See WP:RSP#Rolling Stone; good for culture news reporting; unreliable for politically/societally sensitive reporting; Culture Council articles unreliable.|doi1=|l-count=9|e-count=9|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=25|target=Race and intelligence controversy|citations=414|articles=194|source=URF|note=|doi1=|l-count=9|e-count=8|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=26|target=Blog hosting services|citations=399|articles=352|source=SELF|note=See WP:BLOGS.|doi1=|l-count=198|e-count=185|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=27|target=Frontiers in Bioscience|citations=361|articles=339|source=BLP|note=|doi1=10.2741|l-count=7|e-count=7|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=28|target=Chiropractic|citations=295|articles=145|source=URF|note=|doi1=|l-count=33|e-count=26|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=29|target=Daily Star (United Kingdom)|citations=280|articles=154|source=RSPGU|note=See WP:RSP#Daily Star.|doi1=|l-count=2|e-count=2|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=30|target=Unpublished|citations=272|articles=243|source=—|note=May simply be in need of being updated to the published version. Otherwise, these probably fail WP:V.|doi1=|l-count=170|e-count=168|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=31|target=Medwell Journals|citations=269|articles=232|source=BLP|note=Veterinary Research is most likely the one published by BioMed Central, rather than Medwell. Social Sciences could be multiple other journals.|doi1=10.3923|l-count=14|e-count=11|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=32|target=Quadrant (magazine)|citations=234|articles=153|source=RSPGU|note=See WP:RSP#Quadrant.|doi1=|l-count=3|e-count=3|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=33|target=e-Century Publishing Corporation|citations=223|articles=210|source=BLP|note=|doi1=|l-count=20|e-count=19|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=34|target=HuffPost|citations=220|articles=207|source=RSPGU|note=See WP:RSP#HuffPost contributors, staff is debatable, contributors/editorial partners are not reliable.|doi1=|l-count=13|e-count=13|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=35|target=Canadian Center of Science and Education|citations=217|articles=204|source=BLP|note=|doi1=10.5539|l-count=31|e-count=30|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=36|target=Journal of Management|citations=212|articles=166|source=DOAJ|note=Not the Southern Management Association journal|doi1=|l-count=1|e-count=1|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=37|target=Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks|citations=203|articles=190|source=CIRC|note=Many entries are listed for mirroring small excerpts only.|doi1=|l-count=23|e-count=20|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=38|target=Science Publishing Group|citations=183|articles=166|source=BLP, BLPU|note=Social Sciences could be multiple other journals. Several of SPG journals are named either identically or are very similar to other publications, e.g. International Journal of Data Science and Analysis vs International Journal of Data Science and Analytics and may thus have similar ISO 4 abbreviations. It was founded in 2012, so references prior to 2012 are unlikely to be of this publisher.|doi1=10.11648|l-count=22|e-count=18|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=39|target=Aging (journal)|citations=177|articles=136|source=BLJ|note=|doi1=|l-count=2|e-count=2|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=40|target=Medical Hypotheses|citations=170|articles=140|source=See [https://www.badscience.net/2008/10/more-crap-journals/]|note=Purposefully not peer-reviewed.|doi1=|l-count=3|e-count=3|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=41|target=Psychology Today|citations=153|articles=130|source=QW|note=|doi1=|l-count=1|e-count=1|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=42|target=Superseded theories in science|citations=145|articles=127|source=URF|note=|doi1=|l-count=33|e-count=27|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=43|target=Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine|citations=132|articles=109|source=QW|note=|doi1=|l-count=3|e-count=3|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=44|target=Symbiosis (publisher)|citations=128|articles=118|source=BLP|note=|doi1=10.15226|l-count=4|e-count=3|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=45|target=Marquis Who's Who|citations=127|articles=111|source=RSPGU|note=See WP:RSP#Marquis Who's Who.|doi1=|l-count=18|e-count=17|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=46|target=Genetics and Molecular Research|citations=118|articles=107|source=BLJ|note=|doi1=10.4238|l-count=4|e-count=4|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=47|target=Diva Enterprises|citations=110|articles=104|source=UGC|note=Several of their journal fail [https://lakshmibaicollege.in/Secure-admin/webroot/upload/customfiles/14022020122704Journals-Removed-from-UGC-Approved-List-of-Journals_removed%20(1).pdf UGC criteria]. Those that pass are listed [https://indianjournals.com/UGCApprovedPublications.aspx here]. Those from listed as UGC Group 1 are probably fine. UGC Group II could be fine, depending on the database. Those without UGC recognition are very likely not fine. Those unmentioned are definitely not fine.|doi1=10.5958|l-count=50|e-count=49|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=48|target=OMICS Publishing Group|citations=109|articles=101|source=BLP|note=Vegetos is published by Springer Nature since 2019.|doi1=10.11131|doi2=10.12715|doi3=10.14303|doi4=10.15412|doi5=10.21767|doi6=10.24105|doi7=10.3371|doi8=10.36648|doi9=10.37532|doi10=10.4066|doi11=10.4172|doi12=10.47128|doi13=10.54931|l-count=27|e-count=23|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=49|target=International Journal of Nanomedicine|citations=107|articles=77|source=BLJU|note=|doi1=|l-count=4|e-count=4|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=50|target=Munis Entomology & Zoology|citations=103|articles=90|source=BLJ|note=|doi1=|l-count=2|e-count=2|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=51|target=American Scientific Publishers|citations=101|articles=89|source=BLP|note=|doi1=10.1166|l-count=23|e-count=22|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=52|target=Spectrum (magazine)|citations=100|articles=86|source=QW|note=|doi1=|l-count=3|e-count=3|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=53|target=Project Innovation|citations=93|articles=87|source=BLP|note=These journals were acquired by Project Innovations at some point, but were well-established before that. Project Innovations also switched owners at several points, the most recent being 2004. Unclear when problems with publisher started.|doi1=|l-count=5|e-count=4|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=54|target=Creationism|citations=83|articles=54|source=URF|note=|doi1=|l-count=26|e-count=17|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=55|target=Daily Express|citations=80|articles=72|source=RSPGU|note=See WP:RSP#Daily Express.|doi1=|l-count=5|e-count=5|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=56|target=Pulsus Group|citations=62|articles=61|source=BLP|note=Purchased by OMICS Publishing Group in 2016. The Journal of Agriculture is likely an older, non-Pulsus journal.|doi1=10.19144|doi2=10.21282|doi3=10.4066|l-count=18|e-count=17|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=57|target=Pharmacognosy Reviews|citations=61|articles=57|source=BLJU|note=|doi1=|l-count=3|e-count=3|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=58|target=Scientific Research Publishing|citations=60|articles=48|source=BLP|note=Chinese Medicine likely refers to the BioMed Central journal. Comput. Chem. likely refers to Computer & Chemistry.|doi1=10.4236|l-count=13|e-count=11|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=59|target=Alternative Medicine Review|citations=57|articles=52|source=QW|note=|doi1=|l-count=3|e-count=2|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=60|target=African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines|citations=54|articles=53|source=BLJ|note=|doi1=|l-count=2|e-count=2|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=61|target=Nucleus|citations=54|articles=48|source=DOAJ|note=Make sure it's ISSN [https://www.worldcat.org/search?fq=x0:jrnl&q=n2:1982-2278 1982-2278], there are many other publications with the same/similar name.|doi1=|l-count=2|e-count=2|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=62|target=IGI Global|citations=53|articles=52|source=[http://bogost.com/writing/blog/writeonly_publication/], [https://copy-shake-paste.blogspot.com/2007/12/write-only-publications.html]|note=IGI Global is mostly criticized for it's book-publishing practices. Criticism is mostly silent on its journals, several of which have impact factors.|doi1=10.4018|l-count=39|e-count=38|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=63|target=Homeopathy|citations=50|articles=28|source=URF|note=|doi1=|l-count=11|e-count=8|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=64|target=International Journal of Computer Applications|citations=47|articles=45|source=DOAJ, BLP|note=|doi1=|l-count=1|e-count=1|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=65|target=Anti-vaccine movement|citations=47|articles=36|source=URF|note=See also WP:JCW/PATTERNS#CAM.|doi1=|l-count=14|e-count=9|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=66|target=National Association of Scholars|citations=44|articles=41|source=BLP|note=|doi1=10.51845|l-count=2|e-count=1|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=67|target=Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine|citations=43|articles=29|source=QW|note=|doi1=|l-count=6|e-count=6|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=68|target=Alchemy|citations=41|articles=38|source=URF|note=|doi1=|l-count=15|e-count=9|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=69|target=Genes & Cancer|citations=40|articles=34|source=BLJ|note=|doi1=|l-count=2|e-count=2|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=70|target=Amphibian & Reptile Conservation|citations=37|articles=36|source=BLJU|note=|doi1=|l-count=2|e-count=1|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=71|target=Journal of Physical Therapy Science|citations=37|articles=28|source=BLJ|note=|doi1=|l-count=1|e-count=1|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=72|target=Bioinformation|citations=36|articles=34|source=BLJ|note=|doi1=10.6026|l-count=1|e-count=1|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=73|target=Journal of Environmental Biology|citations=36|articles=34|source=BLJ|note=|doi1=|l-count=2|e-count=2|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=74|target=Bridges (magazine)|citations=36|articles=29|source=QW|note=|doi1=|l-count=2|e-count=1|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=75|target=Genocide denial|citations=36|articles=15|source=URF|note=|doi1=|l-count=10|e-count=9|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=76|target=Vegetarian Times|citations=35|articles=32|source=QW|note=|doi1=|l-count=1|e-count=1|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=77|target=International Institute for Science, Technology and Education|citations=35|articles=28|source=BLP|note=[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&search=insource%3A%22iiste.org%22&ns0=1 Search for iiste.org]|doi1=10.7176|l-count=4|e-count=3|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=78|target=Who's Who (UK)|citations=34|articles=33|source=RSPGU|note=See WP:RSP#Who's Who (UK).|doi1=|l-count=8|e-count=8|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=79|target=Science Publications|citations=33|articles=33|source=BLP|note=|doi1=10.3844|l-count=12|e-count=11|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=80|target=African Research Review|citations=33|articles=30|source=BLP|note=|doi1=|l-count=1|e-count=1|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=81|target=Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies|citations=33|articles=30|source=BLJ|note=|doi1=|l-count=1|e-count=1|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=82|target=Authorea|citations=33|articles=28|source=|note=Preprints|doi1=10.15200|doi2=10.22541|l-count=9|e-count=7|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=83|target=Jaypee Journals|citations=32|articles=31|source=BLP|note=|doi1=10.5005|l-count=12|e-count=11|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=84|target=Journal of Psychology and Theology|citations=32|articles=28|source=BLJ|note=|doi1=|l-count=2|e-count=1|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=85|target=HIV/AIDS denialism|citations=31|articles=21|source=URF|note=|doi1=|l-count=6|e-count=4|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=86|target=Kowsar Publishing|citations=30|articles=26|source=BLP|note=|doi1=10.5812|l-count=15|e-count=13|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=87|target=Astrology|citations=29|articles=24|source=URF|note=|doi1=|l-count=11|e-count=8|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=88|target=Alternative & Complementary Therapies|citations=28|articles=28|source=QW|note=|doi1=|l-count=2|e-count=2|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=89|target=Research Square|citations=28|articles=28|source=|note=Preprint service|doi1=10.21203|l-count=4|e-count=3|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=90|target=Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons|citations=27|articles=18|source=BLJ, QW|note=|doi1=|l-count=3|e-count=2|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=91|target=Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences|citations=26|articles=26|source=BLJ|note=|doi1=|l-count=2|e-count=2|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=92|target=Interdisciplinary Toxicology|citations=26|articles=25|source=BLJ|note=|doi1=|l-count=1|e-count=1|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=93|target=Serials Publications|citations=26|articles=24|source=BLP|note=Man in India dates from well before Serials Publications came about. Date of acquisition unclear.|doi1=|l-count=1|e-count=1|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=94|target=International Journal of Mathematics|citations=26|articles=23|source=DOAJ|note=Refers to the IAEME journal, not the World Scientific one|doi1=|l-count=3|e-count=3|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=95|target=European Journal of Social Sciences|citations=25|articles=24|source=BLJ|note=Possibly hijacked. The journal published by Librairie Droz, hosted on [https://journals.openedition.org/ress Open Edition] is legitimate. The one published by [http://www.europeanjournalofsocialsciences.com/ejss_issues.html Social Sciences Research Platform] is listed by Beall.|doi1=|l-count=3|e-count=3|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=96|target=International Business Times|citations=25|articles=22|source=RSPGU|note=See WP:RSP#International Business Times.|doi1=|l-count=1|e-count=1|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=97|target=Journal of Cosmology|citations=25|articles=16|source=BLJ|note=|doi1=10.37720|l-count=1|e-count=1|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=98|target=FamilySearch|citations=25|articles=14|source=RSPGU|note=See WP:RSP#FamilySearch.|doi1=|l-count=3|e-count=3|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=99|target=International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research|citations=24|articles=23|source=BLJ, DOAJ|note=|doi1=10.14299|l-count=1|e-count=1|entries=

}}

{{JCW-CRAP-rank|rank=100|target=Medium (website)|citations=24|articles=23|source=RSPGU|note=See WP:RSP#Medium.|doi1=|l-count=3|e-count=2|entries=

}}

{{JCW-bottom-questionable}}

{{JCW-PrevNext|previous=|current=Questionable1|next=Questionable2}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:ϙ-01}}